From kramer@pa.dec.com Mon Jul 5 14:45:54 1999 Return-Path: Received: from tudedr.et.tudelft.nl by it.et.tudelft.nl (4.1/BB-2.0) id AA08092; Mon, 5 Jul 99 14:45:54 +0200 Received: from mail2.digital.com by ITS.TUDelft.NL (PMDF V5.1-10 #21918) with ESMTP id <01JD7JCFQV6G934V8Q@ITS.TUDelft.NL> for erik@duteinh.et.tudelft.nl; Mon, 5 Jul 1999 14:45:16 +0200 Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.2/WV2.0g) with SMTP id FAA15846; Mon, 05 Jul 1999 05:41:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rex.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA13005; Mon, 05 Jul 1999 05:41:26 -0700 Received: by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id FAA10112; Mon, 05 Jul 1999 05:40:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id FAA10096; Mon, 05 Jul 1999 05:40:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail1.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA18675; Mon, 05 Jul 1999 05:40:44 -0700 Received: from eshu.request.net (eshu.request.net [207.48.132.2]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.2/WV2.0g) with ESMTP id FAA31264 for ; Mon, 05 Jul 1999 05:40:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: from furina.request.net ([207.48.132.3]) by eshu.request.net with ESMTP id <4403-15409>; Mon, 05 Jul 1999 08:39:05 -0400 Received: from Bad.EHLO.Input ([193.159.63.32]) by furina.request.net with ESMTP id <98610769-278>; Mon, 05 Jul 1999 08:38:59 -0400 Received: by HW_MAIL with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2448.0) id <3KKKHLKA>; Mon, 05 Jul 1999 14:40:24 +0100 Date: Mon, 05 Jul 1999 14:40:24 +0100 From: "JOR. - Jordan, Roman" Subject: kernel image 2.2.9 (binary) Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com To: "'sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com'" Message-Id: <81413F587EB9D1118F56000092941A3EA78A5B@HW_MAIL> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2448.0) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Precedence: bulk Hi there, does anyone have a working 2.2.9 linux kernel (in form of an builded zImage) for the brutus board ? The best it would be, if this kernel image is a result of the default values (configuration) of the 'make config' process. Thanks in advance Roman Jordan From kramer@pa.dec.com Tue Jul 6 10:50:51 1999 Return-Path: Received: from tudedr.et.tudelft.nl by it.et.tudelft.nl (4.1/BB-2.0) id AA11791; Tue, 6 Jul 99 10:50:51 +0200 Received: from mail2.digital.com by ITS.TUDelft.NL (PMDF V5.1-10 #21918) with ESMTP id <01JD8PF71IWQ934W6R@ITS.TUDelft.NL> for erik@duteinh.et.tudelft.nl; Tue, 6 Jul 1999 10:50:05 +0200 Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.2/WV2.0g) with SMTP id BAA01520; Tue, 06 Jul 1999 01:44:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rex.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA28123; Tue, 06 Jul 1999 01:44:30 -0700 Received: by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id BAA13004; Tue, 06 Jul 1999 01:42:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id BAA12942; Tue, 06 Jul 1999 01:42:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail1.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA30656; Tue, 06 Jul 1999 01:42:38 -0700 Received: from eshu.request.net (eshu.request.net [207.48.132.2]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.2/WV2.0g) with ESMTP id BAA13234 for ; Tue, 06 Jul 1999 01:42:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: from furina.request.net ([207.48.132.3]) by eshu.request.net with ESMTP id <661-6029>; Tue, 06 Jul 1999 04:39:24 -0400 Received: from Bad.EHLO.Input ([193.159.140.244]) by furina.request.net with ESMTP id <98610628-13703> convert rfc822-to-8bit; Tue, 06 Jul 1999 04:39:02 -0400 Received: by HW_MAIL with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2448.0) id <3KKKHLQ0>; Tue, 06 Jul 1999 10:40:22 +0100 Date: Tue, 06 Jul 1999 10:40:22 +0100 From: "JOR. - Jordan, Roman" Subject: WG: kernel image 2.2.9 (binary) Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com To: "'sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com'" Message-Id: <81413F587EB9D1118F56000092941A3EA78A5F@HW_MAIL> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2448.0) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Precedence: bulk X-Mime-Autoconverted: from 8bit to quoted-printable by mail1.digital.com id BAA13234 Hello, here i am again. Is there really nobody who has a working kernel image 2.= 2.9 for brutus. I need it for checking the boot problem (invalid compressed format) of my kernel. Thanks, Roman Jordan > -----Urspr=FCngliche Nachricht----- > Von: JOR. - Jordan, Roman=20 > Gesendet am: Monday, July 05, 1999 3:40 PM > An: 'sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com' > Betreff: kernel image 2.2.9 (binary) >=20 > Hi there, > does anyone have a working 2.2.9 linux kernel (in form of an builded > zImage) for the brutus board ? The best it would be, if this kernel ima= ge > is a result of the default values (configuration) of the 'make config' > process. >=20 > Thanks in advance > Roman Jordan >=20 From kramer@pa.dec.com Wed Jul 7 15:56:05 1999 Return-Path: Received: from tudedr.et.tudelft.nl by it.et.tudelft.nl (4.1/BB-2.0) id AA19221; Wed, 7 Jul 99 15:56:05 +0200 Received: from mail2.digital.com by ITS.TUDelft.NL (PMDF V5.1-10 #21918) with ESMTP id <01JDAE7WAW86934WL2@ITS.TUDelft.NL> for erik@duteinh.et.tudelft.nl; Wed, 7 Jul 1999 15:55:07 +0200 Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.2/WV2.0g) with SMTP id GAA27385; Wed, 07 Jul 1999 06:46:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rex.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA31376; Wed, 07 Jul 1999 06:46:37 -0700 Received: by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id GAA17369; Wed, 07 Jul 1999 06:41:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id GAA17322; Wed, 07 Jul 1999 06:40:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail1.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA21468; Wed, 07 Jul 1999 06:40:57 -0700 Received: from eshu.request.net (eshu.request.net [207.48.132.2]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.2/WV2.0g) with ESMTP id GAA02577 for ; Wed, 07 Jul 1999 06:40:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: from furina.request.net ([207.48.132.3]) by eshu.request.net with ESMTP id <1165-14611>; Wed, 07 Jul 1999 09:39:34 -0400 Received: from Bad.EHLO.Input ([193.159.62.68]) by furina.request.net with ESMTP id <98610654-26439> convert rfc822-to-8bit; Wed, 07 Jul 1999 09:39:24 -0400 Received: by HW_MAIL with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2448.0) id <3KKKHL01>; Wed, 07 Jul 1999 15:40:29 +0100 Date: Wed, 07 Jul 1999 15:40:27 +0100 From: "JOR. - Jordan, Roman" Subject: WG: AW: SA1100 Linux & Itsy Source Code Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com To: "'nico@CAM.ORG'" Cc: "'Sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com'" Message-Id: <81413F587EB9D1118F56000092941A3EA78A63@HW_MAIL> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2448.0) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Precedence: bulk X-Mime-Autoconverted: from 8bit to quoted-printable by mail1.digital.com id GAA02577 Hello, i want to get you some information about my problem with the ramdisk. I inserted a small piece of software to the kernel code, which gives me a checksum over the ramdisk area. I compared the result (only addition of shorts) with the result of a pc-linux based program. The values are the same. Therefore i exclude that the problem is during the download process. I compiled a new binutils and egcs for arm. But without a positive result= . I also compiled the whole glibc without any error. I do not think that the ramdisk is faulty, because i can mount it on my p= c. But at this point i have a question. I have two links in my arm-linux/include tree (asm->/usr/src/linux/include/asm/asm-arm and linux->/usr/src/linux/include/linux), which pointed to the kernel sources= , i included to build the compiler. If i want to build a new kernel have i to change this link into the kernel sources? And a second question. Whats the number of the earlier version (before 2.2.9) of a running kernel for brutus. Which supports a wide range of the periphery of brutus? Thats all for the moment. Have a nice day Roman Jordan > -----Urspr=FCngliche Nachricht----- > Von: JOR. - Jordan, Roman=20 > Gesendet am: Tuesday, June 29, 1999 6:45 PM > An: 'Nicolas Pitre' > Betreff: AW: AW: SA1100 Linux & Itsy Source Code >=20 > Hello, > i reversed the patch. But the result is the same. >=20 > I build in several output routines to get the position of the error. > The point where it occurs, is located in 'inflate.c' (i mean the unpatc= hed > version of inflate.c). In function 'inflate'. There is a call to > 'inflate_block'. The result is checked with '0'. This loop is running 2= 0 > times. Then i get the result 1. The ptr which is applied to 'gzip_mark' > has a value of 0xc00b210c at this moment. > In the function 'inflate_block' the flow branchs to inflate_dynamic. >=20 > That's all for the moment. I will try to get a checksum of the ramdisk > after download. Perhaps there is an error. >=20 > BTW: Where can i get the whole memory map of linux on brutus. >=20 > Thanks > Roman >=20 > ---------- > Von: Nicolas Pitre[SMTP:nico@CAM.ORG] > Gesendet: Montag, 28. Juni 1999 22:24 > An: JOR. - Jordan, Roman > Betreff: Re: AW: SA1100 Linux & Itsy Source Code >=20 > Try to reverse the patch applied to linux/lib/inflate.c (just picking u= p > the original from the tarfile should do) and tell me if it works better. >=20 >=20 > On Mon, 28 Jun 1999, JOR. - Jordan, Roman wrote: >=20 > > Hello, > > last week i wrote a mail about linux 2.2.9 and the egcs 1.1.2. But th= ere > are > > only a small response. Therefore i try it again. > > I applied the necessary patches. The compile process terminated witho= ut > any > > errors. i downloaded the resulting kernel to brutus board. Also the > > 'ramdisk' at 'ftp://ssdl-redstone.stanford.edu/pub/ramdisk.gz'. This > ramdisk > > worked fine with my older arm - linux 2.0.35 (it was the arm-linuxaou= t > > format). But after the new kernel starts i get the following error: > >=20 > > * RAMDISK: Compressed image foundat block 0 > > * invalid compressed format (err=3D1) VFS: mounted root (ext2 filesys= tem) > >=20 > > I get the same error with my older ramdisk. > > Any idea's? > >=20 > > Thanks > > Roman Jordan > >=20 > >=20 > > -----Urspr=FCngliche Nachricht----- > > Von: Postmaster=20 > > Gesendet am: Friday, June 25, 1999 7:18 PM > > An: JOR. - Jordan, Roman > > Betreff: WG: SA1100 Linux & Itsy Source Code > >=20 > >=20 > >=20 > > > ---------- > > > Von: Nicolas Pitre[SMTP:NICO@CAM.ORG] > > > Gesendet: Freitag, 25. Juni 1999 16:53:34 > > > An: Vasant Ramasubramanian > > > Cc: Sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com > > > Betreff: Re: SA1100 Linux & Itsy Source Code > > > Diese Nachricht wurde automatisch von einer Regel weitergeleitet. > > >=20 > > >=20 > > On Thu, 24 Jun 1999, Vasant Ramasubramanian wrote: > >=20 > > > Hello! > > >=20 > > > I am new to the StrongARM platform, and I am current trying to deve= lop > > > hardware around the SA1100. The device is best defined as an embedd= ed > > > system; there will be RAM & FlashROM, an LCD, a keyboard interface, > RS-232 > > > and SPI/I2C interface ports. I think this hardware is pretty minima= l, > > > there won't be any need for network, SCSI, PCMCIA or sound support.= =20 > > >=20 > > > Out of curiosity, what recommendations do you folks have for keyboa= rd > > > support/key scanning? The keypad won't be a standard PC-101 key, pr= ob > > > something like 49 keys or 64 keys...Any suggestions on existing > products > > > that scan and debounce keys? > >=20 > > You could use a 8 X 8 matrix using the SA1100's GPIOs if you don't n= eed > > them for other purposes. Then scaning and debouncing is made by > > software when an interrupt occurs on the matrix. > >=20 > > > I plan on running a very vanilla version of Linux, but I am quite > confused > > > as to the distributions and which version/port to use.=20 > >=20 > > Linux is already ported for the SA1100 and few implementation are > actually > > maintained. I maintain a patch against Russell King's tree for those > > implementations. You can find it at ftp.netwinder.org/users/n/nico o= r > > look at > > http://developer.intel.com/design/strong/applnots/sa1100lx/getstart.h= tm > > for more info. > >=20 > > > I checked out Russell King's ARM site; he barely mentions the SA-11= 0. > > >=20 > > > Would the Itsy port be the best to use or would it be better to get > > > Russell King's version and try porting it on my own?=20 > >=20 > > The Itsy distribution is quite old. I suggest you pick up RK's kerne= l + > > my SA1100 patch as your best starting point. All you have to do is t= o > add > > your implementation specifics. > >=20 > > > I downloaded the Itsy source code, but when I look at the .TAR file= , > there > > > are several directories; is the SA-1100 version in the "ARM" > directory? > > > Which directory did DEC/Compaq use for Itsy? > >=20 > > SA1100 stuff consists of drivers which may reside in drivers/char or > > arch/arm/special. System parameters are in include/asm-arm/arch-sa11= 00, > > etc. In fact, things are spread between arch/arm, include/asm-arm an= d > > drivers. Grepping -i "sa1100" through all the source (or looking at = the > > patch file) will point all SA1100 pieces. > >=20 > > > Also, would I use RAMDISK if I wanted the RAM in this device to app= ear > as > > > the Mass Storage System? How much space does partitioning take, I w= ant > to > > > keep as much of the RAM as possible, I'm thinking of using 4MegaByt= es. > > > Also, would 4MegaBytes FlashROM be adequate for Linux and custom > software, > > > assuming my software isn't BloatWare(TM Micro$oft)? > >=20 > > You could use a block device driver that consider your flash as a dri= ve > > from which your applications are run. And if they are small or > limitted, > > 4MB ram should be enough. > >=20 > > > I've never taken on a task quite this large, especially porting Lin= ux > to > > > new hardware. Any WWW sites you can recommend or documents you > suggest, I > > > would greatly appreciate. > >=20 > > Be happy! Most of the job is already done. > >=20 > > > P.S. > > >=20 > > > How come there is no mention of the SA1500 anywhere? > >=20 > > Maybe because it isn't available yet? > >=20 > >=20 > > Nicolas Pitre, B. ing. > > nico@cam.org > >=20 > >=20 >=20 > Nicolas Pitre, B. ing. > nico@cam.org >=20 >=20 From kramer@pa.dec.com Sat Jul 10 04:28:16 1999 Return-Path: Received: from tudedr.et.tudelft.nl by it.et.tudelft.nl (4.1/BB-2.0) id AA01556; Sat, 10 Jul 99 04:28:16 +0200 Received: from mail2.digital.com by ITS.TUDelft.NL (PMDF V5.1-10 #21918) with ESMTP id <01JDDX7FCSPG95MQW6@ITS.TUDelft.NL> for erik@duteinh.et.tudelft.nl; Sat, 10 Jul 1999 04:26:53 +0200 Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.2/WV2.0g) with SMTP id TAA30735; Fri, 09 Jul 1999 19:21:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rex.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA32117; Fri, 09 Jul 1999 19:20:45 -0700 Received: by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id TAA26342; Fri, 09 Jul 1999 19:19:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id TAA25129; Fri, 09 Jul 1999 19:19:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail2.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA19717; Fri, 09 Jul 1999 19:19:08 -0700 Received: from Hydro.CAM.ORG (Hydro.CAM.ORG [198.168.100.7]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.2/WV2.0g) with ESMTP id TAA31168 for ; Fri, 09 Jul 1999 19:19:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: from Ocean.CAM.ORG (Ocean.CAM.ORG [198.168.100.5]) by Hydro.CAM.ORG (8.8.8/8.8.4) with SMTP id WAA12268; Fri, 09 Jul 1999 22:18:01 -0400 (EDT) Date: Fri, 09 Jul 1999 22:18:01 -0400 (EDT) From: Nicolas Pitre Subject: Re: WG: AW: SA1100 Linux & Itsy Source Code In-Reply-To: <81413F587EB9D1118F56000092941A3EA78A63@HW_MAIL> Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com To: "JOR. - Jordan, Roman" Cc: "'Sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com'" Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Precedence: bulk On Wed, 7 Jul 1999, JOR. - Jordan, Roman wrote: > And a second question. Whats the number of the earlier version (before > 2.2.9) of a running kernel for brutus. Which supports a wide range of the > periphery of brutus? You could try diff-2.2.3-rmk2-np5.gz which was quite stable if I remember right. If it works, then the best thing to do would be to find which patch started breaking by trying them downwards from 2.2.10. Nicolas Pitre, B. ing. nico@cam.org From kramer@pa.dec.com Wed Jul 14 13:08:05 1999 Return-Path: Received: from tudedr.et.tudelft.nl by it.et.tudelft.nl (4.1/BB-2.0) id AA17901; Wed, 14 Jul 99 13:08:05 +0200 Received: from mail1.digital.com by ITS.TUDelft.NL (PMDF V5.1-10 #21918) with ESMTP id <01JDK0KZYMOY95MVQ7@ITS.TUDelft.NL> for erik@duteinh.et.tudelft.nl; Wed, 14 Jul 1999 13:08:03 +0200 Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.2/WV2.0g) with SMTP id EAA16243; Wed, 14 Jul 1999 04:05:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rex.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA24672; Wed, 14 Jul 1999 04:04:18 -0700 Received: by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id EAA01537; Wed, 14 Jul 1999 04:03:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id EAA01533; Wed, 14 Jul 1999 04:03:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail1.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA29751; Wed, 14 Jul 1999 04:03:55 -0700 Received: from queen.cwc.nus.edu.sg (queen.cwc.nus.edu.sg [137.132.163.140]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.2/WV2.0g) with ESMTP id EAA16061 for ; Wed, 14 Jul 1999 04:03:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: from konggf.nus.edu.sg ([137.132.163.221]) by queen.cwc.nus.edu.sg (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id SAA22290; Wed, 14 Jul 1999 18:43:18 +0730 (SST) Date: Mon, 12 Jul 1999 01:26:20 +0900 From: Kong Gang Feng Subject: aware of glibc Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com X-Sender: cwckgf@leonis.nus.edu.sg To: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Cc: cwckgf@leonis.nus.edu.sg Message-Id: <3.0.32.19990712012618.00bd0118@leonis.nus.edu.sg> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Windows Eudora Pro Version 3.0 (32) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Precedence: bulk Hi: I installed a glibc in a seperate location, however, I don't know how to make my egcs to be aware of its existance. Currently, I use 'arm-linux-gcc -print-search-dirs' to list all 'install, programs,libraries' path, I can not see my glibc path there. I guess maybe I need to udpate egcs 'specs', but how to do it? Can I maintain 2 'specs' files for my egcs and switch between them? Thanks Kong G.F. From kramer@pa.dec.com Wed Jul 14 12:42:41 1999 Return-Path: Received: from tudedr.et.tudelft.nl by it.et.tudelft.nl (4.1/BB-2.0) id AA17819; Wed, 14 Jul 99 12:42:41 +0200 Received: from mail13.digital.com by ITS.TUDelft.NL (PMDF V5.1-10 #21918) with ESMTP id <01JDJZOJ1KQI95MVQ7@ITS.TUDelft.NL> for erik@duteinh.et.tudelft.nl; Wed, 14 Jul 1999 12:42:39 +0200 Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail13.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.2/WV2.0g) with SMTP id GAA27474; Wed, 14 Jul 1999 06:39:39 -0400 (EDT) Received: from rex.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA27593; Wed, 14 Jul 1999 03:36:56 -0700 Received: by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id DAA01524; Wed, 14 Jul 1999 03:35:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id DAA01520; Wed, 14 Jul 1999 03:35:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail2.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA20100; Wed, 14 Jul 1999 03:35:04 -0700 Received: from web601.yahoomail.com (web1201.mail.yahoo.com [128.11.23.137]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.2/WV2.0g) with SMTP id DAA06142 for ; Wed, 14 Jul 1999 03:35:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [199.105.88.100] by web1201.mail.yahoo.com; Wed, 14 Jul 1999 03:30:30 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 14 Jul 1999 03:30:30 -0700 (PDT) From: ss ss Subject: I want to add in this mail list Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com To: Sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Message-Id: <19990714103030.16380.rocketmail@web601.yahoomail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Precedence: bulk I want to add in Sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com. How can I make it? _________________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com From kramer@pa.dec.com Wed Jul 14 13:25:53 1999 Return-Path: Received: from tudedr.et.tudelft.nl by it.et.tudelft.nl (4.1/BB-2.0) id AA17964; Wed, 14 Jul 99 13:25:53 +0200 Received: from mail1.digital.com by ITS.TUDelft.NL (PMDF V5.1-10 #21918) with ESMTP id <01JDK16YW58Q95MVQ7@ITS.TUDelft.NL> for erik@duteinh.et.tudelft.nl; Wed, 14 Jul 1999 13:25:48 +0200 Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.2/WV2.0g) with SMTP id EAA17343; Wed, 14 Jul 1999 04:23:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rex.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA29921; Wed, 14 Jul 1999 04:22:02 -0700 Received: by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id EAA01566; Wed, 14 Jul 1999 04:21:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id EAA01562; Wed, 14 Jul 1999 04:21:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail2.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA10329; Wed, 14 Jul 1999 04:21:37 -0700 Received: from globe.nexus.co.uk (nexusel.demon.co.uk [158.152.30.195]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.2/WV2.0g) with ESMTP id EAA09100 for ; Wed, 14 Jul 1999 04:21:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.0.0.21] (helo=fountain.nexus.co.uk ident=mail) by globe.nexus.co.uk with smtp (Exim 2.12 #1) id 114N0s-0001pw-00; Wed, 14 Jul 1999 12:15:46 +0100 Received: from fountain.nexus.co.uk ([::ffff:127.0.0.1] ident=pb) by fountain.nexus.co.uk with esmtp (Exim 2.12 #4) id 114N0r-0003ki-00; Wed, 14 Jul 1999 12:15:45 +0100 Date: Wed, 14 Jul 1999 12:15:45 +0100 From: Philip Blundell Subject: Re: aware of glibc In-Reply-To: "Your message of Mon, 12 Jul 1999 01:26:20 +0900." <3.0.32.19990712012618.00bd0118@leonis.nus.edu.sg> Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com To: Kong Gang Feng Cc: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: exmh version 2.0.2 2/24/98 (debian) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Precedence: bulk >I installed a glibc in a seperate location, however, I don't know >how to make my egcs to be aware of its existance. Currently, >I use 'arm-linux-gcc -print-search-dirs' to list all 'install, >programs,libraries' path, I can not see my glibc path there. Depends how often you expect to use it. For casual use you could use appropriate -I, -L and -Wl,--dynamic-linker options. >I guess maybe I need to udpate egcs 'specs', but how to do it? >Can I maintain 2 'specs' files for my egcs and switch between >them? It would probably be better to install a second copy of the compiler configured to use this new library. p. From kramer@pa.dec.com Sun Jul 18 17:24:20 1999 Return-Path: Received: from tudedr.et.tudelft.nl by it.et.tudelft.nl (4.1/BB-2.0) id AA06798; Sun, 18 Jul 99 17:24:20 +0200 Received: from mail1.digital.com by ITS.TUDelft.NL (PMDF V5.1-10 #21918) with ESMTP id <01JDPUP2OX2U95N43G@ITS.TUDelft.NL> for erik@duteinh.et.tudelft.nl; Sun, 18 Jul 1999 17:24:17 +0200 Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.2/WV2.0g) with SMTP id IAA02264; Sun, 18 Jul 1999 08:21:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rex.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA31543; Sun, 18 Jul 1999 08:21:42 -0700 Received: by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id HAA03486; Sun, 18 Jul 1999 07:19:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id HAA03479; Sun, 18 Jul 1999 07:19:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail2.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA29972; Sun, 18 Jul 1999 07:19:23 -0700 Received: from note.orchestra.cse.unsw.EDU.AU (note.orchestra.cse.unsw.EDU.AU [129.94.242.29]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.2/WV2.0g) with SMTP id HAA19101 for ; Sun, 18 Jul 1999 07:19:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: From mozart With LocalMail ; Mon, 19 Jul 1999 00:18:56 +1000 Date: Mon, 19 Jul 1999 00:18:56 +1000 (EST) From: Adam 'WeirdArms' Wiggins Subject: aborts and the PID Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com X-Sender: awiggins@mozart.orchestra.cse.unsw.EDU.AU To: Sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Precedence: bulk When a data abort is raised somewhere in the first 32MB and the PID register contains a non-zero value what is contained in the FAR is it the original address or the relocated address (original OR'd with the PID register)? I'm assuming its just the original address. Cheers Adam From kramer@pa.dec.com Thu Jul 22 07:01:33 1999 Return-Path: Received: from tudedr.et.tudelft.nl by it.et.tudelft.nl (4.1/BB-2.0) id AA20455; Thu, 22 Jul 99 07:01:33 +0200 Received: from mail1.digital.com by ITS.TUDelft.NL (PMDF V5.1-10 #21918) with ESMTP id <01JDUU4BE5Q295N7OY@ITS.TUDelft.NL> for erik@duteinh.et.tudelft.nl; Thu, 22 Jul 1999 07:01:32 +0200 Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.2/WV2.0g) with SMTP id VAA16387; Wed, 21 Jul 1999 21:50:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rex.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA05540; Wed, 21 Jul 1999 21:50:01 -0700 Received: by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id VAA13214; Wed, 21 Jul 1999 21:47:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id VAA13232; Wed, 21 Jul 1999 21:47:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [16.110.248.203] by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA12556; Wed, 21 Jul 1999 21:47:49 -0700 Received: by exchou-gh03bk.im.hou.compaq.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2559.0) id ; Wed, 21 Jul 1999 23:47:49 -0500 Date: Wed, 21 Jul 1999 23:47:47 -0500 From: "Singer, James" Subject: trouble with tar files Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com To: "'sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com'" Message-Id: <427351B4DEABD111A99400805F19E9BB02DE0DC7@exchou-prod0901.eng.hou.compaq.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2559.0) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Precedence: bulk I have a dumb question. I tried to tar the itsy source and the linux distribution under linux 5.1, SunOS, and Solaris with all kinds of error messages. Under Solaris I get tar: directory checksum error. Under linux I get tar: Hmm this doesn't look like a tar file and various other messages before it bails out. I used IE 5.0 to download the tar files. I then ftp'ed the tar files to my various unix environments with no luck. I tried every tar variation that I thought should work with the same results. Any ideas? James singer From kramer@pa.dec.com Fri Jul 23 18:27:46 1999 Return-Path: Received: from tudedr.et.tudelft.nl by it.et.tudelft.nl (4.1/BB-2.0) id AA01199; Fri, 23 Jul 99 18:27:46 +0200 Received: from mail1.digital.com by ITS.TUDelft.NL (PMDF V5.1-10 #21918) with ESMTP id <01JDWWD5TF3Q95NA8A@ITS.TUDelft.NL> for erik@duteinh.et.tudelft.nl; Fri, 23 Jul 1999 18:27:44 +0200 Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.2/WV2.0g) with SMTP id JAA08616; Fri, 23 Jul 1999 09:24:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rex.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA09650; Fri, 23 Jul 1999 09:24:45 -0700 Received: by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id JAA18682; Fri, 23 Jul 1999 09:23:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id JAA18680; Fri, 23 Jul 1999 09:23:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail1.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA09400; Fri, 23 Jul 1999 09:23:06 -0700 Received: from note.orchestra.cse.unsw.EDU.AU (note.orchestra.cse.unsw.EDU.AU [129.94.242.29]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.2/WV2.0g) with SMTP id JAA08783 for ; Fri, 23 Jul 1999 09:23:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: From haydn With LocalMail ; Sat, 24 Jul 1999 02:21:24 +1000 Date: Sat, 24 Jul 1999 02:21:21 +1000 (EST) From: Adam 'WeirdArms' Wiggins Subject: Digital's SHARK Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com X-Sender: awiggins@haydn.orchestra.cse.unsw.EDU.AU To: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Precedence: bulk Anyone heard of a Digital DNARD (digital network appliance reference design) known as the SHARK. I'm trying to get specs on it. Apparently NetBSD runs on it. Cheers Adam P.S. I got no reply about the PID registers effect on the FAR, is it just no one knows or what? From kramer@pa.dec.com Fri Jul 23 19:39:30 1999 Return-Path: Received: from tudedr.et.tudelft.nl by it.et.tudelft.nl (4.1/BB-2.0) id AA01363; Fri, 23 Jul 99 19:39:30 +0200 Received: from mail1.digital.com by ITS.TUDelft.NL (PMDF V5.1-10 #21918) with ESMTP id <01JDWYVE4L4I9356EN@ITS.TUDelft.NL> for erik@duteinh.et.tudelft.nl; Fri, 23 Jul 1999 19:39:28 +0200 Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.2/WV2.0g) with SMTP id KAA19843; Fri, 23 Jul 1999 10:37:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rex.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA06409; Fri, 23 Jul 1999 10:37:02 -0700 Received: by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id KAA18837; Fri, 23 Jul 1999 10:36:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id KAA18820; Fri, 23 Jul 1999 10:36:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail1.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA03771; Fri, 23 Jul 1999 10:36:17 -0700 Received: from thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (thorgal.et.tudelft.nl [130.161.40.91]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.2/WV2.0g) with ESMTP id KAA21407 for ; Fri, 23 Jul 1999 10:36:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [130.161.40.82] (tvs082.et.tudelft.nl [130.161.40.82]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id TAA02302; Fri, 23 Jul 1999 19:36:08 +0200 Date: Fri, 23 Jul 1999 19:35:13 +0200 From: "J.D. Bakker" Subject: Re: Digital's SHARK Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com To: Adam 'WeirdArms' Wiggins Cc: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Precedence: bulk At 18:21 +0200 23-07-1999, Adam 'WeirdArms' Wiggins wrote: > Anyone heard of a Digital DNARD (digital network appliance >reference design) known as the SHARK. I'm trying to get specs on it. >Apparently NetBSD runs on it. http://www.research.digital.com/SRC/iag/ http://www.duh.org/shark/faq/ The internal design of the NetWinder is quite like that of the DNARD. JDB. [Altavista is your friend] -- Jan-Derk Bakker, bakker@mmc.et.tudelft.nl The lazy man's proverb: 'There's no business like slow business !' From kramer@pa.dec.com Fri Jul 23 19:39:50 1999 Return-Path: Received: from tudedr.et.tudelft.nl by it.et.tudelft.nl (4.1/BB-2.0) id AA01367; Fri, 23 Jul 99 19:39:50 +0200 Received: from mail2.digital.com by ITS.TUDelft.NL (PMDF V5.1-10 #21918) with ESMTP id <01JDWYVRCX3895ND4T@ITS.TUDelft.NL> for erik@duteinh.et.tudelft.nl; Fri, 23 Jul 1999 19:39:47 +0200 Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.2/WV2.0g) with SMTP id KAA25922; Fri, 23 Jul 1999 10:37:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rex.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA01856; Fri, 23 Jul 1999 10:37:29 -0700 Received: by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id KAA18838; Fri, 23 Jul 1999 10:37:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id KAA18846; Fri, 23 Jul 1999 10:37:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail1.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA11453; Fri, 23 Jul 1999 10:37:21 -0700 Received: from finch-post-11.mail.demon.net (finch-post-11.mail.demon.net [194.217.242.39]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.2/WV2.0g) with ESMTP id KAA21699 for ; Fri, 23 Jul 1999 10:37:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: from tazenda.demon.co.uk ([158.152.220.239] helo=kings-cross.london.uk.eu.org) by finch-post-11.mail.demon.net with esmtp (Exim 2.12 #1) id 117jFJ-000L35-0B; Fri, 23 Jul 1999 17:36:33 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=kings-cross.london.uk.eu.org ident=phil) by kings-cross.london.uk.eu.org with esmtp (Exim 2.05 #1) id 117jFD-0000hC-00; Fri, 23 Jul 1999 18:36:27 +0100 Date: Fri, 23 Jul 1999 18:36:27 +0100 From: Philip Blundell Subject: Re: Digital's SHARK In-Reply-To: Message from Adam 'WeirdArms' Wiggins "of Sat, 24 Jul 1999 02:21:21 +1000." Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com To: Adam 'WeirdArms' Wiggins Cc: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: exmh version 2.0.2 2/24/98 (debian) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Precedence: bulk > Anyone heard of a Digital DNARD (digital network appliance >reference design) known as the SHARK. I'm trying to get specs on it. >Apparently NetBSD runs on it. Yeah, that's right. Someone is working on a Linux port too but I don't remember his name off the top of my head. If you look at the archives for the linux-arm or debian-arm lists you should be able to find him though. p. From kramer@pa.dec.com Fri Jul 23 21:14:25 1999 Return-Path: Received: from tudedr.et.tudelft.nl by it.et.tudelft.nl (4.1/BB-2.0) id AA01591; Fri, 23 Jul 99 21:14:25 +0200 Received: from mail1.digital.com by ITS.TUDelft.NL (PMDF V5.1-10 #21918) with ESMTP id <01JDX2724VZA95ND1Q@ITS.TUDelft.NL> for erik@duteinh.et.tudelft.nl; Fri, 23 Jul 1999 21:14:22 +0200 Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.2/WV2.0g) with SMTP id MAA07353; Fri, 23 Jul 1999 12:11:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rex.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA26875; Fri, 23 Jul 1999 12:11:58 -0700 Received: by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id MAA19035; Fri, 23 Jul 1999 12:11:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id MAA19016; Fri, 23 Jul 1999 12:11:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail1.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA26276; Fri, 23 Jul 1999 12:11:14 -0700 Received: from it.et.tudelft.nl (duteinh.et.tudelft.nl [130.161.42.1]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.2/WV2.0g) with SMTP id MAA06721 for ; Fri, 23 Jul 1999 12:11:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: from dutein71 (dutein71.et.tudelft.nl) by it.et.tudelft.nl (4.1/BB-2.0) id AA01583; Fri, 23 Jul 1999 21:09:22 +0200 Date: Fri, 23 Jul 1999 21:09:22 +0200 From: Erik Mouw Subject: Re: trouble with tar files In-Reply-To: <427351B4DEABD111A99400805F19E9BB02DE0DC7@exchou-prod0901.eng.hou.compaq.com> Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com To: James.Singer@COMPAQ.com Cc: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Message-Id: <9907231909.AA01583@it.et.tudelft.nl> Organization: Eric conspiracy secret labs Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: XCmail 0.99.6 - with PGP support, PGP engine version 0.5 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Precedence: bulk X-Face: "!Z|1XjFg!3Iw)BwM^M\k)J5KHiPddz}#/Zw%?$&Q!xqob"OA|})3_@&BTTiQERo?/^g[Z<9P4R8:5C:aqq.cw!hotLc=+u-"+1rq@9$V^8PbOUlodyi_sejt+D`iqkLpx$>.aXl%vnfPIt"LK|/%>94_Zrm8jy?`_[RKt'TuoxUxfk(gMhY(n|DBBl~c$dhO>G%6}R4+DGX3|idBm4oU&UM/XUP4I9aoN{]`ax%B?rgD(I3OJ<62Y6L X-Mailerorigin: http://www.fsai.fh-trier.de/~schmitzj/Xclasses/XCmail/ X-Eric-Conspiracy: There is no conspiracy! X-Loop: erik@it.et.tudelft.nl On Wed, 21 Jul 1999 23:47:47 -0500, Singer, James wrote: > I have a dumb question. I tried to tar the itsy source and the linux > distribution under linux 5.1, SunOS, and Solaris with all kinds of error > messages. Under Solaris I get tar: directory checksum error. Under linux I > get tar: Hmm this doesn't look like a tar file and various other messages > before it bails out. I used IE 5.0 to download the tar files. I then > ftp'ed the tar files to my various unix environments with no luck. I tried > every tar variation that I thought should work with the same results. Any > ideas? Silly question: did you use *binary* download with FTP? Another option is that the tar file was compressed with gzip. Erik -- J.A.K. (Erik) Mouw, Information and Communication Theory Group, Department of Electrical Engineering, Faculty of Information Technology and Systems, Delft University of Technology, PO BOX 5031, 2600 GA Delft, The Netherlands Phone: +31-15-2785859 Fax: +31-15-2781843 Email J.A.K.Mouw@its.tudelft.nl WWW: http://www-ict.its.tudelft.nl/~erik/ From kramer@pa.dec.com Fri Jul 23 21:44:28 1999 Return-Path: Received: from tudedr.et.tudelft.nl by it.et.tudelft.nl (4.1/BB-2.0) id AA01668; Fri, 23 Jul 99 21:44:28 +0200 Received: from mail2.digital.com by ITS.TUDelft.NL (PMDF V5.1-10 #21918) with ESMTP id <01JDX38C8DC495ND1Q@ITS.TUDelft.NL> for erik@duteinh.et.tudelft.nl; Fri, 23 Jul 1999 21:44:26 +0200 Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.2/WV2.0g) with SMTP id MAA12079; Fri, 23 Jul 1999 12:40:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rex.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA12894; Fri, 23 Jul 1999 12:40:37 -0700 Received: by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id MAA19120; Fri, 23 Jul 1999 12:40:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id MAA19112; Fri, 23 Jul 1999 12:40:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail2.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA06884; Fri, 23 Jul 1999 12:40:18 -0700 Received: from ns0.utdallas.edu (ns0.utdallas.edu [129.110.10.1]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.2/WV2.0g) with ESMTP id MAA12281 for ; Fri, 23 Jul 1999 12:40:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: from infoserv.utdallas.edu (infoserv.utdallas.edu [129.110.16.2]) by ns0.utdallas.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 052091A001F for ; Fri, 23 Jul 1999 14:36:52 -0500 (CDT) Received: from localhost (vasantr@localhost) by infoserv.utdallas.edu (8.9.0/8.9.0) with SMTP id OAA03538 for ; Fri, 23 Jul 1999 14:36:52 -0500 (CDT) Date: Fri, 23 Jul 1999 14:36:51 -0500 (CDT) From: Vasant Ramasubramanian Subject: Re: Digital's SHARK In-Reply-To: Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com To: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Precedence: bulk X-Authentication-Warning: infoserv.utdallas.edu: vasantr owned process doing -bs I was looking at the hardware for the DNARD (I wasn't aware of this deivce till this thread), and I didn't think the the SA-110 supported SDRAM; is the PAL used to generate timings for the SDRAM and an interface SDRAM <--> PAL <--> SA110? I am using an SA1100 in a project and cheap SDRAM would be a much beter alternative to expensive and soon to be out of date Self-Refresh EDO. Thanks! From kramer@pa.dec.com Sat Jul 24 00:43:22 1999 Return-Path: Received: from tudedr.et.tudelft.nl by it.et.tudelft.nl (4.1/BB-2.0) id AA01989; Sat, 24 Jul 99 00:43:22 +0200 Received: from mail2.digital.com by ITS.TUDelft.NL (PMDF V5.1-10 #21918) with ESMTP id <01JDX9H5KOR693578Q@ITS.TUDelft.NL> for erik@duteinh.et.tudelft.nl; Sat, 24 Jul 1999 00:43:20 +0200 Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.2/WV2.0g) with SMTP id PAA02198; Fri, 23 Jul 1999 15:39:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rex.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA09501; Fri, 23 Jul 1999 15:39:44 -0700 Received: by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id PAA19609; Fri, 23 Jul 1999 15:38:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id PAA19615; Fri, 23 Jul 1999 15:38:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail1.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA06653; Fri, 23 Jul 1999 15:38:45 -0700 Received: from finch-post-12.mail.demon.net (finch-post-12.mail.demon.net [194.217.242.41]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.2/WV2.0g) with ESMTP id PAA08263 for ; Fri, 23 Jul 1999 15:38:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: from tazenda.demon.co.uk ([158.152.220.239] helo=kings-cross.london.uk.eu.org) by finch-post-12.mail.demon.net with esmtp (Exim 2.12 #1) id 117nx0-000IMt-0C; Fri, 23 Jul 1999 22:37:59 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=kings-cross.london.uk.eu.org ident=phil) by kings-cross.london.uk.eu.org with esmtp (Exim 2.05 #1) id 117nwm-0000zS-00; Fri, 23 Jul 1999 23:37:44 +0100 Date: Fri, 23 Jul 1999 23:37:44 +0100 From: Philip Blundell Subject: Re: Digital's SHARK In-Reply-To: Message from Vasant Ramasubramanian "of Fri, 23 Jul 1999 14:36:51 CDT." Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com To: Vasant Ramasubramanian Cc: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: exmh version 2.0.2 2/24/98 (debian) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Precedence: bulk >I was looking at the hardware for the DNARD (I wasn't aware of this deivce >till this thread), and I didn't think the the SA-110 supported SDRAM; is >the PAL used to generate timings for the SDRAM and an interface SDRAM <--> >PAL <--> SA110? The 110 doesn't have a glueless DRAM interface of any sort; you always have to add an external memory controller. Its companion chip, 21285, does include SDRAM control logic. >I am using an SA1100 in a project and cheap SDRAM would be a much beter >alternative to expensive and soon to be out of date Self-Refresh EDO. The SA-1100 doesn't support SDRAM, though I believe the SA-1110 does. If you are designing a new product then the latter might be a better bet. p. From kramer@pa.dec.com Sat Jul 24 02:43:20 1999 Return-Path: Received: from tudedr.et.tudelft.nl by it.et.tudelft.nl (4.1/BB-2.0) id AA02201; Sat, 24 Jul 99 02:43:20 +0200 Received: from mail2.digital.com by ITS.TUDelft.NL (PMDF V5.1-10 #21918) with ESMTP id <01JDXDNVBU8G93578Q@ITS.TUDelft.NL> for erik@duteinh.et.tudelft.nl; Sat, 24 Jul 1999 02:43:16 +0200 Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.2/WV2.0g) with SMTP id RAA13534; Fri, 23 Jul 1999 17:39:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rex.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA11656; Fri, 23 Jul 1999 17:39:17 -0700 Received: by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id RAA19737; Fri, 23 Jul 1999 17:38:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id RAA19727; Fri, 23 Jul 1999 17:38:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail1.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA19411; Fri, 23 Jul 1999 17:38:39 -0700 Received: from www.be-net.cz ([194.228.13.40]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.2/WV2.0g) with ESMTP id RAA24731 for ; Fri, 23 Jul 1999 17:38:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from mail@localhost) by www.be-net.cz (8.8.5/8.8.5) id CAA15207 for ; Sat, 24 Jul 1999 02:38:36 +0200 Received: from fw.sitzn.cz(194.228.13.61) by www.be-net.cz via smap (V2.1) id xma015205; Sat, 24 Jul 1999 02:38:33 +0200 Date: Sat, 24 Jul 1999 02:33:47 +0200 From: Karel Volejnik Subject: StrongARM Psion Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com To: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Reply-To: Karel.Volejnik@be-net.cz Message-Id: <99072402390502.01752@srv.attocom.cz> Organization: AttoCom s.r.o. Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.0.20] Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Precedence: bulk Hello, from Psion: new PSION device (end of '99) will be powered by sa-1100 at 190MHz (color display 640x480, PC card II, weight about 1100g). Nice work ;-) From kramer@pa.dec.com Sun Jul 25 20:07:51 1999 Return-Path: Received: from tudedr.et.tudelft.nl by it.et.tudelft.nl (4.1/BB-2.0) id AA05006; Sun, 25 Jul 99 20:07:51 +0200 Received: from mail1.digital.com by ITS.TUDelft.NL (PMDF V5.1-10 #21918) with ESMTP id <01JDZSG80GII95NCKH@ITS.TUDelft.NL> for erik@duteinh.et.tudelft.nl; Sun, 25 Jul 1999 20:07:48 +0200 Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.2/WV2.0g) with SMTP id LAA21560; Sun, 25 Jul 1999 11:04:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rex.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA31112; Sun, 25 Jul 1999 11:03:53 -0700 Received: by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id LAA26764; Sun, 25 Jul 1999 11:01:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id LAA26760; Sun, 25 Jul 1999 11:01:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail1.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA19729; Sun, 25 Jul 1999 11:01:42 -0700 Received: from it.et.tudelft.nl (duteinh.et.tudelft.nl [130.161.42.1]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.2/WV2.0g) with SMTP id LAA21154 for ; Sun, 25 Jul 1999 11:01:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: from dutein71 (dutein71.et.tudelft.nl) by it.et.tudelft.nl (4.1/BB-2.0) id AA04984; Sun, 25 Jul 1999 19:57:14 +0200 Date: Sun, 25 Jul 1999 19:57:14 +0200 From: Erik Mouw Subject: JTAG ID-code Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com To: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Message-Id: <9907251757.AA04984@it.et.tudelft.nl> Organization: Eric conspiracy secret labs Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: XCmail 0.99.6 - with PGP support, PGP engine version 0.5 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Precedence: bulk X-Face: "!Z|1XjFg!3Iw)BwM^M\k)J5KHiPddz}#/Zw%?$&Q!xqob"OA|})3_@&BTTiQERo?/^g[Z<9P4R8:5C:aqq.cw!hotLc=+u-"+1rq@9$V^8PbOUlodyi_sejt+D`iqkLpx$>.aXl%vnfPIt"LK|/%>94_Zrm8jy?`_[RKt'TuoxUxfk(gMhY(n|DBBl~c$dhO>G%6}R4+DGX3|idBm4oU&UM/XUP4I9aoN{]`ax%B?rgD(I3OJ<62Y6L X-Mailerorigin: http://www.fsai.fh-trier.de/~schmitzj/Xclasses/XCmail/ X-Eric-Conspiracy: There is no conspiracy! X-Loop: erik@it.et.tudelft.nl Hi, What should be the ID code of the SA1100 after I give it an IDCODE instruction on the JTAG input? We do get an answer from the SA1100, but I've no idea if this answer is in fact correct. Erik -- J.A.K. (Erik) Mouw, Information and Communication Theory Group, Department of Electrical Engineering, Faculty of Information Technology and Systems, Delft University of Technology, PO BOX 5031, 2600 GA Delft, The Netherlands Phone: +31-15-2785859 Fax: +31-15-2781843 Email J.A.K.Mouw@its.tudelft.nl WWW: http://www-ict.its.tudelft.nl/~erik/ From kramer@pa.dec.com Mon Jul 26 09:04:05 1999 Return-Path: Received: from tudedr.et.tudelft.nl by it.et.tudelft.nl (4.1/BB-2.0) id AA06086; Mon, 26 Jul 99 09:04:05 +0200 Received: from mail2.digital.com by ITS.TUDelft.NL (PMDF V5.1-10 #21918) with ESMTP id <01JE0JJI2SWE9355I5@ITS.TUDelft.NL> for erik@duteinh.et.tudelft.nl; Mon, 26 Jul 1999 09:03:56 +0200 Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.2/WV2.0g) with SMTP id XAA20286; Sun, 25 Jul 1999 23:59:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rex.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA28802; Sun, 25 Jul 1999 23:59:31 -0700 Received: by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id XAA28784; Sun, 25 Jul 1999 23:58:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id XAA28795; Sun, 25 Jul 1999 23:58:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail2.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA25762; Sun, 25 Jul 1999 23:58:43 -0700 Received: from note.orchestra.cse.unsw.EDU.AU (note.orchestra.cse.unsw.EDU.AU [129.94.242.29]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.2/WV2.0g) with SMTP id XAA20878 for ; Sun, 25 Jul 1999 23:58:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: From paulaner With LocalMail ; Mon, 26 Jul 1999 16:56:53 +1000 Date: Mon, 26 Jul 1999 16:56:52 +1000 (EST) From: Adam 'WeirdArms' Wiggins Subject: Re: JTAG ID-code In-Reply-To: <9907251757.AA04984@it.et.tudelft.nl> Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com X-Sender: awiggins@paulaner.disy.cse.unsw.EDU.AU To: Erik Mouw Cc: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Precedence: bulk On Sun, 25 Jul 1999, Erik Mouw wrote: > Hi, > > What should be the ID code of the SA1100 after I give it an IDCODE > instruction on the JTAG input? We do get an answer from the SA1100, but > I've no idea if this answer is in fact correct. > Our board return 9108406B, I think it varies with chip revision though. Cheers Adam > > Erik > > -- > J.A.K. (Erik) Mouw, Information and Communication Theory Group, Department > of Electrical Engineering, Faculty of Information Technology and Systems, > Delft University of Technology, PO BOX 5031, 2600 GA Delft, The Netherlands > Phone: +31-15-2785859 Fax: +31-15-2781843 Email J.A.K.Mouw@its.tudelft.nl > WWW: http://www-ict.its.tudelft.nl/~erik/ > > From kramer@pa.dec.com Mon Jul 26 12:11:16 1999 Return-Path: Received: from tudedr.et.tudelft.nl by it.et.tudelft.nl (4.1/BB-2.0) id AA06688; Mon, 26 Jul 99 12:11:16 +0200 Received: from mail1.digital.com by ITS.TUDelft.NL (PMDF V5.1-10 #21918) with ESMTP id <01JE0Q3P83Z89358PS@ITS.TUDelft.NL> for erik@duteinh.et.tudelft.nl; Mon, 26 Jul 1999 12:11:14 +0200 Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.2/WV2.0g) with SMTP id DAA26353; Mon, 26 Jul 1999 03:08:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rex.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA02729; Mon, 26 Jul 1999 03:07:49 -0700 Received: by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id DAA29220; Mon, 26 Jul 1999 03:07:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id DAA29342; Mon, 26 Jul 1999 03:07:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail2.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA03851; Mon, 26 Jul 1999 03:07:11 -0700 Received: from penguin.wise.edt.ericsson.se (penguin-ext.wise.edt.ericsson.se [194.237.142.110]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.2/WV2.0g) with ESMTP id DAA10052 for ; Mon, 26 Jul 1999 03:07:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mbb5.ericsson.se (mbb5.ericsson.se [136.225.151.210]) by penguin.wise.edt.ericsson.se (8.9.3/8.9.3/WIREfire-1.3) with ESMTP id MAA20975 for ; Mon, 26 Jul 1999 12:03:47 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from esealnt401.al.sw.ericsson.se (ESEALNT401.al.sw.ericsson.se [153.88.251.22]) by mbb1.ericsson.se (PMDF V5.2-29 #33627) with SMTP id <0FFH002GW2MA08@mbb1.ericsson.se> for sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com; Mon, 26 Jul 1999 12:03:46 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from 153.88.251.21 by esealnt401.al.sw.ericsson.se (InterScan E-Mail VirusWall NT); Mon, 26 Jul 1999 12:03:30 +0200 (W. Europe Daylight Time) Received: by esealnt400 with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2448.0) id ; Mon, 26 Jul 1999 12:03:30 +0200 Date: Mon, 26 Jul 1999 12:03:34 +0200 From: "Anders Hedberg (ECS)" Subject: REMOVE Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com To: SA-1100/Linux Message-Id: <81314DE3B27DD0119A7400609719CF4B069289E4@eseldnt100.ericsson.se> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2448.0) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Precedence: bulk REMOVE From kramer@pa.dec.com Fri Jul 30 09:58:30 1999 Return-Path: Received: from tudedr.et.tudelft.nl by it.et.tudelft.nl (4.1/BB-2.0) id AA21915; Fri, 30 Jul 99 09:58:30 +0200 Received: from mail1.digital.com by ITS.TUDelft.NL (PMDF V5.1-10 #21918) with ESMTP id <01JE66MHV968935AAK@ITS.TUDelft.NL> for erik@duteinh.et.tudelft.nl; Fri, 30 Jul 1999 09:58:29 +0200 Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.2/WV2.0g) with SMTP id AAA20497; Fri, 30 Jul 1999 00:55:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rex.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA16756; Fri, 30 Jul 1999 00:55:33 -0700 Received: by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id AAA11221; Fri, 30 Jul 1999 00:53:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id AAA11223; Fri, 30 Jul 1999 00:53:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail1.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA32498; Fri, 30 Jul 1999 00:53:29 -0700 Received: from note.orchestra.cse.unsw.EDU.AU (note.orchestra.cse.unsw.EDU.AU [129.94.242.29]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.2/WV2.0g) with SMTP id AAA22107 for ; Fri, 30 Jul 1999 00:53:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: From paulaner With LocalMail ; Fri, 30 Jul 1999 17:51:45 +1000 Date: Fri, 30 Jul 1999 17:51:29 +1000 (EST) From: Adam 'WeirdArms' Wiggins Subject: new UNSW CSE technical report (fwd) Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com X-Sender: awiggins@paulaner.disy.cse.unsw.EDU.AU To: Sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com, linux-arm@vger.rutgers.edu, hermann.haertig@inf.tu-dresden.de, ud3@os.inf.tu-dresden.de, hohmuth@innocent.com Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Precedence: bulk For those of you interested. ---------- Forwarded message ---------- Date: Fri, 30 Jul 1999 15:55:28 +1000 (EST) From: Andrew Taylor To: cse@cse.unsw.EDU.AU Subject: new UNSW CSE technical report UNSW Computer Science and Engineering Technical Report no. UNSW-CSE-TR-9906 (20 pages: compressed postscript file 9906.ps.Z) Title: Fast Address-Space Switching on the StrongARM SA-1100 Processor Authors: Adam Wiggins, Gernot Heiser School of Computer Science and Engineering University of New South Wales Sydney 2052 Australia E-mail: {awiggins,gernot}@cse.unsw.edu.au Abstract: The StrongARM SA-1100 is a high-speed low-power processor aimed at embedded and portable applications. Its architecture features virtual caches and TLBs which are not tagged by an address-space identifier. Consequently, context switches on that processor are potentially very expensive, as they may require complete flushes of TLBs and caches. This report presents the design of an address-space management technique for the StrongARM which minimises TLB and cache flushes and thus context switching costs. The basic idea is to implement the top-level of the (hardware-walked) page-table as a cache for page directory entries for different address spaces. This allows switching address spaces with minimal overhead as long as the working sets do not overlap. For small (<=32MB) address spaces further improvements are possible by making use of the StrongARM's re-mapping facility. Our technique is discussed in the context of the L4 microkernel in which it will be implemented. ftp://ftp.cse.unsw.edu.au/pub/doc/papers/UNSW/9906.ps.Z From kramer@pa.dec.com Wed Aug 4 02:46:24 1999 Return-Path: Received: from tudedr.et.tudelft.nl by it.et.tudelft.nl (4.1/BB-2.0) id AA05585; Wed, 4 Aug 99 02:46:24 +0200 Received: from mail2.digital.com by ITS.TUDelft.NL (PMDF V5.1-10 #21918) with ESMTP id <01JECQZIO226935CRQ@ITS.TUDelft.NL> for erik@duteinh.et.tudelft.nl; Wed, 4 Aug 1999 02:46:23 +0200 Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.2/WV2.0g) with SMTP id RAA24714; Tue, 03 Aug 1999 17:39:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rex.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA28801; Tue, 03 Aug 1999 17:39:40 -0700 Received: by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id RAA28893; Tue, 03 Aug 1999 17:34:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id RAA28941; Tue, 03 Aug 1999 17:34:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail2.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA21638; Tue, 03 Aug 1999 17:34:49 -0700 Received: from ns0.utdallas.edu (ns0.utdallas.edu [129.110.10.1]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.2/WV2.0g) with ESMTP id RAA25023 for ; Tue, 03 Aug 1999 17:34:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: from infoserv.utdallas.edu (infoserv.utdallas.edu [129.110.16.2]) by ns0.utdallas.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E7E319FFCE for ; Tue, 03 Aug 1999 19:31:26 -0500 (CDT) Received: from localhost (vasantr@localhost) by infoserv.utdallas.edu (8.9.0/8.9.0) with SMTP id TAA06450 for ; Tue, 03 Aug 1999 19:31:25 -0500 (CDT) Date: Tue, 03 Aug 1999 19:31:24 -0500 (CDT) From: Vasant Ramasubramanian Subject: ARM Tools and Debug Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com To: Sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Precedence: bulk X-Authentication-Warning: infoserv.utdallas.edu: vasantr owned process doing -bs Hello all: I wanted to know how useful are the ARM tools compared with the free GNU available versions/compilers. How useful is the ARMulator? Also is the Angel monitor free? Does anyone have screenshots or a detailed explanations of what all it does? I checked out ARM's site but it doesn't not describe it in the detail I would like. Thanks! Vasant. P.S. If there are any WWW sites/docs the describe the SA-1100 architecture in detail or sites that have detailed information, I would greatly appreciate the links. From kramer@pa.dec.com Wed Aug 4 09:18:45 1999 Return-Path: Received: from tudedr.et.tudelft.nl by it.et.tudelft.nl (4.1/BB-2.0) id AA06528; Wed, 4 Aug 99 09:18:45 +0200 Received: from mail2.digital.com by ITS.TUDelft.NL (PMDF V5.1-10 #21918) with ESMTP id <01JED4OQ7XJG95NGUG@ITS.TUDelft.NL> for erik@duteinh.et.tudelft.nl; Wed, 4 Aug 1999 09:18:35 +0200 Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.2/WV2.0g) with SMTP id AAA23198; Wed, 04 Aug 1999 00:13:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rex.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA00839; Wed, 04 Aug 1999 00:13:54 -0700 Received: by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id AAA30031; Wed, 04 Aug 1999 00:13:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id AAA30045; Wed, 04 Aug 1999 00:13:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail2.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA17300; Wed, 04 Aug 1999 00:13:04 -0700 Received: from eshu.request.net (eshu.request.net [208.226.156.2] (may be forged)) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.2/WV2.0g) with ESMTP id AAA23835 for ; Wed, 04 Aug 1999 00:13:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: from furina.request.net ([207.48.132.3]) by eshu.request.net with ESMTP id <7477-19467>; Wed, 04 Aug 1999 03:06:25 -0400 Received: from Bad.EHLO.Input ([193.159.143.91]) by furina.request.net with ESMTP id <98610545-8866> convert rfc822-to-8bit; Wed, 04 Aug 1999 03:05:44 -0400 Received: by HW_MAIL with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2448.0) id ; Wed, 04 Aug 1999 09:07:41 +0100 Date: Wed, 04 Aug 1999 09:07:40 +0100 From: "JOR. - Jordan, Roman" Subject: AW: ARM Tools and Debug Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com To: "'VASANTR@UTDALLAS.EDU'" Cc: "'Sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com'" Message-Id: <81413F587EB9D1118F56000092941A3EA78A85@HW_MAIL> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2448.0) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Precedence: bulk X-Mime-Autoconverted: from 8bit to quoted-printable by mail2.digital.com id AAA23835 Hi, for information about the SA-1100 architecture a suggest you the url http://www.arm.com/. Somewhere at this sites is a link to available books= , which describe it much bettes than the intel homepage (where you can find more technical information). One nice book is the 'Advanced RISC Machines Architectural Reference Manu= al' by Dave Jaggar (ISBN 0 13 736299 4 - Prentice Hall). regards, Roman -----Urspr=FCngliche Nachricht----- Von: Postmaster=20 Gesendet am: Mittwoch, 4. August 1999 07:11 An: JOR. - Jordan, Roman Betreff: WG: ARM Tools and Debug > ---------- > Von: Vasant Ramasubramanian[SMTP:VASANTR@UTDALLAS.EDU] > Gesendet: Mittwoch, 4. August 1999 01:31:24 > An: Sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com > Betreff: ARM Tools and Debug > Diese Nachricht wurde automatisch von einer Regel weitergeleitet. >=20 Hello all: I wanted to know how useful are the ARM tools compared with the free GNU available versions/compilers. How useful is the ARMulator? Also is the Angel monitor free? Does anyone have screenshots or a detaile= d explanations of what all it does? I checked out ARM's site but it doesn't not describe it in the detail I would like.=20 Thanks! Vasant. P.S. If there are any WWW sites/docs the describe the SA-1100 architecture in detail or sites that have detailed information, I would greatly appreciat= e the links.=20 From kramer@pa.dec.com Wed Aug 4 11:06:47 1999 Return-Path: Received: from tudedr.et.tudelft.nl by it.et.tudelft.nl (4.1/BB-2.0) id AA06942; Wed, 4 Aug 99 11:06:47 +0200 Received: from mail2.digital.com by ITS.TUDelft.NL (PMDF V5.1-10 #21918) with ESMTP id <01JED8GUIHXE95NRDH@ITS.TUDelft.NL> for erik@duteinh.et.tudelft.nl; Wed, 4 Aug 1999 11:06:45 +0200 Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.2/WV2.0g) with SMTP id CAA17738; Wed, 04 Aug 1999 02:01:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rex.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA05301; Wed, 04 Aug 1999 02:01:05 -0700 Received: by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id CAA30343; Wed, 04 Aug 1999 02:00:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id CAA30305; Wed, 04 Aug 1999 02:00:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail2.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA31084; Wed, 04 Aug 1999 02:00:29 -0700 Received: from globe.nexus.co.uk (nexusel.demon.co.uk [158.152.30.195]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.2/WV2.0g) with ESMTP id CAA01009 for ; Wed, 04 Aug 1999 02:00:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.0.0.21] (helo=fountain.nexus.co.uk ident=mail) by globe.nexus.co.uk with smtp (Exim 2.12 #1) id 11Bwpv-0000KN-00; Wed, 04 Aug 1999 09:55:47 +0100 Received: from [::ffff:127.0.0.1] (helo=fountain.nexus.co.uk ident=pb) by fountain.nexus.co.uk with esmtp (Exim 2.12 #4) id 11Bwpv-0003pp-00; Wed, 04 Aug 1999 09:55:47 +0100 Date: Wed, 04 Aug 1999 09:55:47 +0100 From: Philip Blundell Subject: Re: ARM Tools and Debug In-Reply-To: "Your message of Tue, 03 Aug 1999 19:31:24 CDT." Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com To: Vasant Ramasubramanian Cc: Sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: exmh version 2.0.2 2/24/98 (debian) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Precedence: bulk >I wanted to know how useful are the ARM tools compared with the free GNU >available versions/compilers. How useful is the ARMulator? Depends very much on what you want to do. For Linux, the GNU tools are rather more powerful than the ARM tools. The ARMulator is good as far as it goes but of course as with any simulator it has limitations. >If there are any WWW sites/docs the describe the SA-1100 architecture in >detail or sites that have detailed information, I would greatly appreciate >the links. The SA-11xx family documentation is on Intel's web site. p. From kramer@pa.dec.com Wed Aug 4 14:19:42 1999 Return-Path: Received: from tudedr.et.tudelft.nl by it.et.tudelft.nl (4.1/BB-2.0) id AA07706; Wed, 4 Aug 99 14:19:42 +0200 Received: from mail2.digital.com by ITS.TUDelft.NL (PMDF V5.1-10 #21918) with ESMTP id <01JEDF70C75K95NRSN@ITS.TUDelft.NL> for erik@duteinh.et.tudelft.nl; Wed, 4 Aug 1999 14:19:39 +0200 Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.2/WV2.0g) with SMTP id FAA17669; Wed, 04 Aug 1999 05:14:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rex.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA02838; Wed, 04 Aug 1999 05:14:06 -0700 Received: by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id FAA30936; Wed, 04 Aug 1999 05:12:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id FAA30938; Wed, 04 Aug 1999 05:12:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail2.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA18723; Wed, 04 Aug 1999 05:12:19 -0700 Received: from mail-out.visi.com (tele.visi.com [209.98.98.17]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.2/WV2.0g) with ESMTP id FAA18587 for ; Wed, 04 Aug 1999 05:12:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: from isis.visi.com (isis.visi.com [209.98.98.8]) by mail-out.visi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2BAE31F813; Wed, 04 Aug 1999 07:08:59 -0500 (CDT) Received: from localhost (mestery@localhost) by isis.visi.com (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id HAA20436; Wed, 04 Aug 1999 07:08:59 -0500 (CDT) Date: Wed, 04 Aug 1999 07:08:58 -0500 (CDT) From: mestery@visi.com Subject: Re: new UNSW CSE technical report (fwd) In-Reply-To: Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com To: Adam 'WeirdArms' Wiggins Cc: Sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com, linux-arm@vger.rutgers.edu Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Precedence: bulk X-Authentication-Warning: isis.visi.com: mestery owned process doing -bs Hi, Is anyone interested in applying the approach talked about in the paper to the Linux/ARM kernel? I would like to work on this task, and didn't want to duplicate any efforts underway. Any feedback appreciated! Thanks! -- Kyle Mestery | StorageTek's Storage Networking Group mestery@visi.com | http://www.freebsd.org/ mestery@netwinder.org | http://www.netwinder.org/ Protect your right to privacy: www.freecrypto.org On Fri, 30 Jul 1999, Adam 'WeirdArms' Wiggins wrote: > > For those of you interested. > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > Date: Fri, 30 Jul 1999 15:55:28 +1000 (EST) > From: Andrew Taylor > To: cse@cse.unsw.EDU.AU > Subject: new UNSW CSE technical report > > > UNSW Computer Science and Engineering Technical Report no. UNSW-CSE-TR-9906 > (20 pages: compressed postscript file 9906.ps.Z) > > Title: Fast Address-Space Switching on the StrongARM SA-1100 Processor > > > Authors: Adam Wiggins, Gernot Heiser > School of Computer Science and Engineering > University of New South Wales > Sydney 2052 Australia > E-mail: {awiggins,gernot}@cse.unsw.edu.au > > > > Abstract: > > The StrongARM SA-1100 is a high-speed low-power processor aimed at > embedded and portable applications. Its architecture features virtual > caches and TLBs which are not tagged by an address-space > identifier. Consequently, context switches on that processor are > potentially very expensive, as they may require complete flushes of TLBs > and caches. > > This report presents the design of an address-space management technique > for the StrongARM which minimises TLB and cache flushes and thus > context switching costs. The basic idea is to implement the top-level of > the (hardware-walked) page-table as a cache for page directory entries > for different address spaces. This allows switching address spaces with > minimal overhead as long as the working sets do not overlap. For small > (<=32MB) address spaces further improvements are possible by > making use of the StrongARM's re-mapping facility. Our technique is > discussed in the context of the L4 microkernel in which it will be > implemented. > > > ftp://ftp.cse.unsw.edu.au/pub/doc/papers/UNSW/9906.ps.Z > > unsubscribe: body of `unsubscribe linux-arm' to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu > From kramer@pa.dec.com Thu Aug 5 22:11:04 1999 Return-Path: Received: from tudedr.et.tudelft.nl by it.et.tudelft.nl (4.1/BB-2.0) id AA14069; Thu, 5 Aug 99 22:11:04 +0200 Received: from mail2.digital.com by ITS.TUDelft.NL (PMDF V5.1-10 #21918) with ESMTP id <01JEF9XQC9S2935EBV@ITS.TUDelft.NL> for erik@duteinh.et.tudelft.nl; Thu, 5 Aug 1999 22:11:03 +0200 Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.2/WV2.0g) with SMTP id NAA06172; Thu, 05 Aug 1999 13:05:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rex.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA20017; Thu, 05 Aug 1999 13:04:55 -0700 Received: by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id NAA03187; Thu, 05 Aug 1999 13:03:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id NAA03150; Thu, 05 Aug 1999 13:02:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail2.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA30085; Thu, 05 Aug 1999 13:02:58 -0700 Received: from note.orchestra.cse.unsw.EDU.AU (note.orchestra.cse.unsw.EDU.AU [129.94.242.29]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.2/WV2.0g) with SMTP id NAA05280 for ; Thu, 05 Aug 1999 13:02:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: From paulaner With LocalMail ; Fri, 06 Aug 1999 06:02:34 +1000 Date: Fri, 06 Aug 1999 06:02:33 +1000 (EST) From: Adam 'WeirdArms' Wiggins Subject: Problem Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com X-Sender: awiggins@paulaner.disy.cse.unsw.EDU.AU To: Sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: MULTIPART/MIXED; BOUNDARY="0-1205161142-933883353=:21680" Precedence: bulk This message is in MIME format. The first part should be readable text, while the remaining parts are likely unreadable without MIME-aware tools. Send mail to mime@docserver.cac.washington.edu for more info. --0-1205161142-933883353=:21680 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Hello all, I'm writting a boot loader foARM systems (mainly for PLEB). Attached is what I've done so far (not much) it should just send a character continually down the serial port but as far as I can tell the serial port is inactive. The code should be clear (tell me if its not) just edit the Makefile.conf to pont to your tool chain and make. If anyone can have a look and make sure the code doesn't have any errors it would be a big help. Alsoanyone interested on working on a Apex let me know Cheers Adam --0-1205161142-933883353=:21680 Content-Type: APPLICATION/octet-stream; name="Apex-990805.tar.gz" Content-ID: Content-Description: Content-Transfer-Encoding: BASE64 H4sICLnnqTcAA0FwZXgtOTkwODA1LnRhcgDsXOtzGzeSz9eg7o/A2qmKlKIp Us/Y3ts6yZJt7Uq2SpQ3yX1JgTMgiXg4wwVmRPM+3N9+/QBmMHxItk7OVerC JCWbg2l0N/rx624oxzP9aeebr/vp9fZ7RwcH8LPXPzroxT/D55ve4dHB7t4h /LP3Ta+/2z86/EYefGW+6FO5Ulkpv1FzMx6b3G1ad9/zP+jnGM//xFZl5b6a GdD593qfcf79w93dQzj/vf39/T/P//f4xOc/pB/dyWPv0ev3eocbz7/fO0Cf PzzaOwQjOdg7gvUH/X3w/95jM7Lu8//8/Hd+kHKdDQgJD36ypix1LocLeZyq qfyJVfBC7vV2eoc7/efPn9O6C+VKeVmkZmR0urq619/pHTWreSfpZjqBFxKZ 6pHJtZMqT+VUJbZwEtbtCPHUjHJ4KE+uP9x8GPz6VoqnvLb+BtfkSValWj7p dncGx30wtR2n8Ed38kSInR8e/JHrPgK/fn3+8+XZX2Q5MU7Cv6PCyqtJURY5 rnhzdf5eqiwrElWaInf1q5sIPj6HxAI+fWOLakZbv67yBNmBP54aq8Ofz3NT GpXJQalK/TtyKHs9UsgbnWsL+8Off1IftfwwYz2d57OqrHUW/rZZh0Cwv0zw n6en8qKYP5jgrn968eqUV+IfTlWpPMGd90jjCwjuPTbB/ccmePDYBA8/lyD8 BHId+daMJ3cRPHpsgj9+KcHapDYQfP7IBPvkKVcXZyfPBllR8srB4Mornql8 EcH+nQS/3FP6u4/N4d5jE/Secj14trvHfn18cSNvft5I8B6z6R+sJXj984N1 eLhC8CxXw0w/WOSjZYLn+a3KTPpgDoOnnNvTY1r5T20dppGHcvh8maBEDKHl Qwnu9h6b4IqnvLEqL+XJ5QPj4e6Kp1zrf2nATicPJbhXn/L+j0QcbPrs3cnF 2UNF3l8meH0PwXs8ZXclp7QMe008REe6i+Dhsg4v9VS+uvjHgwmuzSk1hvpS gg/+7KwneBeEXfvGfR9Rwz7jCKLKpMhLsGu3Qab7CX6hTPcSfNBbdxHcYVDs 5HxikolUVsuCDhNkfgiPdSHy/sPN1YebX5H4QG71PvUkbOXrgx92tgVt7b1m mYMJeo4qpYHT+Hw26q3fnr95e8fGj/y5Q47jrNQ2xwJiVFcZ90tTywHetFGM z+Lsfy3bVye4yYUfTJCCXmEX8lWRj8y4ssoXdA8m+Jj+KzlsyYH5L/CzUSj4 T6+PL7GuDwd/eXb5/vqXXwfn/3kmt/DhryfH7/7x67sPlydn1yBL8xUu2Waa +/JE5R8dkl2mt0Ji/34W9y9P5JW2TAspryfIPO7Lv/4VcvhaqxRCPNV5appu hfi/bu181ifu/VxCCT4ymX7sPe7u/2HP75D7f/u9/cPDA+r/9f/s//0un6dy nQWIp5/V+3t6X+evtTYQp4YZ7toJkeEqUyV8OZUD3xMUoavX7dY8dQGmjIS4 Ob5+c3Yz+PfMDH2vUon3J38/ewXfCaGy7IX8bssv2m72XCUUEcBXPI1t8e13 W8fX2zKxTn73H9GDl+LbZIZfASl4d+Z5hu1FkmmVvxDfggTPRvKHbgH/Qb3/ 33+AEBCffqSRR92D/P9wf/P8p788/zk43O3/6f+/x+cvf1U2mfztD2Cpf36+ xof8/9X7q1/O3735WnuQ/+9v8v/9vd5Rj/N//7B/dITz/73dvYM//f/3+Hz7 LaLXN+8+yDdn786ujy/k1YeTi/NXEv47ezc4E7wAPqHdt9uRf68AHUNW7wsB FchsYaGSLeXWq2348sfnHXokX1ut5aAYlXMsEl8XVZ5SldKR53nSvaPIgkwA eds5eXyrO/KVmg6tScfwx8tj2dvt78EGHwbHQp7darsogBPj5EzbKeKVVJaF TIAlmiamxpXWDCsoTWHtELaf4kOjncACggZ4mUl07rRMi6Sa6rzsSFgvk4nK 4bTHEkpzWJQXJc305jrtClAJ6eTKauANwBLIcjPRgRIPBKcFACMXpMf/Uu3M OGcOSxx2qblayEVRWTECVaXFFJ+4Ca0H5okFEK7sSnmyoCaNBbTVAbY1H5if dV1VQ9haXHhBcCiZA3JLeatxpbBpCWeBW8m7tsJnIvD87BksmSKfroJluGkt Dg498XRRUFAL8Ohk5cA+uqgJ40SbNRlYU7NZBsrHzUk/dAa6bSmisZTvXaTB nKRR+UIW8I6VM1uMLWDN+aRAylU5KQCxJcUU7ABWisrx8QFLW4Niqv1rm6yy JVxSgLkQnhVB2RdmaBUU3Bskg8BQapV2oTb8pahkonISdiGZGVK959jBCRZF F63mpwkA7LnGUbj6iNogrQZOOvgIObJ6pK1FcUAD/gA7aJNiZmH/LnYm7QbO 3IrtxWeqSrQKMVG3fMKRdUS+wy6zwp/c8rZjx2QKgvwJzOAWtpZQCQNpOTdu st2ptwJZEm1ukUhlEyQNIB+sCBU21uBrpQgvYqfdlNGruMZbassa4XUwPgk8 JswlEsllrufMb9D7SzaiQO5jXsxrummBNB1SBj07Op2bAl8tdVKy61CUc3Qq uY50aTVqKuFpP5EHZQxNKsBYMTyhMnVOru43YUrIOJq0+8iPCjwVi45rSUBe 1RU3/E5rF3Bpl2HLDcOdtqUCgWHFDB6aoclMaXwcQsqsUbH2RGNNdpAjr/4p 1nRovqSK1/BAf1LTWQaL/Iq15FyFTcGgctDVRKPbiTF2qEhiihlypIEQ7QP5 V46Ntz+wDgOksBeNcaXRAukV3UiirXbZy+jdJXOGVxbkYJ3a1CLzgqcisjyg cwwmUfPhJmASsGYajAGyCsYgosoGA38yVoSjQR/W66wE7L6cyHIOZ1rqGVTC W/1tykucKttaB7MUW7vboD/wc28mUWbiTivqyNHDTI/BzSnjOcrIPuV14hMG mjuUhugY4/2I6+PMgYbwLLTCE6PwCfHWi4JU0VlAIDZ48sZg8N7gBClchyxc oeECmMpTVx8Fh9O8gPctZqEFbUnStZINHMT5aCXHTKO+goMQjrvozHEymAFC gEeIJ+Za+GjhYgsCdv2RATPzYBxkQCGn444FHInJVdaBPVgkTDKgCEjtU8ql tkirhNmgJIKnC9aJBCA0Z3j0eAoRLeHz0fewYFaVfBOIPQkfZ4sObRKHJ2Sp nACkgNQNe0G6R12WkEJIep8cZ/i4xDwLdoexlSLIbWFS2j/F6GhZYkhgwRww M4JzKlZ6nTlRCJOn5takFTIliyEFEt6kxjPg8bnUYJsJeRvloUlDBn5CGtKA ohddHzTBJtBc4JjJeEjjU5UimJHYK/Ecggq8QOx+wxpDpWya3rS+93ADozx8 jXqv1ykCZt2AwWZ4/rXnUn4qQEKOmkgTHQUk6DThy9u6YGvjW1uwFNFeV/yb uBcgw9Obs+vLgTx+dypfvX93en5z/v7dQL5+fy19YdWRp+eDm+vzkw/4iBZe vj89f33+6hi/QOZ7XUJO66CSN0dSNkjAOGZe2I8+MtD4DgCIUKgazL2zTHl7 RaNows6kyDC5OLXw0HYKCBS03sSNVFR1/mEdBpy8Hl50We1Prpi/J4CeNSiu Iwiz1OxTWohkQO4p7oFNPiFRhoq9mXYO1MRUQ56T2pDI0ROkgXSBVXMLJwb2 RVSY+UbgTM1fsE8b4gUkh215rVebN+cWZTkrLJkBgYmO8AzUNQRKgPE9NhkX Qm6dm1OMHSg/nZjIwDcrNUaVbb2FyAiBYAQq7tQv4IYE3qn1mdIWRYW2DpDW P85FOBn5JN79CSLPMwzl3jMoxKk0BVBAbuLkE8gdT8BRjiG83zJAKLxeEVht 8ouWkAQmEXg2CJmtw5vDSw6xfr7qDLk8ZFCgHkxFYbQcCVvlK6r3QTkgHZ12 PGIL01oIA8U0fkVEYL3IEW6PaEM8W8oBFEZNSRlRrhiaCDtvQRjUM4ReOVUl ELGQuaEGfE6BC+Rcw/F2V/zEAEfWRmYrhNtIy+EuIe/UQqaF5kzQ7zKIUYvP KVgDVvNkvncxjsHjjcE1wmaTk4dMIQtUAMTA+SDM6wb/ClTNzCRVUbmMd4eY Q7EcbBe+maGjQ4IBIQgjeCbjVaLxNB95vBBJpswUtAJMh8z/Un7UeoYugRbg 0Z3g11zIWIh/sDxuRUKu/FB4NXQ6T2imiLLVpAWuIRDZ1IcREGirDgyBRAmB ze8jVFbA6TJua1bDUdWnxJUOgVePYyDUThYOnCPzds3OHMo13okB3sJTUR4n FjMfYVDmGh5F+AuT7qdQmQfQTJaz21iOx3dEkaWy6w0mREwf2QRHNlhRUV6c MrsbQ3HH51K20xhoUmhvB0If4OWaVDLwwvWFGhbY3lmxSzANANxTrdlIWAqn ozz+QlDzSG03RUCiKscVRI0ZcdJDMT8B3ZJiQUZ0b29yRMNhXCWfDjUm6Ztj DlMIESjFassbHq/qMh/DFT7INlEBNdlIX6Ac71m+tIWYjmTmkJzpKQEwW9Zp nb5znOpQrqUQ6A+WaNB7BLuLERZBLUQFMUL5XRRqIdgzpijyRmPTmgoa0CYk EFI/i59sB+heqz4k+hzsinAloNqUezNUHWB7yipMQxBnvPAQaCHARjUhqxJt lB5ilxZTaojC6BFoevR6RJBAosk9Q9hjsilkWovRggpD4M5gkLd4KACU0KDZ nvK8qCC6YBPQJ2FyilbEk2sjniIC/ovNtc8WYlqoXzoBgdX24b2A+ahf2G4a FtRdI4+PYD1bfNA2HRdRWHYYn0Z1loX8heQkFbuFvDV6vhQTiUqD8LbOPiWa wtULTLCtlF06nY1CzzGcAfBGJDDXUUqvLYGVz12CvKXyDgexVgQK0qwihH9V xnILhikuEetuA3IPfRNaO+WmAvXkfDap7ZX2bNyDilFhEAvAc7qr6LRvvJCC sJykVxgMbXTNDuUl7D0MkQ/lCrz5SK1chEaWEGKDO3Cx0+B9aGe4gfN4bwo6 vsU6rERPiH2QTxYRD7loB/tY1Ktu5CwgtdXskystBSTqdyi3tDU2nauyfkEs GZ1T00gr8DaFHqoxOcRwaWJcK6mI5aRCgTUGnD5pMY1QFPq3QhQSbQ1wA7hp h3CdxyAggGGoIT5hS9wfvcCjtX6bADIryhbcDoEvqPhksaweK5tCMqDzh5fk HNM0N8du4MVONCZATqn/XtYB0+uJkhECo6j/R0DVlSJuHcEyru78DQxmlhsB sO6lhFOaUOHQbEXljdCftOXyNzTOuDeELYxsrbKjAqqwAOcy7GaEcsqthQIg 83mOpYXhac4UI50aj1FLgayveVgO1Mo6QmIZa1GApC/vQCLb+Hclb4uswqb+ CKpeVxYWCisf0xv5GPs2UWhoQ/yLuOOwSTaNVcraLLd3N1RfFmGZeywhOZkG +LO7jTmqGP6GPZXQA4fTS6qS4g1dhlnNv2IQPK5PPOxKQlGbQBQEA2yZeZ/i lgZooMFPxwnk5BnCFbDf+jTwu0xTrrPcU6ZEOAXPAAT1DJM5MskAqilCOt7n g9dGTYU7kCDnmrY4dMD+8BKgVkyVNWD/VWgMNU1CTDqMxl6CCjs1IluVTNX+ RJC7I/m3IQhZQ42t8SIT9t9YroVWlgY1TVlBAIkCwqLjAblHUDmOs7gBnfNA j4CRn3CFCgGzn7YBa3vFxfbaoSzMuicKyxqPcvTy4bTOgYAfJ+DPO4PN+mdJ HnAGySbrMjmqgCNFVLMSPvWJmQ6Ic//SHGqDyIhRqHum/FVkKoLZtPzYltsD I2of5ohEMVJC2bbS7ghtBEx6+H7NX4y17ndekrcGqKq2OizLQS+W2ztyUA1D dhiy9gG6IHJpDchGTVDhjhjzQmNBPo5pnTlxEQ7jfKe2XZmBPmki+pqKhphp 7sjVrs+7C9qdtwzzmBW+4HvYpMJayTRVC1R2WeWoMlHOFYkJDTFwAYWGj1ds Dfdasc7y6zkOWzPjiTImbBHyFzJnfJ+MYA92yLNMxcChkQikfAsHf4tKR2wn 6PeN4cR1ALOdFXlid6ERH2YN34/DaR4NB+tWTw1q49e2sGzndqGnDDoaUgUi 8Jy2G0+Yqt8IAUzBogmdbrGEyPFHMGOdMTRxGMa3vYQCcpTlotUtXAnQjZpM GHjb8mOlBFqtcsItxHO9lfCwXXkPpUZzW3uQ5EcraCGijhAr8gCc1vg+GRk6 8CeAOm3tL2QQOlZ+FE3WQG1qj2rDWxLhOoRm5HKJwIr1BbhNYJSIwYOKcL4T 62BlK0rikALxcTWeRLHd+Ik5NzmnMyiaokslEZGldlGkDJwaSLnfYAa0Im4E cbsG6j9qojN+jVFLC0sItlS0Xv1pho1cKqB8qg/hPIIqOM3EBhNYxawUhHHm hAaLjdtv3h3jJ86V2AZpVqQqTAOlT2aYRQz92kcMXtewJWo/DApGCE1DoTq4 cs+KlBHG7HS8mCECQot6gvX8LdxcMLa5flMzRq5Dx4TlDcbiwADUgzjogn9H VcaRJTMKikeCewd8dKG8i6tNNMlZuVSDOYNNyTCcJtPx1y0o2NbiIygmE8cZ 5tjSr1xR9d8a5fqWHoTwDQeD/aDSLc8++O4NVrwqVGWWhnQTMzQlt+ozNa+n 975QXJWH6UByKXA2PVzwYIz6FS2AvdS83/INxo1N9m1u7uDAMamthvdXvqnb OuOSACyOqbHjGK4Zfclgjzmu2RdLSlwqcfxVh8Muz1FKM9UeoNwF9e+RuIwv NSw5kDd+LJGDN4aQJsIg2T/hmyLsxO1eYjTgD3yBd1MsKnGcrTcMQ8MVCh+e DGQG37kcVZbmVa0LJ74Ga5rq38u62PTB1QcAsmtQxYRGXF3R9iR/Q8X/EoBG LJjgOTUe6EdKUTgmOZYqsqOuPB9xYqd2CrhoPRnAJABV+29VOqZeHoOUqDrl mbMAJIoZR4dFI3+eYX6A/Rq5xdPmqfF3C/28Gty10m67IyIrJDBMeiRDQNvZ 8vdfUCjmCpAfIRIol8PGTaTeDnkar/qBm5Qe6ddbLPlIh8dt7MuYLrD5ifvW qXHzu3zlwt9/wtfjnn7h0Tj+gqgD83JmWmXgppqHRTzAgBwy9riyifoiHttE t/U0nCW136PXfOpfOUSE3sEwN/ieH/uv3kxS4XTr2zNFlTGQ4zui0hYLKBMW z+hKQeTcEU4Iu0DwY9hb0DWcoh6w+RFLSv8rlWzBbfv6b1BGEqoAOVhEijxU WPgrn2gMwFVQ7xCUhOCZG1FxnqNlQwyGOFG3mLTqdhAd8h3sM4aLhj4rDSn4 40RniKS5GMabdDk7pSaUx6mXSKAzJlWmINIam1RTR1GbI9xQZU0I1zH56Caq 4KZkmKeERdFYYunmqr9AmbMJiXhbnKCet1pus8pSBFvTc4OTqXx+pr+x10e3 T1xzrQIb/WCqC989o3ZduKjne3XcODDlwk+DBHWzeeXL9uYT5SsalC7iMEz5 /E0aFHpsPcXSX8NsCuzWETPo79T9VWHQ9DGScIqf8fWMYP0zasmjwqS8pHPU BaxvruSIMd7rALfmqOO3qUvxOY7wLc0g8XbfCks6FcHaKXT5moRuI/p4zr9g 7uANSoF4ryWJajYFYIleeumbqNWsHvfSJaqdtMj5AFLIPindLKWrVtJNyGYQ DFJ6bzULal4Df00w8kzy9ZP6voQPgz4TciCeFIYw4c2S18RmSlfikFHcBbv7 dMFp7ovEIahB37IDDPVqtuKs6sqV8ExFxI/dMFxb7lPs+FuvSxHLuOj6BI4P wuVQKowsBi1fnaKtNNY/XDSTrbhO5xjdwJGVu0QYFan0ci0+VssAiugqTbnv gEYAxz3WuHw2oQl6S8To0gvkNZ7FCQ7EtSgdvpqpyvarrV8H4HZOTiBgCqWA aBTBoaNyfgOdYkrMeTiVKM6uUSwGkF+AB+OIxFFAj1gEPwerDA1GP34cFunK LQMCL8+7dBNm41V01FS4fWH1raHpLR85Xmq+5V/EcMKf/YYr6YwBEMWiO8FP EG+AssU0yHnQMCHDGwzuwLubGUvX1kObyaHj+jf41yOQQ8CdeHUBXkg1mFhG IZ4vHNEW9Q1KHnOAIdIVSALXnhgeFfZXsd+IRwhnXIHQGBfDiryaDrVt7oeG 2tj/3+MIPbfXrhQS/v9U0Fyo85n2CQZvvKhlA4UnnaaKo5Qd7mg0zfOogdoG 1OGSWJgQBqYKG24NtLYKB9xc00NzEGvMYUX2ZqDBSlisU8HSkGxR32EpAs4P r2Btup6bdb+TwVeXet0AHsMd1Mg7CCus3D/5H/ae/TltJOmfrb9ivmyq1t7y AwlsY3uTOiGErS+8VhJxvLdbHAZic8HgRZDEe3v/+3X3PDQSApxAnLo6s5U1 zKOnp2emZ6anH6QLx/mvroUaife7xApOHar5TKM3Ylxi/eT+YAgdejy+xzdp cTRUu4B6j9TZ3ArKp5pbtF7PyIRjfNfHRRYZtB8oIWOkNJ6FmQZuYkR3kmHA yoMp34txQZXxm3FnSKub1t7ko5x2/FgALGfG1XmhfiwEoCRp4ZOwm+GQxndj dWdHyx+u29ADBiO2EVXlhvOT4UNs6lRvsEvb9+16eEXjb+6zkuvYrcBl4YXL mn7jHB0oeIHUii2ziu+6rFFhzgXaYu9iOd/FEjos1JHVAECpBv1234VuPWRN 1695YQjQSlfMbjYBuI2uiKr2JVDTfee4zZBdXrh1o4HgLz3AJwhtrODV2aXv hV79nACiIq7vnV+E7KJRLbs+aeseQOtUkTVtP/TcwAA83nrlZKde2AGg/YJd euFFoxUq5LFzdv2KvfHq5V3megTIfdf03QD6bwBsrwYYu5Dp1Z1qq0yKwCWA UG+EQCfoGeAZNog0sqyEDsgAfKPm+kC/emiXvKoHTaLmcMUL69AE6RfbHHOn VbWhEy2/2QhclN8gCQEIENz3gjfMDgxB2F9atgIE1AUYNbvu0EClBhK7y64a Ldw1oN/VMhYwZAEklMvKbsV1Qu8tDC+UhGaCVs0V9A5CIlC1yuquA/ja/hUL XP+t5yAdDN9t2h6QH3WkfR+hNOqct1j7OHgwS9y3OAda9Sr21nd/aUF/MmYC wrDPYbYhMbVxNy49aBxHKD34u1QFMuLBv4Jp1GA1+4orZl+J6QFoKs3t5KyA SRHPTrvUQBqUAB+P0AJEkCA4RGW7Zp+7wa6hJgE1LZTJd1nQdB0Pv0A+TD0Y 6yqnCqyiX1o4ipAggDAbhhO7hvNQDBmuQZxrdTlHoO30utyO207NP5wX1UaA kw0aCW1GGMPfkoulfbcO9KLlZDtOy4elhSWwBmATtGCxeXUaFAP7S6vZ88ty PRGdWcX2qi1/bo5Byw0gIYKkuaYGRE6yYGeX5gDzKtCUcyFGjyVW7RW7gKEo uVDMLr/1kPPwdgxYC4EnaNIQEAQdibGRrSn0j8pnKPCj7j8WueBqUjbdRrmE NaT9HxKvkOHW4bAjdrkIZ7DYGXuwsQ7H97A5i9NQrEep2bcJLT2xWd6Q/Uc0 NeAOwsVks0jtP/xqJ27ceGVAYQLJpG/xisGkP1p5JxlMjeRewPdAZbCDikkJ 4aZmCqoei6X4UFrESZHsdNoRT07x0Ugp88qTIxdDAEXoKhR13mPXEGNV+04W Jv0+emPCHPHGQp47pLEot0DhOoNwQPjYfxBvVnB4j8QxLVY2JhUeBEUwolsS pNDBTr720xn+hToOvIDz/EiIrdj9mG5ApIpDmnzU0Rl/dCDrRtzXgUhCCfJn pCfVlxoDGgF+hMMavlBx0Ndw93jPYMvvcGWiDs0C0gp/TbDSBtUPDwCfAOCe T0ee17xVupVq5kOJ0T5Tto2JMeZn39g0jOtPTrOVPbPsjGO97ChxalS6eouP SbEZBTckl41U46cwgrKd1JHemT8972cTQH+IFZewW9TpmQoqyyMXLCoYzF2u LALXGbm1IwuS2/uZsr8QD4Uk3B2SvqBU6IRjNoJI79JA3Eds0kGfZomhzIsW XONoqMiGF29Zkeg6itX1WR2rUSS0RBYDFsoR2iNmTMszvM3CTF92AKb6aav+ 3Uca76MZCmoooTxAVwhBmRlnt6RHwG0q8WjcR720yXgE+HPjPzjpA5cbDLmQ M6GbkdBF3ZW8UJqQdJBsE6W+Oxx84JzTIFVHKEecKOL2EwmtVlgwfaE7dT6C 4/RHfo6X0/kIupaxdpMrd652F+4NwlrULgWNKpwzqlf6GfmMZoAYfDZ9gOn8 D7JT/fTjfrwI0qs/3meI8feH2A7SNcUMCIKwmlKSInn5OtOb6/6oI7LPlVRu H+7xSkcvWrF+t8SPcFC1xWyVNrYJO5LEjXGhpVnjPT2iiHePuD16JI5QnvmA ogx8XaO3X7iRkSxBM3PKRE1YLXGZPK32675xNwaQe13A4AOJMO76oxkQrH8X 7e0h16ZrczQb8DdcZd0v7EVEZ0kNDw2PqUgf+Mf4AaptSxt3pXgsat/1JzuM W21PjAgv60P+qjHiuuv4rIwmc7EYLja2eRHbpMizxuC9MUKj+IjbZl4InfQO akzcD2GLIH0pqoPTlFtWXI0fxr2HUV+uaNz/rh9UQ1wTKEaAVgieRgTDFY0D oH9o8/xHfAoj7UBYjRE33o2Y0ElBlZdoR4nPoLH/R2zYRaf7oT8hhvczVxpB M2+YJSE6PhyPXu8yE85lk8GQ/I7gAYVn7KJvjmggrbnewgwSMtwFTFZJVMQb USzNwPmjjy/JMQzN5lW5F1APahOdFXXwOXYyxtdoZDbkREKJYwypCU62mMjk +c5ED40cEzhUkB6X3qImQ4+UBoohgEtxEWcKn6RCqDTg7sHhTdrKZPi1MLL9 WsyLMb+335rnz2Y+5P/pWzl+FJ8V/h/N/KGp/L/lMd3MH5nP/p+e5CP8Pz7G 8aN18njHj7nDg1xxoePH2L3jIu+OgztU6Od6k8zw8Nb+Cs58n/f7w/dGyavb /hX/DUWU+0dUKN0foweaQWe4PzaqXon8RHbvZ/v40Kf7bAxapbLnB69ebjvN Vhu+7rCX282qHaJIjH4vcSaZQpqQ1X1Iwldsm3xJVss7bC+c9j9PX+U+S4eH bG8MZahbO1n1DN7zU1UIIUEplGQBuIakzF6gg+F0QUe5ncldwqelIamAqbLD Bz+pjhhb292elnUG32v2G4AKNODVY9qdpimVASiRn4aWdJeZ0QHNg+bW33DS DPB08XJbDNrO2W/GVm/MfhOtvRzELcDfStU+B1pSK6LoqP+8YWV/Equf5vPm 21jB/61DYPbK/+dhAcoXDgvHz/z/KT4p/s852jfdBJIuyyvINBDUOFYKiSZd oVWuafgbXj0I7Wr11cEtXOwO5HAcQOED2lNSQDCOWCSFsKRpN4XbVGSEjUa1 7TcaYQoQZQADgh1BFdk5wO0FAEt2RoDJSRdp6cX9MGSJV82LRtioGwxqlePG DxzNeIEjgvzqFV6HqGXnwoa2gW/vwYl/9hm2uT3D9gUygNbOAf9K5XY6E8Nx FmXedLtGtbwod9gz8EGjuSgfhQP3uKWWW7WFhcbX/+zN7qgYbklLiuFFESlY GXZuIsMh3vxqr1y16+ct4Ppth+1d4oVy765z34328hZsCYBCf3Qzvd2b9Elz a+/9GK5Ce+/hStXfk6LZvYYpnlTc4BXb82Ab4RNkJ/HjQNvgU+mp3X4/aFUq 3js3ONW+sv2A7XcZHCaM/e7++BT3YcfBbcYR28zLbYkFNNBlL3/a70L9RNF0 gQAJYg8HqJVOYhnyOWcYgChQMkZspw0pO4aOZyqfMBf9oyysIPrzA4Mfwinb PWoAcosL2sShMeGmHtsM7D0MmGfwqZtICmq2H5bs8rnreV4ipwxbdVlLMepu eOnhc5Ge2Ay8Rv2QUprB3jEm6csJpTCQp8UCJB3KMernGBIf7BuPryeRxhTu szqFIGYEd53JtNTp3fQhRaCJ6fRNwxLT6v3ppwHpOApEqS0UWBwaoqMcps2p QUlxiiH6BH2jrn1vZv4VH+L+nLrfNv7ro+P/Fnj81+f4v0/y0cf/O8d/gPGH /3j8h9xx/vn89xQfcf5LzYCniv8gwqZ+ZfyHe6q9RvwHCeB/Pf6DGH1BjieO /5w7Mg/zcv0Xcrk8xX/JPa//J/mo+M+pObDR+M/xPRBLi0X/+PjP4hyoxX+W Kd8y/rORHU1rYXxn7fPTkpB4j2n3qwM4r9nuV4dlXicC8zrBlteJq7xOCOV1 oiWvExh5nRjI64Q7Xiey8TpBjNeJV7xOaOJ1ohCvF3B4nejC6wQSXidm8Drh gdeJBLxO0N+14vuuE8t3nbC960ToXScY7zpxd9cJsbvGdnawdO9fFgN3SaME FO4Unwd3M+g7nAE+4JUFzjx0XJFxLe13bafacN4w+n+7YuWO2oXaxZ/G8ji0 C4LK4h/YL/6imsD8xZei/HIivgCP/Yv9Rgpd8x8qYMmSefmlIL9I+GZxFRDZ nJWTXyQ0S0KDabYciCWbs453jMdHyM0MfZtNnvmeWYWlTWUGsc2KUas6ON+R hTNuYbzWRXPtIBE/tTmhA/Oa8VMJpMmDnD4meqrJKxyxLwmRCsV5jNQ4Hqo6 q3/vq87zJ+OTuPtJkcaGJQCr5H+F3LF8/zVzBYr/WDCf33+f5DN3/1dzYLkE IHWn/zIJgMfv7JEUBeDNXzy3sNt+BxUiySncfkoOIB/CLmJBQJwUiwJ+lgKA 11qaFGy81jhTXPl7D8N3+9DYC7nJt2qDVviS9Z98/0H5n3V8bD6//zzFRx9/ 0p8LNt/G8vifqP9jKfnv0fEx6v/kjgvP/P8pPor/J+bAN5T+Ong5J4cB4v6F hnGK+6OFymxEGCnmLzl4J7pLsvTOJJUQb16v6TROjbRl6ml85xPeSlR5xOx+ 0j9FJ/6j/j6j3+NoesqCLpzVu7d/n+R22cT8fVdcHGLse7ukwdCly6CebIi7 P+MhMlFpZTK7nwrbRvSXGX1AnyPQyabfcLYTuO4g9jG6/K6JdgBQemvYm2xN zF32qnmJ5tvn7WbJDtytv7HquNNjzfEn2D9rnVEHQ4E1Sx2oTnUIF+zHK3VD 3YJK8job0UUWfQUIHIytaAoNQYW/Y2s/qNaajv87VAz6qAQ16fOaxlZlOItu 217Z6XRv+1sctIzN18U07s2BHsuMLS54aFPHgksqLmQRBJPTM/o0mKIP5JsU OXAQfoySxMA0QQlJCpIwEAVSBNBv2FD4kq6BfGS1O3maANTCebOsek/we1Ic H6UaUZfGrYwm0LxMc1aMtmXZzdmVZHOyVh+auxt/pPI/5Ih+Dnkeoqgp2iV3 QS9gDFP4xrfqLdHgpD/sUCi3R8ALEN5ChPq9G7JgBEpFW9kQfBchfFmOC2PB RTLRhwXLLDFHvHrohH6VT5M0SJnpOTUO1e9PZxOSA1DH7ru7bDjBjD55H9aW K5b53pz86z467xeK8xs/Aaze/6X9Rx6Kkv5v/ujZ/uNJPun9X86BFbc/8yB3 /LUngICaiD2I85ZxF12548cXO7W7c4STeztPI7eH1MIsImuSB258ktjrM3d6 2ugDDUhe39mTOzZva0djMoHre7bkMSjG65Pl3Xa9aO6w+pg1O+jrb5cVr9Hw vzPtoBljNB3fs2seuI0Y/FBsgYp/IYsGEMS1rjW2JZprhY6f+51xxu2MphNg XzcspyFQ6sx6zBdhrE6OgOSSs3GWvQyyOQfZ1NAq+eU2AlwGwZqDYCFuYs8P MWzanXDM5XNbdjRAFdw8Ig7PSR83u41w823/ncv+Yvx7+A5tZRZjkZ/DIo9Y 8I1KjLjWarq5wM+1fa9MzdH3Uin+7paWNB3wwRENTTvTeHhWbzNiPguxMOzE 3VMpx+ZBKDpdVInujT+NhG9NKo8OKbSjrT6hB6kj7CQXxxtTAPfjxQHd4osD OjWxYHU4txQsaMLQOVx8iEXclq2Fyw66PBmIWAJq1CtepUHeMjvCjJ1emA4M 8xRBAUGtDIKacCiYRlPK/IES2mG9Ymxd9//YMq+xNbvHfY3GJBKeDBINLx60 8iPOAdjj/97tP7n/C+666TaWy3/N4wK3/8wfweWfbEHh/v+8/z/NZ27/F3Ng oxIA80A7LIjtPo57Nq//lRT78gqa0Fcl4BpMXneBqaKj2UmUeJFN3JNZ7vMJ HDpx6s0XqDk+gwIZOUFAOYWMnCblFOdzLl3KceZznArlmBkNNTkKZkZL5xwH M6Ophshy4l6L1+fDk3audvEn5F7nEp0W+cf59rGWb2Y/2y75pAEWi+3DGCCq /qwJ0Mzl2xZC5ADNuXyzyLuI+Ti31m4wb3GacIDrk8QsHHOaEMBNkOTIikli mhvA8PiofSIAmrlN0PDEVDQEgHODJpUieL45Ny0ty1Q9NHHQpfLEgjUei3/4 Ai8k5roQUlRTq1tJdJJLW4k0kutaSU6Si1oJKVIrmqdX3PRyVqKL1FpW8p70 QibNhhxT5uNmMseMc6wvHrbU4BFAKwZY2AjAfAywuBGABQXwK9ZSFsBDBdDa DMAjBbCwGYDHCmBxMwCLEuDXcMwsgCcSoLUZgKaa8oUNAVQrpbghgHKlfBXH zAIoV4q1KYBypRQ2BVCulOKmAIqVgiTcDECxUqyNARQrpbAxgGKlFDcF0OIr hUi4GYB8pVibA8hXSmFzAPlKKW4OIK0UTsLNAKSVYm0QIK2UwgYB0koprgeQ nl8ylRu1wxmqCebU6awrzgKJbDPOLmZkWyq7l1U7H2fL2qTsGVDkg0X3wkYQ ejXXF3X5uTEJW5YQ5NHPjjLLlFmFuSxLZhXnsvIyy5nLchqtepg6S8o89G7e CpLnSZl3aYfORepMiXluzW979dCty3MlvaUCMfCZLJswiXcyTpfDBF3itzKv mSSL/oqWpEqcU00drOOc9Nk6zqk0UySJs/j92+JDLqScTS62z+6eLpVERNK9 00Xqic7pEvFE33RBd6Jruuw50TNNyJi6H+gyYz5iGTmm6LHMqhdNalclSJk8 n7XmcSLDPKEzGnLQUiIjXyzIjMNExuHxkczIJ0GZh5a4nJiJDCtP5zba6WK0 YpE9YpVKDnmylUou+W+I86WBeFS6mAZCydpE4cnVUi1FMi62DytBGhWS5vNk K53sldOoyHeAFCriSSCNCia7XiUDFbMdlq7mUTHbfn2OKkLWPY8KcFF/jiqY XPHnqEKwG75aOrG6Ohp3cENM/J7SSneacAYkXQ9YXZ0eK80wOkfCgIFrgmCu zPzN2LrrTrbuzcNdhpo08K97Av/gb24JVJZbBja3DKy5DKy5DKy5EKy5Aqy1 DKy1EKy1Amx+Gdj8QrD5BFhSiFFUjQajGx71ubfLPg4m0xnwTBm9ZzBitl9j E8E79dYRimw8GN3ktqHQzhwG/Zt4HKxFKPwxg19rIfDLrLcKgcISBPrkv3Yt DBrd6SoMigsxMDc1CuYKFMwlKGxkFFYhcLgEgc2MwioMThZiYG1qFKwVKFhL UNjIKKxC4GgJApsZhVUYmIv5QX5Tw5BfgUN+CQobGYZVCBwvQWAzw7ACAzPJ D8qDiFQwWhHdk2J08C1MhGDXLb54cdlcK5os24ULcTtC0+ORzUDp4fVjWznk t9Dxxz5vqgmnNEUnjN2ygG4IHSu0oUJMs0k3RTMzr59UqJkERGhhvlmtGXxG 7c+3Mzc2yXYq3rua+39Kh+F60u984IFJIt6c8JWhqVCJE1qqpgwvGcLfA9K3 PfB6Q0EqB6N+jocJvNNDJgxdpS5uapg0Ld7MMcLv3ewptwSwnGYrISfZKumX kMdYecHVxwEy25XxpA2338UA+YYtbYTUW/P3fqj/Rh/97f+7+f86PBL6H0dH lkn2H/B51v94is8PLGsGPJX/L2n2gRYUX+b7S+ipdBY6//5CV2AS3uNcgf1G vsC0asIpGPnY/q/yB0aj39m8za/+WaH/dZgvKP2vgmnh+s+b1vP6f5KP0v/q rLb51Xw/P07rS+iIkzkVdww16NLRiW/Ii1W+7ISRr52y732BYYmiVf69jJ9U 7NmAx0z11RlnpY8PqIknUmBU6EwmKT1uBX671ii7LHfNHy2hPJ1qye+MLqrx ftELmliwgkRT0vd0Dc/Xa5gEuo7RsYaL6wRvHb0OtRLM7jFurMQ/4cqiFMbF TV7cvkZpebpkq15WJU0BuDXimT3AJ5pOZtxTxhxKV0FcU7QR8KDrVHQbVX1n SDK0e1Jnz4j7qHBkACpuK0ieoxMDUG+T82W2baKziby5Q2Tq33BTqlR1Da1f k/VyVO/X/mS8pI6TqGOdUB2nM+HPXQsqvU1WKlKlxsf+5P1w/Cmjnug1HcRL g2nqLQbnhB28EdCOCRgkqlN0KekchWZdXP6IykNiujwuNlxrsStuw8CFhWl8 aFn3Hu5d/zIY3UjbUzYSND41z+LEP4GAiYQuUieRMhZdTyTed3qnVk5LGEz+ SBR4P0j+nt7O7q4TKRSR7fDM+Ddh2p6eqWO73qkMHmEgvffiRQ43hyyewEdG sQ3zVI0SpKnbkpoqjXoInEHQHWYXEr5Wa4lL0sGC8eLVbFHN5NXs4eBmRF7r K53ZcPooEI6cbxwEeWYjW8ys2vPVL+W64NXp0irv6I9pvinqF3h962jvejA9 yFv4h7kyHja7AJ4/TL0XcABlAeAwCwD1xhaiEJ9ilM4BqMZTntYIhmtEGvL3 6LJgXHPVSvHKwmqlwc1BFXbAIdKtN+iMsrsbiFpFXkuwN3TVI6xBs6v5otoJ r+Y3ahjaS9TJrlKRU4MzrMd261dZzfyiap6sZvFqGptfOJnmgLyTQPIE5K0Q ZSnLGvaWvLzDgP4Tzl9Qny1lR7MRueiCpdeGvULnSHjqR4YgGNZ72iv+Ra6n YjZjnprFMz3tM+ciMZTU7z9Tv9+nfk9Sv6PU7+vU72Hqdy/1+z71+1Pqdzf1 u5P6fcd//5v6T+xQkGo1S0RfdvKtjxkpzhdL1B4rUOPitKXStNycMC1bELW6 GVFlmeTucYK7LCGYEhpNs9ual979p71j7W3cRn5OfwUR4Lp2sQ9Lsr05Fyiq xM7WreM1InfRAw4wZFtJ3LUtQ1KyCYr+9+MMSYmUKFvOJs4eyim2kSnOcIaP 4YgcDvVyjfzr4B2eN+K3f4zZsIFj+XvIOhoDxhZR7YprlFXYKYqfL74gfbF4 ttIXruBOUZet7z6ijSkBhrxF9IrLszt4KQqtKbsgd7FstomLszb/7thDXMTz /GSLtK1q0uo5KApZLLEgY7FEqQQxJ+8rJOBtkbK9j5QFHkrEVMssyKmUKe3F 99nE9z1hoS2Ku/E85oUU85ASx7/K8vJ79q9IvzDHFkuoXEBLU4BkChYoV2e9 vZ1yj46nh722rWQGKLZomVJGsJE4J5JnA5ypXX8dJ0jiMZxYDQ0r3z9F5SCp R9eQ1VT46kag+RSTXt5rgbcTfMtfVugNlrq7V+zJ48EpDBmoA3jUDJoJpO8o 6qTCmNGTr0odBwzR9Wst3cpclw4XwA8eO1ig9EnlrnAiD5axtBeYbSC+iolY 0qGlZ5/EaXh+OSBf2brBoy25SOzAzrh9dV8nEmTyzUPyFymHLONk4seryYT+ vQvBxFkGk0lNznh0LM82/2pIptuxHLW2Q/87jo4JZan+45YC/4YostSEqjXq X2Fmfkn3iLU18UwVIU2Bz1QRT2IDp71kk6AZqnaSQ/US+zC9ZF8LPes52to5 UM95+sr5yu+HtM/MUyterpgD9RnnMH2m+qdN1lu09XKg3vJ01aJZ3BBp7j87 sms1YHt/8Qvu/zYaLYgNxvd/HbgLGPZ/zf1PB4Fs/zfeuf+7X9SPLDfb/3Xj OFjRmSzS7/h6yo4v/sIQPgzrgVmmc4glKWkzjDl0j5/zb+GKdQKeGW+vl+F0 Se7ZDx92UuDxvqPu5uAFrK+UfQh3DIGQ3rHrzOER3OdoYi3jfRysNkHkRw91 aTs5o+AnNL+kgrxvXQVh2z9X4F8OOP7bpfH/rHa7nd3/5kD8H8du22b8HwLS 8f8SgX91YX6PUREds/i9E2icpMOWT5jz62sWT1TsJ8ZkSk3l2Y2gnEYiY6j1 746mR5B+9DMdr3GQ7jwdSS/0Tg0so5TNC6+SLxC7Nb+NJeUZRcFVkFB2mEtF 4T3bxlTercPNETJxC7EFCxiw019IhO18nsjDkDFxsSq9JFqsr/n1Sx1QgfFs sTg6/u/aHfX+INMwTMgyxI/6O35HU+NtwzpOYyrKwRSxjZSIh1ClyyMl/Cmw mWGkt3mKJYQ4w2DueWp+fmLzLFytaM6fRdbV6lbNx08Zs1BPsJP53VGOUOLP PseYGjDP5TQcLBCGMHgbaD/aVf68XW3QeiZgONfq6a0vUMmQJMffEy4aCdX9 mD+tD/hRZ/5CtCjyyn2lxlRst1B0iBEHuQYhBHmkTKLjE7WwIeDhNSfIC6Z8 LtZXUGxAWyncCEaUwp9u/OPYf67Arxx2xH9ttN6L+P8WzQbx/53WexP/7SCQ 6v9nCfyq5hZXQ+YDwPKorLrQrzzeZSzFu4xRvX0jwS5jqg2zExf0RYVwkfG3 FC4S256q2hf0/7Uddv8Hfv+1G8z/12mb8X8ISMc/9oGq/r+kyujPuQvL/r/g FcfXuXf6AtO80pch+6X1Bd562S+wcL6I4uTNILgLlqQbxLNosaEWVO6Qe4kT oIx7Dh65OS/N80F30h9+cgf9LiEN5unLHPfAcgUHJznnyP3Qw7UsdI2FFV+e ET1j7fX8zRJLmi8El3VlL4iS8HofLnoQJ8RG97PgGr0FORXr4pTW5WZDFWUB 8bLn9S4/9brEQQc0ahRHd7T5BKMFab2bxZVG2O7HC7c/JC3ma8jWHzHra9Kc LtQLDSG/O2ICY93whcpREK0WMVig8Wti67BG41M3xcJ6klbD+bY/RdXieogK N4RiBXEPOwXRShEreMNeLeeTBb8QVXJBAz9WR/ZjBbSODW5YEgZ6YmkIbkAm mVoy9Tu2rfrJWorX6xwru9NU89gdp5QHKKSMgZj3HImHmLJgFVg4kRL8TcfO F7+bRSfnJjy7UT2Jp7dXqsOvIgRnVJFDqWD8FfH+rGRj/oP0tc51UKXBn8QL VnME/oiklA/Cn8SLrGgiHgXv1T2TVY1Fe21IlcG+KouPYgVbp7S8HUpLyehd uINBqrO8FXyGy5qr+Zte5wDuAA5h4WAE3IEfUTQZt70NuYrCUkTVaCwPNVCD kCbqK4tOXN7t9A3ysE0ZkRwFi5A2806GK+uqUMgRsAk5QQJO9DgCjtCGzeTm EQQGI6oVrXauGXJasa3D9BDTzjU+w+wKRdzYQ5/Ge+vTeLs+hddLECqvVJcb 0Gjt3OGDpqLQHEWj+Rs799vK/W4ov/dRZgqbZXLEUMV5OWKQQzkzcWi+U7ZU vhUVGm9Xw7FeDcdlajhXXQSfxQuJH4LP4kWJMo6rK2OMgkTt1C63T4sqN2cR eb/0z8ek5tjkjfCeH96upvSzMbxix3qSkOkmeOhT4/YeFqhCxdryo8h/KCge mTQ/cFCNtKIXBW2Va7i3V7jrN5Frce+wzJdke1FD7/QhCYrqUSHVUEgpfOhp KVxduH/Q2aKWMvjTTyRfozJ3MBcsgoLK4lS8LVQUxjRkBpcfJtTM9ghXmjsw YTnDlzWrON3lswgHbkLzTW+T3JHCs9PJmXv2iwu3uJPsHM67H/gst4iRAlaZ 7CN4Ojn9/fy8d4mI6ekfGY059GkQ+93eqDfs4idEenBHd05EhOnnksgzDVuA lwVxRzBdjy/7Z2M6YTfUs4gdmLyp/LMEVmHgyKScQtspYO4N9J9iBFCiw4/u 2VnP81LzQyHqz9+h96IgOgwFmyqVy57b5XTs3VQwSMnH9VIdjpQMtYMEN041 MixFVKHqrTGGD1ilErvuOBOYnwEVuWv++kGES/kC96hc46IaJe5zq5tcgQ2n VCAQPBv0sa1Z/Z0tF9CmnJMaJ7jJGpVOC7PPwbxAJjXGbMUY44RAljzGhTuk GvaS15W4qEGUvA5JSeFxfZcdweYTKvWOU0GsXnLnguD4qdVik6Ga2NQlOrpE W5do6RIbmsR/a9JONGnvNWltTZpOGJ0sOlG0kuTSPgfROliyxL95pcKcyhug wrxK5MiCJBdaUPSZO3CGHYdU9dfwkU537AHUdzrPKufKhP8/zKWDLm3+Oduz ypH0tCS9XSQ9HckNJ3nq1jaC5Ebh8tRlE/Xo5iFezHIkNasRGuqw+iHIq9Th Tb2Mesk6iaYA+BooFiC+E0oLKPly0NVPaQHetgIKHxhZAWkfYyuBL7t6+v8P uPbL11Cfq4wd+39w+4dY/2/ZTVz/hyshzfr/ASBd/+d94InvfdoZAQQM5k20 gJkffH7xPkT85sztAoz/M+p50j6A+K2zD9I4Eb8PBqRWuwsXc/JDHaLi1mXj IV5cg8/HMqR2Of5vzia6H0ErzcPbaRqNsA0r2sBOARl2/QUWB4rMsDg4dhly fAO7kzcyPkW+8ZdXKQVcitEiw8YlrfIkyIqmyJCQlsxumMRaLE7LPEnU40v3 QwMvAzj2uRvQc80Au/w/nJa4/9ey2nYD7/+zjP/HQSDV/2kf2OEAojr1VXYB ZDMAd0oTqyiqiv/Uu/T6H4eSks9SCkkX7q8QujyXPrnoD2mylao3mtz3kMJL V7QBAwYMGDBgwIABAwYMGDBgwIABAwYMGDBgwIABAwYMGDBgwIABAwYMGDBg wMATwf8AqJgEAwBAAQA= --0-1205161142-933883353=:21680-- From kramer@pa.dec.com Mon Aug 9 13:28:23 1999 Return-Path: Received: from tudedv.et.tudelft.nl by it.et.tudelft.nl (4.1/BB-2.0) id AA23171; Mon, 9 Aug 99 13:28:23 +0200 Received: from ns2.tudelft.nl by ITS.TUDelft.NL (PMDF V5.1-10 #21918) with ESMTP id <01JEKCV2XFY295NV7L@ITS.TUDelft.NL> for erik@duteinh.et.tudelft.nl; Mon, 9 Aug 1999 13:28:17 +0200 Received: from mail2.digital.com by mailhost1.tudelft.nl (PMDF V5.1-12 #D3520) with ESMTP id <0FG5000I6MV26O@mailhost1.tudelft.nl> for J.A.K.Mouw@its.tudelft.nl; Sun, 08 Aug 1999 18:23:27 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.2/WV2.0g) with SMTP id JAA17888; Sun, 08 Aug 1999 09:15:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rex.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA13308; Sun, 08 Aug 1999 09:15:52 -0700 Received: by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id JAA15571; Sun, 08 Aug 1999 09:11:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id JAA15548; Sun, 08 Aug 1999 09:10:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail2.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA01248; Sun, 08 Aug 1999 09:10:59 -0700 Received: from hyowon.cc.pusan.ac.kr (hyowon.cc.pusan.ac.kr [164.125.9.3]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.2/WV2.0g) with ESMTP id JAA06442 for ; Sun, 08 Aug 1999 09:10:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: from iami2 ([164.125.68.103]) by hyowon.cc.pusan.ac.kr (8.8.8H1/8.8.8) with SMTP id BAA02082 for ; Mon, 09 Aug 1999 01:01:09 +0900 (KST) Date: Mon, 09 Aug 1999 01:01:33 +0900 From: "\"?A@; Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 4.72.3612.1700 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_00B9_01BEE202.B8EBDDB0" Precedence: bulk X-Msmail-Priority: Normal X-Mimeole: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.3612.1700 X-Priority: 3 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_00B9_01BEE202.B8EBDDB0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="euc-kr" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 SSBoYXZlIGEgQlJVVFVTIGJvYXJkLi4NCg0KYW5kDQoNCkkgdXNlIExhbiBDYXJkIHVzaW5nIFBD TUNJQSBJbnRlcmZhY2UuLg0KDQpzbywgSSB3YW50IHRvIGtub3cgd2hlcmUgc2FtcGxlIGNvZGUg aXMuDQoNCmlmIGFueW9uZSBoYXMgYSBzYW1wbGUgY29kZSBvciBET0NzLA0KDQpwbGVhc2Ugc2Vu ZCBtZSBtYWlsLi4NCg0KZS1tYWlsIGlzIGVzb2tAaHlvd29uLmNjLnB1c2FuLmFjLmtyDQoNClBs ZWFzZSBpbiBBZHZhbmNlcy4uDQo= ------=_NextPart_000_00B9_01BEE202.B8EBDDB0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="euc-kr" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 PCFET0NUWVBFIEhUTUwgUFVCTElDICItLy9XM0MvL0RURCBXMyBIVE1MLy9FTiI+DQo8SFRNTD4N CjxIRUFEPg0KDQo8TUVUQSBjb250ZW50PSJ0ZXh0L2h0bWw7IGNoYXJzZXQ9a3NfY181NjAxLTE5 ODciIGh0dHAtZXF1aXY9Q29udGVudC1UeXBlPg0KPE1FVEEgY29udGVudD0nIk1TSFRNTCA0Ljcy LjM2MTIuMTcwNiInIG5hbWU9R0VORVJBVE9SPg0KPC9IRUFEPg0KPEJPRFkgYmdDb2xvcj0jZmZm ZmZmPg0KPERJVj48Rk9OVCBzaXplPTI+SSBoYXZlIGEgQlJVVFVTIGJvYXJkLi48L0ZPTlQ+PC9E SVY+DQo8RElWPjxGT05UIHNpemU9Mj48L0ZPTlQ+Jm5ic3A7PC9ESVY+DQo8RElWPjxGT05UIHNp emU9Mj5hbmQ8L0ZPTlQ+PC9ESVY+DQo8RElWPjxGT05UIHNpemU9Mj48L0ZPTlQ+Jm5ic3A7PC9E SVY+DQo8RElWPjxGT05UIHNpemU9Mj5JIHVzZSBMYW4gQ2FyZCB1c2luZyBQQ01DSUEgSW50ZXJm YWNlLi48L0ZPTlQ+PC9ESVY+DQo8RElWPjxGT05UIHNpemU9Mj48L0ZPTlQ+Jm5ic3A7PC9ESVY+ DQo8RElWPjxGT05UIHNpemU9Mj5zbywgSSB3YW50IHRvIGtub3cgd2hlcmUgc2FtcGxlIGNvZGUg aXMuPC9GT05UPjwvRElWPg0KPERJVj48Rk9OVCBzaXplPTI+PC9GT05UPiZuYnNwOzwvRElWPg0K PERJVj48Rk9OVCBzaXplPTI+aWYgYW55b25lIGhhcyBhIHNhbXBsZSBjb2RlIG9yIERPQ3MsPC9G T05UPjwvRElWPg0KPERJVj48Rk9OVCBzaXplPTI+PC9GT05UPiZuYnNwOzwvRElWPg0KPERJVj48 Rk9OVCBzaXplPTI+cGxlYXNlIHNlbmQgbWUgbWFpbC4uPC9GT05UPjwvRElWPg0KPERJVj48Rk9O VCBzaXplPTI+PC9GT05UPiZuYnNwOzwvRElWPg0KPERJVj48Rk9OVCBzaXplPTI+ZS1tYWlsIGlz IDxBIA0KaHJlZj0ibWFpbHRvOmVzb2tAaHlvd29uLmNjLnB1c2FuLmFjLmtyIj5lc29rQGh5b3dv bi5jYy5wdXNhbi5hYy5rcjwvQT48L0ZPTlQ+PC9ESVY+DQo8RElWPjxGT05UIHNpemU9Mj48L0ZP TlQ+Jm5ic3A7PC9ESVY+DQo8RElWPjxGT05UIHNpemU9Mj5QbGVhc2UgaW4gQWR2YW5jZXMuLjwv Rk9OVD48L0RJVj48L0JPRFk+PC9IVE1MPg0K ------=_NextPart_000_00B9_01BEE202.B8EBDDB0-- From kramer@pa.dec.com Mon Aug 9 15:41:19 1999 Return-Path: Received: from tudedr.et.tudelft.nl by it.et.tudelft.nl (4.1/BB-2.0) id AA24441; Mon, 9 Aug 99 15:41:19 +0200 Received: from mail1.digital.com by ITS.TUDelft.NL (PMDF V5.1-10 #21918) with ESMTP id <01JEKHGJTF8Q935FY0@ITS.TUDelft.NL> for erik@duteinh.et.tudelft.nl; Mon, 9 Aug 1999 15:40:14 +0200 Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.2/WV2.0g) with SMTP id GAA03857; Mon, 09 Aug 1999 06:37:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rex.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA32152; Mon, 09 Aug 1999 06:37:30 -0700 Received: by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id GAA19152; Mon, 09 Aug 1999 06:32:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id GAA19099; Mon, 09 Aug 1999 06:32:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail1.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA12183; Mon, 09 Aug 1999 06:32:47 -0700 Received: from penguin.wise.edt.ericsson.se (penguin-ext.wise.edt.ericsson.se [194.237.142.110]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.2/WV2.0g) with ESMTP id GAA08235 for ; Mon, 09 Aug 1999 06:32:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: from era-t.ericsson.se (koff.ericsson.se [147.214.173.137]) by penguin.wise.edt.ericsson.se (8.9.3/8.9.3/WIREfire-1.3) with SMTP id PAA24974 for ; Mon, 09 Aug 1999 15:29:15 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from era-t.ericsson.se by era-t.ericsson.se (SMI-8.6/LME-DOM-2.2.5(ERA/T)) id PAA02905; Mon, 09 Aug 1999 15:29:15 +0200 Date: Mon, 09 Aug 1999 15:29:15 +0200 From: Peter Danielsson Subject: support for sa1101 Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com To: Sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Message-Id: <37AED7AB.D47D501F@era-t.ericsson.se> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.6 [en] (X11; I; Linux 2.2.5-15 i586) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk X-Accept-Language: en Hi, I have added support for the sa1101 to the 2.2.10 - kernel. If anyone feel that they want it now, send me a mail. I'll send patches to Nicolas for inclusion in the standard (?) sa1100-tree when I feel that the other stuff we are working on is stable enough! The main change from the standard kernel is 63 additional IRQ's, and of course some new hardware defines. /Peter From kramer@pa.dec.com Mon Aug 9 23:39:19 1999 Return-Path: Received: from tudedr.et.tudelft.nl by it.et.tudelft.nl (4.1/BB-2.0) id AA25680; Mon, 9 Aug 99 23:39:19 +0200 Received: from mail1.digital.com by ITS.TUDelft.NL (PMDF V5.1-10 #21918) with ESMTP id <01JEKY7KH8I6935CP7@ITS.TUDelft.NL> for erik@duteinh.et.tudelft.nl; Mon, 9 Aug 1999 23:39:15 +0200 Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.2/WV2.0g) with SMTP id OAA22029; Mon, 09 Aug 1999 14:36:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rex.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA28664; Mon, 09 Aug 1999 14:36:15 -0700 Received: by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id OAA20255; Mon, 09 Aug 1999 14:31:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id OAA20271; Mon, 09 Aug 1999 14:31:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail2.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA24208; Mon, 09 Aug 1999 14:31:23 -0700 Received: from blazieresearch.com (blazieresearch.com [199.227.113.99]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.2/WV2.0g) with ESMTP id OAA01014 for ; Mon, 09 Aug 1999 14:31:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: from cpq800.blazieresearch.com (cpq800 [199.227.113.100]) by blazieresearch.com (8.9.3/8.8.7) with ESMTP id RAA22502 for ; Mon, 09 Aug 1999 17:33:06 -0400 Received: by CPQ800 with Internet Mail Service (5.5.1960.3) id ; Mon, 09 Aug 1999 17:23:35 -0400 Date: Mon, 09 Aug 1999 17:23:14 -0400 From: Jim Kasper Subject: RE: support for sa1101 Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com To: Sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Message-Id: <412E1CF8088BD211AD5100805FAD9A800298EA@CPQ800> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.1960.3) Content-Type: text/plain Precedence: bulk Hi, I am starting to layout a sa-1110, sa-1111 board for my company. I am curious if any of you have used an ICE in your development of your sa-1100 boards. Also, is anyone starting to develop sa-1110 stuff? We had been looking at the Sophia ICE http://www.sophia.com/, but think maybe it is overkill. Thanks for any thoughts Jim From kramer@pa.dec.com Tue Aug 10 11:54:08 1999 Return-Path: Received: from tudedr.et.tudelft.nl by it.et.tudelft.nl (4.1/BB-2.0) id AA27270; Tue, 10 Aug 99 11:54:08 +0200 Received: from mail1.digital.com by ITS.TUDelft.NL (PMDF V5.1-10 #21918) with ESMTP id <01JELNUM48XU95O1IB@ITS.TUDelft.NL> for erik@duteinh.et.tudelft.nl; Tue, 10 Aug 1999 11:54:06 +0200 Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.2/WV2.0g) with SMTP id CAA05913; Tue, 10 Aug 1999 02:50:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rex.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA11604; Tue, 10 Aug 1999 02:49:57 -0700 Received: by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id CAA22153; Tue, 10 Aug 1999 02:40:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id CAA22191; Tue, 10 Aug 1999 02:40:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail1.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA11802; Tue, 10 Aug 1999 02:40:36 -0700 Received: from note.orchestra.cse.unsw.EDU.AU (note.orchestra.cse.unsw.EDU.AU [129.94.242.29]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.2/WV2.0g) with SMTP id CAA04668 for ; Tue, 10 Aug 1999 02:40:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: From paulaner With LocalMail ; Tue, 10 Aug 1999 19:38:44 +1000 Date: Tue, 10 Aug 1999 19:38:43 +1000 (EST) From: Adam 'WeirdArms' Wiggins Subject: RE: support for sa1101 In-Reply-To: <412E1CF8088BD211AD5100805FAD9A800298EA@CPQ800> Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com X-Sender: awiggins@paulaner.disy.cse.unsw.EDU.AU To: Jim Kasper Cc: Sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Precedence: bulk On Mon, 9 Aug 1999, Jim Kasper wrote: > Hi, > I am starting to layout a sa-1110, sa-1111 board for my company. I > am curious if any of you have used an ICE in your development of your > sa-1100 boards. Also, is anyone starting to develop sa-1110 stuff? We > had been looking at the Sophia ICE http://www.sophia.com/, but think > maybe it is overkill. I plan to move the PLEB sdesign over to the SA-1110 during the summer. This however depends on if we can secure supplies of the chip. (Anyone with a SA-1110 supplier please let me know) Cheers Adam P.S. The Aust Ssummer is the end of the year ;) From kramer@pa.dec.com Wed Aug 11 07:38:20 1999 Return-Path: Received: from tudedr.et.tudelft.nl by it.et.tudelft.nl (4.1/BB-2.0) id AA29772; Wed, 11 Aug 99 07:38:20 +0200 Received: from mail2.digital.com by ITS.TUDelft.NL (PMDF V5.1-10 #21918) with ESMTP id <01JEMT7V4Q1895NZXU@ITS.TUDelft.NL> for erik@duteinh.et.tudelft.nl; Wed, 11 Aug 1999 07:38:19 +0200 Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.2/WV2.0g) with SMTP id WAA17366; Tue, 10 Aug 1999 22:33:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rex.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA26287; Tue, 10 Aug 1999 22:33:33 -0700 Received: by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id WAA25023; Tue, 10 Aug 1999 22:29:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id WAA25001; Tue, 10 Aug 1999 22:29:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail2.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA16251; Tue, 10 Aug 1999 22:29:08 -0700 Received: from adsl-216-100-248-143.dsl.snfc21.pacbell.net (adsl-216-100-248-143.dsl.snfc21.pacbell.net [216.100.248.143]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.2/WV2.0g) with ESMTP id WAA11856 for ; Tue, 10 Aug 1999 22:29:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: from barney (benw@barney [192.168.1.7]) by adsl-216-100-248-143.dsl.snfc21.pacbell.net (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id VAA11139 for ; Tue, 10 Aug 1999 21:28:38 -0700 Date: Tue, 10 Aug 1999 22:26:31 -0700 (PDT) From: Ben Williamson Subject: Spam on this list Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com X-Sender: benw@barney.casagrande.way To: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Precedence: bulk Hi, I've received a number of spam messages lately, and the headers would seem to indicate that they are coming from the sa1100-linux list. I've attached the most recent below. Could the list be configured to prevent this? Thanks, - Ben. ------------------------------------------------------------------- Ben Williamson benw@pobox.com http://www.pobox.com/~benw/ ---------- Forwarded message ---------- Received: from brownies.pobox.com (brownies.pobox.com [207.8.152.160]) by adsl-216-100-248-143.dsl.snfc21.pacbell.net (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id VAA11095 for ; Tue, 10 Aug 1999 21:05:50 -0700 Received: from mail1.digital.com (mail1.digital.com [204.123.2.50]) by brownies.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2048B586B for ; Wed, 11 Aug 1999 01:04:21 -0400 (EDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.2/WV2.0g) with SMTP id VAA26607; Tue, 10 Aug 1999 21:59:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rex.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA30346; Tue, 10 Aug 1999 21:56:44 -0700 Received: by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id VAA24810; Tue, 10 Aug 1999 21:54:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id VAA05307; Tue, 10 Aug 1999 21:54:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail1.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA16712; Tue, 10 Aug 1999 21:54:53 -0700 Received: from platberg.dorea.co.za (dorea.co.za [196.27.5.2]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.2/WV2.0g) with ESMTP id VAA26455 for ; Tue, 10 Aug 1999 21:54:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: from yexxy (bstn-68.eclipse.net [216.25.132.68]) by platberg.dorea.co.za (8.9.0/8.8.7) with ESMTP id GAA10527; Wed, 11 Aug 1999 06:48:27 -0200 Message-Id: <199908110848.GAA10527@platberg.dorea.co.za> From: "June" Subject: Will Call... To: allnet1991i@platberg.dorea.co.za X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 4.72.1712.3 X-Mimeole: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V(null).1712.3 Mime-Version: 1.0 Date: Tue, 10 Aug 1999 23:11:54 -0500 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by adsl-216-100-248-143.dsl.snfc21.pacbell.net id VAA11095 *** URGENT *** ACCEPT CREDIT CARDS FOR YOUR BUSINESS AND INCREASE YOUR PROFITS 30%-50% ! INTERNET STOREFRONT HOMEBASED OR MAIL ORDER BUSINESSES WE SPECIALIZE IN HELPING THE SMALL BUSINESS OWNER! IF YOU CALL IN THE NEXT FIVE DAYS YOU WILL RECEIVE: NO APPLICATION FEE NO PROGRAMMING FEE AND YOUR FIRST AND LAST MONTH LEASE PAYMENT IS FREE CALL (888) 264-9272 OUR HOURS OF BUSINESS ARE 9AM - 6PM MST ///////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// / Please remove at mailto:mbok95@usa.net?subject=remove ////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// From kramer@pa.dec.com Wed Aug 11 17:41:05 1999 Return-Path: Received: from tudedr.et.tudelft.nl by it.et.tudelft.nl (4.1/BB-2.0) id AA01527; Wed, 11 Aug 99 17:41:05 +0200 Received: from mail1.digital.com by ITS.TUDelft.NL (PMDF V5.1-10 #21918) with ESMTP id <01JENE9Y8KR495NZZ5@ITS.TUDelft.NL> for erik@duteinh.et.tudelft.nl; Wed, 11 Aug 1999 17:41:03 +0200 Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.2/WV2.0g) with SMTP id IAA10058; Wed, 11 Aug 1999 08:34:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rex.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA13513; Wed, 11 Aug 1999 08:34:06 -0700 Received: by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id IAA26688; Wed, 11 Aug 1999 08:28:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id IAA26702; Wed, 11 Aug 1999 08:28:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail1.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA14240; Wed, 11 Aug 1999 08:28:46 -0700 Received: from eshu.request.net (eshu.request.net [208.226.156.2] (may be forged)) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.2/WV2.0g) with ESMTP id IAA09090 for ; Wed, 11 Aug 1999 08:28:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: from furina.request.net ([207.48.132.3]) by eshu.request.net with ESMTP id <829-10367>; Wed, 11 Aug 1999 11:25:54 -0400 Received: from Bad.EHLO.Input ([193.159.142.120]) by furina.request.net with ESMTP id <98610551-14922> convert rfc822-to-8bit; Wed, 11 Aug 1999 11:25:43 -0400 Received: by HW_MAIL with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2448.0) id ; Wed, 11 Aug 1999 17:28:37 +0100 Date: Wed, 11 Aug 1999 17:28:36 +0100 From: "JOR. - Jordan, Roman" Subject: AW: Problem Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com To: "'AWIGGINS@CSE.UNSW.EDU.AU'" Cc: "'Sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com'" Message-Id: <81413F587EB9D1118F56000092941A3EA78A8F@HW_MAIL> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2448.0) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Precedence: bulk X-Mime-Autoconverted: from 8bit to quoted-printable by mail1.digital.com id IAA09090 Hi, i don't know, if the problem already exists on your site. If so, i think = i can help you. Some times ago i wrote a simple program which runs on brutu= s. It only initialized the serial ports and sends characters and messages ov= er serial 1 and serial 3. The target platform is brutus (but it should not b= e a problem to change this). But, i have to check out if it works already. So if you need it, i will t= est it. By the way, the code is only for internal use. There are a lot of unnecessary parts in it and the form is terrible. regards, Roman -----Urspr=FCngliche Nachricht----- Von: Postmaster=20 Gesendet am: Freitag, 6. August 1999 07:06 An: JOR. - Jordan, Roman Betreff: WG: Problem > ---------- > Von: Adam 'WeirdArms' Wiggins[SMTP:AWIGGINS@CSE.UNSW.EDU.AU] > Gesendet: Donnerstag, 5. August 1999 21:02:33 > An: Sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com > Betreff: Problem > Diese Nachricht wurde automatisch von einer Regel weitergeleitet. >=20 Hello all, I'm writting a boot loader foARM systems (mainly for PLEB). Attached is what I've done so far (not much) it should just send a character continually down the serial port but as far as I can tell the serial port is inactive. The code should be clear (tell me if its not) just edit the Makefile.conf to pont to your tool chain and make. If anyon= e can have a look and make sure the code doesn't have any errors it would b= e a big help. Alsoanyone interested on working on a Apex let me know Cheers Adam =20 From kramer@pa.dec.com Tue Aug 17 00:02:45 1999 Return-Path: Received: from tudedr.et.tudelft.nl by it.et.tudelft.nl (4.1/BB-2.0) id AA09424; Tue, 17 Aug 99 00:02:45 +0200 Received: from mail1.digital.com by ITS.TUDelft.NL (PMDF V5.1-10 #21918) with ESMTP id <01JEUR22BVMM935K9Q@ITS.TUDelft.NL> for erik@duteinh.et.tudelft.nl; Tue, 17 Aug 1999 00:02:42 +0200 Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.2/WV2.0g) with SMTP id PAA01554; Mon, 16 Aug 1999 15:00:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rex.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA14498; Mon, 16 Aug 1999 15:00:44 -0700 Received: by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id OAA14289; Mon, 16 Aug 1999 14:58:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id OAA14272; Mon, 16 Aug 1999 14:58:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail1.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA25902; Mon, 16 Aug 1999 14:58:36 -0700 Received: from note.orchestra.cse.unsw.EDU.AU (note.orchestra.cse.unsw.EDU.AU [129.94.242.29]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.2/WV2.0g) with SMTP id OAA00147 for ; Mon, 16 Aug 1999 14:58:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: From paulaner With LocalMail ; Tue, 17 Aug 1999 07:56:50 +1000 Date: Tue, 17 Aug 1999 07:56:50 +1000 (EST) From: Adam 'WeirdArms' Wiggins Subject: Re: evaluation platform In-Reply-To: <37B88680.DD52DE6A@home.se> Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com X-Sender: awiggins@paulaner.disy.cse.unsw.EDU.AU To: thomas olausson Cc: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Precedence: bulk On Mon, 16 Aug 1999, thomas olausson wrote: > > Yep got one here thats running 2.2.10. Thats if your talkinga bout > > the Brutus. What exactly are you after? > > After I've built a cross development platform (as instructed on the > Intel web site), I can build a Image, which I then gzip and upload to > the platform. > > My machine is actually a Web Phone (but has a SA-1100), normally running > Inferno. > It has a bootloader, where I can upload inferno kernels and boot from, > without problems. I have no idea about the web phone. The intel page is for the brutus and I don't think anyones tried linux on the web-phone since no one has one (do they?) > > When I upload my Linux kernel, and try to boot it, I get > "Not AIF". What is AIF? AIF is the image (executable) formate of teh ARM Software Development Toolkit. A few people have posted how to turn a binary into an AIR file. Thats why its complainning. What is the boot loader on teh web-phone? > > If I upload trash or something that's not SA-1100 code, > I get this, so it seems like the Image isn't in SA-1100 code > format. How can I double check this? The problem is the boot loader. I'm not sure how to approch this so maybe someone else on the list can help? I'm ccurrently writting a boot loader for ARM machines (well its more like a bios/debug monitor/ boot loader, should release late this year. Cheers Adam From kramer@pa.dec.com Tue Aug 17 00:10:35 1999 Return-Path: Received: from tudedr.et.tudelft.nl by it.et.tudelft.nl (4.1/BB-2.0) id AA09448; Tue, 17 Aug 99 00:10:35 +0200 Received: from mail1.digital.com by ITS.TUDelft.NL (PMDF V5.1-10 #21918) with ESMTP id <01JEURBSCVTA935K9Q@ITS.TUDelft.NL> for erik@duteinh.et.tudelft.nl; Tue, 17 Aug 1999 00:10:32 +0200 Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.2/WV2.0g) with SMTP id PAA02773; Mon, 16 Aug 1999 15:08:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rex.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA02476; Mon, 16 Aug 1999 15:08:51 -0700 Received: by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id PAA14316; Mon, 16 Aug 1999 15:08:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id PAA14369; Mon, 16 Aug 1999 15:08:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail2.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA31649; Mon, 16 Aug 1999 15:08:42 -0700 Received: from thalia.fm.intel.com (thalia.fm.intel.com [132.233.247.11]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.2/WV2.0g) with ESMTP id PAA25031 for ; Mon, 16 Aug 1999 15:08:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: from fmsmsx26.fm.intel.com (fmsmsx26.fm.intel.com [132.233.42.26]) by thalia.fm.intel.com (8.9.1a+p1/8.9.1/d: relay.m4,v 1.6 1998/11/24 22:10:56 iwep Exp iwep $) with ESMTP id SAA09216 for ; Mon, 16 Aug 1999 18:09:31 +0000 (GMT) Received: by fmsmsx26.fm.intel.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2448.0) id ; Mon, 16 Aug 1999 15:08:27 -0700 Date: Mon, 16 Aug 1999 15:08:26 -0700 From: "Rao, Ram R" Subject: newest kernel to work on brutus Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com To: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2448.0) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Precedence: bulk Hi, Does anyone have a kernel newer than 2.2.3, with the rmk2 and np5 patches working on the Brutus board? I tried the 2.2.9 kernel at one point, and it didn't seem to work properly. It didn't like the ramdisk that I was downloading even though the same one worked fine on the 2.2.3 kernel. Thanks, Ram Rao From kramer@pa.dec.com Tue Aug 17 00:15:00 1999 Return-Path: Received: from tudedr.et.tudelft.nl by it.et.tudelft.nl (4.1/BB-2.0) id AA09467; Tue, 17 Aug 99 00:15:00 +0200 Received: from mail1.digital.com by ITS.TUDelft.NL (PMDF V5.1-10 #21918) with ESMTP id <01JEURH8FVGU935K9Q@ITS.TUDelft.NL> for erik@duteinh.et.tudelft.nl; Tue, 17 Aug 1999 00:14:56 +0200 Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.2/WV2.0g) with SMTP id PAA01779; Mon, 16 Aug 1999 15:13:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rex.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA10368; Mon, 16 Aug 1999 15:13:22 -0700 Received: by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id PAA14242; Mon, 16 Aug 1999 15:13:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id PAA14329; Mon, 16 Aug 1999 15:13:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail1.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA20134; Mon, 16 Aug 1999 15:13:02 -0700 Received: from note.orchestra.cse.unsw.EDU.AU (note.orchestra.cse.unsw.EDU.AU [129.94.242.29]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.2/WV2.0g) with SMTP id PAA01812 for ; Mon, 16 Aug 1999 15:13:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: From paulaner With LocalMail ; Tue, 17 Aug 1999 08:12:33 +1000 Date: Tue, 17 Aug 1999 08:12:23 +1000 (EST) From: Adam 'WeirdArms' Wiggins Subject: Re: newest kernel to work on brutus In-Reply-To: Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com X-Sender: awiggins@paulaner.disy.cse.unsw.EDU.AU To: "Rao, Ram R" Cc: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Precedence: bulk Try 2.2.10 works fine with the itsy ramdisk on my brutus boards. Cheers Adam On Mon, 16 Aug 1999, Rao, Ram R wrote: > Hi, > Does anyone have a kernel newer than 2.2.3, with the rmk2 and np5 > patches > working on the Brutus board? I tried the 2.2.9 kernel at one point, and it > didn't seem to > work properly. It didn't like the ramdisk that I was downloading even though > the same one worked > fine on the 2.2.3 kernel. > > Thanks, > Ram Rao > > > From kramer@pa.dec.com Tue Aug 17 02:43:06 1999 Return-Path: Received: from tudedr.et.tudelft.nl by it.et.tudelft.nl (4.1/BB-2.0) id AA09829; Tue, 17 Aug 99 02:43:06 +0200 Received: from mail1.digital.com by ITS.TUDelft.NL (PMDF V5.1-10 #21918) with ESMTP id <01JEUWNS98IE935KAN@ITS.TUDelft.NL> for erik@duteinh.et.tudelft.nl; Tue, 17 Aug 1999 02:43:00 +0200 Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.2/WV2.0g) with SMTP id RAA20329; Mon, 16 Aug 1999 17:34:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rex.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA29409; Mon, 16 Aug 1999 17:34:56 -0700 Received: by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id RAA14548; Mon, 16 Aug 1999 17:34:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id RAA14290; Mon, 16 Aug 1999 17:34:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail1.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA23354; Mon, 16 Aug 1999 17:34:23 -0700 Received: from Hydro.CAM.ORG (Hydro.CAM.ORG [198.168.100.7]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.2/WV2.0g) with ESMTP id RAA22099 for ; Mon, 16 Aug 1999 17:34:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: from Ocean.CAM.ORG (Ocean.CAM.ORG [198.168.100.5]) by Hydro.CAM.ORG (8.8.8/8.8.4) with SMTP id UAA29273; Mon, 16 Aug 1999 20:33:03 -0400 (EDT) Date: Mon, 16 Aug 1999 20:33:07 -0400 (EDT) From: Nicolas Pitre Subject: Re: evaluation platform In-Reply-To: Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com To: Adam 'WeirdArms' Wiggins Cc: thomas olausson , sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Precedence: bulk On Tue, 17 Aug 1999, Adam 'WeirdArms' Wiggins wrote: > On Mon, 16 Aug 1999, thomas olausson wrote: > > > After I've built a cross development platform (as instructed on the > > Intel web site), I can build a Image, which I then gzip and upload to > > the platform. Oh... this is wrong. You should issue a "make zImage" command and this will build a compressed kernel. The file you should gzip is the ramdisk if it isn't already. The zImage file is a compressed kernel with some code at the beginning so it is self-uncompressed when executed. > > My machine is actually a Web Phone (but has a SA-1100), normally running > > Inferno. Since it is probably different from the Brutus, you might not be able to run a kernel compiled for Brutus as is. First you must be sure of the amount of memory for each memory bank of your device. Then Linux source code might need to be modified acordingly. Next the screen is probably different so using the serial console without screen support is probably your best bet to start with. > > It has a bootloader, where I can upload inferno kernels and boot from, > > without problems. > > I have no idea about the web phone. The intel page is for the > brutus and I don't think anyones tried linux on the web-phone since no one > has one (do they?) > > > > When I upload my Linux kernel, and try to boot it, I get > > "Not AIF". What is AIF? > > AIF is the image (executable) formate of teh ARM Software > Development Toolkit. A few people have posted how to turn a binary into an > AIR file. Thats why its complainning. What is the boot loader on teh > web-phone? ... and you need to find a way to upload a ramdisk image as well, which might be tricky. > > > If I upload trash or something that's not SA-1100 code, > > I get this, so it seems like the Image isn't in SA-1100 code > > format. How can I double check this? The code is SA1100 code for sure. However it's pure binary image without any header which your bootloader can use. You need to be able to make an AIF header for your zImage file... and that's something I can't help much for. Maybe someone else knows the recipee? Nicolas Pitre, B. ing. nico@cam.org From kramer@pa.dec.com Tue Aug 17 16:14:20 1999 Return-Path: Received: from tudedr.et.tudelft.nl by it.et.tudelft.nl (4.1/BB-2.0) id AA13217; Tue, 17 Aug 99 16:14:20 +0200 Received: from mail2.digital.com by ITS.TUDelft.NL (PMDF V5.1-10 #21918) with ESMTP id <01JEVOZNCUYW935L35@ITS.TUDelft.NL> for erik@duteinh.et.tudelft.nl; Tue, 17 Aug 1999 16:14:17 +0200 Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.2/WV2.0g) with SMTP id HAA11645; Tue, 17 Aug 1999 07:07:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rex.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA13793; Tue, 17 Aug 1999 07:07:34 -0700 Received: by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id HAA16952; Tue, 17 Aug 1999 07:06:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id HAA16957; Tue, 17 Aug 1999 07:06:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail2.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA23360; Tue, 17 Aug 1999 07:06:43 -0700 Received: from mailgate.keith-koep.com (mailgate.keith-koep.com [195.8.230.32]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.2/WV2.0g) with ESMTP id HAA08408 for ; Tue, 17 Aug 1999 07:06:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: from otto (otto [195.8.230.40]) by mailgate.keith-koep.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id PAA16457 for ; Tue, 17 Aug 1999 15:09:08 +0200 Date: Tue, 17 Aug 1999 16:07:04 +0200 (MET DST) From: keith Subject: Aifheader.s Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com To: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Reply-To: keith Message-Id: <199908171309.PAA16457@mailgate.keith-koep.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: dtmail 1.2.0 CDE Version 1.2 SunOS 5.6 sun4u sparc Content-Type: TEXT/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Md5: cW/oAVywwcZiFdpfrB15lA== Precedence: bulk This may be pasted before your program entry to be recognised by the PBL of the ugly angel monitor. .text mov r0,r0 mov r0,r0 mov r0,r0 bl entry b . .long 0 .long 0 .long 0 .long 0 .long 0 .long 0 .long 0 .long 32 .long 0 .long 0 .long 0 mov r0,r0 sub r12,r14,pc add r12,pc,r12 ldmib r12,{r0-r3} sub r12,r12,#16 ldr r2,[r12,#0x30] tsts r2,#0x100 ldrne r12,[r12,#0x34] addeq r12,r12,r0 add r12,r12,r1 mov r0,#0 cmp r3,#0 0: movle pc,r14 str r0,[r12],#4 subs r3,r3,#4 b 0b entry: From kramer@pa.dec.com Wed Aug 18 12:57:27 1999 Return-Path: Received: from tudedr.et.tudelft.nl by it.et.tudelft.nl (4.1/BB-2.0) id AA17400; Wed, 18 Aug 99 12:57:27 +0200 Received: from mail2.digital.com by ITS.TUDelft.NL (PMDF V5.1-10 #21918) with ESMTP id <01JEWWEJMZAK935LDA@ITS.TUDelft.NL> for erik@duteinh.et.tudelft.nl; Wed, 18 Aug 1999 12:57:23 +0200 Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.2/WV2.0g) with SMTP id DAA14882; Wed, 18 Aug 1999 03:53:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rex.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA11590; Wed, 18 Aug 1999 03:53:51 -0700 Received: by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id DAA20388; Wed, 18 Aug 1999 03:52:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id DAA20350; Wed, 18 Aug 1999 03:52:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail1.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA17175; Wed, 18 Aug 1999 03:52:16 -0700 Received: from queen.cwc.nus.edu.sg (queen.cwc.nus.edu.sg [137.132.163.140]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.2/WV2.0g) with ESMTP id DAA03293 for ; Wed, 18 Aug 1999 03:52:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: from catbert.cwc.nus.edu.sg.cwc.nus.edu.sg ([137.132.163.120]) by queen.cwc.nus.edu.sg (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id TAA22909 for ; Wed, 18 Aug 1999 19:01:59 +0730 (SST) Date: Wed, 18 Aug 1999 19:01:59 +0730 (SST) From: Amlan Saha Subject: Re: Spam on this list In-Reply-To: Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com To: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Reply-To: a.saha@acm.org (Amlan Saha) Message-Id: <199908181131.TAA22909@queen.cwc.nus.edu.sg> Organization: Center for Wireless Communications Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: VM 6.72 under 21.1 (patch 3) "Acadia" XEmacs Lucid Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk References: Hi there I am trying to have two different set of libraries (glibc) on the same system - one with version information enabled and one without. For some of my programs, I need to load the one with versioning information and for most others I can do with the default one. Now the problem arises with the ld.so. While it recognizes the correct directory of the alternative libraries, it fails to use the ld.so in the alternative directory. It will invariably use the same /lib/ld.so for both the sets of libraries. And it seems that an ld.so meant to load a glibc without version information is not able to load one with the version avialable. This is what I am doing to preload/prespecify the path of the alternative library. I create a script for every such program which needs the alternative libaries and set the LD_LIBRARY_PATH to the alternative path. For example, if "myprog" needs the other set of libs, I create a script (myprog) - #!/bin/sh export LD_LIBARY_PATH=/alternative/lib /bin/myprog $* While this looks for the correct alternative libs, it still uses the default ld.so from /lib. Now, is there a way in which I could direct this fellow to pick up the ld.so which is in the /alternative/lib directory. Thanks in advance. -amlan. -- Amlan Saha as@cwc.nus.edu.sg amlan@linux.org.sg From kramer@pa.dec.com Wed Aug 18 13:09:29 1999 Return-Path: Received: from tudedr.et.tudelft.nl by it.et.tudelft.nl (4.1/BB-2.0) id AA17467; Wed, 18 Aug 99 13:09:29 +0200 Received: from mail1.digital.com by ITS.TUDelft.NL (PMDF V5.1-10 #21918) with ESMTP id <01JEWWTSAIQQ935LDN@ITS.TUDelft.NL> for erik@duteinh.et.tudelft.nl; Wed, 18 Aug 1999 13:09:27 +0200 Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.2/WV2.0g) with SMTP id EAA04957; Wed, 18 Aug 1999 04:06:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rex.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA05908; Wed, 18 Aug 1999 04:06:14 -0700 Received: by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id EAA20378; Wed, 18 Aug 1999 04:05:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id EAA20428; Wed, 18 Aug 1999 04:05:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail2.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA21850; Wed, 18 Aug 1999 04:05:40 -0700 Received: from queen.cwc.nus.edu.sg (queen.cwc.nus.edu.sg [137.132.163.140]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.2/WV2.0g) with ESMTP id EAA19051 for ; Wed, 18 Aug 1999 04:05:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: from catbert.cwc.nus.edu.sg.cwc.nus.edu.sg ([137.132.163.120]) by queen.cwc.nus.edu.sg (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id TAA23066 for ; Wed, 18 Aug 1999 19:15:29 +0730 (SST) Date: Wed, 18 Aug 1999 19:15:29 +0730 (SST) From: Amlan Saha Subject: glibc problem Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com To: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Reply-To: a.saha@acm.org (Amlan Saha) Message-Id: <199908181145.TAA23066@queen.cwc.nus.edu.sg> Organization: Center for Wireless Communications Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: VM 6.72 under 21.1 (patch 3) "Acadia" XEmacs Lucid Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk Sorry about the misleading title in my last mail. Sheepish grin :0 -amlan. Amlan Saha writes: > Hi there > > I am trying to have two different set of libraries (glibc) on the same > system - one with version information enabled and one without. For > some of my programs, I need to load the one with versioning > information and for most others I can do with the default one. > Now the problem arises with the ld.so. While it recognizes the > correct directory of the alternative libraries, it fails to use the > ld.so in the alternative directory. It will invariably use the same > /lib/ld.so for both the sets of libraries. And it seems that an > ld.so meant to load a glibc without version information is not able > to load one with the version avialable. > > This is what I am doing to preload/prespecify the path of the > alternative library. I create a script for every such program which > needs the alternative libaries and set the LD_LIBRARY_PATH to the > alternative path. For example, if "myprog" needs the other set of > libs, I create a script (myprog) - > > #!/bin/sh > export LD_LIBARY_PATH=/alternative/lib > /bin/myprog $* > > While this looks for the correct alternative libs, it still uses the > default ld.so from /lib. Now, is there a way in which I could direct > this fellow to pick up the ld.so which is in the /alternative/lib > directory. > > Thanks in advance. > > -amlan. > -- Amlan Saha as@cwc.nus.edu.sg amlan@linux.org.sg From kramer@pa.dec.com Sun Aug 22 00:59:47 1999 Return-Path: Received: from tudedr.et.tudelft.nl by it.et.tudelft.nl (4.1/BB-2.0) id AA28409; Sun, 22 Aug 99 00:59:47 +0200 Received: from mail2.digital.com by ITS.TUDelft.NL (PMDF V5.1-10 #21918) with ESMTP id <01JF1SIFSNX6935K79@ITS.TUDelft.NL> for erik@duteinh.et.tudelft.nl; Sun, 22 Aug 1999 00:59:41 +0200 Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.2/WV2.0g) with SMTP id PAA01239; Sat, 21 Aug 1999 15:57:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rex.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA10652; Sat, 21 Aug 1999 15:57:50 -0700 Received: by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id PAA13499; Sat, 21 Aug 1999 15:55:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id PAA00309; Sat, 21 Aug 1999 15:55:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail2.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA07260; Sat, 21 Aug 1999 15:55:49 -0700 Received: from finch-post-12.mail.demon.net (finch-post-12.mail.demon.net [194.217.242.41]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.2/WV2.0g) with ESMTP id PAA03829 for ; Sat, 21 Aug 1999 15:55:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: from tazenda.demon.co.uk ([158.152.220.239] helo=kings-cross.london.uk.eu.org) by finch-post-12.mail.demon.net with esmtp (Exim 2.12 #1) id 11IK34-000LGq-0C; Sat, 21 Aug 1999 22:55:43 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=kings-cross.london.uk.eu.org ident=phil) by kings-cross.london.uk.eu.org with esmtp (Exim 2.05 #1) id 11IJhP-0000Nf-00; Sat, 21 Aug 1999 23:33:19 +0100 Date: Sat, 21 Aug 1999 23:33:19 +0100 From: Philip Blundell Subject: Re: Spam on this list In-Reply-To: Message from Amlan Saha "of Wed, 18 Aug 1999 19:01:59 +0730." <199908181131.TAA22909@queen.cwc.nus.edu.sg> Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com To: a.saha@acm.org (Amlan Saha) Cc: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: exmh version 2.0.2 2/24/98 (debian) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Precedence: bulk > #!/bin/sh > export LD_LIBARY_PATH=/alternative/lib > /bin/myprog $* > >While this looks for the correct alternative libs, it still uses the >default ld.so from /lib. Now, is there a way in which I could direct >this fellow to pick up the ld.so which is in the /alternative/lib >directory. Yes. Just make your script read something like this: #!/bin/sh /alternative/lib/ld-linux.so.2 --library-path /alternative/lib /bin/myprog $* If you use "export LD_LIBRARY_PATH=.." you will come to grief with child processes. They will inherit the path definition from their parent and end up with a mismatch between ld.so and libc.so. p. From kramer@pa.dec.com Mon Aug 23 04:58:57 1999 Return-Path: Received: from tudedr.et.tudelft.nl by it.et.tudelft.nl (4.1/BB-2.0) id AA00944; Mon, 23 Aug 99 04:58:57 +0200 Received: from mail2.digital.com by ITS.TUDelft.NL (PMDF V5.1-10 #21918) with ESMTP id <01JF3F5DAPQ295OHXO@ITS.TUDelft.NL> for erik@duteinh.et.tudelft.nl; Mon, 23 Aug 1999 04:58:57 +0200 Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.2/WV2.0g) with SMTP id TAA06042; Sun, 22 Aug 1999 19:51:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rex.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA09435; Sun, 22 Aug 1999 19:50:55 -0700 Received: by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id TAA04891; Sun, 22 Aug 1999 19:49:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id TAA04879; Sun, 22 Aug 1999 19:49:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail1.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA09713; Sun, 22 Aug 1999 19:49:34 -0700 Received: from funai-tky.co.jp (ns.funai-tky.co.jp [210.154.37.2]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.2/WV2.0g) with ESMTP id TAA06150 for ; Sun, 22 Aug 1999 19:49:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: from hiropu ([192.168.1.19]) by funai-tky.co.jp (8.9.1/3.7Wpr7-98092916) with SMTP id LAA30404 for ; Mon, 23 Aug 1999 11:49:30 +0900 Date: Mon, 23 Aug 1999 11:55:16 +0900 From: Hiroshi Ishii Subject: About booting messages Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com To: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Message-Id: <37C0B81435B.EECDHIROSHI@mail.funai-tky.co.jp> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Becky! ver 1.25.07 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk Hi! When I used linux-2.2.3, show booting messages from serial port (linux version, memory info, ...). But linunx-2.2.10-rmk2-np11 don't show booting messages. Of course, initializing serial port before booting.. Please advice! ---- Funai Electric R & D Co.,LTD Hiroshi Ishii /\ May the Forth be with you .... always! \/ From kramer@pa.dec.com Mon Aug 23 14:16:29 1999 Return-Path: Received: from tudedr.et.tudelft.nl by it.et.tudelft.nl (4.1/BB-2.0) id AA02858; Mon, 23 Aug 99 14:16:29 +0200 Received: from mail2.digital.com by ITS.TUDelft.NL (PMDF V5.1-10 #21918) with ESMTP id <01JF3YML525K95OHVH@ITS.TUDelft.NL> for erik@duteinh.et.tudelft.nl; Mon, 23 Aug 1999 14:16:28 +0200 Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.2/WV2.0g) with SMTP id FAA16405; Mon, 23 Aug 1999 05:12:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rex.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA08577; Mon, 23 Aug 1999 05:12:14 -0700 Received: by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id FAA06428; Mon, 23 Aug 1999 05:11:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id FAA06457; Mon, 23 Aug 1999 05:11:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail2.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA28047; Mon, 23 Aug 1999 05:11:23 -0700 Received: from thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (thorgal.et.tudelft.nl [130.161.40.91]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.2/WV2.0g) with ESMTP id FAA17018 for ; Mon, 23 Aug 1999 05:11:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [130.161.40.82] (tvs082.et.tudelft.nl [130.161.40.82]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id OAA01559 for ; Mon, 23 Aug 1999 14:11:21 +0200 Date: Mon, 23 Aug 1999 14:11:05 +0200 From: "J.D. Bakker" Subject: Some questions on kernels & ramdisks Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com To: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Precedence: bulk [Background: we're designing a minimal SA-1100 board, especially suited for robotics, wearable computers and real-time signal processing. Once the bugs are out, the design will be released under a GPL-like licence. The name for the platform is Linux Advanced Radio Terminal, or LART for short] Hi all, While writing a bootloader for our LART, I stumbled across some problems. I did find out that some constants in the kernel (most notably the memory size and location) have to be edited by hand, and that the kernel should be entered with the MMU off. I'm still left with these questions: 1) I know that the zImage should be copied to physical address 0xC0008000. What are the register values it expects ? Should I set up a stack ? 2) How do I pass a command line to the kernel ? 3) Where exactly should I load the ramdisk image ? ISTR that it should be loaded at address 0x08000000, but I don't have any memory in that space. 4) What should I do if I want to run the kernel from ROM (other than changing the entry address and not compressing it, obviously) ? 5) I want boot messages from the serial port (UART 3), do I have to do anything other than enabling the serial port from my bootloader and compiling in the kernel support ? Thanks, Jan-Derk Bakker. -- I may be obsessive-compulsive, but it's NOT a disorder ! -- Paul S. Sawyer in the Monastery From kramer@pa.dec.com Mon Aug 23 15:24:58 1999 Return-Path: Received: from tudedr.et.tudelft.nl by it.et.tudelft.nl (4.1/BB-2.0) id AA03220; Mon, 23 Aug 99 15:24:58 +0200 Received: from mail1.digital.com by ITS.TUDelft.NL (PMDF V5.1-10 #21918) with ESMTP id <01JF410JEFOU95OJVU@ITS.TUDelft.NL> for erik@duteinh.et.tudelft.nl; Mon, 23 Aug 1999 15:24:57 +0200 Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.2/WV2.0g) with SMTP id GAA05928; Mon, 23 Aug 1999 06:22:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rex.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA19124; Mon, 23 Aug 1999 06:22:02 -0700 Received: by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id GAA05869; Mon, 23 Aug 1999 06:21:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id GAA06643; Mon, 23 Aug 1999 06:21:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail2.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA06919; Mon, 23 Aug 1999 06:21:20 -0700 Received: from globe.nexus.co.uk (nexusel.demon.co.uk [158.152.30.195]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.2/WV2.0g) with ESMTP id GAA25667 for ; Mon, 23 Aug 1999 06:21:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.0.0.21] (helo=fountain.nexus.co.uk ident=mail) by globe.nexus.co.uk with smtp (Exim 2.12 #1) id 11Itpf-0002Gu-00; Mon, 23 Aug 1999 14:08:15 +0100 Received: from [::ffff:127.0.0.1] (helo=fountain.nexus.co.uk ident=pb) by fountain.nexus.co.uk with esmtp (Exim 2.12 #4) id 11Itpe-0007qo-00; Mon, 23 Aug 1999 14:08:14 +0100 Date: Mon, 23 Aug 1999 14:08:14 +0100 From: Philip Blundell Subject: Re: Some questions on kernels & ramdisks In-Reply-To: "Your message of Mon, 23 Aug 1999 14:11:05 +0200." Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com To: "J.D. Bakker" Cc: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: exmh version 2.0.2 2/24/98 (debian) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Precedence: bulk >1) I know that the zImage should be copied to physical address 0xC0008000. >What are the register values it expects ? Should I set up a stack ? R0=0, R1=your architecture number. No, there is no need to set up a stack; the kernel sorts that out for itself. >2) How do I pass a command line to the kernel ? You need to establish a "params" structure and fill it in. >3) Where exactly should I load the ramdisk image ? ISTR that it should be >loaded at address 0x08000000, but I don't have any memory in that space. The initrd start address can also be set in the params struct. >4) What should I do if I want to run the kernel from ROM (other than >changing the entry address and not compressing it, obviously) ? This is tricky. Firstly, you probably don't want to do it because there will be a performance hit. If you really do, you need to arrange for the read-only and read-write parts to be linked at different addresses (by modifying the linker script) and provide some code to copy the read-write data into its correct location before running the kernel. If you just want to boot out of ROM rather than actually running there the easiest thing is to link the kernel as normal and provide a short loader that copies the zImage into RAM and restarts it. p. From kramer@pa.dec.com Mon Aug 23 16:05:09 1999 Return-Path: Received: from tudedr.et.tudelft.nl by it.et.tudelft.nl (4.1/BB-2.0) id AA03371; Mon, 23 Aug 99 16:05:09 +0200 Received: from mail1.digital.com by ITS.TUDelft.NL (PMDF V5.1-10 #21918) with ESMTP id <01JF42FBLCZM95OJ8U@ITS.TUDelft.NL> for erik@duteinh.et.tudelft.nl; Mon, 23 Aug 1999 16:05:07 +0200 Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.2/WV2.0g) with SMTP id HAA18869; Mon, 23 Aug 1999 07:01:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rex.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA16927; Mon, 23 Aug 1999 07:01:45 -0700 Received: by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id HAA06762; Mon, 23 Aug 1999 07:00:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id HAA06781; Mon, 23 Aug 1999 07:00:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail2.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA20062; Mon, 23 Aug 1999 07:00:37 -0700 Received: from thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (thorgal.et.tudelft.nl [130.161.40.91]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.2/WV2.0g) with ESMTP id HAA29059 for ; Mon, 23 Aug 1999 07:00:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [130.161.40.82] (tvs082.et.tudelft.nl [130.161.40.82]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id PAA23302; Mon, 23 Aug 1999 15:59:24 +0200 Date: Mon, 23 Aug 1999 15:58:44 +0200 From: "J.D. Bakker" Subject: Re: Some questions on kernels & ramdisks In-Reply-To: Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com To: Philip Blundell Cc: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Precedence: bulk References: "Your message of Mon, 23 Aug 1999 14:11:05 +0200." [BTW, I'm currently looking at 2.2.3, as I gathered from Nico that that is a reasonably stable one on the SA-1100] >>2) How do I pass a command line to the kernel ? > >You need to establish a "params" structure and fill it in. That's the param_struct from include/asm/setup.h, right ? How does the kernel know where this struct lives, should I hardcode that in PARAMS_BASE ? Are there any memory areas that are a no-no for PARAMS_BASE, like 0xC0000000 or the location that the kernel will be uncompressed to ? [IOW, what's a safe place for this half a k of config data ? ROM is not really an option, as I'd like to make the command line boot-time configurable a la LILO] >>4) What should I do if I want to run the kernel from ROM (other than >>changing the entry address and not compressing it, obviously) ? > >This is tricky. Firstly, you probably don't want to do it because there will >be a performance hit. Not that much, as I use Burst Flash which is almost as fast as my EDO RAM. > If you really do, you need to arrange for the read-only >and read-write parts to be linked at different addresses (by modifying the >linker script) and provide some code to copy the read-write data into its >correct location before running the kernel. ISTR that Nicolas Pitre does something like that. I'll see if I can retrieve one of his patches. Thanks, JDB. -- "A satisfied customer ? We ought to have him stuffed !" -- Basil Fawlty From kramer@pa.dec.com Mon Aug 23 17:44:32 1999 Return-Path: Received: from tudedr.et.tudelft.nl by it.et.tudelft.nl (4.1/BB-2.0) id AA03730; Mon, 23 Aug 99 17:44:32 +0200 Received: from mail2.digital.com by ITS.TUDelft.NL (PMDF V5.1-10 #21918) with ESMTP id <01JF45VKUCQS95OH1J@ITS.TUDelft.NL> for erik@duteinh.et.tudelft.nl; Mon, 23 Aug 1999 17:44:31 +0200 Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.2/WV2.0g) with SMTP id IAA10812; Mon, 23 Aug 1999 08:41:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rex.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA32530; Mon, 23 Aug 1999 08:41:37 -0700 Received: by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id IAA07083; Mon, 23 Aug 1999 08:41:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id IAA07029; Mon, 23 Aug 1999 08:41:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail2.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA00704; Mon, 23 Aug 1999 08:41:03 -0700 Received: from globe.nexus.co.uk (nexusel.demon.co.uk [158.152.30.195]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.2/WV2.0g) with ESMTP id IAA12292 for ; Mon, 23 Aug 1999 08:41:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.0.0.21] (helo=fountain.nexus.co.uk ident=mail) by globe.nexus.co.uk with smtp (Exim 2.12 #1) id 11Iw8F-0002Px-00; Mon, 23 Aug 1999 16:35:35 +0100 Received: from [::ffff:127.0.0.1] (helo=fountain.nexus.co.uk ident=pb) by fountain.nexus.co.uk with esmtp (Exim 2.12 #4) id 11Iw8F-0007yL-00; Mon, 23 Aug 1999 16:35:35 +0100 Date: Mon, 23 Aug 1999 16:35:34 +0100 From: Philip Blundell Subject: Re: Some questions on kernels & ramdisks In-Reply-To: "Your message of Mon, 23 Aug 1999 15:58:44 +0200." Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com To: "J.D. Bakker" Cc: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: exmh version 2.0.2 2/24/98 (debian) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Precedence: bulk >That's the param_struct from include/asm/setup.h, right ? How does the >kernel know where this struct lives, should I hardcode that in PARAMS_BASE ? Yes. Usually it seems to be put just above the start of physical RAM. The kernel copies all the information out of it before setting up the real page tables so it doesn't have to survive very long. See the definitions of PARAMS_BASE for other architectures. p. From kramer@pa.dec.com Mon Aug 23 18:04:02 1999 Return-Path: Received: from tudedr.et.tudelft.nl by it.et.tudelft.nl (4.1/BB-2.0) id AA03805; Mon, 23 Aug 99 18:04:02 +0200 Received: from mail1.digital.com by ITS.TUDelft.NL (PMDF V5.1-10 #21918) with ESMTP id <01JF46KNRMV895OH1J@ITS.TUDelft.NL> for erik@duteinh.et.tudelft.nl; Mon, 23 Aug 1999 18:04:00 +0200 Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.2/WV2.0g) with SMTP id JAA09163; Mon, 23 Aug 1999 09:00:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rex.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA00364; Mon, 23 Aug 1999 09:00:32 -0700 Received: by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id IAA07132; Mon, 23 Aug 1999 08:59:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id IAA07056; Mon, 23 Aug 1999 08:59:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail2.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA10579; Mon, 23 Aug 1999 08:59:55 -0700 Received: from mailgate.keith-koep.com (mailgate.keith-koep.com [195.8.230.32]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.2/WV2.0g) with ESMTP id IAA13676 for ; Mon, 23 Aug 1999 08:59:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: from otto (otto [195.8.230.40]) by mailgate.keith-koep.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id RAA03298 for ; Mon, 23 Aug 1999 17:00:32 +0200 Date: Mon, 23 Aug 1999 18:00:16 +0200 (MET DST) From: keith Subject: Universal Bootstrap Loader (Bootp/Tftp,Flash) Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com To: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Reply-To: keith Message-Id: <199908231500.RAA03298@mailgate.keith-koep.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: dtmail 1.2.0 CDE Version 1.2 SunOS 5.6 sun4u sparc Content-Type: TEXT/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Md5: 32WZ1z+H67Q6CMfhkvet/g== Precedence: bulk Hi, as you are discussing about bootstrap loaders. We have a bootp/tftp bootstrap loader available here ( based on etherboot ). It contains an experimental gdb-stub to talk with a (udp extended) gdb. This bootstrap-loader loads images from flash to dram or from ethernet to dram or from ethernet to flash. We are searching for volunteers to clean up and extend the package. Volker _________________________________________________________________ | | | KEITH & KOEP GMBH DEVELOPMENT OF EMBEDDED CONTROL SYSTEMS | | KOENIGSBERGER STR.2 PHONE +49 (0)202 2525 30 | | D-42277 WUPPERTAL FAX +49 (0)202 2525 333 | | GERMANY keith@keith-koep.com | |_________________________________________________________________| From kramer@pa.dec.com Mon Aug 23 19:14:02 1999 Return-Path: Received: from tudedr.et.tudelft.nl by it.et.tudelft.nl (4.1/BB-2.0) id AA04048; Mon, 23 Aug 99 19:14:02 +0200 Received: from mail1.digital.com by ITS.TUDelft.NL (PMDF V5.1-10 #21918) with ESMTP id <01JF490JF2IW95OH49@ITS.TUDelft.NL> for erik@duteinh.et.tudelft.nl; Mon, 23 Aug 1999 19:14:01 +0200 Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.2/WV2.0g) with SMTP id KAA20890; Mon, 23 Aug 1999 10:08:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rex.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA14719; Mon, 23 Aug 1999 10:08:23 -0700 Received: by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id KAA07278; Mon, 23 Aug 1999 10:07:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id KAA07289; Mon, 23 Aug 1999 10:07:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail1.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA28112; Mon, 23 Aug 1999 10:07:44 -0700 Received: from note.orchestra.cse.unsw.EDU.AU (note.orchestra.cse.unsw.EDU.AU [129.94.242.29]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.2/WV2.0g) with SMTP id KAA22649 for ; Mon, 23 Aug 1999 10:07:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: From paulaner With LocalMail ; Tue, 24 Aug 1999 03:05:58 +1000 Date: Tue, 24 Aug 1999 03:05:58 +1000 (EST) From: Adam 'WeirdArms' Wiggins Subject: Re: Universal Bootstrap Loader (Bootp/Tftp,Flash) In-Reply-To: <199908231500.RAA03298@mailgate.keith-koep.com> Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com X-Sender: awiggins@paulaner.disy.cse.unsw.EDU.AU To: keith Cc: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Precedence: bulk At UNSW we are working on a all purpose loader/debug monitor to used for our PLEB hardware. It will basically be a bios/loader and debug monitor all in one with a modular structure to use an interface from simple serial to cmore complicated LCD/Keyboard. It will offer the following services: - Selectable interface - Loading executables (ELF/COFF/a.out) from FLASH/Disk/network - Boot/Initialisation of the hardware device - Debugging services for testing the hardware and developing OS's It's only in a early stage but I hope to have something released by early next year (jan or so) Cheers Adam On Mon, 23 Aug 1999, keith wrote: > Hi, > as you are discussing about bootstrap loaders. > We have a bootp/tftp bootstrap loader available here > ( based on etherboot ). It contains an experimental gdb-stub > to talk with a (udp extended) gdb. > > This bootstrap-loader loads images from flash to dram or from > ethernet to dram or from ethernet to flash. > > We are searching for volunteers to clean up and extend the > package. > > Volker > _________________________________________________________________ > | | > | KEITH & KOEP GMBH DEVELOPMENT OF EMBEDDED CONTROL SYSTEMS | > | KOENIGSBERGER STR.2 PHONE +49 (0)202 2525 30 | > | D-42277 WUPPERTAL FAX +49 (0)202 2525 333 | > | GERMANY keith@keith-koep.com | > |_________________________________________________________________| > > From kramer@pa.dec.com Tue Aug 24 02:33:30 1999 Return-Path: Received: from tudedr.et.tudelft.nl by it.et.tudelft.nl (4.1/BB-2.0) id AA05237; Tue, 24 Aug 99 02:33:30 +0200 Received: from mail1.digital.com by ITS.TUDelft.NL (PMDF V5.1-10 #21918) with ESMTP id <01JF4ODAG1L695OJTU@ITS.TUDelft.NL> for erik@duteinh.et.tudelft.nl; Tue, 24 Aug 1999 02:33:24 +0200 Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.2/WV2.0g) with SMTP id RAA23524; Mon, 23 Aug 1999 17:30:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rex.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA30076; Mon, 23 Aug 1999 17:30:03 -0700 Received: by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id RAA08334; Mon, 23 Aug 1999 17:29:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id RAA08337; Mon, 23 Aug 1999 17:29:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail2.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA11420; Mon, 23 Aug 1999 17:29:27 -0700 Received: from Hydro.CAM.ORG (Hydro.CAM.ORG [198.168.100.7]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.2/WV2.0g) with ESMTP id RAA07042 for ; Mon, 23 Aug 1999 17:29:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: from Stratus.CAM.ORG (Stratus.CAM.ORG [198.168.100.6]) by Hydro.CAM.ORG (8.8.8/8.8.4) with SMTP id UAA25871; Mon, 23 Aug 1999 20:27:32 -0400 (EDT) Date: Mon, 23 Aug 1999 20:27:46 -0400 (EDT) From: Nicolas Pitre Subject: Re: About booting messages In-Reply-To: <37C0B81435B.EECDHIROSHI@mail.funai-tky.co.jp> Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com To: Hiroshi Ishii Cc: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Precedence: bulk On Mon, 23 Aug 1999, Hiroshi Ishii wrote: > Hi! > > When I used linux-2.2.3, show booting messages from serial > port (linux version, memory info, ...). But > linunx-2.2.10-rmk2-np11 don't show booting messages. Of > course, initializing serial port before booting.. First you have to be sure that you enabled "Console on SA1100 serial port" while configuring the kernel. Next look in the file linux/drivers/char/serial_sa1100.c for the serial_console_setup() function. In there, be sure that the serial_echo_port is initialized to the port you wish to use. Nicolas Pitre, B. ing. nico@cam.org From kramer@pa.dec.com Tue Aug 24 03:17:53 1999 Return-Path: Received: from tudedr.et.tudelft.nl by it.et.tudelft.nl (4.1/BB-2.0) id AA05383; Tue, 24 Aug 99 03:17:53 +0200 Received: from mail2.digital.com by ITS.TUDelft.NL (PMDF V5.1-10 #21918) with ESMTP id <01JF4PWBRNVY95OKAQ@ITS.TUDelft.NL> for erik@duteinh.et.tudelft.nl; Tue, 24 Aug 1999 03:17:46 +0200 Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.2/WV2.0g) with SMTP id SAA09201; Mon, 23 Aug 1999 18:13:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rex.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA08157; Mon, 23 Aug 1999 18:13:49 -0700 Received: by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id SAA08397; Mon, 23 Aug 1999 18:13:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id SAA08451; Mon, 23 Aug 1999 18:13:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail1.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA21873; Mon, 23 Aug 1999 18:13:30 -0700 Received: from Hydro.CAM.ORG (Hydro.CAM.ORG [198.168.100.7]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.2/WV2.0g) with ESMTP id SAA31451 for ; Mon, 23 Aug 1999 18:13:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: from Stratus.CAM.ORG (Stratus.CAM.ORG [198.168.100.6]) by Hydro.CAM.ORG (8.8.8/8.8.4) with SMTP id VAA04075; Mon, 23 Aug 1999 21:09:00 -0400 (EDT) Date: Mon, 23 Aug 1999 21:09:15 -0400 (EDT) From: Nicolas Pitre Subject: Re: Some questions on kernels & ramdisks In-Reply-To: Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com To: "J.D. Bakker" Cc: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Reply-To: Nicolas Pitre Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Precedence: bulk On Mon, 23 Aug 1999, J.D. Bakker wrote: > 1) I know that the zImage should be copied to physical address 0xC0008000. > What are the register values it expects ? Should I set up a stack ? No stack required. The entry point is in linux/arch/arm/kernel/head-armv.S. You'll see there that r0 and r1 should have specific values upon entering there, but those values are actually hardwired for the CONFIG_ARCH_SA1100 case. Since most of us have very minimalistic loaders, it was convenient to do it there. > 2) How do I pass a command line to the kernel ? Again there is a special structure that should be used as long as it is generated by the loader. If you look at linux/arch/arm/kernel/head-armv.S and linux/arch/arm/kernel/setup.c for #ifdef CONFIG_SA1100_VICTOR, you'll see that I've made something that let me pass a parameter string pointed by r0 upon entering the kernel. You can use the same code if you want to hack something quickly. > 3) Where exactly should I load the ramdisk image ? ISTR that it should be > loaded at address 0x08000000, but I don't have any memory in that space. In fact this is for the Brutus since it has all its memory mapped contigously from 0 by Angel before the kernel starts. The idea is to put your ramdisk image in ram where it won't be overwritten during the boot process, let's say from the second meg and above. Then you need to specify in linux/arch/arm/kernel/setup.c where it will be once the kernel has mapped all ram contigously from address 0xc0000000. > 4) What should I do if I want to run the kernel from ROM (other than > changing the entry address and not compressing it, obviously) ? You should link the kernel so its .text and .rodata sections resides in rom and the rest is copied in ram. Probably you'll have to have it appear at 0xc0008000 for less modifications to the generic kernel code. ... Be prepared for a lot of fun! :-) > 5) I want boot messages from the serial port (UART 3), do I have to do > anything other than enabling the serial port from my bootloader and > compiling in the kernel support ? Also look at linux/drivers/char/serial_sa1100.c for serial_console_setup(). You may change the serial port initialisation if you don't like the defaults. For the long run, I suggest that you add a CONFIG_SA1100_LART in linux/arch/arm/config.in and uses #ifdef CONFIG_SA1100_LART to identify your customizations. Then send a patch to me and I'll include it in the main SA1100 patch and you won't have to do it for each kernel releases. Nicolas Pitre, B. ing. nico@cam.org From kramer@pa.dec.com Tue Aug 24 23:08:22 1999 Return-Path: Received: from tudedr.et.tudelft.nl by it.et.tudelft.nl (4.1/BB-2.0) id AA09246; Tue, 24 Aug 99 23:08:22 +0200 Received: from mail1.digital.com by ITS.TUDelft.NL (PMDF V5.1-10 #21918) with ESMTP id <01JF5VHF64K895OJNK@ITS.TUDelft.NL> for erik@duteinh.et.tudelft.nl; Tue, 24 Aug 1999 23:08:20 +0200 Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.2/WV2.0g) with SMTP id OAA29261; Tue, 24 Aug 1999 14:06:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rex.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA20747; Tue, 24 Aug 1999 14:06:01 -0700 Received: by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id OAA14760; Tue, 24 Aug 1999 14:04:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id OAA14734; Tue, 24 Aug 1999 14:03:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail1.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA09555; Tue, 24 Aug 1999 14:03:57 -0700 Received: from thalia.fm.intel.com (thalia.fm.intel.com [132.233.247.11]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.2/WV2.0g) with ESMTP id OAA28197 for ; Tue, 24 Aug 1999 14:03:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: from fmsmsx29.FM.INTEL.COM (fmsmsx29.fm.intel.com [132.233.42.29]) by thalia.fm.intel.com (8.9.1a+p1/8.9.1/d: relay.m4,v 1.6 1998/11/24 22:10:56 iwep Exp iwep $) with ESMTP id RAA15859 for ; Tue, 24 Aug 1999 17:04:42 +0000 (GMT) Received: by fmsmsx29.fm.intel.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2448.0) id ; Tue, 24 Aug 1999 14:03:42 -0700 Date: Tue, 24 Aug 1999 14:03:41 -0700 From: "Rao, Ram R" Subject: touchscreen driver for the brutus Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com To: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2448.0) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Precedence: bulk Hi, Does anyone have a touchscreen driver already implemented for the Brutus board? Is the Itsy's touchscreen driver the best starting point? Thanks for your help, Ram Rao From kramer@pa.dec.com Wed Aug 25 16:19:15 1999 Return-Path: Received: from tudedr.et.tudelft.nl by it.et.tudelft.nl (4.1/BB-2.0) id AA12443; Wed, 25 Aug 99 16:19:15 +0200 Received: from mail1.digital.com by ITS.TUDelft.NL (PMDF V5.1-10 #21918) with ESMTP id <01JF6VHBX0OU95OLS7@ITS.TUDelft.NL> for erik@duteinh.et.tudelft.nl; Wed, 25 Aug 1999 16:19:13 +0200 Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.2/WV2.0g) with SMTP id HAA00091; Wed, 25 Aug 1999 07:14:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rex.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA22878; Wed, 25 Aug 1999 07:14:38 -0700 Received: by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id HAA17718; Wed, 25 Aug 1999 07:10:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id HAA17726; Wed, 25 Aug 1999 07:10:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail2.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA31571; Wed, 25 Aug 1999 07:10:41 -0700 Received: from thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (thorgal.et.tudelft.nl [130.161.40.91]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.2/WV2.0g) with ESMTP id HAA09339 for ; Wed, 25 Aug 1999 07:10:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [130.161.40.82] (tvs082.et.tudelft.nl [130.161.40.82]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id QAA05253 for ; Wed, 25 Aug 1999 16:10:39 +0200 Date: Wed, 25 Aug 1999 16:09:46 +0200 From: "J.D. Bakker" Subject: Anyone have a ramdisk image for SA-1100 ? In-Reply-To: Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com To: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Precedence: bulk References: Hi all, Does anyone have a ramdisk image for the SA-1100 ? I was trying to download the one that is linked from the Intel site (ftp://ssdl-redstone.stanford.edu/pub/ramdisk.gz), but that server won't let me in (and Zsolt Kiraly[sp?]'s homepage with SA-1100 info there has gone missing too). I know I can make one myself, but me and my SA board are off to a conference site tomorrow (where I'd like to show the SA off ;-), which leaves me little time for full glibc-builds and the like. Sincerely, Jan-Derk Bakker. -- Jan-Derk Bakker, bakker@mmc.et.tudelft.nl The lazy man's proverb: 'There's no business like slow business !' From kramer@pa.dec.com Wed Aug 25 16:32:52 1999 Return-Path: Received: from tudedr.et.tudelft.nl by it.et.tudelft.nl (4.1/BB-2.0) id AA12487; Wed, 25 Aug 99 16:32:52 +0200 Received: from mail2.digital.com by ITS.TUDelft.NL (PMDF V5.1-10 #21918) with ESMTP id <01JF6VXTI5G495OLS7@ITS.TUDelft.NL> for erik@duteinh.et.tudelft.nl; Wed, 25 Aug 1999 16:32:51 +0200 Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.2/WV2.0g) with SMTP id HAA20142; Wed, 25 Aug 1999 07:26:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rex.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA10744; Wed, 25 Aug 1999 07:26:16 -0700 Received: by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id HAA31869; Wed, 25 Aug 1999 07:23:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id HAA17762; Wed, 25 Aug 1999 07:23:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail1.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA06761; Wed, 25 Aug 1999 07:23:52 -0700 Received: from linuxhacker.org ([195.89.188.122]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.2/WV2.0g) with SMTP id HAA02354 for ; Wed, 25 Aug 1999 07:23:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 30957 invoked by uid 0); Wed, 25 Aug 1999 14:31:07 +0000 Received: from localhost (alex@127.0.0.1) by linuxhacker.org with SMTP; Wed, 25 Aug 1999 14:31:07 +0000 Date: Wed, 25 Aug 1999 15:31:06 +0100 (GMT) From: Alex Holden Subject: Re: Anyone have a ramdisk image for SA-1100 ? In-Reply-To: Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com To: "J.D. Bakker" Cc: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Precedence: bulk On Wed, 25 Aug 1999, J.D. Bakker wrote: > Does anyone have a ramdisk image for the SA-1100 ? I was trying to download I don't know how well it'll work, but you could try basing one on the one I put together for the Psion 5/geofox port: http://www.linuxhacker.org/pub/flatcap/ It has Glibc, bash, and various utilities. Ping doesn't work because /etc/protocols is missing, and there is something missing from the startup script. The -lite one has ash (awful shell ;) instead of bash, various other things (like modutils) removed, but a few extra utilities courtesy of busybox. --------------- Linux- the choice of a GNU generation. -------------- : Alex Holden (M1CJD)- Caver, Programmer, Land Rover nut, Radio Ham : -------------------- http://www.linuxhacker.org/ -------------------- From kramer@pa.dec.com Wed Aug 25 16:42:22 1999 Return-Path: Received: from tudedr.et.tudelft.nl by it.et.tudelft.nl (4.1/BB-2.0) id AA12526; Wed, 25 Aug 99 16:42:22 +0200 Received: from mail2.digital.com by ITS.TUDelft.NL (PMDF V5.1-10 #21918) with ESMTP id <01JF6WB62LPK95OLS7@ITS.TUDelft.NL> for erik@duteinh.et.tudelft.nl; Wed, 25 Aug 1999 16:42:20 +0200 Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.2/WV2.0g) with SMTP id HAA13231; Wed, 25 Aug 1999 07:39:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rex.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA21998; Wed, 25 Aug 1999 07:39:54 -0700 Received: by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id HAA05992; Wed, 25 Aug 1999 07:36:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id HAA17797; Wed, 25 Aug 1999 07:36:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail2.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA23789; Wed, 25 Aug 1999 07:36:35 -0700 Received: from mailgate.keith-koep.com (mailgate.keith-koep.com [195.8.230.32]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.2/WV2.0g) with ESMTP id HAA11993 for ; Wed, 25 Aug 1999 07:36:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: from otto (otto [195.8.230.40]) by mailgate.keith-koep.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id PAA09812 for ; Wed, 25 Aug 1999 15:36:38 +0200 Date: Wed, 25 Aug 1999 16:36:55 +0200 (MET DST) From: keith Subject: Re: Anyone have a ramdisk image for SA-1100 ? Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com To: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Reply-To: keith Message-Id: <199908251336.PAA09812@mailgate.keith-koep.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: dtmail 1.2.0 CDE Version 1.2 SunOS 5.6 sun4u sparc Content-Type: TEXT/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Md5: cA1hEhKdXM+o5bpcq4kJ2g== Precedence: bulk Here is one (mixed aout and elf, runs with 2.0.30 and 2.2.9 ): ftp://www.keith-koep.com/pub/sa1100_OS/linux229/flashdisk.gz Volker From kramer@pa.dec.com Wed Sep 1 20:30:21 1999 Return-Path: Received: from tudedr.et.tudelft.nl by it.et.tudelft.nl (4.1/BB-2.0) id AA10022; Wed, 1 Sep 99 20:30:21 +0200 Received: from mail2.digital.com by ITS.TUDelft.NL (PMDF V5.1-10 #21918) with ESMTP id <01JFGWB95N8A95OVYZ@ITS.TUDelft.NL> for erik@duteinh.et.tudelft.nl; Wed, 1 Sep 1999 20:30:19 +0200 Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.2/WV2.0g) with SMTP id LAA02086; Wed, 01 Sep 1999 11:25:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rex.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA17053; Wed, 01 Sep 1999 11:25:46 -0700 Received: by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id LAA13154; Wed, 01 Sep 1999 11:23:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id LAA13130; Wed, 01 Sep 1999 11:23:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail2.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA11851; Wed, 01 Sep 1999 11:23:47 -0700 Received: from thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (thorgal.et.tudelft.nl [130.161.40.91]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.2/WV2.0g) with ESMTP id LAA18796 for ; Wed, 01 Sep 1999 11:23:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [130.161.40.82] (tvs082.et.tudelft.nl [130.161.40.82]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id UAA24671 for ; Wed, 01 Sep 1999 20:23:45 +0200 Date: Wed, 01 Sep 1999 20:23:13 +0200 From: "J.D. Bakker" Subject: It works ! (status & even more questions) Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com To: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Precedence: bulk Hi all, Thanks to the great help I've had here, Linux-2.2.10 is running great on my SA-1100 board. When idling at the bash prompt, it takes < 200mW @ 220Mhz. I've only used a minimal kernel (SLIP, PPP, serial console, fbdev, basic IP, no sound, no disk interfaces) and am now trying to get the LCD working (using a 320*240 passive mono panel). Question: Does anyone have some clues on how to get the LCD interface working using the fbdev ? Hints on how to do it on color displays (eg Brutus) are also welcome. I've a small number of observations: - 2.2.10-rmk2-np11 fails to compile; fixing line 165 of arch/arm/mm/fault-common.c cures this. - the kernel *only* works when compiled with the binaries from Werner Almesberger (ftp://lrcftp/pub/people/almesber/psion/xdev-0.tar.gz) ; this is egcs-2.91.57 19980901 (egcs-1.1 release) and binutils 2.9.1.0.15. - the kernel *does not* work when compiled with a homebuilt gcc-2.95.1 with the ARM patch and binutils 2.9.1.0.25. 'Does not work' means that it (reproducably) boots up to "RAMDISK: Compressed image found at block 0" and then reboots (without as much as an oops), while a working kernel would proceed to "VFS: Mounted root (ext2 filesystem)". - The egcs-2.91.57 19980901 (egcs-1.1 release) / binutils 2.9.1.0.15 combo does work with the 'Split text into discardable sections'-option; again gcc-2.95.1 / 2.9.1.0.25 crashes & burns; this time with an oops. I didn't record the oops; I'll reproduce & ksymoops it if it's useful to anyone. Hope this helps anyone; so far 2.2.10 has been perfectly stable for me. Sincerely, Jan-Derk Bakker. -- "There is a style of design I call "wishful thinking engineering." It starts with something like "pigs can fly if you feed them enough beans" and develops utopian plans such as like having everyone commute to work riding on personal pigs, and along the way ignores minor details such as the consequent rain of the non-gaseous byproducts." (Vernon Schryver in n.a.n-a.e) From kramer@pa.dec.com Wed Sep 1 23:03:28 1999 Return-Path: Received: from tudedr.et.tudelft.nl by it.et.tudelft.nl (4.1/BB-2.0) id AA10451; Wed, 1 Sep 99 23:03:28 +0200 Received: from mail2.digital.com by ITS.TUDelft.NL (PMDF V5.1-10 #21918) with ESMTP id <01JFH1N3QPGI95OVDW@ITS.TUDelft.NL> for erik@duteinh.et.tudelft.nl; Wed, 1 Sep 1999 23:03:26 +0200 Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.2/WV2.0g) with SMTP id OAA26069; Wed, 01 Sep 1999 14:01:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rex.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA07784; Wed, 01 Sep 1999 14:01:06 -0700 Received: by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id OAA13331; Wed, 01 Sep 1999 14:00:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id OAA13352; Wed, 01 Sep 1999 14:00:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail2.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA31992; Wed, 01 Sep 1999 14:00:34 -0700 Received: from tele-post-20.mail.demon.net (tele-post-20.mail.demon.net [194.217.242.20]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.2/WV2.0g) with ESMTP id OAA01373 for ; Wed, 01 Sep 1999 14:00:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: from tazenda.demon.co.uk ([158.152.220.239] helo=kings-cross.london.uk.eu.org) by tele-post-20.mail.demon.net with esmtp (Exim 2.12 #2) id 11MHTs-000M9u-0K; Wed, 01 Sep 1999 20:59:44 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=kings-cross.london.uk.eu.org ident=phil) by kings-cross.london.uk.eu.org with esmtp (Exim 2.05 #1) id 11MHTm-0003vT-00; Wed, 01 Sep 1999 21:59:38 +0100 Date: Wed, 01 Sep 1999 21:59:38 +0100 From: Philip Blundell Subject: Re: It works ! (status & even more questions) In-Reply-To: "Message from J.D. Bakker" "of Wed, 01 Sep 1999 20:23:13 +0200." Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com To: "J.D. Bakker" Cc: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: exmh version 2.0.2 2/24/98 (debian) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Precedence: bulk >- the kernel *only* works when compiled with the binaries from Werner > Almesberger (ftp://lrcftp/pub/people/almesber/psion/xdev-0.tar.gz) ; > this is egcs-2.91.57 19980901 (egcs-1.1 release) and binutils 2.9.1.0.15. It does not work to build kernels from those sources with gcc 2.95, owing to various bad interactions. Patches do exist and later kernels should be OK. p. From kramer@pa.dec.com Wed Sep 1 23:28:16 1999 Return-Path: Received: from tudedr.et.tudelft.nl by it.et.tudelft.nl (4.1/BB-2.0) id AA10527; Wed, 1 Sep 99 23:28:16 +0200 Received: from mail1.digital.com by ITS.TUDelft.NL (PMDF V5.1-10 #21918) with ESMTP id <01JFH2IUW86U95OVDW@ITS.TUDelft.NL> for erik@duteinh.et.tudelft.nl; Wed, 1 Sep 1999 23:28:15 +0200 Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.2/WV2.0g) with SMTP id OAA12091; Wed, 01 Sep 1999 14:25:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rex.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA05599; Wed, 01 Sep 1999 14:25:14 -0700 Received: by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id OAA13436; Wed, 01 Sep 1999 14:24:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id OAA13433; Wed, 01 Sep 1999 14:24:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail2.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA12697; Wed, 01 Sep 1999 14:24:53 -0700 Received: from thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (thorgal.et.tudelft.nl [130.161.40.91]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.2/WV2.0g) with ESMTP id OAA28092 for ; Wed, 01 Sep 1999 14:24:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [130.161.40.82] (tvs082.et.tudelft.nl [130.161.40.82]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id XAA24978 for ; Wed, 01 Sep 1999 23:24:51 +0200 Date: Wed, 01 Sep 1999 23:23:44 +0200 From: "J.D. Bakker" Subject: Re: It works ! (status & even more questions) Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com To: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Precedence: bulk >- the kernel *only* works when compiled with the binaries from Werner > Almesberger (ftp://lrcftp/pub/people/almesber/psion/xdev-0.tar.gz) ; > this is egcs-2.91.57 19980901 (egcs-1.1 release) and binutils 2.9.1.0.15. ...that URL should be ftp://lrcftp.epfl.ch/pub/people/almesber/psion/xdev-0.tar.gz ; sorry about that. JDB [LART pics online at http://www-ict.its.tudelft.nl/~erik/open-source/LART/] -- "A satisfied customer ? We ought to have him stuffed !" -- Basil Fawlty From kramer@pa.dec.com Fri Sep 3 22:21:15 1999 Return-Path: Received: from tudedr.et.tudelft.nl by it.et.tudelft.nl (4.1/BB-2.0) id AA21927; Fri, 3 Sep 99 22:21:15 +0200 Received: from mail2.digital.com by ITS.TUDelft.NL (PMDF V5.1-10 #21918) with ESMTP id <01JFJSRGJCDY935UTQ@ITS.TUDelft.NL> for erik@duteinh.et.tudelft.nl; Fri, 3 Sep 1999 22:21:13 +0200 Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.2/WV2.0g) with SMTP id NAA20811; Fri, 03 Sep 1999 13:19:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rex.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA19210; Fri, 03 Sep 1999 13:18:50 -0700 Received: by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id NAA20884; Fri, 03 Sep 1999 13:15:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id NAA20866; Fri, 03 Sep 1999 13:15:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail2.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA19209; Fri, 03 Sep 1999 13:15:19 -0700 Received: from mail-blue.research.att.com (mail-blue.research.att.com [135.207.30.102]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.2/WV2.0g) with ESMTP id NAA07954 for ; Fri, 03 Sep 1999 13:15:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: from bigmail.research.att.com (bigmail.research.att.com [135.207.30.101]) by mail-blue.research.att.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 64EC34CE2B for ; Fri, 03 Sep 1999 16:14:33 -0400 (EDT) Received: from geuse.ha6174 (geuse.research.att.com [135.207.26.133]) by bigmail.research.att.com (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id QAA12077 for ; Fri, 03 Sep 1999 16:14:32 -0400 (EDT) Received: from geuse.research.att.com by geuse.ha6174 (SMI-8.6/SMI-SVR4) id QAA18326; Fri, 03 Sep 1999 16:16:04 -0400 Date: Fri, 03 Sep 1999 16:16:04 -0400 (EDT) From: Gregory Durant Subject: linux port to brutus Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com To: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Reply-To: Gregory Durant Message-Id: <199909032016.QAA18326@geuse.ha6174> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: dtmail 1.2.1 CDE Version 1.2.1 SunOS 5.6 sun4u sparc Content-Type: TEXT/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Md5: 9AeDKvCf7Zxjbb9RPcwohA== Precedence: bulk I'm trying to load the linux port (included in the distribution) to the sa-1100 evaluation board (Brutus). I've followed the linux-distrib-notes and progressed to the point where the angelboot program gives indication that the execution of the kernel is starting (print output of "Starting ... ([20] bytes in reply message)"). Unfortunately, nothing happens after this. Should I see a login prompt on the evaluation board console and/or through the board serial port 1? All suggestions are appreciated! Regards, Gregory M. Durant AT&T Labs Research Initiatives 180 Park Avenue. Blg. 103 Rm-A009 Florham Park, NJ 07932 (973) 360-7110 (973) 360-8455 (fax) durant@research.att.com From kramer@pa.dec.com Tue Sep 7 04:54:23 1999 Return-Path: Received: from tudedr.et.tudelft.nl by it.et.tudelft.nl (4.1/BB-2.0) id AA01815; Tue, 7 Sep 99 04:54:23 +0200 Received: from mail2.digital.com by ITS.TUDelft.NL (PMDF V5.1-10 #21918) with ESMTP id <01JFODCXATMM935X8D@ITS.TUDelft.NL> for erik@duteinh.et.tudelft.nl; Tue, 7 Sep 1999 04:54:21 +0200 Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.2/WV2.0g) with SMTP id TAA28659; Mon, 06 Sep 1999 19:46:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rex.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA20477; Mon, 06 Sep 1999 19:46:27 -0700 Received: by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id TAA00898; Mon, 06 Sep 1999 19:44:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id TAA00942; Mon, 06 Sep 1999 19:44:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail2.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA28771; Mon, 06 Sep 1999 19:44:10 -0700 Received: from funai-tky.co.jp (ns.funai-tky.co.jp [210.154.37.2]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.2/WV2.0g) with ESMTP id TAA16835 for ; Mon, 06 Sep 1999 19:44:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: from hiropu ([192.168.1.19]) by funai-tky.co.jp (8.9.1/3.7Wpr7-98092916) with SMTP id LAA12979 for ; Tue, 07 Sep 1999 11:44:04 +0900 Date: Tue, 07 Sep 1999 11:51:12 +0900 From: Hiroshi Ishii Subject: About Real-Time linux Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com To: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Message-Id: <37D47DA0296.0181HIROSHI@mail.funai-tky.co.jp> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Becky! ver 1.25.07 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk Hi, Everyone hacking today! So, Anyone interesting Real-Time Linux? RT-linux(http://luz.cs.nmt.edu/~rtlinux/) seems only for i386 user. How about arm or StrongArm? Thanks, ---- Funai Electric R & D Co.,LTD Hiroshi Ishii /\ May the Forth be with you .... always! \/ From kramer@pa.dec.com Fri Sep 10 08:15:15 1999 Return-Path: Received: from tudedr.et.tudelft.nl by it.et.tudelft.nl (4.1/BB-2.0) id AA17718; Fri, 10 Sep 99 08:15:15 +0200 Received: from mail2.digital.com by ITS.TUDelft.NL (PMDF V5.1-10 #21918) with ESMTP id <01JFSR8ZYBOO95PDVJ@ITS.TUDelft.NL> for erik@duteinh.et.tudelft.nl; Fri, 10 Sep 1999 08:15:14 +0200 Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.2/WV2.0g) with SMTP id XAA29579; Thu, 09 Sep 1999 23:09:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rex.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA03569; Thu, 09 Sep 1999 23:09:09 -0700 Received: by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id XAA12682; Thu, 09 Sep 1999 23:04:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id XAA12698; Thu, 09 Sep 1999 23:04:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail1.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA01067; Thu, 09 Sep 1999 23:04:23 -0700 Received: from cet.cet.st.com.sg ([203.116.85.223]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.2/WV2.0g) with ESMTP id XAA17605 for ; Thu, 09 Sep 1999 23:04:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nicodemus (cet.st.com.sg [132.0.28.188] (may be forged)) by cet.cet.st.com.sg (2.6 Build 1 (Berkeley 8.8.6)/8.8.4) with SMTP id OAA00595 for ; Fri, 10 Sep 1999 14:03:30 +0800 Date: Fri, 10 Sep 1999 14:07:22 +0800 From: Alan Chong Subject: Sign up Mail List Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com To: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Message-Id: <000b01befb52$bf64d8e0$bc1c0084@nicodemus> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 4.72.3110.1 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0008_01BEFB95.CD44F560" Precedence: bulk X-Msmail-Priority: Normal X-Mimeole: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.3110.3 X-Priority: 3 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0008_01BEFB95.CD44F560 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Wish to sign up wish list Alan Chong Senior Associate Engineer Data Comms Division CET Technologies Pte Ltd chongsm@cet.st.com.sg ------=_NextPart_000_0008_01BEFB95.CD44F560 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
 
Wish to sign up wish=20 list
 
 
Alan = Chong
 
Senior Associate = Engineer
Data Comms=20 Division
CET Technologies Pte Ltd
chongsm@cet.st.com.sg
------=_NextPart_000_0008_01BEFB95.CD44F560-- From kramer@pa.dec.com Fri Sep 10 09:52:12 1999 Return-Path: Received: from tudedr.et.tudelft.nl by it.et.tudelft.nl (4.1/BB-2.0) id AA18042; Fri, 10 Sep 99 09:52:12 +0200 Received: from mail2.digital.com by ITS.TUDelft.NL (PMDF V5.1-10 #21918) with ESMTP id <01JFSUN52QWM95PJ5R@ITS.TUDelft.NL> for erik@duteinh.et.tudelft.nl; Fri, 10 Sep 1999 09:52:09 +0200 Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.2/WV2.0g) with SMTP id AAA09123; Fri, 10 Sep 1999 00:47:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rex.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA22332; Fri, 10 Sep 1999 00:47:15 -0700 Received: by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id AAA13003; Fri, 10 Sep 1999 00:44:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id AAA12971; Fri, 10 Sep 1999 00:43:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail1.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA19683; Fri, 10 Sep 1999 00:43:55 -0700 Received: from linux.co.kr ([210.127.236.5]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.2/WV2.0g) with ESMTP id AAA30444 for ; Fri, 10 Sep 1999 00:43:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: from wave (wave.linux.co.kr [210.127.236.41]) by linux.co.kr (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id QAA11332; Fri, 10 Sep 1999 16:55:15 +0900 Date: Fri, 10 Sep 1999 16:41:53 +0900 From: =?ks_c_5601-1987?B?v+y788O2?= Subject: [Virus alert] Don't run PrettyPark.exe, Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com To: beta@allaire.com, linuxce-devel@linuxce.org, hostmaster@internic.net, customer@[210.104.125.28], listmaster@intraware.com, sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Message-Id: <009001befb5f$ff624dd0$29ec7fd2@linux.co.kr> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2314.1300 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_008D_01BEFBAB.65E7C4E0" Precedence: bulk X-Msmail-Priority: Normal X-Mimeole: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2314.1300 X-Priority: 3 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_008D_01BEFBAB.65E7C4E0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ks_c_5601-1987" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 DQpJdCB3YXMgYSBzcGFtIG1haWwuIChJdCBzZW50IHRvIGFsbCB1c2VycyBvZiBteSBJbmJveCB3 aXRob3V0IG15IGludGVudGlvbikNCkl0IGRvZW4ndCBjYXVzZSBhbnkgc2VyaW91cyBwcm9ibGVt Lg0KRllJLA0KDQpEZXNjcmlwdGlvbjogDQpUaGlzIGlzIGEgd29ybSBwcm9ncmFtIHRoYXQgYmVo YXZlcyBzaW1pbGFyIHRvIEhhcHB5OTkgV29ybS4gVGhpcyB3b3JtIHByb2dyYW0gd2FzIG9yaWdp bmFsbHkgc3ByZWFkIGJ5IGVtYWlsIHNwYW1taW5nIGZyb20gYSBGcmVuY2ggZW1haWwgYWRkcmVz cy4gDQoNClRoZSBhdHRhY2hlZCBwcm9ncmFtIGZpbGUgaXMgbmFtZWQgIlByZXR0eVBhcmsuRVhF Ii4gVGhlIG9yaWdpbmFsIHJlcG9ydCBvZiB0aGlzIHdvcm0gd2FzIHN1Ym1pdHRlZCB0aHJvdWdo IG91ciBleGNsdXNpdmUgU2NhbiZEZWxpdmVyIHN5c3RlbSBvbiBNYXkgMjgsIDE5OTkgZnJvbSBG cmFuY2UuIA0KDQpXaGVuIHRoZSBhdHRhY2hlZCBwcm9ncmFtIGNhbGxlZCAiUHJldHR5UGFyay5F WEUiIGlzIGV4ZWN1dGVkLCBpdCBtYXkgZGlzcGxheSB0aGUgM0QgcGlwZSBzY3JlZW4gc2F2ZXIu IEl0IHdpbGwgYWxzbyBjcmVhdGUgYSBmaWxlIGNhbGxlZCBGSUxFUzMyLlZYRCBpbiB0aGUgV0lO RE9XU1xTWVNURU0gZGlyZWN0b3J5IGFuZCBtb2RpZnkgdGhlIGZvbGxvd2luZyByZWdpc3RyeSBl bnRyeSB2YWx1ZSBmcm9tICIlMSIgJSogdG8gRklMRVMzMi5WWEQgIiUxIiAlKiB3aXRob3V0IHlv dXIga25vd2xlZGdlOiANCg0KSEtFWV9MT0NBTF9NQUNISU5FXFNvZnR3YXJlXENsYXNzZXNcZXhl ZmlsZVxzaGVsbFxvcGVuXGNvbW1hbmQgDQoNCk9uY2UgdGhlIHdvcm0gcHJvZ3JhbSBpcyBleGVj dXRlZCwgaXQgd2lsbCB0cnkgdG8gZW1haWwgaXRzZWxmIGF1dG9tYXRpY2FsbHkgZXZlcnkgMzAg bWludXRlcyAob3IgMzAgbWludXRlcyBhZnRlciBpdCBpcyBsb2FkZWQpIHRvIGVtYWlsIGFkZHJl c3NlcyByZWdpc3RlcmVkIGluIHlvdXIgSW50ZXJuZXQgYWRkcmVzcyBib29rLiANCg0KSXQgd2ls bCBhbHNvIHRyeSB0byBjb25uZWN0IHRvIGFuIElSQyBzZXJ2ZXIgYW5kIGpvaW4gYSBzcGVjaWZp YyBJUkMgY2hhbm5lbC4gVGhlIHdvcm0gd2lsbCBzZW5kIGluZm9ybWF0aW9uIHRvIElSQyBldmVy eSAzMCBzZWNvbmRzIHRvIGtlZXAgaXRzZWxmIGNvbm5lY3RlZCwgYW5kIHRvIHJldHJpZXZlIGFu eSBjb21tYW5kcyBmcm9tIHRoZSBJUkMgY2hhbm5lbC4gDQoNClZpYSBJUkMsIHRoZSBhdXRob3Ig b3IgZGlzdHJpYnV0b3Igb2YgdGhlIHdvcm0gY2FuIG9idGFpbiBzeXN0ZW0gaW5mb3JtYXRpb24g aW5jbHVkaW5nIHRoZSBjb21wdXRlciBuYW1lLCBwcm9kdWN0IG5hbWUsIHByb2R1Y3QgaWRlbnRp ZmllciwgcHJvZHVjdCBrZXksIHJlZ2lzdGVyZWQgb3duZXIsIHJlZ2lzdGVyZWQgb3JnYW5pemF0 aW9uLCBzeXN0ZW0gcm9vdCBwYXRoLCB2ZXJzaW9uLCB2ZXJzaW9uIG51bWJlciwgSUNRIGlkZW50 aWZpY2F0aW9uIG51bWJlcnMsIElDUSBuaWNrbmFtZXMsIHZpY3RpbXMgZW1haWwgYWRkcmVzcywg YW5kIERpYWwgVXAgTmV0d29ya2luZyB1c2VybmFtZSBhbmQgcGFzc3dvcmRzLiBJbiBhZGRpdGlv biwgYmVpbmcgY29ubmVjdGVkIHRvIElSQyBvcGVucyBhIHNlY3VyaXR5IGhvbGUgaW4gd2hpY2gg dGhlIGNsaWVudCBjYW4gcG90ZW50aWFsbHkgYmUgdXNlZCB0byByZWNlaXZlIGFuZCBleGVjdXRl IGZpbGVzLiANCg0KTm9ydG9uIEFudGlWaXJ1cyB1c2VycyBjYW4gcHJvdGVjdCB0aGVtc2VsdmVz IGZyb20gUHJldHR5UGFyay5Xb3JtIGJ5IGRvd25sb2FkaW5nIHRoZSBjdXJyZW50IHZpcnVzIGRl ZmluaXRpb25zIGVpdGhlciB0aHJvdWdoIExpdmVVcGRhdGUgb3IgZnJvbSB0aGUgZm9sbG93aW5n IHdlYiBwYWdlOiANCg0KaHR0cDovL3d3dy5zeW1hbnRlYy5jb20vYXZjZW50ZXIvZG93bmxvYWQu aHRtbCANCg0KTm9ydG9uIEFudGlWaXJ1cyB3aWxsIGRldGVjdCBQcmV0dHlQYXJrLldvcm0gYXMg IlRyb2phbiBIb3JzZSIgd2l0aCBKdW5lIDEsIDE5OTkgdmlydXMgZGVmaW5pdGlvbnMuIFdpdGgg dGhlIEp1bmUgOSwgMTk5OSBkZWZpbml0aW9ucyBvciBsYXRlciwgdGhlIHdvcm0gd2lsbCBiZSBk ZXRlY3RlZCBhcyAiUHJldHR5UGFyay5Xb3JtLiIgDQoNCg0KDQoNClJlcGFpciBJbmZvcm1hdGlv bjogDQoNClJlbW92aW5nIHRoaXMgd29ybSBtYW51YWxseTogDQoNCiAgMS4uIFVzaW5nIFJFR0VE SVQsIG1vZGlmeSB0aGUgUmVnaXN0cnkgZW50cnkgSEtFWV9MT0NBTF9NQUNISU5FXFNvZnR3YXJl XENsYXNzZXNcZXhlZmlsZVxzaGVsbFxvcGVuXGNvbW1hbmQgZnJvbSBGSUxFUzMyLlZYRCAiJTEi ICUqIHRvICIlMSIgJSoNCg0KDQogICAgKFlvdSBtYXkgbGF1bmNoIFJFR0VESVQgdGhyb3VnaCBX aW5kb3dzIFN0YXJ0LW1lbnUtUlVOLiBUaGVuIHNlYXJjaCBmb3IgIkZJTEVTMzIuVlhEIiBpbiBS RUdFRElULikNCg0KDQogIDIuLiBEZWxldGUgV0lORE9XU1xTWVNURU1cRklMRVMzMi5WWEQgDQog IDMuLiBEZWxldGUgdGhlICJQcmV0dHkgUGFyay5FWEUiIGZpbGUuIA0KICA0Li4gUmVib290IHlv dXIgY29tcHV0ZXIuIA0KWW91IG5lZWQgdG8gZG8gc3RlcCAjMiBhYm92ZTsgb3RoZXJ3aXNlLCBl eGVjdXRhYmxlIGZpbGVzIG1heSBub3QgcnVuIHByb3Blcmx5IGlmIHlvdSBzaW1wbHkgZGVsZXRl IEZJTEVTMzIuVlhEIA0KDQpTYWZlIENvbXB1dGluZzogDQoNClRoaXMgd29ybSwgYW5kIG90aGVy IHRyb2phbi1ob3JzZSB0eXBlIHByb2dyYW1zLCBkZW1vbnN0cmF0ZSB0aGUgbmVlZCB0byBwcmFj dGljZSBzYWZlIGNvbXB1dGluZy4gWW91IHNob3VsZCBub3QgbGF1bmNoIGFueSBleGVjdXRhYmxl LWZpbGUgYXR0YWNobWVudCAoRVhFLCBTSFMsIE1TIFdvcmQgb3IgTVMgRXhjZWwgZmlsZSkgdGhh dCBjb21lcyBmcm9tIGFuIHVudHJ1c3RlZCBlbWFpbCBvciBuZXdzZ3JvdXAgc291cmNlLiBUaGVz ZSBmaWxlcyBzaG91bGQgYWx3YXlzIGJlIHNjYW5uZWQgYnkgTm9ydG9uIEFudGlWaXJ1cywgdXNp bmcgdGhlIGxhdGVzdCB2aXJ1cyBkZWZpbml0aW9ucy4NCg0KDQpXcml0ZS11cCBieTpSYXVsIEsu IEVsbml0aWFydGEgJiBFcmljIENoaWVuDQpKdW5lIDEsIDE5OTkNClVwZGF0ZWQ6IEp1bmUgOSwg MTk5OQ0KDQoNCg0KDQoNCi0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0t LS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tDQoNCg== ------=_NextPart_000_008D_01BEFBAB.65E7C4E0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="ks_c_5601-1987" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 PCFET0NUWVBFIEhUTUwgUFVCTElDICItLy9XM0MvL0RURCBIVE1MIDQuMCBUcmFuc2l0aW9uYWwv L0VOIj4NCjxIVE1MPjxIRUFEPg0KPE1FVEEgY29udGVudD0idGV4dC9odG1sOyBjaGFyc2V0PWtz X2NfNTYwMS0xOTg3IiBodHRwLWVxdWl2PUNvbnRlbnQtVHlwZT4NCjxNRVRBIGNvbnRlbnQ9Ik1T SFRNTCA1LjAwLjIzMTQuMTAwMCIgbmFtZT1HRU5FUkFUT1I+DQo8U1RZTEU+PC9TVFlMRT4NCjwv SEVBRD4NCjxCT0RZIGJnQ29sb3I9I2ZmZmZmZj4NCjxESVY+PEZPTlQgc2l6ZT0yPg0KPERJVj48 Rk9OVCBzaXplPTI+PC9GT05UPiZuYnNwOzwvRElWPg0KPERJVj48Rk9OVCBzaXplPTI+SXQgd2Fz IGEgc3BhbSBtYWlsLiAoSXQgc2VudCB0byBhbGwgdXNlcnMgb2YgbXkgSW5ib3ggd2l0aG91dCAN Cm15IGludGVudGlvbik8L0ZPTlQ+PC9ESVY+DQo8RElWPjxGT05UIHNpemU9Mj5JdCBkb2VuJ3Qg Y2F1c2UgYW55IHNlcmlvdXMgcHJvYmxlbS48L0ZPTlQ+PC9ESVY+DQo8RElWPjxGT05UIHNpemU9 Mj5GWUksPC9GT05UPjwvRElWPg0KPERJVj4mbmJzcDs8L0RJVj4NCjxESVY+PEZPTlQgc2l6ZT0y PjxCPkRlc2NyaXB0aW9uOjwvQj4gDQo8UD5UaGlzIGlzIGEgd29ybSBwcm9ncmFtIHRoYXQgYmVo YXZlcyBzaW1pbGFyIHRvIDxBIA0KaHJlZj0iaHR0cDovL3d3dy5zeW1hbnRlYy5jb20vYXZjZW50 ZXIvdmVuYy9kYXRhL2hhcHB5OTkud29ybS5odG1sIj5IYXBweTk5IA0KV29ybTwvQT4uIFRoaXMg d29ybSBwcm9ncmFtIHdhcyBvcmlnaW5hbGx5IHNwcmVhZCBieSBlbWFpbCBzcGFtbWluZyBmcm9t IGEgDQpGcmVuY2ggZW1haWwgYWRkcmVzcy4gDQo8UD5UaGUgYXR0YWNoZWQgcHJvZ3JhbSBmaWxl IGlzIG5hbWVkICJQcmV0dHlQYXJrLkVYRSIuIFRoZSBvcmlnaW5hbCByZXBvcnQgb2YgDQp0aGlz IHdvcm0gd2FzIHN1Ym1pdHRlZCB0aHJvdWdoIG91ciBleGNsdXNpdmUgU2NhbiZhbXA7RGVsaXZl ciBzeXN0ZW0gb24gTWF5IDI4LCANCjE5OTkgZnJvbSBGcmFuY2UuIA0KPFA+V2hlbiB0aGUgYXR0 YWNoZWQgcHJvZ3JhbSBjYWxsZWQgIlByZXR0eVBhcmsuRVhFIiBpcyBleGVjdXRlZCwgaXQgbWF5 IGRpc3BsYXkgDQp0aGUgM0QgcGlwZSBzY3JlZW4gc2F2ZXIuIEl0IHdpbGwgYWxzbyBjcmVhdGUg YSBmaWxlIGNhbGxlZCBGSUxFUzMyLlZYRCBpbiB0aGUgDQpXSU5ET1dTXFNZU1RFTSBkaXJlY3Rv cnkgYW5kIG1vZGlmeSB0aGUgZm9sbG93aW5nIHJlZ2lzdHJ5IGVudHJ5IHZhbHVlIGZyb20gIiUx IiANCiUqIHRvIEZJTEVTMzIuVlhEICIlMSIgJSogd2l0aG91dCB5b3VyIGtub3dsZWRnZTogDQo8 UD5IS0VZX0xPQ0FMX01BQ0hJTkVcU29mdHdhcmVcQ2xhc3Nlc1xleGVmaWxlXHNoZWxsXG9wZW5c Y29tbWFuZCANCjxQPk9uY2UgdGhlIHdvcm0gcHJvZ3JhbSBpcyBleGVjdXRlZCwgaXQgd2lsbCB0 cnkgdG8gZW1haWwgaXRzZWxmIGF1dG9tYXRpY2FsbHkgDQpldmVyeSAzMCBtaW51dGVzIChvciAz MCBtaW51dGVzIGFmdGVyIGl0IGlzIGxvYWRlZCkgdG8gZW1haWwgYWRkcmVzc2VzIA0KcmVnaXN0 ZXJlZCBpbiB5b3VyIEludGVybmV0IGFkZHJlc3MgYm9vay4gDQo8UD5JdCB3aWxsIGFsc28gdHJ5 IHRvIGNvbm5lY3QgdG8gYW4gSVJDIHNlcnZlciBhbmQgam9pbiBhIHNwZWNpZmljIElSQyBjaGFu bmVsLiANClRoZSB3b3JtIHdpbGwgc2VuZCBpbmZvcm1hdGlvbiB0byBJUkMgZXZlcnkgMzAgc2Vj b25kcyB0byBrZWVwIGl0c2VsZiBjb25uZWN0ZWQsIA0KYW5kIHRvIHJldHJpZXZlIGFueSBjb21t YW5kcyBmcm9tIHRoZSBJUkMgY2hhbm5lbC4gDQo8UD5WaWEgSVJDLCB0aGUgYXV0aG9yIG9yIGRp c3RyaWJ1dG9yIG9mIHRoZSB3b3JtIGNhbiBvYnRhaW4gc3lzdGVtIGluZm9ybWF0aW9uIA0KaW5j bHVkaW5nIHRoZSBjb21wdXRlciBuYW1lLCBwcm9kdWN0IG5hbWUsIHByb2R1Y3QgaWRlbnRpZmll ciwgcHJvZHVjdCBrZXksIA0KcmVnaXN0ZXJlZCBvd25lciwgcmVnaXN0ZXJlZCBvcmdhbml6YXRp b24sIHN5c3RlbSByb290IHBhdGgsIHZlcnNpb24sIHZlcnNpb24gDQpudW1iZXIsIElDUSBpZGVu dGlmaWNhdGlvbiBudW1iZXJzLCBJQ1Egbmlja25hbWVzLCB2aWN0aW1zIGVtYWlsIGFkZHJlc3Ms IGFuZCANCkRpYWwgVXAgTmV0d29ya2luZyB1c2VybmFtZSBhbmQgcGFzc3dvcmRzLiBJbiBhZGRp dGlvbiwgYmVpbmcgY29ubmVjdGVkIHRvIElSQyANCm9wZW5zIGEgc2VjdXJpdHkgaG9sZSBpbiB3 aGljaCB0aGUgY2xpZW50IGNhbiBwb3RlbnRpYWxseSBiZSB1c2VkIHRvIHJlY2VpdmUgYW5kIA0K ZXhlY3V0ZSBmaWxlcy4gDQo8UD5Ob3J0b24gQW50aVZpcnVzIHVzZXJzIGNhbiBwcm90ZWN0IHRo ZW1zZWx2ZXMgZnJvbSBQcmV0dHlQYXJrLldvcm0gYnkgDQpkb3dubG9hZGluZyB0aGUgY3VycmVu dCB2aXJ1cyBkZWZpbml0aW9ucyBlaXRoZXIgdGhyb3VnaCBMaXZlVXBkYXRlIG9yIGZyb20gdGhl IA0KZm9sbG93aW5nIHdlYiBwYWdlOiA8QlI+PEJSPjxBIA0KaHJlZj0iaHR0cDovL3d3dy5zeW1h bnRlYy5jb20vYXZjZW50ZXIvZG93bmxvYWQuaHRtbCI+aHR0cDovL3d3dy5zeW1hbnRlYy5jb20v YXZjZW50ZXIvZG93bmxvYWQuaHRtbDwvQT4gDQoNCjxQPk5vcnRvbiBBbnRpVmlydXMgd2lsbCBk ZXRlY3QgUHJldHR5UGFyay5Xb3JtIGFzICJUcm9qYW4gSG9yc2UiIHdpdGggSnVuZSAxLCANCjE5 OTkgdmlydXMgZGVmaW5pdGlvbnMuIFdpdGggdGhlIEp1bmUgOSwgMTk5OSBkZWZpbml0aW9ucyBv ciBsYXRlciwgdGhlIHdvcm0gDQp3aWxsIGJlIGRldGVjdGVkIGFzICJQcmV0dHlQYXJrLldvcm0u IiANCjxQPjxJTUcgaGVpZ2h0PTIgc3JjPSJjaWQ6MDEyZDAxYmVmOWNhJGJhMzkyNWQwJDU5NzIy ZTkzQHNudS5hYy5rciIgDQp3aWR0aD00NTA+PEJSPg0KPFA+PEI+UmVwYWlyIEluZm9ybWF0aW9u OjwvQj4gDQo8UD5SZW1vdmluZyB0aGlzIHdvcm0gbWFudWFsbHk6IA0KPE9MPg0KICA8TEk+VXNp bmcgUkVHRURJVCwgbW9kaWZ5IHRoZSBSZWdpc3RyeSBlbnRyeSANCiAgSEtFWV9MT0NBTF9NQUNI SU5FXFNvZnR3YXJlXENsYXNzZXNcZXhlZmlsZVxzaGVsbFxvcGVuXGNvbW1hbmQgZnJvbSANCiAg PEk+RklMRVMzMi5WWEQgIiUxIiAlKiB0byAiJTEiICUqPC9JPjxCUj48QlI+DQogIDxCTE9DS1FV T1RFPjxJPihZb3UgbWF5IGxhdW5jaCBSRUdFRElUIHRocm91Z2ggV2luZG93cyBTdGFydC1tZW51 LVJVTi4gVGhlbiANCiAgICBzZWFyY2ggZm9yICJGSUxFUzMyLlZYRCIgaW4gUkVHRURJVC4pPC9J PjxCUj48QlI+PC9CTE9DS1FVT1RFPg0KICA8TEk+RGVsZXRlIFdJTkRPV1NcU1lTVEVNXEZJTEVT MzIuVlhEIA0KICA8TEk+RGVsZXRlIHRoZSAiUHJldHR5IFBhcmsuRVhFIiBmaWxlLiANCiAgPExJ PlJlYm9vdCB5b3VyIGNvbXB1dGVyLiA8L0xJPjwvT0w+DQo8UD5Zb3UgbmVlZCB0byBkbyBzdGVw ICMyIGFib3ZlOyBvdGhlcndpc2UsIGV4ZWN1dGFibGUgZmlsZXMgbWF5IG5vdCBydW4gDQpwcm9w ZXJseSBpZiB5b3Ugc2ltcGx5IGRlbGV0ZSBGSUxFUzMyLlZYRCANCjxQPjxCPlNhZmUgQ29tcHV0 aW5nOjwvQj4gDQo8UD5UaGlzIHdvcm0sIGFuZCBvdGhlciB0cm9qYW4taG9yc2UgdHlwZSBwcm9n cmFtcywgZGVtb25zdHJhdGUgdGhlIG5lZWQgdG8gDQpwcmFjdGljZSBzYWZlIGNvbXB1dGluZy4g WW91IHNob3VsZCBub3QgbGF1bmNoIGFueSBleGVjdXRhYmxlLWZpbGUgYXR0YWNobWVudCANCihF WEUsIFNIUywgTVMgV29yZCBvciBNUyBFeGNlbCBmaWxlKSB0aGF0IGNvbWVzIGZyb20gYW4gdW50 cnVzdGVkIGVtYWlsIG9yIA0KbmV3c2dyb3VwIHNvdXJjZS4gVGhlc2UgZmlsZXMgc2hvdWxkIGFs d2F5cyBiZSBzY2FubmVkIGJ5IDxBIA0KaHJlZj0iaHR0cDovL3d3dy5zeW1hbnRlYy5jb20vbmF2 L2luZGV4Lmh0bWwiPk5vcnRvbiBBbnRpVmlydXM8L0E+LCB1c2luZyB0aGUgDQpsYXRlc3QgPEEg aHJlZj0iaHR0cDovL3d3dy5zeW1hbnRlYy5jb20vYXZjZW50ZXIvZG93bmxvYWQuaHRtbCI+dmly dXMgDQpkZWZpbml0aW9uczwvQT4uPC9QPg0KPFA+PC9QPg0KPFA+PEVNPldyaXRlLXVwIGJ5OjxG T05UIGNvbG9yPWJsdWU+PC9FTT48RU0+UmF1bCBLLiBFbG5pdGlhcnRhICZhbXA7IEVyaWMgDQpD aGllbjxCUj5KdW5lIDEsIDE5OTk8L0VNPjwvRk9OVD48QlI+PEVNPlVwZGF0ZWQ6IDxGT05UIGNv bG9yPWJsdWU+SnVuZSA5LCANCjE5OTk8L0ZPTlQ+PC9FTT48L1A+PEZPTlQgY29sb3I9IzAwMDAw MD4NCjxESVY+Jm5ic3A7PC9ESVY+DQo8RElWPiZuYnNwOzwvRElWPg0KPERJVj4mbmJzcDs8L0RJ Vj4NCjxESVY+Jm5ic3A7PC9ESVY+DQo8RElWPi0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0t LS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tPC9ESVY+DQo8RElWPiZuYnNwOzwvRElWPjwvRk9O VD48L0ZPTlQ+PC9ESVY+PC9GT05UPjwvRElWPjwvQk9EWT48L0hUTUw+DQo= ------=_NextPart_000_008D_01BEFBAB.65E7C4E0-- From kramer@pa.dec.com Tue Sep 14 00:03:36 1999 Return-Path: Received: from tudedr.et.tudelft.nl by it.et.tudelft.nl (4.1/BB-2.0) id AA01762; Tue, 14 Sep 99 00:03:36 +0200 Received: from mail2.digital.com by ITS.TUDelft.NL (PMDF V5.1-10 #21918) with ESMTP id <01JFXV8T7OTA95PEGO@ITS.TUDelft.NL> for erik@duteinh.et.tudelft.nl; Tue, 14 Sep 1999 00:03:35 +0200 Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.2/WV2.0g) with SMTP id OAA13898; Mon, 13 Sep 1999 14:59:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rex.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA06270; Mon, 13 Sep 1999 14:59:45 -0700 Received: by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id OAA26585; Mon, 13 Sep 1999 14:58:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id OAA26543; Mon, 13 Sep 1999 14:58:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail2.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA07016; Mon, 13 Sep 1999 14:58:07 -0700 Received: from kerouac.deepwell.com (deepwell.com [209.63.174.12]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.2/WV2.0g) with SMTP id OAA16683 for ; Mon, 13 Sep 1999 14:58:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 27958 invoked from network); Mon, 13 Sep 1999 22:43:14 +0000 Received: from proxy.dcomm.net (HELO terry) (209.63.175.10) by deepwell.com with SMTP; Mon, 13 Sep 1999 22:43:14 +0000 Date: Mon, 13 Sep 1999 14:56:05 -0700 From: Terry Ewing Subject: archives Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com X-Sender: terrye@mail1.dcomm.net (Unverified) To: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Message-Id: <4.2.0.58.19990913145539.01bdfa30@mail1.dcomm.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Pro Version 4.2.0.58 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Precedence: bulk Can anyone point me to a website containing archives of this list? - Terry Ewing Deepwell Internet Services From kramer@pa.dec.com Thu Sep 16 02:07:37 1999 Return-Path: Received: from tudedr.et.tudelft.nl by it.et.tudelft.nl (4.1/BB-2.0) id AA14544; Thu, 16 Sep 99 02:07:37 +0200 Received: from mail2.digital.com by ITS.TUDelft.NL (PMDF V5.1-10 #21918) with ESMTP id <01JG0S66Z70M9360US@ITS.TUDelft.NL> for erik@duteinh.et.tudelft.nl; Thu, 16 Sep 1999 02:07:35 +0200 Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.2/WV2.0g) with SMTP id RAA19087; Wed, 15 Sep 1999 17:04:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rex.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA13683; Wed, 15 Sep 1999 17:04:16 -0700 Received: by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id RAA01893; Wed, 15 Sep 1999 17:02:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id RAA01858; Wed, 15 Sep 1999 17:02:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail2.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA24175; Wed, 15 Sep 1999 17:02:40 -0700 Received: from xanadu.gn.com ([24.200.137.233]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.2/WV2.0g) with ESMTP id RAA18721 for ; Wed, 15 Sep 1999 17:02:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (nico@localhost) by xanadu.gn.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id TAA17737 for ; Wed, 15 Sep 1999 19:57:44 -0400 Date: Wed, 15 Sep 1999 19:57:44 -0400 (EDT) From: Nicolas Pitre Subject: diff-2.2.12-rmk1-np12 Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com X-Sender: nico@xanadu.gn.com To: SA-1100/Linux Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Precedence: bulk X-Authentication-Warning: xanadu.gn.com: nico owned process doing -bs Yes, a new patch is available from: ftp.netwinder.org/users/n/nico The new stuff in there are: - merged IRDA support with the serial driver - cleanup and optimization for the memory configuration macros - SA1101 support from Peter Danielsson - Tifon implementation from Peter Danielsson - LART implementation from J.D. Bakker - fixed compilation problem from previous patch This time, I tested compilation for Brutus and Victor. I tested execution on a Victor only. At the moment I tried this kernel compiled with egcs-1.1.1+PhilB patches and gcc-2.95.1. It runs OK if compiled with egcs-1.1.1 but it DOES crash eventually if compiled with gcc-2.95.1. Be warned. It may work with some other compiler version but I currently only have those mentionned above. >From now I'll try to merge this into 2.3.18 and hopefully be able to submit something to Russell before next week. Of course I'm interested in any reports of success or failure about this patch, especially because I made some changes that could break on some other SA1100 implementations. Please tell me how it works for you. Nicolas From kramer@pa.dec.com Tue Sep 21 15:24:19 1999 Return-Path: Received: from tudedr.et.tudelft.nl by it.et.tudelft.nl (4.1/BB-2.0) id AA07364; Tue, 21 Sep 99 15:24:19 +0200 Received: from mail2.digital.com by ITS.TUDelft.NL (PMDF V5.1-10 #21918) with ESMTP id <01JG8JFNKO7Y95PTX9@ITS.TUDelft.NL> for erik@duteinh.et.tudelft.nl; Tue, 21 Sep 1999 15:24:16 +0200 Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.2/WV2.0g) with SMTP id GAA10438; Tue, 21 Sep 1999 06:15:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rex.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA08325; Tue, 21 Sep 1999 06:10:23 -0700 Received: by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id GAA23617; Tue, 21 Sep 1999 06:01:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id GAA23856; Tue, 21 Sep 1999 06:01:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail2.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA11461; Tue, 21 Sep 1999 06:01:15 -0700 Received: from note.orchestra.cse.unsw.EDU.AU (note.orchestra.cse.unsw.EDU.AU [129.94.242.29]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.2/WV2.0g) with SMTP id GAA09159 for ; Tue, 21 Sep 1999 06:01:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: From paulaner With LocalMail ; Tue, 21 Sep 1999 23:00:32 +1000 Date: Tue, 21 Sep 1999 23:00:31 +1000 (EST) From: Adam 'WeirdArms' Wiggins Subject: Brutus Memory Config Register Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com X-Sender: awiggins@paulaner.disy.cse.unsw.EDU.AU To: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Precedence: bulk What should be bhe memory configuration Registers values for brutus running at 206Mhz with 60ns RAM? Cheers Adam P.S. I'm after the values for all 7 registers actually From kramer@pa.dec.com Mon Sep 27 22:13:32 1999 Return-Path: Received: from tudedr.et.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (4.1/BB-2.0) id AA03667; Mon, 27 Sep 99 22:13:32 +0200 Received: from mail1.digital.com by ITS.TUDelft.NL (PMDF V5.1-10 #21918) with ESMTP id <01JGHBH53GPQ95Q79Y@ITS.TUDelft.NL> for erik@duteinh.et.tudelft.nl; Mon, 27 Sep 1999 22:13:30 +0200 Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.2/WV2.0g) with SMTP id NAA08089; Mon, 27 Sep 1999 13:06:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rex.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA27078; Mon, 27 Sep 1999 13:06:19 -0700 Received: by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id NAA16448; Mon, 27 Sep 1999 13:04:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id NAA16447; Mon, 27 Sep 1999 13:04:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail2.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA07471; Mon, 27 Sep 1999 13:04:23 -0700 Received: from thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (thorgal.et.tudelft.nl [130.161.40.91]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.2/WV2.0g) with ESMTP id NAA11570 for ; Mon, 27 Sep 1999 13:04:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [130.161.40.82] (tvs082.et.tudelft.nl [130.161.40.82]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id WAA24493; Mon, 27 Sep 1999 22:04:10 +0200 Date: Mon, 27 Sep 1999 22:04:01 +0200 From: "J.D. Bakker" Subject: Modules broken on 2.2.1[02] on SA-1100 ? Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com To: linux-arm@vger.rutgers.edu, sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Precedence: bulk Hi all, [quick Q: is there any way to access physical memory locations, specifically the GPIO registers, from userspace on SA-linux ? mmap(2) or read(2) from either /dev/mem or /dev/kmem don't seem to work] As per the subject. insmod on either 2.2.10-rmk2-np11 or 2.2.12-rmk1-np12 gives a very reproducible oops and a solid hang. I tried a home-compiled insmod as well as the one from RedHat rawhide-arm4l; same results. I tried the null module below as well as loop.o, dummy.o and ppp-deflate.o; no change. Platform: LART board, SA-1100DA rev 9; 32M memory Tools: gcc version egcs-2.91.57 19980901 (egcs-1.1 release) binutils 2.9.1.0.15 The module that I used: /* * void.c * Dummy test driver. */ #include #include int __init init_module(void) { printk(KERN_CRIT "Reached init_module.\n"); return 0; } void cleanup_module(void) { printk(KERN_CRIT "Reached cleanup_module.\n"); } The result: bash-2.01# insmod -V insmod version 2.1.121 bash-2.01# ./insmod dummy.o bash-2.01# insmod void.o Bad mode in prefetch abort handler detected: mode SVC_32 Vectors: 00000000: ef9f0000 ea0000a1 e59ff398 ea000093 ea000086 ea0000a9 ea000078 ea0000a6 00000020: 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 Stubs: 00000200: e59fd1a4 e24ee004 e58de000 e14fe000 e58de004 e3ced03f e38dd093 e169f00d 00000220: e20ee00f e28fd0b4 e79de10e e1b0f00e e59fd17c e24ee008 e58de000 e14fe000 00000240: e58de004 e3ced03f e38dd093 e169f00d e20ee00f e28fdf41 e79de10e e1b0f00e 00000260: e59fd14c e24ee004 e58de000 e14fe000 e58de004 e3ced03f e38dd093 e169f00d 00000280: e21ee00f 059fe114 159fe114 e1b0f00e e59fd118 e58de000 e14fe000 e58de004 000002a0: e3ced03f e38dd093 e169f00d e20ee00f e28fd068 e79de10e e1b0f00e e25ef004 000002c0: eafffffe 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 000002e0: c000f5e0 c000f388 c000f388 c000f4a0 c000f388 c000f388 c000f388 c000f388 00000300: c000f388 c000f388 c000f388 c000f388 c000f388 c000f388 c000f388 c000f388 00000320: c000f660 c000f39c c000f39c c000f520 c000f39c c000f39c c000f39c c000f39c 00000340: c000f39c c000f39c c000f39c c000f39c c000f39c c000f39c c000f39c c000f39c 00000360: c000f580 c000f374 c000f374 c000f440 c000f374 c000f374 c000f374 c000f374 00000380: c000f374 c000f374 c000f374 c000f374 c000f374 c000f374 c000f374 c000f374 000003a0: c000f6e0 c000f360 c000f820 c00bf8d0 c00bf8dc c00bf8e8 00000000 00000000 000003c0: 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 000003e0: 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000400: 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000420: 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000440: 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000460: 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000480: 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 000004a0: 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 The oops, run through ksymoops: Options used: -v ../../vmlinux (specified) -o ../../modules (specified) -K (specified) -L (specified) -m ../../System.map (specified) -c 1 (default) No modules in ksyms, skipping objects Reading Oops report from the terminal Internal error: Oops: 0 CPU: 0 pc : [] lr : [] sp : c1635ed4 ip : c1635f2c fp : c1635f28 r10: 400fea44 r9 : ffffffea r8 : c2800048 r7 : c28000c8 r6 : 00000000 r5 : c2800000 r4 : 00000000 r3 : c280004c r2 : c00f6350 r1 : c00e5000 r0 : c2800088 Flags: NzCv IRQs on FIQs on Mode SVC_32 Segment user Control: C07B917F Table: C07B917F DAC: 00000015 Process insmod (pid: 27, stackpage=c1635000) Stack: c1635f00: c2800060 c401ca64 a0000013 ffffffff c1635fb0 c1635f20: c1635f2c c001ff48 c2800058 00000004 c2800048 c1635f3c c2800048 c06e0000 c1635f40: c06e2000 00000048 c00c0e44 c2800048 000000c8 00000000 00000000 00000000 c1635f60: 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 c1635f80: 00000000 00000000 00000000 020113e0 c000f908 00000080 c1634000 c1635ff4 c1635fa0: 00000000 00000000 c1635fb4 c000f760 c001f958 020113e0 020113e0 02017d90 c1635fc0: 00000000 00000000 020113e0 00000002 02000a24 02008260 0200472c 00000000 c1635fe0: 400fea44 bffffe38 02017d90 bffffd40 020046bc 02007ee8 60000010 020113e0 Backtrace: Function entered at [] from [] Function entered at [] from [] r9 = 00000000 r8 = c1635ff4 r7 = c1634000 r6 = 00000080 r5 = c000f908 r4 = 020113e0 Code: pc not in code space Warning, Code line not seen, dumping what data is available >>EIP: c401ca64 Trace: c280004c Trace: c001ff48 Trace: c001f94c Trace: c000f760 1 warning issued. Results may not be reliable. Any ideas ? JDB -- Jan-Derk Bakker, bakker@mmc.et.tudelft.nl The lazy man's proverb: 'There's no business like slow business !' From kramer@pa.dec.com Mon Sep 27 22:48:32 1999 Return-Path: Received: from tudedr.et.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (4.1/BB-2.0) id AA03768; Mon, 27 Sep 99 22:48:32 +0200 Received: from mail1.digital.com by ITS.TUDelft.NL (PMDF V5.1-10 #21918) with ESMTP id <01JGHCPJS6XY936AOJ@ITS.TUDelft.NL> for erik@duteinh.et.tudelft.nl; Mon, 27 Sep 1999 22:48:29 +0200 Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.2/WV2.0g) with SMTP id NAA24910; Mon, 27 Sep 1999 13:45:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rex.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA20475; Mon, 27 Sep 1999 13:44:55 -0700 Received: by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id NAA16498; Mon, 27 Sep 1999 13:44:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id NAA16603; Mon, 27 Sep 1999 13:44:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail2.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA05355; Mon, 27 Sep 1999 13:44:35 -0700 Received: from kings-cross.london.uk.eu.org (tazenda.demon.co.uk [158.152.220.239]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.2/WV2.0g) with ESMTP id NAA27430 for ; Mon, 27 Sep 1999 13:44:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=kings-cross.london.uk.eu.org ident=phil) by kings-cross.london.uk.eu.org with esmtp (Exim 2.05 #1) id 11VhdL-0001a3-00; Mon, 27 Sep 1999 21:44:27 +0100 Date: Mon, 27 Sep 1999 21:44:27 +0100 From: Philip Blundell Subject: Re: Modules broken on 2.2.1[02] on SA-1100 ? In-Reply-To: "Message from J.D. Bakker" "of Mon, 27 Sep 1999 22:04:01 +0200." Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com To: "J.D. Bakker" Cc: linux-arm@vger.rutgers.edu, sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: exmh version 2.0.2 2/24/98 (debian) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Precedence: bulk References: >[quick Q: is there any way to access physical memory locations, >specifically the GPIO registers, from userspace on SA-linux ? mmap(2) or >read(2) from either /dev/mem or /dev/kmem don't seem to work] Mmap'ing /dev/mem ought to give you access to physical memory and is probably the right way to do this. I can't think of any reason why it shouldn't work on the SA-1100 offhand. >gcc version egcs-2.91.57 19980901 (egcs-1.1 release) >binutils 2.9.1.0.15 What version of modutils? >Bad mode in prefetch abort handler detected: mode SVC_32 >CPU: 0 >pc : [] lr : [] >sp : c1635ed4 ip : c1635f2c fp : c1635f28 My best guess is that something is going wrong with the code that resolves branches when the module is loaded. p. From kramer@pa.dec.com Mon Sep 27 23:46:50 1999 Return-Path: Received: from tudedr.et.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (4.1/BB-2.0) id AA03934; Mon, 27 Sep 99 23:46:50 +0200 Received: from mail2.digital.com by ITS.TUDelft.NL (PMDF V5.1-10 #21918) with ESMTP id <01JGHEQWOYCQ9367JA@ITS.TUDelft.NL> for erik@duteinh.et.tudelft.nl; Mon, 27 Sep 1999 23:46:51 +0200 Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.2/WV2.0g) with SMTP id OAA12672; Mon, 27 Sep 1999 14:42:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rex.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA30977; Mon, 27 Sep 1999 14:42:39 -0700 Received: by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id OAA12503; Mon, 27 Sep 1999 14:42:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id OAA16729; Mon, 27 Sep 1999 14:42:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail1.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA25832; Mon, 27 Sep 1999 14:42:18 -0700 Received: from thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (thorgal.et.tudelft.nl [130.161.40.91]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.2/WV2.0g) with ESMTP id OAA16470 for ; Mon, 27 Sep 1999 14:42:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [130.161.40.82] (tvs082.et.tudelft.nl [130.161.40.82]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id XAA24884; Mon, 27 Sep 1999 23:41:58 +0200 Date: Mon, 27 Sep 1999 23:41:28 +0200 From: "J.D. Bakker" Subject: Re: Modules broken on 2.2.1[02] on SA-1100 ? In-Reply-To: Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com To: Philip Blundell Cc: linux-arm@vger.rutgers.edu, sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Precedence: bulk References: "Message from J.D. Bakker" "of Mon, 27 Sep 1999 22:04:01 +0200." >>[quick Q: is there any way to access physical memory locations, >>specifically the GPIO registers, from userspace on SA-linux ? mmap(2) or >>read(2) from either /dev/mem or /dev/kmem don't seem to work] > >Mmap'ing /dev/mem ought to give you access to physical memory and is >probably the right way to do this. I can't think of any reason why it >shouldn't work on the SA-1100 offhand. Theory: The SA-1100 doesn't like cache line reads from the internal control registers. I wrote a small app[1] that memmaps a page and tries to read the first longword. It works as expected for all areas *except* the space between 0x8000 0000 and 0xBFFF FFFF. That's where the internal control registers of the SA live; if I point my app there, the mmap(2) will succeed but reading the data invariably yields Internal error: External abort on linefetch: 6 My guess is that the memory is mapped cacheable, and the SA is allergic to the ensuing line fills. A) Does this sound plausible ? B) Is there a way to fix this ? >>gcc version egcs-2.91.57 19980901 (egcs-1.1 release) >>binutils 2.9.1.0.15 > >What version of modutils? 2.1.121. >>Bad mode in prefetch abort handler detected: mode SVC_32 >>CPU: 0 >>pc : [] lr : [] >>sp : c1635ed4 ip : c1635f2c fp : c1635f28 > >My best guess is that something is going wrong with the code that resolves >branches when the module is loaded. Anything I can do to fix/resolve that ? JDB. [1] Simple mmapper: #include #include #include #include #include #include #include #include #include #include #define FATAL do { fprintf(stderr, "Error at line %d, file %s (%d) [%s]\n", \ __LINE__, __FILE__, errno, strerror(errno)); exit(1); } while(0) #define MAP_SIZE 4096 int main(int argc, char **argv) { int fd; unsigned long *addr; off_t target = 0xE0000000; if(argc > 1) target = strtol(argv[1], 0, 0) & 0xFFFFF000; if((fd = open("/dev/mem", O_RDWR)) == -1) FATAL; printf("/dev/mem opened.\n"); fflush(stdout); /* Map one page of the always-zero memory */ addr = (unsigned long *) mmap(0, MAP_SIZE, PROT_READ | PROT_WRITE, MAP_SHARED, fd, target); if(addr == (unsigned long *) -1) FATAL; printf("Memory mapped at address %p.\n", addr); fflush(stdout); printf("Value at address 0x%X (%p): 0x%X\n", target, addr, *addr); fflush(stdout); if(munmap(addr, MAP_SIZE) == -1) FATAL; close(fd); return 0; } -- Jan-Derk Bakker, bakker@mmc.et.tudelft.nl The lazy man's proverb: 'There's no business like slow business !' From kramer@pa.dec.com Mon Sep 27 23:55:06 1999 Return-Path: Received: from tudedr.et.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (4.1/BB-2.0) id AA03952; Mon, 27 Sep 99 23:55:06 +0200 Received: from mail1.digital.com by ITS.TUDelft.NL (PMDF V5.1-10 #21918) with ESMTP id <01JGHF102A0O95QDY7@ITS.TUDelft.NL> for erik@duteinh.et.tudelft.nl; Mon, 27 Sep 1999 23:55:02 +0200 Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.2/WV2.0g) with SMTP id OAA16193; Mon, 27 Sep 1999 14:51:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rex.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA00358; Mon, 27 Sep 1999 14:51:35 -0700 Received: by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id OAA16703; Mon, 27 Sep 1999 14:51:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id OAA21839; Mon, 27 Sep 1999 14:51:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail1.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA06475; Mon, 27 Sep 1999 14:51:19 -0700 Received: from caramon.armlinux.org.uk (m59-nsv3-trogon.tch.cableol.net [194.168.16.209]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.2/WV2.0g) with ESMTP id OAA16251 for ; Mon, 27 Sep 1999 14:51:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: from raistlin.armlinux.org.uk (linux@raistlin [192.168.0.3]) by caramon.armlinux.org.uk (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id WAA01390; Mon, 27 Sep 1999 22:51:07 +0100 Received: (from linux@localhost) by raistlin.armlinux.org.uk (8.7.4/8.7.3) id WAA00894; Mon, 27 Sep 1999 22:49:47 +0100 Date: Mon, 27 Sep 1999 22:49:47 +0100 (BST) From: linux@arm.linux.org.uk Subject: Re: Modules broken on 2.2.1[02] on SA-1100 ? In-Reply-To: Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com To: Philip.Blundell@pobox.com (Philip Blundell) Cc: J.D.Bakker@ITS.TUDelft.NL, linux-arm@vger.rutgers.edu, sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Message-Id: <199909272149.WAA00894@raistlin.armlinux.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24] Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk Philip Blundell writes: > >Bad mode in prefetch abort handler detected: mode SVC_32 > >CPU: 0 > >pc : [] lr : [] > >sp : c1635ed4 ip : c1635f2c fp : c1635f28 > > My best guess is that something is going wrong with the code that resolves > branches when the module is loaded. This is the classic modutils-can't-handle-system-memory-over-32MB syndrome, seen many times on RiscPCs. I don't think it's compiler related - it's modutils-related. I thought that this was fixed ages ago (even before modutils 2.1.121 was out). _____ |_____| ------------------------------------------------- ---+---+- | | Russell King linux@arm.linux.org.uk --- --- | | | | http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/~rmk/armlinux.html / / | | +-+-+ --- -+- / | THE developer of ARM Linux |+| /|\ / | | | --- | +-+-+ ------------------------------------------------- /\\\ | From kramer@pa.dec.com Tue Sep 28 00:01:15 1999 Return-Path: Received: from tudedr.et.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (4.1/BB-2.0) id AA03966; Tue, 28 Sep 99 00:01:15 +0200 Received: from mail2.digital.com by ITS.TUDelft.NL (PMDF V5.1-10 #21918) with ESMTP id <01JGHF8NEADM9367JA@ITS.TUDelft.NL> for erik@duteinh.et.tudelft.nl; Tue, 28 Sep 1999 00:01:09 +0200 Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.2/WV2.0g) with SMTP id OAA10270; Mon, 27 Sep 1999 14:57:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rex.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA26448; Mon, 27 Sep 1999 14:57:55 -0700 Received: by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id OAA16253; Mon, 27 Sep 1999 14:57:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id OAA12697; Mon, 27 Sep 1999 14:57:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail1.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA19308; Mon, 27 Sep 1999 14:57:42 -0700 Received: from thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (thorgal.et.tudelft.nl [130.161.40.91]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.2/WV2.0g) with ESMTP id OAA09648 for ; Mon, 27 Sep 1999 14:57:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [130.161.40.82] (tvs082.et.tudelft.nl [130.161.40.82]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id XAA24987; Mon, 27 Sep 1999 23:57:34 +0200 Date: Mon, 27 Sep 1999 23:57:03 +0200 From: "J.D. Bakker" Subject: Re: Modules broken on 2.2.1[02] on SA-1100 ? In-Reply-To: Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com To: Philip Blundell Cc: linux-arm@vger.rutgers.edu, sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Precedence: bulk References: "Message from J.D. Bakker" "of Mon, 27 Sep 1999 22:04:01 +0200." At 23:41 +0200 27-09-1999, J.D. Bakker wrote: >Theory: The SA-1100 doesn't like cache line reads from the internal control >registers. Scratch that. The program was buggy; should have used strtoul instead. I can't check it thoroughly now, but it seems to work. Sorry for the wild goose chase. JDB. Note to self: Don't bother people with theories developed 5mins before the building closes. -- Jan-Derk Bakker, bakker@mmc.et.tudelft.nl The lazy man's proverb: 'There's no business like slow business !' From kramer@pa.dec.com Tue Sep 28 00:04:37 1999 Return-Path: Received: from TUDEDU.ET.TUDelft.NL by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (4.1/BB-2.0) id AA03971; Tue, 28 Sep 99 00:04:37 +0200 Received: from mail1.digital.com by ITS.TUDelft.NL (PMDF V5.1-10 #21918) with ESMTP id <01JGHFCLQOY295QDY7@ITS.TUDelft.NL> for erik@duteinh.et.tudelft.nl; Tue, 28 Sep 1999 00:04:31 +0200 Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.2/WV2.0g) with SMTP id PAA22704; Mon, 27 Sep 1999 15:00:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rex.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA12423; Mon, 27 Sep 1999 15:00:39 -0700 Received: by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id PAA16810; Mon, 27 Sep 1999 15:00:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id PAA15044; Mon, 27 Sep 1999 15:00:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail2.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA00599; Mon, 27 Sep 1999 15:00:30 -0700 Received: from thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (thorgal.et.tudelft.nl [130.161.40.91]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.2/WV2.0g) with ESMTP id PAA13321 for ; Mon, 27 Sep 1999 15:00:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [130.161.40.82] (tvs082.et.tudelft.nl [130.161.40.82]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id AAA25002; Tue, 28 Sep 1999 00:00:24 +0200 Date: Mon, 27 Sep 1999 23:58:35 +0200 From: "J.D. Bakker" Subject: Re: Modules broken on 2.2.1[02] on SA-1100 ? In-Reply-To: <199909272149.WAA00894@raistlin.armlinux.org.uk> Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com To: linux@arm.linux.org.uk Cc: linux-arm@vger.rutgers.edu, sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Precedence: bulk References: At 23:49 +0200 27-09-1999, linux@arm.linux.org.uk wrote: >Philip Blundell writes: >> >Bad mode in prefetch abort handler detected: mode SVC_32 >> >CPU: 0 >> >pc : [] lr : [] >> >sp : c1635ed4 ip : c1635f2c fp : c1635f28 >> >> My best guess is that something is going wrong with the code that resolves >> branches when the module is loaded. > >This is the classic modutils-can't-handle-system-memory-over-32MB syndrome, >seen many times on RiscPCs. I don't think it's compiler related - it's >modutils-related. My memory is *exactly* 32M; would it be useful to test it tomorrow with only one bank (16M) ? JDB [who has to run now, don't want to be locked in...] -- Jan-Derk Bakker, bakker@mmc.et.tudelft.nl The lazy man's proverb: 'There's no business like slow business !' From kramer@pa.dec.com Tue Sep 28 00:08:11 1999 Return-Path: Received: from tudedr.et.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (4.1/BB-2.0) id AA03983; Tue, 28 Sep 99 00:08:11 +0200 Received: from mail2.digital.com by ITS.TUDelft.NL (PMDF V5.1-10 #21918) with ESMTP id <01JGHFHDRT4Q936AOJ@ITS.TUDelft.NL> for erik@duteinh.et.tudelft.nl; Tue, 28 Sep 1999 00:08:11 +0200 Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.2/WV2.0g) with SMTP id PAA06801; Mon, 27 Sep 1999 15:06:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rex.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA20351; Mon, 27 Sep 1999 15:06:12 -0700 Received: by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id PAA16774; Mon, 27 Sep 1999 15:06:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id PAA16826; Mon, 27 Sep 1999 15:06:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail2.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA01842; Mon, 27 Sep 1999 15:06:01 -0700 Received: from caramon.armlinux.org.uk (m59-nsv3-trogon.tch.cableol.net [194.168.16.209]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.2/WV2.0g) with ESMTP id PAA14636 for ; Mon, 27 Sep 1999 15:05:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: from raistlin.armlinux.org.uk (linux@raistlin [192.168.0.3]) by caramon.armlinux.org.uk (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id XAA01482; Mon, 27 Sep 1999 23:05:56 +0100 Received: (from linux@localhost) by raistlin.armlinux.org.uk (8.7.4/8.7.3) id XAA01002; Mon, 27 Sep 1999 23:04:34 +0100 Date: Mon, 27 Sep 1999 23:04:29 +0100 (BST) From: linux@arm.linux.org.uk Subject: Re: Modules broken on 2.2.1[02] on SA-1100 ? In-Reply-To: Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com To: J.D.Bakker@ITS.TUDelft.NL (J.D. Bakker) Cc: linux-arm@vger.rutgers.edu, sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Message-Id: <199909272204.XAA01002@raistlin.armlinux.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24] Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk J.D. Bakker writes: > >This is the classic modutils-can't-handle-system-memory-over-32MB syndrome, > >seen many times on RiscPCs. I don't think it's compiler related - it's > >modutils-related. > > My memory is *exactly* 32M; would it be useful to test it tomorrow with > only one bank (16M) ? It will more than likely work with 16M, and 24M (the bug in the 2.0 modutils went undiscovered for some time until I updated my RiscPC to have 40MB). _____ |_____| ------------------------------------------------- ---+---+- | | Russell King linux@arm.linux.org.uk --- --- | | | | http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/~rmk/armlinux.html / / | | +-+-+ --- -+- / | THE developer of ARM Linux |+| /|\ / | | | --- | +-+-+ ------------------------------------------------- /\\\ | From kramer@pa.dec.com Tue Sep 28 11:52:59 1999 Return-Path: Received: from tudedr.et.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (4.1/BB-2.0) id AA06495; Tue, 28 Sep 99 11:52:59 +0200 Received: from mail1.digital.com by ITS.TUDelft.NL (PMDF V5.1-10 #21918) with ESMTP id <01JGI442AVI2936COC@ITS.TUDelft.NL> for erik@duteinh.et.tudelft.nl; Tue, 28 Sep 1999 11:52:54 +0200 Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.2/WV2.0g) with SMTP id CAA26755; Tue, 28 Sep 1999 02:48:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rex.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA30321; Tue, 28 Sep 1999 02:47:57 -0700 Received: by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id CAA18867; Tue, 28 Sep 1999 02:47:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id CAA18853; Tue, 28 Sep 1999 02:47:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail1.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA22245; Tue, 28 Sep 1999 02:47:16 -0700 Received: from thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (thorgal.et.tudelft.nl [130.161.40.91]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.2/WV2.0g) with ESMTP id CAA30696 for ; Tue, 28 Sep 1999 02:47:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [130.161.40.82] (tvs082.et.tudelft.nl [130.161.40.82]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id LAA26549; Tue, 28 Sep 1999 11:47:06 +0200 Date: Tue, 28 Sep 1999 11:46:47 +0200 From: "J.D. Bakker" Subject: Re: Modules broken on 2.2.1[02] on SA-1100 ? In-Reply-To: <199909272204.XAA01002@raistlin.armlinux.org.uk> Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com To: linux@arm.linux.org.uk Cc: linux-arm@vger.rutgers.edu, sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Precedence: bulk References: At 00:04 +0200 28-09-1999, linux@arm.linux.org.uk wrote: >J.D. Bakker writes: >> >This is the classic modutils-can't-handle-system-memory-over-32MB syndrome, >> >seen many times on RiscPCs. I don't think it's compiler related - it's >> >modutils-related. >> >> My memory is *exactly* 32M; would it be useful to test it tomorrow with >> only one bank (16M) ? > >It will more than likely work with 16M, and 24M (the bug in the 2.0 modutils >went undiscovered for some time until I updated my RiscPC to have 40MB). Checked it with 16M; you're right, it works. Do you know how to fix this, or where I could get a working insmod binary ? How do the NetWinder folks handle this, BTW ? ISTR that their smallest model has 32M, and they do use modules. JDB [16M with an 8M ramdisk, a kernel and no swap makes me feel a bit... claustrophobic. And yes, Nico, I know it can be a *lot* tighter..] -- "There is a style of design I call "wishful thinking engineering." It starts with something like "pigs can fly if you feed them enough beans" and develops utopian plans such as like having everyone commute to work riding on personal pigs, and along the way ignores minor details such as the consequent rain of the non-gaseous byproducts." (Vernon Schryver in n.a.n-a.e) From kramer@pa.dec.com Tue Sep 28 12:05:22 1999 Return-Path: Received: from tudedr.et.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (4.1/BB-2.0) id AB06580; Tue, 28 Sep 99 12:05:22 +0200 Received: from mail2.digital.com by ITS.TUDelft.NL (PMDF V5.1-10 #21918) with ESMTP id <01JGI4I8WXY0936COC@ITS.TUDelft.NL> for erik@duteinh.et.tudelft.nl; Tue, 28 Sep 1999 12:04:20 +0200 Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.2/WV2.0g) with SMTP id DAA26604; Tue, 28 Sep 1999 03:01:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rex.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA06419; Tue, 28 Sep 1999 03:00:59 -0700 Received: by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id DAA18928; Tue, 28 Sep 1999 03:00:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id DAA18929; Tue, 28 Sep 1999 03:00:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail2.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA11715; Tue, 28 Sep 1999 03:00:40 -0700 Received: from globe.nexus.co.uk (nexusel.demon.co.uk [158.152.30.195]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.2/WV2.0g) with ESMTP id DAA30281 for ; Tue, 28 Sep 1999 03:00:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.0.0.21] (helo=fountain.nexus.co.uk ident=mail) by globe.nexus.co.uk with smtp (Exim 2.12 #1) id 11Vtxt-0007FA-00; Tue, 28 Sep 1999 10:54:29 +0100 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=fountain ident=pb) by fountain.nexus.co.uk with esmtp (Exim 3.03 #1) id 11Vtxt-0005ZO-00; Tue, 28 Sep 1999 10:54:29 +0100 Date: Tue, 28 Sep 1999 10:54:29 +0100 From: Philip Blundell Subject: Re: Modules broken on 2.2.1[02] on SA-1100 ? In-Reply-To: Message from linux@arm.linux.org.uk of "Mon, 27 Sep 1999 22:49:47 BST." <199909272149.WAA00894@raistlin.armlinux.org.uk> Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com To: linux@arm.linux.org.uk Cc: J.D.Bakker@ITS.TUDelft.NL, linux-arm@vger.rutgers.edu, sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: exmh version 2.0.2 2/24/98 (debian) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Precedence: bulk References: <199909272149.WAA00894@raistlin.armlinux.org.uk> >This is the classic modutils-can't-handle-system-memory-over-32MB syndrome, >seen many times on RiscPCs. I don't think it's compiler related - it's >modutils-related. > >I thought that this was fixed ages ago (even before modutils 2.1.121 was >out). Yeah, I did too but maybe an old version escaped somehow. Get the latest from ftp://ftp.ocs.com.au/pub/modutils and see if it helps, I guess. p. From kramer@pa.dec.com Tue Sep 28 12:31:15 1999 Return-Path: Received: from tudedr.et.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (4.1/BB-2.0) id AA06716; Tue, 28 Sep 99 12:31:15 +0200 Received: from mail1.digital.com by ITS.TUDelft.NL (PMDF V5.1-10 #21918) with ESMTP id <01JGI5FMPM7C936COC@ITS.TUDelft.NL> for erik@duteinh.et.tudelft.nl; Tue, 28 Sep 1999 12:31:15 +0200 Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.2/WV2.0g) with SMTP id DAA06860; Tue, 28 Sep 1999 03:28:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rex.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA07520; Tue, 28 Sep 1999 03:28:14 -0700 Received: by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id DAA18486; Tue, 28 Sep 1999 03:27:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id DAA19010; Tue, 28 Sep 1999 03:27:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail2.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA25969; Tue, 28 Sep 1999 03:27:51 -0700 Received: from globe.nexus.co.uk (nexusel.demon.co.uk [158.152.30.195]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.2/WV2.0g) with ESMTP id DAA24485 for ; Tue, 28 Sep 1999 03:27:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.0.0.21] (helo=fountain.nexus.co.uk ident=mail) by globe.nexus.co.uk with smtp (Exim 2.12 #1) id 11VuTd-0007Lp-00; Tue, 28 Sep 1999 11:27:17 +0100 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=fountain ident=pb) by fountain.nexus.co.uk with esmtp (Exim 3.03 #1) id 11VuTd-0005gG-00; Tue, 28 Sep 1999 11:27:17 +0100 Date: Tue, 28 Sep 1999 11:27:17 +0100 From: Philip Blundell Subject: Re: Modules broken on 2.2.1[02] on SA-1100 ? In-Reply-To: "Message from J.D. Bakker" "of Tue, 28 Sep 1999 11:46:47 +0200." Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com To: "J.D. Bakker" Cc: linux-arm@vger.rutgers.edu, sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: exmh version 2.0.2 2/24/98 (debian) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Precedence: bulk References: >How do the NetWinder folks handle this, BTW ? ISTR that their smallest >model has 32M, and they do use modules. Yeah. I guess they use a working insmod. :-) p. From kramer@pa.dec.com Tue Sep 28 14:05:54 1999 Return-Path: Received: from tudedr.et.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (4.1/BB-2.0) id AA07262; Tue, 28 Sep 99 14:05:54 +0200 Received: from mail2.digital.com by ITS.TUDelft.NL (PMDF V5.1-10 #21918) with ESMTP id <01JGI8QY5Y6Q936CB6@ITS.TUDelft.NL> for erik@duteinh.et.tudelft.nl; Tue, 28 Sep 1999 14:05:53 +0200 Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.2/WV2.0g) with SMTP id FAA12037; Tue, 28 Sep 1999 05:02:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rex.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA06963; Tue, 28 Sep 1999 05:02:40 -0700 Received: by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id FAA19415; Tue, 28 Sep 1999 05:01:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id FAA19389; Tue, 28 Sep 1999 05:01:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail1.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA27993; Tue, 28 Sep 1999 05:01:53 -0700 Received: from thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (thorgal.et.tudelft.nl [130.161.40.91]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.2/WV2.0g) with ESMTP id FAA23901 for ; Tue, 28 Sep 1999 05:01:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [130.161.40.82] (tvs082.et.tudelft.nl [130.161.40.82]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id OAA27673; Tue, 28 Sep 1999 14:01:43 +0200 Date: Tue, 28 Sep 1999 14:00:54 +0200 From: "J.D. Bakker" Subject: Re: Modules broken on 2.2.1[02] on SA-1100 ? In-Reply-To: Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com To: Philip Blundell Cc: linux-arm@vger.rutgers.edu, sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Precedence: bulk References: <199909272149.WAA00894@raistlin.armlinux.org.uk> At 11:54 +0200 28-09-1999, Philip Blundell wrote: >>This is the classic modutils-can't-handle-system-memory-over-32MB syndrome, >>seen many times on RiscPCs. I don't think it's compiler related - it's >>modutils-related. >> >>I thought that this was fixed ages ago (even before modutils 2.1.121 was >>out). > >Yeah, I did too but maybe an old version escaped somehow. Get the latest >from >ftp://ftp.ocs.com.au/pub/modutils and see if it helps, I guess. That did the trick. Thanks a lot ! JDB. -- "A satisfied customer ? We ought to have him stuffed !" -- Basil Fawlty From kramer@pa.dec.com Tue Oct 5 00:37:59 1999 Return-Path: Received: from tudedr.et.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (4.1/BB-2.0) id AA03150; Tue, 5 Oct 99 00:37:59 +0200 Received: from mail2.digital.com by ITS.TUDelft.NL (PMDF V5.1-10 #21918) with ESMTP id <01JGR8KKXN2O936HGS@ITS.TUDelft.NL> for erik@duteinh.et.tudelft.nl; Tue, 5 Oct 1999 00:37:58 +0200 Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.2/WV2.0g) with SMTP id PAA11781; Mon, 04 Oct 1999 15:34:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rex.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA15887; Mon, 04 Oct 1999 15:34:29 -0700 Received: by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id PAA05321; Mon, 04 Oct 1999 15:34:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id PAA05317; Mon, 04 Oct 1999 15:34:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail1.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA14640; Mon, 04 Oct 1999 15:34:01 -0700 Received: from fw-losgatos.losgatos.arm.com (ns.arm.com [208.193.202.3]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.2/WV2.0g) with SMTP id PAA15550 for ; Mon, 04 Oct 1999 15:34:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: by fw-losgatos.losgatos.arm.com; id PAA09636; Mon, 04 Oct 1999 15:27:17 -0700 Received: from dhcp47.losgatos.arm.com(194.202.50.238) by fw-losgatos.losgatos.arm.com via smap (4.1) id xma009614; Mon, 04 Oct 1999 15:26:48 -0700 Date: Mon, 04 Oct 1999 15:27:00 -0500 From: Ian Field Subject: pppd Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com To: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Message-Id: <37F90D94.6E0B5F2@pobox.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.51 [en] (WinNT; I) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk X-Accept-Language: en References: <9910042158.AA03047@duteinh.et.tudelft.nl> I'm trying to get pppd working on a SA1100. I've taken a look at pages like :: http://www.linuxdoc.org/HOWTO/PPP-HOWTO-27.html Has someone gotten this to work, and if so, what did you type and/or put in your scripts, on the PC and on the ARM. Cheers, IAN From kramer@pa.dec.com Tue Oct 5 00:11:37 1999 Return-Path: Received: from tudedr.et.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (4.1/BB-2.0) id AA03097; Tue, 5 Oct 99 00:11:37 +0200 Received: from mail2.digital.com by ITS.TUDelft.NL (PMDF V5.1-10 #21918) with ESMTP id <01JGR7MWTYMY936HGS@ITS.TUDelft.NL> for erik@duteinh.et.tudelft.nl; Tue, 5 Oct 1999 00:11:32 +0200 Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.2/WV2.0g) with SMTP id PAA03003; Mon, 04 Oct 1999 15:01:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rex.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA17023; Mon, 04 Oct 1999 15:01:17 -0700 Received: by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id OAA05219; Mon, 04 Oct 1999 14:59:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id OAA05218; Mon, 04 Oct 1999 14:59:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail2.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA01232; Mon, 04 Oct 1999 14:59:22 -0700 Received: from duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (duteinh.et.tudelft.nl [130.161.42.1]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.2/WV2.0g) with SMTP id OAA10284 for ; Mon, 04 Oct 1999 14:59:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: from dutein71 (dutein71.et.tudelft.nl) by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (4.1/BB-2.0) id AA03047; Mon, 04 Oct 1999 23:58:04 +0200 Date: Mon, 04 Oct 1999 23:58:03 +0200 From: Erik Mouw Subject: Announce: blob-1.0.0, a bootloader for SA1100 based systems Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com To: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com, linux-arm@vger.rutgers.edu Message-Id: <9910042158.AA03047@duteinh.et.tudelft.nl> Organization: Eric conspiracy secret labs Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: XCmail 0.99.6 - with PGP support, PGP engine version 0.5 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Precedence: bulk X-Face: "!Z|1XjFg!3Iw)BwM^M\k)J5KHiPddz}#/Zw%?$&Q!xqob"OA|})3_@&BTTiQERo?/^g[Z<9P4R8:5C:aqq.cw!hotLc=+u-"+1rq@9$V^8PbOUlodyi_sejt+D`iqkLpx$>.aXl%vnfPIt"LK|/%>94_Zrm8jy?`_[RKt'TuoxUxfk(gMhY(n|DBBl~c$dhO>G%6}R4+DGX3|idBm4oU&UM/XUP4I9aoN{]`ax%B?rgD(I3OJ<62Y6L X-Mailerorigin: http://www.fsai.fh-trier.de/~schmitzj/Xclasses/XCmail/ X-Eric-Conspiracy: There is no conspiracy! X-Loop: erik@it.et.tudelft.nl Hi all, I'd like to announce the first release of blob, a bootloader for SA1100 based systems. From the README file: ** What is blob? ---------------- Blob is the Boot Loader OBject, the boot loader for the LART. Blob is able to boot a Linux kernel stored in flash or RAM and provide that kernel with a ramdisk (again from flash or RAM). Blob is copyrighted by Jan-Derk Bakker (J.D.Bakker@its.tudelft.nl) and Erik Mouw (J.A.K.Mouw@its.tudelft.nl). Blob is released with a GNU GPL license. ** So what is LART? ------------------- LART is the Linux Advanced Radio Terminal, a small low power computing element used in the MMC project (http://mmc.et.tudelft.nl/ and http://www-ict.its.tudelft.nl/~erik/open-source/LART/). ** Commands ----------- Blob knows several commands, typing "help" (without the ") will show you which: Help for blob 1.0.0, the LART bootloader The following commands are supported: * boot [kernel options] Boot Linux with optional kernel options * download {kernel|ramdisk} Download kernel or ramdisk image to RAM * flash {kernel|ramdisk} Copy kernel or ramdisk from RAM to flash * help Get this help * reload {kernel|ramdisk} Reload kernel or ramdisk from flash to RAM * reset Reset terminal * speed Set download speed * status Display current status Blob is distributed with a GNU GPL license and can be downloaded from http://www-ict.its.tudelft.nl/~erik/open-source/blob/ (sorry, no nifty webpage yet). Erik -- J.A.K. (Erik) Mouw, Information and Communication Theory Group, Department of Electrical Engineering, Faculty of Information Technology and Systems, Delft University of Technology, PO BOX 5031, 2600 GA Delft, The Netherlands Phone: +31-15-2785859 Fax: +31-15-2781843 Email J.A.K.Mouw@its.tudelft.nl WWW: http://www-ict.its.tudelft.nl/~erik/ From kramer@pa.dec.com Tue Oct 5 04:42:10 1999 Return-Path: Received: from tudedr.et.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (4.1/BB-2.0) id AA03831; Tue, 5 Oct 99 04:42:10 +0200 Received: from mail2.digital.com by ITS.TUDelft.NL (PMDF V5.1-10 #21918) with ESMTP id <01JGRH3FK7RW95QM48@ITS.TUDelft.NL> for erik@duteinh.et.tudelft.nl; Tue, 5 Oct 1999 04:42:08 +0200 Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.2/WV2.0g) with SMTP id TAA12528; Mon, 04 Oct 1999 19:35:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rex.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA22474; Mon, 04 Oct 1999 19:35:42 -0700 Received: by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id TAA05860; Mon, 04 Oct 1999 19:35:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id TAA05856; Mon, 04 Oct 1999 19:35:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail2.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA13807; Mon, 04 Oct 1999 19:35:02 -0700 Received: from hotmail.com (law2-f126.hotmail.com [216.32.181.126]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.2/WV2.0g) with SMTP id TAA12300 for ; Mon, 04 Oct 1999 19:35:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 99335 invoked by uid 0); Tue, 05 Oct 1999 02:34:56 +0000 Received: from 130.65.157.236 by www.hotmail.com with HTTP; Mon, 04 Oct 1999 19:34:56 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 04 Oct 1999 19:34:56 -0700 (PDT) From: John_Justin_Ray _ Subject: RAMDISK image Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com To: Sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Cc: Devel@netwinder.com, Linux-arm@vger.rutgers.edu Message-Id: <19991005023456.99334.qmail@hotmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed Precedence: bulk X-Originating-Ip: [130.65.157.236] Our group would like to know where we can obtain a RAMdisk image or creating a RAMdisk image for the Sa1100 board using the Strongarm chip. The link in: http://developer.intel.com/design/strong/applnots/sa1100lx/download.htm#1001846 which is: ftp://ssdl-redstone.stanford.edu/pub/ramdisk.gz is broken. ______________________________________________________ Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com From kramer@pa.dec.com Sun Oct 10 08:51:07 1999 Return-Path: Received: from tudedv.et.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (4.1/BB-2.0) id AB02749; Sun, 10 Oct 99 08:51:07 +0200 Received: from mail2.digital.com by ITS.TUDelft.NL (PMDF V5.1-10 #21918) with ESMTP id <01JGYP7O62CM95R8AZ@ITS.TUDelft.NL> for erik@duteinh.et.tudelft.nl; Sun, 10 Oct 1999 08:50:10 +0200 Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.2/WV2.0g) with SMTP id XAA16606; Sat, 09 Oct 1999 23:48:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rex.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA30728; Sat, 09 Oct 1999 23:48:12 -0700 Received: by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id XAA24744; Sat, 09 Oct 1999 23:43:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id XAA24747; Sat, 09 Oct 1999 23:43:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail2.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA18965; Sat, 09 Oct 1999 23:43:54 -0700 Received: from ns0.utdallas.edu (ns0.utdallas.edu [129.110.10.1]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.2/WV2.0g) with ESMTP id XAA15912 for ; Sat, 09 Oct 1999 23:43:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: from apache.utdallas.edu (apache.utdallas.edu [129.110.16.9]) by ns0.utdallas.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4235C19FFDE; Sun, 10 Oct 1999 01:40:31 -0500 (CDT) Received: from localhost (vasantr@localhost) by apache.utdallas.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with SMTP id BAA29074; Sun, 10 Oct 1999 01:40:40 -0500 (CDT) Date: Sun, 10 Oct 1999 01:40:40 -0500 (CDT) From: Vasant Ramasubramanian Subject: Brutus Info In-Reply-To: <002e01bf11c1$23ea9640$4df63cd1@mmtdave> Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com To: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Cc: linux-arm@vger.rutgers.edu Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Precedence: bulk X-Authentication-Warning: apache.utdallas.edu: vasantr owned process doing -bs Actually looking over the spread of documentation for Brutus, I found that the version of Angel that runs on Brutus uses *DRAM* and not SRAM. This means that the switch (14) that choose between SRAM / DRAM on the Brutus board is correct as marked in the documentation, however Angel isn't configured for SRAM usage. I'm sending an e-mail because the Intel representative I spoke to simply stated that "S14 is opposite of what's in the documentation." That's not correct, the *default* value should be opposite(use DRAM instead of SRAM), yet SW14 maintains the exact same functionality as marked in the documentation. Understandably, this more than likely won't matter too much if you want to get Linux going; it's a heads up for those of us who might be doing more / different things. Also, has anyone soldered in the 1Mx16 Flash parts and gotten it to work? Thanks, Vasant. From kramer@pa.dec.com Sun Oct 17 18:05:37 1999 Return-Path: Received: from tudedr.et.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (4.1/BB-2.0) id AB27976; Sun, 17 Oct 99 18:05:37 +0200 Received: from mail1.digital.com by ITS.TUDelft.NL (PMDF V5.1-10 #21918) with ESMTP id <01JH7PFTM9JG8WW9QR@ITS.TUDelft.NL> for erik@duteinh.et.tudelft.nl; Sat, 16 Oct 1999 19:33:56 +0200 Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.2/WV2.0g) with SMTP id KAA22382; Sat, 16 Oct 1999 10:31:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rex.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA25457; Sat, 16 Oct 1999 10:31:33 -0700 Received: by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id KAA16817; Sat, 16 Oct 1999 10:29:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id KAA16805; Sat, 16 Oct 1999 10:29:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail2.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA23051; Sat, 16 Oct 1999 10:29:55 -0700 Received: from adsl-216-100-248-143.dsl.snfc21.pacbell.net (adsl-216-100-248-143.dsl.snfc21.pacbell.net [216.100.248.143]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.2/WV2.0g) with ESMTP id KAA16337 for ; Sat, 16 Oct 1999 10:29:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: from biff (biff [192.168.1.4]) by adsl-216-100-248-143.dsl.snfc21.pacbell.net (8.8.7/8.8.7) with SMTP id KAA06500 for ; Sat, 16 Oct 1999 10:23:53 -0700 Date: Sat, 16 Oct 1999 10:29:53 -0700 From: Ian Field Subject: toolchain Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com To: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Message-Id: <011901bf17fc$0ed809e0$0401a8c0@casagrande.way> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2014.211 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk X-Msmail-Priority: Normal X-Mimeole: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2014.211 References: <9910152115.AA26840@duteinh.et.tudelft.nl> X-Priority: 3 The empeg guys have a prebuilt toolchain based on the intel guide (SA1100). http://www.empeg.mars.org/devel/software/toolchain.php3 http://www.empeg.mars.org/devel/files/arm-linux-toolchain.i386.tar.gz Cheers, IAN > >Could you install it in /usr/local instead of /usr? In that way the > >toolchain won't mess with the distribution's package manager (be it rpm, > >dpkg or whatever). > > It won't do any harm anyway. Neither dpkg nor RPM care if you install extra > files in /usr. From kramer@pa.dec.com Tue Oct 19 00:35:13 1999 Return-Path: Received: from tudedr.et.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (4.1/BB-2.0) id AA04146; Tue, 19 Oct 99 00:35:13 +0200 Received: from mail1.digital.com by ITS.TUDelft.NL (PMDF V5.1-10 #21918) with ESMTP id <01JHASJYV7L48WWD4H@ITS.TUDelft.NL> for erik@duteinh.et.tudelft.nl; Tue, 19 Oct 1999 00:35:09 +0200 Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.2/WV2.0g) with SMTP id PAA12879; Mon, 18 Oct 1999 15:29:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rex.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA30071; Mon, 18 Oct 1999 15:29:09 -0700 Received: by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id PAA25476; Mon, 18 Oct 1999 15:27:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id PAA25478; Mon, 18 Oct 1999 15:27:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail2.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA17815; Mon, 18 Oct 1999 15:27:24 -0700 Received: from smtp2.Stanford.EDU (smtp2.Stanford.EDU [171.64.14.23]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.2/WV2.0g) with ESMTP id PAA28870 for ; Mon, 18 Oct 1999 15:27:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: from redstone (ssdl-redstone.Stanford.EDU [171.64.108.11]) by smtp2.Stanford.EDU (8.9.3/8.9.3/L) with SMTP id PAA24555 for ; Mon, 18 Oct 1999 15:24:01 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 18 Oct 1999 15:24:00 -0700 From: Zsolt Kiraly Subject: ramdisk.gz !!!ATTN: Intel !!! Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com To: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Reply-To: Zsolt Kiraly Message-Id: <001b01bf19b7$7a911020$0b6c40ab@stanford.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2314.1300 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk X-Msmail-Priority: Normal X-Mimeole: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2314.1300 X-Priority: 3 Hi there, The ramdisk image that was formerly located at ftp://ssdl-redstone.stanford.edu/pub/ramdisk.gz is now located at http://ssdl.stanford.edu/salinux/ramdisk.gz This file is referenced on several Intel websites. I would like to ask Intel to update their links to the new location. In addition, the ARM development environment setup guide that I wrote is now at: http://ssdl.stanford.edu/salinux/index.html Thanks, Zsolt From kramer@pa.dec.com Tue Oct 19 20:53:03 1999 Return-Path: Received: from tudedr.et.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (4.1/BB-2.0) id AA09277; Tue, 19 Oct 99 20:53:03 +0200 Received: from mail1.digital.com by ITS.TUDelft.NL (PMDF V5.1-10 #21918) with ESMTP id <01JHBZ2YYKF490MUKF@ITS.TUDelft.NL> for erik@duteinh.et.tudelft.nl; Tue, 19 Oct 1999 20:53:00 +0200 Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.2/WV2.0g) with SMTP id LAA14350; Tue, 19 Oct 1999 11:49:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rex.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA30826; Tue, 19 Oct 1999 11:49:43 -0700 Received: by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id LAA28702; Tue, 19 Oct 1999 11:48:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id LAA28692; Tue, 19 Oct 1999 11:48:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail1.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA31622; Tue, 19 Oct 1999 11:48:34 -0700 Received: from xanadu.gn.com (modemcable233.137-200-24.mtl.mc.videotron.net [24.200.137.233]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.2/WV2.0g) with ESMTP id LAA28292 for ; Tue, 19 Oct 1999 11:48:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (nico@localhost) by xanadu.gn.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id OAA18270 for ; Tue, 19 Oct 1999 14:43:13 -0400 Date: Tue, 19 Oct 1999 14:43:13 -0400 (EDT) From: Nicolas Pitre Subject: 2.2.12-rmk1-np13 Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com X-Sender: nico@xanadu.gn.com To: SA-1100/Linux Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Precedence: bulk X-Authentication-Warning: xanadu.gn.com: nico owned process doing -bs ... is available from ftp.netwinder.org/users/n/nico. This contains: - frame buffer fixes for LART - corection of a typo in memory address translation macros - attempt to reinforce gettimeoffday() precision - major update for empeg - some attempt to fix problems with gcc-2.95 compiled kernels and probably some other minor stuff I forget. The empeg stuff is not 100% complete (sorry guys, but some hacks can't be merged in a generic tree, it's too crude :-) )... I tested if it compiles, but don't have access to a SA1100 machine at the moment and can't tell you if it runs. So tell me how it goes. Have fun! Nicolas From kramer@pa.dec.com Sat Oct 23 11:41:38 1999 Return-Path: Received: from tudedr.et.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (4.1/BB-2.0) id AA28501; Sat, 23 Oct 99 11:41:38 +0200 Received: from mail2.digital.com by ITS.TUDelft.NL (PMDF V5.1-10 #21918) with ESMTP id <01JHH0ZJIGNW8WWP53@ITS.TUDelft.NL> for erik@duteinh.et.tudelft.nl; Sat, 23 Oct 1999 11:41:34 +0200 Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.2/WV2.0g) with SMTP id CAA06382; Sat, 23 Oct 1999 02:38:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rex.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA05112; Sat, 23 Oct 1999 02:37:44 -0700 Received: by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id CAA10332; Sat, 23 Oct 1999 02:31:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id CAA10326; Sat, 23 Oct 1999 02:31:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail1.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA10055; Sat, 23 Oct 1999 02:31:03 -0700 Received: from ns0.utdallas.edu (ns0.utdallas.edu [129.110.10.1]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.2/WV2.0g) with ESMTP id CAA01627 for ; Sat, 23 Oct 1999 02:31:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: from apache.utdallas.edu (apache.utdallas.edu [129.110.16.9]) by ns0.utdallas.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id D02461A032E; Sat, 23 Oct 1999 04:27:34 -0500 (CDT) Received: from localhost (vasantr@localhost) by apache.utdallas.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with SMTP id EAA04644; Sat, 23 Oct 1999 04:27:48 -0500 (CDT) Date: Sat, 23 Oct 1999 04:27:48 -0500 (CDT) From: Vasant Ramasubramanian Subject: Re: 2.2.12-rmk1-np13 In-Reply-To: Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com To: Nicolas Pitre Cc: SA-1100/Linux Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Precedence: bulk X-Authentication-Warning: apache.utdallas.edu: vasantr owned process doing -bs On Tue, 19 Oct 1999, Nicolas Pitre wrote: > > I tested if it compiles, but don't have access to a SA1100 machine at the > moment and can't tell you if it runs. So tell me how it goes. Unfortunetly I think it has some problems; I compiled and ran and got a pure white screen on the LCD and no text from the serial port; when using the np12 patch it worked great (everything seemed to work). I started with a new extraction of the 2.2.12 kernel and applied Russel's patch each time I tried your patch... If you need more info, I'll be glad to provide. Also, what file/files are responsible for talking to the keyboard controller? I'd like to see this code. Thanks, Vasant. From kramer@pa.dec.com Sat Oct 23 22:35:32 1999 Return-Path: Received: from tudedr.et.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (4.1/BB-2.0) id AA29835; Sat, 23 Oct 99 22:35:32 +0200 Received: from mail2.digital.com by ITS.TUDelft.NL (PMDF V5.1-10 #21918) with ESMTP id <01JHHNTGDPH090MVHO@ITS.TUDelft.NL> for erik@duteinh.et.tudelft.nl; Sat, 23 Oct 1999 22:35:30 +0200 Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.2/WV2.0g) with SMTP id NAA09881; Sat, 23 Oct 1999 13:32:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rex.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA04550; Sat, 23 Oct 1999 13:32:14 -0700 Received: by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id NAA12044; Sat, 23 Oct 1999 13:31:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id NAA12029; Sat, 23 Oct 1999 13:31:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail2.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA31710; Sat, 23 Oct 1999 13:31:10 -0700 Received: from adsl-216-100-248-143.dsl.snfc21.pacbell.net (adsl-216-100-248-143.dsl.snfc21.pacbell.net [216.100.248.143]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.2/WV2.0g) with ESMTP id NAA06983 for ; Sat, 23 Oct 1999 13:31:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: from biff (biff [192.168.1.4]) by adsl-216-100-248-143.dsl.snfc21.pacbell.net (8.8.7/8.8.7) with SMTP id NAA16675 for ; Sat, 23 Oct 1999 13:24:32 -0700 Date: Sat, 23 Oct 1999 13:31:17 -0700 From: Ian Field Subject: sa1100 usb Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com To: SA-1100/Linux Reply-To: Ian Field Message-Id: <001501bf1d95$8f070dc0$0401a8c0@casagrande.way> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2314.1300 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk X-Msmail-Priority: Normal X-Mimeole: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2314.1300 References: X-Priority: 3 Hi all, I know empeg has a usb driver in the kernel, but I was wondering if anybody has some code or advice for minimal usb support ... Basically, I want to write a bootloader that uses uart3 (9600) as the console, and a second serial port for loading the kernel and ramdisk. Currently I use uart1 (115200), but I would really like to use the usb port. Which driver in x86-2.3.23 etc is closest to what I need, and any thoughts on the minimum polled usb i/o I need on the sa1100 ... Cheers, IAN From kramer@pa.dec.com Sun Oct 24 01:47:13 1999 Return-Path: Received: from tudedr.et.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (4.1/BB-2.0) id AA00337; Sun, 24 Oct 99 01:47:13 +0200 Received: from mail2.digital.com by ITS.TUDelft.NL (PMDF V5.1-10 #21918) with ESMTP id <01JHHUJ37LWC90MVHO@ITS.TUDelft.NL> for erik@duteinh.et.tudelft.nl; Sun, 24 Oct 1999 01:47:11 +0200 Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.2/WV2.0g) with SMTP id QAA09716; Sat, 23 Oct 1999 16:45:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rex.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA26826; Sat, 23 Oct 1999 16:45:20 -0700 Received: by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id QAA12556; Sat, 23 Oct 1999 16:44:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id QAA12521; Sat, 23 Oct 1999 16:44:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail1.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA13801; Sat, 23 Oct 1999 16:44:40 -0700 Received: from relay1.mail.uk.psi.net (relay1.mail.uk.psi.net [154.32.105.6]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.2/WV2.0g) with ESMTP id QAA14433 for ; Sat, 23 Oct 1999 16:44:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: from morrison.empeg.co.uk ([193.119.19.130] helo=empeg.com) by relay1.mail.uk.psi.net with esmtp (Exim 2.12 #2) id 11fAml-000058-00 for sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com; Sun, 24 Oct 1999 00:41:19 +0100 Received: (from mac@localhost) by empeg.com (8.8.7/8.8.7) id AAA24263; Sun, 24 Oct 1999 00:41:35 +0100 Date: Sun, 24 Oct 1999 00:41:35 +0100 From: Mike Crowe Subject: Re: sa1100 usb In-Reply-To: <001501bf1d95$8f070dc0$0401a8c0@casagrande.way>; from Ian Field on Sat, Oct 23, 1999 at 01:31:17PM -0700 Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com To: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Cc: hugo@empeg.com Message-Id: <19991024004135.A24206@fatboy.internal.empeg.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Mutt 0.95.1i Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Precedence: bulk X-Operating-System: Linux 2.2.12 i686 X-Webpage: http://www.empeg.com/ X-Sending-Host: fatboy.internal.empeg.com References: <001501bf1d95$8f070dc0$0401a8c0@casagrande.way> On Sat, Oct 23, 1999 at 01:31:17PM -0700, Ian Field wrote: > I know empeg has a usb driver in the kernel, but I was wondering if > anybody has some code or advice for minimal usb support ... The empeg_usb driver (which is in 2.2.12-rmk1-np13) is for the NatSemi 9602 USB slave controller rather than the SA1100 one due to bugs in the SA1100 chip. It's probably a good place to start though - you might like to ignore the FIQ stuff :-) I've cc'd Hugo who wrote the driver in case he has anything further to add. > Basically, I want to write a bootloader that uses uart3 (9600) as the > console, and a second serial port for loading the kernel and ramdisk. > Currently I use uart1 (115200), but I would really like to use the usb port. > Which driver in x86-2.3.23 etc is closest to what I need, and any thoughts > on the minimum polled usb i/o I need on the sa1100 ... I doubt if there are any standard x86 USB _slave_ drivers since PC's generally only have USB _host_ ports. Luckily USB slave is much easier to implement than USB host. HTH -- Mike Crowe empeg ltd From kramer@pa.dec.com Sun Oct 24 03:01:58 1999 Return-Path: Received: from tudedr.et.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (4.1/BB-2.0) id AB00546; Sun, 24 Oct 99 03:01:58 +0200 Received: from mail1.digital.com by ITS.TUDelft.NL (PMDF V5.1-10 #21918) with ESMTP id <01JHHWNA0EAS90MVHO@ITS.TUDelft.NL> for erik@duteinh.et.tudelft.nl; Sun, 24 Oct 1999 02:47:50 +0200 Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.2/WV2.0g) with SMTP id RAA02473; Sat, 23 Oct 1999 17:46:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rex.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA25780; Sat, 23 Oct 1999 17:46:02 -0700 Received: by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id RAA12714; Sat, 23 Oct 1999 17:45:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id RAA13113; Sat, 23 Oct 1999 17:45:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail2.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA27554; Sat, 23 Oct 1999 17:45:36 -0700 Received: from adsl-216-100-248-143.dsl.snfc21.pacbell.net (adsl-216-100-248-143.dsl.snfc21.pacbell.net [216.100.248.143]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.2/WV2.0g) with ESMTP id RAA07963 for ; Sat, 23 Oct 1999 17:45:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: from biff (biff [192.168.1.4]) by adsl-216-100-248-143.dsl.snfc21.pacbell.net (8.8.7/8.8.7) with SMTP id RAA16911 for ; Sat, 23 Oct 1999 17:38:58 -0700 Date: Sat, 23 Oct 1999 17:45:43 -0700 From: Ian Field Subject: Re: sa1100 usb Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com To: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Reply-To: Ian Field Message-Id: <001f01bf1db9$1a8767a0$0401a8c0@casagrande.way> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2314.1300 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk X-Msmail-Priority: Normal X-Mimeole: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2314.1300 References: <001501bf1d95$8f070dc0$0401a8c0@casagrande.way> <19991024004135.A24206@fatboy.internal.empeg.com> X-Priority: 3 > The empeg_usb driver (which is in 2.2.12-rmk1-np13) is for the NatSemi > 9602 USB slave controller rather than the SA1100 one due to bugs in > the SA1100 chip. It's probably a good place to start though - you > might like to ignore the FIQ stuff :-) bugs ... d'oh, now that you mention it, I recall hearing something about that. Anyone know what is specifically wrong (URL?). > > Which driver in x86-2.3.23 etc is closest to what I need, and any thoughts > > on the minimum polled usb i/o I need on the sa1100 ... > > I doubt if there are any standard x86 USB _slave_ drivers since PC's > generally only have USB _host_ ports. Luckily USB slave is much easier > to implement than USB host. Sorry about that ... I was a little vague. What I meant was, on the PC side, which master device driver will talk to a slave (mouse, ezusb ...)? I'm still trying to figure out if the UDC controls all of the protocol such that it's basically a /dev/serial I 'cat' to and from on the PC ... or do I need to add specific init code and a (basic) protocol layer on the PC and SA1100 sides. Cheers, IAN From kramer@pa.dec.com Sun Oct 24 02:59:44 1999 Return-Path: Received: from tudedr.et.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (4.1/BB-2.0) id AA00484; Sun, 24 Oct 99 02:59:44 +0200 Received: from mail2.digital.com by ITS.TUDelft.NL (PMDF V5.1-10 #21918) with ESMTP id <01JHHX1ZUVM890MVQG@ITS.TUDelft.NL> for erik@duteinh.et.tudelft.nl; Sun, 24 Oct 1999 02:59:42 +0200 Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.2/WV2.0g) with SMTP id RAA17529; Sat, 23 Oct 1999 17:58:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rex.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA04853; Sat, 23 Oct 1999 17:58:07 -0700 Received: by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id RAA12745; Sat, 23 Oct 1999 17:57:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id RAA12738; Sat, 23 Oct 1999 17:57:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail1.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA19479; Sat, 23 Oct 1999 17:57:49 -0700 Received: from ns0.utdallas.edu (ns0.utdallas.edu [129.110.10.1]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.2/WV2.0g) with ESMTP id RAA29328 for ; Sat, 23 Oct 1999 17:57:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: from apache.utdallas.edu (apache.utdallas.edu [129.110.16.9]) by ns0.utdallas.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49F801A068D; Sat, 23 Oct 1999 19:54:26 -0500 (CDT) Received: from localhost (vasantr@localhost) by apache.utdallas.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with SMTP id TAA15595; Sat, 23 Oct 1999 19:54:39 -0500 (CDT) Date: Sat, 23 Oct 1999 19:54:39 -0500 (CDT) From: Vasant Ramasubramanian Subject: Re: sa1100 usb In-Reply-To: <001f01bf1db9$1a8767a0$0401a8c0@casagrande.way> Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com To: Ian Field Cc: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Precedence: bulk X-Authentication-Warning: apache.utdallas.edu: vasantr owned process doing -bs On Sat, 23 Oct 1999, Ian Field wrote: > > The empeg_usb driver (which is in 2.2.12-rmk1-np13) is for the NatSemi > > 9602 USB slave controller rather than the SA1100 one due to bugs in > > the SA1100 chip. It's probably a good place to start though - you > > might like to ignore the FIQ stuff :-) > > bugs ... d'oh, now that you mention it, I recall hearing something about > that. Anyone know what is specifically wrong (URL?). Check the comp.sys.arm history @ Deja, I know several people mentioned it there. Also, the 200MHz StrongARMs (Part code BA) had several problems including USB and IrDA issues. Good luck. Vasant Ram. From kramer@pa.dec.com Sun Oct 24 05:04:25 1999 Return-Path: Received: from tudedr.et.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (4.1/BB-2.0) id AA00763; Sun, 24 Oct 99 05:04:25 +0200 Received: from mail2.digital.com by ITS.TUDelft.NL (PMDF V5.1-10 #21918) with ESMTP id <01JHI1EIXY528WWR11@ITS.TUDelft.NL> for erik@duteinh.et.tudelft.nl; Sun, 24 Oct 1999 05:04:23 +0200 Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.2/WV2.0g) with SMTP id UAA06021; Sat, 23 Oct 1999 20:00:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rex.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA04242; Sat, 23 Oct 1999 19:57:59 -0700 Received: by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id TAA13080; Sat, 23 Oct 1999 19:57:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id TAA13072; Sat, 23 Oct 1999 19:57:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail1.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA10463; Sat, 23 Oct 1999 19:57:28 -0700 Received: from note.orchestra.cse.unsw.EDU.AU (note.orchestra.cse.unsw.EDU.AU [129.94.242.29]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.2/WV2.0g) with SMTP id TAA13323 for ; Sat, 23 Oct 1999 19:57:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: From paulaner With LocalMail ; Sun, 24 Oct 1999 12:55:37 +1000 Date: Sun, 24 Oct 1999 12:55:37 +1000 (EST) From: Adam 'WeirdArms' Wiggins Subject: Re: sa1100 usb In-Reply-To: <001f01bf1db9$1a8767a0$0401a8c0@casagrande.way> Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com X-Sender: awiggins@paulaner.disy.cse.unsw.EDU.AU To: Ian Field Cc: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Precedence: bulk On Sat, 23 Oct 1999, Ian Field wrote: > > The empeg_usb driver (which is in 2.2.12-rmk1-np13) is for the NatSemi > > 9602 USB slave controller rather than the SA1100 one due to bugs in > > the SA1100 chip. It's probably a good place to start though - you > > might like to ignore the FIQ stuff :-) > > bugs ... d'oh, now that you mention it, I recall hearing something about > that. Anyone know what is specifically wrong (URL?). Earlier revisions of the chip had reliability problems. Basically it was pot luck wether the USB slave worked or not. Intel have released details on how to check if a chip is working or not and the bug has been fixed in current revisions. Cheers `Adam From kramer@pa.dec.com Sun Oct 24 12:04:18 1999 Return-Path: Received: from tudedr.et.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (4.1/BB-2.0) id AA01283; Sun, 24 Oct 99 12:04:18 +0200 Received: from mail1.digital.com by ITS.TUDelft.NL (PMDF V5.1-10 #21918) with ESMTP id <01JHIG32PGGE8WWRX7@ITS.TUDelft.NL> for erik@duteinh.et.tudelft.nl; Sun, 24 Oct 1999 12:04:16 +0200 Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.2/WV2.0g) with SMTP id DAA06756; Sun, 24 Oct 1999 03:02:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rex.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA08054; Sun, 24 Oct 1999 03:02:05 -0700 Received: by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id DAA14164; Sun, 24 Oct 1999 03:00:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id DAA14121; Sun, 24 Oct 1999 03:00:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail1.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA26290; Sun, 24 Oct 1999 03:00:37 -0700 Received: from relay1.mail.uk.psi.net (relay1.mail.uk.psi.net [154.32.105.6]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.2/WV2.0g) with ESMTP id DAA28776 for ; Sun, 24 Oct 1999 03:00:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: from morrison.empeg.co.uk ([193.119.19.130] helo=empeg.com) by relay1.mail.uk.psi.net with esmtp (Exim 2.12 #2) id 11fKS3-0002zF-00 for sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com; Sun, 24 Oct 1999 11:00:35 +0100 Received: (from mac@localhost) by empeg.com (8.8.7/8.8.7) id LAA30347 for sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com; Sun, 24 Oct 1999 11:01:11 +0100 Date: Sun, 24 Oct 1999 11:01:11 +0100 From: Mike Crowe Subject: Re: sa1100 usb In-Reply-To: <001f01bf1db9$1a8767a0$0401a8c0@casagrande.way>; from Ian Field on Sat, Oct 23, 1999 at 05:45:43PM -0700 Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com To: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Message-Id: <19991024110111.A30258@fatboy.internal.empeg.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Mutt 0.95.1i Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Precedence: bulk X-Operating-System: Linux 2.2.12 i686 X-Webpage: http://www.empeg.com/ X-Sending-Host: fatboy.internal.empeg.com References: <001501bf1d95$8f070dc0$0401a8c0@casagrande.way> <19991024004135.A24206@fatboy.internal.empeg.com> <001f01bf1db9$1a8767a0$0401a8c0@casagrande.way> On Sat, Oct 23, 1999 at 05:45:43PM -0700, Ian Field wrote: > Sorry about that ... I was a little vague. What I meant was, on the PC side, > which master device driver will talk to a slave (mouse, ezusb ...)? I'm > still trying to figure out if the UDC controls all of the protocol such that > it's basically a /dev/serial I 'cat' to and from on the PC ... or do I need > to add specific init code and a (basic) protocol layer on the PC and SA1100 > sides. There's a generic USB device driver there somewhere (I think it's called acm) which we based our USB host driver for Linux on. Unfortunately, the USB host support in Linux isn't get completely stable API-wise AFAIK. -- Mike Crowe empeg ltd From kramer@pa.dec.com Tue Oct 26 00:00:09 1999 Return-Path: Received: from tudedr.et.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (4.1/BB-2.0) id AA08113; Tue, 26 Oct 99 00:00:09 +0200 Received: from mail2.digital.com by ITS.TUDelft.NL (PMDF V5.1-10 #21918) with ESMTP id <01JHKJCYWDCY90MW7E@ITS.TUDelft.NL> for erik@duteinh.et.tudelft.nl; Tue, 26 Oct 1999 00:00:03 +0200 Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.2/WV2.0g) with SMTP id OAA04802; Mon, 25 Oct 1999 14:56:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rex.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA12679; Mon, 25 Oct 1999 14:56:00 -0700 Received: by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id OAA19434; Mon, 25 Oct 1999 14:53:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id OAA19430; Mon, 25 Oct 1999 14:53:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail1.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA26554; Mon, 25 Oct 1999 14:53:24 -0700 Received: from xanadu.gn.com ([24.200.137.233]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.2/WV2.0g) with ESMTP id OAA29915 for ; Mon, 25 Oct 1999 14:53:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (nico@localhost) by xanadu.gn.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id RAA01003; Mon, 25 Oct 1999 17:47:11 -0400 Date: Mon, 25 Oct 1999 17:47:11 -0400 (EDT) From: Nicolas Pitre Subject: Re: 2.2.12-rmk1-np13 In-Reply-To: Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com X-Sender: nico@xanadu.gn.com To: Vasant Ramasubramanian Cc: SA-1100/Linux Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Precedence: bulk X-Authentication-Warning: xanadu.gn.com: nico owned process doing -bs On Sat, 23 Oct 1999, Vasant Ramasubramanian wrote: > > On Tue, 19 Oct 1999, Nicolas Pitre wrote: > > > > I tested if it compiles, but don't have access to a SA1100 machine at the > > moment and can't tell you if it runs. So tell me how it goes. > > Unfortunetly I think it has some problems; I compiled and ran and got a > pure white screen on the LCD and no text from the serial port; when using > the np12 patch it worked great (everything seemed to work). I started with > a new extraction of the 2.2.12 kernel and applied Russel's patch each time > I tried your patch... Did you 'make brutus_config' before any other make commands? > If you need more info, I'll be glad to provide. Hmmm... I'll have to find some time to try it out... Time isn't a ressource following Moore's law unfortunately. :-( > Also, what file/files are responsible for talking to the keyboard > controller? I'd like to see this code. Mostly in linux/arch/arm/special/keyb_brutus.c. However this code is quite messy. Nicolas From kramer@pa.dec.com Tue Oct 26 03:55:52 1999 Return-Path: Received: from tudedr.et.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (4.1/BB-2.0) id AA08692; Tue, 26 Oct 99 03:55:52 +0200 Received: from mail1.digital.com by ITS.TUDelft.NL (PMDF V5.1-10 #21918) with ESMTP id <01JHKRLADEZW90MW86@ITS.TUDelft.NL> for erik@duteinh.et.tudelft.nl; Tue, 26 Oct 1999 03:55:50 +0200 Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.2/WV2.0g) with SMTP id SAA24688; Mon, 25 Oct 1999 18:50:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rex.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA29076; Mon, 25 Oct 1999 18:50:10 -0700 Received: by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id SAA19939; Mon, 25 Oct 1999 18:49:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id SAA19906; Mon, 25 Oct 1999 18:49:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail1.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA23594; Mon, 25 Oct 1999 18:49:21 -0700 Received: from ns0.utdallas.edu (ns0.utdallas.edu [129.110.10.1]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.2/WV2.0g) with ESMTP id SAA29760 for ; Mon, 25 Oct 1999 18:49:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: from apache.utdallas.edu (apache.utdallas.edu [129.110.16.9]) by ns0.utdallas.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4EA5D1A000A; Mon, 25 Oct 1999 20:45:58 -0500 (CDT) Received: from localhost (vasantr@localhost) by apache.utdallas.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with SMTP id UAA24977; Mon, 25 Oct 1999 20:46:11 -0500 (CDT) Date: Mon, 25 Oct 1999 20:46:11 -0500 (CDT) From: Vasant Ramasubramanian Subject: Re: 2.2.12-rmk1-np13 In-Reply-To: Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com To: Nicolas Pitre Cc: SA-1100/Linux Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Precedence: bulk X-Authentication-Warning: apache.utdallas.edu: vasantr owned process doing -bs On Mon, 25 Oct 1999, Nicolas Pitre wrote: > > I tried your patch... > > Did you 'make brutus_config' before any other make commands? Yes I did; on both np12 and np13. I started from a clean dir each time and extracted the Linux kernel and applied the patches so I made sure it was nice clean (and did a make brutus_config each time). > > If you need more info, I'll be glad to provide. > > Hmmm... I'll have to find some time to try it out... Time isn't a > ressource following Moore's law unfortunately. :-( I understand. > > controller? I'd like to see this code. > > Mostly in linux/arch/arm/special/keyb_brutus.c. However this code is > quite messy. Did you write this code? Thanks, Vasant. From kramer@pa.dec.com Tue Oct 26 16:00:14 1999 Return-Path: Received: from tudedv.et.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (4.1/BB-2.0) id AA12133; Tue, 26 Oct 99 16:00:14 +0200 Received: from mail1.digital.com by ITS.TUDelft.NL (PMDF V5.1-10 #21918) with ESMTP id <01JHLGW6YZNU8WWY2Y@ITS.TUDelft.NL> for erik@duteinh.et.tudelft.nl; Tue, 26 Oct 1999 16:00:07 +0200 Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.2/WV2.0g) with SMTP id GAA14535; Tue, 26 Oct 1999 06:57:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rex.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA11661; Tue, 26 Oct 1999 06:56:50 -0700 Received: by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id GAA22055; Tue, 26 Oct 1999 06:55:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id GAA22067; Tue, 26 Oct 1999 06:55:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail2.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA00718; Tue, 26 Oct 1999 06:55:45 -0700 Received: from xanadu.gn.com ([24.200.137.233]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.2/WV2.0g) with ESMTP id GAA19046 for ; Tue, 26 Oct 1999 06:55:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (nico@localhost) by xanadu.gn.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id JAA01414; Tue, 26 Oct 1999 09:49:45 -0400 Date: Tue, 26 Oct 1999 09:49:45 -0400 (EDT) From: Nicolas Pitre Subject: Re: 2.2.12-rmk1-np13 In-Reply-To: Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com X-Sender: nico@xanadu.gn.com To: Vasant Ramasubramanian Cc: SA-1100/Linux Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Precedence: bulk X-Authentication-Warning: xanadu.gn.com: nico owned process doing -bs On Mon, 25 Oct 1999, Vasant Ramasubramanian wrote: > On Mon, 25 Oct 1999, Nicolas Pitre wrote: > > > > controller? I'd like to see this code. > > > > Mostly in linux/arch/arm/special/keyb_brutus.c. However this code is > > quite messy. > > Did you write this code? No. I think Peter Danielsson adapted the driver found in 2.1.35 which was originally written by the Itsy team. Nicolas From kramer@pa.dec.com Wed Oct 27 12:02:21 1999 Return-Path: Received: from tudedv.et.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (4.1/BB-2.0) id AA16259; Wed, 27 Oct 99 12:02:21 +0200 Received: from mail2.digital.com by ITS.TUDelft.NL (PMDF V5.1-10 #21918) with ESMTP id <01JHML6LZXFQ90MWMD@ITS.TUDelft.NL> for erik@duteinh.et.tudelft.nl; Wed, 27 Oct 1999 11:13:48 +0200 Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.2/WV2.0g) with SMTP id CAA31100; Wed, 27 Oct 1999 02:08:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rex.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA28475; Wed, 27 Oct 1999 02:07:55 -0700 Received: by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id CAA23515; Wed, 27 Oct 1999 02:04:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id CAA23556; Wed, 27 Oct 1999 02:04:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail1.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA20472; Wed, 27 Oct 1999 02:04:37 -0700 Received: from trantor.dso.org.sg ([192.190.204.1]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.2/WV2.0g) with ESMTP id CAA09570 for ; Wed, 27 Oct 1999 02:04:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: from demerzel.dso.org.sg (demerzel.dso.org.sg [192.190.204.8]) by trantor.dso.org.sg (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id RAA15187 for ; Wed, 27 Oct 1999 17:03:22 +0800 (SGT) Received: from hjinyong.dso.org.sg by demerzel.dso.org.sg (8.9.3/8.8.5) with SMTP id RAA27656 for ; Wed, 27 Oct 1999 17:00:38 +0800 (SGT) Date: Wed, 27 Oct 1999 17:15:34 +0800 From: kliteng@dso.org.sg Subject: assembler error Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com X-Sender: kliteng@dso.org.sg To: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Message-Id: <3.0.6.32.19991027171534.007bb930@dso.org.sg> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Light Version 3.0.6 (32) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Precedence: bulk Hello all, Need help on why the following errors occur when I tried to build a native compiler,gcc-2_95_1_tar + patch. command: make bootstrap Assembler messages: /tmp/cc0F66el.s:...Error: no such 386 instruction: 'ldmia' . . . Where do I start looking for the assembler's code ? Thanks! - jessica From kramer@pa.dec.com Wed Oct 27 17:33:01 1999 Return-Path: Received: from tudedr.et.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (4.1/BB-2.0) id AA18417; Wed, 27 Oct 99 17:33:01 +0200 Received: from mail2.digital.com by ITS.TUDelft.NL (PMDF V5.1-10 #21918) with ESMTP id <01JHMYFLJNG890MWNW@ITS.TUDelft.NL> for erik@duteinh.et.tudelft.nl; Wed, 27 Oct 1999 17:32:52 +0200 Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.2/WV2.0g) with SMTP id IAA15964; Wed, 27 Oct 1999 08:27:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rex.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA15733; Wed, 27 Oct 1999 08:26:37 -0700 Received: by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id IAA23715; Wed, 27 Oct 1999 08:24:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id IAA23759; Wed, 27 Oct 1999 08:24:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail1.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA00903; Wed, 27 Oct 1999 08:24:19 -0700 Received: from duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (duteinh.et.tudelft.nl [130.161.42.1]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.2/WV2.0g) with SMTP id IAA13567 for ; Wed, 27 Oct 1999 08:24:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: from dutein71 (dutein71.et.tudelft.nl) by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (4.1/BB-2.0) id AA18356; Wed, 27 Oct 1999 17:22:49 +0200 Date: Wed, 27 Oct 1999 17:22:49 +0200 From: Erik Mouw Subject: Re: assembler error In-Reply-To: <3.0.6.32.19991027171534.007bb930@dso.org.sg> Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com To: kliteng@dso.org.sg Cc: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Message-Id: <9910271522.AA18356@duteinh.et.tudelft.nl> Organization: Eric conspiracy secret labs Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: XCmail 0.99.6 - with PGP support, PGP engine version 0.5 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Precedence: bulk X-Face: "!Z|1XjFg!3Iw)BwM^M\k)J5KHiPddz}#/Zw%?$&Q!xqob"OA|})3_@&BTTiQERo?/^g[Z<9P4R8:5C:aqq.cw!hotLc=+u-"+1rq@9$V^8PbOUlodyi_sejt+D`iqkLpx$>.aXl%vnfPIt"LK|/%>94_Zrm8jy?`_[RKt'TuoxUxfk(gMhY(n|DBBl~c$dhO>G%6}R4+DGX3|idBm4oU&UM/XUP4I9aoN{]`ax%B?rgD(I3OJ<62Y6L X-Mailerorigin: http://www.fsai.fh-trier.de/~schmitzj/Xclasses/XCmail/ X-Eric-Conspiracy: There is no conspiracy! X-Loop: erik@it.et.tudelft.nl On Wed, 27 Oct 1999 17:15:34 +0800, kliteng@dso.org.sg wrote: > Need help on why the following errors occur when I tried to build a native > compiler,gcc-2_95_1_tar + patch. > > command: make bootstrap > > Assembler messages: > /tmp/cc0F66el.s:...Error: no such 386 instruction: 'ldmia' ^^^ Are you sure you are making a *native* compiler? This looks like you're making a cross compiler without the cross binutils installed. Erik -- J.A.K. (Erik) Mouw, Information and Communication Theory Group, Department of Electrical Engineering, Faculty of Information Technology and Systems, Delft University of Technology, PO BOX 5031, 2600 GA Delft, The Netherlands Phone: +31-15-2785859 Fax: +31-15-2781843 Email J.A.K.Mouw@its.tudelft.nl WWW: http://www-ict.its.tudelft.nl/~erik/ From kramer@pa.dec.com Thu Oct 28 01:46:51 1999 Return-Path: Received: from tudedr.et.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (4.1/BB-2.0) id AA19890; Thu, 28 Oct 99 01:46:51 +0200 Received: from mail2.digital.com by ITS.TUDelft.NL (PMDF V5.1-10 #21918) with ESMTP id <01JHNFNW5W088WWZMI@ITS.TUDelft.NL> for erik@duteinh.et.tudelft.nl; Thu, 28 Oct 1999 01:46:46 +0200 Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.2/WV2.0g) with SMTP id QAA02491; Wed, 27 Oct 1999 16:44:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rex.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA16963; Wed, 27 Oct 1999 16:44:00 -0700 Received: by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id QAA24504; Wed, 27 Oct 1999 16:43:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id QAA24464; Wed, 27 Oct 1999 16:43:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail1.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA19349; Wed, 27 Oct 1999 16:43:22 -0700 Received: from fw-losgatos.losgatos.arm.com (ns.arm.com [208.193.202.3]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.2/WV2.0g) with SMTP id QAA04768 for ; Wed, 27 Oct 1999 16:43:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: by fw-losgatos.losgatos.arm.com; id QAA14303; Wed, 27 Oct 1999 16:40:34 -0700 Received: from unknown(194.202.50.2) by fw-losgatos.losgatos.arm.com via smap (V5.0) id xma014301; Wed, 27 Oct 1999 16:40:30 -0700 Received: from magpie (dhcp47 [194.202.50.238]) by incsun1.losgatos.arm.com (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with SMTP id QAA07663 for ; Wed, 27 Oct 1999 16:37:53 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 27 Oct 1999 16:34:49 -0500 From: Ian Field Subject: XFree86 Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com To: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Message-Id: <00fd01bf20c3$190c47d0$ee32cac2@losgatos.arm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2314.1300 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_00FA_01BF2099.300B5F40" Precedence: bulk X-Msmail-Priority: Normal X-Mimeole: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2314.1300 X-Priority: 3 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_00FA_01BF2099.300B5F40 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi all, Has anybody thought about putting X onto a SA1100, using the = framebuffer as the hardware interface? I wonder if the netwinder source = can be easily adapted.=20 Does anybody know how small X can be made and still run fvwm or kde? = Would it thrash disk alot in 16 or 32MB of ram? Cheers, IAN ------=_NextPart_000_00FA_01BF2099.300B5F40 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hi all,
 
    Has anybody thought = about=20 putting X onto a SA1100, using the framebuffer as the hardware = interface? I=20 wonder if the netwinder source can be easily adapted.
 
Does anybody know how small X can be = made and still=20 run fvwm or kde? Would it thrash disk alot in 16 or 32MB of = ram?
 
 
Cheers, IAN
 
 
------=_NextPart_000_00FA_01BF2099.300B5F40-- From kramer@pa.dec.com Thu Oct 28 11:00:38 1999 Return-Path: Received: from tudedr.et.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (4.1/BB-2.0) id AA21520; Thu, 28 Oct 99 11:00:38 +0200 Received: from mail2.digital.com by ITS.TUDelft.NL (PMDF V5.1-10 #21918) with ESMTP id <01JHNZ0GTQMG90MWZ5@ITS.TUDelft.NL> for erik@duteinh.et.tudelft.nl; Thu, 28 Oct 1999 11:00:29 +0200 Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.2/WV2.0g) with SMTP id BAA21695; Thu, 28 Oct 1999 01:58:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rex.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA11955; Thu, 28 Oct 1999 01:58:08 -0700 Received: by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id BAA25819; Thu, 28 Oct 1999 01:57:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id BAA25831; Thu, 28 Oct 1999 01:57:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail2.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA24182; Thu, 28 Oct 1999 01:57:22 -0700 Received: from globe.nexus.co.uk (nexusel.demon.co.uk [158.152.30.195]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.2/WV2.0g) with ESMTP id BAA25721 for ; Thu, 28 Oct 1999 01:57:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.0.0.21] (helo=fountain.nexus.co.uk ident=mail) by globe.nexus.co.uk with smtp (Exim 2.12 #1) id 11glKX-0001XP-00; Thu, 28 Oct 1999 08:54:45 +0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=fountain ident=pb) by fountain.nexus.co.uk with esmtp (Exim 3.03 #1) id 11glKW-00048n-00; Thu, 28 Oct 1999 09:54:44 +0100 Date: Thu, 28 Oct 1999 09:54:44 +0100 From: Philip Blundell Subject: Re: XFree86 In-Reply-To: Message from Ian Field "of Wed, 27 Oct 1999 16:34:49 CDT." <00fd01bf20c3$190c47d0$ee32cac2@losgatos.arm.com> Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com To: Ian Field Cc: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: exmh version 2.0.2 2/24/98 (debian) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Precedence: bulk References: <00fd01bf20c3$190c47d0$ee32cac2@losgatos.arm.com> > Has anybody thought about putting X onto a SA1100, using the >framebuffer as the hardware interface? I wonder if the netwinder source >can be easily adapted. Yes; the FBDev X server works fine on SA-1100. >Does anybody know how small X can be made and still run fvwm or kde? >Would it thrash disk alot in 16 or 32MB of ram? 32 would probably be OK. You might get away with 16 but you'd have to experiment. Depends what other programs you want to run at the same time. p. From kramer@pa.dec.com Wed Nov 3 23:34:39 1999 Return-Path: Received: from tudedr.et.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (4.1/BB-2.0) id AA27256; Wed, 3 Nov 99 23:34:39 +0100 Received: from mail2.digital.com by ITS.TUDelft.NL (PMDF V5.1-10 #21918) with ESMTP id <01JHX33FWQ0I90MY7C@ITS.TUDelft.NL> for erik@duteinh.et.tudelft.nl; Wed, 3 Nov 1999 23:34:33 +0100 Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.2/WV2.0g) with SMTP id OAA17020; Wed, 03 Nov 1999 14:30:05 -0800 (PST) Received: from rex.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA15543; Wed, 03 Nov 1999 14:29:49 -0800 Received: by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id OAA17521; Wed, 03 Nov 1999 14:27:38 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id OAA17530; Wed, 03 Nov 1999 14:27:35 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail1.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA23060; Wed, 03 Nov 1999 14:27:34 -0800 Received: from duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (duteinh.et.tudelft.nl [130.161.42.1]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.2/WV2.0g) with SMTP id OAA18813 for ; Wed, 03 Nov 1999 14:27:33 -0800 (PST) Received: from dutein71 (dutein71.et.tudelft.nl) by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (4.1/BB-2.0) id AA27234; Wed, 03 Nov 1999 23:26:16 +0100 Date: Wed, 03 Nov 1999 23:26:15 +0100 From: Erik Mouw Subject: Announce: LART schematics Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com To: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com, linux-arm@vger.rutgers.edu, pleb@cse.unsw.edu.au Message-Id: <9911032226.AA27234@duteinh.et.tudelft.nl> Organization: Eric conspiracy secret labs Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: XCmail 0.99.6 - with PGP support, PGP engine version 0.5 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Precedence: bulk X-Face: "!Z|1XjFg!3Iw)BwM^M\k)J5KHiPddz}#/Zw%?$&Q!xqob"OA|})3_@&BTTiQERo?/^g[Z<9P4R8:5C:aqq.cw!hotLc=+u-"+1rq@9$V^8PbOUlodyi_sejt+D`iqkLpx$>.aXl%vnfPIt"LK|/%>94_Zrm8jy?`_[RKt'TuoxUxfk(gMhY(n|DBBl~c$dhO>G%6}R4+DGX3|idBm4oU&UM/XUP4I9aoN{]`ax%B?rgD(I3OJ<62Y6L X-Mailerorigin: http://www.fsai.fh-trier.de/~schmitzj/Xclasses/XCmail/ X-Eric-Conspiracy: There is no conspiracy! X-Loop: erik@it.et.tudelft.nl Hi all, On behalf of Jan-Derk Bakker (who is temporarily without laptop and therefore without proper email access), I'd like to announce the schematics of the Linux Advanced Radio Terminal (LART), a small low power computing element used in the MMC project (http://mmc.et.tudelft.nl/). LART features: - 10x7.5 cm (that's 4x3 inch in Stonehenge Units) - 220 MHz Digital StrongARM SA-1100 CPU - 4 Mbyte flash memory - 32 Mbyte DRAM memory - Low power: peak power consumption is 1W You can download the schematics as a PDF file at http://www-ict.its.tudelft.nl/~erik/open-source/LART/ . For now the schematics are released on an "as is" basis; we're looking for an appropriate open hardware license. Erik -- J.A.K. (Erik) Mouw, Information and Communication Theory Group, Department of Electrical Engineering, Faculty of Information Technology and Systems, Delft University of Technology, PO BOX 5031, 2600 GA Delft, The Netherlands Phone: +31-15-2785859 Fax: +31-15-2781843 Email J.A.K.Mouw@its.tudelft.nl WWW: http://www-ict.its.tudelft.nl/~erik/ From kramer@pa.dec.com Tue Nov 9 11:46:12 1999 Return-Path: Received: from tudedr.et.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (4.1/BB-2.0) id AA22362; Tue, 9 Nov 99 11:46:12 +0100 Received: from mail1.digital.com by ITS.TUDelft.NL (PMDF V5.1-10 #21918) with ESMTP id <01JI4S45G6TO8WX9YN@ITS.TUDelft.NL> for erik@duteinh.et.tudelft.nl; Tue, 9 Nov 1999 11:46:09 +0100 Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.2/WV2.0g) with SMTP id CAA30161; Tue, 09 Nov 1999 02:43:08 -0800 (PST) Received: from rex.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA27089; Tue, 09 Nov 1999 02:42:49 -0800 Received: by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id CAA04022; Tue, 09 Nov 1999 02:40:38 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id CAA04004; Tue, 09 Nov 1999 02:40:34 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail1.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA10575; Tue, 09 Nov 1999 02:40:31 -0800 Received: from DECsy.decsy.ru (decsy.decsy.ru [193.233.209.50]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.2/WV2.0g) with ESMTP id CAA06282 for ; Tue, 09 Nov 1999 02:40:26 -0800 (PST) Received: from wint (wint.decsy.ru [193.233.209.54]) by DECsy.decsy.ru (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id NAA13952 for ; Tue, 09 Nov 1999 13:57:41 +0300 (Moscow) Date: Tue, 09 Nov 1999 13:38:06 +0300 From: Sergey Medvedev Subject: SA1110 experience Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com To: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Message-Id: <02b201bf2a9e$87f716e0$80d1e9c1@wint.decsy.ru> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 4.72.3110.5 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1251" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk X-Msmail-Priority: Normal X-Mimeole: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.3110.3 X-Priority: 3 Dear Colleague Whether there is someone with an experience in SA1110/Linux design? Or maybe someone who plane to use this platform in the near future... We would like to use SA1110 in our wireless mobile products, but we are afraid that the first version of it will contain silicon BUGs. Any recommendations will be very useful to us... Thanks Sergey Medvedev DECsy - Russia http://www.decsy.ru From kramer@pa.dec.com Tue Nov 9 13:44:06 1999 Return-Path: Received: from tudedr.et.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (4.1/BB-2.0) id AA23106; Tue, 9 Nov 99 13:44:06 +0100 Received: from mail2.digital.com by ITS.TUDelft.NL (PMDF V5.1-10 #21918) with ESMTP id <01JI4W84QD408WXTI8@ITS.TUDelft.NL> for erik@duteinh.et.tudelft.nl; Tue, 9 Nov 1999 13:43:58 +0100 Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.2/WV2.0g) with SMTP id EAA19762; Tue, 09 Nov 1999 04:40:31 -0800 (PST) Received: from rex.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA04468; Tue, 09 Nov 1999 04:40:16 -0800 Received: by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id EAA04409; Tue, 09 Nov 1999 04:39:55 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id EAA04398; Tue, 09 Nov 1999 04:39:52 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail1.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA00151; Tue, 09 Nov 1999 04:39:47 -0800 Received: from duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (duteinh.et.tudelft.nl [130.161.42.1]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.2/WV2.0g) with SMTP id EAA01289 for ; Tue, 09 Nov 1999 04:37:32 -0800 (PST) Received: from dutein71 (dutein71.et.tudelft.nl) by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (4.1/BB-2.0) id AA23036; Tue, 09 Nov 1999 13:34:09 +0100 Date: Tue, 09 Nov 1999 13:34:09 +0100 From: Erik Mouw Subject: Re: SA1110 experience In-Reply-To: <02b201bf2a9e$87f716e0$80d1e9c1@wint.decsy.ru> Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com To: sm@decsy.ru Cc: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Message-Id: <9911091234.AA23036@duteinh.et.tudelft.nl> Organization: Eric conspiracy secret labs Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: XCmail 0.99.6 - with PGP support, PGP engine version 0.5 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Precedence: bulk X-Face: "!Z|1XjFg!3Iw)BwM^M\k)J5KHiPddz}#/Zw%?$&Q!xqob"OA|})3_@&BTTiQERo?/^g[Z<9P4R8:5C:aqq.cw!hotLc=+u-"+1rq@9$V^8PbOUlodyi_sejt+D`iqkLpx$>.aXl%vnfPIt"LK|/%>94_Zrm8jy?`_[RKt'TuoxUxfk(gMhY(n|DBBl~c$dhO>G%6}R4+DGX3|idBm4oU&UM/XUP4I9aoN{]`ax%B?rgD(I3OJ<62Y6L X-Mailerorigin: http://www.fsai.fh-trier.de/~schmitzj/Xclasses/XCmail/ X-Eric-Conspiracy: There is no conspiracy! X-Loop: erik@it.et.tudelft.nl On Tue, 09 Nov 1999 13:38:06 +0300, Sergey Medvedev wrote: > Whether there is someone with an experience in SA1110/Linux design? > Or maybe someone who plane to use this platform in the near future... Have a look at the LART design (pictures and schematics): http://www-ict.its.tudelft.nl/~erik/open-source/LART/ > We would like to use SA1110 in our wireless mobile products, > but we are afraid that the first version of it will contain silicon BUGs. The first SA-1100 chips contained some silicon bugs (USB, SDLC), but I don't know what the current versions do. Check out the Intel webpages with SA-1100 errata. Erik -- J.A.K. (Erik) Mouw, Information and Communication Theory Group, Department of Electrical Engineering, Faculty of Information Technology and Systems, Delft University of Technology, PO BOX 5031, 2600 GA Delft, The Netherlands Phone: +31-15-2785859 Fax: +31-15-2781843 Email J.A.K.Mouw@its.tudelft.nl WWW: http://www-ict.its.tudelft.nl/~erik/ From kramer@pa.dec.com Tue Nov 9 18:21:28 1999 Return-Path: Received: from tudedr.et.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (4.1/BB-2.0) id AA24926; Tue, 9 Nov 99 18:21:28 +0100 Received: from mail1.digital.com by ITS.TUDelft.NL (PMDF V5.1-10 #21918) with ESMTP id <01JI55WAWIFU90MWYY@ITS.TUDelft.NL> for erik@duteinh.et.tudelft.nl; Tue, 9 Nov 1999 18:21:25 +0100 Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.2/WV2.0g) with SMTP id JAA29711; Tue, 09 Nov 1999 09:19:18 -0800 (PST) Received: from rex.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA16713; Tue, 09 Nov 1999 09:19:07 -0800 Received: by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id JAA05254; Tue, 09 Nov 1999 09:18:29 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id JAA05248; Tue, 09 Nov 1999 09:18:23 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail2.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA32234; Tue, 09 Nov 1999 09:18:22 -0800 Received: from mailgate.keith-koep.com (mailgate.keith-koep.com [195.8.230.32]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.2/WV2.0g) with ESMTP id JAA06948 for ; Tue, 09 Nov 1999 09:18:21 -0800 (PST) Received: from otto (otto [195.8.230.40]) by mailgate.keith-koep.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id SAA21840 for ; Tue, 09 Nov 1999 18:21:00 +0100 Date: Tue, 09 Nov 1999 18:18:19 +0100 (MET) From: keith Subject: Re: SA1110 experience Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com To: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Reply-To: keith Message-Id: <199911091721.SAA21840@mailgate.keith-koep.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: dtmail 1.2.0 CDE Version 1.2 SunOS 5.6 sun4u sparc Content-Type: TEXT/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Md5: CPAiQMBpouDWIdq5XKp5GA== Precedence: bulk We will start to bring up a new evaluation board, which will be like ARNOLD. The Documentation for ARNOLD is attached. Don't hesitate to contact. Volker _________________________________________________________________ | | | KEITH & KOEP GMBH DEVELOPMENT OF EMBEDDED CONTROL SYSTEMS | | KOENIGSBERGER STR.2 PHONE +49 (0)202 2525 30 | | D-42277 WUPPERTAL FAX +49 (0)202 2525 333 | | GERMANY keith@keith-koep.com | |_________________________________________________________________| From kramer@pa.dec.com Tue Nov 9 18:38:14 1999 Return-Path: Received: from tudedr.et.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (4.1/BB-2.0) id AA25004; Tue, 9 Nov 99 18:38:14 +0100 Received: from mail2.digital.com by ITS.TUDelft.NL (PMDF V5.1-10 #21918) with ESMTP id <01JI56I0NMTW8WXP5Z@ITS.TUDelft.NL> for erik@duteinh.et.tudelft.nl; Tue, 9 Nov 1999 18:38:12 +0100 Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.2/WV2.0g) with SMTP id JAA11767; Tue, 09 Nov 1999 09:35:46 -0800 (PST) Received: from rex.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA03856; Tue, 09 Nov 1999 09:35:45 -0800 Received: by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id JAA05312; Tue, 09 Nov 1999 09:35:32 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id JAA05330; Tue, 09 Nov 1999 09:35:29 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail2.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA01919; Tue, 09 Nov 1999 09:35:27 -0800 Received: from NT_SERVER.flatpanels.com (flatpanels.com [207.196.69.66]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.2/WV2.0g) with SMTP id JAA09338 for ; Tue, 09 Nov 1999 09:35:27 -0800 (PST) Received: by NT_SERVER.flatpanels.com with SMTP (Microsoft Exchange Server Internet Mail Connector Version 4.0.994.63) id <01BF2AAF.44A1A1B0@NT_SERVER.flatpanels.com>; Tue, 09 Nov 1999 12:38:04 -0500 Date: Tue, 09 Nov 1999 12:38:03 -0500 From: "Baik, Jonghyeon" Subject: [re]SA1110 experience Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com To: "'sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com'" Cc: "'sm@decsy.ru'" Message-Id: X-Mailer: Microsoft Exchange Server Internet Mail Connector Version 4.0.994.63 Precedence: bulk Why don't you visit our website ? Our company already made several platform with sa1100. And I have SA1110 sample board on my desk. ********************************************************************* Jonghyeon Baik email:jbaik@flatpanels.com Sr. S/W Engineer phone: 301- 490-4007 x15 Applied Data Systems fax: 301-490-4582 9140 -A Guilford Road http://www.flatpanels.com Columbia, MD 21046 ********************************************************************* From kramer@pa.dec.com Wed Nov 10 10:54:01 1999 Return-Path: Received: from tudedr.et.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (4.1/BB-2.0) id AA29278; Wed, 10 Nov 99 10:54:01 +0100 Received: from mail1.digital.com by ITS.TUDelft.NL (PMDF V5.1-10 #21918) with ESMTP id <01JI64KVAF2490MZ07@ITS.TUDelft.NL> for erik@duteinh.et.tudelft.nl; Wed, 10 Nov 1999 10:53:58 +0100 Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.2/WV2.0g) with SMTP id BAA24832; Wed, 10 Nov 1999 01:45:04 -0800 (PST) Received: from rex.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA21918; Wed, 10 Nov 1999 01:43:59 -0800 Received: by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id BAA07777; Wed, 10 Nov 1999 01:43:00 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id BAA07820; Wed, 10 Nov 1999 01:42:57 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail2.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA01135; Wed, 10 Nov 1999 01:42:54 -0800 Received: from duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (duteinh.et.tudelft.nl [130.161.42.1]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.2/WV2.0g) with SMTP id BAA24213 for ; Wed, 10 Nov 1999 01:42:53 -0800 (PST) Received: from dutein71 (dutein71.et.tudelft.nl) by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (4.1/BB-2.0) id AA29169; Wed, 10 Nov 1999 10:41:29 +0100 Date: Wed, 10 Nov 1999 10:41:29 +0100 From: Erik Mouw Subject: Re: SA1110 experience In-Reply-To: <199911100013.DAA14397@DECsy.decsy.ru> Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com To: sm@decsy.ru Cc: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Message-Id: <9911100941.AA29169@duteinh.et.tudelft.nl> Organization: Eric conspiracy secret labs Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: XCmail 0.99.6 - with PGP support, PGP engine version 0.5 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Precedence: bulk X-Face: "!Z|1XjFg!3Iw)BwM^M\k)J5KHiPddz}#/Zw%?$&Q!xqob"OA|})3_@&BTTiQERo?/^g[Z<9P4R8:5C:aqq.cw!hotLc=+u-"+1rq@9$V^8PbOUlodyi_sejt+D`iqkLpx$>.aXl%vnfPIt"LK|/%>94_Zrm8jy?`_[RKt'TuoxUxfk(gMhY(n|DBBl~c$dhO>G%6}R4+DGX3|idBm4oU&UM/XUP4I9aoN{]`ax%B?rgD(I3OJ<62Y6L X-Mailerorigin: http://www.fsai.fh-trier.de/~schmitzj/Xclasses/XCmail/ X-Eric-Conspiracy: There is no conspiracy! X-Loop: erik@it.et.tudelft.nl On Mon, 09 Nov 1998 23:54 +0000, Serg Medvedev wrote: > >> But I mean new Intel-SA1110 chip... We plane to use 128-256mbit Samsung > >> SDRAM chip with it. > >Oh, you mean the spooky BGA-only version. > Yes, I think that Intel plan to redesign it with new 0,18mkm technology (up to > 600MHz...) with PC-133 (&Rambus ?) support. That's not the SA-1110. The SA-1110 runs at a maximum of 206 MHz, while the SA-1100 runs at 220 MHz. It's exactly the same core (SA-1), the only difference is that the SA-1110 supports SDRAM (and that it comes in BGA only, which is not interesting if you want to do a small run). If you want more performance, you'd better go with the SA-1100. You are probably confused by the announcement at Intel's web site: http://developer.intel.com/design/strong/SA-2_web.htm Be careful, this is still vapourware! It is not yet released, and it is expected to be release during the first half of 2000. I don't think you'll be able to get them in significant quantities before the end of 2000. > >> We need some more performance. > > > >What do you mean with "more performance"? We can do 120 Mbyte/s to 60ns > >EDO DRAM, and then our memory interface is not yet tuned. Using 50 ns EDO > >DRAM, we'd expect to use 140~150 Mbyte/s. Oh, and sane code mostly runs > >from cache, > There is an cache-memory access speed problems in SA1100. Not that I am aware of, can you be a bit more specific here? > Why SA1110 have additional miniD cache? The SA-1110 has the same amount of minicache as the SA-1100. The idea of the minicache is to avoid cache poisoning with data intensive operations. Have a look at the manuals at http://developer.intel.com/design/strong/ . >>so memory speed is not really an issue. > To use Linux and some more network services (and maybe X-Windows) > you need more RAM. Isn't it? Depends if you want to use it as an X server or if you want to serve X clients. The Netwinder comes with 64Mbyte RAM, which is sufficient for everyday use. > Or you need to compres the ramdisk... That doesn't help you. Compressing the ramdisk is interesting if you want to store it in flash ROM (we do it like that on the LART), but as soon as you start using it, it will be decompressed. > 256Mbit SDRAM chip from Samsung use the same power as 64Mbit EDO (150mA). > I.e. this is factor of 2 of speed and only 2 chip SDRAM 16Mx16 based design! > SA1110+SDRAM really cool for mobile Linux... With the current earth quake problems in Taiwan, I hope you will be able to find a supplier for the memory you want. Don't base your design on memory you can't get. The LART was also designed for mobile use: it runs (in idle mode, that is) for ~100 hours from a single 4.5V battery, and that's without any optimisation. We hope to save some power with clock and/or voltage scaling. We have found that the real power consumers are not the CPU or the memory, but the peripheral devices like LCD, FPGAs, and FIFOs. Erik -- J.A.K. (Erik) Mouw, Information and Communication Theory Group, Department of Electrical Engineering, Faculty of Information Technology and Systems, Delft University of Technology, PO BOX 5031, 2600 GA Delft, The Netherlands Phone: +31-15-2785859 Fax: +31-15-2781843 Email J.A.K.Mouw@its.tudelft.nl WWW: http://www-ict.its.tudelft.nl/~erik/ From kramer@pa.dec.com Wed Nov 10 11:28:00 1999 Return-Path: Received: from tudedr.et.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (4.1/BB-2.0) id AA29578; Wed, 10 Nov 99 11:28:00 +0100 Received: from mail2.digital.com by ITS.TUDelft.NL (PMDF V5.1-10 #21918) with ESMTP id <01JI65QLUE3O934QCV@ITS.TUDelft.NL> for erik@duteinh.et.tudelft.nl; Wed, 10 Nov 1999 11:27:51 +0100 Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.2/WV2.0g) with SMTP id CAA00332; Wed, 10 Nov 1999 02:23:15 -0800 (PST) Received: from rex.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA28820; Wed, 10 Nov 1999 02:23:09 -0800 Received: by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id CAA07615; Wed, 10 Nov 1999 02:22:39 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id CAA07807; Wed, 10 Nov 1999 02:22:36 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail2.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA01924; Wed, 10 Nov 1999 02:22:36 -0800 Received: from sameday.request.net (sameday.request.net [216.172.148.68]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.2/WV2.0g) with ESMTP id CAA00644 for ; Wed, 10 Nov 1999 02:22:35 -0800 (PST) Received: from furina.request.net ([207.48.132.3]) by sameday.request.net with ESMTP id <337818-13982>; Wed, 10 Nov 1999 05:22:24 -0500 Received: from Bad.EHLO.Input ([149.225.20.230]) by furina.request.net with ESMTP id <98610503-13298>; Wed, 10 Nov 1999 05:22:13 -0500 Received: by HW_MAIL with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2448.0) id <4X54FV15>; Wed, 10 Nov 1999 11:22:17 +0100 Date: Wed, 10 Nov 1999 11:22:10 +0100 From: "JOR. - Jordan, Roman" Subject: technical info Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com To: "'sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com'" Message-Id: <81413F587EB9D1118F56000092941A3EA78B43@HW_MAIL> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2448.0) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Precedence: bulk Hi everyone, i have a question about the SA1110 (or the SA1100) DRAM design. It is possible to make a design, which only uses one 32 bit DRAM Bank? I take a look at the SA1110 data sheet and there i found, that the four RAM banks are organized as two pairs (1/2 and 3/4). If i use DRAM, then i have to fill the two banks of one pair with the equal configuration. For instance: If i want 4MB x 32, i have to fill bank 1 and bank 2 each with 2MB x 32. Or is it possible to connect only the bank number 1 with 4MB x 32? Any ideas or experience? Thanks in advance, Roman Jordan From kramer@pa.dec.com Wed Nov 10 12:03:49 1999 Return-Path: Received: from tudedr.et.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (4.1/BB-2.0) id AA29860; Wed, 10 Nov 99 12:03:49 +0100 Received: from mail1.digital.com by ITS.TUDelft.NL (PMDF V5.1-10 #21918) with ESMTP id <01JI66XEIDYQ934QM1@ITS.TUDelft.NL> for erik@duteinh.et.tudelft.nl; Wed, 10 Nov 1999 12:03:45 +0100 Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.2/WV2.0g) with SMTP id CAA10619; Wed, 10 Nov 1999 02:56:58 -0800 (PST) Received: from rex.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA03749; Wed, 10 Nov 1999 02:56:38 -0800 Received: by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id CAA07995; Wed, 10 Nov 1999 02:55:33 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id CAA07999; Wed, 10 Nov 1999 02:55:30 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail2.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA17911; Wed, 10 Nov 1999 02:55:29 -0800 Received: from note.orchestra.cse.unsw.EDU.AU (note.orchestra.cse.unsw.EDU.AU [129.94.242.29]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.2/WV2.0g) with SMTP id CAA30627 for ; Wed, 10 Nov 1999 02:55:27 -0800 (PST) Received: From paulaner With LocalMail ; Wed, 10 Nov 1999 21:54:51 +1100 Date: Wed, 10 Nov 1999 21:54:51 +1100 (EST) From: Adam 'WeirdArms' Wiggins Subject: Re: technical info In-Reply-To: <81413F587EB9D1118F56000092941A3EA78B43@HW_MAIL> Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com X-Sender: awiggins@paulaner.disy.cse.unsw.EDU.AU To: "JOR. - Jordan, Roman" Cc: "'sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com'" Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Precedence: bulk On Wed, 10 Nov 1999, JOR. - Jordan, Roman wrote: > Hi everyone, > i have a question about the SA1110 (or the SA1100) DRAM design. It is > possible to make a design, which only uses one 32 bit DRAM Bank? > I take a look at the SA1110 data sheet and there i found, that the four RAM > banks are organized as two pairs (1/2 and 3/4). If i use DRAM, then i have > to fill the two banks of one pair with the equal configuration. For > instance: If i want 4MB x 32, i have to fill bank 1 and bank 2 each with 2MB > x 32. Or is it possible to connect only the bank number 1 with 4MB x 32? The pairing is only for configuration. On the SA-1100 you have 4 banks that have the same configuration, then you select which banks out of the four are active. The SA-1110 to give more flexibility has 4 banks organised in two configuration pairs. So bank 1/2 must have the same DRAM and bank 3/4 must have the same bank. Then you select which banks are actually active. This allows you to mix different speed DRAMs and types. So you might have 1 bank of 60ns EDO DRAM in bank 0 (or 1) and 2 banks of PC100 SDRAM in banks 2/3. Where as on the SA-1100 if you used 60ns EDO DRAM all the banks had to be the same size/speed/type of ram (or empty). Hope that clears things up and doesn't confuse you. Cheers Adam From kramer@pa.dec.com Fri Nov 19 08:40:03 1999 Return-Path: Received: from tudedr.et.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id IAA26451; Fri, 19 Nov 1999 08:40:03 +0100 (MET) Received: from mail2.digital.com by ITS.TUDelft.NL (PMDF V5.1-10 #21918) with ESMTP id <01JIIKIWAKS290N1O5@ITS.TUDelft.NL> for erik@duteinh.et.tudelft.nl; Fri, 19 Nov 1999 08:40:01 +0100 Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.2/WV2.0g) with SMTP id XAA18137; Thu, 18 Nov 1999 23:37:48 -0800 (PST) Received: from rex.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA17130; Thu, 18 Nov 1999 23:36:46 -0800 Received: by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id XAA09241; Thu, 18 Nov 1999 23:34:26 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id XAA09232; Thu, 18 Nov 1999 23:34:22 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail1.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA27982; Thu, 18 Nov 1999 23:34:21 -0800 Received: from sgsgxch01.ingrammicro-asia.com (er-stone.electronicresources.com [203.127.52.129]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.2/WV2.0g) with ESMTP id XAA30974 for ; Thu, 18 Nov 1999 23:34:20 -0800 (PST) Received: from er-sgex00.ingrammicro-asia.com (ER-SGEX00 [172.29.91.17]) by sgsgxch01.ingrammicro-asia.com with SMTP (Microsoft Exchange Internet Mail Service Version 5.5.2448.0) id XDXCRPRQ; Fri, 19 Nov 1999 15:31:10 +0800 Received: by ER-SGEX00 with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2448.0) id ; Fri, 19 Nov 1999 15:28:45 +0800 Date: Fri, 19 Nov 1999 15:28:43 +0800 From: See Hui Tan - SG-KB-TS Subject: StrongARM Linux Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com To: "'sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com'" Message-id: MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2448.0) Content-type: text/plain Precedence: bulk Dear sir/madam, I will like to sign up for distribution lists related with Linux and Arms Thanks. > See Hui Tan, Kiwi Field Applications Engineer > Applications/Support Department > Ingrammicro Aisa Limited > 205, Kallang Bahru #04-00, > Singapore 339341 > > Tel : (65) 298-0888 > Fax : (65) 298-9134 > Pgr : (65) 9-3212167 > DID : (65) 393-1850 > > Email < see.hui.tan@ingrammicro-asia.com > > > From kramer@pa.dec.com Mon Nov 22 04:32:46 1999 Return-Path: Received: from tudedv.et.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id EAA02494; Mon, 22 Nov 1999 04:32:45 +0100 (MET) Received: from mail1.digital.com by ITS.TUDelft.NL (PMDF V5.1-10 #21918) with ESMTP id <01JIMIPLXJ0090N4KM@ITS.TUDelft.NL> for erik@duteinh.et.tudelft.nl; Mon, 22 Nov 1999 04:31:22 +0100 Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.2/WV2.0g) with SMTP id TAA29265; Sun, 21 Nov 1999 19:26:43 -0800 (PST) Received: from rex.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA29066; Sun, 21 Nov 1999 19:26:28 -0800 Received: by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id TAA20240; Sun, 21 Nov 1999 19:24:11 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id TAA20239; Sun, 21 Nov 1999 19:24:08 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail1.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA12805; Sun, 21 Nov 1999 19:24:08 -0800 Received: from funai-tky.co.jp (ns.funai-tky.co.jp [210.154.37.2]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.2/WV2.0g) with ESMTP id TAA28230 for ; Sun, 21 Nov 1999 19:24:06 -0800 (PST) Received: from hiropu ([192.168.1.19]) by funai-tky.co.jp (8.9.1/3.7Wpr7-98092916) with SMTP id MAA23631 for ; Mon, 22 Nov 1999 12:24:04 +0900 Date: Mon, 22 Nov 1999 12:24:03 +0900 From: Hiroshi Ishii Subject: About SA1110 Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com To: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Message-id: <3838B7532C6.FA3AHIROSHI@ns.funai-tky.co.jp> MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Becky! ver 1.25.07 Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk Hi! I'm trying to work Linux on SA1110. I think same architecture SA1110 and SA1100. So, nothing to do about it. Does anyone already working it? ---- ++ Funai Electric R & D Co.,LTD ++ ++ Hiroshi Ishii ++ From kramer@pa.dec.com Mon Nov 22 10:06:52 1999 Return-Path: Received: from tudedr.et.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id KAA01096; Mon, 22 Nov 1999 10:06:51 +0100 (MET) Received: from mail2.digital.com by ITS.TUDelft.NL (PMDF V5.1-10 #21918) with ESMTP id <01JIMUFF6W0494E17B@ITS.TUDelft.NL> for erik@duteinh.et.tudelft.nl; Mon, 22 Nov 1999 10:06:44 +0100 Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.2/WV2.0g) with SMTP id BAA30745; Mon, 22 Nov 1999 01:01:33 -0800 (PST) Received: from rex.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA12376; Mon, 22 Nov 1999 01:01:24 -0800 Received: by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id BAA20749; Mon, 22 Nov 1999 01:00:40 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id BAA17831; Mon, 22 Nov 1999 01:00:37 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail1.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA09450; Mon, 22 Nov 1999 01:00:37 -0800 Received: from core.kaist.ac.kr (coregate.kaist.ac.kr [143.248.147.118]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.2/WV2.0g) with ESMTP id BAA00268 for ; Mon, 22 Nov 1999 01:00:29 -0800 (PST) Received: from hakim (hakim.kaist.ac.kr [143.248.165.182]) by core.kaist.ac.kr (8.8.8H2/8.8.8) with SMTP id RAA09302 for ; Mon, 22 Nov 1999 17:56:19 +0900 (KST) Date: Mon, 22 Nov 1999 17:58:13 +0900 From: Young Lee Subject: test(no content) Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com To: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Message-id: <000801bf34c7$b5e197a0$b6a5f88f@hakim> MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2919.6401 Content-type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0005_01BF3513.2542D190" Precedence: bulk X-Msmail-Priority: Normal X-Mimeole: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2919.6400 X-Priority: 3 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0005_01BF3513.2542D190 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable this is a test mail. please kindly ignore. ------=_NextPart_000_0005_01BF3513.2542D190 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
this is a test mail. please kindly=20 ignore.
------=_NextPart_000_0005_01BF3513.2542D190-- From kramer@pa.dec.com Mon Nov 22 10:27:33 1999 Return-Path: Received: from tudedr.et.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id KAA01285; Mon, 22 Nov 1999 10:27:33 +0100 (MET) Received: from mail1.digital.com by ITS.TUDelft.NL (PMDF V5.1-10 #21918) with ESMTP id <01JIMV56P4QS94E16B@ITS.TUDelft.NL> for erik@duteinh.et.tudelft.nl; Mon, 22 Nov 1999 10:27:32 +0100 Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.2/WV2.0g) with SMTP id BAA00125; Mon, 22 Nov 1999 01:25:19 -0800 (PST) Received: from rex.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA16420; Mon, 22 Nov 1999 01:24:55 -0800 Received: by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id BAA21409; Mon, 22 Nov 1999 01:24:39 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id BAA21350; Mon, 22 Nov 1999 01:24:37 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail2.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA22684; Mon, 22 Nov 1999 01:24:36 -0800 Received: from core.kaist.ac.kr (coregate.kaist.ac.kr [143.248.147.118]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.2/WV2.0g) with ESMTP id BAA01339 for ; Mon, 22 Nov 1999 01:24:31 -0800 (PST) Received: from hakim (hakim.kaist.ac.kr [143.248.165.182]) by core.kaist.ac.kr (8.8.8H2/8.8.8) with SMTP id SAA09454 for ; Mon, 22 Nov 1999 18:20:31 +0900 (KST) Date: Mon, 22 Nov 1999 18:22:25 +0900 From: Young Lee Subject: Is there SA1100 linux webpage? Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com To: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Message-id: <00ce01bf34cb$171e7260$b6a5f88f@hakim> MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2919.6401 Content-type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_00CB_01BF3516.86F09690" Precedence: bulk X-Msmail-Priority: Normal X-Mimeole: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2919.6400 X-Priority: 3 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_00CB_01BF3516.86F09690 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable ------=_NextPart_000_00CB_01BF3516.86F09690 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
 
------=_NextPart_000_00CB_01BF3516.86F09690-- From kramer@pa.dec.com Mon Nov 22 14:53:11 1999 Return-Path: Received: from tudedr.et.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id OAA03066; Mon, 22 Nov 1999 14:53:11 +0100 (MET) Received: from mail1.digital.com by ITS.TUDelft.NL (PMDF V5.1-10 #21918) with ESMTP id <01JIN4FDWKLU94E18H@ITS.TUDelft.NL> for erik@duteinh.et.tudelft.nl; Mon, 22 Nov 1999 14:53:11 +0100 Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.2/WV2.0g) with SMTP id FAA05293; Mon, 22 Nov 1999 05:49:44 -0800 (PST) Received: from rex.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA30490; Mon, 22 Nov 1999 05:49:28 -0800 Received: by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id FAA22048; Mon, 22 Nov 1999 05:48:37 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id FAA22100; Mon, 22 Nov 1999 05:48:35 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail1.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA12193; Mon, 22 Nov 1999 05:48:34 -0800 Received: from core.kaist.ac.kr (coregate.kaist.ac.kr [143.248.147.118]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.2/WV2.0g) with ESMTP id FAA05438 for ; Mon, 22 Nov 1999 05:48:29 -0800 (PST) Received: from hakim (hakim.kaist.ac.kr [143.248.165.182]) by core.kaist.ac.kr (8.8.8H2/8.8.8) with SMTP id WAA10097 for ; Mon, 22 Nov 1999 22:44:23 +0900 (KST) Date: Mon, 22 Nov 1999 22:46:19 +0900 From: Young Lee Subject: Is Itsy project finished? If not, do you know any email address? Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com To: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Message-id: <026801bf34ef$f48a84d0$b6a5f88f@hakim> MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2919.6401 Content-type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0265_01BF353B.645221B0" Precedence: bulk X-Msmail-Priority: Normal X-Mimeole: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2919.6400 X-Priority: 3 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0265_01BF353B.645221B0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi, Is Itsy project finished? If not, do you know any email address related to the Itsy project=20 or email address of persons involved in that project? It seems that the project is on-going since there was a notice of recent = meeting result. However, release of linux was Sep. 1998 more than 1 year ago. I'd like to see more recent release. With regards, Young Lee ymlee@core.kaist.ac.kr ------=_NextPart_000_0265_01BF353B.645221B0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hi,
 
Is Itsy project finished?
If not, do you know any email address = related to=20 the Itsy project
or email address of persons involved in = that=20 project?
 
It seems that the project is on-going = since there=20 was a notice of recent meeting result.
However, release of linux was Sep. 1998 = more than 1=20 year ago.
I'd like to see more recent = release.
 
With regards,
Young Lee
ymlee@core.kaist.ac.kr<= /DIV>
 
------=_NextPart_000_0265_01BF353B.645221B0-- From kramer@pa.dec.com Mon Nov 22 16:13:37 1999 Return-Path: Received: from tudedr.et.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id QAA03496; Mon, 22 Nov 1999 16:13:37 +0100 (MET) Received: from mail1.digital.com by ITS.TUDelft.NL (PMDF V5.1-10 #21918) with ESMTP id <01JIN785WTBE90N648@ITS.TUDelft.NL> for erik@duteinh.et.tudelft.nl; Mon, 22 Nov 1999 16:13:33 +0100 Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.2/WV2.0g) with SMTP id HAA19264; Mon, 22 Nov 1999 07:08:58 -0800 (PST) Received: from rex.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA16841; Mon, 22 Nov 1999 07:08:52 -0800 Received: by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id HAA22314; Mon, 22 Nov 1999 07:08:14 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id HAA22335; Mon, 22 Nov 1999 07:08:12 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail2.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA26136; Mon, 22 Nov 1999 07:08:11 -0800 Received: from DECsy.decsy.ru (decsy.decsy.ru [193.233.209.50]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.2/WV2.0g) with ESMTP id HAA14595 for ; Mon, 22 Nov 1999 07:08:05 -0800 (PST) Received: from wint (wint.decsy.ru [193.233.209.54]) by DECsy.decsy.ru (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id RAA06134; Mon, 22 Nov 1999 17:45:44 +0300 (Moscow) Date: Mon, 22 Nov 1999 18:02:25 +0300 From: Sergey Medvedev Subject: Re: About SA1110 Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com To: Hiroshi Ishii Cc: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Message-id: <012101bf34fa$9a9eccf0$80d1e9c1@wint.decsy.ru> MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 4.72.3110.5 Content-type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-transfer-encoding: quoted-printable Precedence: bulk X-Msmail-Priority: Normal X-Mimeole: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.3110.3 X-Mime-Autoconverted: from 8bit to quoted-printable by mail2.digital.com id HAA14595 X-Priority: 3 Dear Hiroshi Ishii, Colleague. Will you be so kind to find out from your company (Funai Electric?) , Where (from what person) they have got SA1110 chips? We have rung round all US Intel distributors (Arrow, Avnet, Wyle, Pioneer...) Nobody has any SA1110 chips in a warehouse... It seems that no one of Intel Distributors (as well as Intel Support team= ) can sell a several StrongARM SA1110 chips with reasonable (up to 4 week) Lead Time. ;( Recently we have developed some SA1110 based board (like Itsy): - SA1100, LCD ... - up to 64MB SDRAM (256 Mbit chip), up to 16 MB Itel Flash - Altera APEX 20k100 FPGA - 2xPCMCIA - & Linux developers Surprise ;) And now we are ready to work with Linux on it, but our open project is frozen ;( Thanks Sergey Medvedev Applied Information Technologies Insitute BTW we have experience of SA1100/Linux work on our first SA1100 based boa= rd, and it works stably enough... -----Original Message----- From: Hiroshi Ishii To: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Date: 22 =ED=EE=FF=E1=F0=FF 1999 =E3. 6:22 Subject: About SA1110 >Hi! > >I'm trying to work Linux on SA1110. >I think same architecture SA1110 and SA1100. >So, nothing to do about it. > >Does anyone already working it? > > >---- >++ Funai Electric R & D Co.,LTD ++ >++ Hiroshi Ishii ++ > > > From kramer@pa.dec.com Mon Nov 22 16:33:51 1999 Return-Path: Received: from tudedr.et.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id QAA03602; Mon, 22 Nov 1999 16:33:51 +0100 (MET) Received: from mail2.digital.com by ITS.TUDelft.NL (PMDF V5.1-10 #21918) with ESMTP id <01JIN7XABV0494E1OK@ITS.TUDelft.NL> for erik@duteinh.et.tudelft.nl; Mon, 22 Nov 1999 16:33:47 +0100 Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.2/WV2.0g) with SMTP id HAA19234; Mon, 22 Nov 1999 07:30:57 -0800 (PST) Received: from rex.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA20887; Mon, 22 Nov 1999 07:30:55 -0800 Received: by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id HAA22376; Mon, 22 Nov 1999 07:30:45 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id HAA22348; Mon, 22 Nov 1999 07:30:43 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail2.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA05519; Mon, 22 Nov 1999 07:30:43 -0800 Received: from NT_SERVER.flatpanels.com (flatpanels.com [207.196.69.66]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.2/WV2.0g) with SMTP id HAA19445 for ; Mon, 22 Nov 1999 07:30:41 -0800 (PST) Received: by NT_SERVER.flatpanels.com with SMTP (Microsoft Exchange Server Internet Mail Connector Version 4.0.994.63) id <01BF34D5.0C3F32D0@NT_SERVER.flatpanels.com>; Mon, 22 Nov 1999 10:33:42 -0500 Date: Mon, 22 Nov 1999 10:33:41 -0500 From: "Baik, Jonghyeon" Subject: RE: About SA1110 Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com To: "'Sergey Medvedev'" , "'Hiroshi Ishii'" Cc: "'sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com'" Message-id: X-Mailer: Microsoft Exchange Server Internet Mail Connector Version 4.0.994.63 Precedence: bulk Dear Sergey I'm John Baik from Applied data systems. We have several ES(Enginerring Sample) SA1110 from Intel. We already made a demo board(didn't decide name yet). We already ported Angel. I'm gonna port Windows CE at first. Thanks ********************************************************************* Jonghyeon Baik email:jbaik@flatpanels.com Sr. S/W Engineer phone: 301- 490-4007 x15 Applied Data Systems fax: 301-490-4582 9140 -A Guilford Road http://www.flatpanels.com Columbia, MD 21046 ********************************************************************* >-----Original Message----- >From: Sergey Medvedev [SMTP:sm@decsy.ru] >Sent: Monday, November 22, 1999 10:02 AM >To: Hiroshi Ishii >Cc: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com >Subject: Re: About SA1110 > >Dear Hiroshi Ishii, Colleague. > >Will you be so kind to find out from your company (Funai Electric?) , >Where (from what person) they have got SA1110 chips? > >We have rung round all US Intel distributors (Arrow, Avnet, Wyle, >Pioneer...) >Nobody has any SA1110 chips in a warehouse... >It seems that no one of Intel Distributors (as well as Intel Support team) >can sell a several StrongARM SA1110 chips with reasonable (up to 4 week) >Lead Time. ;( > >Recently we have developed some SA1110 based board (like Itsy): >- SA1100, LCD ... >- up to 64MB SDRAM (256 Mbit chip), up to 16 MB Itel Flash >- Altera APEX 20k100 FPGA >- 2xPCMCIA >- & Linux developers Surprise ;) > >And now we are ready to work with Linux on it, but our open project is >frozen ;( > >Thanks >Sergey Medvedev >Applied Information Technologies Insitute > >BTW we have experience of SA1100/Linux work on our first SA1100 based board, >and it works stably enough... > > >-----Original Message----- >From: Hiroshi Ishii >To: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com >Date: 22 iiya?y 1999 a. 6:22 >Subject: About SA1110 > > >>Hi! >> >>I'm trying to work Linux on SA1110. >>I think same architecture SA1110 and SA1100. >>So, nothing to do about it. >> >>Does anyone already working it? >> >> >>---- >>++ Funai Electric R & D Co.,LTD ++ >>++ Hiroshi Ishii ++ >> >> >> From kramer@pa.dec.com Mon Nov 22 18:14:03 1999 Return-Path: Received: from tudedr.et.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id SAA04130; Mon, 22 Nov 1999 18:14:02 +0100 (MET) Received: from mail2.digital.com by ITS.TUDelft.NL (PMDF V5.1-10 #21918) with ESMTP id <01JINBFJEFPE90N64Q@ITS.TUDelft.NL> for erik@duteinh.et.tudelft.nl; Mon, 22 Nov 1999 18:13:58 +0100 Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.2/WV2.0g) with SMTP id JAA07765; Mon, 22 Nov 1999 09:09:25 -0800 (PST) Received: from rex.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA10885; Mon, 22 Nov 1999 09:09:19 -0800 Received: by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id JAA22667; Mon, 22 Nov 1999 09:08:39 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id JAA22580; Mon, 22 Nov 1999 09:08:37 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail1.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA05831; Mon, 22 Nov 1999 09:08:36 -0800 Received: from DECsy.decsy.ru (decsy.decsy.ru [193.233.209.50]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.2/WV2.0g) with ESMTP id JAA05390 for ; Mon, 22 Nov 1999 09:07:58 -0800 (PST) Received: from wint (wint.decsy.ru [193.233.209.54]) by DECsy.decsy.ru (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id TAA06888; Mon, 22 Nov 1999 19:46:56 +0300 (Moscow) Date: Mon, 22 Nov 1999 20:03:37 +0300 From: Sergey Medvedev Subject: Fw: About SA1110 Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com To: "Baik, Jonghyeon" Cc: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Message-id: <017f01bf350b$863732a0$80d1e9c1@wint.decsy.ru> MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 4.72.3110.5 Content-type: text/plain; charset="windows-1251" Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk X-Msmail-Priority: Normal X-Mimeole: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.3110.3 X-Priority: 3 Dear Baik I am glad for you and your company. >We already ported Angel It is the really large success... BTW Baik, can you answer on some additional questions? Can you describe your demo board In detail? Is there any differences with this one: http://www.flatpanels.com/GraphicsClient.html? What ~prices (and when) it will be accessible for the order? It is very important for me and a Linux-community, I think... -----Original Message----- From: Baik, Jonghyeon Subject: RE: About SA1110 ... >We have several ES(Enginerring Sample) SA1110 from Intel. Can you give me E-mail (Phone or Fax) of this sales (Enginerring Support) person at Intel Co.? Thanks Sergey Medvedev Applied Information Technologies Institute From kramer@pa.dec.com Tue Nov 23 01:11:09 1999 Return-Path: Received: from tudedr.et.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id BAA05371; Tue, 23 Nov 1999 01:11:09 +0100 (MET) Received: from mail2.digital.com by ITS.TUDelft.NL (PMDF V5.1-10 #21918) with ESMTP id <01JINQ0P8DDK90N6FT@ITS.TUDelft.NL> for erik@duteinh.et.tudelft.nl; Tue, 23 Nov 1999 01:11:06 +0100 Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.2/WV2.0g) with SMTP id QAA12617; Mon, 22 Nov 1999 16:08:47 -0800 (PST) Received: from rex.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA30005; Mon, 22 Nov 1999 16:08:33 -0800 Received: by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id QAA23606; Mon, 22 Nov 1999 16:07:42 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id QAA23594; Mon, 22 Nov 1999 16:07:39 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail1.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA13020; Mon, 22 Nov 1999 16:07:38 -0800 Received: from note.orchestra.cse.unsw.EDU.AU (note.orchestra.cse.unsw.EDU.AU [129.94.242.29]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.2/WV2.0g) with SMTP id QAA11566 for ; Mon, 22 Nov 1999 16:07:35 -0800 (PST) Received: From paulaner With LocalMail ; Tue, 23 Nov 1999 11:04:53 +1100 Date: Tue, 23 Nov 1999 11:04:52 +1100 (EST) From: "Adam 'WeirdArms' Wiggins" Subject: Re: About SA1110 In-reply-to: <012101bf34fa$9a9eccf0$80d1e9c1@wint.decsy.ru> Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com X-Sender: awiggins@paulaner.disy.cse.unsw.EDU.AU To: Sergey Medvedev Cc: Hiroshi Ishii , sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Message-id: MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Content-transfer-encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Precedence: bulk > We have rung round all US Intel distributors (Arrow, Avnet, Wyle, > Pioneer...) > Nobody has any SA1110 chips in a warehouse... > It seems that no one of Intel Distributors (as well as Intel Support team= ) > can sell a several StrongARM SA1110 chips with reasonable (up to 4 week) > Lead Time. ;( =09I've asked about this before and have had a few people mention they can get supplies. I know of at least one group that is developing (using intel engineering samples) and another claimed supply. =09Should I post these contacts to the list or just privately (ie is anyone else interested in them?) =09Cheers Adam >=20 > Recently we have developed some SA1110 based board (like Itsy): > - SA1100, LCD ... > - up to 64MB SDRAM (256 Mbit chip), up to 16 MB Itel Flash > - Altera APEX 20k100 FPGA > - 2xPCMCIA > - & Linux developers Surprise ;) >=20 > And now we are ready to work with Linux on it, but our open project is > frozen ;( >=20 > Thanks > Sergey Medvedev > Applied Information Technologies Insitute >=20 > BTW we have experience of SA1100/Linux work on our first SA1100 based boa= rd, > and it works stably enough... >=20 >=20 > -----Original Message----- > From: Hiroshi Ishii > To: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com > Date: 22 =ED=EE=FF=E1=F0=FF 1999 =E3. 6:22 > Subject: About SA1110 >=20 >=20 > >Hi! > > > >I'm trying to work Linux on SA1110. > >I think same architecture SA1110 and SA1100. > >So, nothing to do about it. > > > >Does anyone already working it? > > > > > >---- > >++ Funai Electric R & D Co.,LTD ++ > >++ Hiroshi Ishii ++ > > > > > > >=20 From kramer@pa.dec.com Tue Nov 23 01:40:59 1999 Return-Path: Received: from tudedr.et.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id BAA05428; Tue, 23 Nov 1999 01:40:59 +0100 (MET) Received: from mail1.digital.com by ITS.TUDelft.NL (PMDF V5.1-10 #21918) with ESMTP id <01JINR1PLPMY94E2DW@ITS.TUDelft.NL> for erik@duteinh.et.tudelft.nl; Tue, 23 Nov 1999 01:40:57 +0100 Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.2/WV2.0g) with SMTP id QAA15035; Mon, 22 Nov 1999 16:38:22 -0800 (PST) Received: from rex.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA32196; Mon, 22 Nov 1999 16:38:20 -0800 Received: by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id QAA23707; Mon, 22 Nov 1999 16:38:02 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id QAA23659; Mon, 22 Nov 1999 16:37:59 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail1.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA11820; Mon, 22 Nov 1999 16:37:59 -0800 Received: from core.kaist.ac.kr (coregate.kaist.ac.kr [143.248.147.118]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.2/WV2.0g) with ESMTP id QAA13640 for ; Mon, 22 Nov 1999 16:37:55 -0800 (PST) Received: from hakim (hakim.kaist.ac.kr [143.248.165.182]) by core.kaist.ac.kr (8.8.8H2/8.8.8) with SMTP id JAA10902 for ; Tue, 23 Nov 1999 09:33:45 +0900 (KST) Date: Tue, 23 Nov 1999 09:35:44 +0900 From: Young Lee Subject: VID/PID of SA1100 UDC Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com To: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Message-id: <046201bf354a$ad6b36c0$b6a5f88f@hakim> MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2919.6401 Content-type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_045F_01BF3596.1D3A4DB0" Precedence: bulk X-Msmail-Priority: Normal X-Mimeole: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2919.6400 X-Priority: 3 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_045F_01BF3596.1D3A4DB0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hello, Is there anyone who knows USB VID/PID of SA1100(UDC)? If any, please let me know. Y.M.Lee ymlee@core.kaist.ac.kr ------=_NextPart_000_045F_01BF3596.1D3A4DB0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hello,
Is there anyone who knows USB VID/PID = of=20 SA1100(UDC)?
If any, please let me = know.
 
Y.M.Lee
ymlee@core.kaist.ac.kr<= /DIV>
 
------=_NextPart_000_045F_01BF3596.1D3A4DB0-- From kramer@pa.dec.com Tue Nov 23 10:54:11 1999 Return-Path: Received: from tudedr.et.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id KAA07515; Tue, 23 Nov 1999 10:54:10 +0100 (MET) Received: from mail1.digital.com by ITS.TUDelft.NL (PMDF V5.1-10 #21918) with ESMTP id <01JIOADIBX6G94E3XO@ITS.TUDelft.NL> for erik@duteinh.et.tudelft.nl; Tue, 23 Nov 1999 10:54:06 +0100 Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.2/WV2.0g) with SMTP id BAA24925; Tue, 23 Nov 1999 01:49:29 -0800 (PST) Received: from rex.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA28264; Tue, 23 Nov 1999 01:49:19 -0800 Received: by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id BAA25141; Tue, 23 Nov 1999 01:47:18 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id BAA25149; Tue, 23 Nov 1999 01:47:15 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail1.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA16804; Tue, 23 Nov 1999 01:47:14 -0800 Received: from DECsy.decsy.ru (decsy.decsy.ru [193.233.209.50]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.2/WV2.0g) with ESMTP id BAA14034 for ; Tue, 23 Nov 1999 01:46:37 -0800 (PST) Received: from wint (wint.decsy.ru [193.233.209.54]) by DECsy.decsy.ru (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id MAA07482; Tue, 23 Nov 1999 12:24:25 +0300 (Moscow) Date: Tue, 23 Nov 1999 12:41:17 +0300 From: Sergey Medvedev Subject: Re: About SA1110 Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com To: "Adam 'WeirdArms' Wiggins" Cc: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Message-id: <019501bf3596$e9daa450$80d1e9c1@wint.decsy.ru> MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 4.72.3110.5 Content-type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk X-Msmail-Priority: Normal X-Mimeole: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.3110.3 X-Priority: 3 Dear Adam This information will be very interesting for us. To get SA1110 samples still large problem. ;( We have decided to evaluate SA1110 because SA1100 has weak (buggy ?) USB support... We hope, that Intel have corrected these defects in the new version of SA1110. Thanks Sergey Medvedev .... >> It seems that no one of Intel Distributors (as well as Intel Support team) >> can sell a several StrongARM SA1110 chips with reasonable (up to 4 week) >> Lead Time. ;( > > I've asked about this before and have had a few people mention >they can get supplies. I know of at least one group that is developing >(using intel engineering samples) and another claimed supply. > > Should I post these contacts to the list or just privately (ie is >anyone else interested in them?) > > Cheers Adam From kramer@pa.dec.com Tue Nov 23 11:03:23 1999 Return-Path: Received: from tudedr.et.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id LAA07609; Tue, 23 Nov 1999 11:03:23 +0100 (MET) Received: from mail2.digital.com by ITS.TUDelft.NL (PMDF V5.1-10 #21918) with ESMTP id <01JIOAOT4MX694E47L@ITS.TUDelft.NL> for erik@duteinh.et.tudelft.nl; Tue, 23 Nov 1999 11:03:13 +0100 Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.2/WV2.0g) with SMTP id BAA21332; Tue, 23 Nov 1999 01:58:53 -0800 (PST) Received: from rex.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA21250; Tue, 23 Nov 1999 01:58:52 -0800 Received: by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id BAA25082; Tue, 23 Nov 1999 01:58:44 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id BAA25218; Tue, 23 Nov 1999 01:58:42 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail1.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA11592; Tue, 23 Nov 1999 01:58:41 -0800 Received: from note.orchestra.cse.unsw.EDU.AU (note.orchestra.cse.unsw.EDU.AU [129.94.242.29]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.2/WV2.0g) with SMTP id BAA14768 for ; Tue, 23 Nov 1999 01:58:39 -0800 (PST) Received: From paulaner With LocalMail ; Tue, 23 Nov 1999 20:56:18 +1100 Date: Tue, 23 Nov 1999 20:56:18 +1100 (EST) From: "Adam 'WeirdArms' Wiggins" Subject: Re: About SA1110 In-reply-to: <019501bf3596$e9daa450$80d1e9c1@wint.decsy.ru> Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com X-Sender: awiggins@paulaner.disy.cse.unsw.EDU.AU To: Sergey Medvedev Cc: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Message-id: MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Precedence: bulk On Tue, 23 Nov 1999, Sergey Medvedev wrote: > Dear Adam > > This information will be very interesting for us. > To get SA1110 samples still large problem. ;( One of them (with the eng samples) was the guys at flatpanel who posted already. The other I'll forward you in a private mail. > > We have decided to evaluate SA1110 because > SA1100 has weak (buggy ?) USB support... This is supposed to have been fixed in the latest SA-1100 silicon revisions so I'd expect its fixed in the SA-1110. > > We hope, that Intel have corrected these defects in the new version of > SA1110. Cheers Adam From kramer@pa.dec.com Wed Nov 24 11:05:27 1999 Return-Path: Received: from TUDEDU.ET.TUDelft.NL by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id LAA15575; Wed, 24 Nov 1999 11:05:27 +0100 (MET) Received: from mail2.digital.com by ITS.TUDelft.NL (PMDF V5.1-10 #21918) with ESMTP id <01JIPP1SMKOG90N79H@ITS.TUDelft.NL> for erik@duteinh.et.tudelft.nl; Wed, 24 Nov 1999 11:05:20 +0100 Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.2/WV2.0g) with SMTP id BAA08769; Wed, 24 Nov 1999 01:56:46 -0800 (PST) Received: from rex.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA03727; Wed, 24 Nov 1999 01:56:36 -0800 Received: by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id BAA29105; Wed, 24 Nov 1999 01:51:25 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id BAA28665; Wed, 24 Nov 1999 01:51:21 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail1.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA07561; Wed, 24 Nov 1999 01:51:07 -0800 Received: from eising.k-net.dk (eising.k-net.dtu.dk [130.225.71.227]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.2/WV2.0g) with SMTP id BAA06512 for ; Wed, 24 Nov 1999 01:51:06 -0800 (PST) Received: (qmail 17241 invoked from network); Wed, 24 Nov 1999 09:51:20 +0000 Received: from obelix.vkr.k-net.dk (192.38.209.3) by eising.k-net.dk with SMTP; Wed, 24 Nov 1999 09:51:20 +0000 Received: by obelix.vkr.k-net.dk with Internet Mail Service (5.5.1960.3) id ; Wed, 24 Nov 1999 10:50:40 +0100 Date: Wed, 24 Nov 1999 10:50:38 +0100 From: Anders Frederiksen Subject: dram AND sram SA1110 Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com To: "'sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com '" Message-id: MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.1960.3) Content-type: text/plain Precedence: bulk I'm looking into the SA1100... And the memory-interface puzzels me! The SA1100 developer's manual states that mixed DRAM and SRAM systems is not possible because the nCas is used as byteselect. But since the SRAM must be full 32bit wide anyway, the nOE, nWE and the nCS should be sufficient to control the SRAM? So what's stopping me from making a mixed RAM system? Any advice greatly appreciated! Anders Frederiksen From kramer@pa.dec.com Wed Nov 24 11:51:46 1999 Return-Path: Received: from tudedv.et.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id LAA15987; Wed, 24 Nov 1999 11:51:46 +0100 (MET) Received: from mail1.digital.com by ITS.TUDelft.NL (PMDF V5.1-10 #21918) with ESMTP id <01JIPQO0FGLQ90N79H@ITS.TUDelft.NL> for erik@duteinh.et.tudelft.nl; Wed, 24 Nov 1999 11:51:33 +0100 Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.2/WV2.0g) with SMTP id CAA13346; Wed, 24 Nov 1999 02:43:06 -0800 (PST) Received: from rex.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA09194; Wed, 24 Nov 1999 02:43:01 -0800 Received: by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id CAA29062; Wed, 24 Nov 1999 02:42:46 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id CAA29268; Wed, 24 Nov 1999 02:42:39 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail1.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA23920; Wed, 24 Nov 1999 02:42:38 -0800 Received: from note.orchestra.cse.unsw.EDU.AU (note.orchestra.cse.unsw.EDU.AU [129.94.242.29]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.2/WV2.0g) with SMTP id CAA13941 for ; Wed, 24 Nov 1999 02:42:37 -0800 (PST) Received: From paulaner With LocalMail ; Wed, 24 Nov 1999 21:42:04 +1100 Date: Wed, 24 Nov 1999 21:41:51 +1100 (EST) From: "Adam 'WeirdArms' Wiggins" Subject: Re: dram AND sram SA1110 In-reply-to: Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com X-Sender: awiggins@paulaner.disy.cse.unsw.EDU.AU To: Anders Frederiksen Cc: "'sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com '" Message-id: MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Precedence: bulk On Wed, 24 Nov 1999, Anders Frederiksen wrote: > I'm looking into the SA1100... And the memory-interface puzzels me! > > The SA1100 developer's manual states that mixed DRAM and SRAM systems is > not possible because the nCas is used as byteselect. But since the SRAM > must be full 32bit wide anyway, the nOE, nWE and the nCS should be > sufficient to control the SRAM? You can mix DRAM with SRAM but you can only do word accesses to the SRAM. This means you can only use it for very specific memory accesses (ie no byte or half-word accesses). Cheers Adam From kramer@pa.dec.com Fri Nov 26 11:42:44 1999 Return-Path: Received: from tudedr.et.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id LAA00884; Fri, 26 Nov 1999 11:42:43 +0100 (MET) Received: from mail1.digital.com by ITS.TUDelft.NL (PMDF V5.1-10 #21918) with ESMTP id <01JISIXOTO5690N82U@ITS.TUDelft.NL> for erik@duteinh.et.tudelft.nl; Fri, 26 Nov 1999 11:42:36 +0100 Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.2/WV2.0g) with SMTP id CAA19808; Fri, 26 Nov 1999 02:39:39 -0800 (PST) Received: from rex.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA16796; Fri, 26 Nov 1999 02:38:51 -0800 Received: by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id CAA04165; Fri, 26 Nov 1999 02:35:38 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id CAA04078; Fri, 26 Nov 1999 02:35:34 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail2.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA24440; Fri, 26 Nov 1999 02:35:30 -0800 Received: from orange.zav.starlab.net (extsrv.starlab.net [195.171.37.194]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.2/WV2.0g) with ESMTP id CAA28144 for ; Fri, 26 Nov 1999 02:35:29 -0800 (PST) Received: from downtown.ett.starlab.net (root@[212.8.177.17]) by orange.zav.starlab.net (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id LAA00810 for ; Fri, 26 Nov 1999 11:35:53 +0100 Received: from wonderland.ett.starlab.net (wonderland.ett.starlab.net [212.8.177.19]) by downtown.ett.starlab.net (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id LAA01949 for ; Fri, 26 Nov 1999 11:35:25 +0100 Date: Fri, 26 Nov 1999 11:35:25 +0100 (CET) From: Ivo Clarysse Subject: MMU weirdness Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com X-Sender: soggie@wonderland.ett.starlab.net To: SA-1100/Linux Message-id: MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Precedence: bulk Hello, I'm trying to get Linux up and running on our own hardware platform (similar in physical memory layout to Brutus, but with 4x16MB DRAM instead of 4x4MB). I'm having some trouble with the MMU, though. The kernel starts up correctly (zImage in 0xC0008000). It doesn't seem to perform setup_io_pagetables() correctly, though. I'm making my port on the basis of 2.2.12-rmk1-np13, and the http://www.empeg.mars.org/devel/files/arm-linux-toolchain.i386.tar.gz toolchain. If I insert the following in linux/include/asm-arm/proc-armv/mm-init.h : #define BIT24 0x01000000 #define BIT25 0x02000000 #define BIT26 0x04000000 #define BIT27 0x08000000 setup_pagetables(unsigned long start_mem, unsigned long end_mem) { unsigned long address = 0; volatile unsigned long *raw_gpsr = (unsigned long *)0x90040008; volatile unsigned long *raw_gpcr = (unsigned long *)0x9004000c; volatile unsigned long *mmu_gpsr = (unsigned long *)0xfa040008; volatile unsigned long *mmu_gpcr = (unsigned long *)0xfa04000c; [...] /* free_init_section(address) */ ; [...] start_mem = setup_io_pagetables(start_mem); [...] *raw_gpsr=BIT26; /* Set LED2 */ *mmu_gpsr=BIT25; /* Set LED1 */ *mmu_gpsr=BIT24; /* Set LED0 */ return start_mem; } GPIOs 24 to 27 are connected to LEDs, for debugging. I compiled with CONFIG_DEBUG_LL, so I/O at 0x8xxx xxxx and 0x9xxx xxxx is already mapped in head-armv.S; to facilitate debugging, I furthermore commented out the calls to free_init_section in setup_pagetables, so that this mapping would still exist at the end of setup_pagetables. What happens at the end of my modified setup_pagetables is that LED2 goes on (using the direct mapping at 0x9000 xxxx), but LEDs 0 & 1 (using the mapping at 0xfa00 xxxx) don't go on. Am I correct in assuming that LEDs 0 & 1 should also go on with this code ? (The GPDR has already been correctly set by the bootloader.) Ivo. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Ivo Clarysse TEL +32-2-7400788 FAX +32-2-7429654 Research Scientist Starlab - http://www.starlab.org/ PGP ID: 0x50154325 // A0A0 EDBC 37B2 C574 CC4D F1F0 FF94 04B9 5015 4325 From kramer@pa.dec.com Fri Nov 26 11:58:11 1999 Return-Path: Received: from tudedv.et.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id LAA01002; Fri, 26 Nov 1999 11:58:10 +0100 (MET) Received: from mail2.digital.com by ITS.TUDelft.NL (PMDF V5.1-10 #21918) with ESMTP id <01JISJGMXAV294EBEA@ITS.TUDelft.NL> for erik@duteinh.et.tudelft.nl; Fri, 26 Nov 1999 11:57:59 +0100 Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.2/WV2.0g) with SMTP id CAA31261; Fri, 26 Nov 1999 02:54:21 -0800 (PST) Received: from rex.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA12973; Fri, 26 Nov 1999 02:54:13 -0800 Received: by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id CAA04235; Fri, 26 Nov 1999 02:54:05 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id CAA04182; Fri, 26 Nov 1999 02:54:00 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail2.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA11452; Fri, 26 Nov 1999 02:54:00 -0800 Received: from funai-tky.co.jp (ns.funai-tky.co.jp [210.154.37.2]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.2/WV2.0g) with ESMTP id CAA31299 for ; Fri, 26 Nov 1999 02:53:59 -0800 (PST) Received: from hiropu ([192.168.1.19]) by funai-tky.co.jp (8.9.1/3.7Wpr7-98092916) with SMTP id TAA25001 for ; Fri, 26 Nov 1999 19:53:57 +0900 Date: Fri, 26 Nov 1999 19:53:58 +0900 From: Hiroshi Ishii Subject: MMU trable Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com To: sa1100 mailng list Message-id: <383E66C632.EE82HIROSHI@ns.funai-tky.co.jp> MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Becky! ver 1.25.07 Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk Hello. I'm trying to port to SA-1110, and I have trouble. In arch/arm/kernel/head-armv.S mcr p15, 0, r0, c1, c0 @ Enable MMU & caches. In 3 instructions When enable MMU, system halt. So, can't 'M' bit enable. What trouble in it? silicon bugs? Can MMU on later(not on this stage)? Regards; ---- ++ Funai Electric R & D Co.,LTD ++ ++ Hiroshi Ishii ++ From kramer@pa.dec.com Fri Nov 26 12:21:28 1999 Return-Path: Received: from tudedr.et.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id MAA01157; Fri, 26 Nov 1999 12:21:28 +0100 (MET) Received: from mail2.digital.com by ITS.TUDelft.NL (PMDF V5.1-10 #21918) with ESMTP id <01JISKARHPZU90N82U@ITS.TUDelft.NL> for erik@duteinh.et.tudelft.nl; Fri, 26 Nov 1999 12:21:23 +0100 Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.2/WV2.0g) with SMTP id DAA01523; Fri, 26 Nov 1999 03:18:29 -0800 (PST) Received: from rex.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA12376; Fri, 26 Nov 1999 03:18:27 -0800 Received: by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id DAA04298; Fri, 26 Nov 1999 03:18:14 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id DAA04275; Fri, 26 Nov 1999 03:18:10 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail2.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA31492; Fri, 26 Nov 1999 03:17:59 -0800 Received: from salisbury.labs.futuretv.com (salisbury.futuretv.com [194.216.164.17]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.2/WV2.0g) with ESMTP id DAA31368 for ; Fri, 26 Nov 1999 03:17:58 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.0.0.67] (helo=zebra.labs.futuretv.com) by salisbury.labs.futuretv.com with smtp (Exim 3.03 #1) id 11rJPD-00017C-00 for sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com; Fri, 26 Nov 1999 11:19:11 +0000 Received: from [192.0.0.21] (helo=fountain.labs.futuretv.com ident=mail) by zebra.labs.futuretv.com with smtp (Exim 3.03 #1) id 11rJO0-0008E6-00; Fri, 26 Nov 1999 11:17:56 +0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=fountain ident=pb) by with esmtp (Exim 3.03 #1) id 11rJO0-0004AA-00; Fri, 26 Nov 1999 11:17:56 +0000 Date: Fri, 26 Nov 1999 11:17:56 +0000 From: Philip Blundell Subject: Re: MMU trable In-reply-to: Message from Hiroshi Ishii "of Fri, 26 Nov 1999 19:53:58 +0900." <383E66C632.EE82HIROSHI@ns.funai-tky.co.jp> Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com To: Hiroshi Ishii Cc: sa1100 mailng list Message-id: MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: exmh version 2.0.2 2/24/98 (debian) Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Precedence: bulk References: <383E66C632.EE82HIROSHI@ns.funai-tky.co.jp> >When enable MMU, system halt. So, can't 'M' bit enable. >What trouble in it? silicon bugs? Chances are that your page tables are not set up correctly. p. From kramer@pa.dec.com Fri Nov 26 16:25:20 1999 Return-Path: Received: from tudedr.et.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id QAA02872; Fri, 26 Nov 1999 16:25:19 +0100 (MET) Received: from mail1.digital.com by ITS.TUDelft.NL (PMDF V5.1-10 #21918) with ESMTP id <01JISSSYA4UC94EDAX@ITS.TUDelft.NL> for erik@duteinh.et.tudelft.nl; Fri, 26 Nov 1999 16:25:13 +0100 Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.2/WV2.0g) with SMTP id HAA07801; Fri, 26 Nov 1999 07:20:35 -0800 (PST) Received: from rex.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA18809; Fri, 26 Nov 1999 07:20:27 -0800 Received: by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id HAA04999; Fri, 26 Nov 1999 07:19:36 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id HAA04957; Fri, 26 Nov 1999 07:19:32 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail1.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA03189; Fri, 26 Nov 1999 07:19:32 -0800 Received: from xanadu.vipswitch.com (generic199.197.205.205.IN-ADDR.ARPA [205.205.197.199] (may be forged)) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.2/WV2.0g) with ESMTP id HAA07903 for ; Fri, 26 Nov 1999 07:19:31 -0800 (PST) Date: Fri, 26 Nov 1999 10:13:04 -0500 (EST) From: Nicolas Pitre Subject: Re: MMU weirdness In-reply-to: Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com To: Ivo Clarysse Cc: SA-1100/Linux Message-id: MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Precedence: bulk Maybe you could try 2.2.12-rmk1-np12 instead of np13. It seems that the later have some problem so far. Since I don't have access to SA1100 hardware at the moment, I haven't been able to fix np13. Also those patches are known to have problems with gcc-2.95.x. Be sure you use egcs-1.1.x. Otherwise you'll have to patch the source to be gcc-2.95 compatible (see Philip Blundell patches). On Fri, 26 Nov 1999, Ivo Clarysse wrote: > Hello, > > I'm trying to get Linux up and running on our own hardware platform > (similar in physical memory layout to Brutus, but with 4x16MB DRAM > instead of 4x4MB). I'm having some trouble with the MMU, though. > > The kernel starts up correctly (zImage in 0xC0008000). It doesn't > seem to perform setup_io_pagetables() correctly, though. > > I'm making my port on the basis of 2.2.12-rmk1-np13, and the > http://www.empeg.mars.org/devel/files/arm-linux-toolchain.i386.tar.gz > toolchain. > > If I insert the following in linux/include/asm-arm/proc-armv/mm-init.h : > > #define BIT24 0x01000000 > #define BIT25 0x02000000 > #define BIT26 0x04000000 > #define BIT27 0x08000000 > setup_pagetables(unsigned long start_mem, unsigned long end_mem) > { > unsigned long address = 0; > volatile unsigned long *raw_gpsr = (unsigned long *)0x90040008; > volatile unsigned long *raw_gpcr = (unsigned long *)0x9004000c; > volatile unsigned long *mmu_gpsr = (unsigned long *)0xfa040008; > volatile unsigned long *mmu_gpcr = (unsigned long *)0xfa04000c; > [...] > /* free_init_section(address) */ ; > [...] > > start_mem = setup_io_pagetables(start_mem); > [...] > *raw_gpsr=BIT26; /* Set LED2 */ > *mmu_gpsr=BIT25; /* Set LED1 */ > *mmu_gpsr=BIT24; /* Set LED0 */ > return start_mem; > } > > GPIOs 24 to 27 are connected to LEDs, for debugging. > > I compiled with CONFIG_DEBUG_LL, so I/O at 0x8xxx xxxx and 0x9xxx xxxx > is already mapped in head-armv.S; to facilitate debugging, I furthermore > commented out the calls to free_init_section in setup_pagetables, so that > this mapping would still exist at the end of setup_pagetables. > > What happens at the end of my modified setup_pagetables is that LED2 > goes on (using the direct mapping at 0x9000 xxxx), but LEDs 0 & 1 > (using the mapping at 0xfa00 xxxx) don't go on. Am I correct in > assuming that LEDs 0 & 1 should also go on with this code ? > > (The GPDR has already been correctly set by the bootloader.) > > > Ivo. > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > Ivo Clarysse TEL +32-2-7400788 FAX +32-2-7429654 > Research Scientist Starlab - http://www.starlab.org/ > PGP ID: 0x50154325 // A0A0 EDBC 37B2 C574 CC4D F1F0 FF94 04B9 5015 4325 > > From kramer@pa.dec.com Tue Nov 30 21:19:37 1999 Return-Path: Received: from tudedr.et.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id VAA04191; Tue, 30 Nov 1999 21:19:37 +0100 (MET) Received: from mail1.digital.com by ITS.TUDelft.NL (PMDF V5.1-10 #21918) with ESMTP id <01JIYO9123VE94EL3T@ITS.TUDelft.NL> for erik@duteinh.et.tudelft.nl; Tue, 30 Nov 1999 21:19:30 +0100 Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.2/WV2.0g) with SMTP id MAA27072; Tue, 30 Nov 1999 12:13:07 -0800 (PST) Received: from rex.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA15441; Tue, 30 Nov 1999 12:12:52 -0800 Received: by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id MAA21524; Tue, 30 Nov 1999 12:09:07 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id MAA21555; Tue, 30 Nov 1999 12:09:05 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail2.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA10229; Tue, 30 Nov 1999 12:09:04 -0800 Received: from msexch01.diebold.com (eliot.diebold.com [204.151.249.21]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.2/WV2.0g) with ESMTP id MAA19564 for ; Tue, 30 Nov 1999 12:09:00 -0800 (PST) Received: by msexch01.diebold.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.10) id ; Tue, 30 Nov 1999 15:08:10 -0500 Date: Tue, 30 Nov 1999 15:08:02 -0500 From: "Plentovich, Dave" Subject: communicating with Brutus Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com To: "'sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com'" Message-id: MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.10) Content-type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Precedence: bulk Hello, We just purchased the Brutus Evaluation Platform and I am having trouble communicating using the angelboot utility. The error I get is "Error: Received wrong # bytes (-19816) when expecting packet.." using angleboot.tgz from (ftp://ftp.netwinder.org/users/n/nico). I get "Error: Received wrong # bytes (-19800) when expecting packet.." using angleboot.tar.gz (in linux-distrib.tar.gz) from (http://www.research.digital.com/wrl/itsy/linux/linux-brutus.html). The Brutus board came with Angel v1.2 in ROM. Has anyone seen this error? Is there a newer angelboot utility for Angel v1.2? (Am I missing something very obvious???) Best regards, David Plentovich DIEBOLD Self-Service Systems, Dept. 9-53-3 (330)490-5092, FAX(330)490-4508, plentod@diebold.com 5995 Mayfair Road, North Canton, OH, 44720, USA From kramer@pa.dec.com Tue Nov 30 23:40:45 1999 Return-Path: Received: from tudedr.et.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id XAA04833; Tue, 30 Nov 1999 23:40:44 +0100 (MET) Received: from mail1.digital.com by ITS.TUDelft.NL (PMDF V5.1-10 #21918) with ESMTP id <01JIYT6BDQPW90NAWI@ITS.TUDelft.NL> for erik@duteinh.et.tudelft.nl; Tue, 30 Nov 1999 23:40:38 +0100 Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.2/WV2.0g) with SMTP id OAA16025; Tue, 30 Nov 1999 14:35:53 -0800 (PST) Received: from rex.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA16983; Tue, 30 Nov 1999 14:35:38 -0800 Received: by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id OAA21838; Tue, 30 Nov 1999 14:35:11 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id OAA21857; Tue, 30 Nov 1999 14:35:08 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail1.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA23728; Tue, 30 Nov 1999 14:35:07 -0800 Received: from ragnarok.preston.cmst.csiro.au (ragnarok.mlb.dmt.csiro.au [138.194.112.1]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.2/WV2.0g) with SMTP id OAA19959 for ; Tue, 30 Nov 1999 14:35:02 -0800 (PST) Received: (qmail 1963 invoked by alias); Tue, 30 Nov 1999 22:33:57 +0000 Received: (qmail 1957 invoked from network); Tue, 30 Nov 1999 22:33:57 +0000 Received: from gefjon.mlb.dmt.csiro.au (HELO gefjon) (138.194.112.53) by ragnarok.mlb.dmt.csiro.au with SMTP; Tue, 30 Nov 1999 22:33:57 +0000 Date: Wed, 01 Dec 1999 09:33:57 +1100 From: Patrick Kearney Subject: Brutus Board Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com To: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Message-id: <19991130223357.1962.qmail@ragnarok.preston.cmst.csiro.au> MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: exmh version 2.0.2 2/24/98 (patchlevel 15 12-Feb-99) Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Precedence: bulk Is anyone interested in purchasing a Brutus evaluation board? We have one for sale to the highest bidder. We had intended using the SA1100 on a series of boards for high-speed image processing to perform housekeeping functions. We are now using the MPC8260 so that we no longer have use for the Brutus board. Patrick Kearney CSIRO CMST Patrick.Kearney@cmst.csiro.au From kramer@pa.dec.com Thu Dec 2 04:57:30 1999 Return-Path: Received: from tudedr.et.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id EAA12846; Thu, 2 Dec 1999 04:57:30 +0100 (MET) Received: from mail1.digital.com by ITS.TUDelft.NL (PMDF V5.1-10 #21918) with ESMTP id <01JJ0IJD250A94EMQA@ITS.TUDelft.NL> for erik@duteinh.et.tudelft.nl; Thu, 2 Dec 1999 04:57:23 +0100 Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.2/WV2.0g) with SMTP id TAA26463; Wed, 01 Dec 1999 19:50:44 -0800 (PST) Received: from rex.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA20750; Wed, 01 Dec 1999 19:50:15 -0800 Received: by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id TAA26480; Wed, 01 Dec 1999 19:48:13 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id TAA26555; Wed, 01 Dec 1999 19:48:10 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail2.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA27407; Wed, 01 Dec 1999 19:48:09 -0800 Received: from funai-tky.co.jp (ns.funai-tky.co.jp [210.154.37.2]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.2/WV2.0g) with ESMTP id TAA00584 for ; Wed, 01 Dec 1999 19:48:07 -0800 (PST) Received: from hiropu ([192.168.1.19]) by funai-tky.co.jp (8.9.1/3.7Wpr7-98092916) with SMTP id MAA24714 for ; Thu, 02 Dec 1999 12:48:04 +0900 Date: Thu, 02 Dec 1999 12:48:04 +0900 From: Hiroshi Ishii Subject: About linux-2.3.24-rmk1-np1 Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com To: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Message-id: <3845EBF414.DFD1HIROSHI@ns.funai-tky.co.jp> MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Becky! ver 1.25.07 Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk Hi, all Does anyone use linux-2.3.24-rmk1-np1? If so, how status? Working stability? Thanks, ---- ++ Funai Electric R & D Co.,LTD ++ ++ Hiroshi Ishii ++ From kramer@pa.dec.com Thu Dec 2 16:26:47 1999 Return-Path: Received: from tudedr.et.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id QAA17304; Thu, 2 Dec 1999 16:26:46 +0100 (MET) Received: from mail1.digital.com by ITS.TUDelft.NL (PMDF V5.1-10 #21918) with ESMTP id <01JJ16LWDS6Y94ENWL@ITS.TUDelft.NL> for erik@duteinh.et.tudelft.nl; Thu, 2 Dec 1999 16:26:42 +0100 Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.2/WV2.0g) with SMTP id HAA28452; Thu, 02 Dec 1999 07:22:24 -0800 (PST) Received: from rex.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA21153; Thu, 02 Dec 1999 07:22:18 -0800 Received: by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id HAA28410; Thu, 02 Dec 1999 07:21:25 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id HAA28461; Thu, 02 Dec 1999 07:21:21 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail1.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA07246; Thu, 02 Dec 1999 07:21:21 -0800 Received: from xanadu.vipswitch.com (generic199.197.205.205.IN-ADDR.ARPA [205.205.197.199] (may be forged)) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.2/WV2.0g) with ESMTP id HAA26736 for ; Thu, 02 Dec 1999 07:21:09 -0800 (PST) Date: Thu, 02 Dec 1999 10:10:52 -0500 (EST) From: Nicolas Pitre Subject: Re: About linux-2.3.24-rmk1-np1 In-reply-to: <3845EBF414.DFD1HIROSHI@ns.funai-tky.co.jp> Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com To: Hiroshi Ishii Cc: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Message-id: MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Precedence: bulk Since I made the patch I used it, but was probably the only one. Stability is quite questionnable, and I don't know yet if it's related to SA1100 specifics or the generic kernel. At the moment, the most stable version is 2.2.12-rmk1-np12 AFAIK. On Thu, 2 Dec 1999, Hiroshi Ishii wrote: > Hi, all > > Does anyone use linux-2.3.24-rmk1-np1? > If so, how status? Working stability? > > Thanks, > > ---- > ++ Funai Electric R & D Co.,LTD ++ > ++ Hiroshi Ishii ++ > > > From kramer@pa.dec.com Thu Dec 2 22:28:23 1999 Return-Path: Received: from tudedr.et.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id WAA19347; Thu, 2 Dec 1999 22:28:23 +0100 (MET) Received: from mail2.digital.com by ITS.TUDelft.NL (PMDF V5.1-10 #21918) with ESMTP id <01JJ1J8C6N3I94EPC9@ITS.TUDelft.NL> for erik@duteinh.et.tudelft.nl; Thu, 2 Dec 1999 22:28:19 +0100 Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.2/WV2.0g) with SMTP id NAA10111; Thu, 02 Dec 1999 13:23:48 -0800 (PST) Received: from rex.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA05782; Thu, 02 Dec 1999 13:22:08 -0800 Received: by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id NAA29483; Thu, 02 Dec 1999 13:19:47 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id NAA29481; Thu, 02 Dec 1999 13:19:44 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail2.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA16465; Thu, 02 Dec 1999 13:19:43 -0800 Received: from baucis.sc.intel.com (baucis.sc.intel.com [143.183.152.22]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.2/WV2.0g) with ESMTP id NAA10094 for ; Thu, 02 Dec 1999 13:19:43 -0800 (PST) Received: from SMTP (fmsmsxvs03-1.fm.intel.com [132.233.42.203]) by baucis.sc.intel.com (8.9.1a+p1/8.9.1/d: relay.m4,v 1.11 1999/11/10 17:27:15 spurcell Exp $) with SMTP id NAA19160 for ; Thu, 02 Dec 1999 13:19:29 -0800 (PST) Received: from fmsmsx19.fm.intel.com ([132.233.48.19]) by 132.233.48.203 (Norton AntiVirus for Internet Email Gateways 1.0) ; Thu, 02 Dec 1999 21:19:28 +0000 (GMT) Received: by fmsmsx19.fm.intel.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2448.0) id ; Thu, 02 Dec 1999 13:19:27 -0800 Date: Thu, 02 Dec 1999 13:19:25 -0800 From: "Rao, Ram R" Subject: a question about modifying the itsy source code Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com To: "'sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com'" Message-id: MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2448.0) Content-type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Precedence: bulk Hi, This question is for the people who wrote the drivers for the Itsy. I was planning on using Itsy's touchscreen driver as a starting point for a touchscreen driver for the Brutus board. One problem that I am unclear about is that Itsy's touchscreen driver has a copyright notice at the top. Am I still free to modify this and place it somewhere on the net for others to use? Any help would be appreciated. Thanks, Ram Rao From kramer@pa.dec.com Mon Dec 6 10:19:28 1999 Return-Path: Received: from TUDEDU.ET.TUDelft.NL by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id KAA02922; Mon, 6 Dec 1999 10:19:27 +0100 (MET) Received: from ns2.tudelft.nl by ITS.TUDelft.NL (PMDF V5.1-10 #21918) with ESMTP id <01JJ6EQV19KO94E6QT@ITS.TUDelft.NL> for erik@duteinh.et.tudelft.nl; Mon, 6 Dec 1999 10:13:41 +0100 Received: from mail1.digital.com (mail1.digital.com [204.123.2.50]) by mailhost1.tudelft.nl (PMDF V5.2-32 #35209) with ESMTP id <0FM600CAZQ7KON@mailhost1.tudelft.nl> for J.A.K.Mouw@its.tudelft.nl; Fri, 03 Dec 1999 22:54:59 +0100 (MET) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.2/WV2.0g) with SMTP id NAA15835; Fri, 03 Dec 1999 13:48:56 -0800 (PST) Received: from rex.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA10034; Fri, 03 Dec 1999 13:48:34 -0800 Received: by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id NAA00808; Fri, 03 Dec 1999 13:44:14 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id NAA00840; Fri, 03 Dec 1999 13:44:11 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail1.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA08094; Fri, 03 Dec 1999 13:44:10 -0800 Received: from blazie.com (blazie.com [207.97.93.2]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.2/WV2.0g) with ESMTP id NAA13395 for ; Fri, 03 Dec 1999 13:44:10 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by blazie.com (8.9.2/8.8.7) with ESMTP id QAA00479 for ; Fri, 03 Dec 1999 16:42:18 -0500 (EST) Date: Fri, 03 Dec 1999 16:42:18 -0500 (EST) From: Chris Blazie Subject: non-elf binary problem In-reply-to: Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com To: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Message-id: MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Precedence: bulk For some reason I am unable to execute non-elf binaries on the SA1100 platform I'm working on. I have a.out and misc binary capability compiled into the kernel, but I always get the following seg fault: ./getty getty: memory violation at pc=0x00c00470, lr=0xa000e2f4 (bad address=0x00c00470, code 3) pc : [<00c00470>] lr : [] sp : 03fffec4 ip : fffffffe fp : 03ffff30 r10: 00000000 r9 : 00000000 r8 : 00000000 r7 : 00000000 r6 : 00000001 r5 : 03ffff50 r4 : 03ffff7c r3 : 00000002 r2 : 00000047 r1 : 0000e220 r0 : 03fffecc Flags: NzCv IRQs on FIQs on Mode USER_26 Segment user Control: C03C117D Table: C03C117D DAC: 00000015 Function entered at [<0000e288>] from [<00008028>] r6 = 00000000 r5 = 00000000 r4 = 00000000 Segmentation fault bash# ELF binaries run just fine, and the binaries in question are statically linked. Any ideas? Thanks, Chris From kramer@pa.dec.com Mon Dec 6 11:31:50 1999 Return-Path: Received: from tudedr.et.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id LAA05335; Mon, 6 Dec 1999 11:31:49 +0100 (MET) Received: from ns2.tudelft.nl by ITS.TUDelft.NL (PMDF V5.1-10 #21918) with ESMTP id <01JJ6GR1B8ZA90NE1S@ITS.TUDelft.NL> for erik@duteinh.et.tudelft.nl; Mon, 6 Dec 1999 11:11:20 +0100 Received: from mail1.digital.com (mail1.digital.com [204.123.2.50]) by mailhost1.tudelft.nl (PMDF V5.2-32 #35209) with ESMTP id <0FMA00KGQEVG65@mailhost1.tudelft.nl> for J.A.K.Mouw@its.tudelft.nl; Sun, 05 Dec 1999 22:40:29 +0100 (MET) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.2/WV2.0g) with SMTP id NAA27550; Sun, 05 Dec 1999 13:34:44 -0800 (PST) Received: from rex.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA30347; Sun, 05 Dec 1999 13:34:30 -0800 Received: by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id NAA08689; Sun, 05 Dec 1999 13:32:11 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id NAA08663; Sun, 05 Dec 1999 13:32:09 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail1.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA24634; Sun, 05 Dec 1999 13:32:08 -0800 Received: from kings-cross.london.uk.eu.org (tazenda.demon.co.uk [158.152.220.239]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.2/WV2.0g) with ESMTP id NAA30020 for ; Sun, 05 Dec 1999 13:32:06 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost ([::ffff:127.0.0.1] helo=kings-cross.london.uk.eu.org ident=phil) by kings-cross.london.uk.eu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.03 #1) id 11uiRC-0000ub-00; Sun, 05 Dec 1999 20:39:18 +0000 Date: Sun, 05 Dec 1999 20:39:18 +0000 From: Philip Blundell Subject: Re: non-elf binary problem In-reply-to: Message from Chris Blazie "of Fri, 03 Dec 1999 16:42:18 EST." Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com To: Chris Blazie Cc: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Message-id: MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: exmh version 2.0.2 2/24/98 (debian) Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Precedence: bulk References: >getty: memory violation at pc=0x00c00470, lr=0xa000e2f4 (bad address=0x00c0047 >0, code 3) That address looks like a shared library location. Are you sure you are using a static binary? Can you try the same binary on another ARM platform with the same kernel? > ELF binaries run just fine, and the binaries in question are >statically linked. Any ideas? Out of interest, why do you want to do this? I can't think of any advantages of a.out binaries over ELF these days. I have a feeling that libc4 also has some Y2K issues so you may be in trouble again in a few weeks. p. From kramer@pa.dec.com Mon Dec 6 17:01:54 1999 Return-Path: Received: from tudedr.et.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id RAA08338; Mon, 6 Dec 1999 17:01:52 +0100 (MET) Received: from mail1.digital.com by ITS.TUDelft.NL (PMDF V5.1-10 #21918) with ESMTP id <01JJ6SZTRQEK90NBZD@ITS.TUDelft.NL> for erik@duteinh.et.tudelft.nl; Mon, 6 Dec 1999 17:01:48 +0100 Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.2/WV2.0g) with SMTP id HAA23476; Mon, 06 Dec 1999 07:56:33 -0800 (PST) Received: from rex.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA10090; Mon, 06 Dec 1999 07:56:19 -0800 Received: by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id HAA11795; Mon, 06 Dec 1999 07:55:07 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id HAA11692; Mon, 06 Dec 1999 07:55:04 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail1.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA17970; Mon, 06 Dec 1999 07:55:04 -0800 Received: from blazie.com (blazie.com [207.97.93.2]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.2/WV2.0g) with ESMTP id HAA25572 for ; Mon, 06 Dec 1999 07:55:03 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by blazie.com (8.9.2/8.8.7) with ESMTP id KAA15751; Mon, 06 Dec 1999 10:53:46 -0500 (EST) Date: Mon, 06 Dec 1999 10:53:45 -0500 (EST) From: Chris Blazie Subject: Re: non-elf binary problem In-reply-to: Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com To: Philip Blundell Cc: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Message-id: MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Precedence: bulk > >getty: memory violation at pc=0x00c00470, lr=0xa000e2f4 (bad address=0x00c0047 > >0, code 3) > > That address looks like a shared library location. Are you sure you are using > a static binary? It is static according to ldd. I didn't compile it myself, however. The file command just reports "getty: data". All of the binaries in question run fine on my netwinder (albeit with an older kernel). > Out of interest, why do you want to do this? I can't think of any No good reason, to be honest, other than the fact that it's a nuisance and I do not have the login and getty binaries compiled as ELF. If anyone can tell me where to find elf distributions of these binaries or suitable ARM patches I'd be glad to switch and stop wasting time with a.out. I can't seem to find either, though, and the current getty_ps package won't compile for me under ARM (presumably for lack of a proper patch). I checked arm.linux.org and netwinder.org. Am I overlooking them? Thanks, Chris From kramer@pa.dec.com Tue Dec 7 10:57:39 1999 Return-Path: Received: from tudedr.et.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id KAA12526; Tue, 7 Dec 1999 10:57:38 +0100 (MET) Received: from mail1.digital.com by ITS.TUDelft.NL (PMDF V5.1-10 #21918) with ESMTP id <01JJ7UKO2TWI94ET1R@ITS.TUDelft.NL> for erik@duteinh.et.tudelft.nl; Tue, 7 Dec 1999 10:57:35 +0100 Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.2/WV2.0g) with SMTP id BAA13819; Tue, 07 Dec 1999 01:54:56 -0800 (PST) Received: from rex.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA23460; Tue, 07 Dec 1999 01:54:44 -0800 Received: by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id BAA14383; Tue, 07 Dec 1999 01:51:53 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id BAA14641; Tue, 07 Dec 1999 01:51:49 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail2.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA17508; Tue, 07 Dec 1999 01:51:45 -0800 Received: from salisbury.labs.futuretv.com (salisbury.futuretv.com [194.216.164.17]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.2/WV2.0g) with ESMTP id BAA04666 for ; Tue, 07 Dec 1999 01:51:44 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.0.0.67] (helo=zebra.labs.futuretv.com) by salisbury.labs.futuretv.com with esmtp (Exim 3.03 #1) id 11vHIp-00051w-00 for sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com; Tue, 07 Dec 1999 09:52:59 +0000 Received: from [192.0.0.21] (helo=fountain.labs.futuretv.com) by zebra.labs.futuretv.com with esmtp (Exim 3.03 #1) id 11vHHb-0005XH-00; Tue, 07 Dec 1999 09:51:43 +0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=fountain) by with esmtp (Exim 3.03 #1) id 11vHHa-0003Wx-00; Tue, 07 Dec 1999 09:51:42 +0000 Date: Tue, 07 Dec 1999 09:51:41 +0000 From: Philip Blundell Subject: Re: non-elf binary problem In-reply-to: Message from Chris Blazie "of Mon, 06 Dec 1999 10:53:45 EST." Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com To: Chris Blazie Cc: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Message-id: MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: exmh version 2.0.2 2/24/98 (debian) Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Precedence: bulk References: >If anyone can tell me where to find elf distributions of these binaries or >suitable ARM patches I'd be glad to switch and stop wasting time with >a.out. I can't seem to find either, though, and the current getty_ps >package won't compile for me under ARM (presumably for lack of a proper >patch). I checked arm.linux.org and netwinder.org. Am I overlooking >them? You could try the Debian distribution. ftp://ftp.debian.org/dists/potato/main/ binary-arm or some such. p. From kramer@pa.dec.com Mon Dec 13 06:48:20 1999 Return-Path: Received: from tudedr.et.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id GAA15458; Mon, 13 Dec 1999 06:48:20 +0100 (MET) Received: from mail1.digital.com by ITS.TUDelft.NL (PMDF V5.1-10 #21918) with ESMTP id <01JJFZLKW3ZU94FA7V@ITS.TUDelft.NL> for erik@duteinh.et.tudelft.nl; Mon, 13 Dec 1999 06:48:17 +0100 Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.2/WV2.0g) with SMTP id VAA18682; Sun, 12 Dec 1999 21:44:31 -0800 (PST) Received: from rex.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA09050; Sun, 12 Dec 1999 21:44:03 -0800 Received: by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id VAA05097; Sun, 12 Dec 1999 21:41:53 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id VAA05153; Sun, 12 Dec 1999 21:41:50 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail1.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA11048; Sun, 12 Dec 1999 21:41:50 -0800 Received: from xanadu.gn.com (modemcable233.137-200-24.mtl.mc.videotron.net [24.200.137.233]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.2/WV2.0g) with ESMTP id VAA21027 for ; Sun, 12 Dec 1999 21:41:49 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (nico@localhost) by xanadu.gn.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id AAA02764 for ; Mon, 13 Dec 1999 00:36:40 -0500 Date: Mon, 13 Dec 1999 00:36:40 -0500 (EST) From: Nicolas Pitre Subject: Fun with 2.3.x Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com X-Sender: nico@xanadu.gn.com To: SA-1100/Linux Message-id: MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Precedence: bulk X-Authentication-warning: xanadu.gn.com: nico owned process doing -bs Hi! I started to port SA1100 stuff to 2.3.x kernels. I already had diff-2.3.24 available, but the one that is actually getting right is diff-2.3.29-rmk1-np1 which is available now at the usual place. This has mainly support for nothing else than the serial port at the moment. I wanted to clean up the basic stuff first. Also the bootmem issue isn't still settled, so I included a quick fix to make things work on the SA1100. However it won't work if you have more than 2 banks with 4 MB ram or less for each bank (I commented out 2 of the 4 Brutus banks for this reason). This is a starting point for people interested in hacking on 2.3.x. But you should know quite well what you are doing i.e. this is far from being at the same completeness level as the 2.2.12 patch. Help is always welcome though! :-) Have fun! Nicolas From kramer@pa.dec.com Mon Dec 13 11:13:13 1999 Return-Path: Received: from tudedv.et.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id LAA16566; Mon, 13 Dec 1999 11:13:12 +0100 (MET) Received: from ns2.tudelft.nl by ITS.TUDelft.NL (PMDF V5.1-10 #21918) with ESMTP id <01JJG8MXKS1M94F938@ITS.TUDelft.NL> for erik@duteinh.et.tudelft.nl; Mon, 13 Dec 1999 11:11:49 +0100 Received: from mail2.digital.com (mail2.digital.com [204.123.2.56]) by mailhost1.tudelft.nl (PMDF V5.2-32 #35209) with ESMTP id <0FMO001E98HQWZ@mailhost1.tudelft.nl> for J.A.K.Mouw@its.tudelft.nl; Mon, 13 Dec 1999 09:49:04 +0100 (MET) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.2/WV2.0g) with SMTP id AAA12678; Mon, 13 Dec 1999 00:44:01 -0800 (PST) Received: from rex.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA15647; Mon, 13 Dec 1999 00:43:54 -0800 Received: by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id AAA05632; Mon, 13 Dec 1999 00:43:35 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id AAA05647; Mon, 13 Dec 1999 00:43:32 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail1.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA21355; Mon, 13 Dec 1999 00:43:32 -0800 Received: from adsl-216-100-248-143.dsl.snfc21.pacbell.net (adsl-216-100-248-143.dsl.snfc21.pacbell.net [216.100.248.143]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.2/WV2.0g) with ESMTP id AAA02345 for ; Mon, 13 Dec 1999 00:43:31 -0800 (PST) Received: from biff (biff [192.168.1.4]) by adsl-216-100-248-143.dsl.snfc21.pacbell.net (8.8.7/8.8.7) with SMTP id AAA22146 for ; Mon, 13 Dec 1999 00:41:34 -0800 Date: Mon, 13 Dec 1999 00:44:14 -0700 From: Ian Field Subject: irq0 Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com To: sa1100 mailng list Reply-to: Ian Field Message-id: <000801bf453d$daac26a0$0401a8c0@casagrande.way> MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2314.1300 Content-type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2314.1300 X-MSMail-priority: Normal References: <3854A96B24E.1DB2HIROSHI@ns.funai-tky.co.jp> X-Priority: 3 Hi all, while I was messing around with mounting disks (cf-card) in 2.2.12, I found that gpio0 as the disk interrupt wouldn't work, however if I patched across to GPIO1/IRQ1, it worked fine. Has someone looked into this, and the fix exists in a patch or in a later kernel version? Cheers, IAN From kramer@pa.dec.com Mon Dec 13 09:11:17 1999 Return-Path: Received: from tudedr.et.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id JAA16036; Mon, 13 Dec 1999 09:11:17 +0100 (MET) Received: from mail1.digital.com by ITS.TUDelft.NL (PMDF V5.1-10 #21918) with ESMTP id <01JJG4LVMOLM90NHYP@ITS.TUDelft.NL> for erik@duteinh.et.tudelft.nl; Mon, 13 Dec 1999 09:11:13 +0100 Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.2/WV2.0g) with SMTP id AAA26123; Mon, 13 Dec 1999 00:08:51 -0800 (PST) Received: from rex.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA27475; Mon, 13 Dec 1999 00:08:45 -0800 Received: by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id AAA09020; Mon, 13 Dec 1999 00:08:21 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id AAA05512; Mon, 13 Dec 1999 00:08:18 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail2.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA21692; Mon, 13 Dec 1999 00:08:17 -0800 Received: from funai-tky.co.jp (ns.funai-tky.co.jp [210.154.37.2]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.2/WV2.0g) with ESMTP id AAA24107 for ; Mon, 13 Dec 1999 00:08:15 -0800 (PST) Received: from hiropu ([192.168.1.19]) by funai-tky.co.jp (8.9.1/3.7Wpr7-98092916) with SMTP id RAA21679 for ; Mon, 13 Dec 1999 17:08:11 +0900 Date: Mon, 13 Dec 1999 17:08:11 +0900 From: Hiroshi Ishii Subject: Re: Fun with 2.3.x In-reply-to: Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com To: sa1100 mailng list Message-id: <3854A96B24E.1DB2HIROSHI@ns.funai-tky.co.jp> MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Becky! ver 1.25.07 Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk References: On Mon, 13 Dec 1999 00:36:40 -0500 (EST) Nicolas Pitre wrote: > Hi! > > I started to port SA1100 stuff to 2.3.x kernels. I already had > diff-2.3.24 available, but the one that is actually getting right is > diff-2.3.29-rmk1-np1 which is available now at the usual place. > Good job! I was testing, so I found one trouble. in arch/arm/kernel/setup.c meminfo.bank[i].start = mem_desc[i].phys_offset - PHYS_OFFSET; ^^^^^^^^^^^ -> meminfo.bank[i].start = mem_desc[i].phys_start - PHYS_OFFSET; ^^^^^^^^^^ Is that ok? ---- ++ Funai Electric R & D Co.,LTD ++ ++ Hiroshi Ishii ++ From kramer@pa.dec.com Mon Dec 13 15:16:52 1999 Return-Path: Received: from tudedv.et.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id PAA18111; Mon, 13 Dec 1999 15:16:51 +0100 (MET) Received: from mail2.digital.com by ITS.TUDelft.NL (PMDF V5.1-10 #21918) with ESMTP id <01JJGHD0NM4C94F80U@ITS.TUDelft.NL> for erik@duteinh.et.tudelft.nl; Mon, 13 Dec 1999 15:16:45 +0100 Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.2/WV2.0g) with SMTP id GAA27825; Mon, 13 Dec 1999 06:11:35 -0800 (PST) Received: from rex.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA06981; Mon, 13 Dec 1999 06:11:28 -0800 Received: by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id GAA06611; Mon, 13 Dec 1999 06:10:46 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id GAA06607; Mon, 13 Dec 1999 06:10:40 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail2.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA18979; Mon, 13 Dec 1999 06:10:39 -0800 Received: from xanadu.gn.com (modemcable233.137-200-24.mtl.mc.videotron.net [24.200.137.233]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.2/WV2.0g) with ESMTP id GAA31568 for ; Mon, 13 Dec 1999 06:10:38 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (nico@localhost) by xanadu.gn.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id JAA03015; Mon, 13 Dec 1999 09:05:17 -0500 Date: Mon, 13 Dec 1999 09:05:17 -0500 (EST) From: Nicolas Pitre Subject: Re: Fun with 2.3.x In-reply-to: <3854A96B24E.1DB2HIROSHI@ns.funai-tky.co.jp> Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com X-Sender: nico@xanadu.gn.com To: Hiroshi Ishii Cc: sa1100 mailng list Message-id: MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Precedence: bulk X-Authentication-warning: xanadu.gn.com: nico owned process doing -bs On Mon, 13 Dec 1999, Hiroshi Ishii wrote: > > On Mon, 13 Dec 1999 00:36:40 -0500 (EST) > Nicolas Pitre wrote: > > > Hi! > > > > I started to port SA1100 stuff to 2.3.x kernels. I already had > > diff-2.3.24 available, but the one that is actually getting right is > > diff-2.3.29-rmk1-np1 which is available now at the usual place. > > > > Good job! > > I was testing, so I found one trouble. > > in arch/arm/kernel/setup.c > > meminfo.bank[i].start = mem_desc[i].phys_offset - PHYS_OFFSET; > ^^^^^^^^^^^ > -> > > meminfo.bank[i].start = mem_desc[i].phys_start - PHYS_OFFSET; > ^^^^^^^^^^ > Is that ok? Oops! Yes, that's OK. Nicolas From kramer@pa.dec.com Tue Dec 14 03:48:58 1999 Return-Path: Received: from tudedr.et.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id DAA21213; Tue, 14 Dec 1999 03:48:58 +0100 (MET) Received: from mail2.digital.com by ITS.TUDelft.NL (PMDF V5.1-10 #21918) with ESMTP id <01JJH7MI5H6S90NHZ9@ITS.TUDelft.NL> for erik@duteinh.et.tudelft.nl; Tue, 14 Dec 1999 03:48:48 +0100 Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.2/WV2.0g) with SMTP id SAA24995; Mon, 13 Dec 1999 18:41:18 -0800 (PST) Received: from rex.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA23765; Mon, 13 Dec 1999 18:41:10 -0800 Received: by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id SAA08735; Mon, 13 Dec 1999 18:40:15 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id SAA08753; Mon, 13 Dec 1999 18:40:12 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail2.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA29236; Mon, 13 Dec 1999 18:40:11 -0800 Received: from funai-tky.co.jp (ns.funai-tky.co.jp [210.154.37.2]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.2/WV2.0g) with ESMTP id SAA26343 for ; Mon, 13 Dec 1999 18:40:09 -0800 (PST) Received: from hiropu ([192.168.1.19]) by funai-tky.co.jp (8.9.1/3.7Wpr7-98092916) with SMTP id LAA26299; Tue, 14 Dec 1999 11:39:59 +0900 Date: Tue, 14 Dec 1999 11:39:58 +0900 From: Hiroshi Ishii Subject: Re: Fun with 2.3.x In-reply-to: Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com To: Nicolas Pitre Cc: sa1100 mailng list Message-id: <3855ADFEAA.D468HIROSHI@ns.funai-tky.co.jp> MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Becky! ver 1.25.07 Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk References: On Mon, 13 Dec 1999 00:36:40 -0500 (EST) Nicolas Philtre wrote: > Hi! > > I started to port SA1100 stuff to 2.3.x kernels. I already had > diff-2.3.24 available, but the one that is actually getting right is > diff-2.3.29-rmk1-np1 which is available now at the usual place. > And, I had more trouble. I try to work with ramdisk, showing this message. Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual address 00000000 pgd = c0004000 *pgd = c0169001, *pmd = c0169001, *pte = c000008b, *ppte = c000000a Internal error: Oops: 0 CPU: 0 pc : [] lr : [] sp : c01b7228 ip : 00000000 fp : c01b7234 r10: c00085d8 r9 : c0105124 r8 : c01b6000 r7 : c01b7260 r6 : c0df97a0 r5 : 00000000 r4 : 00000000 r3 : 60000093 r2 : 00000000 r1 : 00000000 r0 : 00000000 Flags: nZCv IRQs off FIQs on Mode SVC_32 Segment kernel Control: C000517F Table: C000517F DAC: 0000001D Process swapper (pid: 1, stackpage=c01b7000) Stack: c01b7200: c0039788 c00188 88 c01b7220: 60000093 ffffffff c01b728c c01b7238 c0039788 c0018870 01234567 c01b60 00 c01b7240: 00000000 00000000 c01b7260 00000000 01234567 c01b6000 00000000 00000 ........... [snip] What kind trouble? ---- ++ Funai Electric R & D Co.,LTD ++ ++ Hiroshi Ishii ++ From kramer@pa.dec.com Tue Dec 14 05:00:34 1999 Return-Path: Received: from tudedr.et.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id FAA21457; Tue, 14 Dec 1999 05:00:34 +0100 (MET) Received: from mail2.digital.com by ITS.TUDelft.NL (PMDF V5.1-10 #21918) with ESMTP id <01JJHA5BMXEK90NHM1@ITS.TUDelft.NL> for erik@duteinh.et.tudelft.nl; Tue, 14 Dec 1999 05:00:28 +0100 Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.2/WV2.0g) with SMTP id TAA01740; Mon, 13 Dec 1999 19:55:34 -0800 (PST) Received: from rex.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA13131; Mon, 13 Dec 1999 19:55:32 -0800 Received: by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id TAA09037; Mon, 13 Dec 1999 19:55:14 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id TAA08955; Mon, 13 Dec 1999 19:55:11 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail2.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA02511; Mon, 13 Dec 1999 19:55:11 -0800 Received: from xanadu.gn.com (modemcable233.137-200-24.mtl.mc.videotron.net [24.200.137.233]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.2/WV2.0g) with ESMTP id TAA29167 for ; Mon, 13 Dec 1999 19:55:09 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (nico@localhost) by xanadu.gn.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id WAA05434; Mon, 13 Dec 1999 22:49:53 -0500 Date: Mon, 13 Dec 1999 22:49:53 -0500 (EST) From: Nicolas Pitre Subject: Re: Fun with 2.3.x In-reply-to: <3855ADFEAA.D468HIROSHI@ns.funai-tky.co.jp> Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com X-Sender: nico@xanadu.gn.com To: Hiroshi Ishii Cc: sa1100 mailng list Message-id: MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Precedence: bulk X-Authentication-warning: xanadu.gn.com: nico owned process doing -bs On Tue, 14 Dec 1999, Hiroshi Ishii wrote: > > And, I had more trouble. > > I try to work with ramdisk, showing this message. > > Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual address 00000000 > pgd = c0004000 > *pgd = c0169001, *pmd = c0169001, *pte = c000008b, *ppte = c000000a > Internal error: Oops: 0 > CPU: 0 > pc : [] lr : [] > ........... > [snip] > > What kind trouble? Don't know. You should look at the System.map file using the PC register value to tell in which function the problem occured. Otherwise nobody can tell from those addresses alone. Also the command: arm-linux-objdump -d -S vmlinux > out.asm will produce a disassembled version interleaved with source code if the kernel has been compiled with CONFIG_DEBUG_INFO=y. This disassembled kernel along with the register dump you get is the only way to figure out what is the problem. Nicolas From kramer@pa.dec.com Mon Dec 13 12:23:31 1999 Return-Path: Received: from tudedr.et.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id MAA17047; Mon, 13 Dec 1999 12:23:31 +0100 (MET) Received: from mail1.digital.com by ITS.TUDelft.NL (PMDF V5.1-10 #21918) with ESMTP id <01JJGBB4UJII90NHZT@ITS.TUDelft.NL> for erik@duteinh.et.tudelft.nl; Mon, 13 Dec 1999 12:23:27 +0100 Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.2/WV2.0g) with SMTP id DAA13478; Mon, 13 Dec 1999 03:20:26 -0800 (PST) Received: from rex.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA10687; Mon, 13 Dec 1999 03:20:19 -0800 Received: by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id DAA06134; Mon, 13 Dec 1999 03:19:53 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id DAA06086; Mon, 13 Dec 1999 03:19:50 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail2.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA19606; Mon, 13 Dec 1999 03:19:50 -0800 Received: from mailboy.huawei.com.cn ([202.96.135.134]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.2/WV2.0g) with ESMTP id DAA18651 for ; Mon, 13 Dec 1999 03:19:48 -0800 (PST) Received: from w15060 ([10.11.48.31]) by mailboy.huawei.com.cn (Netscape Mail Server v2.02) with SMTP id AAA21072 for ; Mon, 13 Dec 1999 17:02:04 +0800 Date: Tue, 14 Dec 1999 17:06:27 +0800 From: Jun Wu Subject: Novice Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com To: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Message-id: <000501bf4612$80ef8640$1f300b0a@w15060.huawei.com.cn> MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 4.72.3110.5 Content-type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk X-Msmail-Priority: Normal X-Mimeole: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.3110.3 X-Priority: 3 Hello all, I'm a novice of ARM linux and brutus board. Can I use win98 based host to port ARM linux to the brutus board? If yes, what should I do step by step? Best regards Jun From kramer@pa.dec.com Wed Dec 15 11:48:54 1999 Return-Path: Received: from tudedr.et.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id LAA01109; Wed, 15 Dec 1999 11:48:54 +0100 (MET) Received: from mail2.digital.com by ITS.TUDelft.NL (PMDF V5.1-10 #21918) with ESMTP id <01JJJ2OP4SDU90NIDT@ITS.TUDelft.NL> for erik@duteinh.et.tudelft.nl; Wed, 15 Dec 1999 11:48:48 +0100 Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.2/WV2.0g) with SMTP id CAA16988; Wed, 15 Dec 1999 02:45:53 -0800 (PST) Received: from rex.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA05527; Wed, 15 Dec 1999 02:45:31 -0800 Received: by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id CAA14189; Wed, 15 Dec 1999 02:43:02 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id CAA14156; Wed, 15 Dec 1999 02:42:59 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail2.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA20978; Wed, 15 Dec 1999 02:42:56 -0800 Received: from duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (duteinh.et.tudelft.nl [130.161.42.1]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.2/WV2.0g) with ESMTP id CAA14715 for ; Wed, 15 Dec 1999 02:42:55 -0800 (PST) Received: from kalman by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id LAA01022; Wed, 15 Dec 1999 11:41:29 +0100 (MET) Date: Wed, 15 Dec 1999 11:41:29 +0100 (MET) From: Erik Mouw Subject: Re: Novice In-reply-to: <000501bf4612$80ef8640$1f300b0a@w15060.huawei.com.cn> Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com To: junw@sz.huawei.com.cn Cc: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Message-id: <199912151041.LAA01022@duteinh.et.tudelft.nl> Organization: Eric conspiracy secret labs MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: XCmail 1.0.0 - with PGP support, PGP engine version 0.5 (Linux) Content-type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-transfer-encoding: 8bit Precedence: bulk X-Face: "!Z|1XjFg!3Iw)BwM^M\k)J5KHiPddz}#/Zw%?$&Q!xqob"OA|})3_@&BTTiQERo?/^g[Z<9P4R8:5C:aqq.cw!hotLc=+u-"+1rq@9$V^8PbOUlodyi_sejt+D`iqkLpx$>.aXl%vnfPIt"LK|/%>94_Zrm8jy?`_[RKt'TuoxUxfk(gMhY(n|DBBl~c$dhO>G%6}R4+DGX3|idBm4oU&UM/XUP4I9aoN{]`ax%B?rgD(I3OJ<62Y6L X-Mailerorigin: http://www.fsai.fh-trier.de/~schmitzj/Xclasses/XCmail/ X-Eric-Conspiracy: There is no conspiracy! X-Loop: erik@it.et.tudelft.nl On Tue, 14 Dec 1999 17:06:27 +0800, Jun Wu wrote: > I'm a novice of ARM linux and brutus board. > Can I use win98 based host to port ARM linux to the brutus board? > If yes, what should I do step by step? In theory: yes. In practice: no. In theory: Get yourself Cygnus Cygwin32 at sourceware.cygnus.com. This is a Unix compatible compile&build environment for Win 95/98/NT systems. Now get all the neccessary parts (kernel, binutils, gcc, glibc, patches) to build a complete win95-->arm-linux cross compiler toolchain. Compile and install everything and you're set. In practice: Cygwin32 is a very nice piece of software but from what I've read at the autoconf, automake and libtool mailinglists, it has some problems with the those tools. Given the fact that the parts of the cross compiler toolchain implicitly depend on some Unix features, I don't think it will compile out-of-the-box (although it would be an interesting excersise). To make life easier, you should really use a Linux box (or any other sane Unix machine) to setup a cross compiler toolchain. If that works, you can always try to get it working with Cygwin32. Erik -- J.A.K. (Erik) Mouw, Information and Communication Theory Group, Department of Electrical Engineering, Faculty of Information Technology and Systems, Delft University of Technology, PO BOX 5031, 2600 GA Delft, The Netherlands Phone: +31-15-2785859 Fax: +31-15-2781843 Email J.A.K.Mouw@its.tudelft.nl WWW: http://www-ict.its.tudelft.nl/~erik/ From kramer@pa.dec.com Wed Dec 15 11:57:40 1999 Return-Path: Received: from tudedr.et.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id LAA01210; Wed, 15 Dec 1999 11:57:39 +0100 (MET) Received: from mail2.digital.com by ITS.TUDelft.NL (PMDF V5.1-10 #21918) with ESMTP id <01JJJ2ZRG8HE90NIDT@ITS.TUDelft.NL> for erik@duteinh.et.tudelft.nl; Wed, 15 Dec 1999 11:57:35 +0100 Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.2/WV2.0g) with SMTP id CAA17654; Wed, 15 Dec 1999 02:55:37 -0800 (PST) Received: from rex.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA23703; Wed, 15 Dec 1999 02:55:28 -0800 Received: by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id CAA14158; Wed, 15 Dec 1999 02:55:19 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id CAA13849; Wed, 15 Dec 1999 02:55:17 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail2.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA26937; Wed, 15 Dec 1999 02:55:17 -0800 Received: from note.orchestra.cse.unsw.EDU.AU (note.orchestra.cse.unsw.EDU.AU [129.94.242.29]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.2/WV2.0g) with SMTP id CAA17163 for ; Wed, 15 Dec 1999 02:55:14 -0800 (PST) Received: From paulaner With LocalMail ; Wed, 15 Dec 1999 21:51:43 +1100 Date: Wed, 15 Dec 1999 21:51:43 +1100 (EST) From: "Adam 'WeirdArms' Wiggins" Subject: Re: Novice In-reply-to: <199912151041.LAA01022@duteinh.et.tudelft.nl> Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com X-Sender: awiggins@paulaner.disy.cse.unsw.EDU.AU To: Erik Mouw Cc: junw@sz.huawei.com.cn, sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Message-id: MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Precedence: bulk On Wed, 15 Dec 1999, Erik Mouw wrote: > On Tue, 14 Dec 1999 17:06:27 +0800, Jun Wu wrote: > > I'm a novice of ARM linux and brutus board. > > Can I use win98 based host to port ARM linux to the brutus board? > > If yes, what should I do step by step? > > In theory: yes. In practice: no. > Just to add a comment here. One of the guys that did our current JTAG software also did our current boot-loader for PLEB, is an NT user (yuck but anyway). He has a really nice setup for ARM cross-compilation. While I don't know the details of how he went about it and the fact that he is a pretty experienced developer my point is that he did it and he has a really nice setup. If your still interested I can put you on to him or ask him how he setup his ARM GNU cross-compile toolchain. Cheers Adam From kramer@pa.dec.com Wed Dec 15 14:10:57 1999 Return-Path: Received: from tudedr.et.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id OAA02305; Wed, 15 Dec 1999 14:10:56 +0100 (MET) Received: from mail1.digital.com by ITS.TUDelft.NL (PMDF V5.1-10 #21918) with ESMTP id <01JJJ7N49F6S90NJ76@ITS.TUDelft.NL> for erik@duteinh.et.tudelft.nl; Wed, 15 Dec 1999 14:10:53 +0100 Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.2/WV2.0g) with SMTP id FAA18510; Wed, 15 Dec 1999 05:08:21 -0800 (PST) Received: from rex.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA17529; Wed, 15 Dec 1999 05:08:10 -0800 Received: by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id FAA14511; Wed, 15 Dec 1999 05:07:46 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id FAA14490; Wed, 15 Dec 1999 05:07:43 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail2.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA22264; Wed, 15 Dec 1999 05:07:41 -0800 Received: from duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (duteinh.et.tudelft.nl [130.161.42.1]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.2/WV2.0g) with ESMTP id FAA20782 for ; Wed, 15 Dec 1999 05:07:40 -0800 (PST) Received: from kalman by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id OAA02236; Wed, 15 Dec 1999 14:05:59 +0100 (MET) Date: Wed, 15 Dec 1999 14:05:59 +0100 (MET) From: Erik Mouw Subject: Re: Novice In-reply-to: Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com To: awiggins@cse.unsw.edu.au Cc: junw@sz.huawei.com.cn, sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Message-id: <199912151305.OAA02236@duteinh.et.tudelft.nl> Organization: Eric conspiracy secret labs MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: XCmail 1.0.0 - with PGP support, PGP engine version 0.5 (Linux) Content-type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-transfer-encoding: 8bit Precedence: bulk X-Face: "!Z|1XjFg!3Iw)BwM^M\k)J5KHiPddz}#/Zw%?$&Q!xqob"OA|})3_@&BTTiQERo?/^g[Z<9P4R8:5C:aqq.cw!hotLc=+u-"+1rq@9$V^8PbOUlodyi_sejt+D`iqkLpx$>.aXl%vnfPIt"LK|/%>94_Zrm8jy?`_[RKt'TuoxUxfk(gMhY(n|DBBl~c$dhO>G%6}R4+DGX3|idBm4oU&UM/XUP4I9aoN{]`ax%B?rgD(I3OJ<62Y6L X-Mailerorigin: http://www.fsai.fh-trier.de/~schmitzj/Xclasses/XCmail/ X-Eric-Conspiracy: There is no conspiracy! X-Loop: erik@it.et.tudelft.nl On Wed, 15 Dec 1999 21:51:43 +1100 (EST), Adam 'WeirdArms' Wiggins wrote: > On Wed, 15 Dec 1999, Erik Mouw wrote: > >> On Tue, 14 Dec 1999 17:06:27 +0800, Jun Wu wrote: >> > I'm a novice of ARM linux and brutus board. >> > Can I use win98 based host to port ARM linux to the brutus board? >> > If yes, what should I do step by step? >> >> In theory: yes. In practice: no. >> > Just to add a comment here. One of the guys that did our current > JTAG software also did our current boot-loader for PLEB, is an NT user > (yuck but anyway). He has a really nice setup for ARM cross-compilation. > While I don't know the details of how he went about it and the fact that > he is a pretty experienced developer my point is that he did it and he has > a really nice setup. If your still interested I can put you on to him or > ask him how he setup his ARM GNU cross-compile toolchain. I didn't say it was impossible, but given the fact that the original poster is a novice to ARM linux, he'd better stick to a platform that's known to work: Linux. If your toolchain breaks on Win98, you're on your own. BTW: does your JTAG software still need an external microcontroller? Erik -- J.A.K. (Erik) Mouw, Information and Communication Theory Group, Department of Electrical Engineering, Faculty of Information Technology and Systems, Delft University of Technology, PO BOX 5031, 2600 GA Delft, The Netherlands Phone: +31-15-2785859 Fax: +31-15-2781843 Email J.A.K.Mouw@its.tudelft.nl WWW: http://www-ict.its.tudelft.nl/~erik/ From kramer@pa.dec.com Wed Dec 15 14:16:29 1999 Return-Path: Received: from tudedr.et.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id OAA02350; Wed, 15 Dec 1999 14:16:29 +0100 (MET) Received: from mail2.digital.com by ITS.TUDelft.NL (PMDF V5.1-10 #21918) with ESMTP id <01JJJ7TZHPCS94FEFZ@ITS.TUDelft.NL> for erik@duteinh.et.tudelft.nl; Wed, 15 Dec 1999 14:16:27 +0100 Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.2/WV2.0g) with SMTP id FAA18531; Wed, 15 Dec 1999 05:14:40 -0800 (PST) Received: from rex.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA31885; Wed, 15 Dec 1999 05:14:34 -0800 Received: by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id FAA14630; Wed, 15 Dec 1999 05:14:18 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id FAA14591; Wed, 15 Dec 1999 05:14:16 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail2.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA14632; Wed, 15 Dec 1999 05:14:16 -0800 Received: from note.orchestra.cse.unsw.EDU.AU (note.orchestra.cse.unsw.EDU.AU [129.94.242.29]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.2/WV2.0g) with SMTP id FAA14109 for ; Wed, 15 Dec 1999 05:14:13 -0800 (PST) Received: From paulaner With LocalMail ; Thu, 16 Dec 1999 00:12:06 +1100 Date: Thu, 16 Dec 1999 00:12:06 +1100 (EST) From: "Adam 'WeirdArms' Wiggins" Subject: Re: Novice In-reply-to: <199912151305.OAA02236@duteinh.et.tudelft.nl> Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com X-Sender: awiggins@paulaner.disy.cse.unsw.EDU.AU To: Erik Mouw Cc: junw@sz.huawei.com.cn, sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Message-id: MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Precedence: bulk > BTW: does your JTAG software still need an external microcontroller? Need is the wrong word ;) But he coded it in AVR assembler and the AVR takes commands from a dumb serial terminal. For a number of reasons when I get some spare time (read when PLEB boards are shipped and my micro-kernels fully functional and relitively bug free) I'm going to start writting JTAG stuff in C to go in our ARV JTAG programmers, on our boards themselves (so they can JTAG stuff like their own CPLDs), or on PCs with just a parallel port JTAG thing. I'll let you know when I get around to this. Cheers Adam From kramer@pa.dec.com Mon Dec 20 15:39:11 1999 Return-Path: Received: from TUDEDU.ET.TUDelft.NL by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id PAA08886; Mon, 20 Dec 1999 15:39:09 +0100 (MET) Received: from mail1.digital.com by ITS.TUDelft.NL (PMDF V5.1-10 #21918) with ESMTP id <01JJQA42YONA90NM9I@ITS.TUDelft.NL> for erik@duteinh.et.tudelft.nl; Mon, 20 Dec 1999 15:37:30 +0100 Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.2/WV2.0g) with SMTP id GAA18634; Mon, 20 Dec 1999 06:31:56 -0800 (PST) Received: from rex.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA08895; Mon, 20 Dec 1999 06:31:42 -0800 Received: by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id GAA24764; Mon, 20 Dec 1999 06:29:24 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id GAA24891; Mon, 20 Dec 1999 06:29:21 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail2.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA24194; Mon, 20 Dec 1999 06:29:17 -0800 Received: from xanadu.gn.com (modemcable233.137-200-24.mtl.mc.videotron.net [24.200.137.233]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.2/WV2.0g) with ESMTP id GAA22441 for ; Mon, 20 Dec 1999 06:29:16 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (nico@localhost) by xanadu.gn.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id JAA11809; Mon, 20 Dec 1999 09:24:21 -0500 Date: Mon, 20 Dec 1999 09:24:21 -0500 (EST) From: Nicolas Pitre Subject: Re: About Arm Linux for Brutus SA-1100 In-reply-to: Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com X-Sender: nico@xanadu.gn.com To: Eric_Liu@asus.com.tw Cc: SA-1100/Linux Message-id: MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Precedence: bulk X-Authentication-warning: xanadu.gn.com: nico owned process doing -bs Hi! Unfortunately, I've never worked with GUI on Brutus, and can't say much than some people had x window running on it. I CC'ed your message to the SA1100 Linux mailing list. You might find more info from people there. And... many contributions for Brutus support came from people on this list too! :-) On Mon, 20 Dec 1999 Eric_Liu@asus.com.tw wrote: > > Hello, I'v successfully followed the instructions of Intel website > to boot my Brutus board with linux(2.2.12). I think this is really > a great job done by you, right? It's really a incredible work!! > Now, I have a Brutus board with linux console mode login, and can > you tell me that what GUI window systems I can run on this small > LCD panel of Brutus board? I will be very appreciate if you can > give me any hint about this. > > > -- > Eric Liu, Eric_Liu@asus.com.tw > > > > From kramer@pa.dec.com Tue Dec 21 05:05:37 1999 Return-Path: Received: from tudedv.et.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id FAA12380; Tue, 21 Dec 1999 05:05:37 +0100 (MET) Received: from mail1.digital.com by ITS.TUDelft.NL (PMDF V5.1-10 #21918) with ESMTP id <01JJR2BNPAMS94FJOB@ITS.TUDelft.NL> for erik@duteinh.et.tudelft.nl; Tue, 21 Dec 1999 05:05:33 +0100 Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.2/WV2.0g) with SMTP id UAA11996; Mon, 20 Dec 1999 20:01:30 -0800 (PST) Received: from rex.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA23279; Mon, 20 Dec 1999 20:01:18 -0800 Received: by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id UAA27072; Mon, 20 Dec 1999 20:00:24 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id UAA27348; Mon, 20 Dec 1999 20:00:22 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail2.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA06620; Mon, 20 Dec 1999 20:00:22 -0800 Received: from asustek.asus.com.tw (asustek.asus.com.tw [192.72.126.1]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.2/WV2.0g) with ESMTP id UAA00468 for ; Mon, 20 Dec 1999 20:00:19 -0800 (PST) Received: from asustpe3.ASUS.COM.TW (bak.asus.com.tw [192.72.126.36]) by asustek.asus.com.tw (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id MAA03899; Tue, 21 Dec 1999 12:00:09 +0800 Received: by asustpe3.asus.com.tw with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21) id ; Tue, 21 Dec 1999 12:08:03 +0800 Date: Tue, 21 Dec 1999 12:08:03 +0800 From: Eric_Liu@asus.com.tw Subject: Re: About Arm Linux for Brutus SA-1100 Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com To: nico@CAM.ORG, Eric_Liu@asus.com.tw Cc: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Message-id: MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21) Content-type: text/plain; charset="big5" Precedence: bulk Thanks, Anybody who has suggestion for me please CC a message to my mail-box, because I joined the mail-list just now and I'm anxiety about that I've missed any response for me. -- Eric_Liu@asus.com.tw -----Original mail----- Title: Re: About Arm Linux for Brutus SA-1100 Hi! Unfortunately, I've never worked with GUI on Brutus, and can't say much than some people had x window running on it. I CC'ed your message to the SA1100 Linux mailing list. You might find more info from people there. And... many contributions for Brutus support came from people on this list too! :-) From kramer@pa.dec.com Wed Dec 22 11:06:04 1999 Return-Path: Received: from tudedr.et.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id LAA19769; Wed, 22 Dec 1999 11:06:03 +0100 (MET) Received: from mail1.digital.com by ITS.TUDelft.NL (PMDF V5.1-10 #21918) with ESMTP id <01JJST87JX5E94FTGJ@ITS.TUDelft.NL> for erik@duteinh.et.tudelft.nl; Wed, 22 Dec 1999 11:05:57 +0100 Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.2/WV2.0g) with SMTP id CAA12969; Wed, 22 Dec 1999 02:02:02 -0800 (PST) Received: from rex.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA16254; Wed, 22 Dec 1999 02:01:41 -0800 Received: by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id BAA32340; Wed, 22 Dec 1999 01:58:59 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id BAA32233; Wed, 22 Dec 1999 01:58:56 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail1.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA05356; Wed, 22 Dec 1999 01:58:55 -0800 Received: from orange.zav.starlab.net (extsrv.starlab.net [195.171.37.194]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.2/WV2.0g) with ESMTP id BAA12857 for ; Wed, 22 Dec 1999 01:58:54 -0800 (PST) Received: from downtown.ett.starlab.net (root@[212.8.177.17]) by orange.zav.starlab.net (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id KAA19203 for ; Wed, 22 Dec 1999 10:59:18 +0100 Received: from wonderland.ett.starlab.net (wonderland.ett.starlab.net [212.8.177.19]) by downtown.ett.starlab.net (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id KAA02032 for ; Wed, 22 Dec 1999 10:58:50 +0100 Date: Wed, 22 Dec 1999 10:58:49 +0100 (CET) From: Ivo Clarysse Subject: Bad mode in prefetch abort handler Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com X-Sender: soggie@wonderland.ett.starlab.net To: SA-1100/Linux Message-id: MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Precedence: bulk We're having some problems locating a bug on our SA-1100 platform ('FEATHER'; http://foobar.starlab.net/~soggie/feather/). Our platform consists of a CPU board, and a daughterboard containing PCMCIA slots. Without the daughterboard, Linux (2.2.12-rmk1-np12) boots up correctly and works like a charm. However, if the PCMCIA daughterboard is attached (but not accessed from the kernel), it crashes during the kernel initialization (decompression of the kernel works fine). These crashes seem to happen rather randomly, but when we modified head-armv.S to NOT enable the data & instruction caches, the system consistently crashes with 'Bad mode in prefetch abort handler detected: mode SVC_32', always during or the initialization of the SA1100 serial driver (though not always at the same instruction). A sample bootlog with the daughterboard attached: Linux version 2.2.12-rmk1-np12 (root@woodland.ett.starlab.net) (gcc version egc9NetWinder Floating Point Emulator V0.94.1 (c) 1998 Corel Computer Corp. Calibrating delay loop... 4.67 BogoMIPS Memory: 60080k/64M available (532k code, 20k reserved, 804k data, 4k init) POSIX conformance testing by UNIFIX Linux NET4.0 for Linux 2.2 Based upon Swansea University Computer Society NET3.039 Starting kswapd v 1.5 SA1100 serial driver version 4.27 with no serial options enabled Bad mode in prefetch abort handler detected: mode SVC_32 Vectors: 00000000: ef9f0000 ea0000a1 e59ff398 ea000093 ea000086 ea0000a9 ea000078 ea000 00000020: 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000 Stubs: Stubs: 00000200: e59fd1a4 e24ee004 e58de000 e14fe000 e58de004 e3ced03f e38dd093 e169f 00000220: e20ee00f e28fd0b4 e79de10e e1b0f00e e59fd17c e24ee008 e58de000 e14fe 00000240: e58de004 e3ced03f e38dd093 e169f00d e20ee00f e28fdf41 e79de10e e1b0f 00000260: e59fd14c e24ee004 e58de000 e14fe000 e58de004 e3ced03f e38dd093 e169f 00000280: e21ee00f 059fe114 159fe114 e1b0f00e e59fd118 e58de000 e14fe000 e58de 000002a0: e3ced03f e38dd093 e169f00d e20ee00f e28fd068 e79de10e e1b0f00e e25ef 000002c0: eafffffe 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000 000002e0: c0009ea0 c0009c48 c0009c48 c0009d60 c0009c48 c0009c48 c0009c48 c0009 00000300: c0009c48 c0009c48 c0009c48 c0009c48 c0009c48 c0009c48 c0009c48 c0009 00000320: c0009f20 c0009c5c c0009c5c c0009de0 c0009c5c c0009c5c c0009c5c c0009 00000340: c0009c5c c0009c5c c0009c5c c0009c5c c0009c5c c0009c5c c0009c5c c0009 00000360: c0009e40 c0009c34 c0009c34 c0009d00 c0009c34 c0009c34 c0009c34 c0009 00000380: c0009c34 c0009c34 c0009c34 c0009c34 c0009c34 c0009c34 c0009c34 c0009 000003a0: c0009fa0 c0009c20 c000a0e0 c0090960 c009096c c0090978 00000000 00000 000003c0: 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000 000003e0: 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000 00000400: 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000 00000420: 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000 00000440: 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000 00000460: 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000 00000480: 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000 000004a0: 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 Internal error: Oops: 0 CPU: 0 pc : [<00005bb0>] lr : [<00000001>] sp : c015fdd8 ip : 00000000 fp : c015fe44 r10: c0008204 r9 : 00000000 r8 : c0091de0 r7 : c00a7458 r6 : 00000001 r5 : 00000001 r4 : 00000001 r3 : 51eb851f r2 : 7fffffff r1 : 00000001 r0 : 00000005 Flags: nZCv IRQs on FIQs off Mode SVC_32 Segment kernel Control: C000417B Table: C000417B DAC: 0000001D Process swapper (pid: 1, stackpage=c015f000) Stack: c015fe00: 00000001 00005bb0 60000053 fffff c015fe20: 00000001 c00a74a0 c00a745c c00a7458 c0096120 00000000 c015fe60 c015f c015fe40: c001f83c c0015ad4 00000000 00000000 0000001a c015fe90 c015fe64 c000a c015fe60: c001f7b8 00000340 c015fe94 fa050000 c015fedc 00000001 c0018cf0 60000 c015fe80: ffffffff c015ff10 c015fe94 c0009d80 c000a930 c0091ec0 0000000a f8010 c015fea0: 60000053 00000000 c00966c6 c00966c7 0000001a 00000040 c00966ab c0008 c015fec0: c015ff10 0000001b c015fedc 0000001b c0018cf0 60000053 ffffffff 00000 c015fee0: 00000040 c00966c6 0000001b 00000000 00000007 c0095950 00000003 c00ab c015ff00: c00a72ac c015ff58 c015ff24 c006ca50 c0018ac8 c008a3d8 00000001 f8010 c015ff20: 20000053 00000000 00000000 c00a26c8 c015ff58 00000000 c00a2550 00000 c015ff40: 00000005 c00abc34 c00a72ac c015ff78 c015ff5c c00641dc c006c974 c0095 c015ff60: c0090764 00000001 c00a72ac c015ff88 c015ff7c c0068300 c00640a4 c015f c015ff80: c015ff8c c005d918 c00682d8 c015ffb8 c015ff9c c0048bc4 c005d914 c0095 c015ffa0: c0090764 00000001 c00a72ac c015ffe4 c015ffbc c00099d8 c0048bc0 00000 c015ffc0: c0009a9c c009075c c0090760 c00b287c c0090984 4401a118 c015fffc c015f c015ffe0: c0009aac c00098fc c0009a9c c009075c c008ffd8 c0160000 c000b580 c0009 Backtrace: Function entered at [ (= timer_bh) ] from [] r9 = 00000000 r8 = c0096120 r7 = c00a7458 r6 = c00a745c r5 = c00a74a0 r4 = 00000001 Function entered at [ (= do_bottom_half)] from [] r6 = 0000001a r5 = 00000000 r4 = 00000000 Function entered at [ (= do_IRQ)] from [] r9 = ffffffff r8 = 60000053 r7 = c0018cf0 [....] Now, we're assuming this is due to a hardware problem, but how should we interpret this 'Bad mode in prefetch abort handler detected: mode SVC_32' ? Is the MMU reporting a page fault in the kernel memory area ? Ivo Clarysse. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Ivo Clarysse TEL +32-2-7400788 FAX +32-2-7429654 Research Scientist Starlab - http://www.starlab.org/ PGP ID: 0x50154325 // A0A0 EDBC 37B2 C574 CC4D F1F0 FF94 04B9 5015 4325 From kramer@pa.dec.com Wed Dec 22 11:15:32 1999 Return-Path: Received: from tudedr.et.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id LAA19869; Wed, 22 Dec 1999 11:15:32 +0100 (MET) Received: from mail1.digital.com by ITS.TUDelft.NL (PMDF V5.1-10 #21918) with ESMTP id <01JJSTK02OKS94FMQS@ITS.TUDelft.NL> for erik@duteinh.et.tudelft.nl; Wed, 22 Dec 1999 11:15:29 +0100 Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.2/WV2.0g) with SMTP id CAA13685; Wed, 22 Dec 1999 02:12:16 -0800 (PST) Received: from rex.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA03724; Wed, 22 Dec 1999 02:12:11 -0800 Received: by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id CAA32399; Wed, 22 Dec 1999 02:10:33 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id CAA32304; Wed, 22 Dec 1999 02:10:31 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail1.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA25350; Wed, 22 Dec 1999 02:10:30 -0800 Received: from salisbury.labs.futuretv.com (salisbury.futuretv.com [194.216.164.17]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.2/WV2.0g) with ESMTP id CAA13525 for ; Wed, 22 Dec 1999 02:10:29 -0800 (PST) Received: from zebra.labs.futuretv.com ([192.0.0.67] ident=mail) by salisbury.labs.futuretv.com with esmtp (Exim 3.03 #1) id 120ikE-00030q-00 for sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com; Wed, 22 Dec 1999 10:11:46 +0000 Received: from [192.0.0.21] (helo=fountain.labs.futuretv.com ident=mail) by zebra.labs.futuretv.com with esmtp (Exim 3.03 #1) id 120iix-0002kZ-00; Wed, 22 Dec 1999 10:10:27 +0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=fountain ident=pb) by fountain.labs.futuretv.com with esmtp (Exim 3.03 #1) id 120iiw-0006YC-00; Wed, 22 Dec 1999 10:10:26 +0000 Date: Wed, 22 Dec 1999 10:10:26 +0000 From: Philip Blundell Subject: Re: Bad mode in prefetch abort handler In-reply-to: Message from Ivo Clarysse "of Wed, 22 Dec 1999 10:58:49 +0100." Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com To: Ivo Clarysse Cc: SA-1100/Linux Message-id: MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: exmh version 2.0.2 2/24/98 (debian) Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Precedence: bulk References: >Internal error: Oops: 0 >CPU: 0 >pc : [<00005bb0>] lr : [<00000001>] The kernel branched to a bogus address. Kernel code and data is normally at 0xc0000000 upwards. >Backtrace: >Function entered at [ (= timer_bh) ] from [] You may be able to use this to find out where the branch came from. Since do_IRQ is involved it's possible that your daughterboard is confusing the IRQ dispatch logic and making it jump off into some non-existent handler. (I haven't looked at the SA-1100 code to see if this is possible, though other platforms have suffered from it before now.) >Now, we're assuming this is due to a hardware problem, but how should we >interpret this 'Bad mode in prefetch abort handler detected: mode SVC_32' ? >Is the MMU reporting a page fault in the kernel memory area ? Pretty much. A prefetch abort is a pagefault that occurs on an instruction fetch cycle rather than a data transfer. This is not normally supposed to happen in supervisor mode. p. From kramer@pa.dec.com Wed Dec 22 11:33:40 1999 Return-Path: Received: from tudedr.et.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id LAA20022; Wed, 22 Dec 1999 11:33:40 +0100 (MET) Received: from mail2.digital.com by ITS.TUDelft.NL (PMDF V5.1-10 #21918) with ESMTP id <01JJSU7GKSY094FTGJ@ITS.TUDelft.NL> for erik@duteinh.et.tudelft.nl; Wed, 22 Dec 1999 11:33:36 +0100 Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.2/WV2.0g) with SMTP id CAA30578; Wed, 22 Dec 1999 02:31:43 -0800 (PST) Received: from rex.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA19105; Wed, 22 Dec 1999 02:31:41 -0800 Received: by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id CAA32405; Wed, 22 Dec 1999 02:29:52 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id CAA32418; Wed, 22 Dec 1999 02:29:49 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail1.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA25643; Wed, 22 Dec 1999 02:29:49 -0800 Received: from thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (thorgal.et.tudelft.nl [130.161.40.91]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.2/WV2.0g) with ESMTP id CAA14640 for ; Wed, 22 Dec 1999 02:29:48 -0800 (PST) Received: from [130.161.115.44] (jdbakker.et.tudelft.nl [130.161.115.44]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id LAA02295; Wed, 22 Dec 1999 11:29:43 +0100 Date: Wed, 22 Dec 1999 11:27:26 +0100 From: "J.D. Bakker" Subject: Re: Bad mode in prefetch abort handler In-reply-to: Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com To: Ivo Clarysse Cc: SA-1100/Linux Message-id: MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Precedence: bulk At 10:58 +0100 22-12-1999, Ivo Clarysse wrote: >We're having some problems locating a bug on our SA-1100 platform >('FEATHER'; http://foobar.starlab.net/~soggie/feather/). Hey, yet another SA-1100 board ;-) >Our platform consists of a CPU board, and a daughterboard containing >PCMCIA slots. Without the daughterboard, Linux (2.2.12-rmk1-np12) boots >up correctly and works like a charm. However, if the PCMCIA >daughterboard is attached (but not accessed from the kernel), it crashes >during the kernel initialization (decompression of the kernel works >fine). These crashes seem to happen rather randomly, but when we >modified head-armv.S to NOT enable the data & instruction caches, the >system consistently crashes with 'Bad mode in prefetch abort handler >detected: mode SVC_32', always during or the initialization of the >SA1100 serial driver (though not always at the same instruction). >Now, we're assuming this is due to a hardware problem, That would be my guess. Probably the added capacity of the daughterboard increases your effective memory access timings, or the total trace lengths become such that you are seeing transmission line effects. That or your CPU power supply decoupling is inadequate. Try increasing your memory timings; my first hack would be to set CDB2 to one and see what happens next. On your design: maybe the pictures are a bit deceptive, but it scares me that it seems possible to 'see through' to the inner layers. Are you using solid power/ground planes ? Are you sure your CPU is really running at 133MHz ? Where did you get *32 Mbit* DRAM chips ? Looking at the smaller pictures, *please* tell me that your address/data bus doesn't run over those tiny blue & black wires to that memory SIMM. > but how should we >interpret this 'Bad mode in prefetch abort handler detected: mode SVC_32' ? >Is the MMU reporting a page fault in the kernel memory area ? Does it matter ? You most likely have a hardware problem; at that point your software (including the kernel) becomes strictly GIGO. Good luck, JDB. -- LART. 250 MIPS under one Watt. http://www-ict.its.tudelft.nl/~erik/open-source/LART/ From kramer@pa.dec.com Wed Dec 22 14:23:21 1999 Return-Path: Received: from tudedr.et.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id OAA21349; Wed, 22 Dec 1999 14:23:20 +0100 (MET) Received: from mail2.digital.com by ITS.TUDelft.NL (PMDF V5.1-10 #21918) with ESMTP id <01JJT04RONMW94FT8K@ITS.TUDelft.NL> for erik@duteinh.et.tudelft.nl; Wed, 22 Dec 1999 14:23:16 +0100 Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.2/WV2.0g) with SMTP id FAA04655; Wed, 22 Dec 1999 05:21:19 -0800 (PST) Received: from rex.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA02095; Wed, 22 Dec 1999 05:21:13 -0800 Received: by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id FAA00058; Wed, 22 Dec 1999 05:19:27 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id FAA00016; Wed, 22 Dec 1999 05:19:24 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail1.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA20780; Wed, 22 Dec 1999 05:19:23 -0800 Received: from orange.zav.starlab.net (extsrv.starlab.net [195.171.37.194]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.2/WV2.0g) with ESMTP id FAA24607 for ; Wed, 22 Dec 1999 05:19:22 -0800 (PST) Received: from downtown.ett.starlab.net (root@[212.8.177.17]) by orange.zav.starlab.net (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id OAA20293; Wed, 22 Dec 1999 14:19:43 +0100 Received: from wonderland.ett.starlab.net (wonderland.ett.starlab.net [212.8.177.19]) by downtown.ett.starlab.net (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id OAA05403; Wed, 22 Dec 1999 14:19:15 +0100 Date: Wed, 22 Dec 1999 14:19:14 +0100 (CET) From: Ivo Clarysse Subject: Re: Bad mode in prefetch abort handler In-reply-to: Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com X-Sender: soggie@wonderland.ett.starlab.net To: "J.D. Bakker" Cc: SA-1100/Linux Message-id: MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Precedence: bulk On Wed, 22 Dec 1999, J.D. Bakker wrote: > At 10:58 +0100 22-12-1999, Ivo Clarysse wrote: > > >Now, we're assuming this is due to a hardware problem, > > That would be my guess. Probably the added capacity of the daughterboard > increases your effective memory access timings, or the total trace lengths > become such that you are seeing transmission line effects. That or your CPU > power supply decoupling is inadequate. Try increasing your memory timings; > my first hack would be to set CDB2 to one and see what happens next. With CDB2=1 and an extended CAS waveform, it crashes a bit further in the boot process, during the ramdisk decompression (inflate_dynamic -> huft_build -> malloc -> kmalloc). > On your design: maybe the pictures are a bit deceptive, but it scares me > that it seems possible to 'see through' to the inner layers. Are you using > solid power/ground planes ? Are you sure your CPU is really running at > 133MHz ? Where did you get *32 Mbit* DRAM chips ? Those pictures are from a first prototype PCB; we're currently using 2 32MB SODIMM modules. I'll put up some recent images soon. > Looking at the smaller pictures, *please* tell me that your address/data > bus doesn't run over those tiny blue & black wires to that memory SIMM. Our address/data bus doesn't run over those tiny blue & black wires. Ivo. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Ivo Clarysse TEL +32-2-7400788 FAX +32-2-7429654 Research Scientist Starlab - http://www.starlab.org/ PGP ID: 0x50154325 // A0A0 EDBC 37B2 C574 CC4D F1F0 FF94 04B9 5015 4325 From kramer@pa.dec.com Wed Dec 22 15:00:36 1999 Return-Path: Received: from tudedr.et.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id PAA21645; Wed, 22 Dec 1999 15:00:35 +0100 (MET) Received: from mail1.digital.com by ITS.TUDelft.NL (PMDF V5.1-10 #21918) with ESMTP id <01JJT1EY5BVU90NL2I@ITS.TUDelft.NL> for erik@duteinh.et.tudelft.nl; Wed, 22 Dec 1999 15:00:29 +0100 Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.2/WV2.0g) with SMTP id FAA27307; Wed, 22 Dec 1999 05:58:30 -0800 (PST) Received: from rex.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA28891; Wed, 22 Dec 1999 05:58:24 -0800 Received: by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id FAA00059; Wed, 22 Dec 1999 05:56:56 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id FAA00098; Wed, 22 Dec 1999 05:56:53 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail2.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA26041; Wed, 22 Dec 1999 05:56:53 -0800 Received: from thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (thorgal.et.tudelft.nl [130.161.40.91]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.2/WV2.0g) with ESMTP id FAA08150 for ; Wed, 22 Dec 1999 05:56:52 -0800 (PST) Received: from [130.161.115.44] (jdbakker.et.tudelft.nl [130.161.115.44]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id OAA02615; Wed, 22 Dec 1999 14:56:45 +0100 Date: Wed, 22 Dec 1999 14:56:03 +0100 From: "J.D. Bakker" Subject: Re: Bad mode in prefetch abort handler In-reply-to: Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com To: Ivo Clarysse Cc: "J.D. Bakker" , SA-1100/Linux Message-id: MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Precedence: bulk References: >> On your design: maybe the pictures are a bit deceptive, but it scares me >> that it seems possible to 'see through' to the inner layers. Are you using >> solid power/ground planes ? Are you sure your CPU is really running at >> 133MHz ? Where did you get *32 Mbit* DRAM chips ? > >Those pictures are from a first prototype PCB; we're currently using >2 32MB SODIMM modules. I'll put up some recent images soon. Do you buffer the address/data/control lines to the SODIMMs ? If not, assuming that you use 72pin SODIMMS which can be compared to Micron MT4LDT832HXs, the load on the nWE-line is already 32nF per module; add around 5n per socket and you get a grand total of 74n on the line, which exceeds the 50n load that the SA-1100 likes to see. And that's even without the Flash. Probably the daughterboard pushes it over the edge. Another possible culprit is the power supply. Is the daughterboard powered from the main board, and if so did you measure the difference in (HF) power supply ripple with and without the daughterboard connected ? >> Looking at the smaller pictures, *please* tell me that your address/data >> bus doesn't run over those tiny blue & black wires to that memory SIMM. > >Our address/data bus doesn't run over those tiny blue & black wires. Ah great; I was getting nightmares in my daydreams from thinking about it ;-) Sincerely, JDB [happily running Linux on SA-1100 with daughtercards @110MHz mem bus clock] -- Jan-Derk Bakker, bakker@mmc.et.tudelft.nl The lazy man's proverb: 'There's no business like slow business !' From kramer@pa.dec.com Fri Dec 24 05:10:26 1999 Return-Path: Received: from tudedr.et.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id FAA02415; Fri, 24 Dec 1999 05:10:26 +0100 (MET) Received: from mail1.digital.com by ITS.TUDelft.NL (PMDF V5.1-10 #21918) with ESMTP id <01JJV9E0YFUS94FVT5@ITS.TUDelft.NL> for erik@duteinh.et.tudelft.nl; Fri, 24 Dec 1999 05:10:23 +0100 Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.2/WV2.0g) with SMTP id UAA07108; Thu, 23 Dec 1999 20:03:03 -0800 (PST) Received: from rex.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA24470; Thu, 23 Dec 1999 20:02:46 -0800 Received: by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id UAA05729; Thu, 23 Dec 1999 20:00:32 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id UAA05780; Thu, 23 Dec 1999 20:00:29 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail2.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA09738; Thu, 23 Dec 1999 20:00:29 -0800 Received: from xanadu.gn.com (modemcable233.137-200-24.mtl.mc.videotron.net [24.200.137.233]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.2/WV2.0g) with ESMTP id UAA23885 for ; Thu, 23 Dec 1999 20:00:28 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (nico@localhost) by xanadu.gn.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id WAA21973 for ; Thu, 23 Dec 1999 22:55:44 -0500 Date: Thu, 23 Dec 1999 22:55:44 -0500 (EST) From: Nicolas Pitre Subject: diff-2.3.33-rmk3-np1 Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com X-Sender: nico@xanadu.gn.com To: SA-1100/Linux Message-id: MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Precedence: bulk X-Authentication-warning: xanadu.gn.com: nico owned process doing -bs Yep! diff-2.3.33-rmk3-np1.gz is available from ftp.netwinder.org/users/n/nico. This patch reintroduces Brutus LCD console into Linux 2.3.x, cleaned-up keyboard driver, and assorted fixes. But... still if you have a Brutus (or any other SA1100 implementation) with *more* than 2 RAM banks which are *less* than 4mb each, then you won't be able to use it all... yet. I still have to figure out how the discontigous memory support stuff works. If anyone has a clear idea on how to deal with it, especially the multiple mem_maps and additionnal required macros, then please tell me about it! But for many people it should work. If you come to try it please let me know how it goes. Nicolas From kramer@pa.dec.com Fri Dec 24 19:39:02 1999 Return-Path: Received: from tudedr.et.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id TAA05256; Fri, 24 Dec 1999 19:39:02 +0100 (MET) Received: from mail2.digital.com by ITS.TUDelft.NL (PMDF V5.1-10 #21918) with ESMTP id <01JJW3Q0HS4S90NLI4@ITS.TUDelft.NL> for erik@duteinh.et.tudelft.nl; Fri, 24 Dec 1999 19:38:59 +0100 Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.2/WV2.0g) with SMTP id KAA13929; Fri, 24 Dec 1999 10:35:17 -0800 (PST) Received: from rex.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA17923; Fri, 24 Dec 1999 10:35:08 -0800 Received: by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id KAA05956; Fri, 24 Dec 1999 10:34:15 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id KAA06006; Fri, 24 Dec 1999 10:34:13 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail2.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA13451; Fri, 24 Dec 1999 10:34:13 -0800 Received: from xanadu.gn.com (modemcable233.137-200-24.mtl.mc.videotron.net [24.200.137.233]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.2/WV2.0g) with ESMTP id KAA11047 for ; Fri, 24 Dec 1999 10:34:12 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (nico@localhost) by xanadu.gn.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id NAA24500 for ; Fri, 24 Dec 1999 13:29:30 -0500 Date: Fri, 24 Dec 1999 13:29:29 -0500 (EST) From: Nicolas Pitre Subject: Re: diff-2.3.33-rmk3-np1 In-reply-to: Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com X-Sender: nico@xanadu.gn.com To: SA-1100/Linux Message-id: MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Precedence: bulk X-Authentication-warning: xanadu.gn.com: nico owned process doing -bs On Thu, 23 Dec 1999, Nicolas Pitre wrote: > But for many people it should work. If you come to try it please let me > know how it goes. Finally I was able to test initrd. It doesn't work. Anybody knows if initrd actually works for i386 with Linux 2.3.33? ( let's go for crash analysis again... :-) ) Nicolas From kramer@pa.dec.com Fri Dec 24 21:09:49 1999 Return-Path: Received: from tudedv.et.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id VAA05388; Fri, 24 Dec 1999 21:09:49 +0100 (MET) Received: from mail2.digital.com by ITS.TUDelft.NL (PMDF V5.1-10 #21918) with ESMTP id <01JJW6WFZLOY94F8NN@ITS.TUDelft.NL> for erik@duteinh.et.tudelft.nl; Fri, 24 Dec 1999 21:09:43 +0100 Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.2/WV2.0g) with SMTP id MAA17981; Fri, 24 Dec 1999 12:02:08 -0800 (PST) Received: from rex.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA00232; Fri, 24 Dec 1999 12:02:06 -0800 Received: by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id MAA05973; Fri, 24 Dec 1999 12:01:49 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id MAA05925; Fri, 24 Dec 1999 12:01:47 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail2.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA30825; Fri, 24 Dec 1999 12:01:47 -0800 Received: from kings-cross.london.uk.eu.org (tazenda.demon.co.uk [158.152.220.239]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.2/WV2.0g) with ESMTP id MAA17783 for ; Fri, 24 Dec 1999 12:01:35 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost ([::ffff:127.0.0.1] helo=kings-cross.london.uk.eu.org ident=phil) by kings-cross.london.uk.eu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.03 #1) id 121ath-0005HY-00; Fri, 24 Dec 1999 20:01:09 +0000 Date: Fri, 24 Dec 1999 20:01:08 +0000 From: Philip Blundell Subject: Re: diff-2.3.33-rmk3-np1 In-reply-to: Message from Nicolas Pitre "of Fri, 24 Dec 1999 13:29:29 EST." Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com To: Nicolas Pitre Cc: SA-1100/Linux Message-id: MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: exmh version 2.0.2 2/24/98 (debian) Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Precedence: bulk References: >Finally I was able to test initrd. It doesn't work. Anybody knows if >initrd actually works for i386 with Linux 2.3.33? No, I think it was broken on all architectures. Patches do exist to fix it though. p. From kramer@pa.dec.com Sat Dec 25 01:39:15 1999 Return-Path: Received: from tudedr.et.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id BAA05644; Sat, 25 Dec 1999 01:39:15 +0100 (MET) Received: from mail1.digital.com by ITS.TUDelft.NL (PMDF V5.1-10 #21918) with ESMTP id <01JJWGBLS52Y90NOBW@ITS.TUDelft.NL> for erik@duteinh.et.tudelft.nl; Sat, 25 Dec 1999 01:39:12 +0100 Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.2/WV2.0g) with SMTP id QAA07989; Fri, 24 Dec 1999 16:32:55 -0800 (PST) Received: from rex.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA00248; Fri, 24 Dec 1999 16:32:52 -0800 Received: by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id QAA05667; Fri, 24 Dec 1999 16:32:13 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id QAA06055; Fri, 24 Dec 1999 16:32:11 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail2.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA30533; Fri, 24 Dec 1999 16:32:10 -0800 Received: from funai-tky.co.jp (ns.funai-tky.co.jp [210.154.37.2]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.2/WV2.0g) with ESMTP id QAA27345 for ; Fri, 24 Dec 1999 16:32:09 -0800 (PST) Received: from hiropu ([192.168.1.19]) by funai-tky.co.jp (8.9.1/3.7Wpr7-98092916) with SMTP id JAA20084 for ; Sat, 25 Dec 1999 09:32:07 +0900 Date: Sat, 25 Dec 1999 09:32:01 +0900 From: Hiroshi Ishii Subject: Re: diff-2.3.33-rmk3-np1 In-reply-to: Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com To: sa1100 mailng list Message-id: <386410811C2.66ADHIROSHI@ns.funai-tky.co.jp> MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Becky! ver 1.25.07 Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk References: On Fri, 24 Dec 1999 20:01:08 +0000 Philip Blundell wrote: > >Finally I was able to test initrd. It doesn't work. Anybody knows if > >initrd actually works for i386 with Linux 2.3.33? > > No, I think it was broken on all architectures. Patches do exist to fix it > though. > Really? Where is it's patch? ---- ++ Funai Electric R & D Co.,LTD ++ ++ Hiroshi Ishii ++ From kramer@pa.dec.com Wed Dec 29 06:28:57 1999 Return-Path: Received: from tudedr.et.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id GAA15957; Wed, 29 Dec 1999 06:28:57 +0100 (MET) Received: from mail2.digital.com by ITS.TUDelft.NL (PMDF V5.1-10 #21918) with ESMTP id <01JK2BL5JR8A8WVYUM@ITS.TUDelft.NL> for erik@duteinh.et.tudelft.nl; Wed, 29 Dec 1999 06:28:53 +0100 Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.2/WV2.0g) with SMTP id VAA28449; Tue, 28 Dec 1999 21:25:22 -0800 (PST) Received: from rex.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA00720; Tue, 28 Dec 1999 21:25:06 -0800 Received: by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id VAA01258; Tue, 28 Dec 1999 21:22:16 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id VAA01254; Tue, 28 Dec 1999 21:22:10 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail1.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA26505; Tue, 28 Dec 1999 21:22:10 -0800 Received: from xanadu.gn.com (modemcable235.137-200-24.mtl.mc.videotron.net [24.200.137.235]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.2/WV2.0g) with ESMTP id VAA27589 for ; Tue, 28 Dec 1999 21:22:09 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (nico@localhost) by xanadu.gn.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id AAA32375 for ; Wed, 29 Dec 1999 00:17:36 -0500 Date: Wed, 29 Dec 1999 00:17:36 -0500 (EST) From: Nicolas Pitre Subject: diff-2.3.33-rmk3-np2 Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com X-Sender: nico@xanadu.gn.com To: SA-1100/Linux Message-id: MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Precedence: bulk X-Authentication-warning: xanadu.gn.com: nico owned process doing -bs ... is on ftp.netwinder.org/users/n/nico. I only added the bits that seem to be required for initial ramdisks to work. All the rest is the same as 2.3.33-rmk3-np1. I can't tell if it works or not (can't test it atm) since I didn't have time to figure out the discontigous memory support for my Brutus yet... and that's the only SA1100 device I have access to from now on... So any report is welcome! Nicollas From kramer@pa.dec.com Tue Jan 4 06:39:11 2000 Return-Path: Received: from tudedr.et.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id GAA09335; Tue, 4 Jan 2000 06:39:11 +0100 (MET) Received: from mail2.digital.com by ITS.TUDelft.NL (PMDF V5.1-10 #21918) with ESMTP id <01JKAPOW20TU8WW21A@ITS.TUDelft.NL> for erik@duteinh.et.tudelft.nl; Tue, 4 Jan 2000 06:39:06 +0100 Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.2/WV2.0g) with SMTP id VAA02545; Mon, 03 Jan 2000 21:34:11 -0800 (PST) Received: from rex.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA18045; Mon, 03 Jan 2000 21:33:58 -0800 Received: by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id VAA23868; Mon, 03 Jan 2000 21:30:44 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id VAA23869; Mon, 03 Jan 2000 21:30:42 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail2.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA04425; Mon, 03 Jan 2000 21:30:41 -0800 Received: from xanadu.gn.com (modemcable235.137-200-24.mtl.mc.videotron.net [24.200.137.235]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.2/WV2.0g) with ESMTP id VAA02310 for ; Mon, 03 Jan 2000 21:30:40 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (nico@localhost) by xanadu.gn.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id AAA16312 for ; Tue, 04 Jan 2000 00:26:17 -0500 Date: Tue, 04 Jan 2000 00:26:17 -0500 (EST) From: Nicolas Pitre Subject: diff-2.3.33-rmk3-np3 Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com X-Sender: nico@xanadu.gn.com To: SA-1100/Linux Message-id: MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Precedence: bulk X-Authentication-warning: xanadu.gn.com: nico owned process doing -bs It's available from the usual place. I think I got the discontigmem support working this time. It might need further cleaning but hey! it's working better now. Seems it can actually mount an initial ramdisk! If anybody plays with this one, please tell me about your results. Nicolas P.S. Happy new year and millennium to all! From kramer@pa.dec.com Tue Jan 4 09:25:49 2000 Return-Path: Received: from tudedr.et.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id JAA09825; Tue, 4 Jan 2000 09:25:49 +0100 (MET) Received: from mail2.digital.com by ITS.TUDelft.NL (PMDF V5.1-10 #21918) with ESMTP id <01JKAVIGNMBC8ZE3QX@ITS.TUDelft.NL> for erik@duteinh.et.tudelft.nl; Tue, 4 Jan 2000 09:25:47 +0100 Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.2/WV2.0g) with SMTP id AAA13017; Tue, 04 Jan 2000 00:18:55 -0800 (PST) Received: from rex.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA01205; Tue, 04 Jan 2000 00:18:48 -0800 Received: by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id AAA24288; Tue, 04 Jan 2000 00:15:48 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id AAA24282; Tue, 04 Jan 2000 00:15:45 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail2.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA03085; Tue, 04 Jan 2000 00:15:45 -0800 Received: from mta3.263.net ([202.96.44.45]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.2/WV2.0g) with ESMTP id AAA12707 for ; Tue, 04 Jan 2000 00:15:42 -0800 (PST) Received: by mta3.263.net (Postfix, from userid 60001) id B82C41C3536F3; Tue, 04 Jan 2000 16:14:44 +0800 (CST) Date: Tue, 04 Jan 2000 16:14:44 +0800 (CST) From: daihb@263.net Subject: how to port to SA1110? Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com To: nico@CAM.ORG Cc: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Message-id: <3871ABF4.26615@mta3> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=unknown-8bit Content-transfer-encoding: base64 Precedence: bulk X-Mime-Autoconverted: from 8bit to base64 by mail2.digital.com id AAA12707 X-Priority: 3 ICBJcyB0aGVyZSBiaWcgZGlmZmVyZW5jZSBiZXR3ZWVuIHRoZXNlIHR3byBwbGF0Zm9ybT8N DQpDYW4gdGhlIFNBMTEwMCBrZXJuZWwgcnVuIG9uIFNBMTExMCB3aXRob3V0IG1vZGlmaWNh dGlvbnM/DQ0KV2hhdCBhcmUgdGhlIGxhdGVzdCB0b29scyhnY2MsYmludXRpbHMsbGliYyxr ZXJuZWwpIGNhbiBiZSB1c2VkIHRvIGJ1aWxkIGEgZGV2ZWxvcG1lbnQgZW52aXJvbm1lbnQg Zm9yIFNBMTExMD9BbmQgd2hlcmUgd2lsbCB0aGVtIGJlIGF2YWlsYWJsZT8NDQpMb3N0IG9m IHRoYW5rcyBpbiBhZHZhbmNlLg0NCkhhcHB5IG5ldyB5ZWFyIQ0NCg0NCiBEYXZpZA0NCg0N Cl9fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fXw0Kyte2vNTa z98tLc/IvfjW0Ln6yMu1xM34yc+80tSwIGh0dHA6Ly93d3cuMjYzLm5ldA0Kw+K30dPKz+Qg 08q8/tTT1r4gx6nD+9PKvP4g08q8/rzTw9wg08q8/te3ye269A0Ky9HL99L9x+YguPbIy9W+ teMg1NrP39POz7cgzfjJz8HEzOwgzfjJz7nSusUNCr3wyNrN9bn6INTaz9/Jsba+IMz41OnK 0LOhIMjtvP7PwtTYINDdz9DT6cDWDQrFtbe9sLLIq6Os1vrE+mXCt8a9sLINCg== From kramer@pa.dec.com Tue Jan 4 09:27:41 2000 Return-Path: Received: from tudedr.et.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id JAA09837; Tue, 4 Jan 2000 09:27:41 +0100 (MET) Received: from mail2.digital.com by ITS.TUDelft.NL (PMDF V5.1-10 #21918) with ESMTP id <01JKAVKU4TR68WW232@ITS.TUDelft.NL> for erik@duteinh.et.tudelft.nl; Tue, 4 Jan 2000 09:27:39 +0100 Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.2/WV2.0g) with SMTP id AAA13389; Tue, 04 Jan 2000 00:25:40 -0800 (PST) Received: from rex.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA18985; Tue, 04 Jan 2000 00:25:38 -0800 Received: by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id AAA24298; Tue, 04 Jan 2000 00:22:58 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id AAA24316; Tue, 04 Jan 2000 00:22:50 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail1.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA10640; Tue, 04 Jan 2000 00:22:50 -0800 Received: from note.orchestra.cse.unsw.EDU.AU (note.orchestra.cse.unsw.EDU.AU [129.94.242.29]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.2/WV2.0g) with SMTP id AAA09545 for ; Tue, 04 Jan 2000 00:22:48 -0800 (PST) Received: From paulaner With LocalMail ; Tue, 04 Jan 2000 19:21:48 +1100 Date: Tue, 04 Jan 2000 19:21:36 +1100 (EST) From: "Adam 'WeirdArms' Wiggins" Subject: Re: how to port to SA1110? In-reply-to: <3871ABF4.26615@mta3> Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com X-Sender: awiggins@paulaner.disy.cse.unsw.EDU.AU To: daihb@263.net Cc: nico@CAM.ORG, sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Message-id: MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Precedence: bulk On Tue, 4 Jan 2000 daihb@263.net wrote: > Is there big difference between these two platform? > Can the SA1100 kernel run on SA1110 without modifications? > What are the latest tools(gcc,binutils,libc,kernel) can be used to build a development environment for SA1110?And where will them be available? > Lost of thanks in advance. The only difference is the memory controller. This would probably require some small changes to the kernel. Cheers Adam From kramer@pa.dec.com Tue Jan 4 16:30:06 2000 Return-Path: Received: from tudedr.et.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id QAA12182; Tue, 4 Jan 2000 16:30:06 +0100 (MET) Received: from mail1.digital.com by ITS.TUDelft.NL (PMDF V5.1-10 #21918) with ESMTP id <01JKBACJN5BG8WW20F@ITS.TUDelft.NL> for erik@duteinh.et.tudelft.nl; Tue, 4 Jan 2000 16:30:03 +0100 Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.2/WV2.0g) with SMTP id HAA06462; Tue, 04 Jan 2000 07:28:06 -0800 (PST) Received: from rex.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA09129; Tue, 04 Jan 2000 07:27:50 -0800 Received: by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id HAA25454; Tue, 04 Jan 2000 07:26:43 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id HAA25465; Tue, 04 Jan 2000 07:26:30 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail2.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA25228; Tue, 04 Jan 2000 07:26:29 -0800 Received: from xanadu.vipswitch.com (generic199.197.205.205.in-addr.arpa [205.205.197.199] (may be forged)) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.2/WV2.0g) with ESMTP id HAA07159 for ; Tue, 04 Jan 2000 07:26:22 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 04 Jan 2000 10:18:31 -0500 (EST) From: Nicolas Pitre Subject: Re: how to port to SA1110? In-reply-to: <3871ABF4.26615@mta3> Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com To: daihb@263.net Cc: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Message-id: MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Precedence: bulk On Tue, 4 Jan 2000 daihb@263.net wrote: > Is there big difference between these two platform? No. > Can the SA1100 kernel run on SA1110 without modifications? Probably. It depends only on where your ram appears physically. Maybe little modifications to the kernel source might be needed. > What are the latest tools(gcc,binutils,libc,kernel) can be used to build a development environment for SA1110?And where will them be available? See http://inkvine.fluff.org/~chris/arm-tools.html. Nicollas From kramer@pa.dec.com Wed Jan 5 09:33:03 2000 Return-Path: Received: from tudedr.et.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id JAA14924; Wed, 5 Jan 2000 09:33:02 +0100 (MET) Received: from mail1.digital.com by ITS.TUDelft.NL (PMDF V5.1-10 #21918) with ESMTP id <01JKCA2SR8SU8WW2SH@ITS.TUDelft.NL> for erik@duteinh.et.tudelft.nl; Wed, 5 Jan 2000 09:32:59 +0100 Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.2/WV2.0g) with SMTP id AAA20444; Wed, 05 Jan 2000 00:28:48 -0800 (PST) Received: from rex.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA28194; Wed, 05 Jan 2000 00:28:27 -0800 Received: by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id AAA28002; Wed, 05 Jan 2000 00:25:52 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id AAA28008; Wed, 05 Jan 2000 00:25:43 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail1.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA00702; Wed, 05 Jan 2000 00:25:37 -0800 Received: from hw_mail.zentral (pec-21-88.tnt1.h.uunet.de [149.225.21.88]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.2/WV2.0g) with ESMTP id AAA20258 for ; Wed, 05 Jan 2000 00:25:36 -0800 (PST) Received: by HW_MAIL with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2448.0) id ; Wed, 05 Jan 2000 09:27:22 +0100 Date: Wed, 05 Jan 2000 09:27:15 +0100 From: "JOR. - Jordan, Roman" Subject: AW: how to port to SA1110? Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com To: "'NICO@CAM.ORG'" Cc: "'sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com'" Message-id: <81413F587EB9D1118F56000092941A3EA78BE9@HW_MAIL> MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2448.0) Content-type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-transfer-encoding: quoted-printable Precedence: bulk Hi, i know there is also a check for the type of the processor. So this = thinks has also to be modified. regards, Roman -----Urspr=FCngliche Nachricht----- Von: Postmaster=20 Gesendet am: Tuesday, January 04, 2000 16:45 An: JOR. - Jordan, Roman Betreff: WG: how to port to SA1110? > ---------- > Von: Nicolas Pitre[SMTP:NICO@CAM.ORG] > Gesendet: Dienstag, 4. Januar 2000 16:33:40 > An: daihb@263.net > Cc: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com > Betreff: Re: how to port to SA1110? > Diese Nachricht wurde automatisch von einer Regel weitergeleitet. >=20 >=20 >=20 On Tue, 4 Jan 2000 daihb@263.net wrote: > Is there big difference between these two platform? No. > Can the SA1100 kernel run on SA1110 without modifications? Probably. It depends only on where your ram appears physically. Maybe little modifications to the kernel source might be needed. > What are the latest tools(gcc,binutils,libc,kernel) can be used to = build a development environment for SA1110?And where will them be available? See http://inkvine.fluff.org/~chris/arm-tools.html. Nicollas From kramer@pa.dec.com Wed Jan 5 20:05:38 2000 Return-Path: Received: from tudedr.et.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id UAA18227; Wed, 5 Jan 2000 20:05:38 +0100 (MET) Received: from mail2.digital.com by ITS.TUDelft.NL (PMDF V5.1-10 #21918) with ESMTP id <01JKCW63VBJS8WW2X5@ITS.TUDelft.NL> for erik@duteinh.et.tudelft.nl; Wed, 5 Jan 2000 20:05:35 +0100 Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.2/WV2.0g) with SMTP id LAA03047; Wed, 05 Jan 2000 11:00:31 -0800 (PST) Received: from rex.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA03909; Wed, 05 Jan 2000 11:00:24 -0800 Received: by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id KAA29617; Wed, 05 Jan 2000 10:58:10 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id KAA29596; Wed, 05 Jan 2000 10:58:08 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail2.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA14665; Wed, 05 Jan 2000 10:58:07 -0800 Received: from wodc7mr4.ffx.ops.us.uu.net (wodc7mr4.ffx.ops.us.uu.net [192.48.96.29]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.2/WV2.0g) with ESMTP id KAA02641 for ; Wed, 05 Jan 2000 10:58:07 -0800 (PST) Received: from idefix by wodc7mr4.ffx.ops.us.uu.net with SMTP (peer crosschecked as: [63.68.31.100]) id QQhwsh04379 for ; Wed, 05 Jan 2000 18:57:51 +0000 (GMT) Date: Wed, 05 Jan 2000 10:58:14 -0800 From: Jens Skakkebaek Subject: X on SA-1100 Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com To: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Reply-to: jskakkebaek@bv2000.com Message-id: MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) Content-type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit Importance: Normal Precedence: bulk X-Msmail-Priority: Normal X-Mimeole: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2314.1300 X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Hi, I'm new to this list and have a quick question: Has anybody ported X11/XFree86 to the SA-1100? Thanks, Jens From kramer@pa.dec.com Thu Jan 6 06:00:21 2000 Return-Path: Received: from tudedr.et.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id GAA20381; Thu, 6 Jan 2000 06:00:20 +0100 (MET) Received: from mail2.digital.com by ITS.TUDelft.NL (PMDF V5.1-10 #21918) with ESMTP id <01JKDGXEBIQ28ZE878@ITS.TUDelft.NL> for erik@duteinh.et.tudelft.nl; Thu, 6 Jan 2000 06:00:18 +0100 Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.2/WV2.0g) with SMTP id UAA16321; Wed, 05 Jan 2000 20:58:03 -0800 (PST) Received: from rex.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA29305; Wed, 05 Jan 2000 20:57:46 -0800 Received: by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id UAA31168; Wed, 05 Jan 2000 20:55:03 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id UAA31141; Wed, 05 Jan 2000 20:54:57 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail2.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA27203; Wed, 05 Jan 2000 20:54:56 -0800 Received: from xanadu.gn.com (modemcable235.137-200-24.mtl.mc.videotron.net [24.200.137.235]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.2/WV2.0g) with ESMTP id UAA19364 for ; Wed, 05 Jan 2000 20:54:55 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (nico@localhost) by xanadu.gn.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id XAA24499 for ; Wed, 05 Jan 2000 23:50:40 -0500 Date: Wed, 05 Jan 2000 23:50:40 -0500 (EST) From: Nicolas Pitre Subject: diff-2.3.35-rmk1-np1 works!! Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com X-Sender: nico@xanadu.gn.com To: SA-1100/Linux Message-id: MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Precedence: bulk X-Authentication-warning: xanadu.gn.com: nico owned process doing -bs Happy dance !! :-) I finally got it! This is the first 2.3.x version that actually works for me on Brutus! The discontigous memory support seems OK this time. I've been able to run with the ramdisk image found along with my patches on netwinder FTP site (note: don't trust the issue text!). So, it should be usable for more people now. I'll clean things up a bit and start figuring out how to implement pcmcia support. If you try this patch please drop me a note. Happy hacking! Nicolas From kramer@pa.dec.com Fri Jan 7 00:28:08 2000 Return-Path: Received: from tudedr.et.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id AAA25347; Fri, 7 Jan 2000 00:28:08 +0100 (MET) Received: from mail1.digital.com by ITS.TUDelft.NL (PMDF V5.1-10 #21918) with ESMTP id <01JKEJLX7ZMA8WW391@ITS.TUDelft.NL> for erik@duteinh.et.tudelft.nl; Fri, 7 Jan 2000 00:28:04 +0100 Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.2/WV2.0g) with SMTP id PAA31589; Thu, 06 Jan 2000 15:25:57 -0800 (PST) Received: from rex.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA09249; Thu, 06 Jan 2000 15:25:44 -0800 Received: by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id PAA01292; Thu, 06 Jan 2000 15:23:22 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id PAA01284; Thu, 06 Jan 2000 15:23:20 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail1.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA19716; Thu, 06 Jan 2000 15:23:16 -0800 Received: from tekincisnts-4.teklogix.com (mail.teklogix.com [207.219.2.10]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.2/WV2.0g) with ESMTP id PAA31453 for ; Thu, 06 Jan 2000 15:23:15 -0800 (PST) Received: from DeadDuck (BILL [10.128.5.25]) by tekincisnts-4.teklogix.com with SMTP (Microsoft Exchange Internet Mail Service Version 5.5.2448.0) id ZLPHTK01; Thu, 06 Jan 2000 18:22:24 -0500 Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2000 18:22:22 -0600 From: Bill Pringlemeir Subject: Re: diff-2.3.35-rmk1-np1 works!! In-reply-to: Nicolas Pitre's message of "Wed, 5 Jan 2000 23:50:40 -0500 (EST)" Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com To: Nicolas Pitre Cc: SA-1100/Linux Message-id: X-Mailer: Gnus v5.7/Emacs 20.3 Precedence: bulk X-Home-Page: http://www.wwonline.com/~bpringle/ Lines: 18 References: I have the new SA1110 dev board from Intel. It has a CE loader and the Angel debugger. I would like to load a coff image. I think I can convert to binary and write some code to make an 'Microsoft CE .bin' file. Is this a good way to get Linux on this board, before I write some init code to boot from scratch? Does anyone know how the SA1110 WinCE boot chip setup the memory map? thx, Bill -- We're off to see the wizard. Because because because.... of all the wonderful things he does. From kramer@pa.dec.com Fri Jan 7 08:02:04 2000 Return-Path: Received: from tudedr.et.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id IAA26904; Fri, 7 Jan 2000 08:02:03 +0100 (MET) Received: from mail2.digital.com by ITS.TUDelft.NL (PMDF V5.1-10 #21918) with ESMTP id <01JKEZGPI6C88ZEAIU@ITS.TUDelft.NL> for erik@duteinh.et.tudelft.nl; Fri, 7 Jan 2000 08:02:01 +0100 Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.2/WV2.0g) with SMTP id WAA29765; Thu, 06 Jan 2000 22:56:49 -0800 (PST) Received: from rex.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA23749; Thu, 06 Jan 2000 22:56:03 -0800 Received: by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id WAA02429; Thu, 06 Jan 2000 22:53:40 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id WAA02420; Thu, 06 Jan 2000 22:53:38 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail2.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA20993; Thu, 06 Jan 2000 22:53:38 -0800 Received: from mxout2.cac.washington.edu (mxout2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.4]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.2/WV2.0g) with ESMTP id WAA26948 for ; Thu, 06 Jan 2000 22:53:37 -0800 (PST) Received: from mailhost2.u.washington.edu (mailhost2.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.2]) by mxout2.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.09/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id WAA14556 for ; Thu, 06 Jan 2000 22:53:37 -0800 Received: from cs.washington.edu (cs303-5.spmodem.washington.edu [140.142.171.6]) by mailhost2.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.09/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id WAA06900 for ; Thu, 06 Jan 2000 22:53:36 -0800 Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2000 22:54:28 -0800 From: Collin K Murphy Subject: Can't use all of DRAM Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com To: SA-1100/Linux Reply-to: ckmurphy@cs.washington.edu Message-id: <38758DA4.3369B6A9@cs.washington.edu> Organization: University of Washington MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.7 [en] (Win98; U) Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk X-Accept-Language: en I am using the StrongARM eval board (Brutus) and trying to port Linux to it. I have followed the instructions at the Intel site. I can succesfully get the kernel to boot on the eval board but I had to set the memory size (memory_end in arch/arm/kernel/setup.c) to 8MB instead of the available 16MB. If it is set to 16MB, the kernel will not boot. Also, I have found that there is a maximum size of the ramdisk (2MB) and anything above that will not work. I am using linux-2.2.2 with the following patches: patch-2.2.2-rmk5.gz diff-2.2.2-rmk5-np3.gz Has anyone else had this problem? Could it be a conflict with Angel? Collin K Murphy Department of Computer Science and Engineering University of Washington Seattle, WA From kramer@pa.dec.com Fri Jan 7 10:42:04 2000 Return-Path: Received: from tudedr.et.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id KAA27701; Fri, 7 Jan 2000 10:42:04 +0100 (MET) Received: from mail1.digital.com by ITS.TUDelft.NL (PMDF V5.1-10 #21918) with ESMTP id <01JKF52304I48WW3QS@ITS.TUDelft.NL> for erik@duteinh.et.tudelft.nl; Fri, 7 Jan 2000 10:42:01 +0100 Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.2/WV2.0g) with SMTP id BAA07539; Fri, 07 Jan 2000 01:37:57 -0800 (PST) Received: from rex.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA28174; Fri, 07 Jan 2000 01:37:51 -0800 Received: by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id BAA02855; Fri, 07 Jan 2000 01:37:18 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id BAA02857; Fri, 07 Jan 2000 01:37:16 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail1.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA03561; Fri, 07 Jan 2000 01:37:15 -0800 Received: from duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (duteinh.et.tudelft.nl [130.161.42.1]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.2/WV2.0g) with ESMTP id BAA05168 for ; Fri, 07 Jan 2000 01:37:14 -0800 (PST) Received: from kalman by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id KAA27662; Fri, 07 Jan 2000 10:35:53 +0100 (MET) Date: Fri, 07 Jan 2000 10:35:53 +0100 (MET) From: Erik Mouw Subject: Re: Can't use all of DRAM In-reply-to: <38758DA4.3369B6A9@cs.washington.edu> Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com To: ckmurphy@cs.washington.edu Cc: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Message-id: <200001070935.KAA27662@duteinh.et.tudelft.nl> Organization: Eric conspiracy secret labs MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: XCmail 1.0.0 - with PGP support, PGP engine version 0.5 (Linux) Content-type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-transfer-encoding: 8bit Precedence: bulk X-Face: "!Z|1XjFg!3Iw)BwM^M\k)J5KHiPddz}#/Zw%?$&Q!xqob"OA|})3_@&BTTiQERo?/^g[Z<9P4R8:5C:aqq.cw!hotLc=+u-"+1rq@9$V^8PbOUlodyi_sejt+D`iqkLpx$>.aXl%vnfPIt"LK|/%>94_Zrm8jy?`_[RKt'TuoxUxfk(gMhY(n|DBBl~c$dhO>G%6}R4+DGX3|idBm4oU&UM/XUP4I9aoN{]`ax%B?rgD(I3OJ<62Y6L X-Mailerorigin: http://www.fsai.fh-trier.de/~schmitzj/Xclasses/XCmail/ X-Eric-Conspiracy: There is no conspiracy! X-Loop: erik@it.et.tudelft.nl On Thu, 06 Jan 2000 22:54:28 -0800, Collin K Murphy wrote: > I am using the StrongARM eval board (Brutus) and trying to port Linux to it. > I have followed the instructions at the Intel site. Ehm, it is already ported, I suppose you mean "run Linux on it"... ;-) > I can succesfully get the kernel to boot on the eval board but I had to set > the memory size (memory_end in arch/arm/kernel/setup.c) to 8MB instead of > the available 16MB. If it is set to 16MB, the kernel will not boot. > > Also, I have found that there is a maximum size of the ramdisk (2MB) and > anything above that will not work. > > I am using linux-2.2.2 with the following patches: > patch-2.2.2-rmk5.gz > diff-2.2.2-rmk5-np3.gz > > Has anyone else had this problem? Could it be a conflict with Angel? I suggest you try a newer Linux version. The latest Linux 2.2 version for SA1100 is: linux-2.2.12 + patch-2.2.12-rmk2.gz + diff-2.2.10-rmk2-np11.gz Or the latest 2.3 version: linux-2.3.35 + patch-2.3.35-rmk1.gz + diff-2.3.35-rmk1-np2.gz The 2.3 version should definitely work for Brutus, Nicolas Pitre announced it yesterday: I finally got it! This is the first 2.3.x version that actually works for me on Brutus! Erik PS: I don't have a Brutus... -- LART. 250 MIPS under one Watt. http://www-ict.its.tudelft.nl/~erik/open-source/LART/ From kramer@pa.dec.com Tue Jan 11 11:46:49 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id LAA27526; Tue, 11 Jan 2000 11:46:49 +0100 (MET) Received: from ns2.tudelft.nl (ns2.tudelft.nl [130.161.180.65]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.8.6 (PHNE_17135)/8.8.6) with ESMTP id LAA07290 for ; Tue, 11 Jan 2000 11:46:49 +0100 (MET) Received: from mail1.digital.com (mail1.digital.com [204.123.2.50]) by mailhost1.tudelft.nl (PMDF V5.2-32 #35209) with ESMTP id <0FO500DLRY1VVG@mailhost1.tudelft.nl> for J.A.K.Mouw@its.tudelft.nl; Tue, 11 Jan 2000 09:54:01 +0100 (MET) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.2/WV2.0g) with SMTP id AAA21577; Tue, 11 Jan 2000 00:49:03 -0800 (PST) Received: from rex.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA07878; Tue, 11 Jan 2000 00:48:47 -0800 Received: by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id AAA17956; Tue, 11 Jan 2000 00:45:13 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id AAA17902; Tue, 11 Jan 2000 00:45:10 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail2.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA06161; Tue, 11 Jan 2000 00:45:06 -0800 Received: from funai-tky.co.jp (ns.funai-tky.co.jp [210.154.37.2]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.2/WV2.0g) with ESMTP id AAA04710 for ; Tue, 11 Jan 2000 00:45:04 -0800 (PST) Received: from hiropu ([192.168.1.19]) by funai-tky.co.jp (8.9.1/3.7Wpr7-98092916) with SMTP id RAA23581 for ; Tue, 11 Jan 2000 17:44:58 +0900 Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2000 17:44:52 +0900 From: Hiroshi Ishii Subject: Re: diff-2.3.35-rmk1-np1 works!! In-reply-to: Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com To: sa1100 mailng list Message-id: <387AED843B6.0104HIROSHI@ns.funai-tky.co.jp> MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Becky! ver 1.25.07 Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk References: On Wed, 5 Jan 2000 23:50:40 -0500 (EST) Nicolas Pitre wrote: > Happy dance !! :-) > > I finally got it! This is the first 2.3.x version that actually works for > me on Brutus! > It works for me, too!! Great !! But sometimes occurred swapper trouble. ---- ++ Funai Electric R & D Co.,LTD ++ ++ Hiroshi Ishii ++ From kramer@pa.dec.com Tue Jan 11 11:52:47 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id LAA27912; Tue, 11 Jan 2000 11:52:46 +0100 (MET) Received: from ns2.tudelft.nl (ns2.tudelft.nl [130.161.180.65]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.8.6 (PHNE_17135)/8.8.6) with ESMTP id LAA10181 for ; Tue, 11 Jan 2000 11:52:46 +0100 (MET) Received: from mail1.digital.com (mail1.digital.com [204.123.2.50]) by mailhost1.tudelft.nl (PMDF V5.2-32 #35209) with ESMTP id <0FO500D5EYK8VG@mailhost1.tudelft.nl> for J.A.K.Mouw@its.tudelft.nl; Tue, 11 Jan 2000 10:05:00 +0100 (MET) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.2/WV2.0g) with SMTP id BAA21683; Tue, 11 Jan 2000 01:01:04 -0800 (PST) Received: from rex.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA27371; Tue, 11 Jan 2000 01:01:02 -0800 Received: by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id BAA17995; Tue, 11 Jan 2000 01:00:53 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id BAA18021; Tue, 11 Jan 2000 01:00:51 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail1.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA29322; Tue, 11 Jan 2000 01:00:51 -0800 Received: from web1203.mail.yahoo.com (web1203.mail.yahoo.com [128.11.23.139]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.2/WV2.0g) with SMTP id BAA21926 for ; Tue, 11 Jan 2000 01:00:51 -0800 (PST) Received: (qmail 19912 invoked by uid 60001); Tue, 11 Jan 2000 09:00:05 +0000 Received: from [192.11.220.97] by web1203.mail.yahoo.com; Tue, 11 Jan 2000 01:00:05 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2000 01:00:05 -0800 (PST) From: wolf Subject: Where to get sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com mailing list archive Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com To: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Cc: linux-arm@vger.rutgers.edu Message-id: <20000111090005.19911.qmail@web1203.mail.yahoo.com> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Precedence: bulk Hi, Could somebody tell me where to get the archive of the sa1100-linux@pa.dec.ocm mailing list? Thanks in advance. Wolf __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Talk to your friends online with Yahoo! Messenger. http://im.yahoo.com From kramer@pa.dec.com Tue Jan 11 11:47:35 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id LAA27605; Tue, 11 Jan 2000 11:47:35 +0100 (MET) Received: from ns2.tudelft.nl (ns2.tudelft.nl [130.161.180.65]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.8.6 (PHNE_17135)/8.8.6) with ESMTP id LAA07923 for ; Tue, 11 Jan 2000 11:47:35 +0100 (MET) Received: from mail1.digital.com (mail1.digital.com [204.123.2.50]) by mailhost1.tudelft.nl (PMDF V5.2-32 #35209) with ESMTP id <0FO600GU90DNFI@mailhost1.tudelft.nl> for J.A.K.Mouw@its.tudelft.nl; Tue, 11 Jan 2000 10:44:12 +0100 (MET) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.2/WV2.0g) with SMTP id BAA25185; Tue, 11 Jan 2000 01:40:17 -0800 (PST) Received: from rex.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA17911; Tue, 11 Jan 2000 01:40:12 -0800 Received: by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id BAA18127; Tue, 11 Jan 2000 01:39:53 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id BAA18132; Tue, 11 Jan 2000 01:39:50 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail1.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA09727; Tue, 11 Jan 2000 01:39:50 -0800 Received: from salisbury.labs.futuretv.com (salisbury.futuretv.com [194.216.164.17]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.2/WV2.0g) with ESMTP id BAA25381 for ; Tue, 11 Jan 2000 01:39:49 -0800 (PST) Received: from zebra.labs.futuretv.com ([192.0.0.67] ident=mail) by salisbury.labs.futuretv.com with esmtp (Exim 3.03 #1) id 127xnW-0003Fk-00 for sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com; Tue, 11 Jan 2000 09:41:06 +0000 Received: from [192.0.0.21] (helo=fountain.labs.futuretv.com ident=mail) by zebra.labs.futuretv.com with esmtp (Exim 3.03 #1) id 127xm9-0001dM-00; Tue, 11 Jan 2000 09:39:41 +0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=fountain ident=pb) by fountain.labs.futuretv.com with esmtp (Exim 3.03 #1) id 127xm9-00030H-00; Tue, 11 Jan 2000 09:39:41 +0000 Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2000 09:39:41 +0000 From: Philip Blundell Subject: Re: diff-2.3.35-rmk1-np1 works!! In-reply-to: Message from Hiroshi Ishii "of Tue, 11 Jan 2000 17:44:52 +0900." <387AED843B6.0104HIROSHI@ns.funai-tky.co.jp> Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com To: Hiroshi Ishii Cc: sa1100 mailng list Message-id: MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: exmh version 2.0.2 2/24/98 (debian) Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Precedence: bulk References: <387AED843B6.0104HIROSHI@ns.funai-tky.co.jp> > It works for me, too!! Great !! > >But sometimes occurred swapper trouble. What do you mean by `swapper trouble'? p. From kramer@pa.dec.com Tue Jan 11 11:59:48 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id LAA28550; Tue, 11 Jan 2000 11:59:47 +0100 (MET) Received: from ns2.tudelft.nl (ns2.tudelft.nl [130.161.180.65]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.8.6 (PHNE_17135)/8.8.6) with ESMTP id LAA12902 for ; Tue, 11 Jan 2000 11:59:46 +0100 (MET) Received: from mail2.digital.com (mail2.digital.com [204.123.2.56]) by mailhost1.tudelft.nl (PMDF V5.2-32 #35209) with ESMTP id <0FO600K5T3PNKJ@mailhost1.tudelft.nl> for J.A.K.Mouw@its.tudelft.nl; Tue, 11 Jan 2000 11:56:13 +0100 (MET) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.2/WV2.0g) with SMTP id CAA12109; Tue, 11 Jan 2000 02:49:12 -0800 (PST) Received: from rex.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA17549; Tue, 11 Jan 2000 02:49:07 -0800 Received: by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id CAA18322; Tue, 11 Jan 2000 02:48:29 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id CAA18325; Tue, 11 Jan 2000 02:48:27 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail1.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA13259; Tue, 11 Jan 2000 02:48:26 -0800 Received: from funai-tky.co.jp (ns.funai-tky.co.jp [210.154.37.2]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.2/WV2.0g) with ESMTP id CAA29165 for ; Tue, 11 Jan 2000 02:48:25 -0800 (PST) Received: from hiropu ([192.168.1.19]) by funai-tky.co.jp (8.9.1/3.7Wpr7-98092916) with SMTP id TAA24270 for ; Tue, 11 Jan 2000 19:47:44 +0900 Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2000 19:47:39 +0900 From: Hiroshi Ishii Subject: Re: diff-2.3.35-rmk1-np1 works!! In-reply-to: Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com To: sa1100 mailng list Message-id: <387B0A4B2DA.0105HIROSHI@ns.funai-tky.co.jp> MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Becky! ver 1.25.07 Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk References: <387AED843B6.0104HIROSHI@ns.funai-tky.co.jp> On Tue, 11 Jan 2000 09:39:41 +0000 Philip Blundell wrote: > > It works for me, too!! Great !! > > > >But sometimes occurred swapper trouble. > > What do you mean by `swapper trouble'? > > p. Kernel out following messages; ---- swapper (0): undefined instruction: pc=c000852c Internal error: Oops - undefined instruction: 10 CPU: 0 pc : [] lr : [] sp : c0126000 ip : c0125fc0 fp : 00000000 r10: 00000000 r9 : 6901b115 r8 : c0126984 r7 : c0189a70 r6 : c0189a24 r5 : c0194b38 r4 : c0194b38 r3 : 00000000 r2 : fffffffd r1 : 00000000 r0 : 00000000 Flags: nZCv IRQs on FIQs on Mode SVC_32 Segment kernel Control: C0E7917F Table: C0E7917F DAC: 0000001D Process swapper (pid: 0, stackpage=c0125000) Stack: c0125fe0: c000fca0 c000852c 60000013 fffff Backtrace: no frame pointer Code: pc not in code space Kernel panic: Attempted to kill the idle task! In swapper task - not syncing ------ Regards; ---- ++ Funai Electric R & D Co.,LTD ++ ++ Hiroshi Ishii ++ From kramer@pa.dec.com Tue Jan 11 12:48:27 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id MAA00596; Tue, 11 Jan 2000 12:48:26 +0100 (MET) Received: from ns2.tudelft.nl (ns2.tudelft.nl [130.161.180.65]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.8.6 (PHNE_17135)/8.8.6) with ESMTP id MAA03286 for ; Tue, 11 Jan 2000 12:48:26 +0100 (MET) Received: from mail1.digital.com (mail1.digital.com [204.123.2.50]) by mailhost1.tudelft.nl (PMDF V5.2-32 #35209) with ESMTP id <0FO600LNI64BYL@mailhost1.tudelft.nl> for J.A.K.Mouw@its.tudelft.nl; Tue, 11 Jan 2000 12:48:12 +0100 (MET) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.2/WV2.0g) with SMTP id DAA32218; Tue, 11 Jan 2000 03:44:05 -0800 (PST) Received: from rex.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA23021; Tue, 11 Jan 2000 03:44:03 -0800 Received: by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id DAA18487; Tue, 11 Jan 2000 03:43:38 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id DAA18448; Tue, 11 Jan 2000 03:43:36 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail2.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA05010; Tue, 11 Jan 2000 03:43:35 -0800 Received: from salisbury.labs.futuretv.com (salisbury.futuretv.com [194.216.164.17]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.2/WV2.0g) with ESMTP id DAA13648 for ; Tue, 11 Jan 2000 03:43:34 -0800 (PST) Received: from zebra.labs.futuretv.com ([192.0.0.67]) by salisbury.labs.futuretv.com with esmtp (Exim 3.03 #1) id 127zjI-0003IS-00 for sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com; Tue, 11 Jan 2000 11:44:52 +0000 Received: from [192.0.0.21] (helo=fountain.labs.futuretv.com ident=mail) by zebra.labs.futuretv.com with esmtp (Exim 3.03 #1) id 127zhw-00027g-00; Tue, 11 Jan 2000 11:43:28 +0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=fountain ident=pb) by fountain.labs.futuretv.com with esmtp (Exim 3.03 #1) id 127zhv-0004QW-00; Tue, 11 Jan 2000 11:43:27 +0000 Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2000 11:43:27 +0000 From: Philip Blundell Subject: Re: diff-2.3.35-rmk1-np1 works!! In-reply-to: Message from Hiroshi Ishii "of Tue, 11 Jan 2000 19:47:39 +0900." <387B0A4B2DA.0105HIROSHI@ns.funai-tky.co.jp> Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com To: Hiroshi Ishii Cc: sa1100 mailng list Message-id: MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: exmh version 2.0.2 2/24/98 (debian) Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Precedence: bulk References: <387AED843B6.0104HIROSHI@ns.funai-tky.co.jp> <387B0A4B2DA.0105HIROSHI@ns.funai-tky.co.jp> >swapper (0): undefined instruction: pc=c000852c >Internal error: Oops - undefined instruction: 10 >CPU: 0 >pc : [] lr : [] Can you convert those addresses to source code references? Say, using addr2line or gdb. Just cross-referencing them to symbols (with System.map) would be a help. p. From kramer@pa.dec.com Tue Jan 11 15:26:23 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id PAA01718; Tue, 11 Jan 2000 15:26:22 +0100 (MET) Received: from ns2.tudelft.nl (ns2.tudelft.nl [130.161.180.65]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.8.6 (PHNE_17135)/8.8.6) with ESMTP id PAA09731 for ; Tue, 11 Jan 2000 15:26:18 +0100 (MET) Received: from mail2.digital.com (mail2.digital.com [204.123.2.56]) by mailhost1.tudelft.nl (PMDF V5.2-32 #42432) with ESMTP id <0FO60094TDFGWA@mailhost1.tudelft.nl> for J.A.K.Mouw@its.tudelft.nl; Tue, 11 Jan 2000 15:26:05 +0100 (MET) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.2/WV2.0g) with SMTP id GAA24842; Tue, 11 Jan 2000 06:20:45 -0800 (PST) Received: from rex.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA07432; Tue, 11 Jan 2000 06:20:34 -0800 Received: by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id GAA18955; Tue, 11 Jan 2000 06:19:53 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id GAA18935; Tue, 11 Jan 2000 06:19:50 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail2.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA30447; Tue, 11 Jan 2000 06:19:50 -0800 Received: from xanadu.gn.com (modemcable235.137-200-24.mtl.mc.videotron.net [24.200.137.235]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.2/WV2.0g) with ESMTP id GAA24425 for ; Tue, 11 Jan 2000 06:19:49 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (nico@localhost) by xanadu.gn.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id JAA05108; Tue, 11 Jan 2000 09:15:38 -0500 Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2000 09:15:38 -0500 (EST) From: Nicolas Pitre Subject: Re: diff-2.3.35-rmk1-np1 works!! In-reply-to: <387AED843B6.0104HIROSHI@ns.funai-tky.co.jp> Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com X-Sender: nico@xanadu.gn.com To: Hiroshi Ishii Cc: sa1100 mailng list Message-id: MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Precedence: bulk X-Authentication-warning: xanadu.gn.com: nico owned process doing -bs On Tue, 11 Jan 2000, Hiroshi Ishii wrote: > > On Wed, 5 Jan 2000 23:50:40 -0500 (EST) > Nicolas Pitre wrote: > > > Happy dance !! :-) > > > > I finally got it! This is the first 2.3.x version that actually works for > > me on Brutus! > > > > It works for me, too!! Great !! > > But sometimes occurred swapper trouble. I'm up to diff-2.3.35-rmk1-np4. Please try this one since 2.3.35-rmk1-np1 had some oddness. Nicolas From kramer@pa.dec.com Tue Jan 11 15:50:44 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id PAA01868; Tue, 11 Jan 2000 15:50:42 +0100 (MET) Received: from ns2.tudelft.nl (ns2.tudelft.nl [130.161.180.65]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.8.6 (PHNE_17135)/8.8.6) with ESMTP id PAA10682 for ; Tue, 11 Jan 2000 15:50:42 +0100 (MET) Received: from mail1.digital.com (mail1.digital.com [204.123.2.50]) by mailhost1.tudelft.nl (PMDF V5.2-32 #42432) with ESMTP id <0FO600AGNEK3HH@mailhost1.tudelft.nl> for J.A.K.Mouw@its.tudelft.nl; Tue, 11 Jan 2000 15:50:28 +0100 (MET) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.2/WV2.0g) with SMTP id GAA12803; Tue, 11 Jan 2000 06:46:29 -0800 (PST) Received: from rex.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA25602; Tue, 11 Jan 2000 06:46:27 -0800 Received: by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id GAA19014; Tue, 11 Jan 2000 06:46:10 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id GAA18992; Tue, 11 Jan 2000 06:46:04 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail1.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA18831; Tue, 11 Jan 2000 06:46:04 -0800 Received: from thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (thorgal.et.tudelft.nl [130.161.40.91]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.2/WV2.0g) with ESMTP id GAA12664 for ; Tue, 11 Jan 2000 06:46:03 -0800 (PST) Received: from [130.161.40.82] (tvs082.et.tudelft.nl [130.161.40.82]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id PAA20992; Tue, 11 Jan 2000 15:45:59 +0100 Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2000 15:45:11 +0100 From: "J.D. Bakker" Subject: Re: diff-2.3.35-rmk1-np1 works!! Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com To: Nicolas Pitre Cc: erik@it.et.tudelft.nl, sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Message-id: MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Precedence: bulk [We have had some e-mail problems; I hope you don't receive this message twice] Dear Nicolas, >The discontigous memory support seems OK this time. Nevertheless there's the #error in line 436 of arch/arm/kernel/setup.c . I understand that the new 2.3 memory management is the (indirect) cause. I'd love to fix this, but you'd have to supply me with some more clues. Do I understand correctly that the problem lies in the fact that LART has discontiguous memory within one bank ? How would you suggest that I go about fixing this ? Sincerely, Jan-Derk Bakker [who'd love to try out 2.3 on LART, but...] -- LART. 250 MIPS under one Watt. http://www-ict.its.tudelft.nl/~erik/open-source/LART/ From kramer@pa.dec.com Tue Jan 11 16:52:10 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id QAA02207; Tue, 11 Jan 2000 16:52:10 +0100 (MET) Received: from ns2.tudelft.nl (ns2.tudelft.nl [130.161.180.65]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.8.6 (PHNE_17135)/8.8.6) with ESMTP id QAA12781 for ; Tue, 11 Jan 2000 16:52:10 +0100 (MET) Received: from mail1.digital.com (mail1.digital.com [204.123.2.50]) by mailhost1.tudelft.nl (PMDF V5.2-32 #42432) with ESMTP id <0FO600F5IHEFY0@mailhost1.tudelft.nl> for J.A.K.Mouw@its.tudelft.nl; Tue, 11 Jan 2000 16:51:56 +0100 (MET) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.2/WV2.0g) with SMTP id HAA17980; Tue, 11 Jan 2000 07:46:08 -0800 (PST) Received: from rex.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA16997; Tue, 11 Jan 2000 07:44:46 -0800 Received: by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id HAA19204; Tue, 11 Jan 2000 07:43:35 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id HAA19196; Tue, 11 Jan 2000 07:43:33 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail2.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA25242; Tue, 11 Jan 2000 07:43:33 -0800 Received: from xanadu.vipswitch.com (generic199.197.205.205.in-addr.arpa [205.205.197.199] (may be forged)) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.2/WV2.0g) with ESMTP id HAA31587 for ; Tue, 11 Jan 2000 07:43:32 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2000 10:26:41 -0500 (EST) From: Nicolas Pitre Subject: Re: diff-2.3.35-rmk1-np1 works!! In-reply-to: Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com To: "J.D. Bakker" Cc: erik@it.et.tudelft.nl, sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Message-id: MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Precedence: bulk On Tue, 11 Jan 2000, J.D. Bakker wrote: > Dear Nicolas, > > >The discontigous memory support seems OK this time. > > Nevertheless there's the #error in line 436 of arch/arm/kernel/setup.c . I > understand that the new 2.3 memory management is the (indirect) cause. I'd > love to fix this, but you'd have to supply me with some more clues. Yeah... I didn't fix that part yet. > Do I understand correctly that the problem lies in the fact that LART has > discontiguous memory within one bank ? How would you suggest that I go > about fixing this ? The code need to be reworked a bit to break the 1:1 relation between memory banks and memory nodes. Instead of creating a new node for each _logical_ memory bank as described by the meminfo structure, you should pick up all memory belonging to each node (creating nodes from the lowest to the hiest available page frame for that node) and declaring only real memory with free_bootmem(). Well, this may seem a bit vague but it's sometimes easier to express with code. If I have time I'll try to do it tonight. Nicolas From kramer@pa.dec.com Wed Jan 12 00:26:12 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id AAA04294; Wed, 12 Jan 2000 00:26:12 +0100 (MET) Received: from ns2.tudelft.nl (ns2.tudelft.nl [130.161.180.65]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.8.6 (PHNE_17135)/8.8.6) with ESMTP id AAA21892 for ; Wed, 12 Jan 2000 00:26:11 +0100 (MET) Received: from mail1.digital.com (mail1.digital.com [204.123.2.50]) by mailhost1.tudelft.nl (PMDF V5.2-32 #42432) with ESMTP id <0FO700A122F9NY@mailhost1.tudelft.nl> for J.A.K.Mouw@its.tudelft.nl; Wed, 12 Jan 2000 00:25:58 +0100 (MET) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.2/WV2.0g) with SMTP id PAA23512; Tue, 11 Jan 2000 15:18:48 -0800 (PST) Received: from rex.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA21931; Tue, 11 Jan 2000 15:18:37 -0800 Received: by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id PAA20398; Tue, 11 Jan 2000 15:18:06 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id PAA20404; Tue, 11 Jan 2000 15:18:03 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail1.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA27738; Tue, 11 Jan 2000 15:18:03 -0800 Received: from fw-losgatos.losgatos.arm.com (ns.arm.com [208.193.202.3]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.2/WV2.0g) with SMTP id PAA23748 for ; Tue, 11 Jan 2000 15:18:03 -0800 (PST) Received: by fw-losgatos.losgatos.arm.com; id PAA02297; Tue, 11 Jan 2000 15:13:37 -0800 Received: from unknown(194.202.50.2) by fw-losgatos.losgatos.arm.com via smap (V5.0) id xma002286; Tue, 11 Jan 2000 15:12:38 -0800 Received: from magpie (dhcp47 [194.202.50.238]) by incsun1.losgatos.arm.com (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with SMTP id PAA09413 for ; Tue, 11 Jan 2000 15:13:13 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2000 15:06:16 -0600 From: Ian Field Subject: linux distribution Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com To: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Message-id: <004c01bf5c77$b3749990$ee32cac2@losgatos.arm.com> MIME-version: 1.0 X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2314.1300 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2314.1300 Content-type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0049_01BF5C45.68BBA510" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-priority: Normal Precedence: bulk This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0049_01BF5C45.68BBA510 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi all, I've been playing with SA1100-PCMCIA ---> IDE with no luck. It may = be that I'm using an old rev2 part, but in any case, I get alot of = errors. http://www.pobox.com/~ianfield/armzone/sa1100_v1.1/boot1.txt After disabling "using_dma" in the ide-disk driver, it seems to work a = little better although at this stage I'm flying blind. What I was wondering was, other than the patched brutus/sa1100 = distribution we all know, is this the same source tree the eMpeg guys = run, or are there some differences that haven't made it into the main = distribution ( perhaps the eMpeg community can comment ). drivers/block/ide-disk.c /* * IDE subdriver functions, registered with ide.c */ static ide_driver_t idedisk_driver =3D { "ide-disk", /* name */ IDEDISK_VERSION, /* version */ ide_disk, /* media */ 0, /* busy */ 1, /* supports_dma */ 0, /* supports_dsc_overlap */ Cheers, IAN ------=_NextPart_000_0049_01BF5C45.68BBA510 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hi all,
 
    I've been playing = with=20 SA1100-PCMCIA ---> IDE with no luck. It may be that I'm using an old = rev2=20 part, but in any case, I get alot of errors.
 
htt= p://www.pobox.com/~ianfield/armzone/sa1100_v1.1/boot1.txt
 
After disabling "using_dma" in the = ide-disk=20 driver, it seems to work a little better although at this stage I'm = flying=20 blind.
 
What I was wondering was, other than = the patched=20 brutus/sa1100 distribution we all know, is this the same source tree the = eMpeg=20 guys run, or are there some differences that=20 haven't made it into the main distribution ( perhaps the eMpeg community = can=20 comment ).
 
drivers/block/ide-disk.c
 
/*
*      = IDE subdriver=20 functions, registered with ide.c
*/
static ide_driver_t = idedisk_driver =3D=20 {
       =20 "ide-disk",          &n= bsp; =20 /* name */
       =20 IDEDISK_VERSION,        /* version=20 */
       =20 ide_disk,          &nbs= p;   =20 /* media */
       =20 0,            = ;         =20 /* busy */
       =20 1,            = ;         =20 /* supports_dma */
       =20 0,            = ;         =20 /* supports_dsc_overlap */
 
 
Cheers, IAN
 
 
------=_NextPart_000_0049_01BF5C45.68BBA510-- From kramer@pa.dec.com Wed Jan 12 02:33:15 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id CAA04822; Wed, 12 Jan 2000 02:33:14 +0100 (MET) Received: from ns2.tudelft.nl (ns2.tudelft.nl [130.161.180.65]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.8.6 (PHNE_17135)/8.8.6) with ESMTP id CAA23809 for ; Wed, 12 Jan 2000 02:33:14 +0100 (MET) Received: from mail2.digital.com (mail2.digital.com [204.123.2.56]) by mailhost1.tudelft.nl (PMDF V5.2-32 #42432) with ESMTP id <0FO700DEU8AZ63@mailhost1.tudelft.nl> for J.A.K.Mouw@its.tudelft.nl; Wed, 12 Jan 2000 02:33:00 +0100 (MET) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.2/WV2.0g) with SMTP id RAA14743; Tue, 11 Jan 2000 17:27:30 -0800 (PST) Received: from rex.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA11967; Tue, 11 Jan 2000 17:27:28 -0800 Received: by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id RAA20740; Tue, 11 Jan 2000 17:27:10 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id RAA20746; Tue, 11 Jan 2000 17:27:08 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail1.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA32253; Tue, 11 Jan 2000 17:27:07 -0800 Received: from fw-losgatos.losgatos.arm.com (ns.arm.com [208.193.202.3]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.2/WV2.0g) with SMTP id RAA01253 for ; Tue, 11 Jan 2000 17:27:07 -0800 (PST) Received: by fw-losgatos.losgatos.arm.com; id RAA02894; Tue, 11 Jan 2000 17:22:41 -0800 Received: from unknown(194.202.50.2) by fw-losgatos.losgatos.arm.com via smap (V5.0) id xma002889; Tue, 11 Jan 2000 17:22:09 -0800 Received: from magpie (dhcp47 [194.202.50.238]) by incsun1.losgatos.arm.com (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with SMTP id RAA13892; Tue, 11 Jan 2000 17:22:44 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2000 17:15:47 -0600 From: Ian Field Subject: Re: linux distribution Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com To: Nicolas Pitre Cc: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Message-id: <007901bf5c89$cb3bc4b0$ee32cac2@losgatos.arm.com> MIME-version: 1.0 X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2314.1300 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2314.1300 Content-type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-priority: Normal Precedence: bulk References: > > Calibrating delay loop... 55.30 BogoMIPS > Did you configure your clock speed correctly? In the past I left the clock at the default value, but I have tried it at 220MHz also. I also played with the pcmcia clock using victor and empeg values. > What hardware setup do you have exactly? It's pretty much glueless to the pcmcia interface, although I do not use the DMACK and DMARQ signals, just IOR/IOW. Do you know what others do? > AFAIK 2.2.12-rmk1-np12 contains everything to have IDE working with eMpeg > and Victor. The SA1100 specifics are in include/asm/arch/ide.h. yep ... good to hear that it's all there. hmm ... ( time to start blaming my hw again ) Cheers, IAN From kramer@pa.dec.com Wed Jan 12 02:15:42 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id CAA04755; Wed, 12 Jan 2000 02:15:42 +0100 (MET) Received: from ns2.tudelft.nl (ns2.tudelft.nl [130.161.180.65]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.8.6 (PHNE_17135)/8.8.6) with ESMTP id CAA23585 for ; Wed, 12 Jan 2000 02:15:41 +0100 (MET) Received: from mail2.digital.com (mail2.digital.com [204.123.2.56]) by mailhost1.tudelft.nl (PMDF V5.2-32 #42432) with ESMTP id <0FO700D307HR7C@mailhost1.tudelft.nl> for J.A.K.Mouw@its.tudelft.nl; Wed, 12 Jan 2000 02:15:28 +0100 (MET) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.2/WV2.0g) with SMTP id RAA13453; Tue, 11 Jan 2000 17:07:55 -0800 (PST) Received: from rex.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA19554; Tue, 11 Jan 2000 17:07:49 -0800 Received: by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id RAA20692; Tue, 11 Jan 2000 17:07:26 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id RAA20665; Tue, 11 Jan 2000 17:07:24 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail1.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA10413; Tue, 11 Jan 2000 17:07:24 -0800 Received: from xanadu.gn.com (modemcable235.137-200-24.mtl.mc.videotron.net [24.200.137.235]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.2/WV2.0g) with ESMTP id RAA32143 for ; Tue, 11 Jan 2000 17:07:22 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (nico@localhost) by xanadu.gn.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id UAA05426; Tue, 11 Jan 2000 20:03:10 -0500 Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2000 20:03:10 -0500 (EST) From: Nicolas Pitre Subject: Re: linux distribution In-reply-to: <004c01bf5c77$b3749990$ee32cac2@losgatos.arm.com> Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com X-Sender: nico@xanadu.gn.com To: Ian Field Cc: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Message-id: MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Precedence: bulk X-Authentication-warning: xanadu.gn.com: nico owned process doing -bs On Tue, 11 Jan 2000, Ian Field wrote: > Hi all, > > I've been playing with SA1100-PCMCIA ---> IDE with no luck. It may be > that I'm using an old rev2 part, but in any case, I get alot of errors. > > http://www.pobox.com/~ianfield/armzone/sa1100_v1.1/boot1.txt What is strange from your log is this: > Calibrating delay loop... 55.30 BogoMIPS Did you configure your clock speed correctly? > After disabling "using_dma" in the ide-disk driver, it seems to work > a little better although at this stage I'm flying blind. What hardware setup do you have exactly? > What I was wondering was, other than the patched brutus/sa1100 distribution > we all know, is this the same source tree the eMpeg guys run, or are > there some differences that haven't made it into the main distribution > (perhaps the eMpeg community can comment ). AFAIK 2.2.12-rmk1-np12 contains everything to have IDE working with eMpeg and Victor. The SA1100 specifics are in include/asm/arch/ide.h. Nicolas From kramer@pa.dec.com Wed Jan 12 04:52:30 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id EAA05467; Wed, 12 Jan 2000 04:52:30 +0100 (MET) Received: from ns2.tudelft.nl (ns2.tudelft.nl [130.161.180.65]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.8.6 (PHNE_17135)/8.8.6) with ESMTP id EAA24732 for ; Wed, 12 Jan 2000 04:52:29 +0100 (MET) Received: from mail2.digital.com (mail2.digital.com [204.123.2.56]) by mailhost1.tudelft.nl (PMDF V5.2-32 #42432) with ESMTP id <0FO700FK0ER3N5@mailhost1.tudelft.nl> for J.A.K.Mouw@its.tudelft.nl; Wed, 12 Jan 2000 04:52:16 +0100 (MET) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.2/WV2.0g) with SMTP id TAA23779; Tue, 11 Jan 2000 19:44:10 -0800 (PST) Received: from rex.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA05198; Tue, 11 Jan 2000 19:44:07 -0800 Received: by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id TAA21151; Tue, 11 Jan 2000 19:43:26 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id TAA21146; Tue, 11 Jan 2000 19:43:24 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail2.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA07855; Tue, 11 Jan 2000 19:43:24 -0800 Received: from xanadu.gn.com (modemcable235.137-200-24.mtl.mc.videotron.net [24.200.137.235]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.2/WV2.0g) with ESMTP id TAA23896 for ; Tue, 11 Jan 2000 19:43:23 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (nico@localhost) by xanadu.gn.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id WAA08180; Tue, 11 Jan 2000 22:39:10 -0500 Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2000 22:39:10 -0500 (EST) From: Nicolas Pitre Subject: Re: linux distribution In-reply-to: <007901bf5c89$cb3bc4b0$ee32cac2@losgatos.arm.com> Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com X-Sender: nico@xanadu.gn.com To: Ian Field Cc: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Message-id: MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Precedence: bulk X-Authentication-warning: xanadu.gn.com: nico owned process doing -bs On Tue, 11 Jan 2000, Ian Field wrote: > > What hardware setup do you have exactly? > > It's pretty much glueless to the pcmcia interface, although I do not use the > DMACK and DMARQ signals, just IOR/IOW. Do you know what others do? The Victor has some transceiver (3.3V, 5V tol) and IOR/IOW/IOCS16 directly routed from the IDE connector to the SA1100 pins, plus few address lines where one to decode between the low and high IDE registers. It's pretty obvious design. > > AFAIK 2.2.12-rmk1-np12 contains everything to have IDE working with eMpeg > > and Victor. The SA1100 specifics are in include/asm/arch/ide.h. > > yep ... good to hear that it's all there. hmm ... > ( time to start blaming my hw again ) Currently you aren't far from it, since the driver is at least able to identify the drive and read the partition table. BTW: since you are using a Sundisk, are you sure it is properly powered? In the past I've been able to make a Sundisk work (sort of) without the main power. It seemed to suck its power from the control lines. The result was quite like yours. Nicolas From kramer@pa.dec.com Wed Jan 12 05:19:55 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id FAA05565; Wed, 12 Jan 2000 05:19:55 +0100 (MET) Received: from ns2.tudelft.nl (ns2.tudelft.nl [130.161.180.65]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.8.6 (PHNE_17135)/8.8.6) with ESMTP id FAA24856 for ; Wed, 12 Jan 2000 05:19:54 +0100 (MET) Received: from mail2.digital.com (mail2.digital.com [204.123.2.56]) by mailhost1.tudelft.nl (PMDF V5.2-32 #42432) with ESMTP id <0FO700G1WG0SUB@mailhost1.tudelft.nl> for J.A.K.Mouw@its.tudelft.nl; Wed, 12 Jan 2000 05:19:41 +0100 (MET) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.2/WV2.0g) with SMTP id UAA25782; Tue, 11 Jan 2000 20:11:46 -0800 (PST) Received: from rex.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA01820; Tue, 11 Jan 2000 20:11:45 -0800 Received: by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id UAA21228; Tue, 11 Jan 2000 20:11:24 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id UAA21213; Tue, 11 Jan 2000 20:11:22 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail1.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA17620; Tue, 11 Jan 2000 20:11:21 -0800 Received: from xanadu.gn.com (modemcable235.137-200-24.mtl.mc.videotron.net [24.200.137.235]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.2/WV2.0g) with ESMTP id UAA07856 for ; Tue, 11 Jan 2000 20:11:20 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (nico@localhost) by xanadu.gn.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id XAA09379 for ; Tue, 11 Jan 2000 23:07:19 -0500 Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2000 23:07:18 -0500 (EST) From: Nicolas Pitre Subject: diff-2.3.35-rmk1-np5 Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com X-Sender: nico@xanadu.gn.com To: SA-1100/Linux Message-id: MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Precedence: bulk X-Authentication-warning: xanadu.gn.com: nico owned process doing -bs ... is there waiting for you to play with! It seems stable, but I can't test it with real device yet (the only SA1100 hardware I have access to is a Brutus and it can't talk to pcmcia ATAPI adaptor yet). This one should be bootable on a LART too. Tell me guys if it works. Happy hacking! Nicolas From kramer@pa.dec.com Wed Jan 12 11:09:16 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id LAA07662; Wed, 12 Jan 2000 11:09:16 +0100 (MET) Received: from ns2.tudelft.nl (ns2.tudelft.nl [130.161.180.65]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.8.6 (PHNE_17135)/8.8.6) with ESMTP id LAA00932 for ; Wed, 12 Jan 2000 11:09:15 +0100 (MET) Received: from mail2.digital.com (mail2.digital.com [204.123.2.56]) by mailhost1.tudelft.nl (PMDF V5.2-32 #42432) with ESMTP id <0FO7003KRVSPQ5@mailhost1.tudelft.nl> for J.A.K.Mouw@its.tudelft.nl; Wed, 12 Jan 2000 11:00:26 +0100 (MET) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.2/WV2.0g) with SMTP id BAA13860; Wed, 12 Jan 2000 01:51:07 -0800 (PST) Received: from rex.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA07593; Wed, 12 Jan 2000 01:50:46 -0800 Received: by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id BAA22106; Wed, 12 Jan 2000 01:48:04 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id BAA22102; Wed, 12 Jan 2000 01:48:01 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail1.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA04270; Wed, 12 Jan 2000 01:48:01 -0800 Received: from adsl-216-100-248-143.dsl.snfc21.pacbell.net (adsl-216-100-248-143.dsl.snfc21.pacbell.net [216.100.248.143]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.2/WV2.0g) with ESMTP id BAA01010 for ; Wed, 12 Jan 2000 01:48:00 -0800 (PST) Received: from biff (biff [192.168.1.4]) by adsl-216-100-248-143.dsl.snfc21.pacbell.net (8.8.7/8.8.7) with SMTP id BAA13996 for ; Wed, 12 Jan 2000 01:46:06 -0800 Date: Wed, 12 Jan 2000 01:49:03 -0700 From: Ian Field Subject: Re: linux distribution Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Cc: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Reply-to: Ian Field Message-id: <004f01bf5cd9$e1062c40$0401a8c0@casagrande.way> MIME-version: 1.0 X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2314.1300 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2314.1300 Content-type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-priority: Normal Precedence: bulk References: > The Victor has some transceiver (3.3V, 5V tol) and IOR/IOW/IOCS16 directly > routed from the IDE connector to the SA1100 pins, plus few address lines > where one to decode between the low and high IDE registers. It's pretty > obvious design. ok ... sounds like what I did. > Currently you aren't far from it, since the driver is at least able to > identify the drive and read the partition table. cool ... I can read off files and directories, but I get errors occasionally, and sometimes it outright hangs. Before you mentioned 50bogomips was an issue. Is the driver in some way affected by the cpu and memory clocks? > BTW: since you are using a Sundisk, are you sure it is properly powered? > In the past I've been able to make a Sundisk work (sort of) without the > main power. It seemed to suck its power from the control lines. The > result was quite like yours. I also use zip, hd_disk and cdrom drives for testing using the pc as the power supply. I've been able to run executables off the zip drive, some of the files being corrupted. hmmm ... since the drivers are mature, I will probably have to put it down to a board problem, and figure it out when I build up a second cleaner board. Thanks for the help. Cheers, IAN From kramer@pa.dec.com Wed Jan 12 11:51:58 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id LAA08039; Wed, 12 Jan 2000 11:51:57 +0100 (MET) Received: from ns2.tudelft.nl (ns2.tudelft.nl [130.161.180.65]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.8.6 (PHNE_17135)/8.8.6) with ESMTP id LAA02394 for ; Wed, 12 Jan 2000 11:51:57 +0100 (MET) Received: from mail2.digital.com (mail2.digital.com [204.123.2.56]) by mailhost1.tudelft.nl (PMDF V5.2-32 #42432) with ESMTP id <0FO7007CYY61JN@mailhost1.tudelft.nl> for J.A.K.Mouw@its.tudelft.nl; Wed, 12 Jan 2000 11:51:43 +0100 (MET) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.2/WV2.0g) with SMTP id CAA14839; Wed, 12 Jan 2000 02:39:03 -0800 (PST) Received: from rex.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA09145; Wed, 12 Jan 2000 02:39:02 -0800 Received: by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id CAA22195; Wed, 12 Jan 2000 02:36:47 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id CAA22220; Wed, 12 Jan 2000 02:36:44 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail1.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA17429; Wed, 12 Jan 2000 02:36:44 -0800 Received: from duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (duteinh.et.tudelft.nl [130.161.42.1]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.2/WV2.0g) with ESMTP id CAA02396 for ; Wed, 12 Jan 2000 02:36:31 -0800 (PST) Received: from kalman by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id LAA07868; Wed, 12 Jan 2000 11:35:04 +0100 (MET) Date: Wed, 12 Jan 2000 11:35:04 +0100 (MET) From: Erik Mouw X-Face: "!Z|1XjFg!3Iw)BwM^M\k)J5KHiPddz}#/Zw%?$&Q!xqob"OA|})3_@&BTTiQERo?/^g[Z<9P4R8:5C:aqq.cw!hotLc=+u-"+1rq@9$V^8PbOUlodyi_sejt+D`iqkLpx$>.aXl%vnfPIt"LK|/%>94_Zrm8jy?`_[RKt'TuoxUxfk(gMhY(n|DBBl~c$dhO>G%6}R4+DGX3|idBm4oU&UM/XUP4I9aoN{]`ax%B?rgD(I3OJ<62Y6L Subject: Re: diff-2.3.35-rmk1-np5 In-reply-to: Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com To: nico@CAM.ORG Cc: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Message-id: <200001121035.LAA07868@duteinh.et.tudelft.nl> Organization: Eric conspiracy secret labs MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: XCmail 1.0.0 - with PGP support, PGP engine version 0.5 (Linux) Content-type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-transfer-encoding: 8bit Precedence: bulk X-Loop: erik@it.et.tudelft.nl X-Mailerorigin: http://www.fsai.fh-trier.de/~schmitzj/Xclasses/XCmail/ X-Eric-Conspiracy: There is no conspiracy! On Tue, 11 Jan 2000 23:07:18 -0500 (EST), Nicolas Pitre wrote: > This one should be bootable on a LART too. Tell me guys if it works. It compiles without problems. I'm going to test it tonight (if I remember the root password for the programming PC correctly). Erik -- LART. 250 MIPS under one Watt. http://www-ict.its.tudelft.nl/~erik/open-source/LART/ From kramer@pa.dec.com Wed Jan 12 22:51:34 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id WAA12010; Wed, 12 Jan 2000 22:51:34 +0100 (MET) Received: from ns2.tudelft.nl (ns2.tudelft.nl [130.161.180.65]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.8.6 (PHNE_17135)/8.8.6) with ESMTP id WAA18572 for ; Wed, 12 Jan 2000 22:51:33 +0100 (MET) Received: from mail1.digital.com (mail1.digital.com [204.123.2.50]) by mailhost1.tudelft.nl (PMDF V5.2-32 #42432) with ESMTP id <0FO800IJ1SPU6J@mailhost1.tudelft.nl> for J.A.K.Mouw@its.tudelft.nl; Wed, 12 Jan 2000 22:51:32 +0100 (MET) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.2/WV2.0g) with SMTP id NAA23673; Wed, 12 Jan 2000 13:42:38 -0800 (PST) Received: from rex.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA16674; Wed, 12 Jan 2000 13:42:27 -0800 Received: by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id NAA24057; Wed, 12 Jan 2000 13:39:54 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id NAA24056; Wed, 12 Jan 2000 13:39:51 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail1.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA21247; Wed, 12 Jan 2000 13:39:50 -0800 Received: from duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (duteinh.et.tudelft.nl [130.161.42.1]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.2/WV2.0g) with ESMTP id NAA23452 for ; Wed, 12 Jan 2000 13:39:48 -0800 (PST) Received: from kalman by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id WAA11930; Wed, 12 Jan 2000 22:38:30 +0100 (MET) Date: Wed, 12 Jan 2000 22:38:30 +0100 (MET) From: Erik Mouw X-Face: "!Z|1XjFg!3Iw)BwM^M\k)J5KHiPddz}#/Zw%?$&Q!xqob"OA|})3_@&BTTiQERo?/^g[Z<9P4R8:5C:aqq.cw!hotLc=+u-"+1rq@9$V^8PbOUlodyi_sejt+D`iqkLpx$>.aXl%vnfPIt"LK|/%>94_Zrm8jy?`_[RKt'TuoxUxfk(gMhY(n|DBBl~c$dhO>G%6}R4+DGX3|idBm4oU&UM/XUP4I9aoN{]`ax%B?rgD(I3OJ<62Y6L Subject: Re: diff-2.3.35-rmk1-np5 In-reply-to: <200001121035.LAA07868@duteinh.et.tudelft.nl> Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com To: nico@CAM.ORG Cc: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com, J.D.Bakker@its.tudelft.nl Message-id: <200001122138.WAA11930@duteinh.et.tudelft.nl> Organization: Eric conspiracy secret labs MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: XCmail 1.0.0 - with PGP support, PGP engine version 0.5 (Linux) Content-type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-transfer-encoding: 8bit Precedence: bulk X-Loop: erik@it.et.tudelft.nl X-Mailerorigin: http://www.fsai.fh-trier.de/~schmitzj/Xclasses/XCmail/ X-Eric-Conspiracy: There is no conspiracy! On Wed, 12 Jan 2000 11:35:04 +0100 (MET), Erik Mouw wrote: > On Tue, 11 Jan 2000 23:07:18 -0500 (EST), Nicolas Pitre wrote: >> This one should be bootable on a LART too. Tell me guys if it works. > > It compiles without problems. I'm going to test it tonight (if I remember > the root password for the programming PC correctly). I got the root password, but linux-2.3.35 doesn't run on LART. Here is the oops (blob is our bootloader[1]): blob> status Bootloader : blob Version : 1.0.0 Running from : external flash Blocksize : 0x00800000 Download speed: 115200 baud Kernel : downloaded, 465524 bytes Ramdisk : from flash blob> boot Starting kernel ... Uncompressing Linux..................................... done, booting the kernel. Linux version 2.3.35-rmk1-np5 (erikm@besson.et.tudelft.nl) (gcc version 2.95.2 19991024 (release)) #1 Wed Jan 12 10:26:56 CET 2000 On node 0 totalpages: 00000800 zone(0): 2048 pages. zone(1): 0 pages. zone(2): 0 pages. On node 1 totalpages: 00000800 zone(0): 2048 pages. zone(1): 0 pages. zone(2): 0 pages. Calibrating delay loop... 208.08 BogoMIPS Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual address 00000004 pgd = c0004000 *pgd = c016e001, *pmd = c016e001, *pte = c016d08b, *ppte = c016d00a Internal error: Oops: 0 CPU: 0 pc : [] lr : [] sp : c0103f44 ip : c010b2fc fp : c0103f74 r10: ffffffff r9 : 663c0000 r8 : 00000014 r7 : 00000000 r6 : 1061663d r5 : c01b2834 r4 : 00000000 r3 : 600000d3 r2 : ea0000ce r1 : 00000040 r0 : 00079f88 Flags: nZCv IRQs off FIQs off Mode SVC_32 Segment kernel Control: C000517D Table: C000517D DAC: 0000001D Process swapper (pid: 0, stackpage=c0103000) Stack: c0103f20: c002f4b0 c00307c8 600000d3 c0103f40: ffffffff 00000040 0830b31e c01b2834 00000000 00001000 c01123f8 00000270 c0103f60: 00001800 00000001 c0103fa0 c0103f78 c002f4b0 c00306b0 00000000 c011245c c0103f80: 00068310 00000008 c010b2f4 000001a0 c010b524 c0103fb0 c0103fa4 c002f6c8 c0103fa0: c002f3d0 c0103fe4 c0103fb4 c0011e58 c002f6a4 000000d0 000003db 00000000 c0103fc0: c016922c c0162aa4 c0162af0 c010498c 4401a119 c00085f8 c0103ffc c0103fe8 c0103fe0: c000a5e0 c0011d88 c01049cc c016922c 00000000 c0104000 c0008080 c000a544 Backtrace: Function entered at [] from [] Function entered at [] from [] Function entered at [] from [] Function entered at [] from [] Function entered at [] from [] r4 = C016922C Code: e5942004 e06a2002 (e5842004) ea00003e c010b2fc Kernel panic: Attempted to kill the idle task! In swapper task - not syncing With a quickly hacked-up cross-ksymoops[2] I can track down the oops at: erikm@inpc48:~> arm-linux-ksymoops -v vmlinux -m System.map -t arm-linux -K -L -O oops.log ksymoops 2.3.3 on i586 2.2.5-15. Options used -v vmlinux (specified) -K (specified) -L (specified) -O (specified) -m System.map (specified) -t arm-linux Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual address 00000004 *pgd = c016e001, *pmd = c016e001, *pte = c016d08b, *ppte = c016d00a Internal error: Oops: 0 CPU: 0 pc : [] lr : [] Using defaults from ksymoops -a unknown sp : c0103f44 ip : c010b2fc fp : c0103f74 r10: ffffffff r9 : 663c0000 r8 : 00000014 Warning (Oops_set_i370_regs): garbage 'r9 : 663c0000 r8 : 00000014' at end of i370 register line ignored r7 : 00000000 r6 : 1061663d r5 : c01b2834 r4 : 00000000 r3 : 600000d3 r2 : ea0000ce r1 : 00000040 r0 : 00079f88 Flags: nZCv IRQs off FIQs off Mode SVC_32 Segment kernel Control: C000517D Table: C000517D DAC: 0000001D Process swapper (pid: 0, stackpage=c0103000) Stack: c0103f20: c002f4b0 c00307c8 600000d3 c0103f40: ffffffff 00000040 0830b31e c01b2834 00000000 00001000 c01123f8 00000270 c0103f60: 00001800 00000001 c0103fa0 c0103f78 c002f4b0 c00306b0 00000000 c011245c c0103f80: 00068310 00000008 c010b2f4 000001a0 c010b524 c0103fb0 c0103fa4 c002f6c8 c0103fa0: c002f3d0 c0103fe4 c0103fb4 c0011e58 c002f6a4 000000d0 000003db 00000000 c0103fc0: c016922c c0162aa4 c0162af0 c010498c 4401a119 c00085f8 c0103ffc c0103fe8 c0103fe0: c000a5e0 c0011d88 c01049cc c016922c 00000000 c0104000 c0008080 c000a544 Backtrace: Function entered at [] from [] Function entered at [] from [] Function entered at [] from [] Function entered at [] from [] Function entered at [] from [] r4 = C016922C Code: e5942004 e06a2002 (e5842004) ea00003e c010b2fc Error (Oops_bfd_perror): /tmp/fileymyZmg Invalid bfd target >>PC; c00307c8 <__free_pages_ok+124/2a4> <===== >>r10; ffffffff Trace; c00306a4 <__free_pages_ok+0/2a4> Trace; c002f4b0 Trace; c002f3c4 Trace; c002f6c8 Trace; c002f698 Trace; c0011e58 Trace; c0011d7c Trace; c000a5e0 Trace; c000a538 Trace; c0008080 <__mmap_switched+0/30> Kernel panic: Attempted to kill the idle task! In swapper task - not syncing 1 warning and 1 error issued. Results may not be reliable. Okay, my ksymoops hack is not completely perfect, but the function addresses can be trusted (I checked them by hand). I don't think __free_pages_ok() is the real source of the oops, I expect the bug to be somewhere in setup.c. LART is a bit special in its memory layout because it doesn't use A23, so we get 4 8MB chunks in two banks. The memory layout is (IIRC): bank 0, chunk 0: 0xc0000000 - 0xc0800000 (8MB) bank 0, chunk 1: 0xc1000000 - 0xc1800000 (8MB) bank 1, chunk 0: 0xc8000000 - 0xc8800000 (8MB) bank 1, chunk 1: 0xc9000000 - 0xc9800000 (8MB) The kernel output shows 2 zones with 2048 pages each, which makes a total of 2 * 2048 * 4 / 1024 = 16MB -- only half of the available memory. I don't know where to start debugging because I don't know how the memory setup is supposed to work. Maybe that you (or Jan-Derk) have a clue? Erik [1] Blob is free, see http://www-ict.its.tudelft.nl/~erik/open-source/blob/ [2] Link with libbfd.a and libiberty.a from the cross-compiler binutils, change nm in arm-linux-nm and objdump in arm-linux-objdump and you're set. Sort of. -- LART. 250 MIPS under one Watt. http://www-ict.its.tudelft.nl/~erik/open-source/LART/ From kramer@pa.dec.com Wed Jan 12 23:32:28 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id XAA12231; Wed, 12 Jan 2000 23:32:28 +0100 (MET) Received: from ns2.tudelft.nl (ns2.tudelft.nl [130.161.180.65]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.8.6 (PHNE_17135)/8.8.6) with ESMTP id XAA19200 for ; Wed, 12 Jan 2000 23:32:28 +0100 (MET) Received: from mail1.digital.com (mail1.digital.com [204.123.2.50]) by mailhost1.tudelft.nl (PMDF V5.2-32 #42432) with ESMTP id <0FO800JSSUM2L7@mailhost1.tudelft.nl> for J.A.K.Mouw@its.tudelft.nl; Wed, 12 Jan 2000 23:32:27 +0100 (MET) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.2/WV2.0g) with SMTP id OAA26770; Wed, 12 Jan 2000 14:25:31 -0800 (PST) Received: from rex.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA00925; Wed, 12 Jan 2000 14:25:26 -0800 Received: by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id OAA24191; Wed, 12 Jan 2000 14:23:33 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id OAA24184; Wed, 12 Jan 2000 14:23:30 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail2.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA31354; Wed, 12 Jan 2000 14:23:30 -0800 Received: from xanadu.vipswitch.com (generic199.197.205.205.in-addr.arpa [205.205.197.199] (may be forged)) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.2/WV2.0g) with ESMTP id OAA08594 for ; Wed, 12 Jan 2000 14:23:29 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 12 Jan 2000 17:09:51 -0500 (EST) From: Nicolas Pitre Subject: Re: diff-2.3.35-rmk1-np5 In-reply-to: <200001122138.WAA11930@duteinh.et.tudelft.nl> Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com To: Erik Mouw Cc: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com, J.D.Bakker@its.tudelft.nl Message-id: MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Precedence: bulk On Wed, 12 Jan 2000, Erik Mouw wrote: > On Wed, 12 Jan 2000 11:35:04 +0100 (MET), Erik Mouw wrote: > > On Tue, 11 Jan 2000 23:07:18 -0500 (EST), Nicolas Pitre wrote: > >> This one should be bootable on a LART too. Tell me guys if it works. > > > > It compiles without problems. I'm going to test it tonight (if I remember > > the root password for the programming PC correctly). > > I got the root password, but linux-2.3.35 doesn't run on LART. Here is the [...] > I don't think __free_pages_ok() is the real source of the oops, I expect > the bug to be somewhere in setup.c. LART is a bit special in its memory > layout because it doesn't use A23, so we get 4 8MB chunks in two banks. > The memory layout is (IIRC): > > bank 0, chunk 0: 0xc0000000 - 0xc0800000 (8MB) > bank 0, chunk 1: 0xc1000000 - 0xc1800000 (8MB) > bank 1, chunk 0: 0xc8000000 - 0xc8800000 (8MB) > bank 1, chunk 1: 0xc9000000 - 0xc9800000 (8MB) In arch/arm/kernel/setup.c, setup_bootmem() [the one with defined(CONFIG_DISCONTIGMEM)], the code should find out the first and last page of a given node. This is probably where the bug is. Note that SA1100 banks becomes nodes, and chunks are declared as banks in the code. You should get (0xc1800000-0xc0000000)/4096 pages for each node, but the hole in between will be marked as reserved. You can try commenting out the second memory chunk of each SA1100 bank in arch/arm/mm/mm-sa1100, just to see the difference. Nicolas From kramer@pa.dec.com Thu Jan 13 04:10:05 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id EAA13824; Thu, 13 Jan 2000 04:10:05 +0100 (MET) Received: from ns2.tudelft.nl (ns2.tudelft.nl [130.161.180.65]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.8.6 (PHNE_17135)/8.8.6) with ESMTP id EAA22932 for ; Thu, 13 Jan 2000 04:10:05 +0100 (MET) Received: from mail2.digital.com (mail2.digital.com [204.123.2.56]) by mailhost1.tudelft.nl (PMDF V5.2-32 #42432) with ESMTP id <0FO9003AG7GR77@mailhost1.tudelft.nl> for J.A.K.Mouw@its.tudelft.nl; Thu, 13 Jan 2000 04:10:04 +0100 (MET) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.2/WV2.0g) with SMTP id TAA28028; Wed, 12 Jan 2000 19:02:53 -0800 (PST) Received: from rex.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA26278; Wed, 12 Jan 2000 19:00:02 -0800 Received: by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id SAA24921; Wed, 12 Jan 2000 18:57:39 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id SAA24916; Wed, 12 Jan 2000 18:57:37 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail2.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA12240; Wed, 12 Jan 2000 18:57:37 -0800 Received: from mxout1.cac.washington.edu (mxout1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.5]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.2/WV2.0g) with ESMTP id SAA27172 for ; Wed, 12 Jan 2000 18:57:37 -0800 (PST) Received: from mailhost1.u.washington.edu (mailhost1.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.2]) by mxout1.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.09/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id SAA15702 for ; Wed, 12 Jan 2000 18:57:36 -0800 Received: from cs.washington.edu (cs304-12.spmodem.washington.edu [140.142.171.115]) by mailhost1.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.09/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id SAA22745 for ; Wed, 12 Jan 2000 18:57:35 -0800 Date: Wed, 12 Jan 2000 18:52:50 -0800 From: Collin K Murphy Subject: problem with linux 2.2.12 Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com To: SA-1100/Linux Reply-to: ckmurphy@cs.washington.edu Message-id: <387D3E02.F2733534@cs.washington.edu> Organization: University of Washington MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.7 [en] (Win98; U) Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk X-Accept-Language: en I am trying to upgrade from linux 2.2.2 to 2.2.12 on my brutus board. I had 2.2.2 working (and it still works), but I am unable to get 2.2.12 working. I am using the following patches: diff-2.2.12-rmk1-np12.gz patch-2.2.12-rmk1.gz I issues the 'make brutus_config' and 'make config' commands accepting all defaults and the kernel builds without any errors. When I download to the board, I get no output on the serial line. If I go back and download the 2.2.2 kernel, everything is fine. Am I missing something in the 2.2.12 configuration? Collin From kramer@pa.dec.com Thu Jan 13 07:31:54 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id HAA14792; Thu, 13 Jan 2000 07:31:53 +0100 (MET) Received: from ns2.tudelft.nl (ns2.tudelft.nl [130.161.180.65]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.8.6 (PHNE_17135)/8.8.6) with ESMTP id HAA24390 for ; Thu, 13 Jan 2000 07:31:53 +0100 (MET) Received: from mail1.digital.com (mail1.digital.com [204.123.2.50]) by mailhost1.tudelft.nl (PMDF V5.2-32 #42432) with ESMTP id <0FO9005HIGT3Q8@mailhost1.tudelft.nl> for J.A.K.Mouw@its.tudelft.nl; Thu, 13 Jan 2000 07:31:52 +0100 (MET) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.2/WV2.0g) with SMTP id WAA26555; Wed, 12 Jan 2000 22:25:08 -0800 (PST) Received: from rex.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA16570; Wed, 12 Jan 2000 22:24:57 -0800 Received: by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id WAA25451; Wed, 12 Jan 2000 22:21:54 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id WAA25464; Wed, 12 Jan 2000 22:21:52 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail1.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA18948; Wed, 12 Jan 2000 22:21:52 -0800 Received: from web1204.mail.yahoo.com (web1204.mail.yahoo.com [128.11.23.140]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.2/WV2.0g) with SMTP id WAA26528 for ; Wed, 12 Jan 2000 22:21:51 -0800 (PST) Received: (qmail 29205 invoked by uid 60001); Thu, 13 Jan 2000 06:21:06 +0000 Received: from [192.11.222.101] by web1204.mail.yahoo.com; Wed, 12 Jan 2000 22:21:06 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 12 Jan 2000 22:21:06 -0800 (PST) From: wolf Subject: Somebody can give me a archive of this mailing list Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com To: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Message-id: <20000113062106.29204.qmail@web1204.mail.yahoo.com> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Precedence: bulk Hi, I am a newbie and got a brutus board and want to participating development of arm-linux. I have so many questions. I think I should browse all the old emails before asking. Somebody can give me any hints where to get the archive of this mailing list? Or somebody can email his own archive to me? Your help is appriciated. Thanks in advance. wolf __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Talk to your friends online with Yahoo! Messenger. http://im.yahoo.com From kramer@pa.dec.com Thu Jan 13 09:03:23 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id JAA15417; Thu, 13 Jan 2000 09:03:23 +0100 (MET) Received: from ns2.tudelft.nl (ns2.tudelft.nl [130.161.180.65]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.8.6 (PHNE_17135)/8.8.6) with ESMTP id JAA25330 for ; Thu, 13 Jan 2000 09:03:22 +0100 (MET) Received: from mail1.digital.com (mail1.digital.com [204.123.2.50]) by mailhost1.tudelft.nl (PMDF V5.2-32 #42432) with ESMTP id <0FO90082SL1KHM@mailhost1.tudelft.nl> for J.A.K.Mouw@its.tudelft.nl; Thu, 13 Jan 2000 09:03:21 +0100 (MET) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.2/WV2.0g) with SMTP id XAA31005; Wed, 12 Jan 2000 23:57:15 -0800 (PST) Received: from rex.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA09570; Wed, 12 Jan 2000 23:57:08 -0800 Received: by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id XAA25731; Wed, 12 Jan 2000 23:56:20 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id XAA24386; Wed, 12 Jan 2000 23:56:18 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail1.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA01483; Wed, 12 Jan 2000 23:56:18 -0800 Received: from mailboy.huawei.com.cn ([202.96.135.134]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.2/WV2.0g) with ESMTP id XAA30873 for ; Wed, 12 Jan 2000 23:56:02 -0800 (PST) Received: from w15060 ([10.11.48.31]) by mailboy.huawei.com.cn (Netscape Mail Server v2.02) with SMTP id AAA3659 for ; Thu, 13 Jan 2000 15:48:10 +0800 Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2000 15:52:18 +0800 From: Jun Wu Subject: sa1100-brutus Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com To: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Message-id: <003101bf5d9b$1db3cd20$1f300b0a@w15060.huawei.com.cn> MIME-version: 1.0 X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.3110.3 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 4.72.3110.5 Content-type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-priority: Normal Precedence: bulk Hi all, I'm new of sa1100-brutus and sorry my question doesn't concerning linux. I want my application (uHAL demo leds.axf) to be directly booted when brutus power on. I use fmu to download the image to flash. >rom >program 0 boot leds.axf 0 But error occurs. 'ERROR: image base address is in ROM but does not match address of flash block Image base address = 0x80000c0 Expected start of image = 0x??fffc00c0' What' wrong? What should I do? BR Jun From kramer@pa.dec.com Thu Jan 13 12:53:48 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id MAA17181; Thu, 13 Jan 2000 12:53:47 +0100 (MET) Received: from ns2.tudelft.nl (ns2.tudelft.nl [130.161.180.65]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.8.6 (PHNE_17135)/8.8.6) with ESMTP id MAA01732 for ; Thu, 13 Jan 2000 12:53:47 +0100 (MET) Received: from mail2.digital.com (mail2.digital.com [204.123.2.56]) by mailhost1.tudelft.nl (PMDF V5.2-32 #42432) with ESMTP id <0FO900KQ9VPLOT@mailhost1.tudelft.nl> for J.A.K.Mouw@its.tudelft.nl; Thu, 13 Jan 2000 12:53:46 +0100 (MET) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.2/WV2.0g) with SMTP id DAA24103; Thu, 13 Jan 2000 03:47:56 -0800 (PST) Received: from rex.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA06722; Thu, 13 Jan 2000 03:47:44 -0800 Received: by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id DAA26319; Thu, 13 Jan 2000 03:46:32 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id DAA26299; Thu, 13 Jan 2000 03:46:30 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail1.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA02871; Thu, 13 Jan 2000 03:46:29 -0800 Received: from salisbury.labs.futuretv.com (salisbury.futuretv.com [194.216.164.17]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.2/WV2.0g) with ESMTP id DAA13018 for ; Thu, 13 Jan 2000 03:46:29 -0800 (PST) Received: from zebra.labs.futuretv.com ([192.0.0.67] ident=mail) by salisbury.labs.futuretv.com with esmtp (Exim 3.03 #1) id 128ijC-0004Ih-00 for sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com; Thu, 13 Jan 2000 11:47:46 +0000 Received: from [192.0.0.21] (helo=fountain.labs.futuretv.com ident=mail) by zebra.labs.futuretv.com with esmtp (Exim 3.03 #1) id 128ihp-0000qG-00; Thu, 13 Jan 2000 11:46:21 +0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=fountain ident=pb) by fountain.labs.futuretv.com with esmtp (Exim 3.03 #1) id 128ihp-0006fQ-00; Thu, 13 Jan 2000 11:46:21 +0000 Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2000 11:46:21 +0000 From: Philip Blundell Subject: Re: Somebody can give me a archive of this mailing list In-reply-to: Message from wolf "of Wed, 12 Jan 2000 22:21:06 PST." <20000113062106.29204.qmail@web1204.mail.yahoo.com> Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com To: wolf Cc: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Message-id: MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: exmh version 2.0.2 2/24/98 (debian) Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Precedence: bulk References: <20000113062106.29204.qmail@web1204.mail.yahoo.com> >I think I should browse all the old emails before >asking. Somebody can give me any hints where to get >the archive of this mailing list? Or somebody can >email his own archive to me? Your help is appriciated. Actually, I'm not sure that there is any archive. I could try to get one set up at armlinux.org if this is the case, though of course that wouldn't help with old messages. p. From kramer@pa.dec.com Thu Jan 13 14:05:00 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id OAA17635; Thu, 13 Jan 2000 14:05:00 +0100 (MET) Received: from ns2.tudelft.nl (ns2.tudelft.nl [130.161.180.65]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.8.6 (PHNE_17135)/8.8.6) with ESMTP id OAA05090 for ; Thu, 13 Jan 2000 14:05:00 +0100 (MET) Received: from mail2.digital.com (mail2.digital.com [204.123.2.56]) by mailhost1.tudelft.nl (PMDF V5.2-32 #42432) with ESMTP id <0FO90039HZ0963@mailhost1.tudelft.nl> for J.A.K.Mouw@its.tudelft.nl; Thu, 13 Jan 2000 14:04:58 +0100 (MET) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.2/WV2.0g) with SMTP id EAA28010; Thu, 13 Jan 2000 04:58:05 -0800 (PST) Received: from rex.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA32340; Thu, 13 Jan 2000 04:56:43 -0800 Received: by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id EAA26529; Thu, 13 Jan 2000 04:55:47 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id EAA26532; Thu, 13 Jan 2000 04:55:44 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail1.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA24769; Thu, 13 Jan 2000 04:55:44 -0800 Received: from orange.zav.starlab.net (extsrv.starlab.net [195.171.37.194]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.2/WV2.0g) with ESMTP id EAA15300 for ; Thu, 13 Jan 2000 04:55:43 -0800 (PST) Received: from downtown.ett.starlab.net (root@[212.8.177.17]) by orange.zav.starlab.net (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id NAA10652; Thu, 13 Jan 2000 13:56:04 +0100 Received: from wonderland.ett.starlab.net (wonderland.ett.starlab.net [212.8.177.19]) by downtown.ett.starlab.net (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id NAA16881; Thu, 13 Jan 2000 13:55:40 +0100 Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2000 13:55:39 +0100 (CET) From: Ivo Clarysse Subject: Re: Somebody can give me a archive of this mailing list In-reply-to: <20000113062106.29204.qmail@web1204.mail.yahoo.com> Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com X-Sender: soggie@wonderland.ett.starlab.net To: wolf Cc: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Message-id: MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Precedence: bulk On Wed, 12 Jan 2000, wolf wrote: > Hi, > > I am a newbie and got a brutus board and want to > participating development of arm-linux. I have so many > questions. > > I think I should browse all the old emails before > asking. Somebody can give me any hints where to get > the archive of this mailing list? Or somebody can > email his own archive to me? Your help is appriciated. I've put my sa1100-linux mailbox available on ftp://ftp.starlab.net/pub/people/soggie/sa1100-linux-30oct98-12jan00.bz2 It contains all sa1100-linux mails from 30 oct 1998 to 12 jan 2000. Ivo. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Ivo Clarysse TEL +32-2-7400788 FAX +32-2-7429654 Research Scientist Starlab - http://www.starlab.org/ PGP ID: 0x50154325 // A0A0 EDBC 37B2 C574 CC4D F1F0 FF94 04B9 5015 4325 From kramer@pa.dec.com Thu Jan 13 16:28:57 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id QAA18549; Thu, 13 Jan 2000 16:28:56 +0100 (MET) Received: from ns2.tudelft.nl (ns2.tudelft.nl [130.161.180.65]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.8.6 (PHNE_17135)/8.8.6) with ESMTP id QAA09480 for ; Thu, 13 Jan 2000 16:28:55 +0100 (MET) Received: from mail1.digital.com (mail1.digital.com [204.123.2.50]) by mailhost1.tudelft.nl (PMDF V5.2-32 #42432) with ESMTP id <0FOA00CVT5O5KZ@mailhost1.tudelft.nl> for J.A.K.Mouw@its.tudelft.nl; Thu, 13 Jan 2000 16:28:54 +0100 (MET) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.2/WV2.0g) with SMTP id HAA26675; Thu, 13 Jan 2000 07:23:26 -0800 (PST) Received: from rex.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA26764; Thu, 13 Jan 2000 07:23:16 -0800 Received: by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id HAA26975; Thu, 13 Jan 2000 07:22:32 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id HAA26939; Thu, 13 Jan 2000 07:22:30 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail1.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA18772; Thu, 13 Jan 2000 07:22:30 -0800 Received: from xanadu.vipswitch.com (generic199.197.205.205.in-addr.arpa [205.205.197.199] (may be forged)) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.2/WV2.0g) with ESMTP id HAA27462 for ; Thu, 13 Jan 2000 07:22:29 -0800 (PST) Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2000 10:13:53 -0500 (EST) From: Nicolas Pitre Subject: Re: problem with linux 2.2.12 In-reply-to: <387D3E02.F2733534@cs.washington.edu> Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com To: Collin K Murphy Cc: SA-1100/Linux Message-id: MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Precedence: bulk Please try 2.2.13-rmk2-np14 and see if you get something out of the second serial port. On Wed, 12 Jan 2000, Collin K Murphy wrote: > I am trying to upgrade from linux 2.2.2 to 2.2.12 on my brutus board. > > I had 2.2.2 working (and it still works), but I am unable to get 2.2.12 > working. I am using the following patches: > diff-2.2.12-rmk1-np12.gz > patch-2.2.12-rmk1.gz > > I issues the 'make brutus_config' and 'make config' commands accepting all > defaults and the kernel builds without any errors. When I download to the > board, I get no output on the serial line. If I go back and download the > 2.2.2 kernel, everything is fine. > > Am I missing something in the 2.2.12 configuration? > > Collin > From kramer@pa.dec.com Thu Jan 13 18:17:34 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id SAA19139; Thu, 13 Jan 2000 18:17:33 +0100 (MET) Received: from ns2.tudelft.nl (ns2.tudelft.nl [130.161.180.65]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.8.6 (PHNE_17135)/8.8.6) with ESMTP id SAA12337 for ; Thu, 13 Jan 2000 18:17:33 +0100 (MET) Received: from mail1.digital.com (mail1.digital.com [204.123.2.50]) by mailhost1.tudelft.nl (PMDF V5.2-32 #42432) with ESMTP id <0FOA00JLOAP26M@mailhost1.tudelft.nl> for J.A.K.Mouw@its.tudelft.nl; Thu, 13 Jan 2000 18:17:31 +0100 (MET) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.2/WV2.0g) with SMTP id JAA04751; Thu, 13 Jan 2000 09:08:17 -0800 (PST) Received: from rex.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA32522; Thu, 13 Jan 2000 09:08:02 -0800 Received: by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id JAA27257; Thu, 13 Jan 2000 09:07:23 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id JAA27276; Thu, 13 Jan 2000 09:07:20 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail1.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA01222; Thu, 13 Jan 2000 09:07:20 -0800 Received: from nt_server.flatpanels.com (flatpanels.com [207.196.69.66]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.2/WV2.0g) with ESMTP id JAA04569 for ; Thu, 13 Jan 2000 09:07:19 -0800 (PST) Received: by flatpanels.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2448.0) id ; Thu, 13 Jan 2000 12:08:50 -0500 Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2000 12:08:43 -0500 From: "Saxena, Nikita" Subject: Problems compiling kernel Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com To: "'sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com'" Message-id: <3134CD6A0FB3D311A45600105AC9863A015580@flatpanels.com> MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2448.0) Content-type: text/plain Precedence: bulk Greetings, I'm trying to build the ARM-linux kernel ( 2.0.30 version of the port) for the Brutus board on a pentium/linux machine. While I was able to fix a couple of compiler errors that I came across, I finally get a whole slew of them related to lib.a some of which are as follows: arch/arm/lib/lib.a(traps-armv.o)(.text + 0xf94): undefined reference to '_do bottom_half' arch/arm/lib/lib.a(traps-armv.o)(.text + 0xf94): relocation truncated to fit: R_ARM_PC24 _do bottom_half Does anyone know what this means? Thanks, Nikita From kramer@pa.dec.com Thu Jan 13 18:33:05 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id SAA19210; Thu, 13 Jan 2000 18:33:05 +0100 (MET) Received: from ns2.tudelft.nl (ns2.tudelft.nl [130.161.180.65]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.8.6 (PHNE_17135)/8.8.6) with ESMTP id SAA12580 for ; Thu, 13 Jan 2000 18:33:04 +0100 (MET) Received: from mail1.digital.com (mail1.digital.com [204.123.2.50]) by mailhost1.tudelft.nl (PMDF V5.2-32 #42432) with ESMTP id <0FOA00JO1BF1S5@mailhost1.tudelft.nl> for J.A.K.Mouw@its.tudelft.nl; Thu, 13 Jan 2000 18:33:02 +0100 (MET) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.2/WV2.0g) with SMTP id JAA06590; Thu, 13 Jan 2000 09:27:39 -0800 (PST) Received: from rex.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA32304; Thu, 13 Jan 2000 09:27:34 -0800 Received: by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id JAA27315; Thu, 13 Jan 2000 09:27:16 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id JAA27280; Thu, 13 Jan 2000 09:27:14 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail2.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA09338; Thu, 13 Jan 2000 09:27:14 -0800 Received: from xanadu.vipswitch.com (generic199.197.205.205.in-addr.arpa [205.205.197.199] (may be forged)) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.2/WV2.0g) with ESMTP id JAA17989 for ; Thu, 13 Jan 2000 09:27:13 -0800 (PST) Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2000 12:19:34 -0500 (EST) From: Nicolas Pitre Subject: Re: Problems compiling kernel In-reply-to: <3134CD6A0FB3D311A45600105AC9863A015580@flatpanels.com> Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com To: "Saxena, Nikita" Cc: "'sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com'" Message-id: MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Precedence: bulk Please look at 2.2.13 or 2.3.35 patches from ftp.cam.org/users/n/nico. They also require RMK patches from ftp.arm.linux.org.uk/pub/armlinux/source/kernel... (the patch might not be exact). 2.0.30 is quite old and likely to be unsupported. On Thu, 13 Jan 2000, Saxena, Nikita wrote: > > Greetings, > > I'm trying to build the ARM-linux kernel ( 2.0.30 version of the port) for > the Brutus board on a pentium/linux machine. While I was able to fix a > couple of compiler errors that I came across, I finally get a whole slew of > them related to lib.a some of which are as follows: > > arch/arm/lib/lib.a(traps-armv.o)(.text + 0xf94): undefined reference to '_do > bottom_half' > > arch/arm/lib/lib.a(traps-armv.o)(.text + 0xf94): relocation truncated to > fit: R_ARM_PC24 _do bottom_half > > Does anyone know what this means? > > Thanks, > Nikita > From kramer@pa.dec.com Thu Jan 13 20:05:11 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id UAA19648; Thu, 13 Jan 2000 20:05:11 +0100 (MET) Received: from ns2.tudelft.nl (ns2.tudelft.nl [130.161.180.65]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.8.6 (PHNE_17135)/8.8.6) with ESMTP id UAA14098 for ; Thu, 13 Jan 2000 20:05:10 +0100 (MET) Received: from mail1.digital.com (mail1.digital.com [204.123.2.50]) by mailhost1.tudelft.nl (PMDF V5.2-32 #42432) with ESMTP id <0FOA0005JFOKHX@mailhost1.tudelft.nl> for J.A.K.Mouw@its.tudelft.nl; Thu, 13 Jan 2000 20:05:09 +0100 (MET) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.2/WV2.0g) with SMTP id KAA10500; Thu, 13 Jan 2000 10:59:25 -0800 (PST) Received: from rex.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA13474; Thu, 13 Jan 2000 10:59:18 -0800 Received: by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id KAA27622; Thu, 13 Jan 2000 10:58:41 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id KAA27660; Thu, 13 Jan 2000 10:58:39 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail1.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA14005; Thu, 13 Jan 2000 10:58:39 -0800 Received: from xanadu.vipswitch.com (generic199.197.205.205.in-addr.arpa [205.205.197.199] (may be forged)) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.2/WV2.0g) with ESMTP id KAA14539 for ; Thu, 13 Jan 2000 10:58:35 -0800 (PST) Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2000 13:50:46 -0500 (EST) From: Nicolas Pitre Subject: Re: Problems compiling kernel In-reply-to: Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com To: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Message-id: MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Precedence: bulk On Thu, 13 Jan 2000, Nicolas Pitre wrote: > Please look at 2.2.13 or 2.3.35 patches from ftp.cam.org/users/n/nico. Sorry, I mean ftp.netwinder.org here... Nicolas From kramer@pa.dec.com Thu Jan 13 20:24:49 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id UAA19757; Thu, 13 Jan 2000 20:24:48 +0100 (MET) Received: from ns2.tudelft.nl (ns2.tudelft.nl [130.161.180.65]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.8.6 (PHNE_17135)/8.8.6) with ESMTP id UAA14477 for ; Thu, 13 Jan 2000 20:24:47 +0100 (MET) Received: from mail1.digital.com (mail1.digital.com [204.123.2.50]) by mailhost1.tudelft.nl (PMDF V5.2-32 #42432) with ESMTP id <0FOA000JPGL9HX@mailhost1.tudelft.nl> for J.A.K.Mouw@its.tudelft.nl; Thu, 13 Jan 2000 20:24:46 +0100 (MET) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.2/WV2.0g) with SMTP id LAA15750; Thu, 13 Jan 2000 11:19:24 -0800 (PST) Received: from rex.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA08742; Thu, 13 Jan 2000 11:19:22 -0800 Received: by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id LAA27716; Thu, 13 Jan 2000 11:19:09 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id LAA27719; Thu, 13 Jan 2000 11:19:07 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail2.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA06138; Thu, 13 Jan 2000 11:19:07 -0800 Received: from nt_server.flatpanels.com (flatpanels.com [207.196.69.66]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.2/WV2.0g) with ESMTP id LAA28770 for ; Thu, 13 Jan 2000 11:19:05 -0800 (PST) Received: by NT_SERVER_2 with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2448.0) id ; Thu, 13 Jan 2000 14:20:36 -0500 Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2000 14:20:34 -0500 From: "Saxena, Nikita" Subject: ARM Linux kernels Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com To: "'sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com'" Message-id: <3134CD6A0FB3D311A45600105AC9863A015584@NT_SERVER_2> MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2448.0) Content-type: text/plain Precedence: bulk Hi, Does anyone know where I can find ARM/Linux kernels for the Brutus board 2.2.13 or 2.3.35? Thanks, Nikita From kramer@pa.dec.com Thu Jan 13 21:02:39 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id VAA19933; Thu, 13 Jan 2000 21:02:39 +0100 (MET) Received: from ns2.tudelft.nl (ns2.tudelft.nl [130.161.180.65]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.8.6 (PHNE_17135)/8.8.6) with ESMTP id VAA15067 for ; Thu, 13 Jan 2000 21:02:38 +0100 (MET) Received: from mail2.digital.com (mail2.digital.com [204.123.2.56]) by mailhost1.tudelft.nl (PMDF V5.2-32 #42432) with ESMTP id <0FOA001LOICCTS@mailhost1.tudelft.nl> for J.A.K.Mouw@its.tudelft.nl; Thu, 13 Jan 2000 21:02:37 +0100 (MET) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.2/WV2.0g) with SMTP id LAA00860; Thu, 13 Jan 2000 11:57:09 -0800 (PST) Received: from rex.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA04619; Thu, 13 Jan 2000 11:57:07 -0800 Received: by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id LAA27821; Thu, 13 Jan 2000 11:56:53 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id LAA27808; Thu, 13 Jan 2000 11:56:50 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail2.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA23420; Thu, 13 Jan 2000 11:56:50 -0800 Received: from duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (duteinh.et.tudelft.nl [130.161.42.1]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.2/WV2.0g) with ESMTP id LAA00730 for ; Thu, 13 Jan 2000 11:56:49 -0800 (PST) Received: from kalman by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id UAA19880; Thu, 13 Jan 2000 20:55:26 +0100 (MET) Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2000 20:55:26 +0100 (MET) From: Erik Mouw X-Face: "!Z|1XjFg!3Iw)BwM^M\k)J5KHiPddz}#/Zw%?$&Q!xqob"OA|})3_@&BTTiQERo?/^g[Z<9P4R8:5C:aqq.cw!hotLc=+u-"+1rq@9$V^8PbOUlodyi_sejt+D`iqkLpx$>.aXl%vnfPIt"LK|/%>94_Zrm8jy?`_[RKt'TuoxUxfk(gMhY(n|DBBl~c$dhO>G%6}R4+DGX3|idBm4oU&UM/XUP4I9aoN{]`ax%B?rgD(I3OJ<62Y6L Subject: Re: ARM Linux kernels In-reply-to: <3134CD6A0FB3D311A45600105AC9863A015584@NT_SERVER_2> Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com To: nsaxena@flatpanels.com Cc: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Message-id: <200001131955.UAA19880@duteinh.et.tudelft.nl> Organization: Eric conspiracy secret labs MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: XCmail 1.0.0 - with PGP support, PGP engine version 0.5 (Linux) Content-type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-transfer-encoding: 8bit Precedence: bulk X-Loop: erik@it.et.tudelft.nl X-Mailerorigin: http://www.fsai.fh-trier.de/~schmitzj/Xclasses/XCmail/ X-Eric-Conspiracy: There is no conspiracy! On Thu, 13 Jan 2000 14:20:34 -0500, Saxena, Nikita wrote: > Does anyone know where I can find ARM/Linux kernels for the Brutus board > 2.2.13 or 2.3.35? Get linux 2.2.13 and 2.3.35 from your favorite kernel.org mirror. Get Russel King's ArmLinux patches from: ftp://ftp.arm.linux.org.uk/pub/armlinux/kernel-sources/v2.2/ ftp://ftp.arm.linux.org.uk/pub/armlinux/kernel-sources/v2.3/ Get Nicolas Pitre's SA-1100 patches from: ftp://ftp.netwinder.org/users/n/nico/ To build a proper SA-1100 kernel, you need a matching set of sources, so for linux 2.3.35 you need: linux-2.3.35.tar.gz + patch-2.3.35-rmk1.gz + diff-2.3.35-rmk1-np5.gz Erik -- J.A.K. (Erik) Mouw, Information and Communication Theory Group, Department of Electrical Engineering, Faculty of Information Technology and Systems, Delft University of Technology, PO BOX 5031, 2600 GA Delft, The Netherlands Phone: +31-15-2785859 Fax: +31-15-2781843 Email J.A.K.Mouw@its.tudelft.nl WWW: http://www-ict.its.tudelft.nl/~erik/ From kramer@pa.dec.com Thu Jan 13 21:52:06 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id VAA20167; Thu, 13 Jan 2000 21:52:05 +0100 (MET) Received: from ns2.tudelft.nl (ns2.tudelft.nl [130.161.180.65]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.8.6 (PHNE_17135)/8.8.6) with ESMTP id VAA15864 for ; Thu, 13 Jan 2000 21:52:05 +0100 (MET) Received: from mail2.digital.com (mail2.digital.com [204.123.2.56]) by mailhost1.tudelft.nl (PMDF V5.2-32 #42432) with ESMTP id <0FOA003F3KMQOR@mailhost1.tudelft.nl> for J.A.K.Mouw@its.tudelft.nl; Thu, 13 Jan 2000 21:52:03 +0100 (MET) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.2/WV2.0g) with SMTP id MAA05424; Thu, 13 Jan 2000 12:46:28 -0800 (PST) Received: from rex.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA01070; Thu, 13 Jan 2000 12:46:21 -0800 Received: by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id MAA28019; Thu, 13 Jan 2000 12:45:51 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id MAA28021; Thu, 13 Jan 2000 12:45:46 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail2.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA14084; Thu, 13 Jan 2000 12:45:46 -0800 Received: from duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (duteinh.et.tudelft.nl [130.161.42.1]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.2/WV2.0g) with ESMTP id MAA05428 for ; Thu, 13 Jan 2000 12:45:45 -0800 (PST) Received: from kalman by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id VAA20134; Thu, 13 Jan 2000 21:44:14 +0100 (MET) Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2000 21:44:14 +0100 (MET) From: Erik Mouw X-Face: "!Z|1XjFg!3Iw)BwM^M\k)J5KHiPddz}#/Zw%?$&Q!xqob"OA|})3_@&BTTiQERo?/^g[Z<9P4R8:5C:aqq.cw!hotLc=+u-"+1rq@9$V^8PbOUlodyi_sejt+D`iqkLpx$>.aXl%vnfPIt"LK|/%>94_Zrm8jy?`_[RKt'TuoxUxfk(gMhY(n|DBBl~c$dhO>G%6}R4+DGX3|idBm4oU&UM/XUP4I9aoN{]`ax%B?rgD(I3OJ<62Y6L Subject: Re: diff-2.3.35-rmk1-np5 In-reply-to: Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com To: nico@CAM.ORG Cc: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com, J.D.Bakker@its.tudelft.nl Message-id: <200001132044.VAA20134@duteinh.et.tudelft.nl> Organization: Eric conspiracy secret labs MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: XCmail 1.0.0 - with PGP support, PGP engine version 0.5 (Linux) Content-type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-transfer-encoding: 8bit Precedence: bulk X-Loop: erik@it.et.tudelft.nl X-Mailerorigin: http://www.fsai.fh-trier.de/~schmitzj/Xclasses/XCmail/ X-Eric-Conspiracy: There is no conspiracy! On Wed, 12 Jan 2000 17:09:51 -0500 (EST), Nicolas Pitre wrote: > On Wed, 12 Jan 2000, Erik Mouw wrote: >> bank 0, chunk 0: 0xc0000000 - 0xc0800000 (8MB) >> bank 0, chunk 1: 0xc1000000 - 0xc1800000 (8MB) >> bank 1, chunk 0: 0xc8000000 - 0xc8800000 (8MB) >> bank 1, chunk 1: 0xc9000000 - 0xc9800000 (8MB) > > In arch/arm/kernel/setup.c, setup_bootmem() [the one with > defined(CONFIG_DISCONTIGMEM)], the code should find out the first and last > page of a given node. This is probably where the bug is. Note that > SA1100 banks becomes nodes, and chunks are declared as banks in the code. > You should get (0xc1800000-0xc0000000)/4096 pages for each node, but the > hole in between will be marked as reserved. > > You can try commenting out the second memory chunk of each SA1100 bank in > arch/arm/mm/mm-sa1100, just to see the difference. That gives exactly the same oops. If I compile with just a single 8MB memory bank (Victor-like setup, mem_desc[] = {{ 0xc0000000, 0x00800000 }};) I get some strange messages: Uncompressing Linux..................................... done, booting the kernel. Linux version 2.3.35-rmk1-np5 (erikm@besson.et.tudelft.nl) (gcc version 2.95.2 19991024 (release)) #4 Thu Jan 13 21:09:44 CET 2000 On node 0 totalpages: 00000800 zone(0): 2048 pages. zone(1): 0 pages. zone(2): 0 pages. Calibrating delay loop... 208.08 BogoMIPS Memory: 8MB = 8MB total Memory: 2504KB available (987K code, 416K data, 8K init) So first there is 8MB available (correct: 2048 4k pages), but a split second later, there is only 4MB left. Nicolas, before I start doing double work, do you happen to have a new diff available? Another question: in arch/arm/mm/mm-armv.c, the function create_memmap_holes() seems to be *disabled* for CONFIG_DISCONTIGMEM. Shouldn't this function be *enabled* for discontig memory? Erik [going back to printk("Now here\n"); debug mode] -- LART. 250 MIPS under one Watt. http://www-ict.its.tudelft.nl/~erik/open-source/LART/ From kramer@pa.dec.com Thu Jan 13 23:39:13 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id XAA20621; Thu, 13 Jan 2000 23:39:13 +0100 (MET) Received: from ns2.tudelft.nl (ns2.tudelft.nl [130.161.180.65]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.8.6 (PHNE_17135)/8.8.6) with ESMTP id XAA17566 for ; Thu, 13 Jan 2000 23:39:13 +0100 (MET) Received: from mail2.digital.com (mail2.digital.com [204.123.2.56]) by mailhost1.tudelft.nl (PMDF V5.2-32 #42432) with ESMTP id <0FOA00805PLA73@mailhost1.tudelft.nl> for J.A.K.Mouw@its.tudelft.nl; Thu, 13 Jan 2000 23:39:11 +0100 (MET) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.2/WV2.0g) with SMTP id OAA15026; Thu, 13 Jan 2000 14:33:52 -0800 (PST) Received: from rex.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA31047; Thu, 13 Jan 2000 14:33:45 -0800 Received: by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id OAA28283; Thu, 13 Jan 2000 14:33:13 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id OAA28290; Thu, 13 Jan 2000 14:32:40 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail1.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA18573; Thu, 13 Jan 2000 14:32:39 -0800 Received: from thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (thorgal.et.tudelft.nl [130.161.40.91]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.2/WV2.0g) with ESMTP id OAA31907 for ; Thu, 13 Jan 2000 14:32:38 -0800 (PST) Received: from [130.161.40.82] (tvs082.et.tudelft.nl [130.161.40.82]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id XAA04118; Thu, 13 Jan 2000 23:31:28 +0100 Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2000 23:31:23 +0100 From: "J.D. Bakker" Subject: Announce: LART interface board schematics available Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com To: pleb@cse.unsw.edu.au, sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Cc: "Adam 'WeirdArms' Wiggins" , Gabriel Sandberg Message-id: MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Precedence: bulk Hi all, We've released the schematics for the Kitchen Sink Board, which provides our SA-1100 based LART with audio, IDE, PS/2, video and lots more. Have a look at the URL in the .sig . Sincerely, Jan-Derk 'open for suggestions' Bakker. -- LART. 250 MIPS under one Watt. http://www-ict.its.tudelft.nl/~erik/open-source/LART/ From kramer@pa.dec.com Fri Jan 14 02:05:14 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id CAA21094; Fri, 14 Jan 2000 02:05:13 +0100 (MET) Received: from ns2.tudelft.nl (ns2.tudelft.nl [130.161.180.65]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.8.6 (PHNE_17135)/8.8.6) with ESMTP id CAA19409 for ; Fri, 14 Jan 2000 02:05:13 +0100 (MET) Received: from mail2.digital.com (mail2.digital.com [204.123.2.56]) by mailhost1.tudelft.nl (PMDF V5.2-32 #42432) with ESMTP id <0FOA00B8VWCND6@mailhost1.tudelft.nl> for J.A.K.Mouw@its.tudelft.nl; Fri, 14 Jan 2000 02:05:11 +0100 (MET) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.2/WV2.0g) with SMTP id QAA26925; Thu, 13 Jan 2000 16:56:41 -0800 (PST) Received: from rex.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA13751; Thu, 13 Jan 2000 16:56:39 -0800 Received: by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id QAA28685; Thu, 13 Jan 2000 16:55:58 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id QAA28691; Thu, 13 Jan 2000 16:55:56 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail1.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA07316; Thu, 13 Jan 2000 16:55:55 -0800 Received: from funai-tky.co.jp (ns.funai-tky.co.jp [210.154.37.2]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.2/WV2.0g) with ESMTP id QAA09489 for ; Thu, 13 Jan 2000 16:55:53 -0800 (PST) Received: from hiropu ([192.168.1.19]) by funai-tky.co.jp (8.9.1/3.7Wpr7-98092916) with SMTP id JAA07525 for ; Fri, 14 Jan 2000 09:55:50 +0900 Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2000 09:55:44 +0900 From: Hiroshi Ishii Subject: Re: Can't compile glibc-2.1.2 In-reply-to: <387E0329.62FE6AE@netwinder.org> Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com To: sa1100 mailng list Message-id: <387E741023A.7718HIROSHI@ns.funai-tky.co.jp> MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Becky! ver 1.25.07 Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk References: <387D7AE63AC.679FHIROSHI@ns.funai-tky.co.jp> <387E0329.62FE6AE@netwinder.org> Thanks everyone. I retry with following specs; - binutils 2.9.5.0.22 - gcc-2.95.2-core with Phil's gcc-2.95.2-diff-991022.gz patch ---- ++ Funai Electric R & D Co.,LTD ++ ++ Hiroshi Ishii ++ From kramer@pa.dec.com Fri Jan 14 05:04:12 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id FAA21762; Fri, 14 Jan 2000 05:04:12 +0100 (MET) Received: from ns2.tudelft.nl (ns2.tudelft.nl [130.161.180.65]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.8.6 (PHNE_17135)/8.8.6) with ESMTP id FAA20604 for ; Fri, 14 Jan 2000 05:04:12 +0100 (MET) Received: from mail2.digital.com (mail2.digital.com [204.123.2.56]) by mailhost1.tudelft.nl (PMDF V5.2-32 #42432) with ESMTP id <0FOB00EAA4MX1H@mailhost1.tudelft.nl> for J.A.K.Mouw@its.tudelft.nl; Fri, 14 Jan 2000 05:04:10 +0100 (MET) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.2/WV2.0g) with SMTP id TAA04948; Thu, 13 Jan 2000 19:54:00 -0800 (PST) Received: from rex.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA00602; Thu, 13 Jan 2000 19:53:57 -0800 Received: by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id TAA29215; Thu, 13 Jan 2000 19:53:16 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id TAA29189; Thu, 13 Jan 2000 19:53:14 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail2.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA03872; Thu, 13 Jan 2000 19:53:14 -0800 Received: from xanadu.gn.com (modemcable235.137-200-24.mtl.mc.videotron.net [24.200.137.235]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.2/WV2.0g) with ESMTP id TAA05143 for ; Thu, 13 Jan 2000 19:53:11 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (nico@localhost) by xanadu.gn.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id WAA14756; Thu, 13 Jan 2000 22:46:12 -0500 Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2000 22:46:12 -0500 (EST) From: Nicolas Pitre Subject: diff-2.3.35-rmk1-np6, was re: diff-2.3.35-rmk1-np5 In-reply-to: <200001132044.VAA20134@duteinh.et.tudelft.nl> Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com X-Sender: nico@xanadu.gn.com To: Erik Mouw Cc: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com, J.D.Bakker@its.tudelft.nl Message-id: MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Precedence: bulk X-Authentication-warning: xanadu.gn.com: nico owned process doing -bs On Thu, 13 Jan 2000, Erik Mouw wrote: > So first there is 8MB available (correct: 2048 4k pages), but a split > second later, there is only 4MB left. It's because the initrd memory still grab the second 4mb. > Nicolas, before I start doing double work, do you happen to have a new > diff available? Yep! diff-2.3.35-rmk1-np6 should work finally for LART. But it's hard to tell when you don't have proper hardware to test on. ;-) > Another question: in arch/arm/mm/mm-armv.c, the function > create_memmap_holes() seems to be *disabled* for CONFIG_DISCONTIGMEM. > Shouldn't this function be *enabled* for discontig memory? No. Russell used it for discontigous memory, unfortunately the SA1100 physical memory banks are too far apart from each other that the mem_map couldn't even fit in memory in some cases. So I used the NUMA support to do the trick. Eventually that function could be modified to clear mem_map holes inside a single node for LART, but for now you'll only waste a couple memory pages. Let's make it work first. Nicolas From kramer@pa.dec.com Sat Jan 15 14:47:05 2000 Return-Path: Received: from tudedr.et.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id OAA00811; Sat, 15 Jan 2000 14:47:04 +0100 (MET) Received: from mail2.digital.com by ITS.TUDelft.NL (PMDF V5.1-10 #21918) with ESMTP id <01JKQJXL9KT48WVZEQ@ITS.TUDelft.NL> for erik@duteinh.et.tudelft.nl; Sat, 15 Jan 2000 14:47:00 +0100 Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.2/WV2.0g) with SMTP id FAA23659; Sat, 15 Jan 2000 05:43:42 -0800 (PST) Received: from rex.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA17709; Sat, 15 Jan 2000 05:43:34 -0800 Received: by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id FAA02367; Sat, 15 Jan 2000 05:41:54 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id FAA02344; Sat, 15 Jan 2000 05:41:51 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail1.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA07572; Sat, 15 Jan 2000 05:41:50 -0800 Received: from duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (duteinh.et.tudelft.nl [130.161.42.1]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.2/WV2.0g) with ESMTP id FAA12904 for ; Sat, 15 Jan 2000 05:41:49 -0800 (PST) Received: from kalman.et.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id OAA00782; Sat, 15 Jan 2000 14:40:31 +0100 (MET) Received: (from erik@localhost) by kalman.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.8/8.8.8/Debian/GNU) id OAA05634; Sat, 15 Jan 2000 14:40:31 +0100 Date: Sat, 15 Jan 2000 14:40:30 +0100 (CET) From: J.A.K.Mouw@ITS.TUDelft.NL (Erik Mouw) Subject: Re: diff-2.3.35-rmk1-np6, was re: diff-2.3.35-rmk1-np5 In-reply-to: Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com To: nico@CAM.ORG (Nicolas Pitre) Cc: J.A.K.Mouw@ITS.TUDelft.NL, sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com, J.D.Bakker@ITS.TUDelft.NL Reply-to: J.A.K.Mouw@ITS.TUDelft.NL Message-id: <200001151340.OAA05634@kalman.et.tudelft.nl> Organization: Eric Conspiracy Secret Labs MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL39 (25)] Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk X-Eric-Conspiracy: There is no conspiracy! Nicolas Pitre wrote: > On Thu, 13 Jan 2000, Erik Mouw wrote: > > Nicolas, before I start doing double work, do you happen to have a new > > diff available? > > Yep! diff-2.3.35-rmk1-np6 should work finally for LART. But it's hard to > tell when you don't have proper hardware to test on. ;-) I just tested it: Uncompressing Linux..................................... done, booting the kernel. Linux version 2.3.35-rmk1-np6 (erik@zaphod) (gcc version 2.95.2 19991024 (release)) #1 Sat Jan 15 02:03:56 CET 2000 On node 0 totalpages: 00001800 zone(0): 6144 pages. zone(1): 0 pages. zone(2): 0 pages. On node 1 totalpages: 00001800 zone(0): 6144 pages. zone(1): 0 pages. zone(2): 0 pages. Calibrating delay loop... 208.08 BogoMIPS Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual address 00000014 6144 pages per node makes a total of 48 MB, while there is only 32MB available. I haven't yet diffed your diffs to get a clue, maybe I'll find some time to do it this weekend. Erik -- J.A.K. (Erik) Mouw, Information and Communication Theory Group, Department of Electrical Engineering, Faculty of Information Technology and Systems, Delft University of Technology, PO BOX 5031, 2600 GA Delft, The Netherlands Phone: +31-15-2785859 Fax: +31-15-2781843 Email J.A.K.Mouw@its.tudelft.nl WWW: http://www-ict.its.tudelft.nl/~erik/ From kramer@pa.dec.com Sat Jan 15 18:35:45 2000 Return-Path: Received: from tudedr.et.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id SAA01583; Sat, 15 Jan 2000 18:35:45 +0100 (MET) Received: from mail2.digital.com by ITS.TUDelft.NL (PMDF V5.1-10 #21918) with ESMTP id <01JKQRX37C8C8Y4X39@ITS.TUDelft.NL> for erik@duteinh.et.tudelft.nl; Sat, 15 Jan 2000 18:35:41 +0100 Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.2/WV2.0g) with SMTP id JAA32381; Sat, 15 Jan 2000 09:32:28 -0800 (PST) Received: from rex.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA10515; Sat, 15 Jan 2000 09:32:18 -0800 Received: by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id JAA02961; Sat, 15 Jan 2000 09:31:33 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id JAA02968; Sat, 15 Jan 2000 09:31:31 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail2.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA09763; Sat, 15 Jan 2000 09:31:30 -0800 Received: from xanadu.gn.com (modemcable235.137-200-24.mtl.mc.videotron.net [24.200.137.235] (may be forged)) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.2/WV2.0g) with ESMTP id JAA24000 for ; Sat, 15 Jan 2000 09:31:29 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (nico@localhost) by xanadu.gn.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id MAA16290; Sat, 15 Jan 2000 12:26:28 -0500 Date: Sat, 15 Jan 2000 12:26:28 -0500 (EST) From: Nicolas Pitre Subject: Re: diff-2.3.35-rmk1-np6, was re: diff-2.3.35-rmk1-np5 In-reply-to: <200001151340.OAA05634@kalman.et.tudelft.nl> Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com X-Sender: nico@xanadu.gn.com To: J.A.K.Mouw@ITS.TUDelft.NL Cc: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com, J.D.Bakker@ITS.TUDelft.NL Message-id: MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Precedence: bulk X-Authentication-warning: xanadu.gn.com: nico owned process doing -bs On Sat, 15 Jan 2000, Erik Mouw wrote: > Nicolas Pitre wrote: > > Yep! diff-2.3.35-rmk1-np6 should work finally for LART. But it's hard to > > tell when you don't have proper hardware to test on. ;-) > > I just tested it: > > Uncompressing Linux..................................... done, booting the kernel. > Linux version 2.3.35-rmk1-np6 (erik@zaphod) (gcc version 2.95.2 19991024 (release)) #1 Sat Jan 15 02:03:56 CET 2000 > On node 0 totalpages: 00001800 > zone(0): 6144 pages. > zone(1): 0 pages. > zone(2): 0 pages. > On node 1 totalpages: 00001800 > zone(0): 6144 pages. > zone(1): 0 pages. > zone(2): 0 pages. > Calibrating delay loop... 208.08 BogoMIPS > Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual address 00000014 > > 6144 pages per node makes a total of 48 MB, while there is only 32MB > available. I haven't yet diffed your diffs to get a clue, maybe I'll > find some time to do it this weekend. This is OK since you have a 8 mb hole in each node, which is not accounted here. The number of pages shown is 0xc2800000 - 0xc0000000, while the hole in the middle is marked as reserved thus not being used. So this time the cound is good. Unfortunately I can't help you further since I don't have similar enough hardware to yours. Maybe if you provide the backtrace I might think of something though... Nicolas From kramer@pa.dec.com Sun Jan 16 10:54:41 2000 Return-Path: Received: from tudedr.et.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id KAA04851; Sun, 16 Jan 2000 10:54:41 +0100 (MET) Received: from mail1.digital.com by ITS.TUDelft.NL (PMDF V5.1-10 #21918) with ESMTP id <01JKRQ4UQWLO8Y4X3P@ITS.TUDelft.NL> for erik@duteinh.et.tudelft.nl; Sun, 16 Jan 2000 10:54:39 +0100 Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.2/WV2.0g) with SMTP id BAA18605; Sun, 16 Jan 2000 01:51:38 -0800 (PST) Received: from rex.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA30891; Sun, 16 Jan 2000 01:51:23 -0800 Received: by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id BAA05605; Sun, 16 Jan 2000 01:50:42 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id BAA05579; Sun, 16 Jan 2000 01:50:39 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail2.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA11657; Sun, 16 Jan 2000 01:50:37 -0800 Received: from mail2.netcologne.de (mail2.netcologne.de [194.8.194.103]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.2/WV2.0g) with ESMTP id BAA31688 for ; Sun, 16 Jan 2000 01:50:36 -0800 (PST) Received: from neuromancer.anarcho.net (dial11-160.netcologne.de [195.14.233.160]) by mail2.netcologne.de (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id KAA26372; Sun, 16 Jan 2000 10:47:10 +0100 (MET) Received: (from xgxttre@localhost) by neuromancer.anarcho.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) id KAA14268; Sun, 16 Jan 2000 10:48:38 +0100 X-URL: Date: Sun, 16 Jan 2000 10:48:36 +0100 From: Thomas Renard Subject: Re: Announce: LART schematics In-reply-to: Erik Mouw's message of "Wed, 3 Nov 99 23:26:15 +0100" Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com To: Erik Mouw Cc: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com, linux-arm@vger.rutgers.edu, pleb@cse.unsw.edu.au Message-id: Organization: The Anarcho Net MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Precedence: bulk X-Face: 43Gd&$n()k_953x*S*S$KvhoZ5HRR+\?HpR1~dG@&6B[/EKmoE.5mYc3v#`Ahf[{ekw}SL9 g|pT#VQ8a.~3xURG\j?G@roW>lq*V323P[~3fZu6.~DxATbN&IGSABZ*aQ*:1XPF-i[m"h.z&S[k3J a[.Rfdjk9(?uQ$CQ=-& User-Agent: Gnus/5.070097 (Pterodactyl Gnus v0.97) XEmacs/21.1 (Bryce Canyon) Lines: 8 References: <9911032226.AA27234@duteinh.et.tudelft.nl> Hi Erik, maybe there is something wrong with the dns-resolving of tudelft.nl! It cannot be resolved. Is there some fixup? Thomas From kramer@pa.dec.com Sun Jan 16 16:10:05 2000 Return-Path: Received: from tudedr.et.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id QAA05888; Sun, 16 Jan 2000 16:10:02 +0100 (MET) Received: from mail1.digital.com by ITS.TUDelft.NL (PMDF V5.1-10 #21918) with ESMTP id <01JKRX9L4E6C8WW0MS@ITS.TUDelft.NL> for erik@duteinh.et.tudelft.nl; Sun, 16 Jan 2000 14:19:22 +0100 Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.2/WV2.0g) with SMTP id FAA23840; Sun, 16 Jan 2000 05:16:18 -0800 (PST) Received: from rex.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA06601; Sun, 16 Jan 2000 05:16:00 -0800 Received: by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id FAA06195; Sun, 16 Jan 2000 05:15:25 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id FAA06187; Sun, 16 Jan 2000 05:15:21 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail1.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA28014; Sun, 16 Jan 2000 05:15:21 -0800 Received: from thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (thorgal.et.tudelft.nl [130.161.40.91]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.2/WV2.0g) with ESMTP id FAA22788 for ; Sun, 16 Jan 2000 05:15:20 -0800 (PST) Received: from [130.161.115.44] (jdbakker.et.tudelft.nl [130.161.115.44]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id OAA11371; Sun, 16 Jan 2000 14:15:09 +0100 Date: Sun, 16 Jan 2000 14:14:59 +0100 From: "J.D. Bakker" Subject: Re: Announce: LART schematics In-reply-to: Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com To: Thomas Renard Cc: Erik Mouw , sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Message-id: MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Precedence: bulk References: "Erik Mouw's message of Wed, 3 Nov 99 23:26:15 +0100" <9911032226.AA27234@duteinh.et.tudelft.nl> At 10:48 +0100 16-01-2000, Thomas Renard wrote: >Hi Erik, > >maybe there is something wrong with the dns-resolving of tudelft.nl! >It cannot be resolved. That's odd; from my end, I can't seem to contact http://www.netcologne.de/~nc-renardth/ . Hmmmm... Try http://130.161.42.2/~erik/open-source/LART/ JDB. -- "I think the US Government has been going about this all wrong. It's not the DoJ that needs to investigate Microsoft; this is a job for the DEA." -- Anthony DeBoer in the Scary Devil Monastery From kramer@pa.dec.com Sun Jan 16 16:11:46 2000 Return-Path: Received: from tudedr.et.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id QAA05923; Sun, 16 Jan 2000 16:11:45 +0100 (MET) Received: from mail2.digital.com by ITS.TUDelft.NL (PMDF V5.1-10 #21918) with ESMTP id <01JKRYXT94Q68WW0MS@ITS.TUDelft.NL> for erik@duteinh.et.tudelft.nl; Sun, 16 Jan 2000 15:07:06 +0100 Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.2/WV2.0g) with SMTP id GAA06128; Sun, 16 Jan 2000 06:04:12 -0800 (PST) Received: from rex.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA05372; Sun, 16 Jan 2000 06:04:02 -0800 Received: by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id GAA06356; Sun, 16 Jan 2000 06:03:01 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id GAA06307; Sun, 16 Jan 2000 06:02:59 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail1.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AB24002; Sun, 16 Jan 2000 06:02:58 -0800 Received: from duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (duteinh.et.tudelft.nl [130.161.42.1]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.2/WV2.0g) with ESMTP id GAA25326 for ; Sun, 16 Jan 2000 06:02:57 -0800 (PST) Received: from kalman.et.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id PAA05611; Sun, 16 Jan 2000 15:01:23 +0100 (MET) Received: (from erik@localhost) by kalman.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.8/8.8.8/Debian/GNU) id PAA24653; Sun, 16 Jan 2000 15:01:23 +0100 Date: Sun, 16 Jan 2000 15:01:23 +0100 (CET) From: J.A.K.Mouw@ITS.TUDelft.NL (Erik Mouw) Subject: Re: Announce: LART schematics In-reply-to: Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com To: Thomas.Renard@smail.uni-koeln.de (Thomas Renard) Cc: J.A.K.Mouw@ITS.TUDelft.NL, sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com, linux-arm@vger.rutgers.edu, pleb@cse.unsw.edu.au Reply-to: J.A.K.Mouw@ITS.TUDelft.NL Message-id: <200001161401.PAA24653@kalman.et.tudelft.nl> Organization: Eric Conspiracy Secret Labs MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL39 (25)] Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk X-Eric-Conspiracy: There is no conspiracy! > maybe there is something wrong with the dns-resolving of tudelft.nl! > It cannot be resolved. I think it is a problem at your site because >30 people from all over the world were able to download it. > Is there some fixup? Of course: try http://130.161.42.2/~erik/open-source/LART/ Erik -- J.A.K. (Erik) Mouw, Information and Communication Theory Group, Department of Electrical Engineering, Faculty of Information Technology and Systems, Delft University of Technology, PO BOX 5031, 2600 GA Delft, The Netherlands Phone: +31-15-2785859 Fax: +31-15-2781843 Email J.A.K.Mouw@its.tudelft.nl WWW: http://www-ict.its.tudelft.nl/~erik/ From kramer@pa.dec.com Tue Jan 18 23:53:50 2000 Return-Path: Received: from tudedr.et.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id XAA24648; Tue, 18 Jan 2000 23:53:49 +0100 (MET) Received: from mail2.digital.com by ITS.TUDelft.NL (PMDF V5.1-10 #21918) with ESMTP id <01JKV9WHQWDM8Y4YPN@ITS.TUDelft.NL> for erik@duteinh.et.tudelft.nl; Tue, 18 Jan 2000 23:53:44 +0100 Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.2/WV2.0g) with SMTP id OAA02575; Tue, 18 Jan 2000 14:50:40 -0800 (PST) Received: from rex.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA09267; Tue, 18 Jan 2000 14:50:23 -0800 Received: by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id OAA01538; Tue, 18 Jan 2000 14:48:08 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id OAA01534; Tue, 18 Jan 2000 14:48:05 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail2.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA14019; Tue, 18 Jan 2000 14:48:04 -0800 Received: from duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (duteinh.et.tudelft.nl [130.161.42.1]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.2/WV2.0g) with ESMTP id OAA00764 for ; Tue, 18 Jan 2000 14:48:03 -0800 (PST) Received: from kalman by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id XAA24618; Tue, 18 Jan 2000 23:46:29 +0100 (MET) Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2000 23:46:29 +0100 (MET) From: Erik Mouw Subject: Re: diff-2.3.35-rmk1-np6 In-reply-to: Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com To: nico@CAM.ORG Cc: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com, J.D.Bakker@ITS.TUDelft.NL Message-id: <200001182246.XAA24618@duteinh.et.tudelft.nl> Organization: Eric conspiracy secret labs MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: XCmail 1.0.0 - with PGP support, PGP engine version 0.5 (Linux) Content-type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-transfer-encoding: 8bit Precedence: bulk X-Face: "!Z|1XjFg!3Iw)BwM^M\k)J5KHiPddz}#/Zw%?$&Q!xqob"OA|})3_@&BTTiQERo?/^g[Z<9P4R8:5C:aqq.cw!hotLc=+u-"+1rq@9$V^8PbOUlodyi_sejt+D`iqkLpx$>.aXl%vnfPIt"LK|/%>94_Zrm8jy?`_[RKt'TuoxUxfk(gMhY(n|DBBl~c$dhO>G%6}R4+DGX3|idBm4oU&UM/XUP4I9aoN{]`ax%B?rgD(I3OJ<62Y6L X-Mailerorigin: http://www.fsai.fh-trier.de/~schmitzj/Xclasses/XCmail/ X-Eric-Conspiracy: There is no conspiracy! X-Loop: erik@it.et.tudelft.nl On Sat, 15 Jan 2000 12:26:28 -0500 (EST), Nicolas Pitre wrote: > On Sat, 15 Jan 2000, Erik Mouw wrote: >> Uncompressing Linux..................................... done, booting the kernel. >> Linux version 2.3.35-rmk1-np6 (erik@zaphod) (gcc version 2.95.2 19991024 (release)) #1 Sat Jan 15 02:03:56 CET 2000 >> On node 0 totalpages: 00001800 >> zone(0): 6144 pages. >> zone(1): 0 pages. >> zone(2): 0 pages. >> On node 1 totalpages: 00001800 >> zone(0): 6144 pages. >> zone(1): 0 pages. >> zone(2): 0 pages. >> Calibrating delay loop... 208.08 BogoMIPS >> Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual address 00000014 >> >> 6144 pages per node makes a total of 48 MB, while there is only 32MB >> available. I haven't yet diffed your diffs to get a clue, maybe I'll >> find some time to do it this weekend. > > This is OK since you have a 8 mb hole in each node, which is not accounted > here. The number of pages shown is 0xc2800000 - 0xc0000000, while the > hole in the middle is marked as reserved thus not being used. So this > time the cound is good. We just found out that I tested the stuff on a LART with flakey hardware, because the board also fails to run known good kernel+ramdisk combinations :-(. The good news is that linux-2.3.35-rmk1-np6 works on LART, and that we have the correct amount of memory (8M 8M 8M 8M in the boot messages). There are however some minor issues: - getty sometimes locks the complete system: we can only type "roo" (without the quotes, of course) as username, after that the system locks. - LART with linux-2.3.35 draws approximately *ten* times as much as power than linux-2.2.12. It looks like the CPU doesn't hlt in the idle loop, but it can also be a bug in the LCD code. We have to look into this. Can somebody check this out with Brutus? The getty issue might be a bug in the serial driver, but it can also be related to the higher power consumption. Erik -- J.A.K. (Erik) Mouw, Information and Communication Theory Group, Department of Electrical Engineering, Faculty of Information Technology and Systems, Delft University of Technology, PO BOX 5031, 2600 GA Delft, The Netherlands Phone: +31-15-2785859 Fax: +31-15-2781843 Email J.A.K.Mouw@its.tudelft.nl WWW: http://www-ict.its.tudelft.nl/~erik/ From kramer@pa.dec.com Wed Jan 19 02:59:48 2000 Return-Path: Received: from tudedr.et.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id CAA25531; Wed, 19 Jan 2000 02:59:48 +0100 (MET) Received: from mail2.digital.com by ITS.TUDelft.NL (PMDF V5.1-10 #21918) with ESMTP id <01JKVGF30OFC8Y4YQU@ITS.TUDelft.NL> for erik@duteinh.et.tudelft.nl; Wed, 19 Jan 2000 02:59:44 +0100 Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.2/WV2.0g) with SMTP id RAA20616; Tue, 18 Jan 2000 17:55:07 -0800 (PST) Received: from rex.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA11583; Tue, 18 Jan 2000 17:54:53 -0800 Received: by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id RAA01591; Tue, 18 Jan 2000 17:54:09 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id RAA01587; Tue, 18 Jan 2000 17:54:07 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail1.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA22122; Tue, 18 Jan 2000 17:54:06 -0800 Received: from xanadu.gn.com (modemcable248.137-200-24.mtl.mc.videotron.net [24.200.137.248]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.2/WV2.0g) with ESMTP id RAA17943 for ; Tue, 18 Jan 2000 17:54:04 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (nico@localhost) by xanadu.gn.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id UAA29921; Tue, 18 Jan 2000 20:50:14 -0500 Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2000 20:50:14 -0500 (EST) From: Nicolas Pitre Subject: Re: diff-2.3.35-rmk1-np6 In-reply-to: <200001182246.XAA24618@duteinh.et.tudelft.nl> Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com X-Sender: nico@xanadu.gn.com To: Erik Mouw Cc: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com, J.D.Bakker@ITS.TUDelft.NL Message-id: MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: MULTIPART/MIXED; BOUNDARY="-1463811582-127292550-948246614=:29912" Precedence: bulk X-Authentication-warning: xanadu.gn.com: nico owned process doing -bs This message is in MIME format. The first part should be readable text, while the remaining parts are likely unreadable without MIME-aware tools. Send mail to mime@docserver.cac.washington.edu for more info. ---1463811582-127292550-948246614=:29912 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII On Tue, 18 Jan 2000, Erik Mouw wrote: > We just found out that I tested the stuff on a LART with flakey hardware, > because the board also fails to run known good kernel+ramdisk > combinations :-(. > > The good news is that linux-2.3.35-rmk1-np6 works on LART, and that we > have the correct amount of memory (8M 8M 8M 8M in the boot messages). > > There are however some minor issues: > > - getty sometimes locks the complete system: we can only type "roo" > (without the quotes, of course) as username, after that the system locks. This is strange. The serial port is my primary console access and everything seems fine. > - LART with linux-2.3.35 draws approximately *ten* times as much as power > than linux-2.2.12. It looks like the CPU doesn't hlt in the idle loop, > but it can also be a bug in the LCD code. We have to look into this. Can > somebody check this out with Brutus? I don't have proper equipment here to see power consumption... however I expect the attached patch might help. Please try this and tell me if it does the trick. It should be applied over 2.3.35-rmk1-np6. Nicolas ---1463811582-127292550-948246614=:29912 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; name="hlt.diff" Content-ID: Content-Description: Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="hlt.diff" Content-Transfer-Encoding: BASE64 LS0tIC4uLzIuMy4zNS1ybWsxLW5wNi9saW51eC9hcmNoL2FybS9tbS9wcm9j LXNhMTEwLlMJVGh1IEphbiAxMyAyMTo0MjozMCAyMDAwDQorKysgbGludXgv YXJjaC9hcm0vbW0vcHJvYy1zYTExMC5TCVN1biBKYW4gMTYgMTI6NTY6MjMg MjAwMA0KQEAgLTQzMSw3ICs0MzEsNyBAQA0KIEVOVFJZKGNwdV9zYTExMDBf ZG9faWRsZSkNCiAJCW1vdglyMCwgIzANCiAJCW1jcglwMTUsIDAsIHIwLCBj MTUsIGMyLCAyCQlAIERpc2FibGUgY2xvY2sgc3dpdGNoaW5nDQotCQlsZHIJ cjEsID1GTFVTSF9CQVNFK0ZMVVNIX09GRlNFVCoyCUAgbG9hZCBmcm9tIHVu Y2FjaGVhYmxlIGxvYw0KKwkJbGRyCXIxLCA9VU5DQUNIRUFCTEVfQUREUgkJ QCBsb2FkIGZyb20gdW5jYWNoZWFibGUgbG9jDQogCQlsZHIJcjEsIFtyMSwg IzBdDQogCQliCTFmDQogDQotLS0gLi4vMi4zLjM1LXJtazEtbnA2L2xpbnV4 L2luY2x1ZGUvYXNtLWFybS9hcmNoLXNhMTEwMC9oYXJkd2FyZS5oCVRodSBK YW4gMTMgMjE6NDE6MzMgMjAwMA0KKysrIGxpbnV4L2luY2x1ZGUvYXNtLWFy bS9hcmNoLXNhMTEwMC9oYXJkd2FyZS5oCVN1biBKYW4gMTYgMTM6MDA6MDkg MjAwMA0KQEAgLTEzLDYgKzEzLDcgQEANCiAjZGVmaW5lIEZMVVNIX0JBU0Vf UEhZUwkJMHhlMDAwMDAwMAkvKiBTQTExMDAgemVybyBiYW5rICovDQogI2Rl ZmluZSBGTFVTSF9CQVNFCQkweGRmMDAwMDAwDQogI2RlZmluZSBGTFVTSF9C QVNFX01JTklDQUNIRQkweGRmODAwMDAwDQorI2RlZmluZSBVTkNBQ0hFQUJM RV9BRERSCTB4ZmEwNTAwMDANCiANCiAvKg0KICAqIFBDTUNJQSBJTyBpcyBt YXBwZWQgdG8gMHhlMDAwMDAwMC4gIFdlIGFyZSBsaWtlbHkgdG8gdXNlIGlu KigpL291dCooKQ0KLS0tIC4uLzIuMy4zNS1ybWsxLW5wNi9saW51eC9pbmNs dWRlL2FzbS1hcm0vYXJjaC1zYTExMDAvc3lzdGVtLmgJVGh1IEphbiAxMyAy MTo0MTozMyAyMDAwDQorKysgbGludXgvaW5jbHVkZS9hc20tYXJtL2FyY2gt c2ExMTAwL3N5c3RlbS5oCVN1biBKYW4gMTYgMTM6MDI6MDAgMjAwMA0KQEAg LTI1LDI2ICsyNSw2IEBADQogI2VuZGlmDQogDQogDQotI2lmIDENCiAjZGVm aW5lIGFyY2hfZG9faWRsZSgpICAgICAgICAgIGNwdV9kb19pZGxlKCkNCi0j ZWxzZQ0KLS8qIEVudGVyIFNBMTEwMCBpZGxlIG1vZGUgKHNlZSBkYXRhIHNo ZWV0IHNlYyA5LjUpLg0KLSAqIEl0IHNlZW1zIHRoYXQgdGhlIHdhaXQtb24t aW50ZXJydXB0IGp1c3QgaGFuZyB0aGUgQ1BVIGZvcmV2ZXIgaWYgaXQncw0K LSAqIG9uIHRoZSBlbmQgb2YgYSBjYWNoZSBsaW5lLiAgV29ya2Fyb3VuZDog d2UgZm9yY2UgYW4gZXhwbGljaXQgYWxpZ25tZW50DQotICogYmVmb3JlIGl0 Lg0KLSAqLw0KLSNkZWZpbmUgYXJjaF9kb19pZGxlKCkgXA0KLQlkbyB7IFwN Ci0JX19hc21fXyBfX3ZvbGF0aWxlX18oIFwNCi0iCW1jcglwMTUsIDAsICUw LCBjMTUsIGMyLCAyCUAgRGlzYWJsZSBjbG9jayBzd2l0Y2hpbmcgXG4iIFwN Ci0iCWxkcgklMCwgWyUwXQkJQCBNdXN0IHBlcmZvcm0gYSBub24tY2FjaGVk IGFjY2VzcyBcbiIgXA0KLSIJYgkxZgkJCUAgU2VlbXMgd2UgbXVzdCBhbGln biB0aGUgbmV4dCBcbiIgXA0KLSIJLmFsaWduIDUJCQlAIGluc3RydWN0aW9u IG9uIGEgY2FjaGUgbGluZSBcbiIgXA0KLSIxOgltY3IJcDE1LCAwLCAlMCwg YzE1LCBjOCwgMglAIFdhaXQgZm9yIGludGVycnVwdHMgXG4iIFwNCi0iCW1j cglwMTUsIDAsICUwLCBjMTUsIGMxLCAyCUAgUmVlbmFibGUgY2xvY2sgc3dp dGNoaW5nIFxuIiBcDQotCTogOiAiciIgKCZJQ0lQKSA6ICJjYyIgKTsgXA0K LQl9IHdoaWxlICgwKQ0KLSNlbmRpZg0KLQ0KICNkZWZpbmUgYXJjaF9wb3dl cl9vZmYoKQlkbyB7IH0gd2hpbGUgKDApDQogDQo= ---1463811582-127292550-948246614=:29912-- From kramer@pa.dec.com Wed Jan 19 16:22:00 2000 Return-Path: Received: from tudedr.et.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id QAA00182; Wed, 19 Jan 2000 16:22:00 +0100 (MET) Received: from mail2.digital.com by ITS.TUDelft.NL (PMDF V5.1-10 #21918) with ESMTP id <01JKW8FLR7LQ8Y4Z4B@ITS.TUDelft.NL> for erik@duteinh.et.tudelft.nl; Wed, 19 Jan 2000 16:21:53 +0100 Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.2/WV2.0g) with SMTP id HAA18026; Wed, 19 Jan 2000 07:18:03 -0800 (PST) Received: from rex.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA28294; Wed, 19 Jan 2000 07:17:46 -0800 Received: by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id HAA01810; Wed, 19 Jan 2000 07:16:43 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id HAA01806; Wed, 19 Jan 2000 07:16:40 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail2.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA04768; Wed, 19 Jan 2000 07:16:40 -0800 Received: from orange.zav.starlab.net (extsrv.starlab.net [195.171.37.194]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.2/WV2.0g) with ESMTP id HAA18251 for ; Wed, 19 Jan 2000 07:16:33 -0800 (PST) Received: from downtown.ett.starlab.net (root@[212.8.177.17]) by orange.zav.starlab.net (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id QAA12120; Wed, 19 Jan 2000 16:16:47 +0100 Received: from wonderland.ett.starlab.net (wonderland.ett.starlab.net [212.8.177.19]) by downtown.ett.starlab.net (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id QAA30528; Wed, 19 Jan 2000 16:16:22 +0100 Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2000 16:16:20 +0100 (CET) From: Ivo Clarysse Subject: Re: diff-2.3.35-rmk1-np6, was re: diff-2.3.35-rmk1-np5 In-reply-to: Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com X-Sender: soggie@wonderland.ett.starlab.net To: Nicolas Pitre Cc: SA-1100/Linux Message-id: MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Precedence: bulk On Thu, 13 Jan 2000, Nicolas Pitre wrote: > Yep! diff-2.3.35-rmk1-np6 should work finally for LART. But it's hard to > tell when you don't have proper hardware to test on. ;-) diff-2.3.35-rmk1-np6 works with the FEATHER board as well (tested with 2 banks of 16MB DRAM). Ivo. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Ivo Clarysse TEL +32-2-7400788 FAX +32-2-7429654 Research Scientist Starlab - http://www.starlab.org/ PGP ID: 0x50154325 // A0A0 EDBC 37B2 C574 CC4D F1F0 FF94 04B9 5015 4325 From kramer@pa.dec.com Wed Jan 19 21:06:46 2000 Return-Path: Received: from tudedr.et.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id VAA01505; Wed, 19 Jan 2000 21:06:45 +0100 (MET) Received: from mail1.digital.com by ITS.TUDelft.NL (PMDF V5.1-10 #21918) with ESMTP id <01JKWIDOWKKC934S0M@ITS.TUDelft.NL> for erik@duteinh.et.tudelft.nl; Wed, 19 Jan 2000 21:06:42 +0100 Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.2/WV2.0g) with SMTP id MAA22321; Wed, 19 Jan 2000 12:03:35 -0800 (PST) Received: from rex.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA12316; Wed, 19 Jan 2000 12:03:25 -0800 Received: by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id MAA00662; Wed, 19 Jan 2000 12:02:14 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id MAA00658; Wed, 19 Jan 2000 12:02:11 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail2.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA05436; Wed, 19 Jan 2000 12:02:10 -0800 Received: from duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (duteinh.et.tudelft.nl [130.161.42.1]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.2/WV2.0g) with ESMTP id MAA20941 for ; Wed, 19 Jan 2000 12:02:09 -0800 (PST) Received: from kalman by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id VAA01492; Wed, 19 Jan 2000 21:00:50 +0100 (MET) Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2000 21:00:50 +0100 (MET) From: Erik Mouw Subject: Re: diff-2.3.35-rmk1-np6 In-reply-to: Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com To: nico@CAM.ORG Cc: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com, J.D.Bakker@ITS.TUDelft.NL Message-id: <200001192000.VAA01492@duteinh.et.tudelft.nl> Organization: Eric conspiracy secret labs MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: XCmail 1.0.0 - with PGP support, PGP engine version 0.5 (Linux) Content-type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-transfer-encoding: 8bit Precedence: bulk X-Face: "!Z|1XjFg!3Iw)BwM^M\k)J5KHiPddz}#/Zw%?$&Q!xqob"OA|})3_@&BTTiQERo?/^g[Z<9P4R8:5C:aqq.cw!hotLc=+u-"+1rq@9$V^8PbOUlodyi_sejt+D`iqkLpx$>.aXl%vnfPIt"LK|/%>94_Zrm8jy?`_[RKt'TuoxUxfk(gMhY(n|DBBl~c$dhO>G%6}R4+DGX3|idBm4oU&UM/XUP4I9aoN{]`ax%B?rgD(I3OJ<62Y6L X-Mailerorigin: http://www.fsai.fh-trier.de/~schmitzj/Xclasses/XCmail/ X-Eric-Conspiracy: There is no conspiracy! X-Loop: erik@it.et.tudelft.nl On Tue, 18 Jan 2000 20:50:14 -0500 (EST), Nicolas Pitre wrote: > On Tue, 18 Jan 2000, Erik Mouw wrote: >> - LART with linux-2.3.35 draws approximately *ten* times as much as power >> than linux-2.2.12. It looks like the CPU doesn't hlt in the idle loop, >> but it can also be a bug in the LCD code. We have to look into this. Can >> somebody check this out with Brutus? > > I don't have proper equipment here to see power consumption... however I > expect the attached patch might help. Please try this and tell me if it > does the trick. It should be applied over 2.3.35-rmk1-np6. It didn't apply cleanly, but never mind, it was small enough to do it by hand. The power consumption is back at the normal rate: 40mA @ 4.5V. Thanks, Erik -- LART. 250 MIPS under one Watt. http://www-ict.its.tudelft.nl/~erik/open-source/LART/ From kramer@pa.dec.com Mon Jan 24 07:23:52 2000 Return-Path: Received: from tudedr.et.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id HAA04423; Mon, 24 Jan 2000 07:23:52 +0100 (MET) Received: from mail2.digital.com by ITS.TUDelft.NL (PMDF V5.1-10 #21918) with ESMTP id <01JL2P35GHPQ934ZMF@ITS.TUDelft.NL> for erik@duteinh.et.tudelft.nl; Mon, 24 Jan 2000 07:23:49 +0100 Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.2/WV2.0g) with SMTP id WAA12118; Sun, 23 Jan 2000 22:18:05 -0800 (PST) Received: from rex.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA22237; Sun, 23 Jan 2000 22:17:41 -0800 Received: by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id WAA02847; Sun, 23 Jan 2000 22:15:38 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id WAA02843; Sun, 23 Jan 2000 22:15:35 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail2.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA23439; Sun, 23 Jan 2000 22:15:35 -0800 Received: from web1205.mail.yahoo.com (web1205.mail.yahoo.com [128.11.23.141]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.2/WV2.0g) with SMTP id WAA11985 for ; Sun, 23 Jan 2000 22:15:35 -0800 (PST) Received: (qmail 1905 invoked by uid 60001); Mon, 24 Jan 2000 06:14:50 +0000 Received: from [192.11.226.102] by web1205.mail.yahoo.com; Sun, 23 Jan 2000 22:14:50 -0800 (PST) Date: Sun, 23 Jan 2000 22:14:50 -0800 (PST) From: wolf Subject: How to speed up download Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com To: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Message-id: <20000124061450.1904.qmail@web1205.mail.yahoo.com> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Precedence: bulk Hi, I use sa-1100 brutus. But every time I use angelboot to download kernel and ramdisk to the board, a long time to wait. My opts file's content is as follows: base 0x8000 entry 0xc0008000 device /dev/ttyS0 options "9600 8N1" baud 115200 otherfile ramdisk.gz otherbase 0x800000 When I use SDT , the download speed can be tuned. So, I think under linux , it also can be accelerated. But how? TIA wolf __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Talk to your friends online with Yahoo! Messenger. http://im.yahoo.com From kramer@pa.dec.com Mon Jan 24 17:03:16 2000 Return-Path: Received: from tudedr.et.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id RAA08637; Mon, 24 Jan 2000 17:03:15 +0100 (MET) Received: from mail2.digital.com by ITS.TUDelft.NL (PMDF V5.1-10 #21918) with ESMTP id <01JL39BD0THY9350U6@ITS.TUDelft.NL> for erik@duteinh.et.tudelft.nl; Mon, 24 Jan 2000 17:03:04 +0100 Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.2/WV2.0g) with SMTP id HAA24652; Mon, 24 Jan 2000 07:58:16 -0800 (PST) Received: from rex.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA08633; Mon, 24 Jan 2000 07:58:09 -0800 Received: by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id HAA03013; Mon, 24 Jan 2000 07:57:11 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id HAA03009; Mon, 24 Jan 2000 07:57:09 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail1.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA13008; Mon, 24 Jan 2000 07:57:08 -0800 Received: from duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (duteinh.et.tudelft.nl [130.161.42.1]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.2/WV2.0g) with ESMTP id HAA13557 for ; Mon, 24 Jan 2000 07:57:07 -0800 (PST) Received: from kalman by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id QAA08571; Mon, 24 Jan 2000 16:55:48 +0100 (MET) Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2000 16:55:48 +0100 (MET) From: Erik Mouw Subject: Re: How to speed up download In-reply-to: <20000124061450.1904.qmail@web1205.mail.yahoo.com> Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com To: armlinux@yahoo.com Cc: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Message-id: <200001241555.QAA08571@duteinh.et.tudelft.nl> Organization: Eric conspiracy secret labs MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: XCmail 1.0.0 - with PGP support, PGP engine version 0.5 (Linux) Content-type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-transfer-encoding: 8bit Precedence: bulk X-Face: "!Z|1XjFg!3Iw)BwM^M\k)J5KHiPddz}#/Zw%?$&Q!xqob"OA|})3_@&BTTiQERo?/^g[Z<9P4R8:5C:aqq.cw!hotLc=+u-"+1rq@9$V^8PbOUlodyi_sejt+D`iqkLpx$>.aXl%vnfPIt"LK|/%>94_Zrm8jy?`_[RKt'TuoxUxfk(gMhY(n|DBBl~c$dhO>G%6}R4+DGX3|idBm4oU&UM/XUP4I9aoN{]`ax%B?rgD(I3OJ<62Y6L X-Mailerorigin: http://www.fsai.fh-trier.de/~schmitzj/Xclasses/XCmail/ X-Eric-Conspiracy: There is no conspiracy! X-Loop: erik@it.et.tudelft.nl On Sun, 23 Jan 2000 22:14:50 -0800 (PST), wolf wrote: > I use sa-1100 brutus. But every time I use angelboot > to download kernel and ramdisk to the board, a long > time to wait. My opts file's content is as follows: > > base 0x8000 > entry 0xc0008000 > device /dev/ttyS0 > options "9600 8N1" > baud 115200 > otherfile ramdisk.gz > otherbase 0x800000 > > When I use SDT , the download speed can be tuned. So, > I think under linux , it also can be accelerated. But > how? You can't go faster. 115k2 is the maximum serial speed. Erik PS: please don't crosspost between linux-arm and sa1100-linux -- LART. 250 MIPS under one Watt. http://www-ict.its.tudelft.nl/~erik/open-source/LART/ From kramer@pa.dec.com Mon Jan 24 18:22:35 2000 Return-Path: Received: from tudedr.et.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id SAA09017; Mon, 24 Jan 2000 18:22:35 +0100 (MET) Received: from mail2.digital.com by ITS.TUDelft.NL (PMDF V5.1-10 #21918) with ESMTP id <01JL3C2OPM7O93511S@ITS.TUDelft.NL> for erik@duteinh.et.tudelft.nl; Mon, 24 Jan 2000 18:21:35 +0100 Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.2/WV2.0g) with SMTP id JAA00357; Mon, 24 Jan 2000 09:17:16 -0800 (PST) Received: from rex.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA12751; Mon, 24 Jan 2000 09:17:14 -0800 Received: by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id JAA03050; Mon, 24 Jan 2000 09:16:55 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id JAA03043; Mon, 24 Jan 2000 09:16:53 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail2.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA28647; Mon, 24 Jan 2000 09:16:53 -0800 Received: from xanadu.vipswitch.com (generic199.197.205.205.in-addr.arpa [205.205.197.199] (may be forged)) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.2/WV2.0g) with ESMTP id JAA32421 for ; Mon, 24 Jan 2000 09:16:50 -0800 (PST) Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2000 12:05:41 -0500 (EST) From: Nicolas Pitre Subject: Re: How to speed up download In-reply-to: <200001241555.QAA08571@duteinh.et.tudelft.nl> Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com To: Erik Mouw Cc: armlinux@yahoo.com, sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Message-id: MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Precedence: bulk On Mon, 24 Jan 2000, Erik Mouw wrote: > On Sun, 23 Jan 2000 22:14:50 -0800 (PST), wolf wrote: > > I use sa-1100 brutus. But every time I use angelboot > > to download kernel and ramdisk to the board, a long > > time to wait. My opts file's content is as follows: > > [...] > > > > When I use SDT , the download speed can be tuned. So, > > I think under linux , it also can be accelerated. But > > how? It is already tuned to the maximum which is 115200 bauds for normal PC hardware. However the SA1100 can run up to 230400 bauds which is possible if you can stick a fast serial board in your PC. Also you can try this if you use 2.3.x: - search for the free_initrd_mem() function in arch/arm/mm/init.c and put a "return" right at the beginning; - load the ramdisk as usual; - if you have to reboot, do it with the reset switch, don't power your board off; - now on you don't have to load the ramdisk with subsequent kernel loads (you can comment out the "otherfile" and "otherbase" lines in your opts file. This way, the original ramdisk image always stay in memory. This is a great time saver, but you loose about 3 megs of available RAM (shouldn't be a big deal over 16 megs). Probably the same hack can be done with 2.0.x too. Nicolas From kramer@pa.dec.com Mon Jan 24 22:44:34 2000 Return-Path: Received: from tudedr.et.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id WAA10116; Mon, 24 Jan 2000 22:44:34 +0100 (MET) Received: from mail1.digital.com by ITS.TUDelft.NL (PMDF V5.1-10 #21918) with ESMTP id <01JL3L8PX2289350DP@ITS.TUDelft.NL> for erik@duteinh.et.tudelft.nl; Mon, 24 Jan 2000 22:44:30 +0100 Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.2/WV2.0g) with SMTP id NAA13517; Mon, 24 Jan 2000 13:39:36 -0800 (PST) Received: from rex.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA16343; Mon, 24 Jan 2000 13:39:21 -0800 Received: by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id NAA03187; Mon, 24 Jan 2000 13:38:39 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id NAA03183; Mon, 24 Jan 2000 13:38:37 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail1.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA13203; Mon, 24 Jan 2000 13:38:37 -0800 Received: from eising.k-net.dk (eising.k-net.dtu.dk [130.225.71.227]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.2/WV2.0g) with ESMTP id NAA17405 for ; Mon, 24 Jan 2000 13:38:32 -0800 (PST) Received: from obelix.vkr.k-net.dk (obelix.vkr.k-net.dk [192.38.209.3]) by eising.k-net.dk (Postfix) with ESMTP id D78E8918A2 for ; Mon, 24 Jan 2000 22:38:15 +0100 (CET) Received: by obelix.vkr.k-net.dk with Internet Mail Service (5.5.1960.3) id ; Mon, 24 Jan 2000 22:37:51 +0100 Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2000 22:37:51 +0100 From: Anders Frederiksen Subject: RE: How to speed up download Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com To: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Message-id: MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.1960.3) Content-type: text/plain Precedence: bulk [cut!] > It is already tuned to the maximum which is 115200 bauds for normal PC > hardware. However the SA1100 can run up to 230400 bauds > which is possible > if you can stick a fast serial board in your PC. [cut!] Has nobody got angel running on USB. As totally green (just got a Brutus fired up this week) I'd expect to find that allready done - or at least possible without massive problems? Best Regards, Anders Frederiksen PS: Expect some "stupid" questions in the near future when I'm getting problems with toolchains and linux-kernel... By the way: Is there something like a "Real Time Linux"? From kramer@pa.dec.com Tue Jan 25 16:23:15 2000 Return-Path: Received: from tudedr.et.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id QAA15827; Tue, 25 Jan 2000 16:23:15 +0100 (MET) Received: from mail2.digital.com by ITS.TUDelft.NL (PMDF V5.1-10 #21918) with ESMTP id <01JL4M85OCG4935197@ITS.TUDelft.NL> for erik@duteinh.et.tudelft.nl; Tue, 25 Jan 2000 16:23:09 +0100 Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.2/WV2.0g) with SMTP id HAA17820; Tue, 25 Jan 2000 07:19:11 -0800 (PST) Received: from rex.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA08418; Tue, 25 Jan 2000 07:18:56 -0800 Received: by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id HAA03546; Tue, 25 Jan 2000 07:17:22 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id HAA03530; Tue, 25 Jan 2000 07:17:20 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail1.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA18327; Tue, 25 Jan 2000 07:17:20 -0800 Received: from xanadu.vipswitch.com (generic199.197.205.205.in-addr.arpa [205.205.197.199] (may be forged)) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.2/WV2.0g) with ESMTP id HAA09632 for ; Tue, 25 Jan 2000 07:17:19 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2000 10:09:21 -0500 (EST) From: Nicolas Pitre Subject: diff-2.2.14-rmk3-np15 Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com To: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Message-id: MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Precedence: bulk ... is now on ftp.netwinder.org/users/n/nico. This patch only brings SA1100 support to 2.2.14, nothing new. Despite the changes made by Russell in 2.2.14-rmk3 to be more gcc-2.95.x friendly, it still isn't stable if compiled with gcc-2.95.2. I've been able to get into a shell, but processes get random segfaults in kernel mode if you play around, which doesn't happen if the kernel is compiled with egcs. (Philip: do you have any clue?) If you want to use gcc-2.95.x, you should go with 2.3.35-rmk1-np6 for now. Nicolas From kramer@pa.dec.com Tue Jan 25 16:40:27 2000 Return-Path: Received: from tudedr.et.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id QAA15938; Tue, 25 Jan 2000 16:40:26 +0100 (MET) Received: from mail1.digital.com by ITS.TUDelft.NL (PMDF V5.1-10 #21918) with ESMTP id <01JL4MTMLWIM94DOAQ@ITS.TUDelft.NL> for erik@duteinh.et.tudelft.nl; Tue, 25 Jan 2000 16:40:24 +0100 Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.2/WV2.0g) with SMTP id HAA13326; Tue, 25 Jan 2000 07:36:24 -0800 (PST) Received: from rex.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA21860; Tue, 25 Jan 2000 07:36:18 -0800 Received: by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id HAA03560; Tue, 25 Jan 2000 07:36:01 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id HAA03562; Tue, 25 Jan 2000 07:35:59 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail2.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA26074; Tue, 25 Jan 2000 07:35:57 -0800 Received: from salisbury.labs.futuretv.com (salisbury.futuretv.com [194.216.164.17]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.2/WV2.0g) with ESMTP id HAA20783 for ; Tue, 25 Jan 2000 07:35:56 -0800 (PST) Received: from zebra.labs.futuretv.com ([192.0.0.67]) by salisbury.labs.futuretv.com with esmtp (Exim 3.03 #1) id 12D81p-0005ya-00 for sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com; Tue, 25 Jan 2000 15:37:13 +0000 Received: from [192.0.0.21] (helo=fountain.labs.futuretv.com) by zebra.labs.futuretv.com with esmtp (Exim 3.03 #1) id 12D80L-00052h-00; Tue, 25 Jan 2000 15:35:41 +0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=fountain) by fountain.labs.futuretv.com with esmtp (Exim 3.03 #1) id 12D80L-0002vf-00; Tue, 25 Jan 2000 15:35:41 +0000 Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2000 15:35:41 +0000 From: Philip Blundell Subject: Re: diff-2.2.14-rmk3-np15 In-reply-to: Message from Nicolas Pitre "of Tue, 25 Jan 2000 10:09:21 EST." Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com To: Nicolas Pitre Cc: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Message-id: MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: exmh version 2.0.2 2/24/98 (debian) Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Precedence: bulk References: >Despite the changes made by Russell in 2.2.14-rmk3 to be more gcc-2.95.x >friendly, it still isn't stable if compiled with gcc-2.95.2. I've been >able to get into a shell, but processes get random segfaults in kernel >mode if you play around, which doesn't happen if the kernel is compiled >with egcs. (Philip: do you have any clue?) Do you know what changes Russell made? As far as I know, you just need -fno-strict-aliasing and either -ffixed-r10 or a small patch to the context switch code. You could try using the 2.2 code from CVS; we routinely build that with gcc 2.95 and have no problems. I imagine your patches should apply fairly cleanly to it. p. From kramer@pa.dec.com Tue Jan 25 16:54:53 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id QAA16012; Tue, 25 Jan 2000 16:54:53 +0100 (MET) Received: from ns2.tudelft.nl (ns2.tudelft.nl [130.161.180.65]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.8.6 (PHNE_17135)/8.8.6) with ESMTP id QAA19779 for ; Tue, 25 Jan 2000 16:54:53 +0100 (MET) Received: from mail2.digital.com (mail2.digital.com [204.123.2.56]) by mailhost1.tudelft.nl (PMDF V5.2-32 #42432) with ESMTP id <0FOW00AQ1EV91P@mailhost1.tudelft.nl> for J.A.K.Mouw@its.tudelft.nl; Tue, 25 Jan 2000 16:54:46 +0100 (MET) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.2/WV2.0g) with SMTP id HAA22340; Tue, 25 Jan 2000 07:47:51 -0800 (PST) Received: from rex.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA02414; Tue, 25 Jan 2000 07:47:50 -0800 Received: by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id HAA03572; Tue, 25 Jan 2000 07:47:37 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id HAA03574; Tue, 25 Jan 2000 07:47:35 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail1.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA15523; Tue, 25 Jan 2000 07:47:35 -0800 Received: from web1203.mail.yahoo.com (web1203.mail.yahoo.com [128.11.23.139]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.2/WV2.0g) with SMTP id HAA14355 for ; Tue, 25 Jan 2000 07:47:35 -0800 (PST) Received: (qmail 1114 invoked by uid 60001); Tue, 25 Jan 2000 15:45:02 +0000 Received: from [202.106.6.18] by web1203.mail.yahoo.com; Tue, 25 Jan 2000 07:45:02 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2000 07:45:02 -0800 (PST) From: wolf Subject: Re: diff-2.2.14-rmk3-np15 Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com To: Philip Blundell Cc: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Message-id: <20000125154502.1113.qmail@web1203.mail.yahoo.com> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Precedence: bulk Hi, philip Thanks for many help I got from you and sorry to bother you again. How and where can I get code from CVS ? wolf > > You could try using the 2.2 code from CVS; we > routinely build that with gcc __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Talk to your friends online with Yahoo! Messenger. http://im.yahoo.com From kramer@pa.dec.com Tue Jan 25 17:08:54 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id RAA16095; Tue, 25 Jan 2000 17:08:53 +0100 (MET) Received: from ns2.tudelft.nl (ns2.tudelft.nl [130.161.180.65]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.8.6 (PHNE_17135)/8.8.6) with ESMTP id RAA20250 for ; Tue, 25 Jan 2000 17:08:53 +0100 (MET) Received: from mail1.digital.com (mail1.digital.com [204.123.2.50]) by mailhost1.tudelft.nl (PMDF V5.2-32 #42432) with ESMTP id <0FOW00BJLFIM46@mailhost1.tudelft.nl> for J.A.K.Mouw@its.tudelft.nl; Tue, 25 Jan 2000 17:08:47 +0100 (MET) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.2/WV2.0g) with SMTP id IAA16183; Tue, 25 Jan 2000 08:02:04 -0800 (PST) Received: from rex.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA27098; Tue, 25 Jan 2000 08:01:58 -0800 Received: by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id IAA03603; Tue, 25 Jan 2000 08:01:38 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id IAA03596; Tue, 25 Jan 2000 08:01:36 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail1.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA11937; Tue, 25 Jan 2000 08:01:36 -0800 Received: from xanadu.vipswitch.com (generic199.197.205.205.in-addr.arpa [205.205.197.199] (may be forged)) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.2/WV2.0g) with ESMTP id IAA14854 for ; Tue, 25 Jan 2000 08:01:35 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2000 10:53:13 -0500 (EST) From: Nicolas Pitre Subject: Re: diff-2.2.14-rmk3-np15 In-reply-to: Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com To: Philip Blundell Cc: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Message-id: MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Precedence: bulk On Tue, 25 Jan 2000, Philip Blundell wrote: > >Despite the changes made by Russell in 2.2.14-rmk3 to be more gcc-2.95.x > >friendly, it still isn't stable if compiled with gcc-2.95.2. I've been > >able to get into a shell, but processes get random segfaults in kernel > >mode if you play around, which doesn't happen if the kernel is compiled > >with egcs. (Philip: do you have any clue?) > > Do you know what changes Russell made? As far as I know, you just need > -fno-strict-aliasing and either -ffixed-r10 or a small patch to the context > switch code. R10 is now saved between context switches in 2.2.14-rmk3. Nicolas From kramer@pa.dec.com Tue Jan 25 17:03:45 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id RAA16064; Tue, 25 Jan 2000 17:03:45 +0100 (MET) Received: from ns2.tudelft.nl (ns2.tudelft.nl [130.161.180.65]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.8.6 (PHNE_17135)/8.8.6) with ESMTP id RAA20110 for ; Tue, 25 Jan 2000 17:03:45 +0100 (MET) Received: from mail2.digital.com (mail2.digital.com [204.123.2.56]) by mailhost1.tudelft.nl (PMDF V5.2-32 #42432) with ESMTP id <0FOW00BFQFA1V7@mailhost1.tudelft.nl> for J.A.K.Mouw@its.tudelft.nl; Tue, 25 Jan 2000 17:03:38 +0100 (MET) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.2/WV2.0g) with SMTP id HAA23080; Tue, 25 Jan 2000 07:56:25 -0800 (PST) Received: from rex.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA27458; Tue, 25 Jan 2000 07:56:24 -0800 Received: by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id HAA03592; Tue, 25 Jan 2000 07:56:07 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id HAA03583; Tue, 25 Jan 2000 07:56:05 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail2.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA27867; Tue, 25 Jan 2000 07:56:05 -0800 Received: from mailgate.keith-koep.com (mailgate.keith-koep.com [195.8.230.32]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.2/WV2.0g) with ESMTP id HAA23313 for ; Tue, 25 Jan 2000 07:56:03 -0800 (PST) Received: from otto (otto [195.8.230.40]) by mailgate.keith-koep.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id RAA04011 for ; Tue, 25 Jan 2000 17:00:30 +0100 Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2000 16:55:41 +0100 (MET) From: keith Subject: diff-2.2.14-rmk3-np15 Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com To: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Reply-to: keith Message-id: <200001251600.RAA04011@mailgate.keith-koep.com> MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: dtmail 1.2.0 CDE Version 1.2 SunOS 5.6 sun4u sparc Content-type: TEXT/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-MD5: CpFB0YlsHBMo4Pasz9/k2A== Precedence: bulk Hi Nico, using the old kernel and my old gcc (arm-coff, strange but this was the only cross compiler i got to work for the 2.0.30 using solaris, long time ago) i found out that the r10 register was NOT saved across context swaps. I guess the 2.2 did not change this and the problem may be that the new compiler may perhaps use this register. (My coff compiler did, and my problems were solved saving this register across the context switch) Volker _________________________________________________________________ | | | KEITH & KOEP GMBH DEVELOPMENT OF EMBEDDED CONTROL SYSTEMS | | KOENIGSBERGER STR.2 PHONE +49 (0)202 2525 30 | | D-42277 WUPPERTAL FAX +49 (0)202 2525 333 | | GERMANY keith@keith-koep.com | |_________________________________________________________________| From kramer@pa.dec.com Tue Jan 25 17:08:55 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id RAA16099; Tue, 25 Jan 2000 17:08:55 +0100 (MET) Received: from ns2.tudelft.nl (ns2.tudelft.nl [130.161.180.65]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.8.6 (PHNE_17135)/8.8.6) with ESMTP id RAA20254 for ; Tue, 25 Jan 2000 17:08:55 +0100 (MET) Received: from mail1.digital.com (mail1.digital.com [204.123.2.50]) by mailhost1.tudelft.nl (PMDF V5.2-32 #42432) with ESMTP id <0FOW00BIJFIOV7@mailhost1.tudelft.nl> for J.A.K.Mouw@its.tudelft.nl; Tue, 25 Jan 2000 17:08:49 +0100 (MET) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.2/WV2.0g) with SMTP id IAA12560; Tue, 25 Jan 2000 08:02:11 -0800 (PST) Received: from rex.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA05973; Tue, 25 Jan 2000 08:02:05 -0800 Received: by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id IAA03618; Tue, 25 Jan 2000 08:01:54 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id IAA03614; Tue, 25 Jan 2000 08:01:52 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail2.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA10045; Tue, 25 Jan 2000 08:01:51 -0800 Received: from salisbury.labs.futuretv.com (salisbury.futuretv.com [194.216.164.17]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.2/WV2.0g) with ESMTP id IAA22849 for ; Tue, 25 Jan 2000 08:01:49 -0800 (PST) Received: from zebra.labs.futuretv.com ([192.0.0.67] ident=mail) by salisbury.labs.futuretv.com with esmtp (Exim 3.03 #1) id 12D8Qx-0005zP-00 for sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com; Tue, 25 Jan 2000 16:03:11 +0000 Received: from [192.0.0.21] (helo=fountain.labs.futuretv.com ident=mail) by zebra.labs.futuretv.com with esmtp (Exim 3.03 #1) id 12D8PT-0005C9-00; Tue, 25 Jan 2000 16:01:39 +0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=fountain ident=pb) by fountain.labs.futuretv.com with esmtp (Exim 3.03 #1) id 12D8PT-000372-00; Tue, 25 Jan 2000 16:01:39 +0000 Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2000 16:01:39 +0000 From: Philip Blundell Subject: Re: diff-2.2.14-rmk3-np15 In-reply-to: Message from wolf "of Tue, 25 Jan 2000 07:45:02 PST." <20000125154502.1113.qmail@web1203.mail.yahoo.com> Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com To: wolf Cc: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Message-id: MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: exmh version 2.0.2 2/24/98 (debian) Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Precedence: bulk References: <20000125154502.1113.qmail@web1203.mail.yahoo.com> >How and where can I get code from CVS ? The CVS tree is hosted at netwinder.org. If you are a registered developer, see the web pages for details. Otherwise, you can get daily snapshots from . p. From kramer@pa.dec.com Tue Jan 25 17:19:33 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id RAA16160; Tue, 25 Jan 2000 17:19:32 +0100 (MET) Received: from ns2.tudelft.nl (ns2.tudelft.nl [130.161.180.65]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.8.6 (PHNE_17135)/8.8.6) with ESMTP id RAA20539 for ; Tue, 25 Jan 2000 17:19:32 +0100 (MET) Received: from mail1.digital.com (mail1.digital.com [204.123.2.50]) by mailhost1.tudelft.nl (PMDF V5.2-32 #42432) with ESMTP id <0FOW00BQWG0CV7@mailhost1.tudelft.nl> for J.A.K.Mouw@its.tudelft.nl; Tue, 25 Jan 2000 17:19:25 +0100 (MET) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.2/WV2.0g) with SMTP id IAA16256; Tue, 25 Jan 2000 08:05:19 -0800 (PST) Received: from rex.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA18596; Tue, 25 Jan 2000 08:05:18 -0800 Received: by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id IAA03649; Tue, 25 Jan 2000 08:05:07 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id IAA03641; Tue, 25 Jan 2000 08:05:05 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail2.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA18853; Tue, 25 Jan 2000 08:05:04 -0800 Received: from salisbury.labs.futuretv.com (salisbury.futuretv.com [194.216.164.17]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.2/WV2.0g) with ESMTP id IAA23566 for ; Tue, 25 Jan 2000 08:04:42 -0800 (PST) Received: from zebra.labs.futuretv.com ([192.0.0.67] ident=mail) by salisbury.labs.futuretv.com with esmtp (Exim 3.03 #1) id 12D8Tp-0005zT-00 for sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com; Tue, 25 Jan 2000 16:06:09 +0000 Received: from [192.0.0.21] (helo=fountain.labs.futuretv.com ident=mail) by zebra.labs.futuretv.com with esmtp (Exim 3.03 #1) id 12D8SO-0005DF-00; Tue, 25 Jan 2000 16:04:40 +0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=fountain ident=pb) by fountain.labs.futuretv.com with esmtp (Exim 3.03 #1) id 12D8SO-00038i-00; Tue, 25 Jan 2000 16:04:40 +0000 Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2000 16:04:39 +0000 From: Philip Blundell Subject: Re: diff-2.2.14-rmk3-np15 In-reply-to: Message from Nicolas Pitre "of Tue, 25 Jan 2000 10:53:13 EST." Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com To: Nicolas Pitre Cc: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Message-id: MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: exmh version 2.0.2 2/24/98 (debian) Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Precedence: bulk References: >> Do you know what changes Russell made? As far as I know, you just need >> -fno-strict-aliasing and either -ffixed-r10 or a small patch to the context >> switch code. > >R10 is now saved between context switches in 2.2.14-rmk3. And -fno-strict-aliasing? If that is also in already, I guess it's possible that there is some bug in the SA1100 code itself, or that something about that code is tickling a GCC problem. p. From kramer@pa.dec.com Tue Jan 25 17:12:25 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id RAA16124; Tue, 25 Jan 2000 17:12:21 +0100 (MET) Received: from ns2.tudelft.nl (ns2.tudelft.nl [130.161.180.65]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.8.6 (PHNE_17135)/8.8.6) with ESMTP id RAA20357 for ; Tue, 25 Jan 2000 17:12:21 +0100 (MET) Received: from mail2.digital.com (mail2.digital.com [204.123.2.56]) by mailhost1.tudelft.nl (PMDF V5.2-32 #42432) with ESMTP id <0FOW00C5YFODUO@mailhost1.tudelft.nl> for J.A.K.Mouw@its.tudelft.nl; Tue, 25 Jan 2000 17:12:14 +0100 (MET) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.2/WV2.0g) with SMTP id IAA22342; Tue, 25 Jan 2000 08:04:52 -0800 (PST) Received: from rex.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA02749; Tue, 25 Jan 2000 08:04:51 -0800 Received: by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id IAA03637; Tue, 25 Jan 2000 08:04:40 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id IAA03633; Tue, 25 Jan 2000 08:04:38 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail2.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA10741; Tue, 25 Jan 2000 08:04:38 -0800 Received: from hw-mail.hoeft-wessel.de (pec-23-218.tnt2.h.uunet.de [149.225.23.218]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.2/WV2.0g) with ESMTP id IAA23652 for ; Tue, 25 Jan 2000 08:04:36 -0800 (PST) Received: by HW_MAIL with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2448.0) id ; Tue, 25 Jan 2000 17:07:50 +0100 Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2000 17:07:50 +0100 From: "JOR. - Jordan, Roman" Subject: gdb Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com To: "'sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com'" Message-id: <81413F587EB9D1118F56000092941A3EA78C0E@HW_MAIL> MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2448.0) Content-type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Precedence: bulk Hi all, where can i get the gdb patch for arm-linux-elf. Thanks in advance, Roman From kramer@pa.dec.com Tue Jan 25 17:57:23 2000 Return-Path: Received: from TUDEDU.ET.TUDelft.NL by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id RAA16412; Tue, 25 Jan 2000 17:57:22 +0100 (MET) Received: from mail1.digital.com by ITS.TUDelft.NL (PMDF V5.1-10 #21918) with ESMTP id <01JL4P5WFTM493539W@ITS.TUDelft.NL> for erik@duteinh.et.tudelft.nl; Tue, 25 Jan 2000 17:47:35 +0100 Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.2/WV2.0g) with SMTP id IAA18626; Tue, 25 Jan 2000 08:41:08 -0800 (PST) Received: from rex.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA03869; Tue, 25 Jan 2000 08:41:01 -0800 Received: by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id IAA03643; Tue, 25 Jan 2000 08:40:41 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id IAA03656; Tue, 25 Jan 2000 08:40:38 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail1.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA30345; Tue, 25 Jan 2000 08:40:38 -0800 Received: from salisbury.labs.futuretv.com (salisbury.futuretv.com [194.216.164.17]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.2/WV2.0g) with ESMTP id IAA20287 for ; Tue, 25 Jan 2000 08:40:37 -0800 (PST) Received: from zebra.labs.futuretv.com ([192.0.0.67]) by salisbury.labs.futuretv.com with esmtp (Exim 3.03 #1) id 12D92a-00060A-00 for sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com; Tue, 25 Jan 2000 16:42:04 +0000 Received: from [192.0.0.21] (helo=fountain.labs.futuretv.com ident=mail) by zebra.labs.futuretv.com with esmtp (Exim 3.03 #1) id 12D914-0005P9-00; Tue, 25 Jan 2000 16:40:30 +0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=fountain ident=pb) by fountain.labs.futuretv.com with esmtp (Exim 3.03 #1) id 12D913-0003Ok-00; Tue, 25 Jan 2000 16:40:30 +0000 Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2000 16:40:29 +0000 From: Philip Blundell Subject: Re: gdb In-reply-to: "Message from JOR. - Jordan, Roman" "of Tue, 25 Jan 2000 17:07:50 +0100." <81413F587EB9D1118F56000092941A3EA78C0E@HW_MAIL> Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com To: "JOR. - Jordan, Roman" Cc: "'sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com'" Message-id: MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: exmh version 2.0.2 2/24/98 (debian) Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Precedence: bulk References: <81413F587EB9D1118F56000092941A3EA78C0E@HW_MAIL> >where can i get the gdb patch for arm-linux-elf. Just get the latest snapshot from sourceware. p. From kramer@pa.dec.com Tue Jan 25 17:57:20 2000 Return-Path: Received: from TUDEDU.ET.TUDelft.NL by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id RAA16409; Tue, 25 Jan 2000 17:57:19 +0100 (MET) Received: from mail1.digital.com by ITS.TUDelft.NL (PMDF V5.1-10 #21918) with ESMTP id <01JL4P5F0ACW93539W@ITS.TUDelft.NL> for erik@duteinh.et.tudelft.nl; Tue, 25 Jan 2000 17:47:12 +0100 Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.2/WV2.0g) with SMTP id IAA19149; Tue, 25 Jan 2000 08:42:54 -0800 (PST) Received: from rex.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA15625; Tue, 25 Jan 2000 08:42:48 -0800 Received: by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id IAA03666; Tue, 25 Jan 2000 08:42:37 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id IAA03668; Tue, 25 Jan 2000 08:42:35 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail2.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA01566; Tue, 25 Jan 2000 08:42:34 -0800 Received: from salisbury.labs.futuretv.com (salisbury.futuretv.com [194.216.164.17]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.2/WV2.0g) with ESMTP id IAA28275 for ; Tue, 25 Jan 2000 08:42:33 -0800 (PST) Received: from zebra.labs.futuretv.com ([192.0.0.67]) by salisbury.labs.futuretv.com with esmtp (Exim 3.03 #1) id 12D94S-00060E-00 for sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com; Tue, 25 Jan 2000 16:44:00 +0000 Received: from [192.0.0.21] (helo=fountain.labs.futuretv.com ident=mail) by zebra.labs.futuretv.com with esmtp (Exim 3.03 #1) id 12D92x-0005PW-00; Tue, 25 Jan 2000 16:42:27 +0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=fountain ident=pb) by fountain.labs.futuretv.com with esmtp (Exim 3.03 #1) id 12D92x-0003PL-00; Tue, 25 Jan 2000 16:42:27 +0000 Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2000 16:42:26 +0000 From: Philip Blundell Subject: Re: diff-2.2.14-rmk3-np15 In-reply-to: Message from keith "of Tue, 25 Jan 2000 16:55:41 +0100." <200001251600.RAA04011@mailgate.keith-koep.com> Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com To: keith Cc: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Message-id: MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: exmh version 2.0.2 2/24/98 (debian) Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Precedence: bulk References: <200001251600.RAA04011@mailgate.keith-koep.com> >i found out that the r10 register was NOT saved across context swaps. >I guess the 2.2 did not change this and the problem may be >that the new compiler may perhaps use this register. (My coff compiler >did, and my problems were solved saving this register across the context >switch) Yes, that's certainly one of the problems. The newer compilers will use R10 and/or R11 as general registers if they are not required for their "fixed" purposes. But apparently this is corrected in 2.2.14-rmk3. p. From kramer@pa.dec.com Wed Jan 26 09:13:59 2000 Return-Path: Received: from tudedr.et.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id JAA19653; Wed, 26 Jan 2000 09:06:16 +0100 (MET) Received: from mail2.digital.com by ITS.TUDelft.NL (PMDF V5.1-10 #21918) with ESMTP id <01JL5L8V1AC895MMW8@ITS.TUDelft.NL> for erik@duteinh.et.tudelft.nl; Wed, 26 Jan 2000 09:06:13 +0100 Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.2/WV2.0g) with SMTP id AAA32533; Wed, 26 Jan 2000 00:02:54 -0800 (PST) Received: from rex.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA19029; Wed, 26 Jan 2000 00:02:28 -0800 Received: by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id AAA03993; Wed, 26 Jan 2000 00:01:03 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id AAA03988; Wed, 26 Jan 2000 00:01:01 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail2.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA32144; Wed, 26 Jan 2000 00:01:00 -0800 Received: from cwcsun41.cwc.nus.edu.sg (cwcsun41.cwc.nus.edu.sg [137.132.163.102]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.2/WV2.0g) with ESMTP id AAA32235 for ; Wed, 26 Jan 2000 00:00:58 -0800 (PST) Received: from catbert.cwc.nus.edu.sg ([137.132.163.120]) by cwcsun41.cwc.nus.edu.sg (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id PAA23302 for ; Wed, 26 Jan 2000 15:56:53 +0800 (SGT) Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2000 16:04:59 +0800 (SGT) From: amlan@geektown.net Subject: PCMCIA patch for Brutus. Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com X-Sender: amlan@catbert.cwc.nus.edu.sg To: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Reply-to: a.saha@acm.org Message-id: MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Precedence: bulk Phone: +65.8709.265 (O) +65.468.8157 (H) -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hi all We have put together a small patch to enable the standard pcmcia package to run on the Brutus board. The current patch is meant for version 3.0.13 of the pcmcia distribution. While the card manager and associated functions have been ported fully, only two specific card drivers are working - Lucent's WAVELAN (802.11) and the ATA flash drivers. You can download the source(patch) from ftp://dilbert.cwc.nus.edu.sg/pub/delphipad/ - -Amlan Saha Centre for Wireless Communications National University of Singapore -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: PGPfreeware 5.0i for non-commercial use Comment: . Charset: noconv iQCVAwUBOI6qr5e0cErdTwklAQHHlwP+KVT6tUYrk5K30HDkzlsX+7ijlAzzy9F1 5me3DsSX7E1ERqIN+ctgXUpHmwp54B5FdvtbdJD8ps0qHSyAASDzKljf79j22m54 6iwchgjxWwtppFR40Df9l1fk4CPRY3xbQ34XWBeLKQ+TWYSB6opGWydOOM9EjcKq IOHQaSL6yqQ= =I9vL -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From kramer@pa.dec.com Wed Jan 26 19:23:37 2000 Return-Path: Received: from tudedr.et.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id TAA01127; Wed, 26 Jan 2000 19:23:37 +0100 (MET) Received: from mail1.digital.com by ITS.TUDelft.NL (PMDF V5.1-10 #21918) with ESMTP id <01JL66T9P5FK984ITR@ITS.TUDelft.NL> for erik@duteinh.et.tudelft.nl; Wed, 26 Jan 2000 19:23:33 +0100 Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.2/WV2.0g) with SMTP id KAA04395; Wed, 26 Jan 2000 10:20:22 -0800 (PST) Received: from rex.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA13240; Wed, 26 Jan 2000 10:19:57 -0800 Received: by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id KAA04188; Wed, 26 Jan 2000 10:15:27 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id KAA04185; Wed, 26 Jan 2000 10:15:24 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail2.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA06196; Wed, 26 Jan 2000 10:15:23 -0800 Received: from smtp2.andrew.cmu.edu (SMTP2.ANDREW.CMU.EDU [128.2.10.82]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.2/WV2.0g) with ESMTP id KAA11321 for ; Wed, 26 Jan 2000 10:15:23 -0800 (PST) Received: from unix10.andrew.cmu.edu (UNIX10.ANDREW.CMU.EDU [128.2.15.14]) by smtp2.andrew.cmu.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id NAA05636 for ; Wed, 26 Jan 2000 13:11:59 -0500 (EST) Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2000 13:11:59 -0500 (EST) From: John G Dorsey Subject: More PCMCIA! Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com To: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Reply-to: John G Dorsey Message-id: MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Precedence: bulk Hello, It would seem that my thunder has been stolen, but perhaps this is still of interest: http://www.cs.cmu.edu/~wearable/software/ The patch is against Card Services for Linux version 3.1.8, and works on the Itsy. We're running WaveLAN/IEEE devices using the full Lucent driver (not hcf-light), which required no code changes for use with the StrongARM. Please note that this code is _not_ the same as that released by Amlan Saha. In particular, a fair amount of attention has been paid to the configuration interface, in the hopes that the socket driver module will (eventually) work on a variety of boards. I wasn't planning to release this until I had confirmation that the code worked on Brutus and kernel 2.3, but today's earlier announcement seemed significant. =) Congratulations to the folks at the National University of Singapore for getting up and running! -jd From kramer@pa.dec.com Wed Jan 26 20:02:54 2000 Return-Path: Received: from tudedr.et.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id UAA01272; Wed, 26 Jan 2000 20:02:54 +0100 (MET) Received: from mail1.digital.com by ITS.TUDelft.NL (PMDF V5.1-10 #21918) with ESMTP id <01JL686X6M6O99DH2K@ITS.TUDelft.NL> for erik@duteinh.et.tudelft.nl; Wed, 26 Jan 2000 20:02:51 +0100 Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.2/WV2.0g) with SMTP id LAA08263; Wed, 26 Jan 2000 11:00:04 -0800 (PST) Received: from rex.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA09095; Wed, 26 Jan 2000 10:59:58 -0800 Received: by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id KAA04234; Wed, 26 Jan 2000 10:56:50 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id KAA04225; Wed, 26 Jan 2000 10:56:47 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail1.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA06846; Wed, 26 Jan 2000 10:56:47 -0800 Received: from xanadu.vipswitch.com (generic199.197.205.205.in-addr.arpa [205.205.197.199] (may be forged)) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.2/WV2.0g) with ESMTP id KAA07356 for ; Wed, 26 Jan 2000 10:56:44 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2000 13:48:47 -0500 (EST) From: Nicolas Pitre Subject: Re: More PCMCIA! In-reply-to: Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com To: John G Dorsey Cc: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Message-id: MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Precedence: bulk On Wed, 26 Jan 2000, John G Dorsey wrote: [...] > Please note that this code is _not_ the same as that released by Amlan > Saha. In particular, a fair amount of attention has been paid to the > configuration interface, in the hopes that the socket driver module will > (eventually) work on a variety of boards. > > I wasn't planning to release this until I had confirmation that the code > worked on Brutus and kernel 2.3, but today's earlier announcement seemed > significant. =) Congratulations to the folks at the National University > of Singapore for getting up and running! Unfortunately, I won't be able to play with PCMCIA code for some time... There is simply too many things to do and so little time for me currently... since I've also been given a ThinClient to port Linux to ... and I'm leaving for vacation on Friday for two weeks. So if anybody feel like playing with any of those PCMCIA work, I'll be glad to receive any patch against 2.3.x. ;-) Nicolas From kramer@pa.dec.com Thu Jan 27 09:06:56 2000 Return-Path: Received: from tudedv.et.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id JAA04094; Thu, 27 Jan 2000 09:06:55 +0100 (MET) Received: from mail2.digital.com by ITS.TUDelft.NL (PMDF V5.1-10 #21918) with ESMTP id <01JL6V3SOR24984IXG@ITS.TUDelft.NL> for erik@duteinh.et.tudelft.nl; Thu, 27 Jan 2000 06:59:14 +0100 Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.2/WV2.0g) with SMTP id VAA32128; Wed, 26 Jan 2000 21:53:52 -0800 (PST) Received: from rex.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA10063; Wed, 26 Jan 2000 21:53:45 -0800 Received: by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id VAA04495; Wed, 26 Jan 2000 21:50:33 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id VAA04487; Wed, 26 Jan 2000 21:50:31 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail2.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA01760; Wed, 26 Jan 2000 21:50:31 -0800 Received: from web1205.mail.yahoo.com (web1205.mail.yahoo.com [128.11.23.141]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.2/WV2.0g) with SMTP id VAA24590 for ; Wed, 26 Jan 2000 21:50:30 -0800 (PST) Received: (qmail 662 invoked by uid 60001); Thu, 27 Jan 2000 05:49:42 +0000 Received: from [192.11.226.101] by web1205.mail.yahoo.com; Wed, 26 Jan 2000 21:49:42 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2000 21:49:42 -0800 (PST) From: wolf Subject: Where to get ramdisk for X Window Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com To: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Message-id: <20000127054942.661.qmail@web1205.mail.yahoo.com> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Precedence: bulk Hi, I want to run X Window on brutus. Since X Window is large , I think maybe I need a large ramdisk to contain it and some configure files or other supported files. Somebody can give me some hints or a test suite for it? Your help is highly appreciated. wolf __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Talk to your friends online with Yahoo! Messenger. http://im.yahoo.com From kramer@pa.dec.com Thu Jan 27 18:09:54 2000 Return-Path: Received: from tudedr.et.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id SAA02004; Thu, 27 Jan 2000 18:09:54 +0100 (MET) Received: from mail2.digital.com by ITS.TUDelft.NL (PMDF V5.1-10 #21918) with ESMTP id <01JL7IJ3RWCW9AMEYR@ITS.TUDelft.NL> for erik@duteinh.et.tudelft.nl; Thu, 27 Jan 2000 18:09:48 +0100 Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id JAA12544; Thu, 27 Jan 2000 09:06:26 -0800 (PST) Received: from rex.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA32423; Thu, 27 Jan 2000 09:05:28 -0800 Received: by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id JAA04677; Thu, 27 Jan 2000 09:01:30 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id JAA04681; Thu, 27 Jan 2000 09:01:28 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail2.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA26108; Thu, 27 Jan 2000 09:01:28 -0800 Received: from web1204.mail.yahoo.com (web1204.mail.yahoo.com [128.11.23.140]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id JAA08769 for ; Thu, 27 Jan 2000 09:01:27 -0800 (PST) Received: (qmail 7235 invoked by uid 60001); Thu, 27 Jan 2000 16:47:01 +0000 Received: from [202.106.4.84] by web1204.mail.yahoo.com; Thu, 27 Jan 2000 08:47:01 -0800 (PST) Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2000 08:47:01 -0800 (PST) From: wolf Subject: How to build X using cross development tool chain Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com To: philip.blundell@pobox.com Cc: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com, france@crl.dec.com Message-id: <20000127164701.7234.qmail@web1204.mail.yahoo.com> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Precedence: bulk Hi,Philip >philip wrote >Yes. See the Debian, Titan and NetWinder >distributions, for example. People >are using XF86_FBDev at least on SA1100 platforms, and >both XF86_FBDev and >XF86_SVGA on various SA110 machines. >>george wrote: >>ftp.nw.carleton.ca >>/pub/winder/ >>then into the titan directory. >>Yu will find Xwindows already ported to the Strongarm >>bins and source. I got X window package from Titan's ftp site. But all the configuration files seems to be designed for being built based on Titan platform. How can I do a successful build using my cross development tool chain based on redhat PC? I ever tried to modify every configuration files myself. But soon I got confused, it seems I need the native gcc(and ld, libc...) and cross tools arm-linux-gcc(arm-linux-ld, arm-linux-glibc...) working together simultaneouly. BTW , what is Titan , where to get some general information about it? wolf __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Talk to your friends online with Yahoo! Messenger. http://im.yahoo.com From kramer@pa.dec.com Thu Jan 27 22:19:19 2000 Return-Path: Received: from tudedr.et.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id WAA03009; Thu, 27 Jan 2000 22:19:18 +0100 (MET) Received: from mail2.digital.com by ITS.TUDelft.NL (PMDF V5.1-10 #21918) with ESMTP id <01JL7R8EEVII9AMFU5@ITS.TUDelft.NL> for erik@duteinh.et.tudelft.nl; Thu, 27 Jan 2000 22:19:15 +0100 Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id NAA32419; Thu, 27 Jan 2000 13:14:25 -0800 (PST) Received: from rex.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA10373; Thu, 27 Jan 2000 13:14:18 -0800 Received: by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id NAA04767; Thu, 27 Jan 2000 13:09:47 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id NAA04757; Thu, 27 Jan 2000 13:09:45 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail1.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA09754; Thu, 27 Jan 2000 13:09:44 -0800 Received: from kings-cross.london.uk.eu.org (tazenda.demon.co.uk [158.152.220.239]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with ESMTP id NAA29931 for ; Thu, 27 Jan 2000 13:09:43 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost ([::ffff:127.0.0.1] helo=kings-cross.london.uk.eu.org ident=phil) by kings-cross.london.uk.eu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.11 #1) id 12DwAO-0001Nt-00; Thu, 27 Jan 2000 21:09:24 +0000 Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2000 21:09:24 +0000 From: Philip Blundell Subject: Re: How to build X using cross development tool chain In-reply-to: Message from wolf "of Thu, 27 Jan 2000 08:47:01 PST." <20000127164701.7234.qmail@web1204.mail.yahoo.com> Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com To: wolf Cc: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com, france@crl.dec.com Message-id: MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: exmh version 2.0.2 2/24/98 (debian) Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Precedence: bulk References: <20000127164701.7234.qmail@web1204.mail.yahoo.com> >I got X window package from Titan's ftp site. But all >the configuration files seems to be designed for being >built based on Titan platform. How can I do a >successful build using my cross development tool chain >based on redhat PC? Cross-building X would probably be astonishingly hard. To be honest, you will probably be better off buying a NetWinder or some other ARM-based machine that is capable of self hosting. p. From kramer@pa.dec.com Fri Jan 28 00:25:20 2000 Return-Path: Received: from tudedr.et.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id AAA03410; Fri, 28 Jan 2000 00:25:19 +0100 (MET) Received: from mail1.digital.com by ITS.TUDelft.NL (PMDF V5.1-10 #21918) with ESMTP id <01JL7VMPR14A9D4B5Q@ITS.TUDelft.NL> for erik@duteinh.et.tudelft.nl; Fri, 28 Jan 2000 00:25:17 +0100 Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id PAA06946; Thu, 27 Jan 2000 15:22:29 -0800 (PST) Received: from rex.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA19476; Thu, 27 Jan 2000 15:22:12 -0800 Received: by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id PAA04820; Thu, 27 Jan 2000 15:18:42 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id PAA04809; Thu, 27 Jan 2000 15:18:40 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail2.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA23932; Thu, 27 Jan 2000 15:18:39 -0800 Received: from nt_server.flatpanels.com (flatpanels.com [207.196.69.66]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with ESMTP id PAA09351 for ; Thu, 27 Jan 2000 15:18:38 -0800 (PST) Received: by flatpanels.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2448.0) id ; Thu, 27 Jan 2000 18:20:16 -0500 Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2000 18:20:06 -0500 From: "Saxena, Nikita" Subject: Problems building cross-compiler for arm-linux Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com To: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Message-id: <3134CD6A0FB3D311A45600105AC9863A0155A7@flatpanels.com> MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2448.0) Content-type: text/plain Precedence: bulk Hi, I'm trying to build an arm-linux cross compiler and have been following Chris Rutters pages i.e. Building the GNU Toolchain for ARM targets and got as far as putting in the -Dinhibit hack when making the compiler. However, it comes back with the following message, when I do make LANGUAGES="c" : libgcc1.S: 438: asm/unistd.h: No such file or directory make[1]: *** [libgcc1 - asm.a] Error 1 make[1]: Leaving directory '/usr/local/build/gcc/gcc' It appears it can't find unistd.h because as per the document only the /include/asm-arm and /include/linux kernel headers were copied to /usr/arm-linux/include. Is there a way around this? Thanks, Nikita From kramer@pa.dec.com Fri Jan 28 02:18:04 2000 Return-Path: Received: from tudedr.et.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id CAA03774; Fri, 28 Jan 2000 02:18:04 +0100 (MET) Received: from mail2.digital.com by ITS.TUDelft.NL (PMDF V5.1-10 #21918) with ESMTP id <01JL7ZKHZI7G9AMGEW@ITS.TUDelft.NL> for erik@duteinh.et.tudelft.nl; Fri, 28 Jan 2000 02:18:03 +0100 Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id RAA15728; Thu, 27 Jan 2000 17:13:56 -0800 (PST) Received: from rex.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA11709; Thu, 27 Jan 2000 17:13:50 -0800 Received: by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id RAA04865; Thu, 27 Jan 2000 17:10:26 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id RAA04868; Thu, 27 Jan 2000 17:10:24 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail2.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA05752; Thu, 27 Jan 2000 17:10:23 -0800 Received: from note.orchestra.cse.unsw.EDU.AU (note.orchestra.cse.unsw.EDU.AU [129.94.242.29]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id RAA18398 for ; Thu, 27 Jan 2000 17:10:20 -0800 (PST) Received: From paulaner With LocalMail ; Fri, 28 Jan 2000 11:38:27 +1100 Date: Fri, 28 Jan 2000 11:38:26 +1100 (EST) From: "Adam 'WeirdArms' Wiggins" Subject: Cache Write Back Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com X-Sender: awiggins@paulaner.disy.cse.unsw.EDU.AU To: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Message-id: MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Precedence: bulk I have a question about the Data Cache write back behaviour. Are the Page Table permissions check when a dirty DCache line gets written to the Write Buffer? Or is only the translation checked? The example is as follows. Lets say I have a dirty cache line who's current TLB entry is set domain 'A' then lets say we change the domain access register so domain 'A' is NO_ACCESS and domain 'B' is CLIENT then the dirty cache line in question gets replaced. Since the DCache is fully virtual it checks the TLB entry for the physical address to tag the entry with in the Write Buffer, will it: 1. Check permissions as well and therefore generate a domain fault 2. Not check permissions and happily move the dirty line to the Write Buffer Any idea's welcome, but please let me know if you know exactly the behaviour of the chip. Cheers Adam From kramer@pa.dec.com Fri Jan 28 04:54:49 2000 Return-Path: Received: from tudedr.et.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id EAA04307; Fri, 28 Jan 2000 04:54:49 +0100 (MET) Received: from mail2.digital.com by ITS.TUDelft.NL (PMDF V5.1-10 #21918) with ESMTP id <01JL851RB8CI9AMGL6@ITS.TUDelft.NL> for erik@duteinh.et.tudelft.nl; Fri, 28 Jan 2000 04:54:47 +0100 Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id TAA27770; Thu, 27 Jan 2000 19:46:54 -0800 (PST) Received: from rex.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA04005; Thu, 27 Jan 2000 19:46:51 -0800 Received: by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id TAA04917; Thu, 27 Jan 2000 19:43:28 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id TAA04804; Thu, 27 Jan 2000 19:43:26 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail1.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA04754; Thu, 27 Jan 2000 19:43:26 -0800 Received: from web1202.mail.yahoo.com (web1202.mail.yahoo.com [128.11.23.138]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id TAA20826 for ; Thu, 27 Jan 2000 19:43:26 -0800 (PST) Received: (qmail 16911 invoked by uid 60001); Fri, 28 Jan 2000 03:42:36 +0000 Received: from [192.11.226.102] by web1202.mail.yahoo.com; Thu, 27 Jan 2000 19:42:36 -0800 (PST) Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2000 19:42:36 -0800 (PST) From: wolf Subject: RE: How to build X using cross development tool chain Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com To: George France Cc: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Message-id: <20000128034236.16910.qmail@web1202.mail.yahoo.com> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Precedence: bulk Hi,George Thanks for your reply. --- George France wrote: > Hello wolf; > > I am not certain which shell or tool chain you are > using. If you are using > the bash shell then: > CC=arm-linux-gcc make > or > CC=arm-linux-gcc ./configure ... > make I use bash. I am building XFree86-3.3.3.1 with arm patch. It seems two compilers(native and cross) are both used. For example, Imake will be built by native gcc compiler to run on the host to creat subsequent Makefiles , on the other hand , X should be compiled by arm-linux-gcc. > I hope this helps. If you need more info, please, > inform us as to the type > of development system (host), the ARM hardware you > are using (target) and > what you are trying to develop (enlightenment, fw, > x86, gnome, KDE etc...). yes, I need more info. My host is x86 pc installed with red hat 6.1 . Target is sa1100-brutus. I am trying to develop GUI application under X , I initially plan that gnome is prefered. I use the tool chain which was set up by following the instructions given by chris rutter at http://inkvine.fluff.org/~chris/arm-tools.html It is a cross development tool not a native tool. it works well when building linux kernel-2.3.35 and general c program for brutus. My toolchain consists of binutils-2.9.5.0.14(target name is arm-linux), gcc-2.95.1 applied arm patches, glibc-2.1.2(arm binary). All the cross tools name are prefixed by arm-linux-. For example arm-linux-gcc, arm-linux-ld. The path of cross tools is /usr/local/arm/bin and the path of arm glibc is /usr/loca/arm/arm-linux. Thanks in advance. wolf __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Talk to your friends online with Yahoo! Messenger. http://im.yahoo.com From kramer@pa.dec.com Fri Jan 28 10:22:13 2000 Return-Path: Received: from tudedr.et.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id KAA05954; Fri, 28 Jan 2000 10:22:13 +0100 (MET) Received: from mail1.digital.com by ITS.TUDelft.NL (PMDF V5.1-10 #21918) with ESMTP id <01JL8GHN1OWU9AMGWX@ITS.TUDelft.NL> for erik@duteinh.et.tudelft.nl; Fri, 28 Jan 2000 10:22:10 +0100 Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id BAA13651; Fri, 28 Jan 2000 01:18:10 -0800 (PST) Received: from rex.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA30937; Fri, 28 Jan 2000 01:18:01 -0800 Received: by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id BAA05090; Fri, 28 Jan 2000 01:14:23 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id BAA05080; Fri, 28 Jan 2000 01:14:21 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail1.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA02636; Fri, 28 Jan 2000 01:14:20 -0800 Received: from duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (duteinh.et.tudelft.nl [130.161.42.1]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with ESMTP id BAA14016 for ; Fri, 28 Jan 2000 01:14:19 -0800 (PST) Received: from kalman by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id KAA05825; Fri, 28 Jan 2000 10:13:00 +0100 (MET) Date: Fri, 28 Jan 2000 10:13:00 +0100 (MET) From: Erik Mouw Subject: Re: Problems building cross-compiler for arm-linux In-reply-to: <3134CD6A0FB3D311A45600105AC9863A0155A7@flatpanels.com> Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com To: nsaxena@flatpanels.com Cc: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Message-id: <200001280913.KAA05825@duteinh.et.tudelft.nl> Organization: Eric conspiracy secret labs MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: XCmail 1.0.0 - with PGP support, PGP engine version 0.5 (Linux) Content-type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-transfer-encoding: 8bit Precedence: bulk X-Face: "!Z|1XjFg!3Iw)BwM^M\k)J5KHiPddz}#/Zw%?$&Q!xqob"OA|})3_@&BTTiQERo?/^g[Z<9P4R8:5C:aqq.cw!hotLc=+u-"+1rq@9$V^8PbOUlodyi_sejt+D`iqkLpx$>.aXl%vnfPIt"LK|/%>94_Zrm8jy?`_[RKt'TuoxUxfk(gMhY(n|DBBl~c$dhO>G%6}R4+DGX3|idBm4oU&UM/XUP4I9aoN{]`ax%B?rgD(I3OJ<62Y6L X-Mailerorigin: http://www.fsai.fh-trier.de/~schmitzj/Xclasses/XCmail/ X-Eric-Conspiracy: There is no conspiracy! X-Loop: erik@it.et.tudelft.nl On Thu, 27 Jan 2000 18:20:06 -0500, Saxena, Nikita wrote: > I'm trying to build an arm-linux cross compiler and have been following > Chris Rutters pages i.e. Building the GNU Toolchain for ARM targets and got > as far as putting in the -Dinhibit hack when making the compiler. However, > it comes back with the following message, when I do make LANGUAGES="c" : > > libgcc1.S: 438: asm/unistd.h: No such file or directory > make[1]: *** [libgcc1 - asm.a] Error 1 > make[1]: Leaving directory '/usr/local/build/gcc/gcc' > > It appears it can't find unistd.h because as per the document only the > /include/asm-arm and /include/linux kernel headers were copied to > /usr/arm-linux/include. Is there a way around this? You made a mistake. After you did "make config" in the kernel tree, you had to copy (or symlink) include/asm to the place where gcc expects it. include/asm is a symlink to include/asm-arm. Erik -- J.A.K. (Erik) Mouw, Information and Communication Theory Group, Department of Electrical Engineering, Faculty of Information Technology and Systems, Delft University of Technology, PO BOX 5031, 2600 GA Delft, The Netherlands Phone: +31-15-2785859 Fax: +31-15-2781843 Email J.A.K.Mouw@its.tudelft.nl WWW: http://www-ict.its.tudelft.nl/~erik/ From kramer@pa.dec.com Fri Jan 28 16:11:01 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id QAA00999; Fri, 28 Jan 2000 16:11:01 +0100 (MET) Received: from ns2.tudelft.nl (ns2.tudelft.nl [130.161.180.65]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.8.6 (PHNE_17135)/8.8.6) with ESMTP id QAA29222 for ; Fri, 28 Jan 2000 16:11:01 +0100 (MET) Received: from mail2.digital.com (mail2.digital.com [204.123.2.56]) by mailhost1.tudelft.nl (PMDF V5.2-32 #42432) with ESMTP id <0FP1005R1WU4T5@mailhost1.tudelft.nl> for J.A.K.Mouw@its.tudelft.nl; Fri, 28 Jan 2000 16:10:53 +0100 (MET) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id HAA00406; Fri, 28 Jan 2000 07:05:26 -0800 (PST) Received: from rex.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA18482; Fri, 28 Jan 2000 07:05:18 -0800 Received: by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id HAA05207; Fri, 28 Jan 2000 07:02:09 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id HAA05221; Fri, 28 Jan 2000 07:01:51 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail2.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA16113; Fri, 28 Jan 2000 07:01:51 -0800 Received: from iraun1.ira.uka.de (iraun1.ira.uka.de [129.13.10.90]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with ESMTP id HAA00647 for ; Fri, 28 Jan 2000 07:01:46 -0800 (PST) Received: from i30s25.ira.uka.de by iraun1 (PP) with ESMTP; Fri, 28 Jan 2000 15:57:36 +0100 Received: from ira.uka.de (actually i30s25) by i30s25 (PP) with ESMTP; Fri, 28 Jan 2000 15:57:33 +0100 Date: Fri, 28 Jan 2000 15:57:31 +0100 From: Uwe Dannowski Subject: Re: Cache Write Back Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com To: "Adam 'WeirdArms' Wiggins" Cc: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Message-id: <3891AE5B.2D63B039@ira.uka.de> Organization: University of Karlsruhe, Dept. of CS, System Architecture Group MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.7 [en] (X11; I; Linux 2.2.13 i686) Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk X-Accept-Language: en, de References: Adam 'WeirdArms' Wiggins wrote: > I have a question about the Data Cache write back behaviour. Are > the Page Table permissions check when a dirty DCache line gets written to > the Write Buffer? Or is only the translation checked? >From SA-1100 Developer's Manual, 6.2 Data Caches (Dcaches), p. 6-2: > Each line entry contains the physical address of the line and two dirty > bits. ... and ... > When a line is evicted from the Dcaches, the dirty bits are used to decide > if all, half, or none of the line will be written back to memory using the > physical address stored with the line. Seems, nothing is checked on Writeback, since this has been done during Allocate already. At least this is what I read in the manual ;-) Cheers, Uwe -- Uwe Dannowski, University of Karlsruhe, Dept. of CS, System Architecture Group 76128 Karlsruhe, Germany Tel: +49-721-6088970, Fax: +49-721-6087664 mailto:Uwe.Dannowski@ira.uka.de http://i30www.ira.uka.de/~dannowsk/ From kramer@pa.dec.com Fri Jan 28 16:28:52 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id QAA01175; Fri, 28 Jan 2000 16:28:51 +0100 (MET) Received: from ns2.tudelft.nl (ns2.tudelft.nl [130.161.180.65]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.8.6 (PHNE_17135)/8.8.6) with ESMTP id QAA29799 for ; Fri, 28 Jan 2000 16:28:51 +0100 (MET) Received: from mail1.digital.com (mail1.digital.com [204.123.2.50]) by mailhost1.tudelft.nl (PMDF V5.2-32 #42432) with ESMTP id <0FP1007E0XNUJL@mailhost1.tudelft.nl> for J.A.K.Mouw@its.tudelft.nl; Fri, 28 Jan 2000 16:28:43 +0100 (MET) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id HAA00202; Fri, 28 Jan 2000 07:23:41 -0800 (PST) Received: from rex.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA18621; Fri, 28 Jan 2000 07:23:40 -0800 Received: by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id HAA05238; Fri, 28 Jan 2000 07:20:59 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id HAA05237; Fri, 28 Jan 2000 07:20:57 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail1.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA16236; Fri, 28 Jan 2000 07:20:57 -0800 Received: from web1206.mail.yahoo.com (web1206.mail.yahoo.com [128.11.23.142]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id HAA04120 for ; Fri, 28 Jan 2000 07:20:57 -0800 (PST) Received: (qmail 919 invoked by uid 60001); Fri, 28 Jan 2000 15:14:25 +0000 Received: from [202.106.15.160] by web1206.mail.yahoo.com; Fri, 28 Jan 2000 07:14:25 -0800 (PST) Date: Fri, 28 Jan 2000 07:14:25 -0800 (PST) From: wolf Subject: Re: How to build X using cross development tool chain Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com To: Philip Blundell Cc: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Message-id: <20000128151425.918.qmail@web1206.mail.yahoo.com> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Precedence: bulk Hi, Philip It seems I need a gcc which can support muliple targets. But following intel's or chris Rutter's instruction, the created arm-linux-gcc can only support one target, arm-linux. How to build gcc to support multiple targets? wolf --- Philip Blundell wrote: > >I got X window package from Titan's ftp site. But > all > >the configuration files seems to be designed for > being > >built based on Titan platform. How can I do a > >successful build using my cross development tool > chain > >based on redhat PC? > > Cross-building X would probably be astonishingly > hard. To be honest, you will > probably be better off buying a NetWinder or some > other ARM-based machine that > is capable of self hosting. > > p. > > > __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Talk to your friends online with Yahoo! Messenger. http://im.yahoo.com From kramer@pa.dec.com Fri Jan 28 16:48:13 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id QAA01326; Fri, 28 Jan 2000 16:48:08 +0100 (MET) Received: from ns2.tudelft.nl (ns2.tudelft.nl [130.161.180.65]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.8.6 (PHNE_17135)/8.8.6) with ESMTP id QAA00370 for ; Fri, 28 Jan 2000 16:48:08 +0100 (MET) Received: from mail1.digital.com (mail1.digital.com [204.123.2.50]) by mailhost1.tudelft.nl (PMDF V5.2-32 #42432) with ESMTP id <0FP10091HYJZ3M@mailhost1.tudelft.nl> for J.A.K.Mouw@its.tudelft.nl; Fri, 28 Jan 2000 16:48:00 +0100 (MET) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id HAA32498; Fri, 28 Jan 2000 07:42:52 -0800 (PST) Received: from rex.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA16723; Fri, 28 Jan 2000 07:42:50 -0800 Received: by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id HAA05256; Fri, 28 Jan 2000 07:40:10 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id HAA05249; Fri, 28 Jan 2000 07:40:08 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail2.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA19506; Fri, 28 Jan 2000 07:39:57 -0800 Received: from salisbury.labs.futuretv.com (salisbury.futuretv.com [194.216.164.17]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with ESMTP id HAA02913 for ; Fri, 28 Jan 2000 07:39:56 -0800 (PST) Received: from zebra.labs.futuretv.com ([192.0.0.67]) by salisbury.labs.futuretv.com with esmtp (Exim 3.03 #1) id 12EDWL-0007Vv-00 for sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com; Fri, 28 Jan 2000 15:41:13 +0000 Received: from [192.0.0.21] (helo=fountain.labs.futuretv.com ident=mail) by zebra.labs.futuretv.com with esmtp (Exim 3.03 #1) id 12EDUu-0007KH-00; Fri, 28 Jan 2000 15:39:44 +0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=fountain ident=pb) by fountain.labs.futuretv.com with esmtp (Exim 3.03 #1) id 12EDUu-0001KJ-00; Fri, 28 Jan 2000 15:39:44 +0000 Date: Fri, 28 Jan 2000 15:39:44 +0000 From: Philip Blundell Subject: Re: How to build X using cross development tool chain In-reply-to: Message from wolf "of Fri, 28 Jan 2000 07:14:25 PST." <20000128151425.918.qmail@web1206.mail.yahoo.com> Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com To: wolf Cc: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Message-id: MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: exmh version 2.0.2 2/24/98 (debian) Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Precedence: bulk References: <20000128151425.918.qmail@web1206.mail.yahoo.com> >It seems I need a gcc which can support muliple >targets. But following intel's or chris Rutter's >instruction, the created arm-linux-gcc can only >support one target, arm-linux. > >How to build gcc to support multiple targets? You can't. GCC can only be configured to support one target at a time, aside from things like ARM vs Thumb that are really just different variations on a theme. Why do you want a multi-target compiler? p. From kramer@pa.dec.com Fri Jan 28 17:34:50 2000 Return-Path: Received: from tudedr.et.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id RAA01564; Fri, 28 Jan 2000 17:34:49 +0100 (MET) Received: from mail1.digital.com by ITS.TUDelft.NL (PMDF V5.1-10 #21918) with ESMTP id <01JL8VCW10O29ED9B3@ITS.TUDelft.NL> for erik@duteinh.et.tudelft.nl; Fri, 28 Jan 2000 17:33:54 +0100 Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id IAA08740; Fri, 28 Jan 2000 08:25:17 -0800 (PST) Received: from rex.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA27462; Fri, 28 Jan 2000 08:25:14 -0800 Received: by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id IAA05273; Fri, 28 Jan 2000 08:24:52 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id IAA05265; Fri, 28 Jan 2000 08:24:50 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail2.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA16783; Fri, 28 Jan 2000 08:24:50 -0800 Received: from web1205.mail.yahoo.com (web1205.mail.yahoo.com [128.11.23.141]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id IAA06771 for ; Fri, 28 Jan 2000 08:24:50 -0800 (PST) Received: (qmail 4245 invoked by uid 60001); Fri, 28 Jan 2000 16:01:26 +0000 Received: from [202.106.15.160] by web1205.mail.yahoo.com; Fri, 28 Jan 2000 08:01:26 -0800 (PST) Date: Fri, 28 Jan 2000 08:01:26 -0800 (PST) From: wolf Subject: Re: How to build X using cross development tool chain Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com To: Philip Blundell Cc: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Message-id: <20000128160126.4244.qmail@web1205.mail.yahoo.com> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Precedence: bulk Hi, philip --- Philip Blundell wrote: > >It seems I need a gcc which can support muliple > >targets. But following intel's or chris Rutter's > >instruction, the created arm-linux-gcc can only > >support one target, arm-linux. > > > >How to build gcc to support multiple targets? > > You can't. GCC can only be configured to support > one target at a time, aside > from things like ARM vs Thumb that are really just > different variations on a > theme. I am a little confusing. In gcc's manual, there is a -b option, which is called target options. Since gcc can only be configured to support one target at a time, why this option is offered when I have no other option to select? > > Why do you want a multi-target compiler? Because when I am building X server, it seem I need a native compiler to make some intermediate file such as Imake to run on the host, I also need cross compiler to compile X for target. wolf __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Talk to your friends online with Yahoo! Messenger. http://im.yahoo.com From kramer@pa.dec.com Fri Jan 28 17:44:44 2000 Return-Path: Received: from tudedr.et.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id RAA01625; Fri, 28 Jan 2000 17:44:43 +0100 (MET) Received: from mail2.digital.com by ITS.TUDelft.NL (PMDF V5.1-10 #21918) with ESMTP id <01JL8VKFS7ZO9ED9B3@ITS.TUDelft.NL> for erik@duteinh.et.tudelft.nl; Fri, 28 Jan 2000 17:43:01 +0100 Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id IAA06606; Fri, 28 Jan 2000 08:31:03 -0800 (PST) Received: from rex.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA06376; Fri, 28 Jan 2000 08:31:02 -0800 Received: by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id IAA05280; Fri, 28 Jan 2000 08:30:55 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id IAA05285; Fri, 28 Jan 2000 08:30:53 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail2.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA17208; Fri, 28 Jan 2000 08:30:53 -0800 Received: from salisbury.labs.futuretv.com (salisbury.futuretv.com [194.216.164.17]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with ESMTP id IAA04361 for ; Fri, 28 Jan 2000 08:30:52 -0800 (PST) Received: from zebra.labs.futuretv.com ([192.0.0.67] ident=mail) by salisbury.labs.futuretv.com with esmtp (Exim 3.03 #1) id 12EEJn-0007X7-00 for sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com; Fri, 28 Jan 2000 16:32:19 +0000 Received: from [192.0.0.21] (helo=fountain.labs.futuretv.com ident=mail) by zebra.labs.futuretv.com with esmtp (Exim 3.03 #1) id 12EEIM-0007Sd-00; Fri, 28 Jan 2000 16:30:50 +0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=fountain ident=pb) by fountain.labs.futuretv.com with esmtp (Exim 3.03 #1) id 12EEIM-0001lf-00; Fri, 28 Jan 2000 16:30:50 +0000 Date: Fri, 28 Jan 2000 16:30:50 +0000 From: Philip Blundell Subject: Re: How to build X using cross development tool chain In-reply-to: Message from wolf "of Fri, 28 Jan 2000 08:01:26 PST." <20000128160126.4244.qmail@web1205.mail.yahoo.com> Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com To: wolf Cc: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Message-id: MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: exmh version 2.0.2 2/24/98 (debian) Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Precedence: bulk References: <20000128160126.4244.qmail@web1205.mail.yahoo.com> >I am a little confusing. In gcc's manual, there is a >-b option, which is called target options. Since gcc >can only be configured to support one target at a >time, why this option is offered when I have no other >option to select? Oh, I see. That option just tells the `gcc' driver program to invoke a different version of the actual compiler to the one it would usually choose. "gcc -b foo" is pretty much equivalent to "foo-gcc". p. From kramer@pa.dec.com Fri Jan 28 22:01:55 2000 Return-Path: Received: from tudedv.et.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id WAA02686; Fri, 28 Jan 2000 22:01:54 +0100 (MET) Received: from mail1.digital.com by ITS.TUDelft.NL (PMDF V5.1-10 #21918) with ESMTP id <01JL94WE2VQQ9FM7AV@ITS.TUDelft.NL> for erik@duteinh.et.tudelft.nl; Fri, 28 Jan 2000 22:01:24 +0100 Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id MAA01379; Fri, 28 Jan 2000 12:58:08 -0800 (PST) Received: from rex.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA15236; Fri, 28 Jan 2000 12:57:56 -0800 Received: by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id MAA05539; Fri, 28 Jan 2000 12:55:37 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id MAA05553; Fri, 28 Jan 2000 12:55:35 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail1.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA15896; Fri, 28 Jan 2000 12:55:35 -0800 Received: from xanadu.gn.com (modemcable248.137-200-24.mtl.mc.videotron.net [24.200.137.248]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with ESMTP id MAA00833 for ; Fri, 28 Jan 2000 12:55:30 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (nico@localhost) by xanadu.gn.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id PAA11880 for ; Fri, 28 Jan 2000 15:51:57 -0500 Date: Fri, 28 Jan 2000 15:51:57 -0500 (EST) From: Nicolas Pitre Subject: vacation Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com X-Sender: nico@xanadu.gn.com To: SA-1100/Linux Message-id: MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Precedence: bulk X-Authentication-warning: xanadu.gn.com: nico owned process doing -bs I'll be off the net for two weeks from now. So, don't expect any news from me for that period. Please share any patch you may produce with the list. BTW I'm actually uploading a file called arm-xtoolchain.tgz that contains binaries of gcc and binutils to cross-compile for ARM on an i386. Just untar it in the root i.e. / directory. I don't know if everything is in there, neither if the upload will complete successfully. Hopefully it will help people having difficulties compiling their own. PS: If you come by Puerto Plata, and find a man with a white cane on the beach... then come to say hello! :-) Nicolas From kramer@pa.dec.com Mon Jan 31 22:01:50 2000 Return-Path: Received: from tudedr.et.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id WAA21081; Mon, 31 Jan 2000 22:01:50 +0100 (MET) Received: from mail2.digital.com by ITS.TUDelft.NL (PMDF V5.1-10 #21918) with ESMTP id <01JLDBS2YF6E9FMBYI@ITS.TUDelft.NL> for erik@duteinh.et.tudelft.nl; Mon, 31 Jan 2000 22:01:45 +0100 Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id MAA26368; Mon, 31 Jan 2000 12:59:05 -0800 (PST) Received: from rex.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA00699; Mon, 31 Jan 2000 12:59:03 -0800 Received: by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id MAA06826; Mon, 31 Jan 2000 12:56:21 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id MAA06819; Mon, 31 Jan 2000 12:56:19 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail2.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA16653; Mon, 31 Jan 2000 12:56:19 -0800 Received: from fw-losgatos.losgatos.arm.com (ns.arm.com [208.193.202.3]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id MAA24531 for ; Mon, 31 Jan 2000 12:56:18 -0800 (PST) Received: by fw-losgatos.losgatos.arm.com; id MAA14958; Mon, 31 Jan 2000 12:51:27 -0800 Received: from unknown(194.202.50.2) by fw-losgatos.losgatos.arm.com via smap (V5.0) id xma014954; Mon, 31 Jan 2000 12:50:40 -0800 Received: from magpie (dhcp47 [194.202.50.238]) by incsun1.losgatos.arm.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id MAA25826 for ; Mon, 31 Jan 2000 12:51:13 -0800 (PST) Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2000 12:44:31 -0600 From: Ian Field Subject: Re: porting Linux to a StrongARM SA-1110 Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com To: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Message-id: <000701bf6c1b$366ea180$ee32cac2@losgatos.arm.com> MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2314.1300 Content-type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk X-Msmail-Priority: Normal X-Mimeole: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2314.1300 References: <200001312038.VAA20928@duteinh.et.tudelft.nl> X-Priority: 3 check out uClinux port to arm trio. They've done some work with cs8900.c uClinux/linux/arch/armnommu/drivers/net/triocs8900.c Cheers, IAN ----- Original Message ----- From: Erik Mouw To: Cc: Sent: Monday, January 31, 2000 2:38 PM Subject: Re: porting Linux to a StrongARM SA-1110 > On Mon, 31 Jan 2000 19:15:33 +0000 (GMT), Gilroy Billard wrote: > > I am interested in porting Linux to a StrongARM SA-1110 platform and would > > have to include support for: > > Flash (Intel) > > LCD > > USB > > Ethernet (Crystal 89xx) > > Serial Ports > > > > Since I'm relatively new to Linux and especially to the StrongARM, I was > > wondering if somebody out there could tell me how much of this is already > > supported by one port or another. A reference to the best Linux port would > > also be appreciated. > > > > If support for these items does not exist some ballpark estimates as to how > > long it would take would be nice. > > Nicolas Pitre's latest SA1100 patch should work. The biggest difference > between the SA1100 and the SA1110 is the memory controller. > Linux-2.3.35-rmk1-np1 seems to work with SA1110 based boards (according to > Hiroshi Ishii), so I presume linux-2.3.35-rmk1-np6 still works. > > Flash works. It's just memory. I can't remember if there is a flash writer > or a flash device, but otherwise you can just pick any flash utility (the > one from blob, for example[1]) and do it from userspace. > > LCD works, although you have to fiddle with the exact dimensions (in > pixels) of your LCD panel. On LART, we got a b/w and a color display > working within two days or so. > > There is no USB support yet (probably because it is client only). I've > heard rumours about people going to work on it, though. > > The Crystal ethernet chips are supported in i386 Linux. I don't know if it > is yet supported by ArmLinux, but if it isn't, we're going to port it > anyway. The LART KSB[2] comes with four CS8900 chips. The biggest problem > I expect in porting the driver is that it is written with the i386 I/O > space in mind while SA1100 has memory mapped I/O. According to Alan Cox, > it shouldn't be too difficult, so that's why we choose this particular > ethernet chip. > > Serial ports work straight out of the box. > > > Erik > > [1] blob: Boot Loader OBject. The bootloader for the LART board, see > http://www-ict.its.tudelft.nl/~erik/open-source/blob/ . > [2] KSB: Kitchen Sink Board. Basically lots of I/O on 100 cm2. See > http://www-ict.its.tudelft.nl/~erik/open-source/LART/ for the > schematics. > > -- > LART. 250 MIPS under one Watt. > http://www-ict.its.tudelft.nl/~erik/open-source/LART/ > > > From kramer@pa.dec.com Mon Jan 31 20:24:54 2000 Return-Path: Received: from tudedr.et.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id UAA20440; Mon, 31 Jan 2000 20:24:53 +0100 (MET) Received: from mail1.digital.com by ITS.TUDelft.NL (PMDF V5.1-10 #21918) with ESMTP id <01JLD8EX18RQ9FMBZR@ITS.TUDelft.NL> for erik@duteinh.et.tudelft.nl; Mon, 31 Jan 2000 20:24:49 +0100 Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id LAA31751; Mon, 31 Jan 2000 11:21:30 -0800 (PST) Received: from rex.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA00291; Mon, 31 Jan 2000 11:21:07 -0800 Received: by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id LAA06733; Mon, 31 Jan 2000 11:15:40 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id LAA06744; Mon, 31 Jan 2000 11:15:38 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail2.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA14119; Mon, 31 Jan 2000 11:15:38 -0800 Received: from hotmail.com (f149.law7.hotmail.com [216.33.237.149]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id LAA20039 for ; Mon, 31 Jan 2000 11:15:38 -0800 (PST) Received: (qmail 98141 invoked by uid 0); Mon, 31 Jan 2000 19:15:33 +0000 Received: from 24.222.63.8 by www.hotmail.com with HTTP; Mon, 31 Jan 2000 11:15:33 -0800 (PST) Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2000 19:15:33 +0000 (GMT) From: Gilroy Billard Subject: porting Linux to a StrongARM SA-1110 Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com To: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Message-id: <20000131191533.98140.qmail@hotmail.com> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; format=flowed Precedence: bulk X-Originating-Ip: [24.222.63.8] Hi, I am interested in porting Linux to a StrongARM SA-1110 platform and would have to include support for: Flash (Intel) LCD USB Ethernet (Crystal 89xx) Serial Ports Since I'm relatively new to Linux and especially to the StrongARM, I was wondering if somebody out there could tell me how much of this is already supported by one port or another. A reference to the best Linux port would also be appreciated. If support for these items does not exist some ballpark estimates as to how long it would take would be nice. Thanks, Gilroy gilroybillard@hotmail.com ______________________________________________________ Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com From kramer@pa.dec.com Mon Jan 31 21:46:01 2000 Return-Path: Received: from tudedr.et.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id VAA20971; Mon, 31 Jan 2000 21:46:01 +0100 (MET) Received: from mail2.digital.com by ITS.TUDelft.NL (PMDF V5.1-10 #21918) with ESMTP id <01JLDB8JSQHM9ED9FH@ITS.TUDelft.NL> for erik@duteinh.et.tudelft.nl; Mon, 31 Jan 2000 21:45:57 +0100 Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id MAA23936; Mon, 31 Jan 2000 12:43:13 -0800 (PST) Received: from rex.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA06512; Mon, 31 Jan 2000 12:43:07 -0800 Received: by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id MAA06798; Mon, 31 Jan 2000 12:39:53 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id MAA06791; Mon, 31 Jan 2000 12:39:51 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail2.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA31788; Mon, 31 Jan 2000 12:39:51 -0800 Received: from duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (duteinh.et.tudelft.nl [130.161.42.1]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with ESMTP id MAA26168 for ; Mon, 31 Jan 2000 12:39:49 -0800 (PST) Received: from kalman by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id VAA20928; Mon, 31 Jan 2000 21:38:31 +0100 (MET) Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2000 21:38:31 +0100 (MET) From: Erik Mouw Subject: Re: porting Linux to a StrongARM SA-1110 In-reply-to: <20000131191533.98140.qmail@hotmail.com> Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com To: gilroybillard@hotmail.com Cc: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Message-id: <200001312038.VAA20928@duteinh.et.tudelft.nl> Organization: Eric conspiracy secret labs MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: XCmail 1.0.0 - with PGP support, PGP engine version 0.5 (Linux) Content-type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-transfer-encoding: 8bit Precedence: bulk X-Face: "!Z|1XjFg!3Iw)BwM^M\k)J5KHiPddz}#/Zw%?$&Q!xqob"OA|})3_@&BTTiQERo?/^g[Z<9P4R8:5C:aqq.cw!hotLc=+u-"+1rq@9$V^8PbOUlodyi_sejt+D`iqkLpx$>.aXl%vnfPIt"LK|/%>94_Zrm8jy?`_[RKt'TuoxUxfk(gMhY(n|DBBl~c$dhO>G%6}R4+DGX3|idBm4oU&UM/XUP4I9aoN{]`ax%B?rgD(I3OJ<62Y6L X-Mailerorigin: http://www.fsai.fh-trier.de/~schmitzj/Xclasses/XCmail/ X-Eric-Conspiracy: There is no conspiracy! X-Loop: erik@it.et.tudelft.nl On Mon, 31 Jan 2000 19:15:33 +0000 (GMT), Gilroy Billard wrote: > I am interested in porting Linux to a StrongARM SA-1110 platform and would > have to include support for: > Flash (Intel) > LCD > USB > Ethernet (Crystal 89xx) > Serial Ports > > Since I'm relatively new to Linux and especially to the StrongARM, I was > wondering if somebody out there could tell me how much of this is already > supported by one port or another. A reference to the best Linux port would > also be appreciated. > > If support for these items does not exist some ballpark estimates as to how > long it would take would be nice. Nicolas Pitre's latest SA1100 patch should work. The biggest difference between the SA1100 and the SA1110 is the memory controller. Linux-2.3.35-rmk1-np1 seems to work with SA1110 based boards (according to Hiroshi Ishii), so I presume linux-2.3.35-rmk1-np6 still works. Flash works. It's just memory. I can't remember if there is a flash writer or a flash device, but otherwise you can just pick any flash utility (the one from blob, for example[1]) and do it from userspace. LCD works, although you have to fiddle with the exact dimensions (in pixels) of your LCD panel. On LART, we got a b/w and a color display working within two days or so. There is no USB support yet (probably because it is client only). I've heard rumours about people going to work on it, though. The Crystal ethernet chips are supported in i386 Linux. I don't know if it is yet supported by ArmLinux, but if it isn't, we're going to port it anyway. The LART KSB[2] comes with four CS8900 chips. The biggest problem I expect in porting the driver is that it is written with the i386 I/O space in mind while SA1100 has memory mapped I/O. According to Alan Cox, it shouldn't be too difficult, so that's why we choose this particular ethernet chip. Serial ports work straight out of the box. Erik [1] blob: Boot Loader OBject. The bootloader for the LART board, see http://www-ict.its.tudelft.nl/~erik/open-source/blob/ . [2] KSB: Kitchen Sink Board. Basically lots of I/O on 100 cm2. See http://www-ict.its.tudelft.nl/~erik/open-source/LART/ for the schematics. -- LART. 250 MIPS under one Watt. http://www-ict.its.tudelft.nl/~erik/open-source/LART/ From kramer@pa.dec.com Mon Jan 31 21:58:58 2000 Return-Path: Received: from tudedr.et.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id VAA21065; Mon, 31 Jan 2000 21:58:58 +0100 (MET) Received: from mail2.digital.com by ITS.TUDelft.NL (PMDF V5.1-10 #21918) with ESMTP id <01JLDBOKI8MY9FMBYI@ITS.TUDelft.NL> for erik@duteinh.et.tudelft.nl; Mon, 31 Jan 2000 21:58:55 +0100 Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id MAA27807; Mon, 31 Jan 2000 12:56:15 -0800 (PST) Received: from rex.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA11929; Mon, 31 Jan 2000 12:56:13 -0800 Received: by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id MAA06808; Mon, 31 Jan 2000 12:53:34 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id MAA06805; Mon, 31 Jan 2000 12:53:32 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail1.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA04560; Mon, 31 Jan 2000 12:53:31 -0800 Received: from mailgate.keith-koep.com (mailgate.keith-koep.com [195.8.230.32]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with ESMTP id MAA08216 for ; Mon, 31 Jan 2000 12:53:30 -0800 (PST) Received: from otto (otto [195.8.230.40]) by mailgate.keith-koep.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id VAA02040 for ; Mon, 31 Jan 2000 21:58:15 +0100 Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2000 21:53:11 +0100 (MET) From: keith Subject: Re: porting Linux to a StrongARM SA-1110 Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com To: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Reply-to: keith Message-id: <200001312058.VAA02040@mailgate.keith-koep.com> MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: dtmail 1.2.0 CDE Version 1.2 SunOS 5.6 sun4u sparc Content-type: TEXT/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-MD5: ZNx+9fDUVLV+ITrrtj/low== Precedence: bulk The cs8900 driver works with linux. We made one attempt on a sunday afternoon. And we succeded. There were minor problems regarding our 3.3V Transformer (cable problems). But there is a lot of hope to get it running VERY quickly ! (we used the IO space mode of the cs8900A) Volker _________________________________________________________________ | | | KEITH & KOEP GMBH DEVELOPMENT OF EMBEDDED CONTROL SYSTEMS | | KOENIGSBERGER STR.2 PHONE +49 (0)202 2525 30 | | D-42277 WUPPERTAL FAX +49 (0)202 2525 333 | | GERMANY keith@keith-koep.com | |_________________________________________________________________| From kramer@pa.dec.com Tue Feb 1 07:44:00 2000 Return-Path: Received: from tudedr.et.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id HAA24023; Tue, 1 Feb 2000 07:43:59 +0100 (MET) Received: from mail1.digital.com by ITS.TUDelft.NL (PMDF V5.1-10 #21918) with ESMTP id <01JLDW4XIIR49I43WH@ITS.TUDelft.NL> for erik@duteinh.et.tudelft.nl; Tue, 1 Feb 2000 07:43:58 +0100 Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id WAA21149; Mon, 31 Jan 2000 22:39:21 -0800 (PST) Received: from rex.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA21065; Mon, 31 Jan 2000 22:39:05 -0800 Received: by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id WAA06984; Mon, 31 Jan 2000 22:35:44 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id WAA06980; Mon, 31 Jan 2000 22:35:42 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail1.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA27609; Mon, 31 Jan 2000 22:35:42 -0800 Received: from asustpe3.ASUS.COM.TW ([192.72.126.36]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with ESMTP id WAA19662 for ; Mon, 31 Jan 2000 22:35:35 -0800 (PST) Received: by asustpe3.asus.com.tw with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21) id ; Tue, 01 Feb 2000 14:44:42 +0800 Date: Tue, 01 Feb 2000 14:44:41 +0800 From: Eric_Liu@asus.com.tw Subject: Unable to mount RAMDISK?? Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com To: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Message-id: MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21) Content-type: text/plain; charset="big5" Precedence: bulk Hello everybody, I'm encounter problem when mounting RAMDISK in Brutus board boot-up procedure. My environment: 16MB RAM Brutus, Linux-2.2.13 kernel and all its relative patch gcc-2.95.2 binutil-2.9.5.022 Error message told me case 1: "RAMDISK: Couldn't find valid ramdisk image at address 0" When I set the base address to 0x800000 in angelboot option. case 2: "Invalid ext2 structure......" When I set the base address to 0xd8000000 in angelboot option. (Documentation told me to set this address:0xd8000000.) I'm sure this ramdisk-img.gz is correct because I can ungzip it and mount it on host PC... Any comment or hint will be appreciate.. Eric Liu From kramer@pa.dec.com Wed Feb 2 06:28:08 2000 Return-Path: Received: from tudedr.et.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id GAA01680; Wed, 2 Feb 2000 06:28:08 +0100 (MET) Received: from mail1.digital.com by ITS.TUDelft.NL (PMDF V5.1-10 #21918) with ESMTP id <01JLF7R8MZQS9I45MX@ITS.TUDelft.NL> for erik@duteinh.et.tudelft.nl; Wed, 2 Feb 2000 06:28:06 +0100 Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id VAA21531; Tue, 01 Feb 2000 21:19:03 -0800 (PST) Received: from rex.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA10487; Tue, 01 Feb 2000 21:17:32 -0800 Received: by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id VAA07390; Tue, 01 Feb 2000 21:13:37 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id VAA07386; Tue, 01 Feb 2000 21:13:35 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail2.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA30717; Tue, 01 Feb 2000 21:13:34 -0800 Received: from cwcsun41.cwc.nus.edu.sg (cwcsun41.cwc.nus.edu.sg [137.132.163.102]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with ESMTP id VAA07179 for ; Tue, 01 Feb 2000 21:13:33 -0800 (PST) Received: from konggf.nus.edu.sg ([137.132.163.221]) by cwcsun41.cwc.nus.edu.sg (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id NAA15188; Wed, 02 Feb 2000 13:02:29 +0800 (SGT) Date: Tue, 01 Feb 2000 22:34:20 +0800 From: Kong Gang Feng Subject: Re: Screen blanks in VGA mode... Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com X-Sender: konggf@postman.cwc.nus.edu.sg To: "J.D. Bakker" , "Saxena, Nikita" Cc: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Message-id: <3.0.32.20000201223419.00a9e070@postman.cwc.nus.edu.sg> MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Windows Eudora Pro Version 3.0 (32) Content-type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Precedence: bulk >The console code has an autoblank feature, which turns the display off >after a period of inactivity (10 minutes default). Normally the console is >unblanked when you hit a key, but I'm guessing your platform has no >keyboard to perform the unblanking. By doing > >setterm -blank 0 > /dev console (or whatever the proper device for your >console is) > How about X window? Once X server start, console drv is replaced? How to control the autoblanking of X? Thanks Kong >in one of your startup scripts, the blanking is stopped. > >HTH, > >JDB. > >-- >LART. 250 MIPS under one Watt. >http://www-ict.its.tudelft.nl/~erik/open-source/LART/ > > > > From kramer@pa.dec.com Wed Feb 2 00:15:25 2000 Return-Path: Received: from tudedr.et.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id AAA00308; Wed, 2 Feb 2000 00:15:25 +0100 (MET) Received: from mail2.digital.com by ITS.TUDelft.NL (PMDF V5.1-10 #21918) with ESMTP id <01JLEUR4NC6U9EDA7I@ITS.TUDelft.NL> for erik@duteinh.et.tudelft.nl; Wed, 2 Feb 2000 00:15:22 +0100 Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id PAA15707; Tue, 01 Feb 2000 15:11:00 -0800 (PST) Received: from rex.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA02294; Tue, 01 Feb 2000 15:09:26 -0800 Received: by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id PAA07245; Tue, 01 Feb 2000 15:04:29 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id PAA07238; Tue, 01 Feb 2000 15:04:27 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail1.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA07515; Tue, 01 Feb 2000 15:04:26 -0800 Received: from NT_Server.flatpanels.com (flatpanels.com [207.196.69.66]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with ESMTP id PAA27509 for ; Tue, 01 Feb 2000 15:04:26 -0800 (PST) Received: by flatpanels.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21) id <1C06FZ17>; Tue, 01 Feb 2000 18:02:24 -0500 Date: Tue, 01 Feb 2000 18:02:24 -0500 From: "Saxena, Nikita" Subject: Screen blanks in VGA mode... Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com To: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Message-id: <91B07CA588CED3118CFE00105AC97594D09C@flatpanels.com> MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21) Content-type: text/plain Precedence: bulk Hi all, I'm running linux kernel 2.3.35 on our sa1100 thinclient board here and it works with a VGA TFT LCD display. While it boots up fine, the display blanks out after approx. 10 mts. Does anyone have any suggestions? Thanks, Nikita From kramer@pa.dec.com Wed Feb 2 00:31:08 2000 Return-Path: Received: from tudedr.et.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id AAA00374; Wed, 2 Feb 2000 00:31:08 +0100 (MET) Received: from mail2.digital.com by ITS.TUDelft.NL (PMDF V5.1-10 #21918) with ESMTP id <01JLEVANLB1C9EDA7I@ITS.TUDelft.NL> for erik@duteinh.et.tudelft.nl; Wed, 2 Feb 2000 00:31:06 +0100 Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id PAA17540; Tue, 01 Feb 2000 15:28:28 -0800 (PST) Received: from rex.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA30912; Tue, 01 Feb 2000 15:27:01 -0800 Received: by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id PAA07265; Tue, 01 Feb 2000 15:24:01 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id PAA07255; Tue, 01 Feb 2000 15:23:59 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail1.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA15784; Tue, 01 Feb 2000 15:23:59 -0800 Received: from thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (thorgal.et.tudelft.nl [130.161.40.91]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with ESMTP id PAA28496 for ; Tue, 01 Feb 2000 15:23:58 -0800 (PST) Received: from [130.161.115.44] (jdbakker.et.tudelft.nl [130.161.115.44]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id AAA16549; Wed, 02 Feb 2000 00:23:53 +0100 Date: Wed, 02 Feb 2000 00:23:31 +0100 From: "J.D. Bakker" Subject: Re: Screen blanks in VGA mode... In-reply-to: <91B07CA588CED3118CFE00105AC97594D09C@flatpanels.com> Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com To: "Saxena, Nikita" Cc: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Message-id: MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Precedence: bulk At 00:02 +0100 02-02-2000, Saxena, Nikita wrote: >I'm running linux kernel 2.3.35 on our sa1100 thinclient board here and it >works with a VGA TFT LCD display. While it boots up fine, the display >blanks out after approx. 10 mts. Does anyone have any suggestions? Short answer: man setterm Long answer: The console code has an autoblank feature, which turns the display off after a period of inactivity (10 minutes default). Normally the console is unblanked when you hit a key, but I'm guessing your platform has no keyboard to perform the unblanking. By doing setterm -blank 0 > /dev console (or whatever the proper device for your console is) in one of your startup scripts, the blanking is stopped. HTH, JDB. -- LART. 250 MIPS under one Watt. http://www-ict.its.tudelft.nl/~erik/open-source/LART/ From kramer@pa.dec.com Wed Feb 2 17:24:33 2000 Return-Path: Received: from tudedr.et.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id RAA05484; Wed, 2 Feb 2000 17:24:33 +0100 (MET) Received: from mail1.digital.com by ITS.TUDelft.NL (PMDF V5.1-10 #21918) with ESMTP id <01JLFUP347ES9I46FD@ITS.TUDelft.NL> for erik@duteinh.et.tudelft.nl; Wed, 2 Feb 2000 17:24:31 +0100 Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id IAA31511; Wed, 02 Feb 2000 08:21:25 -0800 (PST) Received: from rex.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA08429; Wed, 02 Feb 2000 08:19:54 -0800 Received: by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id IAA07550; Wed, 02 Feb 2000 08:16:25 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id IAA07562; Wed, 02 Feb 2000 08:16:22 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail2.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA28747; Wed, 02 Feb 2000 08:16:21 -0800 Received: from duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (duteinh.et.tudelft.nl [130.161.42.1]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with ESMTP id IAA22015 for ; Wed, 02 Feb 2000 08:16:20 -0800 (PST) Received: from kalman by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id RAA05436; Wed, 02 Feb 2000 17:14:56 +0100 (MET) Date: Wed, 02 Feb 2000 17:14:56 +0100 (MET) From: Erik Mouw Subject: Re: Screen blanks in VGA mode... In-reply-to: <3.0.32.20000201223419.00a9e070@postman.cwc.nus.edu.sg> Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com To: konggf@cwc.nus.edu.sg Cc: J.D.Bakker@ITS.TUDelft.NL, NSaxena@flatpanels.com, sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Message-id: <200002021614.RAA05436@duteinh.et.tudelft.nl> Organization: Eric conspiracy secret labs MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: XCmail 1.0.0 - with PGP support, PGP engine version 0.5 (Linux) Content-type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-transfer-encoding: 8bit Precedence: bulk X-Face: "!Z|1XjFg!3Iw)BwM^M\k)J5KHiPddz}#/Zw%?$&Q!xqob"OA|})3_@&BTTiQERo?/^g[Z<9P4R8:5C:aqq.cw!hotLc=+u-"+1rq@9$V^8PbOUlodyi_sejt+D`iqkLpx$>.aXl%vnfPIt"LK|/%>94_Zrm8jy?`_[RKt'TuoxUxfk(gMhY(n|DBBl~c$dhO>G%6}R4+DGX3|idBm4oU&UM/XUP4I9aoN{]`ax%B?rgD(I3OJ<62Y6L X-Mailerorigin: http://www.fsai.fh-trier.de/~schmitzj/Xclasses/XCmail/ X-Eric-Conspiracy: There is no conspiracy! X-Loop: erik@it.et.tudelft.nl On Tue, 01 Feb 2000 22:34:20 +0800, Kong Gang Feng wrote: >>setterm -blank 0 > /dev console (or whatever the proper device for your >>console is) >> > How about X window? Once X server start, console drv is replaced? > How to control the autoblanking of X? The short answer: man xset The slightly longer version: xset s off Erik -- LART. 250 MIPS under one Watt. http://www-ict.its.tudelft.nl/~erik/open-source/LART/ From kramer@pa.dec.com Wed Feb 2 22:55:04 2000 Return-Path: Received: from tudedr.et.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id WAA06807; Wed, 2 Feb 2000 22:55:04 +0100 (MET) Received: from mail2.digital.com by ITS.TUDelft.NL (PMDF V5.1-10 #21918) with ESMTP id <01JLG68VFI5O9I479M@ITS.TUDelft.NL> for erik@duteinh.et.tudelft.nl; Wed, 2 Feb 2000 22:55:02 +0100 Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id NAA19308; Wed, 02 Feb 2000 13:51:51 -0800 (PST) Received: from rex.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA01076; Wed, 02 Feb 2000 13:51:34 -0800 Received: by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id NAA07748; Wed, 02 Feb 2000 13:47:51 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id NAA07753; Wed, 02 Feb 2000 13:47:48 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail2.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA29579; Wed, 02 Feb 2000 13:47:48 -0800 Received: from NT_Server.flatpanels.com (flatpanels.com [207.196.69.66]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with ESMTP id NAA18946 for ; Wed, 02 Feb 2000 13:47:47 -0800 (PST) Received: by flatpanels.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21) id <1C06FZN7>; Wed, 02 Feb 2000 16:45:52 -0500 Date: Wed, 02 Feb 2000 16:45:52 -0500 From: "Saxena, Nikita" Subject: X window or GNOME Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com To: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Message-id: <91B07CA588CED3118CFE00105AC97594D0A0@flatpanels.com> MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21) Content-type: text/plain Precedence: bulk Hi all, Has anyone had any luck making X work with kernel version 2.3.35 on a brutus or brutus like system? If so, what are some of the key steps involved in doing that? Also, same question for GNOME? Thanks, Nikita From kramer@pa.dec.com Thu Feb 3 09:48:06 2000 Return-Path: Received: from tudedr.et.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id JAA08718; Thu, 3 Feb 2000 09:48:06 +0100 (MET) Received: from mail2.digital.com by ITS.TUDelft.NL (PMDF V5.1-10 #21918) with ESMTP id <01JLGT1IRBT09EDAM2@ITS.TUDelft.NL> for erik@duteinh.et.tudelft.nl; Thu, 3 Feb 2000 09:48:04 +0100 Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id AAA07429; Thu, 03 Feb 2000 00:44:33 -0800 (PST) Received: from rex.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA04016; Thu, 03 Feb 2000 00:44:11 -0800 Received: by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id AAA08100; Thu, 03 Feb 2000 00:39:48 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id AAA08090; Thu, 03 Feb 2000 00:39:45 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail1.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA10571; Thu, 03 Feb 2000 00:39:41 -0800 Received: from uumail-relay-blr.ernet.in (uumail-relay-blr.ernet.in [202.141.1.17]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with ESMTP id AAA03563 for ; Thu, 03 Feb 2000 00:39:35 -0800 (PST) Received: from iisc.ernet.in (iisc.ernet.in [144.16.64.3]) by uumail-relay-blr.ernet.in (8.9.0/8.9.0) with ESMTP id OAA29593; Thu, 03 Feb 2000 14:07:44 +0530 Received: from osiris.csa.iisc.ernet.in (osiris.csa.iisc.ernet.in [144.16.67.12]) by iisc.ernet.in (8.9.2/8.9.0) with ESMTP id OAA21120; Thu, 03 Feb 2000 14:03:20 +0530 (IST) Received: from localhost by osiris.csa.iisc.ernet.in (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id OAA27710; Thu, 03 Feb 2000 14:00:53 +0530 (IST) Date: Thu, 03 Feb 2000 14:00:52 +0530 (IST) From: Nitin A Kamble Subject: Re: X window or GNOME In-reply-to: <91B07CA588CED3118CFE00105AC97594D0A0@flatpanels.com> Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com To: "Saxena, Nikita" Cc: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Message-id: MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Precedence: bulk X-Authentication-warning: osiris.csa.iisc.ernet.in: nitin owned process doing -bs hi Nikita, GNOME is windo manager which runs on top of X server. And it is not replacement for the X server. You can try microwindows which runs on top of Nano X-server , for more info see http://microwindows.censoft.com/ Nitin On Wed, 2 Feb 2000, Saxena, Nikita wrote: > > Hi all, > > Has anyone had any luck making X work with kernel version 2.3.35 on a brutus > or brutus like system? If so, what are some of the key steps involved in > doing that? Also, same question for GNOME? > > Thanks, > Nikita > From kramer@pa.dec.com Fri Feb 4 16:19:52 2000 Return-Path: Received: from tudedr.et.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id QAA17520; Fri, 4 Feb 2000 16:19:52 +0100 (MET) Received: from mail1.digital.com by ITS.TUDelft.NL (PMDF V5.1-10 #21918) with ESMTP id <01JLIL0L6D929EDBRR@ITS.TUDelft.NL> for erik@duteinh.et.tudelft.nl; Fri, 4 Feb 2000 16:19:49 +0100 Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id HAA26952; Fri, 04 Feb 2000 07:16:18 -0800 (PST) Received: from rex.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA17359; Fri, 04 Feb 2000 07:16:00 -0800 Received: by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id HAA08820; Fri, 04 Feb 2000 07:12:59 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id HAA08830; Fri, 04 Feb 2000 07:12:57 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail1.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA21325; Fri, 04 Feb 2000 07:12:53 -0800 Received: from blazieresearch.com (blazieresearch.com [199.227.113.99]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with ESMTP id HAA26980 for ; Fri, 04 Feb 2000 07:12:50 -0800 (PST) Received: from cpq800.blazieresearch.com (cpq800 [199.227.113.100]) by blazieresearch.com (8.9.3/8.8.7) with ESMTP id KAA06651 for ; Fri, 04 Feb 2000 10:12:47 -0500 Received: by ispsl1-100.gate.net with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.10) id ; Fri, 04 Feb 2000 10:12:34 -0500 Date: Fri, 04 Feb 2000 10:12:33 -0500 From: Mike Reynolds Subject: binary or hex image for prom programmer. Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com To: SA-1100/Linux Message-id: <412E1CF8088BD211AD5100805FAD9A800B5A9B@ispsl1-100.gate.net> MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.10) Content-type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Precedence: bulk Hi, Does any know of a utility or some method to convert a binary output to an image that can be programmed with a prom programmer? Thanks. Mike Reynolds From kramer@pa.dec.com Fri Feb 4 16:29:15 2000 Return-Path: Received: from tudedr.et.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id QAA17580; Fri, 4 Feb 2000 16:29:15 +0100 (MET) Received: from mail2.digital.com by ITS.TUDelft.NL (PMDF V5.1-10 #21918) with ESMTP id <01JLILC71U369I49TO@ITS.TUDelft.NL> for erik@duteinh.et.tudelft.nl; Fri, 4 Feb 2000 16:29:13 +0100 Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id HAA23376; Fri, 04 Feb 2000 07:26:31 -0800 (PST) Received: from rex.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA32716; Fri, 04 Feb 2000 07:26:24 -0800 Received: by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id HAA08855; Fri, 04 Feb 2000 07:26:13 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id HAA08844; Fri, 04 Feb 2000 07:26:11 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail2.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA01222; Fri, 04 Feb 2000 07:26:11 -0800 Received: from mailgate.keith-koep.com (mailgate.keith-koep.com [195.8.230.32]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with ESMTP id HAA26783 for ; Fri, 04 Feb 2000 07:26:10 -0800 (PST) Received: from otto (otto [195.8.230.40]) by mailgate.keith-koep.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id QAA07602 for ; Fri, 04 Feb 2000 16:30:26 +0100 Date: Fri, 04 Feb 2000 16:25:51 +0100 (MET) From: keith Subject: Re: binary or hex image for prom programmer. Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com To: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Reply-to: keith Message-id: <200002041530.QAA07602@mailgate.keith-koep.com> MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: dtmail 1.2.0 CDE Version 1.2 SunOS 5.6 sun4u sparc Content-type: TEXT/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-MD5: FiuRbib9Py+Qst1f/KBguA== Precedence: bulk Try it with: objcopy -O binary infile outfile to get raw binary objcopy -O srec infile outfile to get srecords The objcopy should be out of the toolchain you are using Volker From kramer@pa.dec.com Sun Feb 6 02:56:27 2000 Return-Path: Received: from tudedr.et.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id CAA22644; Sun, 6 Feb 2000 02:56:27 +0100 (MET) Received: from mail2.digital.com by ITS.TUDelft.NL (PMDF V5.1-10 #21918) with ESMTP id <01JLKLJ7XAOS9I4B59@ITS.TUDelft.NL> for erik@duteinh.et.tudelft.nl; Sun, 6 Feb 2000 02:56:26 +0100 Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id RAA28658; Sat, 05 Feb 2000 17:53:36 -0800 (PST) Received: from rex.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA31467; Sat, 05 Feb 2000 17:53:19 -0800 Received: by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id RAA09385; Sat, 05 Feb 2000 17:51:39 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id RAA09386; Sat, 05 Feb 2000 17:51:36 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail2.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA26108; Sat, 05 Feb 2000 17:51:36 -0800 Received: from note.orchestra.cse.unsw.EDU.AU (note.orchestra.cse.unsw.EDU.AU [129.94.242.29]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id RAA30765 for ; Sat, 05 Feb 2000 17:51:33 -0800 (PST) Received: From hildegard With LocalMail ; Sun, 06 Feb 2000 12:49:45 +1100 Date: Sun, 06 Feb 2000 12:49:45 +1100 ( ) From: "Adam 'WeirdArms' Wiggins" Subject: Re: binary or hex image for prom programmer. In-reply-to: <412E1CF8088BD211AD5100805FAD9A800B5A9B@ispsl1-100.gate.net> Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com X-Sender: awiggins@hildegard.orchestra.cse.unsw.EDU.AU To: Mike Reynolds Cc: SA-1100/Linux Message-id: MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Precedence: bulk On Fri, 4 Feb 2000, Mike Reynolds wrote: > Hi, > > Does any know of a utility or some method to convert a binary output to an > image that can be programmed with a prom programmer? > Thanks. binutils objcopy? Or write your own using the bfd out of binutils Cheers Adam From kramer@pa.dec.com Sun Feb 6 02:56:59 2000 Return-Path: Received: from tudedr.et.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id CAA22649; Sun, 6 Feb 2000 02:56:59 +0100 (MET) Received: from mail1.digital.com by ITS.TUDelft.NL (PMDF V5.1-10 #21918) with ESMTP id <01JLKLJT65N69I4B59@ITS.TUDelft.NL> for erik@duteinh.et.tudelft.nl; Sun, 6 Feb 2000 02:56:58 +0100 Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id RAA05068; Sat, 05 Feb 2000 17:54:18 -0800 (PST) Received: from rex.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA17708; Sat, 05 Feb 2000 17:54:12 -0800 Received: by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id RAA09404; Sat, 05 Feb 2000 17:54:02 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id RAA09399; Sat, 05 Feb 2000 17:54:00 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail1.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA05325; Sat, 05 Feb 2000 17:54:00 -0800 Received: from note.orchestra.cse.unsw.EDU.AU (note.orchestra.cse.unsw.EDU.AU [129.94.242.29]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id RAA05096 for ; Sat, 05 Feb 2000 17:53:58 -0800 (PST) Received: From hildegard With LocalMail ; Sun, 06 Feb 2000 12:53:38 +1100 Date: Sun, 06 Feb 2000 12:53:21 +1100 ( ) From: "Adam 'WeirdArms' Wiggins" Subject: Cache Cleanning operation Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com X-Sender: awiggins@hildegard.orchestra.cse.unsw.EDU.AU To: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Message-id: MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Precedence: bulk Just a stab in the dark here, but would loop unrolling help with the expensive DCache cleanning loops? Cheers Adam From kramer@pa.dec.com Sun Feb 6 14:31:54 2000 Return-Path: Received: from tudedr.et.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id OAA24045; Sun, 6 Feb 2000 14:31:54 +0100 (MET) Received: from mail1.digital.com by ITS.TUDelft.NL (PMDF V5.1-10 #21918) with ESMTP id <01JLL9TDGEZE9I4BCB@ITS.TUDelft.NL> for erik@duteinh.et.tudelft.nl; Sun, 6 Feb 2000 14:31:52 +0100 Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id FAA26023; Sun, 06 Feb 2000 05:28:49 -0800 (PST) Received: from rex.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA07759; Sun, 06 Feb 2000 05:28:30 -0800 Received: by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id FAA09590; Sun, 06 Feb 2000 05:27:29 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id FAA09584; Sun, 06 Feb 2000 05:27:26 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail1.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA29698; Sun, 06 Feb 2000 05:27:25 -0800 Received: from duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (duteinh.et.tudelft.nl [130.161.42.1]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with ESMTP id FAA26688 for ; Sun, 06 Feb 2000 05:27:24 -0800 (PST) Received: from kalman by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id OAA24026; Sun, 06 Feb 2000 14:26:05 +0100 (MET) Date: Sun, 06 Feb 2000 14:26:05 +0100 (MET) From: Erik Mouw Subject: Re: binary or hex image for prom programmer. In-reply-to: <412E1CF8088BD211AD5100805FAD9A800B5A9B@ispsl1-100.gate.net> Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com To: mike@blazie.com Cc: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Message-id: <200002061326.OAA24026@duteinh.et.tudelft.nl> Organization: Eric conspiracy secret labs MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: XCmail 1.0.0 - with PGP support, PGP engine version 0.5 (Linux) Content-type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-transfer-encoding: 8bit Precedence: bulk X-Face: "!Z|1XjFg!3Iw)BwM^M\k)J5KHiPddz}#/Zw%?$&Q!xqob"OA|})3_@&BTTiQERo?/^g[Z<9P4R8:5C:aqq.cw!hotLc=+u-"+1rq@9$V^8PbOUlodyi_sejt+D`iqkLpx$>.aXl%vnfPIt"LK|/%>94_Zrm8jy?`_[RKt'TuoxUxfk(gMhY(n|DBBl~c$dhO>G%6}R4+DGX3|idBm4oU&UM/XUP4I9aoN{]`ax%B?rgD(I3OJ<62Y6L X-Mailerorigin: http://www.fsai.fh-trier.de/~schmitzj/Xclasses/XCmail/ X-Eric-Conspiracy: There is no conspiracy! X-Loop: erik@it.et.tudelft.nl On Fri, 04 Feb 2000 10:12:33 -0500, Mike Reynolds wrote: > Does any know of a utility or some method to convert a binary output to an > image that can be programmed with a prom programmer? > Thanks. Objcopy should do the trick. Try objcopy -I binary -O ihex foo.bin foo.hex to convert a binary image to an Intel Hex image. I don't know how you obtained the binary image, but if it is with a normal GNU toolchain (gcc, gas, GNU ld), you can also convert the ELF image to Intel Hex. I use this commandline to get a binary image in blob[1]: arm-linux-objcopy -O binary -R .note -R .comment -S blob-elf32 blob To obtain Intel Hex, I should use: arm-linux-objcopy -O ihex -R .note -R .comment -S blob-elf32 blob.hex HTH, Erik [1] Boot Loader Object, the LART bootloader, see http://www-ict.its.tudelft.nl/~erik/open-source/blob/ -- LART. 250 MIPS under one Watt. http://www-ict.its.tudelft.nl/~erik/open-source/LART/ From kramer@pa.dec.com Sun Feb 6 14:42:42 2000 Return-Path: Received: from tudedr.et.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id OAA24083; Sun, 6 Feb 2000 14:42:41 +0100 (MET) Received: from mail1.digital.com by ITS.TUDelft.NL (PMDF V5.1-10 #21918) with ESMTP id <01JLLA7RGLLS9I4BCB@ITS.TUDelft.NL> for erik@duteinh.et.tudelft.nl; Sun, 6 Feb 2000 14:42:40 +0100 Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id FAA26080; Sun, 06 Feb 2000 05:40:01 -0800 (PST) Received: from rex.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA21823; Sun, 06 Feb 2000 05:40:00 -0800 Received: by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id FAA09614; Sun, 06 Feb 2000 05:39:49 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id FAA09596; Sun, 06 Feb 2000 05:39:46 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail2.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA05719; Sun, 06 Feb 2000 05:39:46 -0800 Received: from kings-cross.london.uk.eu.org (tazenda.demon.co.uk [158.152.220.239]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with ESMTP id FAA18882 for ; Sun, 06 Feb 2000 05:39:44 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost ([::ffff:127.0.0.1] helo=kings-cross.london.uk.eu.org ident=phil) by kings-cross.london.uk.eu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.11 #1) id 12HRnB-0000jp-00; Sun, 06 Feb 2000 13:31:57 +0000 Date: Sun, 06 Feb 2000 13:31:57 +0000 From: Philip Blundell Subject: Re: Cache Cleanning operation In-reply-to: Message from Adam 'WeirdArms' Wiggins "of Sun, 06 Feb 2000 12:53:21 +1100." Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com To: "Adam 'WeirdArms' Wiggins" Cc: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Message-id: MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: exmh version 2.0.2 2/24/98 (debian) Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Precedence: bulk References: > Just a stab in the dark here, but would loop unrolling help with >the expensive DCache cleanning loops? Possibly. On the other hand, that code is not usually in the Icache when it's executed, so unrolling it too far would probably be a loss. The balance might well be different for SA-1100 and SA-110 - on the latter the cache cleaning involves external Dcache line-fills and so bus bandwidth is the main limiting factor. It couldn't hurt to try, anyway. If it makes a difference lmbench will probably show it up. p. From kramer@pa.dec.com Tue Feb 8 02:05:08 2000 Return-Path: Received: from tudedr.et.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id CAA02899; Tue, 8 Feb 2000 02:05:08 +0100 (MET) Received: from mail2.digital.com by ITS.TUDelft.NL (PMDF V5.1-10 #21918) with ESMTP id <01JLNCC89UM09I4DLO@ITS.TUDelft.NL> for erik@duteinh.et.tudelft.nl; Tue, 8 Feb 2000 02:05:05 +0100 Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id QAA04880; Mon, 07 Feb 2000 16:56:53 -0800 (PST) Received: from rex.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA25156; Mon, 07 Feb 2000 16:56:07 -0800 Received: by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id QAA10388; Mon, 07 Feb 2000 16:53:55 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id QAA10393; Mon, 07 Feb 2000 16:53:53 -0800 (PST) Received: from stowe.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA15024; Mon, 07 Feb 2000 16:53:52 -0800 Received: by stowe.pa.dec.com; (5.65v4.0/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id AA15407; Mon, 07 Feb 2000 16:53:48 -0800 Date: Mon, 07 Feb 2000 16:53:48 -0800 From: Deborah Wallach Subject: Itsy schematics and updated Linux software available Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com To: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.arm.linux.org.uk Message-id: <200002080053.AA15407@stowe.pa.dec.com> Precedence: bulk Address: Compaq Computer Corporation; Western Research Laboratory; 250 University Avenue; Palo Alto, CA 94301; USA Phone: 650-617-3315 In order to promote collaboration and to advance the state of pocket computing research, Compaq Computer Corporation's Research Laboratories are making available the schematics and manufacturing information for the Itsy V1.5 Pocket Computer. The Itsy is a flexible research platform, based on the StrongARM 1100, intended to enable hardware and software research in pocket computing. It is a small, low-power handheld device with a highly flexible interface, designed to encourage the development of innovative research projects, such as novel user interfaces, new applications, power management techniques, hardware extensions, etc. The information we are making available includes the hardware specifications, a low level monitor, and the Linux source code for the Itsy. Information about the project is available at: www.research.compaq.com/wrl/itsy More information on the distribution and how to download it is available at: www.research.compaq.com/wrl/itsy/download.html Deborah Wallach Western Research Laboratory Compaq Computer Corporation From kramer@pa.dec.com Wed Feb 9 04:14:20 2000 Return-Path: Received: from tudedr.et.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id EAA11778; Wed, 9 Feb 2000 04:14:20 +0100 (MET) Received: from mail2.digital.com by ITS.TUDelft.NL (PMDF V5.1-10 #21918) with ESMTP id <01JLOV4T3VSE9EDEGO@ITS.TUDelft.NL> for erik@duteinh.et.tudelft.nl; Wed, 9 Feb 2000 04:14:19 +0100 Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id TAA19413; Tue, 08 Feb 2000 19:10:25 -0800 (PST) Received: from rex.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA14974; Tue, 08 Feb 2000 19:08:03 -0800 Received: by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id TAA11533; Tue, 08 Feb 2000 19:04:53 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id TAA11553; Tue, 08 Feb 2000 19:04:51 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail2.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA11337; Tue, 08 Feb 2000 19:04:50 -0800 Received: from maxwell.ee.washington.edu (root@maxwell.ee.washington.edu [128.95.42.3]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with ESMTP id TAA14825 for ; Tue, 08 Feb 2000 19:04:50 -0800 (PST) Received: from raccoon (adsl-63-194-216-100.dsl.snfc21.pacbell.net [63.194.216.100]) by maxwell.ee.washington.edu (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id TAA15049 for ; Tue, 08 Feb 2000 19:03:50 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 08 Feb 2000 19:07:11 -0800 From: Ling Su Subject: About the Flash file system Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com To: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Reply-to: Ling Su Message-id: <004001bf72aa$c2e41ec0$6500a8c0@raccoon> Organization: Palm Microsystems, Inc. MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2919.6600 Content-type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk X-Msmail-Priority: Normal X-Mimeole: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2919.6600 X-Priority: 3 Hi, >From the website, I knew there is a Flash File System in Itsy's Linux port, could someone please tell me what is its name? Where I can found it? Another general question is where I can find the Itsy's Linux port document except dig into the code. Thanks! Regards, -Ling From kramer@pa.dec.com Wed Feb 9 10:23:07 2000 Return-Path: Received: from tudedr.et.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id KAA13717; Wed, 9 Feb 2000 10:23:07 +0100 (MET) Received: from mail2.digital.com by ITS.TUDelft.NL (PMDF V5.1-10 #21918) with ESMTP id <01JLP81044SE9EDEJ0@ITS.TUDelft.NL> for erik@duteinh.et.tudelft.nl; Wed, 9 Feb 2000 10:23:05 +0100 Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id BAA10940; Wed, 09 Feb 2000 01:20:05 -0800 (PST) Received: from rex.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA14050; Wed, 09 Feb 2000 01:19:19 -0800 Received: by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id BAA11861; Wed, 09 Feb 2000 01:18:16 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id BAA11844; Wed, 09 Feb 2000 01:17:14 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail2.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA12958; Wed, 09 Feb 2000 01:16:43 -0800 Received: from duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (duteinh.et.tudelft.nl [130.161.42.1]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with ESMTP id BAA10160 for ; Wed, 09 Feb 2000 01:16:42 -0800 (PST) Received: from kalman by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id KAA13663; Wed, 09 Feb 2000 10:15:22 +0100 (MET) Date: Wed, 09 Feb 2000 10:15:22 +0100 (MET) From: Erik Mouw Subject: Re: About the Flash file system In-reply-to: <004001bf72aa$c2e41ec0$6500a8c0@raccoon> Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com To: lingsu@palmmicro.com Cc: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Message-id: <200002090915.KAA13663@duteinh.et.tudelft.nl> Organization: Eric conspiracy secret labs MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: XCmail 1.0.0 - with PGP support, PGP engine version 0.5 (Linux) Content-type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-transfer-encoding: 8bit Precedence: bulk X-Face: "!Z|1XjFg!3Iw)BwM^M\k)J5KHiPddz}#/Zw%?$&Q!xqob"OA|})3_@&BTTiQERo?/^g[Z<9P4R8:5C:aqq.cw!hotLc=+u-"+1rq@9$V^8PbOUlodyi_sejt+D`iqkLpx$>.aXl%vnfPIt"LK|/%>94_Zrm8jy?`_[RKt'TuoxUxfk(gMhY(n|DBBl~c$dhO>G%6}R4+DGX3|idBm4oU&UM/XUP4I9aoN{]`ax%B?rgD(I3OJ<62Y6L X-Mailerorigin: http://www.fsai.fh-trier.de/~schmitzj/Xclasses/XCmail/ X-Eric-Conspiracy: There is no conspiracy! X-Loop: erik@it.et.tudelft.nl On Tue, 08 Feb 2000 19:07:11 -0800, Ling Su wrote: >>From the website, I knew there is a Flash File System in Itsy's Linux port, > could someone please tell me what is its name? Where I can found it? I think you mean the ramdisk. You can find one at Nicolas Pitre's site: ftp://ftp.netwinder.org/users/n/nico/ramdisk-img.gz I'm currently building a new ramdisk based on glibc-2.1.2 which I will announce to this list as soon as it is ready. (Ramdisk status update: all binaries are in place, just have to add a couple of scripts to get the whole thing started) > Another general question is where I can find the Itsy's Linux port document > except dig into the code. There isn't that much documentation except for the talk slides available at http://www.research.digital.com/wrl/itsy/slides.html . Erik -- LART. 250 MIPS under one Watt. http://www-ict.its.tudelft.nl/~erik/open-source/LART/ From kramer@pa.dec.com Wed Feb 9 16:03:24 2000 Return-Path: Received: from tudedv.et.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id QAA16231; Wed, 9 Feb 2000 16:03:23 +0100 (MET) Received: from mail2.digital.com by ITS.TUDelft.NL (PMDF V5.1-10 #21918) with ESMTP id <01JLPJVOKC3U9EDEV7@ITS.TUDelft.NL> for erik@duteinh.et.tudelft.nl; Wed, 9 Feb 2000 16:03:11 +0100 Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id HAA31236; Wed, 09 Feb 2000 07:00:30 -0800 (PST) Received: from rex.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA03511; Wed, 09 Feb 2000 06:59:54 -0800 Received: by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id GAA12118; Wed, 09 Feb 2000 06:59:33 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id GAA12113; Wed, 09 Feb 2000 06:59:31 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail1.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA12847; Wed, 09 Feb 2000 06:59:30 -0800 Received: from duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (duteinh.et.tudelft.nl [130.161.42.1]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with ESMTP id GAA05951 for ; Wed, 09 Feb 2000 06:59:29 -0800 (PST) Received: from kalman by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id PAA16186; Wed, 09 Feb 2000 15:58:10 +0100 (MET) Date: Wed, 09 Feb 2000 15:58:10 +0100 (MET) From: Erik Mouw Subject: Re: hello In-reply-to: <38A1A302.98F19C0A@siscom.net> Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com To: bkraack@siscom.net Cc: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Message-id: <200002091458.PAA16186@duteinh.et.tudelft.nl> Organization: Eric conspiracy secret labs MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: XCmail 1.0.0 - with PGP support, PGP engine version 0.5 (Linux) Content-type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-transfer-encoding: 8bit Precedence: bulk X-Face: "!Z|1XjFg!3Iw)BwM^M\k)J5KHiPddz}#/Zw%?$&Q!xqob"OA|})3_@&BTTiQERo?/^g[Z<9P4R8:5C:aqq.cw!hotLc=+u-"+1rq@9$V^8PbOUlodyi_sejt+D`iqkLpx$>.aXl%vnfPIt"LK|/%>94_Zrm8jy?`_[RKt'TuoxUxfk(gMhY(n|DBBl~c$dhO>G%6}R4+DGX3|idBm4oU&UM/XUP4I9aoN{]`ax%B?rgD(I3OJ<62Y6L X-Mailerorigin: http://www.fsai.fh-trier.de/~schmitzj/Xclasses/XCmail/ X-Eric-Conspiracy: There is no conspiracy! X-Loop: erik@it.et.tudelft.nl On Wed, 09 Feb 2000 09:25:22 -0800, Brian Kraack wrote: > I just joined the list because I just found out about this thing. It seems > very > cool and I want to build one. Any advice from you all would be great. I'm a I assume you're referring to the Itsy. There is not just "one" SA1100 based system, there are several designs around. Intel has a couple of development boards (http://developer.intel.com/design/strong/), PLEB is another one (http://www.cse.unsw.edu.au/~pleb/), we've developed LART (see URL in my signature), and there are others available as well. > software guy, but I took several hardware classes in college (I know how to > wire > a breadboard, etc.), and I know some hardware guys too. Ehm, you _really_ don't want to wire a SA1100 based system on a breadboard. Besides the fact that an LQFP or BGA package doesn't really fit on a breadboard, there is also the issue about the clock frequency. Breadboards aren't designed for > 30MHz. The LART uses a 6 layer PCB, I don't know about the other designs. You need proper power and ground planes on your PCB, so unless you are _very_ lucky it won't work on a two layer PCB. If you want an SA1100 based board _now_, just buy one from Intel. Or contact the PLEB guys if they have one available for you. > The first thing I noticed is the claim that the touch screen and LCD are not > publicly available ... how did you work around this issue? Where did you read this claim? It might be outdated because the Itsy documentation has been released yesterday. > If there is a FAQ that covers this stuff, I apologize, please point me to it. > (the 'official' itsy site seams very small for such a cool thing ... are there > other sites out there?) Some random links: - http://developer.intel.com/design/strong/ The official Intel pages - http://www.cse.unsw.edu.au/~pleb/ The PLEB homepage - http://foobar.starlab.net/~soggie/feather/ StarLab's FEATHER board - http://www-ict.its.tudelft.nl/~erik/open-source/LART/ The LART homepage - http://www-ict.its.tudelft.nl/~erik/open-source/blob/ The blob homepage (bootloader for LART) - http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/ ArmLinux homepage - ftp://ftp.netwinder.org/users/n/nico/ Nicolas Pitre's patches for SA1100 Linux - ftp://ftp.netwinder.org/users/p/philb/ Phil Blundell's ARM patches for gcc and binutils - http://www.inkvine.fluff.org/~chris/arm-tools.html Chris Rutter's cross compiler build HOWTO Erik -- LART. 250 MIPS under one Watt. http://www-ict.its.tudelft.nl/~erik/open-source/LART/ From kramer@pa.dec.com Wed Feb 9 17:37:46 2000 Return-Path: Received: from tudedr.et.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id RAA16926; Wed, 9 Feb 2000 17:37:45 +0100 (MET) Received: from mail1.digital.com by ITS.TUDelft.NL (PMDF V5.1-10 #21918) with ESMTP id <01JLPN6UZ7GC9JD3UO@ITS.TUDelft.NL> for erik@duteinh.et.tudelft.nl; Wed, 9 Feb 2000 17:37:44 +0100 Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id IAA13502; Wed, 09 Feb 2000 08:34:50 -0800 (PST) Received: from rex.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA00407; Wed, 09 Feb 2000 08:34:12 -0800 Received: by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id IAA12159; Wed, 09 Feb 2000 08:33:37 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id IAA12164; Wed, 09 Feb 2000 08:33:34 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail1.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA08369; Wed, 09 Feb 2000 08:33:34 -0800 Received: from blazieresearch.com (blazieresearch.com [199.227.113.99]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with ESMTP id IAA12846 for ; Wed, 09 Feb 2000 08:33:33 -0800 (PST) Received: from cpq800.blazieresearch.com (cpq800 [199.227.113.100]) by blazieresearch.com (8.9.3/8.8.7) with ESMTP id LAA03326 for ; Wed, 09 Feb 2000 11:33:46 -0500 Received: by ispsl1-100.gate.net with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.10) id <1RJ57CY3>; Wed, 09 Feb 2000 11:32:26 -0500 Date: Wed, 09 Feb 2000 11:32:25 -0500 From: Mike Reynolds Subject: SA1110 bootloader Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com To: "'SA-1100/Linux'" Message-id: <412E1CF8088BD211AD5100805FAD9A800B5A9F@ispsl1-100.gate.net> MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.10) Content-type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Precedence: bulk Hi all, Is anyone aware of a bootloader for the SA1110 that was developed with the Linux tool chain? It seems that most of them were done with the ARM SDT. Thanks. Mike Reynolds From kramer@pa.dec.com Wed Feb 9 17:47:36 2000 Return-Path: Received: from tudedr.et.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id RAA16973; Wed, 9 Feb 2000 17:47:36 +0100 (MET) Received: from mail2.digital.com by ITS.TUDelft.NL (PMDF V5.1-10 #21918) with ESMTP id <01JLPNJ3AABQ9JD3UO@ITS.TUDelft.NL> for erik@duteinh.et.tudelft.nl; Wed, 9 Feb 2000 17:47:34 +0100 Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id IAA08076; Wed, 09 Feb 2000 08:44:23 -0800 (PST) Received: from rex.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA30778; Wed, 09 Feb 2000 08:43:47 -0800 Received: by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id IAA12194; Wed, 09 Feb 2000 08:43:40 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id IAA12179; Wed, 09 Feb 2000 08:43:37 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail1.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA10627; Wed, 09 Feb 2000 08:43:37 -0800 Received: from duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (duteinh.et.tudelft.nl [130.161.42.1]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with ESMTP id IAA14396 for ; Wed, 09 Feb 2000 08:43:36 -0800 (PST) Received: from kalman by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id RAA16956; Wed, 09 Feb 2000 17:42:17 +0100 (MET) Date: Wed, 09 Feb 2000 17:42:17 +0100 (MET) From: Erik Mouw Subject: Re: SA1110 bootloader In-reply-to: <412E1CF8088BD211AD5100805FAD9A800B5A9F@ispsl1-100.gate.net> Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com To: mike@blazie.com Cc: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Message-id: <200002091642.RAA16956@duteinh.et.tudelft.nl> Organization: Eric conspiracy secret labs MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: XCmail 1.0.0 - with PGP support, PGP engine version 0.5 (Linux) Content-type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-transfer-encoding: 8bit Precedence: bulk X-Face: "!Z|1XjFg!3Iw)BwM^M\k)J5KHiPddz}#/Zw%?$&Q!xqob"OA|})3_@&BTTiQERo?/^g[Z<9P4R8:5C:aqq.cw!hotLc=+u-"+1rq@9$V^8PbOUlodyi_sejt+D`iqkLpx$>.aXl%vnfPIt"LK|/%>94_Zrm8jy?`_[RKt'TuoxUxfk(gMhY(n|DBBl~c$dhO>G%6}R4+DGX3|idBm4oU&UM/XUP4I9aoN{]`ax%B?rgD(I3OJ<62Y6L X-Mailerorigin: http://www.fsai.fh-trier.de/~schmitzj/Xclasses/XCmail/ X-Eric-Conspiracy: There is no conspiracy! X-Loop: erik@it.et.tudelft.nl On Wed, 09 Feb 2000 11:32:25 -0500, Mike Reynolds wrote: > Is anyone aware of a bootloader for the SA1110 that was developed with the > Linux tool chain? > It seems that most of them were done with the ARM SDT. Thanks. Yes, blob[1] (the bootloader for LART) can be compiled with a gcc toolchain. Both a native as well as a cross toolchain will do. Blob is available at: http://www-ict.its.tudelft.nl/~erik/open-source/blob/ Erik [1] Boot Loader OBject -- LART. 250 MIPS under one Watt. http://www-ict.its.tudelft.nl/~erik/open-source/LART/ From kramer@pa.dec.com Wed Feb 9 18:06:20 2000 Return-Path: Received: from tudedr.et.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id SAA17073; Wed, 9 Feb 2000 18:06:20 +0100 (MET) Received: from mail1.digital.com by ITS.TUDelft.NL (PMDF V5.1-10 #21918) with ESMTP id <01JLPO7922T29JD3UO@ITS.TUDelft.NL> for erik@duteinh.et.tudelft.nl; Wed, 9 Feb 2000 18:06:18 +0100 Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id JAA15874; Wed, 09 Feb 2000 09:03:19 -0800 (PST) Received: from rex.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA14145; Wed, 09 Feb 2000 09:02:43 -0800 Received: by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id JAA12156; Wed, 09 Feb 2000 09:02:31 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id JAA12183; Wed, 09 Feb 2000 09:02:29 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail1.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA25049; Wed, 09 Feb 2000 09:02:28 -0800 Received: from mailgate.keith-koep.com (root@mailgate.keith-koep.com [195.8.230.32]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with ESMTP id JAA16375 for ; Wed, 09 Feb 2000 09:02:27 -0800 (PST) Received: from otto (otto [195.8.230.40]) by mailgate.keith-koep.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id SAA00541 for ; Wed, 09 Feb 2000 18:07:23 +0100 Date: Wed, 09 Feb 2000 18:02:07 +0100 (MET) From: keith Subject: bootp tftp bootstrap Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com To: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Reply-to: keith Message-id: <200002091707.SAA00541@mailgate.keith-koep.com> MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: dtmail 1.2.0 CDE Version 1.2 SunOS 5.6 sun4u sparc Content-type: TEXT/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-MD5: Eq20o47Fw0zMaAKP5ymKQw== Precedence: bulk Bootstrap with GNU Toolchains There is a bootp/tftp bootstrap loader available at: ftp://keith-koep.com/pub/sa1100_boot/bootstrp/src/gdbstub.tar.gz tools to make bootimages: ftp://keith-koep.com/pub/sa1100_boot/boottools There is a serial+udp version of a generic gdb-stub for the direkt interface to gdb included. To have ethernet debugging features you will need an extension to remote.c in gdb. If interested please contact me. Volker PS: The bootstap code is loaded by the PBL in angel. The entry is very early after reset. So the things you need to add for the reset code is very small. As our angel adaption code is on the ftp server too it should be easily included into the bootstrap. _________________________________________________________________ | | | KEITH & KOEP GMBH DEVELOPMENT OF EMBEDDED CONTROL SYSTEMS | | KOENIGSBERGER STR.2 PHONE +49 (0)202 2525 30 | | D-42277 WUPPERTAL FAX +49 (0)202 2525 333 | | GERMANY keith@keith-koep.com | |_________________________________________________________________| From kramer@pa.dec.com Wed Feb 9 15:31:03 2000 Return-Path: Received: from tudedr.et.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id PAA15972; Wed, 9 Feb 2000 15:31:03 +0100 (MET) Received: from mail1.digital.com by ITS.TUDelft.NL (PMDF V5.1-10 #21918) with ESMTP id <01JLPIRS77D89EDEV7@ITS.TUDelft.NL> for erik@duteinh.et.tudelft.nl; Wed, 9 Feb 2000 15:31:00 +0100 Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id GAA32721; Wed, 09 Feb 2000 06:28:03 -0800 (PST) Received: from rex.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA01260; Wed, 09 Feb 2000 06:27:21 -0800 Received: by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id GAA12077; Wed, 09 Feb 2000 06:26:30 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id GAA12074; Wed, 09 Feb 2000 06:26:28 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail2.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA26864; Wed, 09 Feb 2000 06:26:27 -0800 Received: from server1.siscom.net (server1.siscom.net [209.251.2.89]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id GAA26588 for ; Wed, 09 Feb 2000 06:26:27 -0800 (PST) Received: (qmail 23655 invoked from network); Wed, 09 Feb 2000 14:25:40 +0000 Received: from ppp94.c5300-1.day-oh.siscom.net (HELO siscom.net) ([209.251.9.94]) (envelope-sender ) by server1.siscom.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; Wed, 09 Feb 2000 14:25:40 +0000 Date: Wed, 09 Feb 2000 09:25:22 -0800 From: Brian Kraack Subject: hello Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com To: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Reply-to: bkraack@siscom.net Message-id: <38A1A302.98F19C0A@siscom.net> MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.04 [en] (Win95; U) Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk References: <200002090915.KAA13663@duteinh.et.tudelft.nl> Hello all, I just joined the list because I just found out about this thing. It seems very cool and I want to build one. Any advice from you all would be great. I'm a software guy, but I took several hardware classes in college (I know how to wire a breadboard, etc.), and I know some hardware guys too. The first thing I noticed is the claim that the touch screen and LCD are not publicly available ... how did you work around this issue? If there is a FAQ that covers this stuff, I apologize, please point me to it. (the 'official' itsy site seams very small for such a cool thing ... are there other sites out there?) tia, /Brian From kramer@pa.dec.com Wed Feb 9 19:27:46 2000 Return-Path: Received: from tudedr.et.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id TAA17549; Wed, 9 Feb 2000 19:27:46 +0100 (MET) Received: from mail1.digital.com by ITS.TUDelft.NL (PMDF V5.1-10 #21918) with ESMTP id <01JLPR19Z7KU9EDEII@ITS.TUDelft.NL> for erik@duteinh.et.tudelft.nl; Wed, 9 Feb 2000 19:27:44 +0100 Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id KAA14798; Wed, 09 Feb 2000 10:24:52 -0800 (PST) Received: from rex.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA13066; Wed, 09 Feb 2000 10:24:15 -0800 Received: by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id KAA12266; Wed, 09 Feb 2000 10:24:07 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id KAA12258; Wed, 09 Feb 2000 10:24:04 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail1.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA15993; Wed, 09 Feb 2000 10:24:04 -0800 Received: from hotmail.com (f24.law8.hotmail.com [216.33.241.24]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id KAA23319 for ; Wed, 09 Feb 2000 10:24:04 -0800 (PST) Received: (qmail 99713 invoked by uid 0); Wed, 09 Feb 2000 18:23:29 +0000 Received: from 134.48.4.15 by www.hotmail.com with HTTP; Wed, 09 Feb 2000 10:23:29 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 09 Feb 2000 18:23:29 +0000 (GMT) From: Grant R Subject: Q.SA-1100 vs SA-1110? Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com To: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Message-id: <20000209182329.99712.qmail@hotmail.com> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; format=flowed Precedence: bulk X-Originating-Ip: [134.48.4.15] Dear Group, Currently I'm studying computer science; as Linux is open-source it seems to be an excellent study in OS internals and embedded systems via the SA-1100. Having put the SA-1100 development board under considersation; I would like to know if anyone has worked with the SA-1110 and if so how did their experience with ArmLinux differ? According to Intel's web site, "The SA-1110 differs from the SA-1100 only in the features of its memory and PCMCIA controller." So, do I need to be worried if I purchase the SA-1110? Best Wishes, G.C.R ______________________________________________________ Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com From kramer@pa.dec.com Wed Feb 9 20:14:38 2000 Return-Path: Received: from tudedr.et.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id UAA17783; Wed, 9 Feb 2000 20:14:37 +0100 (MET) Received: from mail1.digital.com by ITS.TUDelft.NL (PMDF V5.1-10 #21918) with ESMTP id <01JLPSODHTU89JD40K@ITS.TUDelft.NL> for erik@duteinh.et.tudelft.nl; Wed, 9 Feb 2000 20:14:36 +0100 Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id LAA28540; Wed, 09 Feb 2000 11:11:51 -0800 (PST) Received: from rex.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA23866; Wed, 09 Feb 2000 11:11:14 -0800 Received: by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id LAA12319; Wed, 09 Feb 2000 11:10:44 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id LAA12314; Wed, 09 Feb 2000 11:10:42 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail1.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA26053; Wed, 09 Feb 2000 11:10:42 -0800 Received: from tekincisnts-4.teklogix.com (mail.teklogix.com [207.219.2.10]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with ESMTP id LAA28245 for ; Wed, 09 Feb 2000 11:10:41 -0800 (PST) Received: from DeadDuck (BILL [10.128.5.25]) by tekincisnts-4.teklogix.com with SMTP (Microsoft Exchange Internet Mail Service Version 5.5.2448.0) id CYMG40VT; Wed, 09 Feb 2000 14:09:21 -0500 Date: Wed, 09 Feb 2000 14:10:03 -0600 From: Bill Pringlemeir Subject: Re: Q.SA-1100 vs SA-1110? In-reply-to: "Grant R"'s message of "Wed, 09 Feb 2000 18:23:29 GMT" Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com To: Grant R Cc: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Message-id: Organization: noitazinagro MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Precedence: bulk X-Home-Page: http://www.wwonline.com/~bpringle/ User-Agent: Gnus/5.0803 (Gnus v5.8.3) Emacs/20.5 Lines: 32 References: <20000209182329.99712.qmail@hotmail.com> What Intel says is true, the SA1110 is only different in the PCCard (PCMCIA) and the SDRAM support. However, if you buy a brutus board (SA1100) or the SA1110 evaluation board, you get different memory and peripherals. If you are designing your own board, then the code could be identical for SA1100 or SA1110 (excluding SDRAM). The PCCard differences are just buffering, or hardware mainly. The SA1110, can also be clocked faster and seems to be lower power from what I have seen. So the processors are about the same, but the boards will have differences. Also, the SA1110 is in sample mode only (afaik) and the silicon could be buggy. hth, Bill Grant> Dear Group, Currently I'm studying computer science; as Grant> Linux is open-source it seems to be an excellent study in Grant> OS internals and embedded systems via the SA-1100. Having Grant> put the SA-1100 development board under considersation; I Grant> would like to know if anyone has worked with the SA-1110 Grant> and if so how did their experience with ArmLinux differ? Grant> According to Intel's web site, "The SA-1110 differs from Grant> the SA-1100 only in the features of its memory and PCMCIA Grant> controller." So, do I need to be worried if I purchase the Grant> SA-1110? -- When I'm in Canada, I feel this is what the world should be like - Jane Fonda From kramer@pa.dec.com Wed Feb 9 19:14:57 2000 Return-Path: Received: from tudedr.et.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id TAA17472; Wed, 9 Feb 2000 19:14:57 +0100 (MET) Received: from mail2.digital.com by ITS.TUDelft.NL (PMDF V5.1-10 #21918) with ESMTP id <01JLPQLDUC0G9EDEII@ITS.TUDelft.NL> for erik@duteinh.et.tudelft.nl; Wed, 9 Feb 2000 19:14:55 +0100 Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id KAA18311; Wed, 09 Feb 2000 10:11:47 -0800 (PST) Received: from rex.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA32640; Wed, 09 Feb 2000 10:11:10 -0800 Received: by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id KAA12241; Wed, 09 Feb 2000 10:10:37 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id KAA12240; Wed, 09 Feb 2000 10:10:35 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail2.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA11405; Wed, 09 Feb 2000 10:10:34 -0800 Received: from server1.siscom.net (server1.siscom.net [209.251.2.89]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id KAA17902 for ; Wed, 09 Feb 2000 10:10:34 -0800 (PST) Received: (qmail 71182 invoked from network); Wed, 09 Feb 2000 18:09:47 +0000 Received: from ppp165.c5300-1.day-oh.siscom.net (HELO siscom.net) ([209.251.9.165]) (envelope-sender ) by server1.siscom.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; Wed, 09 Feb 2000 18:09:47 +0000 Date: Wed, 09 Feb 2000 13:09:30 -0800 From: Brian Kraack Subject: Re: hello Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com To: Erik Mouw Cc: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Reply-to: bkraack@siscom.net Message-id: <38A1D78A.F182DFEB@siscom.net> MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.04 [en] (Win95; U) Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk References: <200002091458.PAA16186@duteinh.et.tudelft.nl> yes, I'm refering to the Itsy ... I didn't realize there were multiple projects. I didn't think I'd be able to do it on a breadboard (though I hoped I could). The claim about the non-availability of the LCD and touch screens is from the Itsy website ... and the documentation (that I dl'd yesterday) claims they are custom/not-available, etc. maybe they're just not up-to-date ... A buddy and I had decided we were going to try and roll our own rather than mess with Itsy and all of it's licensing issues (and also maybe to sell as kits, etc.) .... it sounds like there are several other attempts at this from the URLs listed in your email, I'll check them out. Thanks for the all of the info ... /Brian Erik Mouw wrote: > On Wed, 09 Feb 2000 09:25:22 -0800, Brian Kraack wrote: > > I just joined the list because I just found out about this thing. It seems > > very > > cool and I want to build one. Any advice from you all would be great. I'm a > > I assume you're referring to the Itsy. There is not just "one" SA1100 > based system, there are several designs around. Intel has a couple of > development boards (http://developer.intel.com/design/strong/), PLEB is > another one (http://www.cse.unsw.edu.au/~pleb/), we've developed LART (see > URL in my signature), and there are others available as well. > > > software guy, but I took several hardware classes in college (I know how to > > wire > > a breadboard, etc.), and I know some hardware guys too. > > Ehm, you _really_ don't want to wire a SA1100 based system on a > breadboard. Besides the fact that an LQFP or BGA package doesn't really > fit on a breadboard, there is also the issue about the clock frequency. > Breadboards aren't designed for > 30MHz. The LART uses a 6 layer PCB, I > don't know about the other designs. You need proper power and ground > planes on your PCB, so unless you are _very_ lucky it won't work on a two > layer PCB. > > If you want an SA1100 based board _now_, just buy one from Intel. Or > contact the PLEB guys if they have one available for you. > > > The first thing I noticed is the claim that the touch screen and LCD are not > > publicly available ... how did you work around this issue? > > Where did you read this claim? It might be outdated because the Itsy > documentation has been released yesterday. > > > If there is a FAQ that covers this stuff, I apologize, please point me to it. > > (the 'official' itsy site seams very small for such a cool thing ... are there > > other sites out there?) > > Some random links: > > - http://developer.intel.com/design/strong/ > The official Intel pages > - http://www.cse.unsw.edu.au/~pleb/ > The PLEB homepage > - http://foobar.starlab.net/~soggie/feather/ > StarLab's FEATHER board > - http://www-ict.its.tudelft.nl/~erik/open-source/LART/ > The LART homepage > - http://www-ict.its.tudelft.nl/~erik/open-source/blob/ > The blob homepage (bootloader for LART) > - http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/ > ArmLinux homepage > - ftp://ftp.netwinder.org/users/n/nico/ > Nicolas Pitre's patches for SA1100 Linux > - ftp://ftp.netwinder.org/users/p/philb/ > Phil Blundell's ARM patches for gcc and binutils > - http://www.inkvine.fluff.org/~chris/arm-tools.html > Chris Rutter's cross compiler build HOWTO > > Erik > > -- > LART. 250 MIPS under one Watt. > http://www-ict.its.tudelft.nl/~erik/open-source/LART/ From kramer@pa.dec.com Wed Feb 9 22:52:20 2000 Return-Path: Received: from tudedr.et.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id WAA18474; Wed, 9 Feb 2000 22:52:20 +0100 (MET) Received: from mail2.digital.com by ITS.TUDelft.NL (PMDF V5.1-10 #21918) with ESMTP id <01JLPY6WCQ8K9EDEK6@ITS.TUDelft.NL> for erik@duteinh.et.tudelft.nl; Wed, 9 Feb 2000 22:52:18 +0100 Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id NAA06876; Wed, 09 Feb 2000 13:49:34 -0800 (PST) Received: from rex.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA20820; Wed, 09 Feb 2000 13:48:57 -0800 Received: by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id NAA12488; Wed, 09 Feb 2000 13:48:11 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id NAA12474; Wed, 09 Feb 2000 13:48:08 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail2.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA15619; Wed, 09 Feb 2000 13:48:08 -0800 Received: from mentor.cc.purdue.edu (IDENT:root@mentor.cc.purdue.edu [128.210.10.12]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with ESMTP id NAA03811 for ; Wed, 09 Feb 2000 13:48:06 -0800 (PST) Received: from cs.purdue.edu (dial-c-02-50.resnet.purdue.edu [128.211.132.156]) by mentor.cc.purdue.edu (8.8.8+Sun/8.8.8) with ESMTP id QAA16451 for ; Wed, 09 Feb 2000 16:44:40 -0500 (EST) Date: Wed, 09 Feb 2000 16:55:02 -0500 From: Adrian Silveanu Subject: Itsy's Cost Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com To: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Message-id: <38A1E236.4A5411AC@cs.purdue.edu> MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.61 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.2.12-20 i586) Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk X-Accept-Language: en Hi, I am looking into the possibility of building a copy of Compaq's Itsy and am trying to estimate its cost. I hope to built one during the summer if the cost isn't high. I am currently studying at college. I looked that the prices for Intel's SA-1100 Evaluation Platform, which is $2500, and Intel's SA-1110 Dev. Board, which is $1750. These are out of my range. I plan to budget about $500 or the price of a Palm Pilot Vx, which ever is more. Is this reasonable? I realize I might go out of budget a little. I would pay a company to make the printed circuit boards. When I am not at college, I am in Chicago, so hopefully it shouldn't be too hard to get this done. I am concerned about the surface mount components. Soldering them in by hand isn't impossible, but I can imagine difficult. As for the case, once I get everything else working, I would buy/make a case for it. Thanks for any info, Adrian Silveanu From kramer@pa.dec.com Wed Feb 9 23:25:11 2000 Return-Path: Received: from tudedr.et.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id XAA18602; Wed, 9 Feb 2000 23:25:11 +0100 (MET) Received: from mail2.digital.com by ITS.TUDelft.NL (PMDF V5.1-10 #21918) with ESMTP id <01JLPZBKT9JY9JD49M@ITS.TUDelft.NL> for erik@duteinh.et.tudelft.nl; Wed, 9 Feb 2000 23:25:08 +0100 Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id OAA10956; Wed, 09 Feb 2000 14:22:18 -0800 (PST) Received: from rex.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA07375; Wed, 09 Feb 2000 14:19:06 -0800 Received: by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id OAA12533; Wed, 09 Feb 2000 14:18:42 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id OAA12532; Wed, 09 Feb 2000 14:18:40 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail1.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA26245; Wed, 09 Feb 2000 14:18:40 -0800 Received: from kings-cross.london.uk.eu.org (mail@tazenda.demon.co.uk [158.152.220.239]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with ESMTP id OAA10602 for ; Wed, 09 Feb 2000 14:18:38 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost ([::ffff:127.0.0.1] helo=kings-cross.london.uk.eu.org ident=phil) by kings-cross.london.uk.eu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.11 #1) id 12IfRG-0007iT-00; Wed, 09 Feb 2000 22:18:22 +0000 Date: Wed, 09 Feb 2000 22:18:22 +0000 From: Philip Blundell Subject: Re: Itsy's Cost In-reply-to: Message from Adrian Silveanu "of Wed, 09 Feb 2000 16:55:02 EST." <38A1E236.4A5411AC@cs.purdue.edu> Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com To: Adrian Silveanu Cc: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Message-id: MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: exmh version 2.0.2 2/24/98 (debian) Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Precedence: bulk References: <38A1E236.4A5411AC@cs.purdue.edu> > I looked that the prices for Intel's SA-1100 Evaluation Platform, >which is $2500, and Intel's SA-1110 Dev. Board, which is $1750. These >are out of my range. I plan to budget about $500 or the price of a >Palm Pilot Vx, which ever is more. Is this reasonable? I realize I >might go out of budget a little. It depends how much of the work you plan to do yourself. I think $500 should easily cover the material costs, but if you have to pay for PCB layout, assembly etc that will of course push the price up. Get a copy of the Itsy bill of materials, call some local distributors and get quotes for 1-up prices on the major parts. You may find some of them will send you "sample" parts for free. >I am concerned about the surface mount components. >Soldering them in by hand isn't impossible, but I can imagine difficult. You almost certainly don't want to try to solder these by hand. You need to find someone with reflow equipment who is prepared to do single boards (which will obviously mean manual placement). p. From kramer@pa.dec.com Thu Feb 10 00:14:54 2000 Return-Path: Received: from tudedr.et.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id AAA18772; Thu, 10 Feb 2000 00:14:54 +0100 (MET) Received: from mail2.digital.com by ITS.TUDelft.NL (PMDF V5.1-10 #21918) with ESMTP id <01JLQ1120W029EDF71@ITS.TUDelft.NL> for erik@duteinh.et.tudelft.nl; Thu, 10 Feb 2000 00:14:52 +0100 Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id PAA12511; Wed, 09 Feb 2000 15:10:59 -0800 (PST) Received: from rex.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA15925; Wed, 09 Feb 2000 15:07:45 -0800 Received: by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id PAA12567; Wed, 09 Feb 2000 15:06:59 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id PAA12560; Wed, 09 Feb 2000 15:06:56 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail2.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA25363; Wed, 09 Feb 2000 15:06:56 -0800 Received: from empeg.com (morrison.empeg.co.uk [193.119.19.130]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with ESMTP id PAA15178 for ; Wed, 09 Feb 2000 15:06:55 -0800 (PST) Received: from dodgy (dodgy.internal.empeg.com [10.1.1.32]) by empeg.com (8.8.7/8.8.7) with SMTP id XAA12610; Wed, 09 Feb 2000 23:06:41 +0000 (GMT) Date: Wed, 09 Feb 2000 23:06:42 +0000 From: Mike Crowe Subject: Re: Itsy's Cost Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com To: Adrian Silveanu , Philip Blundell Cc: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Message-id: <002d01bf7352$546215d0$2001010a@internal.empeg.com> Organization: empeg ltd MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2919.6600 Content-type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk X-Msmail-Priority: Normal X-Mimeole: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2919.6600 References: <38A1E236.4A5411AC@cs.purdue.edu> X-Priority: 3 You wrote: > You almost certainly don't want to try to solder these by hand. You need to > find someone with reflow equipment who is prepared to do single boards (which > will obviously mean manual placement). Well, all the empeg prototypes have been hand soldered and all but the first ran code first time. To do this you require: a) A fine tipped soldering iron. b) SMT solder. c) Lots of flux. d) Solder braid. e) One mad hardware engineer. f) Lots of patience and practice (ie. over 32000 individual solder joints in the last year). However, we wouldn't recommend it. :) -- Mike Crowe empeg ltd From kramer@pa.dec.com Thu Feb 10 01:35:34 2000 Return-Path: Received: from tudedr.et.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id BAA19077; Thu, 10 Feb 2000 01:35:34 +0100 (MET) Received: from mail2.digital.com by ITS.TUDelft.NL (PMDF V5.1-10 #21918) with ESMTP id <01JLQ3VATXHE9JD4FD@ITS.TUDelft.NL> for erik@duteinh.et.tudelft.nl; Thu, 10 Feb 2000 01:35:32 +0100 Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id QAA22542; Wed, 09 Feb 2000 16:32:17 -0800 (PST) Received: from rex.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA02009; Wed, 09 Feb 2000 16:31:00 -0800 Received: by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id QAA12591; Wed, 09 Feb 2000 16:30:11 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id QAA12586; Wed, 09 Feb 2000 16:30:09 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail1.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA29029; Wed, 09 Feb 2000 16:30:08 -0800 Received: from note.orchestra.cse.unsw.EDU.AU (note.orchestra.cse.unsw.EDU.AU [129.94.242.29]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id QAA22626 for ; Wed, 09 Feb 2000 16:30:06 -0800 (PST) Received: From paulaner With LocalMail ; Thu, 10 Feb 2000 11:27:53 +1100 Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2000 11:27:52 +1100 (EST) From: "Adam 'WeirdArms' Wiggins" Subject: Re: About the Flash file system In-reply-to: <200002090915.KAA13663@duteinh.et.tudelft.nl> Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com X-Sender: awiggins@paulaner.disy.cse.unsw.EDU.AU To: Erik Mouw Cc: lingsu@palmmicro.com, sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Message-id: MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Precedence: bulk On Wed, 9 Feb 2000, Erik Mouw wrote: > On Tue, 08 Feb 2000 19:07:11 -0800, Ling Su wrote: > >>From the website, I knew there is a Flash File System in Itsy's Linux port, > > could someone please tell me what is its name? Where I can found it? > The itsy site does talk about feature of the itsy kernel which haven't been merged into the current kernels. They mention a Flash File System as well as power management support. So I think to answer Ling's questions the Flash File System would be part of the kernel they have on their site. > I think you mean the ramdisk. You can find one at Nicolas Pitre's site: Cheers Adam From kramer@pa.dec.com Thu Feb 10 01:41:14 2000 Return-Path: Received: from tudedr.et.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id BAA19104; Thu, 10 Feb 2000 01:41:14 +0100 (MET) Received: from mail1.digital.com by ITS.TUDelft.NL (PMDF V5.1-10 #21918) with ESMTP id <01JLQ43BC2O69EDF71@ITS.TUDelft.NL> for erik@duteinh.et.tudelft.nl; Thu, 10 Feb 2000 01:41:12 +0100 Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id QAA20879; Wed, 09 Feb 2000 16:38:36 -0800 (PST) Received: from rex.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA01808; Wed, 09 Feb 2000 16:37:43 -0800 Received: by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id QAA12515; Wed, 09 Feb 2000 16:37:36 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id QAA12593; Wed, 09 Feb 2000 16:37:34 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail2.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA29521; Wed, 09 Feb 2000 16:37:34 -0800 Received: from note.orchestra.cse.unsw.EDU.AU (note.orchestra.cse.unsw.EDU.AU [129.94.242.29]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id QAA21525 for ; Wed, 09 Feb 2000 16:37:31 -0800 (PST) Received: From paulaner With LocalMail ; Thu, 10 Feb 2000 11:36:28 +1100 Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2000 11:36:15 +1100 (EST) From: "Adam 'WeirdArms' Wiggins" Subject: Re: Q.SA-1100 vs SA-1110? In-reply-to: <20000209182329.99712.qmail@hotmail.com> Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com X-Sender: awiggins@paulaner.disy.cse.unsw.EDU.AU To: Grant R Cc: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Message-id: MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Precedence: bulk On Wed, 9 Feb 2000, Grant R wrote: > Dear Group, > > Currently I'm studying computer science; as Linux is open-source it > seems to be an excellent study in OS internals and embedded systems via the > SA-1100. Having put the SA-1100 development board under considersation; I > would like to know if anyone has worked with the SA-1110 and if so how did > their experience with ArmLinux differ? According to Intel's web site, > "The SA-1110 differs from the SA-1100 only in the features of its memory and > PCMCIA controller." So, do I need to be worried if I purchase the SA-1110? My advice is check the pricing, avaliability and minimum quantities you can get of either. Also you cannot use the SA-1110 unless you can solder BGA parts to your PCBs, not as hard as sounds but you regire a) Your own gear to do it b) A friend or board packer to do it for you. In general rumours are that the SA-1110 will be cheaper and more avaliable, the SA-1100 has silicon bugs which won't be fixed and it apparently more expensive and harder to get due to production line problems. The SA-1100 comes in TQFP (Thin Quad Flat Pack) and mBGA (micro Ball Grid Array), the SA-1110 comes in only mBGA. The SA-1110 has a slightly functional memory controller, the most significant additions (IMHO) is the SDRAM support but there are other features added (see SA-1110 TRM). The support chips SA-1101 and SA-1111 for the SA-1100 and SA-1110 respectively have different functionality see their TRM (Technical Reference Manuals) for more information. Cheers Adam, The PLEB Guy From kramer@pa.dec.com Thu Feb 10 01:45:15 2000 Return-Path: Received: from tudedr.et.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id BAA19121; Thu, 10 Feb 2000 01:45:15 +0100 (MET) Received: from mail2.digital.com by ITS.TUDelft.NL (PMDF V5.1-10 #21918) with ESMTP id <01JLQ488LQBM9JD4FD@ITS.TUDelft.NL> for erik@duteinh.et.tudelft.nl; Thu, 10 Feb 2000 01:45:13 +0100 Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id QAA22869; Wed, 09 Feb 2000 16:42:35 -0800 (PST) Received: from rex.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA23649; Wed, 09 Feb 2000 16:41:58 -0800 Received: by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id QAA12499; Wed, 09 Feb 2000 16:41:52 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id QAA12612; Wed, 09 Feb 2000 16:41:50 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail1.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA10730; Wed, 09 Feb 2000 16:41:50 -0800 Received: from note.orchestra.cse.unsw.EDU.AU (note.orchestra.cse.unsw.EDU.AU [129.94.242.29]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id QAA23285 for ; Wed, 09 Feb 2000 16:41:45 -0800 (PST) Received: From paulaner With LocalMail ; Thu, 10 Feb 2000 11:39:48 +1100 Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2000 11:39:45 +1100 (EST) From: "Adam 'WeirdArms' Wiggins" Subject: Re: Itsy's Cost In-reply-to: Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com X-Sender: awiggins@paulaner.disy.cse.unsw.EDU.AU To: Philip Blundell Cc: Adrian Silveanu , sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Message-id: MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Precedence: bulk > You almost certainly don't want to try to solder these by hand. You need to > find someone with reflow equipment who is prepared to do single boards (which > will obviously mean manual placement). From experience I'll just qualify that statement. You don't want to solder it by hand without the right tools, Which is a Very good solder station and a micro-reflow tip. With making these boards you really want to outsorce what you don't have the tools to do locally. Outsourcing shouldn't be a problem if you have a board design you know works, the benifit of your own tools is you can fix problems locally which might be an issue if you get a board that hasn't been built properly or if you have problems with it later. Cheers Adam From kramer@pa.dec.com Thu Feb 10 03:44:06 2000 Return-Path: Received: from tudedr.et.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id DAA19612; Thu, 10 Feb 2000 03:44:06 +0100 (MET) Received: from mail2.digital.com by ITS.TUDelft.NL (PMDF V5.1-10 #21918) with ESMTP id <01JLQ8DN84PA9EDEUH@ITS.TUDelft.NL> for erik@duteinh.et.tudelft.nl; Thu, 10 Feb 2000 03:44:04 +0100 Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id SAA32041; Wed, 09 Feb 2000 18:41:26 -0800 (PST) Received: from rex.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA08821; Wed, 09 Feb 2000 18:40:39 -0800 Received: by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id SAA12657; Wed, 09 Feb 2000 18:39:52 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id SAA12660; Wed, 09 Feb 2000 18:39:49 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail2.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA00059; Wed, 09 Feb 2000 18:39:48 -0800 Received: from note.orchestra.cse.unsw.EDU.AU (note.orchestra.cse.unsw.EDU.AU [129.94.242.29]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id SAA00284 for ; Wed, 09 Feb 2000 18:39:47 -0800 (PST) Received: From paulaner With LocalMail ; Thu, 10 Feb 2000 13:38:06 +1100 Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2000 13:38:03 +1100 (EST) From: "Adam 'WeirdArms' Wiggins" Subject: Re: hello In-reply-to: <38A1A302.98F19C0A@siscom.net> Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com X-Sender: awiggins@paulaner.disy.cse.unsw.EDU.AU To: Brian Kraack Cc: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Message-id: MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Precedence: bulk On Wed, 9 Feb 2000, Brian Kraack wrote: > Hello all, > The first thing I noticed is the claim that the touch screen and LCD are not > publicly available ... how did you work around this issue? On this front the LCD and touch screen are a major issue since they are standard interfaces. If you look at the TRM (Technical Reference Manual) for the SA-1100 you'll find that the LCD controler supports a large range of LCDs. Interfacing an LCD is trivial however the power supply circuits for LCDs are tightly bound to a particular LCD so you might have to get/design a power supply circuit for a LCD you get. Also you'll have to make it fit in the casing somehow. As for the Touch screen, they use the Philips UCB-1200 which supplies a standard 4 wire resistive touch screen interface. You might have problems getting a touch sceen full stop and then more problems finding one that fits your LCD. What I'm trying to say is the LCD and touch screen arnt a major issue to interface. So you can work with whatever you can get your hands on. Cheers Adam From kramer@pa.dec.com Fri Feb 11 18:38:40 2000 Return-Path: Received: from tudedr.et.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id SAA01958; Fri, 11 Feb 2000 18:38:40 +0100 (MET) Received: from mail2.digital.com by ITS.TUDelft.NL (PMDF V5.1-10 #21918) with ESMTP id <01JLSHW44YU49EDGJ2@ITS.TUDelft.NL> for erik@duteinh.et.tudelft.nl; Fri, 11 Feb 2000 18:38:38 +0100 Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id JAA06690; Fri, 11 Feb 2000 09:35:09 -0800 (PST) Received: from rex.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA05401; Fri, 11 Feb 2000 09:34:23 -0800 Received: by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id JAA14057; Fri, 11 Feb 2000 09:31:31 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id JAA14058; Fri, 11 Feb 2000 09:31:29 -0800 (PST) Received: from stowe.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA08481; Fri, 11 Feb 2000 09:31:28 -0800 Received: by stowe.pa.dec.com; (5.65v4.0/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id AA26147; Fri, 11 Feb 2000 09:31:27 -0800 Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2000 09:31:27 -0800 From: Deborah Wallach Subject: Re: hello In-reply-to: (awiggins@cse.unsw.edu.au) Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com To: awiggins@cse.unsw.edu.au Cc: bkraack@siscom.net, sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Message-id: <200002111731.AA26147@stowe.pa.dec.com> Precedence: bulk Address: Compaq Computer Corporation; Western Research Laboratory; 250 University Avenue; Palo Alto, CA 94301; USA Phone: 650-617-3315 > The first thing I noticed is the claim that the touch screen and LCD are not > publicly available ... how did you work around this issue? On this front the LCD and touch screen are a major issue since they are standard interfaces. If you look at the TRM (Technical Reference Manual) for the SA-1100 you'll find that the LCD controler supports a large range of LCDs. Interfacing an LCD is trivial however the power supply circuits for LCDs are tightly bound to a particular LCD so you might have to get/design a power supply circuit for a LCD you get. Also you'll have to make it fit in the casing somehow. As for the Touch screen, they use the Philips UCB-1200 which supplies a standard 4 wire resistive touch screen interface. You might have problems getting a touch sceen full stop and then more problems finding one that fits your LCD. What I'm trying to say is the LCD and touch screen arnt a major issue to interface. So you can work with whatever you can get your hands on. I've placed a mini-FAQ on the download page (http://www.research.compaq.com/wrl/itsy/download.html) which addresses these issues in more detail than was originally included in the release. Deborah Wallach Western Research Laboratory Compaq Computer Corporation From kramer@pa.dec.com Mon Feb 14 00:45:47 2000 Return-Path: Received: from tudedr.et.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id AAA12440; Mon, 14 Feb 2000 00:45:47 +0100 (MET) Received: from mail2.digital.com by ITS.TUDelft.NL (PMDF V5.1-10 #21918) with ESMTP id <01JLVNAZ1EAE9EDI37@ITS.TUDelft.NL> for erik@duteinh.et.tudelft.nl; Mon, 14 Feb 2000 00:45:46 +0100 Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id PAA30743; Sun, 13 Feb 2000 15:42:44 -0800 (PST) Received: from rex.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA29271; Sun, 13 Feb 2000 15:42:05 -0800 Received: by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id PAA15109; Sun, 13 Feb 2000 15:39:27 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id PAA15094; Sun, 13 Feb 2000 15:39:25 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail2.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA20822; Sun, 13 Feb 2000 15:39:23 -0800 Received: from duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (duteinh.et.tudelft.nl [130.161.42.1]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with ESMTP id PAA31075 for ; Sun, 13 Feb 2000 15:39:23 -0800 (PST) Received: from kalman.et.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id AAA12417; Mon, 14 Feb 2000 00:37:51 +0100 (MET) Received: (from erik@localhost) by kalman.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.8/8.8.8/Debian/GNU) id AAA12079; Mon, 14 Feb 2000 00:37:51 +0100 Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2000 00:37:51 +0100 (CET) From: J.A.K.Mouw@ITS.TUDelft.NL (Erik Mouw) Subject: ANNOUNCE: Precompiled cross compiler Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com To: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com, linux-arm@vger.rutgers.edu Message-id: <200002132337.AAA12079@kalman.et.tudelft.nl> Organization: Eric Conspiracy Secret Labs MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL39 (25)] Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk X-Eric-Conspiracy: There is no conspiracy! Hi all, Because a lot of people have problems building their own i386 --> arm cross-compiler I tarred up my own compiler and put it on a web page. You can get it at: http://www-ict.its.tudelft.nl/~erik/open-source/arm-linux-cross/ The package contains gcc and g++ 2.95.2, glibc 2.1.2 with glibc-crypt and glibc-linux-threads, and binutils 2.9.5.0.22. The compiler was build on a i386 Debian GNU/Linux 2.1 system, which uses glibc-2.0.7. It works for me, YMMV. Please read the README file before you download the tarball. Erik -- J.A.K. (Erik) Mouw, Information and Communication Theory Group, Department of Electrical Engineering, Faculty of Information Technology and Systems, Delft University of Technology, PO BOX 5031, 2600 GA Delft, The Netherlands Phone: +31-15-2785859 Fax: +31-15-2781843 Email J.A.K.Mouw@its.tudelft.nl WWW: http://www-ict.its.tudelft.nl/~erik/ From kramer@pa.dec.com Fri Feb 18 07:08:53 2000 Return-Path: Received: from tudedr.et.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id HAA15290; Fri, 18 Feb 2000 07:08:53 +0100 (MET) Received: from mail1.digital.com by ITS.TUDelft.NL (PMDF V5.1-10 #21918) with ESMTP id <01JM1LU98JP69N434N@ITS.TUDelft.NL> for erik@duteinh.et.tudelft.nl; Fri, 18 Feb 2000 07:08:49 +0100 Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id WAA01718; Thu, 17 Feb 2000 22:05:35 -0800 (PST) Received: from rex.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA24975; Thu, 17 Feb 2000 22:04:47 -0800 Received: by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id WAA02467; Thu, 17 Feb 2000 22:02:29 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id WAA02475; Thu, 17 Feb 2000 22:02:28 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail1.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA19535; Thu, 17 Feb 2000 22:02:28 -0800 Received: from note.orchestra.cse.unsw.EDU.AU (note.orchestra.cse.unsw.EDU.AU [129.94.242.29]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id WAA28319 for ; Thu, 17 Feb 2000 22:02:26 -0800 (PST) Received: From paulaner With LocalMail ; Fri, 18 Feb 2000 17:00:47 +1100 Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2000 17:00:39 +1100 (EST) From: "Adam 'WeirdArms' Wiggins" Subject: Memory test programs Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com X-Sender: awiggins@paulaner.disy.cse.unsw.EDU.AU To: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Message-id: MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Precedence: bulk Hi all, I'm after an algorithm for testing DRAM chips. Basically we've been having reliability problems with our memory boards for PLEB and I need quickly hand code some assembly memory tester program to test for stuck bits and aliases. We are using 2 banks of 16MB EDO DRAM, 32Bit wide. Any idea's or pointers? Cheers Adam From kramer@pa.dec.com Fri Feb 18 10:38:05 2000 Return-Path: Received: from tudedr.et.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id KAA16559; Fri, 18 Feb 2000 10:38:05 +0100 (MET) Received: from mail1.digital.com by ITS.TUDelft.NL (PMDF V5.1-10 #21918) with ESMTP id <01JM1T5LCG9C9N45YN@ITS.TUDelft.NL> for erik@duteinh.et.tudelft.nl; Fri, 18 Feb 2000 10:38:02 +0100 Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id BAA16373; Fri, 18 Feb 2000 01:34:40 -0800 (PST) Received: from rex.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA23189; Fri, 18 Feb 2000 01:34:07 -0800 Received: by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id BAA02606; Fri, 18 Feb 2000 01:33:20 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id BAA02597; Fri, 18 Feb 2000 01:33:19 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail1.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA01764; Fri, 18 Feb 2000 01:33:19 -0800 Received: from bastion.power-x.co.uk (bastion.power-x.co.uk [62.232.19.201]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with ESMTP id BAA13712 for ; Fri, 18 Feb 2000 01:33:17 -0800 (PST) Received: from springhead.px.uk.com (IDENT:dg@springhead.px.uk.com [172.16.18.41]) by bastion.power-x.co.uk (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id JAA01087; Fri, 18 Feb 2000 09:32:51 +0000 (GMT) Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2000 09:32:48 +0000 (GMT) From: "Dr. David Gilbert" Subject: Re: Memory test programs In-reply-to: Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com X-Sender: dg@springhead.px.uk.com To: "Adam 'WeirdArms' Wiggins" Cc: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Message-id: MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Precedence: bulk On Fri, 18 Feb 2000, Adam 'WeirdArms' Wiggins wrote: > Hi all, I'm after an algorithm for testing DRAM chips. Basically > we've been having reliability problems with our memory boards for PLEB and > I need quickly hand code some assembly memory tester program to test for > stuck bits and aliases. We are using 2 banks of 16MB EDO DRAM, 32Bit wide. > Any idea's or pointers? I find a good trick is to allocate as large a block of RAM you can; seed a random number generator with a known seed and remember the seed. Fill the RAM with the random numbers; reset the generator back to the original seed and run through the RAM again comparing. Then just leave it running. It worked a treat last time I had problems on my Alpha. Dave /------------------------------------------------------------------\ | Dr. David Alan Gilbert | Work:dg@px.uk.com +44-161-286-2000 Ex258| | -------- G7FHJ --------|---------------------------------------- | | Home: dave@treblig.org http://www.treblig.clara.net | \------------------------------------------------------------------/ From kramer@pa.dec.com Fri Feb 18 13:44:58 2000 Return-Path: Received: from tudedr.et.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id NAA18159; Fri, 18 Feb 2000 13:44:58 +0100 (MET) Received: from mail1.digital.com by ITS.TUDelft.NL (PMDF V5.1-10 #21918) with ESMTP id <01JM1ZOA5VOW9OCVHS@ITS.TUDelft.NL> for erik@duteinh.et.tudelft.nl; Fri, 18 Feb 2000 13:44:50 +0100 Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id EAA26684; Fri, 18 Feb 2000 04:41:45 -0800 (PST) Received: from rex.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA18619; Fri, 18 Feb 2000 04:41:09 -0800 Received: by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id EAA02718; Fri, 18 Feb 2000 04:40:40 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id EAA02711; Fri, 18 Feb 2000 04:40:39 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail2.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA15935; Fri, 18 Feb 2000 04:40:38 -0800 Received: from eising.k-net.dk (eising.k-net.dtu.dk [130.225.71.227]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with ESMTP id EAA09662 for ; Fri, 18 Feb 2000 04:40:34 -0800 (PST) Received: from obelix.vkr.k-net.dk (obelix.vkr.k-net.dk [192.38.209.3]) by eising.k-net.dk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F17E9184E for ; Fri, 18 Feb 2000 13:40:34 +0100 (CET) Received: by obelix.vkr.k-net.dk with Internet Mail Service (5.5.1960.3) id ; Fri, 18 Feb 2000 13:39:45 +0100 Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2000 13:39:45 +0100 From: Anders Frederiksen Subject: RE: Memory test programs Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com To: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Message-id: MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.1960.3) Content-type: text/plain Precedence: bulk > -----Original Message----- > From: Dr. David Gilbert [mailto:gilbertd@treblig.org] > On Fri, 18 Feb 2000, Adam 'WeirdArms' Wiggins wrote: > > Hi all, I'm after an algorithm for testing DRAM chips. Basically > > we've been having reliability problems with our memory > boards for PLEB and > > I need quickly hand code some assembly memory tester > program to test for > > stuck bits and aliases. We are using 2 banks of 16MB EDO > DRAM, 32Bit wide. > > Any idea's or pointers? > > I find a good trick is to allocate as large a block of RAM > you can; seed a > random number generator with a known seed and remember the > seed. Fill the > RAM with the random numbers; reset the generator back to the > original seed > and run through the RAM again comparing. Then just leave it running. > It worked a treat last time I had problems on my Alpha. > Dave Well that might do the trick. But in any case I'd start with walking bit (001 010 100 and inverted) shorts etc. checker pattern (010 101) for crosstalk / decoupling inversion (111 000) for max change: decoupling etc. The problem with random numbers is that you'll never "get through". The above approach targets the specific problems and can be finished in constant time. Maybe for DRAM it would be proper to add specific tests for address correctnes and refresh. Here a few runs of the random number approach would be fine. Anders PS: Sorry Dave! You got this twice - my mistake! From kramer@pa.dec.com Fri Feb 18 17:20:13 2000 Return-Path: Received: from tudedr.et.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id RAA19817; Fri, 18 Feb 2000 17:20:13 +0100 (MET) Received: from mail1.digital.com by ITS.TUDelft.NL (PMDF V5.1-10 #21918) with ESMTP id <01JM27732EYS9N466S@ITS.TUDelft.NL> for erik@duteinh.et.tudelft.nl; Fri, 18 Feb 2000 17:20:05 +0100 Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id IAA07123; Fri, 18 Feb 2000 08:16:19 -0800 (PST) Received: from rex.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA09528; Fri, 18 Feb 2000 08:15:34 -0800 Received: by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id IAA02784; Fri, 18 Feb 2000 08:11:54 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id IAA02766; Fri, 18 Feb 2000 08:11:52 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail2.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA13581; Fri, 18 Feb 2000 08:11:52 -0800 Received: from xanadu.vipswitch.com (generic199.197.205.205.in-addr.arpa [205.205.197.199] (may be forged)) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with ESMTP id IAA21309 for ; Fri, 18 Feb 2000 08:11:47 -0800 (PST) Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2000 11:01:41 -0500 (EST) From: Nicolas Pitre Subject: Re: Memory test programs In-reply-to: Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com To: "Adam 'WeirdArms' Wiggins" Cc: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Message-id: MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: MULTIPART/MIXED; BOUNDARY="-842151995-903431265-950889701=:2472" Precedence: bulk This message is in MIME format. The first part should be readable text, while the remaining parts are likely unreadable without MIME-aware tools. Send mail to mime@docserver.cac.washington.edu for more info. ---842151995-903431265-950889701=:2472 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Try the attached source. It assumes the serial port is already initialized. It should be called from assembly code since all ram memory is destroyed... or rejump into your bootloader entry point at the end. On Fri, 18 Feb 2000, Adam 'WeirdArms' Wiggins wrote: > Hi all, I'm after an algorithm for testing DRAM chips. Basically > we've been having reliability problems with our memory boards for PLEB and > I need quickly hand code some assembly memory tester program to test for > stuck bits and aliases. We are using 2 banks of 16MB EDO DRAM, 32Bit wide. > Any idea's or pointers? > > Cheers Adam > > ---842151995-903431265-950889701=:2472 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=iso-8859-1; name="memory.S" Content-ID: Content-Description: Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="memory.S" Content-Transfer-Encoding: BASE64 LyoNCiAqIE1lbW9yeSB0ZXN0IGZvciB0aGUgU0ExMTAwDQogKiAoQykgTmlj b2xhcyBQaXRyZSA8bmljb0BjYW0ub3JnPg0KICovDQoNCi8qDQogKiB2b2lk IHRlc3RfbWVtKCB1bnNpZ25lZCBsb25nIG1lbV9zdGFydCwgdW5zaWduZWQg bG9uZyBtZW1fc2l6ZSApDQogKiBGdWxsIG1lbW9yeSB0ZXN0Lg0KICogRW50 cnk6ICByMCA9IG1lbW9yeSBzdGFydA0KICoJICAgcjEgPSBtZW1vcnkgc2l6 ZSAoY29udGlnb3VzKQ0KICogUmV0dXJuOiByMCA9IG1lbW9yeSBzaXplDQog KgkgICAoaWYgd2UgcmVhY2ggdGhlIGVuZCwgbWVtb3J5IGlzIE9LKQ0KICog Q2x1YmJlcmVkOiBhbGwgcmVnaXN0ZXJzIChjYW4ndCByZXR1cm4gdG8gQyBm dW5jdGlvbnMpDQogKiANCiAqIE5vdGU6IFRoaXMgY29kZSBtdXN0IHJ1biB3 aXRoIGRhdGEgY2FjaGUgdHVybmVkIG9mZi4gIEFsc28gc2hvdWxkIHByb2Jh Ymx5DQogKgkgYmUgZXhlY3V0ZWQgZnJvbSBmbGFzaCwgdW5sZXNzIHlvdSB0 ZXN0IGEgZGlmZmVyZW50IG1lbW9yeSBiYW5rLg0KICovDQoNCgkuYWxpZ24N CgkuZ2xvYmwJdGVzdF9tZW1fDQp0ZXN0X21lbV86DQoJTU9WCXI5LCBscgkJ CUAgcHLpc2VydmUgbHINCglNT1YJcjEyLCByMAkJCUAgcmFtX3N0YXJ0DQoJ TU9WCXIxMywgcjEJCQlAIHJhbV9zaXplDQoNCiNpZiAxDQoJQCBBbGlhcyBt ZW1vcnkgdGVzdCAod2Ugd3JpdGUgdGhlIGFkZHJlc3MgYXQgYWRkcmVzcy4u LikNCglAIERlc3RydWN0aXZlIG1lbW9yeSB0ZXN0IChjb250ZW50IGlzIGxv c3QpDQoNCglNT1YJcjgsIHIxMg0KCUFERAlyNiwgcjEyLCByMTMNCjU6DQoJ TERSCXI1LCA9MHgzZmZmZg0KCVRTVAlyOCwgcjUNCglCTkUJMWYNCglNT1YJ cjAsIHI4DQoJTU9WCXIxLCAjMQ0KCUJMCXB1dGhleF8NCglNT1YJcjAsICMn XHInDQoJQkwJcHV0Y18NCg0KMToJU1RSCXI4LCBbcjhdLCM0CQlAIHdyaXRl IGFkZHJlc3MgYXQgYWRkcmVzcw0KCUNNUAlyOCwgcjYNCglCTkUJNWINCg0K CU1PVglyOCwgcjEyDQoJQURECXI2LCByMTIsIHIxMw0KNjoNCglMRFIJcjUs ID0weDNmZmZmDQoJVFNUCXI4LCByNQ0KCUJORQkxZg0KCU1PVglyMCwgcjgN CglNT1YJcjEsICMxDQoJQkwJcHV0aGV4Xw0KCU1PVglyMCwgIydccicNCglC TAlwdXRjXw0KDQoxOglMRFIJcjAsIFtyOF0NCglDTVAJcjgsIHIwDQoJTU9W TkUJcjEsIHI4DQoJQk5FCWVycm9ybWVtDQoJQURECXI4LCByOCwgIzQNCglD TVAJcjgsIHI2DQoJQk5FCTZiDQojZW5kaWYNCg0KI2lmIDENCglAIENvb2tp ZSB0ZXN0IChmb3Igc3RhbGwgYml0cywgZXRjKQ0KCUAgVGhpcyB0ZXN0IHBy ZXNlcnZlcyBtZW1vcnkgY29udGVudCBpLmUuIG5vbi1kZXN0cnVjdGl2ZQ0K DQoJTERSCXIxMCwgPTB4NTVhYWNjMzMJQCBjb29raWUNCglNVk4JcjExLCBy MTAJCUAgbmVnYXRpdmUgY29va2llDQoNCglNT1YJcjgsIHIxMg0KCUFERAly NiwgcjEyLCByMTMNCjQ6DQoJTERSCXI1LCA9MHgzZmZmZg0KCVRTVAlyOCwg cjUNCglCTkUJMWYNCglNT1YJcjAsIHI4DQoJTU9WCXIxLCAjMQ0KCUJMCXB1 dGhleF8NCglNT1YJcjAsICMnXHInDQoJQkwJcHV0Y18NCg0KMToJTERSCXI3 LCBbcjhdDQogICAgDQoJU1RSCXIxMCwgW3I4XQ0KCUxEUglyMCwgW3I4XQ0K CUNNUAlyMTAsIHIwDQoJTU9WTkUJcjEsIHIxMA0KCUJORQllcnJvcm1lbQ0K ICAgIA0KCVNUUglyMTEsIFtyOF0NCglMRFIJcjAsIFtyOF0NCglDTVAJcjEx LCByMA0KCU1PVk5FCXIxLCByMTENCglCTkUJZXJyb3JtZW0NCg0KCVNUUgly NywgW3I4XSwjNA0KCUNNUAlyOCwgcjYNCglCTkUJNGINCiNlbmRpZg0KDQoJ QURSCXIwLCBTdHJpbmdNZW0yDQoJQkwJcHV0c18NCglNT1YJcjAsIHIxMwkJ CUAgcmV0dXJuIFJBTSBzaXplDQoJTU9WICAgICBwYywgcjkNCg0KU3RyaW5n TWVtMjoJCS5hc2NpegkiTUVNIHRlc3QgT0tcclxuIg0KDQoJLmFsaWduDQpl cnJvcm1lbToNCgkvKiBEaXNwbGF5IGZhdWx0eSBtZW1vcnkgYWRkcmVzcyBh bmQgY29udGVudA0KCSAqIEhlcmUgcjggY29udGFpbnMgZmF1bHR5IG1lbW9y eSBhZGRyZXNzDQoJICogICAgICByMSBjb250YWlucyB3cml0dGVuIHZhbHVl DQoJICogICAgICByMCBjb250YWlucyByZWFkIHZhbHVlDQoJICovDQoJTU9W CXI2LCByMAkJCS8qIHB1dGhleCBjbHViYmVycyB1cCB0byByNSAqLw0KCU1P VglyNywgcjENCglBRFIgCXIwLCBTdHJpbmdFcnJvcjENCglCTAlwdXRzXw0K CU1PVglyMCwgcjgNCglNT1YJcjEsICMxDQoJQkwJcHV0aGV4Xw0KCUFEUgly MCwgU3RyaW5nRXJyb3IyDQoJQkwJcHV0c18NCglNT1YJcjAsIHI3DQoJTU9W CXIxLCAjMQ0KCUJMCXB1dGhleF8NCglBRFIJcjAsIFN0cmluZ0Vycm9yMw0K CUJMCXB1dHNfDQoJTU9WCXIwLCByNg0KCU1PVglyMSwgIzENCglCTAlwdXRo ZXhfDQoJQkwJUlRMRl8NCglCICAgCWhhbHQNCiAgICANClN0cmluZ0Vycm9y MToJLmFzY2l6CSJNZW1vcnkgZXJyb3IgYXQgIg0KU3RyaW5nRXJyb3IyOgku YXNjaXoJIjogd3JvdGUgIg0KU3RyaW5nRXJyb3IzOgkuYXNjaXoJIiwgcmVh ZCAiDQoNCg0KcHV0c186DQogICAgICAgIE1PViAgICAgUjMsIFIwDQogICAg ICAgIE1PViAgICAgUjQsIExSDQoxOiAgICAgIExEUkIgICAgUjAsIFtSM10s ICMxDQogICAgICAgIENNUCAgICAgUjAsICMwDQogICAgICAgIE1PVkVRICAg UEMsIFI0DQogICAgICAgIEJMICAgICAgcHV0Yw0KICAgICAgICBCICAgICAg IDFiDQoNCg0KcHV0aGV4XzoNCiAgICAgICAgTU9WICAgICBSMywgUjANCiAg ICAgICAgTU9WICAgICBSNCwgIzI4DQogICAgICAgIE1PViAgICAgUjUsIExS DQogICAgICAgIENNUCAgICAgUjEsICMwDQogICAgICAgIEJFUSAgICAgMWYN CiAgICAgICAgTU9WICAgICBSMCwgIycwJw0KICAgICAgICBCTCAgICAgIHB1 dGMNCiAgICAgICAgTU9WICAgICBSMCwgIyd4Jw0KICAgICAgICBCTCAgICAg IHB1dGMNCg0KMTogICAgICBNT1YgICAgIFIwLCBSMywgTFNSIFI0DQogICAg ICAgIEFORCAgICAgUjAsIFIwLCAjMHhGDQogICAgICAgIENNUCAgICAgUjAs ICMxMA0KICAgICAgICBBRERHRSAgIFIwLCBSMCwgIydBJyAtIDEwDQogICAg ICAgIEFERExUICAgUjAsIFIwLCAjJzAnDQogICAgICAgIEJMICAgICAgcHV0 Yw0KICAgICAgICBTVUJTICAgIFI0LCBSNCwgIzQNCiAgICAgICAgQkdFICAg ICAxYg0KICAgICAgICBNT1YgICAgIFIwLCBSMw0KICAgICAgICBNT1YgICAg IFBDLCBSNQ0KDQoNClJUTEY6DQpSVExGXzoNCiAgICAgICAgbW92ICAgICBy MywgbHINCiAgICAgICAgbW92ICAgICByMCwgIydccicNCiAgICAgICAgYmwg ICAgICBwdXRjDQogICAgICAgIG1vdiAgICAgcjAsICMnXG4nDQogICAgICAg IGJsICAgICAgcHV0Yw0KICAgICAgICBtb3YgICAgIHBjLCByMw0KDQoNCmhh bHQ6DQoJYgloYWx0DQoNCg0KI2RlZmluZSBTZXJCYXNlCQkweDgwMDUwMDAw CUAgU2VyMw0KDQojZGVmaW5lIFVUQ1IwCQkweDAwDQojZGVmaW5lIFVUQ1Ix CQkweDA0DQojZGVmaW5lIFVUQ1IyCQkweDA4DQojZGVmaW5lIFVUQ1IzCQkw eDBjDQojZGVmaW5lIFVURFIJCTB4MTQNCiNkZWZpbmUgVVRTUjAJCTB4MWMN CiNkZWZpbmUJVVRTUjEJCTB4MjANCg0KI2RlZmluZSBVVFNSMV9UTkYJMHgw MDAwMDAwNAkvKiBUcmFuc21pdCBGSUZPIE5vdCBGdWxsICovDQoNCiAgICAg DQpwdXRjOgkNCnB1dGNfOg0KCUxEUglSMSwgPVNlckJhc2UJCUAgc2VyaWFs IGJhc2UgYWRkcmVzcw0KDQoJQCB3YWl0IGZvciBzcGFjZSBpbiBmaWZvDQox OglMRFIgICAgIFIyLCBbUjEsICNVVFNSMV0NCglUU1QJUjIsICNVVFNSMV9U TkYNCglCRVEJMWINCgkNCiAgICAgICAgU1RSQglSMCwgW1IxLCAjVVREUl0J CUAgd3JpdGUgdGhlIGNoYXINCglNT1YJUEMsIExSDQoNCg== ---842151995-903431265-950889701=:2472-- From kramer@pa.dec.com Fri Feb 18 17:26:01 2000 Return-Path: Received: from tudedr.et.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id RAA19853; Fri, 18 Feb 2000 17:26:01 +0100 (MET) Received: from mail2.digital.com by ITS.TUDelft.NL (PMDF V5.1-10 #21918) with ESMTP id <01JM27ECGQAS9OCVIH@ITS.TUDelft.NL> for erik@duteinh.et.tudelft.nl; Fri, 18 Feb 2000 17:25:56 +0100 Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id IAA22801; Fri, 18 Feb 2000 08:22:00 -0800 (PST) Received: from rex.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA20047; Fri, 18 Feb 2000 08:21:28 -0800 Received: by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id IAA02798; Fri, 18 Feb 2000 08:18:20 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id IAA02788; Fri, 18 Feb 2000 08:18:20 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail1.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA27248; Fri, 18 Feb 2000 08:18:20 -0800 Received: from tekincisnts-4.teklogix.com (mail.teklogix.com [207.219.2.10]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with ESMTP id IAA07376 for ; Fri, 18 Feb 2000 08:18:19 -0800 (PST) Received: from DeadDuck (BILL [10.128.5.25]) by tekincisnts-4.teklogix.com with SMTP (Microsoft Exchange Internet Mail Service Version 5.5.2448.0) id CYMGVYD7; Fri, 18 Feb 2000 11:16:59 -0500 Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2000 11:17:45 -0500 From: Bill Pringlemeir Subject: Re: Memory test programs In-reply-to: "Adam 'WeirdArms' Wiggins"'s message of "Fri, 18 Feb 2000 17:00:39 +1100 (EST)" Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com To: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Message-id: Organization: noitazinagro MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Precedence: bulk X-Home-Page: http://www.wwonline.com/~bpringle/ User-Agent: Gnus/5.0803 (Gnus v5.8.3) Emacs/20.5 Lines: 42 References: I am currently trying to code this for an SA1110 with SDRAM. Many people on comp.arch.embed have said that an LFSR is excellent. I just looked at some Xilinx appnotes. I think that you an use a prime polynomial to make the LFSR. This should work faster than an incongruential RNG as you use XOR, AND, rotate instead of multiply and add? Or will the MAC on the ARM beat this? I do agree with Anders that either LFSR or Incongruent RNGs are both not as good as walking bits etc. I have also seen AA - 55 tests as this will get address lines and adjacent data bits. I have seen very few cross-talk and decoupling problems. This would definitely be a design verification algorithm and not a POST type routine. Most common solder faults seem to be address lines and adjacent data bits. Other routines test for decoupling or cell problems. An exhaustive test would be to treat the memory as a huge number and keep incrementing and verifying. For 1Mbyte, the number is 2^(2^20*8) ~= 10^5814536. At 1 TeraHertz, this would take about 10^5814500 years to execute, which is probably billions of times longer than the age of the universe :-0 Please let me know how it goes. Bill >>>>> "Adam" == Adam 'WeirdArms' Wiggins writes: Adam> Hi all, I'm after an algorithm for testing DRAM Adam> chips. Basically we've been having reliability problems with Adam> our memory boards for PLEB and I need quickly hand code some Adam> assembly memory tester program to test for stuck bits and Adam> aliases. We are using 2 banks of 16MB EDO DRAM, 32Bit wide. Adam> Any idea's or pointers? -- Where ever you go, there you are. mafia_boy Albanian Legion of Doom plutonium strategic Ft. Meade PLO Ortega arrangements colonel munitions mafiaboy Soviet NSA From kramer@pa.dec.com Fri Feb 18 18:25:43 2000 Return-Path: Received: from tudedr.et.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id SAA20121; Fri, 18 Feb 2000 18:25:43 +0100 (MET) Received: from mail1.digital.com by ITS.TUDelft.NL (PMDF V5.1-10 #21918) with ESMTP id <01JM29HBN6VK9OCVIH@ITS.TUDelft.NL> for erik@duteinh.et.tudelft.nl; Fri, 18 Feb 2000 18:25:36 +0100 Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id JAA07721; Fri, 18 Feb 2000 09:21:13 -0800 (PST) Received: from rex.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA16772; Fri, 18 Feb 2000 09:20:40 -0800 Received: by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id JAA02830; Fri, 18 Feb 2000 09:14:33 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id JAA02827; Fri, 18 Feb 2000 09:14:32 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail2.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA21812; Fri, 18 Feb 2000 09:14:31 -0800 Received: from duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (duteinh.et.tudelft.nl [130.161.42.1]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with ESMTP id JAA28195 for ; Fri, 18 Feb 2000 09:14:30 -0800 (PST) Received: from kalman by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id SAA20073; Fri, 18 Feb 2000 18:13:05 +0100 (MET) Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2000 18:13:05 +0100 (MET) From: Erik Mouw Subject: Re: Memory test programs In-reply-to: Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com To: nico@CAM.ORG Cc: awiggins@cse.unsw.edu.au, sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Message-id: <200002181713.SAA20073@duteinh.et.tudelft.nl> Organization: Eric conspiracy secret labs MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: XCmail 1.0.0 - with PGP support, PGP engine version 0.5 (Linux) Content-type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-transfer-encoding: 8bit Precedence: bulk X-Face: "!Z|1XjFg!3Iw)BwM^M\k)J5KHiPddz}#/Zw%?$&Q!xqob"OA|})3_@&BTTiQERo?/^g[Z<9P4R8:5C:aqq.cw!hotLc=+u-"+1rq@9$V^8PbOUlodyi_sejt+D`iqkLpx$>.aXl%vnfPIt"LK|/%>94_Zrm8jy?`_[RKt'TuoxUxfk(gMhY(n|DBBl~c$dhO>G%6}R4+DGX3|idBm4oU&UM/XUP4I9aoN{]`ax%B?rgD(I3OJ<62Y6L X-Mailerorigin: http://www.fsai.fh-trier.de/~schmitzj/Xclasses/XCmail/ X-Eric-Conspiracy: There is no conspiracy! X-Loop: erik@it.et.tudelft.nl On Fri, 18 Feb 2000 11:01:41 -0500 (EST), Nicolas Pitre wrote: > Try the attached source. It assumes the serial port is already > initialized. It should be called from assembly code since all ram memory > is destroyed... or rejump into your bootloader entry point at the end. > > On Fri, 18 Feb 2000, Adam 'WeirdArms' Wiggins wrote: > >> Hi all, I'm after an algorithm for testing DRAM chips. Basically >> we've been having reliability problems with our memory boards for PLEB and >> I need quickly hand code some assembly memory tester program to test for >> stuck bits and aliases. We are using 2 banks of 16MB EDO DRAM, 32Bit wide. >> Any idea's or pointers? Nico, I want to integrate your memory tester in BLOB (our bootloader), because having a memory tester in BLOB has been on our wish list for quite some time. BLOB is GPL'ed, so before I start hacking I'd like to know if it is OK with you if I stick a GPL license on your code. Erik -- J.A.K. (Erik) Mouw, Information and Communication Theory Group, Department of Electrical Engineering, Faculty of Information Technology and Systems, Delft University of Technology, PO BOX 5031, 2600 GA Delft, The Netherlands Phone: +31-15-2785859 Fax: +31-15-2781843 Email J.A.K.Mouw@its.tudelft.nl WWW: http://www-ict.its.tudelft.nl/~erik/ From kramer@pa.dec.com Fri Feb 18 21:25:08 2000 Return-Path: Received: from tudedr.et.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id VAA20690; Fri, 18 Feb 2000 21:25:07 +0100 (MET) Received: from mail2.digital.com by ITS.TUDelft.NL (PMDF V5.1-10 #21918) with ESMTP id <01JM2FQV99EE9OCVIJ@ITS.TUDelft.NL> for erik@duteinh.et.tudelft.nl; Fri, 18 Feb 2000 21:25:03 +0100 Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id MAA09644; Fri, 18 Feb 2000 12:22:00 -0800 (PST) Received: from rex.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA18936; Fri, 18 Feb 2000 12:21:24 -0800 Received: by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id MAA02933; Fri, 18 Feb 2000 12:05:28 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id MAA02936; Fri, 18 Feb 2000 12:05:27 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail1.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA05262; Fri, 18 Feb 2000 12:05:27 -0800 Received: from blazieresearch.com (blazieresearch.com [199.227.113.99]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with ESMTP id MAA23955 for ; Fri, 18 Feb 2000 12:05:23 -0800 (PST) Received: from cpq800.blazieresearch.com (cpq800 [199.227.113.100]) by blazieresearch.com (8.9.3/8.8.7) with ESMTP id PAA13489 for ; Fri, 18 Feb 2000 15:05:13 -0500 Received: by ispsl1-100.gate.net with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.10) id ; Fri, 18 Feb 2000 15:04:07 -0500 Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2000 15:03:57 -0500 From: Mike Reynolds Subject: SA1110 SDRAM and revison number Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com To: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Message-id: <412E1CF8088BD211AD5100805FAD9A800B5AA7@ispsl1-100.gate.net> MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.10) Content-type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Precedence: bulk Hi all, Has anybody had any problems with the SA1110 ES (step A0) version in regards to the SDRAM controller? We have boards that have been populated with step A0 ( rev. 0) SA1110 and would like to know if there are major problems. The Intel spec updates list a couple of "minor" bugs, but I would like to hear from someone that has acutally used this version of the part with regards to the SDRAM controller. Thanks in advance. Mike Reynolds From kramer@pa.dec.com Sat Feb 19 00:15:14 2000 Return-Path: Received: from tudedr.et.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id AAA21182; Sat, 19 Feb 2000 00:15:13 +0100 (MET) Received: from mail2.digital.com by ITS.TUDelft.NL (PMDF V5.1-10 #21918) with ESMTP id <01JM2LOQXGOE9OCVIK@ITS.TUDelft.NL> for erik@duteinh.et.tudelft.nl; Sat, 19 Feb 2000 00:15:09 +0100 Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id PAA25508; Fri, 18 Feb 2000 15:12:02 -0800 (PST) Received: from rex.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA31901; Fri, 18 Feb 2000 15:11:30 -0800 Received: by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id PAA02997; Fri, 18 Feb 2000 15:10:58 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id PAA02994; Fri, 18 Feb 2000 15:10:57 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail2.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA29846; Fri, 18 Feb 2000 15:10:57 -0800 Received: from tekincisnts-4.teklogix.com (mail.teklogix.com [207.219.2.10]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with ESMTP id PAA21279 for ; Fri, 18 Feb 2000 15:10:56 -0800 (PST) Received: from DeadDuck (BILL [10.128.5.25]) by tekincisnts-4.teklogix.com with SMTP (Microsoft Exchange Internet Mail Service Version 5.5.2448.0) id CYMGVZSS; Fri, 18 Feb 2000 18:09:36 -0500 Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2000 18:10:23 -0500 From: Bill Pringlemeir Subject: Re: Memory test programs In-reply-to: Bill Pringlemeir's message of "18 Feb 2000 11:17:45 -0500" Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com To: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Message-id: Organization: noitazinagro MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: multipart/mixed; boundary="=-=-=" Precedence: bulk X-Home-Page: http://www.wwonline.com/~bpringle/ User-Agent: Gnus/5.0803 (Gnus v5.8.3) Emacs/20.5 Lines: 75 References: --=-=-= I finished the LFSR code. It is just a CRC32 applied over memory. Here is the assembler snippet for the gnu assembler. People can integrate it into any code they like. [start] crc32Poly: .long 0x04c11db7 memTest: /* Initial - fill memory */ mov r0,#DRAM_PHYSICAL add r1,r0,#DRAM_SIZE ldr r2,crc32Poly mov r3,#-1 mov r4,#1 10: orrs r3,r4,r3,lsl#1 eorcs r3,r3,r2 str r3,[r0], #4 cmp r0,r1 bne 10b /* Phase two, check */ mov r0,#DRAM_PHYSICAL mov r3,#-1 20: orrs r3,r4,r3,lsl #1 eorcs r3,r3,r2 ldr r5,[r0],#4 cmp r5,r3 bne memError cmp r0,r1 bne 20b mov pc,lr [end] I wrote some 'C' code to test out the length of this sequence. It is a full 4 GByte. So, this will be much the same as an address equals data test. However, it should have a wider variations of bit changes. This should catch some of the cross talk problems that Anders pointed out. The loop could be expanded. --=-=-= Content-Type: application/octet-stream Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=test.c Content-Description: Test code /* * Test sequence length of 32 bit CRC polynomial. * */ #include #include #define POLY (0x04c11db7U) int main(void) { unsigned long a = 0xffffffff; int i = 0, j = 0; do { if(!(i&(1024*1024-1))) { j++; printf("%d MB.\r",j); } // printf("%.8x,", a); // if((i%8)==7) // printf("\n"); if(a&0x80000000) { a <<= 1; a |= 1; a ^= POLY; } else { a <<=1; a |= 1; } i++; } while(0xffffffff != a); printf("\nSequence length is %d.\n", i); return 0; } --=-=-= hth, Bill >>>>> "Bill" == Bill Pringlemeir writes: Bill> I am currently trying to code this for an SA1110 with SDRAM. Bill> Many people on comp.arch.embed have said that an LFSR is Bill> excellent. I just looked at some Xilinx appnotes. I think Bill> that you an use a prime polynomial to make the LFSR. This Bill> should work faster than an incongruential RNG as you use Bill> XOR, AND, rotate instead of multiply and add? Or will the Bill> MAC on the ARM beat this? >>>>> "Adam" == Adam 'WeirdArms' Wiggins writes: Adam> Hi all, I'm after an algorithm for testing DRAM Adam> chips. Basically we've been having reliability problems with Adam> our memory boards for PLEB and I need quickly hand code some Adam> assembly memory tester program to test for stuck bits and Adam> aliases. We are using 2 banks of 16MB EDO DRAM, 32Bit wide. Adam> Any idea's or pointers? -- jihad FSF domestic disruption kibo CIA Mossad strategic Qaddafi cryptographic mafiaboy PLO munitions Honduras Peking radar --=-=-=-- From kramer@pa.dec.com Sun Feb 20 00:46:41 2000 Return-Path: Received: from tudedr.et.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id AAA24965; Sun, 20 Feb 2000 00:46:40 +0100 (MET) Received: from mail2.digital.com by ITS.TUDelft.NL (PMDF V5.1-10 #21918) with ESMTP id <01JM412Y6JQ49OCVWQ@ITS.TUDelft.NL> for erik@duteinh.et.tudelft.nl; Sun, 20 Feb 2000 00:46:31 +0100 Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id PAA21809; Sat, 19 Feb 2000 15:43:26 -0800 (PST) Received: from rex.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA27755; Sat, 19 Feb 2000 15:42:51 -0800 Received: by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id PAA03409; Sat, 19 Feb 2000 15:37:44 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id PAA03412; Sat, 19 Feb 2000 15:37:43 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail2.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA32658; Sat, 19 Feb 2000 15:37:43 -0800 Received: from mail.com (24.64.228.243.ab.wave.home.com [24.64.228.243]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with ESMTP id PAA21359 for ; Sat, 19 Feb 2000 15:37:42 -0800 (PST) Received: (from rayl@localhost) by mail.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) id QAA11380; Sat, 19 Feb 2000 16:37:29 -0700 Date: Sat, 19 Feb 2000 16:37:29 -0700 From: Ray L Subject: Re: Memory test programs In-reply-to: ; from awiggins@cse.unsw.edu.au on Fri, Feb 18, 2000 at 05:00:39PM +1100 Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com To: "Adam 'WeirdArms' Wiggins" Cc: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Reply-to: Ray Lehtiniemi Message-id: <20000219163729.E2433@optitech.com> MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0.1i Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Precedence: bulk References: On Fri, Feb 18, 2000 at 05:00:39PM +1100, Adam 'WeirdArms' Wiggins wrote: > Hi all, I'm after an algorithm for testing DRAM chips. Basically > we've been having reliability problems with our memory boards for PLEB and > I need quickly hand code some assembly memory tester program to test for > stuck bits and aliases. We are using 2 banks of 16MB EDO DRAM, 32Bit wide. > Any idea's or pointers? http://reality.sgi.com/cbrady_denver/memtest86 it's x86 specific but has writeup about the theory -- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- Ray Lehtiniemi (rayl@mail.com) (rayl@optitech.com) From kramer@pa.dec.com Mon Feb 21 08:25:49 2000 Return-Path: Received: from tudedr.et.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id IAA28930; Mon, 21 Feb 2000 08:25:49 +0100 (MET) Received: from mail2.digital.com by ITS.TUDelft.NL (PMDF V5.1-10 #21918) with ESMTP id <01JM5VEQ3Z9M9OCWEB@ITS.TUDelft.NL> for erik@duteinh.et.tudelft.nl; Mon, 21 Feb 2000 08:25:46 +0100 Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id XAA14229; Sun, 20 Feb 2000 23:21:06 -0800 (PST) Received: from rex.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA09065; Sun, 20 Feb 2000 23:20:15 -0800 Received: by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id XAA03927; Sun, 20 Feb 2000 23:17:43 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id XAA03926; Sun, 20 Feb 2000 23:17:42 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail2.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA16349; Sun, 20 Feb 2000 23:17:42 -0800 Received: from note.orchestra.cse.unsw.EDU.AU (note.orchestra.cse.unsw.EDU.AU [129.94.242.29]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id XAA11351 for ; Sun, 20 Feb 2000 23:17:40 -0800 (PST) Received: From paulaner With LocalMail ; Mon, 21 Feb 2000 18:17:13 +1100 Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2000 18:17:13 +1100 (EST) From: "Adam 'WeirdArms' Wiggins" Subject: lmbench ramdisk Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com X-Sender: awiggins@paulaner.disy.cse.unsw.EDU.AU To: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Message-id: MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Precedence: bulk Someone mentioned there was a ramdisk around with a copy of lmbench on it. I've got Linux running on our PLEB hardware and would like to play with a few idea's to improve the context switch time. Cheers Adam From kramer@pa.dec.com Mon Feb 21 15:33:42 2000 Return-Path: Received: from tudedr.et.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id PAA02667; Mon, 21 Feb 2000 15:33:42 +0100 (MET) Received: from mail1.digital.com by ITS.TUDelft.NL (PMDF V5.1-10 #21918) with ESMTP id <01JM69RQYQU29ULLD7@ITS.TUDelft.NL> for erik@duteinh.et.tudelft.nl; Mon, 21 Feb 2000 15:30:10 +0100 Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id GAA16022; Mon, 21 Feb 2000 06:11:43 -0800 (PST) Received: from rex.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA32208; Mon, 21 Feb 2000 06:11:02 -0800 Received: by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id GAA04057; Mon, 21 Feb 2000 06:10:28 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id GAA04041; Mon, 21 Feb 2000 06:10:27 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail2.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA05392; Mon, 21 Feb 2000 06:10:26 -0800 Received: from court2.aleph1.co.uk (IDENT:root@aleph1.demon.co.uk [158.152.9.127]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with ESMTP id GAA01989 for ; Mon, 21 Feb 2000 06:10:25 -0800 (PST) Received: from chewy.aleph1.co.uk ([194.70.44.163]) by court2.aleph1.co.uk with smtp (Exim 2.05 #1) id 12MtPR-0006ej-00 for sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com; Mon, 21 Feb 2000 14:01:57 +0000 Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2000 14:01:57 +0000 (GMT) From: Wookey Subject: Re: Memory test programs In-reply-to: Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com To: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Message-id: X-Organization: Aleph One,Cambridge, UK. Tel +44 1223 811679 MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: ANT RISCOS Marcel [ver 1.50] Content-type: TEXT/PLAIN; CHARSET=US-ASCII Precedence: bulk On Fri 18 Feb, Bill Pringlemeir wrote: > I do agree with Anders that either LFSR or Incongruent RNGs are > both not as good as walking bits etc. I have also seen AA - 55 > tests as this will get address lines and adjacent data bits. I > have seen very few cross-talk and decoupling problems. This would > definitely be a design verification algorithm and not a POST type > routine. Most common solder faults seem to be address lines and > adjacent data bits. Yes. I'd just say that from practical experience I can confirm the above. We have some code for fault-finding on our PC-cards which starts making no assumptions at all about what might be working and tries increasingly complicated things to try and spot problems. Shorted or clamped data/address lines due to solder bridges are most common and are best spotted as described above (AA 55 tests and walking bits). I didn't post the code as it's rather too specific to our unusual hardware to be much use as a basis for anything else. Wookey -- Aleph One Ltd, Bottisham, CAMBRIDGE, CB5 9BA, UK Tel (00 44) 1223 811679 work: http://www.aleph1.co.uk/ play: http://www.chaos.org.uk/~wookey/ From kramer@pa.dec.com Mon Feb 21 18:15:12 2000 Return-Path: Received: from tudedr.et.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id SAA03944; Mon, 21 Feb 2000 18:15:12 +0100 (MET) Received: from mail1.digital.com by ITS.TUDelft.NL (PMDF V5.1-10 #21918) with ESMTP id <01JM6G0DJT549YCG3J@ITS.TUDelft.NL> for erik@duteinh.et.tudelft.nl; Mon, 21 Feb 2000 18:15:07 +0100 Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id JAA32489; Mon, 21 Feb 2000 09:12:22 -0800 (PST) Received: from rex.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA12581; Mon, 21 Feb 2000 09:11:46 -0800 Received: by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id JAA04109; Mon, 21 Feb 2000 09:11:13 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id JAA04106; Mon, 21 Feb 2000 09:11:11 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail2.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA16052; Mon, 21 Feb 2000 09:11:11 -0800 Received: from xanadu.vipswitch.com (generic199.197.205.205.in-addr.arpa [205.205.197.199] (may be forged)) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with ESMTP id JAA12387 for ; Mon, 21 Feb 2000 09:11:10 -0800 (PST) Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2000 11:58:05 -0500 (EST) From: Nicolas Pitre Subject: Re: Memory test programs In-reply-to: <200002181713.SAA20073@duteinh.et.tudelft.nl> Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com To: Erik Mouw Cc: awiggins@cse.unsw.edu.au, sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Message-id: MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Precedence: bulk On Fri, 18 Feb 2000, Erik Mouw wrote: > Nico, I want to integrate your memory tester in BLOB (our bootloader), > because having a memory tester in BLOB has been on our wish list for quite > some time. BLOB is GPL'ed, so before I start hacking I'd like to know if > it is OK with you if I stick a GPL license on your code. Go for it. Nicolas From kramer@pa.dec.com Mon Feb 21 22:13:23 2000 Return-Path: Received: from tudedr.et.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id WAA05005; Mon, 21 Feb 2000 22:13:23 +0100 (MET) Received: from mail2.digital.com by ITS.TUDelft.NL (PMDF V5.1-10 #21918) with ESMTP id <01JM6OBPP9Z69YCG42@ITS.TUDelft.NL> for erik@duteinh.et.tudelft.nl; Mon, 21 Feb 2000 22:13:19 +0100 Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id NAA30302; Mon, 21 Feb 2000 13:10:20 -0800 (PST) Received: from rex.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA19538; Mon, 21 Feb 2000 13:09:44 -0800 Received: by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id NAA04187; Mon, 21 Feb 2000 13:08:34 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id NAA04171; Mon, 21 Feb 2000 13:08:33 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail1.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA17624; Mon, 21 Feb 2000 13:08:33 -0800 Received: from NT_Server.flatpanels.com (flatpanels.com [207.196.69.66]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with ESMTP id NAA07472 for ; Mon, 21 Feb 2000 13:08:32 -0800 (PST) Received: by flatpanels.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21) id ; Mon, 21 Feb 2000 16:06:01 -0500 Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2000 16:05:55 -0500 From: "Saxena, Nikita" Subject: XFree86 port... Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com To: "'sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com'" Message-id: <91B07CA588CED3118CFE00105AC97594D0C3@flatpanels.com> MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21) Content-type: text/plain Precedence: bulk Greetings, I was wondering if anyone knows where I can find a port of XFree86 for an SA1100 based system like Brutus? Thanks, Nikita From kramer@pa.dec.com Mon Feb 21 23:03:30 2000 Return-Path: Received: from tudedr.et.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id XAA05200; Mon, 21 Feb 2000 23:03:30 +0100 (MET) Received: from mail2.digital.com by ITS.TUDelft.NL (PMDF V5.1-10 #21918) with ESMTP id <01JM6Q2OZ8BW9YCG42@ITS.TUDelft.NL> for erik@duteinh.et.tudelft.nl; Mon, 21 Feb 2000 23:03:19 +0100 Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id OAA01779; Mon, 21 Feb 2000 14:00:24 -0800 (PST) Received: from rex.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA26922; Mon, 21 Feb 2000 13:59:51 -0800 Received: by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id NAA04216; Mon, 21 Feb 2000 13:59:37 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id NAA04206; Mon, 21 Feb 2000 13:59:37 -0800 (PST) Received: from stowe.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA26229; Mon, 21 Feb 2000 13:59:36 -0800 Received: by stowe.pa.dec.com; (5.65v4.0/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id AA15672; Mon, 21 Feb 2000 13:59:36 -0800 Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2000 13:59:36 -0800 From: Deborah Wallach Subject: Re: XFree86 port... In-reply-to: <91B07CA588CED3118CFE00105AC97594D0C3@flatpanels.com> (NSaxena@flatpanels.com) Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com To: NSaxena@flatpanels.com Cc: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Message-id: <200002212159.AA15672@stowe.pa.dec.com> Precedence: bulk Address: Compaq Computer Corporation; Western Research Laboratory; 250 University Avenue; Palo Alto, CA 94301; USA Phone: 650-617-3315 I was wondering if anyone knows where I can find a port of XFree86 for an SA1100 based system like Brutus? XFree86 runs on the Itsy (a SA1100-based system, see http://www.research.compaq.com/wrl/itsy). The source code for the Itsy port is included in the latest snapshots (for example, check out ftp://ftp.xfree86.org/pub/XFree86/snapshots/3.9.17/). Deborah Wallach Western Research Laboratory Compaq Computer Corporation From kramer@pa.dec.com Tue Feb 22 22:09:16 2000 Return-Path: Received: from tudedr.et.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id WAA13169; Tue, 22 Feb 2000 22:09:16 +0100 (MET) Received: from mail1.digital.com by ITS.TUDelft.NL (PMDF V5.1-10 #21918) with ESMTP id <01JM82GZ9KXK8ZDV99@ITS.TUDelft.NL> for erik@duteinh.et.tudelft.nl; Tue, 22 Feb 2000 22:09:13 +0100 Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id NAA19357; Tue, 22 Feb 2000 13:05:53 -0800 (PST) Received: from rex.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA23414; Tue, 22 Feb 2000 13:05:14 -0800 Received: by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id NAA04613; Tue, 22 Feb 2000 13:02:38 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id NAA04542; Tue, 22 Feb 2000 13:02:37 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail2.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA18742; Tue, 22 Feb 2000 13:02:33 -0800 Received: from msexch01.diebold.com (eliot.diebold.com [204.151.249.21]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with ESMTP id NAA12996 for ; Tue, 22 Feb 2000 13:02:32 -0800 (PST) Received: by msexch01.diebold.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21) id ; Tue, 22 Feb 2000 16:00:48 -0500 Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2000 16:00:42 -0500 From: "Plentovich, Dave" Subject: build arm-linux Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com To: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Message-id: MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21) Content-type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Precedence: bulk Hello. I need some assistance in building a "C" xdev toolchain (ELF) for StrongARM (specifically BRUTUS). I have read the Intel notes, Philip Blundell's page and Chris Rutter's page but I am still having trouble picking the correct tool versions. Can anyone fill in the blanks for the latest toolchain version set that works/builds together? 1) binutils-???.tar.gz 2) binutils-???-diff-???.gz 3) linux-???.tar.gz 4) patch-???-rmk?.gz 5) diff-???-rmk?-np?.gz 6) gcc-???.tar.gz (or egcs?) 7) gcc-???-diff-???.gz (or egcs?) 8) glibc-???.tar.gz 9) glibc-linuxthreads-???.tar.gz 10) glibc-crypt-???.tar.gz I have built the latest GCC cross-compiler using one-tree-1.6.sh and build-cross.sh (binutil-2.9.1, gcc-2.95.2, newlib-1.8.2). The toolchain built/installed correctly but it only builds arm-linux-aout and arm-linux-coff binaries, not arm-linux (ELF). Thanks for your help. Best regards, David Plentovich DIEBOLD Self-Service Systems, Dept. 9-53-3 (330)490-5092, FAX(330)490-4508, plentod@diebold.com 5995 Mayfair Road, North Canton, OH, 44720, USA From kramer@pa.dec.com Tue Feb 22 22:57:19 2000 Return-Path: Received: from tudedr.et.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id WAA13339; Tue, 22 Feb 2000 22:57:18 +0100 (MET) Received: from mail2.digital.com by ITS.TUDelft.NL (PMDF V5.1-10 #21918) with ESMTP id <01JM845HWCU48ZDV9F@ITS.TUDelft.NL> for erik@duteinh.et.tudelft.nl; Tue, 22 Feb 2000 22:57:15 +0100 Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id NAA17003; Tue, 22 Feb 2000 13:54:33 -0800 (PST) Received: from rex.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA09240; Tue, 22 Feb 2000 13:54:01 -0800 Received: by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id NAA04624; Tue, 22 Feb 2000 13:53:49 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id NAA04639; Tue, 22 Feb 2000 13:53:48 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail2.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA06913; Tue, 22 Feb 2000 13:53:48 -0800 Received: from duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (duteinh.et.tudelft.nl [130.161.42.1]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with ESMTP id NAA16884 for ; Tue, 22 Feb 2000 13:53:47 -0800 (PST) Received: from kalman by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id WAA13305; Tue, 22 Feb 2000 22:52:28 +0100 (MET) Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2000 22:52:28 +0100 (MET) From: Erik Mouw Subject: Re: build arm-linux In-reply-to: Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com To: PlentoD@diebold.com Cc: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Message-id: <200002222152.WAA13305@duteinh.et.tudelft.nl> Organization: Eric conspiracy secret labs MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: XCmail 1.0.0 - with PGP support, PGP engine version 0.5 (Linux) Content-type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-transfer-encoding: 8bit Precedence: bulk X-Face: "!Z|1XjFg!3Iw)BwM^M\k)J5KHiPddz}#/Zw%?$&Q!xqob"OA|})3_@&BTTiQERo?/^g[Z<9P4R8:5C:aqq.cw!hotLc=+u-"+1rq@9$V^8PbOUlodyi_sejt+D`iqkLpx$>.aXl%vnfPIt"LK|/%>94_Zrm8jy?`_[RKt'TuoxUxfk(gMhY(n|DBBl~c$dhO>G%6}R4+DGX3|idBm4oU&UM/XUP4I9aoN{]`ax%B?rgD(I3OJ<62Y6L X-Mailerorigin: http://www.fsai.fh-trier.de/~schmitzj/Xclasses/XCmail/ X-Eric-Conspiracy: There is no conspiracy! X-Loop: erik@it.et.tudelft.nl On Tue, 22 Feb 2000 16:00:42 -0500, Plentovich, Dave wrote: > Hello. I need some assistance in building a "C" xdev toolchain (ELF) for > StrongARM (specifically BRUTUS). I have read the Intel notes, Philip > Blundell's page and Chris Rutter's page but I am still having trouble picking > the correct tool versions. Can anyone fill in the blanks for the latest > toolchain version set that works/builds together? > > 1) binutils-???.tar.gz > 2) binutils-???-diff-???.gz > 3) linux-???.tar.gz > 4) patch-???-rmk?.gz > 5) diff-???-rmk?-np?.gz > 6) gcc-???.tar.gz (or egcs?) > 7) gcc-???-diff-???.gz (or egcs?) > 8) glibc-???.tar.gz > 9) glibc-linuxthreads-???.tar.gz > 10) glibc-crypt-???.tar.gz This is a known to work combination (I made two toolchains with it): binutils-2.9.5.0.22.tar.bz2 linux-2.2.13.tar.gz patch-2.2.13-rmk2.gz diff-2.2.13-rmk2-np14.gz gcc-2.95.2.tar.gz gcc-2.95.2-diff-991022.gz chris-rutter-patch-for-gcc-2.95.2 (the one on Chris' page) glibc-crypt-2.1.tar.gz glibc-linuxthreads-2.1.2.tar.bz2 You can also use gcc-2.95.3-diff, this will obsolete gcc-2.95.2-diff and Chris Rutters patch. If you don't want to build it yourself, you can download my precompiled version at: http://www-ict.its.tudelft.nl/~erik/open-source/arm-linux-cross/ Erik -- J.A.K. (Erik) Mouw, Information and Communication Theory Group, Department of Electrical Engineering, Faculty of Information Technology and Systems, Delft University of Technology, PO BOX 5031, 2600 GA Delft, The Netherlands Phone: +31-15-2785859 Fax: +31-15-2781843 Email J.A.K.Mouw@its.tudelft.nl WWW: http://www-ict.its.tudelft.nl/~erik/ From kramer@pa.dec.com Wed Feb 23 11:29:16 2000 Return-Path: Received: from tudedr.et.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id LAA16784; Wed, 23 Feb 2000 11:29:16 +0100 (MET) Received: from mail2.digital.com by ITS.TUDelft.NL (PMDF V5.1-10 #21918) with ESMTP id <01JM8UETCMU88WW0F9@ITS.TUDelft.NL> for erik@duteinh.et.tudelft.nl; Wed, 23 Feb 2000 11:29:13 +0100 Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id CAA09968; Wed, 23 Feb 2000 02:25:47 -0800 (PST) Received: from rex.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA07105; Wed, 23 Feb 2000 02:25:04 -0800 Received: by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id CAA04754; Wed, 23 Feb 2000 02:23:17 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id CAA04851; Wed, 23 Feb 2000 02:23:16 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail2.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA12219; Wed, 23 Feb 2000 02:23:16 -0800 Received: from asustpe3.ASUS.COM.TW ([192.72.126.36]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with ESMTP id CAA11707 for ; Wed, 23 Feb 2000 02:23:12 -0800 (PST) Received: by bak.asus.com.tw with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21) id ; Wed, 23 Feb 2000 18:33:38 +0800 Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2000 18:33:31 +0800 From: Eric_Liu@asus.com.tw Subject: RE: XFree86 port... Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com To: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Message-id: MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21) Content-type: text/plain; charset="BIG5" Precedence: bulk Dear Deborah, I'm trying to find a small X to run on Brutus board, and I've tried to build the Itsy X of xfree86-3.9.17 after seeing your post. I found that Itsy X can not be built by arm linux cross-compile toolchain which can correctly build Linux OS image and APs for Brutus. What should I do to build the Itsy X correctly? My env now is.. x86 PC, RedHat 6.1, arm-linux cross-compile toolchain with Linux-2.2.14, binutils-2.9.5.0.22, gcc-2.95.2, glibc-2.1.2. The work I've done now: 1. Add definition of BuildFonts NO, XItsyServer YES, KDriveXServer YES in config. 2. Modify paths in itsy.cf to proper path. But there is one INCLUDE path named "xxx/lib/gcc-include", I can not find related directory on my system, I guess it's "xxx/sys-include". 3. Untar the linux-3.0.tgz downloading from Compaq site. Link the "xxx/arm-linux/include/asm" and "xxx/arm-linux/include/linux" into linux-3.0. Is it right? What else should I do? Any hint or suggestion will be appreciated. -- Eric Liu > -----Original Message----- > From: Deborah Wallach [mailto:kerr@pa.dec.com] > Sent: Tuesday, February 22, 2000 6:00 AM > To: NSaxena@flatpanels.com > Cc: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com > Subject: Re: XFree86 port... > > > > I was wondering if anyone knows where I can find a port of > XFree86 for an > SA1100 based system like Brutus? > > XFree86 runs on the Itsy (a SA1100-based system, see > http://www.research.compaq.com/wrl/itsy). The source code > for the Itsy > port is included in the latest snapshots (for example, check out > ftp://ftp.xfree86.org/pub/XFree86/snapshots/3.9.17/). > > Deborah Wallach > Western Research Laboratory > Compaq Computer Corporation > From kramer@pa.dec.com Thu Feb 24 09:47:32 2000 Return-Path: Received: from tudedr.et.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id JAA02233; Thu, 24 Feb 2000 09:47:31 +0100 (MET) Received: from mail2.digital.com by ITS.TUDelft.NL (PMDF V5.1-10 #21918) with ESMTP id <01JMA551XWU48WW2LW@ITS.TUDelft.NL> for erik@duteinh.et.tudelft.nl; Thu, 24 Feb 2000 09:47:29 +0100 Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id AAA16674; Thu, 24 Feb 2000 00:43:49 -0800 (PST) Received: from rex.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA24199; Thu, 24 Feb 2000 00:42:48 -0800 Received: by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id AAA05282; Thu, 24 Feb 2000 00:39:55 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id AAA05279; Thu, 24 Feb 2000 00:39:53 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail1.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA01317; Thu, 24 Feb 2000 00:39:53 -0800 Received: from one.net.au (lightgrey.one.net.au [203.101.17.163]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id AAA14715 for ; Thu, 24 Feb 2000 00:39:51 -0800 (PST) Received: (qmail 18097 invoked from network); Thu, 24 Feb 2000 08:38:15 +0000 Received: from unknown (HELO bart.linux.bogus) (203.101.100.127) by lightgrey.one.net.au with SMTP; Thu, 24 Feb 2000 08:38:15 +0000 Received: from localhost (benw@localhost) by bart.linux.bogus (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id TAA01017 for ; Thu, 24 Feb 2000 19:38:18 +1100 Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2000 19:38:17 +1100 (EST) From: Ben Williamson Subject: More spam on the list Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com X-Sender: benw@bart.linux.bogus To: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Message-id: MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: MULTIPART/MIXED; BOUNDARY="-1463811839-1258237209-951381497=:805" Precedence: bulk X-Authentication-warning: bart.linux.bogus: benw owned process doing -bs This message is in MIME format. The first part should be readable text, while the remaining parts are likely unreadable without MIME-aware tools. Send mail to mime@docserver.cac.washington.edu for more info. ---1463811839-1258237209-951381497=:805 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII I'm still getting spam via the list. Anyone care to do something about this? Cheers, - Ben. ------------------------------------------------------------------- Ben Williamson benw@pobox.com http://www.pobox.com/~benw/ ---1463811839-1258237209-951381497=:805 Content-Type: MESSAGE/RFC822; CHARSET=US-ASCII Content-ID: Content-Description: One Call (fwd) Return-Path: Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by bart.linux.bogus (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id TAA00882 for ; Thu, 24 Feb 2000 19:35:27 +1100 Delivered-To: bwilliamson@one.net.au Received: from mail.one.net.au by localhost with POP3 (fetchmail-5.0.0) for benw@localhost (single-drop); Thu, 24 Feb 2000 19:35:28 +1100 (EST) Received: (qmail 9613 invoked from network); 23 Feb 2000 13:21:55 -0000 Received: from growl.pobox.com (208.210.124.27) by lightgrey.one.net.au with SMTP; 23 Feb 2000 13:21:55 -0000 Received: from mail1.digital.com (mail1.digital.com [204.123.2.50]) by growl.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D4C723929 for ; Wed, 23 Feb 2000 08:21:52 -0500 (EST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id FAA30386; Wed, 23 Feb 2000 05:20:37 -0800 (PST) Received: from rex.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA24305; Wed, 23 Feb 2000 05:20:05 -0800 Received: by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id FAA04936; Wed, 23 Feb 2000 05:19:43 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id FAA04930; Wed, 23 Feb 2000 05:19:41 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail1.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA23963; Wed, 23 Feb 2000 05:19:41 -0800 Received: from ross.itri.brighton.ac.uk (ross.itri.brighton.ac.uk [194.81.196.84]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id FAA29294 for ; Wed, 23 Feb 2000 05:19:40 -0800 (PST) Received: from kllklk (PPPa47-ResaleRhodeIsland1-4R1163.saturn.bbn.com) by ross.itri.brighton.ac.uk; Wed, 23 Feb 00 13:18:02 GMT Message-Id: <20819.10002231318@ross.itri.brighton.ac.uk> From: "kevin" Subject: One Call To: lock39s@itri.brighton.ac.uk X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.70 [en] (Win95; I) Mime-Version: 1.0 Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2000 06:36:10 -0500 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit WE MAKE IT EASY & AFFORDABLE TO ACCEPT CREDIT CARDS FOR YOUR BUSINESS ! INTERNET (Auction Vendors & Online Mall Stores Too!) STOREFRONT OR MAIL ORDER MERCHANTS WE SPECIALIZE IN APPROVING YOU! APPLY TODAY AND START FOR JUST $9.95! FREE APPLICATION!! FREE PROGRAMMING!! DON'T LOSE ANOTHER SALE! APPLY TO ACCEPT CREDIT CARDS AND CALL (888) 264-9272 DON'T FORGET TO ASK ABOUT OUR WEB DESIGN AND HOSTING PACKAGE !!! ********************************************************************* **** If you receive this message and have never joined one of our email lists you can be removed by replying to: mailto:awak@wildmail.com?subject=remove ********************************************************************* **** ---1463811839-1258237209-951381497=:805-- From kramer@pa.dec.com Thu Feb 24 10:09:07 2000 Return-Path: Received: from tudedr.et.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id KAA02453; Thu, 24 Feb 2000 10:09:07 +0100 (MET) Received: from mail2.digital.com by ITS.TUDelft.NL (PMDF V5.1-10 #21918) with ESMTP id <01JMA5VSKXEM8WW2JH@ITS.TUDelft.NL> for erik@duteinh.et.tudelft.nl; Thu, 24 Feb 2000 10:09:04 +0100 Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id BAA18144; Thu, 24 Feb 2000 01:06:19 -0800 (PST) Received: from rex.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA19472; Thu, 24 Feb 2000 01:05:47 -0800 Received: by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id BAA05308; Thu, 24 Feb 2000 01:05:35 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id BAA05297; Thu, 24 Feb 2000 01:05:34 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail1.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA08677; Thu, 24 Feb 2000 01:05:34 -0800 Received: from ns0.utdallas.edu (ns0.utdallas.edu [129.110.10.1]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with ESMTP id BAA21639 for ; Thu, 24 Feb 2000 01:05:34 -0800 (PST) Received: from apache.utdallas.edu (apache.utdallas.edu [129.110.16.9]) by ns0.utdallas.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C8821A04A5 for ; Thu, 24 Feb 2000 03:02:00 -0600 (CST) Received: from localhost (vasantr@localhost) by apache.utdallas.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id DAA09490 for ; Thu, 24 Feb 2000 03:02:00 -0600 (CST) Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2000 03:01:59 -0600 (CST) From: Vasant Ramasubramanian Subject: Brutus w/CardServices Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com To: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Message-id: MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Precedence: bulk X-Authentication-warning: apache.utdallas.edu: vasantr owned process doing -bs Could someone kindly send me a Brutus kernel that has PCMCIA socket services enabled? I am trying to trouble shoot some issues I have with the PCMCIA port on Brutus and I'm not sure if my PCMCIA interface[Brutus] is to fault, or my PCMCIA hardware. I have a 3COM Etherlink III NIC+Modem and a CompactFlash card which I can put in a type II CF to PCMCIA adaptor. Will either of these at least be IDed by the Linux kernel w/card services? (The CF card should appear as a ATA FlashDisk to the PCMCIA drivers...). I don't have my toolchain setup yet, so I can't make such a kernel myself. Thanks, Vasant. P.S. I'd be more than willing to describe my problems to whom ever is interested. From kramer@pa.dec.com Thu Feb 24 15:39:21 2000 Return-Path: Received: from tudedr.et.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id PAA04816; Thu, 24 Feb 2000 15:39:21 +0100 (MET) Received: from mail1.digital.com by ITS.TUDelft.NL (PMDF V5.1-10 #21918) with ESMTP id <01JMAHF8D2NY8WW3LT@ITS.TUDelft.NL> for erik@duteinh.et.tudelft.nl; Thu, 24 Feb 2000 15:39:19 +0100 Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id GAA14819; Thu, 24 Feb 2000 06:35:17 -0800 (PST) Received: from rex.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA15721; Thu, 24 Feb 2000 06:34:40 -0800 Received: by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id GAA05423; Thu, 24 Feb 2000 06:34:01 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id GAA05400; Thu, 24 Feb 2000 06:34:00 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail2.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AB09997; Thu, 24 Feb 2000 06:33:59 -0800 Received: from smtp1.andrew.cmu.edu (SMTP1.ANDREW.CMU.EDU [128.2.10.81]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with ESMTP id GAA05745 for ; Thu, 24 Feb 2000 06:33:59 -0800 (PST) Received: from unix5.andrew.cmu.edu (UNIX5.ANDREW.CMU.EDU [128.2.15.9]) by smtp1.andrew.cmu.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id JAA09364 for ; Thu, 24 Feb 2000 09:30:35 -0500 (EST) Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2000 09:30:36 -0500 (EST) From: John G Dorsey Subject: Re: Brutus w/CardServices In-reply-to: Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com To: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Message-id: MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Precedence: bulk On Thu, 24 Feb 2000, Vasant Ramasubramanian wrote: > Could someone kindly send me a Brutus kernel that has PCMCIA socket > services enabled? I am trying to trouble shoot some issues I have with the > PCMCIA port on Brutus and I'm not sure if my PCMCIA interface[Brutus] is > to fault, or my PCMCIA hardware. In general, there will be no kernel changes required to support PCMCIA if you're planning to use Card Services for Linux. (CS is implemented by a handful of kernel modules and a userland manager.) > I have a 3COM Etherlink III NIC+Modem and a CompactFlash card which I can > put in a type II CF to PCMCIA adaptor. Will either of these at least be > IDed by the Linux kernel w/card services? (The CF card should appear as a > ATA FlashDisk to the PCMCIA drivers...). On an Itsy, I've seen a 3c589d (EtherLink III) pass the CIS ID check. > I don't have my toolchain setup yet, so I can't make such a kernel myself. Unfortunately, your request comes about a month or so early. =( Card Services for StrongARM: http://www.cs.cmu.edu/~wearable/software/ I've been working with the author/maintainer of the standard Card Services distribution to add support for embedded-style socket controllers. The catch on the SA-1100 (and, to a lesser extent, on the MPC8xx) is the sheer amount of board-specific configuration that must occur for the socket driver to function. (There are at least thirty implementation features which can differ across designs.) The idea behind the StrongARM patch against Card Services is to produce a socket driver which could be distributed in binary form, and run on any board via a concise, userland configuration interface. Two other things which might be of use to you: - About a month ago, on this list, another group announced a Brutus-only alteration of an older version of Card Services. The URL is in the README.sa1100 file of Card Services for StrongARM. - If all you want to do is dump the CIS on your PCMCIA card (that's how the card is identified), you can do that in about twenty lines of C tossed into your kernel setup routine. Again, see README.sa1100 in the patch for more information. So, returning to my comment about your request being early: I don't have anything yet which is known to run on Brutus. The configuration interface should be within earshot of handling Brutus, but no one has reported success (or even an attempt). For right now, it seems like most of your options involve a working toolchain. I'd like to ask anyone who has a day or so that they can afford to waste to take a look at the StrongARM patch and at least try to get a CIS dump on Brutus. (I've tried to get a Brutus board from Intel, but the well seems to be dry.) For those who are interested, SA-1110/SA-1111 development hardware will allegedly be winging its way east some time soon. The next release of Card Services for StrongARM will probably focus on that, kernel 2.3, and a better userland configuration front-end. -jd From kramer@pa.dec.com Thu Feb 24 16:15:04 2000 Return-Path: Received: from tudedr.et.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id QAA05095; Thu, 24 Feb 2000 16:15:04 +0100 (MET) Received: from mail1.digital.com by ITS.TUDelft.NL (PMDF V5.1-10 #21918) with ESMTP id <01JMAIOJ8TKQ8ZDVLK@ITS.TUDelft.NL> for erik@duteinh.et.tudelft.nl; Thu, 24 Feb 2000 16:15:01 +0100 Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id HAA17794; Thu, 24 Feb 2000 07:12:20 -0800 (PST) Received: from rex.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA18254; Thu, 24 Feb 2000 07:11:40 -0800 Received: by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id HAA05440; Thu, 24 Feb 2000 07:11:12 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id HAA05443; Thu, 24 Feb 2000 07:11:11 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail2.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA06557; Thu, 24 Feb 2000 07:11:11 -0800 Received: from xanadu.vipswitch.com (generic199.197.205.205.in-addr.arpa [205.205.197.199] (may be forged)) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with ESMTP id HAA10342 for ; Thu, 24 Feb 2000 07:11:10 -0800 (PST) Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2000 10:01:31 -0500 (EST) From: Nicolas Pitre Subject: Re: Brutus w/CardServices In-reply-to: Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com To: Vasant Ramasubramanian Cc: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Message-id: MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Precedence: bulk On Thu, 24 Feb 2000, Vasant Ramasubramanian wrote: > Could someone kindly send me a Brutus kernel that has PCMCIA socket > services enabled? I am trying to trouble shoot some issues I have with the > PCMCIA port on Brutus and I'm not sure if my PCMCIA interface[Brutus] is > to fault, or my PCMCIA hardware. PCMCIA for Brutus is still on my TODO list. There are different patches around, but some work is required. You are on your own for now. Nicolas From kramer@pa.dec.com Thu Feb 24 16:21:55 2000 Return-Path: Received: from tudedr.et.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id QAA05158; Thu, 24 Feb 2000 16:21:55 +0100 (MET) Received: from mail2.digital.com by ITS.TUDelft.NL (PMDF V5.1-10 #21918) with ESMTP id <01JMAIWYYON48WW3LT@ITS.TUDelft.NL> for erik@duteinh.et.tudelft.nl; Thu, 24 Feb 2000 16:21:52 +0100 Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id HAA11436; Thu, 24 Feb 2000 07:19:11 -0800 (PST) Received: from rex.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA12960; Thu, 24 Feb 2000 07:18:35 -0800 Received: by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id HAA05461; Thu, 24 Feb 2000 07:18:18 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id HAA05460; Thu, 24 Feb 2000 07:18:17 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail1.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA13732; Thu, 24 Feb 2000 07:18:17 -0800 Received: from xanadu.vipswitch.com (generic199.197.205.205.in-addr.arpa [205.205.197.199] (may be forged)) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with ESMTP id HAA16583 for ; Thu, 24 Feb 2000 07:18:16 -0800 (PST) Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2000 10:05:18 -0500 (EST) From: Nicolas Pitre Subject: Re: how download,boot new kernel on SA1110 In-reply-to: <20000224104933.76223.qmail@sina.com> Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com To: daihbxd Cc: "sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com" Message-id: MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Precedence: bulk On Thu, 24 Feb -1, daihbxd wrote: > > > I successfully download the kernel to my SA1110 Evalution Board with > angelboot and reset the target system,but nothing showed up on the LCD.Should the opts file be modified? Didn't put my hands on a SA1110 yet so can't help you much. However the problem is unlikely to be in your opt file. Nicolas From kramer@pa.dec.com Thu Feb 24 18:13:24 2000 Return-Path: Received: from tudedr.et.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id SAA05861; Thu, 24 Feb 2000 18:13:24 +0100 (MET) Received: from mail2.digital.com by ITS.TUDelft.NL (PMDF V5.1-10 #21918) with ESMTP id <01JMAMT6FMKM8WW27F@ITS.TUDelft.NL> for erik@duteinh.et.tudelft.nl; Thu, 24 Feb 2000 18:13:20 +0100 Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id JAA16956; Thu, 24 Feb 2000 09:10:34 -0800 (PST) Received: from rex.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA05551; Thu, 24 Feb 2000 09:09:57 -0800 Received: by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id JAA05516; Thu, 24 Feb 2000 09:09:08 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id JAA05487; Thu, 24 Feb 2000 09:08:43 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail1.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA28277; Thu, 24 Feb 2000 09:08:43 -0800 Received: from hw-mail.hoeft-wessel.de (pC19F3FBB.dip.t-dialin.net [193.159.63.187]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with ESMTP id JAA27382 for ; Thu, 24 Feb 2000 09:08:42 -0800 (PST) Received: by HW_MAIL with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21) id ; Thu, 24 Feb 2000 18:07:53 +0100 Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2000 18:07:45 +0100 From: "JOR. - Jordan, Roman" Subject: AW: how download,boot new kernel on SA1110 Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com To: "'DAIHBXD@SINA.COM'" Cc: "'sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com'" Message-id: <81413F587EB9D1118F56000092941A3EA78C35@HW_MAIL> MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21) Content-type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-transfer-encoding: quoted-printable Precedence: bulk Hi, some time ago i walked to the arm kernel sources. There is one point, = were the system get the processor id. The sa1110 has not the same like the sa1100. Perhaps thats the problem? regards, Roman Jordan -----Urspr=FCngliche Nachricht----- Von: Postmaster=20 Gesendet am: Thursday, February 24, 2000 16:33 An: JOR. - Jordan, Roman Betreff: WG: how download,boot new kernel on SA1110 > ---------- > Von: Nicolas Pitre[SMTP:NICO@CAM.ORG] > Gesendet: Donnerstag, 24. Februar 2000 16:05:18 > An: daihbxd > Cc: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com > Betreff: Re: how download,boot new kernel on SA1110 > Diese Nachricht wurde automatisch von einer Regel weitergeleitet. >=20 >=20 >=20 On Thu, 24 Feb -1, daihbxd wrote: >=20 >=20 > I successfully download the kernel to my SA1110 Evalution Board with > angelboot and reset the target system,but nothing showed up on the LCD.Should the opts file be modified? Didn't put my hands on a SA1110 yet so can't help you much. However = the problem is unlikely to be in your opt file. =20 Nicolas From kramer@pa.dec.com Thu Feb 24 11:53:35 2000 Return-Path: Received: from tudedr.et.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id LAA03177; Thu, 24 Feb 2000 11:53:35 +0100 (MET) Received: from mail1.digital.com by ITS.TUDelft.NL (PMDF V5.1-10 #21918) with ESMTP id <01JMA9JC56R48ZDVCM@ITS.TUDelft.NL> for erik@duteinh.et.tudelft.nl; Thu, 24 Feb 2000 11:53:32 +0100 Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id CAA29621; Thu, 24 Feb 2000 02:50:36 -0800 (PST) Received: from rex.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA21817; Thu, 24 Feb 2000 02:49:59 -0800 Received: by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id CAA05333; Thu, 24 Feb 2000 02:49:04 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id CAA05330; Thu, 24 Feb 2000 02:49:03 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail1.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA23356; Thu, 24 Feb 2000 02:49:03 -0800 Received: from sina.com ([202.106.187.154]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id CAA27527 for ; Thu, 24 Feb 2000 02:49:01 -0800 (PST) Received: (qmail 76226 invoked by uid 99); Thu, 24 Feb 2000 10:49:33 +0000 Date: Thu Feb 24 18:49:33 CST 2000 From: daihbxd Subject: how download,boot new kernel on SA1110 Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com To: "sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com" Message-id: <20000224104933.76223.qmail@sina.com> X-Mailer: SinaMail 3.0Beta (FireToad) Precedence: bulk I successfully download the kernel to my SA1110 Evalution Board with angelboot and reset the target system,but nothing showed up on the LCD.Should the opts file be modified? Regards. David ______________________________________ =================================================================== PB@KCb7Q5gWSSJOd http://mail.sina.com.cn From kramer@pa.dec.com Fri Feb 25 02:04:01 2000 Return-Path: Received: from tudedr.et.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id CAA07504; Fri, 25 Feb 2000 02:04:01 +0100 (MET) Received: from mail1.digital.com by ITS.TUDelft.NL (PMDF V5.1-10 #21918) with ESMTP id <01JMB38PVGN68WW4T6@ITS.TUDelft.NL> for erik@duteinh.et.tudelft.nl; Fri, 25 Feb 2000 02:03:58 +0100 Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id RAA01326; Thu, 24 Feb 2000 17:00:44 -0800 (PST) Received: from rex.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA29287; Thu, 24 Feb 2000 16:59:57 -0800 Received: by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id QAA05684; Thu, 24 Feb 2000 16:58:44 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id QAA05688; Thu, 24 Feb 2000 16:58:43 -0800 (PST) Received: from stowe.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA06658; Thu, 24 Feb 2000 16:58:43 -0800 Received: by stowe.pa.dec.com; (5.65v4.0/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id AA21517; Thu, 24 Feb 2000 16:58:43 -0800 Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2000 16:58:43 -0800 From: Deborah Wallach Subject: Re: XFree86 port... In-reply-to: (Eric_Liu@asus.com.tw) Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com To: Eric_Liu@asus.com.tw Cc: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Message-id: <200002250058.AA21517@stowe.pa.dec.com> Precedence: bulk Address: Compaq Computer Corporation; Western Research Laboratory; 250 University Avenue; Palo Alto, CA 94301; USA Phone: 650-617-3315 I'm trying to find a small X to run on Brutus board, and I've tried to build the Itsy X of xfree86-3.9.17 after seeing your post. I found that Itsy X can not be built by arm linux cross-compile toolchain which can correctly build Linux OS image and APs for Brutus. What should I do to build the Itsy X correctly? My env now is.. x86 PC, RedHat 6.1, arm-linux cross-compile toolchain with Linux-2.2.14, binutils-2.9.5.0.22, gcc-2.95.2, glibc-2.1.2. The work I've done now: 1. Add definition of BuildFonts NO, XItsyServer YES, KDriveXServer YES in config. 2. Modify paths in itsy.cf to proper path. But there is one INCLUDE path named "xxx/lib/gcc-include", I can not find related directory on my system, I guess it's "xxx/sys-include". 3. Untar the linux-3.0.tgz downloading from Compaq site. Link the "xxx/arm-linux/include/asm" and "xxx/arm-linux/include/linux" into linux-3.0. Is it right? What else should I do? Any hint or suggestion will be appreciated. I've never built it myself, only used it. I believe that when it was built for the Itsy (before it was distributed with xfree86), it used our environment: x86 PC, ancient cross-compile toolchain based on egcs-2.91.66 19990325/philb (egcs-1.1.2 release), linux-2.0.30, libc-2.1, etc. I don't know what "xxx/lib/gcc-include" is supposed to refer to; I don't see that directory on my system either. I've forwarded your message on to people who might be able to help. -Deborah Wallach From kramer@pa.dec.com Fri Feb 25 05:56:20 2000 Return-Path: Received: from tudedr.et.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id FAA08174; Fri, 25 Feb 2000 05:56:20 +0100 (MET) Received: from mail1.digital.com by ITS.TUDelft.NL (PMDF V5.1-10 #21918) with ESMTP id <01JMBBCRIBXC8ZDVMG@ITS.TUDelft.NL> for erik@duteinh.et.tudelft.nl; Fri, 25 Feb 2000 05:56:17 +0100 Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id UAA17965; Thu, 24 Feb 2000 20:53:25 -0800 (PST) Received: from rex.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA00426; Thu, 24 Feb 2000 20:52:52 -0800 Received: by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id UAA05791; Thu, 24 Feb 2000 20:52:10 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id UAA05789; Thu, 24 Feb 2000 20:52:09 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail1.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA29233; Thu, 24 Feb 2000 20:52:08 -0800 Received: from funai-tky.co.jp (ns.funai-tky.co.jp [210.154.37.2]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with ESMTP id UAA12777 for ; Thu, 24 Feb 2000 20:52:07 -0800 (PST) Received: from hiropu ([192.168.1.19]) by funai-tky.co.jp (8.9.1/3.7Wpr7-98092916) with SMTP id NAA09336 for ; Fri, 25 Feb 2000 13:52:05 +0900 Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2000 13:51:51 +0900 From: Hiroshi Ishii Subject: kaffe & NEWFPE trouble Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com To: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Message-id: <38B60A672F6.957DHIROSHI@ns.funai-tky.co.jp> MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Becky! ver 1.25.07 Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk Hello! I met trouble , when try Caffeinemark. syslogd out following message; NWFPE: Kaffe[52] takes exception 00000014 at c00d4c74 from 400be294 What's mean? I use kaffe-1.0.5, linux-2.3.35-rmk1-np5. Regards; ---- Funai Electric R & D Co.,LTD Hiroshi Ishii From kramer@pa.dec.com Fri Feb 25 10:53:20 2000 Return-Path: Received: from tudedr.et.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id KAA09561; Fri, 25 Feb 2000 10:53:20 +0100 (MET) Received: from mail1.digital.com by ITS.TUDelft.NL (PMDF V5.1-10 #21918) with ESMTP id <01JMBLPY2Z7Y8ZDVMN@ITS.TUDelft.NL> for erik@duteinh.et.tudelft.nl; Fri, 25 Feb 2000 10:53:17 +0100 Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id BAA02675; Fri, 25 Feb 2000 01:49:24 -0800 (PST) Received: from rex.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA14845; Fri, 25 Feb 2000 01:48:43 -0800 Received: by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id BAA05878; Fri, 25 Feb 2000 01:46:36 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id BAA05859; Fri, 25 Feb 2000 01:46:31 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail2.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA13589; Fri, 25 Feb 2000 01:46:31 -0800 Received: from kings-cross.london.uk.eu.org (mail@tazenda.demon.co.uk [158.152.220.239]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with ESMTP id BAA31068 for ; Fri, 25 Feb 2000 01:46:29 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost ([::ffff:127.0.0.1] helo=kings-cross.london.uk.eu.org ident=phil) by kings-cross.london.uk.eu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.11 #1) id 12OHKH-00023B-00; Fri, 25 Feb 2000 09:46:21 +0000 Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2000 09:46:21 +0000 From: Philip Blundell Subject: Re: kaffe & NEWFPE trouble In-reply-to: Message from Hiroshi Ishii "of Fri, 25 Feb 2000 13:51:51 +0900." <38B60A672F6.957DHIROSHI@ns.funai-tky.co.jp> Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com To: Hiroshi Ishii Cc: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Message-id: MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: exmh version 2.0.2 2/24/98 (debian) Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Precedence: bulk References: <38B60A672F6.957DHIROSHI@ns.funai-tky.co.jp> >syslogd out following message; >NWFPE: Kaffe[52] takes exception 00000014 at c00d4c74 from 400be294 > >What's mean? Your program performed some illegal floating point operation. (This isn't always fatal; Kaffe might trap SIGFPE and take some evasive action.) To decode the message: the first hex number is the exception code, made up from these bits: #define BIT_IXC 0x00000010 /* inexact exception flag */ #define BIT_UFC 0x00000008 /* underflow exception flag */ #define BIT_OFC 0x00000004 /* overfloat exception flag */ #define BIT_DZC 0x00000002 /* divide by zero exception flag */ #define BIT_IOC 0x00000001 /* invalid operation exception flag */ The second bit of hex is the address in NWFPE where the exception was raised, and the third is the address in the program (in this case, in some shared library) where the offending instruction is situated. p. From kramer@pa.dec.com Fri Feb 25 13:25:14 2000 Return-Path: Received: from tudedr.et.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id NAA10672; Fri, 25 Feb 2000 13:25:14 +0100 (MET) Received: from mail2.digital.com by ITS.TUDelft.NL (PMDF V5.1-10 #21918) with ESMTP id <01JMBR1BCH8I8WW5I8@ITS.TUDelft.NL> for erik@duteinh.et.tudelft.nl; Fri, 25 Feb 2000 13:25:11 +0100 Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id EAA08513; Fri, 25 Feb 2000 04:13:54 -0800 (PST) Received: from rex.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA12489; Fri, 25 Feb 2000 04:13:14 -0800 Received: by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id EAA05914; Fri, 25 Feb 2000 04:12:46 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id EAA05917; Fri, 25 Feb 2000 04:12:44 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail1.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA03219; Fri, 25 Feb 2000 04:12:44 -0800 Received: from hw-mail.hoeft-wessel.de (pD4B9D0B4.dip.t-dialin.net [212.185.208.180]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with ESMTP id EAA10814 for ; Fri, 25 Feb 2000 04:12:43 -0800 (PST) Received: by HW_MAIL with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21) id ; Fri, 25 Feb 2000 13:12:42 +0100 Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2000 13:12:37 +0100 From: "JOR. - Jordan, Roman" Subject: information about arm linux Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com To: "'sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com'" Message-id: <81413F587EB9D1118F56000092941A3EA78C38@HW_MAIL> MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21) Content-type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Precedence: bulk Hi, i have some questions about arm linux for sa1100 and sa1110. In my comany are many qeustions about linux (or a embedded version of it) and internet. I read that digital has published his sources for a Xfree adaption. Is there any one, who has successfully run this xfree version on his strongarm based hardware? It is possible to get 'kde' on it (so it could be possible to run an browser)? Are there any other plans to integrate a browser in the arm port of xfree (Netscape ??). Thanks in advance Roman From kramer@pa.dec.com Fri Feb 25 22:42:25 2000 Return-Path: Received: from tudedr.et.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id WAA13225; Fri, 25 Feb 2000 22:42:25 +0100 (MET) Received: from mail1.digital.com by ITS.TUDelft.NL (PMDF V5.1-10 #21918) with ESMTP id <01JMCAI1GMTI8WW6V8@ITS.TUDelft.NL> for erik@duteinh.et.tudelft.nl; Fri, 25 Feb 2000 22:42:22 +0100 Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id NAA17813; Fri, 25 Feb 2000 13:39:18 -0800 (PST) Received: from rex.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA27155; Fri, 25 Feb 2000 13:38:32 -0800 Received: by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id NAA06108; Fri, 25 Feb 2000 13:37:57 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id NAA06105; Fri, 25 Feb 2000 13:37:56 -0800 (PST) Received: from crl.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA03452; Fri, 25 Feb 2000 13:37:54 -0800 Received: from crlwebmail.crl.dec.com (crlwebmail.crl.dec.com [16.11.0.2]) by crl.dec.com (8.8.8/RWD-1.2) with ESMTP id QAA08263 for ; Fri, 25 Feb 2000 16:37:53 -0500 (EST) Received: by crlwebmail.crl.dec.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21) id ; Fri, 25 Feb 2000 16:41:29 -0500 Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2000 16:38:09 -0500 From: George France Subject: Binary tar ball of i386 to armv4l (Strong-ARM) Cross Tool Chain available for download. Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com To: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Message-id: MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21) Content-type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Precedence: bulk > There have been so many questions and problems on the mailing list about > building a Cross Tool Chain. We have decided to post a 38 Mbyte binary > (executable) tar-ball here: > > > http://crl.research.compaq.com/projects/personalserver/sw_download.html > > it is an arm-linux cross Tool Chain. The Tool Chain is made up of: > > binutils-2.9.5.0.22, > gcc-2.95.2 - C, C++, f77, CHILL, java and objc. > glibc-2.1.2. with the International crypt library. (THIS IS NOT FOR > EXPORT) > > The Tool Chain is compiled for a i386 host with an armv4l target. Armv4 = > the instructions set for the SA-110, SA-1100 and SA-1110 processors. l = > little edian. > > > Installation notes: > > The Tool Chain must be installed in /skiff/local. It will not work from > any other path. > > The only other problem that you may have with the include files is that > the tar ball was setup for Linux 2.2.14. You may need to setup a symbolic > links for: > > ln -s /usr/src/linux/include/asm > /skiff/local/arm-linux/include/asm > ln -s /usr/src/linux/include/linux > /skiff/local/arm-linux/include/linux > > or you could copy the /usr/src/linux/include/asm and > /usr/src/linux/include/linux directories to the > /skiff/local/arm-linux/include. Be certain that you have run 'make > menuconfig' or equivalent, then 'make dep'. This will verify that your > kernel tree is up-to-date and the correct symbolic links are up-to-date. > > This tool chain has glibc symbol versioning. If you are using a > netwinder, you may have to compile your code with static libs. > > > > If there is interest, we may make a binary i386 to Strong-ARM cross gdb > available for remote debugging. > > > --George > > > George France, france@crl.dec.com > Cambridge Research Laboratory, Compaq Computer Corporation > One Kendall Square, Building 700 MS: CRL > Cambridge, MA 02139 USA > > From kramer@pa.dec.com Mon Feb 28 20:13:08 2000 Return-Path: Received: from tudedr.et.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id UAA26958; Mon, 28 Feb 2000 20:13:08 +0100 (MET) Received: from mail2.digital.com by ITS.TUDelft.NL (PMDF V5.1-10 #21918) with ESMTP id <01JMGC62W5XO90MVGD@ITS.TUDelft.NL> for erik@duteinh.et.tudelft.nl; Mon, 28 Feb 2000 20:13:06 +0100 Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id LAA27164; Mon, 28 Feb 2000 11:09:54 -0800 (PST) Received: from rex.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA15977; Mon, 28 Feb 2000 11:09:17 -0800 Received: by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id LAA07256; Mon, 28 Feb 2000 11:06:29 -0800 (PST) Received: from pachyderm.pa.dec.com by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id LAA07265; Mon, 28 Feb 2000 11:06:28 -0800 (PST) Received: by pachyderm.pa.dec.com; id LAA07798; Mon, 28 Feb 2000 11:06:28 -0800 (PST) Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2000 11:06:28 -0800 (PST) From: jg@pa.dec.com (Jim Gettys) Subject: Re: information about arm linux Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com To: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Message-id: <200002281906.LAA07798@pachyderm.pa.dec.com> MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Pachyderm (client lkgdhcp-20-64-75.lkg.dec.com, user jg) Content-type: text/plain Precedence: bulk The Itsy X server code has been integrated into the development branch of XFree86 as of 3.9.17 (current version is 3.9.18a). Itsy has a 4 bit/pixel grayscale "dumb" framebuffer. What is most interesting about the code now in XFree86 is that the frame buffer code is Keith Packard's new FB code, which uses about .5 megabytes less code space, and supports all depths that the server needs. This is more desirable than the existing mfb/cfb code in the X server: it is generally faster as well as being smaller (there are alot more CPU instructions / memory or buss cycle now). Note that this is frame buffer code: if your display has accelerator hardware, you may want to do more work to take advantage of it. I think Keith Packard has run this code on an Itsy: I plan to do so as well sometime in the next week or two, though I'll be targetting a different display eventually. As to KDE, dunno: KDE seems to be a memory hog, though I don't know yet if gnome is much smaller. Also on my investigation list. A port of Mozilla is probably the right long term way to get a browser: there are other possibilities out there as well. - Jim -- Jim Gettys Technology and Corporate Development Compaq Computer Corporation jg@pa.dec.com From kramer@pa.dec.com Mon Feb 28 22:09:03 2000 Return-Path: Received: from tudedr.et.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id WAA27531; Mon, 28 Feb 2000 22:09:03 +0100 (MET) Received: from mail2.digital.com by ITS.TUDelft.NL (PMDF V5.1-10 #21918) with ESMTP id <01JMGG7T8EQW91VRNN@ITS.TUDelft.NL> for erik@duteinh.et.tudelft.nl; Mon, 28 Feb 2000 22:09:02 +0100 Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id NAA24321; Mon, 28 Feb 2000 13:06:19 -0800 (PST) Received: from rex.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA12995; Mon, 28 Feb 2000 13:05:38 -0800 Received: by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id NAA07311; Mon, 28 Feb 2000 13:04:55 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id NAA07319; Mon, 28 Feb 2000 13:04:55 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail1.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA21166; Mon, 28 Feb 2000 13:04:54 -0800 Received: from kings-cross.london.uk.eu.org (mail@tazenda.demon.co.uk [158.152.220.239]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with ESMTP id NAA02170; Mon, 28 Feb 2000 13:04:49 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost ([::ffff:127.0.0.1] helo=kings-cross.london.uk.eu.org ident=phil) by kings-cross.london.uk.eu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.11 #1) id 12PXHy-0000W3-00; Mon, 28 Feb 2000 21:01:10 +0000 Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2000 21:01:10 +0000 From: Philip Blundell Subject: Re: information about arm linux In-reply-to: Message from jg@pa.dec.com (Jim Gettys) of "Mon, 28 Feb 2000 11:06:28 PST." <200002281906.LAA07798@pachyderm.pa.dec.com> Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com To: jg@pa.dec.com (Jim Gettys) Cc: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Message-id: MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: exmh version 2.0.2 2/24/98 (debian) Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Precedence: bulk References: <200002281906.LAA07798@pachyderm.pa.dec.com> >A port of Mozilla is probably the right long term way to get a browser: >there are other possibilities out there as well. Mozilla should already run on StrongARM; I don't think any special porting ought to be needed for Itsy. It's pretty large, though p. From kramer@pa.dec.com Mon Feb 28 22:16:32 2000 Return-Path: Received: from tudedr.et.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id WAA27562; Mon, 28 Feb 2000 22:16:32 +0100 (MET) Received: from mail1.digital.com by ITS.TUDelft.NL (PMDF V5.1-10 #21918) with ESMTP id <01JMGGH3Q8TK91VRNN@ITS.TUDelft.NL> for erik@duteinh.et.tudelft.nl; Mon, 28 Feb 2000 22:16:31 +0100 Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id NAA05257; Mon, 28 Feb 2000 13:13:46 -0800 (PST) Received: from rex.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA10824; Mon, 28 Feb 2000 13:13:15 -0800 Received: by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id NAA07364; Mon, 28 Feb 2000 13:13:09 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id NAA07357; Mon, 28 Feb 2000 13:13:09 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail1.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA13181; Mon, 28 Feb 2000 13:13:08 -0800 Received: from mailgate.keith-koep.com (root@mailgate.keith-koep.com [195.8.230.32]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with ESMTP id NAA04159 for ; Mon, 28 Feb 2000 13:13:06 -0800 (PST) Received: from otto (otto [195.8.230.40]) by mailgate.keith-koep.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id WAA17807 for ; Mon, 28 Feb 2000 22:16:01 +0100 Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2000 22:12:08 +0100 (MET) From: keith Subject: Re: information about arm linux Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com To: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Reply-to: keith Message-id: <200002282116.WAA17807@mailgate.keith-koep.com> MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: dtmail 1.2.0 CDE Version 1.2 SunOS 5.6 sun4u sparc Content-type: TEXT/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-MD5: t44kOeHj3RxBIya7vSIlEQ== Precedence: bulk Hi Jim, as the framebuffer device interface was modified from 2.0 to 2.2, it would be interesting to know: is the X Server running on linux 2.0.3 only or does it fit to 2.2 too ? Do you think a port for 8 bpp is a big issue ? From kramer@pa.dec.com Mon Feb 28 22:15:56 2000 Return-Path: Received: from tudedr.et.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id WAA27558; Mon, 28 Feb 2000 22:15:56 +0100 (MET) Received: from mail2.digital.com by ITS.TUDelft.NL (PMDF V5.1-10 #21918) with ESMTP id <01JMGGGC9WQ090MVMH@ITS.TUDelft.NL> for erik@duteinh.et.tudelft.nl; Mon, 28 Feb 2000 22:15:55 +0100 Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id NAA25383; Mon, 28 Feb 2000 13:13:18 -0800 (PST) Received: from rex.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA03473; Mon, 28 Feb 2000 13:12:46 -0800 Received: by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id NAA07330; Mon, 28 Feb 2000 13:12:35 -0800 (PST) Received: from pachyderm.pa.dec.com by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id NAA07315; Mon, 28 Feb 2000 13:12:34 -0800 (PST) Received: by pachyderm.pa.dec.com; id NAA12542; Mon, 28 Feb 2000 13:12:34 -0800 (PST) Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2000 13:12:34 -0800 (PST) From: jg@pa.dec.com (Jim Gettys) Subject: Re: information about arm linux In-reply-to: Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com To: Philip Blundell Cc: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Message-id: <200002282112.NAA12542@pachyderm.pa.dec.com> MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Pachyderm (client lkgdhcp-20-64-75.lkg.dec.com, user jg) Content-type: text/plain Precedence: bulk I'm not (yet) set up to perform the experiment, though probably will be soon (in a few weeks). Previously, Netscape was so leaky of memory that any constrained environment was pretty hopeless. I gather that Mozilla is not as horiffic as Netscape. Do you have a statistics on the sizes of the various libraries that compose Mozilla? - Jim > From: Philip Blundell > Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2000 21:01:10 +0000 > To: jg@pa.dec.com (Jim Gettys) > Cc: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com > Subject: Re: information about arm linux > ----- > >A port of Mozilla is probably the right long term way to get a browser: > >there are other possibilities out there as well. > > Mozilla should already run on StrongARM; I don't think any special porting > ought to be needed for Itsy. It's pretty large, though > > p. -- Jim Gettys Technology and Corporate Development Compaq Computer Corporation jg@pa.dec.com From kramer@pa.dec.com Mon Feb 28 22:27:51 2000 Return-Path: Received: from tudedr.et.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id WAA27610; Mon, 28 Feb 2000 22:27:50 +0100 (MET) Received: from mail1.digital.com by ITS.TUDelft.NL (PMDF V5.1-10 #21918) with ESMTP id <01JMGGV3UZSY90MVMH@ITS.TUDelft.NL> for erik@duteinh.et.tudelft.nl; Mon, 28 Feb 2000 22:27:49 +0100 Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id NAA03542; Mon, 28 Feb 2000 13:25:11 -0800 (PST) Received: from rex.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA20085; Mon, 28 Feb 2000 13:24:40 -0800 Received: by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id NAA07361; Mon, 28 Feb 2000 13:24:31 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id NAA07346; Mon, 28 Feb 2000 13:24:31 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail2.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA29072; Mon, 28 Feb 2000 13:24:30 -0800 Received: from kings-cross.london.uk.eu.org (mail@tazenda.demon.co.uk [158.152.220.239]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with ESMTP id NAA04622; Mon, 28 Feb 2000 13:24:27 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost ([::ffff:127.0.0.1] helo=kings-cross.london.uk.eu.org ident=phil) by kings-cross.london.uk.eu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.11 #1) id 12PXeO-0000eu-00; Mon, 28 Feb 2000 21:24:20 +0000 Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2000 21:24:20 +0000 From: Philip Blundell Subject: Re: information about arm linux In-reply-to: Message from jg@pa.dec.com (Jim Gettys) of "Mon, 28 Feb 2000 13:12:34 PST." <200002282112.NAA12542@pachyderm.pa.dec.com> Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com To: jg@pa.dec.com (Jim Gettys) Cc: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Message-id: MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: exmh version 2.0.2 2/24/98 (debian) Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Precedence: bulk References: <200002282112.NAA12542@pachyderm.pa.dec.com> >Previously, Netscape was so leaky of memory that any constrained environment >was pretty hopeless. I gather that Mozilla is not as horiffic as Netscape. Yes. The Mozilla folks take leaks rather seriously. >Do you have a statistics on the sizes of the various libraries that >compose Mozilla? I can certainly try to gather some. For what it's worth, a freshly loaded mozilla looks like this in `ps': USER PID %CPU %MEM VSZ RSS TTY STAT START TIME COMMAND philb 21350 22.2 26.7 31556 21104 pts/1 S 21:18 0:40 ./viewer (This is on armv3) p. From kramer@pa.dec.com Thu Mar 2 15:22:39 2000 Return-Path: Received: from tudedr.et.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id PAA15835; Thu, 2 Mar 2000 15:22:39 +0100 (MET) Received: from mail1.digital.com by ITS.TUDelft.NL (PMDF V5.1-10 #21918) with ESMTP id <01JMK8VXBRZO984JGY@ITS.TUDelft.NL> for erik@duteinh.et.tudelft.nl; Thu, 2 Mar 2000 15:22:36 +0100 Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id GAA27169; Thu, 02 Mar 2000 06:19:17 -0800 (PST) Received: from rex.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA30968; Thu, 02 Mar 2000 06:18:30 -0800 Received: by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id GAA08440; Thu, 02 Mar 2000 06:16:05 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id GAA08457; Thu, 02 Mar 2000 06:16:04 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail2.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA21175; Thu, 02 Mar 2000 06:16:04 -0800 Received: from blazieresearch.com ([216.85.232.66]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with ESMTP id GAA12310 for ; Thu, 02 Mar 2000 06:16:03 -0800 (PST) Received: from cpq800.blazieresearch.com (cpq800 [216.85.232.67]) by blazieresearch.com (8.9.3/8.8.7) with ESMTP id JAA06407 for ; Thu, 02 Mar 2000 09:15:56 -0500 Received: by CPQ800 with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.10) id ; Thu, 02 Mar 2000 09:14:14 -0500 Date: Thu, 02 Mar 2000 09:14:09 -0500 From: Mike Reynolds Subject: flash serial downloader Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com To: "'sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com'" Message-id: <412E1CF8088BD211AD5100805FAD9A800B5AB2@CPQ800> MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.10) Content-type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Precedence: bulk Hi all, Has anybody developed a serial port flash downloader with the gnu toolchain? I am presently using the Intel Strataflash. Thanks Mike Reynolds From kramer@pa.dec.com Thu Mar 2 15:35:45 2000 Return-Path: Received: from tudedr.et.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id PAA15898; Thu, 2 Mar 2000 15:35:44 +0100 (MET) Received: from mail1.digital.com by ITS.TUDelft.NL (PMDF V5.1-10 #21918) with ESMTP id <01JMK9C44PYM984JNK@ITS.TUDelft.NL> for erik@duteinh.et.tudelft.nl; Thu, 2 Mar 2000 15:35:40 +0100 Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id GAA10312; Thu, 02 Mar 2000 06:33:01 -0800 (PST) Received: from rex.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA30443; Thu, 02 Mar 2000 06:32:29 -0800 Received: by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id GAA08466; Thu, 02 Mar 2000 06:32:23 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id GAA08484; Thu, 02 Mar 2000 06:32:22 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail1.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA19917; Thu, 02 Mar 2000 06:32:22 -0800 Received: from mailgate.keith-koep.com (root@mailgate.keith-koep.com [195.8.230.32]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with ESMTP id GAA27217 for ; Thu, 02 Mar 2000 06:32:19 -0800 (PST) Received: from otto (otto [195.8.230.40]) by mailgate.keith-koep.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id PAA03777 for ; Thu, 02 Mar 2000 15:37:02 +0100 Date: Thu, 02 Mar 2000 15:31:50 +0100 (MET) From: keith Subject: Re: flash serial downloader Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com To: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Reply-to: keith Message-id: <200003021437.PAA03777@mailgate.keith-koep.com> MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: dtmail 1.2.0 CDE Version 1.2 SunOS 5.6 sun4u sparc Content-type: TEXT/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-transfer-encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Content-MD5: GIfBNy2bQGFRPkfauYZ6og== Precedence: bulk Hi=20 we have a bootp/tftp bootstrap loader. It is designed to load via ethernet. We extended it with our=04gdb-stub code. So it=20 should be possible do download with a gdb. But we did not test it yet to download via gdb on a serial line.=20 As the packets come to the serial port when no ethernet-card is=20 attached it should work out of the box.=20 We are using different kinds of flash. Our lastest bootstrap of course supports the 28F128J3. Volker _________________________________________________________________ | | | KEITH & KOEP GMBH DEVELOPMENT OF EMBEDDED CONTROL SYSTEMS |=20 | KOENIGSBERGER STR.2 PHONE +49 (0)202 2525 30 | | D-42277 WUPPERTAL FAX +49 (0)202 2525 333 | | GERMANY keith@keith-koep.com | |_________________________________________________________________| From kramer@pa.dec.com Thu Mar 2 15:51:14 2000 Return-Path: Received: from tudedr.et.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id PAA16016; Thu, 2 Mar 2000 15:51:14 +0100 (MET) Received: from mail2.digital.com by ITS.TUDelft.NL (PMDF V5.1-10 #21918) with ESMTP id <01JMK9VERCMQ984JNX@ITS.TUDelft.NL> for erik@duteinh.et.tudelft.nl; Thu, 2 Mar 2000 15:51:11 +0100 Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id GAA15915; Thu, 02 Mar 2000 06:48:29 -0800 (PST) Received: from rex.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA29485; Thu, 02 Mar 2000 06:47:58 -0800 Received: by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id GAA08427; Thu, 02 Mar 2000 06:47:45 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id GAA08479; Thu, 02 Mar 2000 06:47:44 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail1.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA22748; Thu, 02 Mar 2000 06:47:44 -0800 Received: from hotmail.com (f84.law8.hotmail.com [216.33.241.84]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id GAA23012 for ; Thu, 02 Mar 2000 06:47:43 -0800 (PST) Received: (qmail 11508 invoked by uid 0); Thu, 02 Mar 2000 14:47:08 +0000 Received: from 134.48.4.15 by www.hotmail.com with HTTP; Thu, 02 Mar 2000 06:47:08 -0800 (PST) Date: Thu, 02 Mar 2000 14:47:08 +0000 (GMT) From: Grant R Subject: YOPY, the SA-1110 Linux PDA Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com To: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Message-id: <20000302144708.11507.qmail@hotmail.com> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; format=flowed Precedence: bulk X-Originating-Ip: [134.48.4.15] Dear list readers, What are your thoughts on this new PDA? http://www.yopy.org http://www.gmate.co.kr G.C.R ______________________________________________________ Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com From kramer@pa.dec.com Thu Mar 2 20:23:03 2000 Return-Path: Received: from tudedr.et.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id UAA17237; Thu, 2 Mar 2000 20:23:03 +0100 (MET) Received: from mail1.digital.com by ITS.TUDelft.NL (PMDF V5.1-10 #21918) with ESMTP id <01JMKJDEWVMC96VKSB@ITS.TUDelft.NL> for erik@duteinh.et.tudelft.nl; Thu, 2 Mar 2000 20:23:00 +0100 Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id LAA17261; Thu, 02 Mar 2000 11:19:51 -0800 (PST) Received: from rex.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA16074; Thu, 02 Mar 2000 11:19:05 -0800 Received: by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id LAA08566; Thu, 02 Mar 2000 11:17:47 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id LAA08562; Thu, 02 Mar 2000 11:17:46 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail2.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA01144; Thu, 02 Mar 2000 11:17:45 -0800 Received: from duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (duteinh.et.tudelft.nl [130.161.42.1]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with ESMTP id LAA28422 for ; Thu, 02 Mar 2000 11:17:44 -0800 (PST) Received: from kalman by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id UAA17220; Thu, 02 Mar 2000 20:16:24 +0100 (MET) Date: Thu, 02 Mar 2000 20:16:24 +0100 (MET) From: Erik Mouw Subject: Re: flash serial downloader In-reply-to: <412E1CF8088BD211AD5100805FAD9A800B5AB2@CPQ800> Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com To: mike@blazie.com Cc: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Message-id: <200003021916.UAA17220@duteinh.et.tudelft.nl> Organization: Eric conspiracy secret labs MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: XCmail 1.0.0 - with PGP support, PGP engine version 0.5 (Linux) Content-type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-transfer-encoding: 8bit Precedence: bulk X-Face: "!Z|1XjFg!3Iw)BwM^M\k)J5KHiPddz}#/Zw%?$&Q!xqob"OA|})3_@&BTTiQERo?/^g[Z<9P4R8:5C:aqq.cw!hotLc=+u-"+1rq@9$V^8PbOUlodyi_sejt+D`iqkLpx$>.aXl%vnfPIt"LK|/%>94_Zrm8jy?`_[RKt'TuoxUxfk(gMhY(n|DBBl~c$dhO>G%6}R4+DGX3|idBm4oU&UM/XUP4I9aoN{]`ax%B?rgD(I3OJ<62Y6L X-Mailerorigin: http://www.fsai.fh-trier.de/~schmitzj/Xclasses/XCmail/ X-Eric-Conspiracy: There is no conspiracy! X-Loop: erik@it.et.tudelft.nl On Thu, 02 Mar 2000 09:14:09 -0500, Mike Reynolds wrote: > Has anybody developed a serial port flash downloader with the gnu toolchain? > I am presently using the Intel Strataflash. Yes, you BLOB, the LART bootloader has been developed with the GNU toolchain. Have a look at: http://www-ict.its.tudelft.nl/~erik/open-source/blob/ BLOB currently only works with Intel DT28F160F3B120 Fast Boot Block Flash, unless Adam Wiggins has ported it to use the Flash chips on the PLEB board. Erik -- In theory, practice and theory are the same, but in practice they are different -- Larry McVoy From kramer@pa.dec.com Wed Mar 8 11:33:31 2000 Return-Path: Received: from tudedr.et.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id LAA19444; Wed, 8 Mar 2000 11:33:30 +0100 (MET) Received: from mail1.digital.com by ITS.TUDelft.NL (PMDF V5.1-10 #21918) with ESMTP id <01JMSEMVR5P29BVD2O@ITS.TUDelft.NL> for erik@duteinh.et.tudelft.nl; Wed, 8 Mar 2000 11:33:25 +0100 Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id CAA16231; Wed, 08 Mar 2000 02:30:13 -0800 (PST) Received: from rex.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA29836; Wed, 08 Mar 2000 02:27:53 -0800 Received: by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id CAA10872; Wed, 08 Mar 2000 02:23:38 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id CAA10837; Wed, 08 Mar 2000 02:23:37 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail1.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA30156; Wed, 08 Mar 2000 02:23:33 -0800 Received: from eising.k-net.dk (eising.k-net.dtu.dk [130.225.71.227]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with ESMTP id CAA14830 for ; Wed, 08 Mar 2000 02:23:28 -0800 (PST) Received: from obelix.vkr.k-net.dk (obelix.vkr.k-net.dk [192.38.209.3]) by eising.k-net.dk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F00B9180B for ; Wed, 08 Mar 2000 11:23:33 +0100 (CET) Received: by obelix.vkr.k-net.dk with Internet Mail Service (5.5.1960.3) id ; Wed, 08 Mar 2000 11:23:14 +0100 Date: Wed, 08 Mar 2000 11:23:12 +0100 From: Anders Frederiksen Subject: A lot of questions... Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com To: "'sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com'" Message-id: MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.1960.3) Content-type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Precedence: bulk Right on: Where can the SA1100-linux mailing list archives be found? I'm considering implementing an external DMA-controller for the SA1100. The question is whether the processor will be able to use the time off the bus efficiently. I guess, in most cases the SA1100 will encounter a cache miss and halt until the buscontrol is restored? Which would render the DMAC a complete waste of time (my time and CPU time ;) We've build the cross-compiler and the arm-linux kernel for Brutus as described by Intel. Never the less we have encountered some problems using the angelboot_old.tgz to download and run applications. We receive an error when running the "go" script. "Received 1d when expecting start packet.*" Is there a (up to date) version of the angel boot-loader which will make my day or an option we have missed? Thanx for your time! Regards, Anders Frederiksen From kramer@pa.dec.com Wed Mar 8 12:59:11 2000 Return-Path: Received: from tudedr.et.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id MAA20018; Wed, 8 Mar 2000 12:59:11 +0100 (MET) Received: from mail1.digital.com by ITS.TUDelft.NL (PMDF V5.1-10 #21918) with ESMTP id <01JMSHM2PZ5K9BVD33@ITS.TUDelft.NL> for erik@duteinh.et.tudelft.nl; Wed, 8 Mar 2000 12:59:04 +0100 Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id DAA23356; Wed, 08 Mar 2000 03:55:38 -0800 (PST) Received: from rex.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA22242; Wed, 08 Mar 2000 03:53:46 -0800 Received: by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id DAA10896; Wed, 08 Mar 2000 03:52:55 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id DAA10892; Wed, 08 Mar 2000 03:52:50 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail1.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA06878; Wed, 08 Mar 2000 03:52:39 -0800 Received: from salisbury.labs.futuretv.com (salisbury.futuretv.com [194.216.164.17]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with ESMTP id DAA24584 for ; Wed, 08 Mar 2000 03:52:38 -0800 (PST) Received: from zebra.labs.futuretv.com ([192.0.0.67] ident=mail) by salisbury.labs.futuretv.com with esmtp (Exim 3.03 #1) id 12Sf1v-000351-00 for sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com; Wed, 08 Mar 2000 11:53:31 +0000 Received: from [192.0.0.21] (helo=fountain.labs.futuretv.com ident=mail) by zebra.labs.futuretv.com with esmtp (Exim 3.03 #1) id 12Sf0O-0003NI-00; Wed, 08 Mar 2000 11:51:56 +0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=fountain ident=pb) by fountain.labs.futuretv.com with esmtp (Exim 3.03 #1) id 12Sf0O-0002E6-00; Wed, 08 Mar 2000 11:51:56 +0000 Date: Wed, 08 Mar 2000 11:51:56 +0000 From: Philip Blundell Subject: Re: A lot of questions... In-reply-to: Message from Anders Frederiksen "of Wed, 08 Mar 2000 11:23:12 +0100." Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com To: Anders Frederiksen Cc: "'sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com'" Message-id: MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: exmh version 2.0.2 2/24/98 (debian) Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Precedence: bulk References: >Where can the SA1100-linux mailing list archives be found? http://www.armlinux.org/~webmail/sa1100-linux/ They don't go back all that far at the moment; I'll add some older messages when I get a chance. >I'm considering implementing an external DMA-controller for the SA1100. >The question is whether the processor will be able to use the time off >the bus efficiently. I guess, in most cases the SA1100 will encounter a >cache miss and halt until the buscontrol is restored? Which would render >the DMAC a complete waste of time (my time and CPU time ;) Depends what your cache locality is like, really, and how long DMA bursts last for. I forget what the SA-1100 bus interface looks like, but you might be able to arrange for DMA to split a burst when the CPU wants to perform an access. >an error when running the "go" script. "Received 1d when expecting start >packet.*" That usually indicates some problem in your serial port configuration, or Angel not actually running on the remote end, in my experience. p. From kramer@pa.dec.com Wed Mar 8 13:20:54 2000 Return-Path: Received: from tudedr.et.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id NAA20178; Wed, 8 Mar 2000 13:20:54 +0100 (MET) Received: from mail2.digital.com by ITS.TUDelft.NL (PMDF V5.1-10 #21918) with ESMTP id <01JMSIDYG2OE99DME0@ITS.TUDelft.NL> for erik@duteinh.et.tudelft.nl; Wed, 8 Mar 2000 13:20:49 +0100 Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id EAA18829; Wed, 08 Mar 2000 04:18:04 -0800 (PST) Received: from rex.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA18401; Wed, 08 Mar 2000 04:16:12 -0800 Received: by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id EAA10908; Wed, 08 Mar 2000 04:15:53 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id EAA10913; Wed, 08 Mar 2000 04:15:52 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail1.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA05366; Wed, 08 Mar 2000 04:15:52 -0800 Received: from ms1.yeah.net ([202.106.185.105]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with ESMTP id EAA23924 for ; Wed, 08 Mar 2000 04:15:50 -0800 (PST) Received: by ms1.yeah.net (Postfix, from userid 60001) id 219191C6F99E0; Wed, 08 Mar 2000 20:14:21 +0800 (CST) Date: Wed, 08 Mar 2000 20:14:21 +0800 (CST) From: zhuf@yeah.net Subject: linux resources Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com To: Sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Message-id: <38C6441D.18177@ms3.yeah.net> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=unknown-8bit Content-transfer-encoding: quoted-printable Precedence: bulk X-Mime-Autoconverted: from 8bit to quoted-printable by mail1.digital.com id EAA23924 X-Priority: 3 Dear Mr:=0D =0D I cannot get those linux tools from hyperlinks in intel's website.=0D =0D It may be out-of-date.=0D =0D Could you help me?=0D =0D Thank you.=0D =0D Best regards.=0D =0D Beetle=0D =0D ___________________________________________________________________ =CD=C6=BC=F6=A3=A1EaseBand( http://easeband.163.com )=C8=C3=C4=E3=C7=E1=CB= =C9=C9=CF=CD=F8=A1=A3 From kramer@pa.dec.com Wed Mar 8 14:25:46 2000 Return-Path: Received: from tudedr.et.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id OAA20655; Wed, 8 Mar 2000 14:25:46 +0100 (MET) Received: from mail1.digital.com by ITS.TUDelft.NL (PMDF V5.1-10 #21918) with ESMTP id <01JMSKNIHVGA9BVDAA@ITS.TUDelft.NL> for erik@duteinh.et.tudelft.nl; Wed, 8 Mar 2000 14:25:44 +0100 Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id FAA29512; Wed, 08 Mar 2000 05:22:55 -0800 (PST) Received: from rex.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA11182; Wed, 08 Mar 2000 05:21:03 -0800 Received: by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id FAA10835; Wed, 08 Mar 2000 05:20:00 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id FAA10934; Wed, 08 Mar 2000 05:19:59 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail2.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA00094; Wed, 08 Mar 2000 05:19:55 -0800 Received: from msexch01.diebold.com (eliot.diebold.com [204.151.249.21]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with ESMTP id FAA21307 for ; Wed, 08 Mar 2000 05:19:55 -0800 (PST) Received: by msexch01.diebold.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21) id ; Wed, 08 Mar 2000 08:18:29 -0500 Date: Wed, 08 Mar 2000 08:18:25 -0500 From: "Plentovich, Dave" Subject: RE: A lot of questions... Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com To: "'Anders Frederiksen'" Cc: "'sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com'" Message-id: MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21) Content-type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Precedence: bulk Anders, I get the "1d" error when I am connected to the wrong comm port on BRUTUS. You should be using J23 for downloads and J22 for terminal (minicom). I had a lot of trouble building the correct toolchain/linux combination but I found a pre-built set of binaries which work with BRUTUS (angel 1.2). See ftp://ftp.netwinder.org/users/n/nico/ and look for the following files: arm-xtoolchain.tgz, brutus-test.tgz, and ramdisk-img.gz. Using these xdev tools we have built/ran arm-linux-2.2.14-rmk3 successfully. Best regards, David Plentovich Diebold, Incorporated ATM Development & Engineering, Dept. 9-53-3 5995 Mayfair Road, North Canton, OH 44720, USA voice 330.490.5092, fax 330.490.4508 plentod@diebold.com -----Original Message----- From: Anders Frederiksen [mailto:Nize@vkr.k-net.dk] Sent: Wednesday, March 08, 2000 5:23 AM To: 'sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com' Subject: A lot of questions... Right on: Where can the SA1100-linux mailing list archives be found? I'm considering implementing an external DMA-controller for the SA1100. The question is whether the processor will be able to use the time off the bus efficiently. I guess, in most cases the SA1100 will encounter a cache miss and halt until the buscontrol is restored? Which would render the DMAC a complete waste of time (my time and CPU time ;) We've build the cross-compiler and the arm-linux kernel for Brutus as described by Intel. Never the less we have encountered some problems using the angelboot_old.tgz to download and run applications. We receive an error when running the "go" script. "Received 1d when expecting start packet.*" Is there a (up to date) version of the angel boot-loader which will make my day or an option we have missed? Thanx for your time! Regards, Anders Frederiksen From kramer@pa.dec.com Wed Mar 8 20:27:53 2000 Return-Path: Received: from tudedr.et.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id UAA22705; Wed, 8 Mar 2000 20:27:53 +0100 (MET) Received: from mail2.digital.com by ITS.TUDelft.NL (PMDF V5.1-10 #21918) with ESMTP id <01JMSXADOHLQ9BVDB3@ITS.TUDelft.NL> for erik@duteinh.et.tudelft.nl; Wed, 8 Mar 2000 20:27:48 +0100 Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id LAA15170; Wed, 08 Mar 2000 11:24:53 -0800 (PST) Received: from rex.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA19492; Wed, 08 Mar 2000 11:24:12 -0800 Received: by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id LAA11077; Wed, 08 Mar 2000 11:23:13 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id LAA11090; Wed, 08 Mar 2000 11:23:12 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail2.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA31307; Wed, 08 Mar 2000 11:23:11 -0800 Received: from blazieresearch.com ([216.85.232.66]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with ESMTP id LAA13180 for ; Wed, 08 Mar 2000 11:23:10 -0800 (PST) Received: from cpq800.blazieresearch.com (cpq800 [216.85.232.67]) by blazieresearch.com (8.9.3/8.8.7) with ESMTP id OAA31344 for ; Wed, 08 Mar 2000 14:23:03 -0500 Received: by CPQ800 with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.10) id ; Wed, 08 Mar 2000 14:21:07 -0500 Date: Wed, 08 Mar 2000 14:21:06 -0500 From: Mike Reynolds Subject: BLOB Flash downloader using Intel Strataflash Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com To: "'sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com'" Message-id: <412E1CF8088BD211AD5100805FAD9A800B5ABD@CPQ800> MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.10) Content-type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Precedence: bulk Hi all, Has any BLOB users modified the BLOB code to download to Intel Strataflash? Thanks. Mike From kramer@pa.dec.com Wed Mar 8 21:39:00 2000 Return-Path: Received: from tudedr.et.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id VAA23015; Wed, 8 Mar 2000 21:38:59 +0100 (MET) Received: from mail1.digital.com by ITS.TUDelft.NL (PMDF V5.1-10 #21918) with ESMTP id <01JMSZRI6G6E99DMN4@ITS.TUDelft.NL> for erik@duteinh.et.tudelft.nl; Wed, 8 Mar 2000 21:38:51 +0100 Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id MAA28177; Wed, 08 Mar 2000 12:36:07 -0800 (PST) Received: from rex.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA20311; Wed, 08 Mar 2000 12:35:35 -0800 Received: by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id MAA11086; Wed, 08 Mar 2000 12:34:57 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id MAA11122; Wed, 08 Mar 2000 12:34:56 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail1.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA09798; Wed, 08 Mar 2000 12:34:56 -0800 Received: from thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (thorgal.et.tudelft.nl [130.161.40.91]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with ESMTP id MAA28385 for ; Wed, 08 Mar 2000 12:34:55 -0800 (PST) Received: from [130.161.40.82] (tvs082.et.tudelft.nl [130.161.40.82]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id VAA18626; Wed, 08 Mar 2000 21:34:52 +0100 Date: Wed, 08 Mar 2000 21:34:42 +0100 From: "J.D. Bakker" Subject: Re: BLOB Flash downloader using Intel Strataflash In-reply-to: <412E1CF8088BD211AD5100805FAD9A800B5ABD@CPQ800> Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com To: Mike Reynolds Cc: "'sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com'" Message-id: MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Precedence: bulk >Hi all, > >Has any BLOB users modified the BLOB code to download to Intel Strataflash? >Thanks. Not AFAIK. I don't believe it should be too hard; print the Fast BootBlock Flash datasheet and put it next to the StrataFlash docs, you'll see that the programming algorithms are 95% alike (with differences in block sizes and the like). Oh and as the LART (for which BLOB was developed) has a pretty funky address/data connection to the Flash, you may have to adapt data_{from|to}_flash. If your data connection is straight (ie D0->D0 ... D31->D31), those functions should be NOPs. JDB. -- LART. 250 MIPS under one Watt. http://www-ict.its.tudelft.nl/~erik/open-source/LART/ From kramer@pa.dec.com Wed Mar 8 23:24:01 2000 Return-Path: Received: from tudedr.et.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id XAA23396; Wed, 8 Mar 2000 23:24:01 +0100 (MET) Received: from mail1.digital.com by ITS.TUDelft.NL (PMDF V5.1-10 #21918) with ESMTP id <01JMT3FRGAMY9BVDBM@ITS.TUDelft.NL> for erik@duteinh.et.tudelft.nl; Wed, 8 Mar 2000 23:23:54 +0100 Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id OAA23136; Wed, 08 Mar 2000 14:21:11 -0800 (PST) Received: from rex.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA20837; Wed, 08 Mar 2000 14:20:35 -0800 Received: by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id OAA11167; Wed, 08 Mar 2000 14:20:09 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id OAA11151; Wed, 08 Mar 2000 14:20:08 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail2.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA08325; Wed, 08 Mar 2000 14:20:08 -0800 Received: from msexch01.diebold.com (eliot.diebold.com [204.151.249.21]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with ESMTP id OAA26542 for ; Wed, 08 Mar 2000 14:20:08 -0800 (PST) Received: by msexch01.diebold.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21) id ; Wed, 08 Mar 2000 17:18:48 -0500 Date: Wed, 08 Mar 2000 17:18:21 -0500 From: "Plentovich, Dave" Subject: SA1100 serial port parity Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com To: "'sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com'" Message-id: MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21) Content-type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Precedence: bulk I am having trouble getting the parity to work on the BRUTUS serial port. I am using the tcsetattr() function to set for even parity but the BRUTUS board always inputs/outputs no parity. I am running arm-linux-2.2.14-rmk3-np15. I compared the serial driver code "serial-sa1100.c" with the standard driver "serial.c" and found that there is a difference in the change_speed() function. In change_speed() the variable cval gets setup with the new parity setting (plus other things) but never gets written to register UTCR0 (in serial.c the cval is written to the LCR register). Is there an existing patch to correct this problem? Is this the function that would be called by tcsetattr() to change the parity of the serial port? Thanks for your help. Best regards, David Plentovich Diebold, Incorporated ATM Development & Engineering, Dept. 9-53-3 5995 Mayfair Road, North Canton, OH 44720, USA voice 330.490.5092, fax 330.490.4508 plentod@diebold.com From kramer@pa.dec.com Thu Mar 9 15:02:15 2000 Return-Path: Received: from tudedv.et.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id PAA28941; Thu, 9 Mar 2000 15:02:15 +0100 (MET) Received: from mail2.digital.com by ITS.TUDelft.NL (PMDF V5.1-10 #21918) with ESMTP id <01JMU07IL4HK99DOY9@ITS.TUDelft.NL> for erik@duteinh.et.tudelft.nl; Thu, 9 Mar 2000 15:01:48 +0100 Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id FAA10498; Thu, 09 Mar 2000 05:57:14 -0800 (PST) Received: from rex.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA17139; Thu, 09 Mar 2000 05:56:34 -0800 Received: by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id FAA11531; Thu, 09 Mar 2000 05:54:47 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id FAA11520; Thu, 09 Mar 2000 05:54:46 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail1.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA12020; Thu, 09 Mar 2000 05:54:46 -0800 Received: from msexch01.diebold.com (eliot.diebold.com [204.151.249.21]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with ESMTP id FAA25363 for ; Thu, 09 Mar 2000 05:54:42 -0800 (PST) Received: by msexch01.diebold.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21) id ; Thu, 09 Mar 2000 08:53:20 -0500 Date: Thu, 09 Mar 2000 08:52:56 -0500 From: "Plentovich, Dave" Subject: FW: SA1100 serial port parity Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com To: "'sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com'" Message-id: MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21) Content-type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Precedence: bulk I added a line in serial_sa1100.c to program cval into the UTCR0 register and the even parity setup now seems to operate correctly. Diff report shown below. --- serial_sa1100.c Thu Mar 9 09:13:48 2000 +++ serial_sa1100.old.c Wed Mar 8 12:39:39 2000 @@ -951,9 +951,6 @@ IER_copy = serial_inp(info, UTCR3) ; serial_outp(info, UTCR3, 0) ; - /* set the parity, stop bits, data size */ - serial_outp(info, UTCR0, cval); - /* set the baud rate */ quot -= 1; /* divisor = divisor - 1 */ serial_outp(info, UTCR1, (quot >> 8)&0xf); /* MS of divisor */ Best regards, David Plentovich -----Original Message----- From: Plentovich, Dave [mailto:PlentoD@diebold.com] Sent: Wednesday, March 08, 2000 5:18 PM To: 'sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com' Subject: SA1100 serial port parity I am having trouble getting the parity to work on the BRUTUS serial port. I am using the tcsetattr() function to set for even parity but the BRUTUS board always inputs/outputs no parity. I am running arm-linux-2.2.14-rmk3-np15. I compared the serial driver code "serial-sa1100.c" with the standard driver "serial.c" and found that there is a difference in the change_speed() function. In change_speed() the variable cval gets setup with the new parity setting (plus other things) but never gets written to register UTCR0 (in serial.c the cval is written to the LCR register). Is there an existing patch to correct this problem? Is this the function that would be called by tcsetattr() to change the parity of the serial port? Thanks for your help. Best regards, David Plentovich Diebold, Incorporated ATM Development & Engineering, Dept. 9-53-3 5995 Mayfair Road, North Canton, OH 44720, USA voice 330.490.5092, fax 330.490.4508 plentod@diebold.com From kramer@pa.dec.com Thu Mar 9 15:39:04 2000 Return-Path: Received: from tudedr.et.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id PAA29303; Thu, 9 Mar 2000 15:39:04 +0100 (MET) Received: from mail2.digital.com by ITS.TUDelft.NL (PMDF V5.1-10 #21918) with ESMTP id <01JMU1HM22T699DOR7@ITS.TUDelft.NL> for erik@duteinh.et.tudelft.nl; Thu, 9 Mar 2000 15:38:58 +0100 Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id GAA11737; Thu, 09 Mar 2000 06:34:44 -0800 (PST) Received: from rex.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA13834; Thu, 09 Mar 2000 06:34:12 -0800 Received: by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id GAA11534; Thu, 09 Mar 2000 06:33:37 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id GAA11530; Thu, 09 Mar 2000 06:33:37 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail2.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA06387; Thu, 09 Mar 2000 06:33:36 -0800 Received: from duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (duteinh.et.tudelft.nl [130.161.42.1]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with ESMTP id GAA09770 for ; Thu, 09 Mar 2000 06:33:35 -0800 (PST) Received: from kalman by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id PAA29198; Thu, 09 Mar 2000 15:32:14 +0100 (MET) Date: Thu, 09 Mar 2000 15:32:14 +0100 (MET) From: Erik Mouw Subject: Re: FW: SA1100 serial port parity In-reply-to: Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com To: PlentoD@diebold.com Cc: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Message-id: <200003091432.PAA29198@duteinh.et.tudelft.nl> Organization: Eric conspiracy secret labs MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: XCmail 1.0.0 - with PGP support, PGP engine version 0.5 (Linux) Content-type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-transfer-encoding: 8bit Precedence: bulk X-Face: "!Z|1XjFg!3Iw)BwM^M\k)J5KHiPddz}#/Zw%?$&Q!xqob"OA|})3_@&BTTiQERo?/^g[Z<9P4R8:5C:aqq.cw!hotLc=+u-"+1rq@9$V^8PbOUlodyi_sejt+D`iqkLpx$>.aXl%vnfPIt"LK|/%>94_Zrm8jy?`_[RKt'TuoxUxfk(gMhY(n|DBBl~c$dhO>G%6}R4+DGX3|idBm4oU&UM/XUP4I9aoN{]`ax%B?rgD(I3OJ<62Y6L X-Mailerorigin: http://www.fsai.fh-trier.de/~schmitzj/Xclasses/XCmail/ X-Eric-Conspiracy: There is no conspiracy! X-Loop: erik@it.et.tudelft.nl On Thu, 09 Mar 2000 08:52:56 -0500, Plentovich, Dave wrote: > I added a line in serial_sa1100.c to program cval into the UTCR0 register and > the even parity setup now seems to operate correctly. Diff report shown below. > > --- serial_sa1100.c Thu Mar 9 09:13:48 2000 > +++ serial_sa1100.old.c Wed Mar 8 12:39:39 2000 > @@ -951,9 +951,6 @@ > IER_copy = serial_inp(info, UTCR3) ; > serial_outp(info, UTCR3, 0) ; > > - /* set the parity, stop bits, data size */ > - serial_outp(info, UTCR0, cval); > - > /* set the baud rate */ > quot -= 1; /* divisor = divisor - 1 */ > serial_outp(info, UTCR1, (quot >> 8)&0xf); /* MS of divisor */ This looks reasonable to me. If I find some time this week, I'll try if this also fixes the login problems we see on the LART. Minor detail: you diff'ed it the other way around. You should have used "diff -u serial_sa1100.old.c serial_sa1100.c". People who want to apply this patch should use "patch -Rp0" to apply it in reverse. Erik -- Computers run on faith, not electrons. -- T.N. Thompson From kramer@pa.dec.com Thu Mar 9 17:25:27 2000 Return-Path: Received: from tudedr.et.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id RAA00246; Thu, 9 Mar 2000 17:25:27 +0100 (MET) Received: from mail2.digital.com by ITS.TUDelft.NL (PMDF V5.1-10 #21918) with ESMTP id <01JMU57NBXM29BVDDX@ITS.TUDelft.NL> for erik@duteinh.et.tudelft.nl; Thu, 9 Mar 2000 17:25:25 +0100 Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id IAA19013; Thu, 09 Mar 2000 08:22:26 -0800 (PST) Received: from rex.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA26022; Thu, 09 Mar 2000 08:21:54 -0800 Received: by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id IAA11579; Thu, 09 Mar 2000 08:21:17 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id IAA11564; Thu, 09 Mar 2000 08:21:16 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail1.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA09048; Thu, 09 Mar 2000 08:21:16 -0800 Received: from xanadu.vipswitch.com (generic199.197.205.205.in-addr.arpa [205.205.197.199] (may be forged)) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with ESMTP id IAA03290 for ; Thu, 09 Mar 2000 08:21:15 -0800 (PST) Date: Thu, 09 Mar 2000 11:07:37 -0500 (EST) From: Nicolas Pitre Subject: Re: FW: SA1100 serial port parity In-reply-to: <200003091432.PAA29198@duteinh.et.tudelft.nl> Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com To: Erik Mouw Cc: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Message-id: MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Precedence: bulk On Thu, 9 Mar 2000, Erik Mouw wrote: > This looks reasonable to me. If I find some time this week, I'll try if > this also fixes the login problems we see on the LART. What kind of problem? Nicolas From kramer@pa.dec.com Thu Mar 9 19:36:52 2000 Return-Path: Received: from tudedr.et.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id TAA00940; Thu, 9 Mar 2000 19:36:51 +0100 (MET) Received: from mail2.digital.com by ITS.TUDelft.NL (PMDF V5.1-10 #21918) with ESMTP id <01JMU9SIAT8699DPJK@ITS.TUDelft.NL> for erik@duteinh.et.tudelft.nl; Thu, 9 Mar 2000 19:36:48 +0100 Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id KAA18792; Thu, 09 Mar 2000 10:33:23 -0800 (PST) Received: from rex.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA27099; Thu, 09 Mar 2000 10:32:50 -0800 Received: by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id KAA11677; Thu, 09 Mar 2000 10:32:11 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id KAA11689; Thu, 09 Mar 2000 10:32:10 -0800 (PST) Received: from stowe.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA04202; Thu, 09 Mar 2000 10:32:10 -0800 Received: by stowe.pa.dec.com; (5.65v4.0/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id AA21479; Thu, 09 Mar 2000 10:32:09 -0800 Date: Thu, 09 Mar 2000 10:32:09 -0800 From: Deborah Wallach Subject: Re: flash filesystem In-reply-to: <20000309083554.13104.qmail@sina.com> (message from daihbxd on Thu Mar 9 16:35:54 CST 2000) Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com To: daihbxd@sina.com Cc: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Message-id: <200003091832.AA21479@stowe.pa.dec.com> Precedence: bulk Address: Compaq Computer Corporation; Western Research Laboratory; 250 University Avenue; Palo Alto, CA 94301; USA Phone: 650-617-3315 From: daihbxd Date: Thu Mar 9 16:35:54 CST 2000 I'd like to add a flash filesystem to linux kernel so I can store files on flash memory.what do i need to do? There is a flash filesystem included in the Itsy Linux release. You can port the driver from our version of the kernel (2.0.30) to whichever version you are using. The URL you should look at is: http://www.research.digital.com/wrl/itsy/download.html (click on "Download the Itsy Linux Port", near the bottom of the page). -Deborah Wallach From kramer@pa.dec.com Thu Mar 9 19:47:40 2000 Return-Path: Received: from tudedr.et.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id TAA00998; Thu, 9 Mar 2000 19:47:40 +0100 (MET) Received: from mail1.digital.com by ITS.TUDelft.NL (PMDF V5.1-10 #21918) with ESMTP id <01JMUA6XCJL299DPJK@ITS.TUDelft.NL> for erik@duteinh.et.tudelft.nl; Thu, 9 Mar 2000 19:47:37 +0100 Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id KAA02484; Thu, 09 Mar 2000 10:44:55 -0800 (PST) Received: from rex.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA26144; Thu, 09 Mar 2000 10:44:23 -0800 Received: by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id KAA11716; Thu, 09 Mar 2000 10:44:11 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id KAA11559; Thu, 09 Mar 2000 10:44:10 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail1.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA06970; Thu, 09 Mar 2000 10:44:10 -0800 Received: from duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (duteinh.et.tudelft.nl [130.161.42.1]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with ESMTP id KAA11866 for ; Thu, 09 Mar 2000 10:44:09 -0800 (PST) Received: from kalman by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id TAA00966; Thu, 09 Mar 2000 19:42:49 +0100 (MET) Date: Thu, 09 Mar 2000 19:42:49 +0100 (MET) From: Erik Mouw Subject: Re: FW: SA1100 serial port parity In-reply-to: Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com To: nico@CAM.ORG Cc: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Message-id: <200003091842.TAA00966@duteinh.et.tudelft.nl> Organization: Eric conspiracy secret labs MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: XCmail 1.0.0 - with PGP support, PGP engine version 0.5 (Linux) Content-type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-transfer-encoding: 8bit Precedence: bulk X-Face: "!Z|1XjFg!3Iw)BwM^M\k)J5KHiPddz}#/Zw%?$&Q!xqob"OA|})3_@&BTTiQERo?/^g[Z<9P4R8:5C:aqq.cw!hotLc=+u-"+1rq@9$V^8PbOUlodyi_sejt+D`iqkLpx$>.aXl%vnfPIt"LK|/%>94_Zrm8jy?`_[RKt'TuoxUxfk(gMhY(n|DBBl~c$dhO>G%6}R4+DGX3|idBm4oU&UM/XUP4I9aoN{]`ax%B?rgD(I3OJ<62Y6L X-Mailerorigin: http://www.fsai.fh-trier.de/~schmitzj/Xclasses/XCmail/ X-Eric-Conspiracy: There is no conspiracy! X-Loop: erik@it.et.tudelft.nl On Thu, 09 Mar 2000 11:07:37 -0500 (EST), Nicolas Pitre wrote: > On Thu, 9 Mar 2000, Erik Mouw wrote: >> This looks reasonable to me. If I find some time this week, I'll try if >> this also fixes the login problems we see on the LART. > > What kind of problem? If you type the login name ("root" in our case) too fast, the getty just doesn't respond. Once you're logged in everything is fine again. It can also be a problem with the getty, but I haven't time to sort it out now (organizing a workshop costs a lot of time). Erik -- A towel has immense psychological value. -- Douglas Adams, The Hitch Hikers Guide to the Galaxy From kramer@pa.dec.com Thu Mar 9 18:21:54 2000 Return-Path: Received: from tudedr.et.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id SAA00605; Thu, 9 Mar 2000 18:21:54 +0100 (MET) Received: from mail1.digital.com by ITS.TUDelft.NL (PMDF V5.1-10 #21918) with ESMTP id <01JMU76L0VM699DPHL@ITS.TUDelft.NL> for erik@duteinh.et.tudelft.nl; Thu, 9 Mar 2000 18:21:50 +0100 Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id JAA07063; Thu, 09 Mar 2000 09:17:54 -0800 (PST) Received: from rex.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA08568; Thu, 09 Mar 2000 09:17:22 -0800 Received: by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id JAA11588; Thu, 09 Mar 2000 09:16:43 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id JAA11616; Thu, 09 Mar 2000 09:16:42 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail2.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA04077; Thu, 09 Mar 2000 09:16:42 -0800 Received: from sina.com ([202.106.187.163]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id JAA16223 for ; Thu, 09 Mar 2000 09:16:40 -0800 (PST) Received: (qmail 13105 invoked by uid 99); Thu, 09 Mar 2000 08:35:54 +0000 Date: Thu Mar 9 16:35:54 CST 2000 From: daihbxd Subject: flash filesystem Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com To: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Message-id: <20000309083554.13104.qmail@sina.com> X-Mailer: SinaMail 3.0Beta (FireToad) Precedence: bulk hi all I'd like to add a flash filesystem to linux kernel so I can store files on flash memory.what do i need to do? regareds ______________________________________ =================================================================== PB@KCb7Q5gWSSJOd http://mail.sina.com.cn From kramer@pa.dec.com Fri Mar 10 00:28:55 2000 Return-Path: Received: from tudedr.et.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id AAA02433; Fri, 10 Mar 2000 00:28:55 +0100 (MET) Received: from mail2.digital.com by ITS.TUDelft.NL (PMDF V5.1-10 #21918) with ESMTP id <01JMUK0IB7AA99DPZD@ITS.TUDelft.NL> for erik@duteinh.et.tudelft.nl; Fri, 10 Mar 2000 00:28:49 +0100 Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id PAA13405; Thu, 09 Mar 2000 15:24:16 -0800 (PST) Received: from rex.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA26686; Thu, 09 Mar 2000 15:23:39 -0800 Received: by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id PAA11865; Thu, 09 Mar 2000 15:19:49 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id PAA11842; Thu, 09 Mar 2000 15:19:48 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail1.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA32493; Thu, 09 Mar 2000 15:19:44 -0800 Received: from ns0.utdallas.edu (ns0.utdallas.edu [129.110.10.1]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with ESMTP id PAA29322 for ; Thu, 09 Mar 2000 15:19:43 -0800 (PST) Received: from apache.utdallas.edu (apache.utdallas.edu [129.110.16.9]) by ns0.utdallas.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6EDE21A0116; Thu, 09 Mar 2000 17:16:20 -0600 (CST) Received: from localhost (vasantr@localhost) by apache.utdallas.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id RAA10927; Thu, 09 Mar 2000 17:16:20 -0600 (CST) Date: Thu, 09 Mar 2000 17:16:19 -0600 (CST) From: Vasant Ramasubramanian Subject: IDE & CF PCB Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com To: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com, linux-arm@vger.rutgers.edu Message-id: MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Precedence: bulk X-Authentication-warning: apache.utdallas.edu: vasantr owned process doing -bs Hello all. I am considering making relatively simple PCBs to allow one to use an IDE hard drive over the PCMCIA interface (this would requre an external power supply for the HDD) and a CompactFlash to PCMCIA adaptor (the CF card would be used in "TrueIDE" mode). I'm also considering an IDE to PCMCIA interface which would physically contain laptop size 2.5" HDD. I've successfully been able to get an ARM Linux kernel ID an IDE hard drive on my Brutus board with one adaptor I made, however it is not near reliable, hence the desire to make a PCB. To cut the cost of th boards, I'd like to offer them to anyone else here who wants one (@cost). Please let me know if you are interested. I have not yet finished making the design or finished getting quotes. These adaptors are passive and I have the pinouts available. If someone else has access to PCB making facilities, please let me know. The layout would be something like a PCMCIA surface mount connector, an IDE surface mount connector and traces ~12mils wide with 12mils spacing. Thanks, Vasant. From kramer@pa.dec.com Sat Mar 11 12:42:36 2000 Return-Path: Received: from tudedr.et.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id MAA11554; Sat, 11 Mar 2000 12:42:35 +0100 (MET) Received: from mail1.digital.com by ITS.TUDelft.NL (PMDF V5.1-10 #21918) with ESMTP id <01JMWNWKWLKU99DSWS@ITS.TUDelft.NL> for erik@duteinh.et.tudelft.nl; Sat, 11 Mar 2000 12:42:32 +0100 Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id DAA18676; Sat, 11 Mar 2000 03:39:22 -0800 (PST) Received: from rex.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA26636; Sat, 11 Mar 2000 03:38:32 -0800 Received: by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id DAA12412; Sat, 11 Mar 2000 03:35:28 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id DAA12378; Sat, 11 Mar 2000 03:35:27 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail2.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA26766; Sat, 11 Mar 2000 03:35:23 -0800 Received: from apple.ncku.edu.tw (apple.tnrc.edu.tw [163.28.113.1]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with ESMTP id DAA26992 for ; Sat, 11 Mar 2000 03:35:18 -0800 (PST) Received: from sparc1.cc.ncku.edu.tw (sparc1.cc.ncku.edu.tw [140.116.5.1]) by apple.ncku.edu.tw (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id TAA08150 for ; Sat, 11 Mar 2000 19:30:47 +0800 (CST) Received: from green (green.mmn.es.ncku.edu.tw [140.116.39.76]) by sparc1.cc.ncku.edu.tw (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id TAA14815 for ; Sat, 11 Mar 2000 19:30:59 +0800 (CST) Date: Sat, 11 Mar 2000 19:34:20 +0800 From: green Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com To: Sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Message-id: <001e01bf8b4d$beda8d80$4c27748c@mmn.es.ncku.edu.tw> MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2314.1300 Content-type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_001B_01BF8B90.CC55F4C0" Precedence: bulk X-Msmail-Priority: Normal X-Mimeole: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2314.1300 X-Priority: 3 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_001B_01BF8B90.CC55F4C0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="big5" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable ------=_NextPart_000_001B_01BF8B90.CC55F4C0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="big5" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable   ------=_NextPart_000_001B_01BF8B90.CC55F4C0-- From kramer@pa.dec.com Sun Mar 12 03:53:21 2000 Return-Path: Received: from tudedr.et.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id DAA14352; Sun, 12 Mar 2000 03:53:21 +0100 (MET) Received: from mail2.digital.com by ITS.TUDelft.NL (PMDF V5.1-10 #21918) with ESMTP id <01JMXJPSJXRM9GV5NM@ITS.TUDelft.NL> for erik@duteinh.et.tudelft.nl; Sun, 12 Mar 2000 03:53:17 +0100 Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id SAA03037; Sat, 11 Mar 2000 18:48:17 -0800 (PST) Received: from rex.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA26417; Sat, 11 Mar 2000 18:47:36 -0800 Received: by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id SAA12644; Sat, 11 Mar 2000 18:46:06 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id SAA12679; Sat, 11 Mar 2000 18:46:06 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail2.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA00021; Sat, 11 Mar 2000 18:46:06 -0800 Received: from xanadu.gn.com (modemcable248.137-200-24.mtl.mc.videotron.net [24.200.137.248]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with ESMTP id SAA25565 for ; Sat, 11 Mar 2000 18:46:05 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (nico@localhost) by xanadu.gn.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id VAA28699 for ; Sat, 11 Mar 2000 21:51:29 -0500 Date: Sat, 11 Mar 2000 21:51:29 -0500 (EST) From: Nicolas Pitre Subject: diff-2.2.14-rmk5-np16.gz Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com X-Sender: nico@xanadu.gn.com To: SA-1100/Linux Message-id: MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Precedence: bulk X-Authentication-warning: xanadu.gn.com: nico owned process doing -bs ... is available right now from ftp.netwinder.org/users/n/nico. This contains: - serial fix for parity setting (Dave Plentovich) - wait-for-irq lockup workaround (David Chaiken) - ThinClient support - various changes to fit with 2.2.14-rmk5 - assorted fixes I've been running this version compiled with gcc-2.95.2 on my ThinClient with Titan VI over NFS ... and everything seem OK ! :-) It means that, for the first time, I have a 2.2.x kernel that behave correctly when compiled with gcc-2.95.2... or at least behave as well as if compiled with egcs-1.1.2. So I guess it might be OK for others too. Didn't test it on Brutus yet though. Also a 2.3.49 diff should be coming shortly. Have fun! Nicolas From kramer@pa.dec.com Tue Mar 14 00:59:56 2000 Return-Path: Received: from tudedr.et.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id AAA25183; Tue, 14 Mar 2000 00:59:56 +0100 (MET) Received: from mail1.digital.com by ITS.TUDelft.NL (PMDF V5.1-10 #21918) with ESMTP id <01JN069ELKK09GV5QK@ITS.TUDelft.NL> for erik@duteinh.et.tudelft.nl; Tue, 14 Mar 2000 00:59:49 +0100 Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id PAA13326; Mon, 13 Mar 2000 15:56:30 -0800 (PST) Received: from rex.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA11739; Mon, 13 Mar 2000 15:55:42 -0800 Received: by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id PAA13441; Mon, 13 Mar 2000 15:53:05 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id PAA13428; Mon, 13 Mar 2000 15:53:04 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail1.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA12996; Mon, 13 Mar 2000 15:53:04 -0800 Received: from ADSServer.flatpanels.com (flatpanels.com [207.196.69.66] (may be forged)) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with ESMTP id PAA15232 for ; Mon, 13 Mar 2000 15:53:02 -0800 (PST) Received: by flatpanels.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21) id ; Mon, 13 Mar 2000 18:49:34 -0500 Date: Mon, 13 Mar 2000 18:49:31 -0500 From: "Saxena, Nikita" Subject: SVGALib... Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com To: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Message-id: <91B07CA588CED3118CFE00105AC97594D10D@flatpanels.com> MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21) Content-type: text/plain Precedence: bulk Hi, Does anyone know of a SVGALib that has been built for SA1100 running Linux. I get a slew of errors when I try to cross compile it for the Arm processor? Thanks, Nikita From kramer@pa.dec.com Tue Mar 14 19:20:11 2000 Return-Path: Received: from tudedr.et.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id TAA01231; Tue, 14 Mar 2000 19:20:10 +0100 (MET) Received: from mail1.digital.com by ITS.TUDelft.NL (PMDF V5.1-10 #21918) with ESMTP id <01JN18OBP38A9FMD90@ITS.TUDelft.NL> for erik@duteinh.et.tudelft.nl; Tue, 14 Mar 2000 19:20:00 +0100 Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id KAA21801; Tue, 14 Mar 2000 10:16:21 -0800 (PST) Received: from rex.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA12786; Tue, 14 Mar 2000 10:15:38 -0800 Received: by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id KAA13745; Tue, 14 Mar 2000 10:14:26 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id KAA13753; Tue, 14 Mar 2000 10:14:25 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail2.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA15303; Tue, 14 Mar 2000 10:14:21 -0800 Received: from msexch01.diebold.com (eliot.diebold.com [204.151.249.21]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with ESMTP id KAA24940 for ; Tue, 14 Mar 2000 10:14:20 -0800 (PST) Received: by msexch01.diebold.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21) id ; Tue, 14 Mar 2000 13:12:06 -0500 Date: Tue, 14 Mar 2000 13:11:54 -0500 From: "Plentovich, Dave" Subject: RE: diff-2.2.14-rmk5-np16.gz Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com To: "'Nicolas Pitre'" Cc: "Sa1100-Linux Group (E-mail)" Message-id: MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21) Content-type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Precedence: bulk I attempted to build arm-linux-2.2.14-rmk5-np16 for the BRUTUS board but the build failed. File linux/arch/arm/boot/compressed/head-sa1100.S failed becasue of a redefinition of GPIO_BASE. It looks like a section of code for CONFIG_SA1100_BRUTUS was duplicatd and this was causing the redefinition. I removed that section of code and everything built correctly and downloaded/ran correctly on BRUTUS. Below is the diff for head-sa1100.S (hope I used the correct order this time.) --- head-sa1100.S.old Tue Mar 14 08:42:04 2000 +++ head-sa1100.S Tue Mar 14 08:42:32 2000 @@ -122,65 +122,6 @@ str r1, [r0, #UTSR0] #endif -#ifdef CONFIG_SA1100_BRUTUS - @ Initialize UART1 for early serial communication - @ since UART3 is used by angelboot. It is routed to - @ alternate GPIO functions on Brutus. - b 1f - -GPIO_BASE: .long 0x90040000 -#define GPDR 0x04 -#define GAFR 0x1c - -PPC_BASE: .long 0x90060000 -#define PPAR 0x08 - -UART1_BASE: .long 0x80010000 -#define UTCR0 0x00 -#define UTCR1 0x04 -#define UTCR2 0x08 -#define UTCR3 0x0c -#define UTSR0 0x1c -#define UTSR1 0x20 - -#define BAUD_DIV_230400 0x000 -#define BAUD_DIV_115200 0x001 -#define BAUD_DIV_57600 0x003 -#define BAUD_DIV_38400 0x005 -#define BAUD_DIV_19200 0x00b -#define BAUD_DIV_9600 0x017 -#define BAUD_DIV BAUD_DIV_9600 - -1: ldr r0, GPIO_BASE - ldr r1, [r0, #GPDR] - bic r1, r1, #1<<15 - orr r1, r1, #1<<14 - str r1, [r0, #GPDR] - ldr r1, [r0, #GAFR] - orr r1, r1, #(1<<15)|(1<<14) - str r1, [r0, #GAFR] - ldr r0, PPC_BASE - ldr r1, [r0, #PPAR] - orr r1, r1, #1<<12 - str r1, [r0, #PPAR] - ldr r0, UART1_BASE -1: ldr r1, [r0, #UTSR1] - tst r1, #1<<0 @ TBY - bne 1b - mov r1, #0 - str r1, [r0, #UTCR3] - mov r1, #0x08 @ 8N1 - str r1, [r0, #UTCR0] - mov r1, #BAUD_DIV - str r1, [r0, #UTCR2] - mov r1, r1, lsr #8 - str r1, [r0, #UTCR1] - mov r1, #0x03 @ RXE + TXE - str r1, [r0, #UTCR3] - mov r1, #0xff @ flush status reg - str r1, [r0, #UTSR0] -#endif - @ set registers for entry mov r0, #0 mov r1, #16 Best regards, David Plentovich Diebold, Incorporated ATM Development & Engineering, Dept. 9-53-3 5995 Mayfair Road, North Canton, OH 44720, USA voice 330.490.5092, fax 330.490.4508 plentod@diebold.com -----Original Message----- From: Nicolas Pitre [mailto:nico@CAM.ORG] Sent: Saturday, March 11, 2000 9:51 PM To: SA-1100/Linux Subject: diff-2.2.14-rmk5-np16.gz ... is available right now from ftp.netwinder.org/users/n/nico. This contains: - serial fix for parity setting (Dave Plentovich) - wait-for-irq lockup workaround (David Chaiken) - ThinClient support - various changes to fit with 2.2.14-rmk5 - assorted fixes I've been running this version compiled with gcc-2.95.2 on my ThinClient with Titan VI over NFS ... and everything seem OK ! :-) It means that, for the first time, I have a 2.2.x kernel that behave correctly when compiled with gcc-2.95.2... or at least behave as well as if compiled with egcs-1.1.2. So I guess it might be OK for others too. Didn't test it on Brutus yet though. Also a 2.3.49 diff should be coming shortly. Have fun! Nicolas From kramer@pa.dec.com Tue Mar 14 23:29:47 2000 Return-Path: Received: from tudedr.et.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id XAA02124; Tue, 14 Mar 2000 23:29:47 +0100 (MET) Received: from mail1.digital.com by ITS.TUDelft.NL (PMDF V5.1-10 #21918) with ESMTP id <01JN1HDYKBO69GV5S0@ITS.TUDelft.NL> for erik@duteinh.et.tudelft.nl; Tue, 14 Mar 2000 23:29:39 +0100 Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id OAA32442; Tue, 14 Mar 2000 14:26:52 -0800 (PST) Received: from rex.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA15944; Tue, 14 Mar 2000 14:26:18 -0800 Received: by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id OAA13860; Tue, 14 Mar 2000 14:25:31 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id OAA13841; Tue, 14 Mar 2000 14:25:30 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail1.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA31467; Tue, 14 Mar 2000 14:25:30 -0800 Received: from xanadu.gn.com (modemcable248.137-200-24.mtl.mc.videotron.net [24.200.137.248]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with ESMTP id OAA06485 for ; Tue, 14 Mar 2000 14:25:29 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (nico@localhost) by xanadu.gn.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id RAA02820; Tue, 14 Mar 2000 17:30:58 -0500 Date: Tue, 14 Mar 2000 17:30:58 -0500 (EST) From: Nicolas Pitre Subject: RE: diff-2.2.14-rmk5-np16.gz In-reply-to: Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com X-Sender: nico@xanadu.gn.com To: "Plentovich, Dave" Cc: "Sa1100-Linux Group (E-mail)" Message-id: MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Precedence: bulk X-Authentication-warning: xanadu.gn.com: nico owned process doing -bs On Tue, 14 Mar 2000, Plentovich, Dave wrote: > I attempted to build arm-linux-2.2.14-rmk5-np16 for the BRUTUS board > but the build failed. Oops... Thanks. Patch sometimes produces strange results on an already patched file. Nicolas From kramer@pa.dec.com Fri Mar 17 03:26:48 2000 Return-Path: Received: from tudedr.et.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id DAA17578; Fri, 17 Mar 2000 03:26:48 +0100 (MET) Received: from mail2.digital.com by ITS.TUDelft.NL (PMDF V5.1-10 #21918) with ESMTP id <01JN4I9KA0XK9FMJDD@ITS.TUDelft.NL> for erik@duteinh.et.tudelft.nl; Fri, 17 Mar 2000 03:26:46 +0100 Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id SAA20060; Thu, 16 Mar 2000 18:23:37 -0800 (PST) Received: from rex.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA24504; Thu, 16 Mar 2000 18:22:52 -0800 Received: by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id SAA14774; Thu, 16 Mar 2000 18:20:33 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id SAA14788; Thu, 16 Mar 2000 18:20:32 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail2.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA02577; Thu, 16 Mar 2000 18:20:32 -0800 Received: from hydra.wireless-sys.com (dryline-fw.wireless-sys.com [216.126.67.45]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with ESMTP id SAA20088 for ; Thu, 16 Mar 2000 18:20:31 -0800 (PST) Received: from gordon.wireless-sys.com (gordon.wireless-sys.com [192.168.11.138]) by hydra.wireless-sys.com (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id VAA00827 for ; Thu, 16 Mar 2000 21:20:27 -0500 Date: Thu, 16 Mar 2000 21:20:16 -0500 (EST) From: "Scott K. Lindsay P.Eng." Subject: Device address weirdness Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com To: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Message-id: MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Precedence: bulk Dear all, I'm working on a device driver for SA1100 linux and running into a problem. I'm using 2.3.35 (with rmk & np patches) and gcc-2.95.2 toolchain. The driver currently uses a 10ms kernel timer to simulate an interrupt (the hardware's not fully baked yet). If I do the access to the device within the function triggered by the kernel timer, all is well. If I use the timer function to add the function to tq_immediate and mark it active, things are not so well. The device access function causes the kernel to freeze (no message, apparently no external bus activity). In an attempt to find out what the CPU is doing (if anything), I used the nowb and nocache command line parameters. If I do that the problem goes away. I've read as much of the sa1100-linux mailing list history as I have (thanks Nico) and this seems to indicate a cache coherence problem. The bit I don't understand is that I'm not doing any DMA --- the CPU freezes on a single write to a 16 bit device in the PCMCIA memory space. Does anyone have a suggestion? Is 2.3.35 a reasonable thing to be using? It seems stable enough (without the device driver). My apologies if this has already been discussed to death. skl -- Scott K. Lindsay, P.Eng. Wireless System Technologies Scott.Lindsay@wireless-sys.com From kramer@pa.dec.com Fri Mar 17 05:18:50 2000 Return-Path: Received: from tudedr.et.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id FAA17901; Fri, 17 Mar 2000 05:18:50 +0100 (MET) Received: from mail2.digital.com by ITS.TUDelft.NL (PMDF V5.1-10 #21918) with ESMTP id <01JN4M6GJ2V49FMJDD@ITS.TUDelft.NL> for erik@duteinh.et.tudelft.nl; Fri, 17 Mar 2000 05:18:48 +0100 Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id UAA26471; Thu, 16 Mar 2000 20:16:00 -0800 (PST) Received: from rex.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA18893; Thu, 16 Mar 2000 20:15:24 -0800 Received: by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id UAA14784; Thu, 16 Mar 2000 20:14:36 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id UAA14816; Thu, 16 Mar 2000 20:14:35 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail1.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA32135; Thu, 16 Mar 2000 20:14:35 -0800 Received: from xanadu.gn.com (modemcable248.137-200-24.mtl.mc.videotron.net [24.200.137.248]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with ESMTP id UAA02002 for ; Thu, 16 Mar 2000 20:14:24 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (nico@localhost) by xanadu.gn.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id XAA24160; Thu, 16 Mar 2000 23:19:52 -0500 Date: Thu, 16 Mar 2000 23:19:51 -0500 (EST) From: Nicolas Pitre Subject: Re: Device address weirdness In-reply-to: Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com X-Sender: nico@xanadu.gn.com To: "Scott K. Lindsay P.Eng." Cc: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Message-id: MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Precedence: bulk X-Authentication-warning: xanadu.gn.com: nico owned process doing -bs On Thu, 16 Mar 2000, Scott K. Lindsay P.Eng. wrote: > Dear all, > > I'm working on a device driver for SA1100 linux and running > into a problem. I'm using 2.3.35 (with rmk & np patches) and > gcc-2.95.2 toolchain. The driver currently uses a 10ms kernel > timer to simulate an interrupt (the hardware's not fully baked > yet). You could use OSMR1 to generate interrupts, since this interrupt could be assigned and registered by your driver. This would make your setup more like if it was a real life interrupt with variable intervals and won't be synchronized on the OS timer. > If I do the access to the device within the function triggered > by the kernel timer, all is well. If I use the timer function > to add the function to tq_immediate and mark it active, things are > not so well. The device access function causes the kernel to freeze > (no message, apparently no external bus activity). In an attempt > to find out what the CPU is doing (if anything), I used the nowb > and nocache command line parameters. If I do that the problem goes > away. I would rather suspect a timing issue than cache coherency, especially when PCMCIA mem space isn't cacheable. Beware 16-bit access on 8-bit devices -- I think there is an erata about that for the SA1100. Nicolas From kramer@pa.dec.com Fri Mar 17 15:42:51 2000 Return-Path: Received: from tudedr.et.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id PAA21246; Fri, 17 Mar 2000 15:42:51 +0100 (MET) Received: from mail1.digital.com by ITS.TUDelft.NL (PMDF V5.1-10 #21918) with ESMTP id <01JN57Y4H3GG9FMK3G@ITS.TUDelft.NL> for erik@duteinh.et.tudelft.nl; Fri, 17 Mar 2000 15:42:48 +0100 Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id GAA07828; Fri, 17 Mar 2000 06:40:00 -0800 (PST) Received: from rex.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA07796; Fri, 17 Mar 2000 06:39:29 -0800 Received: by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id GAA15018; Fri, 17 Mar 2000 06:39:15 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id GAA14913; Fri, 17 Mar 2000 06:39:14 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail1.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA22918; Fri, 17 Mar 2000 06:39:14 -0800 Received: from xanadu.vipswitch.com (generic199.197.205.205.in-addr.arpa [205.205.197.199] (may be forged)) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with ESMTP id GAA05242 for ; Fri, 17 Mar 2000 06:39:12 -0800 (PST) Date: Fri, 17 Mar 2000 04:37:36 -0500 (EST) From: Nicolas Pitre Subject: Re: Bringing up 2.2.14 kernel on SA1110 (Intel Zilker board) In-reply-to: Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com To: Jeff Sutherland Cc: "SA1100 Linux mailing list (E-mail)" Message-id: MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Precedence: bulk On Fri, 17 Mar 2000, Jeff Sutherland wrote: > The kernel source tree with arm patches doesn't include a config for the > SA1110, although it has SA1100. Has anyone successfully created a > configuration for the SA1110 chip? It doesn't look difficult, just tedious. I'm waiting for my SA1110 board to do so, but if anyone is ahead of me I welcome patches! :-) > Plus, a new processor ID has to be added and apparently a new > include/asm-arm/arch-sa1110 directory as well. Please advise... Yep for the proc ID, but there is no need for a arch-sa1110 directory. SA1100 and SA1110 __architectures__ are the same, or similar enough to be considered the same. Nicolas From kramer@pa.dec.com Fri Mar 17 20:08:42 2000 Return-Path: Received: from tudedr.et.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id UAA22582; Fri, 17 Mar 2000 20:08:42 +0100 (MET) Received: from mail2.digital.com by ITS.TUDelft.NL (PMDF V5.1-10 #21918) with ESMTP id <01JN5H8QJHQU9FMKSI@ITS.TUDelft.NL> for erik@duteinh.et.tudelft.nl; Fri, 17 Mar 2000 20:08:40 +0100 Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id LAA08822; Fri, 17 Mar 2000 11:05:49 -0800 (PST) Received: from rex.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA26528; Fri, 17 Mar 2000 11:05:18 -0800 Received: by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id LAA15136; Fri, 17 Mar 2000 11:05:12 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id LAA15151; Fri, 17 Mar 2000 11:05:11 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail1.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA05209; Fri, 17 Mar 2000 11:05:11 -0800 Received: from xanadu.vipswitch.com (generic199.197.205.205.in-addr.arpa [205.205.197.199] (may be forged)) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with ESMTP id LAA26622 for ; Fri, 17 Mar 2000 11:05:09 -0800 (PST) Date: Fri, 17 Mar 2000 08:56:43 -0500 (EST) From: Nicolas Pitre Subject: RE: Bringing up 2.2.14 kernel on SA1110 (Intel Zilker board) In-reply-to: Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com To: "Latham, Steve" Cc: "'Jeff Sutherland'" , "'SA1100-linux@pa.dec.com'" Message-id: MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Precedence: bulk On Fri, 17 Mar 2000, Latham, Steve wrote: > Takafumi Kawana at Kasara Research has done the port but can't release for > competition reasons. Hmmm... As long as they keep it for themselves only and have no plan of distributing any product or binary without source code. Otherwise it's a GPL violation. Anyway the amount of work involved is very little. Really. So there is not much of a competitive advantage there. Nicolas From kramer@pa.dec.com Fri Mar 17 15:29:29 2000 Return-Path: Received: from tudedr.et.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id PAA21154; Fri, 17 Mar 2000 15:29:28 +0100 (MET) Received: from mail1.digital.com by ITS.TUDelft.NL (PMDF V5.1-10 #21918) with ESMTP id <01JN57HGPE7E9GV64D@ITS.TUDelft.NL> for erik@duteinh.et.tudelft.nl; Fri, 17 Mar 2000 15:29:19 +0100 Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id GAA08487; Fri, 17 Mar 2000 06:21:24 -0800 (PST) Received: from rex.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA17954; Fri, 17 Mar 2000 06:20:40 -0800 Received: by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id GAA15015; Fri, 17 Mar 2000 06:19:41 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id GAA15014; Fri, 17 Mar 2000 06:19:40 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail2.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA08782; Fri, 17 Mar 2000 06:19:40 -0800 Received: from ice.ar51.net (IDENT:root@ice.ar51.net [208.225.80.11]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with ESMTP id GAA18728 for ; Fri, 17 Mar 2000 06:19:39 -0800 (PST) Received: from server01.asi (akron-80-169.ar51.net [208.225.80.169]) by ice.ar51.net (8.9.3/8.8.7) with ESMTP id JAA08532 for ; Fri, 17 Mar 2000 09:19:48 -0500 Received: by SERVER01 with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2448.0) id ; Fri, 17 Mar 2000 09:19:28 -0500 Date: Fri, 17 Mar 2000 09:19:27 -0500 From: Jeff Sutherland Subject: Bringing up 2.2.14 kernel on SA1110 (Intel Zilker board) Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com To: "SA1100 Linux mailing list (E-mail)" Message-id: MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2448.0) Content-type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Precedence: bulk The kernel source tree with arm patches doesn't include a config for the SA1110, although it has SA1100. Has anyone successfully created a configuration for the SA1110 chip? It doesn't look difficult, just tedious. Plus, a new processor ID has to be added and apparently a new include/asm-arm/arch-sa1110 directory as well. Please advise... Regards, //Jeff From kramer@pa.dec.com Fri Mar 17 16:36:38 2000 Return-Path: Received: from tudedr.et.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id QAA21636; Fri, 17 Mar 2000 16:36:37 +0100 (MET) Received: from mail2.digital.com by ITS.TUDelft.NL (PMDF V5.1-10 #21918) with ESMTP id <01JN59TVZP0W9GV64F@ITS.TUDelft.NL> for erik@duteinh.et.tudelft.nl; Fri, 17 Mar 2000 16:36:35 +0100 Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id HAA23553; Fri, 17 Mar 2000 07:27:50 -0800 (PST) Received: from rex.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA06178; Fri, 17 Mar 2000 07:27:14 -0800 Received: by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id HAA15067; Fri, 17 Mar 2000 07:27:00 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id HAA15063; Fri, 17 Mar 2000 07:26:59 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail1.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA02600; Fri, 17 Mar 2000 07:26:59 -0800 Received: from fwsrv2.itt.com (fwsrv2.itt.com [151.190.254.230]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id HAA12093 for ; Fri, 17 Mar 2000 07:26:58 -0800 (PST) Received: by fwsrv2.itt.com; (5.65v4.0/1.3/10May95) id AA29586; Fri, 17 Mar 2000 10:25:43 -0500 Received: by fwemail2.de.ittind.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21) id ; Fri, 17 Mar 2000 10:25:41 -0500 Date: Fri, 17 Mar 2000 10:25:41 -0500 From: "Latham, Steve" Subject: RE: Bringing up 2.2.14 kernel on SA1110 (Intel Zilker board) Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com To: "'SA1100-linux@pa.dec.com'" Message-id: MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21) Content-type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Precedence: bulk I'm working on it but at the moment its crashing when the MMU is turned on. I'm using 0x6901b110 that Takafumi Kawana gave me. Steve -----Original Message----- From: Nicolas Pitre [mailto:nico@CAM.ORG] Sent: Friday, March 17, 2000 4:38 AM To: Jeff Sutherland Cc: SA1100 Linux mailing list (E-mail) Subject: Re: Bringing up 2.2.14 kernel on SA1110 (Intel Zilker board) On Fri, 17 Mar 2000, Jeff Sutherland wrote: > The kernel source tree with arm patches doesn't include a config for the > SA1110, although it has SA1100. Has anyone successfully created a > configuration for the SA1110 chip? It doesn't look difficult, just tedious. I'm waiting for my SA1110 board to do so, but if anyone is ahead of me I welcome patches! :-) > Plus, a new processor ID has to be added and apparently a new > include/asm-arm/arch-sa1110 directory as well. Please advise... Yep for the proc ID, but there is no need for a arch-sa1110 directory. SA1100 and SA1110 __architectures__ are the same, or similar enough to be considered the same. Nicolas From kramer@pa.dec.com Fri Mar 17 16:49:27 2000 Return-Path: Received: from tudedr.et.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id QAA21707; Fri, 17 Mar 2000 16:49:27 +0100 (MET) Received: from mail1.digital.com by ITS.TUDelft.NL (PMDF V5.1-10 #21918) with ESMTP id <01JN5AAPKXQS9GV64F@ITS.TUDelft.NL> for erik@duteinh.et.tudelft.nl; Fri, 17 Mar 2000 16:49:24 +0100 Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id HAA13397; Fri, 17 Mar 2000 07:46:35 -0800 (PST) Received: from rex.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA26654; Fri, 17 Mar 2000 07:46:04 -0800 Received: by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id HAA15080; Fri, 17 Mar 2000 07:45:56 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id HAA15047; Fri, 17 Mar 2000 07:45:55 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail2.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA30853; Fri, 17 Mar 2000 07:45:55 -0800 Received: from ice.ar51.net (IDENT:root@ice.ar51.net [208.225.80.11]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with ESMTP id HAA31007 for ; Fri, 17 Mar 2000 07:45:54 -0800 (PST) Received: from server01.asi (akron-80-169.ar51.net [208.225.80.169]) by ice.ar51.net (8.9.3/8.8.7) with ESMTP id KAA13338; Fri, 17 Mar 2000 10:45:41 -0500 Received: by SERVER01 with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2448.0) id ; Fri, 17 Mar 2000 10:45:21 -0500 Date: Fri, 17 Mar 2000 10:45:20 -0500 From: Jeff Sutherland Subject: RE: Bringing up 2.2.14 kernel on SA1110 (Intel Zilker board) Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com To: "'Latham, Steve'" Cc: "SA1100 Linux mailing list (E-mail)" Message-id: MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2448.0) Content-type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Precedence: bulk I'm working on it but at the moment its crashing when the MMU is turned on. I'm using 0x6901b110 that Takafumi Kawana gave me. Steve My processor returns 0x6901b114 (B0 stepping). I suspect there may be some subtle differences between the MMU on this part and on SA1100, but I haven't gotten that far with the kernel. Maybe I should write some debug code to test it out before attempting to bring up a kernel... //Jeff From kramer@pa.dec.com Fri Mar 17 18:04:06 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id SAA22096; Fri, 17 Mar 2000 18:04:05 +0100 (MET) Received: from ns2.tudelft.nl (ns2.tudelft.nl [130.161.180.65]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.8.6 (PHNE_17135)/8.8.6) with ESMTP id SAA00574 for ; Fri, 17 Mar 2000 18:04:05 +0100 (MET) Received: from mail2.digital.com (mail2.digital.com [204.123.2.56]) by mailhost1.tudelft.nl (PMDF V5.2-32 #42432) with ESMTP id <0FRK0070KSQQET@mailhost1.tudelft.nl> for J.A.K.Mouw@its.tudelft.nl; Fri, 17 Mar 2000 18:04:04 +0100 (MET) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id IAA02601; Fri, 17 Mar 2000 08:58:21 -0800 (PST) Received: from rex.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA32424; Fri, 17 Mar 2000 08:57:45 -0800 Received: by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id IAA15093; Fri, 17 Mar 2000 08:57:09 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id IAA15082; Fri, 17 Mar 2000 08:57:08 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail2.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA18189; Fri, 17 Mar 2000 08:57:08 -0800 Received: from fwsrv2.itt.com (fwsrv2.itt.com [151.190.254.230]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id IAA03348 for ; Fri, 17 Mar 2000 08:57:07 -0800 (PST) Received: by fwsrv2.itt.com; (5.65v4.0/1.3/10May95) id AA23047; Fri, 17 Mar 2000 11:55:51 -0500 Received: by fwemail2.de.ittind.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21) id ; Fri, 17 Mar 2000 11:55:46 -0500 Date: Fri, 17 Mar 2000 11:55:44 -0500 From: "Latham, Steve" Subject: RE: Bringing up 2.2.14 kernel on SA1110 (Intel Zilker board) Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com To: "'Jeff Sutherland'" Cc: "'SA1100-linux@pa.dec.com'" Message-id: MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21) Content-type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Precedence: bulk Takafumi Kawana at Kasara Research has done the port but can't release for competition reasons. Steve -----Original Message----- From: Jeff Sutherland [mailto:jsutherland@accelent.com] Sent: Friday, March 17, 2000 10:45 AM To: 'Latham, Steve' Cc: SA1100 Linux mailing list (E-mail) Subject: RE: Bringing up 2.2.14 kernel on SA1110 (Intel Zilker board) I'm working on it but at the moment its crashing when the MMU is turned on. I'm using 0x6901b110 that Takafumi Kawana gave me. Steve My processor returns 0x6901b114 (B0 stepping). I suspect there may be some subtle differences between the MMU on this part and on SA1100, but I haven't gotten that far with the kernel. Maybe I should write some debug code to test it out before attempting to bring up a kernel... //Jeff From kramer@pa.dec.com Fri Mar 17 20:08:41 2000 Return-Path: Received: from tudedr.et.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id UAA22578; Fri, 17 Mar 2000 20:08:40 +0100 (MET) Received: from mail2.digital.com by ITS.TUDelft.NL (PMDF V5.1-10 #21918) with ESMTP id <01JN5H8R679M9FMKSI@ITS.TUDelft.NL> for erik@duteinh.et.tudelft.nl; Fri, 17 Mar 2000 20:08:37 +0100 Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id LAA11635; Fri, 17 Mar 2000 11:05:24 -0800 (PST) Received: from rex.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA19367; Fri, 17 Mar 2000 11:04:47 -0800 Received: by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id LAA15127; Fri, 17 Mar 2000 11:04:07 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id LAA15130; Fri, 17 Mar 2000 11:04:06 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail2.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA26226; Fri, 17 Mar 2000 11:04:06 -0800 Received: from fwsrv2.itt.com (fwsrv2.itt.com [151.190.254.230]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id LAA10138 for ; Fri, 17 Mar 2000 11:04:05 -0800 (PST) Received: by fwsrv2.itt.com; (5.65v4.0/1.3/10May95) id AA01373; Fri, 17 Mar 2000 14:02:40 -0500 Received: by fwemail2.de.ittind.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21) id ; Fri, 17 Mar 2000 14:02:38 -0500 Date: Fri, 17 Mar 2000 14:02:35 -0500 From: "Latham, Steve" Subject: RE: Bringing up 2.2.14 kernel on SA1110 (Intel Zilker board) Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com To: "'Nicolas Pitre'" Cc: "'SA1100-linux@pa.dec.com'" Message-id: MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21) Content-type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Precedence: bulk No, I meant their hardware -----Original Message----- From: Nicolas Pitre [mailto:nico@cam.org] Sent: Friday, March 17, 2000 8:57 AM To: Latham, Steve Cc: 'Jeff Sutherland'; 'SA1100-linux@pa.dec.com' Subject: RE: Bringing up 2.2.14 kernel on SA1110 (Intel Zilker board) On Fri, 17 Mar 2000, Latham, Steve wrote: > Takafumi Kawana at Kasara Research has done the port but can't release for > competition reasons. Hmmm... As long as they keep it for themselves only and have no plan of distributing any product or binary without source code. Otherwise it's a GPL violation. Anyway the amount of work involved is very little. Really. So there is not much of a competitive advantage there. Nicolas From kramer@pa.dec.com Mon Mar 20 04:43:23 2000 Return-Path: Received: from tudedr.et.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id EAA01682; Mon, 20 Mar 2000 04:43:22 +0100 (MET) Received: from mail1.digital.com by ITS.TUDelft.NL (PMDF V5.1-10 #21918) with ESMTP id <01JN8RSK0OXY9GV65X@ITS.TUDelft.NL> for erik@duteinh.et.tudelft.nl; Mon, 20 Mar 2000 04:43:22 +0100 Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id TAA29820; Sun, 19 Mar 2000 19:39:27 -0800 (PST) Received: from rex.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA01423; Sun, 19 Mar 2000 19:38:45 -0800 Received: by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id TAA16039; Sun, 19 Mar 2000 19:34:10 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id TAA16021; Sun, 19 Mar 2000 19:34:09 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail2.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA30184; Sun, 19 Mar 2000 19:34:08 -0800 Received: from xanadu.gn.com (modemcable248.137-200-24.mtl.mc.videotron.net [24.200.137.248]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with ESMTP id TAA03771 for ; Sun, 19 Mar 2000 19:33:53 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (nico@localhost) by xanadu.gn.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id WAA15935 for ; Sun, 19 Mar 2000 22:39:30 -0500 Date: Sun, 19 Mar 2000 22:39:30 -0500 (EST) From: Nicolas Pitre Subject: diff-2.3.99-pre1-rmk1-np1.gz Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com X-Sender: nico@xanadu.gn.com To: SA-1100/Linux Message-id: MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Precedence: bulk X-Authentication-warning: xanadu.gn.com: nico owned process doing -bs (hmmm, with all sufixes it gets long...) It's available from ftp.netwinder.org/users/n/nico. This includes all the fixes the last 2.2.14 patch has, plus many other things I forget. Have fun! Nicolas From kramer@pa.dec.com Mon Mar 20 19:30:06 2000 Return-Path: Received: from tudedr.et.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id TAA06901; Mon, 20 Mar 2000 19:30:06 +0100 (MET) Received: from mail1.digital.com by ITS.TUDelft.NL (PMDF V5.1-10 #21918) with ESMTP id <01JN9MRWZQV69FMQ2H@ITS.TUDelft.NL> for erik@duteinh.et.tudelft.nl; Mon, 20 Mar 2000 19:30:03 +0100 Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id KAA04565; Mon, 20 Mar 2000 10:26:34 -0800 (PST) Received: from rex.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA31986; Mon, 20 Mar 2000 10:25:51 -0800 Received: by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id KAA16263; Mon, 20 Mar 2000 10:23:27 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id KAA16250; Mon, 20 Mar 2000 10:23:26 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail2.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA22627; Mon, 20 Mar 2000 10:23:26 -0800 Received: from chmls06.mediaone.net (chmls06.mediaone.net [24.128.1.71]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with ESMTP id KAA01121 for ; Mon, 20 Mar 2000 10:23:25 -0800 (PST) Received: from brightstareng.com (h0060082e53bb.ne.mediaone.net [24.128.220.79]) by chmls06.mediaone.net (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id NAA01367; Mon, 20 Mar 2000 13:20:00 -0500 (EST) Date: Mon, 20 Mar 2000 13:19:44 -0500 From: Stuart Adams Subject: Re: Bringing up 2.2.14 kernel on SA1110 (Intel Zilker board) Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com To: Jeff Sutherland Cc: "SA1100 Linux mailing list (E-mail)" Message-id: <38D66BC0.CBD484EB@brightstareng.com> Organization: Bright Star Engineering Inc. MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.72 [en]C-MOENE (WinNT; U) Content-type: multipart/mixed; boundary="------------60CBCEE892B1E6D13A9C2EE0" Precedence: bulk X-Accept-Language: en References: This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------60CBCEE892B1E6D13A9C2EE0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit > Has anyone successfully created a > configuration for the SA1110 chip? Well attached is a quick patchset of a base build tree for one of our SA1110 boards against the original 2.3.25-rmk1-np6 sources. (At one point I think we did have 2.2.X working too). (I would just use this as a reference, we were in a hurry and just patched over top of the SA1110/Brutus config. (Serial console is on part 1 at 57,600 baud)) -- Stuart ----------------------------------- Stuart Adams Bright Star Engineering Inc. 19 Enfield Drive Andover MA 01810 USA Tel: +1-978-470-8738 Fax: +1-978-470-8878 Email: sja@brightstareng.com Web: http://www.brightstareng.com/ --------------60CBCEE892B1E6D13A9C2EE0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; name="diffs" Content-Disposition: inline; filename="diffs" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit diff -ur linux/arch/arm/boot/compressed/head-sa1100.S linux_new/arch/arm/boot/compressed/head-sa1100.S --- linux/arch/arm/boot/compressed/head-sa1100.S Fri Mar 17 16:05:16 2000 +++ linux_new/arch/arm/boot/compressed/head-sa1100.S Fri Mar 17 13:25:52 2000 @@ -17,7 +17,7 @@ #error What am I doing here... #endif -#ifdef CONFIG_SA1100_BRUTUS +#ifdef CONFIG_SA1100_BRUTUSZ @ need to enter SVC mode #define angel_SWIreason_EnterSVC 0x17 /* from arm.h, in angel source */ #define angel_SWI_ARM (0xEF123456 & 0xffffff) @@ -60,7 +60,7 @@ orr r0, r0, #0x1000 @ set Icache mcr p15, 0, r0, c1, c0, 0 -#ifdef CONFIG_SA1100_BRUTUS +#ifdef CONFIG_SA1100_BRUTUSZ @ Initialize UART1 for early serial communication @ since UART3 is used by angelboot. It is routed to @ alternate GPIO functions on Brutus. diff -ur linux/arch/arm/boot/compressed/head.S linux_new/arch/arm/boot/compressed/head.S --- linux/arch/arm/boot/compressed/head.S Fri Mar 17 16:05:08 2000 +++ linux_new/arch/arm/boot/compressed/head.S Fri Mar 17 13:25:52 2000 @@ -144,9 +150,15 @@ mov r0, r4 bl memdump #endif - eor r0, r6, #0x44 << 24 @ SA-110 or SA-1100? + @eor r0, r6, #0x44 << 24 @ SA-110 or SA-1100? + @eor r0, r0, #0x01 << 16 + @eor r0, r0, #0xa1 << 8 + @movs r0, r0, lsr #5 + @mcreq p15, 0, r0, c7, c7, 0 @ flush I cache + @mcreq p15, 0, r1, c7, c10, 4 @ drain WB + eor r0, r6, #0x69 << 24 @ SA-110 or SA-1100? eor r0, r0, #0x01 << 16 - eor r0, r0, #0xa1 << 8 + eor r0, r0, #0xb1 << 8 movs r0, r0, lsr #5 mcreq p15, 0, r0, c7, c7, 0 @ flush I cache mcreq p15, 0, r1, c7, c10, 4 @ drain WB diff -ur linux/arch/arm/kernel/head-armv.S linux_new/arch/arm/kernel/head-armv.S --- linux/arch/arm/kernel/head-armv.S Fri Mar 17 16:05:08 2000 +++ linux_new/arch/arm/kernel/head-armv.S Fri Mar 17 13:25:52 2000 @@ -24,7 +24,10 @@ .section ".text.init",#alloc,#execinstr ENTRY(stext) ENTRY(_stext) + mov r0, #0 + mov r1, #0x10 + #ifdef CONFIG_ARCH_NETWINDER /* * Compatability cruft for old NetWinder NeTTroms. This diff -ur linux/arch/arm/kernel/setup.c linux_new/arch/arm/kernel/setup.c --- linux/arch/arm/kernel/setup.c Fri Mar 17 16:05:16 2000 +++ linux_new/arch/arm/kernel/setup.c Fri Mar 17 15:37:37 2000 @@ -708,7 +708,7 @@ } meminfo.nr_banks = i; -#if defined(CONFIG_SA1100_BRUTUS) +#if defined(CONFIG_SA1100_BRUTUSZZ) ROOT_DEV = MKDEV(RAMDISK_MAJOR,0); setup_ramdisk( 1, 0, 0, 8192 ); setup_initrd( __phys_to_virt(0xd8000000), 3*1024*1024 ); diff -ur linux/arch/arm/mm/mm-sa1100.c linux_new/arch/arm/mm/mm-sa1100.c --- linux/arch/arm/mm/mm-sa1100.c Fri Mar 17 16:05:16 2000 +++ linux_new/arch/arm/mm/mm-sa1100.c Fri Mar 17 13:25:52 2000 @@ -34,10 +34,7 @@ unsigned long length; } mem_desc[] __initdata = { #if defined(CONFIG_SA1100_BRUTUS) - { 0xc0000000, 0x00400000 }, /* 4MB */ - { 0xc8000000, 0x00400000 }, /* 4MB */ - { 0xd0000000, 0x00400000 }, /* 4MB */ - { 0xd8000000, 0x00400000 } /* 4MB */ + { 0xc0000000, 0x01000000 }, /* 16MB */ #elif defined(CONFIG_SA1100_EMPEG) { 0xc0000000, 0x00400000 }, /* 4MB */ { 0xc8000000, 0x00400000 } /* 4MB */ diff -ur linux/arch/arm/mm/proc-sa110.S linux_new/arch/arm/mm/proc-sa110.S --- linux/arch/arm/mm/proc-sa110.S Fri Mar 17 16:05:08 2000 +++ linux_new/arch/arm/mm/proc-sa110.S Fri Mar 17 13:25:52 2000 @@ -578,5 +578,16 @@ .long cpu_sa1100_info .long sa1100_processor_functions .size __sa1100_proc_info, . - __sa1100_proc_info +__sa1110_proc_info: + .long 0x0001b110 + .long 0x00fffff0 + .long 0x00000c02 + b __sa110_setup + .long cpu_arch_name + .long cpu_elf_name + .long HWCAP_SWP | HWCAP_HALF | HWCAP_26BIT + .long cpu_sa1100_info + .long sa1100_processor_functions + .size __sa1100_proc_info, . - __sa1100_proc_info diff -ur linux/arch/arm/special/Makefile linux_new/arch/arm/special/Makefile --- linux/arch/arm/special/Makefile Fri Mar 17 16:05:16 2000 +++ linux_new/arch/arm/special/Makefile Fri Mar 17 13:25:52 2000 @@ -24,7 +24,7 @@ KEYB_ebsa110 := KEYB_footbridge := defkeymap.o pc_keyb.o -ifeq ($(CONFIG_SA1100_BRUTUS),y) +ifeq ($(CONFIG_SA1100_BRUTUSXX),y) KEYB_sa1100 := brutus_keyb.o defkeymap-acorn.o endif ifeq ($(CONFIG_SA1100_TIFON),y) diff -ur linux/drivers/char/serial_sa1100.c linux_new/drivers/char/serial_sa1100.c --- linux/drivers/char/serial_sa1100.c Fri Mar 17 16:05:18 2000 +++ linux_new/drivers/char/serial_sa1100.c Fri Mar 17 13:25:52 2000 @@ -2326,7 +2326,7 @@ break; case (int)&Ser1UTCR0: /* uart serial port 1 on sa1100 */ -#if defined( CONFIG_SA1100_BRUTUS ) || defined( CONFIG_SA1100_TIFON ) || \ +#if defined( CONFIG_SA1100_BRUTUSZ ) || defined( CONFIG_SA1100_TIFON ) || \ defined( CONFIG_SA1100_LART ) /* set up for using alternate UART */ GAFR |= (GPIO_GPIO14 | GPIO_GPIO15); @@ -2418,8 +2418,8 @@ /* Life in the fast lane */ B115200 #else - /* A little pedestrian... */ - B9600 + /* A little pedestrian... sja was 9600*/ + B57600 #endif | CS8 | CREAD | HUPCL | CLOCAL; serial_driver.flags = TTY_DRIVER_REAL_RAW; @@ -2652,16 +2652,18 @@ serial_echo_port[UTCR3] = UTCR3_TXE; /* Turn on transmitter */ #elif defined( CONFIG_SA1100_BRUTUS ) serial_echo_port = (unsigned long *)&Ser1UTCR0; +#if 0 /* set up for using alternate UART */ GAFR |= (GPIO_GPIO14 | GPIO_GPIO15); GPDR |= GPIO_GPIO14; GPDR &= ~GPIO_GPIO15; PPAR |= PPAR_UPR; +#endif serial_echo_port[UTCR3] = 0; /* Disable all interrupts for now */ serial_echo_port[UTCR0] = 0x08; /* No parity, 8 bits, 1 stop */ serial_echo_port[UTCR1] = 0; /* 9600 baud */ - serial_echo_port[UTCR2] = 0x17; + serial_echo_port[UTCR2] = 0x3; /* sja was 0x17 */ serial_echo_port[UTCR3] = UTCR3_TXE; /* Turn on transmitter */ #elif defined( CONFIG_SA1100_VICTOR ) serial_echo_port= (unsigned long *)&Ser3UTCR0; --------------60CBCEE892B1E6D13A9C2EE0-- From kramer@pa.dec.com Mon Mar 20 21:04:09 2000 Return-Path: Received: from tudedr.et.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id VAA07390; Mon, 20 Mar 2000 21:04:09 +0100 (MET) Received: from mail1.digital.com by ITS.TUDelft.NL (PMDF V5.1-10 #21918) with ESMTP id <01JN9Q2KHR429GV6EJ@ITS.TUDelft.NL> for erik@duteinh.et.tudelft.nl; Mon, 20 Mar 2000 21:04:07 +0100 Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id MAA31779; Mon, 20 Mar 2000 12:01:19 -0800 (PST) Received: from rex.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA13812; Mon, 20 Mar 2000 12:00:31 -0800 Received: by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id LAA16278; Mon, 20 Mar 2000 11:58:37 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id LAA16299; Mon, 20 Mar 2000 11:58:35 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail2.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA16696; Mon, 20 Mar 2000 11:58:35 -0800 Received: from thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (thorgal.et.tudelft.nl [130.161.40.91]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with ESMTP id LAA08960 for ; Mon, 20 Mar 2000 11:58:34 -0800 (PST) Received: from [130.161.40.82] (tvs082.et.tudelft.nl [130.161.40.82]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id UAA04165; Mon, 20 Mar 2000 20:58:24 +0100 Date: Mon, 20 Mar 2000 20:57:22 +0100 From: "J.D. Bakker" Subject: Announce: LART hardware distribution released. Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com To: pleb@cse.unsw.edu.au, sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com, linux-arm@vger.rutgers.edu Cc: lart@lart.tudelft.nl Message-id: MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Precedence: bulk Hi all, We've released all the CAD files required for building the LART under an Open Hardware-ish license. All files can be found at http://www.lart.tudelft.nl . The LART is a small yet powerful embedded computer capable of running Linux, built around an Intel SA-1100 StrongARM processor. Its performance is around 250 MIPS while consuming less than 1 Watt of power. In a standard configuration it holds 32MB DRAM and 4MB Flash ROM, which is sufficient for a Linux kernel and a sizeable ramdisk image. No computer is an island. We have designed I/O boards for LART, offering audio I/O, IDE (can you say MP3man ?), Ethernet, PS2, IrDA, USB, video out, telco and touchscreen interface. More boards are in various stages of development, including video in, GPS and inertial navigation. We intend to release all these PCB designs under the same open license. On this site you can also get BLOB, our BootLoader Object; and a recipe for building a Linux kernel and a crosscompiler toolchain. There's also a majordomo list discussing the ins and outs of SA-based embedded computing in general and LARTish stuff in specific; the address is lart@lart.tudelft.nl, see http://www.lart.tudelft.nl/list/ how to get there from here. Note: we don't sell the stuff, we just try to give back to the community. You could see us as a fabless PCB design group ;-) If you have any more questions, don't hesitate to ask. Sincerely, Jan-Derk Bakker. -- LART. 250 MIPS under one Watt. Free hardware design files. http://www.lart.tudelft.nl From kramer@pa.dec.com Tue Mar 21 08:55:25 2000 Return-Path: Received: from tudedr.et.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id IAA10130; Tue, 21 Mar 2000 08:55:25 +0100 (MET) Received: from mail2.digital.com by ITS.TUDelft.NL (PMDF V5.1-10 #21918) with ESMTP id <01JNAEWFXNGE9GV6F5@ITS.TUDelft.NL> for erik@duteinh.et.tudelft.nl; Tue, 21 Mar 2000 08:55:23 +0100 Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id XAA22453; Mon, 20 Mar 2000 23:51:59 -0800 (PST) Received: from rex.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA24126; Mon, 20 Mar 2000 23:51:21 -0800 Received: by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id XAA16561; Mon, 20 Mar 2000 23:49:18 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id XAA16526; Mon, 20 Mar 2000 23:49:18 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail1.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA30447; Mon, 20 Mar 2000 23:49:17 -0800 Received: from funai-tky.co.jp (ns.funai-tky.co.jp [210.154.37.2]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with ESMTP id XAA12173 for ; Mon, 20 Mar 2000 23:49:16 -0800 (PST) Received: from hiropu ([192.168.1.19]) by funai-tky.co.jp (8.9.1/3.7Wpr7-98092916) with SMTP id QAA14696 for ; Tue, 21 Mar 2000 16:49:10 +0900 Date: Tue, 21 Mar 2000 16:48:58 +0900 From: Hiroshi Ishii Subject: Re: Bringing up 2.2.14 kernel on SA1110 (Intel Zilker board) In-reply-to: Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com To: sa1100 mailng list Message-id: <38D7296A4C.919AHIROSHI@ns.funai-tky.co.jp> MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Becky! ver 1.25.09 Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk References: On Fri, 17 Mar 2000 10:25:41 -0500 "Latham, Steve" wrote: > > I'm working on it but at the moment its crashing when the MMU is turned on. > I'm using 0x6901b110 that Takafumi Kawana gave me. > Steve > Me too. But 2.3.35 or 2.3.99 working good. It's strange. In 2.2.14, stop before flush_tlb_all() at arch/arm/mm/init.c ---- Funai Electric R & D Co.,LTD Hiroshi Ishii From kramer@pa.dec.com Tue Mar 21 14:13:44 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id OAA12537; Tue, 21 Mar 2000 14:13:40 +0100 (MET) Received: from ns2.tudelft.nl (ns2.tudelft.nl [130.161.180.65]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.8.6 (PHNE_17135)/8.8.6) with ESMTP id OAA09712 for ; Tue, 21 Mar 2000 14:13:40 +0100 (MET) Received: from mail1.digital.com (mail1.digital.com [204.123.2.50]) by mailhost1.tudelft.nl (PMDF V5.2-32 #42432) with ESMTP id <0FRR00AJQWQRIC@mailhost1.tudelft.nl> for J.A.K.Mouw@its.tudelft.nl; Tue, 21 Mar 2000 14:13:40 +0100 (MET) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id FAA25591; Tue, 21 Mar 2000 05:07:15 -0800 (PST) Received: from rex.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA19543; Tue, 21 Mar 2000 05:06:36 -0800 Received: by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id FAA16654; Tue, 21 Mar 2000 05:05:50 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id FAA16641; Tue, 21 Mar 2000 05:05:49 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail2.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA12764; Tue, 21 Mar 2000 05:05:48 -0800 Received: from hw.ia.ac.cn (IDENT:root@[159.226.21.134]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with ESMTP id FAA05938 for ; Tue, 21 Mar 2000 05:05:45 -0800 (PST) Received: from dai ([159.226.21.171]) by hw.ia.ac.cn (8.9.3/8.8.7) with SMTP id UAA12984; Tue, 21 Mar 2000 20:52:59 -0800 Date: Tue, 21 Mar 2000 21:04:12 +0800 From: dai Subject: Re: Bringing up 2.2.14 kernel on SA1110 (Intel Zilker board) Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com To: Hiroshi Ishii , sa1100 mailng list Message-id: <000e01bf9335$f72e0000$d664a8c0@hw.co.cn> MIME-version: 1.0 X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2014.211 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2014.211 Content-type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-transfer-encoding: base64 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-priority: Normal Precedence: bulk References: <38D7296A4C.919AHIROSHI@ns.funai-tky.co.jp> DQotLS0tLSBPcmlnaW5hbCBNZXNzYWdlIC0tLS0tIA0KRnJvbTogSGlyb3NoaSBJc2hpaSA8aGly b3NoaUBmdW5haS10a3kuY28uanA+DQpUbzogc2ExMTAwIG1haWxuZyBsaXN0IDxzYTExMDAtbGlu dXhAcGEuZGVjLmNvbT4NClNlbnQ6IFR1ZXNkYXksIE1hcmNoIDIxLCAyMDAwIDM6NDggUE0NClN1 YmplY3Q6IFJlOiBCcmluZ2luZyB1cCAyLjIuMTQga2VybmVsIG9uIFNBMTExMCAoSW50ZWwgWmls a2VyIGJvYXJkKQ0KDQoNCj4gDQo+IE9uIEZyaSwgMTcgTWFyIDIwMDAgMTA6MjU6NDEgLTA1MDAN Cj4gIkxhdGhhbSwgU3RldmUiIDxTTGF0aGFtQGFjZG5qLml0dC5jb20+IHdyb3RlOg0KPiANCj4g PiANCj4gPiBJJ20gd29ya2luZyBvbiBpdCBidXQgYXQgdGhlIG1vbWVudCBpdHMgY3Jhc2hpbmcg d2hlbiB0aGUgTU1VIGlzIHR1cm5lZCBvbi4NCj4gPiBJJ20gdXNpbmcgMHg2OTAxYjExMCB0aGF0 IFRha2FmdW1pIEthd2FuYSBnYXZlIG1lLg0KPiA+IFN0ZXZlIA0KPiA+IA0KPiANCj4gTWUgdG9v LiBCdXQgMi4zLjM1IG9yIDIuMy45OSB3b3JraW5nIGdvb2QuDQo+IEl0J3Mgc3RyYW5nZS4gDQo+ IA0KPiBJbiAyLjIuMTQsIHN0b3AgYmVmb3JlIGZsdXNoX3RsYl9hbGwoKSBhdA0KPiBhcmNoL2Fy bS9tbS9pbml0LmMNCj4gDQo+IA0KPiAtLS0tDQo+IEZ1bmFpIEVsZWN0cmljIFIgJiBEIENvLixM VEQgIA0KPiBIaXJvc2hpIElzaGlpDQo= From kramer@pa.dec.com Tue Mar 21 15:16:30 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id PAA12987; Tue, 21 Mar 2000 15:16:29 +0100 (MET) Received: from ns2.tudelft.nl (ns2.tudelft.nl [130.161.180.65]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.8.6 (PHNE_17135)/8.8.6) with ESMTP id PAA12191 for ; Tue, 21 Mar 2000 15:16:29 +0100 (MET) Received: from mail1.digital.com (mail1.digital.com [204.123.2.50]) by mailhost1.tudelft.nl (PMDF V5.2-32 #42432) with ESMTP id <0FRR00GHNZNFVE@mailhost1.tudelft.nl> for J.A.K.Mouw@its.tudelft.nl; Tue, 21 Mar 2000 15:16:29 +0100 (MET) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id GAA29171; Tue, 21 Mar 2000 06:10:43 -0800 (PST) Received: from rex.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA04703; Tue, 21 Mar 2000 06:08:48 -0800 Received: by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id GAA16693; Tue, 21 Mar 2000 06:08:13 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id GAA16706; Tue, 21 Mar 2000 06:08:12 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail1.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA05850; Tue, 21 Mar 2000 06:08:12 -0800 Received: from ice.ar51.net (IDENT:root@ice.ar51.net [208.225.80.11]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with ESMTP id GAA29126 for ; Tue, 21 Mar 2000 06:08:12 -0800 (PST) Received: from server01.asi (akron-80-186.ar51.net [208.225.80.186]) by ice.ar51.net (8.9.3/8.8.7) with ESMTP id JAA27577; Tue, 21 Mar 2000 09:07:51 -0500 Received: by SERVER01 with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2448.0) id ; Tue, 21 Mar 2000 09:07:57 -0500 Date: Tue, 21 Mar 2000 09:07:55 -0500 From: Jeff Sutherland Subject: SA-1111 Audio Recording questions. Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com To: "ARM on Linux Mailing List (E-mail)" , "SA1100 Linux mailing list (E-mail)" , "'lart@lart.tudelft.nl'" Message-id: MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2448.0) Content-type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Precedence: bulk We have been experiencing problems with the SA1111 audio recording functions. Has anyone else seen this, or better yet, figured out a workaround? Using latest Assabet with Niponset board, I have been able to isolate the problem to the SADRCS register in the SAC section of the SA-1111 chip. The SA-1111 SADRSA (receive buffer A pointer) SADRCA (receive buffer A count) SADRSB(receive buffer B pointer) and SADRCB(receive buffer B count) registers are first properly initialized. I know that these are correct because when I get DONEA flag the A buffer is filled in with the data I would expect. Also, when I get the DONEB flag the data in the B buffer is filled in with the data I would expect. The problem is that the ping pong nature for the receiver is either broken or I'm missing something. I am listing six test sets with my results. I would like you to give me your feed back on possible work arounds. The following are six of the several tests I have run on the SADRCS register (Note: the SADTCS register operates as I would expect and I do have playback working, via DMA & interrupts from the memory on the Assabet board). TEST 1 ------ Write 0 to SADRCS - disable receive DMA controller Write 1 to SADRCS - Enable DMA (note: only doing this in polled mode for these tests) Write 11 to SADRCS - Set STARTA flag Read 9 from SADRCS - Read DONEA flag set Write 9 to SADRCS - Clear the DONEA flag Read 1 from SADRCS - Dma enabled. Write 11 to SADRCS - Set STARTA flag Read 81 from SADRCS - BIU Set, No DONEA, Dead at this point can set either STARTA/B and never get any more DONE flags. TEST 2 ------ Write 0 to SADRCS - disable receive DMA controller Write 1 to SADRCS - Enable DMA (note: only doing this in polled mode for these tests) Write 51 to SADRCS - Set STARTA/STARTB flags Read 89 from SADRCS - Read DONEA flag set, BIU set Write 89 to SADRCS - Clear the DONEA flag Read 81 from SADRCS - BIU Set, No DONEB, Dead at this point can set either STARTA/B and never get any more DONE flags. TEST 3 ------ Write 0 to SADRCS - disable receive DMA controller Write 1 to SADRCS - Enable DMA (note: only doing this in polled mode for these tests) Write 41 to SADRCS - Set STARTB flag Read 21 from SADRCS - Read DONEB flag set Write 21 to SADRCS - Clear the DONEB flag Read 1 from SADRCS - Dma enabled. Write 11 to SADRCS - Set STARTA flag Read 81 from SADRCS - BIU Set, No DONEA, Dead at this point can set either STARTA/B and never get any more DONE flags. TEST 4 ------ Write 0 to SADRCS - disable receive DMA controller Write 1 to SADRCS - Enable DMA (note: only doing this in polled mode for these tests) Write 51 to SADRCS - Set STARTA/STARTB flags Read 89 from SADRCS - Read DONEA flag set, BIU set Write C9 to SADRCS - Clear the DONEA flag, set the STARTB flag Read C1 from SADRCS - BIU Set, No DONEB, Dead at this point can set either STARTA/B and never get any more DONE flags. TEST 5 ------ Write 0 to SADRCS - disable receive DMA controller Write 1 to SADRCS - Enable DMA (note: only doing this in polled mode for these tests) Write 51 to SADRCS - Set STARTA/STARTB flags Read 89 from SADRCS - Read DONEA flag set, BIU set> Write 99 to SADRCS - Clear the DONEA flag, set STARTA Read 91 from SADRCS - BIU Set, No DONEA, Dead at this point can set either STARTA/B and never get any more DONE flags. TEST 6 ------ Write 0 to SADRCS - disable receive DMA controller Write 1 to SADRCS - Enable DMA (note: only doing this in polled mode for these tests) Write 41 to SADRCS - Set STARTB flag Read 21 from SADRCS - Read DONEB flag set Write 21 to SADRCS - Clear the DONEB flag Read 1 from SADRCS - Dma enabled. Write 41 to SADRCS - Set STARTB flag Read 81 from SADRCS - BIU Set, No DONEB, Dead at this point can set either STARTA/B and never get any more DONE flags. It appears that the transition between buffers is broken, if the BIU bit gets set we're done and no further activity happens on that record channel. Thanks, Wayne G. Peters Accelent Systems Inc. From kramer@pa.dec.com Tue Mar 21 15:28:36 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id PAA13082; Tue, 21 Mar 2000 15:28:35 +0100 (MET) Received: from ns2.tudelft.nl (ns2.tudelft.nl [130.161.180.65]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.8.6 (PHNE_17135)/8.8.6) with ESMTP id PAA12575 for ; Tue, 21 Mar 2000 15:28:35 +0100 (MET) Received: from mail1.digital.com (mail1.digital.com [204.123.2.50]) by mailhost1.tudelft.nl (PMDF V5.2-32 #42432) with ESMTP id <0FRS00HPY07L89@mailhost1.tudelft.nl> for J.A.K.Mouw@its.tudelft.nl; Tue, 21 Mar 2000 15:28:35 +0100 (MET) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id GAA29555; Tue, 21 Mar 2000 06:23:11 -0800 (PST) Received: from rex.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA11719; Tue, 21 Mar 2000 06:22:39 -0800 Received: by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id GAA16710; Tue, 21 Mar 2000 06:22:29 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id GAA16699; Tue, 21 Mar 2000 06:22:28 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail2.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA16374; Tue, 21 Mar 2000 06:22:28 -0800 Received: from thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (thorgal.et.tudelft.nl [130.161.40.91]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with ESMTP id GAA11805 for ; Tue, 21 Mar 2000 06:22:27 -0800 (PST) Received: from [130.161.40.82] (tvs082.et.tudelft.nl [130.161.40.82]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id PAA10255; Tue, 21 Mar 2000 15:22:19 +0100 Date: Tue, 21 Mar 2000 15:21:53 +0100 From: "J.D. Bakker" Subject: Re: SA-1111 Audio Recording questions. In-reply-to: Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com To: Jeff Sutherland Cc: "ARM on Linux Mailing List (E-mail)" , "SA1100 Linux mailing list (E-mail)" , "'lart@lart.tudelft.nl'" Message-id: MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Precedence: bulk At 15:07 +0100 21-03-2000, Jeff Sutherland wrote: >We have been experiencing problems with the SA1111 audio recording >functions. Has anyone else seen this, or better yet, figured out a >workaround? > Using latest Assabet with Niponset board, I have been able to >isolate the problem to the SADRCS register in the SAC section of the SA-1111 >chip. There was a thread on the newsgroup comp.sys.arm on this subject quite recently; you may want to check http://www.deja.com/ for it. JDB. -- LART. 250 MIPS under one Watt. Free hardware design files. http://www.lart.tudelft.nl From kramer@pa.dec.com Tue Mar 21 19:35:44 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id TAA14848; Tue, 21 Mar 2000 19:35:44 +0100 (MET) Received: from ns2.tudelft.nl (ns2.tudelft.nl [130.161.180.65]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.8.6 (PHNE_17135)/8.8.6) with ESMTP id TAA19528 for ; Tue, 21 Mar 2000 19:35:43 +0100 (MET) Received: from mail1.digital.com (mail1.digital.com [204.123.2.50]) by mailhost1.tudelft.nl (PMDF V5.2-32 #42432) with ESMTP id <0FRS00AHKBNIJJ@mailhost1.tudelft.nl> for J.A.K.Mouw@its.tudelft.nl; Tue, 21 Mar 2000 19:35:43 +0100 (MET) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id KAA21839; Tue, 21 Mar 2000 10:30:04 -0800 (PST) Received: from rex.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA28626; Tue, 21 Mar 2000 10:29:51 -0800 Received: by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id KAA16739; Tue, 21 Mar 2000 10:29:12 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id KAA16781; Tue, 21 Mar 2000 10:29:11 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail2.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA08177; Tue, 21 Mar 2000 10:29:11 -0800 Received: from hotmail.com (f26.law7.hotmail.com [216.33.237.26]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id KAA28360 for ; Tue, 21 Mar 2000 10:29:11 -0800 (PST) Received: (qmail 34852 invoked by uid 0); Tue, 21 Mar 2000 18:29:06 +0000 Received: from 24.222.63.8 by www.hotmail.com with HTTP; Tue, 21 Mar 2000 10:29:06 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 21 Mar 2000 18:29:06 +0000 (GMT) From: Gilroy Billard Subject: Tools and Kernal for SA-1110 Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com To: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Message-id: <20000321182906.34851.qmail@hotmail.com> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; format=flowed Precedence: bulk X-Originating-Ip: [24.222.63.8] Hi, I am considering a SA-1110 based embedded computer, to which I would like to port Linux. At this point I am still considering both a standard port and a real-time port, weighing the relative advantages and disadvantages. For each option I was wondering which kernal to start with and what toolchain will work. Could someone point me in the right direction, perhaps a file which details this stuff? Gilroy ______________________________________________________ Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com From kramer@pa.dec.com Tue Mar 21 20:13:10 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id UAA14980; Tue, 21 Mar 2000 20:13:09 +0100 (MET) Received: from ns2.tudelft.nl (ns2.tudelft.nl [130.161.180.65]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.8.6 (PHNE_17135)/8.8.6) with ESMTP id UAA20113 for ; Tue, 21 Mar 2000 20:13:08 +0100 (MET) Received: from mail1.digital.com (mail1.digital.com [204.123.2.50]) by mailhost1.tudelft.nl (PMDF V5.2-32 #42432) with ESMTP id <0FRS00BNGDDVAA@mailhost1.tudelft.nl> for J.A.K.Mouw@its.tudelft.nl; Tue, 21 Mar 2000 20:13:08 +0100 (MET) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id LAA24968; Tue, 21 Mar 2000 11:07:51 -0800 (PST) Received: from rex.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA00085; Tue, 21 Mar 2000 11:07:44 -0800 Received: by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id LAA16679; Tue, 21 Mar 2000 11:07:29 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id LAA16705; Tue, 21 Mar 2000 11:07:28 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail2.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA30410; Tue, 21 Mar 2000 11:07:28 -0800 Received: from hydra.wireless-sys.com (dryline-fw.wireless-sys.com [216.126.67.45]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with ESMTP id LAA31441 for ; Tue, 21 Mar 2000 11:07:27 -0800 (PST) Received: from wireless-sys.com (gordon.wireless-sys.com [192.168.11.138]) by hydra.wireless-sys.com (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id OAA27344; Tue, 21 Mar 2000 14:07:25 -0500 Date: Tue, 21 Mar 2000 14:07:11 -0500 From: "Scott K. Lindsay, P.Eng." Subject: Re: Device address weirdness Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com To: Nicolas Pitre Cc: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Reply-to: Scott.Lindsay@wireless-sys.com Message-id: <38D7C85F.1F6E8D7D@wireless-sys.com> Organization: Wireless System Technologies MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.72 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.2.13-4mdk i686) Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk X-Accept-Language: en References: Nicolas Pitre wrote: > On Thu, 16 Mar 2000, Scott K. Lindsay P.Eng. wrote: > > > Dear all, > > > > I'm working on a device driver for SA1100 linux and running > > into a problem. I'm using 2.3.35 (with rmk & np patches) and > > gcc-2.95.2 toolchain. The driver currently uses a 10ms kernel > > timer to simulate an interrupt (the hardware's not fully baked > > yet). > > You could use OSMR1 to generate interrupts, since this interrupt could be > assigned and registered by your driver. This would make your setup more > like if it was a real life interrupt with variable intervals and won't be > synchronized on the OS timer. That's true and a reasonable thought. I'm not sure that it matters but it might be worth trying. > > If I do the access to the device within the function triggered > > by the kernel timer, all is well. If I use the timer function > > to add the function to tq_immediate and mark it active, things are > > not so well. The device access function causes the kernel to freeze > > (no message, apparently no external bus activity). In an attempt > > to find out what the CPU is doing (if anything), I used the nowb > > and nocache command line parameters. If I do that the problem goes > > away. > > I would rather suspect a timing issue than cache coherency, especially > when PCMCIA mem space isn't cacheable. Beware 16-bit access on 8-bit > devices -- I think there is an erata about that for the SA1100. It seems that it doesn't have to be our device. Writing to an on-board serial port has the same effect and that shouldn't be affected by the PCMCIA timing. If we take out the device access from the bottom half, all is well. If we add in a write to a serial port's data register, the system eventually freezes (if the data cache is enabled). Does that ring any bells? I'm currently looking at the DRAM timing to see if that has any effect. skl -- Scott K. Lindsay, P.Eng. Wireless System Technologies Scott.Lindsay@wireless-sys.com ---------------------------IMPORTANT NOTICE--------------------------- This message, and its attachments if any, is intended only for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed, and contains information that is Valuable, Proprietary and Confidential to Wireless System Technologies. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or an employee or agent authorized and responsible for delivering the message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please immediately notify Wireless System Technologies either by telephone at (416)-977-1414 or (415)-543-4255 or by email at legal@wireless-sys.com and delete all copies of this message after doing so. Thank you. From kramer@pa.dec.com Wed Mar 22 01:36:17 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id BAA16182; Wed, 22 Mar 2000 01:36:16 +0100 (MET) Received: from ns2.tudelft.nl (ns2.tudelft.nl [130.161.180.65]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.8.6 (PHNE_17135)/8.8.6) with ESMTP id BAA26054 for ; Wed, 22 Mar 2000 01:36:16 +0100 (MET) Received: from mail1.digital.com (mail1.digital.com [204.123.2.50]) by mailhost1.tudelft.nl (PMDF V5.2-32 #42432) with ESMTP id <0FRS000GGSCFRE@mailhost1.tudelft.nl> for J.A.K.Mouw@its.tudelft.nl; Wed, 22 Mar 2000 01:36:16 +0100 (MET) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id QAA14583; Tue, 21 Mar 2000 16:30:18 -0800 (PST) Received: from rex.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA26239; Tue, 21 Mar 2000 16:30:07 -0800 Received: by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id QAA16903; Tue, 21 Mar 2000 16:29:10 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id QAA16906; Tue, 21 Mar 2000 16:29:05 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail1.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA12280; Tue, 21 Mar 2000 16:29:05 -0800 Received: from xanadu.gn.com (modemcable248.137-200-24.mtl.mc.videotron.net [24.200.137.248]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with ESMTP id QAA15621 for ; Tue, 21 Mar 2000 16:29:04 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (nico@localhost) by xanadu.gn.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id TAA01349; Tue, 21 Mar 2000 19:34:47 -0500 Date: Tue, 21 Mar 2000 19:34:47 -0500 (EST) From: Nicolas Pitre Subject: Re: Device address weirdness In-reply-to: <38D7C85F.1F6E8D7D@wireless-sys.com> Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com X-Sender: nico@xanadu.gn.com To: "Scott K. Lindsay, P.Eng." Cc: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Message-id: MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Precedence: bulk X-Authentication-warning: xanadu.gn.com: nico owned process doing -bs On Tue, 21 Mar 2000, Scott K. Lindsay, P.Eng. wrote: > It seems that it doesn't have to be our device. Writing to an on-board > serial port has the same effect and that shouldn't be affected by the PCMCIA > timing. If we take out the device access from the bottom half, all is > well. If > we add in a write to a serial port's data register, the system eventually > freezes > (if the data cache is enabled). Does that ring any bells? I'm currently > looking > at the DRAM timing to see if that has any effect. Hugo (empeg) and I experienced some mysterious freeze problems last year... until we found it was due to an interrupt race in the timer interrupt handler. What patch version are you using? Nicolas From kramer@pa.dec.com Wed Mar 22 09:02:46 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id JAA18047; Wed, 22 Mar 2000 09:02:45 +0100 (MET) Received: from ns2.tudelft.nl (ns2.tudelft.nl [130.161.180.65]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.8.6 (PHNE_17135)/8.8.6) with ESMTP id JAA01203 for ; Wed, 22 Mar 2000 09:02:45 +0100 (MET) Received: from mail2.digital.com (mail2.digital.com [204.123.2.56]) by mailhost1.tudelft.nl (PMDF V5.2-32 #42432) with ESMTP id <0FRT009CID0JJU@mailhost1.tudelft.nl> for J.A.K.Mouw@its.tudelft.nl; Wed, 22 Mar 2000 09:02:44 +0100 (MET) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id XAA31890; Tue, 21 Mar 2000 23:57:05 -0800 (PST) Received: from rex.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA07198; Tue, 21 Mar 2000 23:56:55 -0800 Received: by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id XAA16525; Tue, 21 Mar 2000 23:54:00 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id XAA17126; Tue, 21 Mar 2000 23:54:00 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail1.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA21219; Tue, 21 Mar 2000 23:53:59 -0800 Received: from note.orchestra.cse.unsw.EDU.AU (note.orchestra.cse.unsw.EDU.AU [129.94.242.29]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id XAA11494 for ; Tue, 21 Mar 2000 23:53:57 -0800 (PST) Received: From paulaner With LocalMail ; Wed, 22 Mar 2000 18:52:15 +1100 Date: Wed, 22 Mar 2000 18:52:15 +1100 (EST) From: "Adam 'WeirdArms' Wiggins" Subject: Linux and zeroed memory Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com X-Sender: awiggins@paulaner.disy.cse.unsw.EDU.AU To: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Message-id: MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Precedence: bulk Hi, I've recently tried out running PLEB hardware with 64MB of DRAM vs 32MB. However being lazy I didn't modify the bootloader to zero out the additional 32MB of ram. On boot the kernel freezing after being unzipped. Is it freezing due to the top 32MB of mem not being zero'd or might it be something else? Cheers Adam From kramer@pa.dec.com Wed Mar 22 16:00:33 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id QAA21033; Wed, 22 Mar 2000 16:00:32 +0100 (MET) Received: from ns2.tudelft.nl (ns2.tudelft.nl [130.161.180.65]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.8.6 (PHNE_17135)/8.8.6) with ESMTP id QAA15759 for ; Wed, 22 Mar 2000 16:00:32 +0100 (MET) Received: from mail1.digital.com (mail1.digital.com [204.123.2.50]) by mailhost1.tudelft.nl (PMDF V5.2-32 #42432) with ESMTP id <0FRT00M1TWCUSX@mailhost1.tudelft.nl> for J.A.K.Mouw@its.tudelft.nl; Wed, 22 Mar 2000 16:00:32 +0100 (MET) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id GAA02275; Wed, 22 Mar 2000 06:54:43 -0800 (PST) Received: from rex.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA13222; Wed, 22 Mar 2000 06:54:29 -0800 Received: by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id GAA17288; Wed, 22 Mar 2000 06:52:49 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id GAA17278; Wed, 22 Mar 2000 06:52:48 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail2.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA18709; Wed, 22 Mar 2000 06:52:47 -0800 Received: from hydra.wireless-sys.com (dryline-fw.wireless-sys.com [216.126.67.45]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with ESMTP id GAA31127 for ; Wed, 22 Mar 2000 06:52:46 -0800 (PST) Received: from wireless-sys.com (gordon.wireless-sys.com [192.168.11.138]) by hydra.wireless-sys.com (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id JAA32274; Wed, 22 Mar 2000 09:52:45 -0500 Date: Wed, 22 Mar 2000 09:52:30 -0500 From: "Scott K. Lindsay, P.Eng." Subject: Re: Device address weirdness Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com To: Nicolas Pitre Cc: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Reply-to: Scott.Lindsay@wireless-sys.com Message-id: <38D8DE2E.69FBFE18@wireless-sys.com> Organization: Wireless System Technologies MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.72 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.2.13-4mdk i686) Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk X-Accept-Language: en References: Nicolas Pitre wrote: > On Tue, 21 Mar 2000, Scott K. Lindsay, P.Eng. wrote: > > > It seems that it doesn't have to be our device. Writing to an on-board > > serial port has the same effect and that shouldn't be affected by the PCMCIA > > timing. If we take out the device access from the bottom half, all is > > well. If > > we add in a write to a serial port's data register, the system eventually > > freezes > > (if the data cache is enabled). Does that ring any bells? I'm currently > > looking > > at the DRAM timing to see if that has any effect. > > Hugo (empeg) and I experienced some mysterious freeze problems last > year... until we found it was due to an interrupt race in the timer > interrupt handler. Okay. What would I look for to determine whether that's happening? > What patch version are you using? We're using 2.3.35 with the rmk1 and np7 patches. skl -- Scott K. Lindsay, P.Eng. Wireless System Technologies Scott.Lindsay@wireless-sys.com From kramer@pa.dec.com Wed Mar 22 16:28:34 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id QAA21312; Wed, 22 Mar 2000 16:28:34 +0100 (MET) Received: from ns2.tudelft.nl (ns2.tudelft.nl [130.161.180.65]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.8.6 (PHNE_17135)/8.8.6) with ESMTP id QAA16723 for ; Wed, 22 Mar 2000 16:28:34 +0100 (MET) Received: from mail2.digital.com (mail2.digital.com [204.123.2.56]) by mailhost1.tudelft.nl (PMDF V5.2-32 #42432) with ESMTP id <0FRT001L9XNKZN@mailhost1.tudelft.nl> for J.A.K.Mouw@its.tudelft.nl; Wed, 22 Mar 2000 16:28:34 +0100 (MET) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id HAA06863; Wed, 22 Mar 2000 07:23:13 -0800 (PST) Received: from rex.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA30990; Wed, 22 Mar 2000 07:23:04 -0800 Received: by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id HAA17316; Wed, 22 Mar 2000 07:22:15 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id HAA17309; Wed, 22 Mar 2000 07:22:14 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail1.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA14937; Wed, 22 Mar 2000 07:22:14 -0800 Received: from xanadu.vipswitch.com (generic199.197.205.205.in-addr.arpa [205.205.197.199] (may be forged)) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with ESMTP id HAA03589 for ; Wed, 22 Mar 2000 07:22:13 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 22 Mar 2000 10:19:12 -0500 (EST) From: Nicolas Pitre Subject: Re: Device address weirdness In-reply-to: <38D8DE2E.69FBFE18@wireless-sys.com> Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com To: Scott.Lindsay@wireless-sys.com Cc: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Message-id: MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Precedence: bulk On Wed, 22 Mar 2000, Scott K. Lindsay, P.Eng. wrote: > Nicolas Pitre wrote: > > > Hugo (empeg) and I experienced some mysterious freeze problems last > > year... until we found it was due to an interrupt race in the timer > > interrupt handler. > > Okay. What would I look for to determine whether that's happening? > > > What patch version are you using? > > We're using 2.3.35 with the rmk1 and np7 patches. OK, forget about what I said then. The bug I was thinking of has been fixed long before 2.3.35. Nicolas From kramer@pa.dec.com Wed Mar 22 16:33:59 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id QAA21363; Wed, 22 Mar 2000 16:33:59 +0100 (MET) Received: from ns2.tudelft.nl (ns2.tudelft.nl [130.161.180.65]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.8.6 (PHNE_17135)/8.8.6) with ESMTP id QAA16911 for ; Wed, 22 Mar 2000 16:33:59 +0100 (MET) Received: from mail2.digital.com (mail2.digital.com [204.123.2.56]) by mailhost1.tudelft.nl (PMDF V5.2-32 #42432) with ESMTP id <0FRT002UAXWL22@mailhost1.tudelft.nl> for J.A.K.Mouw@its.tudelft.nl; Wed, 22 Mar 2000 16:33:59 +0100 (MET) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id HAA06202; Wed, 22 Mar 2000 07:28:27 -0800 (PST) Received: from rex.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA18372; Wed, 22 Mar 2000 07:28:25 -0800 Received: by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id HAA17336; Wed, 22 Mar 2000 07:27:33 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id HAA17295; Wed, 22 Mar 2000 07:27:32 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail1.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA19504; Wed, 22 Mar 2000 07:27:32 -0800 Received: from xanadu.vipswitch.com (generic199.197.205.205.in-addr.arpa [205.205.197.199] (may be forged)) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with ESMTP id HAA00051 for ; Wed, 22 Mar 2000 07:27:31 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 22 Mar 2000 10:25:04 -0500 (EST) From: Nicolas Pitre Subject: Re: Linux and zeroed memory In-reply-to: Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com To: "Adam 'WeirdArms' Wiggins" Cc: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Message-id: MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Precedence: bulk On Wed, 22 Mar 2000, Adam 'WeirdArms' Wiggins wrote: > Hi, I've recently tried out running PLEB hardware with 64MB of > DRAM vs 32MB. However being lazy I didn't modify the bootloader to zero > out the additional 32MB of ram. On boot the kernel freezing after being > unzipped. Is it freezing due to the top 32MB of mem not being zero'd or > might it be something else? It should be something else. The kernel doesn't care if memory has been pre-zeroed or not. Nicolas From kramer@pa.dec.com Wed Mar 22 19:13:16 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id TAA22615; Wed, 22 Mar 2000 19:13:15 +0100 (MET) Received: from ns2.tudelft.nl (ns2.tudelft.nl [130.161.180.65]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.8.6 (PHNE_17135)/8.8.6) with ESMTP id TAA21147 for ; Wed, 22 Mar 2000 19:13:15 +0100 (MET) Received: from mail2.digital.com (mail2.digital.com [204.123.2.56]) by mailhost1.tudelft.nl (PMDF V5.2-32 #42432) with ESMTP id <0FRU00BFD5A2LI@mailhost1.tudelft.nl> for J.A.K.Mouw@its.tudelft.nl; Wed, 22 Mar 2000 19:13:15 +0100 (MET) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id KAA19682; Wed, 22 Mar 2000 10:07:32 -0800 (PST) Received: from rex.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA16255; Wed, 22 Mar 2000 10:07:26 -0800 Received: by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id KAA17352; Wed, 22 Mar 2000 10:06:22 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id KAA17368; Wed, 22 Mar 2000 10:06:21 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail1.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA31150; Wed, 22 Mar 2000 10:06:21 -0800 Received: from etek.chalmers.se (quarl0.etek.chalmers.se [129.16.32.20]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with ESMTP id KAA18161 for ; Wed, 22 Mar 2000 10:06:20 -0800 (PST) Received: from hortensia.etek.chalmers.se (_7-A4D@hortensia [129.16.32.92]) by etek.chalmers.se (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id TAA11753 for ; Wed, 22 Mar 2000 19:05:02 +0100 (MET) Received: (from e4borgen@localhost) by hortensia.etek.chalmers.se (8.8.8/8.8.8) id TAA28227 for SA1100-linux@pa.dec.com; Wed, 22 Mar 2000 19:05:02 +0100 (MET) Date: Wed, 22 Mar 2000 19:05:02 +0100 From: Per Borgentun Subject: Re: Linux and zeroed memory In-reply-to: ; from Adam 'WeirdArms' Wiggins on Wed, Mar 22, 2000 at 06:52:15PM +1100 Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com To: SA1100-linux@pa.dec.com Message-id: <20000322190502.A21291@etek.chalmers.se> MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Mutt 0.95.6i Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Precedence: bulk References: X-Authentication-warning: quarl0.etek.chalmers.se: Host _7-A4D@hortensia [129.16.32.92] claimed to be hortensia.etek.chalmers.se * Adam 'WeirdArms' Wiggins (awiggins@cse.unsw.edu.au) [000322 08:58]: > Hi, I've recently tried out running PLEB hardware with 64MB of > DRAM vs 32MB. However being lazy I didn't modify the bootloader to zero > out the additional 32MB of ram. On boot the kernel freezing after being > unzipped. Is it freezing due to the top 32MB of mem not being zero'd or > might it be something else? > > Cheers Adam I have had similar problem with our own sa1100 based 'Popey' hardware, using 2.2.12 Image file works fine but using 2.2.12 zImage or 2.2.14 zImage kernel makes it freeze after unpacking the kernel. We are not zeroing any memory. Does anyone have any hints on whats going on ? Thanks. /Per B From kramer@pa.dec.com Wed Mar 22 19:25:04 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id TAA22744; Wed, 22 Mar 2000 19:25:04 +0100 (MET) Received: from ns2.tudelft.nl (ns2.tudelft.nl [130.161.180.65]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.8.6 (PHNE_17135)/8.8.6) with ESMTP id TAA21348 for ; Wed, 22 Mar 2000 19:25:04 +0100 (MET) Received: from mail1.digital.com (mail1.digital.com [204.123.2.50]) by mailhost1.tudelft.nl (PMDF V5.2-32 #42432) with ESMTP id <0FRU00BNP5TQLI@mailhost1.tudelft.nl> for J.A.K.Mouw@its.tudelft.nl; Wed, 22 Mar 2000 19:25:03 +0100 (MET) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id KAA18330; Wed, 22 Mar 2000 10:19:45 -0800 (PST) Received: from rex.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA09100; Wed, 22 Mar 2000 10:19:43 -0800 Received: by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id KAA17339; Wed, 22 Mar 2000 10:18:53 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id KAA17328; Wed, 22 Mar 2000 10:18:52 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail1.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA32091; Wed, 22 Mar 2000 10:18:52 -0800 Received: from duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (duteinh.et.tudelft.nl [130.161.42.1]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with ESMTP id KAA19135 for ; Wed, 22 Mar 2000 10:18:51 -0800 (PST) Received: from kalman by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id TAA22673; Wed, 22 Mar 2000 19:17:23 +0100 (MET) Date: Wed, 22 Mar 2000 19:17:23 +0100 (MET) From: Erik Mouw X-Face: "!Z|1XjFg!3Iw)BwM^M\k)J5KHiPddz}#/Zw%?$&Q!xqob"OA|})3_@&BTTiQERo?/^g[Z<9P4R8:5C:aqq.cw!hotLc=+u-"+1rq@9$V^8PbOUlodyi_sejt+D`iqkLpx$>.aXl%vnfPIt"LK|/%>94_Zrm8jy?`_[RKt'TuoxUxfk(gMhY(n|DBBl~c$dhO>G%6}R4+DGX3|idBm4oU&UM/XUP4I9aoN{]`ax%B?rgD(I3OJ<62Y6L Subject: Re: Linux and zeroed memory In-reply-to: Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com To: awiggins@cse.unsw.edu.au Cc: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Message-id: <200003221817.TAA22673@duteinh.et.tudelft.nl> Organization: Eric conspiracy secret labs MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: XCmail 1.0.0 - with PGP support, PGP engine version 0.5 (Linux) Content-type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-transfer-encoding: 8bit Precedence: bulk X-Loop: erik@it.et.tudelft.nl X-Mailerorigin: http://www.fsai.fh-trier.de/~schmitzj/Xclasses/XCmail/ X-Eric-Conspiracy: There is no conspiracy! On Wed, 22 Mar 2000 18:52:15 +1100 (EST), Adam 'WeirdArms' Wiggins wrote: > Hi, I've recently tried out running PLEB hardware with 64MB of > DRAM vs 32MB. However being lazy I didn't modify the bootloader to zero > out the additional 32MB of ram. On boot the kernel freezing after being > unzipped. Is it freezing due to the top 32MB of mem not being zero'd or > might it be something else? BLOB tries to zero the complete SA1100 memory range, so unless you modified BLOB, it will also zero your additional 32MB DRAM. Erik -- "[Microsoft] ... guarantees 99.8% NT uptime for certain hard-/software. That's exactly the 3 minutes daily that my NT server needs to reboot." -- ZDnet editorial From kramer@pa.dec.com Wed Mar 22 19:51:15 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id TAA23023; Wed, 22 Mar 2000 19:51:15 +0100 (MET) Received: from ns2.tudelft.nl (ns2.tudelft.nl [130.161.180.65]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.8.6 (PHNE_17135)/8.8.6) with ESMTP id TAA21929 for ; Wed, 22 Mar 2000 19:51:14 +0100 (MET) Received: from mail1.digital.com (mail1.digital.com [204.123.2.50]) by mailhost1.tudelft.nl (PMDF V5.2-32 #42432) with ESMTP id <0FRU00CCH71DTS@mailhost1.tudelft.nl> for J.A.K.Mouw@its.tudelft.nl; Wed, 22 Mar 2000 19:51:14 +0100 (MET) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id KAA21506; Wed, 22 Mar 2000 10:45:42 -0800 (PST) Received: from rex.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA05103; Wed, 22 Mar 2000 10:45:40 -0800 Received: by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id KAA17363; Wed, 22 Mar 2000 10:45:10 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id KAA17378; Wed, 22 Mar 2000 10:45:09 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail1.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA04466; Wed, 22 Mar 2000 10:45:09 -0800 Received: from xanadu.vipswitch.com (generic199.197.205.205.in-addr.arpa [205.205.197.199] (may be forged)) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with ESMTP id KAA18351 for ; Wed, 22 Mar 2000 10:45:08 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 22 Mar 2000 13:42:28 -0500 (EST) From: Nicolas Pitre Subject: Re: Linux and zeroed memory In-reply-to: <20000322190502.A21291@etek.chalmers.se> Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com To: Per Borgentun Cc: SA1100-linux@pa.dec.com Message-id: MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Precedence: bulk On Wed, 22 Mar 2000, Per Borgentun wrote: > I have had similar problem with our own sa1100 based 'Popey' hardware, > using 2.2.12 Image file works fine but using 2.2.12 zImage > or 2.2.14 zImage kernel makes it freeze after unpacking the kernel. Please note that it's unlikely that any unmodified kernel passed 2.2.13 or so will boot using Image. For a cleaner tree, I removed some SA1100 stuff from linux/arch/arm/kernel/head-armv.S to put them in linux/arch/boot/compressed/head-sa1100.S which is executed just before uncompression occurs. Nicolas From kramer@pa.dec.com Thu Mar 23 00:09:54 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id AAA24733; Thu, 23 Mar 2000 00:09:53 +0100 (MET) Received: from ns2.tudelft.nl (ns2.tudelft.nl [130.161.180.65]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.8.6 (PHNE_17135)/8.8.6) with ESMTP id AAA27288 for ; Thu, 23 Mar 2000 00:09:53 +0100 (MET) Received: from mail2.digital.com (mail2.digital.com [204.123.2.56]) by mailhost1.tudelft.nl (PMDF V5.2-32 #42432) with ESMTP id <0FRU00M6TJ0GL2@mailhost1.tudelft.nl> for J.A.K.Mouw@its.tudelft.nl; Thu, 23 Mar 2000 00:09:53 +0100 (MET) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id PAA09958; Wed, 22 Mar 2000 15:04:29 -0800 (PST) Received: from rex.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA14764; Wed, 22 Mar 2000 15:04:22 -0800 Received: by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id PAA17473; Wed, 22 Mar 2000 15:03:35 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id PAA17477; Wed, 22 Mar 2000 15:03:34 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail2.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA10479; Wed, 22 Mar 2000 15:03:34 -0800 Received: from thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (thorgal.et.tudelft.nl [130.161.40.91]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with ESMTP id PAA32741 for ; Wed, 22 Mar 2000 15:03:33 -0800 (PST) Received: from [130.161.115.44] (jdbakker.et.tudelft.nl [130.161.115.44]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id AAA18690; Thu, 23 Mar 2000 00:03:23 +0100 Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2000 00:03:04 +0100 From: "J.D. Bakker" Subject: Re: Linux and zeroed memory In-reply-to: <200003221817.TAA22673@duteinh.et.tudelft.nl> Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com To: Erik Mouw Cc: awiggins@cse.unsw.edu.au, sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Message-id: MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Precedence: bulk References: At 19:17 +0100 22-03-2000, Erik Mouw wrote: >On Wed, 22 Mar 2000 18:52:15 +1100 (EST), Adam 'WeirdArms' Wiggins wrote: >> Hi, I've recently tried out running PLEB hardware with 64MB of >> DRAM vs 32MB. However being lazy I didn't modify the bootloader to zero >> out the additional 32MB of ram. On boot the kernel freezing after being >> unzipped. Is it freezing due to the top 32MB of mem not being zero'd or >> might it be something else? > >BLOB tries to zero the complete SA1100 memory range, so unless you >modified BLOB, it will also zero your additional 32MB DRAM. No, it only zeroes the range from C0000000-CFFFFFFF, or the first two banks. JDB. -- Jan-Derk Bakker, bakker@mmc.et.tudelft.nl The lazy man's proverb: 'There's no business like slow business !' From kramer@pa.dec.com Thu Mar 23 02:07:45 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id CAA25427; Thu, 23 Mar 2000 02:07:44 +0100 (MET) Received: from ns2.tudelft.nl (ns2.tudelft.nl [130.161.180.65]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.8.6 (PHNE_17135)/8.8.6) with ESMTP id CAA29296 for ; Thu, 23 Mar 2000 02:07:44 +0100 (MET) Received: from mail1.digital.com (mail1.digital.com [204.123.2.50]) by mailhost1.tudelft.nl (PMDF V5.2-32 #42432) with ESMTP id <0FRU001GHOGUS8@mailhost1.tudelft.nl> for J.A.K.Mouw@its.tudelft.nl; Thu, 23 Mar 2000 02:07:43 +0100 (MET) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id RAA18151; Wed, 22 Mar 2000 17:01:44 -0800 (PST) Received: from rex.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA18025; Wed, 22 Mar 2000 17:01:30 -0800 Received: by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id RAA17534; Wed, 22 Mar 2000 17:00:58 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id RAA17502; Wed, 22 Mar 2000 17:00:57 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail2.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA08740; Wed, 22 Mar 2000 17:00:56 -0800 Received: from note.orchestra.cse.unsw.EDU.AU (note.orchestra.cse.unsw.EDU.AU [129.94.242.29]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id RAA16579 for ; Wed, 22 Mar 2000 17:00:54 -0800 (PST) Received: From paulaner With LocalMail ; Thu, 23 Mar 2000 11:59:37 +1100 Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2000 11:59:37 +1100 (EST) From: "Adam 'WeirdArms' Wiggins" Subject: Re: Linux and zeroed memory In-reply-to: <20000322190502.A21291@etek.chalmers.se> Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com X-Sender: awiggins@paulaner.disy.cse.unsw.EDU.AU To: Per Borgentun Cc: SA1100-linux@pa.dec.com Message-id: MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Precedence: bulk On Wed, 22 Mar 2000, Per Borgentun wrote: > * Adam 'WeirdArms' Wiggins (awiggins@cse.unsw.edu.au) [000322 08:58]: > > Hi, I've recently tried out running PLEB hardware with 64MB of > > DRAM vs 32MB. However being lazy I didn't modify the bootloader to zero > > out the additional 32MB of ram. On boot the kernel freezing after being > > unzipped. Is it freezing due to the top 32MB of mem not being zero'd or > > might it be something else? > > > > Cheers Adam > > I have had similar problem with our own sa1100 based 'Popey' hardware, > using 2.2.12 Image file works fine but using 2.2.12 zImage > or 2.2.14 zImage kernel makes it freeze after unpacking the kernel. > We are not zeroing any memory. > Does anyone have any hints on whats going on ? Basically with ours I ran a kernel with setting for 32MB of DRAM and it loaded and ran fine on the 64MB hardware but only showing 32MB avaliable. Then setting it to 64MB didn't work. Now that I think about it does linux play with the memory controlers at all or does it asume the boot loader initialised them? I just remembered the boot loader doesn't even enable the last 2 banks either. Cheers Adam From kramer@pa.dec.com Thu Mar 23 03:28:56 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id DAA25953; Thu, 23 Mar 2000 03:28:56 +0100 (MET) Received: from ns2.tudelft.nl (ns2.tudelft.nl [130.161.180.65]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.8.6 (PHNE_17135)/8.8.6) with ESMTP id DAA00319 for ; Thu, 23 Mar 2000 03:28:55 +0100 (MET) Received: from mail1.digital.com (mail1.digital.com [204.123.2.50]) by mailhost1.tudelft.nl (PMDF V5.2-32 #42432) with ESMTP id <0FRU002JGS86X6@mailhost1.tudelft.nl> for J.A.K.Mouw@its.tudelft.nl; Thu, 23 Mar 2000 03:28:55 +0100 (MET) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id SAA20547; Wed, 22 Mar 2000 18:23:28 -0800 (PST) Received: from rex.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA26630; Wed, 22 Mar 2000 18:23:21 -0800 Received: by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id SAA17579; Wed, 22 Mar 2000 18:22:38 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id SAA17603; Wed, 22 Mar 2000 18:22:37 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail1.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA03524; Wed, 22 Mar 2000 18:22:37 -0800 Received: from xanadu.gn.com (modemcable248.137-200-24.mtl.mc.videotron.net [24.200.137.248]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with ESMTP id SAA21887 for ; Wed, 22 Mar 2000 18:22:36 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (nico@localhost) by xanadu.gn.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id VAA01983; Wed, 22 Mar 2000 21:28:16 -0500 Date: Wed, 22 Mar 2000 21:28:16 -0500 (EST) From: Nicolas Pitre Subject: Re: Linux and zeroed memory In-reply-to: Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com X-Sender: nico@xanadu.gn.com To: "Adam 'WeirdArms' Wiggins" Cc: SA-1100/Linux Message-id: MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Precedence: bulk X-Authentication-warning: xanadu.gn.com: nico owned process doing -bs On Thu, 23 Mar 2000, Adam 'WeirdArms' Wiggins wrote: > Basically with ours I ran a kernel with setting for 32MB of DRAM > and it loaded and ran fine on the 64MB hardware but only showing 32MB > avaliable. Then setting it to 64MB didn't work. Now that I think about it > does linux play with the memory controlers at all or does it asume the > boot loader initialised them? I just remembered the boot loader doesn't > even enable the last 2 banks either. That's probably your problem. The kernel doesn't touch memory regs. Nicolas From kramer@pa.dec.com Thu Mar 23 10:05:07 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id KAA28287; Thu, 23 Mar 2000 10:05:01 +0100 (MET) Received: from ns2.tudelft.nl (ns2.tudelft.nl [130.161.180.65]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.8.6 (PHNE_17135)/8.8.6) with ESMTP id KAA06574 for ; Thu, 23 Mar 2000 10:05:01 +0100 (MET) Received: from mail1.digital.com (mail1.digital.com [204.123.2.50]) by mailhost1.tudelft.nl (PMDF V5.2-32 #42432) with ESMTP id <0FRV00DKQAKBTK@mailhost1.tudelft.nl> for J.A.K.Mouw@its.tudelft.nl; Thu, 23 Mar 2000 10:05:00 +0100 (MET) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id AAA11631; Thu, 23 Mar 2000 00:58:38 -0800 (PST) Received: from rex.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA29959; Thu, 23 Mar 2000 00:58:31 -0800 Received: by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id AAA17811; Thu, 23 Mar 2000 00:53:43 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id AAA17814; Thu, 23 Mar 2000 00:53:42 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail1.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA12000; Thu, 23 Mar 2000 00:53:42 -0800 Received: from funai-tky.co.jp (ns.funai-tky.co.jp [210.154.37.2]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with ESMTP id AAA08718 for ; Thu, 23 Mar 2000 00:53:40 -0800 (PST) Received: from hiropu ([192.168.1.19]) by funai-tky.co.jp (8.9.1/3.7Wpr7-98092916) with SMTP id RAA29731 for ; Thu, 23 Mar 2000 17:53:37 +0900 Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2000 17:53:25 +0900 From: Hiroshi Ishii Subject: ne2000 based card trouble Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com To: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Message-id: <38D9DB851AA.BDA1HIROSHI@ns.funai-tky.co.jp> MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Becky! ver 1.25.09 Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk Hello. Does anybody work ne2000 based card correctly on SA11x0? I met trouble ftp/telnet not work. It seems odd packet don't send/receive correctly. I try follow command; ping -s 555 return follow message; wrong data byte #554 should be 0x2a but was 0xd4 Do I need modify ne.c? ---- Funai Electric R & D Co.,LTD Hiroshi Ishii From kramer@pa.dec.com Thu Mar 23 19:01:53 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id TAA01675; Thu, 23 Mar 2000 19:01:53 +0100 (MET) Received: from ns2.tudelft.nl (ns2.tudelft.nl [130.161.180.65]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.8.6 (PHNE_17135)/8.8.6) with ESMTP id TAA23209 for ; Thu, 23 Mar 2000 19:01:52 +0100 (MET) Received: from mail1.digital.com (mail1.digital.com [204.123.2.50]) by mailhost1.tudelft.nl (PMDF V5.2-32 #42432) with ESMTP id <0FRV00508ZF3CF@mailhost1.tudelft.nl> for J.A.K.Mouw@its.tudelft.nl; Thu, 23 Mar 2000 19:01:52 +0100 (MET) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id JAA10874; Thu, 23 Mar 2000 09:56:02 -0800 (PST) Received: from rex.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA01979; Thu, 23 Mar 2000 09:55:48 -0800 Received: by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id JAA17996; Thu, 23 Mar 2000 09:55:09 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id JAA17966; Thu, 23 Mar 2000 09:55:08 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail1.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA29128; Thu, 23 Mar 2000 09:55:08 -0800 Received: from xanadu.vipswitch.com (generic199.197.205.205.in-addr.arpa [205.205.197.199] (may be forged)) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with ESMTP id JAA12356 for ; Thu, 23 Mar 2000 09:55:06 -0800 (PST) Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2000 12:52:05 -0500 (EST) From: Nicolas Pitre Subject: Re: ne2000 based card trouble In-reply-to: <38D9DB851AA.BDA1HIROSHI@ns.funai-tky.co.jp> Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com To: Hiroshi Ishii Cc: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Message-id: MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Precedence: bulk On Thu, 23 Mar 2000, Hiroshi Ishii wrote: > Hello. > > Does anybody work ne2000 based card correctly on SA11x0? > > I met trouble ftp/telnet not work. It seems odd packet > don't send/receive correctly. I have a similar problem with a SMC9194 chipset. NFS works, even packet length pings too, but TCP connections just hang forever somewhere. Nicolas From kramer@pa.dec.com Thu Mar 23 19:14:43 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id TAA01736; Thu, 23 Mar 2000 19:14:38 +0100 (MET) Received: from ns2.tudelft.nl (ns2.tudelft.nl [130.161.180.65]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.8.6 (PHNE_17135)/8.8.6) with ESMTP id TAA23538 for ; Thu, 23 Mar 2000 19:14:37 +0100 (MET) Received: from mail2.digital.com (mail2.digital.com [204.123.2.56]) by mailhost1.tudelft.nl (PMDF V5.2-32 #42432) with ESMTP id <0FRW005D600CAC@mailhost1.tudelft.nl> for J.A.K.Mouw@its.tudelft.nl; Thu, 23 Mar 2000 19:14:37 +0100 (MET) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id KAA04289; Thu, 23 Mar 2000 10:09:19 -0800 (PST) Received: from rex.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA28662; Thu, 23 Mar 2000 10:09:17 -0800 Received: by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id KAA18008; Thu, 23 Mar 2000 10:09:08 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id KAA17991; Thu, 23 Mar 2000 10:09:08 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail1.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA13646; Thu, 23 Mar 2000 10:09:07 -0800 Received: from mailgate.keith-koep.com (mailgate.keith-koep.com [195.8.230.32]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with ESMTP id KAA13923 for ; Thu, 23 Mar 2000 10:09:06 -0800 (PST) Received: from otto (otto [195.8.230.40]) by mailgate.keith-koep.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id TAA01110 for ; Thu, 23 Mar 2000 19:14:11 +0100 Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2000 19:08:32 +0100 (MET) From: keith Subject: SMC91C96 OK Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com To: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Reply-to: keith Message-id: <200003231814.TAA01110@mailgate.keith-koep.com> MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: dtmail 1.2.0 CDE Version 1.2 SunOS 5.6 sun4u sparc Content-type: TEXT/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-MD5: Q2W+oBXxchiFOVCq2Ryghw== Precedence: bulk Our smc91c96 port is working OK. But we have several adaptions to different board types. Are you working with a pcmcia card (Ositech, SMC) or with an on board controller ? > > I have a similar problem with a SMC9194 chipset. NFS works, even packet > length pings too, but TCP connections just hang forever somewhere. > _________________________________________________________________ | | | KEITH & KOEP GMBH DEVELOPMENT OF EMBEDDED CONTROL SYSTEMS | | KOENIGSBERGER STR.2 PHONE +49 (0)202 2525 30 | | D-42277 WUPPERTAL FAX +49 (0)202 2525 333 | | GERMANY keith@keith-koep.com | |_________________________________________________________________| From kramer@pa.dec.com Thu Mar 23 19:49:59 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id TAA01856; Thu, 23 Mar 2000 19:49:59 +0100 (MET) Received: from ns2.tudelft.nl (ns2.tudelft.nl [130.161.180.65]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.8.6 (PHNE_17135)/8.8.6) with ESMTP id TAA24200 for ; Thu, 23 Mar 2000 19:49:58 +0100 (MET) Received: from mail2.digital.com (mail2.digital.com [204.123.2.56]) by mailhost1.tudelft.nl (PMDF V5.2-32 #42432) with ESMTP id <0FRW0072V1N924@mailhost1.tudelft.nl> for J.A.K.Mouw@its.tudelft.nl; Thu, 23 Mar 2000 19:49:58 +0100 (MET) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id KAA10789; Thu, 23 Mar 2000 10:44:46 -0800 (PST) Received: from rex.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA27935; Thu, 23 Mar 2000 10:44:44 -0800 Received: by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id KAA18011; Thu, 23 Mar 2000 10:44:32 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id KAA18031; Thu, 23 Mar 2000 10:44:31 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail2.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA06452; Thu, 23 Mar 2000 10:44:31 -0800 Received: from xanadu.vipswitch.com (generic199.197.205.205.in-addr.arpa [205.205.197.199] (may be forged)) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with ESMTP id KAA11264 for ; Thu, 23 Mar 2000 10:44:28 -0800 (PST) Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2000 13:41:56 -0500 (EST) From: Nicolas Pitre Subject: Re: SMC91C96 OK In-reply-to: <200003231814.TAA01110@mailgate.keith-koep.com> Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com To: keith Cc: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Message-id: MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Precedence: bulk On Thu, 23 Mar 2000, keith wrote: > Our smc91c96 port is working OK. But we have several adaptions > to different board types. Maybe you could look at diff-2.3.99-pre1-rmk1-np1. I isolated all IO access of the smc9194.c driver into macros so multiple implementation could share the same codebase. It's not fully cleaned yet, but you should need only few lines to make it work with your setup. > Are you working with a pcmcia card (Ositech, SMC) or with an on board > controller ? It's on-board. Nicolas From kramer@pa.dec.com Thu Mar 23 22:32:14 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id WAA02490; Thu, 23 Mar 2000 22:32:14 +0100 (MET) Received: from ns2.tudelft.nl (ns2.tudelft.nl [130.161.180.65]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.8.6 (PHNE_17135)/8.8.6) with ESMTP id WAA27578 for ; Thu, 23 Mar 2000 22:32:13 +0100 (MET) Received: from mail2.digital.com (mail2.digital.com [204.123.2.56]) by mailhost1.tudelft.nl (PMDF V5.2-32 #42432) with ESMTP id <0FRW00CBX95NB3@mailhost1.tudelft.nl> for J.A.K.Mouw@its.tudelft.nl; Thu, 23 Mar 2000 22:32:12 +0100 (MET) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id NAA17500; Thu, 23 Mar 2000 13:26:56 -0800 (PST) Received: from rex.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA03276; Thu, 23 Mar 2000 13:26:49 -0800 Received: by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id NAA18090; Thu, 23 Mar 2000 13:26:04 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id NAA18079; Thu, 23 Mar 2000 13:26:04 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail2.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA29402; Thu, 23 Mar 2000 13:26:03 -0800 Received: from duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (duteinh.et.tudelft.nl [130.161.42.1]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with ESMTP id NAA19323 for ; Thu, 23 Mar 2000 13:26:02 -0800 (PST) Received: from kalman by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id WAA02462; Thu, 23 Mar 2000 22:24:46 +0100 (MET) Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2000 22:24:46 +0100 (MET) From: Erik Mouw X-Face: "!Z|1XjFg!3Iw)BwM^M\k)J5KHiPddz}#/Zw%?$&Q!xqob"OA|})3_@&BTTiQERo?/^g[Z<9P4R8:5C:aqq.cw!hotLc=+u-"+1rq@9$V^8PbOUlodyi_sejt+D`iqkLpx$>.aXl%vnfPIt"LK|/%>94_Zrm8jy?`_[RKt'TuoxUxfk(gMhY(n|DBBl~c$dhO>G%6}R4+DGX3|idBm4oU&UM/XUP4I9aoN{]`ax%B?rgD(I3OJ<62Y6L Subject: UCB-1200 Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com To: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Message-id: <200003232124.WAA02462@duteinh.et.tudelft.nl> Organization: Eric conspiracy secret labs MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: XCmail 1.0.0 - with PGP support, PGP engine version 0.5 (Linux) Content-type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-transfer-encoding: 8bit Precedence: bulk X-Loop: erik@it.et.tudelft.nl X-Mailerorigin: http://www.fsai.fh-trier.de/~schmitzj/Xclasses/XCmail/ X-Eric-Conspiracy: There is no conspiracy! Hi all, The first two LART KSB prototypes just arrived, so if I can find some spare time this weekend, I'd like to fiddle with the UCB-1200. AFAIK, the Brutus also has this chip, and I'd like to know if somebody has experience with it. Is it functional, is there a driver (I can't find it in the kernel sources)? Erik [who doesn't have a Brutus, just a LART] -- "I'm just this guy you know?" -- Zaphod Beeblebrox in "The Hitchhikers Guide to the Galaxy" by Douglas Adams From kramer@pa.dec.com Thu Mar 23 22:54:14 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id WAA02571; Thu, 23 Mar 2000 22:54:14 +0100 (MET) Received: from ns2.tudelft.nl (ns2.tudelft.nl [130.161.180.65]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.8.6 (PHNE_17135)/8.8.6) with ESMTP id WAA28039 for ; Thu, 23 Mar 2000 22:54:13 +0100 (MET) Received: from mail2.digital.com (mail2.digital.com [204.123.2.56]) by mailhost1.tudelft.nl (PMDF V5.2-32 #42432) with ESMTP id <0FRW00CLEA6BDS@mailhost1.tudelft.nl> for J.A.K.Mouw@its.tudelft.nl; Thu, 23 Mar 2000 22:54:13 +0100 (MET) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id NAA22237; Thu, 23 Mar 2000 13:49:03 -0800 (PST) Received: from rex.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA08109; Thu, 23 Mar 2000 13:49:02 -0800 Received: by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id NAA17504; Thu, 23 Mar 2000 13:48:53 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id NAA18109; Thu, 23 Mar 2000 13:48:53 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail2.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA03471; Thu, 23 Mar 2000 13:48:52 -0800 Received: from xanadu.vipswitch.com (generic199.197.205.205.in-addr.arpa [205.205.197.199] (may be forged)) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with ESMTP id NAA22087 for ; Thu, 23 Mar 2000 13:48:47 -0800 (PST) Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2000 16:40:13 -0500 (EST) From: Nicolas Pitre Subject: Re: UCB-1200 In-reply-to: <200003232124.WAA02462@duteinh.et.tudelft.nl> Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com To: Erik Mouw Cc: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Message-id: MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Precedence: bulk On Thu, 23 Mar 2000, Erik Mouw wrote: > Hi all, > > The first two LART KSB prototypes just arrived, so if I can find some > spare time this weekend, I'd like to fiddle with the UCB-1200. AFAIK, the > Brutus also has this chip, and I'd like to know if somebody has experience > with it. Is it functional, is there a driver (I can't find it in the > kernel sources)? See 2.2.x patches. I didn't port it over to 2.3 yet. Nicolas From kramer@pa.dec.com Thu Mar 23 23:01:13 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id XAA02607; Thu, 23 Mar 2000 23:01:13 +0100 (MET) Received: from ns2.tudelft.nl (ns2.tudelft.nl [130.161.180.65]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.8.6 (PHNE_17135)/8.8.6) with ESMTP id XAA28171 for ; Thu, 23 Mar 2000 23:01:13 +0100 (MET) Received: from mail1.digital.com (mail1.digital.com [204.123.2.50]) by mailhost1.tudelft.nl (PMDF V5.2-32 #42432) with ESMTP id <0FRW00DDPAI0AJ@mailhost1.tudelft.nl> for J.A.K.Mouw@its.tudelft.nl; Thu, 23 Mar 2000 23:01:13 +0100 (MET) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id NAA28985; Thu, 23 Mar 2000 13:56:04 -0800 (PST) Received: from rex.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA15078; Thu, 23 Mar 2000 13:56:03 -0800 Received: by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id NAA18095; Thu, 23 Mar 2000 13:55:56 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id NAA18004; Thu, 23 Mar 2000 13:55:55 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail1.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA17023; Thu, 23 Mar 2000 13:55:55 -0800 Received: from duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (duteinh.et.tudelft.nl [130.161.42.1]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with ESMTP id NAA27002 for ; Thu, 23 Mar 2000 13:55:54 -0800 (PST) Received: from kalman by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id WAA02575; Thu, 23 Mar 2000 22:54:36 +0100 (MET) Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2000 22:54:36 +0100 (MET) From: Erik Mouw X-Face: "!Z|1XjFg!3Iw)BwM^M\k)J5KHiPddz}#/Zw%?$&Q!xqob"OA|})3_@&BTTiQERo?/^g[Z<9P4R8:5C:aqq.cw!hotLc=+u-"+1rq@9$V^8PbOUlodyi_sejt+D`iqkLpx$>.aXl%vnfPIt"LK|/%>94_Zrm8jy?`_[RKt'TuoxUxfk(gMhY(n|DBBl~c$dhO>G%6}R4+DGX3|idBm4oU&UM/XUP4I9aoN{]`ax%B?rgD(I3OJ<62Y6L Subject: Re: UCB-1200 In-reply-to: Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com To: nico@CAM.ORG Cc: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Message-id: <200003232154.WAA02575@duteinh.et.tudelft.nl> Organization: Eric conspiracy secret labs MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: XCmail 1.0.0 - with PGP support, PGP engine version 0.5 (Linux) Content-type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-transfer-encoding: 8bit Precedence: bulk X-Loop: erik@it.et.tudelft.nl X-Mailerorigin: http://www.fsai.fh-trier.de/~schmitzj/Xclasses/XCmail/ X-Eric-Conspiracy: There is no conspiracy! On Thu, 23 Mar 2000 16:40:13 -0500 (EST), Nicolas Pitre wrote: > On Thu, 23 Mar 2000, Erik Mouw wrote: >> The first two LART KSB prototypes just arrived, so if I can find some >> spare time this weekend, I'd like to fiddle with the UCB-1200. AFAIK, the >> Brutus also has this chip, and I'd like to know if somebody has experience >> with it. Is it functional, is there a driver (I can't find it in the >> kernel sources)? > > See 2.2.x patches. I didn't port it over to 2.3 yet. Ah! I was grep'ing through a 2.3 tree... %-) A 2.2 tree contains much more information. Given the fact that the Itsy guys made it, I assume it is functional. Erik -- "software industry, the: unique industry where selling substandard goods is legal and you can charge extra for fixing the problems." -- Duncan Simpson on BugTraq From kramer@pa.dec.com Thu Mar 23 23:32:38 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id XAA02730; Thu, 23 Mar 2000 23:32:38 +0100 (MET) Received: from ns2.tudelft.nl (ns2.tudelft.nl [130.161.180.65]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.8.6 (PHNE_17135)/8.8.6) with ESMTP id XAA28927 for ; Thu, 23 Mar 2000 23:32:38 +0100 (MET) Received: from mail1.digital.com (mail1.digital.com [204.123.2.50]) by mailhost1.tudelft.nl (PMDF V5.2-32 #42432) with ESMTP id <0FRW00EALBYCIT@mailhost1.tudelft.nl> for J.A.K.Mouw@its.tudelft.nl; Thu, 23 Mar 2000 23:32:38 +0100 (MET) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id OAA25853; Thu, 23 Mar 2000 14:27:14 -0800 (PST) Received: from rex.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA31167; Thu, 23 Mar 2000 14:27:08 -0800 Received: by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id OAA18131; Thu, 23 Mar 2000 14:26:38 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id OAA18134; Thu, 23 Mar 2000 14:26:37 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail1.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA10119; Thu, 23 Mar 2000 14:26:37 -0800 Received: from xanadu.vipswitch.com (generic199.197.205.205.in-addr.arpa [205.205.197.199] (may be forged)) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with ESMTP id OAA32031 for ; Thu, 23 Mar 2000 14:26:36 -0800 (PST) Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2000 17:18:21 -0500 (EST) From: Nicolas Pitre Subject: Re: UCB-1200 In-reply-to: <200003232154.WAA02575@duteinh.et.tudelft.nl> Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com To: Erik Mouw Cc: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Message-id: MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Precedence: bulk On Thu, 23 Mar 2000, Erik Mouw wrote: > On Thu, 23 Mar 2000 16:40:13 -0500 (EST), Nicolas Pitre wrote: > > > > See 2.2.x patches. I didn't port it over to 2.3 yet. > > Ah! I was grep'ing through a 2.3 tree... %-) A 2.2 tree contains much more > information. Given the fact that the Itsy guys made it, I assume it is > functional. But... if ever you feel like porting it to 2.3... be my guest! :-) Nicolas From kramer@pa.dec.com Fri Mar 24 14:48:04 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id OAA06620; Fri, 24 Mar 2000 14:48:03 +0100 (MET) Received: from ns2.tudelft.nl (ns2.tudelft.nl [130.161.180.65]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.8.6 (PHNE_17135)/8.8.6) with ESMTP id OAA19311 for ; Fri, 24 Mar 2000 14:48:03 +0100 (MET) Received: from mail1.digital.com (mail1.digital.com [204.123.2.50]) by mailhost1.tudelft.nl (PMDF V5.2-32 #42432) with ESMTP id <0FRX003QPIC28Q@mailhost1.tudelft.nl> for J.A.K.Mouw@its.tudelft.nl; Fri, 24 Mar 2000 14:48:03 +0100 (MET) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id FAA16698; Fri, 24 Mar 2000 05:40:52 -0800 (PST) Received: from rex.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA06368; Fri, 24 Mar 2000 05:40:42 -0800 Received: by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id FAA18434; Fri, 24 Mar 2000 05:39:01 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id FAA18427; Fri, 24 Mar 2000 05:39:00 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail2.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA02993; Fri, 24 Mar 2000 05:38:59 -0800 Received: from gate1.itt.com (gate1.itt.com [151.190.254.100]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id FAA06023 for ; Fri, 24 Mar 2000 05:38:59 -0800 (PST) Received: from FWEMAIL2 by gate1.itt.com via smtpd (for mail2.digital.com [204.123.2.56]) with SMTP; Fri, 24 Mar 2000 13:38:59 +0000 (UT) Received: by fwemail2.de.ittind.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21) id ; Fri, 24 Mar 2000 08:38:46 -0500 Date: Fri, 24 Mar 2000 08:38:45 -0500 From: "Latham, Steve" Subject: RE: any linux running on Assebet? Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com To: "'daihbxd'" Cc: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Message-id: MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21) Content-type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Precedence: bulk I'm working on it, but I've little related previous experience. I'm into init_irq. I only have output by brute force to the UART physical address. I've yet to get the kernel to handle output properly ( printk ). From what I understand from one blurb in the angel code, assabet GPIO alternate mappings for UART 1 are not physically realized - so that is the mod I'm working and I thought I had that resolved, but I'm missing something. Steve PS: Any help is welcome! -----Original Message----- From: daihbxd [mailto:daihbxd@sina.com] Sent: Friday, March 24, 2000 2:35 PM To: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Subject: any linux running on Assebet? I got my Assebet(SA1110,32M RAM,32M FLASH), with linux 2.3.35,rmk1,np7, the processor id corrected,but it just doesnt work. anybody got linux running on Assebet? It seems SA1100 is going to be out-dated,but SA1110 is still just a box:) advices,please. =================================================================== PB@KCb7Q5gWSSJOd http://mail.sina.com.cn From kramer@pa.dec.com Fri Mar 24 06:43:55 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id GAA04163; Fri, 24 Mar 2000 06:43:54 +0100 (MET) Received: from ns2.tudelft.nl (ns2.tudelft.nl [130.161.180.65]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.8.6 (PHNE_17135)/8.8.6) with ESMTP id GAA06355 for ; Fri, 24 Mar 2000 06:43:53 +0100 (MET) Received: from mail1.digital.com (mail1.digital.com [204.123.2.50]) by mailhost1.tudelft.nl (PMDF V5.2-32 #42432) with ESMTP id <0FRW0007TVX4J0@mailhost1.tudelft.nl> for J.A.K.Mouw@its.tudelft.nl; Fri, 24 Mar 2000 06:43:53 +0100 (MET) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id VAA25698; Thu, 23 Mar 2000 21:36:05 -0800 (PST) Received: from rex.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA16187; Thu, 23 Mar 2000 21:35:51 -0800 Received: by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id VAA18264; Thu, 23 Mar 2000 21:34:28 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id VAA18272; Thu, 23 Mar 2000 21:34:28 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail1.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA15766; Thu, 23 Mar 2000 21:34:27 -0800 Received: from sina.com ([202.106.187.163]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id VAA25935 for ; Thu, 23 Mar 2000 21:34:18 -0800 (PST) Received: (qmail 5490 invoked by uid 99); Fri, 24 Mar 2000 05:34:45 +0000 Date: Fri Mar 24 13:34:45 CST 2000 From: daihbxd Subject: any linux running on Assebet? Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com To: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Message-id: <20000324053445.5489.qmail@sina.com> X-Mailer: SinaMail 3.0Beta (FireToad) Precedence: bulk I got my Assebet(SA1110,32M RAM,32M FLASH), with linux 2.3.35,rmk1,np7, the processor id corrected,but it just doesnt work. anybody got linux running on Assebet? It seems SA1100 is going to be out-dated,but SA1110 is still just a box:) advices,please. =================================================================== PB@KCb7Q5gWSSJOd http://mail.sina.com.cn From kramer@pa.dec.com Thu Mar 30 20:33:53 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id UAA14968; Thu, 30 Mar 2000 20:33:53 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from ns2.tudelft.nl (ns2.tudelft.nl [130.161.180.65]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.8.6 (PHNE_17135)/8.8.6) with ESMTP id UAA01177 for ; Thu, 30 Mar 2000 20:33:53 +0200 (METDST) Received: from mail2.digital.com (mail2.digital.com [204.123.2.56]) by mailhost1.tudelft.nl (PMDF V5.2-32 #42432) with ESMTP id <0FS8007K2ZKFX8@mailhost1.tudelft.nl> for J.A.K.Mouw@its.tudelft.nl; Thu, 30 Mar 2000 20:33:53 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id KAA14636; Thu, 30 Mar 2000 10:28:08 -0800 (PST) Received: from rex.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA12678; Thu, 30 Mar 2000 10:27:58 -0800 Received: by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id KAA20909; Thu, 30 Mar 2000 10:25:05 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id KAA20898; Thu, 30 Mar 2000 10:25:04 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail2.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA02680; Thu, 30 Mar 2000 10:25:04 -0800 Received: from xanadu.vipswitch.com (generic199.197.205.205.in-addr.arpa [205.205.197.199] (may be forged)) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with ESMTP id KAA03090 for ; Thu, 30 Mar 2000 10:24:54 -0800 (PST) Date: Thu, 30 Mar 2000 13:22:54 -0500 (EST) From: Nicolas Pitre Subject: diff-2.3.99-pre3-rmk1-np1 Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com To: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Message-id: MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Precedence: bulk ... is available from ftp://ftp.netwinder.org/users/n/nico . This contains: - serial driver updates to reflect latest changes in the kernel - big time timer cleanup (time keeping is now exact) * Mike: Tell Hugo to look at it -- I think my solution is much better than his! :-) - Intel Flash block driver (currently broken: CURRENT->sector doesn't seem to be the current sector anymore, after all block device changes lately) * there is a diff-2.3.35-rmk1-np9 with this driver working BTW: Russell already merged parts of previous SA1100 patches! NOTE: It seems that at least one certain big organisation is unable to reach ftp.netwinder.org at all for many days now. If it's your case, I've exceptionaly put a copy if diff-2.3.99-pre3-rmk1-np1.gz on ftp.cam.org/users/nico. In either case, I would like to know if you are able to access ftp.netwinder.org or not. Please sent me a private e-mail. Have fun! Nicolas From kramer@pa.dec.com Fri Mar 31 20:49:37 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id UAA22346; Fri, 31 Mar 2000 20:49:37 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from ns2.tudelft.nl (ns2.tudelft.nl [130.161.180.65]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.8.6 (PHNE_17135)/8.8.6) with ESMTP id UAA06156 for ; Fri, 31 Mar 2000 20:49:35 +0200 (METDST) Received: from mail2.digital.com (mail2.digital.com [204.123.2.56]) by mailhost1.tudelft.nl (PMDF V5.2-32 #42432) with ESMTP id <0FSA0059RUYM6R@mailhost1.tudelft.nl> for J.A.K.Mouw@its.tudelft.nl; Fri, 31 Mar 2000 20:49:35 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id KAA23609; Fri, 31 Mar 2000 10:43:48 -0800 (PST) Received: from rex.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA22725; Fri, 31 Mar 2000 10:43:15 -0800 Received: by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id KAA21364; Fri, 31 Mar 2000 10:40:34 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id KAA21356; Fri, 31 Mar 2000 10:40:33 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail2.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA29918; Fri, 31 Mar 2000 10:40:33 -0800 Received: from ADSServer.flatpanels.com (flatpanels.com [207.196.69.66] (may be forged)) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with ESMTP id KAA09989 for ; Fri, 31 Mar 2000 10:40:33 -0800 (PST) Received: by flatpanels.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21) id ; Fri, 31 Mar 2000 13:36:07 -0500 Date: Fri, 31 Mar 2000 13:36:00 -0500 From: "Saxena, Nikita" Subject: Recent Ramdisks Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com To: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Message-id: <91B07CA588CED3118CFE00105AC97594D160@flatpanels.com> MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21) Content-type: text/plain Precedence: bulk Hi everyone, I was wondering if anyone knows of recent ext2fs ramdisks for SA1100 available for download from the internet. Thanks, Nikita From kramer@pa.dec.com Mon Apr 3 20:21:16 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id UAA05922; Mon, 3 Apr 2000 20:21:15 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from ns2.tudelft.nl (ns2.tudelft.nl [130.161.180.65]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.8.6 (PHNE_17135)/8.8.6) with ESMTP id UAA28528 for ; Mon, 3 Apr 2000 20:21:15 +0200 (METDST) Received: from mail1.digital.com (mail1.digital.com [204.123.2.50]) by mailhost1.tudelft.nl (PMDF V5.2-32 #42432) with ESMTP id <0FSG00MMMDNCVE@mailhost1.tudelft.nl> for J.A.K.Mouw@its.tudelft.nl; Mon, 3 Apr 2000 20:21:14 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id LAA08576; Mon, 03 Apr 2000 11:15:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rex.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA00484; Mon, 03 Apr 2000 11:15:28 -0700 Received: by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id LAA22595; Mon, 03 Apr 2000 11:13:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id LAA22597; Mon, 03 Apr 2000 11:13:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail2.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA15490; Mon, 03 Apr 2000 11:13:25 -0700 Received: from duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (duteinh.et.tudelft.nl [130.161.42.1]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with ESMTP id LAA20708 for ; Mon, 03 Apr 2000 11:13:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: from kalman by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id UAA05887; Mon, 03 Apr 2000 20:12:04 +0200 (MET DST) Date: Mon, 03 Apr 2000 20:12:04 +0200 (MET DST) From: Erik Mouw X-Face: "!Z|1XjFg!3Iw)BwM^M\k)J5KHiPddz}#/Zw%?$&Q!xqob"OA|})3_@&BTTiQERo?/^g[Z<9P4R8:5C:aqq.cw!hotLc=+u-"+1rq@9$V^8PbOUlodyi_sejt+D`iqkLpx$>.aXl%vnfPIt"LK|/%>94_Zrm8jy?`_[RKt'TuoxUxfk(gMhY(n|DBBl~c$dhO>G%6}R4+DGX3|idBm4oU&UM/XUP4I9aoN{]`ax%B?rgD(I3OJ<62Y6L Subject: Announce: LART ramdisk page Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com To: lart@lart.tudelft.nl Cc: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Message-id: <200004031812.UAA05887@duteinh.et.tudelft.nl> Organization: Eric conspiracy secret labs MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: XCmail 1.0.0 - with PGP support, PGP engine version 0.5 (Linux) Content-type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-transfer-encoding: 8bit Precedence: bulk X-Loop: erik@it.et.tudelft.nl X-Mailerorigin: http://www.fsai.fh-trier.de/~schmitzj/Xclasses/XCmail/ X-Eric-Conspiracy: There is no conspiracy! Hi all, We just made a page with RAM disks on the LART site (see signature for URL). There are currently two ramdisks available: the modified Itsy ramdisk, and a glibc-2.1.2 based ramdisk. The latter is not yet tested, but we all know about Eric Raymond's "release early, release often" mantra... Erik -- LART. 250 MIPS under one Watt. Free hardware design files. http://www.lart.tudelft.nl/ From kramer@pa.dec.com Mon Apr 3 20:53:40 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id UAA06099; Mon, 3 Apr 2000 20:53:40 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from ns2.tudelft.nl (ns2.tudelft.nl [130.161.180.65]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.8.6 (PHNE_17135)/8.8.6) with ESMTP id UAA29377 for ; Mon, 3 Apr 2000 20:53:40 +0200 (METDST) Received: from mail2.digital.com (mail2.digital.com [204.123.2.56]) by mailhost1.tudelft.nl (PMDF V5.2-32 #42432) with ESMTP id <0FSG000JLF5CUH@mailhost1.tudelft.nl> for J.A.K.Mouw@its.tudelft.nl; Mon, 3 Apr 2000 20:53:38 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id LAA29413; Mon, 03 Apr 2000 11:48:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rex.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA14484; Mon, 03 Apr 2000 11:48:27 -0700 Received: by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id LAA22577; Mon, 03 Apr 2000 11:48:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id LAA22625; Mon, 03 Apr 2000 11:48:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail2.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA22509; Mon, 03 Apr 2000 11:48:02 -0700 Received: from xanadu.vipswitch.com (generic199.197.205.205.in-addr.arpa [205.205.197.199] (may be forged)) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with ESMTP id LAA30366 for ; Mon, 03 Apr 2000 11:48:01 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 03 Apr 2000 14:37:08 -0400 (EDT) From: Nicolas Pitre Subject: Re: Announce: LART ramdisk page In-reply-to: <200004031812.UAA05887@duteinh.et.tudelft.nl> Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com To: Erik Mouw Cc: lart@lart.tudelft.nl, sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Message-id: MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Precedence: bulk On Mon, 3 Apr 2000, Erik Mouw wrote: > Hi all, > > We just made a page with RAM disks on the LART site (see signature for > URL). There are currently two ramdisks available: the modified Itsy > ramdisk, and a glibc-2.1.2 based ramdisk. Damn! I was just about to announce that I produced a glibc-2.1.2 ramdisk too! I finished it an hour ago. I wanted to test it tonight before announcing it... :-) So, if all is well, I'll have a new ramdisk image available by tomorrow too, stuffed with Red Hat style sysv initscripts, z-modem and many networking tools. Nicolas From kramer@pa.dec.com Mon Apr 3 22:53:13 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id WAA06525; Mon, 3 Apr 2000 22:53:12 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from ns2.tudelft.nl (ns2.tudelft.nl [130.161.180.65]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.8.6 (PHNE_17135)/8.8.6) with ESMTP id WAA02693 for ; Mon, 3 Apr 2000 22:53:12 +0200 (METDST) Received: from mail2.digital.com (mail2.digital.com [204.123.2.56]) by mailhost1.tudelft.nl (PMDF V5.2-32 #42432) with ESMTP id <0FSG0064FKONFX@mailhost1.tudelft.nl> for J.A.K.Mouw@its.tudelft.nl; Mon, 3 Apr 2000 22:53:11 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id NAA22154; Mon, 03 Apr 2000 13:47:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rex.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA24968; Mon, 03 Apr 2000 13:46:28 -0700 Received: by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id NAA22672; Mon, 03 Apr 2000 13:45:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id NAA22656; Mon, 03 Apr 2000 13:45:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail1.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA32106; Mon, 03 Apr 2000 13:45:30 -0700 Received: from duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (duteinh.et.tudelft.nl [130.161.42.1]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with ESMTP id NAA05760 for ; Mon, 03 Apr 2000 13:45:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: from kalman by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id WAA06481; Mon, 03 Apr 2000 22:42:51 +0200 (MET DST) Date: Mon, 03 Apr 2000 22:42:51 +0200 (MET DST) From: Erik Mouw X-Face: "!Z|1XjFg!3Iw)BwM^M\k)J5KHiPddz}#/Zw%?$&Q!xqob"OA|})3_@&BTTiQERo?/^g[Z<9P4R8:5C:aqq.cw!hotLc=+u-"+1rq@9$V^8PbOUlodyi_sejt+D`iqkLpx$>.aXl%vnfPIt"LK|/%>94_Zrm8jy?`_[RKt'TuoxUxfk(gMhY(n|DBBl~c$dhO>G%6}R4+DGX3|idBm4oU&UM/XUP4I9aoN{]`ax%B?rgD(I3OJ<62Y6L Subject: Re: Announce: LART ramdisk page In-reply-to: Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com To: nico@CAM.ORG Cc: lart@lart.tudelft.nl, sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Message-id: <200004032042.WAA06481@duteinh.et.tudelft.nl> Organization: Eric conspiracy secret labs MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: XCmail 1.0.0 - with PGP support, PGP engine version 0.5 (Linux) Content-type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-transfer-encoding: 8bit Precedence: bulk X-Loop: erik@it.et.tudelft.nl X-Mailerorigin: http://www.fsai.fh-trier.de/~schmitzj/Xclasses/XCmail/ X-Eric-Conspiracy: There is no conspiracy! On Mon, 03 Apr 2000 14:37:08 -0400 (EDT), Nicolas Pitre wrote: > On Mon, 3 Apr 2000, Erik Mouw wrote: >> We just made a page with RAM disks on the LART site (see signature for >> URL). There are currently two ramdisks available: the modified Itsy >> ramdisk, and a glibc-2.1.2 based ramdisk. > > Damn! I was just about to announce that I produced a glibc-2.1.2 ramdisk > too! I finished it an hour ago. I wanted to test it tonight before > announcing it... :-) You can still be the first with a _working_ ramdisk, because my glibc-2.1.2 based ramdisk doesn't work yet. I think I made a minor mistake with a (busybox) init script, because I get dropped on an interesting "init-2.03 #" prompt that turns out to be bash. > So, if all is well, I'll have a new ramdisk image available by tomorrow > too, stuffed with Red Hat style sysv initscripts, z-modem and many > networking tools. No, mine is a lot smaller thanks to busybox and tinylogin. Bash is currently the biggest part, and I plan to replace it with ash. I also have to add z-modem and insmod, now you're speaking of it... Erik -- "people are still using Win98? Wow... VMS i could understand, but WinXX - that's just so passe..." -- Paul Jakma on linux-kernel From kramer@pa.dec.com Mon Apr 3 23:06:32 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id XAA06608; Mon, 3 Apr 2000 23:06:31 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from ns2.tudelft.nl (ns2.tudelft.nl [130.161.180.65]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.8.6 (PHNE_17135)/8.8.6) with ESMTP id XAA03072 for ; Mon, 3 Apr 2000 23:06:31 +0200 (METDST) Received: from mail1.digital.com (mail1.digital.com [204.123.2.50]) by mailhost1.tudelft.nl (PMDF V5.2-32 #42432) with ESMTP id <0FSG006OTLAT2G@mailhost1.tudelft.nl> for J.A.K.Mouw@its.tudelft.nl; Mon, 3 Apr 2000 23:06:30 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id OAA09115; Mon, 03 Apr 2000 14:01:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rex.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA30283; Mon, 03 Apr 2000 14:00:04 -0700 Received: by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id NAA22708; Mon, 03 Apr 2000 13:59:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id NAA22648; Mon, 03 Apr 2000 13:59:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: from crl.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA27666; Mon, 03 Apr 2000 13:59:53 -0700 Received: from crlwebmail.crl.dec.com (crlwebmail.crl.dec.com [16.11.0.2]) by crl.dec.com (8.8.8/RWD-1.2) with ESMTP id QAA03053; Mon, 03 Apr 2000 16:54:49 -0400 (EDT) Received: by crlwebmail.crl.dec.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21) id ; Mon, 03 Apr 2000 16:58:47 -0400 Date: Mon, 03 Apr 2000 16:55:16 -0400 From: George France Subject: RE: Announce: LART ramdisk page Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com To: "'Erik Mouw'" , nico@CAM.ORG Cc: lart@lart.tudelft.nl, sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Message-id: MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21) Content-type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Precedence: bulk I am working on one, as well. :-)) --George George France, france@crl.dec.com Cambridge Research Laboratory, Compaq Computer Corporation One Kendall Square, Building 700 MS: CRL Cambridge, MA 02139 USA -----Original Message----- From: Erik Mouw [mailto:J.A.K.Mouw@its.tudelft.nl] Sent: Monday, April 03, 2000 4:43 PM To: nico@CAM.ORG Cc: lart@lart.tudelft.nl; sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Subject: Re: Announce: LART ramdisk page On Mon, 03 Apr 2000 14:37:08 -0400 (EDT), Nicolas Pitre wrote: > On Mon, 3 Apr 2000, Erik Mouw wrote: >> We just made a page with RAM disks on the LART site (see signature for >> URL). There are currently two ramdisks available: the modified Itsy >> ramdisk, and a glibc-2.1.2 based ramdisk. > > Damn! I was just about to announce that I produced a glibc-2.1.2 ramdisk > too! I finished it an hour ago. I wanted to test it tonight before > announcing it... :-) You can still be the first with a _working_ ramdisk, because my glibc-2.1.2 based ramdisk doesn't work yet. I think I made a minor mistake with a (busybox) init script, because I get dropped on an interesting "init-2.03 #" prompt that turns out to be bash. > So, if all is well, I'll have a new ramdisk image available by tomorrow > too, stuffed with Red Hat style sysv initscripts, z-modem and many > networking tools. No, mine is a lot smaller thanks to busybox and tinylogin. Bash is currently the biggest part, and I plan to replace it with ash. I also have to add z-modem and insmod, now you're speaking of it... Erik -- "people are still using Win98? Wow... VMS i could understand, but WinXX - that's just so passe..." -- Paul Jakma on linux-kernel From kramer@pa.dec.com Mon Apr 3 23:18:42 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id XAA06669; Mon, 3 Apr 2000 23:18:42 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from ns2.tudelft.nl (ns2.tudelft.nl [130.161.180.65]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.8.6 (PHNE_17135)/8.8.6) with ESMTP id XAA03323 for ; Mon, 3 Apr 2000 23:18:42 +0200 (METDST) Received: from mail2.digital.com (mail2.digital.com [204.123.2.56]) by mailhost1.tudelft.nl (PMDF V5.2-32 #42432) with ESMTP id <0FSG007IULV423@mailhost1.tudelft.nl> for J.A.K.Mouw@its.tudelft.nl; Mon, 3 Apr 2000 23:18:41 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id OAA20570; Mon, 03 Apr 2000 14:13:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rex.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA09791; Mon, 03 Apr 2000 14:13:36 -0700 Received: by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id OAA22670; Mon, 03 Apr 2000 14:13:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id OAA22695; Mon, 03 Apr 2000 14:13:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail1.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA24229; Mon, 03 Apr 2000 14:13:18 -0700 Received: from duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (duteinh.et.tudelft.nl [130.161.42.1]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with ESMTP id OAA08693 for ; Mon, 03 Apr 2000 14:13:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: from kalman by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id XAA06639; Mon, 03 Apr 2000 23:11:52 +0200 (MET DST) Date: Mon, 03 Apr 2000 23:11:52 +0200 (MET DST) From: Erik Mouw X-Face: "!Z|1XjFg!3Iw)BwM^M\k)J5KHiPddz}#/Zw%?$&Q!xqob"OA|})3_@&BTTiQERo?/^g[Z<9P4R8:5C:aqq.cw!hotLc=+u-"+1rq@9$V^8PbOUlodyi_sejt+D`iqkLpx$>.aXl%vnfPIt"LK|/%>94_Zrm8jy?`_[RKt'TuoxUxfk(gMhY(n|DBBl~c$dhO>G%6}R4+DGX3|idBm4oU&UM/XUP4I9aoN{]`ax%B?rgD(I3OJ<62Y6L Subject: RE: Announce: LART ramdisk page In-reply-to: Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com To: france@crl.dec.com Cc: nico@CAM.ORG, lart@lart.tudelft.nl, sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Message-id: <200004032111.XAA06639@duteinh.et.tudelft.nl> Organization: Eric conspiracy secret labs MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: XCmail 1.0.0 - with PGP support, PGP engine version 0.5 (Linux) Content-type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-transfer-encoding: 8bit Precedence: bulk X-Loop: erik@it.et.tudelft.nl X-Mailerorigin: http://www.fsai.fh-trier.de/~schmitzj/Xclasses/XCmail/ X-Eric-Conspiracy: There is no conspiracy! On Mon, 03 Apr 2000 16:55:16 -0400, George France wrote: > I am working on one, as well. :-)) Oh, cool! So that makes three: - my ramdisk is (eh, will be) small - Nico's ramdisk is full featured and RedHat-ish - Your ramdisk is ...? ;-)) Anyway, this will solve the problem that people can't get a ramdisk for their board. Erik -- There was a point to this story, but it has temporarily escaped the croniclers mind. -- Douglas Adams, The Hitch Hikers Guide to the Galaxy From kramer@pa.dec.com Mon Apr 3 23:33:22 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id XAA06725; Mon, 3 Apr 2000 23:33:22 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from ns2.tudelft.nl (ns2.tudelft.nl [130.161.180.65]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.8.6 (PHNE_17135)/8.8.6) with ESMTP id XAA03590 for ; Mon, 3 Apr 2000 23:33:22 +0200 (METDST) Received: from mail2.digital.com (mail2.digital.com [204.123.2.56]) by mailhost1.tudelft.nl (PMDF V5.2-32 #42432) with ESMTP id <0FSG007C9MJKN2@mailhost1.tudelft.nl> for J.A.K.Mouw@its.tudelft.nl; Mon, 3 Apr 2000 23:33:21 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id OAA28890; Mon, 03 Apr 2000 14:28:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rex.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA04785; Mon, 03 Apr 2000 14:28:14 -0700 Received: by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id OAA22711; Mon, 03 Apr 2000 14:28:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id OAA22698; Mon, 03 Apr 2000 14:28:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail2.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA08076; Mon, 03 Apr 2000 14:28:00 -0700 Received: from xanadu.vipswitch.com (generic199.197.205.205.in-addr.arpa [205.205.197.199] (may be forged)) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with ESMTP id OAA25057 for ; Mon, 03 Apr 2000 14:27:55 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 03 Apr 2000 17:17:01 -0400 (EDT) From: Nicolas Pitre Subject: Re: Announce: LART ramdisk page In-reply-to: <200004032042.WAA06481@duteinh.et.tudelft.nl> Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com To: Erik Mouw Cc: lart@lart.tudelft.nl, sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Message-id: MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Precedence: bulk On Mon, 3 Apr 2000, Erik Mouw wrote: > > So, if all is well, I'll have a new ramdisk image available by tomorrow > > too, stuffed with Red Hat style sysv initscripts, z-modem and many > > networking tools. > > No, mine is a lot smaller thanks to busybox and tinylogin. Do you think I don't have those? :-) I just preserved the regular init since I don't like busybox's init much. > Bash is > currently the biggest part, and I plan to replace it with ash. I don't. My bash is about 340k where ash is 110k, but bash's touch anf feel is better to me. Nicolas From kramer@pa.dec.com Tue Apr 4 07:01:01 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id HAA07899; Tue, 4 Apr 2000 07:01:00 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from ns2.tudelft.nl (ns2.tudelft.nl [130.161.180.65]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.8.6 (PHNE_17135)/8.8.6) with ESMTP id HAA08589 for ; Tue, 4 Apr 2000 07:01:00 +0200 (METDST) Received: from mail1.digital.com (mail1.digital.com [204.123.2.50]) by mailhost1.tudelft.nl (PMDF V5.2-32 #42432) with ESMTP id <0FSH00GLJ79NPT@mailhost1.tudelft.nl> for J.A.K.Mouw@its.tudelft.nl; Tue, 4 Apr 2000 07:01:00 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id VAA19519; Mon, 03 Apr 2000 21:55:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rex.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA19074; Mon, 03 Apr 2000 21:55:03 -0700 Received: by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id VAA22887; Mon, 03 Apr 2000 21:54:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id VAA22840; Mon, 03 Apr 2000 21:54:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail2.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA10593; Mon, 03 Apr 2000 21:54:01 -0700 Received: from xanadu.vipswitch.com (generic199.197.205.205.in-addr.arpa [205.205.197.199] (may be forged)) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with ESMTP id VAA02022 for ; Mon, 03 Apr 2000 21:53:59 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 04 Apr 2000 00:51:54 -0400 (EDT) From: Nicolas Pitre Subject: New ELF ramdisk In-reply-to: Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com To: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Cc: lart@lart.tudelft.nl Message-id: MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Precedence: bulk On Mon, 3 Apr 2000, Nicolas Pitre wrote: > So, if all is well, I'll have a new ramdisk image available by tomorrow > too, stuffed with Red Hat style sysv initscripts, z-modem and many > networking tools. So, it's available and pretty much working. The file can be retrieved from: ftp://ftp.netwinder.org/users/n/nico/ramdisk_img.gz The big features are: - glibc-2.1.2 - bash-1.14.7 - busybox-0.43 (most of it, but not all) - Red Hat style sysv initscripts (just drop Titan-VI RPMs...) - insmod/rmmod/lsmod - ifconfig/route/ping/traceroute/arp/netstat - telnet/ftp/inetd/in.telnetd - rz/sz - ae (text editor) - etc... The compressed file is 1.49 MB. There is approx 1.8 MB free on the filesystem. There should not be any problem running dynamically linked programs anymore. Tested on ADS ThinClient, but should work on anything else with a SA110 core too. Nicolas From kramer@pa.dec.com Tue Apr 4 08:53:55 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id IAA08308; Tue, 4 Apr 2000 08:53:54 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from ns2.tudelft.nl (ns2.tudelft.nl [130.161.180.65]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.8.6 (PHNE_17135)/8.8.6) with ESMTP id IAA10026 for ; Tue, 4 Apr 2000 08:53:54 +0200 (METDST) Received: from mail1.digital.com (mail1.digital.com [204.123.2.50]) by mailhost1.tudelft.nl (PMDF V5.2-32 #42432) with ESMTP id <0FSH00K1DCHT83@mailhost1.tudelft.nl> for J.A.K.Mouw@its.tudelft.nl; Tue, 4 Apr 2000 08:53:54 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id XAA01593; Mon, 03 Apr 2000 23:48:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rex.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA07592; Mon, 03 Apr 2000 23:48:10 -0700 Received: by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id XAA22891; Mon, 03 Apr 2000 23:46:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id XAA22899; Mon, 03 Apr 2000 23:46:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail1.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA05535; Mon, 03 Apr 2000 23:46:26 -0700 Received: from mail.nulec.com.au ([203.102.220.26]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with ESMTP id XAA05124 for ; Mon, 03 Apr 2000 23:46:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: by MAIL with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21) id ; Tue, 04 Apr 2000 16:45:36 +1000 Date: Tue, 04 Apr 2000 16:45:35 +1000 From: Rodney Davies Subject: RE: New ELF ramdisk Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com To: "'Nicolas Pitre'" Cc: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Message-id: <1072F1A27E99D3119747005004B9A380415768@MAIL> MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21) Content-type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Precedence: bulk Hi Nicolas!! Great to hear of your progress with your Ramdisk!! Very impressive!! > -----Original Message----- > From: Nicolas Pitre [mailto:nico@cam.org] > Sent: Tuesday, 4 April 2000 2:52 PM > To: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com > Cc: lart@lart.tudelft.nl > Subject: New ELF ramdisk > The big features are: > > - glibc-2.1.2 > The compressed file is 1.49 MB. There is approx 1.8 MB free on the > filesystem. There should not be any problem running > dynamically linked > programs anymore. The question I have for you, is how did you configure glibc to compile very small?? I'm trying to prepare an embedded environment, but am having great difficulty working out what/how to do anything with the libraries... I really don't quite know where to start, was wondering if you could please point me in the right direction?? Thanks Nicolas! Cheers, Rod From kramer@pa.dec.com Tue Apr 4 10:57:09 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id KAA09238; Tue, 4 Apr 2000 10:57:09 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from ns2.tudelft.nl (ns2.tudelft.nl [130.161.180.65]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.8.6 (PHNE_17135)/8.8.6) with ESMTP id KAA13734 for ; Tue, 4 Apr 2000 10:57:09 +0200 (METDST) Received: from mail1.digital.com (mail1.digital.com [204.123.2.50]) by mailhost1.tudelft.nl (PMDF V5.2-32 #42432) with ESMTP id <0FSH004IRI775Z@mailhost1.tudelft.nl> for J.A.K.Mouw@its.tudelft.nl; Tue, 4 Apr 2000 10:57:08 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id BAA07293; Tue, 04 Apr 2000 01:51:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rex.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA12327; Tue, 04 Apr 2000 01:51:45 -0700 Received: by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id BAA22954; Tue, 04 Apr 2000 01:51:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id BAA22969; Tue, 04 Apr 2000 01:51:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail2.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA19279; Tue, 04 Apr 2000 01:51:10 -0700 Received: from duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (duteinh.et.tudelft.nl [130.161.42.1]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with ESMTP id BAA13389 for ; Tue, 04 Apr 2000 01:51:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: from kalman by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id KAA09186; Tue, 04 Apr 2000 10:49:50 +0200 (MET DST) Date: Tue, 04 Apr 2000 10:49:50 +0200 (MET DST) From: Erik Mouw X-Face: "!Z|1XjFg!3Iw)BwM^M\k)J5KHiPddz}#/Zw%?$&Q!xqob"OA|})3_@&BTTiQERo?/^g[Z<9P4R8:5C:aqq.cw!hotLc=+u-"+1rq@9$V^8PbOUlodyi_sejt+D`iqkLpx$>.aXl%vnfPIt"LK|/%>94_Zrm8jy?`_[RKt'TuoxUxfk(gMhY(n|DBBl~c$dhO>G%6}R4+DGX3|idBm4oU&UM/XUP4I9aoN{]`ax%B?rgD(I3OJ<62Y6L Subject: Re: New ELF ramdisk In-reply-to: Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com To: nico@CAM.ORG Cc: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com, lart@lart.tudelft.nl Message-id: <200004040849.KAA09186@duteinh.et.tudelft.nl> Organization: Eric conspiracy secret labs MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: XCmail 1.0.0 - with PGP support, PGP engine version 0.5 (Linux) Content-type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-transfer-encoding: 8bit Precedence: bulk X-Loop: erik@it.et.tudelft.nl X-Mailerorigin: http://www.fsai.fh-trier.de/~schmitzj/Xclasses/XCmail/ X-Eric-Conspiracy: There is no conspiracy! On Tue, 04 Apr 2000 00:51:54 -0400 (EDT), Nicolas Pitre wrote: > On Mon, 3 Apr 2000, Nicolas Pitre wrote: > >> So, if all is well, I'll have a new ramdisk image available by tomorrow >> too, stuffed with Red Hat style sysv initscripts, z-modem and many >> networking tools. > > So, it's available and pretty much working. The file can be retrieved > from: > > ftp://ftp.netwinder.org/users/n/nico/ramdisk_img.gz Ehm, maybe you should rename it because there is also a file ramdisk-img.gz in the same directory. [snip] > Tested on ADS ThinClient, but should work on anything else with a > SA110 core too. I just tested it on a LART and it works. One question: how did you make the file /etc/ld.so.cache? I can't find a proper ldconfig to generate it. I have the impression that I only miss that file to get it working (it alreay works with statically linked binaries). Erik -- J.A.K. (Erik) Mouw, Information and Communication Theory Group, Department of Electrical Engineering, Faculty of Information Technology and Systems, Delft University of Technology, PO BOX 5031, 2600 GA Delft, The Netherlands Phone: +31-15-2785859 Fax: +31-15-2781843 Email J.A.K.Mouw@its.tudelft.nl WWW: http://www-ict.its.tudelft.nl/~erik/ From kramer@pa.dec.com Tue Apr 4 16:20:59 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id QAA11434; Tue, 4 Apr 2000 16:20:59 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from ns2.tudelft.nl (ns2.tudelft.nl [130.161.180.65]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.8.6 (PHNE_17135)/8.8.6) with ESMTP id QAA25027 for ; Tue, 4 Apr 2000 16:20:58 +0200 (METDST) Received: from mail1.digital.com (mail1.digital.com [204.123.2.50]) by mailhost1.tudelft.nl (PMDF V5.2-32 #42432) with ESMTP id <0FSH0073FX6X5S@mailhost1.tudelft.nl> for J.A.K.Mouw@its.tudelft.nl; Tue, 4 Apr 2000 16:20:58 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id HAA31100; Tue, 04 Apr 2000 07:15:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rex.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA18978; Tue, 04 Apr 2000 07:14:59 -0700 Received: by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id HAA23036; Tue, 04 Apr 2000 07:14:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id HAA23061; Tue, 04 Apr 2000 07:14:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail1.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA23420; Tue, 04 Apr 2000 07:14:19 -0700 Received: from xanadu.gn.com (modemcable248.137-200-24.mtl.mc.videotron.net [24.200.137.248]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with ESMTP id HAA29737 for ; Tue, 04 Apr 2000 07:14:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (nico@localhost) by xanadu.gn.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id KAA10616; Tue, 04 Apr 2000 10:14:12 -0400 Date: Tue, 04 Apr 2000 10:14:12 -0400 (EDT) From: Nicolas Pitre Subject: RE: New ELF ramdisk In-reply-to: <1072F1A27E99D3119747005004B9A380415768@MAIL> Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com X-Sender: nico@xanadu.gn.com To: Rodney Davies Cc: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Message-id: MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Precedence: bulk X-Authentication-warning: xanadu.gn.com: nico owned process doing -bs On Tue, 4 Apr 2000, Rodney Davies wrote: > Hi Nicolas!! > > Great to hear of your progress with your Ramdisk!! Very impressive!! > > The question I have for you, is how did you configure glibc to compile very > small?? I'm trying to prepare an embedded environment, but am having great > difficulty working out what/how to do anything with the libraries... There is no particular configuration. My libc-2.1.2.so is still 936KB after being stripped. And still, you need some other glibc component libraries to have a full running system. For example, to know what libraries a particular program requires, use ldd on it. If you have glibc on your development host, it should give you the same libraries as the ARM system would require. So the idea is to use only those glibc sub-libraries that your applications requires... and strip them. Also beware those libraries that are loaded in the middle of a program execution. Those aren't listed with ldd. Some of those are libnss_files, libnss_dns, etc. In this case, you don't have to provide all the libraries your application wants to load, but only the useful ones. I know that the Linux Router Project (LRP) uses a script that looks at all used library symbols in all applications on the ramdisk, and then uses a linker trick to create a new dynamically loadable library from the original ones with only required symbols. I gave it a shot with the ARM libraries but the resulting library isn't working. Didn't investigate it further. Maybe you could have a look at Cygnus' newlib if it provides you what you need for your apps. Nicolas From kramer@pa.dec.com Tue Apr 4 16:28:17 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id QAA11480; Tue, 4 Apr 2000 16:28:17 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from ns2.tudelft.nl (ns2.tudelft.nl [130.161.180.65]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.8.6 (PHNE_17135)/8.8.6) with ESMTP id QAA25255 for ; Tue, 4 Apr 2000 16:28:17 +0200 (METDST) Received: from mail1.digital.com (mail1.digital.com [204.123.2.50]) by mailhost1.tudelft.nl (PMDF V5.2-32 #42432) with ESMTP id <0FSH0072OXJ3TT@mailhost1.tudelft.nl> for J.A.K.Mouw@its.tudelft.nl; Tue, 4 Apr 2000 16:28:17 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id HAA31098; Tue, 04 Apr 2000 07:23:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rex.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA10615; Tue, 04 Apr 2000 07:23:07 -0700 Received: by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id HAA23078; Tue, 04 Apr 2000 07:22:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id HAA23053; Tue, 04 Apr 2000 07:22:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail2.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA18333; Tue, 04 Apr 2000 07:22:57 -0700 Received: from xanadu.gn.com (modemcable248.137-200-24.mtl.mc.videotron.net [24.200.137.248]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with ESMTP id HAA28994 for ; Tue, 04 Apr 2000 07:22:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (nico@localhost) by xanadu.gn.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id KAA10622; Tue, 04 Apr 2000 10:21:47 -0400 Date: Tue, 04 Apr 2000 10:21:47 -0400 (EDT) From: Nicolas Pitre Subject: Re: New ELF ramdisk In-reply-to: <200004040849.KAA09186@duteinh.et.tudelft.nl> Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com X-Sender: nico@xanadu.gn.com To: Erik Mouw Cc: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com, lart@lart.tudelft.nl Message-id: MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Precedence: bulk X-Authentication-warning: xanadu.gn.com: nico owned process doing -bs On Tue, 4 Apr 2000, Erik Mouw wrote: > > So, it's available and pretty much working. The file can be retrieved > > from: > > > > ftp://ftp.netwinder.org/users/n/nico/ramdisk_img.gz > > Ehm, maybe you should rename it because there is also a file > ramdisk-img.gz in the same directory. Huh.. right. The old one has been renamed ramdisk_img.old.gz > One question: how did you make the file /etc/ld.so.cache? I can't find a > proper ldconfig to generate it. I have the impression that I only miss > that file to get it working (it alreay works with statically linked > binaries). This is not mandatory. It worked even without ld.so.cache before, as long as you have correct symlinks. I used ldconfig just because I didn't want to create all symlinks by hand. I used ldconfig from Titan-VI. Nicolas From kramer@pa.dec.com Wed Apr 5 00:43:32 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id AAA13791; Wed, 5 Apr 2000 00:43:31 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from ns2.tudelft.nl (ns2.tudelft.nl [130.161.180.65]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.8.6 (PHNE_17135)/8.8.6) with ESMTP id AAA08864 for ; Wed, 5 Apr 2000 00:43:31 +0200 (METDST) Received: from mail2.digital.com (mail2.digital.com [204.123.2.56]) by mailhost1.tudelft.nl (PMDF V5.2-32 #42432) with ESMTP id <0FSI006JSKGIBC@mailhost1.tudelft.nl> for J.A.K.Mouw@its.tudelft.nl; Wed, 5 Apr 2000 00:43:31 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id PAA25823; Tue, 04 Apr 2000 15:35:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rex.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA01077; Tue, 04 Apr 2000 15:35:10 -0700 Received: by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id PAA23150; Tue, 04 Apr 2000 15:32:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id PAA23190; Tue, 04 Apr 2000 15:32:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail2.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA02932; Tue, 04 Apr 2000 15:32:13 -0700 Received: from duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (duteinh.et.tudelft.nl [130.161.42.1]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with ESMTP id PAA00836 for ; Tue, 04 Apr 2000 15:32:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: from kalman by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id AAA13741; Wed, 05 Apr 2000 00:30:48 +0200 (MET DST) Date: Wed, 05 Apr 2000 00:30:48 +0200 (MET DST) From: Erik Mouw X-Face: "!Z|1XjFg!3Iw)BwM^M\k)J5KHiPddz}#/Zw%?$&Q!xqob"OA|})3_@&BTTiQERo?/^g[Z<9P4R8:5C:aqq.cw!hotLc=+u-"+1rq@9$V^8PbOUlodyi_sejt+D`iqkLpx$>.aXl%vnfPIt"LK|/%>94_Zrm8jy?`_[RKt'TuoxUxfk(gMhY(n|DBBl~c$dhO>G%6}R4+DGX3|idBm4oU&UM/XUP4I9aoN{]`ax%B?rgD(I3OJ<62Y6L Subject: Re: New ELF ramdisk In-reply-to: <200004040849.KAA09186@duteinh.et.tudelft.nl> Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com To: nico@CAM.ORG Cc: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com, lart@lart.tudelft.nl Message-id: <200004042230.AAA13741@duteinh.et.tudelft.nl> Organization: Eric conspiracy secret labs MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: XCmail 1.0.0 - with PGP support, PGP engine version 0.5 (Linux) Content-type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-transfer-encoding: 8bit Precedence: bulk X-Loop: erik@it.et.tudelft.nl X-Mailerorigin: http://www.fsai.fh-trier.de/~schmitzj/Xclasses/XCmail/ X-Eric-Conspiracy: There is no conspiracy! On Tue, 4 Apr 2000 10:49:50 +0200 (MET DST), Erik Mouw wrote: > On Tue, 04 Apr 2000 00:51:54 -0400 (EDT), Nicolas Pitre wrote: >> Tested on ADS ThinClient, but should work on anything else with a >> SA110 core too. > > I just tested it on a LART and it works. I hate to followup my own posts, but I'd like you to know that it also works with a Netwinder, though it needs "some" extra work: Unzip ramdisk and mount it on a Linux box using the loop device, NFS export that directory, put it in the dhcpd.conf file, put up a tftp directory with a proper Netwinder kernel, start Netwinder, wait for bootprompt, enter "boot diskless", Netwinder boots and NFS mounts the ramdisk, wait for the "login:" prompt. Easy, eh? ;-) Erik -- "I'm just this guy you know?" -- Zaphod Beeblebrox in "The Hitchhikers Guide to the Galaxy" by Douglas Adams From kramer@pa.dec.com Wed Apr 5 10:57:34 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id KAA15904; Wed, 5 Apr 2000 10:57:34 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from ns2.tudelft.nl (ns2.tudelft.nl [130.161.180.65]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.8.6 (PHNE_17135)/8.8.6) with ESMTP id KAA20347 for ; Wed, 5 Apr 2000 10:57:34 +0200 (METDST) Received: from mail2.digital.com (mail2.digital.com [204.123.2.56]) by mailhost1.tudelft.nl (PMDF V5.2-32 #42432) with ESMTP id <0FSJ000ALCVWXG@mailhost1.tudelft.nl> for J.A.K.Mouw@its.tudelft.nl; Wed, 5 Apr 2000 10:57:33 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id BAA29534; Wed, 05 Apr 2000 01:52:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rex.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA01810; Wed, 05 Apr 2000 01:51:56 -0700 Received: by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id BAA26037; Wed, 05 Apr 2000 01:51:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id BAA26050; Wed, 05 Apr 2000 01:51:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail2.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA19133; Wed, 05 Apr 2000 01:51:10 -0700 Received: from relay04.netaddress.usa.net (relay04.netaddress.usa.net [204.68.24.184]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id BAA26659 for ; Wed, 05 Apr 2000 01:51:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 6214 invoked from network); Tue, 04 Apr 2000 23:05:25 +0000 Received: from nwcst316.netaddress.usa.net (204.68.23.61) by outbound.netaddress.usa.net with SMTP; Tue, 04 Apr 2000 23:05:25 +0000 Received: (qmail 7633 invoked by uid 60001); Tue, 04 Apr 2000 23:05:24 +0000 Received: from 204.68.23.61 by nwcst316 for [206.170.3.190] via web-mailer(M3.4.0.33) on Tue Apr 4 23:05:24 GMT 2000 Date: Tue, 04 Apr 2000 17:05:24 -0600 (MDT) From: Kumar Ramanathan Subject: Loading linux kernel on the SA1100. Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com To: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Message-id: <20000404230524.7632.qmail@nwcst316.netaddress.usa.net> MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: USANET web-mailer (M3.4.0.33) Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-transfer-encoding: quoted-printable Precedence: bulk Hi , = I have a Network Processor board with a Strong ARM (SA1100) on it. I need to load linux onto the board. = I was considering overwriting Flash RAM (which currently has VXWORKS and = ucos on it). Is there anbother way ??? Like pumping directly into RAM ??? Thanks, Kumar ____________________________________________________________________ Get free email and a permanent address at http://www.netaddress.com/?N=3D= 1 From kramer@pa.dec.com Wed Apr 5 02:37:17 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id CAA14162; Wed, 5 Apr 2000 02:37:17 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from ns2.tudelft.nl (ns2.tudelft.nl [130.161.180.65]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.8.6 (PHNE_17135)/8.8.6) with ESMTP id CAA10859 for ; Wed, 5 Apr 2000 02:37:16 +0200 (METDST) Received: from mail2.digital.com (mail2.digital.com [204.123.2.56]) by mailhost1.tudelft.nl (PMDF V5.2-32 #42432) with ESMTP id <0FSI00933PQ31L@mailhost1.tudelft.nl> for J.A.K.Mouw@its.tudelft.nl; Wed, 5 Apr 2000 02:37:16 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id RAA14362; Tue, 04 Apr 2000 17:32:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rex.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA09969; Tue, 04 Apr 2000 17:31:51 -0700 Received: by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id RAA23285; Tue, 04 Apr 2000 17:31:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id RAA23258; Tue, 04 Apr 2000 17:31:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail2.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA05531; Tue, 04 Apr 2000 17:31:13 -0700 Received: from xanadu.gn.com (modemcable248.137-200-24.mtl.mc.videotron.net [24.200.137.248]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with ESMTP id RAA14657 for ; Tue, 04 Apr 2000 17:31:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (nico@localhost) by xanadu.gn.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id UAA10862; Tue, 04 Apr 2000 20:30:52 -0400 Date: Tue, 04 Apr 2000 20:30:52 -0400 (EDT) From: Nicolas Pitre Subject: Re: New ELF ramdisk In-reply-to: <200004042230.AAA13741@duteinh.et.tudelft.nl> Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com X-Sender: nico@xanadu.gn.com To: Erik Mouw Cc: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com, lart@lart.tudelft.nl Message-id: MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Precedence: bulk X-Authentication-warning: xanadu.gn.com: nico owned process doing -bs On Wed, 5 Apr 2000, Erik Mouw wrote: > On Tue, 4 Apr 2000 10:49:50 +0200 (MET DST), Erik Mouw wrote: > > On Tue, 04 Apr 2000 00:51:54 -0400 (EDT), Nicolas Pitre wrote: > >> Tested on ADS ThinClient, but should work on anything else with a > >> SA110 core too. > > > > I just tested it on a LART and it works. > > I hate to followup my own posts, but I'd like you to know that it also > works with a Netwinder... Cool! :-) I should say that it also work on an EBSA285! :-) Nicolas From kramer@pa.dec.com Wed Apr 5 07:36:36 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id HAA14996; Wed, 5 Apr 2000 07:36:36 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from ns2.tudelft.nl (ns2.tudelft.nl [130.161.180.65]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.8.6 (PHNE_17135)/8.8.6) with ESMTP id HAA14681 for ; Wed, 5 Apr 2000 07:36:35 +0200 (METDST) Received: from mail2.digital.com (mail2.digital.com [204.123.2.56]) by mailhost1.tudelft.nl (PMDF V5.2-32 #42432) with ESMTP id <0FSJ00DAT3KY6X@mailhost1.tudelft.nl> for J.A.K.Mouw@its.tudelft.nl; Wed, 5 Apr 2000 07:36:35 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id WAA12653; Tue, 04 Apr 2000 22:31:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rex.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA29676; Tue, 04 Apr 2000 22:30:56 -0700 Received: by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id WAA23369; Tue, 04 Apr 2000 22:29:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id WAA23321; Tue, 04 Apr 2000 22:29:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail2.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA28584; Tue, 04 Apr 2000 22:29:41 -0700 Received: from note.orchestra.cse.unsw.EDU.AU (note.orchestra.cse.unsw.EDU.AU [129.94.242.29]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id WAA11529 for ; Tue, 04 Apr 2000 22:29:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: From mozart With LocalMail ; Wed, 05 Apr 2000 15:23:29 +1000 Date: Wed, 05 Apr 2000 15:23:28 +1000 (EST) From: "Adam 'WeirdArms' Wiggins" Subject: Assebet JTAG In-reply-to: Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com X-Sender: awiggins@mozart.orchestra.cse.unsw.EDU.AU To: lart@lart.tudelft.nl, "utility account for group.pleb " , sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Cc: "Chagas, Jason" Message-id: MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Precedence: bulk Ok can someone explain something to me. I just got an Assebet (SA-1110 evaluation board) and it has a PC parallel port to SA-1100 JTAG. The board doesn't appear to do any voltage translation for the JTAG_CLK and JTAG_TMS signals. Are they using 5volts from the PC for these signals (which is out of the chips max 3.6volt signal spec AFAIK) or am I missing something here? Anyone with a assebet tried using the parallel port JTAGing? Cheers Adam From kramer@pa.dec.com Wed Apr 5 13:58:01 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id NAA17017; Wed, 5 Apr 2000 13:58:01 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from ns2.tudelft.nl (ns2.tudelft.nl [130.161.180.65]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.8.6 (PHNE_17135)/8.8.6) with ESMTP id NAA26915 for ; Wed, 5 Apr 2000 13:58:00 +0200 (METDST) Received: from mail2.digital.com (mail2.digital.com [204.123.2.56]) by mailhost1.tudelft.nl (PMDF V5.2-32 #42432) with ESMTP id <0FSJ00G0CL8N1F@mailhost1.tudelft.nl> for J.A.K.Mouw@its.tudelft.nl; Wed, 5 Apr 2000 13:58:00 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id EAA06574; Wed, 05 Apr 2000 04:52:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rex.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA02703; Wed, 05 Apr 2000 04:51:52 -0700 Received: by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id EAA26102; Wed, 05 Apr 2000 04:51:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id EAA26122; Wed, 05 Apr 2000 04:51:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail2.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA29207; Wed, 05 Apr 2000 04:51:02 -0700 Received: from duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (duteinh.et.tudelft.nl [130.161.42.1]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with ESMTP id EAA12722 for ; Wed, 05 Apr 2000 04:51:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: from kalman by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id NAA16960; Wed, 05 Apr 2000 13:49:32 +0200 (MET DST) Date: Wed, 05 Apr 2000 13:49:32 +0200 (MET DST) From: Erik Mouw X-Face: "!Z|1XjFg!3Iw)BwM^M\k)J5KHiPddz}#/Zw%?$&Q!xqob"OA|})3_@&BTTiQERo?/^g[Z<9P4R8:5C:aqq.cw!hotLc=+u-"+1rq@9$V^8PbOUlodyi_sejt+D`iqkLpx$>.aXl%vnfPIt"LK|/%>94_Zrm8jy?`_[RKt'TuoxUxfk(gMhY(n|DBBl~c$dhO>G%6}R4+DGX3|idBm4oU&UM/XUP4I9aoN{]`ax%B?rgD(I3OJ<62Y6L Subject: Re: Assebet JTAG In-reply-to: Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com To: awiggins@cse.unsw.edu.au Cc: lart@lart.tudelft.nl, pleb@cse.unsw.edu.au, sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com, jason.chagas@intel.com Message-id: <200004051149.NAA16960@duteinh.et.tudelft.nl> Organization: Eric conspiracy secret labs MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: XCmail 1.0.0 - with PGP support, PGP engine version 0.5 (Linux) Content-type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-transfer-encoding: 8bit Precedence: bulk X-Loop: erik@it.et.tudelft.nl X-Mailerorigin: http://www.fsai.fh-trier.de/~schmitzj/Xclasses/XCmail/ X-Eric-Conspiracy: There is no conspiracy! On Wed, 05 Apr 2000 15:23:28 +1000 (EST), Adam 'WeirdArms' Wiggins wrote: > Ok can someone explain something to me. I just got an Assebet > (SA-1110 evaluation board) and it has a PC parallel port to SA-1100 JTAG. > The board doesn't appear to do any voltage translation for the JTAG_CLK > and JTAG_TMS signals. Are they using 5volts from the PC for these signals > (which is out of the chips max 3.6volt signal spec AFAIK) or am I missing > something here? > Anyone with a assebet tried using the parallel port JTAGing? Depends on the parallel port specs. If it uses the classic TTL scheme with a pull-up resistor, the maximum level is indeed not 5V. In that way it is a relatively safe hack (though still a hack) to connect it directly to the SA-1110 JTAG port, though it depends a bit on the overvoltage protection circuit in the SA-1110 JTAG port. It is also possible that there are some line drivers in the connection cable and that it is completely safe to connect the SA-1110 to the parallel port (sorry, we didn't got an Assabet, so I can't really help you on that ;-). Erik -- LART. 250 MIPS under one Watt. Free hardware design files. http://www.lart.tudelft.nl/ From kramer@pa.dec.com Wed Apr 5 14:37:04 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id OAA17238; Wed, 5 Apr 2000 14:37:04 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from ns2.tudelft.nl (ns2.tudelft.nl [130.161.180.65]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.8.6 (PHNE_17135)/8.8.6) with ESMTP id OAA28272 for ; Wed, 5 Apr 2000 14:37:04 +0200 (METDST) Received: from mail2.digital.com (mail2.digital.com [204.123.2.56]) by mailhost1.tudelft.nl (PMDF V5.2-32 #42432) with ESMTP id <0FSJ00IREN1QB1@mailhost1.tudelft.nl> for J.A.K.Mouw@its.tudelft.nl; Wed, 5 Apr 2000 14:37:03 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id FAA11701; Wed, 05 Apr 2000 05:31:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rex.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA00692; Wed, 05 Apr 2000 05:31:46 -0700 Received: by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id FAA26070; Wed, 05 Apr 2000 05:31:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id FAA26105; Wed, 05 Apr 2000 05:31:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail2.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA20686; Wed, 05 Apr 2000 05:31:26 -0700 Received: from gate2.itt.com (gate2.itt.com [151.190.254.105]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id FAA16748 for ; Wed, 05 Apr 2000 05:31:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: from fwemail2.itt.com by gate2.itt.com via smtpd (for mail2.digital.com [204.123.2.56]) with SMTP; Wed, 05 Apr 2000 12:31:25 +0000 (UT) Received: by fwemail2.de.ittind.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21) id <2A5T09A5>; Wed, 05 Apr 2000 07:31:21 -0500 Date: Wed, 05 Apr 2000 07:30:06 -0500 From: "Latham, Steve" Subject: RE: Assebet JTAG Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com To: "'Erik Mouw'" , sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Message-id: MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21) Content-type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Precedence: bulk I use it to reburn flash using the software provided at the intel site Steve -----Original Message----- From: Erik Mouw [mailto:J.A.K.Mouw@its.tudelft.nl] Sent: Wednesday, April 05, 2000 7:50 AM To: awiggins@cse.unsw.edu.au Cc: lart@lart.tudelft.nl; pleb@cse.unsw.edu.au; sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com; jason.chagas@intel.com Subject: Re: Assebet JTAG On Wed, 05 Apr 2000 15:23:28 +1000 (EST), Adam 'WeirdArms' Wiggins wrote: > Ok can someone explain something to me. I just got an Assebet > (SA-1110 evaluation board) and it has a PC parallel port to SA-1100 JTAG. > The board doesn't appear to do any voltage translation for the JTAG_CLK > and JTAG_TMS signals. Are they using 5volts from the PC for these signals > (which is out of the chips max 3.6volt signal spec AFAIK) or am I missing > something here? > Anyone with a assebet tried using the parallel port JTAGing? Depends on the parallel port specs. If it uses the classic TTL scheme with a pull-up resistor, the maximum level is indeed not 5V. In that way it is a relatively safe hack (though still a hack) to connect it directly to the SA-1110 JTAG port, though it depends a bit on the overvoltage protection circuit in the SA-1110 JTAG port. It is also possible that there are some line drivers in the connection cable and that it is completely safe to connect the SA-1110 to the parallel port (sorry, we didn't got an Assabet, so I can't really help you on that ;-). Erik -- LART. 250 MIPS under one Watt. Free hardware design files. http://www.lart.tudelft.nl/ From kramer@pa.dec.com Wed Apr 5 16:36:07 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id QAA17796; Wed, 5 Apr 2000 16:36:07 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from ns2.tudelft.nl (ns2.tudelft.nl [130.161.180.65]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.8.6 (PHNE_17135)/8.8.6) with ESMTP id QAA02680 for ; Wed, 5 Apr 2000 16:36:06 +0200 (METDST) Received: from mail2.digital.com (mail2.digital.com [204.123.2.56]) by mailhost1.tudelft.nl (PMDF V5.2-32 #42432) with ESMTP id <0FSJ00588SK4BZ@mailhost1.tudelft.nl> for J.A.K.Mouw@its.tudelft.nl; Wed, 5 Apr 2000 16:36:05 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id HAA26741; Wed, 05 Apr 2000 07:30:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rex.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA19186; Wed, 05 Apr 2000 07:30:07 -0700 Received: by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id HAA26151; Wed, 05 Apr 2000 07:29:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id HAA26149; Wed, 05 Apr 2000 07:29:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail2.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA19018; Wed, 05 Apr 2000 07:29:36 -0700 Received: from xanadu.vipswitch.com (generic199.197.205.205.in-addr.arpa [205.205.197.199] (may be forged)) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with ESMTP id HAA27967 for ; Wed, 05 Apr 2000 07:29:34 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 05 Apr 2000 10:27:44 -0400 (EDT) From: Nicolas Pitre Subject: Re: Loading linux kernel on the SA1100. In-reply-to: <20000404230524.7632.qmail@nwcst316.netaddress.usa.net> Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com To: Kumar Ramanathan Cc: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Message-id: MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Precedence: bulk On 4 Apr 2000, Kumar Ramanathan wrote: > Hi , > I have a Network Processor board with a Strong ARM (SA1100) on it. > I need to load linux onto the board. You have two options: 1- use angel on the flash and angelboot on a Linux host. 2- use BLOB Two versions of angelboot can be found from ftp.netwinder.org/users/n/nico. For BLOB, look at http://www.lart.tudelft.nl. Nicolas From kramer@pa.dec.com Thu Apr 6 05:04:07 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id FAA20414; Thu, 6 Apr 2000 05:04:07 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from ns2.tudelft.nl (ns2.tudelft.nl [130.161.180.65]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.8.6 (PHNE_17135)/8.8.6) with ESMTP id FAA25516 for ; Thu, 6 Apr 2000 05:04:06 +0200 (METDST) Received: from mail2.digital.com (mail2.digital.com [204.123.2.56]) by mailhost1.tudelft.nl (PMDF V5.2-32 #42432) with ESMTP id <0FSK00A59R6T67@mailhost1.tudelft.nl> for J.A.K.Mouw@its.tudelft.nl; Thu, 6 Apr 2000 05:04:06 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id TAA17542; Wed, 05 Apr 2000 19:58:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rex.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA17060; Wed, 05 Apr 2000 19:58:02 -0700 Received: by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id TAA26395; Wed, 05 Apr 2000 19:53:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id TAA26404; Wed, 05 Apr 2000 19:53:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail2.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA26517; Wed, 05 Apr 2000 19:53:04 -0700 Received: from note.orchestra.cse.unsw.EDU.AU (note.orchestra.cse.unsw.EDU.AU [129.94.242.29]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id TAA16379 for ; Wed, 05 Apr 2000 19:53:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: From paulaner With LocalMail ; Thu, 06 Apr 2000 12:45:32 +1000 Date: Thu, 06 Apr 2000 12:45:26 +1000 (EST) From: "Adam 'WeirdArms' Wiggins" Subject: Re: Assebet JTAG In-reply-to: <200004051149.NAA16960@duteinh.et.tudelft.nl> Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com X-Sender: awiggins@paulaner.disy.cse.unsw.EDU.AU To: Erik Mouw Cc: lart@lart.tudelft.nl, pleb@cse.unsw.edu.au, sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com, jason.chagas@intel.com Message-id: MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Precedence: bulk It seems they are using 100ohm resistors in series with the signals going into the assebet. This was hidden in the parallel port plug of the cable. Cheers Adma On Wed, 5 Apr 2000, Erik Mouw wrote: > > Depends on the parallel port specs. If it uses the classic TTL scheme with > a pull-up resistor, the maximum level is indeed not 5V. In that way it is > a relatively safe hack (though still a hack) to connect it directly to the > SA-1110 JTAG port, though it depends a bit on the overvoltage protection > circuit in the SA-1110 JTAG port. It is also possible that there are some > line drivers in the connection cable and that it is completely safe to > connect the SA-1110 to the parallel port (sorry, we didn't got an > Assabet, so I can't really help you on that ;-). > > > Erik > > -- > LART. 250 MIPS under one Watt. Free hardware design files. > http://www.lart.tudelft.nl/ > > > From kramer@pa.dec.com Thu Apr 6 05:30:07 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id FAA20484; Thu, 6 Apr 2000 05:30:06 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from ns2.tudelft.nl (ns2.tudelft.nl [130.161.180.65]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.8.6 (PHNE_17135)/8.8.6) with ESMTP id FAA26380 for ; Thu, 6 Apr 2000 05:30:06 +0200 (METDST) Received: from mail2.digital.com (mail2.digital.com [204.123.2.56]) by mailhost1.tudelft.nl (PMDF V5.2-32 #42432) with ESMTP id <0FSK009MJSE4M1@mailhost1.tudelft.nl> for J.A.K.Mouw@its.tudelft.nl; Thu, 6 Apr 2000 05:30:05 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id UAA20806; Wed, 05 Apr 2000 20:24:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rex.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA28346; Wed, 05 Apr 2000 20:24:58 -0700 Received: by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id UAA26403; Wed, 05 Apr 2000 20:24:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id UAA26436; Wed, 05 Apr 2000 20:24:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail2.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA01916; Wed, 05 Apr 2000 20:23:37 -0700 Received: from sam.comms.unsw.EDU.AU (sam.comms.unsw.EDU.AU [149.171.96.20]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with ESMTP id UAA18500 for ; Wed, 05 Apr 2000 20:23:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: from alpha400.ee.unsw.edu.au (alpha400.ee.unsw.EDU.AU [149.171.36.48]) by sam.comms.unsw.EDU.AU (8.8.8/8.8.8 Kenso-Central-NO-SPAM) with ESMTP id NAA26981; Thu, 06 Apr 2000 13:20:22 +1000 (EST) Received: from localhost (u2189659@localhost) by alpha400.ee.unsw.edu.au (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id NAA12703; Thu, 06 Apr 2000 13:20:53 +1000 (EST) Date: Thu, 06 Apr 2000 13:20:53 +1000 (EST) From: Ken Chiu Kun Wu Subject: missing memory config. in glibc-2.1.2 Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.arm.linux.org.uk, sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Message-id: MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Precedence: bulk Hi , Has anyone had problem like this when compiling glibc-2.1.2 for their toolchain? so far I've got gcc-2.95.2, binutils-2.9.5.0.22 and kernel header files from linux-2.2.13 ----- make[1]: Entering directory `/home/kckwu/build/glibc-2.1.2/misc' arm-linux-gcc ../sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/arm/ioperm.c -c -O -Wall -Winline -Wstr ict-prototypes -Wwrite-strings -g -I../include -I. -I.. -I../libio -I../s ysdeps/arm/elf -I../crypt/sysdeps/unix -I../linuxthreads/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux -I../linuxthreads/sysdeps/pthread -I../linuxthreads/sysdeps/unix/sysv -I../linu xthreads/sysdeps/unix -I../linuxthreads/sysdeps/arm -I../sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux /arm -I../sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux -I../sysdeps/gnu -I../sysdeps/unix/common -I.. /sysdeps/unix/mman -I../sysdeps/unix/inet -I../sysdeps/unix/sysv -I../sysdeps/un ix/arm -I../sysdeps/unix -I../sysdeps/posix -I../sysdeps/arm/fpu -I../sysdeps/ar m -I../sysdeps/wordsize-32 -I../sysdeps/ieee754 -I../sysdeps/libm-ieee754 -I../s ysdeps/generic/elf -I../sysdeps/generic -D_LIBC_REENTRANT -include ../include/ libc-symbols.h -o ioperm.o In file included from /usr/lib/gcc-lib/arm-linux/2.95.2/../../../../arm-linux/include/asm/page.h:4, from ../sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/arm/ioperm.c:41: /usr/lib/gcc-lib/arm-linux/2.95.2/../../../../arm-linux/include/asm/arch/memory. h:73: #error missing memory configuration make[1]: *** [ioperm.o] Error 1 make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/kckwu/build/glibc-2.1.2/misc' make: *** [misc/subdir_lib] Error 2 ------ cheers Ken ----------------------------------------------- Ken Wu (Electrical/Biomedical Eng. UNSW Sydney) E-Mail: kenwu@ieee.org kenchiu.wu@au.unisys.com Homepage: www.progsoc.uts.edu.au/~kckwu Mobile: 0410 668 349 ICQ number: 1074203 ----------------------------------------------- From kramer@pa.dec.com Thu Apr 6 06:00:28 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id GAA20555; Thu, 6 Apr 2000 06:00:28 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from ns2.tudelft.nl (ns2.tudelft.nl [130.161.180.65]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.8.6 (PHNE_17135)/8.8.6) with ESMTP id GAA27316 for ; Thu, 6 Apr 2000 06:00:27 +0200 (METDST) Received: from mail2.digital.com (mail2.digital.com [204.123.2.56]) by mailhost1.tudelft.nl (PMDF V5.2-32 #42432) with ESMTP id <0FSK00A48TSPZG@mailhost1.tudelft.nl> for J.A.K.Mouw@its.tudelft.nl; Thu, 6 Apr 2000 06:00:26 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id UAA25259; Wed, 05 Apr 2000 20:55:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rex.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA02805; Wed, 05 Apr 2000 20:55:20 -0700 Received: by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id UAA26432; Wed, 05 Apr 2000 20:55:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id UAA26421; Wed, 05 Apr 2000 20:55:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail2.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA07993; Wed, 05 Apr 2000 20:55:01 -0700 Received: from xanadu.gn.com (modemcable248.137-200-24.mtl.mc.videotron.net [24.200.137.248]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with ESMTP id UAA26598 for ; Wed, 05 Apr 2000 20:55:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (nico@localhost) by xanadu.gn.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id XAA18064 for ; Wed, 05 Apr 2000 23:55:01 -0400 Date: Wed, 05 Apr 2000 23:55:01 -0400 (EDT) From: Nicolas Pitre Subject: diff-2.3.99-pre3-rmk1-np2 Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com X-Sender: nico@xanadu.gn.com To: SA-1100/Linux Message-id: MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Precedence: bulk X-Authentication-warning: xanadu.gn.com: nico owned process doing -bs ... is available from ftp://ftp.netwinder.org/users/n/nico. This includes: - SA1110 CPU support - timer accuracy protection for time_of_day sampled from interrupt handlers - debugging printk's removed from ramdisk code (nobody complained... strange) *** WARNING *** THIS PATCH IS BROKEN *** And so were my latest patches, but I don't know since when. It seems that the discontigous memory support for SA1100 is broken. This means that, for instance, only the *first* physical RAM bank can be used. So, if you want to use this patch on your hardware, you must edit linux/arch/arm/mm/mm-sa1100.c and comment out all RAM definitions except the first one. If you have only one RAM bank, go in peace and forget about all this -- you are OK. If your first RAM bank is too small (this is the case for Brutus), I suggest you stick to 2.3.35-rmk1-np9 for now. If you don't comment out extra ram definitions, the boot sequence will just freeze after the "Uncompressing .... done." message. If you really want to make this kernel boot with more than one RAM bank (and... help me find the bobo), just uncomment line 59 of linux/arch/arm/config.in and restart everything from 'make config'. The kernel will crash as soon as /sbin/init is started. Good luck! Nicolas From kramer@pa.dec.com Thu Apr 6 06:05:12 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id GAA20568; Thu, 6 Apr 2000 06:05:12 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from ns2.tudelft.nl (ns2.tudelft.nl [130.161.180.65]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.8.6 (PHNE_17135)/8.8.6) with ESMTP id GAA27454 for ; Thu, 6 Apr 2000 06:05:11 +0200 (METDST) Received: from mail2.digital.com (mail2.digital.com [204.123.2.56]) by mailhost1.tudelft.nl (PMDF V5.2-32 #42432) with ESMTP id <0FSK00AMSU0M89@mailhost1.tudelft.nl> for J.A.K.Mouw@its.tudelft.nl; Thu, 6 Apr 2000 06:05:11 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id VAA27188; Wed, 05 Apr 2000 21:00:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rex.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA11236; Wed, 05 Apr 2000 21:00:03 -0700 Received: by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id UAA26464; Wed, 05 Apr 2000 20:59:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id UAA26414; Wed, 05 Apr 2000 20:59:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail2.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA06618; Wed, 05 Apr 2000 20:59:45 -0700 Received: from xanadu.gn.com (modemcable248.137-200-24.mtl.mc.videotron.net [24.200.137.248]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with ESMTP id UAA24564 for ; Wed, 05 Apr 2000 20:59:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (nico@localhost) by xanadu.gn.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id XAA18084; Wed, 05 Apr 2000 23:59:33 -0400 Date: Wed, 05 Apr 2000 23:59:33 -0400 (EDT) From: Nicolas Pitre Subject: Re: missing memory config. in glibc-2.1.2 In-reply-to: Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com X-Sender: nico@xanadu.gn.com To: Ken Chiu Kun Wu Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.arm.linux.org.uk, sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Message-id: MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Precedence: bulk X-Authentication-warning: xanadu.gn.com: nico owned process doing -bs On Thu, 6 Apr 2000, Ken Chiu Kun Wu wrote: > Hi , > Has anyone had problem like this when compiling > glibc-2.1.2 for their toolchain? > so far I've got gcc-2.95.2, binutils-2.9.5.0.22 > and kernel header files from linux-2.2.13 [...] Run 'make config' and 'make dep' in your kernel source tree before using its header files. Nicolas From kramer@pa.dec.com Thu Apr 6 20:12:31 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id UAA24835; Thu, 6 Apr 2000 20:12:30 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from ns2.tudelft.nl (ns2.tudelft.nl [130.161.180.65]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.8.6 (PHNE_17135)/8.8.6) with ESMTP id UAA25103 for ; Thu, 6 Apr 2000 20:12:29 +0200 (METDST) Received: from mail1.digital.com (mail1.digital.com [204.123.2.50]) by mailhost1.tudelft.nl (PMDF V5.2-32 #42432) with ESMTP id <0FSL00ELUX8SY0@mailhost1.tudelft.nl> for J.A.K.Mouw@its.tudelft.nl; Thu, 6 Apr 2000 20:12:29 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id LAA10056; Thu, 06 Apr 2000 11:06:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rex.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA11767; Thu, 06 Apr 2000 11:06:31 -0700 Received: by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id LAA26691; Thu, 06 Apr 2000 11:03:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id LAA26700; Thu, 06 Apr 2000 11:03:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: from crl.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA23514; Thu, 06 Apr 2000 11:03:56 -0700 Received: from crlwebmail.crl.dec.com (crlwebmail.crl.dec.com [16.11.0.2]) by crl.dec.com (8.8.8/RWD-1.2) with ESMTP id OAA08251 for ; Thu, 06 Apr 2000 14:03:55 -0400 (EDT) Received: by crlwebmail.crl.dec.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21) id ; Thu, 06 Apr 2000 14:07:55 -0400 Date: Thu, 06 Apr 2000 14:04:23 -0400 From: George France Subject: param's passed from the boot loader Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com To: "'sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com'" Message-id: MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21) Content-type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Precedence: bulk CONFIG_ARCH_SA1100 = MACH_TYPE_SA1100 oops, --George George France, france@crl.dec.com Cambridge Research Laboratory, Compaq Computer Corporation One Kendall Square, Building 700 MS: CRL Cambridge, MA 02139 USA From kramer@pa.dec.com Thu Apr 6 20:17:25 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id UAA24854; Thu, 6 Apr 2000 20:17:24 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from ns2.tudelft.nl (ns2.tudelft.nl [130.161.180.65]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.8.6 (PHNE_17135)/8.8.6) with ESMTP id UAA25168 for ; Thu, 6 Apr 2000 20:17:23 +0200 (METDST) Received: from mail2.digital.com (mail2.digital.com [204.123.2.56]) by mailhost1.tudelft.nl (PMDF V5.2-32 #42432) with ESMTP id <0FSL00F3MXGYZF@mailhost1.tudelft.nl> for J.A.K.Mouw@its.tudelft.nl; Thu, 6 Apr 2000 20:17:23 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id LAA04747; Thu, 06 Apr 2000 11:12:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rex.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA21339; Thu, 06 Apr 2000 11:12:18 -0700 Received: by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id LAA26649; Thu, 06 Apr 2000 11:12:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id LAA26671; Thu, 06 Apr 2000 11:12:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: from crl.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA12077; Thu, 06 Apr 2000 11:12:07 -0700 Received: from ims.crl.dec.com (ims.crl.dec.com [16.11.0.11]) by crl.dec.com (8.8.8/RWD-1.2) with ESMTP id OAA08355 for ; Thu, 06 Apr 2000 14:12:07 -0400 (EDT) Received: by ims.crl.dec.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21) id ; Thu, 06 Apr 2000 14:16:01 -0400 Date: Thu, 06 Apr 2000 14:12:29 -0400 From: George France Subject: FW: param's passed from the boot loader Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com To: "'sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com'" Message-id: MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21) Content-type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Precedence: bulk > -----Original Message----- > From: George France > Sent: Thursday, April 06, 2000 2:02 PM > To: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com > Subject: param's passed from the boot loader > > In the arch/arm/kernel/arch.c file is the 'machine_desc' structure for > MACH_TYPE_SA1100. The third field is marked NO_PARAMS, which means no > parameters are received from the boot loader. The Itsy and Bitsy boot > loaders are capable of passing parameters to the kernel. We would like to > change the NO_PARAMS definition to some memory address, so that we may > pass parameters to the kernel and eliminate the Itsy and Bitsy code from > the fixup_sa1100 procedure. > > We would like to use address 0x00000100, the same as the Compaq Personal > Server. > > Does anyone object to this or have a different address they would like to > use? > > Best Regards, > > > > --George > > George France, france@crl.dec.com > Cambridge Research Laboratory, Compaq Computer Corporation > One Kendall Square, Building 700 MS: CRL > Cambridge, MA 02139 USA > > From kramer@pa.dec.com Thu Apr 6 21:16:27 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id VAA25090; Thu, 6 Apr 2000 21:16:27 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from ns2.tudelft.nl (ns2.tudelft.nl [130.161.180.65]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.8.6 (PHNE_17135)/8.8.6) with ESMTP id VAA26439 for ; Thu, 6 Apr 2000 21:16:26 +0200 (METDST) Received: from mail1.digital.com (mail1.digital.com [204.123.2.50]) by mailhost1.tudelft.nl (PMDF V5.2-32 #42432) with ESMTP id <0FSM00HJG07CK3@mailhost1.tudelft.nl> for J.A.K.Mouw@its.tudelft.nl; Thu, 6 Apr 2000 21:16:25 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id MAA10167; Thu, 06 Apr 2000 12:11:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rex.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA22228; Thu, 06 Apr 2000 12:11:15 -0700 Received: by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id MAA26772; Thu, 06 Apr 2000 12:10:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id MAA26749; Thu, 06 Apr 2000 12:10:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail1.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA02484; Thu, 06 Apr 2000 12:10:49 -0700 Received: from xanadu.vipswitch.com (generic199.197.205.205.in-addr.arpa [205.205.197.199] (may be forged)) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with ESMTP id MAA15138 for ; Thu, 06 Apr 2000 12:10:42 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 06 Apr 2000 15:07:53 -0400 (EDT) From: Nicolas Pitre Subject: Re: FW: param's passed from the boot loader In-reply-to: Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com To: George France Cc: "'sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com'" Message-id: MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Precedence: bulk On Thu, 6 Apr 2000, George France wrote: > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: George France > > Sent: Thursday, April 06, 2000 2:02 PM > > To: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com > > Subject: param's passed from the boot loader > > > > In the arch/arm/kernel/arch.c file is the 'machine_desc' structure for > > MACH_TYPE_SA1100. The third field is marked NO_PARAMS, which means no > > parameters are received from the boot loader. The Itsy and Bitsy boot > > loaders are capable of passing parameters to the kernel. We would like to > > change the NO_PARAMS definition to some memory address, so that we may > > pass parameters to the kernel and eliminate the Itsy and Bitsy code from > > the fixup_sa1100 procedure. I think it might be time to separate the architecture concept from machine types, indeed. Like the Netwinder, EBSA285, Cats, etc. share a common architecture named Footbridge, I suggest we have the SA1100 architecture, but different machine_type for each SA11x0 implementation. This way each SA11x0 out there could have its own fixup function, param_struct offset (if they care to support it), etc. Even using the machine_is_xyz macros, we could configure a kernel which binary could be run on multiple SA11x0 with no problem. This means, however, that every developers will need to register a probably misnamed "architecture number" with Russell. In the mean time, bogus numbers could be used, but an offucial number would be required before being merged into upstream patches. Any comments? Somebody already done that? Otherwise I'll do it. > > We would like to use address 0x00000100, the same as the Compaq Personal > > Server. On the SA1100, there is no RAM at that location. You better choose another address. ;-) Nicolas From kramer@pa.dec.com Thu Apr 6 21:41:10 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id VAA25172; Thu, 6 Apr 2000 21:41:10 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from ns2.tudelft.nl (ns2.tudelft.nl [130.161.180.65]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.8.6 (PHNE_17135)/8.8.6) with ESMTP id VAA26990 for ; Thu, 6 Apr 2000 21:41:09 +0200 (METDST) Received: from mail1.digital.com (mail1.digital.com [204.123.2.50]) by mailhost1.tudelft.nl (PMDF V5.2-32 #42432) with ESMTP id <0FSM00J5Q1CJ42@mailhost1.tudelft.nl> for J.A.K.Mouw@its.tudelft.nl; Thu, 6 Apr 2000 21:41:08 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id MAA15690; Thu, 06 Apr 2000 12:36:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rex.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA11903; Thu, 06 Apr 2000 12:35:56 -0700 Received: by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id MAA26786; Thu, 06 Apr 2000 12:35:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id MAA26747; Thu, 06 Apr 2000 12:35:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: from crl.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA06281; Thu, 06 Apr 2000 12:35:35 -0700 Received: from ims.crl.dec.com (ims.crl.dec.com [16.11.0.11]) by crl.dec.com (8.8.8/RWD-1.2) with ESMTP id PAA12637; Thu, 06 Apr 2000 15:35:33 -0400 (EDT) Received: by ims.crl.dec.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21) id ; Thu, 06 Apr 2000 15:39:28 -0400 Date: Thu, 06 Apr 2000 15:35:51 -0400 From: George France Subject: RE: FW: param's passed from the boot loader Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com To: "'Nicolas Pitre'" , George France Cc: "'sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com'" Message-id: MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21) Content-type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Precedence: bulk >I think it might be time to separate the architecture concept from machine >types, indeed. Like the Netwinder, EBSA285, Cats, etc. share a common >architecture named Footbridge, I suggest we have the SA1100 architecture, >but different machine_type for each SA11x0 implementation. This way each >SA11x0 out there could have its own fixup function, param_struct offset >(if they care to support it), etc. Even using the machine_is_xyz macros, >we could configure a kernel which binary could be run on multiple SA11x0 >with no problem. >This means, however, that every developers will need to register a >probably misnamed "architecture number" with Russell. In the mean time, >bogus numbers could be used, but an offucial number would be required >before being merged into upstream patches. >Any comments? >Somebody already done that? Otherwise I'll do it. Just in case this was necessary the Bitsy has its own architecture number. :-) If passing params from the boot loader to the kernel will break other SA-1100 architectures then I think it is time to separate. For those that have not looked at the param struct it is in include/asm-arm/setup.h. So the interesting question is, if we use the parameter passing, will the defaults used break other architectures? > > We would like to use address 0x00000100, the same as the Compaq Personal > > Server. >On the SA1100, there is no RAM at that location. You better choose >another address. ;-) I am glad, that someone is paying attention. I will go get some more coffee. How about: 0xc0000100 O.K :-) --George Nicolas From kramer@pa.dec.com Thu Apr 6 21:47:23 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id VAA25213; Thu, 6 Apr 2000 21:47:23 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from ns2.tudelft.nl (ns2.tudelft.nl [130.161.180.65]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.8.6 (PHNE_17135)/8.8.6) with ESMTP id VAA27140 for ; Thu, 6 Apr 2000 21:47:22 +0200 (METDST) Received: from mail2.digital.com (mail2.digital.com [204.123.2.56]) by mailhost1.tudelft.nl (PMDF V5.2-32 #42432) with ESMTP id <0FSM00JBB1MX0M@mailhost1.tudelft.nl> for J.A.K.Mouw@its.tudelft.nl; Thu, 6 Apr 2000 21:47:22 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id MAA14305; Thu, 06 Apr 2000 12:42:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rex.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA14976; Thu, 06 Apr 2000 12:42:17 -0700 Received: by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id MAA26774; Thu, 06 Apr 2000 12:42:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id MAA26757; Thu, 06 Apr 2000 12:42:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail1.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA00809; Thu, 06 Apr 2000 12:42:06 -0700 Received: from thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (thorgal.et.tudelft.nl [130.161.40.91]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with ESMTP id MAA07412 for ; Thu, 06 Apr 2000 12:42:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [130.161.115.44] (jdbakker.et.tudelft.nl [130.161.115.44]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id VAA16837 for ; Thu, 06 Apr 2000 21:41:53 +0200 Date: Thu, 06 Apr 2000 21:41:24 +0200 From: "J.D. Bakker" Subject: Read buffer and FFT Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com To: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Message-id: MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Precedence: bulk Hi all, Has anyone used the SA-1100 read buffer from userspace yet ? I'm writing an FFT library, and the read buffer could really help me suck in the twiddle factors. JDB [who would of course also be interested in SA-tuned FFTs that may be out there] -- LART. 250 MIPS under one Watt. Free hardware design files. http://www.lart.tudelft.nl/ From kramer@pa.dec.com Thu Apr 6 22:12:32 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id WAA25303; Thu, 6 Apr 2000 22:12:32 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from ns2.tudelft.nl (ns2.tudelft.nl [130.161.180.65]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.8.6 (PHNE_17135)/8.8.6) with ESMTP id WAA27702 for ; Thu, 6 Apr 2000 22:12:31 +0200 (METDST) Received: from mail1.digital.com (mail1.digital.com [204.123.2.50]) by mailhost1.tudelft.nl (PMDF V5.2-32 #42432) with ESMTP id <0FSM00KN42SU0H@mailhost1.tudelft.nl> for J.A.K.Mouw@its.tudelft.nl; Thu, 6 Apr 2000 22:12:31 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id NAA19224; Thu, 06 Apr 2000 13:07:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rex.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA23510; Thu, 06 Apr 2000 13:07:22 -0700 Received: by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id NAA26792; Thu, 06 Apr 2000 13:06:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id NAA26825; Thu, 06 Apr 2000 13:06:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail2.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA16768; Thu, 06 Apr 2000 13:06:57 -0700 Received: from xanadu.vipswitch.com (generic199.197.205.205.in-addr.arpa [205.205.197.199] (may be forged)) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with ESMTP id NAA13472 for ; Thu, 06 Apr 2000 13:06:56 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 06 Apr 2000 16:05:05 -0400 (EDT) From: Nicolas Pitre Subject: RE: FW: param's passed from the boot loader In-reply-to: Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com To: George France Cc: "'sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com'" Message-id: MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Precedence: bulk On Thu, 6 Apr 2000, George France wrote: > >I think it might be time to separate the architecture concept from machine > >types, indeed. Like the Netwinder, EBSA285, Cats, etc. share a common > >architecture named Footbridge, I suggest we have the SA1100 architecture, > >but different machine_type for each SA11x0 implementation. This way each > >SA11x0 out there could have its own fixup function, param_struct offset > >(if they care to support it), etc. Even using the machine_is_xyz macros, > >we could configure a kernel which binary could be run on multiple SA11x0 > >with no problem. > > >This means, however, that every developers will need to register a > >probably misnamed "architecture number" with Russell. In the mean time, > >bogus numbers could be used, but an offucial number would be required > >before being merged into upstream patches. > > >Any comments? > >Somebody already done that? Otherwise I'll do it. > > If passing params from the boot loader to the kernel will break other > SA-1100 architectures then I think it is time to separate. It is because ATM nobody care about the param structure. I hacked a kernel cmdline passing for Victor in the past and it's probably still there, but it wasn't through the param struct. Another nice side effect is that all different machines would have their own name instead of "SA1100-based" with uname. > For those that have not looked at the param struct it is in > include/asm-arm/setup.h. So the interesting question is, if we use the > parameter passing, will the defaults used break other architectures? Currently, yes. For instance you could conditionnally assign a forced value to the param pointer until we make appropriate changes. Nicolas From kramer@pa.dec.com Thu Apr 6 22:34:12 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id WAA25357; Thu, 6 Apr 2000 22:34:12 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from ns2.tudelft.nl (ns2.tudelft.nl [130.161.180.65]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.8.6 (PHNE_17135)/8.8.6) with ESMTP id WAA28097 for ; Thu, 6 Apr 2000 22:34:11 +0200 (METDST) Received: from mail1.digital.com (mail1.digital.com [204.123.2.50]) by mailhost1.tudelft.nl (PMDF V5.2-32 #42432) with ESMTP id <0FSM00KGP3SYJL@mailhost1.tudelft.nl> for J.A.K.Mouw@its.tudelft.nl; Thu, 6 Apr 2000 22:34:11 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id NAA12889; Thu, 06 Apr 2000 13:29:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rex.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA12537; Thu, 06 Apr 2000 13:28:55 -0700 Received: by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id NAA26797; Thu, 06 Apr 2000 13:28:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id NAA26834; Thu, 06 Apr 2000 13:28:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail1.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA22800; Thu, 06 Apr 2000 13:28:30 -0700 Received: from xanadu.vipswitch.com (generic199.197.205.205.in-addr.arpa [205.205.197.199] (may be forged)) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with ESMTP id NAA18193 for ; Thu, 06 Apr 2000 13:28:29 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 06 Apr 2000 16:17:38 -0400 (EDT) From: Nicolas Pitre Subject: Re: Read buffer and FFT In-reply-to: Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com To: "J.D. Bakker" Cc: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Message-id: MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Precedence: bulk On Thu, 6 Apr 2000, J.D. Bakker wrote: > Hi all, > > Has anyone used the SA-1100 read buffer from userspace yet ? I'm writing an > FFT library, and the read buffer could really help me suck in the twiddle > factors. Watch out task switches. Also you might not be able to use it if not in SVC mode, which would require a system call to be used from user space thus with no overall gain. Apparently the SA1110 read buffer is buggy with signed shorts and bytes. Let's hope you won't need those by the time your SA1100 stock disappears. Nicolas From kramer@pa.dec.com Thu Apr 6 22:35:11 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id WAA25362; Thu, 6 Apr 2000 22:35:07 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from ns2.tudelft.nl (ns2.tudelft.nl [130.161.180.65]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.8.6 (PHNE_17135)/8.8.6) with ESMTP id WAA28126 for ; Thu, 6 Apr 2000 22:35:06 +0200 (METDST) Received: from mail1.digital.com (mail1.digital.com [204.123.2.50]) by mailhost1.tudelft.nl (PMDF V5.2-32 #42432) with ESMTP id <0FSM00KH13UHRS@mailhost1.tudelft.nl> for J.A.K.Mouw@its.tudelft.nl; Thu, 6 Apr 2000 22:35:06 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id NAA19977; Thu, 06 Apr 2000 13:30:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rex.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA07090; Thu, 06 Apr 2000 13:30:01 -0700 Received: by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id NAA26833; Thu, 06 Apr 2000 13:29:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id NAA26822; Thu, 06 Apr 2000 13:29:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail2.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA26480; Thu, 06 Apr 2000 13:29:54 -0700 Received: from msexch01.diebold.com (eliot.diebold.com [204.151.249.21]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with ESMTP id NAA16100 for ; Thu, 06 Apr 2000 13:29:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: by msexch01.diebold.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21) id <2M6SH291>; Thu, 06 Apr 2000 16:29:00 -0400 Date: Thu, 06 Apr 2000 16:28:33 -0400 From: "Plentovich, Dave" Subject: linux threads Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com To: "Sa1100-Linux Group (E-mail)" Message-id: MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21) Content-type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Precedence: bulk Can anyone tell me the story about linux threads and SA1100/1110? Do the pthread functions work or must all cross compiled programs use processes? Best regards, David Plentovich Diebold, Incorporated ATM Development & Engineering, Dept. 9-53-3 5995 Mayfair Road, North Canton, OH 44720, USA voice 330.490.5092, fax 330.490.4508 plentod@diebold.com From kramer@pa.dec.com Thu Apr 6 22:48:32 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id WAA25393; Thu, 6 Apr 2000 22:48:31 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from ns2.tudelft.nl (ns2.tudelft.nl [130.161.180.65]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.8.6 (PHNE_17135)/8.8.6) with ESMTP id WAA28369 for ; Thu, 6 Apr 2000 22:48:30 +0200 (METDST) Received: from mail2.digital.com (mail2.digital.com [204.123.2.56]) by mailhost1.tudelft.nl (PMDF V5.2-32 #42432) with ESMTP id <0FSM00KHE4GTOC@mailhost1.tudelft.nl> for J.A.K.Mouw@its.tudelft.nl; Thu, 6 Apr 2000 22:48:30 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id NAA14907; Thu, 06 Apr 2000 13:43:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rex.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA01905; Thu, 06 Apr 2000 13:43:25 -0700 Received: by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id NAA26840; Thu, 06 Apr 2000 13:43:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id NAA26793; Thu, 06 Apr 2000 13:43:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail2.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA17448; Thu, 06 Apr 2000 13:43:17 -0700 Received: from thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (thorgal.et.tudelft.nl [130.161.40.91]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with ESMTP id NAA16818 for ; Thu, 06 Apr 2000 13:43:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [130.161.115.44] (jdbakker.et.tudelft.nl [130.161.115.44]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id WAA16953; Thu, 06 Apr 2000 22:43:13 +0200 Date: Thu, 06 Apr 2000 22:42:51 +0200 From: "J.D. Bakker" Subject: Re: Read buffer and FFT In-reply-to: Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com To: Nicolas Pitre Cc: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Message-id: MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Precedence: bulk References: At 22:17 +0200 06-04-2000, Nicolas Pitre wrote: >On Thu, 6 Apr 2000, J.D. Bakker wrote: >> Has anyone used the SA-1100 read buffer from userspace yet ? I'm writing an >> FFT library, and the read buffer could really help me suck in the twiddle >> factors. > >Watch out task switches. Oh, it's just an optimization, so it's no problem if it occasionally doesn't work. OTOH, do you know whether the read buffers are invalidated across task switches ? > Also you might not be able to use it if not in >SVC mode, which would require a system call to be used from user space >thus with no overall gain. The SA-1100 allows the enabling of read buffer allocates from userspace. If the kernel doesn't do this yet, would you accept a patch that does ? >Apparently the SA1110 read buffer is buggy with signed shorts and bytes. >Let's hope you won't need those by the time your SA1100 stock disappears. The '1100 has the same bug, IIRC. No problem for me; I'll just store the coefficients in words (which is OK as the FFT is compute bound). JDB. -- If you think the problem is bad now, just wait until we've solved it. -- Arthur Kasspe From kramer@pa.dec.com Thu Apr 6 22:51:22 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id WAA25413; Thu, 6 Apr 2000 22:51:22 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from ns2.tudelft.nl (ns2.tudelft.nl [130.161.180.65]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.8.6 (PHNE_17135)/8.8.6) with ESMTP id WAA28443 for ; Thu, 6 Apr 2000 22:51:21 +0200 (METDST) Received: from mail2.digital.com (mail2.digital.com [204.123.2.56]) by mailhost1.tudelft.nl (PMDF V5.2-32 #42432) with ESMTP id <0FSM00KVW4LKRS@mailhost1.tudelft.nl> for J.A.K.Mouw@its.tudelft.nl; Thu, 6 Apr 2000 22:51:20 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id NAA19467; Thu, 06 Apr 2000 13:46:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rex.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA21609; Thu, 06 Apr 2000 13:46:16 -0700 Received: by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id NAA26879; Thu, 06 Apr 2000 13:46:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id NAA26830; Thu, 06 Apr 2000 13:46:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail1.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA02359; Thu, 06 Apr 2000 13:46:09 -0700 Received: from xanadu.vipswitch.com (generic199.197.205.205.in-addr.arpa [205.205.197.199] (may be forged)) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with ESMTP id NAA16121 for ; Thu, 06 Apr 2000 13:46:07 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 06 Apr 2000 16:44:14 -0400 (EDT) From: Nicolas Pitre Subject: Re: linux threads In-reply-to: Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com To: "Plentovich, Dave" Cc: "Sa1100-Linux Group (E-mail)" Message-id: MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Precedence: bulk On Thu, 6 Apr 2000, Plentovich, Dave wrote: > Can anyone tell me the story about linux threads and SA1100/1110? Do the pthread functions work or must all cross compiled programs use processes? Threads work perfectly, just as on a standard PC. And because threads share the same pagetable, you save on context switches where the cache doesn't have to be flushed. Nicolas From kramer@pa.dec.com Thu Apr 6 23:15:58 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id XAA25494; Thu, 6 Apr 2000 23:15:57 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from ns2.tudelft.nl (ns2.tudelft.nl [130.161.180.65]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.8.6 (PHNE_17135)/8.8.6) with ESMTP id XAA28919 for ; Thu, 6 Apr 2000 23:15:58 +0200 (METDST) Received: from mail2.digital.com (mail2.digital.com [204.123.2.56]) by mailhost1.tudelft.nl (PMDF V5.2-32 #42432) with ESMTP id <0FSM00MFO5QK6B@mailhost1.tudelft.nl> for J.A.K.Mouw@its.tudelft.nl; Thu, 6 Apr 2000 23:15:57 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id OAA19933; Thu, 06 Apr 2000 14:10:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rex.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA19400; Thu, 06 Apr 2000 14:10:52 -0700 Received: by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id OAA26901; Thu, 06 Apr 2000 14:10:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id OAA26912; Thu, 06 Apr 2000 14:10:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail2.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA16101; Thu, 06 Apr 2000 14:10:42 -0700 Received: from xanadu.vipswitch.com (generic199.197.205.205.in-addr.arpa [205.205.197.199] (may be forged)) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with ESMTP id OAA20244 for ; Thu, 06 Apr 2000 14:10:40 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 06 Apr 2000 16:59:47 -0400 (EDT) From: Nicolas Pitre Subject: Re: Read buffer and FFT In-reply-to: Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com To: "J.D. Bakker" Cc: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Message-id: MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Precedence: bulk On Thu, 6 Apr 2000, J.D. Bakker wrote: > At 22:17 +0200 06-04-2000, Nicolas Pitre wrote: > >On Thu, 6 Apr 2000, J.D. Bakker wrote: > >> Has anyone used the SA-1100 read buffer from userspace yet ? I'm writing an > >> FFT library, and the read buffer could really help me suck in the twiddle > >> factors. > > > >Watch out task switches. > > Oh, it's just an optimization, so it's no problem if it occasionally > doesn't work. OTOH, do you know whether the read buffers are invalidated > across task switches ? That's the problem. I don't think so. But it should be trivial to add. > > Also you might not be able to use it if not in > >SVC mode, which would require a system call to be used from user space > >thus with no overall gain. > > The SA-1100 allows the enabling of read buffer allocates from userspace. Then there is no problem. Otherwise the system call overhead would probably have consumed all gain the read buffer provides. > JDB. > > -- > If you think the problem is bad now, just wait until we've solved it. I really like this one... :-) Nicolas From kramer@pa.dec.com Thu Apr 6 23:11:24 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id XAA25474; Thu, 6 Apr 2000 23:11:24 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from ns2.tudelft.nl (ns2.tudelft.nl [130.161.180.65]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.8.6 (PHNE_17135)/8.8.6) with ESMTP id XAA28831 for ; Thu, 6 Apr 2000 23:11:24 +0200 (METDST) Received: from mail1.digital.com (mail1.digital.com [204.123.2.50]) by mailhost1.tudelft.nl (PMDF V5.2-32 #42432) with ESMTP id <0FSM00MAW5IZ6B@mailhost1.tudelft.nl> for J.A.K.Mouw@its.tudelft.nl; Thu, 6 Apr 2000 23:11:24 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id OAA21527; Thu, 06 Apr 2000 14:06:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rex.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA01689; Thu, 06 Apr 2000 14:06:12 -0700 Received: by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id OAA26867; Thu, 06 Apr 2000 14:05:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id OAA26878; Thu, 06 Apr 2000 14:05:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail1.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA09592; Thu, 06 Apr 2000 14:05:52 -0700 Received: from duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (duteinh.et.tudelft.nl [130.161.42.1]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with ESMTP id OAA24039 for ; Thu, 06 Apr 2000 14:05:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: from kalman by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id XAA25453; Thu, 06 Apr 2000 23:04:30 +0200 (MET DST) Date: Thu, 06 Apr 2000 23:04:30 +0200 (MET DST) From: Erik Mouw X-Face: "!Z|1XjFg!3Iw)BwM^M\k)J5KHiPddz}#/Zw%?$&Q!xqob"OA|})3_@&BTTiQERo?/^g[Z<9P4R8:5C:aqq.cw!hotLc=+u-"+1rq@9$V^8PbOUlodyi_sejt+D`iqkLpx$>.aXl%vnfPIt"LK|/%>94_Zrm8jy?`_[RKt'TuoxUxfk(gMhY(n|DBBl~c$dhO>G%6}R4+DGX3|idBm4oU&UM/XUP4I9aoN{]`ax%B?rgD(I3OJ<62Y6L Subject: RE: FW: param's passed from the boot loader In-reply-to: Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com To: france@crl.dec.com Cc: nico@CAM.ORG, sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Message-id: <200004062104.XAA25453@duteinh.et.tudelft.nl> Organization: Eric conspiracy secret labs MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: XCmail 1.0.0 - with PGP support, PGP engine version 0.5 (Linux) Content-type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-transfer-encoding: 8bit Precedence: bulk X-Loop: erik@it.et.tudelft.nl X-Mailerorigin: http://www.fsai.fh-trier.de/~schmitzj/Xclasses/XCmail/ X-Eric-Conspiracy: There is no conspiracy! On Thu, 06 Apr 2000 15:35:51 -0400, George France wrote: > Nicolas Pitre wrote: >> George France wrote: >> > We would like to use address 0x00000100, the same as the Compaq Personal >> > Server. > >>On the SA1100, there is no RAM at that location. You better choose >>another address. ;-) > > I am glad, that someone is paying attention. I will go get some more coffee. It didn't look too strange to me. You can put the params structure in ROM, AFAIK the kernel only reads the structure. Erik -- "I'm just this guy you know?" -- Zaphod Beeblebrox in "The Hitchhikers Guide to the Galaxy" by Douglas Adams From kramer@pa.dec.com Thu Apr 6 23:30:09 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id XAA25561; Thu, 6 Apr 2000 23:30:09 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from ns2.tudelft.nl (ns2.tudelft.nl [130.161.180.65]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.8.6 (PHNE_17135)/8.8.6) with ESMTP id XAA29241 for ; Thu, 6 Apr 2000 23:30:09 +0200 (METDST) Received: from mail2.digital.com (mail2.digital.com [204.123.2.56]) by mailhost1.tudelft.nl (PMDF V5.2-32 #42432) with ESMTP id <0FSM00M8W6E84F@mailhost1.tudelft.nl> for J.A.K.Mouw@its.tudelft.nl; Thu, 6 Apr 2000 23:30:09 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id OAA20928; Thu, 06 Apr 2000 14:24:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rex.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA29603; Thu, 06 Apr 2000 14:24:56 -0700 Received: by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id OAA26870; Thu, 06 Apr 2000 14:24:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id OAA26910; Thu, 06 Apr 2000 14:24:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail1.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA05539; Thu, 06 Apr 2000 14:24:46 -0700 Received: from xanadu.vipswitch.com (generic199.197.205.205.in-addr.arpa [205.205.197.199] (may be forged)) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with ESMTP id OAA14023 for ; Thu, 06 Apr 2000 14:24:41 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 06 Apr 2000 17:16:31 -0400 (EDT) From: Nicolas Pitre Subject: RE: FW: param's passed from the boot loader In-reply-to: <200004062104.XAA25453@duteinh.et.tudelft.nl> Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com To: Erik Mouw Cc: france@crl.dec.com, sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Message-id: MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Precedence: bulk On Thu, 6 Apr 2000, Erik Mouw wrote: > It didn't look too strange to me. You can put the params structure in ROM, > AFAIK the kernel only reads the structure. But you still have to modify it from the bootloader if you want to pass the kernel a command line string... or have the bootloader detect available RAM and tell the kernel. Nicolas From kramer@pa.dec.com Thu Apr 6 23:36:43 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id XAA25595; Thu, 6 Apr 2000 23:36:43 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from ns2.tudelft.nl (ns2.tudelft.nl [130.161.180.65]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.8.6 (PHNE_17135)/8.8.6) with ESMTP id XAA29430 for ; Thu, 6 Apr 2000 23:36:43 +0200 (METDST) Received: from mail1.digital.com (mail1.digital.com [204.123.2.50]) by mailhost1.tudelft.nl (PMDF V5.2-32 #42432) with ESMTP id <0FSM0002Y6P6HT@mailhost1.tudelft.nl> for J.A.K.Mouw@its.tudelft.nl; Thu, 6 Apr 2000 23:36:43 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id OAA21613; Thu, 06 Apr 2000 14:31:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rex.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA09903; Thu, 06 Apr 2000 14:31:33 -0700 Received: by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id OAA26921; Thu, 06 Apr 2000 14:31:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id OAA26837; Thu, 06 Apr 2000 14:31:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: from crl.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA13885; Thu, 06 Apr 2000 14:31:20 -0700 Received: from crlwebmail.crl.dec.com (crlwebmail.crl.dec.com [16.11.0.2]) by crl.dec.com (8.8.8/RWD-1.2) with ESMTP id RAA16994; Thu, 06 Apr 2000 17:27:33 -0400 (EDT) Received: by crlwebmail.crl.dec.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21) id ; Thu, 06 Apr 2000 17:31:33 -0400 Date: Thu, 06 Apr 2000 17:28:01 -0400 From: Jamey Hicks Subject: RE: FW: param's passed from the boot loader Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com To: "'Nicolas Pitre'" , Erik Mouw Cc: George France , sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Message-id: MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21) Content-type: text/plain Precedence: bulk Our various bootloaders detect the amount of flash and dram and use the params structure to inform the kernel of the actual memory configuration. -Jamey -----Original Message----- From: Nicolas Pitre [mailto:nico@CAM.ORG] Sent: Thursday, April 06, 2000 5:17 PM To: Erik Mouw Cc: france@crl.dec.com; sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Subject: RE: FW: param's passed from the boot loader On Thu, 6 Apr 2000, Erik Mouw wrote: > It didn't look too strange to me. You can put the params structure in ROM, > AFAIK the kernel only reads the structure. But you still have to modify it from the bootloader if you want to pass the kernel a command line string... or have the bootloader detect available RAM and tell the kernel. Nicolas From kramer@pa.dec.com Thu Apr 6 23:41:08 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id XAA25612; Thu, 6 Apr 2000 23:41:08 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from ns2.tudelft.nl (ns2.tudelft.nl [130.161.180.65]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.8.6 (PHNE_17135)/8.8.6) with ESMTP id XAA29533 for ; Thu, 6 Apr 2000 23:41:08 +0200 (METDST) Received: from mail1.digital.com (mail1.digital.com [204.123.2.50]) by mailhost1.tudelft.nl (PMDF V5.2-32 #42432) with ESMTP id <0FSM000AD6WJDC@mailhost1.tudelft.nl> for J.A.K.Mouw@its.tudelft.nl; Thu, 6 Apr 2000 23:41:08 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id OAA23134; Thu, 06 Apr 2000 14:36:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rex.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA02331; Thu, 06 Apr 2000 14:36:03 -0700 Received: by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id OAA26927; Thu, 06 Apr 2000 14:35:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id OAA26918; Thu, 06 Apr 2000 14:35:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail1.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA05763; Thu, 06 Apr 2000 14:35:55 -0700 Received: from duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (duteinh.et.tudelft.nl [130.161.42.1]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with ESMTP id OAA26356 for ; Thu, 06 Apr 2000 14:35:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: from kalman by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id XAA25584; Thu, 06 Apr 2000 23:34:35 +0200 (MET DST) Date: Thu, 06 Apr 2000 23:34:35 +0200 (MET DST) From: Erik Mouw X-Face: "!Z|1XjFg!3Iw)BwM^M\k)J5KHiPddz}#/Zw%?$&Q!xqob"OA|})3_@&BTTiQERo?/^g[Z<9P4R8:5C:aqq.cw!hotLc=+u-"+1rq@9$V^8PbOUlodyi_sejt+D`iqkLpx$>.aXl%vnfPIt"LK|/%>94_Zrm8jy?`_[RKt'TuoxUxfk(gMhY(n|DBBl~c$dhO>G%6}R4+DGX3|idBm4oU&UM/XUP4I9aoN{]`ax%B?rgD(I3OJ<62Y6L Subject: RE: FW: param's passed from the boot loader In-reply-to: Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com To: nico@CAM.ORG Cc: france@crl.dec.com, sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Message-id: <200004062134.XAA25584@duteinh.et.tudelft.nl> Organization: Eric conspiracy secret labs MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: XCmail 1.0.0 - with PGP support, PGP engine version 0.5 (Linux) Content-type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-transfer-encoding: 8bit Precedence: bulk X-Loop: erik@it.et.tudelft.nl X-Mailerorigin: http://www.fsai.fh-trier.de/~schmitzj/Xclasses/XCmail/ X-Eric-Conspiracy: There is no conspiracy! On Thu, 06 Apr 2000 17:16:31 -0400 (EDT), Nicolas Pitre wrote: > On Thu, 6 Apr 2000, Erik Mouw wrote: >> It didn't look too strange to me. You can put the params structure in ROM, >> AFAIK the kernel only reads the structure. > > But you still have to modify it from the bootloader if you want to pass > the kernel a command line string... or have the bootloader detect > available RAM and tell the kernel. .. unless you have Flash memory with boot parameter blocks ;-) Erik -- There was a point to this story, but it has temporarily escaped the croniclers mind. -- Douglas Adams, The Hitch Hikers Guide to the Galaxy From kramer@pa.dec.com Fri Apr 7 00:09:05 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id AAA25733; Fri, 7 Apr 2000 00:09:05 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from ns2.tudelft.nl (ns2.tudelft.nl [130.161.180.65]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.8.6 (PHNE_17135)/8.8.6) with ESMTP id AAA00166 for ; Fri, 7 Apr 2000 00:09:05 +0200 (METDST) Received: from mail1.digital.com (mail1.digital.com [204.123.2.50]) by mailhost1.tudelft.nl (PMDF V5.2-32 #42432) with ESMTP id <0FSM0017J874IF@mailhost1.tudelft.nl> for J.A.K.Mouw@its.tudelft.nl; Fri, 7 Apr 2000 00:09:05 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id PAA24939; Thu, 06 Apr 2000 15:03:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rex.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA14808; Thu, 06 Apr 2000 15:03:47 -0700 Received: by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id PAA26936; Thu, 06 Apr 2000 15:03:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id PAA26913; Thu, 06 Apr 2000 15:03:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: from crl.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA32533; Thu, 06 Apr 2000 15:03:29 -0700 Received: from ims.crl.dec.com (ims.crl.dec.com [16.11.0.11]) by crl.dec.com (8.8.8/RWD-1.2) with ESMTP id SAA13715 for ; Thu, 06 Apr 2000 18:03:28 -0400 (EDT) Received: by ims.crl.dec.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21) id ; Thu, 06 Apr 2000 18:07:22 -0400 Date: Thu, 06 Apr 2000 18:03:50 -0400 From: George France Subject: serial port minor numbers Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com To: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Message-id: MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21) Content-type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Precedence: bulk While updating the Compaq Personal Server to 2.3.99-pre3-rmk2, I found that Russell changed the minor number of the serial port ttyS0 from 64 to 255 for ttyS191. This is because in theory you could have a generic serial port with the SA-110 which would utilize minor number 64. Should we change the serial_sa1100.c driver to match the serial_21285 driver? It would allow the same ramdisk to be used across the SA-110 and SA-11x0 platforms. --George George France, france@crl.dec.com Cambridge Research Laboratory, Compaq Computer Corporation One Kendall Square, Building 700 MS: CRL Cambridge, MA 02139 USA From kramer@pa.dec.com Fri Apr 7 01:49:48 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id BAA25997; Fri, 7 Apr 2000 01:49:47 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from ns2.tudelft.nl (ns2.tudelft.nl [130.161.180.65]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.8.6 (PHNE_17135)/8.8.6) with ESMTP id BAA01901 for ; Fri, 7 Apr 2000 01:49:48 +0200 (METDST) Received: from mail2.digital.com (mail2.digital.com [204.123.2.56]) by mailhost1.tudelft.nl (PMDF V5.2-32 #42432) with ESMTP id <0FSM0040KCUY67@mailhost1.tudelft.nl> for J.A.K.Mouw@its.tudelft.nl; Fri, 7 Apr 2000 01:49:47 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id QAA12666; Thu, 06 Apr 2000 16:44:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rex.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA29752; Thu, 06 Apr 2000 16:44:18 -0700 Received: by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id QAA26968; Thu, 06 Apr 2000 16:43:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id QAA26970; Thu, 06 Apr 2000 16:43:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail2.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA24619; Thu, 06 Apr 2000 16:43:26 -0700 Received: from xanadu.gn.com (modemcable248.137-200-24.mtl.mc.videotron.net [24.200.137.248]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with ESMTP id QAA28231 for ; Thu, 06 Apr 2000 16:43:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (nico@localhost) by xanadu.gn.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id TAA21510; Thu, 06 Apr 2000 19:43:27 -0400 Date: Thu, 06 Apr 2000 19:43:27 -0400 (EDT) From: Nicolas Pitre Subject: Re: serial port minor numbers In-reply-to: Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com X-Sender: nico@xanadu.gn.com To: George France Cc: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Message-id: MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Precedence: bulk X-Authentication-warning: xanadu.gn.com: nico owned process doing -bs On Thu, 6 Apr 2000, George France wrote: > While updating the Compaq Personal Server to 2.3.99-pre3-rmk2, I found that > Russell changed the minor number of the serial port ttyS0 from 64 to 255 > for ttyS191. This is because in theory you could have a generic serial port > with the SA-110 which would utilize minor number 64. Should we change the > serial_sa1100.c driver to match the serial_21285 driver? It would allow the > same ramdisk to be used across the SA-110 and SA-11x0 platforms. You can't use 255 for your first serial port since the SA11x0 may have two or three of them. Personally I don't think Russell made a good choice. The best solution would be to use the first tty slot available. If the standard serial driver detects some ports, the 21285 port would simply be at the end of the sequence, otherwise it get the first place. IMHO It's not a good idea to perpetuate a design flaw for uniformity's sake. The right solution is to improve serial_21285.c. Nicolas From kramer@pa.dec.com Fri Apr 7 16:31:05 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id QAA00497; Fri, 7 Apr 2000 16:31:05 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from ns2.tudelft.nl (ns2.tudelft.nl [130.161.180.65]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.8.6 (PHNE_17135)/8.8.6) with ESMTP id QAA19312 for ; Fri, 7 Apr 2000 16:31:01 +0200 (METDST) Received: from mail2.digital.com (mail2.digital.com [204.123.2.56]) by mailhost1.tudelft.nl (PMDF V5.2-32 #42432) with ESMTP id <0FSN00G46HNM8K@mailhost1.tudelft.nl> for J.A.K.Mouw@its.tudelft.nl; Fri, 7 Apr 2000 16:30:59 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id HAA06538; Fri, 07 Apr 2000 07:25:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rex.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA13684; Fri, 07 Apr 2000 07:25:01 -0700 Received: by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id HAA27261; Fri, 07 Apr 2000 07:23:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id HAA27281; Fri, 07 Apr 2000 07:23:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: from crl.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA23609; Fri, 07 Apr 2000 07:23:05 -0700 Received: from crlwebmail.crl.dec.com (crlwebmail.crl.dec.com [16.11.0.2]) by crl.dec.com (8.8.8/RWD-1.2) with ESMTP id KAA00472; Fri, 07 Apr 2000 10:23:01 -0400 (EDT) Received: by crlwebmail.crl.dec.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21) id ; Fri, 07 Apr 2000 10:27:01 -0400 Date: Fri, 07 Apr 2000 10:23:29 -0400 From: George France Subject: RE: serial port minor numbers Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com To: "'Nicolas Pitre'" , George France Cc: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Message-id: MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21) Content-type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Precedence: bulk I agree with you should we forward this to Russell? --George -----Original Message----- From: Nicolas Pitre [mailto:nico@CAM.ORG] Sent: Thursday, April 06, 2000 7:43 PM To: George France Cc: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Subject: Re: serial port minor numbers On Thu, 6 Apr 2000, George France wrote: > While updating the Compaq Personal Server to 2.3.99-pre3-rmk2, I found that > Russell changed the minor number of the serial port ttyS0 from 64 to 255 > for ttyS191. This is because in theory you could have a generic serial port > with the SA-110 which would utilize minor number 64. Should we change the > serial_sa1100.c driver to match the serial_21285 driver? It would allow the > same ramdisk to be used across the SA-110 and SA-11x0 platforms. You can't use 255 for your first serial port since the SA11x0 may have two or three of them. Personally I don't think Russell made a good choice. The best solution would be to use the first tty slot available. If the standard serial driver detects some ports, the 21285 port would simply be at the end of the sequence, otherwise it get the first place. IMHO It's not a good idea to perpetuate a design flaw for uniformity's sake. The right solution is to improve serial_21285.c. Nicolas From kramer@pa.dec.com Fri Apr 7 16:40:31 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id QAA00552; Fri, 7 Apr 2000 16:40:31 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from ns2.tudelft.nl (ns2.tudelft.nl [130.161.180.65]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.8.6 (PHNE_17135)/8.8.6) with ESMTP id QAA19597 for ; Fri, 7 Apr 2000 16:40:31 +0200 (METDST) Received: from mail2.digital.com (mail2.digital.com [204.123.2.56]) by mailhost1.tudelft.nl (PMDF V5.2-32 #42432) with ESMTP id <0FSN00JJQI3EG0@mailhost1.tudelft.nl> for J.A.K.Mouw@its.tudelft.nl; Fri, 7 Apr 2000 16:40:27 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id HAA07707; Fri, 07 Apr 2000 07:35:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rex.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA19491; Fri, 07 Apr 2000 07:35:17 -0700 Received: by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id HAA27242; Fri, 07 Apr 2000 07:35:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id HAA27286; Fri, 07 Apr 2000 07:35:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail1.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA05620; Fri, 07 Apr 2000 07:35:03 -0700 Received: from xanadu.vipswitch.com (generic199.197.205.205.in-addr.arpa [205.205.197.199] (may be forged)) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with ESMTP id HAA13092 for ; Fri, 07 Apr 2000 07:35:02 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 07 Apr 2000 10:32:42 -0400 (EDT) From: Nicolas Pitre Subject: RE: serial port minor numbers In-reply-to: Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com To: George France Cc: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Message-id: MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Precedence: bulk On Fri, 7 Apr 2000, George France wrote: > I agree with you should we forward this to Russell? Probably. Or a patch might be even better. > -----Original Message----- > From: Nicolas Pitre [mailto:nico@CAM.ORG] > Sent: Thursday, April 06, 2000 7:43 PM > To: George France > Cc: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com > Subject: Re: serial port minor numbers > > > > > On Thu, 6 Apr 2000, George France wrote: > > > While updating the Compaq Personal Server to 2.3.99-pre3-rmk2, I found > that > > Russell changed the minor number of the serial port ttyS0 from 64 to 255 > > for ttyS191. This is because in theory you could have a generic serial > port > > with the SA-110 which would utilize minor number 64. Should we change the > > serial_sa1100.c driver to match the serial_21285 driver? It would allow > the > > same ramdisk to be used across the SA-110 and SA-11x0 platforms. > > You can't use 255 for your first serial port since the SA11x0 may have two > or three of them. > > Personally I don't think Russell made a good choice. The best solution > would be to use the first tty slot available. If the standard serial > driver detects some ports, the 21285 port would simply be at the end of > the sequence, otherwise it get the first place. > > IMHO It's not a good idea to perpetuate a design flaw for uniformity's > sake. The right solution is to improve serial_21285.c. > > > Nicolas > From kramer@pa.dec.com Fri Apr 7 16:50:03 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id QAA00611; Fri, 7 Apr 2000 16:50:03 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from ns2.tudelft.nl (ns2.tudelft.nl [130.161.180.65]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.8.6 (PHNE_17135)/8.8.6) with ESMTP id QAA19950 for ; Fri, 7 Apr 2000 16:50:03 +0200 (METDST) Received: from mail2.digital.com (mail2.digital.com [204.123.2.56]) by mailhost1.tudelft.nl (PMDF V5.2-32 #42432) with ESMTP id <0FSN00KHUIJ90D@mailhost1.tudelft.nl> for J.A.K.Mouw@its.tudelft.nl; Fri, 7 Apr 2000 16:49:58 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id HAA07281; Fri, 07 Apr 2000 07:44:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rex.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA06461; Fri, 07 Apr 2000 07:44:44 -0700 Received: by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id HAA27295; Fri, 07 Apr 2000 07:44:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id HAA27296; Fri, 07 Apr 2000 07:44:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: from crl.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA10889; Fri, 07 Apr 2000 07:44:35 -0700 Received: from crlwebmail.crl.dec.com (crlwebmail.crl.dec.com [16.11.0.2]) by crl.dec.com (8.8.8/RWD-1.2) with ESMTP id KAA32261; Fri, 07 Apr 2000 10:40:44 -0400 (EDT) Received: by crlwebmail.crl.dec.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21) id ; Fri, 07 Apr 2000 10:44:44 -0400 Date: Fri, 07 Apr 2000 10:41:11 -0400 From: George France Subject: RE: FW: param's passed from the boot loader Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com To: "'Erik Mouw'" , nico@CAM.ORG Cc: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Message-id: MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21) Content-type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Precedence: bulk What we have decide to do is to send Nico a patch using parameters, it breaks other arch's then we will send him the patch which separates the architecture concept from machine types, using different arch. numbers. We have tried it both ways and 'parameter passing' works both ways. --George George France, france@crl.dec.com Cambridge Research Laboratory, Compaq Computer Corporation One Kendall Square, Building 700 MS: CRL Cambridge, MA 02139 USA From kramer@pa.dec.com Mon Apr 10 06:51:44 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id GAA08856; Mon, 10 Apr 2000 06:51:44 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from ns2.tudelft.nl (ns2.tudelft.nl [130.161.180.65]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.8.6 (PHNE_17135)/8.8.6) with ESMTP id GAA02394 for ; Mon, 10 Apr 2000 06:51:43 +0200 (METDST) Received: from mail1.digital.com (mail1.digital.com [204.123.2.50]) by mailhost1.tudelft.nl (PMDF V5.2-32 #42432) with ESMTP id <0FSS00DDBAU0MR@mailhost1.tudelft.nl> for J.A.K.Mouw@its.tudelft.nl; Mon, 10 Apr 2000 06:51:37 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id VAA10141; Sun, 09 Apr 2000 21:44:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rex.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA20492; Sun, 09 Apr 2000 21:43:19 -0700 Received: by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id VAA07660; Sun, 09 Apr 2000 21:36:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id VAA07657; Sun, 09 Apr 2000 21:36:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail1.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA08951; Sun, 09 Apr 2000 21:36:39 -0700 Received: from xanadu.gn.com (modemcable248.137-200-24.mtl.mc.videotron.net [24.200.137.248]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with ESMTP id VAA06452 for ; Sun, 09 Apr 2000 21:36:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (nico@localhost) by xanadu.gn.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id AAA00741 for ; Mon, 10 Apr 2000 00:36:49 -0400 Date: Mon, 10 Apr 2000 00:36:49 -0400 (EDT) From: Nicolas Pitre Subject: diff-2.3.99-pre3-rmk1-np3.gz Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com X-Sender: nico@xanadu.gn.com To: SA-1100/Linux Message-id: MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Precedence: bulk X-Authentication-warning: xanadu.gn.com: nico owned process doing -bs ... available from ftp.netwinder.org/users/n/nico. This contains: - architecture/machine distinction not fully complete yet i.e. it still not possible to run the same kernel binary on two different machines, but it's not far from it - serial port driver cleanup mostly because of the above, removed some old cruft from serial.c. - frame bufer driver cleanup idem - some pieces for Bitsy support - a clever modification to have a working debugging serial port for both before and after MMU is enabled I know it's trivial, but I simply didn't think of it myself... :-) Thanks to George France / James Hicks I might have broken something that worked before. Tell me if so. I know this is not current with Russell's patch, but that's my next step. Now for all of you hardware folks: Please register for an architecture number with Russell. See "Kernel entry (head-armv.S)" in linux/Documentation/arm/README for details. I need your registered number ASAP. If you have one, please tell me what it is. Also consider implementing this number in bootloaders. Nicolas From kramer@pa.dec.com Mon Apr 10 08:23:16 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id IAA09052; Mon, 10 Apr 2000 08:23:15 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from ns2.tudelft.nl (ns2.tudelft.nl [130.161.180.65]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.8.6 (PHNE_17135)/8.8.6) with ESMTP id IAA03539 for ; Mon, 10 Apr 2000 08:23:15 +0200 (METDST) Received: from mail1.digital.com (mail1.digital.com [204.123.2.50]) by mailhost1.tudelft.nl (PMDF V5.2-32 #42432) with ESMTP id <0FSS00EEUF28ND@mailhost1.tudelft.nl> for J.A.K.Mouw@its.tudelft.nl; Mon, 10 Apr 2000 08:22:57 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id XAA14100; Sun, 09 Apr 2000 23:16:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rex.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA04120; Sun, 09 Apr 2000 23:15:01 -0700 Received: by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id XAA07703; Sun, 09 Apr 2000 23:11:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id XAA07680; Sun, 09 Apr 2000 23:11:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail1.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA12382; Sun, 09 Apr 2000 23:11:53 -0700 Received: from lakdiva.slt.lk (lakdiva.slt.lk [204.143.96.17]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with ESMTP id XAA11391 for ; Sun, 09 Apr 2000 23:11:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: from obelix.atpos.lk ([203.115.31.220]) by lakdiva.slt.lk (8.9.1b+Sun/8.9.1) with ESMTP id MAA03862; Mon, 10 Apr 2000 12:07:27 -0600 (GMT) Received: from sri.atpos.com (192.1.1.105 [192.1.1.105]) by obelix.atpos.lk with SMTP (Microsoft Exchange Internet Mail Service Version 5.5.2650.21) id 2FYSS5QC; Mon, 10 Apr 2000 12:01:38 +0600 Date: Mon, 10 Apr 2000 12:05:06 +0600 From: Nandana Subject: Re: diff-2.3.99-pre3-rmk1-np3.gz Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com To: Nicolas Pitre Cc: SA-1100/Linux Message-id: <38F16F12.230CAC08@sri.atpos.com> MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.7 [en] (X11; I; Linux 2.2.14-15mdk i686) Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk X-Accept-Language: en References: How about pcmcia support Nandana Nicolas Pitre wrote: > ... available from ftp.netwinder.org/users/n/nico. > > This contains: > > - architecture/machine distinction > not fully complete yet i.e. it still not possible to run the same > kernel binary on two different machines, but it's not far from it > - serial port driver cleanup > mostly because of the above, removed some old cruft from > serial.c. > - frame bufer driver cleanup > idem > - some pieces for Bitsy support > - a clever modification to have a working debugging serial port for both > before and after MMU is enabled > I know it's trivial, but I simply didn't think of it myself... :-) > Thanks to George France / James Hicks > > I might have broken something that worked before. Tell me if so. > I know this is not current with Russell's patch, but that's my next step. > > Now for all of you hardware folks: Please register for an architecture > number with Russell. See "Kernel entry (head-armv.S)" in > linux/Documentation/arm/README for details. I need your registered number > ASAP. If you have one, please tell me what it is. Also consider > implementing this number in bootloaders. > > Nicolas From kramer@pa.dec.com Tue Apr 11 03:45:31 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id DAA14352; Tue, 11 Apr 2000 03:45:31 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from ns2.tudelft.nl (ns2.tudelft.nl [130.161.180.65]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.8.6 (PHNE_17135)/8.8.6) with ESMTP id DAA07073 for ; Tue, 11 Apr 2000 03:45:31 +0200 (METDST) Received: from mail1.digital.com (mail1.digital.com [204.123.2.50]) by mailhost1.tudelft.nl (PMDF V5.2-32 #42432) with ESMTP id <0FST00LC2WVS02@mailhost1.tudelft.nl> for J.A.K.Mouw@its.tudelft.nl; Tue, 11 Apr 2000 03:45:29 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id SAA12651; Mon, 10 Apr 2000 18:35:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rex.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA03364; Mon, 10 Apr 2000 18:35:01 -0700 Received: by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id SAA08078; Mon, 10 Apr 2000 18:29:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id SAA08108; Mon, 10 Apr 2000 18:29:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail2.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA11831; Mon, 10 Apr 2000 18:29:35 -0700 Received: from cambridge.merl.com (cambridge.merl.com [137.203.190.1]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with ESMTP id SAA02672 for ; Mon, 10 Apr 2000 18:29:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: from merl.com (eagle.merl.com [137.203.128.4]) by cambridge.merl.com (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id VAA31814 for ; Mon, 10 Apr 2000 21:29:33 -0400 Received: from bester.merl.com (root@bester.merl.com [137.203.128.22]) by merl.com (8.8.7/8.8.4) with ESMTP id VAA20349 for ; Mon, 10 Apr 2000 21:29:33 -0400 Received: from bester (IDENT:leigh@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by bester.merl.com (8.9.3/8.8.3) with ESMTP id VAA22984 for ; Mon, 10 Apr 2000 21:29:32 -0400 Date: Mon, 10 Apr 2000 21:29:32 -0400 From: Darren Leigh Subject: Looking for intro to Linux on SA-1110 Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com To: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Message-id: <200004110129.VAA22984@bester.merl.com> Precedence: bulk Hi, I just joined the list. I have two of the Intel SA-1110/SA-1111 dev kits that I am trying to get Linux running on. I've been working on getting a toolchain up and running, but have been stymied trying to find the correct patches, etc. to apply to all of the packages. I'd like to find out what is available and what other people have done so I don't have to reinvent the wheel. I've looked over the Linux ARM sites that I could find, but info specific to the SA-1110 seems to be scarce and the SA-1100 info I found was a little dated. Sorry if this is a FAQ, but the only archives of this list that majordomo could tell me about are from 1998. Thanks! Darren Darren Leigh | MERL - A Mitsubishi Electric Research Laboratory Research Scientist | /\ 201 Broadway, 8th floor Voice: 617-621-7579 | _\/_ Cambridge, MA 02139 Fax: 617-621-7550 | /_/\_\ http://www.merl.com From kramer@pa.dec.com Tue Apr 11 12:12:13 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id MAA16814; Tue, 11 Apr 2000 12:12:13 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from ns2.tudelft.nl (ns2.tudelft.nl [130.161.180.65]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.8.6 (PHNE_17135)/8.8.6) with ESMTP id MAA19766 for ; Tue, 11 Apr 2000 12:12:12 +0200 (METDST) Received: from mail2.digital.com (mail2.digital.com [204.123.2.56]) by mailhost1.tudelft.nl (PMDF V5.2-32 #42432) with ESMTP id <0FSU00HLVKCB67@mailhost1.tudelft.nl> for J.A.K.Mouw@its.tudelft.nl; Tue, 11 Apr 2000 12:12:12 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id DAA23163; Tue, 11 Apr 2000 03:06:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rex.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA15192; Tue, 11 Apr 2000 03:05:50 -0700 Received: by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id DAA08248; Tue, 11 Apr 2000 03:02:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id DAA08257; Tue, 11 Apr 2000 03:02:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail1.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA00981; Tue, 11 Apr 2000 03:02:43 -0700 Received: from duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (duteinh.et.tudelft.nl [130.161.42.1]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with ESMTP id DAA05217 for ; Tue, 11 Apr 2000 03:02:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: from kalman by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id MAA16710; Tue, 11 Apr 2000 12:01:24 +0200 (MET DST) Date: Tue, 11 Apr 2000 12:01:24 +0200 (MET DST) From: Erik Mouw X-Face: "!Z|1XjFg!3Iw)BwM^M\k)J5KHiPddz}#/Zw%?$&Q!xqob"OA|})3_@&BTTiQERo?/^g[Z<9P4R8:5C:aqq.cw!hotLc=+u-"+1rq@9$V^8PbOUlodyi_sejt+D`iqkLpx$>.aXl%vnfPIt"LK|/%>94_Zrm8jy?`_[RKt'TuoxUxfk(gMhY(n|DBBl~c$dhO>G%6}R4+DGX3|idBm4oU&UM/XUP4I9aoN{]`ax%B?rgD(I3OJ<62Y6L Subject: Re: Looking for intro to Linux on SA-1110 In-reply-to: <200004110129.VAA22984@bester.merl.com> Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com To: leigh@merl.com Cc: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Message-id: <200004111001.MAA16710@duteinh.et.tudelft.nl> Organization: Eric conspiracy secret labs MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: XCmail 1.0.0 - with PGP support, PGP engine version 0.5 (Linux) Content-type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-transfer-encoding: 8bit Precedence: bulk X-Loop: erik@it.et.tudelft.nl X-Mailerorigin: http://www.fsai.fh-trier.de/~schmitzj/Xclasses/XCmail/ X-Eric-Conspiracy: There is no conspiracy! On Mon, 10 Apr 2000 21:29:32 -0400, Darren Leigh wrote: > Hi, I just joined the list. I have two of the Intel SA-1110/SA-1111 dev > kits that I am trying to get Linux running on. I've been working on > getting a toolchain up and running, but have been stymied trying to find > the correct patches, etc. to apply to all of the packages. I'd like to > find out what is available and what other people have done so I don't > have to reinvent the wheel. I've looked over the Linux ARM sites that I > could find, but info specific to the SA-1110 seems to be scarce and the > SA-1100 info I found was a little dated. There are several precompiled toolchains available, but if you want to build one yourself, there is a list with all necessary parts available at http://www.lart.tudelft.nl/lartware/compile-tools/ On this page is also a link to Chris Rutter's toolchain HOWTO. Erik -- J.A.K. (Erik) Mouw, Information and Communication Theory Group, Department of Electrical Engineering, Faculty of Information Technology and Systems, Delft University of Technology, PO BOX 5031, 2600 GA Delft, The Netherlands Phone: +31-15-2785859 Fax: +31-15-2781843 Email J.A.K.Mouw@its.tudelft.nl WWW: http://www-ict.its.tudelft.nl/~erik/ From kramer@pa.dec.com Tue Apr 11 22:34:51 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id WAA20502; Tue, 11 Apr 2000 22:34:50 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from ns2.tudelft.nl (ns2.tudelft.nl [130.161.180.65]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.8.6 (PHNE_17135)/8.8.6) with ESMTP id WAA09950 for ; Tue, 11 Apr 2000 22:34:49 +0200 (METDST) Received: from mail1.digital.com (mail1.digital.com [204.123.2.50]) by mailhost1.tudelft.nl (PMDF V5.2-32 #42432) with ESMTP id <0FSV007LJD604X@mailhost1.tudelft.nl> for J.A.K.Mouw@its.tudelft.nl; Tue, 11 Apr 2000 22:34:49 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id NAA07134; Tue, 11 Apr 2000 13:29:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rex.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA12618; Tue, 11 Apr 2000 13:29:06 -0700 Received: by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id NAA08450; Tue, 11 Apr 2000 13:28:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id NAA08440; Tue, 11 Apr 2000 13:28:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail2.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA07084; Tue, 11 Apr 2000 13:28:07 -0700 Received: from blazieresearch.com ([216.85.232.66]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with ESMTP id NAA00798 for ; Tue, 11 Apr 2000 13:28:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (chris@localhost) by blazieresearch.com (8.9.3/8.8.7) with SMTP id QAA05152 for ; Tue, 11 Apr 2000 16:27:53 -0400 Date: Tue, 11 Apr 2000 16:27:53 -0400 (EDT) From: Chris Blazie Subject: kernel build tool problem In-reply-to: Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com To: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Message-id: MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Precedence: bulk Hello, I'm trying to build a 2.3.99-pre3 kernel, and have run into various tool problems on my netwinder. Upgrading binutils to 2.9.5x helped, but now I'm really stuck, as follows: /usr/bin/ld -p -X -T arch/arm/vmlinux.lds arch/arm/kernel/head-armv.o arch/arm/kernel/init_task.o init/main.o init/version.o \ --start-group \ arch/arm/kernel/kernel.o arch/arm/mm/mm.o kernel/kernel.o mm/mm.o fs/fs.o ipc/ipc.o \ drivers/block/block.a drivers/char/char.o drivers/misc/misc.o drivers/net/net.o drivers/parport/parport.a arch/arm/special/special.a drivers/acorn/block/acorn-block.a drivers/acorn/char/acorn-char.o drivers/acorn/net/acorn-net.a drivers/acorn/scsi/acorn-scsi.a \ net/network.a \ arch/arm/nwfpe/math-emu.o arch/arm/lib/lib.o arch/arm/lib/lib.a /usr/src/linux/lib/lib.a /usr/lib/gcc-lib/armv4l-unknown-linux-gnu/2.95.2/soft-float/libgcc.a \ --end-group \ -o vmlinux arch/arm/kernel/kernel.o: In function `exec_mmap': /home/chris/linux-2.3.99-pre3/arch/arm/kernel/ecard.c:242: undefined reference to `cpu_CPU_NAME_flush_cache_all' /home/chris/linux-2.3.99-pre3/arch/arm/kernel/ecard.c:242: relocation truncated to fit: R_ARM_PC24 cpu_CPU_NAME_flush_cache_all /home/chris/linux-2.3.99-pre3/arch/arm/kernel/ecard.c:245: undefined reference to `cpu_CPU_NAME_flush_tlb_all' /home/chris/linux-2.3.99-pre3/arch/arm/kernel/ecard.c:245: relocation truncated to fit: R_ARM_PC24 cpu_CPU_NAME_flush_tlb_all [snip, continues for every file in list] I fixed the gcc specs file as indicated in Scott B's binutils.txt and verified via "gcc -dumpspecs" that the link spec uses "armelf_linux26" instead of "elf32arm26". What else have I neglected to update? Thanks, Chris From kramer@pa.dec.com Tue Apr 11 23:13:34 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id XAA20612; Tue, 11 Apr 2000 23:13:34 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from ns2.tudelft.nl (ns2.tudelft.nl [130.161.180.65]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.8.6 (PHNE_17135)/8.8.6) with ESMTP id XAA11016 for ; Tue, 11 Apr 2000 23:13:34 +0200 (METDST) Received: from mail1.digital.com (mail1.digital.com [204.123.2.50]) by mailhost1.tudelft.nl (PMDF V5.2-32 #42432) with ESMTP id <0FSV0092OEYKDN@mailhost1.tudelft.nl> for J.A.K.Mouw@its.tudelft.nl; Tue, 11 Apr 2000 23:13:33 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id OAA16516; Tue, 11 Apr 2000 14:08:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rex.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA26845; Tue, 11 Apr 2000 14:08:18 -0700 Received: by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id OAA08482; Tue, 11 Apr 2000 14:08:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id OAA08452; Tue, 11 Apr 2000 14:08:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail1.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA10873; Tue, 11 Apr 2000 14:08:05 -0700 Received: from kings-cross.london.uk.eu.org (tazenda.demon.co.uk [158.152.220.239]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with ESMTP id OAA10265 for ; Tue, 11 Apr 2000 14:08:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost ([::ffff:127.0.0.1] helo=kings-cross.london.uk.eu.org ident=phil) by kings-cross.london.uk.eu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.11 #1) id 12f7t1-0006NA-00; Tue, 11 Apr 2000 22:07:51 +0100 Date: Tue, 11 Apr 2000 22:07:51 +0100 From: Philip Blundell Subject: Re: kernel build tool problem In-reply-to: Message from Chris Blazie "of Tue, 11 Apr 2000 16:27:53 EDT." Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com To: Chris Blazie Cc: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Message-id: MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: exmh version 2.0.2 2/24/98 (debian) Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Precedence: bulk References: >/home/chris/linux-2.3.99-pre3/arch/arm/kernel/ecard.c:242: undefined >reference to `cpu_CPU_NAME_flush_cache_all' > > I fixed the gcc specs file as indicated in Scott B's binutils.txt >and verified via "gcc -dumpspecs" that the link spec uses "armelf_linux26" >instead of "elf32arm26". What else have I neglected to update? Nothing, I think. Seems you have some kernel configuration problem instead. Are you really trying to build an Acorn kernel? p. From kramer@pa.dec.com Tue Apr 11 23:50:12 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id XAA20747; Tue, 11 Apr 2000 23:50:11 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from ns2.tudelft.nl (ns2.tudelft.nl [130.161.180.65]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.8.6 (PHNE_17135)/8.8.6) with ESMTP id XAA11876 for ; Tue, 11 Apr 2000 23:50:11 +0200 (METDST) Received: from mail2.digital.com (mail2.digital.com [204.123.2.56]) by mailhost1.tudelft.nl (PMDF V5.2-32 #42432) with ESMTP id <0FSV00A8KGNL04@mailhost1.tudelft.nl> for J.A.K.Mouw@its.tudelft.nl; Tue, 11 Apr 2000 23:50:10 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id OAA06663; Tue, 11 Apr 2000 14:45:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rex.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA32405; Tue, 11 Apr 2000 14:45:04 -0700 Received: by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id OAA08577; Tue, 11 Apr 2000 14:44:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id OAA08569; Tue, 11 Apr 2000 14:44:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail2.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA23363; Tue, 11 Apr 2000 14:44:38 -0700 Received: from blazieresearch.com ([216.85.232.66]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with ESMTP id OAA05175 for ; Tue, 11 Apr 2000 14:44:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (chris@localhost) by blazieresearch.com (8.9.3/8.8.7) with SMTP id RAA06221; Tue, 11 Apr 2000 17:44:26 -0400 Date: Tue, 11 Apr 2000 17:44:26 -0400 (EDT) From: Chris Blazie Subject: Re: kernel build tool problem In-reply-to: Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com To: Philip Blundell Cc: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Message-id: MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Precedence: bulk > >reference to `cpu_CPU_NAME_flush_cache_all' > > > > I fixed the gcc specs file as indicated in Scott B's binutils.txt > >and verified via "gcc -dumpspecs" that the link spec uses "armelf_linux26" > >instead of "elf32arm26". What else have I neglected to update? > > Nothing, I think. Seems you have some kernel configuration problem instead. > Are you really trying to build an Acorn kernel? No, I chose a bad example to send, though. I tried a few off the wall configurations to see how/if the link errors changed before I upgraded the linker. But you may be right, actually; I haven't cleaned up my configuration since fixing the tools. Thanks, Chris From kramer@pa.dec.com Wed Apr 12 03:35:40 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id DAA21517; Wed, 12 Apr 2000 03:35:40 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from ns2.tudelft.nl (ns2.tudelft.nl [130.161.180.65]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.8.6 (PHNE_17135)/8.8.6) with ESMTP id DAA17067 for ; Wed, 12 Apr 2000 03:35:39 +0200 (METDST) Received: from mail2.digital.com (mail2.digital.com [204.123.2.56]) by mailhost1.tudelft.nl (PMDF V5.2-32 #42432) with ESMTP id <0FSV00EO5R3DXJ@mailhost1.tudelft.nl> for J.A.K.Mouw@its.tudelft.nl; Wed, 12 Apr 2000 03:35:38 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id SAA15400; Tue, 11 Apr 2000 18:29:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rex.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA30899; Tue, 11 Apr 2000 18:29:25 -0700 Received: by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id SAA09124; Tue, 11 Apr 2000 18:28:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id SAA09131; Tue, 11 Apr 2000 18:28:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail2.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA30338; Tue, 11 Apr 2000 18:28:03 -0700 Received: from ganymede.or.intel.com (ganymede.or.intel.com [134.134.248.3]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with ESMTP id SAA07557 for ; Tue, 11 Apr 2000 18:28:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: from SMTP (orsmsxvs01-1.jf.intel.com [192.168.65.200]) by ganymede.or.intel.com (8.9.1a+p1/8.9.1/d: relay.m4,v 1.22 2000/04/06 17:58:51 dmccart Exp $) with SMTP id SAA15456 for ; Tue, 11 Apr 2000 18:27:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: from orsmsx28.jf.intel.com ([192.168.70.28]) by 192.168.70.200 (Norton AntiVirus for Internet Email Gateways 1.0) ; Wed, 12 Apr 2000 01:27:45 +0000 (GMT) Received: by orsmsx28.jf.intel.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2448.0) id <2NM95HLY>; Tue, 11 Apr 2000 18:27:44 -0700 Date: Tue, 11 Apr 2000 18:27:41 -0700 From: "Chagas, Jason" Subject: IDE-UI for ARM-Linux development? Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com To: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Message-id: MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2448.0) Content-type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Precedence: bulk Does anyone know of an Integrated Development Environment (IDE - something similar to MS-Visual C++) with a friendly UI for developing to ARM-Linux? Perhaps a shell application for the GNU Tools. Is there anything that comes close enough that could be easily adapted? Thanks, Jason From kramer@pa.dec.com Wed Apr 12 11:51:57 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id LAA23709; Wed, 12 Apr 2000 11:51:57 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from ns2.tudelft.nl (ns2.tudelft.nl [130.161.180.65]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.8.6 (PHNE_17135)/8.8.6) with ESMTP id LAA29895 for ; Wed, 12 Apr 2000 11:51:56 +0200 (METDST) Received: from mail2.digital.com (mail2.digital.com [204.123.2.56]) by mailhost1.tudelft.nl (PMDF V5.2-32 #42432) with ESMTP id <0FSW00AIPE2I72@mailhost1.tudelft.nl> for J.A.K.Mouw@its.tudelft.nl; Wed, 12 Apr 2000 11:51:55 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id CAA02363; Wed, 12 Apr 2000 02:43:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rex.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA06140; Wed, 12 Apr 2000 02:42:21 -0700 Received: by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id CAA09308; Wed, 12 Apr 2000 02:39:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id CAA09292; Wed, 12 Apr 2000 02:39:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail1.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA07691; Wed, 12 Apr 2000 02:39:41 -0700 Received: from duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (duteinh.et.tudelft.nl [130.161.42.1]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with ESMTP id CAA19989 for ; Wed, 12 Apr 2000 02:39:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: from kalman by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id LAA23601; Wed, 12 Apr 2000 11:38:21 +0200 (MET DST) Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2000 11:38:21 +0200 (MET DST) From: Erik Mouw X-Face: "!Z|1XjFg!3Iw)BwM^M\k)J5KHiPddz}#/Zw%?$&Q!xqob"OA|})3_@&BTTiQERo?/^g[Z<9P4R8:5C:aqq.cw!hotLc=+u-"+1rq@9$V^8PbOUlodyi_sejt+D`iqkLpx$>.aXl%vnfPIt"LK|/%>94_Zrm8jy?`_[RKt'TuoxUxfk(gMhY(n|DBBl~c$dhO>G%6}R4+DGX3|idBm4oU&UM/XUP4I9aoN{]`ax%B?rgD(I3OJ<62Y6L Subject: Re: IDE-UI for ARM-Linux development? In-reply-to: Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com To: jason.chagas@intel.com Cc: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Message-id: <200004120938.LAA23601@duteinh.et.tudelft.nl> Organization: Eric conspiracy secret labs MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: XCmail 1.0.0 - with PGP support, PGP engine version 0.5 (Linux) Content-type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-transfer-encoding: 8bit Precedence: bulk X-Loop: erik@it.et.tudelft.nl X-Mailerorigin: http://www.fsai.fh-trier.de/~schmitzj/Xclasses/XCmail/ X-Eric-Conspiracy: There is no conspiracy! On Tue, 11 Apr 2000 18:27:41 -0700, Chagas, Jason wrote: > Does anyone know of an Integrated Development Environment (IDE - something > similar to MS-Visual C++) with a friendly UI for developing to ARM-Linux? > Perhaps a shell application for the GNU Tools. Is there anything that comes > close enough that could be easily adapted? There are a couple of them available, like gIDE, and eh... (oops forgot, please have a look at freshmeat.net), but I don't know if they support cross compiler builds. Cygnus (www.cygnus.com) has some tools available (not freeware) that support cross compilers. And of course there is the Emacs/XEmacs solution which is between a text editor and an IDE. Note that all IDE solutions on Linux are front ends for the GNU tools, simply because it fits into the Unix philosophy: make tools that can do only one thing, but do that single task exceptionaly good. Erik [who likes XEmacs and autoconf+automake best] -- LART. 250 MIPS under one Watt. Free hardware design files. http://www.lart.tudelft.nl/ From kramer@pa.dec.com Wed Apr 12 11:57:54 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id LAA23738; Wed, 12 Apr 2000 11:57:54 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from ns2.tudelft.nl (ns2.tudelft.nl [130.161.180.65]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.8.6 (PHNE_17135)/8.8.6) with ESMTP id LAA00181 for ; Wed, 12 Apr 2000 11:57:53 +0200 (METDST) Received: from mail1.digital.com (mail1.digital.com [204.123.2.50]) by mailhost1.tudelft.nl (PMDF V5.2-32 #42432) with ESMTP id <0FSW00ANFECF1D@mailhost1.tudelft.nl> for J.A.K.Mouw@its.tudelft.nl; Wed, 12 Apr 2000 11:57:53 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id CAA18338; Wed, 12 Apr 2000 02:51:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rex.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA19924; Wed, 12 Apr 2000 02:50:04 -0700 Received: by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id CAA09238; Wed, 12 Apr 2000 02:48:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id CAA09306; Wed, 12 Apr 2000 02:48:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail2.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA29787; Wed, 12 Apr 2000 02:48:16 -0700 Received: from duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (duteinh.et.tudelft.nl [130.161.42.1]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with ESMTP id CAA08312 for ; Wed, 12 Apr 2000 02:48:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: from kalman by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id LAA23671; Wed, 12 Apr 2000 11:46:15 +0200 (MET DST) Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2000 11:46:15 +0200 (MET DST) From: Erik Mouw X-Face: "!Z|1XjFg!3Iw)BwM^M\k)J5KHiPddz}#/Zw%?$&Q!xqob"OA|})3_@&BTTiQERo?/^g[Z<9P4R8:5C:aqq.cw!hotLc=+u-"+1rq@9$V^8PbOUlodyi_sejt+D`iqkLpx$>.aXl%vnfPIt"LK|/%>94_Zrm8jy?`_[RKt'TuoxUxfk(gMhY(n|DBBl~c$dhO>G%6}R4+DGX3|idBm4oU&UM/XUP4I9aoN{]`ax%B?rgD(I3OJ<62Y6L Subject: Re: compressed filesystem available? In-reply-to: <20000412054317.21994.qmail@sina.com> Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com To: daihbxd@sina.com Cc: SA1100-linux@pa.dec.com Message-id: <200004120946.LAA23671@duteinh.et.tudelft.nl> Organization: Eric conspiracy secret labs MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: XCmail 1.0.0 - with PGP support, PGP engine version 0.5 (Linux) Content-type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-transfer-encoding: 8bit Precedence: bulk X-Loop: erik@it.et.tudelft.nl X-Mailerorigin: http://www.fsai.fh-trier.de/~schmitzj/Xclasses/XCmail/ X-Eric-Conspiracy: There is no conspiracy! On Wed Apr 12 13:43:17 CST 2000, daihbxd wrote: > since the Flash Memory and ROM is not that cheap,i believe a compressed > filessystem(like M$ stupid doublespace:)) is useful and feasible,do I need > write a new one from scratch or some other available? No. You normally make a compressed ramdisk and put that into Flash memory. Just before you boot linux you copy the compressed ramdisk from Flash to RAM (at a position known by the kernel), and the kernel will automatically uncompress the ramdisk. There are patches for ext2 that allow you to do per file compression, but those patches are beta, and AFAIK not tested on ARM systems. If you want a real ROM filesystem (i.e. completely read only), you might want to have a look at the Compressed ROM filesystem (cromfs) in the latest 2.3 kernels. Erik -- J.A.K. (Erik) Mouw, Information and Communication Theory Group, Department of Electrical Engineering, Faculty of Information Technology and Systems, Delft University of Technology, PO BOX 5031, 2600 GA Delft, The Netherlands Phone: +31-15-2785859 Fax: +31-15-2781843 Email J.A.K.Mouw@its.tudelft.nl WWW: http://www-ict.its.tudelft.nl/~erik/ From kramer@pa.dec.com Wed Apr 12 14:44:21 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id OAA24728; Wed, 12 Apr 2000 14:44:20 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from ns2.tudelft.nl (ns2.tudelft.nl [130.161.180.65]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.8.6 (PHNE_17135)/8.8.6) with ESMTP id OAA06737 for ; Wed, 12 Apr 2000 14:44:19 +0200 (METDST) Received: from mail2.digital.com (mail2.digital.com [204.123.2.56]) by mailhost1.tudelft.nl (PMDF V5.2-32 #42432) with ESMTP id <0FSW001B5M1S3K@mailhost1.tudelft.nl> for J.A.K.Mouw@its.tudelft.nl; Wed, 12 Apr 2000 14:44:16 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id FAA15074; Wed, 12 Apr 2000 05:38:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rex.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA19850; Wed, 12 Apr 2000 05:38:09 -0700 Received: by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id FAA09374; Wed, 12 Apr 2000 05:36:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id FAA09360; Wed, 12 Apr 2000 05:36:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail2.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA30740; Wed, 12 Apr 2000 05:36:18 -0700 Received: from msexch01.diebold.com (eliot.diebold.com [204.151.249.21]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with ESMTP id FAA09115 for ; Wed, 12 Apr 2000 05:36:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: by msexch01.diebold.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21) id <2M6SJX2K>; Wed, 12 Apr 2000 08:35:20 -0400 Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2000 08:34:59 -0400 From: "Plentovich, Dave" Subject: RE: IDE-UI for ARM-Linux development? Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com To: "'Chagas, Jason'" Cc: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Message-id: MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21) Content-type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Precedence: bulk Jason, We are using Code Crusader (www.cco.caltech.edu/~jafl/jcc/). By modifying the Make.header file (after the project is created) we can point to the appropriate bins and libs for the xdev environment. Doesn't seem to directly support asm (.S) files; but there are ways around that. Best regards, David Plentovich (plentod@diebold.com) -----Original Message----- From: Chagas, Jason [mailto:jason.chagas@intel.com] Sent: Tuesday, April 11, 2000 9:28 PM To: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Subject: IDE-UI for ARM-Linux development? Does anyone know of an Integrated Development Environment (IDE - something similar to MS-Visual C++) with a friendly UI for developing to ARM-Linux? Perhaps a shell application for the GNU Tools. Is there anything that comes close enough that could be easily adapted? Thanks, Jason From kramer@pa.dec.com Wed Apr 12 07:50:44 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id HAA22292; Wed, 12 Apr 2000 07:50:43 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from ns2.tudelft.nl (ns2.tudelft.nl [130.161.180.65]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.8.6 (PHNE_17135)/8.8.6) with ESMTP id HAA21586 for ; Wed, 12 Apr 2000 07:50:43 +0200 (METDST) Received: from mail1.digital.com (mail1.digital.com [204.123.2.50]) by mailhost1.tudelft.nl (PMDF V5.2-32 #42432) with ESMTP id <0FSW00J6T2WHMH@mailhost1.tudelft.nl> for J.A.K.Mouw@its.tudelft.nl; Wed, 12 Apr 2000 07:50:42 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id WAA10738; Tue, 11 Apr 2000 22:44:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rex.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA25706; Tue, 11 Apr 2000 22:43:32 -0700 Received: by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id WAA09203; Tue, 11 Apr 2000 22:42:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id WAA09183; Tue, 11 Apr 2000 22:42:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail1.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA16868; Tue, 11 Apr 2000 22:42:08 -0700 Received: from sina.com ([202.106.187.163]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id WAA11047 for ; Tue, 11 Apr 2000 22:42:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 21995 invoked by uid 99); Wed, 12 Apr 2000 05:43:17 +0000 Date: Wed Apr 12 13:43:17 CST 2000 From: daihbxd Subject: compressed filesystem available? Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com To: SA1100-linux@pa.dec.com Message-id: <20000412054317.21994.qmail@sina.com> X-Mailer: SinaMail 3.0Beta (FireToad) Precedence: bulk since the Flash Memory and ROM is not that cheap,i believe a compressed filessystem(like M$ stupid doublespace:)) is useful and feasible,do I need write a new one from scratch or some other available? regards dai ______________________________________ =================================================================== PB@KCb7Q5gWSSJOd http://mail.sina.com.cn From kramer@pa.dec.com Wed Apr 12 07:54:48 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id HAA22314; Wed, 12 Apr 2000 07:54:48 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from ns2.tudelft.nl (ns2.tudelft.nl [130.161.180.65]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.8.6 (PHNE_17135)/8.8.6) with ESMTP id HAA21672 for ; Wed, 12 Apr 2000 07:54:47 +0200 (METDST) Received: from mail1.digital.com (mail1.digital.com [204.123.2.50]) by mailhost1.tudelft.nl (PMDF V5.2-32 #42432) with ESMTP id <0FSW00J0Y33AUV@mailhost1.tudelft.nl> for J.A.K.Mouw@its.tudelft.nl; Wed, 12 Apr 2000 07:54:47 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id WAA07444; Tue, 11 Apr 2000 22:49:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rex.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA17360; Tue, 11 Apr 2000 22:49:01 -0700 Received: by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id WAA09211; Tue, 11 Apr 2000 22:48:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by rex.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id WAA09206; Tue, 11 Apr 2000 22:48:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail1.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA00871; Tue, 11 Apr 2000 22:48:51 -0700 Received: from sina.com ([202.106.187.151]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id WAA09014 for ; Tue, 11 Apr 2000 22:48:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 64535 invoked by uid 99); Wed, 12 Apr 2000 05:48:39 +0000 Date: Wed Apr 12 13:48:39 CST 2000 From: daihbxd Subject: compressed filesystem available? Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com To: SA1100-linux@pa.dec.com Message-id: <20000412054839.64534.qmail@sina.com> X-Mailer: SinaMail 3.0Beta (FireToad) Precedence: bulk since the Flash Memory and ROM is not that cheap,i believe a compressed filessystem(like M$ stupid doublespace:)) is useful and feasible,do I need write a new one from scratch or some other available? regards dai =================================================================== PB@KCb7Q5gWSSJOd http://mail.sina.com.cn From kramer@pa.dec.com Thu Apr 20 22:06:15 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id WAA17683; Thu, 20 Apr 2000 22:06:15 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from ns2.tudelft.nl (ns2.tudelft.nl [130.161.180.65]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.8.6 (PHNE_17135)/8.8.6) with ESMTP id WAA05285 for ; Thu, 20 Apr 2000 22:06:13 +0200 (METDST) Received: from mail2.digital.com (mail2.digital.com [204.123.2.56]) by mailhost1.tudelft.nl (PMDF V5.2-32 #42432) with ESMTP id <0FTB00HM1ZUCQN@mailhost1.tudelft.nl> for J.A.K.Mouw@its.tudelft.nl; Thu, 20 Apr 2000 22:06:13 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id MAA22598; Thu, 20 Apr 2000 12:59:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA24241; Thu, 20 Apr 2000 12:56:56 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id MAA19593; Thu, 20 Apr 2000 12:55:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id MAA26021; Thu, 20 Apr 2000 12:55:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail2.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA03980; Thu, 20 Apr 2000 12:55:03 -0700 Received: from xanadu.vipswitch.com (generic199.197.205.205.in-addr.arpa [205.205.197.199] (may be forged)) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with ESMTP id MAA23170 for ; Thu, 20 Apr 2000 12:55:00 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2000 12:19:41 -0400 (EDT) From: Nicolas Pitre Subject: diff-2.3.99-pre3-rmk3-np1 Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com To: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Message-id: MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Precedence: bulk This is available at ftp.netwinder.org/users/n/nico. It contains minor fixes to the Assabet support (LEDs are working now), plus the default configs for LART. The Assabet screen is still not fixed though. Nicolas From kramer@pa.dec.com Thu Apr 20 21:00:42 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id VAA17405; Thu, 20 Apr 2000 21:00:42 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from ns2.tudelft.nl (ns2.tudelft.nl [130.161.180.65]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.8.6 (PHNE_17135)/8.8.6) with ESMTP id VAA03874 for ; Thu, 20 Apr 2000 21:00:41 +0200 (METDST) Received: from mail2.digital.com (mail2.digital.com [204.123.2.56]) by mailhost1.tudelft.nl (PMDF V5.2-32 #42432) with ESMTP id <0FTB00FPTWT4BA@mailhost1.tudelft.nl> for J.A.K.Mouw@its.tudelft.nl; Thu, 20 Apr 2000 21:00:41 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id LAA16383; Thu, 20 Apr 2000 11:54:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA21673; Thu, 20 Apr 2000 11:51:36 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id LAA07228; Thu, 20 Apr 2000 11:49:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id LAA20264; Thu, 20 Apr 2000 11:49:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail2.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA13732; Thu, 20 Apr 2000 11:49:55 -0700 Received: from nwcst292.netaddress.usa.net (nwcst292.netaddress.usa.net [204.68.23.37]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id LAA05404 for ; Thu, 20 Apr 2000 11:49:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 6665 invoked by uid 60001); Thu, 20 Apr 2000 18:48:54 +0000 Received: from 204.68.23.37 by nwcst292 for [207.21.138.151] via web-mailer(M3.4.0.33) on Thu Apr 20 18:48:54 GMT 2000 Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2000 12:48:54 -0600 (MDT) From: Kumar Ramanathan Subject: Evaluation board... Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com To: Erik Mouw , Linux-arm@vger.rutgers.edu, Devel@netwinder.com, Sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Message-id: <20000420184854.6664.qmail@nwcst292.netaddress.usa.net> MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: USANET web-mailer (M3.4.0.33) Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-transfer-encoding: quoted-printable Precedence: bulk I have the IXp1200 network processor board and need to run linux on it's strongARM core. = Does the kernel need to be ported for the board ?? ASlso ,the board has only one serial port, so I can dnld the kernel only = from that port.No console output seems possible . Is there a way I can make the kernel image output something to the serial= port so I can view it via the same port I use for downloasd of the kernel imag= e ?? Or is there a way I can write to some memory address so that the leds on = the board can show some output ???? Please advice, it's been a blind download using Angelboot so far. Thanks, Krishna. Erik Mouw wrote: On Tue, 04 Apr 2000 16:59:16 -0600 (MDT), Kumar Ramanathan wrote: > I was directed to your page from the LART site ... looking for RAMdisks= =2E > Can't find any , could you help me ??? Go to http://www.lart.tudelft.nl/ . In the left column is a link to "RAM disk". FYI: Nicolas Pitre released a very nice RAM disk a couple of days ago. Ge= t it at ftp://ftp.netwinder.org/users/n/nico/ramdisk_img.gz . > I have a SA 1100 Evaluation board from Intel. Eh, which evaluation board? Intel made quite a few. Erik -- = J.A.K. (Erik) Mouw, Information and Communication Theory Group, Departmen= t of Electrical Engineering, Faculty of Information Technology and Systems,= Delft University of Technology, PO BOX 5031, 2600 GA Delft, The Netherla= nds Phone: +31-15-2785859 Fax: +31-15-2781843 Email J.A.K.Mouw@its.tudelft.= nl WWW: http://www-ict.its.tudelft.nl/~erik/ ____________________________________________________________________ Get free email and a permanent address at http://www.netaddress.com/?N=3D= 1 From kramer@pa.dec.com Thu Apr 20 21:04:14 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id VAA17415; Thu, 20 Apr 2000 21:03:07 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from ns2.tudelft.nl (ns2.tudelft.nl [130.161.180.65]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.8.6 (PHNE_17135)/8.8.6) with ESMTP id VAA03936 for ; Thu, 20 Apr 2000 21:03:06 +0200 (METDST) Received: from mail2.digital.com (mail2.digital.com [204.123.2.56]) by mailhost1.tudelft.nl (PMDF V5.2-32 #42432) with ESMTP id <0FTB00EMZWX5SZ@mailhost1.tudelft.nl> for J.A.K.Mouw@its.tudelft.nl; Thu, 20 Apr 2000 21:03:06 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id LAA15367; Thu, 20 Apr 2000 11:54:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA08185; Thu, 20 Apr 2000 11:52:11 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id LAA22862; Thu, 20 Apr 2000 11:50:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id LAA06415; Thu, 20 Apr 2000 11:50:16 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2000 11:50:16 -0700 (PDT) From: Jason Wold Subject: test Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Apparently-to: dkranak@sedona.ch.intel.com Apparently-to: J.A.K.Mouw@its.tudelft.nl Apparently-to: jlm@ict.es Apparently-to: wright@lcs.mit.edu Apparently-to: bpringle@teklogix.com Apparently-to: Nize@vkr.k-net.dk Apparently-to: jbaik@flatpanels.com Apparently-to: wung_y@263.net Apparently-to: ianfield@pobox.com Apparently-to: durant@alliance.research.att.com Apparently-to: Uwe.Dannowski@ira.uka.de Apparently-to: terrybrutus@deepwell.com Apparently-to: roadkill@best.com Apparently-to: phil@blazie.com Apparently-to: sm@decsy.ru Apparently-to: ymlee@core.kaist.ac.kr Apparently-to: PlentoD@diebold.com Apparently-to: junw@sz.huawei.com.cn Apparently-to: peter@duxsys.com Apparently-to: Eric_Liu@asus.com.tw Apparently-to: trevor.mahaffey@khyber.com Apparently-to: jslipp@trakonic.com Apparently-to: daihb@263.net Apparently-to: rrk+@andrew.cmu.edu To: J.A.K.Mouw@its.tudelft.nl Message-id: <200004201850.LAA06415@wera.pa.dec.com> Precedence: bulk Sorry for the spam, one last time From kramer@pa.dec.com Thu Apr 20 21:16:05 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id VAA17464; Thu, 20 Apr 2000 21:14:59 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from ns2.tudelft.nl (ns2.tudelft.nl [130.161.180.65]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.8.6 (PHNE_17135)/8.8.6) with ESMTP id VAA04197 for ; Thu, 20 Apr 2000 21:14:58 +0200 (METDST) Received: from mail1.digital.com (mail1.digital.com [204.123.2.50]) by mailhost1.tudelft.nl (PMDF V5.2-32 #42432) with ESMTP id <0FTB00G5EXGWJM@mailhost1.tudelft.nl> for J.A.K.Mouw@its.tudelft.nl; Thu, 20 Apr 2000 21:14:57 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id MAA11280; Thu, 20 Apr 2000 12:06:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA18591; Thu, 20 Apr 2000 12:04:02 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id MAA22801; Thu, 20 Apr 2000 12:02:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id LAA06415; Thu, 20 Apr 2000 11:50:16 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2000 11:50:16 -0700 (PDT) From: Jason Wold Subject: test Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Apparently-to: dkranak@sedona.ch.intel.com Apparently-to: J.A.K.Mouw@its.tudelft.nl Apparently-to: jlm@ict.es Apparently-to: wright@lcs.mit.edu Apparently-to: bpringle@teklogix.com Apparently-to: Nize@vkr.k-net.dk Apparently-to: jbaik@flatpanels.com Apparently-to: wung_y@263.net Apparently-to: ianfield@pobox.com Apparently-to: durant@alliance.research.att.com Apparently-to: Uwe.Dannowski@ira.uka.de Apparently-to: terrybrutus@deepwell.com Apparently-to: roadkill@best.com Apparently-to: phil@blazie.com Apparently-to: sm@decsy.ru Apparently-to: ymlee@core.kaist.ac.kr Apparently-to: PlentoD@diebold.com Apparently-to: junw@sz.huawei.com.cn Apparently-to: peter@duxsys.com Apparently-to: Eric_Liu@asus.com.tw Apparently-to: trevor.mahaffey@khyber.com Apparently-to: jslipp@trakonic.com Apparently-to: daihb@263.net Apparently-to: rrk+@andrew.cmu.edu To: J.A.K.Mouw@its.tudelft.nl Message-id: <200004201850.LAA06415@wera.pa.dec.com> Precedence: bulk Sorry for the spam, one last time From kramer@pa.dec.com Thu Apr 20 21:11:19 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id VAA17453; Thu, 20 Apr 2000 21:10:12 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from ns2.tudelft.nl (ns2.tudelft.nl [130.161.180.65]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.8.6 (PHNE_17135)/8.8.6) with ESMTP id VAA04115 for ; Thu, 20 Apr 2000 21:10:11 +0200 (METDST) Received: from mail1.digital.com (mail1.digital.com [204.123.2.50]) by mailhost1.tudelft.nl (PMDF V5.2-32 #42432) with ESMTP id <0FTB00G38X8XI1@mailhost1.tudelft.nl> for J.A.K.Mouw@its.tudelft.nl; Thu, 20 Apr 2000 21:10:10 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id MAA10868; Thu, 20 Apr 2000 12:01:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA24326; Thu, 20 Apr 2000 11:59:03 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id LAA20563; Thu, 20 Apr 2000 11:57:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id LAA22454; Thu, 20 Apr 2000 11:57:06 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2000 11:57:06 -0700 (PDT) From: Jason Wold Subject: test Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Apparently-to: dkranak@sedona.ch.intel.com Apparently-to: J.A.K.Mouw@its.tudelft.nl Apparently-to: jlm@ict.es Apparently-to: wright@lcs.mit.edu Apparently-to: bpringle@teklogix.com Apparently-to: Nize@vkr.k-net.dk Apparently-to: jbaik@flatpanels.com Apparently-to: wung_y@263.net Apparently-to: ianfield@pobox.com Apparently-to: durant@alliance.research.att.com Apparently-to: Uwe.Dannowski@ira.uka.de Apparently-to: terrybrutus@deepwell.com Apparently-to: roadkill@best.com Apparently-to: phil@blazie.com Apparently-to: sm@decsy.ru Apparently-to: ymlee@core.kaist.ac.kr Apparently-to: PlentoD@diebold.com Apparently-to: junw@sz.huawei.com.cn Apparently-to: peter@duxsys.com Apparently-to: Eric_Liu@asus.com.tw Apparently-to: trevor.mahaffey@khyber.com Apparently-to: jslipp@trakonic.com Apparently-to: daihb@263.net Apparently-to: rrk+@andrew.cmu.edu To: J.A.K.Mouw@its.tudelft.nl Message-id: <200004201857.LAA22454@wera.pa.dec.com> Precedence: bulk test From kramer@pa.dec.com Fri Apr 21 00:06:40 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id AAA18083; Fri, 21 Apr 2000 00:06:40 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from ns2.tudelft.nl (ns2.tudelft.nl [130.161.180.65]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.8.6 (PHNE_17135)/8.8.6) with ESMTP id AAA07484 for ; Fri, 21 Apr 2000 00:06:39 +0200 (METDST) Received: from mail2.digital.com (mail2.digital.com [204.123.2.56]) by mailhost1.tudelft.nl (PMDF V5.2-32 #42432) with ESMTP id <0FTC00KN45F2KU@mailhost1.tudelft.nl> for J.A.K.Mouw@its.tudelft.nl; Fri, 21 Apr 2000 00:06:39 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id OAA31773; Thu, 20 Apr 2000 14:59:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA00499; Thu, 20 Apr 2000 14:56:48 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id OAA04165; Thu, 20 Apr 2000 14:54:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id OAA18462; Thu, 20 Apr 2000 14:54:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail2.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA31924; Thu, 20 Apr 2000 14:54:42 -0700 Received: from xanadu.vipswitch.com (generic199.197.205.205.in-addr.arpa [205.205.197.199] (may be forged)) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with ESMTP id OAA31008 for ; Thu, 20 Apr 2000 14:54:41 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2000 17:51:50 -0400 (EDT) From: Nicolas Pitre Subject: test, please ignore. Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com To: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Message-id: MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Precedence: bulk test Nicolas From kramer@pa.dec.com Fri Apr 21 10:43:42 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id KAA19528; Fri, 21 Apr 2000 10:43:38 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from ns2.tudelft.nl (ns2.tudelft.nl [130.161.180.65]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.8.6 (PHNE_17135)/8.8.6) with ESMTP id KAA14292 for ; Fri, 21 Apr 2000 10:43:37 +0200 (METDST) Received: from mail1.digital.com (mail1.digital.com [204.123.2.50]) by mailhost1.tudelft.nl (PMDF V5.2-32 #42432) with ESMTP id <0FTC00A9FYWO8B@mailhost1.tudelft.nl> for J.A.K.Mouw@its.tudelft.nl; Fri, 21 Apr 2000 10:43:37 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id BAA24535; Fri, 21 Apr 2000 01:38:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA07659; Fri, 21 Apr 2000 01:38:05 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id BAA19150; Fri, 21 Apr 2000 01:37:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id BAA06465; Fri, 21 Apr 2000 01:37:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail2.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA12428; Fri, 21 Apr 2000 01:37:13 -0700 Received: from ns.sindo.co.kr (ns.sindo.co.kr [210.101.160.1]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id BAA30533 for ; Fri, 21 Apr 2000 01:37:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: from sr.sindo.co.kr (unverified [192.168.1.254]) by ns.sindo.co.kr (EMWAC SMTPRS 0.83) with SMTP id ; Fri, 21 Apr 2000 17:39:24 +0900 Date: Fri, 21 Apr 2000 17:40:40 +0900 From: youngjo Song Subject: arm linux source... Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com To: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Message-id: <39001408.66C63827@sr.sindo.co.kr> MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.72 [en] (Win98; I) Content-type: text/plain; charset=EUC-KR Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk X-Accept-Language: ko,en,ja Dear. Hi. I will develope the linux port on the SA1110 CPU. I can't download the source code files in the home page "http://developer.intel.com/design/strong/applnots/sa1100lx/getstart.htm#1001576". Please, check the link or source code files. Thank you. From kramer@pa.dec.com Fri Apr 21 11:15:38 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id LAA19620; Fri, 21 Apr 2000 11:15:38 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from ns2.tudelft.nl (ns2.tudelft.nl [130.161.180.65]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.8.6 (PHNE_17135)/8.8.6) with ESMTP id LAA14836 for ; Fri, 21 Apr 2000 11:15:37 +0200 (METDST) Received: from mail2.digital.com (mail2.digital.com [204.123.2.56]) by mailhost1.tudelft.nl (PMDF V5.2-32 #42432) with ESMTP id <0FTD00A510E08B@mailhost1.tudelft.nl> for J.A.K.Mouw@its.tudelft.nl; Fri, 21 Apr 2000 11:15:37 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id CAA31388; Fri, 21 Apr 2000 02:10:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA10346; Fri, 21 Apr 2000 02:10:29 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id CAA14211; Fri, 21 Apr 2000 02:10:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id CAA24829; Fri, 21 Apr 2000 02:10:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail1.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA16705; Fri, 21 Apr 2000 02:10:18 -0700 Received: from duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (duteinh.et.tudelft.nl [130.161.42.1]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with ESMTP id CAA24446 for ; Fri, 21 Apr 2000 02:10:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: from kalman by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id LAA19595; Fri, 21 Apr 2000 11:08:25 +0200 (MET DST) Date: Fri, 21 Apr 2000 11:08:25 +0200 (MET DST) From: Erik Mouw X-Face: "!Z|1XjFg!3Iw)BwM^M\k)J5KHiPddz}#/Zw%?$&Q!xqob"OA|})3_@&BTTiQERo?/^g[Z<9P4R8:5C:aqq.cw!hotLc=+u-"+1rq@9$V^8PbOUlodyi_sejt+D`iqkLpx$>.aXl%vnfPIt"LK|/%>94_Zrm8jy?`_[RKt'TuoxUxfk(gMhY(n|DBBl~c$dhO>G%6}R4+DGX3|idBm4oU&UM/XUP4I9aoN{]`ax%B?rgD(I3OJ<62Y6L Subject: Re: arm linux source... In-reply-to: <39001408.66C63827@sr.sindo.co.kr> Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com To: youngjo@ns.sindo.co.kr Cc: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Message-id: <200004210908.LAA19595@duteinh.et.tudelft.nl> Organization: Eric conspiracy secret labs MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: XCmail 1.0.0 - with PGP support, PGP engine version 0.5 (Linux) Content-type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-transfer-encoding: 8bit Precedence: bulk X-Loop: erik@it.et.tudelft.nl X-Mailerorigin: http://www.fsai.fh-trier.de/~schmitzj/Xclasses/XCmail/ X-Eric-Conspiracy: There is no conspiracy! On Fri, 21 Apr 2000 17:40:40 +0900, youngjo Song wrote: > I will develope the linux port on the SA1110 CPU. > I can't download the source code files in the home page > "http://developer.intel.com/design/strong/applnots/sa1100lx/getstart.htm#100157 > ". > > Please, check the link or source code files. It's a bit outdated. The LART site contains links to more up-to-date information (I updated it a month ago). Check out http://www.lart.tudelft.nl/ . Another great source of information is http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/ . Erik -- J.A.K. (Erik) Mouw, Information and Communication Theory Group, Department of Electrical Engineering, Faculty of Information Technology and Systems, Delft University of Technology, PO BOX 5031, 2600 GA Delft, The Netherlands Phone: +31-15-2783635 Fax: +31-15-2781843 Email: J.A.K.Mouw@its.tudelft.nl WWW: http://www-ict.its.tudelft.nl/~erik/ From kramer@pa.dec.com Fri Apr 21 11:29:45 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id LAA19682; Fri, 21 Apr 2000 11:29:45 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from ns2.tudelft.nl (ns2.tudelft.nl [130.161.180.65]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.8.6 (PHNE_17135)/8.8.6) with ESMTP id LAA15028 for ; Fri, 21 Apr 2000 11:29:44 +0200 (METDST) Received: from mail2.digital.com (mail2.digital.com [204.123.2.56]) by mailhost1.tudelft.nl (PMDF V5.2-32 #42432) with ESMTP id <0FTD00A7V11IDO@mailhost1.tudelft.nl> for J.A.K.Mouw@its.tudelft.nl; Fri, 21 Apr 2000 11:29:44 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id CAA29343; Fri, 21 Apr 2000 02:24:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA08460; Fri, 21 Apr 2000 02:24:37 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id CAA24669; Fri, 21 Apr 2000 02:24:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id CAA23544; Fri, 21 Apr 2000 02:24:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail1.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA27116; Fri, 21 Apr 2000 02:24:24 -0700 Received: from duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (duteinh.et.tudelft.nl [130.161.42.1]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with ESMTP id CAA30571 for ; Fri, 21 Apr 2000 02:24:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: from kalman by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id LAA19655; Fri, 21 Apr 2000 11:23:02 +0200 (MET DST) Date: Fri, 21 Apr 2000 11:23:02 +0200 (MET DST) From: Erik Mouw X-Face: "!Z|1XjFg!3Iw)BwM^M\k)J5KHiPddz}#/Zw%?$&Q!xqob"OA|})3_@&BTTiQERo?/^g[Z<9P4R8:5C:aqq.cw!hotLc=+u-"+1rq@9$V^8PbOUlodyi_sejt+D`iqkLpx$>.aXl%vnfPIt"LK|/%>94_Zrm8jy?`_[RKt'TuoxUxfk(gMhY(n|DBBl~c$dhO>G%6}R4+DGX3|idBm4oU&UM/XUP4I9aoN{]`ax%B?rgD(I3OJ<62Y6L Subject: Re: Evaluation board... In-reply-to: <20000420184854.6664.qmail@nwcst292.netaddress.usa.net> Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com To: kumarrk@usa.net Cc: Linux-arm@vger.rutgers.edu, Devel@netwinder.com, Sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Message-id: <200004210923.LAA19655@duteinh.et.tudelft.nl> Organization: Eric conspiracy secret labs MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: XCmail 1.0.0 - with PGP support, PGP engine version 0.5 (Linux) Content-type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-transfer-encoding: 8bit Precedence: bulk X-Loop: erik@it.et.tudelft.nl X-Mailerorigin: http://www.fsai.fh-trier.de/~schmitzj/Xclasses/XCmail/ X-Eric-Conspiracy: There is no conspiracy! On Thu, 20 Apr 2000 12:48:54 -0600 (MDT), Kumar Ramanathan wrote: > I have the IXp1200 network processor board and need to run linux on it's > strongARM core. > > Does the kernel need to be ported for the board ?? I'm not sure. As far as I know, you should be able to run standard SA1100 linux on it. Intel is also working to get Linux running on it, but they want to use it in big-endian mode, so they need to change quite a lot. Ask David Meng (david.meng@intel.com) about the current status. > ASlso ,the board has only one serial port, so I can dnld the kernel only from > that port.No console output seems possible . Why not? I also using a single serial port to do console and download on a normal SA1100 board. The second serial port isn't neccessary. > Is there a way I can make the kernel image output something to the serial port > so I can view it via the same port I use for downloasd of the kernel image ?? I don't have IXP1200 information available, but if its serial port is not at the same location as the "normal" SA1100, you won't see anything at all. I think you need to do some more low level debugging. If the board has leds, try to blink them in one of the kernel initialization routines. In that way you know if the kernel starts at all. That's how we did it with the LART. > Or is there a way I can write to some memory address so that the leds on the > board can show some output ???? I don't know, you really should download the IXP1200 documentation for that. Debugging low level software without proper hardware documentation is close to impossible. Erik -- Yes, it works sometimes. If you need something that "works sometimes" use Windows! -- Victor Khimenko on linux-kernel From kramer@pa.dec.com Fri Apr 21 16:22:02 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id QAA20624; Fri, 21 Apr 2000 16:22:02 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from ns2.tudelft.nl (ns2.tudelft.nl [130.161.180.65]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.8.6 (PHNE_17135)/8.8.6) with ESMTP id QAA19651 for ; Fri, 21 Apr 2000 16:22:01 +0200 (METDST) Received: from mail1.digital.com (mail1.digital.com [204.123.2.50]) by mailhost1.tudelft.nl (PMDF V5.2-32 #42432) with ESMTP id <0FTD00L6LEKN5J@mailhost1.tudelft.nl> for J.A.K.Mouw@its.tudelft.nl; Fri, 21 Apr 2000 16:22:00 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id HAA00473; Fri, 21 Apr 2000 07:16:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA18343; Fri, 21 Apr 2000 07:16:30 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id HAA01769; Fri, 21 Apr 2000 07:15:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id HAA20200; Fri, 21 Apr 2000 07:15:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail1.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA21664; Fri, 21 Apr 2000 07:15:47 -0700 Received: from ice.fiftyone.com (ice.fiftyone.com [208.225.80.11]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with ESMTP id HAA11292 for ; Fri, 21 Apr 2000 07:15:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: from server01.asi (akron-80-188.ar51.net [208.225.80.188]) by ice.fiftyone.com (8.9.3/8.8.7) with ESMTP id KAA06755 for ; Fri, 21 Apr 2000 10:15:12 -0400 Received: by SERVER01 with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2448.0) id ; Fri, 21 Apr 2000 10:14:50 -0400 Date: Fri, 21 Apr 2000 10:14:40 -0400 From: Jeff Sutherland Subject: Frame buffer device fixes for Assabet's Sharp TFT display Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com To: "SA1100 Linux mailing list (E-mail)" Message-id: MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2448.0) Content-type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----_=_NextPart_001_01BFAB9B.F45AE830" Precedence: bulk This message is in MIME format. Since your mail reader does not understand this format, some or all of this message may not be legible. ------_=_NextPart_001_01BFAB9B.F45AE830 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" I wonder if any of the frame buffer driver maintainers are lurking out there? The Sharp display on the Assabet is not being set up correctly in Linux 2.3.99-pre3: This is an active display, needs 16bpp depth, 320x200 size, and LCD control registers should be set up as follows: reg0: 0x000000B9 reg1: 0x02020130 reg2: 0x000000EF reg3: 0x0000000C These are the hardware settings that work on WindowsCE. Note that in this mode no palette is required: just shove pixel data into the display. I'm trying to hack this on my own but really could use some friendly advice :) Regards, -Jeff ------_=_NextPart_001_01BFAB9B.F45AE830 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1"
I wonder if any of the frame buffer driver maintainers are lurking out there?  The Sharp display on the Assabet is not being set up correctly in Linux 2.3.99-pre3: This is an active display, needs 16bpp depth, 320x200 size, and LCD control registers should be set up as follows:
 
reg0: 0x000000B9
reg1: 0x02020130
reg2: 0x000000EF
reg3: 0x0000000C
 
These are the hardware settings that work on WindowsCE.  Note that in this mode no palette is required: just shove pixel data into the display.  I'm trying to hack this on my own but really could use some friendly advice :)
 
Regards,
-Jeff
 
 
 
------_=_NextPart_001_01BFAB9B.F45AE830-- From kramer@pa.dec.com Fri Apr 21 17:36:02 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id RAA20884; Fri, 21 Apr 2000 17:36:01 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from ns2.tudelft.nl (ns2.tudelft.nl [130.161.180.65]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.8.6 (PHNE_17135)/8.8.6) with ESMTP id RAA20978 for ; Fri, 21 Apr 2000 17:36:00 +0200 (METDST) Received: from mail2.digital.com (mail2.digital.com [204.123.2.56]) by mailhost1.tudelft.nl (PMDF V5.2-32 #42432) with ESMTP id <0FTD0002EHZZML@mailhost1.tudelft.nl> for J.A.K.Mouw@its.tudelft.nl; Fri, 21 Apr 2000 17:36:00 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id IAA12484; Fri, 21 Apr 2000 08:30:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA04718; Fri, 21 Apr 2000 08:30:45 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id IAA15604; Fri, 21 Apr 2000 08:30:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id IAA14191; Fri, 21 Apr 2000 08:30:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail1.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA04027; Fri, 21 Apr 2000 08:30:29 -0700 Received: from xanadu.gn.com (modemcable248.137-200-24.mtl.mc.videotron.net [24.200.137.248]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with ESMTP id IAA18066 for ; Fri, 21 Apr 2000 08:30:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (nico@localhost) by xanadu.gn.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id LAA12208; Fri, 21 Apr 2000 11:29:37 -0400 Date: Fri, 21 Apr 2000 11:29:37 -0400 (EDT) From: Nicolas Pitre Subject: Re: Frame buffer device fixes for Assabet's Sharp TFT display In-reply-to: Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com X-Sender: nico@xanadu.gn.com To: Jeff Sutherland Cc: "SA1100 Linux mailing list (E-mail)" Message-id: MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Precedence: bulk X-Authentication-warning: xanadu.gn.com: nico owned process doing -bs On Fri, 21 Apr 2000, Jeff Sutherland wrote: > I wonder if any of the frame buffer driver maintainers are lurking out > there? The Sharp display on the Assabet is not being set up correctly in > Linux 2.3.99-pre3: This is an active display, needs 16bpp depth, 320x200 > size, and LCD control registers should be set up as follows: The docs mention 320x240. > reg0: 0x000000B9 > reg1: 0x02020130 > reg2: 0x000000EF > reg3: 0x0000000C If those are the same as the settings in Intel's diagnostic code, that's what is currently set in the Linux driver. > These are the hardware settings that work on WindowsCE. Note that in this > mode no palette is required: just shove pixel data into the display. I'm > trying to hack this on my own but really could use some friendly advice :) What is missing currently is 16bpp support. Nicolas From kramer@pa.dec.com Fri Apr 21 17:48:45 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id RAA20914; Fri, 21 Apr 2000 17:48:44 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from ns2.tudelft.nl (ns2.tudelft.nl [130.161.180.65]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.8.6 (PHNE_17135)/8.8.6) with ESMTP id RAA21129 for ; Fri, 21 Apr 2000 17:48:44 +0200 (METDST) Received: from mail1.digital.com (mail1.digital.com [204.123.2.50]) by mailhost1.tudelft.nl (PMDF V5.2-32 #42432) with ESMTP id <0FTD00MOZIL6Y2@mailhost1.tudelft.nl> for J.A.K.Mouw@its.tudelft.nl; Fri, 21 Apr 2000 17:48:43 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id IAA10512; Fri, 21 Apr 2000 08:43:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA24508; Fri, 21 Apr 2000 08:43:38 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id IAA14717; Fri, 21 Apr 2000 08:43:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id IAA17170; Fri, 21 Apr 2000 08:43:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail1.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA21085; Fri, 21 Apr 2000 08:43:13 -0700 Received: from ice.fiftyone.com (ice.fiftyone.com [208.225.80.11]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with ESMTP id IAA17976 for ; Fri, 21 Apr 2000 08:43:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: from server01.asi (akron-80-188.ar51.net [208.225.80.188]) by ice.fiftyone.com (8.9.3/8.8.7) with ESMTP id LAA11997; Fri, 21 Apr 2000 11:43:27 -0400 Received: by SERVER01 with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2448.0) id ; Fri, 21 Apr 2000 11:42:54 -0400 Date: Fri, 21 Apr 2000 11:42:52 -0400 From: Jeff Sutherland Subject: RE: Frame buffer device fixes for Assabet's Sharp TFT display Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com To: "'Nicolas Pitre'" Cc: "'SA1100 Linux mailing list (E-mail)'" Message-id: MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2448.0) Content-type: text/plain Precedence: bulk > > size, and LCD control registers should be set up as follows: > > The docs mention 320x240. > It is 320x240- fat fingers this morning... > > reg0: 0x000000B9 > > reg1: 0x02020130 > > reg2: 0x000000EF > > reg3: 0x0000000C > > If those are the same as the settings in Intel's diagnostic > code, that's > what is currently set in the Linux driver. If the frame buffer device fails to initialize (I broke it) then these settings remain. Of course then nothing shows up on the screen. If the frame buffer is allowed to initialize with the settings in sa1100fb.c then reg1 and 2 get loaded with 0x3912F930 and 0x30004EF, which goofs up the scan timing somewhat. The real problem though is the lack of 16bpp support. No response yet from the linux-fbdev list... //Jeff From kramer@pa.dec.com Sat Apr 22 08:46:54 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id IAA23396; Sat, 22 Apr 2000 08:46:53 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from ns2.tudelft.nl (ns2.tudelft.nl [130.161.180.65]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.8.6 (PHNE_17135)/8.8.6) with ESMTP id IAA00709 for ; Sat, 22 Apr 2000 08:46:53 +0200 (METDST) Received: from mail2.digital.com (mail2.digital.com [204.123.2.56]) by mailhost1.tudelft.nl (PMDF V5.2-32 #42432) with ESMTP id <0FTE00HJ5O64X3@mailhost1.tudelft.nl> for J.A.K.Mouw@its.tudelft.nl; Sat, 22 Apr 2000 08:46:53 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id XAA32600; Fri, 21 Apr 2000 23:41:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA02527; Fri, 21 Apr 2000 23:41:18 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id XAA23495; Fri, 21 Apr 2000 23:39:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id XAA20682; Fri, 21 Apr 2000 23:39:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail1.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA27338; Fri, 21 Apr 2000 23:39:26 -0700 Received: from xanadu.gn.com (modemcable248.137-200-24.mtl.mc.videotron.net [24.200.137.248]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with ESMTP id XAA02715 for ; Fri, 21 Apr 2000 23:39:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (nico@localhost) by xanadu.gn.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id CAA15913 for ; Sat, 22 Apr 2000 02:39:14 -0400 Date: Sat, 22 Apr 2000 02:39:14 -0400 (EDT) From: Nicolas Pitre Subject: diff-2.3.99-pre3-rmk3-np2 Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com X-Sender: nico@xanadu.gn.com To: SA-1100/Linux Message-id: MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Precedence: bulk X-Authentication-warning: xanadu.gn.com: nico owned process doing -bs For Assabet users: The LCD screen kind of work now. Nicolas From kramer@pa.dec.com Sun Apr 23 16:52:22 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id QAA27381; Sun, 23 Apr 2000 16:52:13 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from ns2.tudelft.nl (ns2.tudelft.nl [130.161.180.65]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id QAA16965 for ; Sun, 23 Apr 2000 16:52:11 +0200 (METDST) Received: from mail2.digital.com (mail2.digital.com [204.123.2.56]) by mailhost1.tudelft.nl (PMDF V5.2-32 #42432) with ESMTP id <0FTH00J5N5AX2P@mailhost1.tudelft.nl> for J.A.K.Mouw@its.tudelft.nl; Sun, 23 Apr 2000 16:52:10 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id HAA02946; Sun, 23 Apr 2000 07:46:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA27246; Sun, 23 Apr 2000 07:46:43 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id HAA15181; Sun, 23 Apr 2000 07:43:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id HAA05769; Sun, 23 Apr 2000 07:43:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail2.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA18776; Sun, 23 Apr 2000 07:43:22 -0700 Received: from forsmark.securenet.se (net1.securenet.se [195.43.236.2]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with ESMTP id HAA04807 for ; Sun, 23 Apr 2000 07:43:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: from kllklk (01-027.044.popsite.net [216.126.163.27]) by forsmark.securenet.se with SMTP (Microsoft Exchange Internet Mail Service Version 5.5.2650.21) id JJX9N0Y5; Sun, 23 Apr 2000 16:42:28 +0200 Date: Sun, 23 Apr 2000 09:01:52 -0500 From: Andy Shoutre Subject: Until Now... Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com To: win887j@mail2.digital.com Message-id: <200004231443.HAA04807@mail2.digital.com> MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.70 [en] (Win95; I) Content-type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-transfer-encoding: quoted-printable Precedence: bulk =46REE E-COMMERCE WHEN YOU HOST WITH US!! Tired of expensive e-commerce software, set up fees and leasing contracts? Here is the deal: You host your site with us and you get free E-Commerce, including a merchant account, real-time software and shopping cart. NO ONE CAN BEAT OUR PRICE! I=46 YOU =46IND A BETTER DEAL =46OR OUR PAC= KAGE ANYWHERE ELSE, WE WILL MATCH OUR COMPETITOR'S PRICE PLUS GIVE YOU THE =46IRST MONTH =46OR =46REE. While others charge you hundreds of dollars to get a merchant account or put you on a 48 months non-cancelable lease agreement we charge you NOTHING for E-commerce when you sign up for our e-commerce hosting plan. If you wish to stay with your current hosting company or have already a merchant account our offer is even better. We have 7 different E-Commerce plans to suit your individual needs. We have a solution for U.S. beased merchants and international merchants. No matter where in the world you are, we get your online store up and running within a few days. Check it out first and make an informed decision. You have never seen a package deal like this before: * Your own merchant account with one of the lowest rates in the industry * Real-Time software to accept VISA, MASTERCARD, AMEX, DISCOVER/NOVUS , DINERSCLUB/CARTE BLANCHE, JCB * Direct deposit within 48 hrs into your checking account * Shopping Cart store front software with an easy to use web based interface * Real-Time Credit Card Processing software * Virtual terminal for phone/fax/mail orders * Automated E-mail receipts to your clients * Recurring billing feature with batch uploads * Automatic batch closing * Address verification system (AVS) * Back office to 24/7 access account history * 75 MB (megabytes) of disk space * 30 GB (gigabyte) of data transfer per month * 25 POP3 E-mail accounts * Unlimited alias E-mail addresses * Live web site statistics * Unlimited =46TP uploads * Anonymous =46TP * CGI directory for your own scripts * Site control panel * Installation included * Tech support included All this and more when you sign up for our E-Commerce Hosting plan for ONLY $69.95 per month and a one time set up fee of $199.00. That 's right. NO ADDITIONAL SET UP =46EES or application fees for your merchant account, real-time software or shopping cart storefront. A one-stop E-Commerce solution. And the best is: NO LEASING, NO LONG TERM COMMITMENT. YOU CAN CANCEL ANYTIME. In addition you get a =46REE listing in our mall and =46REE advertisin= g to promote your store. We drive traffic to your site and help you to become a successful online business. Please reply to: mailto:mron@populus.net?subject=3DIN=46O-PLEASE to receive our =46REE = e -mail information package without obligations. ********************************************************* Remove at mailto:vvxx76@yahoo.com?subject=3Dremove ********************************************************* From kramer@pa.dec.com Thu Apr 27 21:30:23 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id VAA05464; Thu, 27 Apr 2000 21:30:22 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from ns2.tudelft.nl (ns2.tudelft.nl [130.161.180.65]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id VAA03708 for ; Thu, 27 Apr 2000 21:30:20 +0200 (METDST) Received: from mail2.digital.com (mail2.digital.com [204.123.2.56]) by mailhost1.tudelft.nl (PMDF V5.2-32 #42432) with ESMTP id <0FTO00DP5WUIFT@mailhost1.tudelft.nl> for J.A.K.Mouw@its.tudelft.nl; Thu, 27 Apr 2000 21:30:19 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id MAA10191; Thu, 27 Apr 2000 12:25:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA08830; Thu, 27 Apr 2000 12:24:54 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id MAA05927; Thu, 27 Apr 2000 12:22:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id MAA12821; Thu, 27 Apr 2000 12:22:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail2.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA27832; Thu, 27 Apr 2000 12:22:25 -0700 Received: from blazie.com (blazie.com [207.97.93.2]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with ESMTP id MAA10052 for ; Thu, 27 Apr 2000 12:22:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by blazie.com (8.9.2/8.8.7) with ESMTP id PAA05489 for ; Thu, 27 Apr 2000 15:22:18 -0400 (EDT) Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2000 15:22:18 -0400 (EDT) From: Chris Blazie Subject: booting kernel on SA1110 Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com To: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Message-id: MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Precedence: bulk I'm trying to get a kernel to boot on an SA1110 platform (development board with 64mb SDRAM). I set up the memory configurations in mm/mm-sa1100.c and kernel/arch.c. I pass architecture number 0x10 from the bootloader but it never gets out of head-armv.S. I traced the problem to the instruction turning on the MMU: mcr p15, 0, r0, c1, c0 At this point r0 = 0xc000517d; mmu, write buffer, and all caches on. Is all of that really supposed to happen here? Or is r0 getting incorrectly set in __create_page_tables? I remember someone else reporting a freeze when the MMU is switched on (SA1110 also). Any ideas? Thanks, Chris From kramer@pa.dec.com Thu Apr 27 21:50:40 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id VAA05602; Thu, 27 Apr 2000 21:50:40 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from ns2.tudelft.nl (ns2.tudelft.nl [130.161.180.65]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id VAA04102 for ; Thu, 27 Apr 2000 21:50:38 +0200 (METDST) Received: from mail2.digital.com (mail2.digital.com [204.123.2.56]) by mailhost1.tudelft.nl (PMDF V5.2-32 #42432) with ESMTP id <0FTO00EE7XSCLJ@mailhost1.tudelft.nl> for J.A.K.Mouw@its.tudelft.nl; Thu, 27 Apr 2000 21:50:37 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id MAA11740; Thu, 27 Apr 2000 12:45:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA15673; Thu, 27 Apr 2000 12:45:32 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id MAA01791; Thu, 27 Apr 2000 12:45:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id MAA11254; Thu, 27 Apr 2000 12:45:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail1.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA22938; Thu, 27 Apr 2000 12:45:18 -0700 Received: from tekincisnts-4.teklogix.com (mail.teklogix.com [207.219.2.10]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with ESMTP id MAA30408 for ; Thu, 27 Apr 2000 12:45:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: from DeadDuck (BILL [10.128.5.25]) by tekincisnts-4.teklogix.com with SMTP (Microsoft Exchange Internet Mail Service Version 5.5.2448.0) id JCA1L74Q; Thu, 27 Apr 2000 15:44:27 -0400 Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2000 15:46:58 -0400 From: Bill Pringlemeir Subject: Re: booting kernel on SA1110 In-reply-to: Chris Blazie's message of "Thu, 27 Apr 2000 15:22:18 -0400 (EDT)" Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com To: Chris Blazie Cc: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Message-id: Organization: noitazinagro MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Precedence: bulk User-Agent: Gnus/5.0803 (Gnus v5.8.3) Emacs/20.5 X-Home-Page: http://www.wwonline.com/~bpringle/ Lines: 49 References: Are you sure that it isn't, MCR p15, 0, r1, c2, c0, 0 /* Write the TTBR in MMU */ This is the base for the page table. I believe that the page table must be aligned to an address divisible by 0x4000. If the actual instruction is, mcr p15, 0, r0, c1, c0, 0 Then this is setting up the configuration and the value in r0 doesn't make any sense to me. 0xc000???? makes sense as this is a physical RAM value and this would be a good place to put the MMU table. A value that would be good is 0xc0008000, but you must have setup the table to be based here. Sorry I don't have the Linux code yet. I am almost done with vxWorks. I have done a lot of stuff to get this to boot. Send me / direct me to head-armv.s and I might be able to tell more. cheers, Bill >>>>> "Chris" == Chris Blazie writes: Chris> I'm trying to get a kernel to boot on an SA1110 Chris> platform (development board with 64mb SDRAM). I set up the Chris> memory configurations in mm/mm-sa1100.c and kernel/arch.c. Chris> I pass architecture number 0x10 from the bootloader but it Chris> never gets out of head-armv.S. I traced the problem to the Chris> instruction turning on the MMU: Chris> mcr p15, 0, r0, c1, c0 Chris> At this point r0 = 0xc000517d; mmu, write buffer, and Chris> all caches on. Is all of that really supposed to happen Chris> here? Or is r0 getting incorrectly set in Chris> __create_page_tables? Chris> I remember someone else reporting a freeze when the Chris> MMU is switched on (SA1110 also). Any ideas? -- I'm a fuschia bowling ball somewhere in Brittany Yow!! It's LIBERACE and TUESDAY WELD!! High on a HILL... driving a LITTLE CAR... I wanna be in that LITTLE CAR, too!! I wanna drive off with LIBBY and TUESDAY! From kramer@pa.dec.com Thu Apr 27 22:47:40 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id WAA05934; Thu, 27 Apr 2000 22:47:40 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from ns2.tudelft.nl (ns2.tudelft.nl [130.161.180.65]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id WAA05306 for ; Thu, 27 Apr 2000 22:47:37 +0200 (METDST) Received: from mail2.digital.com (mail2.digital.com [204.123.2.56]) by mailhost1.tudelft.nl (PMDF V5.2-32 #42432) with ESMTP id <0FTP00H5P0FB9T@mailhost1.tudelft.nl> for J.A.K.Mouw@its.tudelft.nl; Thu, 27 Apr 2000 22:47:36 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id NAA16158; Thu, 27 Apr 2000 13:42:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA02311; Thu, 27 Apr 2000 13:42:21 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id NAA31989; Thu, 27 Apr 2000 13:41:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id NAA17852; Thu, 27 Apr 2000 13:41:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail1.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA02493; Thu, 27 Apr 2000 13:41:31 -0700 Received: from xanadu.vipswitch.com (generic199.197.205.205.in-addr.arpa [205.205.197.199] (may be forged)) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with ESMTP id NAA05865 for ; Thu, 27 Apr 2000 13:41:30 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2000 16:38:18 -0400 (EDT) From: Nicolas Pitre Subject: Re: booting kernel on SA1110 In-reply-to: Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com To: Chris Blazie Cc: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Message-id: MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Precedence: bulk On Thu, 27 Apr 2000, Chris Blazie wrote: > > I'm trying to get a kernel to boot on an SA1110 platform > (development board with 64mb SDRAM). I set up the memory configurations > in mm/mm-sa1100.c and kernel/arch.c. I pass architecture number 0x10 from > the bootloader but it never gets out of head-armv.S. I traced the problem > to the instruction turning on the MMU: > > mcr p15, 0, r0, c1, c0 > > At this point r0 = 0xc000517d; mmu, write buffer, and all caches > on. Is all of that really supposed to happen here? Yep. > I remember someone else reporting a freeze when the MMU is > switched on (SA1110 also). Any ideas? It has been cured in latest patches. It is surely not the same problem. What patches do you have? Nicolas From kramer@pa.dec.com Mon May 1 23:37:13 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id XAA26457; Mon, 1 May 2000 23:37:12 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from ns2.tudelft.nl (ns2.tudelft.nl [130.161.180.65]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id XAA27443 for ; Mon, 1 May 2000 23:37:09 +0200 (METDST) Received: from mail2.digital.com (mail2.digital.com [204.123.2.56]) by mailhost1.tudelft.nl (PMDF V5.2-32 #42432) with ESMTP id <0FTW0085RHDVZE@mailhost1.tudelft.nl> for J.A.K.Mouw@its.tudelft.nl; Mon, 1 May 2000 23:37:08 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id OAA16497; Mon, 01 May 2000 14:31:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA03363; Mon, 01 May 2000 14:31:21 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id OAA03017; Mon, 01 May 2000 14:28:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id OAA03559; Mon, 01 May 2000 14:28:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail1.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA16957; Mon, 01 May 2000 14:28:15 -0700 Received: from ADSServer.flatpanels.com (flatpanels.com [207.196.69.66] (may be forged)) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with ESMTP id OAA31465 for ; Mon, 01 May 2000 14:28:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: by flatpanels.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21) id ; Mon, 01 May 2000 17:23:13 -0400 Date: Mon, 01 May 2000 17:23:10 -0400 From: "Saxena, Nikita" Subject: Socket handling... Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com To: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Message-id: <91B07CA588CED3118CFE00105AC97594D1A8@flatpanels.com> MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21) Content-type: text/plain Precedence: bulk Hi everyone, I was wondering if anyone knew of any problems handling sockets under Linux 2.3.35 running on a StrongARM platform. I have a file (compiled with 'gcc -static namedsock.c -o namedsock' or 'arm-linux-gcc etc') doesn't complain under Red Hat but blows up when run on the arm with a "socket: Invalid argument" error. Does anyone have any suggestions? Thanks, Nikita Saxena From kramer@pa.dec.com Mon May 1 23:47:35 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id XAA26503; Mon, 1 May 2000 23:47:35 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from ns2.tudelft.nl (ns2.tudelft.nl [130.161.180.65]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id XAA27626 for ; Mon, 1 May 2000 23:47:34 +0200 (METDST) Received: from mail1.digital.com (mail1.digital.com [204.123.2.50]) by mailhost1.tudelft.nl (PMDF V5.2-32 #42432) with ESMTP id <0FTW0096YHV711@mailhost1.tudelft.nl> for J.A.K.Mouw@its.tudelft.nl; Mon, 1 May 2000 23:47:32 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id OAA05591; Mon, 01 May 2000 14:42:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA14102; Mon, 01 May 2000 14:42:11 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id OAA09077; Mon, 01 May 2000 14:41:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id OAA30349; Mon, 01 May 2000 14:41:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: from crl.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA29568; Mon, 01 May 2000 14:41:52 -0700 Received: from crlwebmail.crl.dec.com (crlwebmail.crl.dec.com [16.11.0.2]) by crl.dec.com (8.8.8/RWD-1.2) with ESMTP id RAA25378; Mon, 01 May 2000 17:41:50 -0400 (EDT) Received: by CRLWEBMAIL with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21) id <20427D5Y>; Mon, 01 May 2000 17:46:04 -0400 Date: Mon, 01 May 2000 17:42:26 -0400 From: George France Subject: RE: Socket handling... Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com To: "'Saxena, Nikita'" , sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Message-id: MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21) Content-type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Precedence: bulk Hello Nikita; Could you gives some more detail?? Which processor, which version on gcc, the library versions, the error messages and a copy of the relevant source code?? Under Red Hat what??? Sorry, about all of the questions, but what you have asked is a lot like going to the airport and asking "I could I have a ticket to somewhere nice". Although it is not a bad question, it is not very useful. Best Regards, --George George France, france@crl.dec.com Cambridge Research Laboratory, Compaq Computer Corporation One Kendall Square, Building 700 MS: CRL Cambridge, MA 02139 USA -----Original Message----- From: Saxena, Nikita [mailto:NSaxena@flatpanels.com] Sent: Monday, May 01, 2000 5:23 PM To: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Subject: Socket handling... Hi everyone, I was wondering if anyone knew of any problems handling sockets under Linux 2.3.35 running on a StrongARM platform. I have a file (compiled with 'gcc -static namedsock.c -o namedsock' or 'arm-linux-gcc etc') doesn't complain under Red Hat but blows up when run on the arm with a "socket: Invalid argument" error. Does anyone have any suggestions? Thanks, Nikita Saxena From kramer@pa.dec.com Tue May 2 00:03:31 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id AAA26566; Tue, 2 May 2000 00:03:31 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from ns2.tudelft.nl (ns2.tudelft.nl [130.161.180.65]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id AAA27919 for ; Tue, 2 May 2000 00:03:29 +0200 (METDST) Received: from mail1.digital.com (mail1.digital.com [204.123.2.50]) by mailhost1.tudelft.nl (PMDF V5.2-32 #42432) with ESMTP id <0FTW009EPILR11@mailhost1.tudelft.nl> for J.A.K.Mouw@its.tudelft.nl; Tue, 2 May 2000 00:03:27 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id OAA12898; Mon, 01 May 2000 14:58:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA20926; Mon, 01 May 2000 14:58:15 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id OAA11110; Mon, 01 May 2000 14:58:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id OAA08981; Mon, 01 May 2000 14:58:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail1.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA08850; Mon, 01 May 2000 14:58:01 -0700 Received: from kings-cross.london.uk.eu.org (tazenda.demon.co.uk [158.152.220.239]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with ESMTP id OAA11797 for ; Mon, 01 May 2000 14:57:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost ([::ffff:127.0.0.1] helo=kings-cross.london.uk.eu.org ident=phil) by kings-cross.london.uk.eu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.11 #1) id 12mOxk-0006GX-00; Mon, 01 May 2000 23:46:48 +0100 Date: Mon, 01 May 2000 23:46:48 +0100 From: Philip Blundell Subject: Re: Socket handling... In-reply-to: "Message from Saxena, Nikita" "of Mon, 01 May 2000 17:23:10 EDT." <91B07CA588CED3118CFE00105AC97594D1A8@flatpanels.com> Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com To: "Saxena, Nikita" Cc: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Message-id: MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: exmh version 2.0.2 2/24/98 (debian) Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Precedence: bulk References: <91B07CA588CED3118CFE00105AC97594D1A8@flatpanels.com> >2.3.35 running on a StrongARM platform. I have a file (compiled with 'gcc >-static namedsock.c -o namedsock' or >'arm-linux-gcc etc') doesn't complain under Red Hat but blows up when run >on the arm with a "socket: Invalid argument" error. > >Does anyone have any suggestions? What is the actual call that fails? Running it under strace might yield some clues. There should be no incompatibility here. p. From kramer@pa.dec.com Tue May 2 05:03:27 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id FAA27695; Tue, 2 May 2000 05:03:26 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from ns2.tudelft.nl (ns2.tudelft.nl [130.161.180.65]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id FAA01533 for ; Tue, 2 May 2000 05:03:25 +0200 (METDST) Received: from mail2.digital.com (mail2.digital.com [204.123.2.56]) by mailhost1.tudelft.nl (PMDF V5.2-32 #42432) with ESMTP id <0FTW00FF9WHN8R@mailhost1.tudelft.nl> for J.A.K.Mouw@its.tudelft.nl; Tue, 2 May 2000 05:03:24 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id TAA08418; Mon, 01 May 2000 19:58:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA15620; Mon, 01 May 2000 19:57:50 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id TAA22153; Mon, 01 May 2000 19:56:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id TAA26220; Mon, 01 May 2000 19:56:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail2.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA11944; Mon, 01 May 2000 19:56:38 -0700 Received: from xanadu.gn.com (modemcable248.137-200-24.mtl.mc.videotron.net [24.200.137.248]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with ESMTP id TAA08351 for ; Mon, 01 May 2000 19:56:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (nico@localhost) by xanadu.gn.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id WAA18355 for ; Mon, 01 May 2000 22:56:25 -0400 Date: Mon, 01 May 2000 22:56:25 -0400 (EDT) From: Nicolas Pitre Subject: diff-2.3.99-pre6-rmk1-np1 Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com X-Sender: nico@xanadu.gn.com To: SA-1100/Linux Message-id: MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Precedence: bulk X-Authentication-warning: xanadu.gn.com: nico owned process doing -bs ... is available from ftp.netwinder.org/users/n/nico. This contains: - updated to latest kernel version - LEDs support for Assabet, Brutus, LART - Low-level SA1100 PCMCIA framework with documentation from John G Dorsey This is still work in progress... it is not working yet. - Further machine configuration reorganization - UCB1200 driver from 2.2.x ported to current version by Erik Mouw Tested on LART only, but Brutus should still work. This code would need a big cleanup though... - Typo from last patch fixed - compiler flags fix in Makefile - fixed code for enabling caches for kernel decompression on SA1100's - ... and probably some other things I forget Enjoy! Nicolas From kramer@pa.dec.com Tue May 2 09:59:39 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id JAA28782; Tue, 2 May 2000 09:59:38 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from ns2.tudelft.nl (ns2.tudelft.nl [130.161.180.65]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id JAA05800 for ; Tue, 2 May 2000 09:59:32 +0200 (METDST) Received: from mail1.digital.com (mail1.digital.com [204.123.2.50]) by mailhost1.tudelft.nl (PMDF V5.2-32 #42432) with ESMTP id <0FTX000FIA76C2@mailhost1.tudelft.nl> for J.A.K.Mouw@its.tudelft.nl; Tue, 2 May 2000 09:59:31 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id AAA14868; Tue, 02 May 2000 00:52:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA07135; Tue, 02 May 2000 00:51:59 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id AAA20022; Tue, 02 May 2000 00:50:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id AAA12421; Tue, 02 May 2000 00:50:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail1.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA13447; Tue, 02 May 2000 00:50:53 -0700 Received: from krdl.org.sg (rodin.krdl.org.sg [192.122.139.27]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with ESMTP id AAA11199 for ; Tue, 02 May 2000 00:50:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mailhost.krdl.org.sg (mailhost [192.122.134.30]) by krdl.org.sg (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id PAA19124; Tue, 02 May 2000 15:58:17 +0800 Received: from krdl.org.sg (QUNYING.krdl.org.sg [192.168.136.36]) by mailhost.krdl.org.sg (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id PAA19348; Tue, 02 May 2000 15:49:45 +0800 (SGT) Date: Tue, 02 May 2000 15:50:39 +0800 From: zhu qun ying Subject: Re: diff-2.3.99-pre6-rmk1-np1 Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com To: Nicolas Pitre , sa1100 Message-id: <390E88CF.D2A4E41D@krdl.org.sg> Organization: KRDL MIME-version: 1.0 X-MIME-Autoconverted: from 8bit to quoted-printable by mail1.digital.com id AAA11199 X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.72 [en] (WinNT; U) Content-type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-transfer-encoding: quoted-printable Precedence: bulk X-Accept-Language: en References: I just compiled this kernel, and the kernel hung after release initrd mem= ory. The boot messages is as below: Uncompressing Linux.................................. done, booting the k= ernel. Linux version 2.3.99-pre6-rmk1-np1 (qyzhu@edge2) (gcc version 2.95.2 1999= 1024 (r elease)) #9 Tue May 2 15:25:48 SGT 2000 Architecture: LART On node 0 totalpages: 4096 zone(0): 4096 pages. zone(1): 0 pages. zone(2): 0 pages. On node 1 totalpages: 4096 zone(0): 4096 pages. zone(1): 0 pages. zone(2): 0 pages. Calibrating delay loop... 207.67 BogoMIPS Memory: 16MB 16MB =3D 32MB total Memory: 26948KB available (867K code, 193K data, 40K init) VFS: DCACHE hash table configured to 4096 entries Buffer-cache hash table entries: 1024 (order: 0, 4096 bytes) Page-cache hash table entries: 8192 (order: 3, 32768 bytes) VFS: INODE hash table configured to 2048 entries POSIX conformance testing by UNIFIX Linux NET4.0 for Linux 2.3 Based upon Swansea University Computer Society NET3.039 NET4: Unix domain sockets 1.0/SMP for Linux NET4.0. NET4: Linux TCP/IP 1.0 for NET4.0 IP Protocols: ICMP, UDP, TCP IP: routing cache hash table of 512 buckets, 4Kbytes TCP: Hash tables configured (established 2048 bind 2048) Starting kswapd v1.6 SA1100 serial driver version 1.2 ttyS0 on SA1100 UART3 (irq 17) ttyS1 on SA1100 UART1 (irq 15) pty: 256 Unix98 ptys configured RAMDISK driver initialized: 16 RAM disks of 8192K size 1024 blocksize RAMDISK: Compressed image found at block 0 Freeing initrd memory: 4096k freed Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual address 00000= 070 pgd =3D c0004000 *pgd =3D c011f001, *pmd =3D c011f001, *pte =3D c011e08b, *ppte =3D c011e0= 0a Internal error: Oops: 0 CPU: 0 pc : [] lr : [] sp : c204dfb0 ip : 80000013 fp : 00000000 r10: c0011158 r9 : 4401a119 r8 : c0112d54 r7 : c0111224 r6 : c00f4bf8 r5 : c00dcfc0 r4 : 00000000 r3 : 0000000a r2 : 00000070 r1 : c0080ea4 r0 : a0000013 Flags: NzCv IRQs off FIQs on Mode SVC_32 Segment kernel Control: C000517F Table: C000517F DAC: 0000001D Process swapper (pid: 1, stackpage=3Dc204d000) Stack: c204dfa0: c0063c8c c000e958 a0000093 ffffffff 00000000 c0011d80 c0011d88= c00f85 bc c204dfc0: c000889c 00000001 c00ee840 c0008944 c0111684 c001215c c011a128= c01116 84 c204dfe0: c01116d0 c00eea64 c0012164 c001215c c011a128 c0111684 c01116d0= c0013d 00 Backtrace: no frame pointer Code: e3a02070 e3a0300a (e5c23000) e5d21000 e5c23000 I have a LART like board, and have kernel-2.3.99-pre3-rmk1-np2 working. W= hat's the major change that cause this problem? Any starting points to look at? --=20 (~._.~) =D6=EC =C8=BA =D3=A2 (Qun Ying) (65) 874-6743 ( O ) Kent Ridge Digital Labs (KRDL) ()~*~() 21 Heng Mui Keng Terrace, Singapore 119613 (_)-(_) qyzhu@krdl.org.sg * zhuqy@hotmail.com From kramer@pa.dec.com Tue May 2 11:11:41 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id LAA29323; Tue, 2 May 2000 11:11:40 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from ns2.tudelft.nl (ns2.tudelft.nl [130.161.180.65]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id LAA08307 for ; Tue, 2 May 2000 11:11:38 +0200 (METDST) Received: from mail1.digital.com (mail1.digital.com [204.123.2.50]) by mailhost1.tudelft.nl (PMDF V5.2-32 #42432) with ESMTP id <0FTX005MCDJCFI@mailhost1.tudelft.nl> for J.A.K.Mouw@its.tudelft.nl; Tue, 2 May 2000 11:11:37 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id CAA17629; Tue, 02 May 2000 02:04:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA24316; Tue, 02 May 2000 02:04:57 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id CAA08967; Tue, 02 May 2000 02:04:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id CAA09902; Tue, 02 May 2000 02:04:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail1.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA10686; Tue, 02 May 2000 02:03:59 -0700 Received: from krdl.org.sg (rodin.krdl.org.sg [192.122.139.27]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with ESMTP id CAA19147 for ; Tue, 02 May 2000 02:03:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mailhost.krdl.org.sg (mailhost [192.122.134.30]) by krdl.org.sg (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id RAA22470 for ; Tue, 02 May 2000 17:11:40 +0800 Received: from krdl.org.sg (QUNYING.krdl.org.sg [192.168.136.36]) by mailhost.krdl.org.sg (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id RAA28560 for ; Tue, 02 May 2000 17:03:08 +0800 (SGT) Date: Tue, 02 May 2000 17:03:53 +0800 From: zhu qun ying Subject: Re: diff-2.3.99-pre6-rmk1-np1 Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com To: sa1100 Message-id: <390E99F9.73F3D341@krdl.org.sg> Organization: KRDL MIME-version: 1.0 X-MIME-Autoconverted: from 8bit to quoted-printable by mail1.digital.com id CAA19147 X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.72 [en] (WinNT; U) Content-type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-transfer-encoding: quoted-printable Precedence: bulk X-Accept-Language: en References: <390E88CF.D2A4E41D@krdl.org.sg> Sorry, my mistake. I compiled the enhanced real time clock support into t= he kernel without noticed. :) sorry. --=20 (~._.~) =D6=EC =C8=BA =D3=A2 (Qun Ying) (65) 874-6743 ( O ) Kent Ridge Digital Labs (KRDL) ()~*~() 21 Heng Mui Keng Terrace, Singapore 119613 (_)-(_) qyzhu@krdl.org.sg * zhuqy@hotmail.com From kramer@pa.dec.com Tue May 2 11:47:16 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id LAA29506; Tue, 2 May 2000 11:47:10 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from ns2.tudelft.nl (ns2.tudelft.nl [130.161.180.65]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id LAA09297 for ; Tue, 2 May 2000 11:47:08 +0200 (METDST) Received: from mail1.digital.com (mail1.digital.com [204.123.2.50]) by mailhost1.tudelft.nl (PMDF V5.2-32 #42432) with ESMTP id <0FTX008K1F6I8W@mailhost1.tudelft.nl> for J.A.K.Mouw@its.tudelft.nl; Tue, 2 May 2000 11:47:07 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id CAA21432; Tue, 02 May 2000 02:40:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA07345; Tue, 02 May 2000 02:39:11 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id CAA01033; Tue, 02 May 2000 02:36:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id CAA03172; Tue, 02 May 2000 02:36:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail1.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA10212; Tue, 02 May 2000 02:36:32 -0700 Received: from lakdiva.slt.lk (lakdiva.slt.lk [204.143.96.17]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with ESMTP id CAA16745 for ; Tue, 02 May 2000 02:16:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: from obelix.atpos.lk (ras1-pool2-slt.lk [204.143.106.225] (may be forged)) by lakdiva.slt.lk (8.9.1b+Sun/8.9.1) with ESMTP id PAA03326 for ; Tue, 02 May 2000 15:09:57 -0600 (GMT) Received: from sri.atpos.com (192.1.1.105 [192.1.1.105]) by obelix.atpos.lk with SMTP (Microsoft Exchange Internet Mail Service Version 5.5.2650.21) id J66MYMSJ; Tue, 02 May 2000 15:03:38 +0600 Date: Tue, 02 May 2000 15:07:43 +0600 From: Nandana Subject: [Fwd: diff-2.3.99-pre6-rmk1-np1] Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com To: sa1100 Message-id: <390E9ADF.86CA7EB5@sri.atpos.com> MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.7 [en] (X11; I; Linux 2.2.14-15mdk i686) Content-type: multipart/mixed; boundary="------------B398D46FECEBBCBB6C17B9DB" Precedence: bulk X-Accept-Language: en This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------B398D46FECEBBCBB6C17B9DB Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit --------------B398D46FECEBBCBB6C17B9DB Content-Type: message/rfc822 Content-Disposition: inline X-Mozilla-Status2: 00000000 Message-ID: <390E8D30.E237E6D4@sri.atpos.com> Date: Tue, 02 May 2000 14:09:20 +0600 From: Nandana X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.7 [en] (X11; I; Linux 2.2.14-15mdk i686) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Nicolas Pitre Subject: Re: diff-2.3.99-pre6-rmk1-np1 References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit I just compiled it for Brutus and it gives repeated warnings and kernel panic . --------------------------------------------------------------- Linux version 2.3.99-pre6-rmk1-np1 (root@nandana.sri.blah.net) (gcc version 2.95.2 19991024 (release)) #1 Tue May 2 13:29:25 LKT 2000 Architecture: Intel Brutus (SA1100 eval board) hm, page ee001000 reserved twice. hm, page ee002000 reserved twice. hm, page ee011000 reserved twice. hm, page ee013000 reserved twice. hm, page ee018000 reserved twice. hm, page ee01b000 reserved twice. hm, page ee01d000 reserved twice. hm, page ee01e000 reserved twice. hm, page ee01f000 reserved twice. hm, page ee022000 reserved twice. hm, page ee024000 reserved twice. hm, page ee025000 reserved twice. hm, page ee026000 reserved twice. hm, page ee02d000 reserved twice. hm, page ee030000 reserved twice. hm, page ee031000 reserved twice. hm, page ee033000 reserved twice. hm, page ee034000 reserved twice. hm, page ee038000 reserved twice. hm, page ee03a000 reserved twice. hm, page ee03d000 reserved twice. hm, page ee03e000 reserved twice. hm, page ee03f000 reserved twice. hm, page ee042000 reserved twice. hm, page ee043000 reserved twice. hm, page ee044000 reserved twice. hm, page ee045000 reserved twice. hm, page ee046000 reserved twice. hm, page ee04e000 reserved twice. hm, page ee050000 reserved twice. hm, page ee051000 reserved twice. hm, page ee053000 reserved twice. hm, page ee054000 reserved twice. hm, page ee058000 reserved twice. hm, page ee05a000 reserved twice. hm, page ee05d000 reserved twice. hm, page ee05e000 reserved twice. hm, page ee05f000 reserved twice. hm, page ee060000 reserved twice. hm, page ee06c000 reserved twice. hm, page ee06d000 reserved twice. hm, page ee071000 reserved twice. hm, page ee075000 reserved twice. hm, page ee079000 reserved twice. hm, page ee07d000 reserved twice. hm, page ee07e000 reserved twice. hm, page ee07f000 reserved twice. hm, page ee080000 reserved twice. hm, page ee081000 reserved twice. hm, page ee087000 reserved twice. hm, page ee088000 reserved twice. hm, page ee089000 reserved twice. hm, page ee08a000 reserved twice. hm, page ee08c000 reserved twice. hm, page ee08d000 reserved twice. hm, page ee092000 reserved twice. hm, page ee097000 reserved twice. hm, page ee098000 reserved twice. hm, page ee09d000 reserved twice. hm, page ee09e000 reserved twice. hm, page ee09f000 reserved twice. hm, page ee0a2000 reserved twice. hm, page ee0a3000 reserved twice. hm, page ee0a4000 reserved twice. hm, page ee0a5000 reserved twice. hm, page ee0a7000 reserved twice. hm, page ee0aa000 reserved twice. hm, page ee0ac000 reserved twice. hm, page ee0ad000 reserved twice. hm, page ee0b0000 reserved twice. hm, page ee0b1000 reserved twice. hm, page ee0b3000 reserved twice. hm, page ee0b6000 reserved twice. hm, page ee0b8000 reserved twice. hm, page ee0bd000 reserved twice. hm, page ee0be000 reserved twice. hm, page ee0bf000 reserved twice. hm, page ee0c4000 reserved twice. hm, page ee0c5000 reserved twice. hm, page ee0c6000 reserved twice. hm, page ee0cc000 reserved twice. hm, page ee0cd000 reserved twice. hm, page ee0d0000 reserved twice. hm, page ee0d1000 reserved twice. hm, page ee0d3000 reserved twice. hm, page ee0d4000 reserved twice. hm, page ee0d8000 reserved twice. hm, page ee0da000 reserved twice. hm, page ee0dd000 reserved twice. hm, page ee0de000 reserved twice. hm, page ee0df000 reserved twice. hm, page ee0e0000 reserved twice. hm, page ee0e1000 reserved twice. hm, page ee0e2000 reserved twice. hm, page ee0f0000 reserved twice. hm, page ee0f2000 reserved twice. hm, page ee0f4000 reserved twice. hm, page ee0f7000 reserved twice. hm, page ee0fb000 reserved twice. hm, page ee0fd000 reserved twice. hm, page ee0fe000 reserved twice. hm, page ee0ff000 reserved twice. hm, page ee100000 reserved twice. hm, page ee101000 reserved twice. hm, page ee102000 reserved twice. hm, page ee110000 reserved twice. hm, page ee111000 reserved twice. hm, page ee117000 reserved twice. hm, page ee11b000 reserved twice. hm, page ee11d000 reserved twice. hm, page ee11e000 reserved twice. hm, page ee11f000 reserved twice. hm, page ee120000 reserved twice. hm, page ee121000 reserved twice. hm, page ee128000 reserved twice. hm, page ee139000 reserved twice. hm, page ee13b000 reserved twice. hm, page ee13d000 reserved twice. hm, page ee13e000 reserved twice. hm, page ee13f000 reserved twice. hm, page ee142000 reserved twice. hm, page ee145000 reserved twice. hm, page ee146000 reserved twice. hm, page ee14c000 reserved twice. hm, page ee150000 reserved twice. hm, page ee151000 reserved twice. hm, page ee153000 reserved twice. hm, page ee156000 reserved twice. hm, page ee159000 reserved twice. hm, page ee15d000 reserved twice. hm, page ee15e000 reserved twice. hm, page ee15f000 reserved twice. hm, page ee163000 reserved twice. hm, page ee164000 reserved twice. hm, page ee165000 reserved twice. hm, page ee166000 reserved twice. hm, page ee16e000 reserved twice. hm, page ee170000 reserved twice. hm, page ee171000 reserved twice. hm, page ee173000 reserved twice. hm, page ee174000 reserved twice. hm, page ee178000 reserved twice. hm, page ee17a000 reserved twice. hm, page ee17d000 reserved twice. hm, page ee17e000 reserved twice. hm, page ee17f000 reserved twice. hm, page ee184000 reserved twice. hm, page ee186000 reserved twice. hm, page ee18d000 reserved twice. hm, page ee190000 reserved twice. hm, page ee191000 reserved twice. hm, page ee193000 reserved twice. hm, page ee196000 reserved twice. hm, page ee199000 reserved twice. hm, page ee19d000 reserved twice. hm, page ee19e000 reserved twice. hm, page ee19f000 reserved twice. hm, page ee1a7000 reserved twice. hm, page ee1ac000 reserved twice. hm, page ee1b0000 reserved twice. hm, page ee1b1000 reserved twice. hm, page ee1b3000 reserved twice. hm, page ee1b8000 reserved twice. hm, page ee1ba000 reserved twice. hm, page ee1bd000 reserved twice. hm, page ee1be000 reserved twice. hm, page ee1bf000 reserved twice. hm, page ee1d2000 reserved twice. hm, page ee1d4000 reserved twice. hm, page ee1d6000 reserved twice. hm, page ee1d8000 reserved twice. hm, page ee1d9000 reserved twice. hm, page ee1dd000 reserved twice. hm, page ee1de000 reserved twice. hm, page ee1df000 reserved twice. hm, page ee1e0000 reserved twice. hm, page ee1ec000 reserved twice. hm, page ee1ef000 reserved twice. hm, page ee1f0000 reserved twice. hm, page ee1f3000 reserved twice. hm, page ee1f7000 reserved twice. hm, page ee1f9000 reserved twice. hm, page ee20d000 reserved twice. hm, page ee20e000 reserved twice. hm, page ee210000 reserved twice. hm, page ee213000 reserved twice. hm, page ee215000 reserved twice. hm, page ee216000 reserved twice. hm, page ee219000 reserved twice. hm, page ee21d000 reserved twice. hm, page ee21e000 reserved twice. hm, page ee21f000 reserved twice. hm, page ee231000 reserved twice. hm, page ee232000 reserved twice. hm, page ee234000 reserved twice. hm, page ee236000 reserved twice. hm, page ee238000 reserved twice. hm, page ee239000 reserved twice. hm, page ee23d000 reserved twice. hm, page ee23e000 reserved twice. hm, page ee23f000 reserved twice. hm, page ee240000 reserved twice. hm, page ee241000 reserved twice. hm, page ee242000 reserved twice. hm, page ee243000 reserved twice. hm, page ee244000 reserved twice. hm, page ee245000 reserved twice. hm, page ee24d000 reserved twice. hm, page ee24f000 reserved twice. hm, page ee250000 reserved twice. hm, page ee253000 reserved twice. hm, page ee259000 reserved twice. hm, page ee25d000 reserved twice. hm, page ee25e000 reserved twice. hm, page ee25f000 reserved twice. hm, page ee264000 reserved twice. hm, page ee265000 reserved twice. hm, page ee271000 reserved twice. hm, page ee274000 reserved twice. hm, page ee27b000 reserved twice. hm, page ee27d000 reserved twice. hm, page ee27e000 reserved twice. hm, page ee27f000 reserved twice. hm, page ee282000 reserved twice. hm, page ee299000 reserved twice. hm, page ee29b000 reserved twice. hm, page ee29c000 reserved twice. hm, page ee2af000 reserved twice. hm, page ee2b5000 reserved twice. hm, page ee2b7000 reserved twice. hm, page ee2b8000 reserved twice. hm, page ee2b9000 reserved twice. hm, page ee2bd000 reserved twice. hm, page ee2be000 reserved twice. hm, page ee2bf000 reserved twice. hm, page ee2cc000 reserved twice. hm, page ee2cd000 reserved twice. hm, page ee2ce000 reserved twice. hm, page ee2d5000 reserved twice. hm, page ee2d7000 reserved twice. hm, page ee2d8000 reserved twice. hm, page ee2d9000 reserved twice. hm, page ee2dd000 reserved twice. hm, page ee2de000 reserved twice. hm, page ee2df000 reserved twice. hm, page ee2e0000 reserved twice. hm, page ee2e2000 reserved twice. hm, page ee2ec000 reserved twice. hm, page ee2f5000 reserved twice. hm, page ee2f7000 reserved twice. hm, page ee2f8000 reserved twice. hm, page ee2fd000 reserved twice. hm, page ee2fe000 reserved twice. hm, page ee2ff000 reserved twice. On node 0 totalpages: 1024 zone(0): 1024 pages. zone(1): 0 pages. zone(2): 0 pages. On node 1 totalpages: 1024 zone(0): 1024 pages. zone(1): 0 pages. zone(2): 0 pages. On node 2 totalpages: 1024 zone(0): 1024 pages. zone(1): 0 pages. zone(2): 0 pages. On node 3 totalpages: 1024 zone(0): 1024 pages. zone(1): 0 pages. zone(2): 0 pages. Console: colour dummy device 80x30 Calibrating delay loop... 194.15 BogoMIPS Memory: 4MB 4MB 4MB 4MB = 16MB total Memory: 15048KB available (725K code, 213K data, 52K init) VFS: DCACHE hash table configured to 2048 entries Buffer-cache hash table entries: 1024 (order: 0, 4096 bytes) Page-cache hash table entries: 4096 (order: 2, 16384 bytes) VFS: INODE hash table configured to 1024 entries POSIX conformance testing by UNIFIX Linux NET4.0 for Linux 2.3 Based upon Swansea University Computer Society NET3.039 Starting kswapd v1.6 Console: switching to colour frame buffer device 40x30 Brutus keyboard driver v1.0 SA1100 serial driver version 1.2 ttyS0 on SA1100 UART1 (irq 15), using GPIO 14/15 ttyS1 on SA1100 UART3 (irq 17) pty: 256 Unix98 ptys configured MCP SA1100/UCB1200 module initalized SA1100 MCP audio driver version 2.2 initialized RAMDISK driver initialized: 16 RAM disks of 8192K size 1024 blocksize RAMDISK: Couldn't find valid RAM disk image starting at 0. Freeing initrd memory: 3072k freed NetWinder Floating Point Emulator V0.95 (c) 1998-1999 Rebel.com kmem_alloc: Bad front redzone (name=inode_cache) kmem_alloc: Bad rear redzone (name=inode_cache) kmem_alloc: Bad poison (name=inode_cache) iput: inode 00:00/5 still has locks! iput: device 00:00 inode 5 still has aliases! iput: Aieee, semaphore in use inode 00:00/5, count=32 Kernel panic: VFS: Unable to mount root fs on 01:00 --------------------------------------------------- Anyway after 2.3.35 it doesnt working on Brutus. Nandana Nicolas Pitre wrote: > ... is available from ftp.netwinder.org/users/n/nico. > > This contains: > > - updated to latest kernel version > - LEDs support for Assabet, Brutus, LART > - Low-level SA1100 PCMCIA framework with documentation from John G Dorsey > This is still work in progress... it is not working yet. > - Further machine configuration reorganization > - UCB1200 driver from 2.2.x ported to current version by Erik Mouw > Tested on LART only, but Brutus should still work. > This code would need a big cleanup though... > - Typo from last patch fixed > - compiler flags fix in Makefile > - fixed code for enabling caches for kernel decompression on SA1100's > - ... and probably some other things I forget > > Enjoy! > > Nicolas --------------B398D46FECEBBCBB6C17B9DB-- From kramer@pa.dec.com Tue May 2 15:19:52 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id PAA00813; Tue, 2 May 2000 15:19:52 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from ns2.tudelft.nl (ns2.tudelft.nl [130.161.180.65]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id PAA15977 for ; Tue, 2 May 2000 15:19:50 +0200 (METDST) Received: from mail2.digital.com (mail2.digital.com [204.123.2.56]) by mailhost1.tudelft.nl (PMDF V5.2-32 #42432) with ESMTP id <0FTX00MPCP0ZG6@mailhost1.tudelft.nl> for J.A.K.Mouw@its.tudelft.nl; Tue, 2 May 2000 15:19:48 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id GAA14675; Tue, 02 May 2000 06:14:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA20239; Tue, 02 May 2000 06:14:26 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id GAA26076; Tue, 02 May 2000 06:13:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id GAA17212; Tue, 02 May 2000 06:13:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail1.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA17516; Tue, 02 May 2000 06:13:19 -0700 Received: from duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (duteinh.et.tudelft.nl [130.161.42.1]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with ESMTP id GAA32129 for ; Tue, 02 May 2000 06:13:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: from dutein71 by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id PAA00761; Tue, 02 May 2000 15:11:46 +0200 (MET DST) Date: Tue May 02 15:11:45 +0200 (MDT) 2000 From: Erik Mouw X-Face: "!Z|1XjFg!3Iw)BwM^M\k)J5KHiPddz}#/Zw%?$&Q!xqob"OA|})3_@&BTTiQERo?/^g[Z<9P4R8:5C:aqq.cw!hotLc=+u-"+1rq@9$V^8PbOUlodyi_sejt+D`iqkLpx$>.aXl%vnfPIt"LK|/%>94_Zrm8jy?`_[RKt'TuoxUxfk(gMhY(n|DBBl~c$dhO>G%6}R4+DGX3|idBm4oU&UM/XUP4I9aoN{]`ax%B?rgD(I3OJ<62Y6L Subject: Re: diff-2.3.99-pre6-rmk1-np1 In-reply-to: Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com To: nico@CAM.ORG Cc: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Message-id: <200005021311.PAA00761@duteinh.et.tudelft.nl> Organization: Eric conspiracy secret labs MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: XCmail 1.0.1 - with PGP support, PGP engine version 0.5 (IRIX) Content-type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-transfer-encoding: 8bit Precedence: bulk X-Loop: erik@it.et.tudelft.nl X-Mailerorigin: http://www.fsai.fh-trier.de/~schmitzj/Xclasses/XCmail/ X-Eric-Conspiracy: There is no conspiracy! On Mon, 01 May 2000 22:56:25 -0400 (EDT), Nicolas Pitre wrote: > ... is available from ftp.netwinder.org/users/n/nico. > > This contains: > > - updated to latest kernel version > - LEDs support for Assabet, Brutus, LART > - Low-level SA1100 PCMCIA framework with documentation from John G Dorsey > This is still work in progress... it is not working yet. > - Further machine configuration reorganization > - UCB1200 driver from 2.2.x ported to current version by Erik Mouw > Tested on LART only, but Brutus should still work. > This code would need a big cleanup though... I think this needs some clarification: - I just ported it from 2.2.x to 2.3.99-pre3. I can MP3 files using splay, so sound _output_ works. I didn't yet test the sound _input_ though. - The code currently doesn't compile as a module. There were some module hooks in it which I preserved, but I didn't test it as a module. - It is compiled in if you choose to compile for LART, Brutus, or Tifon. It should be made a configuration option. - It should be a real OSS module and not a SA1100 specific module. - I think we should get rid of the Itsy sound API, because OSS is standard. - We also should get rid of the multi-open/mixing/rate conversion implementation, because it is unwanted policy. Policy belongs in userland, the kernel should just provide mechanisms. There are userland solutions to do mixing, like the Enlightenment Sound Daemon (esd, comes with GNOME). > - Typo from last patch fixed > - compiler flags fix in Makefile > - fixed code for enabling caches for kernel decompression on SA1100's > - ... and probably some other things I forget > > > Enjoy! It Doesn't Work [tm] on the LART. Here is the kernel output: blob> boot Starting kernel ... Uncompressing Linux.................................... done, booting the kernel. That's all. I think the discontinuous memory setup broke, I'll see if I can find a clue. Erik -- J.A.K. (Erik) Mouw, Information and Communication Theory Group, Department of Electrical Engineering, Faculty of Information Technology and Systems, Delft University of Technology, PO BOX 5031, 2600 GA Delft, The Netherlands Phone: +31-15-2783635 Fax: +31-15-2781843 Email: J.A.K.Mouw@its.tudelft.nl WWW: http://www-ict.its.tudelft.nl/~erik/ From kramer@pa.dec.com Tue May 2 17:30:29 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id RAA01532; Tue, 2 May 2000 17:30:29 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from ns2.tudelft.nl (ns2.tudelft.nl [130.161.180.65]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id RAA19979 for ; Tue, 2 May 2000 17:30:27 +0200 (METDST) Received: from mail1.digital.com (mail1.digital.com [204.123.2.50]) by mailhost1.tudelft.nl (PMDF V5.2-32 #42432) with ESMTP id <0FTX009JQV2OI6@mailhost1.tudelft.nl> for J.A.K.Mouw@its.tudelft.nl; Tue, 2 May 2000 17:30:25 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id IAA03737; Tue, 02 May 2000 08:25:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA18806; Tue, 02 May 2000 08:25:17 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id IAA30275; Tue, 02 May 2000 08:25:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id IAA03475; Tue, 02 May 2000 08:25:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail2.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA09488; Tue, 02 May 2000 08:25:05 -0700 Received: from xanadu.vipswitch.com (generic199.197.205.205.in-addr.arpa [205.205.197.199] (may be forged)) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with ESMTP id IAA25924 for ; Tue, 02 May 2000 08:25:04 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 02 May 2000 10:08:15 -0400 (EDT) From: Nicolas Pitre Subject: Re: diff-2.3.99-pre6-rmk1-np1 In-reply-to: <390E8D30.E237E6D4@sri.atpos.com> Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com To: Nandana Message-id: MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Precedence: bulk On Tue, 2 May 2000, Nandana wrote: > I just compiled it for Brutus and it gives repeated warnings and kernel > panic . Thanks. I'll look at it as soon as I can. In the mean time you may stick to 2.3.35-rmk1-np9 which seems stable on Brutus. Nicolas From kramer@pa.dec.com Tue May 2 17:27:23 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id RAA01497; Tue, 2 May 2000 17:27:23 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from ns2.tudelft.nl (ns2.tudelft.nl [130.161.180.65]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id RAA19870 for ; Tue, 2 May 2000 17:27:21 +0200 (METDST) Received: from mail2.digital.com (mail2.digital.com [204.123.2.56]) by mailhost1.tudelft.nl (PMDF V5.2-32 #42432) with ESMTP id <0FTX009FHUXJI6@mailhost1.tudelft.nl> for J.A.K.Mouw@its.tudelft.nl; Tue, 2 May 2000 17:27:20 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id IAA25496; Tue, 02 May 2000 08:22:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA18375; Tue, 02 May 2000 08:22:11 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id IAA30527; Tue, 02 May 2000 08:21:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id IAA03550; Tue, 02 May 2000 08:21:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail1.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA10117; Tue, 02 May 2000 08:21:33 -0700 Received: from xanadu.vipswitch.com (generic199.197.205.205.in-addr.arpa [205.205.197.199] (may be forged)) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with ESMTP id IAA06289 for ; Tue, 02 May 2000 08:21:32 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 02 May 2000 11:13:11 -0400 (EDT) From: Nicolas Pitre Subject: Re: diff-2.3.99-pre6-rmk1-np1 In-reply-to: <200005021311.PAA00761@duteinh.et.tudelft.nl> Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com To: Erik Mouw Cc: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Message-id: MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Precedence: bulk On Tue, 2 May -1, Erik Mouw wrote: > On Mon, 01 May 2000 22:56:25 -0400 (EDT), Nicolas Pitre wrote: > > ... is available from ftp.netwinder.org/users/n/nico. > > > > This contains: > > > > - updated to latest kernel version > > - LEDs support for Assabet, Brutus, LART > > - Low-level SA1100 PCMCIA framework with documentation from John G Dorsey > > This is still work in progress... it is not working yet. > > - Further machine configuration reorganization > > - UCB1200 driver from 2.2.x ported to current version by Erik Mouw > > Tested on LART only, but Brutus should still work. > > This code would need a big cleanup though... > > I think this needs some clarification: > > - I just ported it from 2.2.x to 2.3.99-pre3. I can MP3 files using splay, > so sound _output_ works. I didn't yet test the sound _input_ though. Of course my comment about cleaning up the code didn't apply to you directly since you only ported it. No reproches to you of course. Nicolas From kramer@pa.dec.com Tue May 2 17:32:57 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id RAA01541; Tue, 2 May 2000 17:32:56 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from ns2.tudelft.nl (ns2.tudelft.nl [130.161.180.65]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id RAA20035 for ; Tue, 2 May 2000 17:32:54 +0200 (METDST) Received: from mail2.digital.com (mail2.digital.com [204.123.2.56]) by mailhost1.tudelft.nl (PMDF V5.2-32 #42432) with ESMTP id <0FTX009FFV6QNZ@mailhost1.tudelft.nl> for J.A.K.Mouw@its.tudelft.nl; Tue, 2 May 2000 17:32:51 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id IAA26083; Tue, 02 May 2000 08:27:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA30171; Tue, 02 May 2000 08:27:47 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id IAA29271; Tue, 02 May 2000 08:27:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id IAA04698; Tue, 02 May 2000 08:27:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail2.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA09156; Tue, 02 May 2000 08:27:24 -0700 Received: from xanadu.vipswitch.com (generic199.197.205.205.in-addr.arpa [205.205.197.199] (may be forged)) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with ESMTP id IAA26037 for ; Tue, 02 May 2000 08:27:23 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 02 May 2000 11:19:02 -0400 (EDT) From: Nicolas Pitre Subject: Re: diff-2.3.99-pre6-rmk1-np1 In-reply-to: <200005021311.PAA00761@duteinh.et.tudelft.nl> Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com To: Erik Mouw Cc: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Message-id: MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Precedence: bulk On Tue, 2 May -1, Erik Mouw wrote: > It Doesn't Work [tm] on the LART. Here is the kernel output: > > blob> boot > > Starting kernel ... > > Uncompressing Linux.................................... done, booting the kernel. > > That's all. I think the discontinuous memory setup broke, I'll see if I > can find a clue. It might be even simpler than that. Try this: - configure in CONFIG_DEBUG_LL - ensure the correct port address (UART1 or UART3) is selected for your board in debug-armv.S - intercept all printk() messages and send them also with printascii() in kernel/printk.c - reboot and see what it shows. Nicolas From kramer@pa.dec.com Tue May 2 17:34:13 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id RAA01550; Tue, 2 May 2000 17:34:12 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from ns2.tudelft.nl (ns2.tudelft.nl [130.161.180.65]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id RAA20098 for ; Tue, 2 May 2000 17:34:11 +0200 (METDST) Received: from mail2.digital.com (mail2.digital.com [204.123.2.56]) by mailhost1.tudelft.nl (PMDF V5.2-32 #42432) with ESMTP id <0FTX008M1V8WYY@mailhost1.tudelft.nl> for J.A.K.Mouw@its.tudelft.nl; Tue, 2 May 2000 17:34:09 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id IAA26174; Tue, 02 May 2000 08:29:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA06596; Tue, 02 May 2000 08:29:04 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id IAA28799; Tue, 02 May 2000 08:28:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id IAA11752; Tue, 02 May 2000 08:28:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail1.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA21291; Tue, 02 May 2000 08:28:52 -0700 Received: from duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (duteinh.et.tudelft.nl [130.161.42.1]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with ESMTP id IAA03801 for ; Tue, 02 May 2000 08:28:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: from dutein71 by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id RAA01503; Tue, 02 May 2000 17:27:27 +0200 (MET DST) Date: Tue May 02 17:27:24 +0200 (MDT) 2000 From: Erik Mouw X-Face: "!Z|1XjFg!3Iw)BwM^M\k)J5KHiPddz}#/Zw%?$&Q!xqob"OA|})3_@&BTTiQERo?/^g[Z<9P4R8:5C:aqq.cw!hotLc=+u-"+1rq@9$V^8PbOUlodyi_sejt+D`iqkLpx$>.aXl%vnfPIt"LK|/%>94_Zrm8jy?`_[RKt'TuoxUxfk(gMhY(n|DBBl~c$dhO>G%6}R4+DGX3|idBm4oU&UM/XUP4I9aoN{]`ax%B?rgD(I3OJ<62Y6L Subject: Re: diff-2.3.99-pre6-rmk1-np1 In-reply-to: Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com To: nico@CAM.ORG Cc: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Message-id: <200005021527.RAA01503@duteinh.et.tudelft.nl> Organization: Eric conspiracy secret labs MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: XCmail 1.0.1 - with PGP support, PGP engine version 0.5 (IRIX) Content-type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-transfer-encoding: 8bit Precedence: bulk X-Loop: erik@it.et.tudelft.nl X-Mailerorigin: http://www.fsai.fh-trier.de/~schmitzj/Xclasses/XCmail/ X-Eric-Conspiracy: There is no conspiracy! On Tue, 02 May 2000 11:13:11 -0400 (EDT), Nicolas Pitre wrote: > On Tue, 2 May -1, Erik Mouw wrote: >> On Mon, 01 May 2000 22:56:25 -0400 (EDT), Nicolas Pitre wrote: >> > - UCB1200 driver from 2.2.x ported to current version by Erik Mouw >> > Tested on LART only, but Brutus should still work. >> > This code would need a big cleanup though... >> >> I think this needs some clarification: >> >> - I just ported it from 2.2.x to 2.3.99-pre3. I can MP3 files using splay, >> so sound _output_ works. I didn't yet test the sound _input_ though. > > Of course my comment about cleaning up the code didn't apply to you > directly since you only ported it. No reproches to you of course. I didn't take it personally, I just wanted to point out what needed to be done in my opinion. Erik -- J.A.K. (Erik) Mouw, Information and Communication Theory Group, Department of Electrical Engineering, Faculty of Information Technology and Systems, Delft University of Technology, PO BOX 5031, 2600 GA Delft, The Netherlands Phone: +31-15-2783635 Fax: +31-15-2781843 Email: J.A.K.Mouw@its.tudelft.nl WWW: http://www-ict.its.tudelft.nl/~erik/ From kramer@pa.dec.com Wed May 3 02:30:08 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id CAA03924; Wed, 3 May 2000 02:30:08 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from ns2.tudelft.nl (ns2.tudelft.nl [130.161.180.65]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id CAA01405 for ; Wed, 3 May 2000 02:30:07 +0200 (METDST) Received: from mail2.digital.com (mail2.digital.com [204.123.2.56]) by mailhost1.tudelft.nl (PMDF V5.2-32 #42432) with ESMTP id <0FTY006N9K24X0@mailhost1.tudelft.nl> for J.A.K.Mouw@its.tudelft.nl; Wed, 3 May 2000 02:30:05 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id RAA05721; Tue, 02 May 2000 17:24:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA14775; Tue, 02 May 2000 17:24:24 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id RAA28889; Tue, 02 May 2000 17:21:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id RAA09324; Tue, 02 May 2000 17:21:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail1.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA21591; Tue, 02 May 2000 17:21:32 -0700 Received: from krdl.org.sg (rodin.krdl.org.sg [192.122.139.27]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with ESMTP id RAA10380 for ; Tue, 02 May 2000 17:21:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mailhost.krdl.org.sg (mailhost [192.122.134.30]) by krdl.org.sg (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id IAA15144; Wed, 03 May 2000 08:29:01 +0800 Received: from krdl.org.sg (QUNYING.krdl.org.sg [192.168.136.36]) by mailhost.krdl.org.sg (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id IAA11345; Wed, 03 May 2000 08:20:26 +0800 (SGT) Date: Wed, 03 May 2000 08:21:24 +0800 From: zhu qun ying Subject: Re: diff-2.3.99-pre6-rmk1-np1 Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com To: Erik Mouw , sa1100 Message-id: <390F7104.2DF7C54@krdl.org.sg> Organization: KRDL MIME-version: 1.0 X-MIME-Autoconverted: from 8bit to quoted-printable by mail1.digital.com id RAA10380 X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.72 [en] (WinNT; U) Content-type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-transfer-encoding: quoted-printable Precedence: bulk X-Accept-Language: en References: <200005021311.PAA00761@duteinh.et.tudelft.nl> Erik Mouw wrote: > I think this needs some clarification: >=20 > - I just ported it from 2.2.x to 2.3.99-pre3. I can MP3 files using spl= ay, > so sound _output_ works. I didn't yet test the sound _input_ though. >=20 > - The code currently doesn't compile as a module. There were some modul= e > hooks in it which I preserved, but I didn't test it as a module. >=20 > - It is compiled in if you choose to compile for LART, Brutus, or Tifon. > It should be made a configuration option. >=20 > - It should be a real OSS module and not a SA1100 specific module. >=20 > - I think we should get rid of the Itsy sound API, because OSS is > standard. But ALSA will be the future (2.5) of Linux sound system, why use OSS now = and change later? Linus has agreed to put ALSA into the main kernel tree to r= eplace OSS once 2.5 is started (It is to late for 2.4). I use ALSA for the PC se= tup, everything goes well with it. http://www.alsa-project.org >=20 > - We also should get rid of the multi-open/mixing/rate conversion > implementation, because it is unwanted policy. Policy belongs in > userland, the kernel should just provide mechanisms. There are userla= nd > solutions to do mixing, like the Enlightenment Sound Daemon (esd, com= es > with GNOME). >=20 > It Doesn't Work [tm] on the LART. Here is the kernel output: >=20 > blob> boot >=20 > Starting kernel ... >=20 > Uncompressing Linux.................................... done, booting= the kernel. >=20 > That's all. I think the discontinuous memory setup broke, I'll see if I > can find a clue. >=20 > Erik >=20 I get the kernel booted. And I found that my code runs faster at this new kernel. I have a program to grap a image from a parallel port scanner, it= need 330~360 ms at kernel 2.3.99-pre3, now it takes 300~302 ms. --=20 (~._.~) =D6=EC =C8=BA =D3=A2 (Qun Ying) (65) 874-6743 ( O ) Kent Ridge Digital Labs (KRDL) ()~*~() 21 Heng Mui Keng Terrace, Singapore 119613 (_)-(_) qyzhu@krdl.org.sg * zhuqy@hotmail.com From kramer@pa.dec.com Wed May 3 10:54:58 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id KAA05830; Wed, 3 May 2000 10:54:58 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from ns2.tudelft.nl (ns2.tudelft.nl [130.161.180.65]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id KAA08809 for ; Wed, 3 May 2000 10:54:57 +0200 (METDST) Received: from mail2.digital.com (mail2.digital.com [204.123.2.56]) by mailhost1.tudelft.nl (PMDF V5.2-32 #42432) with ESMTP id <0FTZ00LNJ7FJ05@mailhost1.tudelft.nl> for J.A.K.Mouw@its.tudelft.nl; Wed, 3 May 2000 10:54:56 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id BAA03843; Wed, 03 May 2000 01:49:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA11159; Wed, 03 May 2000 01:49:06 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id BAA00100; Wed, 03 May 2000 01:47:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id BAA13792; Wed, 03 May 2000 01:47:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail1.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA31159; Wed, 03 May 2000 01:47:36 -0700 Received: from salisbury.labs.futuretv.com (salisbury.futuretv.com [194.216.164.17]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with ESMTP id BAA03992 for ; Wed, 03 May 2000 01:47:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: from zebra.labs.futuretv.com ([192.168.32.2]) by salisbury.labs.futuretv.com with esmtp (Exim 3.03 #1) id 12mvtK-0003Vm-00 for sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com; Wed, 03 May 2000 09:56:26 +0000 Received: from [192.168.33.3] (helo=fountain.labs.futuretv.com) by zebra.labs.futuretv.com with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1) id 12muoe-0000U1-00; Wed, 03 May 2000 09:47:32 +0100 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=fountain.labs.futuretv.com) by fountain.labs.futuretv.com with esmtp (Exim 3.03 #1) id 12muoe-0008Ur-00; Wed, 03 May 2000 09:47:32 +0100 Date: Wed, 03 May 2000 09:47:32 +0100 From: Philip Blundell Subject: Re: diff-2.3.99-pre6-rmk1-np1 In-reply-to: Message from zhu qun ying "of Wed, 03 May 2000 08:21:24 +0800." <390F7104.2DF7C54@krdl.org.sg> Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com To: zhu qun ying Cc: Erik Mouw , sa1100 Message-id: MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: exmh version 2.0.2 2/24/98 (debian) Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Precedence: bulk References: <200005021311.PAA00761@duteinh.et.tudelft.nl> <390F7104.2DF7C54@krdl.org.sg> In message <390F7104.2DF7C54@krdl.org.sg>, zhu qun ying writes: >But ALSA will be the future (2.5) of Linux sound system, why use OSS now >and change later? Agreed. It seems foolish to put too much effort into OSS now. p. From kramer@pa.dec.com Wed May 3 11:10:53 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id LAA05936; Wed, 3 May 2000 11:10:53 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from ns2.tudelft.nl (ns2.tudelft.nl [130.161.180.65]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id LAA09313 for ; Wed, 3 May 2000 11:10:51 +0200 (METDST) Received: from mail1.digital.com (mail1.digital.com [204.123.2.50]) by mailhost1.tudelft.nl (PMDF V5.2-32 #42432) with ESMTP id <0FTZ00LA3861ZK@mailhost1.tudelft.nl> for J.A.K.Mouw@its.tudelft.nl; Wed, 3 May 2000 11:10:50 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id CAA07325; Wed, 03 May 2000 02:05:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA09116; Wed, 03 May 2000 02:05:41 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id CAA06187; Wed, 03 May 2000 02:05:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id CAA13277; Wed, 03 May 2000 02:05:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail2.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA08774; Wed, 03 May 2000 02:05:31 -0700 Received: from duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (duteinh.et.tudelft.nl [130.161.42.1]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with ESMTP id CAA04775 for ; Wed, 03 May 2000 02:05:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: from dutein71 by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id LAA05887; Wed, 03 May 2000 11:04:09 +0200 (MET DST) Date: Wed May 03 11:04:07 +0200 (MDT) 2000 From: Erik Mouw X-Face: "!Z|1XjFg!3Iw)BwM^M\k)J5KHiPddz}#/Zw%?$&Q!xqob"OA|})3_@&BTTiQERo?/^g[Z<9P4R8:5C:aqq.cw!hotLc=+u-"+1rq@9$V^8PbOUlodyi_sejt+D`iqkLpx$>.aXl%vnfPIt"LK|/%>94_Zrm8jy?`_[RKt'TuoxUxfk(gMhY(n|DBBl~c$dhO>G%6}R4+DGX3|idBm4oU&UM/XUP4I9aoN{]`ax%B?rgD(I3OJ<62Y6L Subject: Re: diff-2.3.99-pre6-rmk1-np1 In-reply-to: <390F7104.2DF7C54@krdl.org.sg> Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com To: qyzhu@krdl.org.sg Cc: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Message-id: <200005030904.LAA05887@duteinh.et.tudelft.nl> Organization: Eric conspiracy secret labs MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: XCmail 1.0.1 - with PGP support, PGP engine version 0.5 (IRIX) Content-type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-transfer-encoding: 8bit Precedence: bulk X-Loop: erik@it.et.tudelft.nl X-Mailerorigin: http://www.fsai.fh-trier.de/~schmitzj/Xclasses/XCmail/ X-Eric-Conspiracy: There is no conspiracy! On Wed, 03 May 2000 08:21:24 +0800, zhu qun ying wrote: > Erik Mouw wrote: >> - I think we should get rid of the Itsy sound API, because OSS is >> standard. > > But ALSA will be the future (2.5) of Linux sound system, why use OSS now and > change later? Linus has agreed to put ALSA into the main kernel tree to replace > OSS once 2.5 is started (It is to late for 2.4). I use ALSA for the PC setup, > everything goes well with it. > http://www.alsa-project.org Why not (yet) ALSA: - The OSS API is already in place. We just need to get rid of the Itsy API. - The OSS API is the current kernel standard and it is here right now. - 2.3.99 is currently in deep freeze, and I think it will be like that for at least two or three months. Alan Cox regularly posts "2.4 task lists" to the kernel mailing list which contain all kinds of show-stopper bugs that need to be fixed before 2.4.0. The task list becomes shorter, but it is still quite large. After 2.4.0 is released, it will take several months (6 or so) before 2.5 development start. It will take at least 8 months before 2.5 development starts. > I get the kernel booted. And I found that my code runs faster at this new > kernel. I have a program to grap a image from a parallel port scanner, it need > 330~360 ms at kernel 2.3.99-pre3, now it takes 300~302 ms. What kind of hardware do you use? Erik -- J.A.K. (Erik) Mouw, Information and Communication Theory Group, Department of Electrical Engineering, Faculty of Information Technology and Systems, Delft University of Technology, PO BOX 5031, 2600 GA Delft, The Netherlands Phone: +31-15-2783635 Fax: +31-15-2781843 Email: J.A.K.Mouw@its.tudelft.nl WWW: http://www-ict.its.tudelft.nl/~erik/ From kramer@pa.dec.com Wed May 3 11:35:56 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id LAA06127; Wed, 3 May 2000 11:35:56 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from ns2.tudelft.nl (ns2.tudelft.nl [130.161.180.65]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id LAA10150 for ; Wed, 3 May 2000 11:35:54 +0200 (METDST) Received: from mail2.digital.com (mail2.digital.com [204.123.2.56]) by mailhost1.tudelft.nl (PMDF V5.2-32 #42432) with ESMTP id <0FTZ000QC9BS9N@mailhost1.tudelft.nl> for J.A.K.Mouw@its.tudelft.nl; Wed, 3 May 2000 11:35:53 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id CAA05897; Wed, 03 May 2000 02:30:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA23471; Wed, 03 May 2000 02:30:44 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id CAA09161; Wed, 03 May 2000 02:30:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id CAA09719; Wed, 03 May 2000 02:30:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail2.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA07311; Wed, 03 May 2000 02:30:16 -0700 Received: from krdl.org.sg (rodin.krdl.org.sg [192.122.139.27]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with ESMTP id CAA05950 for ; Wed, 03 May 2000 02:30:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mailhost.krdl.org.sg (mailhost [192.122.134.30]) by krdl.org.sg (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id RAA02437; Wed, 03 May 2000 17:37:55 +0800 Received: from krdl.org.sg (QUNYING.krdl.org.sg [192.168.136.36]) by mailhost.krdl.org.sg (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id RAA10321; Wed, 03 May 2000 17:29:22 +0800 (SGT) Date: Wed, 03 May 2000 17:30:11 +0800 From: zhu qun ying Subject: Re: diff-2.3.99-pre6-rmk1-np1 Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com To: Erik Mouw , sa1100 Message-id: <390FF1A3.1912F373@krdl.org.sg> Organization: KRDL MIME-version: 1.0 X-MIME-Autoconverted: from 8bit to quoted-printable by mail2.digital.com id CAA05950 X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.72 [en] (WinNT; U) Content-type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-transfer-encoding: quoted-printable Precedence: bulk X-Accept-Language: en References: <200005030904.LAA05887@duteinh.et.tudelft.nl> > Why not (yet) ALSA: >=20 > - The OSS API is already in place. We just need to get rid of the Itsy = API. > - The OSS API is the current kernel standard and it is here right now. > - 2.3.99 is currently in deep freeze, and I think it will be like that = for > at least two or three months. Alan Cox regularly posts "2.4 task list= s" > to the kernel mailing list which contain all kinds of show-stopper bu= gs > that need to be fixed before 2.4.0. The task list becomes shorter, bu= t > it is still quite large. After 2.4.0 is released, it will take severa= l > months (6 or so) before 2.5 development start. It will take at least = 8 > months before 2.5 development starts. It is still argurable, since ALSA works quite well now. The current ALSA = tree is not integrated with the main kernel and maitain as a separate modules. Si= nce the affort of making it as a real OSS module and independent of SA1100, it ma= ke sence to use ALSA now (a ALSA module). The only thing I am not sure is ho= w well the ALSA works on different platform. >=20 > > I get the kernel booted. And I found that my code runs faster at this= new > > kernel. I have a program to grap a image from a parallel port scanner= , it need > > 330~360 ms at kernel 2.3.99-pre3, now it takes 300~302 ms. >=20 > What kind of hardware do you use? >=20 > Erik It is a hardware quite similar to LART, and I compiled the kernel with LA= RT configuration and some modification to the code. The board I used has 2 b= anks of DRAM each has 16 MB (starting at 0xc000000, and 0xc8000000). And use UART= 3 as the serail console. Other GPIO pins are used to implement the parallel interface. --=20 (~._.~) =D6=EC =C8=BA =D3=A2 (Qun Ying) (65) 874-6743 ( O ) Kent Ridge Digital Labs (KRDL) ()~*~() 21 Heng Mui Keng Terrace, Singapore 119613 (_)-(_) qyzhu@krdl.org.sg * zhuqy@hotmail.com From kramer@pa.dec.com Wed May 3 11:54:05 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id LAA06245; Wed, 3 May 2000 11:54:04 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from ns2.tudelft.nl (ns2.tudelft.nl [130.161.180.65]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id LAA10704 for ; Wed, 3 May 2000 11:54:03 +0200 (METDST) Received: from mail1.digital.com (mail1.digital.com [204.123.2.50]) by mailhost1.tudelft.nl (PMDF V5.2-32 #42432) with ESMTP id <0FTZ002B4A618G@mailhost1.tudelft.nl> for J.A.K.Mouw@its.tudelft.nl; Wed, 3 May 2000 11:54:02 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id CAA11567; Wed, 03 May 2000 02:48:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA08820; Wed, 03 May 2000 02:48:56 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id CAA06916; Wed, 03 May 2000 02:48:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id CAA30191; Wed, 03 May 2000 02:48:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail2.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA10517; Wed, 03 May 2000 02:48:30 -0700 Received: from duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (duteinh.et.tudelft.nl [130.161.42.1]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with ESMTP id CAA06779 for ; Wed, 03 May 2000 02:48:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: from dutein71 by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id LAA06209; Wed, 03 May 2000 11:47:09 +0200 (MET DST) Date: Wed May 03 11:47:08 +0200 (MDT) 2000 From: Erik Mouw X-Face: "!Z|1XjFg!3Iw)BwM^M\k)J5KHiPddz}#/Zw%?$&Q!xqob"OA|})3_@&BTTiQERo?/^g[Z<9P4R8:5C:aqq.cw!hotLc=+u-"+1rq@9$V^8PbOUlodyi_sejt+D`iqkLpx$>.aXl%vnfPIt"LK|/%>94_Zrm8jy?`_[RKt'TuoxUxfk(gMhY(n|DBBl~c$dhO>G%6}R4+DGX3|idBm4oU&UM/XUP4I9aoN{]`ax%B?rgD(I3OJ<62Y6L Subject: Re: diff-2.3.99-pre6-rmk1-np1 In-reply-to: <390FF1A3.1912F373@krdl.org.sg> Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com To: qyzhu@krdl.org.sg Cc: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Message-id: <200005030947.LAA06209@duteinh.et.tudelft.nl> Organization: Eric conspiracy secret labs MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: XCmail 1.0.1 - with PGP support, PGP engine version 0.5 (IRIX) Content-type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-transfer-encoding: 8bit Precedence: bulk X-Loop: erik@it.et.tudelft.nl X-Mailerorigin: http://www.fsai.fh-trier.de/~schmitzj/Xclasses/XCmail/ X-Eric-Conspiracy: There is no conspiracy! On Wed, 03 May 2000 17:30:11 +0800, zhu qun ying wrote: > It is still argurable, since ALSA works quite well now. The current ALSA tree is > not integrated with the main kernel and maitain as a separate modules. Since the > affort of making it as a real OSS module and independent of SA1100, it make > sence to use ALSA now (a ALSA module). The only thing I am not sure is how well > the ALSA works on different platform. I agree that we should move to ALSA, but I don't think we should do it right now. Cleaning up the current OSS stuff is quite easy: just remove all of the Itsy API and you're set. Writing a complete driver ALSA compatible driver from the ground up is much more complicated. I don't want to spend too much time on it so I just want to clean up the driver. However, if somebody wants to write an ALSA driver, please go ahead. >> What kind of hardware do you use? > > It is a hardware quite similar to LART, and I compiled the kernel with LART > configuration and some modification to the code. The board I used has 2 banks of > DRAM each has 16 MB (starting at 0xc000000, and 0xc8000000). And use UART3 as > the serail console. Other GPIO pins are used to implement the parallel > interface. OK, that's more evidence that the discontiguous memory support is broken. Here is the LART memory layout: - 0xc0000000-0xc07fffff - 0xc1000000-0xc17fffff - 0xc8000000-0xc87fffff - 0xc9000000-0xc97fffff So that's two logical banks in each physical bank. I'll disable the memory at 0xc1000000 and 0xc9000000 to see what happens. Erik -- Computers run on faith, not electrons. -- T.N. Thompson From kramer@pa.dec.com Wed May 3 17:25:43 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id RAA08433; Wed, 3 May 2000 17:25:42 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from ns2.tudelft.nl (ns2.tudelft.nl [130.161.180.65]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id RAA21174 for ; Wed, 3 May 2000 17:25:41 +0200 (METDST) Received: from mail2.digital.com (mail2.digital.com [204.123.2.56]) by mailhost1.tudelft.nl (PMDF V5.2-32 #42432) with ESMTP id <0FTZ000XKPIRIB@mailhost1.tudelft.nl> for J.A.K.Mouw@its.tudelft.nl; Wed, 3 May 2000 17:25:40 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id IAA28245; Wed, 03 May 2000 08:20:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA13385; Wed, 03 May 2000 08:20:07 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id IAA28278; Wed, 03 May 2000 08:18:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id IAA29297; Wed, 03 May 2000 08:18:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail2.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA11894; Wed, 03 May 2000 08:18:56 -0700 Received: from xanadu.vipswitch.com (generic199.197.205.205.in-addr.arpa [205.205.197.199] (may be forged)) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with ESMTP id IAA27715 for ; Wed, 03 May 2000 08:18:55 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 03 May 2000 11:10:36 -0400 (EDT) From: Nicolas Pitre Subject: Re: diff-2.3.99-pre6-rmk1-np1 In-reply-to: <200005030947.LAA06209@duteinh.et.tudelft.nl> Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com To: Erik Mouw Cc: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Message-id: MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Precedence: bulk On Wed, 3 May -1, Erik Mouw wrote: > > It is a hardware quite similar to LART, and I compiled the kernel with LART > > configuration and some modification to the code. The board I used has 2 banks of > > DRAM each has 16 MB (starting at 0xc000000, and 0xc8000000). And use UART3 as > > the serail console. Other GPIO pins are used to implement the parallel > > interface. > > OK, that's more evidence that the discontiguous memory support is broken. The discontigous memory support is used by the above configuration as well. > Here is the LART memory layout: > > - 0xc0000000-0xc07fffff > - 0xc1000000-0xc17fffff > - 0xc8000000-0xc87fffff > - 0xc9000000-0xc97fffff > > So that's two logical banks in each physical bank. I'll disable the memory > at 0xc1000000 and 0xc9000000 to see what happens. Or, in arch/arm/mm/init.c, try commenting out the call to create_memmap_holes() instead. Only LART is using it in the discontigous memory case at the moment... and I may have screwed it up. Also please try booting with printk()'s messages sent out by printascii(). The boot sequence may have gone far but not to the point where the real printk() is initialized. In linux/kernel/printk.c, you'll find the following code segment: if (msg_level < console_loglevel && console_drivers) { struct console *c = console_drivers; while(c) { if ((c->flags & CON_ENABLED) && c->write) c->write(c, msg, p - msg + line_feed); c = c->next; } } Just before that segment, add this: printascii(msg); and tell me the result. Nicolas From kramer@pa.dec.com Wed May 3 17:36:45 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id RAA08520; Wed, 3 May 2000 17:36:45 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from ns2.tudelft.nl (ns2.tudelft.nl [130.161.180.65]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id RAA21560 for ; Wed, 3 May 2000 17:36:44 +0200 (METDST) Received: from mail1.digital.com (mail1.digital.com [204.123.2.50]) by mailhost1.tudelft.nl (PMDF V5.2-32 #42432) with ESMTP id <0FTZ0000WQ16XH@mailhost1.tudelft.nl> for J.A.K.Mouw@its.tudelft.nl; Wed, 3 May 2000 17:36:43 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id IAA23665; Wed, 03 May 2000 08:31:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA00766; Wed, 03 May 2000 08:31:38 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id IAA08643; Wed, 03 May 2000 08:31:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id IAA30419; Wed, 03 May 2000 08:31:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail1.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA13137; Wed, 03 May 2000 08:31:27 -0700 Received: from duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (duteinh.et.tudelft.nl [130.161.42.1]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with ESMTP id IAA31645 for ; Wed, 03 May 2000 08:31:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: from dutein71 by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id RAA08459; Wed, 03 May 2000 17:30:09 +0200 (MET DST) Date: Wed May 03 17:30:08 +0200 (MDT) 2000 From: Erik Mouw X-Face: "!Z|1XjFg!3Iw)BwM^M\k)J5KHiPddz}#/Zw%?$&Q!xqob"OA|})3_@&BTTiQERo?/^g[Z<9P4R8:5C:aqq.cw!hotLc=+u-"+1rq@9$V^8PbOUlodyi_sejt+D`iqkLpx$>.aXl%vnfPIt"LK|/%>94_Zrm8jy?`_[RKt'TuoxUxfk(gMhY(n|DBBl~c$dhO>G%6}R4+DGX3|idBm4oU&UM/XUP4I9aoN{]`ax%B?rgD(I3OJ<62Y6L Subject: Clock scaling patch Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com To: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com, lart@lart.tudelft.nl Message-id: <200005031530.RAA08459@duteinh.et.tudelft.nl> Organization: Eric conspiracy secret labs MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: XCmail 1.0.1 - with PGP support, PGP engine version 0.5 (IRIX) Content-type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-transfer-encoding: 8bit Precedence: bulk X-Loop: erik@it.et.tudelft.nl X-Mailerorigin: http://www.fsai.fh-trier.de/~schmitzj/Xclasses/XCmail/ X-Eric-Conspiracy: There is no conspiracy! Hi all, I just released the clock scaling patch for the SA-1100 CPU. It works perfectly well on the LART, but it should work on any SA-1100 platform that uses 50ns EDO DRAM. I'm going to make it more generic, so it will run on other SA-1100 platforms as well. Have a look at: http://www.lart.tudelft.nl/lartware/port/ The C file contains lots of documentation about how it works. Enjoy, Erik PS: I take a couple of days of, I'll be back in the office at monday. Maybe I read my email, maybe not. -- J.A.K. (Erik) Mouw, Information and Communication Theory Group, Department of Electrical Engineering, Faculty of Information Technology and Systems, Delft University of Technology, PO BOX 5031, 2600 GA Delft, The Netherlands Phone: +31-15-2783635 Fax: +31-15-2781843 Email: J.A.K.Mouw@its.tudelft.nl WWW: http://www-ict.its.tudelft.nl/~erik/ From kramer@pa.dec.com Wed May 3 22:13:42 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id WAA09995; Wed, 3 May 2000 22:13:41 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from ns2.tudelft.nl (ns2.tudelft.nl [130.161.180.65]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id WAA27814 for ; Wed, 3 May 2000 22:13:40 +0200 (METDST) Received: from mail2.digital.com (mail2.digital.com [204.123.2.56]) by mailhost1.tudelft.nl (PMDF V5.2-32 #42432) with ESMTP id <0FU000E2K2UQLX@mailhost1.tudelft.nl> for J.A.K.Mouw@its.tudelft.nl; Wed, 3 May 2000 22:13:39 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id NAA18577; Wed, 03 May 2000 13:08:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA16940; Wed, 03 May 2000 13:08:14 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id NAA12754; Wed, 03 May 2000 13:07:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id NAA30104; Wed, 03 May 2000 13:07:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail1.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA17618; Wed, 03 May 2000 13:07:05 -0700 Received: from thebrain.trakonic.com (thebrain.trakonic.com [24.222.63.8]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with ESMTP id NAA20153 for ; Wed, 03 May 2000 13:07:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: from Moe (192.168.10.43) by thebrain.trakonic.com (Worldmail 1.3.167) for sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com; Wed, 03 May 2000 17:07:24 -0300 Date: Wed, 03 May 2000 17:05:25 -0300 From: "J.R. MacArthur" Subject: Realtime/SA1110 Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com To: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Message-id: <005901bfb53a$ec151b00$2b0aa8c0@trakonic.com> MIME-version: 1.0 X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2615.200 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2615.200 Content-type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-priority: Normal Precedence: bulk We are currently working on a port to the SA1110, are there any SA1100 Real Time patches out there that we could apply to our SA1110 kernel? ================================================= J.R. MacArthur Electrical Technologist Trakonic (www.trakonic.com) From kramer@pa.dec.com Wed May 3 22:37:21 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id WAA10096; Wed, 3 May 2000 22:37:21 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from ns2.tudelft.nl (ns2.tudelft.nl [130.161.180.65]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id WAA28326 for ; Wed, 3 May 2000 22:37:20 +0200 (METDST) Received: from mail2.digital.com (mail2.digital.com [204.123.2.56]) by mailhost1.tudelft.nl (PMDF V5.2-32 #42432) with ESMTP id <0FU000F863Y6JZ@mailhost1.tudelft.nl> for J.A.K.Mouw@its.tudelft.nl; Wed, 3 May 2000 22:37:19 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id NAA20931; Wed, 03 May 2000 13:32:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA05522; Wed, 03 May 2000 13:32:14 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id NAA10638; Wed, 03 May 2000 13:32:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id NAA17990; Wed, 03 May 2000 13:32:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail2.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA10520; Wed, 03 May 2000 13:32:02 -0700 Received: from xanadu.vipswitch.com (generic199.197.205.205.in-addr.arpa [205.205.197.199] (may be forged)) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with ESMTP id NAA21012 for ; Wed, 03 May 2000 13:32:01 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 03 May 2000 16:29:30 -0400 (EDT) From: Nicolas Pitre Subject: Re: Realtime/SA1110 In-reply-to: <005901bfb53a$ec151b00$2b0aa8c0@trakonic.com> Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com To: "J.R. MacArthur" Cc: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Message-id: MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Precedence: bulk On Wed, 3 May 2000, J.R. MacArthur wrote: > We are currently working on a port to the SA1110, are there any SA1100 Real > Time patches out there that we could apply to our SA1110 kernel? Not that I know of. Nicolas From kramer@pa.dec.com Thu May 4 11:01:34 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id LAA13034; Thu, 4 May 2000 11:01:33 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from ns2.tudelft.nl (ns2.tudelft.nl [130.161.180.65]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id LAA09601 for ; Thu, 4 May 2000 11:01:32 +0200 (METDST) Received: from mail2.digital.com (mail2.digital.com [204.123.2.56]) by mailhost1.tudelft.nl (PMDF V5.2-32 #42432) with ESMTP id <0FU100E772EIA0@mailhost1.tudelft.nl> for J.A.K.Mouw@its.tudelft.nl; Thu, 4 May 2000 11:01:31 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id BAA07596; Thu, 04 May 2000 01:55:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA00563; Thu, 04 May 2000 01:55:17 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id BAA14719; Thu, 04 May 2000 01:50:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id BAA31579; Thu, 04 May 2000 01:50:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail2.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA29327; Thu, 04 May 2000 01:49:40 -0700 Received: from krdl.org.sg (rodin.krdl.org.sg [192.122.139.27]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with ESMTP id BAA07139 for ; Thu, 04 May 2000 01:49:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mailhost.krdl.org.sg (mailhost [192.122.134.30]) by krdl.org.sg (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id QAA11478; Thu, 04 May 2000 16:50:43 +0800 Received: from krdl.org.sg (QUNYING.krdl.org.sg [192.168.136.36]) by mailhost.krdl.org.sg (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id QAA12604; Thu, 04 May 2000 16:42:07 +0800 (SGT) Date: Thu, 04 May 2000 16:42:56 +0800 From: zhu qun ying Subject: char array, int pointer and cross boundary access Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com To: arm , sa1100 , lart Message-id: <39113810.C4AA5C46@krdl.org.sg> Organization: KRDL MIME-version: 1.0 X-MIME-Autoconverted: from 8bit to quoted-printable by mail2.digital.com id BAA07139 X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.72 [en] (WinNT; U) Content-type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-transfer-encoding: quoted-printable Precedence: bulk X-Accept-Language: en Hi, While trying to figure out how StrongARM behave on cross boundary access,= I encounter the following error ( I have the kernel-mode alignment trap han= dler on and off with the same result). For comparisom, I have the same program co= mpile at x86 platform. The arm result is very strange. The behavior is realy unacceptable. It sh= ould either return run time error or some software emulation should return the correct result? I am using kernel 2.3.99-pre6-rmk1-np1. The kernel-mode alignment trap handler suppose to be able to catch this and return the co= rrect result, but it has no effect for this case. A kernel problem? A GCC problem? Any hints? =3D=3D=3D=3D x86 kk's starting address: 0x0xbffff86c i's address for kk + 0: 0x0xbffff86c 3 5 6 t i's address for kk + 1: 0x0xbffff86d 5 6 t g i's address for kk + 2: 0x0xbffff86e 6 t g h i's address for kk + 3: 0x0xbffff86f t g h n i's address for kk + 4: 0x0xbffff870 g h n o i's address for kk + 5: 0x0xbffff871 h n o r i's address for kk + 6: 0x0xbffff872 n o r q i's address for kk + 7: 0x0xbffff873 o r q i i's address for kk + 8: 0x0xbffff874 r q i p =3D=3D=3D SA1100 kk's starting address: 0x0xbffffd8c i's address for kk + 0: 0x0xbffffd8c 3 5 6 t i's address for kk + 1: 0x0xbffffd8d 5 6 t 3 i's address for kk + 2: 0x0xbffffd8e 6 t 3 5 i's address for kk + 3: 0x0xbffffd8f t 3 5 6 i's address for kk + 4: 0x0xbffffd90 g h n o i's address for kk + 5: 0x0xbffffd91 h n o g i's address for kk + 6: 0x0xbffffd92 n o g h i's address for kk + 7: 0x0xbffffd93 o g h n i's address for kk + 8: 0x0xbffffd94 r q i p The source code for this program: =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D #include int main(void) { char kk[12] =3D {'3', '5', '6', 't', 'g', 'h', 'n', 'o', 'r', 'q', 'i', 'p'}; int *i; int y, j; =20 printf("kk's starting address: 0x%p\n", kk); for (j =3D 0; j < 9; ++j) { i =3D (int *)(kk + j); printf("i's address for kk + %d: 0x%p %c %c %c %c\n", j, i, (*i) & 0xFF, ((*i) >> 8) & 0xff, ((*i)>>16)&0xff, ((*i)>>24) & 0xff); } return 0; } =20 --=20 (~._.~) =D6=EC =C8=BA =D3=A2 (Qun Ying) (65) 874-6743 ( O ) Kent Ridge Digital Labs (KRDL) ()~*~() 21 Heng Mui Keng Terrace, Singapore 119613 (_)-(_) qyzhu@krdl.org.sg * zhuqy@hotmail.com From kramer@pa.dec.com Thu May 4 19:13:18 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id TAA16733; Thu, 4 May 2000 19:13:18 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from ns2.tudelft.nl (ns2.tudelft.nl [130.161.180.65]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id TAA29272 for ; Thu, 4 May 2000 19:13:16 +0200 (METDST) Received: from mail2.digital.com (mail2.digital.com [204.123.2.56]) by mailhost1.tudelft.nl (PMDF V5.2-32 #42432) with ESMTP id <0FU1007LJP622B@mailhost1.tudelft.nl> for J.A.K.Mouw@its.tudelft.nl; Thu, 4 May 2000 19:13:15 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id KAA29571; Thu, 04 May 2000 10:07:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA22492; Thu, 04 May 2000 10:07:34 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id KAA17270; Thu, 04 May 2000 10:06:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id KAA03255; Thu, 04 May 2000 10:06:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail2.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA16750; Thu, 04 May 2000 10:06:02 -0700 Received: from salisbury.labs.futuretv.com (salisbury.futuretv.com [194.216.164.17]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with ESMTP id KAA29941 for ; Thu, 04 May 2000 10:06:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: from zebra.labs.futuretv.com ([192.168.32.2] ident=mail) by salisbury.labs.futuretv.com with esmtp (Exim 3.03 #1) id 12nQ9F-0005As-00 for sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com; Thu, 04 May 2000 18:14:53 +0000 Received: from [192.168.33.3] (helo=fountain.labs.futuretv.com ident=mail) by zebra.labs.futuretv.com with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1) id 12nP4Z-0000Aq-00; Thu, 04 May 2000 18:05:59 +0100 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=fountain.labs.futuretv.com ident=pb) by fountain.labs.futuretv.com with esmtp (Exim 3.03 #1) id 12nP4Y-0004N5-00; Thu, 04 May 2000 18:05:58 +0100 Date: Thu, 04 May 2000 18:05:58 +0100 From: Philip Blundell Subject: Re: char array, int pointer and cross boundary access In-reply-to: Message from zhu qun ying "of Thu, 04 May 2000 16:42:56 +0800." <39113810.C4AA5C46@krdl.org.sg> Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com To: zhu qun ying Cc: arm , sa1100 , lart Message-id: MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: exmh version 2.0.2 2/24/98 (debian) Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Precedence: bulk References: <39113810.C4AA5C46@krdl.org.sg> In message <39113810.C4AA5C46@krdl.org.sg>, zhu qun ying writes: >The arm result is very strange. The behavior is realy unacceptable. >It should either return run time error or some software emulation should >return the correct result? No, your program is in error. You can't cast a pointer of arbitrary alignment to some other type and expect it to work. If you play these sorts of games you need to know the limitations of the machine. >The kernel-mode alignment trap handler suppose to be able to catch this >and return the correct result, Only for code inside the kernel. If your program is in user context the trap handler will have no effect. p. From kramer@pa.dec.com Thu May 4 20:17:17 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id UAA17138; Thu, 4 May 2000 20:17:17 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from ns2.tudelft.nl (ns2.tudelft.nl [130.161.180.65]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id UAA01005 for ; Thu, 4 May 2000 20:17:15 +0200 (METDST) Received: from mail1.digital.com (mail1.digital.com [204.123.2.50]) by mailhost1.tudelft.nl (PMDF V5.2-32 #42432) with ESMTP id <0FU100A41S4PFB@mailhost1.tudelft.nl> for J.A.K.Mouw@its.tudelft.nl; Thu, 4 May 2000 20:17:14 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id LAA22708; Thu, 04 May 2000 11:11:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA26696; Thu, 04 May 2000 11:11:53 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id LAA32096; Thu, 04 May 2000 11:10:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id LAA08447; Thu, 04 May 2000 11:10:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail1.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA06419; Thu, 04 May 2000 11:10:58 -0700 Received: from core.federated.com (core.federated.com [199.217.175.51]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with ESMTP id LAA14845 for ; Thu, 04 May 2000 11:10:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from jim@localhost) by core.federated.com (8.9.3/8.9.3/Debian 8.9.3-6) id NAA26296; Thu, 04 May 2000 13:09:49 -0500 Date: Thu, 04 May 2000 13:09:49 -0500 (CDT) From: Jim Studt Subject: Re: char array, int pointer and cross boundary access In-reply-to: <39113810.C4AA5C46@krdl.org.sg> Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com To: zhu qun ying Cc: arm , sa1100 , lart Message-id: <200005041809.NAA26296@core.federated.com> MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL66 (25)] Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk Qun Ying wrote: > While trying to figure out how StrongARM behave on cross boundary access, I > encounter the following error ( I have the kernel-mode alignment trap handler on > and off with the same result). For comparisom, I have the same program compile > at x86 platform. > > The arm result is very strange. The behavior is realy unacceptable. It should > either return run time error or some software emulation should return the > correct result? I am using kernel 2.3.99-pre6-rmk1-np1. The kernel-mode > alignment trap handler suppose to be able to catch this and return the correct > result, but it has no effect for this case. > > A kernel problem? A GCC problem? Any hints? This is just the way ARMs work. Consult the documentation of the LDR instruction on page 36 (paper) 40 (PDF) of http://www.arm.com/Documentation/UserMans/PDF/ARM7vC.pdf It has a pretty diagram on the next couple of pages. In short you aren't allowed to read misaligned words, but if you do it has some useful quirks that might be helpful for unscrambling data. -- Jim Studt, President The Federated Software Group, Inc. From kramer@pa.dec.com Thu May 4 22:22:32 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id WAA17918; Thu, 4 May 2000 22:22:32 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from ns2.tudelft.nl (ns2.tudelft.nl [130.161.180.65]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id WAA03836 for ; Thu, 4 May 2000 22:22:29 +0200 (METDST) Received: from mail2.digital.com (mail2.digital.com [204.123.2.56]) by mailhost1.tudelft.nl (PMDF V5.2-32 #42432) with ESMTP id <0FU100F6KXXE6B@mailhost1.tudelft.nl> for J.A.K.Mouw@its.tudelft.nl; Thu, 4 May 2000 22:22:27 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id NAA20569; Thu, 04 May 2000 13:17:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA03799; Thu, 04 May 2000 13:17:18 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id NAA30259; Thu, 04 May 2000 13:16:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id NAA29484; Thu, 04 May 2000 13:16:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail1.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA12277; Thu, 04 May 2000 13:16:22 -0700 Received: from ADSServer.flatpanels.com (flatpanels.com [207.196.69.66] (may be forged)) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with ESMTP id NAA03770 for ; Thu, 04 May 2000 13:16:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: by flatpanels.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21) id ; Thu, 04 May 2000 16:10:23 -0400 Date: Thu, 04 May 2000 16:10:18 -0400 From: "Huh, Woojung" Subject: I'm sorry Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com To: "'Sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com'" Message-id: <91B07CA588CED3118CFE00105AC97594026EC4@flatpanels.com> MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21) Content-type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Precedence: bulk I'm sorry but can I ask how to join this mailing list ? From kramer@pa.dec.com Fri May 5 02:31:33 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id CAA19452; Fri, 5 May 2000 02:31:33 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from ns2.tudelft.nl (ns2.tudelft.nl [130.161.180.65]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id CAA08388 for ; Fri, 5 May 2000 02:31:32 +0200 (METDST) Received: from mail1.digital.com (mail1.digital.com [204.123.2.50]) by mailhost1.tudelft.nl (PMDF V5.2-32 #42432) with ESMTP id <0FU200MB79GHCK@mailhost1.tudelft.nl> for J.A.K.Mouw@its.tudelft.nl; Fri, 5 May 2000 02:31:31 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id RAA00636; Thu, 04 May 2000 17:25:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA11234; Thu, 04 May 2000 17:24:53 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id RAA29208; Thu, 04 May 2000 17:23:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id RAA01521; Thu, 04 May 2000 17:23:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail2.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA25406; Thu, 04 May 2000 17:22:32 -0700 Received: from krdl.org.sg (rodin.krdl.org.sg [192.122.139.27]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with ESMTP id RAA14416 for ; Thu, 04 May 2000 17:22:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mailhost.krdl.org.sg (mailhost [192.122.134.30]) by krdl.org.sg (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id IAA05020; Fri, 05 May 2000 08:24:46 +0800 Received: from krdl.org.sg (QUNYING.krdl.org.sg [192.168.136.36]) by mailhost.krdl.org.sg (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id IAA01941; Fri, 05 May 2000 08:16:11 +0800 (SGT) Date: Fri, 05 May 2000 08:17:04 +0800 From: zhu qun ying Subject: Re: char array, int pointer and cross boundary access Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com To: Jim Studt Cc: arm , sa1100 , lart , Philip Blundell Message-id: <39121300.90E714EC@krdl.org.sg> Organization: KRDL MIME-version: 1.0 X-MIME-Autoconverted: from 8bit to quoted-printable by mail2.digital.com id RAA14416 X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.72 [en] (WinNT; U) Content-type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-transfer-encoding: quoted-printable Precedence: bulk X-Accept-Language: en References: <200005041809.NAA26296@core.federated.com> I know the limit of ARM, and I know that I can't cast arbitrary alignment= to some other type. I want to know why the kernel allow this operation inste= ad of issuing run time error, like illeagl operation/access, or emulating the behaviour using software. I used to port some program over to WINCE, and = that is a horrible experience, that kind of operation causes runtime error. Any advantage that allow this kind of operation? --=20 (~._.~) =D6=EC =C8=BA =D3=A2 (Qun Ying) (65) 874-6743 ( O ) Kent Ridge Digital Labs (KRDL) ()~*~() 21 Heng Mui Keng Terrace, Singapore 119613 (_)-(_) qyzhu@krdl.org.sg * zhuqy@hotmail.com From kramer@pa.dec.com Fri May 5 03:16:28 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id DAA19731; Fri, 5 May 2000 03:16:28 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from ns2.tudelft.nl (ns2.tudelft.nl [130.161.180.65]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id DAA08919 for ; Fri, 5 May 2000 03:16:27 +0200 (METDST) Received: from mail2.digital.com (mail2.digital.com [204.123.2.56]) by mailhost1.tudelft.nl (PMDF V5.2-32 #42432) with ESMTP id <0FU20007FBJC5K@mailhost1.tudelft.nl> for J.A.K.Mouw@its.tudelft.nl; Fri, 5 May 2000 03:16:25 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id SAA18080; Thu, 04 May 2000 18:11:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA06730; Thu, 04 May 2000 18:11:16 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id SAA07546; Thu, 04 May 2000 18:10:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id SAA07423; Thu, 04 May 2000 18:10:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail1.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA16356; Thu, 04 May 2000 18:10:55 -0700 Received: from xanadu.gn.com (modemcable248.137-200-24.mtl.mc.videotron.net [24.200.137.248]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with ESMTP id SAA14048 for ; Thu, 04 May 2000 18:10:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (nico@localhost) by xanadu.gn.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id VAA00382; Thu, 04 May 2000 21:10:05 -0400 Date: Thu, 04 May 2000 21:10:05 -0400 (EDT) From: Nicolas Pitre Subject: Re: char array, int pointer and cross boundary access In-reply-to: <39121300.90E714EC@krdl.org.sg> Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com X-Sender: nico@xanadu.gn.com To: zhu qun ying Cc: Jim Studt , arm , sa1100 , lart , Philip Blundell Message-id: MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Precedence: bulk X-Authentication-warning: xanadu.gn.com: nico owned process doing -bs On Fri, 5 May 2000, zhu qun ying wrote: > I know the limit of ARM, and I know that I can't cast arbitrary alignment to > some other type. I want to know why the kernel allow this operation instead of > issuing run time error, like illeagl operation/access, or emulating the > behaviour using software. I used to port some program over to WINCE, and that is > a horrible experience, that kind of operation causes runtime error. Any > advantage that allow this kind of operation? If you look at linux/arch/arm/mm/fault-armv.c, line 134, you'll see the do_alignment() function. Few lines further you'll see: if (user_mode(regs)) { set_cr(cr_no_alignment); ai_user += 1; return 0; } This disables the alignment trap for user space code. See the documentation for the expected results... If you want the alignment trap handler to work on user space code as well as kernel code, just modify the above so it looks like: if (user_mode(regs)) { ai_user += 1; } Alternately, if you want to fix broken user space programs and kill them whenever a misaligned access occur, just use: if (user_mode(regs)) { ai_user += 1; return 1; } The above is based on linux-2.3.99-pre6-rmk1. Nicolas From kramer@pa.dec.com Fri May 5 10:07:31 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id KAA21968; Fri, 5 May 2000 10:07:30 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from ns2.tudelft.nl (ns2.tudelft.nl [130.161.180.65]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id KAA13910 for ; Fri, 5 May 2000 10:07:29 +0200 (METDST) Received: from mail2.digital.com (mail2.digital.com [204.123.2.56]) by mailhost1.tudelft.nl (PMDF V5.2-32 #42432) with ESMTP id <0FU2006BQUKENM@mailhost1.tudelft.nl> for J.A.K.Mouw@its.tudelft.nl; Fri, 5 May 2000 10:07:28 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id BAA13521; Fri, 05 May 2000 01:00:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA28291; Fri, 05 May 2000 00:58:06 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id AAA11877; Fri, 05 May 2000 00:53:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id AAA10965; Fri, 05 May 2000 00:53:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail2.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA12845; Fri, 05 May 2000 00:52:32 -0700 Received: from caramon.arm.linux.org.uk (p45-magpie-gui.tch.enablis.net [194.168.180.45]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with ESMTP id AAA12232 for ; Fri, 05 May 2000 00:52:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: from flint.arm.linux.org.uk (root@flint [192.168.0.4]) by caramon.arm.linux.org.uk (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id IAA31436; Fri, 05 May 2000 08:34:59 +0100 Received: (from linux@localhost) by flint.arm.linux.org.uk (8.9.3/8.9.3) id IAA24826; Fri, 05 May 2000 08:28:42 +0100 Date: Fri, 05 May 2000 08:28:41 +0100 (BST) From: Russell King - ARM Linux Admin Subject: Re: char array, int pointer and cross boundary access In-reply-to: <39121300.90E714EC@krdl.org.sg> Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com To: qyzhu@krdl.org.sg (zhu qun ying) Cc: jim@federated.com (Jim Studt), linux-arm-kernel@lists.arm.linux.org.uk (arm), sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com (sa1100), lart@lart.tudelft.nl (lart), pb@labs.futuretv.com (Philip Blundell) Message-id: <200005050728.IAA24826@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL1] Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk zhu qun ying writes: > I know the limit of ARM, and I know that I can't cast arbitrary alignment to > some other type. I want to know why the kernel allow this operation instead of > issuing run time error, like illeagl operation/access, or emulating the > behaviour using software. I used to port some program over to WINCE, and that is > a horrible experience, that kind of operation causes runtime error. Any > advantage that allow this kind of operation? For the past 13 years that the ARM architecture has been around, the behaviour of unaligned loads is something that was 100% defined to happen, and that the compiler can rely on to optimise its code. If you start causing user-mode runtime errors for these cases, then you will effectively prevent any program which has not been compiled with the appropriate flags to fail in perhaps undetectable ways (eg, if you compile up a program with a compiler that does not generate half-word instructions). There are a fair number of machines out there that use the StrongARM, but are not able to use the half-word instructions, or don't use the StrongARM at all that would be adversely affected by this. Basically to maintain consistent behaviour across all current machines, we ignore user-mode unaligned accesses. It's just not worth the hastle. Make sure your programs follow the appropriate C standards, and you won't have a problem. _____ |_____| ------------------------------------------------- ---+---+- | | Russell King linux@arm.linux.org.uk --- --- | | | | http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/ / / | | +-+-+ --- -+- / | THE developer of ARM Linux |+| /|\ / | | | --- | +-+-+ ------------------------------------------------- /\\\ | From kramer@pa.dec.com Fri May 5 10:07:34 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id KAA21972; Fri, 5 May 2000 10:07:34 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from ns2.tudelft.nl (ns2.tudelft.nl [130.161.180.65]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id KAA13914 for ; Fri, 5 May 2000 10:07:32 +0200 (METDST) Received: from mail2.digital.com (mail2.digital.com [204.123.2.56]) by mailhost1.tudelft.nl (PMDF V5.2-32 #42432) with ESMTP id <0FU2006KCUKIUE@mailhost1.tudelft.nl> for J.A.K.Mouw@its.tudelft.nl; Fri, 5 May 2000 10:07:31 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id BAA13349; Fri, 05 May 2000 01:00:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA25864; Fri, 05 May 2000 00:58:06 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id AAA07834; Fri, 05 May 2000 00:53:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id AAA24955; Fri, 05 May 2000 00:53:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail2.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA08630; Fri, 05 May 2000 00:53:03 -0700 Received: from caramon.arm.linux.org.uk (p45-magpie-gui.tch.enablis.net [194.168.180.45]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with ESMTP id AAA13123 for ; Fri, 05 May 2000 00:53:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: from flint.arm.linux.org.uk (root@flint [192.168.0.4]) by caramon.arm.linux.org.uk (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id IAA31450; Fri, 05 May 2000 08:37:11 +0100 Received: (from linux@localhost) by flint.arm.linux.org.uk (8.9.3/8.9.3) id IAA24847; Fri, 05 May 2000 08:30:53 +0100 Date: Fri, 05 May 2000 08:30:53 +0100 (BST) From: Russell King - ARM Linux Admin Subject: Re: char array, int pointer and cross boundary access In-reply-to: Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com To: nico@CAM.ORG (Nicolas Pitre) Cc: qyzhu@krdl.org.sg (zhu qun ying), jim@federated.com (Jim Studt), linux-arm-kernel@lists.arm.linux.org.uk (arm), sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com (sa1100), lart@lart.tudelft.nl (lart), pb@labs.futuretv.com (Philip Blundell) Message-id: <200005050730.IAA24847@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL1] Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk Nicolas Pitre writes: > If you want the alignment trap handler to work on user space code as well > as kernel code, just modify the above so it looks like: > > if (user_mode(regs)) { > ai_user += 1; > } Either case is not good. (see previous mails). It's best left as-is and the program must follow the C alignment rules to have expected behaviour. _____ |_____| ------------------------------------------------- ---+---+- | | Russell King linux@arm.linux.org.uk --- --- | | | | http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/ / / | | +-+-+ --- -+- / | THE developer of ARM Linux |+| /|\ / | | | --- | +-+-+ ------------------------------------------------- /\\\ | From kramer@pa.dec.com Fri May 5 12:15:45 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id MAA22747; Fri, 5 May 2000 12:15:44 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from ns2.tudelft.nl (ns2.tudelft.nl [130.161.180.65]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id MAA16057 for ; Fri, 5 May 2000 12:15:42 +0200 (METDST) Received: from mail2.digital.com (mail2.digital.com [204.123.2.56]) by mailhost1.tudelft.nl (PMDF V5.2-32 #42432) with ESMTP id <0FU300BMU0I3H2@mailhost1.tudelft.nl> for J.A.K.Mouw@its.tudelft.nl; Fri, 5 May 2000 12:15:40 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id DAA21247; Fri, 05 May 2000 03:10:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA10261; Fri, 05 May 2000 03:10:19 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id DAA13340; Fri, 05 May 2000 03:10:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id DAA28891; Fri, 05 May 2000 03:10:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail2.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA22290; Fri, 05 May 2000 03:10:01 -0700 Received: from br4.qld-remote.bigpond.net.au (br4.qld-remote.bigpond.net.au [24.192.64.19]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with ESMTP id DAA20323 for ; Fri, 05 May 2000 03:10:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: from onthenet.com.au (CPE-24-192-86-254.qld.bigpond.net.au [24.192.86.254]) by br4.qld-remote.bigpond.net.au (8.8.6 (PHNE_14041)/8.8.6) with SMTP id UAA03202; Fri, 05 May 2000 20:06:22 +1000 (EST) Date: Fri, 05 May 2000 20:06:02 +1000 From: David Bath Subject: Re: char array, int pointer and cross boundary access Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com To: Russell King - ARM Linux Admin Cc: Nicolas Pitre , zhu qun ying , Jim Studt , arm , sa1100 , lart , Philip Blundell Message-id: <39129D0A.7769C59C@onthenet.com.au> MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.72 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.2.14-15mdk i586) Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk X-Accept-Language: en References: <200005050730.IAA24847@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> Russell King - ARM Linux Admin wrote: > Nicolas Pitre writes: > > If you want the alignment trap handler to work on user space code as well > > as kernel code, just modify the above so it looks like: > > > > if (user_mode(regs)) { > > ai_user += 1; > > } > > Either case is not good. (see previous mails). It's best left as-is and > the program must follow the C alignment rules to have expected behaviour. While I agree with your "if it hurts don't do it" policy, life is all too often about porting existing old code rather than writing new code, and old code from x86 and 68K worlds has definitely been known to be sloppy in this area. It seems there are two classes of programs, those that have been optimised by the ARM compiler to take advantage of this well defined behaviour and don't want exceptions or fixups, and those sloppy programs being ported from other platforms that expect more "traditional" behaviour, and desperately need exceptions or fixups. I would imagine debugging the latter on an ARM/Linux platform that produces no exception would be very unpleasant. How feasible would it be to make this run-time configurable, on a per-process basis (perhaps by use of the /proc filesystem) ? dB. From kramer@pa.dec.com Fri May 5 12:15:40 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id MAA22743; Fri, 5 May 2000 12:15:40 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from ns2.tudelft.nl (ns2.tudelft.nl [130.161.180.65]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id MAA16050 for ; Fri, 5 May 2000 12:15:38 +0200 (METDST) Received: from mail2.digital.com (mail2.digital.com [204.123.2.56]) by mailhost1.tudelft.nl (PMDF V5.2-32 #42432) with ESMTP id <0FU300C700I04B@mailhost1.tudelft.nl> for J.A.K.Mouw@its.tudelft.nl; Fri, 5 May 2000 12:15:37 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id DAA21117; Fri, 05 May 2000 03:10:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA16292; Fri, 05 May 2000 03:10:19 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id DAA00927; Fri, 05 May 2000 03:07:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id DAA17075; Fri, 05 May 2000 03:07:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail2.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA05650; Fri, 05 May 2000 03:07:49 -0700 Received: from mail.linuxgrrls.org ([62.6.164.226]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with ESMTP id DAA20953 for ; Fri, 05 May 2000 03:07:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.linuxgrrls.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A0E6374954; Fri, 05 May 2000 11:07:29 +0100 (BST) Date: Fri, 05 May 2000 11:07:29 +0100 (BST) From: Kira Brown Subject: Re: char array, int pointer and cross boundary access In-reply-to: <200005050728.IAA24826@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com To: Russell King - ARM Linux Admin Cc: zhu qun ying , Jim Studt , arm , sa1100 , lart , Philip Blundell Message-id: MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Precedence: bulk On Fri, 5 May 2000, Russell King - ARM Linux Admin wrote: > There are a fair number of machines out there that use the StrongARM, but > are not able to use the half-word instructions, or don't use the StrongARM > at all that would be adversely affected by this. The only ones I know of are the Medusa architecture machines; is it really worth worrying about them? They're obsolete and becoming increasingly rare. kira. From kramer@pa.dec.com Fri May 5 16:35:56 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id QAA24280; Fri, 5 May 2000 16:35:55 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from ns2.tudelft.nl (ns2.tudelft.nl [130.161.180.65]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id QAA20826 for ; Fri, 5 May 2000 16:35:49 +0200 (METDST) Received: from mail2.digital.com (mail2.digital.com [204.123.2.56]) by mailhost1.tudelft.nl (PMDF V5.2-32 #42432) with ESMTP id <0FU300JE9CJMDC@mailhost1.tudelft.nl> for J.A.K.Mouw@its.tudelft.nl; Fri, 5 May 2000 16:35:47 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id HAA04873; Fri, 05 May 2000 07:30:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA26128; Fri, 05 May 2000 07:30:38 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id HAA13271; Fri, 05 May 2000 07:30:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id HAA14302; Fri, 05 May 2000 07:30:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail1.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA30086; Fri, 05 May 2000 07:30:12 -0700 Received: from caramon.arm.linux.org.uk (p31-magpie-gui.tch.enablis.net [194.168.180.31]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with ESMTP id HAA10611 for ; Fri, 05 May 2000 07:30:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: from raistlin.arm.linux.org.uk (root@raistlin [192.168.0.3]) by caramon.arm.linux.org.uk (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id NAA00777; Fri, 05 May 2000 13:10:48 +0100 Received: (from linux@localhost) by raistlin.arm.linux.org.uk (8.7.4/8.7.3) id NAA00877; Fri, 05 May 2000 13:10:11 +0100 Date: Fri, 05 May 2000 13:10:10 +0100 (BST) From: Russell King - ARM Linux Admin Subject: Re: char array, int pointer and cross boundary access In-reply-to: Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com To: kira@linuxgrrls.org (Kira Brown) Cc: qyzhu@krdl.org.sg (zhu qun ying), jim@federated.com (Jim Studt), linux-arm-kernel@lists.arm.linux.org.uk (arm), sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com (sa1100), lart@lart.tudelft.nl (lart), pb@labs.futuretv.com (Philip Blundell) Message-id: <200005051210.NAA00877@raistlin.arm.linux.org.uk> MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL1] Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk Kira Brown writes: > On Fri, 5 May 2000, Russell King - ARM Linux Admin wrote: > > There are a fair number of machines out there that use the StrongARM, but > > are not able to use the half-word instructions, or don't use the StrongARM > > at all that would be adversely affected by this. > > The only ones I know of are the Medusa architecture machines; is it really > worth worrying about them? They're obsolete and becoming increasingly > rare. Try any ARM based machine which does not support V4 architecture - ie, ARM6 cores and some, if not most ARM7 cores. It's far wider than just Medusa. _____ |_____| ------------------------------------------------- ---+---+- | | Russell King linux@arm.linux.org.uk --- --- | | | | http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/ / / | | +-+-+ --- -+- / | THE developer of ARM Linux |+| /|\ / | | | --- | +-+-+ ------------------------------------------------- /\\\ | From kramer@pa.dec.com Fri May 5 16:36:22 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id QAA24288; Fri, 5 May 2000 16:36:22 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from ns2.tudelft.nl (ns2.tudelft.nl [130.161.180.65]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id QAA20853 for ; Fri, 5 May 2000 16:36:20 +0200 (METDST) Received: from mail2.digital.com (mail2.digital.com [204.123.2.56]) by mailhost1.tudelft.nl (PMDF V5.2-32 #42432) with ESMTP id <0FU300JELCKIDC@mailhost1.tudelft.nl> for J.A.K.Mouw@its.tudelft.nl; Fri, 5 May 2000 16:36:19 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id HAA04867; Fri, 05 May 2000 07:31:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA23642; Fri, 05 May 2000 07:31:14 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id HAA27696; Fri, 05 May 2000 07:31:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id HAA20817; Fri, 05 May 2000 07:31:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail1.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA25837; Fri, 05 May 2000 07:31:05 -0700 Received: from caramon.arm.linux.org.uk (p31-magpie-gui.tch.enablis.net [194.168.180.31]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with ESMTP id HAA01915 for ; Fri, 05 May 2000 07:31:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: from raistlin.arm.linux.org.uk (root@raistlin [192.168.0.3]) by caramon.arm.linux.org.uk (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id NAA00811; Fri, 05 May 2000 13:25:41 +0100 Received: (from linux@localhost) by raistlin.arm.linux.org.uk (8.7.4/8.7.3) id NAA00916; Fri, 05 May 2000 13:25:04 +0100 Date: Fri, 05 May 2000 13:25:03 +0100 (BST) From: Russell King - ARM Linux Admin Subject: Re: char array, int pointer and cross boundary access In-reply-to: <39129D0A.7769C59C@onthenet.com.au> Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com To: dbath@onthenet.com.au (David Bath) Cc: nico@CAM.ORG (Nicolas Pitre), qyzhu@krdl.org.sg (zhu qun ying), jim@federated.com (Jim Studt), linux-arm-kernel@lists.arm.linux.org.uk (arm), sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com (sa1100), lart@lart.tudelft.nl (lart), pb@labs.futuretv.com (Philip Blundell) Message-id: <200005051225.NAA00916@raistlin.arm.linux.org.uk> MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL1] Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk David Bath writes: > While I agree with your "if it hurts don't do it" policy, life is all too > often about porting existing old code rather than writing new code, and old > code from x86 and 68K worlds has definitely been known to be sloppy in this > area. I wasn't talking about an "if it hurts". It doesn't hurt - it breaks. > It seems there are two classes of programs, those that have been optimised by > the ARM compiler to take advantage of this well defined behaviour and don't > want exceptions or fixups, and those sloppy programs being ported from other > platforms that expect more "traditional" behaviour, and desperately need > exceptions or fixups. I would imagine debugging the latter on an ARM/Linux > platform that produces no exception would be very unpleasant. This is an old topic of discussion - please read the mailing list archives for the results of the previous discussions. The problem here is: 1. without the user-mode exception handler Sloppily written programs aren't flagged with an obvious warning message. Correctly written, binary compatible programs across the whole range of ARM processors will run as expected. 2. with the user-mode exception handler Sloppily written programs are flagged with a warning message. Correctly written, binary compatible programs will fail, maybe in unpredicatable ways. Ok, so you choose option 2, and suddenly your currently running processes die. That is extremely unpleasant. So, you make it per-process selectable. So long as you get the right compiler options, all well and good - you enable the user-mode alignment trap. But if you get the options wrong? You either end up with either case (1) or (2) for that particular program. Most packages are built using a standard set of options, and therefore these problems may not be detected. It depends really on the setup of the binutils, and whether binutils can be teached to "do the right thing" automagically. Really, it can't do because you've got this thing called the C library which will be an unknown quantity. No, there are just too many variables here - binutils, glibc, compiler options, hardware platform. All have to be exactly right, or else all hell can break loose. _____ |_____| ------------------------------------------------- ---+---+- | | Russell King linux@arm.linux.org.uk --- --- | | | | http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/ / / | | +-+-+ --- -+- / | THE developer of ARM Linux |+| /|\ / | | | --- | +-+-+ ------------------------------------------------- /\\\ | From kramer@pa.dec.com Fri May 5 15:54:19 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id PAA24003; Fri, 5 May 2000 15:54:18 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from ns2.tudelft.nl (ns2.tudelft.nl [130.161.180.65]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id PAA19967 for ; Fri, 5 May 2000 15:54:17 +0200 (METDST) Received: from mail1.digital.com (mail1.digital.com [204.123.2.50]) by mailhost1.tudelft.nl (PMDF V5.2-32 #42432) with ESMTP id <0FU300HPAAMEK4@mailhost1.tudelft.nl> for J.A.K.Mouw@its.tudelft.nl; Fri, 5 May 2000 15:54:15 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id GAA05802; Fri, 05 May 2000 06:48:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA10500; Fri, 05 May 2000 06:48:43 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id GAA24886; Fri, 05 May 2000 06:47:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id GAA19291; Fri, 05 May 2000 06:47:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail2.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA17674; Fri, 05 May 2000 06:47:40 -0700 Received: from xanadu.vipswitch.com (generic199.197.205.205.in-addr.arpa [205.205.197.199] (may be forged)) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with ESMTP id GAA01878 for ; Fri, 05 May 2000 06:47:39 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 05 May 2000 09:44:31 -0400 (EDT) From: Nicolas Pitre Subject: Re: char array, int pointer and cross boundary access In-reply-to: <200005050730.IAA24847@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com To: Russell King - ARM Linux Admin Cc: zhu qun ying , Jim Studt , arm , sa1100 , lart , Philip Blundell Message-id: MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Precedence: bulk On Fri, 5 May 2000, Russell King - ARM Linux Admin wrote: > Nicolas Pitre writes: > > If you want the alignment trap handler to work on user space code as well > > as kernel code, just modify the above so it looks like: > > > > if (user_mode(regs)) { > > ai_user += 1; > > } > > Either case is not good. (see previous mails). It's best left as-is and > the program must follow the C alignment rules to have expected behaviour. The idea is to debug misbehaving code. Generating a SIGBUS is really nice to quickly spot where are the alignment abuses. This is not intended for mainstream kernels. Nicolas From kramer@pa.dec.com Fri May 5 16:45:22 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id QAA24362; Fri, 5 May 2000 16:45:21 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from ns2.tudelft.nl (ns2.tudelft.nl [130.161.180.65]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id QAA21043 for ; Fri, 5 May 2000 16:45:20 +0200 (METDST) Received: from mail2.digital.com (mail2.digital.com [204.123.2.56]) by mailhost1.tudelft.nl (PMDF V5.2-32 #42432) with ESMTP id <0FU300KANCZH05@mailhost1.tudelft.nl> for J.A.K.Mouw@its.tudelft.nl; Fri, 5 May 2000 16:45:18 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id HAA06537; Fri, 05 May 2000 07:40:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA19582; Fri, 05 May 2000 07:40:13 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id HAA00061; Fri, 05 May 2000 07:40:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id HAA08368; Fri, 05 May 2000 07:40:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail2.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA17679; Fri, 05 May 2000 07:40:03 -0700 Received: from caramon.arm.linux.org.uk (p31-magpie-gui.tch.enablis.net [194.168.180.31]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with ESMTP id HAA06180 for ; Fri, 05 May 2000 07:40:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: from raistlin.arm.linux.org.uk (root@raistlin [192.168.0.3]) by caramon.arm.linux.org.uk (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id PAA01327; Fri, 05 May 2000 15:39:43 +0100 Received: (from linux@localhost) by raistlin.arm.linux.org.uk (8.7.4/8.7.3) id PAA01310; Fri, 05 May 2000 15:39:06 +0100 Date: Fri, 05 May 2000 15:39:06 +0100 (BST) From: Russell King - ARM Linux Admin Subject: Re: char array, int pointer and cross boundary access In-reply-to: Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com To: nico@CAM.ORG (Nicolas Pitre) Cc: qyzhu@krdl.org.sg (zhu qun ying), jim@federated.com (Jim Studt), linux-arm-kernel@lists.arm.linux.org.uk (arm), sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com (sa1100), lart@lart.tudelft.nl (lart), pb@labs.futuretv.com (Philip Blundell) Message-id: <200005051439.PAA01310@raistlin.arm.linux.org.uk> MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL1] Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk Nicolas Pitre writes: > The idea is to debug misbehaving code. Generating a SIGBUS is really nice > to quickly spot where are the alignment abuses. This is not intended for > mainstream kernels. In that case, what about hiding it under the kernel hacking options, so that it can only be enabled when EXPERIMENTAL is also turned on? Of course, it will have to display a message so when people complain that they're having problems its obvious why... _____ |_____| ------------------------------------------------- ---+---+- | | Russell King linux@arm.linux.org.uk --- --- | | | | http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/ / / | | +-+-+ --- -+- / | THE developer of ARM Linux |+| /|\ / | | | --- | +-+-+ ------------------------------------------------- /\\\ | From kramer@pa.dec.com Fri May 5 17:35:05 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id RAA24680; Fri, 5 May 2000 17:35:05 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from ns2.tudelft.nl (ns2.tudelft.nl [130.161.180.65]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id RAA21877 for ; Fri, 5 May 2000 17:35:03 +0200 (METDST) Received: from mail1.digital.com (mail1.digital.com [204.123.2.50]) by mailhost1.tudelft.nl (PMDF V5.2-32 #42432) with ESMTP id <0FU300L9VFACJH@mailhost1.tudelft.nl> for J.A.K.Mouw@its.tudelft.nl; Fri, 5 May 2000 17:35:01 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id IAA16080; Fri, 05 May 2000 08:29:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA29477; Fri, 05 May 2000 08:29:55 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id IAA05379; Fri, 05 May 2000 08:29:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id IAA00865; Fri, 05 May 2000 08:29:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail2.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA30155; Fri, 05 May 2000 08:29:47 -0700 Received: from kei.netwinder.org (netwinder.org [207.245.35.202]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with ESMTP id IAA10731 for ; Fri, 05 May 2000 08:29:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: from netwinder.org ([10.1.19.121]) by kei.netwinder.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id LAA20728; Fri, 05 May 2000 11:29:28 -0400 Date: Fri, 05 May 2000 11:24:41 -0400 From: Scott Bambrough Subject: Re: char array, int pointer and cross boundary access Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com To: Russell King - ARM Linux Admin Cc: Nicolas Pitre , zhu qun ying , Jim Studt , arm , sa1100 , lart , Philip Blundell Message-id: <3912E7B9.F5A4FFD0@netwinder.org> Organization: Rebel.com MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.7 [en] (Win95; U) Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk X-Accept-Language: en References: <200005051439.PAA01310@raistlin.arm.linux.org.uk> Russell King - ARM Linux Admin wrote: > > Nicolas Pitre writes: > > The idea is to debug misbehaving code. Generating a SIGBUS is really nice > > to quickly spot where are the alignment abuses. This is not intended for > > mainstream kernels. > > In that case, what about hiding it under the kernel hacking options, so that > it can only be enabled when EXPERIMENTAL is also turned on? Of course, it > will have to display a message so when people complain that they're having > problems its obvious why... I like this idea myself. Scott -- Scott Bambrough - Software Engineer REBEL.COM http://www.rebel.com NetWinder http://www.netwinder.org From kramer@pa.dec.com Fri May 5 17:34:07 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id RAA24667; Fri, 5 May 2000 17:34:07 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from ns2.tudelft.nl (ns2.tudelft.nl [130.161.180.65]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id RAA21862 for ; Fri, 5 May 2000 17:34:05 +0200 (METDST) Received: from mail2.digital.com (mail2.digital.com [204.123.2.56]) by mailhost1.tudelft.nl (PMDF V5.2-32 #42432) with ESMTP id <0FU300L8LF8RJH@mailhost1.tudelft.nl> for J.A.K.Mouw@its.tudelft.nl; Fri, 5 May 2000 17:34:04 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id IAA08389; Fri, 05 May 2000 08:28:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA06267; Fri, 05 May 2000 08:28:29 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id IAA16024; Fri, 05 May 2000 08:26:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id IAA01456; Fri, 05 May 2000 08:26:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail2.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA08639; Fri, 05 May 2000 08:26:39 -0700 Received: from mail.linuxgrrls.org ([62.6.164.226]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with ESMTP id IAA10922 for ; Fri, 05 May 2000 08:26:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.linuxgrrls.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B936874954; Fri, 05 May 2000 16:26:15 +0100 (BST) Date: Fri, 05 May 2000 16:26:15 +0100 (BST) From: Kira Brown Subject: Re: char array, int pointer and cross boundary access In-reply-to: <200005051210.NAA00877@raistlin.arm.linux.org.uk> Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com To: Russell King - ARM Linux Admin Cc: zhu qun ying , Jim Studt , arm , sa1100 , lart , Philip Blundell Message-id: MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Precedence: bulk On Fri, 5 May 2000, Russell King - ARM Linux Admin wrote: > > The only ones I know of are the Medusa architecture machines; is it really > > worth worrying about them? They're obsolete and becoming increasingly > > rare. > > Try any ARM based machine which does not support V4 architecture - ie, ARM6 > cores and some, if not most ARM7 cores. It's far wider than just Medusa. Yes, I know, but we were talking about StrongARM. The ability to compile kernels specific to your processor is one of the advantages of Linux... can't we have this as an optional feature in StrongARM kernels? kira. From kramer@pa.dec.com Fri May 5 17:44:30 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id RAA24745; Fri, 5 May 2000 17:44:29 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from ns2.tudelft.nl (ns2.tudelft.nl [130.161.180.65]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id RAA22060 for ; Fri, 5 May 2000 17:44:28 +0200 (METDST) Received: from mail2.digital.com (mail2.digital.com [204.123.2.56]) by mailhost1.tudelft.nl (PMDF V5.2-32 #42432) with ESMTP id <0FU300LDPFQ2WI@mailhost1.tudelft.nl> for J.A.K.Mouw@its.tudelft.nl; Fri, 5 May 2000 17:44:27 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id IAA11950; Fri, 05 May 2000 08:39:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA25134; Fri, 05 May 2000 08:39:22 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id IAA01282; Fri, 05 May 2000 08:39:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id IAA05574; Fri, 05 May 2000 08:39:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: from crl.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA12379; Fri, 05 May 2000 08:39:04 -0700 Received: from ims.crl.dec.com (ims.crl.dec.com [16.11.0.11]) by crl.dec.com (8.8.8/RWD-1.2) with ESMTP id LAA09080; Fri, 05 May 2000 11:38:53 -0400 (EDT) Received: by ims.crl.dec.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21) id ; Fri, 05 May 2000 11:43:12 -0400 Date: Fri, 05 May 2000 11:39:26 -0400 From: George France Subject: RE: char array, int pointer and cross boundary access Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com To: "'Scott Bambrough'" , Russell King - ARM Linux Admin Cc: Nicolas Pitre , zhu qun ying , Jim Studt , arm , sa1100 , lart , Philip Blundell Message-id: MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21) Content-type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Precedence: bulk Hello Scott; Even though I like the idea, at this time the ARM linux is mostly used by researchers and other highly technical people. I think that in the future, this will not be true. Do we really want to give the less experenced users, the means to shoot themselves?? --George George France, france@crl.dec.com Cambridge Research Laboratory, Compaq Computer Corporation One Kendall Square, Building 700 MS: CRL Cambridge, MA 02139 USA -----Original Message----- From: Scott Bambrough [mailto:scottb@netwinder.org] Sent: Friday, May 05, 2000 11:25 AM To: Russell King - ARM Linux Admin Cc: Nicolas Pitre; zhu qun ying; Jim Studt; arm; sa1100; lart; Philip Blundell Subject: Re: char array, int pointer and cross boundary access Russell King - ARM Linux Admin wrote: > > Nicolas Pitre writes: > > The idea is to debug misbehaving code. Generating a SIGBUS is really nice > > to quickly spot where are the alignment abuses. This is not intended for > > mainstream kernels. > > In that case, what about hiding it under the kernel hacking options, so that > it can only be enabled when EXPERIMENTAL is also turned on? Of course, it > will have to display a message so when people complain that they're having > problems its obvious why... I like this idea myself. Scott -- Scott Bambrough - Software Engineer REBEL.COM http://www.rebel.com NetWinder http://www.netwinder.org From kramer@pa.dec.com Fri May 5 17:56:58 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id RAA24820; Fri, 5 May 2000 17:56:54 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from ns2.tudelft.nl (ns2.tudelft.nl [130.161.180.65]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id RAA22229 for ; Fri, 5 May 2000 17:56:52 +0200 (METDST) Received: from mail2.digital.com (mail2.digital.com [204.123.2.56]) by mailhost1.tudelft.nl (PMDF V5.2-32 #42432) with ESMTP id <0FU300LL3GAQJH@mailhost1.tudelft.nl> for J.A.K.Mouw@its.tudelft.nl; Fri, 5 May 2000 17:56:51 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id IAA12927; Fri, 05 May 2000 08:51:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA19165; Fri, 05 May 2000 08:51:44 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id IAA13417; Fri, 05 May 2000 08:51:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id IAA08701; Fri, 05 May 2000 08:51:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail2.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA13639; Fri, 05 May 2000 08:51:30 -0700 Received: from kei.netwinder.org (netwinder.org [207.245.35.202]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with ESMTP id IAA13203 for ; Fri, 05 May 2000 08:51:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: from netwinder.org ([10.1.19.121]) by kei.netwinder.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id LAA20896; Fri, 05 May 2000 11:50:17 -0400 Date: Fri, 05 May 2000 11:45:31 -0400 From: Scott Bambrough Subject: Re: char array, int pointer and cross boundary access Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com To: George France Cc: Russell King - ARM Linux Admin , Nicolas Pitre , zhu qun ying , Jim Studt , arm , sa1100 , lart , Philip Blundell Message-id: <3912EC9B.DB66987B@netwinder.org> Organization: Rebel.com MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.7 [en] (Win95; U) Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk X-Accept-Language: en References: George France wrote: > Even though I like the idea, at this time the ARM linux is mostly used by > researchers and other highly technical people. I think that in the future, > this will not be true. Do we really want to give the less experenced users, > the means to shoot themselves?? > > > it can only be enabled when EXPERIMENTAL is also turned on? Of course, it > > will have to display a message so when people complain that they're having > > problems its obvious why... If a inexperienced user is going to play with the kernel, and use experimental features, they deserve what they get. We only provide the gun, we don't make them use it. I think if it is documented correctly, it should be ok. Scott -- Scott Bambrough - Software Engineer REBEL.COM http://www.rebel.com NetWinder http://www.netwinder.org From kramer@pa.dec.com Fri May 5 18:07:58 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id SAA24900; Fri, 5 May 2000 18:07:57 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from ns2.tudelft.nl (ns2.tudelft.nl [130.161.180.65]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id SAA22411 for ; Fri, 5 May 2000 18:07:56 +0200 (METDST) Received: from mail1.digital.com (mail1.digital.com [204.123.2.50]) by mailhost1.tudelft.nl (PMDF V5.2-32 #42432) with ESMTP id <0FU300M8TGT5KM@mailhost1.tudelft.nl> for J.A.K.Mouw@its.tudelft.nl; Fri, 5 May 2000 18:07:54 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id JAA17106; Fri, 05 May 2000 09:02:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA05293; Fri, 05 May 2000 09:02:41 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id JAA29645; Fri, 05 May 2000 09:02:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id JAA10348; Fri, 05 May 2000 09:02:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail1.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA21720; Fri, 05 May 2000 09:02:28 -0700 Received: from micros.micros.com (micros.micros.com [63.75.30.3]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with ESMTP id JAA13291 for ; Fri, 05 May 2000 09:02:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: from usmail.micros.com (usmail.micros.com [172.28.196.60]) by micros.micros.com (8.8.5/8.8.5/micros-2.1) with ESMTP id LAA04229; Fri, 05 May 2000 11:57:59 -0400 (EDT) Received: from SATCH2 ([206.241.199.116]) by usmail.micros.com with SMTP (Microsoft Exchange Internet Mail Service Version 5.5.2448.0) id KJMXB9H2; Fri, 05 May 2000 11:54:25 -0400 Date: Fri, 05 May 2000 11:58:03 -0400 From: brad more Subject: Re: char array, int pointer and cross boundary access Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com To: George France , "'Scott Bambrough'" , Russell King - ARM Linux Admin Cc: Nicolas Pitre , zhu qun ying , Jim Studt , arm , sa1100 , lart , Philip Blundell Message-id: <003601bfb6aa$b73877d0$74c7f1ce@ft.micros.com> MIME-version: 1.0 X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2919.6600 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2919.6600 Content-type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-priority: Normal Precedence: bulk References: > Do we really want to give the less experenced users, the means to shoot themselves?? Speaking for the "less experienced" users ... Yes. We'd prefer you didn't attempt to "protect" us. By the way, some of us are actaully "highly technical" too... r/Brad From kramer@pa.dec.com Fri May 5 18:13:33 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id SAA24945; Fri, 5 May 2000 18:13:32 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from ns2.tudelft.nl (ns2.tudelft.nl [130.161.180.65]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id SAA22623 for ; Fri, 5 May 2000 18:13:31 +0200 (METDST) Received: from mail2.digital.com (mail2.digital.com [204.123.2.56]) by mailhost1.tudelft.nl (PMDF V5.2-32 #42432) with ESMTP id <0FU300M37H2HYH@mailhost1.tudelft.nl> for J.A.K.Mouw@its.tudelft.nl; Fri, 5 May 2000 18:13:30 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id JAA12937; Fri, 05 May 2000 09:08:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA10573; Fri, 05 May 2000 09:08:24 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id JAA31954; Fri, 05 May 2000 09:08:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id JAA27915; Fri, 05 May 2000 09:08:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: from crl.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA22373; Fri, 05 May 2000 09:08:13 -0700 Received: from ims.crl.dec.com (ims.crl.dec.com [16.11.0.11]) by crl.dec.com (8.8.8/RWD-1.2) with ESMTP id MAA06428; Fri, 05 May 2000 12:07:57 -0400 (EDT) Received: by ims.crl.dec.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21) id ; Fri, 05 May 2000 12:12:16 -0400 Date: Fri, 05 May 2000 12:08:26 -0400 From: George France Subject: RE: char array, int pointer and cross boundary access Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com To: "'Scott Bambrough'" , George France Cc: Russell King - ARM Linux Admin , Nicolas Pitre , zhu qun ying , Jim Studt , arm , sa1100 , lart , Philip Blundell Message-id: MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21) Content-type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Precedence: bulk Scott Bambrough [mailto:scottb@netwinder.org] writes: >If a inexperienced user is going to play with the kernel, and use experimental >features, they deserve what they get. We only provide the gun, we don't make >them use it. I think if it is documented correctly, it should be ok. If our tone and attitude is going to be 'caveat emptor' then I agree with you fully. I was more thinking about the mailing list and the extra traffic that will be generated from people using the gun. It is not only the user that will suffer from the gun, but developers on the mailing list having to answer the same questions over and over and over and over again. --George From kramer@pa.dec.com Fri May 5 18:22:21 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id SAA24995; Fri, 5 May 2000 18:22:21 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from ns2.tudelft.nl (ns2.tudelft.nl [130.161.180.65]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id SAA22762 for ; Fri, 5 May 2000 18:22:19 +0200 (METDST) Received: from mail2.digital.com (mail2.digital.com [204.123.2.56]) by mailhost1.tudelft.nl (PMDF V5.2-32 #42432) with ESMTP id <0FU300MHIHH5KM@mailhost1.tudelft.nl> for J.A.K.Mouw@its.tudelft.nl; Fri, 5 May 2000 18:22:18 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id JAA15250; Fri, 05 May 2000 09:17:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA31482; Fri, 05 May 2000 09:17:13 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id JAA19696; Fri, 05 May 2000 09:17:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id JAA26395; Fri, 05 May 2000 09:17:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail1.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA21044; Fri, 05 May 2000 09:17:04 -0700 Received: from lhs.com (lnsmtpbos00.lhs.com [208.162.98.43]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id JAA18670 for ; Fri, 05 May 2000 09:17:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: by lhs.com(Lotus SMTP MTA v4.6.6 (890.1 7-16-1999)) id 852568D6.005A174B ; Fri, 05 May 2000 12:24:02 -0400 Date: Fri, 05 May 2000 12:15:06 -0400 From: ebunce@lhsl.com Subject: RE: char array, int pointer and cross boundary access Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com To: George France Cc: "'Scott Bambrough'" , George France , Russell King - ARM Linux Admin , Nicolas Pitre , zhu qun ying , Jim Studt , arm , sa1100 , lart , Philip Blundell Message-id: <852568D6.005A1543.00@lhs.com> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-disposition: inline Precedence: bulk X-Lotus-FromDomain: LHS > Scott Bambrough [mailto:scottb@netwinder.org] writes: > >>If a inexperienced user is going to play with the kernel, and use experimental >>features, they deserve what they get. We only provide the gun, we don't make >>them use it. I think if it is documented correctly, it should be ok. > >If our tone and attitude is going to be 'caveat emptor' then I agree with >you fully. I was more thinking about the mailing list and the extra traffic >that will be generated from people using the gun. It is not only the user >that will suffer from the gun, but developers on the mailing list having to >answer the same questions over and over and over and over again. The same could be said about a good half the experimental features. The one addition I'd make is From kramer@pa.dec.com Fri May 5 18:49:15 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id SAA25176; Fri, 5 May 2000 18:49:15 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from ns2.tudelft.nl (ns2.tudelft.nl [130.161.180.65]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id SAA23203 for ; Fri, 5 May 2000 18:49:13 +0200 (METDST) Received: from mail1.digital.com (mail1.digital.com [204.123.2.50]) by mailhost1.tudelft.nl (PMDF V5.2-32 #42432) with ESMTP id <0FU300MN5IPZZ4@mailhost1.tudelft.nl> for J.A.K.Mouw@its.tudelft.nl; Fri, 5 May 2000 18:49:12 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id JAA14130; Fri, 05 May 2000 09:43:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA23768; Fri, 05 May 2000 09:43:28 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id JAA18953; Fri, 05 May 2000 09:42:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id JAA19646; Fri, 05 May 2000 09:42:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail1.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA06715; Fri, 05 May 2000 09:41:31 -0700 Received: from lhs.com (lnsmtpbos00.lhs.com [208.162.98.43]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id JAA19765 for ; Fri, 05 May 2000 09:41:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: by lhs.com(Lotus SMTP MTA v4.6.6 (890.1 7-16-1999)) id 852568D6.005C5244 ; Fri, 05 May 2000 12:48:23 -0400 Date: Fri, 05 May 2000 12:39:31 -0400 From: ebunce@lhsl.com Subject: RE: char array, int pointer and cross boundary access Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com To: George France Cc: "'Scott Bambrough'" , George France , Russell King - ARM Linux Admin , Nicolas Pitre , zhu qun ying , Jim Studt , arm , sa1100 , lart , Philip Blundell Message-id: <852568D6.005C5104.00@lhs.com> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-disposition: inline Precedence: bulk X-Lotus-FromDomain: LHS George France wrote: > Scott Bambrough [mailto:scottb@netwinder.org] writes: > >>If a inexperienced user is going to play with the kernel, and use experimental >>features, they deserve what they get. We only provide the gun, we don't make >>them use it. I think if it is documented correctly, it should be ok. > >If our tone and attitude is going to be 'caveat emptor' then I agree with >you fully. I was more thinking about the mailing list and the extra traffic >that will be generated from people using the gun. It is not only the user >that will suffer from the gun, but developers on the mailing list having to >answer the same questions over and over and over and over again. The same could be said about a good half the Experimental features. If such an the option was put into the kernel, I'd mark it as "(Testing Purposes Only)" and put it under either the "Kernel Hacking" section or something similar. I'd also place the appropriate description explaining it's use in the documentation used by the configuration software. It would be easier than having to explain to moderately experienced users how to modify the kernel source in order to perform that type of testing. If it's clearly marked, than it's not even a matter of 'caveat emptor', it's more on the order of "you've been warned". If someone chooses that option after being warned they deserve what they get. Erik Bunce From kramer@pa.dec.com Fri May 5 19:02:28 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id TAA25256; Fri, 5 May 2000 19:02:27 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from ns2.tudelft.nl (ns2.tudelft.nl [130.161.180.65]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id TAA23388 for ; Fri, 5 May 2000 19:02:26 +0200 (METDST) Received: from mail2.digital.com (mail2.digital.com [204.123.2.56]) by mailhost1.tudelft.nl (PMDF V5.2-32 #42432) with ESMTP id <0FU30002YJBZXO@mailhost1.tudelft.nl> for J.A.K.Mouw@its.tudelft.nl; Fri, 5 May 2000 19:02:25 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id JAA19415; Fri, 05 May 2000 09:57:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA18763; Fri, 05 May 2000 09:57:19 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id JAA15808; Fri, 05 May 2000 09:56:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id JAA26519; Fri, 05 May 2000 09:56:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail2.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA12066; Fri, 05 May 2000 09:56:56 -0700 Received: from kei.netwinder.org (netwinder.org [207.245.35.202]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with ESMTP id JAA19409 for ; Fri, 05 May 2000 09:56:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: from netwinder.org ([10.1.19.121]) by kei.netwinder.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id MAA21392; Fri, 05 May 2000 12:56:45 -0400 Date: Fri, 05 May 2000 12:51:59 -0400 From: Scott Bambrough Subject: Re: char array, int pointer and cross boundary access Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com To: George France Cc: Russell King - ARM Linux Admin , Nicolas Pitre , zhu qun ying , Jim Studt , arm , sa1100 , lart , Philip Blundell Message-id: <3912FC2F.168CD3F4@netwinder.org> Organization: Rebel.com MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.7 [en] (Win95; U) Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk X-Accept-Language: en References: George France wrote: > > If our tone and attitude is going to be 'caveat emptor' then I agree with > you fully. I was more thinking about the mailing list and the extra traffic > that will be generated from people using the gun. It is not only the user > that will suffer from the gun, but developers on the mailing list having to > answer the same questions over and over and over and over again. Don't get me wrong here. I don't think our tone and attitude should be "caveat emptor", but if it is under experimental that is implied (at least that is the way I look at it). If it wasn't under experimental I would adopt an attitude very similar to yours. Scott -- Scott Bambrough - Software Engineer REBEL.COM http://www.rebel.com NetWinder http://www.netwinder.org From kramer@pa.dec.com Fri May 5 19:08:39 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id TAA25303; Fri, 5 May 2000 19:08:38 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from ns2.tudelft.nl (ns2.tudelft.nl [130.161.180.65]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id TAA23499 for ; Fri, 5 May 2000 19:08:36 +0200 (METDST) Received: from mail2.digital.com (mail2.digital.com [204.123.2.56]) by mailhost1.tudelft.nl (PMDF V5.2-32 #42432) with ESMTP id <0FU300065JMAXO@mailhost1.tudelft.nl> for J.A.K.Mouw@its.tudelft.nl; Fri, 5 May 2000 19:08:35 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id KAA19909; Fri, 05 May 2000 10:03:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA05718; Fri, 05 May 2000 10:03:30 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id KAA00777; Fri, 05 May 2000 10:03:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id KAA18210; Fri, 05 May 2000 10:03:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail1.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA05911; Fri, 05 May 2000 10:03:14 -0700 Received: from kei.netwinder.org (netwinder.org [207.245.35.202]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with ESMTP id KAA15844 for ; Fri, 05 May 2000 10:03:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: from netwinder.org ([10.1.19.121]) by kei.netwinder.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id NAA21497; Fri, 05 May 2000 13:03:01 -0400 Date: Fri, 05 May 2000 12:58:15 -0400 From: Scott Bambrough Subject: Re: char array, int pointer and cross boundary access Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com To: ebunce@lhsl.com Cc: George France , Russell King - ARM Linux Admin , Nicolas Pitre , zhu qun ying , Jim Studt , arm , sa1100 , lart , Philip Blundell Message-id: <3912FDA7.46B621EF@netwinder.org> Organization: Rebel.com MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.7 [en] (Win95; U) Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk X-Accept-Language: en References: <852568D6.005C5104.00@lhs.com> ebunce@lhsl.com wrote: > > If such an the option was put into the kernel, I'd mark it as > "(Testing Purposes Only)" and put it under either the > "Kernel Hacking" section or something similar. I'd also place the appropriate > description explaining it's use in the documentation used by the configuration > software. Err, I was operating under the assumption that it would be added to the 'Kernel Hacking' menu. I don't advocate putting it anywhere else. Sorry if that was what everyone thought. Scott -- Scott Bambrough - Software Engineer REBEL.COM http://www.rebel.com NetWinder http://www.netwinder.org From kramer@pa.dec.com Fri May 5 19:09:07 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id TAA25309; Fri, 5 May 2000 19:09:06 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from ns2.tudelft.nl (ns2.tudelft.nl [130.161.180.65]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id TAA23508 for ; Fri, 5 May 2000 19:09:05 +0200 (METDST) Received: from mail1.digital.com (mail1.digital.com [204.123.2.50]) by mailhost1.tudelft.nl (PMDF V5.2-32 #42432) with ESMTP id <0FU30008GJN3T6@mailhost1.tudelft.nl> for J.A.K.Mouw@its.tudelft.nl; Fri, 5 May 2000 19:09:04 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id KAA19692; Fri, 05 May 2000 10:03:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA08928; Fri, 05 May 2000 10:03:58 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id KAA16427; Fri, 05 May 2000 10:03:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id KAA31416; Fri, 05 May 2000 10:03:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: from crl.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA09404; Fri, 05 May 2000 10:03:49 -0700 Received: from crlwebmail.crl.dec.com (crlwebmail.crl.dec.com [16.11.0.2]) by crl.dec.com (8.8.8/RWD-1.2) with ESMTP id NAA10483; Fri, 05 May 2000 13:03:40 -0400 (EDT) Received: by crlwebmail.crl.dec.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21) id ; Fri, 05 May 2000 13:07:56 -0400 Date: Fri, 05 May 2000 13:04:16 -0400 From: George France Subject: RE: char array, int pointer and cross boundary access Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com To: "'Scott Bambrough'" , George France Cc: Russell King - ARM Linux Admin , Nicolas Pitre , zhu qun ying , Jim Studt , arm , sa1100 , lart , Philip Blundell Message-id: MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21) Content-type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Precedence: bulk Scott Bambrough [mailto:scottb@netwinder.org] wrote: >Don't get me wrong here. I don't think our tone and attitude should be "caveat >emptor", but if it is under experimental that is implied (at least that is the >way I look at it). If it wasn't under experimental I would adopt an attitude >very similar to yours. Hello Scott; I do not mind experimental code, in odd numbered kernels, in fact I encourage it. I am just questioning adding experimental stuff that will end up in 2.4.0. I would full support almost any experimental code into 2.5.0. In this way the main stream users on the stable version do not have the gun, beta users on the other hand can take their chances. The added benefit is that the developers on the mailing list only have to answer questions from the beta users, not the public at large. I am sorry if I was not more clear before. --George George France, france@crl.dec.com Cambridge Research Laboratory, Compaq Computer Corporation One Kendall Square, Building 700 MS: CRL Cambridge, MA 02139 USA From kramer@pa.dec.com Sat May 6 00:07:55 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id AAA27016; Sat, 6 May 2000 00:07:55 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from ns2.tudelft.nl (ns2.tudelft.nl [130.161.180.65]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id AAA28082 for ; Sat, 6 May 2000 00:07:54 +0200 (METDST) Received: from mail1.digital.com (mail1.digital.com [204.123.2.50]) by mailhost1.tudelft.nl (PMDF V5.2-32 #42432) with ESMTP id <0FU3007FYXH3LV@mailhost1.tudelft.nl> for J.A.K.Mouw@its.tudelft.nl; Sat, 6 May 2000 00:07:52 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id PAA10096; Fri, 05 May 2000 15:02:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA09733; Fri, 05 May 2000 15:02:30 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id PAA01886; Fri, 05 May 2000 15:01:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id PAA22091; Fri, 05 May 2000 15:01:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail1.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA18157; Fri, 05 May 2000 15:01:31 -0700 Received: from br4.qld-remote.bigpond.net.au (br4.qld-remote.bigpond.net.au [24.192.64.19]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with ESMTP id PAA10708 for ; Fri, 05 May 2000 15:01:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: from onthenet.com.au (CPE-24-192-86-254.qld.bigpond.net.au [24.192.86.254]) by br4.qld-remote.bigpond.net.au (8.8.6 (PHNE_14041)/8.8.6) with SMTP id HAA19780; Sat, 06 May 2000 07:58:36 +1000 (EST) Date: Sat, 06 May 2000 07:58:18 +1000 From: David Bath Subject: Re: char array, int pointer and cross boundary access Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com To: Russell King - ARM Linux Admin Cc: Nicolas Pitre , zhu qun ying , Jim Studt , arm , sa1100 , lart , Philip Blundell Message-id: <391343FA.3A7B3D49@onthenet.com.au> MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.72 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.2.14-15mdk i586) Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk X-Accept-Language: en References: <200005051439.PAA01310@raistlin.arm.linux.org.uk> Russell King - ARM Linux Admin wrote: > Nicolas Pitre writes: > > The idea is to debug misbehaving code. Generating a SIGBUS is really nice > > to quickly spot where are the alignment abuses. This is not intended for > > mainstream kernels. > > In that case, what about hiding it under the kernel hacking options, so that > it can only be enabled when EXPERIMENTAL is also turned on? Of course, it > will have to display a message so when people complain that they're having > problems its obvious why... So, if we now all accept that there is a time when experienced users (namely those attempting to port poorly written x86 Linux apps to ARM) will want to turn user level exceptions on, it seems only a small step (conceptually, if not technically) to allow them to turn it on at runtime. It seems a bit excessive making them rebuild their kernel just so they can debug some poorly written user level code, and then reboot their original kernel so they can continue to run their correctly written ARM code. There's plenty of precedence with Linux for controlling experimental /diagnostic stuff at runtime. For example... echo 1 >/proc/sys/net/ipv4/tcp_syncookies if I want SYN cookie protection echo "scsi log token [level]" > /proc/scsi/scsi if I want scsi logging enabled echo "0 0 0 y y y - y - 10 " >/proc/scsi/tmscsim/0 if I want to try out tagged queuing on a scsi device If I've just copied a source tar file down from somewhere, typed "make", had a clean build, and then had it crash or behave very strangely, it would be very useful to be able to do something like... echo "usr-fixup" /proc/..... [to enable user level fixups] run it again, and see if it works. If it does work, I could then do a echo "usr-sigbus" /proc/.... [to enable user level exceptions] run it again, and gather all the info I need to work out how to fix it from SIGBUS crash details. Fix it, rebuild, and then echo "usr-none" /proc/.... [to return to no user level intervention] run it again, notice it works, and declare victory. If you believe that ARM-Linux will only ever be used in a single-user environment then this is probably sufficient. If you think one day a corporate server with 100 users might one day be running on ARM-Linux then you might want to make the above work on a per-process basis. I might be trying to debug my sloppy x86 code while 99 other users are trying to run their correctly written ARM code. dB. From kramer@pa.dec.com Sat May 6 00:11:26 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id AAA27042; Sat, 6 May 2000 00:11:26 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from ns2.tudelft.nl (ns2.tudelft.nl [130.161.180.65]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id AAA28177 for ; Sat, 6 May 2000 00:11:24 +0200 (METDST) Received: from mail1.digital.com (mail1.digital.com [204.123.2.50]) by mailhost1.tudelft.nl (PMDF V5.2-32 #42432) with ESMTP id <0FU3007PSXMW31@mailhost1.tudelft.nl> for J.A.K.Mouw@its.tudelft.nl; Sat, 6 May 2000 00:11:21 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id PAA07200; Fri, 05 May 2000 15:05:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA19928; Fri, 05 May 2000 15:05:44 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id PAA21453; Fri, 05 May 2000 15:05:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id PAA31821; Fri, 05 May 2000 15:05:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail2.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA28980; Fri, 05 May 2000 15:05:36 -0700 Received: from caramon.arm.linux.org.uk (p60-robin-gui.tch.enablis.net [194.168.180.120]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with ESMTP id PAA12893 for ; Fri, 05 May 2000 15:05:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: from raistlin.arm.linux.org.uk (root@raistlin [192.168.0.3]) by caramon.arm.linux.org.uk (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id XAA00997; Fri, 05 May 2000 23:05:09 +0100 Received: (from linux@localhost) by raistlin.arm.linux.org.uk (8.7.4/8.7.3) id XAA03152; Fri, 05 May 2000 23:04:27 +0100 Date: Fri, 05 May 2000 23:04:26 +0100 (BST) From: Russell King - ARM Linux Admin Subject: Re: char array, int pointer and cross boundary access In-reply-to: <391343FA.3A7B3D49@onthenet.com.au> Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com To: dbath@onthenet.com.au (David Bath) Cc: nico@CAM.ORG (Nicolas Pitre), qyzhu@krdl.org.sg (zhu qun ying), jim@federated.com (Jim Studt), linux-arm-kernel@lists.arm.linux.org.uk (arm), sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com (sa1100), lart@lart.tudelft.nl (lart), pb@labs.futuretv.com (Philip Blundell) Message-id: <200005052204.XAA03152@raistlin.arm.linux.org.uk> MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL1] Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk David Bath writes: > So, if we now all accept that there is a time when experienced users (namely > those attempting to port poorly written x86 Linux apps to ARM) will want to > turn user level exceptions on, it seems only a small step (conceptually, if not > technically) to allow them to turn it on at runtime. And then its all too easy for it to be turned on permanently. No, that is not something we want, especially when we end up with users complaining. > If you believe that ARM-Linux will only ever be used in a single-user > environment then this is probably sufficient. If you think one day a corporate > server with 100 users might one day be running on ARM-Linux then you might want > to make the above work on a per-process basis. I might be trying to debug my > sloppy x86 code while 99 other users are trying to run their correctly written > ARM code. But then a decent sysadmin of the corporate server would never let you near to debug your program. He'd want to lock it down as tightly as possible to prevent misuse/hacking/etc, which, if you're talking about a distribution-only box will probably mean no C compiler either. (If you need the machine to stay up, you should only be running tried and tested programs on it). _____ |_____| ------------------------------------------------- ---+---+- | | Russell King linux@arm.linux.org.uk --- --- | | | | http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/ / / | | +-+-+ --- -+- / | THE developer of ARM Linux |+| /|\ / | | | --- | +-+-+ ------------------------------------------------- /\\\ | From kramer@pa.dec.com Sat May 6 00:50:31 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id AAA27264; Sat, 6 May 2000 00:50:31 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from ns2.tudelft.nl (ns2.tudelft.nl [130.161.180.65]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id AAA28803 for ; Sat, 6 May 2000 00:50:30 +0200 (METDST) Received: from mail1.digital.com (mail1.digital.com [204.123.2.50]) by mailhost1.tudelft.nl (PMDF V5.2-32 #42432) with ESMTP id <0FU30097VZG42S@mailhost1.tudelft.nl> for J.A.K.Mouw@its.tudelft.nl; Sat, 6 May 2000 00:50:29 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id PAA12910; Fri, 05 May 2000 15:44:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA13520; Fri, 05 May 2000 15:44:58 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id PAA07618; Fri, 05 May 2000 15:44:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id PAA05926; Fri, 05 May 2000 15:44:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail1.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA29733; Fri, 05 May 2000 15:44:06 -0700 Received: from br4.qld-remote.bigpond.net.au (br4.qld-remote.bigpond.net.au [24.192.64.19]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with ESMTP id PAA12478 for ; Fri, 05 May 2000 15:44:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: from onthenet.com.au (CPE-24-192-86-254.qld.bigpond.net.au [24.192.86.254]) by br4.qld-remote.bigpond.net.au (8.8.6 (PHNE_14041)/8.8.6) with SMTP id IAA07628; Sat, 06 May 2000 08:41:11 +1000 (EST) Date: Sat, 06 May 2000 08:40:53 +1000 From: David Bath Subject: Re: char array, int pointer and cross boundary access Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com To: Russell King - ARM Linux Admin Cc: Nicolas Pitre , zhu qun ying , Jim Studt , arm , sa1100 , lart , Philip Blundell Message-id: <39134DF5.FC8B1A5C@onthenet.com.au> MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.72 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.2.14-15mdk i586) Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk X-Accept-Language: en References: <200005052204.XAA03152@raistlin.arm.linux.org.uk> Russell King - ARM Linux Admin wrote: > David Bath writes: > > So, if we now all accept that there is a time when experienced users (namely > > those attempting to port poorly written x86 Linux apps to ARM) will want to > > turn user level exceptions on, it seems only a small step (conceptually, if not > > technically) to allow them to turn it on at runtime. > > And then its all too easy for it to be turned on permanently. No, that is not > something we want, especially when we end up with users complaining. Hadn't we agreed we were going to let them turn it on at kernel config time? Turning it on at config time seems to have more potential for permanence then controlling it at runtime. If it's a config time option you need to reboot your machine again to turn it off. If it's a runtime option, then it's much easier to turn it off again. > But then a decent sysadmin of the corporate server would never let you near to > debug your program. I think that depends on what business the corporation is in. Do a 'top' on some big corporate servers at s/w companies like Sun or Cisco and you'll see dozens of people running cc on big thumping SMP servers. Clearly you wouldn't want one of those users to be able to influence user-level exception handling for other users, hence the need to be able to control your own destiny, on a per-process basis. dB. From kramer@pa.dec.com Sun May 7 12:56:44 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id MAA07543; Sun, 7 May 2000 12:56:43 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from ns2.tudelft.nl (ns2.tudelft.nl [130.161.180.65]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id MAA15777 for ; Sun, 7 May 2000 12:56:43 +0200 (METDST) Received: from mail1.digital.com (mail1.digital.com [204.123.2.50]) by mailhost1.tudelft.nl (PMDF V5.2-32 #42432) with ESMTP id <0FU600DEHRQGGV@mailhost1.tudelft.nl> for J.A.K.Mouw@its.tudelft.nl; Sun, 7 May 2000 12:56:41 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id DAA28240; Sun, 07 May 2000 03:50:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA05930; Sun, 07 May 2000 03:48:27 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id DAA16621; Sun, 07 May 2000 03:43:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id DAA12958; Sun, 07 May 2000 03:43:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail1.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA25088; Sun, 07 May 2000 03:43:04 -0700 Received: from kings-cross.london.uk.eu.org (tazenda.demon.co.uk [158.152.220.239]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with ESMTP id DAA00360 for ; Sun, 07 May 2000 03:43:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost ([::ffff:127.0.0.1] helo=kings-cross.london.uk.eu.org ident=phil) by kings-cross.london.uk.eu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.11 #1) id 12oEsD-0002ou-00; Sun, 07 May 2000 01:24:41 +0100 Date: Sun, 07 May 2000 01:24:41 +0100 From: Philip Blundell Subject: Re: char array, int pointer and cross boundary access In-reply-to: Message from David Bath "of Sat, 06 May 2000 07:58:18 +1000." <391343FA.3A7B3D49@onthenet.com.au> Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com To: David Bath Cc: Russell King - ARM Linux Admin , Nicolas Pitre , zhu qun ying , Jim Studt , arm , sa1100 , lart Message-id: MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: exmh version 2.0.2 2/24/98 (debian) Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Precedence: bulk References: <200005051439.PAA01310@raistlin.arm.linux.org.uk> <391343FA.3A7B3D49@onthenet.com.au> >clean build, and then had it crash or behave very strangely, it would be very >useful to be able to do something like... > >echo "usr-fixup" /proc/..... [to enable user level fixups] > >run it again, and see if it works. If it does work, I could then do a > >echo "usr-sigbus" /proc/.... [to enable user level >exceptions] > >run it again, and gather all the info I need to work out how to fix it from >SIGBUS crash details. Fix it, rebuild, and then Both of these solutions are pretty poor because they carry the risk of breaking already-running programs. If your shell was compiled with -march=armv3, for example, enabling either fixups or exceptions for unaligned accesses might well leave you with an unusable machine. (The default for GCC is -march=armv3.) >you might want to make the above work on a per-process basis. Yes. I guess you could conceive of a bit in the program header that says "this program shouldn't be doing unaligned accesses" and caused them to be trapped. p. From kramer@pa.dec.com Sun May 7 13:21:13 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id NAA07674; Sun, 7 May 2000 13:21:13 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from ns2.tudelft.nl (ns2.tudelft.nl [130.161.180.65]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id NAA15947 for ; Sun, 7 May 2000 13:21:12 +0200 (METDST) Received: from mail1.digital.com (mail1.digital.com [204.123.2.50]) by mailhost1.tudelft.nl (PMDF V5.2-32 #42432) with ESMTP id <0FU600DJNSV9FK@mailhost1.tudelft.nl> for J.A.K.Mouw@its.tudelft.nl; Sun, 7 May 2000 13:21:10 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id EAA04257; Sun, 07 May 2000 04:14:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA14587; Sun, 07 May 2000 04:13:25 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id EAA12740; Sun, 07 May 2000 04:11:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id EAA16174; Sun, 07 May 2000 04:11:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail2.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA19807; Sun, 07 May 2000 04:11:47 -0700 Received: from br4.qld-remote.bigpond.net.au (br4.qld-remote.bigpond.net.au [24.192.64.19]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with ESMTP id EAA15713 for ; Sun, 07 May 2000 04:11:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: from onthenet.com.au (CPE-24-192-86-254.qld.bigpond.net.au [24.192.86.254]) by br4.qld-remote.bigpond.net.au (8.8.6 (PHNE_14041)/8.8.6) with SMTP id VAA19994; Sun, 07 May 2000 21:08:05 +1000 (EST) Date: Sun, 07 May 2000 21:07:47 +1000 From: David Bath Subject: Re: char array, int pointer and cross boundary access Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com To: Philip Blundell Cc: Russell King - ARM Linux Admin , Nicolas Pitre , zhu qun ying , Jim Studt , arm , sa1100 , lart Message-id: <39154E83.8EBA5DD2@onthenet.com.au> MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.72 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.2.14-15mdk i586) Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk X-Accept-Language: en References: <200005051439.PAA01310@raistlin.arm.linux.org.uk> <391343FA.3A7B3D49@onthenet.com.au> Philip Blundell wrote: > >you might want to make the above work on a per-process basis. > > Yes. I guess you could conceive of a bit in the program header that says > "this program shouldn't be doing unaligned accesses" and caused them to be > trapped. hmmm... maybe we could just add a system call to enable it. Then the first thing you could do when porting some code that doesn't seem to work right, is enable the exception handler on the first line. Then you could use the exception to locate and fix the real bug, and then remove the fist line you added. dB. From kramer@pa.dec.com Sun May 7 13:52:12 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id NAA07849; Sun, 7 May 2000 13:52:12 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from ns2.tudelft.nl (ns2.tudelft.nl [130.161.180.65]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id NAA16259 for ; Sun, 7 May 2000 13:52:11 +0200 (METDST) Received: from mail1.digital.com (mail1.digital.com [204.123.2.50]) by mailhost1.tudelft.nl (PMDF V5.2-32 #42432) with ESMTP id <0FU600E4RUAXPF@mailhost1.tudelft.nl> for J.A.K.Mouw@its.tudelft.nl; Sun, 7 May 2000 13:52:10 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id EAA06951; Sun, 07 May 2000 04:45:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA29206; Sun, 07 May 2000 04:44:25 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id EAA04579; Sun, 07 May 2000 04:42:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id EAA25688; Sun, 07 May 2000 04:42:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail2.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA17467; Sun, 07 May 2000 04:42:39 -0700 Received: from caramon.arm.linux.org.uk (p48-robin-gui.tch.enablis.net [194.168.180.108]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with ESMTP id EAA18343 for ; Sun, 07 May 2000 04:42:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: from flint.arm.linux.org.uk (root@flint [192.168.0.4]) by caramon.arm.linux.org.uk (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id MAA07248; Sun, 07 May 2000 12:41:35 +0100 Received: (from linux@localhost) by flint.arm.linux.org.uk (8.9.3/8.9.3) id MAA09205; Sun, 07 May 2000 12:40:49 +0100 Date: Sun, 07 May 2000 12:40:48 +0100 (BST) From: Russell King - ARM Linux Admin Subject: Re: char array, int pointer and cross boundary access In-reply-to: <39154E83.8EBA5DD2@onthenet.com.au> Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com To: dbath@onthenet.com.au (David Bath) Cc: Philip.Blundell@pobox.com (Philip Blundell), nico@CAM.ORG (Nicolas Pitre), qyzhu@krdl.org.sg (zhu qun ying), jim@federated.com (Jim Studt), linux-arm-kernel@lists.arm.linux.org.uk (arm), sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com (sa1100), lart@lart.tudelft.nl (lart) Message-id: <200005071140.MAA09205@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL1] Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk David Bath writes: > hmmm... maybe we could just add a system call to enable it. Then the first thing > you could do when porting some code that doesn't seem to work right, is enable the > exception handler on the first line. Then you could use the exception to locate > and fix the real bug, and then remove the fist line you added. No. Phil's point is more or less the same as one of the points I've been trying to make. If all your binaries are compiled up so that they rely on unaligned accesses, and you turn on the SIGBUS, suddenly every process on your system receives SIGBUS when it next runs, leaving you with zero processes, and therefore an unusable system. I did make the suggestion of using the compiler to indicate this, but then dismissed this as a solution because it is not a "binary" thing. It can only be turned on if your binary, your dynamic linker and your libraries are compiled up so they don't use unaligned accesses. IMHO, this is a deep complicated issue which needs a lot of further discussion. Until all the issues are resolved, I don't think we can even start to consider putting this in for 2.4. _____ |_____| ------------------------------------------------- ---+---+- | | Russell King linux@arm.linux.org.uk --- --- | | | | http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/ / / | | +-+-+ --- -+- / | THE developer of ARM Linux |+| /|\ / | | | --- | +-+-+ ------------------------------------------------- /\\\ | From kramer@pa.dec.com Sun May 7 14:01:41 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id OAA07915; Sun, 7 May 2000 14:01:41 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from ns2.tudelft.nl (ns2.tudelft.nl [130.161.180.65]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id OAA16377 for ; Sun, 7 May 2000 14:01:40 +0200 (METDST) Received: from mail2.digital.com (mail2.digital.com [204.123.2.56]) by mailhost1.tudelft.nl (PMDF V5.2-32 #42432) with ESMTP id <0FU600EFBUQQ8F@mailhost1.tudelft.nl> for J.A.K.Mouw@its.tudelft.nl; Sun, 7 May 2000 14:01:39 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id EAA18781; Sun, 07 May 2000 04:55:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA24725; Sun, 07 May 2000 04:53:54 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id EAA27516; Sun, 07 May 2000 04:52:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id EAA23244; Sun, 07 May 2000 04:52:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail2.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA04178; Sun, 07 May 2000 04:52:21 -0700 Received: from br4.qld-remote.bigpond.net.au (br4.qld-remote.bigpond.net.au [24.192.64.19]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with ESMTP id EAA18579 for ; Sun, 07 May 2000 04:52:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: from onthenet.com.au (CPE-24-192-86-254.qld.bigpond.net.au [24.192.86.254]) by br4.qld-remote.bigpond.net.au (8.8.6 (PHNE_14041)/8.8.6) with SMTP id VAA05382; Sun, 07 May 2000 21:49:22 +1000 (EST) Date: Sun, 07 May 2000 21:49:03 +1000 From: David Bath Subject: Re: char array, int pointer and cross boundary access Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com To: Russell King - ARM Linux Admin Cc: Philip Blundell , Nicolas Pitre , zhu qun ying , Jim Studt , arm , sa1100 , lart Message-id: <3915582E.2EF664CE@onthenet.com.au> MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.72 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.2.14-15mdk i586) Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk X-Accept-Language: en References: <200005071140.MAA09205@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> Russell King - ARM Linux Admin wrote: > David Bath writes: > > hmmm... maybe we could just add a system call to enable it. Then the first thing > > you could do when porting some code that doesn't seem to work right, is enable the > > exception handler on the first line. Then you could use the exception to locate > > and fix the real bug, and then remove the fist line you added. > > No. Phil's point is more or less the same as one of the points I've been trying to > make. > > If all your binaries are compiled up so that they rely on unaligned accesses, and > you turn on the SIGBUS, suddenly every process on your system receives SIGBUS when > it next runs, leaving you with zero processes, and therefore an unusable system. Actually, I meant for the system call to only turn on exception handling for the process that issued the system call, not for everybody. > It can only be turned on if > your binary, your dynamic linker and your libraries are compiled up so they don't > use unaligned accesses. Yes, dynamic libraries to complicate things. > IMHO, this is a deep complicated issue which needs a lot of further discussion. > Until all the issues are resolved, I don't think we can even start to consider > putting this in for 2.4. Yep, there do seem to be a lot of gotcha's. dB. From kramer@pa.dec.com Sun May 7 14:06:07 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id OAA07941; Sun, 7 May 2000 14:06:07 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from ns2.tudelft.nl (ns2.tudelft.nl [130.161.180.65]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id OAA16434 for ; Sun, 7 May 2000 14:06:06 +0200 (METDST) Received: from mail2.digital.com (mail2.digital.com [204.123.2.56]) by mailhost1.tudelft.nl (PMDF V5.2-32 #42432) with ESMTP id <0FU600F08UY48D@mailhost1.tudelft.nl> for J.A.K.Mouw@its.tudelft.nl; Sun, 7 May 2000 14:06:05 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id EAA19329; Sun, 07 May 2000 04:59:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA23008; Sun, 07 May 2000 04:58:20 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id EAA18603; Sun, 07 May 2000 04:56:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id EAA14243; Sun, 07 May 2000 04:56:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail2.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA09025; Sun, 07 May 2000 04:56:45 -0700 Received: from caramon.arm.linux.org.uk (p48-robin-gui.tch.enablis.net [194.168.180.108]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with ESMTP id EAA13106 for ; Sun, 07 May 2000 04:56:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: from flint.arm.linux.org.uk (root@flint [192.168.0.4]) by caramon.arm.linux.org.uk (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id MAA07339; Sun, 07 May 2000 12:56:35 +0100 Received: (from linux@localhost) by flint.arm.linux.org.uk (8.9.3/8.9.3) id MAA09286; Sun, 07 May 2000 12:55:49 +0100 Date: Sun, 07 May 2000 12:55:49 +0100 (BST) From: Russell King - ARM Linux Admin Subject: Re: char array, int pointer and cross boundary access In-reply-to: Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com To: Philip.Blundell@pobox.com (Philip Blundell) Cc: dbath@onthenet.com.au (David Bath), nico@CAM.ORG (Nicolas Pitre), qyzhu@krdl.org.sg (zhu qun ying), jim@federated.com (Jim Studt), linux-arm-kernel@lists.arm.linux.org.uk (arm), sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com (sa1100), lart@lart.tudelft.nl (lart) Message-id: <200005071155.MAA09286@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL1] Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk Philip Blundell writes: > Actually, I think you dismiss David's suggestion too lightly. You could have > a system call that turned trapping on for the calling process only. But what about the dynamic linker and libraries? _____ |_____| ------------------------------------------------- ---+---+- | | Russell King linux@arm.linux.org.uk --- --- | | | | http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/ / / | | +-+-+ --- -+- / | THE developer of ARM Linux |+| /|\ / | | | --- | +-+-+ ------------------------------------------------- /\\\ | From kramer@pa.dec.com Sun May 7 13:57:29 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id NAA07886; Sun, 7 May 2000 13:57:28 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from ns2.tudelft.nl (ns2.tudelft.nl [130.161.180.65]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id NAA16332 for ; Sun, 7 May 2000 13:57:28 +0200 (METDST) Received: from mail1.digital.com (mail1.digital.com [204.123.2.50]) by mailhost1.tudelft.nl (PMDF V5.2-32 #42432) with ESMTP id <0FU600E7JUJPPF@mailhost1.tudelft.nl> for J.A.K.Mouw@its.tudelft.nl; Sun, 7 May 2000 13:57:26 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id EAA04711; Sun, 07 May 2000 04:51:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA32585; Sun, 07 May 2000 04:49:39 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id EAA22951; Sun, 07 May 2000 04:48:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id EAA22224; Sun, 07 May 2000 04:48:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail1.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA03244; Sun, 07 May 2000 04:47:59 -0700 Received: from kings-cross.london.uk.eu.org (tazenda.demon.co.uk [158.152.220.239]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with ESMTP id EAA00565 for ; Sun, 07 May 2000 04:47:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost ([::ffff:127.0.0.1] helo=kings-cross.london.uk.eu.org ident=phil) by kings-cross.london.uk.eu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.11 #1) id 12oQTF-0006HG-00; Sun, 07 May 2000 13:47:41 +0100 Date: Sun, 07 May 2000 13:47:41 +0100 From: Philip Blundell Subject: Re: char array, int pointer and cross boundary access In-reply-to: Message from Russell King - ARM Linux Admin "of Sun, 07 May 2000 12:40:48 BST." <200005071140.MAA09205@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com To: Russell King - ARM Linux Admin Cc: dbath@onthenet.com.au (David Bath), nico@CAM.ORG (Nicolas Pitre), qyzhu@krdl.org.sg (zhu qun ying), jim@federated.com (Jim Studt), linux-arm-kernel@lists.arm.linux.org.uk (arm), sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com (sa1100), lart@lart.tudelft.nl (lart) Message-id: MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: exmh version 2.0.2 2/24/98 (debian) Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Precedence: bulk References: <200005071140.MAA09205@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> Russell King wrote: >David Bath writes: >> hmmm... maybe we could just add a system call to enable it. > >No. Phil's point is more or less the same as one of the points I've been >trying to make. Actually, I think you dismiss David's suggestion too lightly. You could have a system call that turned trapping on for the calling process only. p. From kramer@pa.dec.com Sun May 7 14:52:30 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id OAA08163; Sun, 7 May 2000 14:52:29 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from ns2.tudelft.nl (ns2.tudelft.nl [130.161.180.65]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id OAA16742 for ; Sun, 7 May 2000 14:52:24 +0200 (METDST) Received: from mail1.digital.com (mail1.digital.com [204.123.2.50]) by mailhost1.tudelft.nl (PMDF V5.2-32 #42432) with ESMTP id <0FU600FJQX3A8D@mailhost1.tudelft.nl> for J.A.K.Mouw@its.tudelft.nl; Sun, 7 May 2000 14:52:23 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id FAA03694; Sun, 07 May 2000 05:45:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA00834; Sun, 07 May 2000 05:43:45 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id FAA12771; Sun, 07 May 2000 05:41:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id FAA17741; Sun, 07 May 2000 05:41:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail2.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA15037; Sun, 07 May 2000 05:41:52 -0700 Received: from kings-cross.london.uk.eu.org (tazenda.demon.co.uk [158.152.220.239]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with ESMTP id FAA21131 for ; Sun, 07 May 2000 05:41:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost ([::ffff:127.0.0.1] helo=kings-cross.london.uk.eu.org ident=phil) by kings-cross.london.uk.eu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.11 #1) id 12oRJb-0006Mp-00; Sun, 07 May 2000 14:41:47 +0100 Date: Sun, 07 May 2000 14:41:47 +0100 From: Philip Blundell Subject: Re: char array, int pointer and cross boundary access In-reply-to: Message from Russell King - ARM Linux Admin "of Sun, 07 May 2000 12:55:49 BST." <200005071155.MAA09286@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com To: Russell King - ARM Linux Admin Cc: dbath@onthenet.com.au (David Bath), nico@CAM.ORG (Nicolas Pitre), qyzhu@krdl.org.sg (zhu qun ying), jim@federated.com (Jim Studt), linux-arm-kernel@lists.arm.linux.org.uk (arm), sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com (sa1100), lart@lart.tudelft.nl (lart) Message-id: MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: exmh version 2.0.2 2/24/98 (debian) Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Precedence: bulk References: <200005071155.MAA09286@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> >But what about the dynamic linker and libraries? Yes, there's still a pitfall there for the unwary. But it's not nearly as bad - the worst that happens is that the process you're debugging dies unexpectedly (and I think it's fair to say that if you want to do this, you need to take care of how the linker and libraries were built). Whereas with the global approach that some people were advocating, other users can be screwed over without them realising what's going on. p. From kramer@pa.dec.com Mon May 8 02:56:07 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id CAA11837; Mon, 8 May 2000 02:56:07 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from ns2.tudelft.nl (ns2.tudelft.nl [130.161.180.65]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id CAA24788 for ; Mon, 8 May 2000 02:56:05 +0200 (METDST) Received: from mail2.digital.com (mail2.digital.com [204.123.2.56]) by mailhost1.tudelft.nl (PMDF V5.2-32 #42432) with ESMTP id <0FU7005FRULF05@mailhost1.tudelft.nl> for J.A.K.Mouw@its.tudelft.nl; Mon, 8 May 2000 02:56:04 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id RAA16087; Sun, 07 May 2000 17:49:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA17676; Sun, 07 May 2000 17:47:48 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id RAA22634; Sun, 07 May 2000 17:44:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id RAA15178; Sun, 07 May 2000 17:44:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail1.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA20032; Sun, 07 May 2000 17:44:41 -0700 Received: from br4.qld-remote.bigpond.net.au (br4.qld-remote.bigpond.net.au [24.192.64.19]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with ESMTP id RAA10887 for ; Sun, 07 May 2000 17:44:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: from onthenet.com.au (CPE-24-192-86-254.qld.bigpond.net.au [24.192.86.254]) by br4.qld-remote.bigpond.net.au (8.8.6 (PHNE_14041)/8.8.6) with SMTP id KAA16599; Mon, 08 May 2000 10:41:25 +1000 (EST) Date: Mon, 08 May 2000 10:41:06 +1000 From: David Bath Subject: Re: char array, int pointer and cross boundary access Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com To: Philip Blundell Cc: Russell King - ARM Linux Admin , Nicolas Pitre , zhu qun ying , Jim Studt , arm , sa1100 , lart Message-id: <39160D22.97DF437E@onthenet.com.au> MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.72 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.2.14-15mdk i586) Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk X-Accept-Language: en References: <200005071155.MAA09286@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> Philip Blundell wrote: > >But what about the dynamic linker and libraries? > > Yes, there's still a pitfall there for the unwary. But it's not nearly as > bad - the worst that happens is that the process you're debugging dies > unexpectedly (and I think it's fair to say that if you want to do this, you > need to take care of how the linker and libraries were built). It would be cool if the exception handler could inspect the code and/or address that caused the misaligned access, and then determine whether it was an intended misaligned access (as caused by -march=armv3 etc.) or an unintended one, as caused by sloppy x86 code. I haven't looked at the generated code, but I would imagine they'd be indistinguishable :-(. dB. From kramer@pa.dec.com Mon May 8 08:37:28 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id IAA13526; Mon, 8 May 2000 08:37:28 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from ns2.tudelft.nl (ns2.tudelft.nl [130.161.180.65]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id IAA27574 for ; Mon, 8 May 2000 08:37:27 +0200 (METDST) Received: from mail1.digital.com (mail1.digital.com [204.123.2.50]) by mailhost1.tudelft.nl (PMDF V5.2-32 #42432) with ESMTP id <0FU8009A6AEDTM@mailhost1.tudelft.nl> for J.A.K.Mouw@its.tudelft.nl; Mon, 8 May 2000 08:37:26 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id XAA28696; Sun, 07 May 2000 23:29:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA19612; Sun, 07 May 2000 23:27:39 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id XAA01622; Sun, 07 May 2000 23:25:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id XAA15329; Sun, 07 May 2000 23:25:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail1.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA25752; Sun, 07 May 2000 23:25:04 -0700 Received: from caramon.arm.linux.org.uk (p35-cordelia-gui.tch.enablis.net [212.250.233.35]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with ESMTP id XAA26404 for ; Sun, 07 May 2000 23:25:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: from flint.arm.linux.org.uk (root@flint [192.168.0.4]) by caramon.arm.linux.org.uk (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id HAA10969; Mon, 08 May 2000 07:16:13 +0100 Received: (from linux@localhost) by flint.arm.linux.org.uk (8.9.3/8.9.3) id HAA18381; Mon, 08 May 2000 07:15:26 +0100 Date: Mon, 08 May 2000 07:15:26 +0100 (BST) From: Russell King - ARM Linux Admin Subject: Re: char array, int pointer and cross boundary access In-reply-to: <39160D22.97DF437E@onthenet.com.au> Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com To: dbath@onthenet.com.au (David Bath) Cc: Philip.Blundell@pobox.com (Philip Blundell), nico@CAM.ORG (Nicolas Pitre), qyzhu@krdl.org.sg (zhu qun ying), jim@federated.com (Jim Studt), linux-arm-kernel@lists.arm.linux.org.uk (arm), sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com (sa1100), lart@lart.tudelft.nl (lart) Message-id: <200005080615.HAA18381@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL1] Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk David Bath writes: > It would be cool if the exception handler could inspect the code and/or address > that caused the misaligned access, and then determine whether it was an > intended misaligned access (as caused by -march=armv3 etc.) or an unintended > one, as caused by sloppy x86 code. I haven't looked at the generated code, but > I would imagine they'd be indistinguishable :-(. They could well be identical. However, it may be worth looking at what the sloppy x86 case is producing. Could you create a simple test case and post the instructions around the offending unaligned load? _____ |_____| ------------------------------------------------- ---+---+- | | Russell King linux@arm.linux.org.uk --- --- | | | | http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/ / / | | +-+-+ --- -+- / | THE developer of ARM Linux |+| /|\ / | | | --- | +-+-+ ------------------------------------------------- /\\\ | From kramer@pa.dec.com Mon May 8 17:59:20 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id RAA17438; Mon, 8 May 2000 17:59:20 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from ns2.tudelft.nl (ns2.tudelft.nl [130.161.180.65]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id RAA15780 for ; Mon, 8 May 2000 17:59:18 +0200 (METDST) Received: from mail2.digital.com (mail2.digital.com [204.123.2.56]) by mailhost1.tudelft.nl (PMDF V5.2-32 #42432) with ESMTP id <0FU9002OL0ESQ3@mailhost1.tudelft.nl> for J.A.K.Mouw@its.tudelft.nl; Mon, 8 May 2000 17:59:17 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id IAA14193; Mon, 08 May 2000 08:54:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA24592; Mon, 08 May 2000 08:53:40 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id IAA03641; Mon, 08 May 2000 08:51:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id IAA30713; Mon, 08 May 2000 08:51:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail1.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA26017; Mon, 08 May 2000 08:51:25 -0700 Received: from xanadu.vipswitch.com (generic199.197.205.205.in-addr.arpa [205.205.197.199] (may be forged)) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with ESMTP id IAA03040 for ; Mon, 08 May 2000 08:51:24 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 08 May 2000 11:49:16 -0400 (EDT) From: Nicolas Pitre Subject: diff-2.3.99-pre6-rmk1-np2.gz Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com To: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Message-id: MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Precedence: bulk ... is available from ftp.netwinder.org/users/n/nico. This contains: - ADS GraphicsClient support - Fixes to the flash block driver (tested on ThinClient) - Brutus fixes (it now boots, but runs really slooooooooow. Seems like some cache or clock switching didn't take effect... Maybe it's just me... Any reports appreciated) - Many SA1100 documentation updates (be sure to read them if you might be concerned) - PCMCIA support updated (still not usable yet) - Preliminary audio driver for the UDA1341 on Assabet (Not working yet. For now it will only crash your kernel!) - ...and probably some other things I forget as usual. Enjoy! Nicolas From kramer@pa.dec.com Mon May 8 21:16:14 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id VAA18819; Mon, 8 May 2000 21:16:14 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from ns2.tudelft.nl (ns2.tudelft.nl [130.161.180.65]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id VAA20390 for ; Mon, 8 May 2000 21:16:13 +0200 (METDST) Received: from mail1.digital.com (mail1.digital.com [204.123.2.50]) by mailhost1.tudelft.nl (PMDF V5.2-32 #42432) with ESMTP id <0FU900CFW9IY2U@mailhost1.tudelft.nl> for J.A.K.Mouw@its.tudelft.nl; Mon, 8 May 2000 21:16:12 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id MAA21672; Mon, 08 May 2000 12:10:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA23388; Mon, 08 May 2000 12:10:48 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id MAA13067; Mon, 08 May 2000 12:10:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id MAA19938; Mon, 08 May 2000 12:10:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail1.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA17235; Mon, 08 May 2000 12:09:59 -0700 Received: from duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (duteinh.et.tudelft.nl [130.161.42.1]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with ESMTP id MAA15198 for ; Mon, 08 May 2000 12:09:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: from dutein71 by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id VAA18750; Mon, 08 May 2000 21:08:39 +0200 (MET DST) Date: Mon May 08 21:08:36 +0200 (MDT) 2000 From: Erik Mouw X-Face: "!Z|1XjFg!3Iw)BwM^M\k)J5KHiPddz}#/Zw%?$&Q!xqob"OA|})3_@&BTTiQERo?/^g[Z<9P4R8:5C:aqq.cw!hotLc=+u-"+1rq@9$V^8PbOUlodyi_sejt+D`iqkLpx$>.aXl%vnfPIt"LK|/%>94_Zrm8jy?`_[RKt'TuoxUxfk(gMhY(n|DBBl~c$dhO>G%6}R4+DGX3|idBm4oU&UM/XUP4I9aoN{]`ax%B?rgD(I3OJ<62Y6L Subject: Re: diff-2.3.99-pre6-rmk1-np1 In-reply-to: Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com To: nico@CAM.ORG Cc: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Message-id: <200005081908.VAA18750@duteinh.et.tudelft.nl> Organization: Eric conspiracy secret labs MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: XCmail 1.0.1 - with PGP support, PGP engine version 0.5 (IRIX) Content-type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-transfer-encoding: 8bit Precedence: bulk X-Loop: erik@it.et.tudelft.nl X-Mailerorigin: http://www.fsai.fh-trier.de/~schmitzj/Xclasses/XCmail/ X-Eric-Conspiracy: There is no conspiracy! On Wed, 03 May 2000 11:10:36 -0400 (EDT), Nicolas Pitre wrote: > Or, in arch/arm/mm/init.c, try commenting out the call to > create_memmap_holes() instead. Only LART is using it in the discontigous > memory case at the moment... and I may have screwed it up. > > Also please try booting with printk()'s messages sent out by printascii(). OK, this is with linux-2.3.99-pre6-rmk1-np2, but the result is the same. With or without the call to create_memmap_holes(): Uncompressing Linux.................................... done, booting the kernel. Linux version 2.3.99-pre6-rmk1-np2 (erikm@besson.et.tudelft.nl) (gcc version 2.95.2 19991024 (0 Architecture: LART kernel BUG at bootmem.c:104! However, if I change the LART memory setup in arch/arm/kernel/arch.c into: SET_BANK( 0, 0xc0000000, 8*1024*1024 ); SET_BANK( 1, 0xc8000000, 8*1024*1024 ); mi->nr_banks = 2; Linux boots, and I get: Uncompressing Linux.................................... done, booting the kernel. Linux version 2.3.99-pre6-rmk1-np2 (erikm@besson.et.tudelft.nl) (gcc version 2.95.2 19991024 (0 Architecture: LART On node 0 totalpages: 2048 zone(0): 2048 pages. zone(1): 0 pages. zone(2): 0 pages. On node 1 totalpages: 2048 zone(0): 2048 pages. zone(1): 0 pages. zone(2): 0 pages. Calibrating delay loop... 207.67 BogoMIPS Memory: 8MB 8MB = 16MB total Memory: 10784KB available (950K code, 183K data, 36K init) I'll try find out what's going on tomorrow. Erik -- J.A.K. (Erik) Mouw, Information and Communication Theory Group, Department of Electrical Engineering, Faculty of Information Technology and Systems, Delft University of Technology, PO BOX 5031, 2600 GA Delft, The Netherlands Phone: +31-15-2783635 Fax: +31-15-2781843 Email: J.A.K.Mouw@its.tudelft.nl WWW: http://www-ict.its.tudelft.nl/~erik/ From kramer@pa.dec.com Tue May 9 02:49:21 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id CAA20739; Tue, 9 May 2000 02:49:20 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from ns2.tudelft.nl (ns2.tudelft.nl [130.161.180.65]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id CAA26198 for ; Tue, 9 May 2000 02:49:19 +0200 (METDST) Received: from mail1.digital.com (mail1.digital.com [204.123.2.50]) by mailhost1.tudelft.nl (PMDF V5.2-32 #42432) with ESMTP id <0FU900MKJOY5KL@mailhost1.tudelft.nl> for J.A.K.Mouw@its.tudelft.nl; Tue, 9 May 2000 02:49:18 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id RAA06130; Mon, 08 May 2000 17:43:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA22020; Mon, 08 May 2000 17:43:37 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id RAA26320; Mon, 08 May 2000 17:42:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id RAA19318; Mon, 08 May 2000 17:42:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail1.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA15404; Mon, 08 May 2000 17:42:17 -0700 Received: from br4.qld-remote.bigpond.net.au (br4.qld-remote.bigpond.net.au [24.192.64.19]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with ESMTP id RAA10353 for ; Mon, 08 May 2000 17:42:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: from onthenet.com.au (CPE-24-192-86-254.qld.bigpond.net.au [24.192.86.254]) by br4.qld-remote.bigpond.net.au (8.8.6 (PHNE_14041)/8.8.6) with SMTP id KAA08980; Tue, 09 May 2000 10:37:43 +1000 (EST) Date: Tue, 09 May 2000 10:37:23 +1000 From: David Bath Subject: Re: char array, int pointer and cross boundary access Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com To: Russell King - ARM Linux Admin Cc: Philip Blundell , Nicolas Pitre , zhu qun ying , Jim Studt , arm , sa1100 , lart Message-id: <39175DC3.D8F920C8@onthenet.com.au> MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.72 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.2.14-15mdk i586) Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk X-Accept-Language: en References: <200005080615.HAA18381@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> Russell King - ARM Linux Admin wrote: > David Bath writes: > > It would be cool if the exception handler could inspect the code and/or address > > that caused the misaligned access, and then determine whether it was an > > intended misaligned access (as caused by -march=armv3 etc.) or an unintended > > one, as caused by sloppy x86 code. I haven't looked at the generated code, but > > I would imagine they'd be indistinguishable :-(. > > They could well be identical. However, it may be worth looking at what > the sloppy x86 case is producing. Could you create a simple test case > and post the instructions around the offending unaligned load? I don't have an example handy, but if I come across one I will. Perhaps the original instigator of this thread can help out here. Can you give us an example of some correct C code that inspires arm-gcc to generate intentional misaligned accesses? I suspect porting application code directly to ARM-Linux will remain a task for true masochists. Happily, most unix apps have long ago been ported to MIPS platforms, and so have long ago had their misaligned accesses fixed. The MIPS architecture is far friendlier in this regard, since all misaligned accesses are bad; it doesn't have the concept of good ones and bad ones. Maybe ARM-Linux application porters should keep an old DECstation of SGI Indigo handy. Get the code running there first, and then get it working on ARM. dB. From kramer@pa.dec.com Tue May 9 03:21:55 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id DAA20970; Tue, 9 May 2000 03:21:54 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from ns2.tudelft.nl (ns2.tudelft.nl [130.161.180.65]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id DAA26503 for ; Tue, 9 May 2000 03:21:53 +0200 (METDST) Received: from mail1.digital.com (mail1.digital.com [204.123.2.50]) by mailhost1.tudelft.nl (PMDF V5.2-32 #42432) with ESMTP id <0FU9000KQQGF0R@mailhost1.tudelft.nl> for J.A.K.Mouw@its.tudelft.nl; Tue, 9 May 2000 03:21:52 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id SAA04493; Mon, 08 May 2000 18:16:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA07706; Mon, 08 May 2000 18:16:40 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id SAA13360; Mon, 08 May 2000 18:14:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id SAA11424; Mon, 08 May 2000 18:14:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail1.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA29735; Mon, 08 May 2000 18:14:53 -0700 Received: from krdl.org.sg (rodin.krdl.org.sg [192.122.139.27]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with ESMTP id SAA11119 for ; Mon, 08 May 2000 18:14:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mailhost.krdl.org.sg (mailhost [192.122.134.30]) by krdl.org.sg (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id JAA01571; Tue, 09 May 2000 09:22:13 +0800 Received: from krdl.org.sg (QUNYING.krdl.org.sg [192.168.136.36]) by mailhost.krdl.org.sg (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id JAA17086; Tue, 09 May 2000 09:13:35 +0800 (SGT) Date: Tue, 09 May 2000 09:14:26 +0800 From: zhu qun ying Subject: Re: char array, int pointer and cross boundary access Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com To: David Bath Cc: Russell King - ARM Linux Admin , Philip Blundell , Nicolas Pitre , Jim Studt , arm , sa1100 , lart Message-id: <39176672.5A4D20F7@krdl.org.sg> Organization: KRDL MIME-version: 1.0 X-MIME-Autoconverted: from 8bit to quoted-printable by mail1.digital.com id SAA11119 X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.72 [en] (WinNT; U) Content-type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-transfer-encoding: quoted-printable Precedence: bulk X-Accept-Language: en References: <200005080615.HAA18381@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> <39175DC3.D8F920C8@onthenet.com.au> > I don't have an example handy, but if I come across one I will. Perhap= s the > original instigator of this thread can help out here. >=20 > Can you give us an example of some correct C code that inspires arm-gcc= to generate > intentional misaligned accesses? >=20 > I suspect porting application code directly to ARM-Linux will remain a = task for true > masochists. Happily, most unix apps have long ago been ported to MIPS = platforms, > and so have long ago had their misaligned accesses fixed. The MIPS arc= hitecture is > far friendlier in this regard, since all misaligned accesses are bad; i= t doesn't > have the concept of good ones and bad ones. >=20 > Maybe ARM-Linux application porters should keep an old DECstation of SG= I Indigo > handy. Get the code running there first, and then get it working on AR= M. >=20 > dB. I have the simple C source for this thread at my first post, but it is no= t intentional. The original idea comes from re-construct a packed network p= acket into its original structure form, one integer element is misalligned and = I cast the pointer to integer and cause some porblem. Just curious to know, as I am working with StrongARM for only a few month= s, what are the intentional misalignment asccess for? what are the advantage to u= se misalignement access to have the roation, as StrongARM does have the rota= tion instruction. --=20 (~._.~) =D6=EC =C8=BA =D3=A2 (Qun Ying) (65) 874-6743 ( O ) Kent Ridge Digital Labs (KRDL) ()~*~() 21 Heng Mui Keng Terrace, Singapore 119613 (_)-(_) qyzhu@krdl.org.sg * zhuqy@hotmail.com From kramer@pa.dec.com Tue May 9 12:26:02 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id MAA24349; Tue, 9 May 2000 12:26:02 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from ns2.tudelft.nl (ns2.tudelft.nl [130.161.180.65]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id MAA07798 for ; Tue, 9 May 2000 12:26:00 +0200 (METDST) Received: from mail1.digital.com (mail1.digital.com [204.123.2.50]) by mailhost1.tudelft.nl (PMDF V5.2-32 #42432) with ESMTP id <0FUA00K3RFNAGJ@mailhost1.tudelft.nl> for J.A.K.Mouw@its.tudelft.nl; Tue, 9 May 2000 12:25:59 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id DAA23846; Tue, 09 May 2000 03:20:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA09491; Tue, 09 May 2000 03:20:27 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id DAA26158; Tue, 09 May 2000 03:17:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id DAA27760; Tue, 09 May 2000 03:17:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail2.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA25857; Tue, 09 May 2000 03:17:42 -0700 Received: from caramon.arm.linux.org.uk (p48-magpie-gui.tch.enablis.net [194.168.180.48]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with ESMTP id DAA25266 for ; Tue, 09 May 2000 03:17:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: from flint.arm.linux.org.uk (root@flint [192.168.0.4]) by caramon.arm.linux.org.uk (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id HAA15618; Tue, 09 May 2000 07:27:12 +0100 Received: (from linux@localhost) by flint.arm.linux.org.uk (8.9.3/8.9.3) id HAA23139; Tue, 09 May 2000 07:26:22 +0100 Date: Tue, 09 May 2000 07:26:22 +0100 (BST) From: Russell King - ARM Linux Admin Subject: Re: char array, int pointer and cross boundary access In-reply-to: <39176672.5A4D20F7@krdl.org.sg> Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com To: qyzhu@krdl.org.sg (zhu qun ying) Cc: dbath@onthenet.com.au (David Bath), Philip.Blundell@pobox.com (Philip Blundell), nico@CAM.ORG (Nicolas Pitre), jim@federated.com (Jim Studt), linux-arm-kernel@lists.arm.linux.org.uk (arm), sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com (sa1100), lart@lart.tudelft.nl (lart) Message-id: <200005090626.HAA23139@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL1] Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk zhu qun ying writes: > Just curious to know, as I am working with StrongARM for only a few months, what > are the intentional misalignment asccess for? what are the advantage to use > misalignement access to have the roation, as StrongARM does have the rotation > instruction. Take the following code on a machine without half-word instructions (ie, any V3 architecture or broken V4 architecture): struct { unsigned short a; unsigned short b; } *c; c = <4-byte aligned pointer> printf("%d %d\n", c->a, c->b); The code will be: @ r4 = c adr r0, string ldr r1, [r4, #0] ldr r2, [r4, #2] mov r1, r1, asl #16 mov r2, r2, asl #16 mov r1, r1, lsr #16 @ a mov r2, r2, lsr #16 @ b bl printf _____ |_____| ------------------------------------------------- ---+---+- | | Russell King linux@arm.linux.org.uk --- --- | | | | http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/ / / | | +-+-+ --- -+- / | THE developer of ARM Linux |+| /|\ / | | | --- | +-+-+ ------------------------------------------------- /\\\ | From kramer@pa.dec.com Fri May 12 16:10:43 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id QAA17678; Fri, 12 May 2000 16:10:43 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from mail2.digital.com (mail2.digital.com [204.123.2.56]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id QAA21099 for ; Fri, 12 May 2000 16:10:40 +0200 (METDST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id HAA06179; Fri, 12 May 2000 07:08:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA18863; Fri, 12 May 2000 07:08:47 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id HAA13596; Fri, 12 May 2000 07:05:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id HAA15180; Fri, 12 May 2000 07:05:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail2.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA09032; Fri, 12 May 2000 07:05:48 -0700 Received: from relay.starlab.net (extsrv.starlab.net [212.8.177.194]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with ESMTP id HAA06184 for ; Fri, 12 May 2000 07:05:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: from downtown.ett.starlab.net (IDENT:root@downtown.ett.starlab.net [212.8.177.17]) by relay.starlab.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id QAA09280 for ; Fri, 12 May 2000 16:05:18 +0200 Received: from starlab.net (brigham.ett.starlab.net [212.8.177.73]) by downtown.ett.starlab.net (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id QAA26567 for ; Fri, 12 May 2000 16:05:17 +0200 Message-Id: <391C0F53.5902AA5E@starlab.net> Date: Fri, 12 May 2000 16:04:03 +0200 From: Kristiaan De Paepe Organization: STARLAB NV X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.51 [en] (WinNT; U) X-Accept-Language: en Mime-Version: 1.0 To: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Subject: Alternative for UCB1200/1300? Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk Hi all, excuse me for being just a bit off-topic but we're currently searching for an easy replacement of the Philips UCB1200 / UCB1300 codec. Alternative should be easily suported by linux and the SA1100 codec-port. We're only interested in the mono or stereo audio output, i.e. we don't need the telecom and other stuff. Does anyone have any suggestions (we need like 30-35 of them within 3 weeks instead of the 30 weeks!@# standard lead-time from Philips). TIA Kristiaan ------------------------------------------------------------------ Ing. De Paepe Kristiaan Principal Investigator Starlab Tel: +32 2 740 07 40 Research Laboratories Fax: +32 2 742 96 54 Blvd. St. Michel 47, Email: mailto:kristiaan@starlab.net B-1040 Brussels (Belgium) WWW: http://www.starlab.net/ Home:mailto:kristiaan@tijd.com Mob: +32 476 43 40 19 ------------------------------------------------------------------ Never reinvent the wheel unless you want it to come out square.(c) ------------------------------------------------------------------ From kramer@pa.dec.com Fri May 12 17:41:30 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id RAA18173; Fri, 12 May 2000 17:41:30 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from mail1.digital.com (mail1.digital.com [204.123.2.50]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id RAA25180 for ; Fri, 12 May 2000 17:41:28 +0200 (METDST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id IAA12138; Fri, 12 May 2000 08:40:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA27275; Fri, 12 May 2000 08:40:02 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id IAA25841; Fri, 12 May 2000 08:39:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id IAA20345; Fri, 12 May 2000 08:39:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail1.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA21742; Fri, 12 May 2000 08:39:14 -0700 Received: from duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (duteinh.et.tudelft.nl [130.161.42.1]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with ESMTP id IAA14732 for ; Fri, 12 May 2000 08:39:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: from dutein71 by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id RAA18140; Fri, 12 May 2000 17:37:55 +0200 (MET DST) Message-Id: <200005121537.RAA18140@duteinh.et.tudelft.nl> From: Erik Mouw To: kristiaan@starlab.net Cc: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Subject: Re: Alternative for UCB1200/1300? In-Reply-To: <391C0F53.5902AA5E@starlab.net> Organization: Eric conspiracy secret labs Date: Fri May 12 17:37:54 +0200 (MDT) 2000 X-Face: "!Z|1XjFg!3Iw)BwM^M\k)J5KHiPddz}#/Zw%?$&Q!xqob"OA|})3_@&BTTiQERo?/^g[Z<9P4R8:5C:aqq.cw!hotLc=+u-"+1rq@9$V^8PbOUlodyi_sejt+D`iqkLpx$>.aXl%vnfPIt"LK|/%>94_Zrm8jy?`_[RKt'TuoxUxfk(gMhY(n|DBBl~c$dhO>G%6}R4+DGX3|idBm4oU&UM/XUP4I9aoN{]`ax%B?rgD(I3OJ<62Y6L X-Mailer: XCmail 1.0.1 - with PGP support, PGP engine version 0.5 (IRIX) X-Mailerorigin: http://www.fsai.fh-trier.de/~schmitzj/Xclasses/XCmail/ X-Eric-Conspiracy: There is no conspiracy! X-Loop: erik@it.et.tudelft.nl Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk On Fri, 12 May 2000 16:04:03 +0200, Kristiaan De Paepe wrote: > excuse me for being just a bit off-topic but we're currently searching > for an easy replacement of the Philips UCB1200 / UCB1300 codec. > Alternative should be easily suported by linux and the SA1100 > codec-port. We're only interested in the mono or stereo audio output, > i.e. we don't need the telecom and other stuff. > Does anyone have any suggestions (we need like 30-35 of them within 3 > weeks instead of the 30 weeks!@# standard lead-time from Philips). If you only want audio output, you can go for the Victor/LART way and use a standard audio DAC. The LART currently uses a Burr-Brown PCM 1710U on the SSP port. Yes, that's a high quality DAC, but hey, we want good audio quality for our MP3^H^H^Hhandheld! ;-) Have a look at the LART site for the KSB schematics. Erik -- LART. 250 MIPS under one Watt. Free hardware design files. http://www.lart.tudelft.nl/ From kramer@pa.dec.com Fri May 12 17:46:05 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id RAA18202; Fri, 12 May 2000 17:46:04 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from mail1.digital.com (mail1.digital.com [204.123.2.50]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id RAA25449 for ; Fri, 12 May 2000 17:46:02 +0200 (METDST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id IAA06706; Fri, 12 May 2000 08:44:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA05863; Fri, 12 May 2000 08:44:43 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id IAA00154; Fri, 12 May 2000 08:44:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id IAA29780; Fri, 12 May 2000 08:44:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail1.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA19681; Fri, 12 May 2000 08:44:35 -0700 Received: from eising.k-net.dk (eising.k-net.dtu.dk [130.225.71.227]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with ESMTP id IAA12612 for ; Fri, 12 May 2000 08:44:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: from obelix.vkr.k-net.dk (obelix.vkr.k-net.dk [192.38.209.3]) by eising.k-net.dk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3281AC521 for ; Fri, 12 May 2000 17:44:30 +0200 (CEST) Received: by obelix.vkr.k-net.dk with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21) id ; Fri, 12 May 2000 17:43:55 +0200 Message-Id: From: Anders Frederiksen To: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Subject: RE: Alternative for UCB1200/1300? Date: Fri, 12 May 2000 17:43:49 +0200 Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk Maybe a bit off topic: I'm designing towards attaching a ADC/DAC (with the option of a DSP in between)directly to the synchroneous serial interface port (even though it annoys me that it only supports 16 bit (not 24))... I couldn't imagine adapting the codec-port driver to the more encoded ssi will pose a problem? But then again I haven't started fiddeling with the Linux yet. If some of you sharks out there got any comments that should make me reconsider they will be MOST welcome! Best regards, Anders Frederiksen > -----Original Message----- > From: Kristiaan De Paepe [mailto:kristiaan@starlab.net] > Sent: 12. maj 2000 16:04 > To: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com > Subject: Alternative for UCB1200/1300? > > > Hi all, > excuse me for being just a bit off-topic but we're currently searching > for an easy replacement of the Philips UCB1200 / UCB1300 codec. > Alternative should be easily suported by linux and the SA1100 > codec-port. We're only interested in the mono or stereo audio output, > i.e. we don't need the telecom and other stuff. > Does anyone have any suggestions (we need like 30-35 of them within 3 > weeks instead of the 30 weeks!@# standard lead-time from Philips). > > TIA > Kristiaan > ------------------------------------------------------------------ > Ing. De Paepe Kristiaan Principal Investigator > Starlab Tel: +32 2 740 07 40 > Research Laboratories Fax: +32 2 742 96 54 > Blvd. St. Michel 47, Email: mailto:kristiaan@starlab.net > B-1040 Brussels (Belgium) WWW: http://www.starlab.net/ > > Home:mailto:kristiaan@tijd.com Mob: +32 476 43 40 19 > ------------------------------------------------------------------ > Never reinvent the wheel unless you want it to come out square.(c) > ------------------------------------------------------------------ > > From kramer@pa.dec.com Fri May 12 20:28:00 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id UAA18955; Fri, 12 May 2000 20:28:00 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from mail1.digital.com (mail1.digital.com [204.123.2.50]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id UAA00487 for ; Fri, 12 May 2000 20:27:58 +0200 (METDST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id LAA18446; Fri, 12 May 2000 11:26:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA14532; Fri, 12 May 2000 11:26:06 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id LAA20246; Fri, 12 May 2000 11:25:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id LAA23851; Fri, 12 May 2000 11:25:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail1.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA23386; Fri, 12 May 2000 11:25:12 -0700 Received: from xanadu.gn.com (modemcable248.137-200-24.mtl.mc.videotron.net [24.200.137.248]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with ESMTP id LAA22157 for ; Fri, 12 May 2000 11:25:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (nico@localhost) by xanadu.gn.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id OAA29401; Fri, 12 May 2000 14:48:31 -0400 X-Authentication-Warning: xanadu.gn.com: nico owned process doing -bs Date: Fri, 12 May 2000 14:48:31 -0400 (EDT) From: Nicolas Pitre X-Sender: nico@xanadu.gn.com To: Erik Mouw Cc: kristiaan@starlab.net, sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Subject: Re: Alternative for UCB1200/1300? In-Reply-To: <200005121537.RAA18140@duteinh.et.tudelft.nl> Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk On Fri, 12 May -1, Erik Mouw wrote: > On Fri, 12 May 2000 16:04:03 +0200, Kristiaan De Paepe wrote: > > excuse me for being just a bit off-topic but we're currently searching > > for an easy replacement of the Philips UCB1200 / UCB1300 codec. > > Alternative should be easily suported by linux and the SA1100 > > codec-port. We're only interested in the mono or stereo audio output, > > i.e. we don't need the telecom and other stuff. > > Does anyone have any suggestions (we need like 30-35 of them within 3 > > weeks instead of the 30 weeks!@# standard lead-time from Philips). > > If you only want audio output, you can go for the Victor/LART way and use > a standard audio DAC. The LART currently uses a Burr-Brown PCM 1710U on > the SSP port. Yes, that's a high quality DAC, but hey, we want good audio > quality for our MP3^H^H^Hhandheld! ;-) Have a look at the LART site for > the KSB schematics. On Victor, a CS4333 from Crystal was used. Nicolas From kramer@pa.dec.com Sat May 13 23:29:53 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id XAA23170; Sat, 13 May 2000 23:29:53 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from mail2.digital.com (mail2.digital.com [204.123.2.56]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id XAA25401 for ; Sat, 13 May 2000 23:29:51 +0200 (METDST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id OAA05216; Sat, 13 May 2000 14:28:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA23373; Sat, 13 May 2000 14:27:44 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id OAA06725; Sat, 13 May 2000 14:24:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id OAA16888; Sat, 13 May 2000 14:24:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail2.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA00458; Sat, 13 May 2000 14:24:20 -0700 Received: from xanadu.gn.com (modemcable248.137-200-24.mtl.mc.videotron.net [24.200.137.248]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with ESMTP id OAA01075 for ; Sat, 13 May 2000 14:24:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (nico@localhost) by xanadu.gn.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id RAA03464; Sat, 13 May 2000 17:47:38 -0400 X-Authentication-Warning: xanadu.gn.com: nico owned process doing -bs Date: Sat, 13 May 2000 17:47:38 -0400 (EDT) From: Nicolas Pitre X-Sender: nico@xanadu.gn.com To: lart@lart.tudelft.nl, mad-dev@lists.mars.org Cc: SA-1100/Linux Subject: madplay vs splay (MP3 performances) Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk In the process of searching for a good way to test my UDA1341 audio driver, I just cleaned up splay's fixpoint support a bit and created a ramdisk image with splay on it. Sorry Rob, but I couldn't resist comparing splay against madplay on a SA1100 CPU because of recent concerns about splay benchmarks, threads, etc. So here are the results. Since my ramdisk doesn't have the 'time' command, I grabbed a 'top' screen while each players were running in the background. madplay: 12:27am up 27 min, 1 user, load average: 0.17, 0.04, 0.01 11 processes: 10 sleeping, 1 running, 0 zombie, 0 stopped CPU states: 23.8% user, 0.5% system, 0.0% nice, 75.5% idle Mem: 28140K av, 13328K used, 14812K free, 0K shrd, 6144K buff Swap: 0K av, 0K used, 0K free 3752K cached PID USER PRI NI SIZE RSS SHARE STAT LIB %CPU %MEM TIME COMMAND 84 root 16 0 1272 1272 1176 S 0 23.8 4.5 0:11 madplay 85 root 1 0 872 872 704 R 0 0.5 3.0 0:00 top 1 root 0 0 512 512 440 S 0 0.0 1.8 0:02 init 2 root 0 0 0 0 0 SW 0 0.0 0.0 0:00 kswapd 3 root 0 0 0 0 0 SW 0 0.0 0.0 0:00 kflushd 4 root 0 0 0 0 0 SW 0 0.0 0.0 0:00 kupdate 34 root 0 0 500 500 436 S 0 0.0 1.7 0:00 syslogd 50 root 0 0 568 568 492 S 0 0.0 2.0 0:00 inetd 54 root 0 0 472 472 400 S 0 0.0 1.6 0:00 getty 55 root 0 0 472 472 400 S 0 0.0 1.6 0:00 getty 56 root 0 0 904 904 748 S 0 0.0 3.2 0:00 bash splay: 12:29am up 29 min, 1 user, load average: 0.12, 0.05, 0.01 13 processes: 11 sleeping, 2 running, 0 zombie, 0 stopped CPU states: 17.6% user, 0.5% system, 0.0% nice, 81.7% idle Mem: 28140K av, 13672K used, 14468K free, 0K shrd, 6144K buff Swap: 0K av, 0K used, 0K free 3752K cached PID USER PRI NI SIZE RSS SHARE STAT LIB %CPU %MEM TIME COMMAND 86 root 14 0 904 904 536 R 0 17.0 3.2 0:08 splay 88 root 0 0 904 904 536 S 0 0.5 3.2 0:00 splay 89 root 1 0 872 872 704 R 0 0.5 3.0 0:00 top 1 root 0 0 512 512 440 S 0 0.0 1.8 0:02 init 2 root 0 0 0 0 0 SW 0 0.0 0.0 0:00 kswapd 3 root 0 0 0 0 0 SW 0 0.0 0.0 0:00 kflushd 4 root 0 0 0 0 0 SW 0 0.0 0.0 0:00 kupdate 34 root 0 0 500 500 436 S 0 0.0 1.7 0:00 syslogd 50 root 0 0 568 568 492 S 0 0.0 2.0 0:00 inetd 54 root 0 0 472 472 400 S 0 0.0 1.6 0:00 getty 55 root 0 0 472 472 400 S 0 0.0 1.6 0:00 getty 56 root 0 0 904 904 748 S 0 0.0 3.2 0:00 bash 87 root 0 0 904 904 536 S 0 0.0 3.2 0:00 splay Even if splay has 3 threads running, they account for 17.5% CPU vs 23.8% CPU for madplay. Both screen snapshots were taken at the same playback time so the "TIME" comparison should be accurate too. The test file used is MPEG-1 Layer 3, joint stereo, 44100Hz, 128kbit/s. This was tested on Linux 2.3.99-pre6-rmk1-np4. /proc/cpuinfo shows: Processor : Intel StrongARM-1110 rev 5 (v4l) BogoMIPS : 194.15 Hardware : Intel-Assabet The splay version I used is the cleaned one. Its playback performances is the same as the old one, however is starts right away instead of crunching 100% CPU for few seconds. This will produce proper results if mesured with the 'time' comands. If you are interested, here are where you can find all relevant files: splay-0.8.2-fp1.tgz ftp://ftp.netwinder.org/users/n/nico/ ramdisk_img_splay.gz ftp://ftp.netwinder.org/users/n/nico/ mad-0.10.3b.tar.gz ftp://ftp.mars.org/pub/mpeg/ Nicolas From kramer@pa.dec.com Sun May 14 03:17:34 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id DAA23745; Sun, 14 May 2000 03:17:33 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from mail2.digital.com (mail2.digital.com [204.123.2.56]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id DAA28195 for ; Sun, 14 May 2000 03:17:31 +0200 (METDST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id SAA13639; Sat, 13 May 2000 18:15:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA17044; Sat, 13 May 2000 18:15:48 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id SAA31864; Sat, 13 May 2000 18:14:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id SAA04805; Sat, 13 May 2000 18:14:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail1.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA06943; Sat, 13 May 2000 18:14:32 -0700 Received: from deimos.mars.org (deimos.ne.mediaone.net [24.147.209.78]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with ESMTP id SAA06670 for ; Sat, 13 May 2000 18:14:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: from deimos.mars.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by deimos.mars.org (8.9.3/8.9.3/Debian/GNU) with ESMTP id VAA02853; Sat, 13 May 2000 21:12:52 -0400 Message-Id: <200005140112.VAA02853@deimos.mars.org> From: Rob Leslie To: Nicolas Pitre Cc: lart@lart.tudelft.nl, mad-dev@lists.mars.org, SA-1100/Linux Subject: Re: [mad-dev] madplay vs splay (MP3 performances) In-Reply-To: Your message of "Sat, 13 May 2000 17:47:38 EDT." Mime-Version: 1.0 (generated by tm-edit 7.106) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Date: Sat, 13 May 2000 21:12:49 -0400 Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk Hi Nicolas, Your results are interesting. I tried to reproduce them on my SA-1100 platform, but I continue to get results similar to my previous tests: empeg:~# time ./splay-0.8.2-fp1 -d - WS010038.A08.mp3 >/dev/null real 1m40.466s user 1m37.240s sys 0m2.450s empeg:~# time ./madplay -o pcm:- WS010038.A08.mp3 >/dev/null MPEG Audio Decoder version 0.10.4 (beta) - Copyright (C) 2000 Robert Leslie WS010038.A08.mp3: 9550 frames decoded (4:09.4) real 1m9.162s user 1m6.000s sys 0m0.980s Since this file's audio playing time is 4:09, I calculate about 40% and 27% CPU respectively for splay and madplay. (This madplay is a developmental 0.10.4b not 0.10.3b but the results are still similar.) [I note that 40% is an improvement over my previous measurement of 43% for a previous version of splay on this platform :-] Taking a running snapshot during live audio playback tends to confirm this: empeg:~# ps u USER PID %CPU %MEM VSZ RSS TTY STAT START TIME COMMAND #0 20 0.0 11.7 2188 856 ttyS1 S Feb17 0:09 -bash #0 592 40.6 12.6 1856 924 ttyS1 S 11:15 0:11 ./splay-0.8.2-fp #0 593 0.0 12.6 1856 924 ttyS1 S 11:15 0:00 ./splay-0.8.2-fp #0 594 0.6 12.6 1856 924 ttyS1 S 11:15 0:00 ./splay-0.8.2-fp #0 606 0.0 9.5 2268 696 ttyS1 R 11:16 0:00 ps u empeg:~# ps u USER PID %CPU %MEM VSZ RSS TTY STAT START TIME COMMAND #0 20 0.0 11.8 2188 868 ttyS1 S Feb17 0:09 -bash #0 611 26.8 10.2 7040 748 ttyS1 S 11:17 0:02 ./madplay WS0100 #0 615 0.0 9.4 2268 692 ttyS1 R 11:17 0:00 ps u For reference: empeg:~# cat /proc/cpuinfo Processor : Intel StrongARM-1100 rev 9 (v4l) BogoMIPS : 208.08 Hardware : SA1100-based Revision : 0000 Serial : 0000000000000000 empeg:~# uname -a Linux empeg 2.2.14-rmk5-np17-empeg22 #193 Sat Mar 25 18:04:26 GMT 2000 armv4l unknown Incidentally, your CPU info was: > Processor : Intel StrongARM-1110 rev 5 (v4l) > BogoMIPS : 194.15 > Hardware : Intel-Assabet I'm not very familiar with the differences between the SA-1100 and the SA-1110, but my understanding is that the SA-1110 has at least a faster memory bus. At any rate, the reported time is definitely affected on the SA-110 and possibly the SA-1110 too when threads are used in splay, although curiously, reporting on my SA-1100 is not significantly affected. To wit: [without threads] empeg:~# time ./splay-0.8.2-fp1 -t 0 test.mp3 real 4m24.557s user 1m41.140s sys 0m2.650s [with threads] empeg:~# time ./splay-0.8.2-fp1 test.mp3 real 4m24.727s user 1m34.870s sys 0m5.530s So the total CPU time on the SA-1100 is similar: 104 vs 100 seconds. Compare that with the SA-110: [without threads] labrat:~$ time ./splay-0.8.2-fp1 -t 0 test.mp3 real 4m23.827s user 0m46.620s sys 0m1.850s [with threads] labrat:~$ time ./splay-0.8.2-fp1 test.mp3 real 4m23.896s user 0m0.650s sys 0m1.540s That's quite a difference: 48 vs 2 seconds total CPU? Can this be accurate? labrat:~$ cat /proc/cpuinfo Processor : Intel sa110 rev 3 BogoMips : 262.14 Hardware : Rebel-NetWinder Serial # : 1517 Revision : 44ff labrat:~$ uname -a Linux labrat 2.2.13 #27 Sat Apr 15 01:32:47 CDT 2000 armv4l unknown If you believe the "with threads" numbers, splay is using less than 1% of the SA-110 CPU. (Incidentally, `top' seems to confirm this.) Without threads, it's more like 18%. For the record, madplay scores about 16% on the same machine with the same input file. I don't have access to a SA-1110 machine so I can't compare directly, but I'd be happy to provide a `time' binary if you'd like to take measurements with something better than `top'. Any idea why the numbers are so different for splay using threads vs splay without threads? Can you compare this on the SA-1110? In any event, madplay seems to be significantly faster than splay right now *on the SA-1100* regardless of the threads issue. Perhaps someone else could compare on another SA-1100 host? Cheers, -- Rob Leslie rob@mars.org From kramer@pa.dec.com Sun May 14 16:29:46 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id QAA25296; Sun, 14 May 2000 16:29:45 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from mail1.digital.com (mail1.digital.com [204.123.2.50]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id QAA06149 for ; Sun, 14 May 2000 16:29:44 +0200 (METDST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id HAA00700; Sun, 14 May 2000 07:28:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA05783; Sun, 14 May 2000 07:27:51 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id HAA25657; Sun, 14 May 2000 07:26:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id HAA31276; Sun, 14 May 2000 07:26:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail2.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA09352; Sun, 14 May 2000 07:26:37 -0700 Received: from xanadu.gn.com (modemcable248.137-200-24.mtl.mc.videotron.net [24.200.137.248]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with ESMTP id HAA11991 for ; Sun, 14 May 2000 07:26:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (nico@localhost) by xanadu.gn.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id KAA04090; Sun, 14 May 2000 10:48:55 -0400 X-Authentication-Warning: xanadu.gn.com: nico owned process doing -bs Date: Sun, 14 May 2000 10:48:55 -0400 (EDT) From: Nicolas Pitre X-Sender: nico@xanadu.gn.com To: Rob Leslie Cc: lart@lart.tudelft.nl, mad-dev@lists.mars.org, SA-1100/Linux Subject: Re: [mad-dev] madplay vs splay (MP3 performances) In-Reply-To: <200005140112.VAA02853@deimos.mars.org> Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk On Sat, 13 May 2000, Rob Leslie wrote: > Hi Nicolas, > > Your results are interesting. > > I tried to reproduce them on my SA-1100 platform, but I continue to get > results similar to my previous tests: > > empeg:~# time ./splay-0.8.2-fp1 -d - WS010038.A08.mp3 >/dev/null > > real 1m40.466s > user 1m37.240s > sys 0m2.450s > > empeg:~# time ./madplay -o pcm:- WS010038.A08.mp3 >/dev/null > MPEG Audio Decoder version 0.10.4 (beta) - Copyright (C) 2000 Robert Leslie > WS010038.A08.mp3: 9550 frames decoded (4:09.4) > > real 1m9.162s > user 1m6.000s > sys 0m0.980s > > Since this file's audio playing time is 4:09, I calculate about 40% and 27% > CPU respectively for splay and madplay. (This madplay is a developmental > 0.10.4b not 0.10.3b but the results are still similar.) Did you read README.ARM in splay's archive? For best performances you need to add some compiler flags by hand. Also you could use the splay binary included in the ramdisk image I mentionned in my last mail. Or send me your both binaries so I'll try them on my system. Nicolas From kramer@pa.dec.com Mon May 15 01:55:46 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id BAA26508; Mon, 15 May 2000 01:55:46 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from mail1.digital.com (mail1.digital.com [204.123.2.50]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id BAA15061 for ; Mon, 15 May 2000 01:55:44 +0200 (METDST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id QAA26575; Sun, 14 May 2000 16:52:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA09835; Sun, 14 May 2000 16:52:36 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id QAA01204; Sun, 14 May 2000 16:49:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id QAA21782; Sun, 14 May 2000 16:49:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail2.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA15973; Sun, 14 May 2000 16:49:44 -0700 Received: from deimos.mars.org (deimos.ne.mediaone.net [24.147.209.78]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with ESMTP id QAA04845 for ; Sun, 14 May 2000 16:49:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: from deimos.mars.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by deimos.mars.org (8.9.3/8.9.3/Debian/GNU) with ESMTP id TAA16786; Sun, 14 May 2000 19:47:57 -0400 Message-Id: <200005142347.TAA16786@deimos.mars.org> From: Rob Leslie To: Nicolas Pitre Cc: lart@lart.tudelft.nl, mad-dev@lists.mars.org, SA-1100/Linux Subject: Re: [mad-dev] madplay vs splay (MP3 performances) In-Reply-To: Your message of "Sun, 14 May 2000 10:48:55 EDT." Mime-Version: 1.0 (generated by tm-edit 7.106) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Date: Sun, 14 May 2000 19:47:56 -0400 Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk > Did you read README.ARM in splay's archive? For best performances you > need to add some compiler flags by hand. Also you could use the splay > binary included in the ramdisk image I mentionned in my last mail. Yes, I followed the README.ARM instructions, and I also tried using the binary from your ramdisk image. > Or send me your both binaries so I'll try them on my system. Your binaries are probably fine, but do you want me to send you a `time' program? (If so, please follow up privately.) You could try timing the pure decoding time like I did by dumping the PCM output to /dev/null. I'm also curious how the threads issue is manifested on the SA-1110. Cheers, -rob From kramer@pa.dec.com Mon May 15 04:32:40 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id EAA26888; Mon, 15 May 2000 04:32:39 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from mail2.digital.com (mail2.digital.com [204.123.2.56]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id EAA16581 for ; Mon, 15 May 2000 04:32:38 +0200 (METDST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id TAA10007; Sun, 14 May 2000 19:29:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA11045; Sun, 14 May 2000 19:28:32 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id TAA02468; Sun, 14 May 2000 19:27:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id TAA23890; Sun, 14 May 2000 19:27:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail1.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA27529; Sun, 14 May 2000 19:27:30 -0700 Received: from xanadu.gn.com (modemcable248.137-200-24.mtl.mc.videotron.net [24.200.137.248]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with ESMTP id TAA00647 for ; Sun, 14 May 2000 19:27:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (nico@localhost) by xanadu.gn.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id WAA18210 for ; Sun, 14 May 2000 22:50:52 -0400 X-Authentication-Warning: xanadu.gn.com: nico owned process doing -bs Date: Sun, 14 May 2000 22:50:52 -0400 (EDT) From: Nicolas Pitre X-Sender: nico@xanadu.gn.com To: SA-1100/Linux Subject: diff-2.3.99-pre8-rmk1-np1.gz Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk ... is available from ftp.netwinder.org/users/n/nico. This includes: - Updated to pre8-rmk1 - UDA1341 driver updates (Playback works perfectly but bolted at 44100Hz stereo. No mixer support yet) - Small fix to the framebuffer driver - Small fix to the discontigmem support - Generic IRQ handler for GPIO >= 11 (you can register separate IRQ numbers for all GPIOs now) - PLEB memory config added Some major PCMCIA updates should be coming shortly. *** NOTE *** This kernel now assumes the bootloader is able to pass the correct value in r0/r1 on entry. This will allows for a kernel to be run on multiple SA1100 designs. Failure to do so will result in a non-booting kernel. For those of you using angelboot, see linux/Documentation/arm/SA1100 for documentation files where some angelboot example parameters are presented and r0/r1 registers are assigned their proper values. All registered architecture numbers are listed in linux/include/asm/system.h. If you didn't register one for your architecture, please do so now (see the end of linux/Documentation/arm/README). If your bootloader can't be fixed immediately, you can hardcode r0/r1 at the end of linux/arch/arm/boot/compressed/head-sa1100.S as a workaround in the mean time. But of course you'd better fix your bootloader ASAP. Enjoy Nicolas From kramer@pa.dec.com Mon May 15 19:38:38 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id TAA02305; Mon, 15 May 2000 19:38:37 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from mail2.digital.com (mail2.digital.com [204.123.2.56]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id TAA18558 for ; Mon, 15 May 2000 19:38:35 +0200 (METDST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id KAA00721; Mon, 15 May 2000 10:36:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA31888; Mon, 15 May 2000 10:36:23 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id KAA18284; Mon, 15 May 2000 10:34:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id KAA23626; Mon, 15 May 2000 10:34:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail1.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA31366; Mon, 15 May 2000 10:34:49 -0700 Received: from ice.fiftyone.com (ice.fiftyone.com [208.225.80.11]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with ESMTP id KAA16299 for ; Mon, 15 May 2000 10:34:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: from server01.asi (akron-80-152.ar51.net [208.225.80.152]) by ice.fiftyone.com (8.9.3/8.8.7) with ESMTP id NAA06315; Mon, 15 May 2000 13:35:33 -0400 Received: by SERVER01 with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2448.0) id ; Mon, 15 May 2000 13:35:15 -0400 Message-Id: From: Jeff Sutherland To: "'Nicolas Pitre'" , "'SA-1100/Linux'" Subject: RE: diff-2.3.99-pre8-rmk1-np1.gz Date: Mon, 15 May 2000 13:35:01 -0400 Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2448.0) Content-Type: text/plain Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk > ... is available from ftp.netwinder.org/users/n/nico. > > This includes: > > - Updated to pre8-rmk1 > - UDA1341 driver updates > (Playback works perfectly but bolted at 44100Hz stereo. > No mixer support yet) > - Small fix to the framebuffer driver > - Small fix to the discontigmem support > - Generic IRQ handler for GPIO >= 11 > (you can register separate IRQ numbers for all GPIOs now) > - PLEB memory config added > > Some major PCMCIA updates should be coming shortly. --snip-- Kernel boots OK on my Assabet as long as I disable the 1341 support. With it enabled my kernel would simply hang after printing "UDA1341 audio driver initialized". To minimize the damage to the source all I did to disable was to return a non-zero number (error condition) right at the top of audio_uda1341_init() in sa1100-uda1341.c, then the kernel would boot just fine. Hardware problems on a first-generation Assabet possibly? //Jeff From kramer@pa.dec.com Tue May 16 02:57:22 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id CAA04722; Tue, 16 May 2000 02:57:22 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from mail1.digital.com (mail1.digital.com [204.123.2.50]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id CAA01413 for ; Tue, 16 May 2000 02:57:20 +0200 (METDST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id RAA09222; Mon, 15 May 2000 17:55:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA20531; Mon, 15 May 2000 17:54:13 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id RAA25022; Mon, 15 May 2000 17:51:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id RAA18775; Mon, 15 May 2000 17:51:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail2.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA26899; Mon, 15 May 2000 17:51:29 -0700 Received: from xanadu.gn.com (modemcable248.137-200-24.mtl.mc.videotron.net [24.200.137.248]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with ESMTP id RAA05958 for ; Mon, 15 May 2000 17:51:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (nico@localhost) by xanadu.gn.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id VAA18825; Mon, 15 May 2000 21:14:50 -0400 X-Authentication-Warning: xanadu.gn.com: nico owned process doing -bs Date: Mon, 15 May 2000 21:14:50 -0400 (EDT) From: Nicolas Pitre X-Sender: nico@xanadu.gn.com To: Jeff Sutherland Cc: "'SA-1100/Linux'" Subject: RE: diff-2.3.99-pre8-rmk1-np1.gz In-Reply-To: Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk On Mon, 15 May 2000, Jeff Sutherland wrote: > > ... is available from ftp.netwinder.org/users/n/nico. > > > > This includes: > > > > - Updated to pre8-rmk1 > > - UDA1341 driver updates > > (Playback works perfectly but bolted at 44100Hz stereo. > > No mixer support yet) > > - Small fix to the framebuffer driver BTW I forgot to mention 16bpp framebuffer support (from Jamey Hicks) > > - Small fix to the discontigmem support > > - Generic IRQ handler for GPIO >= 11 > > (you can register separate IRQ numbers for all GPIOs now) > > - PLEB memory config added > > > > Some major PCMCIA updates should be coming shortly. > > --snip-- > > Kernel boots OK on my Assabet as long as I disable the 1341 support. With > it enabled my kernel would simply hang after printing "UDA1341 audio driver > initialized". To minimize the damage to the source all I did to disable was > to return a non-zero number (error condition) right at the top of > audio_uda1341_init() in sa1100-uda1341.c, then the kernel would boot just > fine. Hardware problems on a first-generation Assabet possibly? Could you try re-enabling the driver and commenting out references to MDREFR to see if it helps? Nicolas From kramer@pa.dec.com Tue May 16 05:09:23 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id FAA05434; Tue, 16 May 2000 05:09:23 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from mail1.digital.com (mail1.digital.com [204.123.2.50]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id FAA03649 for ; Tue, 16 May 2000 05:09:20 +0200 (METDST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id UAA08665; Mon, 15 May 2000 20:07:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA29182; Mon, 15 May 2000 20:07:49 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id UAA09426; Mon, 15 May 2000 20:07:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id UAA08999; Mon, 15 May 2000 20:07:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail2.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA26538; Mon, 15 May 2000 20:07:04 -0700 Received: from xanadu.gn.com (modemcable248.137-200-24.mtl.mc.videotron.net [24.200.137.248]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with ESMTP id UAA12713 for ; Mon, 15 May 2000 20:07:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (nico@localhost) by xanadu.gn.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id XAA24575; Mon, 15 May 2000 23:30:21 -0400 X-Authentication-Warning: xanadu.gn.com: nico owned process doing -bs Date: Mon, 15 May 2000 23:30:21 -0400 (EDT) From: Nicolas Pitre X-Sender: nico@xanadu.gn.com To: Rob Leslie Cc: lart@lart.tudelft.nl, mad-dev@lists.mars.org, SA-1100/Linux Subject: Re: [mad-dev] madplay vs splay (MP3 performances) In-Reply-To: <200005142347.TAA16786@deimos.mars.org> Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk On Sun, 14 May 2000, Rob Leslie wrote: > Your binaries are probably fine, but do you want me to send you a `time' > program? (If so, please follow up privately.) You could try timing the pure > decoding time like I did by dumping the PCM output to /dev/null. OK, so I just did on SA1100 hardware for which I don't currently have audio output support: [root@thinclient /]# date; splay -d - test.mp3 | cat > /dev/null; date Mon May 15 21:43:44 EDT 2000 Mon May 15 21:44:11 EDT 2000 [root@thinclient /]# date; madplay -o raw:/dev/null test.mp3; date Mon May 15 21:50:42 EDT 2000 MPEG Audio Decoder version 0.10.3 (beta) - Copyright (C) 2000 Robert Leslie test.mp3: 1959 frames decoded (0:51.1) Mon May 15 21:51:02 EDT 2000 [root@thinclient /]# cat /proc/cpuinfo Processor : Intel StrongARM-1100 rev 9 (v4l) BogoMIPS : 124.52 Hardware : ADS ThinClient [root@thinclient /dev]# uname -s -r Linux 2.3.99-pre8-rmk1-np1 So we got: splay: 27 sec 52.8 %CPU if real-time madplay: 20 sec 39.1 %CPU if real-time The same tests with the same binaries on SA1110 hardware gave me: [root@Linux /]$date; splay -d - test.mp3 | cat > /dev/null; date Thu Jan 1 00:17:03 UTC 1970 Thu Jan 1 00:17:27 UTC 1970 [root@Linux /]$date; madplay -o raw:/dev/null test.mp3; date Thu Jan 1 00:22:16 UTC 1970 MPEG Audio Decoder version 0.10.3 (beta) - Copyright (C) 2000 Robert Leslie test.mp3: 1959 frames decoded (0:51.1) Thu Jan 1 00:22:27 UTC 1970 [root@Linux /]$cat /proc/cpuinfo Processor : Intel StrongARM-1110 rev 5 (v4l) BogoMIPS : 194.15 Hardware : Intel-Assabet [root@Linux /]$uname -s -r Linux 2.3.99-pre8-rmk1-np1 So we get: splay: 24 sec 47.0 %CPU if real-time madplay: 11 sec 21.5 %CPU if real-time So by looking at this splay is much worse than madplay... and even more on a SA1110 which is pretty weird. However, here is what 'time' produces when both players are actually playing: [root@Linux /]$time splay test.mp3 8.81user 0.25system 0:50.44elapsed 17%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata 0maxresident)k 0inputs+0outputs (150major+131minor)pagefaults 0swaps [root@Linux /]$time /tmp/madplay test.mp3 MPEG Audio Decoder version 0.10.3 (beta) - Copyright (C) 2000 Robert Leslie test.mp3: 1959 frames decoded (0:51.1) 11.37user 0.31system 0:50.39elapsed 23%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata 0maxresident)k 0inputs+0outputs (311major+52minor)pagefaults 0swaps Here splay is better than madplay and these 'time' results are also coherent with what I get from 'top' statistics. If I do a cat /dev/zero > /dev/null & I can actually see with 'top' that splay uses approx 18% CPU and the 'cat' process uses the 80% leftover. When madplay uses its 23% CPU, cat actually gets 75% CPU. It's true that splay uses a different object when writing to a file instead of the audio device, but looking at the code it shouldn't make so a big difference... I don't know what to think. Nicolas From kramer@pa.dec.com Tue May 16 06:39:50 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id GAA05860; Tue, 16 May 2000 06:39:50 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from mail2.digital.com (mail2.digital.com [204.123.2.56]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id GAA04830 for ; Tue, 16 May 2000 06:39:48 +0200 (METDST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id VAA18238; Mon, 15 May 2000 21:37:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA02297; Mon, 15 May 2000 21:37:46 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id VAA21240; Mon, 15 May 2000 21:35:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id VAA31402; Mon, 15 May 2000 21:35:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail2.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA22373; Mon, 15 May 2000 21:35:47 -0700 Received: from xanadu.gn.com (modemcable248.137-200-24.mtl.mc.videotron.net [24.200.137.248]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with ESMTP id VAA17608 for ; Mon, 15 May 2000 21:35:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (nico@localhost) by xanadu.gn.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id AAA27245 for ; Tue, 16 May 2000 00:59:11 -0400 X-Authentication-Warning: xanadu.gn.com: nico owned process doing -bs Date: Tue, 16 May 2000 00:59:11 -0400 (EDT) From: Nicolas Pitre X-Sender: nico@xanadu.gn.com To: SA-1100/Linux Subject: diff-2.3.99-pre8-rmk1-np2.gz Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk ... is available from ftp.netwinder.org/users/n/nico. This contains: - duplicate makefile targets removed - big PCMCIA patch from John Dorsey (Supports the Socket LP-E CF+ card on Assabet. See http://www.cs.cmu.edu/~wearable/software/pcmcia-arm.html) Enjoy! Nicolas From kramer@pa.dec.com Tue May 16 07:38:20 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id HAA06127; Tue, 16 May 2000 07:38:19 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from mail1.digital.com (mail1.digital.com [204.123.2.50]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id HAA05727 for ; Tue, 16 May 2000 07:38:18 +0200 (METDST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id WAA16229; Mon, 15 May 2000 22:36:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA27940; Mon, 15 May 2000 22:36:49 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id WAA31102; Mon, 15 May 2000 22:36:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id WAA08672; Mon, 15 May 2000 22:36:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail1.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA28636; Mon, 15 May 2000 22:36:02 -0700 Received: from thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (thorgal.et.tudelft.nl [130.161.40.91]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with ESMTP id WAA14568 for ; Mon, 15 May 2000 22:36:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [130.161.115.44] (jdbakker.et.tudelft.nl [130.161.115.44]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id HAA12978; Tue, 16 May 2000 07:35:52 +0200 Message-Id: In-Reply-To: References: <200005142347.TAA16786@deimos.mars.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Date: Tue, 16 May 2000 07:33:36 +0200 To: Nicolas Pitre From: "J.D. Bakker" Subject: Re: [mad-dev] madplay vs splay (MP3 performances) Cc: Rob Leslie , lart@lart.tudelft.nl, mad-dev@lists.mars.org, SA-1100/Linux Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk At 05:30 +0200 16-05-2000, Nicolas Pitre wrote: >On Sun, 14 May 2000, Rob Leslie wrote: > >> Your binaries are probably fine, but do you want me to send you a `time' >> program? (If so, please follow up privately.) You could try timing the pure >> decoding time like I did by dumping the PCM output to /dev/null. > >OK, so I just did on SA1100 hardware for which I don't currently have >audio output support: > > >[root@thinclient /]# date; splay -d - test.mp3 | cat > /dev/null; date Aren't you really measuring pipe/context switch latency here ? Both of these suck on ARMLinux (because of the required cache flushes). This benchmark may not say too much about splay performance. JDB. -- LART. 250 MIPS under one Watt. Free hardware design files. http://www.lart.tudelft.nl/ From kramer@pa.dec.com Tue May 16 14:25:50 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id OAA09793; Tue, 16 May 2000 14:25:50 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from mail2.digital.com (mail2.digital.com [204.123.2.56]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id OAA22382 for ; Tue, 16 May 2000 14:25:48 +0200 (METDST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id FAA10112; Tue, 16 May 2000 05:21:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA03123; Tue, 16 May 2000 05:20:25 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id FAA18234; Tue, 16 May 2000 05:17:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id FAA24546; Tue, 16 May 2000 05:17:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail1.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA13344; Tue, 16 May 2000 05:17:57 -0700 Received: from krdl.org.sg (rodin.krdl.org.sg [192.122.139.27]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with ESMTP id FAA12360 for ; Tue, 16 May 2000 05:17:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mailhost.krdl.org.sg (mailhost [192.122.134.30]) by krdl.org.sg (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id UAA23596; Tue, 16 May 2000 20:25:34 +0800 Received: from krdl.org.sg (QUNYING.krdl.org.sg [192.168.136.36]) by mailhost.krdl.org.sg (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id UAA25299; Tue, 16 May 2000 20:16:50 +0800 (SGT) Message-Id: <39213C67.2954D90@krdl.org.sg> Date: Tue, 16 May 2000 20:17:43 +0800 From: zhu qun ying Organization: KRDL X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.73 [en] (WinNT; U) X-Accept-Language: en Mime-Version: 1.0 To: Nicolas Pitre , sa1100 Subject: Re: diff-2.3.99-pre8-rmk1-np2.gz References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Mime-Autoconverted: from 8bit to quoted-printable by mail1.digital.com id FAA12360 Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk The Assabet only code in arch/arm/kernel/hw-sa1100.c is not enclosed in t= he=20 #ifdef CONFIG_SA1100_ASSABET, #endif pair, caused compiled error for othe= r platform. My kernel did not boot, stops after decompressing. (configure after LART) --=20 (~._.~) =D6=EC =C8=BA =D3=A2 (Qun Ying) (65) 874-6743 ( O ) Kent Ridge Digital Labs (KRDL) ()~*~() 21 Heng Mui Keng Terrace, Singapore 119613 (_)-(_) qyzhu@krdl.org.sg * zhuqy@hotmail.com From kramer@pa.dec.com Tue May 16 14:48:42 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id OAA10042; Tue, 16 May 2000 14:48:42 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from mail1.digital.com (mail1.digital.com [204.123.2.50]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id OAA23481 for ; Tue, 16 May 2000 14:48:40 +0200 (METDST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id FAA04223; Tue, 16 May 2000 05:45:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA23830; Tue, 16 May 2000 05:44:38 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id FAA24926; Tue, 16 May 2000 05:42:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id FAA12097; Tue, 16 May 2000 05:42:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail2.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA19160; Tue, 16 May 2000 05:42:58 -0700 Received: from smtp1.andrew.cmu.edu (SMTP1.ANDREW.CMU.EDU [128.2.10.81]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with ESMTP id FAA14152 for ; Tue, 16 May 2000 05:42:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: from unix4.andrew.cmu.edu (UNIX4.ANDREW.CMU.EDU [128.2.15.8]) by smtp1.andrew.cmu.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id IAA03786; Tue, 16 May 2000 08:39:33 -0400 (EDT) Date: Tue, 16 May 2000 08:39:34 -0400 (EDT) From: John G Dorsey To: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Subject: Re: diff-2.3.99-pre8-rmk1-np2.gz In-Reply-To: <39213C67.2954D90@krdl.org.sg> Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk On Tue, 16 May 2000, zhu qun ying wrote: > The Assabet only code in arch/arm/kernel/hw-sa1100.c is not enclosed in the > #ifdef CONFIG_SA1100_ASSABET, #endif pair, caused compiled error for other > platform. That's my fault. I was toying with the notion of moving some of the low-level operations into the sa1100 socket driver module, and forgot to put everything back where I found it. I apologize. -jd From kramer@pa.dec.com Tue May 16 15:14:32 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id PAA10285; Tue, 16 May 2000 15:14:31 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from mail1.digital.com (mail1.digital.com [204.123.2.50]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id PAA25109 for ; Tue, 16 May 2000 15:14:29 +0200 (METDST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id GAA16662; Tue, 16 May 2000 06:11:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA16645; Tue, 16 May 2000 06:10:28 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id GAA26284; Tue, 16 May 2000 06:08:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id GAA00995; Tue, 16 May 2000 06:08:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail2.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA08759; Tue, 16 May 2000 06:08:45 -0700 Received: from duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (duteinh.et.tudelft.nl [130.161.42.1]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with ESMTP id GAA15499 for ; Tue, 16 May 2000 06:08:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: from dutein71 by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id PAA10211; Tue, 16 May 2000 15:07:19 +0200 (MET DST) Message-Id: <200005161307.PAA10211@duteinh.et.tudelft.nl> From: Erik Mouw To: qyzhu@krdl.org.sg Cc: nico@CAM.ORG, sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Subject: Re: diff-2.3.99-pre8-rmk1-np2.gz In-Reply-To: <39213C67.2954D90@krdl.org.sg> Organization: Eric conspiracy secret labs Date: Tue May 16 15:07:17 +0200 (MDT) 2000 X-Face: "!Z|1XjFg!3Iw)BwM^M\k)J5KHiPddz}#/Zw%?$&Q!xqob"OA|})3_@&BTTiQERo?/^g[Z<9P4R8:5C:aqq.cw!hotLc=+u-"+1rq@9$V^8PbOUlodyi_sejt+D`iqkLpx$>.aXl%vnfPIt"LK|/%>94_Zrm8jy?`_[RKt'TuoxUxfk(gMhY(n|DBBl~c$dhO>G%6}R4+DGX3|idBm4oU&UM/XUP4I9aoN{]`ax%B?rgD(I3OJ<62Y6L X-Mailer: XCmail 1.0.1 - with PGP support, PGP engine version 0.5 (IRIX) X-Mailerorigin: http://www.fsai.fh-trier.de/~schmitzj/Xclasses/XCmail/ X-Eric-Conspiracy: There is no conspiracy! X-Loop: erik@it.et.tudelft.nl Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk On Tue, 16 May 2000 20:17:43 +0800, zhu qun ying wrote: > My kernel did not boot, stops after decompressing. (configure after LART) The LART also doesn't boot, but that's because of the broken discontiguos memory. I still have to look into this, but other things go first. If you have a real LART (complete with the funny memory setup), you can disable bank 1 and 3 to get it booted (with only 16MB, though). Erik -- Computers run on faith, not electrons. -- T.N. Thompson From kramer@pa.dec.com Tue May 16 15:59:07 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id PAA10707; Tue, 16 May 2000 15:59:06 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from mail2.digital.com (mail2.digital.com [204.123.2.56]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id PAA27627 for ; Tue, 16 May 2000 15:59:05 +0200 (METDST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id GAA18845; Tue, 16 May 2000 06:56:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA24547; Tue, 16 May 2000 06:55:02 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id GAA00348; Tue, 16 May 2000 06:52:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id GAA01491; Tue, 16 May 2000 06:52:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail2.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA10663; Tue, 16 May 2000 06:52:49 -0700 Received: from xanadu.vipswitch.com (generic199.197.205.205.in-addr.arpa [205.205.197.199] (may be forged)) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with ESMTP id GAA17432 for ; Tue, 16 May 2000 06:52:48 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 16 May 2000 09:47:05 -0400 (EDT) From: Nicolas Pitre To: "J.D. Bakker" Cc: Rob Leslie , lart@lart.tudelft.nl, mad-dev@lists.mars.org, SA-1100/Linux Subject: Re: [mad-dev] madplay vs splay (MP3 performances) In-Reply-To: Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk On Tue, 16 May 2000, J.D. Bakker wrote: > At 05:30 +0200 16-05-2000, Nicolas Pitre wrote: > >On Sun, 14 May 2000, Rob Leslie wrote: > > > >> Your binaries are probably fine, but do you want me to send you a `time' > >> program? (If so, please follow up privately.) You could try timing the pure > >> decoding time like I did by dumping the PCM output to /dev/null. > > > >OK, so I just did on SA1100 hardware for which I don't currently have > >audio output support: > > > > > >[root@thinclient /]# date; splay -d - test.mp3 | cat > /dev/null; date > > > > Aren't you really measuring pipe/context switch latency here ? Both of > these suck on ARMLinux (because of the required cache flushes). This > benchmark may not say too much about splay performance. Task switches between threads don't require a cache flush... but the 'cat' process might be a problem indeed. But for the interesting case i.e. when the player is actually playing, it's still strange that I get opposite results than Rob's. Anyone else can compare splay vs madplay on a SA1100? Nicolas From kramer@pa.dec.com Tue May 16 16:19:57 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id QAA10919; Tue, 16 May 2000 16:19:57 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from mail1.digital.com (mail1.digital.com [204.123.2.50]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id QAA28790 for ; Tue, 16 May 2000 16:19:55 +0200 (METDST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id HAA20528; Tue, 16 May 2000 07:17:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA28606; Tue, 16 May 2000 07:15:54 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id HAA29439; Tue, 16 May 2000 07:14:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id HAA07512; Tue, 16 May 2000 07:14:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail2.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA17470; Tue, 16 May 2000 07:14:13 -0700 Received: from duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (duteinh.et.tudelft.nl [130.161.42.1]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with ESMTP id HAA18805 for ; Tue, 16 May 2000 07:14:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: from dutein71 by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id QAA10853; Tue, 16 May 2000 16:12:50 +0200 (MET DST) Message-Id: <200005161412.QAA10853@duteinh.et.tudelft.nl> From: Erik Mouw To: nico@CAM.ORG Cc: bakker@thorgal.et.tudelft.nl, rob@mars.org, lart@lart.tudelft.nl, mad-dev@lists.mars.org, sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Subject: Re: [mad-dev] madplay vs splay (MP3 performances) In-Reply-To: Organization: Eric conspiracy secret labs Date: Tue May 16 16:12:49 +0200 (MDT) 2000 X-Face: "!Z|1XjFg!3Iw)BwM^M\k)J5KHiPddz}#/Zw%?$&Q!xqob"OA|})3_@&BTTiQERo?/^g[Z<9P4R8:5C:aqq.cw!hotLc=+u-"+1rq@9$V^8PbOUlodyi_sejt+D`iqkLpx$>.aXl%vnfPIt"LK|/%>94_Zrm8jy?`_[RKt'TuoxUxfk(gMhY(n|DBBl~c$dhO>G%6}R4+DGX3|idBm4oU&UM/XUP4I9aoN{]`ax%B?rgD(I3OJ<62Y6L X-Mailer: XCmail 1.0.1 - with PGP support, PGP engine version 0.5 (IRIX) X-Mailerorigin: http://www.fsai.fh-trier.de/~schmitzj/Xclasses/XCmail/ X-Eric-Conspiracy: There is no conspiracy! X-Loop: erik@it.et.tudelft.nl Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk On Tue, 16 May 2000 09:47:05 -0400 (EDT), Nicolas Pitre wrote: > On Tue, 16 May 2000, J.D. Bakker wrote: >> At 05:30 +0200 16-05-2000, Nicolas Pitre wrote: >> >[root@thinclient /]# date; splay -d - test.mp3 | cat > /dev/null; date >> >> >> >> Aren't you really measuring pipe/context switch latency here ? Both of >> these suck on ARMLinux (because of the required cache flushes). This >> benchmark may not say too much about splay performance. > > Task switches between threads don't require a cache flush... but the 'cat' > process might be a problem indeed. > > But for the interesting case i.e. when the player is actually playing, > it's still strange that I get opposite results than Rob's. > > Anyone else can compare splay vs madplay on a SA1100? Erm, what's wrong with "splay -d - test.mp3 > /dev/null" ? Erik -- Computers run on faith, not electrons. -- T.N. Thompson From kramer@pa.dec.com Tue May 16 16:38:52 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id QAA11075; Tue, 16 May 2000 16:38:51 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from mail2.digital.com (mail2.digital.com [204.123.2.56]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id QAA29845 for ; Tue, 16 May 2000 16:38:49 +0200 (METDST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id HAA20864; Tue, 16 May 2000 07:36:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA11277; Tue, 16 May 2000 07:34:48 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id HAA11401; Tue, 16 May 2000 07:32:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id HAA30454; Tue, 16 May 2000 07:32:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail1.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA30087; Tue, 16 May 2000 07:32:45 -0700 Received: from xanadu.vipswitch.com (generic199.197.205.205.in-addr.arpa [205.205.197.199] (may be forged)) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with ESMTP id HAA17541 for ; Tue, 16 May 2000 07:32:44 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 16 May 2000 10:30:39 -0400 (EDT) From: Nicolas Pitre To: Erik Mouw Cc: qyzhu@krdl.org.sg, sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Subject: Re: diff-2.3.99-pre8-rmk1-np2.gz In-Reply-To: <200005161307.PAA10211@duteinh.et.tudelft.nl> Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk On Tue, 16 May -1, Erik Mouw wrote: > On Tue, 16 May 2000 20:17:43 +0800, zhu qun ying wrote: > > My kernel did not boot, stops after decompressing. (configure after LART) > > The LART also doesn't boot, but that's because of the broken discontiguos > memory. Discontigous memory works on Brutus. I guess you mean discontigous memory inside a single node... Well we are getting nested discontigous support now! :-) > I still have to look into this, but other things go first. If you > have a real LART (complete with the funny memory setup), you can disable > bank 1 and 3 to get it booted (with only 16MB, though). Try this: While still enabling CONFIG_DEBUG_LL and using printascii(msg) inside the definition of printk(), add some printk()'s to display (in hex) the value of parameters passed to the following functions: init_bootmem_node() reserve_bootmem_node() free_bootmem_node() Those are in linux/mm/bootmem.c. Send me the result. This should be enough to find the problem. Nicolas From kramer@pa.dec.com Tue May 16 16:49:26 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id QAA11162; Tue, 16 May 2000 16:49:26 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from mail2.digital.com (mail2.digital.com [204.123.2.56]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id QAA00483 for ; Tue, 16 May 2000 16:49:24 +0200 (METDST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id HAA21889; Tue, 16 May 2000 07:46:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA07240; Tue, 16 May 2000 07:45:24 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id HAA04097; Tue, 16 May 2000 07:43:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id HAA04911; Tue, 16 May 2000 07:43:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail1.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA17012; Tue, 16 May 2000 07:43:49 -0700 Received: from xanadu.vipswitch.com (generic199.197.205.205.in-addr.arpa [205.205.197.199] (may be forged)) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with ESMTP id HAA25168 for ; Tue, 16 May 2000 07:43:48 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 16 May 2000 10:38:17 -0400 (EDT) From: Nicolas Pitre To: Erik Mouw Cc: bakker@thorgal.et.tudelft.nl, rob@mars.org, lart@lart.tudelft.nl, mad-dev@lists.mars.org, sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Subject: Re: [mad-dev] madplay vs splay (MP3 performances) In-Reply-To: <200005161412.QAA10853@duteinh.et.tudelft.nl> Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk On Tue, 16 May -1, Erik Mouw wrote: > On Tue, 16 May 2000 09:47:05 -0400 (EDT), Nicolas Pitre wrote: > > On Tue, 16 May 2000, J.D. Bakker wrote: > >> At 05:30 +0200 16-05-2000, Nicolas Pitre wrote: > >> >[root@thinclient /]# date; splay -d - test.mp3 | cat > /dev/null; date > >> > >> > >> > >> Aren't you really measuring pipe/context switch latency here ? Both of > >> these suck on ARMLinux (because of the required cache flushes). This > >> benchmark may not say too much about splay performance. > > > > Task switches between threads don't require a cache flush... but the 'cat' > > process might be a problem indeed. > > > > But for the interesting case i.e. when the player is actually playing, > > it's still strange that I get opposite results than Rob's. > > > > Anyone else can compare splay vs madplay on a SA1100? > > Erm, what's wrong with "splay -d - test.mp3 > /dev/null" ? Well... Euh... I'm simply too stupid some times... Nicolas From kramer@pa.dec.com Tue May 16 20:52:33 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id UAA12984; Tue, 16 May 2000 20:52:32 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from mail1.digital.com (mail1.digital.com [204.123.2.50]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id UAA09248 for ; Tue, 16 May 2000 20:52:31 +0200 (METDST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id LAA08050; Tue, 16 May 2000 11:49:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA21300; Tue, 16 May 2000 11:47:59 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id LAA27995; Tue, 16 May 2000 11:43:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id LAA04742; Tue, 16 May 2000 11:43:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail1.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA07832; Tue, 16 May 2000 11:42:46 -0700 Received: from ns.centurysoftware.com (ns.censoft.com [208.219.23.2]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with ESMTP id LAA05238 for ; Tue, 16 May 2000 11:42:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pcgregh (pcgregh.CenSoft.COM [208.219.23.48]) by ns.centurysoftware.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id LAA05237; Tue, 16 May 2000 11:58:58 -0700 (MST) Message-Id: <00d101bfbf66$a8379e90$3017dbd0@censoft.com> From: "Greg Haerr" To: "daihbxd" , , Cc: , References: <20000516093243.29510.qmail@sina.com> Subject: Re: problem about MCP and UCB1300 Date: Tue, 16 May 2000 12:43:41 -0600 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" X-Priority: 3 X-Msmail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2314.1300 X-Mimeole: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2314.1300 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Mime-Autoconverted: from 8bit to quoted-printable by mail1.digital.com id LAA05238 Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk Did you get ahold of the UCB1200 driver that we wrote at Century? That version, although not yet completed because of polling issues, works quite well on the ADS StrongARM box with a 640x480 LCD and the UCB1200 input controller. Regards, Greg Subject: problem about MCP and UCB1300 : hi all, : microwindows 0.88pre7 can run on Assabet with frame-buffer and network support happily, : but there is still no touchscreen driver available,so i just can imagin what will be like to drags windows by finger.:) : I tried to struggle for a driver,but clearly i need more hardware study. : i used BCR_SET(CODEC_RESET|AUDIO_ON)to enable UCB1300,and set MCCR= 0 MCE bit, : but the mcp channel or the ucb1300 did not work,because the simple thin= g like to read UCB1300's ID register failed. : anybody could give a hint,i really appreciate it. : regards : : : dai : : : =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D : =D0=C2=C0=CB=C3=E2=B7=D1=B5=E7=D7=D3=D3=CA=CF=E4 http://mail.sina.com.c= n : : : --------------------------------------------------------------------- : To unsubscribe, e-mail: nanogui-unsubscribe@linuxhacker.org : For additional commands, e-mail: nanogui-help@linuxhacker.org : : From kramer@pa.dec.com Wed May 17 04:04:07 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id EAA15334; Wed, 17 May 2000 04:04:06 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from mail2.digital.com (mail2.digital.com [204.123.2.56]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id EAA20102 for ; Wed, 17 May 2000 04:04:04 +0200 (METDST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id TAA31113; Tue, 16 May 2000 19:01:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA19043; Tue, 16 May 2000 18:59:47 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id SAA22811; Tue, 16 May 2000 18:55:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id SAA00592; Tue, 16 May 2000 18:55:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail1.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA02642; Tue, 16 May 2000 18:55:50 -0700 Received: from krdl.org.sg (rodin.krdl.org.sg [192.122.139.27]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with ESMTP id SAA00975 for ; Tue, 16 May 2000 18:55:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mailhost.krdl.org.sg (mailhost [192.122.134.30]) by krdl.org.sg (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id KAA14021; Wed, 17 May 2000 10:03:38 +0800 Received: from krdl.org.sg (QUNYING.krdl.org.sg [192.168.136.36]) by mailhost.krdl.org.sg (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id JAA07148; Wed, 17 May 2000 09:54:52 +0800 (SGT) Message-Id: <3921FC22.4A98F2F8@krdl.org.sg> Date: Wed, 17 May 2000 09:55:46 +0800 From: zhu qun ying Organization: KRDL X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.73 [en] (WinNT; U) X-Accept-Language: en Mime-Version: 1.0 To: Nicolas Pitre , sa1100 Subject: Re: diff-2.3.99-pre8-rmk1-np2.gz References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Mime-Autoconverted: from 8bit to quoted-printable by mail1.digital.com id SAA00975 Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk I put the following code segment into the begining of printk(), but I sti= ll have nothing from the output, it freezes after decompression done. I only get = a second line with only a few words, "Error: a", that is all. #ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_LL char buffer[128]; va_list ap; va_start(ap, fmt); vsprintf(buffer, fmt, ap); va_end(ap); printascii(buffer); return 0; #else =20 Even I disable the 2nd bank of DRAM, only use the first bank, it hangs af= ter decompression. --=20 (~._.~) =D6=EC =C8=BA =D3=A2 (Qun Ying) (65) 874-6743 ( O ) Kent Ridge Digital Labs (KRDL) ()~*~() 21 Heng Mui Keng Terrace, Singapore 119613 (_)-(_) qyzhu@krdl.org.sg * zhuqy@hotmail.com From kramer@pa.dec.com Wed May 17 04:25:00 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id EAA15425; Wed, 17 May 2000 04:25:00 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from mail1.digital.com (mail1.digital.com [204.123.2.50]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id EAA20456 for ; Wed, 17 May 2000 04:24:57 +0200 (METDST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id TAA30264; Tue, 16 May 2000 19:22:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA10664; Tue, 16 May 2000 19:20:52 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id TAA22679; Tue, 16 May 2000 19:19:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id TAA23111; Tue, 16 May 2000 19:19:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail2.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA11329; Tue, 16 May 2000 19:19:10 -0700 Received: from krdl.org.sg (rodin.krdl.org.sg [192.122.139.27]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with ESMTP id TAA32463 for ; Tue, 16 May 2000 19:19:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mailhost.krdl.org.sg (mailhost [192.122.134.30]) by krdl.org.sg (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id KAA14895; Wed, 17 May 2000 10:26:52 +0800 Received: from krdl.org.sg (QUNYING.krdl.org.sg [192.168.136.36]) by mailhost.krdl.org.sg (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id KAA10000; Wed, 17 May 2000 10:18:06 +0800 (SGT) Message-Id: <39220193.972FF037@krdl.org.sg> Date: Wed, 17 May 2000 10:18:59 +0800 From: zhu qun ying Organization: KRDL X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.73 [en] (WinNT; U) X-Accept-Language: en Mime-Version: 1.0 To: Nicolas Pitre , sa1100 , Erik Mouw Subject: Re: diff-2.3.99-pre8-rmk1-np2.gz References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Mime-Autoconverted: from 8bit to quoted-printable by mail2.digital.com id TAA32463 Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk Is blob capable to boot the latest kernel? I did look at blob's code, and= it call the kernel as fololow: void (*theKernel)(int zero, int arch) =3D (void (*)(int, int))KERNEL_RAM_= BASE; ... theKernel(0, 9); Where could I find out more information on passing kernel paramer from bootloader? --=20 (~._.~) =D6=EC =C8=BA =D3=A2 (Qun Ying) (65) 874-6743 ( O ) Kent Ridge Digital Labs (KRDL) ()~*~() 21 Heng Mui Keng Terrace, Singapore 119613 (_)-(_) qyzhu@krdl.org.sg * zhuqy@hotmail.com From kramer@pa.dec.com Wed May 17 04:16:23 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id EAA15392; Wed, 17 May 2000 04:16:23 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from mail2.digital.com (mail2.digital.com [204.123.2.56]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id EAA20309 for ; Wed, 17 May 2000 04:16:21 +0200 (METDST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id TAA32415; Tue, 16 May 2000 19:13:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA03129; Tue, 16 May 2000 19:12:15 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id TAA19947; Tue, 16 May 2000 19:10:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id TAA20350; Tue, 16 May 2000 19:10:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail2.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA03806; Tue, 16 May 2000 19:10:37 -0700 Received: from xanadu.gn.com (modemcable248.137-200-24.mtl.mc.videotron.net [24.200.137.248]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with ESMTP id TAA31848 for ; Tue, 16 May 2000 19:10:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (nico@localhost) by xanadu.gn.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id WAA28751; Tue, 16 May 2000 22:33:50 -0400 X-Authentication-Warning: xanadu.gn.com: nico owned process doing -bs Date: Tue, 16 May 2000 22:33:50 -0400 (EDT) From: Nicolas Pitre X-Sender: nico@xanadu.gn.com To: zhu qun ying Cc: sa1100 Subject: Re: diff-2.3.99-pre8-rmk1-np2.gz In-Reply-To: <3921FC22.4A98F2F8@krdl.org.sg> Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk On Wed, 17 May 2000, zhu qun ying wrote: > I put the following code segment into the begining of printk(), but I still have > nothing from the output, it freezes after decompression done. I only get a > second line with only a few words, "Error: a", that is all. Please please please re-read the warning I wrote along the patch announcement about register values on kernel entry. Nicolas From kramer@pa.dec.com Wed May 17 11:33:25 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id LAA17674; Wed, 17 May 2000 11:33:24 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from mail1.digital.com (mail1.digital.com [204.123.2.50]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id LAA01979 for ; Wed, 17 May 2000 11:33:21 +0200 (METDST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id CAA21310; Wed, 17 May 2000 02:30:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA07441; Wed, 17 May 2000 02:28:44 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id CAA06565; Wed, 17 May 2000 02:25:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id CAA19615; Wed, 17 May 2000 02:25:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail2.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA18972; Wed, 17 May 2000 02:25:29 -0700 Received: from duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (duteinh.et.tudelft.nl [130.161.42.1]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with ESMTP id CAA23243 for ; Wed, 17 May 2000 02:25:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: from dutein71 by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id LAA17596; Wed, 17 May 2000 11:24:04 +0200 (MET DST) Message-Id: <200005170924.LAA17596@duteinh.et.tudelft.nl> From: Erik Mouw To: qyzhu@krdl.org.sg Cc: nico@CAM.ORG, sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Subject: Re: diff-2.3.99-pre8-rmk1-np2.gz In-Reply-To: <39220193.972FF037@krdl.org.sg> Organization: Eric conspiracy secret labs Date: Wed May 17 11:24:02 +0200 (MDT) 2000 X-Face: "!Z|1XjFg!3Iw)BwM^M\k)J5KHiPddz}#/Zw%?$&Q!xqob"OA|})3_@&BTTiQERo?/^g[Z<9P4R8:5C:aqq.cw!hotLc=+u-"+1rq@9$V^8PbOUlodyi_sejt+D`iqkLpx$>.aXl%vnfPIt"LK|/%>94_Zrm8jy?`_[RKt'TuoxUxfk(gMhY(n|DBBl~c$dhO>G%6}R4+DGX3|idBm4oU&UM/XUP4I9aoN{]`ax%B?rgD(I3OJ<62Y6L X-Mailer: XCmail 1.0.1 - with PGP support, PGP engine version 0.5 (IRIX) X-Mailerorigin: http://www.fsai.fh-trier.de/~schmitzj/Xclasses/XCmail/ X-Eric-Conspiracy: There is no conspiracy! X-Loop: erik@it.et.tudelft.nl Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk On Wed, 17 May 2000 10:18:59 +0800, zhu qun ying wrote: > Is blob capable to boot the latest kernel? I did look at blob's code, and it > call the kernel > as fololow: > > void (*theKernel)(int zero, int arch) = (void (*)(int, int))KERNEL_RAM_BASE; > ... > theKernel(0, 9); Not yet. I'm currently working on audio, booting Nico's latest kernel comes next. The changes are trivial, I think adding #include at the top of main.c and changing the boot call into theKernel(0, MACH_TYPE_LART); will do the trick for LART. If you have a different machine, use another machine type for the second parameter. > Where could I find out more information on passing kernel paramer from > bootloader? I'm afraid the kernel source is the only documentation, so "Use the source, Luke!" Erik -- "I'm just this guy you know?" -- Zaphod Beeblebrox in "The Hitchhikers Guide to the Galaxy" by Douglas Adams From kramer@pa.dec.com Wed May 17 15:35:16 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id PAA19094; Wed, 17 May 2000 15:35:16 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from mail2.digital.com (mail2.digital.com [204.123.2.56]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id PAA13351 for ; Wed, 17 May 2000 15:35:14 +0200 (METDST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id GAA03475; Wed, 17 May 2000 06:32:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA07394; Wed, 17 May 2000 06:30:58 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id GAA05574; Wed, 17 May 2000 06:27:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id GAA17099; Wed, 17 May 2000 06:27:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail2.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA02652; Wed, 17 May 2000 06:27:50 -0700 Received: from xanadu.vipswitch.com (generic199.197.205.205.in-addr.arpa [205.205.197.199] (may be forged)) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with ESMTP id GAA01702 for ; Wed, 17 May 2000 06:27:49 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 17 May 2000 09:26:01 -0400 (EDT) From: Nicolas Pitre To: zhu qun ying Cc: sa1100 , Erik Mouw Subject: Re: diff-2.3.99-pre8-rmk1-np2.gz In-Reply-To: <39220193.972FF037@krdl.org.sg> Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk On Wed, 17 May 2000, zhu qun ying wrote: > Is blob capable to boot the latest kernel? I did look at blob's code, and it > call the kernel > as fololow: > > void (*theKernel)(int zero, int arch) = (void (*)(int, int))KERNEL_RAM_BASE; > ... > theKernel(0, 9); The '9' is wrong. For LART, it should be 27. See linux/include/asm/system.h for the complete list. Nicolas From kramer@pa.dec.com Wed May 17 18:09:35 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id SAA20057; Wed, 17 May 2000 18:09:35 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from mail2.digital.com (mail2.digital.com [204.123.2.56]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id SAA20550 for ; Wed, 17 May 2000 18:09:33 +0200 (METDST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id JAA15282; Wed, 17 May 2000 09:06:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA26575; Wed, 17 May 2000 09:05:24 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id JAA12112; Wed, 17 May 2000 09:03:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id JAA11942; Wed, 17 May 2000 09:03:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail1.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA20820; Wed, 17 May 2000 09:03:02 -0700 Received: from blazieresearch.com ([216.85.232.66]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with ESMTP id JAA15381 for ; Wed, 17 May 2000 09:02:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (chris@localhost) by blazieresearch.com (8.9.3/8.8.7) with SMTP id MAA04009; Wed, 17 May 2000 12:02:42 -0400 Date: Wed, 17 May 2000 12:02:42 -0400 (EDT) From: Chris Blazie Reply-To: Chris Blazie To: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.arm.linux.org.uk Subject: sa1100 memory limit? Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk As of yesterday I have everything working on our SA1110 development board. All memory problems stopped when I lowered the total memory defined in the kernel to 32MB. Next I added my changes to Russel and Nicolas's latest patches (2.3.99-pre8-rmk1-np2) and experimented with my bank declarations in arch.c and the MEM_SIZE definition in setup.c. I can use just about any combination of bank declarations (allowing enough memory at C0008000 for kernel and ramdisk) and still operate, but any amount over 32MB causes an oops on kernel boot like the one below. In page_alloc.c, BUG() is executed because page-mem_map >= max_mapnr. max_mapnr is initialized in arch/arm/mm/init.c: max_mapnr = MAP_NR(high_memory); and high_memory == 0xc2000000 at that point. So it seems an implicit 32MB memory limit exists, unless I have something else set up incorrectly. I'm looking, but appreciate any pointers while I try to run this down. I also noticed in include/asm/arch/mmzone.h: /* * 32MB max in each bank, must fit with __virt_to_phys() & __phys_to_virt() */ #define NODE_MAX_MEM_SHIFT 25 #define NODE_MAX_MEM_SIZE (1<] lr : [] sp : c00a9f24 ip : c00a9ee0 fp : c00a9f34 r10: 00000001 r9 : 00002000 r8 : 00000000 r7 : 00000000 r6 : 00000091 r5 : c20028d8 r4 : 00000000 r3 : 00000000 r2 : c00b1e9c r1 : c00b1e9c r0 : 00000022 Flags: nZCv IRQs on FIQs off Mode SVC_32 Segment kernel Control: C000517D Table: C000517D DAC: 0000001D Process swapper (pid: 0, stackpage=c00a9000) Stack: c00a9f00: c001e030 c001643c 60000 c00a9f20: ffffffff c20028f0 c00a9f68 c00a9f38 c0036570 c001640c 60000053 00000 c00a9f40: c20028d8 00000000 00000091 c00b63fc 00000001 00002000 00000001 c00a9 c00a9f60: c00a9f6c c000b708 c00364dc 00000001 c00b63e4 00000020 00000259 c000f c00a9f80: c00b2298 c00c9758 c00a9fa4 c00a9f98 c000b91c c000b63c c00a9fe0 c00a9 c00a9fa0: c000a158 c000b8f8 c001de3c 00000020 000000ab 00000259 00000000 c00d0 c00a9fc0: c00c81f4 c00c8240 c00aaa34 6901b115 c000ecfc c00a9ffc c00a9fe4 c0008 c00a9fe0: c000a078 c00aaa94 c00d1198 c00d1198 00000000 c00aa000 c0008080 c0008 Backtrace: Function entered at [] from [] r4 = C20028F0 Function entered at [] from [] Function entered at [] from [] Function entered at [] from [] Function entered at [] from [] Function entered at [] from [] r5 = C00D1198 r4 = C00D1198 Code: eb001e7c e3a03000 (e5833000) e91ba810 c0091a48 Kernel panic: Attempted to kill the idle task! In idle task - not syncing From kramer@pa.dec.com Wed May 17 18:45:50 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id SAA20257; Wed, 17 May 2000 18:45:50 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from mail1.digital.com (mail1.digital.com [204.123.2.50]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id SAA21732 for ; Wed, 17 May 2000 18:45:48 +0200 (METDST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id JAA12295; Wed, 17 May 2000 09:41:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA04409; Wed, 17 May 2000 09:40:34 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id JAA12602; Wed, 17 May 2000 09:38:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id JAA03485; Wed, 17 May 2000 09:38:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail2.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA07069; Wed, 17 May 2000 09:38:27 -0700 Received: from xanadu.vipswitch.com (generic199.197.205.205.in-addr.arpa [205.205.197.199] (may be forged)) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with ESMTP id JAA17055 for ; Wed, 17 May 2000 09:38:25 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 17 May 2000 12:35:51 -0400 (EDT) From: Nicolas Pitre To: Chris Blazie Cc: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.arm.linux.org.uk Subject: Re: sa1100 memory limit? In-Reply-To: Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk On Wed, 17 May 2000, Chris Blazie wrote: > > As of yesterday I have everything working on our SA1110 > development board. All memory problems stopped when I lowered the total > memory defined in the kernel to 32MB. Next I added my changes to Russel > and Nicolas's latest patches (2.3.99-pre8-rmk1-np2) and experimented with > my bank declarations in arch.c and the MEM_SIZE definition in setup.c. I > can use just about any combination of bank declarations (allowing enough > memory at C0008000 for kernel and ramdisk) and still operate, but any > amount over 32MB causes an oops on kernel boot like the one below. [...] > looking, but appreciate any pointers while I try to run this down. I also > noticed in include/asm/arch/mmzone.h: > > /* > * 32MB max in each bank, must fit with __virt_to_phys() & > __phys_to_virt() > */ > #define NODE_MAX_MEM_SHIFT 25 > #define NODE_MAX_MEM_SIZE (1< > Is this an absolute limit on bank size to 32MB? Don't look any further!! You found it. What's the actual maximum memory bank size on the SA1110? It's 32 MB on the SA1100 I think. That's why that limit was 32 MB. To fix that, simply change the NODE_MAX_MEM_SHIFT value and modify __virt_to_phys() and __phys_to_virt() macros accordingly. Nicolas From kramer@pa.dec.com Wed May 17 18:55:10 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id SAA20293; Wed, 17 May 2000 18:55:09 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from mail1.digital.com (mail1.digital.com [204.123.2.50]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id SAA22007 for ; Wed, 17 May 2000 18:55:07 +0200 (METDST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id JAA18531; Wed, 17 May 2000 09:52:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA31294; Wed, 17 May 2000 09:51:05 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id JAA08922; Wed, 17 May 2000 09:49:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id JAA11905; Wed, 17 May 2000 09:49:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail1.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA10515; Wed, 17 May 2000 09:49:16 -0700 Received: from blazieresearch.com ([216.85.232.66]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with ESMTP id JAA18355 for ; Wed, 17 May 2000 09:49:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (chris@localhost) by blazieresearch.com (8.9.3/8.8.7) with SMTP id MAA04601; Wed, 17 May 2000 12:48:51 -0400 Date: Wed, 17 May 2000 12:48:51 -0400 (EDT) From: Chris Blazie Reply-To: Chris Blazie To: Nicolas Pitre Cc: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.arm.linux.org.uk Subject: Re: sa1100 memory limit? In-Reply-To: Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk > > looking, but appreciate any pointers while I try to run this down. I also > > noticed in include/asm/arch/mmzone.h: > > > > /* > > * 32MB max in each bank, must fit with __virt_to_phys() & > > __phys_to_virt() > > */ > > #define NODE_MAX_MEM_SHIFT 25 > > #define NODE_MAX_MEM_SIZE (1< > > > Is this an absolute limit on bank size to 32MB? > > Don't look any further!! You found it. > > What's the actual maximum memory bank size on the SA1110? It's 32 MB on > the SA1100 I think. That's why that limit was 32 MB. According to the SA1100 and SA1110 reference (memory map), each dynamic memory bank is 128MB max. So bank 0 is C0000000 to C7FFFFFF, bank 1 at C8000000 and so on. Also...if the problem were a bank size limit, I should still be able to handle up to 64MB, correct? 32MB per bank. My problem is anything over 32MB TOTAL gives the oops. Chris From kramer@pa.dec.com Wed May 17 19:17:41 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id TAA20409; Wed, 17 May 2000 19:17:41 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from mail2.digital.com (mail2.digital.com [204.123.2.56]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id TAA22771 for ; Wed, 17 May 2000 19:17:39 +0200 (METDST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id KAA20451; Wed, 17 May 2000 10:14:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA18116; Wed, 17 May 2000 10:13:38 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id KAA22308; Wed, 17 May 2000 10:11:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id KAA14973; Wed, 17 May 2000 10:11:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail2.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA00014; Wed, 17 May 2000 10:11:23 -0700 Received: from tekincisnts-4.teklogix.com (mail.teklogix.com [207.219.2.10]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with ESMTP id KAA20009 for ; Wed, 17 May 2000 10:11:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: from DeadDuck (BILL [10.128.5.25]) by tekincisnts-4.teklogix.com with SMTP (Microsoft Exchange Internet Mail Service Version 5.5.2448.0) id JCA13LJM; Wed, 17 May 2000 13:10:30 -0400 To: Chris Blazie Cc: Nicolas Pitre , sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.arm.linux.org.uk Subject: Re: sa1100 memory limit? References: From: Bill Pringlemeir Organization: noitazinagro X-Home-Page: http://www.wwonline.com/~bpringle/ Date: 17 May 2000 13:13:34 -0400 In-Reply-To: Chris Blazie's message of "Wed, 17 May 2000 12:48:51 -0400 (EDT)" Message-Id: Lines: 26 User-Agent: Gnus/5.0803 (Gnus v5.8.3) Emacs/20.5 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk >>>>> "Chris" == Chris Blazie writes: Chris> According to the SA1100 and SA1110 reference (memory Chris> map), each dynamic memory bank is 128MB max. So bank 0 is Chris> C0000000 to C7FFFFFF, bank 1 at C8000000 and so on. Chris> Also...if the problem were a bank size limit, I should Chris> still be able to handle up to 64MB, correct? 32MB per Chris> bank. My problem is anything over 32MB TOTAL gives the Chris> oops. Could it be related to the fact that the branch instruction is a 24 bit signed offset giving a range of +/- 32MB? If you have code living outside this range and a direct jump is made, this could cause problems. The Sa1110 can have four banks of 128MB for 1/2 GB total. There is a hard limit set by the physical addresses of the banks. fwiw, Bill -- I couldn't care less about your whale. You pathetic working quiche-eater! From kramer@pa.dec.com Wed May 17 19:59:29 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id TAA20586; Wed, 17 May 2000 19:59:28 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from mail2.digital.com (mail2.digital.com [204.123.2.56]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id TAA24193 for ; Wed, 17 May 2000 19:59:26 +0200 (METDST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id KAA22143; Wed, 17 May 2000 10:56:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA32725; Wed, 17 May 2000 10:55:14 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id KAA31420; Wed, 17 May 2000 10:53:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id KAA29838; Wed, 17 May 2000 10:53:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail1.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA24386; Wed, 17 May 2000 10:53:21 -0700 Received: from blazieresearch.com ([216.85.232.66]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with ESMTP id KAA22544 for ; Wed, 17 May 2000 10:53:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (chris@localhost) by blazieresearch.com (8.9.3/8.8.7) with SMTP id NAA05157; Wed, 17 May 2000 13:28:28 -0400 Date: Wed, 17 May 2000 13:28:28 -0400 (EDT) From: Chris Blazie To: Bill Pringlemeir Cc: Chris Blazie , Nicolas Pitre , sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.arm.linux.org.uk Subject: Re: sa1100 memory limit? In-Reply-To: Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk > Could it be related to the fact that the branch instruction is a > 24 bit signed offset giving a range of +/- 32MB? If you have code > living outside this range and a direct jump is made, this could > cause problems. True, but there are various Netwinders with >32MB and the SA110 is very, very similar to a StrongARM. Chris From kramer@pa.dec.com Thu May 18 08:58:29 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id IAA23471; Thu, 18 May 2000 08:58:29 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from mail2.digital.com (mail2.digital.com [204.123.2.56]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id IAA14437 for ; Thu, 18 May 2000 08:58:27 +0200 (METDST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id XAA03423; Wed, 17 May 2000 23:55:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA11236; Wed, 17 May 2000 23:53:48 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id XAA14423; Wed, 17 May 2000 23:51:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id XAA11027; Wed, 17 May 2000 23:51:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail1.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA20475; Wed, 17 May 2000 23:51:00 -0700 Received: from thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (thorgal.et.tudelft.nl [130.161.40.91]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with ESMTP id XAA02367 for ; Wed, 17 May 2000 23:50:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [130.161.115.44] (jdbakker.et.tudelft.nl [130.161.115.44]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id IAA23393; Thu, 18 May 2000 08:50:43 +0200 Message-Id: In-Reply-To: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Date: Thu, 18 May 2000 00:02:07 +0200 To: Nicolas Pitre From: "J.D. Bakker" Subject: Re: sa1100 memory limit? Cc: Chris Blazie , sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.arm.linux.org.uk Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk At 00:15 +0200 18-05-2000, Nicolas Pitre wrote: >On Wed, 17 May 2000, Chris Blazie wrote: >> According to the SA1100 and SA1110 reference (memory map), each >> dynamic memory bank is 128MB max. So bank 0 is C0000000 to C7FFFFFF, bank >> 1 at C8000000 and so on. > >This is the physical address space reserved for each bank. However I >doubt you can actually put 128 MB of RAM on a single bank. Can you? You can, using four byte-wide 256Mb devices on SA-1110. JDB [who has 64MB single bank expansion cards for LART] -- LART. 250 MIPS under one Watt. Free hardware design files. http://www.lart.tudelft.nl/ From kramer@pa.dec.com Wed May 17 23:58:34 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id XAA21577; Wed, 17 May 2000 23:58:33 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from mail1.digital.com (mail1.digital.com [204.123.2.50]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id XAA03051 for ; Wed, 17 May 2000 23:58:32 +0200 (METDST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id OAA06932; Wed, 17 May 2000 14:55:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AB25629; Wed, 17 May 2000 14:54:25 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id OAA01724; Wed, 17 May 2000 14:52:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id OAA26612; Wed, 17 May 2000 14:52:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail1.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA03910; Wed, 17 May 2000 14:52:22 -0700 Received: from xanadu.gn.com (modemcable248.137-200-24.mtl.mc.videotron.net [24.200.137.248]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with ESMTP id OAA04166 for ; Wed, 17 May 2000 14:52:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (nico@localhost) by xanadu.gn.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id SAA29197; Wed, 17 May 2000 18:15:39 -0400 X-Authentication-Warning: xanadu.gn.com: nico owned process doing -bs Date: Wed, 17 May 2000 18:15:39 -0400 (EDT) From: Nicolas Pitre X-Sender: nico@xanadu.gn.com To: Chris Blazie Cc: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.arm.linux.org.uk Subject: Re: sa1100 memory limit? In-Reply-To: Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk On Wed, 17 May 2000, Chris Blazie wrote: > > > > looking, but appreciate any pointers while I try to run this down. I also > > > noticed in include/asm/arch/mmzone.h: > > > > > > /* > > > * 32MB max in each bank, must fit with __virt_to_phys() & > > > __phys_to_virt() > > > */ > > > #define NODE_MAX_MEM_SHIFT 25 > > > #define NODE_MAX_MEM_SIZE (1< > > > > > Is this an absolute limit on bank size to 32MB? > > > > Don't look any further!! You found it. > > > > What's the actual maximum memory bank size on the SA1110? It's 32 MB on > > the SA1100 I think. That's why that limit was 32 MB. > > According to the SA1100 and SA1110 reference (memory map), each > dynamic memory bank is 128MB max. So bank 0 is C0000000 to C7FFFFFF, bank > 1 at C8000000 and so on. This is the physical address space reserved for each bank. However I doubt you can actually put 128 MB of RAM on a single bank. Can you? > Also...if the problem were a bank size limit, I should still be > able to handle up to 64MB, correct? 32MB per bank. My problem is > anything over 32MB TOTAL gives the oops. That's strange... Nicolas From kramer@pa.dec.com Thu May 18 05:31:04 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id FAA22598; Thu, 18 May 2000 05:31:04 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from mail1.digital.com (mail1.digital.com [204.123.2.50]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id FAA10336 for ; Thu, 18 May 2000 05:31:02 +0200 (METDST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id UAA26898; Wed, 17 May 2000 20:28:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA24892; Wed, 17 May 2000 20:27:00 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id UAA12283; Wed, 17 May 2000 20:25:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id UAA13459; Wed, 17 May 2000 20:25:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail1.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA16199; Wed, 17 May 2000 20:24:42 -0700 Received: from notes.lhsl.co.kr ([211.54.38.3]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id UAA17979 for ; Wed, 17 May 2000 20:24:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: by notes.lhsl.co.kr(Lotus SMTP MTA v4.6.5 (863.2 5-20-1999)) id C92568E3.00128972 ; Thu, 18 May 2000 13:22:28 +1000 X-Lotus-Fromdomain: LHS From: "Erik Bunce" To: Nicolas Pitre Cc: Chris Blazie , sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.arm.linux.org.uk Message-Id: Date: Wed, 17 May 2000 22:07:37 -0400 Subject: Re: sa1100 memory limit? Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=euc-kr Content-Disposition: inline Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk nico@cam.org wrote: > > This is the physical address space reserved for each bank. However I > doubt you can actually put 128 MB of RAM on a single bank. Can you? It is actually be relatively simple to get 128MB into a single bank using 256Mbit SDRAM in 32Meg x 8 configuration using 4 chips, or for the masochistic among us using 128MBit SDRAM in 64Meg x 4 configuration using 8 chips. In fact if you look at Table 10-6 on page 10-30 of the "SA1110 Microprocessor Developers Manual" it lists these and other possibilities for putting greater than 32MB in each bank. In fact all four banks could be filled up this way at 128 MB each for a total physical memory size of 512MB. Enjoy, Erik From kramer@pa.dec.com Thu May 18 04:36:17 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id EAA22431; Thu, 18 May 2000 04:36:16 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from mail1.digital.com (mail1.digital.com [204.123.2.50]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id EAA09345 for ; Thu, 18 May 2000 04:36:14 +0200 (METDST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id TAA17452; Wed, 17 May 2000 19:33:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA06836; Wed, 17 May 2000 19:31:59 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id TAA04099; Wed, 17 May 2000 19:27:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id TAA08905; Wed, 17 May 2000 19:27:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail2.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA12704; Wed, 17 May 2000 19:27:57 -0700 Received: from blazieresearch.com ([216.85.232.66]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with ESMTP id TAA22912 for ; Wed, 17 May 2000 19:27:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: from cpq800.blazieresearch.com (cpq800 [216.85.232.67]) by blazieresearch.com (8.9.3/8.8.7) with ESMTP id WAA12179; Wed, 17 May 2000 22:27:55 -0400 Received: by CPQ800 with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.10) id ; Wed, 17 May 2000 22:28:13 -0400 Message-Id: <412E1CF8088BD211AD5100805FAD9A800CD23E@CPQ800> From: Jim Kasper To: Jim Kasper Cc: "'sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com '" , "'linux-arm-kernel@lists.arm.linux.org.uk '" Subject: RE: sa1100 memory limit? Date: Wed, 17 May 2000 22:28:06 -0400 Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.10) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252" Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk -----Original Message----- From: Nicolas Pitre To: Chris Blazie Cc: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com; linux-arm-kernel@lists.arm.linux.org.uk Sent: 05/17/00 18:15 Subject: Re: sa1100 memory limit? On Wed, 17 May 2000, Chris Blazie wrote: > > > > looking, but appreciate any pointers while I try to run this down. I also > > > noticed in include/asm/arch/mmzone.h: > > > > > > /* > > > * 32MB max in each bank, must fit with __virt_to_phys() & > > > __phys_to_virt() > > > */ > > > #define NODE_MAX_MEM_SHIFT 25 > > > #define NODE_MAX_MEM_SIZE (1< > > > > > Is this an absolute limit on bank size to 32MB? > > > > Don't look any further!! You found it. > > > > What's the actual maximum memory bank size on the SA1110? It's 32 MB on > > the SA1100 I think. That's why that limit was 32 MB. > > According to the SA1100 and SA1110 reference (memory map), each > dynamic memory bank is 128MB max. So bank 0 is C0000000 to C7FFFFFF, bank > 1 at C8000000 and so on. This is the physical address space reserved for each bank. However I doubt you can actually put 128 MB of RAM on a single bank. Can you? Actually yes, we currently have 64 Meg per bank and it works fine from boot loader. > Also...if the problem were a bank size limit, I should still be > able to handle up to 64MB, correct? 32MB per bank. My problem is > anything over 32MB TOTAL gives the oops. That's strange... Nicolas From kramer@pa.dec.com Thu May 18 06:12:44 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id GAA22742; Thu, 18 May 2000 06:12:44 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from mail1.digital.com (mail1.digital.com [204.123.2.50]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id GAA11012 for ; Thu, 18 May 2000 06:12:42 +0200 (METDST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id VAA26149; Wed, 17 May 2000 21:09:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA13227; Wed, 17 May 2000 21:08:38 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id VAA12940; Wed, 17 May 2000 21:06:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id VAA14558; Wed, 17 May 2000 21:06:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail2.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA16548; Wed, 17 May 2000 21:06:29 -0700 Received: from xanadu.gn.com (modemcable248.137-200-24.mtl.mc.videotron.net [24.200.137.248]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with ESMTP id VAA28569 for ; Wed, 17 May 2000 21:06:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (nico@localhost) by xanadu.gn.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id AAA31594; Thu, 18 May 2000 00:29:38 -0400 X-Authentication-Warning: xanadu.gn.com: nico owned process doing -bs Date: Thu, 18 May 2000 00:29:38 -0400 (EDT) From: Nicolas Pitre X-Sender: nico@xanadu.gn.com To: Erik Bunce Cc: Chris Blazie , sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.arm.linux.org.uk Subject: Re: sa1100 memory limit? In-Reply-To: Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk On Wed, 17 May 2000, Erik Bunce wrote: > > > nico@cam.org wrote: > > > > This is the physical address space reserved for each bank. However I > > doubt you can actually put 128 MB of RAM on a single bank. Can you? > > It is actually be relatively simple to get 128MB into a single bank using > 256Mbit SDRAM in 32Meg x 8 configuration using 4 chips, or for the masochistic > among us using 128MBit SDRAM in 64Meg x 4 configuration using 8 chips. In fact > if you look at Table 10-6 on page 10-30 of the "SA1110 Microprocessor Developers > Manual" it lists these and other possibilities for putting greater than 32MB in > each bank. In fact all four banks could be filled up this way at 128 MB each > for a total physical memory size of 512MB. This is amazing! This is more than what my last PC could handle!! Well... Gonna have to re-think the whole mapping to accomodate that possibility... and Chris' as well. Chris -> Can you survive with only 32 MB for a couple of days? Nicolas From kramer@pa.dec.com Thu May 18 14:38:26 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id OAA26143; Thu, 18 May 2000 14:38:25 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from mail2.digital.com (mail2.digital.com [204.123.2.56]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id OAA01299 for ; Thu, 18 May 2000 14:38:22 +0200 (METDST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id FAA24865; Thu, 18 May 2000 05:34:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA17045; Thu, 18 May 2000 05:33:23 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id FAA02992; Thu, 18 May 2000 05:30:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id FAA17807; Thu, 18 May 2000 05:30:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail1.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA27691; Thu, 18 May 2000 05:30:46 -0700 Received: from blazieresearch.com ([216.85.232.66]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with ESMTP id FAA21241 for ; Thu, 18 May 2000 05:30:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (chris@localhost) by blazieresearch.com (8.9.3/8.8.7) with SMTP id IAA19345; Thu, 18 May 2000 08:29:45 -0400 Date: Thu, 18 May 2000 08:29:45 -0400 (EDT) From: Chris Blazie To: Nicolas Pitre Cc: Erik Bunce , Chris Blazie , sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.arm.linux.org.uk Subject: Re: sa1100 memory limit? In-Reply-To: Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk > Well... Gonna have to re-think the whole mapping to accomodate that > possibility... and Chris' as well. > > Chris -> Can you survive with only 32 MB for a couple of days? Absolutely; actually it won't be an issue for quite a long time. Thanks, Chris From kramer@pa.dec.com Thu May 18 17:50:27 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id RAA27644; Thu, 18 May 2000 17:50:27 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from mail1.digital.com (mail1.digital.com [204.123.2.50]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id RAA11982 for ; Thu, 18 May 2000 17:50:24 +0200 (METDST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id IAA31683; Thu, 18 May 2000 08:47:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA30529; Thu, 18 May 2000 08:46:11 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id IAA15473; Thu, 18 May 2000 08:43:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id IAA31491; Thu, 18 May 2000 08:43:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail1.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA22077; Thu, 18 May 2000 08:43:38 -0700 Received: from xanadu.vipswitch.com (generic199.197.205.205.in-addr.arpa [205.205.197.199] (may be forged)) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with ESMTP id IAA02461 for ; Thu, 18 May 2000 08:43:37 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 18 May 2000 11:41:48 -0400 (EDT) From: Nicolas Pitre To: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Subject: diff-2.3.99-pre8-rmk1-np3 Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk ... is available from the following locations: ftp.netwinder.org/users/n/nico/ ftp.arm.linux.org.uk/pub/linux/arm/people/nico/ This contains: - Big PCMCIA support integration plus documentation updates; - Fix to previous patch which prevented to compile for something else than Assabet; - More UDA1341 work, essentially the framework for audio input support. Pending: - Support for more than 32MB of ram per bank on the SA1110. Note that ftp.arm.linux.org.uk/pub/linux/arm/people/nico/ is now a mirror of ftp.netwinder.org/users/n/nico/ and should be synchronized automatically within an hour. Enjoy! Nicolas From kramer@pa.dec.com Fri May 19 21:29:24 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id VAA05604; Fri, 19 May 2000 21:29:23 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from mail1.digital.com (mail1.digital.com [204.123.2.50]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id VAA09943 for ; Fri, 19 May 2000 21:29:21 +0200 (METDST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id MAA11598; Fri, 19 May 2000 12:26:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA21187; Fri, 19 May 2000 12:24:56 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id MAA31157; Fri, 19 May 2000 12:19:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id MAA16947; Fri, 19 May 2000 12:19:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail2.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA18782; Fri, 19 May 2000 12:19:00 -0700 Received: from ice.ar51.net (ice.fiftyone.com [208.225.80.11]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with ESMTP id MAA27860 for ; Fri, 19 May 2000 12:19:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: from server01.asi (akron-80-177.ar51.net [208.225.80.177]) by ice.ar51.net (8.9.3/8.8.7) with ESMTP id PAA10765; Fri, 19 May 2000 15:18:31 -0400 Received: by SERVER01 with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2448.0) id ; Fri, 19 May 2000 15:19:02 -0400 Message-Id: From: Jeff Sutherland To: "John G. Dorsey (E-mail)" , "SA1100 Linux mailing list (E-mail)" Subject: Ethernet working on Assabet (mostly...) Date: Fri, 19 May 2000 15:18:54 -0400 Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2448.0) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk Just want to report that a compact flash Ethernet card WORKS on 2.3.99-pre8-rmk1-np3 on the Assabet. One small issue: about every 8 seconds "eth0: interrupt(s) dropped!" appears on the console, yet ifconfig shows no errors at all for the eth0 interface. What did I mess up? In fact, I've noticed no real operational issues, telneting all over the place, even ftp'd something from Nico's site on Netwinder.org directly to the Assabet. Cool! Also I'm tweaking the startup scripts a little- I boned something so currently I have to load the modules by hand. John's card utilities work fine, I'm in the process of adding NFS support to the kernel, then no more ramdisk space issues. Thanks, guys! //Jeff From kramer@pa.dec.com Fri May 19 22:12:52 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id WAA05723; Fri, 19 May 2000 22:12:51 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from mail1.digital.com (mail1.digital.com [204.123.2.50]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id WAA11219 for ; Fri, 19 May 2000 22:12:49 +0200 (METDST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id NAA08667; Fri, 19 May 2000 13:09:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA32311; Fri, 19 May 2000 13:07:39 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id NAA21274; Fri, 19 May 2000 13:04:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id NAA25658; Fri, 19 May 2000 13:04:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail2.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA28469; Fri, 19 May 2000 13:04:30 -0700 Received: from ice.ar51.net (ice.fiftyone.com [208.225.80.11]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with ESMTP id NAA30408 for ; Fri, 19 May 2000 13:04:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: from server01.asi (akron-80-177.ar51.net [208.225.80.177]) by ice.ar51.net (8.9.3/8.8.7) with ESMTP id QAA13653; Fri, 19 May 2000 16:04:28 -0400 Received: by SERVER01 with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2448.0) id ; Fri, 19 May 2000 16:05:04 -0400 Message-Id: From: Jeff Sutherland To: "'nmistry@lhsl.com'" , "SA1100 Linux mailing list (E-mail)" Subject: RE: Ethernet working on Assabet (mostly...) Date: Fri, 19 May 2000 16:04:55 -0400 Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2448.0) Content-Type: text/plain Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk > Jeff, > > Can you send me some information about how you got the CF > Ethernet working? > does it work w/ just the 8-1-3, or have you created a set of > patches.. if it > is just 8-1-3, can yous end me your kernel config.. I am > currently working on > the touch screen, and x-windows for assabet, and having > network access would > definitely speed up things.. > > Thanks! > > -Nick Well, umm, I just kind of followed the directions in the kernel source once I applied the patches. Also went to John Dorsey's page and grabbed his ramdisk image to look at his startup scripts and got a pcmcia source tree so I could get the userland utilities for PCMCIA that don't come with the kernel. I had pretty much gone through the exercise of setting up networking by getting PPP working first a while back. Actually, setting up all the config files to make networking run is really the most work. I built all the PCMCIA drivers as modules, stripped 'em, and loaded them into my ramdisk. Once booted I still have some config problems to work through, so just loaded the modules by hand, stuck the card in, ran cardmgr which saw the card right away, then did 'ifup eth0' and bang! I was on the net. Easier than I ever dreamed possible. (All you network gurus stop laughing NOW, OK?) BTW the card is the compact flash Socket 10baseT device that comes with the Assabet dev. kit. Now it's on to booting diskless and NFS mounting the root filesystem somewhere (probably on my Netwinder since they're binary compatible :D ) //Jeff From kramer@pa.dec.com Mon May 22 19:12:18 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id TAA17947; Mon, 22 May 2000 19:12:17 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from mail1.digital.com (mail1.digital.com [204.123.2.50]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id TAA10351 for ; Mon, 22 May 2000 19:12:15 +0200 (METDST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id KAA12879; Mon, 22 May 2000 10:09:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA25342; Mon, 22 May 2000 10:09:10 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id KAA01850; Mon, 22 May 2000 10:04:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id KAA22744; Mon, 22 May 2000 10:04:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail1.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA26365; Mon, 22 May 2000 10:04:53 -0700 Received: from smtp3.andrew.cmu.edu (SMTP3.ANDREW.CMU.EDU [128.2.10.83]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with ESMTP id KAA13184 for ; Mon, 22 May 2000 10:04:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: from unix10.andrew.cmu.edu (UNIX10.ANDREW.CMU.EDU [128.2.15.14]) by smtp3.andrew.cmu.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id NAA22070; Mon, 22 May 2000 13:01:26 -0400 (EDT) Date: Mon, 22 May 2000 13:01:27 -0400 (EDT) From: John G Dorsey To: Jeff Sutherland Cc: "SA1100 Linux mailing list (E-mail)" Subject: Re: Ethernet working on Assabet (mostly...) In-Reply-To: Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk On Fri, 19 May 2000, Jeff Sutherland wrote: > Just want to report that a compact flash Ethernet card WORKS on > 2.3.99-pre8-rmk1-np3 on the Assabet. One small issue: about every 8 seconds > "eth0: interrupt(s) dropped!" appears on the console, yet ifconfig shows no > errors at all for the eth0 interface. What did I mess up? Nothing that doesn't seem to be messed up for others who use that device. =) (Before the driver even started working properly, I was warned by Andrew Pfiffer at Intel that he had observed this card failing to reliably generate interrupts.) Since I don't have long-term needs for this device, and since it does appear to "work" apart from the occasional console error message, I'm inclined to leave it alone for now. Socket won't even send me documentation on the card, so if anyone else is feeling adventurous (or doesn't mind trying to explain to a tech support operator why there really _isn't_ a driver for me already on their web site...), feel free to tackle this. > Also I'm tweaking the startup scripts a little- I boned something so > currently I have to load the modules by hand. You're missing half the fun of Card Services! I've put up a new ramdisk on the web site, which has some extra utilities and some corrections to the Card Services scripts. Once you have a clean setup, hot insertions should work, which are good for hours of fun. =) > I'm in the process of adding NFS support to the kernel, then no more > ramdisk space issues. I hadn't thought to check this earlier, but it seems that Nicolas' latest patch omits one important CF-related tweak. Specifically, it's Erik Bunce's ide.h change, which lets you use ATA/IDE devices as well. (He developed on Kingston and SanDisk flash parts, but I've had no problems with a Microdrive.) The patch is 1KB, and is also on the web site. Also available is a config file, since I've received some reports of confusion over the correct options. I'm thinking about adding SA-1111 PCMCIA support next. Does anybody have Neponset patches I should know about? -jd From kramer@pa.dec.com Mon May 22 19:37:44 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id TAA18149; Mon, 22 May 2000 19:37:44 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from mail1.digital.com (mail1.digital.com [204.123.2.50]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id TAA11299 for ; Mon, 22 May 2000 19:37:41 +0200 (METDST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id KAA14677; Mon, 22 May 2000 10:35:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA20171; Mon, 22 May 2000 10:35:24 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id KAA05814; Mon, 22 May 2000 10:33:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id KAA03308; Mon, 22 May 2000 10:33:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail1.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA08025; Mon, 22 May 2000 10:33:32 -0700 Received: from ice.ar51.net (ice.fiftyone.com [208.225.80.11]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with ESMTP id KAA06541 for ; Mon, 22 May 2000 10:33:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: from server01.asi (akron-80-162.ar51.net [208.225.80.162]) by ice.ar51.net (8.9.3/8.8.7) with ESMTP id NAA03069; Mon, 22 May 2000 13:33:29 -0400 Received: by SERVER01 with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2448.0) id ; Mon, 22 May 2000 13:34:11 -0400 Message-Id: From: Jeff Sutherland To: "'John G Dorsey'" Cc: "'SA1100 Linux mailing list (E-mail)'" Subject: RE: Ethernet working on Assabet (mostly...) Date: Mon, 22 May 2000 13:34:09 -0400 Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2448.0) Content-Type: text/plain Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk > > I'm in the process of adding NFS support to the kernel, then no more > > ramdisk space issues. > > I hadn't thought to check this earlier, but it seems that > Nicolas' latest > patch omits one important CF-related tweak. Specifically, it's Erik > Bunce's ide.h change, which lets you use ATA/IDE devices as well. (He > developed on Kingston and SanDisk flash parts, but I've had > no problems > with a Microdrive.) The patch is 1KB, and is also on the web > site. Also > available is a config file, since I've received some reports > of confusion > over the correct options. I'll check that out. In the meantime I'm going back to turn on the debug code in the pcmcia modules. After I recompiled my kernel I can't get this thing working any more! The modules apparently load OK, the card power seems to be coming on (10baseT light on the hub comes on) but no pcmcia device shows up in /proc/devices, hence cardmgr and cardctl won't work. Triple checked kernel config, rebuilt everything a couple of times, now I have to go figure it out... Ahh, hacking... Gotta love it. > I'm thinking about adding SA-1111 PCMCIA support next. Does > anybody have > Neponset patches I should know about? > > -jd Is the Nep even working yet? One issue the CE guys found out the hard way: If using the PCMCIA sockets on the Nep, do NOT put anything in the compact flash socket on the Assabet! They roasted a compact flash card this way. I need to go look at the schemos again for the exact reason... Also due to buffering the SDRAM on the Nep can only run at 51MHz max (half the speed of the Assabet SDRAM). Then there's that problematic SA1111 chip to deal with... //Jeff From kramer@pa.dec.com Mon May 22 20:41:23 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id UAA18577; Mon, 22 May 2000 20:41:23 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from mail1.digital.com (mail1.digital.com [204.123.2.50]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id UAA13327 for ; Mon, 22 May 2000 20:41:19 +0200 (METDST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id LAA11872; Mon, 22 May 2000 11:39:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA21105; Mon, 22 May 2000 11:39:03 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id LAA29194; Mon, 22 May 2000 11:35:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id LAA04483; Mon, 22 May 2000 11:35:22 -0700 (PDT) From: Received: from mail2.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA30647; Mon, 22 May 2000 11:35:22 -0700 Received: from lhs.com (lnsmtpbos00.lhs.com [208.162.98.43]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id LAA07806 for ; Mon, 22 May 2000 11:35:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: by lhs.com(Lotus SMTP MTA v4.6.6 (890.1 7-16-1999)) id 852568E7.0066CE3A ; Mon, 22 May 2000 14:42:54 -0400 X-Lotus-Fromdomain: LHS To: Jeff Sutherland Cc: "'John G Dorsey'" , "'SA1100 Linux mailing list (E-mail)'" Message-Id: <852568E7.0066CC17.00@lhs.com> Date: Mon, 22 May 2000 14:32:21 -0400 Subject: RE: Ethernet working on Assabet (mostly...) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk jsutherland@accelent.com writes: > I'll check that out. In the meantime I'm going back to turn on the debug > code in the pcmcia modules. After I recompiled my kernel I can't get this > thing working any more! The modules apparently load OK, the card power > seems to be coming on (10baseT light on the hub comes on) but no pcmcia > device shows up in /proc/devices, hence cardmgr and cardctl won't work. > Triple checked kernel config, rebuilt everything a couple of times, now I've submitted a patch to John Dorsey and Nicolas Pitre that should fix that problem. If a card was inserted when cardmanager was started, then it would just work. However if a card wasn't inserted at startup it wouldn't. It turns out there was a bug in cs.c included in the patches that it didn't call set_socket to initialize the state of the SA1100 driver, which includes the mask setting for DETECT. Since DETECT isn't in the mask of the sa1100's copy of the CardServices state, it doesn't pass on the event when it receives the card detect interrupt. Unfortunately I don't have a place to put my patch up at the moment, but if you wan't I can send it to you seperately. Erik From kramer@pa.dec.com Tue May 23 05:05:07 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id FAA21499; Tue, 23 May 2000 05:05:06 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from mail1.digital.com (mail1.digital.com [204.123.2.50]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id FAA27134 for ; Tue, 23 May 2000 05:05:04 +0200 (METDST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id UAA11323; Mon, 22 May 2000 20:02:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA06777; Mon, 22 May 2000 20:02:21 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id UAA26930; Mon, 22 May 2000 20:00:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id UAA15598; Mon, 22 May 2000 20:00:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail2.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA18718; Mon, 22 May 2000 20:00:10 -0700 Received: from xanadu.gn.com (modemcable248.137-200-24.mtl.mc.videotron.net [24.200.137.248]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with ESMTP id UAA03648 for ; Mon, 22 May 2000 20:00:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (nico@localhost) by xanadu.gn.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id XAA24948 for ; Mon, 22 May 2000 23:23:32 -0400 X-Authentication-Warning: xanadu.gn.com: nico owned process doing -bs Date: Mon, 22 May 2000 23:23:32 -0400 (EDT) From: Nicolas Pitre X-Sender: nico@xanadu.gn.com To: SA-1100/Linux Subject: diff-2.3.99-pre8-rmk1-np4 Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk Is available at the usual places... This contains: - UDA1341 recording support - Some minor changes to allow PCMCIA modules to be compiled in the kernel The major improvement is the UDA1341 recording support. I've been working on that the whole day and most of the weekend so didn't have time to merge all the latest PCMCIA patches. So if you don't care about UDA1341 recording support then just wait for the next patch. If you want to test it quickly, just try: dd if=/dev/dsp of=/dev/dsp bs=16384 and listen to the result with headphones. If the above command is run in the background, then you can use the 'mix' program available on my ramdisk_img_splay.gz image. 'mix' is a minimal text mode mixer which lets you change the volume, treble, recording level, recording source, etc. (well, you all have played with a mixer program already, right?). Note that output as well as input are fixed to 44100Hz stereo, 16 bits/sample. I'll get on PCMCIA stuff hopefully tomorow. Enjoy! Nicolas From kramer@pa.dec.com Wed May 24 05:58:27 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id FAA29944; Wed, 24 May 2000 05:58:27 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from mail2.digital.com (mail2.digital.com [204.123.2.56]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id FAA21199 for ; Wed, 24 May 2000 05:58:24 +0200 (METDST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id UAA29545; Tue, 23 May 2000 20:56:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA10756; Tue, 23 May 2000 20:56:11 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id UAA05088; Tue, 23 May 2000 20:50:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id UAA27930; Tue, 23 May 2000 20:50:57 -0700 (PDT) From: Received: from mail1.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA20651; Tue, 23 May 2000 20:50:26 -0700 Received: from lhs.com (lnsmtpbos00.lhs.com [208.162.98.43]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id UAA18458 for ; Tue, 23 May 2000 20:50:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: by lhs.com(Lotus SMTP MTA v4.6.6 (890.1 7-16-1999)) id 852568E9.0015CC15 ; Tue, 23 May 2000 23:58:05 -0400 X-Lotus-Fromdomain: LHS To: Sun-Gi Hong Cc: linux-arm@vger.rutgers.edu, sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Message-Id: <852568E9.0015CA7F.00@lhs.com> Date: Tue, 23 May 2000 23:34:47 -0400 Subject: Re: LCD backlight on Assabet BD problem Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk After speaking with an engineer @ ergpower I have the part needed to power the frontlight on the Sharp LQ039Q2DS54 Display. The part # is 8m122375 its an 8m Class DC to AC inverter The cost per unit is $29 each, for a qty of less than 10.. there is a minimum order amount of $100. And a lead time of 4 weeks.. -Nick nmistry@lhsl.com on 05/23/2000 04:04:47 PM To: Sun-Gi Hong cc: linux-arm@vger.rutgers.edu (bcc: Nicholas Mistry/USER/US/LHS) Subject: Re: LCD backlight on Assabet BD problem Unless you obtain an AC inverter for the frontlight on the Assabet, enabling the frontlight in software will do nothing. After doing a bit of research (and calling intel) i was able to find a vendor for the inverter.. Endicott Research (www.ergpower.com) 2601 Wayne Street Endicott, New York 13760 607-754-9187 fax 607-754-9255 I was able to find out that they do have an inverter that supports the Sharp LQ039Q2DS54, but every time i try to contact the engineer, he is not at his desk!?!? I will try again today, and see if i can get more info.. pricing.. etc.. -Nick Sun-Gi Hong on 05/23/2000 03:50:19 AM To: linux-arm@vger.rutgers.edu cc: (bcc: Nicholas Mistry/USER/US/LHS) Subject: LCD backlight on Assabet BD problem Greetings, Now I am trying to turn on the LCD backlight on Assabet board, however, I don't know how to achieve this. In /video/sa1100fb.c, there is a function of sa1100fb_enable_lcd_controller (), and it contains the following routines. if (machine_is_assabet()) { #ifdef CONFIG_SA1100_ASSABET BCR_set(BCR_LCD_ON); #endif } else if (machine_is_penny()) { #ifdef CONFIG_SA1100_PENNY FpgaLcdCS1 = 0x0FF; /* LCD Backlight to 100% */ FpgaPortI |= LCD_ON; /* Turn on LCD Backlight */ #endif } else if (machine_is_tifon()) { GPCR = GPIO_GPIO(24); /* cycle on/off-switch */ udelay(150); GPSR = GPIO_GPIO(24); /* turn on display */ As you can see, LCD backlight seems to work in the case of PENNY, but Assabet does not. (Am I right?) What can I do for turning on LCD backlight? Any ideas? unsubscribe: body of `unsubscribe linux-arm' to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu ++ Please use linux-arm-kernel@lists.arm.linux.org.uk for ++ ++ kernel-related discussions. ++ unsubscribe: body of `unsubscribe linux-arm' to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu ++ Please use linux-arm-kernel@lists.arm.linux.org.uk for ++ ++ kernel-related discussions. ++ From kramer@pa.dec.com Wed May 24 19:15:53 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id TAA04611; Wed, 24 May 2000 19:15:53 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from mail2.digital.com (mail2.digital.com [204.123.2.56]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id TAA25664 for ; Wed, 24 May 2000 19:15:51 +0200 (METDST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id KAA12692; Wed, 24 May 2000 10:13:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA11948; Wed, 24 May 2000 10:13:20 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id KAA10733; Wed, 24 May 2000 10:10:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id KAA22200; Wed, 24 May 2000 10:10:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail1.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA04140; Wed, 24 May 2000 10:10:39 -0700 Received: from mail-blue.research.att.com (mail-blue.research.att.com [135.207.30.102]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with ESMTP id KAA32463 for ; Wed, 24 May 2000 10:10:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: from hermes.research.att.com (hermes.research.att.com [135.207.16.38]) by mail-blue.research.att.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 068B64CE16 for ; Wed, 24 May 2000 13:09:53 -0400 (EDT) Received: from research.att.com (tcc@dhcp-new133.research.att.com [135.207.19.133]) by hermes.research.att.com (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id NAA20625 for ; Wed, 24 May 2000 13:09:50 -0400 (EDT) Message-Id: <392C0CCE.FC2A06E0@research.att.com> Date: Wed, 24 May 2000 13:09:34 -0400 From: "Jack T. Chang" Organization: AT&T Labs-Research X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.72 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.2.14-15mdk i686) X-Accept-Language: en Mime-Version: 1.0 To: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Subject: Re: Please add me to the mailing list Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------2BE9ACFAED2A2F7203ABE908" Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk --------------2BE9ACFAED2A2F7203ABE908 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=big5 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Thanks -- Jack T. Chang --------------2BE9ACFAED2A2F7203ABE908 Content-Type: text/html; charset=big5 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Thanks 
-- 

Jack T. Chang
  --------------2BE9ACFAED2A2F7203ABE908-- From kramer@pa.dec.com Fri May 26 05:07:30 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id FAA14433; Fri, 26 May 2000 05:07:30 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from mail1.digital.com (mail1.digital.com [204.123.2.50]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id FAA04697 for ; Fri, 26 May 2000 05:07:28 +0200 (METDST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id UAA14005; Thu, 25 May 2000 20:05:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA31698; Thu, 25 May 2000 20:05:18 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id UAA31188; Thu, 25 May 2000 20:02:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id UAA31186; Thu, 25 May 2000 20:02:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail1.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA04488; Thu, 25 May 2000 20:02:31 -0700 Received: from xanadu.gn.com (modemcable248.137-200-24.mtl.mc.videotron.net [24.200.137.248]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with ESMTP id UAA04483 for ; Thu, 25 May 2000 20:02:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (nico@localhost) by xanadu.gn.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id XAA31394 for ; Thu, 25 May 2000 23:01:42 -0400 X-Authentication-Warning: xanadu.gn.com: nico owned process doing -bs Date: Thu, 25 May 2000 23:01:42 -0400 (EDT) From: Nicolas Pitre X-Sender: nico@xanadu.gn.com To: SA-1100/Linux Subject: diff-2.3.99-pre8-rmk1-np5 Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk ... is available from the usual places. This contains: - CPU speed scaling from the LART team, plus SA1110 additions from Erik Bunce - some fixes to the PCMCIA support (generic IDE configuration for non-PCMCIA systems has to be fixed though) There are still many things to clean up, but it'll come with time... ;) Enjoy! Nicolas From kramer@pa.dec.com Fri May 26 18:11:27 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id SAA18246; Fri, 26 May 2000 18:11:26 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from mail2.digital.com (mail2.digital.com [204.123.2.56]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id SAA02737 for ; Fri, 26 May 2000 18:11:25 +0200 (METDST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id JAA14256; Fri, 26 May 2000 09:09:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA03433; Fri, 26 May 2000 09:09:28 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id JAA16114; Fri, 26 May 2000 09:07:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id JAA17182; Fri, 26 May 2000 09:07:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail1.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA13629; Fri, 26 May 2000 09:07:42 -0700 Received: from thalia.fm.intel.com (thalia.fm.intel.com [132.233.247.11]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with ESMTP id JAA12755 for ; Fri, 26 May 2000 09:07:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: from SMTP (fmsmsxvs05-1.fm.intel.com [132.233.42.205]) by thalia.fm.intel.com (8.9.1a+p1/8.9.1/d: relay.m4,v 1.28 2000/05/06 00:07:11 dmccart Exp $) with SMTP id QAA11010 for ; Fri, 26 May 2000 16:08:18 GMT Received: from fmsmsx28.FM.INTEL.COM ([132.233.48.28]) by 132.233.48.205 (Norton AntiVirus for Internet Email Gateways 1.0) ; Fri, 26 May 2000 16:07:27 0000 (GMT) Received: by fmsmsx28.fm.intel.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2448.0) id ; Fri, 26 May 2000 09:07:26 -0700 Message-Id: <4D1999F67A93D211AC4C00A0C945BCFA056ACD10@apsmsxhk90.ihk.intel.com> From: "Yu, Sherman" To: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Subject: Linux porting on Assabet(/Niponset) board Date: Fri, 26 May 2000 09:07:20 -0700 Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2448.0) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk Dear Sir: I am supporting StrongARM in APac. A lot of customers had interest in the Linux porting on Assabet. Please put me in your distribution list. We can share the information. With Best Regards... Sherman Yu From kramer@pa.dec.com Tue May 30 17:25:59 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id RAA07480; Tue, 30 May 2000 17:25:58 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from mail1.digital.com (mail1.digital.com [204.123.2.50]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id RAA05501 for ; Tue, 30 May 2000 17:25:57 +0200 (METDST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id IAA19135; Tue, 30 May 2000 08:23:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA24410; Tue, 30 May 2000 08:23:29 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id IAA06873; Tue, 30 May 2000 08:19:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id IAA06887; Tue, 30 May 2000 08:19:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail1.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA29289; Tue, 30 May 2000 08:19:38 -0700 Received: from zinc.singnet.com.sg (smtp3.singnet.com.sg [165.21.7.83]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with ESMTP id IAA13328 for ; Tue, 30 May 2000 08:19:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: from wks1 (ad202.166.107.152.magix.com.sg [202.166.107.152]) by zinc.singnet.com.sg (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id XAA00538 for ; Tue, 30 May 2000 23:18:30 +0800 (SGT) Message-Id: <002201bfca4b$1da9f9e0$0864a8c0@wks1> From: "Toong See Wan" To: Subject: How to download kernel to SA1110 Assabalt? Date: Tue, 30 May 2000 23:24:08 +0800 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_001F_01BFCA8E.27A429A0" X-Priority: 3 X-Msmail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2919.6600 X-Mimeole: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2919.6600 Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_001F_01BFCA8E.27A429A0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Is there any documenation to byulid toolchain and download to Strongarm = eval board Assabalt SA1110 ? All info I find is for SA1100. When i tried = the step shown I ran into alot of problems. So I would appreciate if = anybody can tell me a resource for SA1110 eval=20 Thanks Seewan ------=_NextPart_000_001F_01BFCA8E.27A429A0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Is there any documenation to byulid = toolchain and=20 download to Strongarm eval board Assabalt SA1110 ? All info I find is = for=20 SA1100. When i tried the step shown I ran into alot of problems. So I = would=20 appreciate if anybody can tell me a resource for SA1110 eval =
Thanks
 
Seewan
------=_NextPart_000_001F_01BFCA8E.27A429A0-- From kramer@pa.dec.com Tue May 30 17:39:33 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id RAA07536; Tue, 30 May 2000 17:39:29 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from mail1.digital.com (mail1.digital.com [204.123.2.50]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id RAA06033 for ; Tue, 30 May 2000 17:39:27 +0200 (METDST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id IAA18737; Tue, 30 May 2000 08:38:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA17384; Tue, 30 May 2000 08:38:08 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id IAA08129; Tue, 30 May 2000 08:37:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id IAA08162; Tue, 30 May 2000 08:37:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail2.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA16156; Tue, 30 May 2000 08:37:56 -0700 Received: from mail-blue.research.att.com (mail-blue.research.att.com [135.207.30.102]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with ESMTP id IAA27878 for ; Tue, 30 May 2000 08:37:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: from hermes.research.att.com (hermes.research.att.com [135.207.16.38]) by mail-blue.research.att.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A4C94CE04; Tue, 30 May 2000 11:37:10 -0400 (EDT) Received: from research.att.com (gliss [135.207.17.204]) by hermes.research.att.com (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id LAA02647; Tue, 30 May 2000 11:37:05 -0400 (EDT) Message-Id: <3933E07F.DC9EEDA2@research.att.com> Date: Tue, 30 May 2000 11:38:40 -0400 From: "Jack T.C. Chang" X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.61 [en] (X11; U; IRIX 6.3 IP32) X-Accept-Language: en Mime-Version: 1.0 To: Toong See Wan Cc: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Subject: Re: How to download kernel to SA1110 Assabalt? References: <002201bfca4b$1da9f9e0$0864a8c0@wks1> Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------A0421A2B220D9FFD97893D11" Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk --------------A0421A2B220D9FFD97893D11 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=big5 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit You may find useful info from http://www.cs.cmu.edu/~wearable/software/assabet.html Toong See Wan wrote: > Is there any documenation to byulid toolchain and download to > Strongarm eval board Assabalt SA1110 ? All info I find is for SA1100. > When i tried the step shown I ran into alot of problems. So I would > appreciate if anybody can tell me a resource for SA1110 evalThanks > Seewan -- ====== Jack T. Chang AT&T Laboratories - Research URL:http://www.research.att.com/info/tcc --------------A0421A2B220D9FFD97893D11 Content-Type: text/html; charset=big5 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit You may find useful info from
http://www.cs.cmu.edu/~wearable/software/assabet.html

Toong See Wan wrote:

Is there any documenation to byulid toolchain and download to Strongarm eval board Assabalt SA1110 ? All info I find is for SA1100. When i tried the step shown I ran into alot of problems. So I would appreciate if anybody can tell me a resource for SA1110 evalThanks Seewan
-- 
======  Jack T. Chang 
        AT&T Laboratories - Research
        URL:http://www.research.att.com/info/tcc
  --------------A0421A2B220D9FFD97893D11-- From kramer@pa.dec.com Tue May 30 17:41:02 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id RAA07545; Tue, 30 May 2000 17:41:01 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from mail2.digital.com (mail2.digital.com [204.123.2.56]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id RAA06099 for ; Tue, 30 May 2000 17:41:00 +0200 (METDST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id IAA29006; Tue, 30 May 2000 08:39:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA04324; Tue, 30 May 2000 08:39:37 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id IAA08210; Tue, 30 May 2000 08:39:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id IAA08199; Tue, 30 May 2000 08:39:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail1.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA07618; Tue, 30 May 2000 08:39:31 -0700 Received: from ns1.neogenesis.com (ns1.neogenesis.com [209.21.255.2]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id IAA18500 for ; Tue, 30 May 2000 08:39:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.3.8] by ns1.neogenesis.com via smtpd (for mail1.digital.com [204.123.2.50]) with SMTP; 30 May 2000 15:44:33 UT Received: from livetoy.com (IDENT:mhuang@hotrod.livetoy.com [192.168.3.15]) by smtp.livetoy.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id LAA23624 for ; Tue, 30 May 2000 11:44:46 -0400 Message-Id: <3933E0C3.A97680D7@livetoy.com> Date: Tue, 30 May 2000 11:39:48 -0400 From: Mark Huang Organization: LiveToy Networks, Inc. X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.72 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.2.14 i686) X-Accept-Language: en Mime-Version: 1.0 To: sa1100-linux Subject: Unresolved symbols in flash_mem Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="------------EDEA57EF995712CE03D1B4BB" Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------EDEA57EF995712CE03D1B4BB Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi, I'm trying to compile the flash block driver that ships with 2.3.99-rmk1-np4 as a module and am getting the following errors on insmod: flash_mem.o: unresolved symbol sa1100_node_data flash_mem.o: unresolved symbol alloc_pages As far as nm can tell me, both symbols are defined in the kernel. I'm guessing that the problematic functions are __get_free_pages() and free_pages(); I've always been a little uncertain about the difference between these functions, vmalloc(), and kmalloc(). Anyway, any pointers would be helpful; I'll try statically linking the driver code into a new kernel in the meantime. Thanks, --Mark -- Mark Huang Systems Development Manager LiveToy Networks, Inc. --------------EDEA57EF995712CE03D1B4BB Content-Type: text/x-vcard; charset=us-ascii; name="mhuang.vcf" Content-Description: Card for Mark Huang Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="mhuang.vcf" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit begin:vcard n:Huang;Mark tel;cell:617-359-7898 tel;fax:617-354-5930 tel;work:617-354-0699 x-mozilla-html:FALSE org:LiveToy Networks, Inc. adr:;;840 Memorial Dr;Cambridge;MA;02139;USA version:2.1 email;internet:mhuang@livetoy.com title:Systems Development Manager x-mozilla-cpt:;6592 fn:Mark Huang end:vcard --------------EDEA57EF995712CE03D1B4BB-- From kramer@pa.dec.com Tue May 30 17:48:52 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id RAA07592; Tue, 30 May 2000 17:48:51 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from mail1.digital.com (mail1.digital.com [204.123.2.50]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id RAA06619 for ; Tue, 30 May 2000 17:48:50 +0200 (METDST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id IAA19812; Tue, 30 May 2000 08:47:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA06455; Tue, 30 May 2000 08:47:30 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id IAA08438; Tue, 30 May 2000 08:47:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id IAA08470; Tue, 30 May 2000 08:47:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail1.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA21157; Tue, 30 May 2000 08:47:19 -0700 Received: from xanadu.vipswitch.com ([205.250.170.220]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with ESMTP id IAA20385 for ; Tue, 30 May 2000 08:47:18 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 30 May 2000 11:43:06 -0400 (EDT) From: Nicolas Pitre To: Toong See Wan Cc: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Subject: Re: How to download kernel to SA1110 Assabalt? In-Reply-To: <002201bfca4b$1da9f9e0$0864a8c0@wks1> Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk On Tue, 30 May 2000, Toong See Wan wrote: > Is there any documenation to byulid toolchain and download to Strongarm eval board Assabalt SA1110 ? All info I find is for SA1100. When i tried the step shown I ran into alot of problems. So I would appreciate if anybody can tell me a resource for SA1110 eval > Thanks See linux/Documentation/arm/SA1100/Assabet after you patched your Linux source tree. Nicolas From kramer@pa.dec.com Tue May 30 17:53:41 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id RAA07617; Tue, 30 May 2000 17:53:40 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from mail1.digital.com (mail1.digital.com [204.123.2.50]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id RAA06784 for ; Tue, 30 May 2000 17:53:38 +0200 (METDST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id IAA17519; Tue, 30 May 2000 08:52:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA30088; Tue, 30 May 2000 08:52:18 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id IAA08599; Tue, 30 May 2000 08:52:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id IAA08608; Tue, 30 May 2000 08:52:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail2.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA05046; Tue, 30 May 2000 08:52:06 -0700 Received: from xanadu.vipswitch.com ([205.250.170.220]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with ESMTP id IAA29474 for ; Tue, 30 May 2000 08:52:06 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 30 May 2000 11:48:08 -0400 (EDT) From: Nicolas Pitre To: Mark Huang Cc: sa1100-linux Subject: Re: Unresolved symbols in flash_mem In-Reply-To: <3933E0C3.A97680D7@livetoy.com> Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: MULTIPART/Mixed; BOUNDARY=------------EDEA57EF995712CE03D1B4BB Content-Id: Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk This message is in MIME format. The first part should be readable text, while the remaining parts are likely unreadable without MIME-aware tools. Send mail to mime@docserver.cac.washington.edu for more info. --------------EDEA57EF995712CE03D1B4BB Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; CHARSET=US-ASCII Content-ID: On Tue, 30 May 2000, Mark Huang wrote: > Hi, > > I'm trying to compile the flash block driver that ships with > 2.3.99-rmk1-np4 as a module and am getting the following errors on > insmod: > > flash_mem.o: unresolved symbol sa1100_node_data > flash_mem.o: unresolved symbol alloc_pages Hmmm... For instance, try adding EXPORT_SYMBOL(x); Just after those symbols are defined in the source tree. Substitute x with the symbol name. Of course, linking the driver in the kernel will work. Nicolas --------------EDEA57EF995712CE03D1B4BB Content-Type: TEXT/X-VCARD; CHARSET=us-ascii; NAME="mhuang.vcf" Content-ID: Content-Description: Card for Mark Huang Content-Disposition: ATTACHMENT; FILENAME="mhuang.vcf" begin:vcard n:Huang;Mark tel;cell:617-359-7898 tel;fax:617-354-5930 tel;work:617-354-0699 x-mozilla-html:FALSE org:LiveToy Networks, Inc. adr:;;840 Memorial Dr;Cambridge;MA;02139;USA version:2.1 email;internet:mhuang@livetoy.com title:Systems Development Manager x-mozilla-cpt:;6592 fn:Mark Huang end:vcard --------------EDEA57EF995712CE03D1B4BB-- From kramer@pa.dec.com Wed May 31 00:49:56 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id AAA08970; Wed, 31 May 2000 00:49:55 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from mail1.digital.com (mail1.digital.com [204.123.2.50]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id AAA20213 for ; Wed, 31 May 2000 00:49:53 +0200 (METDST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id PAA12238; Tue, 30 May 2000 15:48:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA25552; Tue, 30 May 2000 15:48:04 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id PAA26696; Tue, 30 May 2000 15:47:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id PAA27845; Tue, 30 May 2000 15:47:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail1.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA29504; Tue, 30 May 2000 15:47:16 -0700 Received: from ns1.neogenesis.com (ns1.neogenesis.com [209.21.255.2]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id PAA14504 for ; Tue, 30 May 2000 15:47:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.3.8] by ns1.neogenesis.com via smtpd (for mail1.digital.com [204.123.2.50]) with SMTP; 30 May 2000 22:52:17 UT Received: from livetoy.com (IDENT:mhuang@hotrod.livetoy.com [192.168.3.15]) by smtp.livetoy.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id SAA25561; Tue, 30 May 2000 18:52:23 -0400 Message-Id: <393444FC.225A6A1B@livetoy.com> Date: Tue, 30 May 2000 18:47:24 -0400 From: Mark Huang Organization: LiveToy Networks, Inc. X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.72 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.2.14 i686) X-Accept-Language: en Mime-Version: 1.0 To: Nicolas Pitre , sa1100-linux Subject: Re: Unresolved symbols in flash_mem References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk Nicolas Pitre wrote: > For instance, try adding > > EXPORT_SYMBOL(x); > > Just after those symbols are defined in the source tree. Substitute x > with the symbol name. > > Of course, linking the driver in the kernel will work. > In flash_mem.c, I changed the calls to __get_free_pages() and free_pages() to vmalloc() and vfree(); I couldn't see any reason that the flash cache would need contiguous physical regions. It seems to work, and doesn't complain during compilation, so I went with it. I made a few other changes to make it easier to replace the erase_sector() and write_sector() functions for different kinds of flash and can submit those in a patch if you like. One other question I have is what happened to the sync() interface for custom block drivers? The only way I can flush the cache manually is to umount the device. sync() and update() don't seem to do anything, there doesn't seem to be an fsync() block_device_operation, and the BLKFLSBUF ioctl() doesn't flush the flash cache (bug?). For now, I threw a call to write_cached_data() in BLKFLSBUF and wrote my own sync program to call it, but I'm not sure this is entirely kosher. Thanks! --Mark -- Mark Huang Systems Development Manager LiveToy Networks, Inc. From kramer@pa.dec.com Wed May 31 16:25:20 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id QAA13524; Wed, 31 May 2000 16:25:20 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from mail1.digital.com (mail1.digital.com [204.123.2.50]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id QAA22439 for ; Wed, 31 May 2000 16:25:17 +0200 (METDST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id HAA09500; Wed, 31 May 2000 07:23:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA30265; Wed, 31 May 2000 07:23:29 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id HAA21503; Wed, 31 May 2000 07:21:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id HAA21441; Wed, 31 May 2000 07:21:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail1.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA28953; Wed, 31 May 2000 07:21:52 -0700 Received: from xanadu.vipswitch.com ([205.250.170.220]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with ESMTP id HAA06868 for ; Wed, 31 May 2000 07:21:51 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 31 May 2000 10:17:53 -0400 (EDT) From: Nicolas Pitre To: Mark Huang Cc: sa1100-linux Subject: Re: Unresolved symbols in flash_mem In-Reply-To: <393444FC.225A6A1B@livetoy.com> Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk On Tue, 30 May 2000, Mark Huang wrote: > I made a few other changes to make it easier to replace the > erase_sector() and write_sector() functions for different kinds of flash > and can submit those in a patch if you like. Any patch you may come with will be greatly appreciated. > One other question I have is what happened to the sync() interface for > custom block drivers? The only way I can flush the cache manually is to > umount the device. I probably got lost during the port to 2.3.x... Some improvements are still needed there indeed. Nicolas From kramer@pa.dec.com Thu Jun 1 07:12:05 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id HAA16218; Thu, 1 Jun 2000 07:12:04 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from mail1.digital.com (mail1.digital.com [204.123.2.50]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id HAA15523 for ; Thu, 1 Jun 2000 07:12:03 +0200 (METDST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id WAA30453; Wed, 31 May 2000 22:10:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA26819; Wed, 31 May 2000 22:10:20 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id WAA23257; Wed, 31 May 2000 22:07:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id WAA13683; Wed, 31 May 2000 22:07:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail2.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA10688; Wed, 31 May 2000 22:07:42 -0700 Received: from xanadu.gn.com (modemcable248.137-200-24.mtl.mc.videotron.net [24.200.137.248]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with ESMTP id WAA32432 for ; Wed, 31 May 2000 22:07:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (nico@localhost) by xanadu.gn.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id BAA24623 for ; Thu, 1 Jun 2000 01:06:52 -0400 X-Authentication-Warning: xanadu.gn.com: nico owned process doing -bs Date: Thu, 1 Jun 2000 01:06:52 -0400 (EDT) From: Nicolas Pitre X-Sender: nico@xanadu.gn.com To: SA-1100/Linux Subject: diff-2.4.0-test1-ac6-rmk1-np1 Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk ... is available at usual places This contains: - Initial Neponset support John G Dorsey - PCMCIA updates John G Dorsey - Fixes to the framebuffer driver for Assabet Chan Tak Shing Tho (if it doesn't work, try replacing the BCR_set by BCR_set in line 1177 of drivers/video/sa1100fb.c. Please tell me what works for you) - UDA1341 is now using the sound registration interface and configurable in the "sound" section. Some parts look hackish to me ATM... It should get fixed in a near future. Note the patch order is actually the following: linux-2.4.0-test1.tar.gz patch-2.4.0test1-ac6.gz patch-2.4.0-test1-ac6-rmk1.gz diff-2.4.0-test1-ac6-rmk1-np1.gz Enjoy! Nicolas From kramer@pa.dec.com Fri Jun 2 09:19:35 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id JAA20415; Fri, 2 Jun 2000 09:19:35 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from mail2.digital.com (mail2.digital.com [204.123.2.56]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id JAA19121 for ; Fri, 2 Jun 2000 09:19:29 +0200 (METDST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id AAA13552; Fri, 2 Jun 2000 00:17:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA18026; Fri, 2 Jun 2000 00:17:30 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id AAA05791; Fri, 2 Jun 2000 00:10:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id AAA05693; Fri, 2 Jun 2000 00:10:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail1.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA07697; Fri, 2 Jun 2000 00:10:57 -0700 Received: from iron.singnet.com.sg (smtp1.singnet.com.sg [165.21.7.81]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with ESMTP id AAA06987 for ; Fri, 2 Jun 2000 00:10:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: from wks1 (ad202.166.105.161.magix.com.sg [202.166.105.161]) by iron.singnet.com.sg (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id PAA18642; Fri, 2 Jun 2000 15:09:51 +0800 (SGT) Message-Id: <001c01bfcc62$5e38b820$0864a8c0@wks1> From: "Toong See Wan" To: "linux-arm mailing List" , Subject: How to flash the zImage (kernel) to the Assabet flash and have angel boot from it? Date: Fri, 2 Jun 2000 15:15:44 +0800 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0019_01BFCCA5.6C18D4A0" X-Priority: 3 X-Msmail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2919.6600 X-Mimeole: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2919.6600 Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0019_01BFCCA5.6C18D4A0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi, I have successfully compiled the kernel download the kernel to Assabet. = However the utility provide by Nicolas downloaded the image to the = SDRAM . How can I load it to the StrataFlash and have angel boot from = there? seewan ------=_NextPart_000_0019_01BFCCA5.6C18D4A0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hi,
 
I have successfully compiled the kernel = download=20 the kernel to Assabet. However the utility provide by Nicolas  = downloaded=20 the image to the SDRAM . How can I load it to the StrataFlash and have = angel=20 boot from there?
 
seewan
------=_NextPart_000_0019_01BFCCA5.6C18D4A0-- From kramer@pa.dec.com Fri Jun 2 15:57:46 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id PAA21797; Fri, 2 Jun 2000 15:57:45 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from mail1.digital.com (mail1.digital.com [204.123.2.50]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id PAA01317 for ; Fri, 2 Jun 2000 15:57:43 +0200 (METDST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id GAA30193; Fri, 2 Jun 2000 06:56:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA12122; Fri, 2 Jun 2000 06:56:04 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id GAA14131; Fri, 2 Jun 2000 06:54:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id GAA14108; Fri, 2 Jun 2000 06:54:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail2.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA16388; Fri, 2 Jun 2000 06:54:40 -0700 Received: from xanadu.vipswitch.com ([205.250.170.220]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with ESMTP id GAA00386 for ; Fri, 2 Jun 2000 06:54:39 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 2 Jun 2000 09:50:13 -0400 (EDT) From: Nicolas Pitre To: Toong See Wan Cc: linux-arm mailing List , sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Subject: Re: How to flash the zImage (kernel) to the Assabet flash and have angel boot from it? In-Reply-To: <001c01bfcc62$5e38b820$0864a8c0@wks1> Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk On Fri, 2 Jun 2000, Toong See Wan wrote: > Hi, > > I have successfully compiled the kernel download the kernel to Assabet. However the utility provide by Nicolas downloaded the image to the SDRAM . How can I load it to the StrataFlash and have angel boot from there? IMHO the best thing to do would be porting BLOB to Assabet. Any volunteer? Nicolas From kramer@pa.dec.com Fri Jun 2 16:54:21 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id QAA21948; Fri, 2 Jun 2000 16:54:06 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from mail2.digital.com (mail2.digital.com [204.123.2.56]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id QAA03293 for ; Fri, 2 Jun 2000 16:54:04 +0200 (METDST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id HAA05114; Fri, 2 Jun 2000 07:52:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA15328; Fri, 2 Jun 2000 07:52:45 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id HAA16078; Fri, 2 Jun 2000 07:51:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id HAA16074; Fri, 2 Jun 2000 07:51:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail2.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA27876; Fri, 2 Jun 2000 07:51:11 -0700 Received: from ice.ar51.net (ice.fiftyone.com [208.225.80.11]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with ESMTP id HAA04039 for ; Fri, 2 Jun 2000 07:51:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: from server01.asi (akron-80-150.ar51.net [208.225.80.150]) by ice.ar51.net (8.9.3/8.8.7) with ESMTP id KAA24314; Fri, 2 Jun 2000 10:50:22 -0400 Received: by SERVER01 with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2448.0) id ; Fri, 2 Jun 2000 10:51:05 -0400 Message-Id: From: Jeff Sutherland To: "'Nicolas Pitre'" , "'Toong See Wan'" Cc: "'linux-arm mailing List'" , "'sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com'" Subject: RE: How to flash the zImage (kernel) to the Assabet flash and hav eangel boot from it? Date: Fri, 2 Jun 2000 10:50:49 -0400 Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2448.0) Content-Type: text/plain Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk > On Fri, 2 Jun 2000, Toong See Wan wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > I have successfully compiled the kernel download the kernel > to Assabet. However the utility provide by Nicolas > downloaded the image to the SDRAM . How can I load it to the > StrataFlash and have angel boot from there? > > IMHO the best thing to do would be porting BLOB to Assabet. > Any volunteer? > > > Nicolas Well, it's halfway there :) At least the SDRAM setup was reported to work in an early version. I've made changes to bring the CPU speed up to 221MHz, but presently it only supports the SDRAM on the Assabet board, not the Neponset add-on. Plus, I never fooled around with the flash downloading part. If anyone wants to hack away at the flashing part let me know and I'll send you the archive. //Jeff mailto:jsutherland@accelent.com From kramer@pa.dec.com Sun Jun 4 05:40:07 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id FAA27311; Sun, 4 Jun 2000 05:40:06 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from mail1.digital.com (mail1.digital.com [204.123.2.50]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id FAA07281 for ; Sun, 4 Jun 2000 05:40:05 +0200 (METDST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id UAA06859; Sat, 3 Jun 2000 20:38:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA20369; Sat, 3 Jun 2000 20:37:32 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id UAA08557; Sat, 3 Jun 2000 20:33:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id UAA08585; Sat, 3 Jun 2000 20:33:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail1.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA10077; Sat, 3 Jun 2000 20:33:53 -0700 Received: from smtp4.singnet.com.sg (smtp4.singnet.com.sg [165.21.101.224]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with ESMTP id UAA02588 for ; Sat, 3 Jun 2000 20:33:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: from wks1 (ad202.166.105.168.magix.com.sg [202.166.105.168]) by smtp4.singnet.com.sg (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id LAA06282; Sun, 4 Jun 2000 11:32:39 +0800 (SGT) (envelope-from seewan@surreal.com.sg) Message-Id: <001201bfcdd6$636c4a80$0864a8c0@wks1> From: "Toong See Wan" To: "Nicolas Pitre" Cc: "linux-arm mailing List" , References: Subject: Re: How to flash the zImage (kernel) to the Assabet flash and haveangel boot from it? Date: Sun, 4 Jun 2000 11:38:45 +0800 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-Msmail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2919.6600 X-Mimeole: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2919.6600 Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk I will volunteer to write a bootloader for the Assabet that boot from flash. But I will need alot of help as I am new to this. See Wan ----- Original Message ----- From: "Nicolas Pitre" To: "Toong See Wan" Cc: "linux-arm mailing List" ; Sent: Friday, June 02, 2000 9:50 PM Subject: Re: How to flash the zImage (kernel) to the Assabet flash and haveangel boot from it? > > > On Fri, 2 Jun 2000, Toong See Wan wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > I have successfully compiled the kernel download the kernel to Assabet. However the utility provide by Nicolas downloaded the image to the SDRAM . How can I load it to the StrataFlash and have angel boot from there? > > IMHO the best thing to do would be porting BLOB to Assabet. > Any volunteer? > > > Nicolas > > From kramer@pa.dec.com Sun Jun 4 09:04:54 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id JAA27721; Sun, 4 Jun 2000 09:04:53 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from mail1.digital.com (mail1.digital.com [204.123.2.50]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id JAA09006 for ; Sun, 4 Jun 2000 09:04:51 +0200 (METDST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id AAA13842; Sun, 4 Jun 2000 00:02:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA16716; Sun, 4 Jun 2000 00:02:29 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id AAA12740; Sun, 4 Jun 2000 00:00:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id AAA11734; Sun, 4 Jun 2000 00:00:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail1.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA30907; Sun, 4 Jun 2000 00:00:14 -0700 Received: from www.ntust.edu.tw ([140.118.31.56]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with ESMTP id XAA14483 for ; Sat, 3 Jun 2000 23:59:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail.ntust.edu.tw (mail.ntust.edu.tw [140.118.31.60]) by www.ntust.edu.tw (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id OAA15174; Sun, 4 Jun 2000 14:55:51 +0800 (CST) Received: from mail.ntust.edu.tw (mail.ntust.edu.tw [140.118.31.60]) by mail.ntust.edu.tw (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id OAA09614; Sun, 4 Jun 2000 14:55:47 +0800 (CST) Date: Sun, 4 Jun 2000 14:55:47 +0800 (CST) From: Chester To: Jeff Sutherland Cc: "'Nicolas Pitre'" , "'Toong See Wan'" , "'linux-arm mailing List'" , "'sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com'" Subject: RE: How to flash the zImage (kernel) to the Assabet flash and hav eangel boot from it? In-Reply-To: Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk > > IMHO the best thing to do would be porting BLOB to Assabet. > > Any volunteer? > > > > > > Nicolas > Well, I just send a blob-1.0.7b patch that modified by me and Jeff to Erik ,it should works fine with Assabet and other SA-1100 board,hope it will be released on next version of blob. Best regards, Chester From kramer@pa.dec.com Mon Jun 5 05:47:58 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id FAA00944; Mon, 5 Jun 2000 05:47:58 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from mail1.digital.com (mail1.digital.com [204.123.2.50]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id FAA28841 for ; Mon, 5 Jun 2000 05:47:56 +0200 (METDST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id UAA08959; Sun, 4 Jun 2000 20:46:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA05128; Sun, 4 Jun 2000 20:46:07 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id UAA09404; Sun, 4 Jun 2000 20:42:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id UAA08918; Sun, 4 Jun 2000 20:42:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail1.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA19164; Sun, 4 Jun 2000 20:42:11 -0700 Received: from xanadu.gn.com (modemcable248.137-200-24.mtl.mc.videotron.net [24.200.137.248]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with ESMTP id UAA09206 for ; Sun, 4 Jun 2000 20:42:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (nico@localhost) by xanadu.gn.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id XAA16132 for ; Sun, 4 Jun 2000 23:41:23 -0400 X-Authentication-Warning: xanadu.gn.com: nico owned process doing -bs Date: Sun, 4 Jun 2000 23:41:23 -0400 (EDT) From: Nicolas Pitre X-Sender: nico@xanadu.gn.com To: SA-1100/Linux Subject: diff-2.4.0-test1-ac7-rmk1-np1 Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk ... is available at the usual sites. This contains: - GPIO and SA1111 IRQ handling cleanup (probably not complete for the extra IRQs on the Neponset) - PCMCIA reorganization (since it is now part of the kernel proper... It looks much cleaner in /driver/pcmcia with a separate file for each implementation.) - TouchScreen driver, contributed by (not fully integrated yet, but might inspire others...) This is actually the first incarnation of a large cleanup. Hopefully there isn't too much breakages. Now *before* registering an IRQ which is a GPIO line, you must call set_GPIO_IRQ_edge() to determine on which edge transition on the line an IRQ must be triggered. The drivers/pcmcia/sa1100_assabet.c should give a good usage example. If you have any comments please don't hesitate to send them to me. Note the patch order is actually the following: linux-2.4.0-test1.tar.gz: ftp.*.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v2.4/ patch-2.4.0test1-ac7.gz: ftp.*.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/alan/2.4.0test/ patch-2.4.0-test1-ac7-rmk1.gz: ftp.arm.linux.org.uk/pub/linux/arm/source/kernel-patches/v2.4/ diff-2.4.0-test1-ac7-rmk1-np1.gz: ftp.netwinder.org/users/n/nico/ or ftp.arm.linux.org.uk/pub/linux/arm/people/nico/ Enjoy! Nicolas From kramer@pa.dec.com Mon Jun 5 21:17:08 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id VAA06684; Mon, 5 Jun 2000 21:17:08 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from mail2.digital.com (mail2.digital.com [204.123.2.56]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id VAA04615 for ; Mon, 5 Jun 2000 21:17:05 +0200 (METDST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id MAA12098; Mon, 5 Jun 2000 12:15:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA09114; Mon, 5 Jun 2000 12:15:24 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id MAA02975; Mon, 5 Jun 2000 12:14:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id MAA02823; Mon, 5 Jun 2000 12:14:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail1.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA19225; Mon, 5 Jun 2000 12:14:01 -0700 Received: from duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (duteinh.et.tudelft.nl [130.161.42.1]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with ESMTP id MAA00094 for ; Mon, 5 Jun 2000 12:14:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: from kalman.et.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id VAA06661; Mon, 5 Jun 2000 21:12:23 +0200 (MET DST) Received: (from erik@localhost) by kalman.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.8/8.8.8/Debian/GNU) id VAA31839; Mon, 5 Jun 2000 21:12:22 +0200 Message-Id: <200006051912.VAA31839@kalman.et.tudelft.nl> Subject: Re: How to flash the zImage (kernel) to the Assabet flash and hav eangel boot from it? In-Reply-To: from Chester at "Jun 4, 0 02:55:47 pm" To: B8502004@ntust.edu.tw (Chester) Date: Mon, 5 Jun 2000 21:12:22 +0200 (CEST) Cc: jsutherland@accelent.com, nico@CAM.ORG, seewan@surreal.com.sg, linux-arm@vger.rutgers.edu, sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com From: J.A.K.Mouw@ITS.TUDelft.NL (Erik Mouw) Organization: Eric Conspiracy Secret Labs X-Eric-Conspiracy: There is no conspiracy! X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL39 (25)] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk Chester wrote: > > > Well, I just send a blob-1.0.7b patch that modified by me and Jeff to Erik > ,it should works fine with Assabet and other SA-1100 board,hope it will be Yep, I received the patch, I suppose this is supersedes Jeff' patch he send me earlier? Anyway, I'll try to integrate it into blob and call the complete stuff blob-1.0.8. Note that I am officially on holidays, so it might take some time before I am online again. Erik -- J.A.K. (Erik) Mouw, Information and Communication Theory Group, Department of Electrical Engineering, Faculty of Information Technology and Systems, Delft University of Technology, PO BOX 5031, 2600 GA Delft, The Netherlands Phone: +31-15-2783635 Fax: +31-15-2781843 Email: J.A.K.Mouw@its.tudelft.nl WWW: http://www-ict.its.tudelft.nl/~erik/ From kramer@pa.dec.com Tue Jun 6 10:18:34 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id KAA10316; Tue, 6 Jun 2000 10:18:34 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from mail1.digital.com (mail1.digital.com [204.123.2.50]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id KAA24363 for ; Tue, 6 Jun 2000 10:18:31 +0200 (METDST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id BAA22968; Tue, 6 Jun 2000 01:16:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA13396; Tue, 6 Jun 2000 01:16:20 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id BAA28683; Tue, 6 Jun 2000 01:12:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id BAA28694; Tue, 6 Jun 2000 01:12:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail1.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA16988; Tue, 6 Jun 2000 01:12:55 -0700 Received: from lakdiva.slt.lk ([204.143.96.17]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with ESMTP id BAA14993 for ; Tue, 6 Jun 2000 01:12:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: from obelix.atpos.lk ([203.115.31.220]) by lakdiva.slt.lk (8.9.1b+Sun/8.9.1) with ESMTP id OAA26026; Tue, 6 Jun 2000 14:07:45 -0600 (GMT) Received: from U2 ([192.1.1.25]) by obelix.atpos.lk with SMTP (Microsoft Exchange Internet Mail Service Version 5.5.2650.21) id ML5XN5S0; Tue, 6 Jun 2000 13:59:59 +0600 Date: Tue, 6 Jun 2000 13:55:27 +0600 (LKT) From: Nandana Kuruwitage X-Sender: root@u2 Reply-To: Harsha Sanjeewa To: Nicolas Pitre Cc: SA-1100/Linux Subject: Re: diff-2.4.0-test1-ac7-rmk1-np1 In-Reply-To: Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk Hi, I tried to copile the new kernel with both diff-2.4.0-test1-ac7-rmk1-np1 and diff-2.4.0-test1-ac7-rmk1-np2. But they gave the following errors. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ arm-linux-ld -p -X -T arch/arm/vmlinux.lds arch/arm/kernel/head-armv.o arch/arm/kernel/init_task.o init/main.o init/version.o \ --start-group \ arch/arm/kernel/kernel.o arch/arm/mm/mm.o kernel/kernel.o mm/mm.o fs/fs.o ipc/ipc.o \ drivers/block/block.a drivers/char/char.o drivers/misc/misc.o drivers/net/net.o drivers/parport/parport.a drivers/video/video.o arch/arm/special/special.a \ net/network.a \ arch/arm/nwfpe/math-emu.o arch/arm/lib/lib.o arch/arm/lib/lib.a /opt/ARM/build/linux/lib/lib.a /usr/local/arm/lib/gcc-lib/arm-linux/2.95.2/soft-float/libgcc.a \ --end-group \ -o vmlinux arch/arm/special/special.a(mcp_common.o): In function `sa1100_mcp_common_init': /opt/ARM/build/linux/arch/arm/special/mcp_common.c(.text.init+0x1c): undefined reference to `proc_register' /opt/ARM/build/linux/arch/arm/special/mcp_common.c(.text.init+0x1c): relocation truncated to fit: R_ARM_PC24 proc_register arch/arm/special/special.a(audio-sa1100-mcp.o): In function `lg': /opt/ARM/build/linux/arch/arm/special/audio-sa1100-mcp.c:394: undefined reference to `proc_register' /opt/ARM/build/linux/arch/arm/special/audio-sa1100-mcp.c:394: relocation truncated to fit: R_ARM_PC24 proc_register make: *** [vmlinux] Error 1 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Any Idea Regards, Harsha From kramer@pa.dec.com Tue Jun 6 18:18:44 2000 Return-Path: Received: from tudedr.et.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id SAA14470; Tue, 6 Jun 2000 18:18:44 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from ns2.tudelft.nl by ITS.TUDelft.NL (PMDF V5.1-10 #21918) with ESMTP id <01JQAJ18PO0G8ZDVCI@ITS.TUDelft.NL> for erik@duteinh.et.tudelft.nl; Tue, 6 Jun 2000 18:19:19 +0200 Received: from mail2.digital.com (mail2.digital.com [204.123.2.56]) by mailhost1.tudelft.nl (PMDF V5.2-33 #42432) with ESMTP id <0FVQ00E2UQGWRD@mailhost1.tudelft.nl> for J.A.K.Mouw@its.tudelft.nl; Tue, 06 Jun 2000 18:14:57 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id JAA28235; Tue, 06 Jun 2000 09:09:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA11961; Tue, 06 Jun 2000 09:09:34 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id JAA06599; Tue, 06 Jun 2000 09:08:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id JAA06799; Tue, 06 Jun 2000 09:08:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail2.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA15348; Tue, 06 Jun 2000 09:08:26 -0700 Received: from thalia.fm.intel.com (thalia.fm.intel.com [132.233.247.11]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with ESMTP id JAA29195 for ; Tue, 06 Jun 2000 09:08:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: from SMTP (fmsmsxvs05-1.fm.intel.com [132.233.42.205]) by thalia.fm.intel.com (8.9.1a+p1/8.9.1/d: relay.m4,v 1.29 2000/05/27 05:56:37 nzand Exp $) with SMTP id QAA19910; Tue, 06 Jun 2000 16:08:20 +0000 (GMT) Received: from fmsmsx28.FM.INTEL.COM ([132.233.48.28]) by 132.233.48.205 (Norton AntiVirus for Internet Email Gateways 1.0) ; Tue, 06 Jun 2000 16:07:28 +0000 (GMT) Received: by fmsmsx28.fm.intel.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2448.0) id ; Tue, 06 Jun 2000 09:07:27 -0700 Date: Tue, 06 Jun 2000 09:07:24 -0700 From: "Meng, David" Subject: Start up code Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com To: "'George France'" Cc: linux-arm mailing List , sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Message-id: <4EE51D128990D211AC4100A0C96B1E440314448C@fmsmsx74.fm.intel.com> MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2448.0) Content-type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Precedence: bulk Hi George: How are you doing today? I get a question about the start up code for strong ARM platform. How should I modify the start.S (also init.c, abi-note.S) in glibc so I can build a crt1.o ( also include crti.o crtbegin.o crtend.o and crtn.o)file to build an application. My toolcahin can build linux kernel. I know I should modify the start up code to make the application. Please let me know how did you build all these start up files in order to build an application. Thanks a lot. David Meng From kramer@pa.dec.com Wed Jun 7 04:22:31 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id EAA16602; Wed, 7 Jun 2000 04:22:29 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from mail1.digital.com (mail1.digital.com [204.123.2.50]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id EAA22833 for ; Wed, 7 Jun 2000 04:22:28 +0200 (METDST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id TAA00364; Tue, 6 Jun 2000 19:20:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA01239; Tue, 6 Jun 2000 19:20:22 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id TAA03867; Tue, 6 Jun 2000 19:18:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id TAA03919; Tue, 6 Jun 2000 19:18:36 -0700 (PDT) From: Received: from mail2.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA32070; Tue, 6 Jun 2000 19:18:35 -0700 Received: from linux.org.tw (tlug.sinica.edu.tw [140.109.13.42]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with ESMTP id TAA00206 for ; Tue, 6 Jun 2000 19:18:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (chester@localhost) by linux.org.tw (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id KAA10256; Wed, 7 Jun 2000 10:20:50 +0800 Date: Wed, 7 Jun 2000 10:20:49 +0800 (CST) To: nico@CAM.ORG Cc: chester@linux.org.tw, sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Subject: Re: diff-2.4.0-test1-ac7-rmk1-np1 (fwd) In-Reply-To: Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk > patch-2.4.0-test1-ac7-rmk1.gz: > ftp.arm.linux.org.uk/pub/linux/arm/source/kernel-patches/v2.4/ > diff-2.4.0-test1-ac7-rmk1-np1.gz: > ftp.netwinder.org/users/n/nico/ or > ftp.arm.linux.org.uk/pub/linux/arm/people/nico/ > > Enjoy! > > > Nicolas > Hi, i have found that this patch already include neponset support,but when i combined assabet and neponset together,nothing happen on minicom screen(kernel didn't boot at all).Also i have change neponset jumper to fit this. Myabe i should try np2 patch ..! Chester From kramer@pa.dec.com Wed Jun 7 04:23:36 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id EAA16615; Wed, 7 Jun 2000 04:23:35 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from mail2.digital.com (mail2.digital.com [204.123.2.56]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id EAA22859 for ; Wed, 7 Jun 2000 04:23:33 +0200 (METDST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id TAA01582; Tue, 6 Jun 2000 19:22:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA26451; Tue, 6 Jun 2000 19:22:05 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id TAA03713; Tue, 6 Jun 2000 19:21:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id TAA02339; Tue, 6 Jun 2000 19:21:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail1.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA05037; Tue, 6 Jun 2000 19:21:58 -0700 Received: from pikachu.idthk.com (pc125.idthk.com [210.184.5.125]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with ESMTP id TAA29358 for ; Tue, 6 Jun 2000 19:21:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (thomas@localhost) by pikachu.idthk.com (8.9.3/8.8.7) with ESMTP id KAA29603; Wed, 7 Jun 2000 10:23:24 +0800 Date: Wed, 7 Jun 2000 10:23:24 +0800 (CST) From: Tak-Shing Chan To: Harsha Sanjeewa Cc: SA-1100/Linux Subject: Re: diff-2.4.0-test1-ac7-rmk1-np1 In-Reply-To: Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk Harsha, mcp_common.c relies on the proc_register() function when CONFIG_PROC_FS is defined. Unfortunately, proc_register() is no longer a public-callable function in linux-2.4.0-test1-ac7 on all platforms. A quick and dirty fix is to delete the ``static'' keyword at line 346 of linux/fs/proc/generic.c. If you don't want to mess with Linus' code, you can #undef CONFIG_PROC_FS at the beginning of linux/arch/arm/special/mcp_common.c, but you will lose the /proc stuffs. Of course the best way is to rewrite the proc stuffs in mcp_common.c. I believe Nicolas is already fixing it. Tak-Shing Chan On Tue, 6 Jun 2000, Nandana Kuruwitage wrote: > Hi, > I tried to copile the new kernel with both > diff-2.4.0-test1-ac7-rmk1-np1 and > diff-2.4.0-test1-ac7-rmk1-np2. > But they gave the following errors. > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > arm-linux-ld -p -X -T arch/arm/vmlinux.lds arch/arm/kernel/head-armv.o > arch/arm/kernel/init_task.o init/main.o init/version.o \ > --start-group \ > arch/arm/kernel/kernel.o arch/arm/mm/mm.o kernel/kernel.o mm/mm.o > fs/fs.o ipc/ipc.o \ > drivers/block/block.a drivers/char/char.o drivers/misc/misc.o > drivers/net/net.o drivers/parport/parport.a drivers/video/video.o > arch/arm/special/special.a \ > net/network.a \ > arch/arm/nwfpe/math-emu.o arch/arm/lib/lib.o arch/arm/lib/lib.a > /opt/ARM/build/linux/lib/lib.a > /usr/local/arm/lib/gcc-lib/arm-linux/2.95.2/soft-float/libgcc.a \ > --end-group \ > -o vmlinux > arch/arm/special/special.a(mcp_common.o): In function > `sa1100_mcp_common_init': > /opt/ARM/build/linux/arch/arm/special/mcp_common.c(.text.init+0x1c): undefined > reference to `proc_register' > /opt/ARM/build/linux/arch/arm/special/mcp_common.c(.text.init+0x1c): relocation > truncated to fit: R_ARM_PC24 proc_register > arch/arm/special/special.a(audio-sa1100-mcp.o): In function `lg': > /opt/ARM/build/linux/arch/arm/special/audio-sa1100-mcp.c:394: undefined > reference to `proc_register' > /opt/ARM/build/linux/arch/arm/special/audio-sa1100-mcp.c:394: relocation > truncated to fit: R_ARM_PC24 proc_register > make: *** [vmlinux] Error 1 > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Any Idea > > Regards, > Harsha > > From kramer@pa.dec.com Thu Jun 8 11:45:41 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id UAA21821; Wed, 7 Jun 2000 20:03:55 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from mail2.digital.com (mail2.digital.com [204.123.2.56]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id UAA00241 for ; Wed, 7 Jun 2000 20:03:53 +0200 (METDST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id LAA22626; Wed, 7 Jun 2000 11:02:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA08060; Wed, 7 Jun 2000 11:02:12 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id LAA23903; Wed, 7 Jun 2000 11:00:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id LAA30023; Wed, 7 Jun 2000 11:00:24 -0700 (PDT) From: Received: from mail2.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA02951; Wed, 7 Jun 2000 11:00:24 -0700 Received: from cmdexsvr.cmd.com (lnxfirefox.cmd.com [192.122.179.28]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with ESMTP id LAA24586 for ; Wed, 7 Jun 2000 11:00:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: by cmdexsvr.cmd.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21) id ; Wed, 7 Jun 2000 11:03:23 -0700 Message-Id: To: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Subject: Problems writing back dirty data from the SA-110 data cache Date: Wed, 7 Jun 2000 11:03:20 -0700 Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21) Content-Type: text/plain Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk We are trying to port linux/drivers/scsi/advansys.c to a StrongArm platform running Linux 2.2.13. We are experiencing cache coherency problems between the SA-110 and a PCI master (AdvanSys SCSI chip). We have attempted to implement the cache write back and invalidate functions in linux/arch/arm/mm/proc-sa110.s to achieve cache coherency, but every attempt has resulted in memory corruption and memory violations. To help diagnose the problem, we simplified our strategy to rely primarily on the "_sa110_flush_cache_all" function which does a 16K read from the Footbridge SA-110 Cache Flush area followed by an SA-110 Coprocessor "Drain Write Buffer" instruction. Attaching an analyzer to the processor bus and the PCI bus we can see the following sequence for a particular command the driver queues to the SCSI chip. (Note: the command structures are cache line aligned and are exactly three cache lines in length.) 1. The driver calls "_sa110_flush_cache_all" to write back and invalidate the command structure from the cache. During the 16K read loop, two of the three cache lines belonging to the command structure are successfully written to the processor bus. The third cache line is not written even though it was modified by the processor. 2. The driver updates command queue linkage and calls "_sa110_cache_wback_area" to write back the modified linkage. This function also includes an SA-110 Coprocessor "Drain Write Buffer" instruction. 3. The processor performs an unbuffered write to the SCSI chip to inform the chip of the new command. 4. The SCSI chip reads the command structure from processor memory. 5. The third cache line is finally written to the processor bus (75 us after step 3, 14 us after step 4) the next time "_sa110_flush_cache_all" is called (apparently by the kernel). 6. The SCSI chip returns the corrupted command structure to the driver. From kramer@pa.dec.com Thu Jun 8 11:43:22 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id GAA23690; Thu, 8 Jun 2000 06:10:28 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from mail2.digital.com (mail2.digital.com [204.123.2.56]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id GAA17475 for ; Thu, 8 Jun 2000 06:10:26 +0200 (METDST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id VAA30866; Wed, 7 Jun 2000 21:08:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA22506; Wed, 7 Jun 2000 21:08:46 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id VAA12469; Wed, 7 Jun 2000 21:06:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id VAA16441; Wed, 7 Jun 2000 21:06:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail1.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA10777; Wed, 7 Jun 2000 21:06:42 -0700 Received: from pikachu.idthk.com (pc125.idthk.com [210.184.5.125]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with ESMTP id VAA06404 for ; Wed, 7 Jun 2000 21:06:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (thomas@localhost) by pikachu.idthk.com (8.9.3/8.8.7) with ESMTP id MAA11334; Thu, 8 Jun 2000 12:07:48 +0800 Date: Thu, 8 Jun 2000 12:07:48 +0800 (CST) From: Tak-Shing Chan To: Nicolas Pitre Cc: Harsha Sanjeewa , SA-1100/Linux Subject: Re: diff-2.4.0-test1-ac7-rmk1-np1 In-Reply-To: Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk On Wed, 7 Jun 2000, Tak-Shing Chan wrote: > Hi Nicolas and Harsha, > > Here's the proc_register() <-> create_proc_info_entry() > patch for diff-2.4.0-test1-ac7-rmk1-np[1-3]. > > Tak-Shing Chan I forgot that proc_unregister() is also outdated. Here's the final patch against diff-2.4.0-test1-ac7-rmk1-np[1-3]: --- linux/arch/arm/special/audio-sa1100-mcp.c.orig Wed Jun 7 17:19:13 2000 +++ linux/arch/arm/special/audio-sa1100-mcp.c Thu Jun 8 11:51:56 2000 @@ -352,20 +352,6 @@ #ifdef CONFIG_PROC_FS static int audio_get_info(char *, char **, off_t, int); - -static struct proc_dir_entry audio_proc_entry = { - 0, /* low ino: the Inode is dynamic */ - 9, "audio_mcp", /* the lenght and name */ - S_IFREG | S_IRUGO, /* the file mode */ - 1, 0, 0, /* nr. links, owner, group */ - 0, /* size; unused */ - NULL, /* inode operations */ - NULL, /* read data */ - audio_get_info, /* get info */ - NULL, /* fill inode */ - NULL, /* next */ - NULL, NULL, /* parent, subdir */ -}; #endif /* CONFIG_PROC_FS */ /* @@ -4040,7 +4026,7 @@ #ifdef CONFIG_PROC_FS /* register procfs device */ - proc_register(&proc_root, &audio_proc_entry); + create_proc_info_entry("audio_mcp", 0, NULL, audio_get_info); #endif /* CONFIG_PROC_FS */ /* log device registration */ @@ -4077,12 +4063,7 @@ #ifdef CONFIG_PROC_FS /* unregister procfs entry */ - if ((err = proc_unregister(&proc_root, audio_proc_entry.low_ino)) != 0) - { -#ifdef AUDIO_DEBUG - printk(AUDIO_NAME ": cleanup_module: proc_unregister(audio) %d\n", err); -#endif - } + remove_proc_entry("audio_mcp", NULL); #endif /* CONFIG_PROC_FS */ /* unregister driver */ --- linux/arch/arm/special/mcp_common.c.orig Wed Jun 7 17:20:39 2000 +++ linux/arch/arm/special/mcp_common.c Thu Jun 8 11:53:42 2000 @@ -126,20 +126,6 @@ #ifdef CONFIG_PROC_FS static int mcp_get_info(char *, char **, off_t, int); - -static struct proc_dir_entry mcp_proc_entry = { - 0, /* low ino: the Inode is dynamic */ - 3, "mcp", /* the length and name */ - S_IFREG | S_IRUGO, /* the file mode */ - 1, 0, 0, /* nr. links, owner, group */ - 0, /* size; unused */ - NULL, /* inode operations */ - NULL, /* read data */ - mcp_get_info, /* get info */ - NULL, /* fill inode */ - NULL, /* next */ - NULL, NULL, /* parent, subdir */ -}; #endif /* CONFIG_PROC_FS */ /* @@ -515,7 +501,7 @@ #ifdef CONFIG_PROC_FS /* register procfs devices */ - proc_register(&proc_root, &mcp_proc_entry); + create_proc_info_entry("mcp", 0, NULL, mcp_get_info); #endif /* CONFIG_PROC_FS */ #ifdef CONFIG_POWERMGR @@ -562,12 +548,7 @@ #ifdef CONFIG_PROC_FS /* unregister procfs entries */ - if ((err = proc_unregister(&proc_root, mcp_proc_entry.low_ino)) != 0) - { -#ifdef MCP_DEBUG - printk(MCP_MODULE_NAME ": cleanup_module: proc_unregister %d\n", err); -#endif - } + remove_proc_entry("mcp", NULL); #endif /* CONFIG_PROC_FS */ #ifdef CONFIG_POWERMGR From kramer@pa.dec.com Thu Jun 8 11:43:11 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id HAA23884; Thu, 8 Jun 2000 07:26:04 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from mail2.digital.com (mail2.digital.com [204.123.2.56]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id HAA18696 for ; Thu, 8 Jun 2000 07:26:03 +0200 (METDST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id WAA02483; Wed, 7 Jun 2000 22:24:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA30396; Wed, 7 Jun 2000 22:24:36 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id WAA20496; Wed, 7 Jun 2000 22:23:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id WAA20500; Wed, 7 Jun 2000 22:23:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail1.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA20746; Wed, 7 Jun 2000 22:23:43 -0700 Received: from lakdiva.slt.lk (lakdiva.slt.lk [204.143.96.17]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with ESMTP id WAA08582 for ; Wed, 7 Jun 2000 22:23:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: from obelix.atpos.lk ([203.115.31.220]) by lakdiva.slt.lk (8.9.1b+Sun/8.9.1) with ESMTP id LAA07279; Thu, 8 Jun 2000 11:18:46 -0600 (GMT) Received: from U2 ([192.1.1.25]) by obelix.atpos.lk with SMTP (Microsoft Exchange Internet Mail Service Version 5.5.2650.21) id MMG6V7MP; Thu, 8 Jun 2000 11:12:18 +0600 Date: Thu, 8 Jun 2000 11:06:25 +0600 (LKT) From: Harsha Sanjeewa X-Sender: root@u2 Reply-To: Harsha Sanjeewa To: Tak-Shing Chan Cc: Nicolas Pitre , SA-1100/Linux Subject: Re: diff-2.4.0-test1-ac7-rmk1-np1 In-Reply-To: Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk Hi Chan, Your patch worked.Thanks a lot. I complied the kernel and downloaded it to SA1100 Brutus board. Once downloaded it takes long time to reach the login prompt. Then the CPU hangs and LCD goes blank. It cant allocate the keyboard IRQ either. Any Help ? Regards, Harsha From kramer@pa.dec.com Thu Jun 8 11:43:03 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id IAA24018; Thu, 8 Jun 2000 08:06:38 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from mail1.digital.com (mail1.digital.com [204.123.2.50]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id IAA19557 for ; Thu, 8 Jun 2000 08:06:37 +0200 (METDST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id XAA14934; Wed, 7 Jun 2000 23:05:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA05785; Wed, 7 Jun 2000 23:05:13 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id XAA21277; Wed, 7 Jun 2000 23:04:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id XAA12312; Wed, 7 Jun 2000 23:04:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail1.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA12233; Wed, 7 Jun 2000 23:04:51 -0700 Received: from pikachu.idthk.com (pc125.idthk.com [210.184.5.125]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with ESMTP id XAA15301 for ; Wed, 7 Jun 2000 23:04:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (thomas@localhost) by pikachu.idthk.com (8.9.3/8.8.7) with ESMTP id OAA14385; Thu, 8 Jun 2000 14:06:19 +0800 Date: Thu, 8 Jun 2000 14:06:19 +0800 (CST) From: Tak-Shing Chan To: Harsha Sanjeewa Cc: SA-1100/Linux Subject: Re: diff-2.4.0-test1-ac7-rmk1-np1 In-Reply-To: Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk Hi, I don't have a Brutus board here... Anyone else? Tak-Shing Chan On Thu, 8 Jun 2000, Harsha Sanjeewa wrote: > Hi Chan, > Your patch worked.Thanks a lot. > I complied the kernel and > downloaded it to SA1100 Brutus board. Once > downloaded it takes long time to reach > the login prompt. Then the CPU hangs and > LCD goes blank. It cant allocate the > keyboard IRQ either. Any Help ? > > Regards, > Harsha > > From kramer@pa.dec.com Thu Jun 8 23:17:17 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id XAA06021; Thu, 8 Jun 2000 23:17:16 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from mail1.digital.com (mail1.digital.com [204.123.2.50]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id XAA29679 for ; Thu, 8 Jun 2000 23:17:13 +0200 (METDST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id OAA13594; Thu, 8 Jun 2000 14:15:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA00493; Thu, 8 Jun 2000 14:15:26 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id OAA15214; Thu, 8 Jun 2000 14:12:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id OAA15353; Thu, 8 Jun 2000 14:12:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail2.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA06021; Thu, 8 Jun 2000 14:12:29 -0700 Received: from xanadu.vip.ca ([205.250.170.220]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with ESMTP id OAA29923 for ; Thu, 8 Jun 2000 14:12:29 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 8 Jun 2000 17:08:52 -0400 (EDT) From: Nicolas Pitre To: Dan Malek Cc: john+@cs.cmu.edu, sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Subject: Re: Assabet In-Reply-To: <393FEAFE.33B90CC5@embeddededge.com> Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk On Thu, 8 Jun 2000, Dan Malek wrote: > > > Hi guys. > > I just wanted to let you know that I am spending time working on > the Assabet. I am new to the StrongARM development, but I continue > to do lots of the embedded PowerPC development. > > I have three projects in the fire. One is USB (host and function), and > IP over USB. Another is the MediaQ graphics board. Last is the Ethernet. > Not in any particular order (i.e. all high priority :-). Ethernet is pretty much taken care of now. USB (slave only for Assabet but master for Neponset) is currently an unexplored project. Idem for the graphic board which I never seen any sign of existence yet. > I would like to know what mailing lists would be good so I don't miss > information, and where I can send patches for updates. I make my patch announcements on sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com. Relevant mailing lists also include those mentionned on www.arm.linux.org.uk. You can send any patch you make to me or share them on the sa1100 mailing list. > Oh yeah, I work for MontaVista software. We have a group in Sunnyvale > that has built cross development tools, libraries and file systems. They > are attempting to build a in-line floating point version of the libraries > and applications like we did for the embedded PowerPC processors. I > was intending to use 2.4.0-test1-ac7 as the baseline for our development > for a while. All of this is (or soon will be) on the ftp server. > > Thanks for your help. > > > > -- Dan > From kramer@pa.dec.com Fri Jun 9 04:14:49 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id EAA07600; Fri, 9 Jun 2000 04:14:49 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from mail1.digital.com (mail1.digital.com [204.123.2.50]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id EAA06534 for ; Fri, 9 Jun 2000 04:14:47 +0200 (METDST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id TAA24374; Thu, 8 Jun 2000 19:13:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA00928; Thu, 8 Jun 2000 19:12:57 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id TAA27054; Thu, 8 Jun 2000 19:12:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id TAA27096; Thu, 8 Jun 2000 19:12:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail2.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA00536; Thu, 8 Jun 2000 19:12:13 -0700 Received: from xanadu.gn.com (modemcable248.137-200-24.mtl.mc.videotron.net [24.200.137.248]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with ESMTP id TAA07616 for ; Thu, 8 Jun 2000 19:12:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (nico@localhost) by xanadu.gn.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id WAA18254 for ; Thu, 8 Jun 2000 22:11:20 -0400 X-Authentication-Warning: xanadu.gn.com: nico owned process doing -bs Date: Thu, 8 Jun 2000 22:11:20 -0400 (EDT) From: Nicolas Pitre X-Sender: nico@xanadu.gn.com To: SA-1100/Linux Subject: diff-2.4.0-test1-ac7-rmk1-np5.gz Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk ... is now available. This contains: - last bit (hopefully) for Neponset interrupt support - various fixes to make Brutus, Thinclient and Graphicsclient compile again. - other things that I surely forget ATM. Enjoy! Nicolas From kramer@pa.dec.com Fri Jun 9 16:25:00 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id QAA01095; Fri, 9 Jun 2000 16:25:00 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from mail2.digital.com (mail2.digital.com [204.123.2.56]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id QAA01971 for ; Fri, 9 Jun 2000 16:24:58 +0200 (METDST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id HAA19517; Fri, 9 Jun 2000 07:23:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA09486; Fri, 9 Jun 2000 07:22:59 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id HAA10513; Fri, 9 Jun 2000 07:18:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id HAA10452; Fri, 9 Jun 2000 07:18:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail1.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA20905; Fri, 9 Jun 2000 07:18:52 -0700 Received: from xanadu.gn.com (modemcable248.137-200-24.mtl.mc.videotron.net [24.200.137.248]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with ESMTP id HAA13130 for ; Fri, 9 Jun 2000 07:18:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (nico@localhost) by xanadu.gn.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id KAA22002; Fri, 9 Jun 2000 10:17:42 -0400 X-Authentication-Warning: xanadu.gn.com: nico owned process doing -bs Date: Fri, 9 Jun 2000 10:17:42 -0400 (EDT) From: Nicolas Pitre X-Sender: nico@xanadu.gn.com To: dai Cc: SA-1100/Linux Subject: Re: diff-2.4.0-test1-ac7-rmk1-np5.gz In-Reply-To: <3940AA3D.C7187C32@hw.ia.ac.cn> Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk On Fri, 9 Jun 2000, dai wrote: > nico, > i tried the patch,touch screen still refuse to response. > I wonder if GPIO_11_2_27 IRQs are corrected handled? They are, as PCMCIA support on Assabet is concerned. Notice that the irq number for GPIOs from 10 and above is not the same as the GPIO number. Also before a GPIO is registered for IRQ, the set_GPIO_IRQ_edge() function must be called for the IRQ to be effective. Nicolas From kramer@pa.dec.com Fri Jun 9 21:10:18 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id VAA02355; Fri, 9 Jun 2000 21:10:17 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from mail2.digital.com (mail2.digital.com [204.123.2.56]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id VAA11761 for ; Fri, 9 Jun 2000 21:10:15 +0200 (METDST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id MAA06595; Fri, 9 Jun 2000 12:08:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA26965; Fri, 9 Jun 2000 12:08:35 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id MAA20835; Fri, 9 Jun 2000 12:07:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id MAA22497; Fri, 9 Jun 2000 12:07:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail1.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA10172; Fri, 9 Jun 2000 12:07:30 -0700 Received: from mail.trakonic.com (seascape-216.129.1.18.seascape.ns.ca [216.129.1.18] (may be forged)) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with ESMTP id MAA01169 for ; Fri, 9 Jun 2000 12:07:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: from Moe (moe [192.168.10.43]) by mail.trakonic.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id QAA00902 for ; Fri, 9 Jun 2000 16:09:51 -0300 Message-Id: <005f01bfd245$edf07b40$2b0aa8c0@trakonic.com> From: "J.R. MacArthur" To: Subject: Compact Flash + SA1110 Date: Fri, 9 Jun 2000 16:07:16 -0300 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-Msmail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2615.200 X-Mimeole: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2615.200 Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk We are looking into developing Compact flash support for the SA1110 using the PCMCIA port of the SA1110. Has anyone out there worked on this already? I haven't been able to find much about this on any sites. ================================================= J.R. MacArthur Electrical Technologist Trakonic (www.trakonic.com) From kramer@pa.dec.com Fri Jun 9 21:20:22 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id VAA02392; Fri, 9 Jun 2000 21:20:22 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from mail1.digital.com (mail1.digital.com [204.123.2.50]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id VAA11982 for ; Fri, 9 Jun 2000 21:20:20 +0200 (METDST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id MAA26426; Fri, 9 Jun 2000 12:19:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA08022; Fri, 9 Jun 2000 12:19:00 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id MAA23711; Fri, 9 Jun 2000 12:18:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id MAA02640; Fri, 9 Jun 2000 12:18:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail2.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA28547; Fri, 9 Jun 2000 12:18:48 -0700 Received: from smtp1.andrew.cmu.edu (SMTP1.ANDREW.CMU.EDU [128.2.10.81]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with ESMTP id MAA06422 for ; Fri, 9 Jun 2000 12:18:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: from unix10.andrew.cmu.edu (UNIX10.ANDREW.CMU.EDU [128.2.15.14]) by smtp1.andrew.cmu.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id PAA01514; Fri, 9 Jun 2000 15:15:08 -0400 (EDT) Date: Fri, 9 Jun 2000 15:15:07 -0400 (EDT) From: John G Dorsey To: "J.R. MacArthur" Cc: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Subject: Re: Compact Flash + SA1110 In-Reply-To: <005f01bfd245$edf07b40$2b0aa8c0@trakonic.com> Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk On Fri, 9 Jun 2000, J.R. MacArthur wrote: > We are looking into developing Compact flash support for the SA1110 using > the PCMCIA port of the SA1110. Has anyone out there worked on this already? > I haven't been able to find much about this on any sites. http://www.cs.cmu.edu/~wearable/software/pcmcia-arm.html It's a wee bit stale at the moment, because of the volume of patches which were released in the last week involving PCMCIA. Nicolas' most recent release (2.4.0-test1-ac7-rmk1-np5) looks pretty close to being right, modulo a slight change in interrupt configuration for Neponset. -jd From kramer@pa.dec.com Sun Jun 11 10:06:34 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id KAA07103; Sun, 11 Jun 2000 10:06:33 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from mail2.digital.com (mail2.digital.com [204.123.2.56]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id KAA19196 for ; Sun, 11 Jun 2000 10:06:31 +0200 (METDST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id BAA15888; Sun, 11 Jun 2000 01:04:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA01086; Sun, 11 Jun 2000 01:04:33 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id AAA12475; Sun, 11 Jun 2000 00:59:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id AAA12933; Sun, 11 Jun 2000 00:59:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail1.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA07075; Sun, 11 Jun 2000 00:59:42 -0700 Received: from caramon.arm.linux.org.uk (p52-cordelia-gui.tch.enablis.net [212.250.233.52]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with ESMTP id AAA05094 for ; Sun, 11 Jun 2000 00:59:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: from flint.arm.linux.org.uk (root@flint [192.168.0.4]) by caramon.arm.linux.org.uk (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id IAA15674; Sun, 11 Jun 2000 08:59:19 +0100 Received: (from linux@localhost) by flint.arm.linux.org.uk (8.9.3/8.9.3) id IAA01727; Sun, 11 Jun 2000 08:55:23 +0100 From: Russell King - ARM Linux Admin Message-Id: <200006110755.IAA01727@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> Subject: Re: Problems writing back dirty data from the SA-110 data cache To: Ezell@cmdexsvr.cmd.com Date: Sun, 11 Jun 2000 08:55:22 +0100 (BST) Cc: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com In-Reply-To: from "Ezell@cmdexsvr.cmd.com" at Jun 07, 2000 11:03:20 AM X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL1] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk Ezell@cmdexsvr.cmd.com writes: > We are trying to port linux/drivers/scsi/advansys.c to a StrongArm platform > running Linux 2.2.13. Well, first thing here is that things have moved on a lot since 2.2.13. We now have a better generic PCI cache coherent API for non-coherent architectures in the 2.3 development trees and 2.4.0test1 kernels. > We have attempted to implement the cache write back and invalidate > functions in linux/arch/arm/mm/proc-sa110.s to achieve cache coherency, These are already implemented as dma_cache_{inv,wback,wback_inv} functions. However, there is a fundamental problem with these if you have data in the same half of a cacheline which can be modified by both from the CPU and the PCI bus. In this circumstance, the data which actually ends up in the RAM can be indeterminant. > 1. The driver calls "_sa110_flush_cache_all" to write back and > invalidate the command structure from the cache. During the > 16K read loop, two of the three cache lines belonging to the > command structure are successfully written to the processor > bus. The third cache line is not written even though it was > modified by the processor. I hope this is not called from an interrupt. _sa110_flush_cache_all is not interrupt-safe when called from interrupts (which is another reason why not to use the old interface). _____ |_____| ------------------------------------------------- ---+---+- | | Russell King linux@arm.linux.org.uk --- --- | | | | http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/ / / | | +-+-+ --- -+- / | THE developer of ARM Linux |+| /|\ / | | | --- | +-+-+ ------------------------------------------------- /\\\ | From kramer@pa.dec.com Sun Jun 11 23:05:09 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id XAA08549; Sun, 11 Jun 2000 23:05:09 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from mail2.digital.com (mail2.digital.com [204.123.2.56]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id XAA29848 for ; Sun, 11 Jun 2000 23:05:06 +0200 (METDST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id OAA16880; Sun, 11 Jun 2000 14:03:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA30521; Sun, 11 Jun 2000 14:02:59 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id NAA28717; Sun, 11 Jun 2000 13:58:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id NAA27417; Sun, 11 Jun 2000 13:58:37 -0700 (PDT) From: Received: from mail1.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA26435; Sun, 11 Jun 2000 13:58:36 -0700 Received: from www.darktech.org ([209.10.219.126]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with ESMTP id NAA24422; Sun, 11 Jun 2000 13:58:36 -0700 (PDT) To: @pa.net@pa.dec.com Date: Sun, 11 Jun 2000 16:45:15 -0500 Subject: Mortgage Loans "WE Do All The Work" Message-Id: <6056qloqws4.2gfb6tj4ekka@y78e6qbo.sv012.com> Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk
The Lender's Network
Mortgage Specialists

Comparison shop hundreds of U.S. Lenders!

The Lenders Network is a 100% free service which lets you shop for a mortgage conveniently and securely from the comfort of your home. Using our vast network of lenders across the U.S., we will search our database of loan programs for the one's that best fit your situation, to help you get the best deal on your next loan. You then simply choose the lender with the best loan terms and save money.

Choose from these types of loans:
Debt Consolidation, 2nd Mortgage (125% of property value), Refinance, or Home Improvment.

Ready to get started? Simply fill out the form below, and we'll begin shopping for your loan.  It's that easy!

Free Mortgage Quote
Contact Information
(* required info)

Name: *
Address: *
City: *
State(US Only): *
Zip/Postal Code: *
Home Phone:  *
Work Phone: *
Email Address:
Best Time to Call:
Do You Own Your Home? Mobile Homes DO NOT Qualify
Are You Self-Employed? *
Current Property Value: * See Below For Qualifications
1st Mortgage Owed: * 
2nd Mortgage Owed: *
Amount You Wish To Borrow: *
Current Interest Rate: *
Term Desired: *
Credit Rating: *
Loan Interested In: *

*  Home must be greater than $60,000 in value.  Mortgages owed may not currently exceed 80% of property value.
Email List Removal
Click Here
From kramer@pa.dec.com Mon Jun 12 05:05:52 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id FAA09409; Mon, 12 Jun 2000 05:05:52 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from mail1.digital.com (mail1.digital.com [204.123.2.50]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id FAA05231 for ; Mon, 12 Jun 2000 05:05:50 +0200 (METDST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id UAA08546; Sun, 11 Jun 2000 20:04:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA04396; Sun, 11 Jun 2000 20:03:46 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id UAA04160; Sun, 11 Jun 2000 20:01:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id UAA03035; Sun, 11 Jun 2000 20:01:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail1.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA18700; Sun, 11 Jun 2000 20:01:39 -0700 Received: from smtp.Stanford.EDU (smtp.Stanford.EDU [171.64.14.23]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with ESMTP id UAA14836 for ; Sun, 11 Jun 2000 20:01:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: from zskiraly (mhl-ca16-61.ix.netcom.com [206.216.66.61]) by smtp.Stanford.EDU (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id TAA13373; Sun, 11 Jun 2000 19:57:59 -0700 (PDT) From: "Zsolt Kiraly" To: "Nicolas Pitre" Cc: Subject: question on cache issues on sa-1100 Date: Sun, 11 Jun 2000 19:56:42 -0700 Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-Msmail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) Importance: Normal In-Reply-To: X-Mimeole: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2919.6700 Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk Hi Nicolas, If I remember correctly there were some cache problems with linux and sa-1100 cpu. Unfortunately I don't remember the resolution. Could you point me to some resource about this issue, or maybe provide a brief explanation yourself (although I know you are busy) ? I am particularly interested to know if the cache is actually used on the sa-1100 by linux. I would appreciate input on this issue from anyone else as well. Thanks, Zsolt zskiraly@stanford.edu From kramer@pa.dec.com Mon Jun 12 20:05:00 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id UAA11772; Mon, 12 Jun 2000 20:04:55 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from mail2.digital.com (mail2.digital.com [204.123.2.56]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id UAA22896 for ; Mon, 12 Jun 2000 20:04:53 +0200 (METDST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id JAA14371; Mon, 12 Jun 2000 09:20:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA22348; Mon, 12 Jun 2000 09:14:57 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id IAA18878; Mon, 12 Jun 2000 08:44:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id IAA02804; Mon, 12 Jun 2000 08:41:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail1.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA21245; Mon, 12 Jun 2000 08:39:46 -0700 Received: from xanadu.vip.ca ([205.250.170.220]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with ESMTP id IAA23506 for ; Mon, 12 Jun 2000 08:39:46 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2000 11:35:42 -0400 (EDT) From: Nicolas Pitre To: Zsolt Kiraly Cc: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Subject: Re: question on cache issues on sa-1100 In-Reply-To: Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk On Sun, 11 Jun 2000, Zsolt Kiraly wrote: > Hi Nicolas, Hi! It has been a long time... > If I remember correctly there were some cache problems with linux and > sa-1100 cpu. Unfortunately I don't remember the resolution. Could you point > me to some resource about this issue, or maybe provide a brief explanation > yourself (although I know you are busy) ? I am particularly interested to > know if the cache is actually used on the sa-1100 by linux. Yes it is. If you refer to the problem we had one and a half year ago, it has been nuked quickly. ;-) Nicolas From kramer@pa.dec.com Mon Jun 12 20:05:03 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id UAA11776; Mon, 12 Jun 2000 20:05:03 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from mail2.digital.com (mail2.digital.com [204.123.2.56]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id UAA22905 for ; Mon, 12 Jun 2000 20:05:01 +0200 (METDST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id JAA14519; Mon, 12 Jun 2000 09:33:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA22604; Mon, 12 Jun 2000 09:27:48 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id JAA19584; Mon, 12 Jun 2000 09:02:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id IAA25028; Mon, 12 Jun 2000 08:59:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: from crl.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA04974; Mon, 12 Jun 2000 08:59:44 -0700 Received: from ims.crl.dec.com (ims.crl.dec.com [16.11.0.11]) by crl.dec.com (8.8.8/RWD-1.2) with ESMTP id LAA13757; Mon, 12 Jun 2000 11:59:39 -0400 (EDT) Received: by ims.crl.dec.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21) id ; Mon, 12 Jun 2000 12:04:28 -0400 Message-Id: From: George France To: "'Zsolt Kiraly'" , Nicolas Pitre Cc: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Subject: RE: question on cache issues on sa-1100 Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2000 11:59:22 -0400 Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk the solution is pci_alloc_consistent. The docs are in the linux/docs/DMA-mappings.txt files. -George George France, france@crl.dec.com Cambridge Research Laboratory, Compaq Computer Corporation One Cambridgecenter MS: CRL Cambridge, MA 02142 USA -----Original Message----- From: Zsolt Kiraly [mailto:zskiraly@leland.Stanford.EDU] Sent: Sunday, June 11, 2000 10:57 PM To: Nicolas Pitre Cc: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Subject: question on cache issues on sa-1100 Hi Nicolas, If I remember correctly there were some cache problems with linux and sa-1100 cpu. Unfortunately I don't remember the resolution. Could you point me to some resource about this issue, or maybe provide a brief explanation yourself (although I know you are busy) ? I am particularly interested to know if the cache is actually used on the sa-1100 by linux. I would appreciate input on this issue from anyone else as well. Thanks, Zsolt zskiraly@stanford.edu From kramer@pa.dec.com Tue Jun 13 06:09:56 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id GAA13607; Tue, 13 Jun 2000 06:09:56 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from mail1.digital.com (mail1.digital.com [204.123.2.50]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id GAA08076 for ; Tue, 13 Jun 2000 06:09:54 +0200 (METDST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id VAA04946; Mon, 12 Jun 2000 21:08:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA01827; Mon, 12 Jun 2000 21:07:46 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id VAA12139; Mon, 12 Jun 2000 21:05:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id VAA06225; Mon, 12 Jun 2000 21:05:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail2.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA08106; Mon, 12 Jun 2000 21:05:55 -0700 Received: from xanadu.gn.com (modemcable248.137-200-24.mtl.mc.videotron.net [24.200.137.248]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with ESMTP id VAA22681 for ; Mon, 12 Jun 2000 21:05:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (nico@localhost) by xanadu.gn.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id AAA05569 for ; Tue, 13 Jun 2000 00:05:06 -0400 X-Authentication-Warning: xanadu.gn.com: nico owned process doing -bs Date: Tue, 13 Jun 2000 00:05:06 -0400 (EDT) From: Nicolas Pitre X-Sender: nico@xanadu.gn.com To: SA-1100/Linux Subject: diff-2.4.0-test1-ac7-rmk1-np6.gz Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk ... is now available. This contains: - more IRQ work for multiplexed GPIOs - external IRQ handler for Thinclient / GraphicsClient - more Neponset PCMCIA hacks John G Dorsey [ this is becoming really ugly... :-( What a mess Intel did with that board... ] - read buffer support + LART stuff Erik Mouw - fix for Thinclient on-board ethernet Mark Lehrer / Greg Haerr [ it finally works ! ] Enjoy! Nicolas From kramer@pa.dec.com Wed Jun 14 07:54:33 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id HAA24339; Wed, 14 Jun 2000 07:54:32 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from mail1.digital.com (mail1.digital.com [204.123.2.50]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id HAA29744 for ; Wed, 14 Jun 2000 07:54:31 +0200 (METDST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id WAA17079; Tue, 13 Jun 2000 22:51:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA26527; Tue, 13 Jun 2000 22:51:30 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id WAA23512; Tue, 13 Jun 2000 22:47:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id WAA21410; Tue, 13 Jun 2000 22:47:14 -0700 (PDT) From: Received: from mail2.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA24961; Tue, 13 Jun 2000 22:47:13 -0700 Received: from linux.org.tw (tlug.sinica.edu.tw [140.109.13.42]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with ESMTP id WAA23335 for ; Tue, 13 Jun 2000 22:47:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (chester@localhost) by linux.org.tw (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id NAA02124; Wed, 14 Jun 2000 13:49:40 +0800 Date: Wed, 14 Jun 2000 13:49:40 +0800 (CST) To: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Cc: lart@lart.tudelft.nl Subject: blob for assabet Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk Hi..! I have receive a lot of mail about blob on assabet,and i think it's ready for use. This is work is only for Assabet,not for other sa1100 eval board,if you using Toshiba SDRM on Intel board.Just try it. PS,the offical release of blob on assabet will as soon as possible,i think! (Erik ???) go ftp://ftp.netwinder.org/users/c/chester/blob-sa1110-assabet.tgz Good luck. Chester From kramer@pa.dec.com Wed Jun 14 21:48:26 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id VAA29824; Wed, 14 Jun 2000 21:48:25 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from mail2.digital.com (mail2.digital.com [204.123.2.56]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id VAA06416 for ; Wed, 14 Jun 2000 21:48:23 +0200 (METDST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id MAA01493; Wed, 14 Jun 2000 12:45:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA18926; Wed, 14 Jun 2000 12:42:38 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id MAA11002; Wed, 14 Jun 2000 12:41:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id MAA14568; Wed, 14 Jun 2000 12:41:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail2.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA18825; Wed, 14 Jun 2000 12:41:06 -0700 Received: from duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (duteinh.et.tudelft.nl [130.161.42.1]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with ESMTP id MAA30401 for ; Wed, 14 Jun 2000 12:41:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: from kalman.et.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id VAA29771; Wed, 14 Jun 2000 21:39:47 +0200 (MET DST) Received: (from erik@localhost) by kalman.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.8/8.8.8/Debian/GNU) id VAA26516; Wed, 14 Jun 2000 21:39:47 +0200 Message-Id: <200006141939.VAA26516@kalman.et.tudelft.nl> Subject: Re: blob for assabet In-Reply-To: from "chester@linux.org.tw" at "Jun 14, 0 01:49:40 pm" To: chester@linux.org.tw Date: Wed, 14 Jun 2000 21:39:47 +0200 (CEST) Cc: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com, lart@lart.tudelft.nl From: J.A.K.Mouw@ITS.TUDelft.NL (Erik Mouw) Organization: Eric Conspiracy Secret Labs X-Eric-Conspiracy: There is no conspiracy! X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL39 (25)] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk Chester wrote: > I have receive a lot of mail about blob on assabet,and i think it's > ready for use. > This is work is only for Assabet,not for other sa1100 eval board,if you > using Toshiba SDRM on Intel board.Just try it. > PS,the offical release of blob on assabet will as soon as possible,i > think! (Erik ???) I'm working on blob-1.0.8, which will have support for Assabet, Brutus, LART, and PLEB. I'm currently at 80%: the C parts have been done, and I am working on the assembly merge. As I am officialy on vacations, I can only check if the stuff compiles correctly, not if it actually runs. I'll contact you as soon as I am back and give you my preliminary patch to test it. > go > > ftp://ftp.netwinder.org/users/c/chester/blob-sa1110-assabet.tgz I have currently no way of downloading that onto my own laptop, so I hope that the differences with your patch against blob-1.0.7b aren't too big. Erik -- J.A.K. (Erik) Mouw, Information and Communication Theory Group, Department of Electrical Engineering, Faculty of Information Technology and Systems, Delft University of Technology, PO BOX 5031, 2600 GA Delft, The Netherlands Phone: +31-15-2783635 Fax: +31-15-2781843 Email: J.A.K.Mouw@its.tudelft.nl WWW: http://www-ict.its.tudelft.nl/~erik/ From kramer@pa.dec.com Thu Jun 15 09:54:26 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id JAA02625; Thu, 15 Jun 2000 09:54:24 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from mail2.digital.com (mail2.digital.com [204.123.2.56]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id JAA24556 for ; Thu, 15 Jun 2000 09:54:23 +0200 (METDST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id AAA09037; Thu, 15 Jun 2000 00:51:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA17878; Thu, 15 Jun 2000 00:48:11 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id AAA05455; Thu, 15 Jun 2000 00:43:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id AAA02599; Thu, 15 Jun 2000 00:43:10 -0700 (PDT) From: Received: from mail2.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA17480; Thu, 15 Jun 2000 00:43:08 -0700 Received: from linux.org.tw (tlug.sinica.edu.tw [140.109.13.42]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with ESMTP id AAA07155 for ; Thu, 15 Jun 2000 00:43:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (chester@localhost) by linux.org.tw (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id PAA30804; Thu, 15 Jun 2000 15:45:22 +0800 Date: Thu, 15 Jun 2000 15:45:22 +0800 (CST) To: Erik Mouw Cc: chester@linux.org.tw, sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com, lart@lart.tudelft.nl Subject: Re: blob for assabet In-Reply-To: <200006141939.VAA26516@kalman.et.tudelft.nl> Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk > > ftp://ftp.netwinder.org/users/c/chester/blob-sa1110-assabet.tgz > > I have currently no way of downloading that onto my own laptop, so > I hope that the differences with your patch against blob-1.0.7b aren't > too big. > > > Erik This version is based on 1.0.5,start.s and serial.c have been modified for assabet board.(I think :p) Chester From kramer@pa.dec.com Fri Jun 16 00:15:54 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id AAA07233; Fri, 16 Jun 2000 00:15:53 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from mail2.digital.com (mail2.digital.com [204.123.2.56]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id AAA02728 for ; Fri, 16 Jun 2000 00:15:50 +0200 (METDST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id PAA18132; Thu, 15 Jun 2000 15:12:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA21576; Thu, 15 Jun 2000 15:10:04 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id PAA32583; Thu, 15 Jun 2000 15:07:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id PAA32618; Thu, 15 Jun 2000 15:07:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail2.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA21684; Thu, 15 Jun 2000 15:07:22 -0700 Received: from handhelds.org (h0.handhelds.org [204.123.13.90]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with ESMTP id PAA19573 for ; Thu, 15 Jun 2000 15:07:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: from handhelds.org (IDENT:jg@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by handhelds.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id PAA24457 for ; Thu, 15 Jun 2000 15:06:09 -0700 Message-Id: <200006152206.PAA24457@handhelds.org> To: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Subject: Establishment of handhelds.org Date: Thu, 15 Jun 2000 15:06:09 -0700 From: Jim Gettys Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk The open source and research communities have expressed great interest in the Itsy pocket computer research project of Compaq's corporate research labs. With the recent appearance on the market of products with most of the attributes that made the Itsy pocket computer so exciting, both from Compaq (the iPAQ H3600) and other companies, we believe that the time is ripe for more serious work in the general open source software community. handhelds.org ------------- Compaq's research groups have established the handhelds.org web site to help provide a focus and aid development of open source software on handheld and wearable computers in the open source software community. The intent of this web site is to act as a repository and development aid for open source software for all platforms, including Compaq's H3600. We are providing FTP and CVS repositories for open source software for handheld and wearable computers. These services are provided from Palo Alto, California, on a high speed network. Please send us mail if you have a project that would be helped by hosting of your project. Handhelds.org services include: o A mirror of Russell King's ARM Linux site o Nicolas Pitre's SA11XX Arm Linux patches o ARM V4L GNU compiler cross development tool chain for Linux and BSD o Carlton University's ARM V4L RPM files o Linux on the Philips Nino o Anonymous read access CVS repositories - of our bootloader/monitor for embedded devices, which runs out of Flash and is relocatable to any part of RAM - of the Linux kernel containing the latest changes to support the iPAQ H3600 and Itsy - of the X Window System for the iPAQ H3600 and Itsy - of open source software we have written or changed for Itsy, as we port it to the iPAQ H3600 and make it available o FTP archives of tarballs of releases of this software (when available) o The usual links page Patches of changes for the iPAQ H3600 are already being submitted for inclusion in the standard distributions of the base software: these CVS pools are being made available to enable more rapid development. We will have succeeded when these independent duplicate source pools of base open source components become unneeded! Mailing Lists ------------- Please join the mailing list handhelds@handhelds.org to discuss open source software for handhelds and wearable computers. We have also established the "linux@handhelds.org" and "netbsd@handhelds.org" mailing lists to provide forums to discuss specifically Linux and NetBSD kernel issues on handheld computers. To subscribe to any of these mailing lists, visit: http://www.handhelds.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/handhelds http://www.handhelds.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/linux http://www.handhelds.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/netbsd or send mail to: handhelds-request@handhelds.org linux-request@handhelds.org netbsd-request@handhelds.org Further information ------------------- Mailing lists: handhelds@handhelds.org linux@handhelds.org netbsd@handhelds.org The Handhelds.org web site: http://handhelds.org Information about the Itsy hand held computer can be found at: http://www.research.compaq.com/wrl/itsy Information about the iPAQ H3600 Pocket PC product can be found at: http://www.compaq.com/products/handhelds/pocketpc/ For more information, please join one of the mailing lists mentioned above. Press inquiries should contact Eileen Quinn, eileen.quinn@compaq.com, at 408-285-9272. Credits ------- The Itsy Team: Compaq Western Research Lab: Joel Bartlett, Lawrence Brakmo, Keith Farkas, William Hamburgen, Marc Viredaz, Deborah Wallach Compaq Systems Research Center: Timothy Mann, Carl Waldspurger (now at VMWare) The Open Handheld Team: Compaq Cambridge Research Lab: George France, Jamey Hicks, Frank Bomba, Edwin Foo Compaq PAAD: Ed Gould, Tom Lawler, Dave Redell Compaq SEA: Blair Fidler, Charlie Flynn, Dirk van Hennekeler, Greg McCane Compaq CPCG: Jim Mann, Ken Nicholas Compaq Research: Jim Gettys, Dick Greeley, Ken Salsman Others: Self: Keith Packard, Nicolas Pitre, Steve Hill, Stan Thomas Our thanks to Kelly Martin who has been kind enough to make the domain handhelds.org name available. From kramer@pa.dec.com Fri Jun 16 00:15:54 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id AAA07234; Fri, 16 Jun 2000 00:15:53 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from mail2.digital.com (mail2.digital.com [204.123.2.56]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id AAA02729 for ; Fri, 16 Jun 2000 00:15:50 +0200 (METDST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id PAA16569; Thu, 15 Jun 2000 15:12:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA21663; Thu, 15 Jun 2000 15:10:08 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id PAA32587; Thu, 15 Jun 2000 15:08:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id PAA25819; Thu, 15 Jun 2000 15:08:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail2.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA21716; Thu, 15 Jun 2000 15:08:23 -0700 Received: from handhelds.org (h0.handhelds.org [204.123.13.90]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with ESMTP id PAA18236 for ; Thu, 15 Jun 2000 15:08:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: from handhelds.org (IDENT:jg@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by handhelds.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id PAA24470 for ; Thu, 15 Jun 2000 15:07:10 -0700 Message-Id: <200006152207.PAA24470@handhelds.org> To: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Subject: Open Source software running on iPAQ H3600 Date: Thu, 15 Jun 2000 15:07:10 -0700 From: Jim Gettys Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk On April 19, Compaq announced the iPAQ H3600. Many people have recognized the interesting capabilities of this device, and Compaq Research has been receiving inquiries from the research and open sourcen communities about it. These same communities have expressed great interest over the last several years in the Itsy pocket computer, a research prototype device with many hardware similarities to the iPAQ H3600, but running open source software. To satisfy these inquiries, we are happy to make the following announcement: Compaq's open handheld program ------------------------------ We have three primary goals: o Promote development and discussion of open source software for pocket and wearable computers in general, o Ensure that the results of our research in pocket computing (e.g. power management) are available to the community, o Ensure that current open source software runs on our new hand held computer. Open handhelds website ---------------------- Towards these goals, we have established the http://www.handhelds.org web site to act as a resource for open source software on handheld and wearable computers in general, not limited to Compaq's hardware. We hope that you will join us in making open source software work well on handheld and wearable computers in general, and you will join us in making open source software run well on our platforms. Linux for the iPAQ H3600 ------------------------ Compaq's Corporate Research group is porting current versions of the Linux kernel and XFree86 X server to the H3600, and updating to this software base the software developed specifically with the Itsy handheld computer. Most of the Itsy software, based on Linux 2.0.30, was made available to the open source development community in February. For the last several months we have been submitting patches to support the iPAQ H3600 back into the Linux and XFree86 development streams. The hardware design specification of the iPAQ H3600 is available and the mechanical specifications for the expansion packs will be available on Compaq's web site soon. While our kernel efforts are currently primarily focussed on Linux, a project has recently started to port NetBSD, and we will be happy to answer questions from people interested in porting other operating systems to the iPAQ H3600 PocketPC, which will become available for purchase in June. While we have been making great progress with Linux on the iPAQ H3600, the system is still in development. Linux 2.3.99pre1 was booted recently (since updated to Linux 2.4.0-test1-ac7) at Compaq's Cambridge Research Laboratory, and we are working on device drivers for the hardware and on integrating features developed in the Itsy software into current versions of open source software. XFree86 4.0 is also running on the iPAQ H3600. Mailing Lists ------------- Please join the mailing list handhelds@handhelds.org to discuss open source software for handhelds and wearable computers. We have also established the "linux@handhelds.org" and "netbsd@handhelds.org" mailing lists to provide forums to discuss specifically Linux and NetBSD kernel issues on handheld computers. To subscribe to either of these mailing lists, visit: http://www.handhelds.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/handhelds http://www.handhelds.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/linux http://www.handhelds.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/netbsd or send mail to: handhelds-request@handhelds.org linux-request@handhelds.org netbsd-request@handhelds.org Further information about Compaq's handhelds research and products ------------------------------------------------------------------ Information about the iPAQ H3600 product can be found at: http://www.compaq.com/products/handhelds/pocketpc/ Information about the Itsy handheld computer can be found at: http://www.research.compaq.com/wrl/itsy The hardware specification for the iPAQ H3600 can be found at: http://www.handhelds.org/specs/Compaq/iPAQH3600/ http://www.handhelds.org/specs/Compaq/iPAQH3600/iPAQ_H3600.html Information about Compaq's corporate research labs can be found at: http://www.research.compaq.com/ For more information, please join one of the mailing lists mentioned above. Press inquiries should contact Eileen Quinn, eileen.quinn@compaq.com, at 408-285-9272. Credits ------- The Itsy Team: Compaq Western Research Lab: Joel Bartlett, Lawrence Brakmo, Keith Farkas,A William Hamburgen, Marc Viredaz, Deborah Wallach Compaq Systems Research Center: Timothy Mann, Carl Waldspurger (now at VMWare) The Open Handheld Team: Compaq Cambridge Research Lab: George France, Jamey Hicks, Frank Bomba, Edwin Foo Compaq PAAD: Ed Gould, Tom Lawler, Dave Redell Compaq SEA: Blair Fidler, Charlie Flynn, Dirk van Hennekeler, Greg McCane Compaq CPCG: Jim Mann, Ken Nicholas Compaq Research: Jim Gettys, Dick Greeley, Ken Salsman Others: Self: Keith Packard, Nicolas Pitre, Stan Thomas Our thanks to Kelly Martin who has been kind enough to make the domain handhelds.org name available. From kramer@pa.dec.com Fri Jun 16 16:28:19 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id QAA11585; Fri, 16 Jun 2000 16:28:19 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from mail2.digital.com (mail2.digital.com [204.123.2.56]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id QAA05606 for ; Fri, 16 Jun 2000 16:28:16 +0200 (METDST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id HAA22045; Fri, 16 Jun 2000 07:26:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA22710; Fri, 16 Jun 2000 07:26:30 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id HAA26277; Fri, 16 Jun 2000 07:23:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id HAA26385; Fri, 16 Jun 2000 07:23:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail1.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA22830; Fri, 16 Jun 2000 07:23:27 -0700 Received: from xanadu.vip.ca ([205.250.170.220]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with ESMTP id HAA27525 for ; Fri, 16 Jun 2000 07:23:26 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 16 Jun 2000 10:17:11 -0400 (EDT) From: Nicolas Pitre To: Rick Schneeman Cc: LART List , sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Subject: Re: Flash Driver and BLOB In-Reply-To: Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk On Thu, 15 Jun 2000, Rick Schneeman wrote: > Has anyone been able to use the Linux flash driver for the sa-1110 based > ASSABET? I am trying to use BLOB to boot the ramdisk/kernel pair in > standalone mode from the flash. I am trying to write the two images to the > flash device using the driver but have not been successful. Has anyone tried > this? I need to know if the partition information for the various defines in > the flash.h driver requires specific values or is it user defined. Also, > does anyone have any secrets for sucessfully making the flash filesystem and > writing the images to it? Finally, is there any special magic needed for > BLOB to understand that the two images are located in the flash area located > just after the BLOB. Erik seems to think there is none but he cannot > empirically test this out at the moment. Any help would be appreciated.... The "partition" concept is only a simple offset into the flash. Thus you should reserve a partition where BLOB and the kernel actually reside, and define some other partitions for the real filesystems. Next you might put any filesystem in the flash. JFFS would be the best choice but it is not ready yet. In the mean time ext2 might do it as well. You create a filesystem the same way you would for a ramdisk image. Then you only need to write that filesystem image file at the right offset in flash and tell the kernel to use the right device for its root filesystem. Eventually the flash driver would benifit from being merged with the MTD patches, but that's another matter. Nicolas From kramer@pa.dec.com Fri Jun 16 16:39:22 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id QAA11645; Fri, 16 Jun 2000 16:39:22 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from mail1.digital.com (mail1.digital.com [204.123.2.50]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id QAA06290 for ; Fri, 16 Jun 2000 16:39:19 +0200 (METDST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id HAA26985; Fri, 16 Jun 2000 07:38:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA21196; Fri, 16 Jun 2000 07:37:56 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id HAA26413; Fri, 16 Jun 2000 07:37:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id HAA21321; Fri, 16 Jun 2000 07:37:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: from crl.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA23316; Fri, 16 Jun 2000 07:37:43 -0700 Received: from crlwebmail.crl.dec.com (crlwebmail.crl.dec.com [16.11.0.2]) by crl.dec.com (8.8.8/RWD-1.2) with ESMTP id KAA06185; Fri, 16 Jun 2000 10:30:06 -0400 (EDT) Received: by crlwebmail.crl.dec.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21) id ; Fri, 16 Jun 2000 10:34:44 -0400 Message-Id: From: Jamey Hicks To: "'Nicolas Pitre'" , Rick Schneeman Cc: LART List , sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Subject: RE: Flash Driver and BLOB Date: Fri, 16 Jun 2000 10:29:56 -0400 Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21) Content-Type: text/plain Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk > Eventually the flash driver would benifit from being merged > with the MTD patches, but that's another matter. I agree that we should merge the flash driver with MTD. It's on my list of things to do, but I won't mind if someone else gets to it first. It should be very straightforward to make an MTD module from the flash driver. -Jamey From kramer@pa.dec.com Mon Jun 19 04:01:34 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id EAA20003; Mon, 19 Jun 2000 04:01:34 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from mail2.digital.com (mail2.digital.com [204.123.2.56]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id EAA07129 for ; Mon, 19 Jun 2000 04:01:32 +0200 (METDST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id SAA09559; Sun, 18 Jun 2000 18:59:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA07295; Sun, 18 Jun 2000 18:59:25 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id SAA13628; Sun, 18 Jun 2000 18:54:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id SAA14345; Sun, 18 Jun 2000 18:54:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail2.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA31564; Sun, 18 Jun 2000 18:54:52 -0700 Received: from xanadu.gn.com (modemcable248.137-200-24.mtl.mc.videotron.net [24.200.137.248]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with ESMTP id SAA07524 for ; Sun, 18 Jun 2000 18:54:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (nico@localhost) by xanadu.gn.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id VAA14760 for ; Sun, 18 Jun 2000 21:54:04 -0400 X-Authentication-Warning: xanadu.gn.com: nico owned process doing -bs Date: Sun, 18 Jun 2000 21:54:04 -0400 (EDT) From: Nicolas Pitre X-Sender: nico@xanadu.gn.com To: SA-1100/Linux Subject: diff-2.4.0-test1-ac19-rmk1-np1 Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk ... is available at ftp.arm.linux.org.uk/pub/linux/arm/people/nico/ This contains: - mostly resynching with latest RMK patch - some initial work for a generic API for SA1100 DMA - SA1111 IRQ handling fixes Note that ftp.netwinder.org is unreachable for me ATM so the patch might not appear there for a while. Use the above mentionned site instead. Enjoy! Nicolas From kramer@pa.dec.com Mon Jun 19 15:16:37 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id PAA22621; Mon, 19 Jun 2000 15:16:36 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from mail2.digital.com (mail2.digital.com [204.123.2.56]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id PAA28976 for ; Mon, 19 Jun 2000 15:16:34 +0200 (METDST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id GAA32633; Mon, 19 Jun 2000 06:14:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA32724; Mon, 19 Jun 2000 06:14:35 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id GAA03760; Mon, 19 Jun 2000 06:13:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id GAA25179; Mon, 19 Jun 2000 06:13:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail1.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA00002; Mon, 19 Jun 2000 06:13:22 -0700 Received: from eising.k-net.dk (eising.k-net.dtu.dk [130.225.71.227]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with ESMTP id GAA25034 for ; Mon, 19 Jun 2000 06:13:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: from obelix.vkr.k-net.dk (obelix.vkr.k-net.dk [192.38.209.3]) by eising.k-net.dk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C0CEC1AA for ; Mon, 19 Jun 2000 15:13:19 +0200 (CEST) Received: by OBELIX with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21) id ; Mon, 19 Jun 2000 15:13:09 +0200 Message-Id: From: Anders Frederiksen To: "'sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com'" Subject: SA1110 schematics symbol Date: Mon, 19 Jun 2000 15:13:06 +0200 Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk Has anyone drawn a SA1110 symbol for Orcad that they would kindly share? I'd prefer not to dabble the 256 pins in... Thanx in advance, Anders Frederiksen Anyway: If not I could share the resulting lib when finished if others are interested. From kramer@pa.dec.com Mon Jun 19 15:47:49 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id PAA22762; Mon, 19 Jun 2000 15:47:49 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from mail2.digital.com (mail2.digital.com [204.123.2.56]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id PAA00521 for ; Mon, 19 Jun 2000 15:47:47 +0200 (METDST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id GAA31113; Mon, 19 Jun 2000 06:46:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA30269; Mon, 19 Jun 2000 06:46:26 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id GAA30171; Mon, 19 Jun 2000 06:46:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id GAA30306; Mon, 19 Jun 2000 06:46:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail2.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA00971; Mon, 19 Jun 2000 06:46:11 -0700 Received: from note.orchestra.cse.unsw.EDU.AU (note.orchestra.cse.unsw.EDU.AU [129.94.242.29]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id GAA02481 for ; Mon, 19 Jun 2000 06:46:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: From paulaner With LocalMail ; Mon, 19 Jun 2000 23:44:21 +1000 From: "Adam 'WeirdArms' Wiggins" To: Anders Frederiksen Date: Mon, 19 Jun 2000 23:44:19 +1000 (EST) X-Sender: awiggins@paulaner.disy.cse.unsw.EDU.AU Cc: "'sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com'" Subject: Re: SA1110 schematics symbol In-Reply-To: Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk On Mon, 19 Jun 2000, Anders Frederiksen wrote: > Has anyone drawn a SA1110 symbol for Orcad that they would kindly share? I'd > prefer not to dabble the 256 pins in... Yes, I'll ask regarding it tommorow and try to forward it to you. Its only just been done so its not 'verified' yet... Its also pretty big. Cheers Adam > > Thanx in advance, > > Anders Frederiksen > > > Anyway: If not I could share the resulting lib when finished if others are > interested. > From kramer@pa.dec.com Tue Jun 20 08:10:07 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id IAA25314; Tue, 20 Jun 2000 08:10:06 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from mail2.digital.com (mail2.digital.com [204.123.2.56]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id IAA12957 for ; Tue, 20 Jun 2000 08:10:03 +0200 (METDST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id XAA09286; Mon, 19 Jun 2000 23:07:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA07464; Mon, 19 Jun 2000 23:05:38 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id XAA02156; Mon, 19 Jun 2000 23:00:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id XAA02434; Mon, 19 Jun 2000 23:00:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail1.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA11067; Mon, 19 Jun 2000 23:00:33 -0700 Received: from hpackers.com ([211.42.233.30]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with ESMTP id XAA03907 for ; Mon, 19 Jun 2000 23:00:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: from vsausage ([211.42.233.14]) by hpackers.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id OAA01090 for ; Tue, 20 Jun 2000 14:59:50 +0900 From: "Lee, Yunseung" To: Subject: porting USB in Assabet(SA1110+SA1111)... Date: Tue, 20 Jun 2000 15:02:00 +0900 Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_000A_01BFDAC8.7C663290" X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-Msmail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) X-Mimeole: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2919.6700 Importance: Normal Disposition-Notification-To: "Lee, Yunseung" Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_000A_01BFDAC8.7C663290 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ks_c_5601-1987" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 SGmhpg0KSSB3YW50IHRvIGdldCB3aGF0YHMgZ29pbmcgb24gYXNzYWJldCBwb3JpdG5nIGFuZCB3 aGF0oa9zIGNvbXBsZXRlZC4NCk5vdyBJoa9tIHBvcnRpbmcgVVNCIEhvc3QgQ29udHJvbGxlciBk ZXZpY2UgZHJpdmVyKHNhMTExMSkgYW5kIFVTQiBDbGllbnQgRGV2aWNlIGRyaXZlcihzYTExMTAp Lg0KSWYgdGhlcmUgaXMgc29tZWJvZHkgdG8gZG8gc2FtZSB0aGluZywgSSB3YW50IHRvIHRhbGsg YWJvdXQgdGhhdC4NCkJlc3QgUmVnYXJkcy4NCiANCg== ------=_NextPart_000_000A_01BFDAC8.7C663290 Content-Type: text/html; charset="ks_c_5601-1987" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 PGh0bWwgeG1sbnM6bz0idXJuOnNjaGVtYXMtbWljcm9zb2Z0LWNvbTpvZmZpY2U6b2ZmaWNlIiB4 bWxuczp3PSJ1cm46c2NoZW1hcy1taWNyb3NvZnQtY29tOm9mZmljZTp3b3JkIiB4bWxucz0iaHR0 cDovL3d3dy53My5vcmcvVFIvUkVDLWh0bWw0MCI+DQoNCjxoZWFkPg0KPG1ldGEgaHR0cC1lcXVp dj1Db250ZW50LVR5cGUgY29udGVudD0idGV4dC9odG1sOyBjaGFyc2V0PWtzX2NfNTYwMS0xOTg3 Ij4NCjxtZXRhIG5hbWU9UHJvZ0lkIGNvbnRlbnQ9V29yZC5Eb2N1bWVudD4NCjxtZXRhIG5hbWU9 R2VuZXJhdG9yIGNvbnRlbnQ9Ik1pY3Jvc29mdCBXb3JkIDkiPg0KPG1ldGEgbmFtZT1PcmlnaW5h dG9yIGNvbnRlbnQ9Ik1pY3Jvc29mdCBXb3JkIDkiPg0KPGxpbmsgcmVsPUZpbGUtTGlzdCBocmVm PSJjaWQ6ZmlsZWxpc3QueG1sQDAxQkZEQUM4LjdCRENCNzQwIj4NCjwhLS1baWYgZ3RlIG1zbyA5 XT48eG1sPg0KIDxvOk9mZmljZURvY3VtZW50U2V0dGluZ3M+DQogIDxvOkRvTm90UmVseU9uQ1NT Lz4NCiA8L286T2ZmaWNlRG9jdW1lbnRTZXR0aW5ncz4NCjwveG1sPjwhW2VuZGlmXS0tPjwhLS1b aWYgZ3RlIG1zbyA5XT48eG1sPg0KIDx3OldvcmREb2N1bWVudD4NCiAgPHc6Vmlldz5Ob3JtYWw8 L3c6Vmlldz4NCiAgPHc6Wm9vbT4wPC93Olpvb20+DQogIDx3OkRvY3VtZW50S2luZD5Eb2N1bWVu dEVtYWlsPC93OkRvY3VtZW50S2luZD4NCiAgPHc6RW52ZWxvcGVWaXMvPg0KICA8dzpEaXNwbGF5 SG9yaXpvbnRhbERyYXdpbmdHcmlkRXZlcnk+MDwvdzpEaXNwbGF5SG9yaXpvbnRhbERyYXdpbmdH cmlkRXZlcnk+DQogIDx3OkRpc3BsYXlWZXJ0aWNhbERyYXdpbmdHcmlkRXZlcnk+MjwvdzpEaXNw bGF5VmVydGljYWxEcmF3aW5nR3JpZEV2ZXJ5Pg0KICA8dzpDb21wYXRpYmlsaXR5Pg0KICAgPHc6 U3BhY2VGb3JVTC8+DQogICA8dzpCYWxhbmNlU2luZ2xlQnl0ZURvdWJsZUJ5dGVXaWR0aC8+DQog ICA8dzpEb05vdExlYXZlQmFja3NsYXNoQWxvbmUvPg0KICAgPHc6VUxUcmFpbFNwYWNlLz4NCiAg IDx3OkRvTm90RXhwYW5kU2hpZnRSZXR1cm4vPg0KICAgPHc6QWRqdXN0TGluZUhlaWdodEluVGFi bGUvPg0KICAgPHc6VXNlRkVMYXlvdXQvPg0KICA8L3c6Q29tcGF0aWJpbGl0eT4NCiA8L3c6V29y ZERvY3VtZW50Pg0KPC94bWw+PCFbZW5kaWZdLS0+DQo8c3R5bGU+DQo8IS0tDQogLyogRm9udCBE ZWZpbml0aW9ucyAqLw0KQGZvbnQtZmFjZQ0KCXtmb250LWZhbWlseTq52cXBOw0KCXBhbm9zZS0x OjIgMyA2IDAgMCAxIDEgMSAxIDE7DQoJbXNvLWZvbnQtYWx0OkJhdGFuZzsNCgltc28tZm9udC1j aGFyc2V0OjEyOTsNCgltc28tZ2VuZXJpYy1mb250LWZhbWlseTpyb21hbjsNCgltc28tZm9udC1w aXRjaDp2YXJpYWJsZTsNCgltc28tZm9udC1zaWduYXR1cmU6LTEzNDIxNzY1OTMgMTc3NTcyOTkx NSA0OCAwIDUyNDQ0NyAwO30NCkBmb250LWZhY2UNCgl7Zm9udC1mYW1pbHk6sby4sjsNCglwYW5v c2UtMToyIDExIDYgMCAwIDEgMSAxIDEgMTsNCgltc28tZm9udC1hbHQ6R3VsaW07DQoJbXNvLWZv bnQtY2hhcnNldDoxMjk7DQoJbXNvLWdlbmVyaWMtZm9udC1mYW1pbHk6bW9kZXJuOw0KCW1zby1m b250LXBpdGNoOnZhcmlhYmxlOw0KCW1zby1mb250LXNpZ25hdHVyZTotMTM0MjE3NjU5MyAxNzc1 NzI5OTE1IDQ4IDAgNTI0NDQ3IDA7fQ0KQGZvbnQtZmFjZQ0KCXtmb250LWZhbWlseToiXECxvLiy IjsNCglwYW5vc2UtMToyIDExIDYgMCAwIDEgMSAxIDEgMTsNCgltc28tZm9udC1jaGFyc2V0OjEy OTsNCgltc28tZ2VuZXJpYy1mb250LWZhbWlseTptb2Rlcm47DQoJbXNvLWZvbnQtcGl0Y2g6dmFy aWFibGU7DQoJbXNvLWZvbnQtc2lnbmF0dXJlOi0xMzQyMTc2NTkzIDE3NzU3Mjk5MTUgNDggMCA1 MjQ0NDcgMDt9DQpAZm9udC1mYWNlDQoJe2ZvbnQtZmFtaWx5OiJcQLnZxcEiOw0KCXBhbm9zZS0x OjIgMyA2IDAgMCAxIDEgMSAxIDE7DQoJbXNvLWZvbnQtY2hhcnNldDoxMjk7DQoJbXNvLWdlbmVy aWMtZm9udC1mYW1pbHk6cm9tYW47DQoJbXNvLWZvbnQtcGl0Y2g6dmFyaWFibGU7DQoJbXNvLWZv bnQtc2lnbmF0dXJlOi0xMzQyMTc2NTkzIDE3NzU3Mjk5MTUgNDggMCA1MjQ0NDcgMDt9DQogLyog U3R5bGUgRGVmaW5pdGlvbnMgKi8NCnAuTXNvTm9ybWFsLCBsaS5Nc29Ob3JtYWwsIGRpdi5Nc29O b3JtYWwNCgl7bXNvLXN0eWxlLXBhcmVudDoiIjsNCgltYXJnaW46MGNtOw0KCW1hcmdpbi1ib3R0 b206LjAwMDFwdDsNCgl0ZXh0LWFsaWduOmp1c3RpZnk7DQoJdGV4dC1qdXN0aWZ5OmludGVyLWlk ZW9ncmFwaDsNCgltc28tcGFnaW5hdGlvbjpub25lOw0KCXRleHQtYXV0b3NwYWNlOm5vbmU7DQoJ d29yZC1icmVhazpicmVhay1oYW5ndWw7DQoJZm9udC1zaXplOjEwLjBwdDsNCgltc28tYmlkaS1m b250LXNpemU6MTIuMHB0Ow0KCWZvbnQtZmFtaWx5OrnZxcE7DQoJbXNvLWhhbnNpLWZvbnQtZmFt aWx5OiJUaW1lcyBOZXcgUm9tYW4iOw0KCW1zby1iaWRpLWZvbnQtZmFtaWx5OiJUaW1lcyBOZXcg Um9tYW4iOw0KCW1zby1mb250LWtlcm5pbmc6MS4wcHQ7fQ0KcC5Nc29BdXRvU2lnLCBsaS5Nc29B dXRvU2lnLCBkaXYuTXNvQXV0b1NpZw0KCXttYXJnaW46MGNtOw0KCW1hcmdpbi1ib3R0b206LjAw MDFwdDsNCgl0ZXh0LWFsaWduOmp1c3RpZnk7DQoJdGV4dC1qdXN0aWZ5OmludGVyLWlkZW9ncmFw aDsNCgltc28tcGFnaW5hdGlvbjpub25lOw0KCXRleHQtYXV0b3NwYWNlOm5vbmU7DQoJd29yZC1i cmVhazpicmVhay1oYW5ndWw7DQoJZm9udC1zaXplOjEwLjBwdDsNCgltc28tYmlkaS1mb250LXNp emU6MTIuMHB0Ow0KCWZvbnQtZmFtaWx5OrnZxcE7DQoJbXNvLWhhbnNpLWZvbnQtZmFtaWx5OiJU aW1lcyBOZXcgUm9tYW4iOw0KCW1zby1iaWRpLWZvbnQtZmFtaWx5OiJUaW1lcyBOZXcgUm9tYW4i Ow0KCW1zby1mb250LWtlcm5pbmc6MS4wcHQ7fQ0Kc3Bhbi5FbWFpbFN0eWxlMTUNCgl7bXNvLXN0 eWxlLXR5cGU6cGVyc29uYWwtY29tcG9zZTsNCgltc28tYW5zaS1mb250LXNpemU6MTAuMHB0Ow0K CW1zby1hc2NpaS1mb250LWZhbWlseTqxvLiyOw0KCW1zby1mYXJlYXN0LWZvbnQtZmFtaWx5OrG8 uLI7DQoJbXNvLWhhbnNpLWZvbnQtZmFtaWx5OkFyaWFsOw0KCW1zby1iaWRpLWZvbnQtZmFtaWx5 OkFyaWFsOw0KCWNvbG9yOmJsYWNrO30NCiAvKiBQYWdlIERlZmluaXRpb25zICovDQpAcGFnZQ0K CXttc28tcGFnZS1ib3JkZXItc3Vycm91bmQtaGVhZGVyOm5vOw0KCW1zby1wYWdlLWJvcmRlci1z dXJyb3VuZC1mb290ZXI6bm87fQ0KQHBhZ2UgU2VjdGlvbjENCgl7c2l6ZTo1OTUuM3B0IDg0MS45 cHQ7DQoJbWFyZ2luOjk5LjI1cHQgMy4wY20gMy4wY20gMy4wY207DQoJbXNvLWhlYWRlci1tYXJn aW46NDIuNTVwdDsNCgltc28tZm9vdGVyLW1hcmdpbjo0OS42cHQ7DQoJbXNvLXBhcGVyLXNvdXJj ZTowOw0KCWxheW91dC1ncmlkOjE4LjBwdDt9DQpkaXYuU2VjdGlvbjENCgl7cGFnZTpTZWN0aW9u MTt9DQotLT4NCjwvc3R5bGU+DQo8L2hlYWQ+DQoNCjxib2R5IGxhbmc9S08gc3R5bGU9J3RhYi1p bnRlcnZhbDo0MC4wcHQnPg0KDQo8ZGl2IGNsYXNzPVNlY3Rpb24xIHN0eWxlPSdsYXlvdXQtZ3Jp ZDoxOC4wcHQnPg0KDQo8cCBjbGFzcz1Nc29Ob3JtYWw+PGZvbnQgc2l6ZT0yIGNvbG9yPWJsYWNr IGZhY2U9udnFwT48c3BhbiBsYW5nPUVOLVVTDQpzdHlsZT0nZm9udC1zaXplOjEwLjBwdDtjb2xv cjpibGFjayc+PHNwYW4gc3R5bGU9J21zby1iaWRpLWZvbnQtc2l6ZToxMi4wcHQnPkhpPC9zcGFu Pjwvc3Bhbj48L2ZvbnQ+PGZvbnQNCmNvbG9yPWJsYWNrIGZhY2U9IlRpbWVzIE5ldyBSb21hbiI+ PHNwYW4gbGFuZz1FTi1VUyBzdHlsZT0nZm9udC1mYW1pbHk6IlRpbWVzIE5ldyBSb21hbiI7DQpt c28tYXNjaWktZm9udC1mYW1pbHk6udnFwTtjb2xvcjpibGFjayc+oaY8L3NwYW4+PC9mb250Pjxm b250IGNvbG9yPWJsYWNrPjxzcGFuDQpsYW5nPUVOLVVTIHN0eWxlPSdjb2xvcjpibGFjazttc28t Y29sb3ItYWx0OndpbmRvd3RleHQnPjxvOnA+PC9vOnA+PC9zcGFuPjwvZm9udD48L3A+DQoNCjxw IGNsYXNzPU1zb05vcm1hbD48Zm9udCBzaXplPTIgY29sb3I9YmxhY2sgZmFjZT252cXBPjxzcGFu IGxhbmc9RU4tVVMNCnN0eWxlPSdmb250LXNpemU6MTAuMHB0O2NvbG9yOmJsYWNrJz48c3BhbiBz dHlsZT0nbXNvLWJpZGktZm9udC1zaXplOjEyLjBwdCc+SSB3YW50DQp0byBnZXQgd2hhdGBzIGdv aW5nIG9uIGFzc2FiZXQgcG9yaXRuZyBhbmQgd2hhdDwvc3Bhbj48L3NwYW4+PC9mb250Pjxmb250 DQpjb2xvcj1ibGFjayBmYWNlPSJUaW1lcyBOZXcgUm9tYW4iPjxzcGFuIGxhbmc9RU4tVVMgc3R5 bGU9J2ZvbnQtZmFtaWx5OiJUaW1lcyBOZXcgUm9tYW4iOw0KbXNvLWFzY2lpLWZvbnQtZmFtaWx5 OrnZxcE7Y29sb3I6YmxhY2snPqGvPC9zcGFuPjwvZm9udD48Zm9udCBjb2xvcj1ibGFjaz48c3Bh bg0KbGFuZz1FTi1VUyBzdHlsZT0nY29sb3I6YmxhY2snPnMgY29tcGxldGVkLjwvc3Bhbj48L2Zv bnQ+PGZvbnQgY29sb3I9YmxhY2s+PHNwYW4NCmxhbmc9RU4tVVMgc3R5bGU9J2NvbG9yOmJsYWNr O21zby1jb2xvci1hbHQ6d2luZG93dGV4dCc+PG86cD48L286cD48L3NwYW4+PC9mb250PjwvcD4N Cg0KPHAgY2xhc3M9TXNvTm9ybWFsPjxmb250IHNpemU9MiBjb2xvcj1ibGFjayBmYWNlPbnZxcE+ PHNwYW4gbGFuZz1FTi1VUw0Kc3R5bGU9J2ZvbnQtc2l6ZToxMC4wcHQ7Y29sb3I6YmxhY2snPjxz cGFuIHN0eWxlPSdtc28tYmlkaS1mb250LXNpemU6MTIuMHB0Jz5Ob3cNCkk8L3NwYW4+PC9zcGFu PjwvZm9udD48Zm9udCBjb2xvcj1ibGFjayBmYWNlPSJUaW1lcyBOZXcgUm9tYW4iPjxzcGFuDQps YW5nPUVOLVVTIHN0eWxlPSdmb250LWZhbWlseToiVGltZXMgTmV3IFJvbWFuIjttc28tYXNjaWkt Zm9udC1mYW1pbHk6udnFwTsNCmNvbG9yOmJsYWNrJz6hrzwvc3Bhbj48L2ZvbnQ+PGZvbnQgY29s b3I9YmxhY2s+PHNwYW4gbGFuZz1FTi1VUw0Kc3R5bGU9J2NvbG9yOmJsYWNrJz5tIHBvcnRpbmcg VVNCIEhvc3QgQ29udHJvbGxlciBkZXZpY2UgZHJpdmVyKHNhMTExMSkgYW5kIFVTQg0KQ2xpZW50 IERldmljZSBkcml2ZXIoc2ExMTEwKS48L3NwYW4+PC9mb250Pjxmb250IGNvbG9yPWJsYWNrPjxz cGFuIGxhbmc9RU4tVVMNCnN0eWxlPSdjb2xvcjpibGFjazttc28tY29sb3ItYWx0OndpbmRvd3Rl eHQnPjxvOnA+PC9vOnA+PC9zcGFuPjwvZm9udD48L3A+DQoNCjxwIGNsYXNzPU1zb05vcm1hbD48 Zm9udCBzaXplPTIgY29sb3I9YmxhY2sgZmFjZT252cXBPjxzcGFuIGxhbmc9RU4tVVMNCnN0eWxl PSdmb250LXNpemU6MTAuMHB0O2NvbG9yOmJsYWNrJz48c3BhbiBzdHlsZT0nbXNvLWJpZGktZm9u dC1zaXplOjEyLjBwdCc+SWYNCnRoZXJlIGlzIHNvbWVib2R5IHRvIGRvIHNhbWUgdGhpbmcsIEkg d2FudCB0byB0YWxrIGFib3V0IHRoYXQuPC9zcGFuPjwvc3Bhbj48L2ZvbnQ+PGZvbnQNCmNvbG9y PWJsYWNrPjxzcGFuIGxhbmc9RU4tVVMgc3R5bGU9J2NvbG9yOmJsYWNrO21zby1jb2xvci1hbHQ6 d2luZG93dGV4dCc+PG86cD48L286cD48L3NwYW4+PC9mb250PjwvcD4NCg0KPHAgY2xhc3M9TXNv Tm9ybWFsPjxzcGFuIGNsYXNzPUVtYWlsU3R5bGUxNT48Zm9udCBzaXplPTIgY29sb3I9YmxhY2sg ZmFjZT2xvLiyPjxzcGFuDQpsYW5nPUVOLVVTIHN0eWxlPSdmb250LXNpemU6MTAuMHB0O2ZvbnQt ZmFtaWx5OrG8uLI7bXNvLWhhbnNpLWZvbnQtZmFtaWx5OkFyaWFsJz48c3Bhbg0Kc3R5bGU9J21z by1iaWRpLWZvbnQtc2l6ZToxMi4wcHQnPkJlc3QgUmVnYXJkcy48bzpwPjwvbzpwPjwvc3Bhbj48 L3NwYW4+PC9mb250Pjwvc3Bhbj48L3A+DQoNCjxwIGNsYXNzPU1zb05vcm1hbD48c3BhbiBjbGFz cz1FbWFpbFN0eWxlMTU+PGZvbnQgc2l6ZT0yIGNvbG9yPWJsYWNrIGZhY2U9sby4sj48c3Bhbg0K bGFuZz1FTi1VUyBzdHlsZT0nZm9udC1zaXplOjEwLjBwdDtmb250LWZhbWlseTqxvLiyO21zby1o YW5zaS1mb250LWZhbWlseTpBcmlhbCc+PCFbaWYgIXN1cHBvcnRFbXB0eVBhcmFzXT4mbmJzcDs8 IVtlbmRpZl0+PC9zcGFuPjxzcGFuDQpsYW5nPUVOLVVTPjxvOnA+PC9vOnA+PC9zcGFuPjwvZm9u dD48L3NwYW4+PC9wPg0KDQo8L2Rpdj4NCg0KPC9ib2R5Pg0KDQo8L2h0bWw+DQo= ------=_NextPart_000_000A_01BFDAC8.7C663290-- From kramer@pa.dec.com Tue Jun 20 08:37:28 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id IAA25372; Tue, 20 Jun 2000 08:37:28 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from mail2.digital.com (mail2.digital.com [204.123.2.56]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id IAA13618 for ; Tue, 20 Jun 2000 08:37:26 +0200 (METDST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id XAA08470; Mon, 19 Jun 2000 23:34:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA15239; Mon, 19 Jun 2000 23:33:03 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id XAA04395; Mon, 19 Jun 2000 23:31:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id XAA04601; Mon, 19 Jun 2000 23:31:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail2.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA13550; Mon, 19 Jun 2000 23:31:20 -0700 Received: from mail.netx4.com (216-064-003-018.inaddr.vitts.com [216.64.3.18]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with ESMTP id XAA08138 for ; Mon, 19 Jun 2000 23:31:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: from embeddededge.com (purp.netx4.com [192.168.253.32]) by mail.netx4.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id WAA04387; Mon, 19 Jun 2000 22:56:57 -0400 Message-Id: <394F0F75.E8CB96FB@embeddededge.com> Date: Tue, 20 Jun 2000 02:30:13 -0400 From: Dan Malek Organization: Embedded Edge, LLC X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.6 [en] (X11; I; Linux 2.2.15-2.9.d ppc) X-Accept-Language: en Mime-Version: 1.0 To: "Lee, Yunseung" Cc: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Subject: Re: porting USB in Assabet(SA1110+SA1111)... References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk Yes, someone working for me is is currently doing this....... -- Dan From kramer@pa.dec.com Wed Jun 21 07:49:34 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id HAA00374; Wed, 21 Jun 2000 07:49:33 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from mail2.digital.com (mail2.digital.com [204.123.2.56]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id HAA02838 for ; Wed, 21 Jun 2000 07:49:31 +0200 (METDST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id WAA25572; Tue, 20 Jun 2000 22:47:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA07390; Tue, 20 Jun 2000 22:47:44 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id WAA16430; Tue, 20 Jun 2000 22:45:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id WAA09672; Tue, 20 Jun 2000 22:45:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail1.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA02437; Tue, 20 Jun 2000 22:45:58 -0700 Received: from ns0.utdallas.edu (ns0.utdallas.edu [129.110.10.1]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with ESMTP id WAA04125 for ; Tue, 20 Jun 2000 22:45:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: from apache.utdallas.edu (apache.utdallas.edu [129.110.16.9]) by ns0.utdallas.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id C9DC61A019F; Wed, 21 Jun 2000 00:40:31 -0500 (CDT) Received: from localhost (vasantr@localhost) by apache.utdallas.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id AAA03536; Wed, 21 Jun 2000 00:41:31 -0500 (CDT) X-Authentication-Warning: apache.utdallas.edu: vasantr owned process doing -bs Date: Wed, 21 Jun 2000 00:41:31 -0500 (CDT) From: Vasant Ramasubramanian To: linux-arm@vger.rutgers.edu, sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Subject: SDRAM Testing code for 1110 Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk Does anyone out there have code to bring SDRAMs out of hardware reset / code to test DRAMs/SDRAMs? I'm working with an SA-1110 that has basically one bank of SDRAM and I need to test it/board as this is new hardware. Thanks and sorry for the cross-post. Vasant. From kramer@pa.dec.com Sun Jun 25 01:37:58 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id BAA21631; Sun, 25 Jun 2000 01:37:58 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from mail2.digital.com (mail2.digital.com [204.123.2.56]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id BAA12318 for ; Sun, 25 Jun 2000 01:37:56 +0200 (METDST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id QAA11213; Sat, 24 Jun 2000 16:35:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA06935; Sat, 24 Jun 2000 16:30:50 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id QAA06197; Sat, 24 Jun 2000 16:24:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id QAA07998; Sat, 24 Jun 2000 16:24:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: from crl.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA09272; Sat, 24 Jun 2000 16:24:19 -0700 Received: from crlwebmail.crl.dec.com (crlwebmail.crl.dec.com [16.11.0.2]) by crl.dec.com (8.8.8/RWD-1.2) with ESMTP id TAA28322; Sat, 24 Jun 2000 19:24:13 -0400 (EDT) Received: by crlwebmail.crl.dec.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21) id ; Sat, 24 Jun 2000 19:28:57 -0400 Message-Id: From: George France To: "'Vasant Ramasubramanian'" , linux-arm@vger.rutgers.edu, sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Subject: RE: SDRAM Testing code for 1110 Date: Sat, 24 Jun 2000 19:24:14 -0400 Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk Hello Vasant; If you go to http://handhelds.org, then you will find instructions for anonymous cvs access. Checkout the 'bootldr' program from the cvs repository. In the 'boot.s' file searh for the label 'memTest:' you will find what you are looking for. I hope this helps. --George George France, france@crl.dec.com Cambridge Research Laboratory, Compaq Computer Corporation One Cambridgecenter MS: CRL Cambridge, MA 02142 USA -----Original Message----- From: Vasant Ramasubramanian [mailto:vasantr@utdallas.edu] Sent: Wednesday, June 21, 2000 1:42 AM To: linux-arm@vger.rutgers.edu; sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Subject: SDRAM Testing code for 1110 Does anyone out there have code to bring SDRAMs out of hardware reset / code to test DRAMs/SDRAMs? I'm working with an SA-1110 that has basically one bank of SDRAM and I need to test it/board as this is new hardware. Thanks and sorry for the cross-post. Vasant. From kramer@pa.dec.com Mon Jun 26 00:09:06 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id AAA25312; Mon, 26 Jun 2000 00:09:06 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from mail1.digital.com (mail1.digital.com [204.123.2.50]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id AAA02876 for ; Mon, 26 Jun 2000 00:09:03 +0200 (METDST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id PAA30740; Sun, 25 Jun 2000 15:04:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA25748; Sun, 25 Jun 2000 15:00:45 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id OAA03348; Sun, 25 Jun 2000 14:55:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id OAA02389; Sun, 25 Jun 2000 14:55:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail2.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA17036; Sun, 25 Jun 2000 14:55:19 -0700 Received: from adsl-63-193-117-152.dsl.snfc21.pacbell.net (adsl-63-193-117-152.dsl.snfc21.pacbell.net [63.193.117.152]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id OAA27313 for ; Sun, 25 Jun 2000 14:55:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: from iridescent.org by adsl-63-193-117-152.dsl.snfc21.pacbell.net (AppleShare IP Mail Server 6.3) id 6135u via TCP with SMTP; Sun, 25 Jun 2000 14:55:23 -0700 Received: from [192.168.0.2] by iridescent.org (AppleShare IP Mail Server 6.3) id 6135 via TCP with SMTP; Sun, 25 Jun 2000 14:53:18 -0700 Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Sender: leb@mail.iridescent.org Message-Id: Date: Sun, 25 Jun 2000 14:53:04 -0700 To: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com From: "Lawrence E. Bakst" Subject: Time frame for saving WinCE flash images Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" ; format="flowed" Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk Could someone (George France ) comment on the time frame for the release of the bootldr feature that will allowing saving of the WinCE OS image? Best, leb -- Lawrence E. Bakst leb@iridescent.org From kramer@pa.dec.com Mon Jun 26 00:33:34 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id AAA25378; Mon, 26 Jun 2000 00:33:33 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from mail1.digital.com (mail1.digital.com [204.123.2.50]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id AAA03373 for ; Mon, 26 Jun 2000 00:33:31 +0200 (METDST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id PAA02935; Sun, 25 Jun 2000 15:28:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA19453; Sun, 25 Jun 2000 15:24:52 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id PAA00483; Sun, 25 Jun 2000 15:21:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id PAA03202; Sun, 25 Jun 2000 15:21:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail1.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA22251; Sun, 25 Jun 2000 15:21:48 -0700 Received: from crl.dec.com (crl.dec.com [192.58.206.2]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with ESMTP id PAA04207 for ; Sun, 25 Jun 2000 15:21:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ims.crl.dec.com (ims.crl.dec.com [16.11.0.11]) by crl.dec.com (8.8.8/RWD-1.2) with ESMTP id SAA12697; Sun, 25 Jun 2000 18:15:55 -0400 (EDT) Received: by ims.crl.dec.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21) id ; Sun, 25 Jun 2000 18:20:54 -0400 Message-Id: From: George France To: "'Lawrence E. Bakst'" , sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Cc: "'handhelds@handhelds.org'" Subject: RE: Time frame for saving WinCE flash images Date: Sun, 25 Jun 2000 18:15:56 -0400 Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk Hello; I am in Lab, working on it right now. The program should be ready for testing by Tuesday morning. I will have to find someone with the WinCE OS still on their unit. It seems that all the units in the Lab have been converted to Linux. :-) Best Regards, --George George France, france@crl.dec.com Cambridge Research Laboratory, Compaq Computer Corporation One Cambridgecenter MS: CRL Cambridge, MA 02142 USA -----Original Message----- From: Lawrence E. Bakst [mailto:leb@iridescent.org] Sent: Sunday, June 25, 2000 5:53 PM To: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Subject: Time frame for saving WinCE flash images Could someone (George France ) comment on the time frame for the release of the bootldr feature that will allowing saving of the WinCE OS image? Best, leb -- Lawrence E. Bakst leb@iridescent.org From kramer@pa.dec.com Tue Jun 27 05:28:18 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id FAA02755; Tue, 27 Jun 2000 05:28:18 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from mail2.digital.com (mail2.digital.com [204.123.2.56]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id FAA27953 for ; Tue, 27 Jun 2000 05:28:16 +0200 (METDST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id UAA12203; Mon, 26 Jun 2000 20:24:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA08785; Mon, 26 Jun 2000 20:21:13 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id UAA21516; Mon, 26 Jun 2000 20:16:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id UAA23342; Mon, 26 Jun 2000 20:16:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail1.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA05158; Mon, 26 Jun 2000 20:16:32 -0700 Received: from xanadu.gn.com (modemcable248.137-200-24.mtl.mc.videotron.net [24.200.137.248]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with ESMTP id UAA29690 for ; Mon, 26 Jun 2000 20:16:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (nico@localhost) by xanadu.gn.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id XAA03835 for ; Mon, 26 Jun 2000 23:15:43 -0400 X-Authentication-Warning: xanadu.gn.com: nico owned process doing -bs Date: Mon, 26 Jun 2000 23:15:43 -0400 (EDT) From: Nicolas Pitre X-Sender: nico@xanadu.gn.com To: SA-1100/Linux Subject: diff-2.4.0-test2-ac1-rmk2-np1 Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk ... is now available from many places: ftp.netwinder.org/users/n/nico/ ftp.arm.linux.org.uk/pub/linux/arm/people/nico/ ftp.handhelds.org/pub/linux/arm/sa-1100-patches/ This contains: - updated to the latest kernel - partial merge of the Compaq iPaq support - DMA fix for the UDA1341 audio driver - SA1100 framebuffer small fixes - probably other forgotten things NOTE: this patch is somewhat broken due to all pieces that changed since the last one. It is known to compile for Assabet but I guess it might not compile for other SA1100 targets. Nicolas From kramer@pa.dec.com Wed Jun 28 23:45:35 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id XAA04200; Wed, 28 Jun 2000 23:45:34 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from mail1.digital.com (mail1.digital.com [204.123.2.50]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id XAA26357 for ; Wed, 28 Jun 2000 23:45:32 +0200 (METDST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id OAA01557; Wed, 28 Jun 2000 14:44:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA01660; Wed, 28 Jun 2000 14:43:49 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id OAA13664; Wed, 28 Jun 2000 14:40:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id OAA14809; Wed, 28 Jun 2000 14:40:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail2.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA19734; Wed, 28 Jun 2000 14:40:13 -0700 Received: from ns.centurysoftware.com (ns.censoft.com [208.219.23.2]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with ESMTP id OAA27324 for ; Wed, 28 Jun 2000 14:40:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: from censoft.com (IDENT:markl@penguin.CenSoft.COM [208.219.23.17]) by ns.centurysoftware.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id PAA23436 for ; Wed, 28 Jun 2000 15:07:28 -0700 (MST) Message-Id: <395A708E.4E770F1F@censoft.com> Date: Wed, 28 Jun 2000 15:39:26 -0600 From: Mark Lehrer Reply-To: markl@censoft.com Organization: Century Software X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.72 [en] (X11; I; Linux 2.2.16 i686) X-Accept-Language: en Mime-Version: 1.0 To: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Subject: arm, ucb1200, mpg123 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk Hello. I'm doing some fun work with an ADS Graphics Client (SA-1110, UCB1200 sound). I understand that there is a pre-compiled version of arm mpg123 available; could someone please point me to a URL? I checked the Carleton site but it doesn't appear to be there. I tried compiling my own but it isn't quite acting right. I suspect the kernel or driver and a known-good version of mpg123 would help me to prove it. Thanks! Mark Lehrer From kramer@pa.dec.com Thu Jun 29 00:03:13 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id AAA04259; Thu, 29 Jun 2000 00:03:12 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from mail1.digital.com (mail1.digital.com [204.123.2.50]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id AAA27044 for ; Thu, 29 Jun 2000 00:03:10 +0200 (METDST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id PAA04042; Wed, 28 Jun 2000 15:01:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA17025; Wed, 28 Jun 2000 15:01:51 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id PAA13364; Wed, 28 Jun 2000 15:01:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id PAA15843; Wed, 28 Jun 2000 15:01:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: from crl.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA03989; Wed, 28 Jun 2000 15:01:35 -0700 Received: from crlwebmail.crl.dec.com (crlwebmail.crl.dec.com [16.11.0.2]) by crl.dec.com (8.8.8/RWD-1.2) with ESMTP id SAA20871; Wed, 28 Jun 2000 18:01:32 -0400 (EDT) Received: by crlwebmail.crl.dec.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21) id ; Wed, 28 Jun 2000 18:06:18 -0400 Message-Id: From: George France To: "'markl@censoft.com'" , sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Subject: RE: arm, ucb1200, mpg123 Date: Wed, 28 Jun 2000 18:01:35 -0400 Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk Hello Mark; At ftp://ftp.handhelds.org/pub/apps/sound is have placed an integerized ARM mpg123 player. In the next few days it the file will be moved to the ftp://ftp.handhelds.org/pub/apps/arm directory. Enjoy, --George George France, france@crl.dec.com Cambridge Research Laboratory, Compaq Computer Corporation One Cambridgecenter MS: CRL Cambridge, MA 02142 USA -----Original Message----- From: Mark Lehrer [mailto:markl@censoft.com] Sent: Wednesday, June 28, 2000 5:39 PM To: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Subject: arm, ucb1200, mpg123 Hello. I'm doing some fun work with an ADS Graphics Client (SA-1110, UCB1200 sound). I understand that there is a pre-compiled version of arm mpg123 available; could someone please point me to a URL? I checked the Carleton site but it doesn't appear to be there. I tried compiling my own but it isn't quite acting right. I suspect the kernel or driver and a known-good version of mpg123 would help me to prove it. Thanks! Mark Lehrer From kramer@pa.dec.com Thu Jun 29 01:20:09 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id BAA04453; Thu, 29 Jun 2000 01:20:09 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from mail2.digital.com (mail2.digital.com [204.123.2.56]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id BAA29182 for ; Thu, 29 Jun 2000 01:20:07 +0200 (METDST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id QAA01088; Wed, 28 Jun 2000 16:17:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA15075; Wed, 28 Jun 2000 16:17:55 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id QAA15777; Wed, 28 Jun 2000 16:16:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id QAA17421; Wed, 28 Jun 2000 16:16:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail1.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA19510; Wed, 28 Jun 2000 16:16:31 -0700 Received: from ns.centurysoftware.com (ns.censoft.com [208.219.23.2]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with ESMTP id QAA12044 for ; Wed, 28 Jun 2000 16:16:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: from censoft.com (IDENT:markl@penguin.CenSoft.COM [208.219.23.17]) by ns.centurysoftware.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id QAA24541; Wed, 28 Jun 2000 16:43:30 -0700 (MST) Message-Id: <395A8711.CA6A2ADD@censoft.com> Date: Wed, 28 Jun 2000 17:15:29 -0600 From: Mark Lehrer Reply-To: markl@censoft.com Organization: Century Software X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.72 [en] (X11; I; Linux 2.2.16 i686) X-Accept-Language: en Mime-Version: 1.0 To: George France Cc: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Subject: Re: arm, ucb1200, mpg123 References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk George France wrote: > At ftp://ftp.handhelds.org/pub/apps/sound is have placed an integerized ARM > mpg123 player. In the next few days it the file will be moved to the > ftp://ftp.handhelds.org/pub/apps/arm directory. A-ha. This makes sense; the software floating point is what made my version unusable. Thanks! Now, the next question is, of course, how well it works. I have no trouble with 32bps mp3's, but 64bps is a bit choppy. Is this typical, or particular to my system? It only has about 10 megabytes left to the kernel, bash, etc, so it certainly can't buffer up a lot of sound data; perhaps that is the real problem. Thanks, Mark From kramer@pa.dec.com Thu Jun 29 10:17:46 2000 Return-Path: Received: from tudedr.et.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id KAA00515; Thu, 29 Jun 2000 10:17:46 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from ns2.tudelft.nl by ITS.TUDelft.NL (PMDF V5.1-10 #21918) with ESMTP id <01JR66WXXX088WWCH0@ITS.TUDelft.NL> for erik@duteinh.et.tudelft.nl; Thu, 29 Jun 2000 10:17:40 +0200 Received: from mail2.digital.com (mail2.digital.com [204.123.2.56]) by mailhost1.tudelft.nl (PMDF V5.2-33 #42432) with ESMTP id <0FWW00AM9PJ2UV@mailhost1.tudelft.nl> for J.A.K.Mouw@its.tudelft.nl; Thu, 29 Jun 2000 10:13:51 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id BAA11175; Thu, 29 Jun 2000 01:08:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA29303; Thu, 29 Jun 2000 01:08:11 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id BAA03371; Thu, 29 Jun 2000 01:06:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id BAA04474; Thu, 29 Jun 2000 01:06:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail1.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA21793; Thu, 29 Jun 2000 01:06:45 -0700 Received: from salisbury.labs.futuretv.com (salisbury.futuretv.com [194.216.164.17]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with ESMTP id BAA27421 for ; Thu, 29 Jun 2000 01:06:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: from zebra.labs.futuretv.com ([192.168.32.2] ident=mail) by salisbury.labs.futuretv.com with esmtp (Exim 3.03 #1) id 137arS-0004CS-00 for sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com; Thu, 29 Jun 2000 09:43:54 +0000 Received: from [192.168.33.3] (helo=fountain.labs.futuretv.com ident=mail) by zebra.labs.futuretv.com with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1) id 137ZLC-0000JU-00; Thu, 29 Jun 2000 09:06:30 +0100 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=fountain.labs.futuretv.com ident=pb) by fountain.labs.futuretv.com with esmtp (Exim 3.03 #1) id 137ZLB-0001bx-00; Thu, 29 Jun 2000 09:06:29 +0100 Date: Thu, 29 Jun 2000 09:06:29 +0100 From: Philip Blundell Subject: Re: arm, ucb1200, mpg123 In-reply-to: Message from Rob Leslie "of Wed, 28 Jun 2000 20:18:24 EDT." <200006290018.UAA18551@deimos.mars.org> Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com To: Rob Leslie Cc: George France , "'markl@censoft.com'" , sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com, "'linux@handhelds.org'" Message-id: MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: exmh version 2.1.1 10/15/1999 (debian) Content-type: multipart/signed; boundary="==_Exmh_-2021294200P"; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk References: <200006290018.UAA18551@deimos.mars.org> --==_Exmh_-2021294200P Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In message <200006290018.UAA18551@deimos.mars.org>, Rob Leslie writes: >I was going to mention some other fixed-point alternatives, but Nicolas beat >me to splay. :-) The only other decoder I'm well aware of is Xaudio. Of course there's the ARM decoder. p. --==_Exmh_-2021294200P Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP MESSAGE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.1 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Exmh version 2.1.1 10/15/1999 (debian) owE1kL9LQlEUx1NpefUIydY4i0igz6dglpUl0iD0A8QiaLq+d3zeeO9eefea2tLS IEQSbUUQtbQ2BW0tTdUfELQ0trXV0NBV8gznLN/vh/P9nuqhQDDcfX87Lu7FTwLP j2dywjQ84Riz2XTawLZXn98NHRU5k8hkotJpYA4ktmWy4RLKFsCqE1+gXGqKBBEW pbqmayUGHgpBHITFtKlmNj1vmqk5Y6tQSM1lMqkVG6nHheEpr8F9Jx+HMq/CGgqX IrR8KlHkdC1fghYR4HDKHJBcQZmknIHgHgKXdfShRttoJxpKIYG4En1GJN1HEYdq U8IGtbirCFUkUuGUS1GE+rxjQC4xA1CpKxBzO/80Gy1uq1uKedBC1wXSIr5S1IAK 2CFNm3KjH3CzBhZvqtzQt2FM9C8UyutDwkDVGGxd6y6HRgP9Foc1h4NP9yOX41/X v6+l1c9p7fsn8nB+0+uNTY1cHSanMrXoS2r7Nhi9OIhU7j6yk38= =tFUp -----END PGP MESSAGE----- --==_Exmh_-2021294200P-- From kramer@pa.dec.com Thu Jun 29 15:42:04 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id PAA02257; Thu, 29 Jun 2000 15:42:03 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from mail2.digital.com (mail2.digital.com [204.123.2.56]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id PAA24024 for ; Thu, 29 Jun 2000 15:42:01 +0200 (METDST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id GAA07158; Thu, 29 Jun 2000 06:39:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA23029; Thu, 29 Jun 2000 06:39:48 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id GAA11519; Thu, 29 Jun 2000 06:38:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id GAA10855; Thu, 29 Jun 2000 06:38:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail2.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA06803; Thu, 29 Jun 2000 06:38:27 -0700 Received: from ns.centurysoftware.com (ns.censoft.com [208.219.23.2]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with ESMTP id GAA07491 for ; Thu, 29 Jun 2000 06:38:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: from censoft.com (IDENT:markl@penguin.CenSoft.COM [208.219.23.17]) by ns.centurysoftware.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id HAA29258; Thu, 29 Jun 2000 07:05:41 -0700 (MST) Message-Id: <395B5122.1AE33968@censoft.com> Date: Thu, 29 Jun 2000 07:37:38 -0600 From: Mark Lehrer Reply-To: markl@censoft.com Organization: Century Software X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.72 [en] (X11; I; Linux 2.2.16 i686) X-Accept-Language: en Mime-Version: 1.0 To: Nicolas Pitre Cc: George France , sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Subject: Re: arm, ucb1200, mpg123 References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk Nicolas Pitre wrote: > On Wed, 28 Jun 2000, Mark Lehrer wrote: > > > Now, the next question is, of course, how well it works. I have no trouble > > with 32bps mp3's, but 64bps is a bit choppy. Is this typical, or particular > > to my system? It only has about 10 megabytes left to the kernel, bash, etc, > > so it certainly can't buffer up a lot of sound data; perhaps that is the real > > problem. > > Absolutely not. 10MB is quite enough. Audio buffering is usually less > than 1MB of memory. > > Typically, I can play 128kbps MPEG Layer-3 files using splay in real-time. > CPU usage is about 17% on my Assabet and memory usage is also quite low. OK, that is good to know... I'll look into the alternative mp3 players. Mark From kramer@pa.dec.com Fri Jun 30 20:36:48 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id UAA09331; Fri, 30 Jun 2000 20:36:48 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from mail1.digital.com (mail1.digital.com [204.123.2.50]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id UAA22054 for ; Fri, 30 Jun 2000 20:36:46 +0200 (METDST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id LAA25571; Fri, 30 Jun 2000 11:34:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA16580; Fri, 30 Jun 2000 11:34:31 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id LAA07103; Fri, 30 Jun 2000 11:29:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id LAA06325; Fri, 30 Jun 2000 11:29:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail1.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA20682; Fri, 30 Jun 2000 11:29:56 -0700 Received: from eising.k-net.dk (eising.k-net.dtu.dk [130.225.71.227]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with ESMTP id LAA02642 for ; Fri, 30 Jun 2000 11:29:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: from obelix.vkr.k-net.dk (obelix.vkr.k-net.dk [192.38.209.3]) by eising.k-net.dk (Postfix) with ESMTP id D8D87C54D for ; Fri, 30 Jun 2000 20:29:52 +0200 (CEST) Received: by OBELIX with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21) id ; Fri, 30 Jun 2000 20:29:49 +0200 Message-Id: From: Anders Frederiksen To: "'sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com'" Subject: Brutus / kernel versions Date: Fri, 30 Jun 2000 20:29:46 +0200 Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk What kernel/patch versions will you recommend for the Brutus platform? Stability preffered over features ;-) Regards, Anders Frederiksen From kramer@pa.dec.com Sat Jul 1 01:00:38 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id BAA10049; Sat, 1 Jul 2000 01:00:38 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from mail2.digital.com (mail2.digital.com [204.123.2.56]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id BAA29458 for ; Sat, 1 Jul 2000 01:00:36 +0200 (METDST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id PAA01292; Fri, 30 Jun 2000 15:59:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA26825; Fri, 30 Jun 2000 15:59:00 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id PAA16743; Fri, 30 Jun 2000 15:57:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id PAA16626; Fri, 30 Jun 2000 15:57:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail1.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA32282; Fri, 30 Jun 2000 15:57:40 -0700 Received: from xanadu.gn.com (modemcable248.137-200-24.mtl.mc.videotron.net [24.200.137.248]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with ESMTP id PAA20413 for ; Fri, 30 Jun 2000 15:57:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (nico@localhost) by xanadu.gn.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id SAA15684 for ; Fri, 30 Jun 2000 18:56:51 -0400 X-Authentication-Warning: xanadu.gn.com: nico owned process doing -bs Date: Fri, 30 Jun 2000 18:56:51 -0400 (EDT) From: Nicolas Pitre X-Sender: nico@xanadu.gn.com To: SA-1100/Linux Subject: diff-2.4.0-test2-ac1-rmk2-np2.gz Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk ... is available from ftp.netwinder.org and all mirrors. This contains: - cleaned up compressed/head-sa1100 code - fixed SA1100 serial console support (I finally came to it... one year later. Now all boot messages are correctly displayed without garbage. Also the kernel commandline parameter for the serial console settings is supported) - moved Neponset probing code to a better logical location - sa1100 touchscreen driver fixes Tak-Shing Chan The iPaq specific initialization bits in the audio driver are still half merged. Enjoy! Nicolas From kramer@pa.dec.com Sat Jul 1 23:13:18 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id XAA12760; Sat, 1 Jul 2000 23:13:17 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from mail2.digital.com (mail2.digital.com [204.123.2.56]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id XAA20483 for ; Sat, 1 Jul 2000 23:13:16 +0200 (METDST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id OAA30905; Sat, 1 Jul 2000 14:11:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA26059; Sat, 1 Jul 2000 14:11:29 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id OAA17723; Sat, 1 Jul 2000 14:06:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id OAA17622; Sat, 1 Jul 2000 14:06:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail2.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA02397; Sat, 1 Jul 2000 14:06:19 -0700 Received: from xanadu.gn.com (modemcable248.137-200-24.mtl.mc.videotron.net [24.200.137.248]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with ESMTP id OAA28155 for ; Sat, 1 Jul 2000 14:06:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (nico@localhost) by xanadu.gn.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id RAA20286; Sat, 1 Jul 2000 17:05:27 -0400 X-Authentication-Warning: xanadu.gn.com: nico owned process doing -bs Date: Sat, 1 Jul 2000 17:05:27 -0400 (EDT) From: Nicolas Pitre X-Sender: nico@xanadu.gn.com To: Anders Frederiksen Cc: "'sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com'" Subject: Re: Brutus / kernel versions In-Reply-To: Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk On Fri, 30 Jun 2000, Anders Frederiksen wrote: > What kernel/patch versions will you recommend for the Brutus platform? > Stability preffered over features ;-) Maybe the last 2.2.x kernel version for which there is a patch on ftp.netwinder.org/users/n/nico. However you should know that 2.2.x kernels for SA1100 are no longer maintained and going for 2.4.x with the latest patch from the same site is probably a better idea too. The 2.2.x kernels might be stable i.e. the code won't change. However that doesn't mean it is better than the latest one. Nicolas From kramer@pa.dec.com Sun Jul 2 06:31:17 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id GAA13625; Sun, 2 Jul 2000 06:31:16 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from mail2.digital.com (mail2.digital.com [204.123.2.56]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id GAA26026 for ; Sun, 2 Jul 2000 06:31:14 +0200 (METDST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id VAA05980; Sat, 1 Jul 2000 21:29:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA07969; Sat, 1 Jul 2000 21:29:17 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id VAA30808; Sat, 1 Jul 2000 21:28:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id VAA28782; Sat, 1 Jul 2000 21:28:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail1.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA18107; Sat, 1 Jul 2000 21:28:07 -0700 Received: from ricl.konkuk.ac.kr ([203.252.137.80]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with ESMTP id VAA30469 for ; Sat, 1 Jul 2000 21:28:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: from newage (s210-181-100-80.thrunet.ne.kr [210.181.100.80]) by ricl.konkuk.ac.kr (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id MAA01106 for ; Sun, 2 Jul 2000 12:55:55 +0900 Message-Id: <000501bfe3d5$6f682a60$5064b5d2@wseoul.thrunet.com> Reply-To: "=?ks_c_5601-1987?B?seizsrHUXChyaWNsXCk=?=" From: "=?ks_c_5601-1987?B?seizsrHUXChyaWNsXCk=?=" To: Date: Sun, 2 Jul 2000 13:27:20 +1000 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ks_c_5601-1987" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 X-Priority: 3 X-Msmail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2919.6600 X-Mimeole: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2919.6600 Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk c3Vic2NyaWJlIG5ra2ltQHJpY2wua29ua3VrLmFjLmtyDQo= From kramer@pa.dec.com Mon Jul 3 01:12:00 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id BAA15731; Mon, 3 Jul 2000 01:11:59 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from mail2.digital.com (mail2.digital.com [204.123.2.56]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id BAA12906 for ; Mon, 3 Jul 2000 01:11:57 +0200 (METDST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id QAA28689; Sun, 2 Jul 2000 16:10:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA25389; Sun, 2 Jul 2000 16:10:09 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id QAA20605; Sun, 2 Jul 2000 16:05:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id QAA20426; Sun, 2 Jul 2000 16:05:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail2.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA31819; Sun, 2 Jul 2000 16:05:31 -0700 Received: from xanadu.gn.com (modemcable248.137-200-24.mtl.mc.videotron.net [24.200.137.248]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with ESMTP id QAA11766 for ; Sun, 2 Jul 2000 16:05:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (nico@localhost) by xanadu.gn.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id TAA24965 for ; Sun, 2 Jul 2000 19:04:39 -0400 X-Authentication-Warning: xanadu.gn.com: nico owned process doing -bs Date: Sun, 2 Jul 2000 19:04:39 -0400 (EDT) From: Nicolas Pitre X-Sender: nico@xanadu.gn.com To: SA-1100/Linux Subject: diff-2.4.0-test2-ac1-rmk2-np3.gz Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk ... is available from the usual sites This doesn't contain much than np2 except for some bits that were missing into the UDA1341 driver for Bitsy. I also realized that I broke the serial driver somehow from np1 to np2 when I fixed the console support and cleaned it up. Apparently it can't receive more than 2 character in a row, which doesn't happen when you type normal characters. Escape sequences, like arrow keys, or uploads doesn't get through ATM. If you require it, stick with np1 for now. I'll be out of town for few days, so if anybody feel like fixing it, please do it and post any patch to the list. Nicolas From kramer@pa.dec.com Wed Jul 5 11:54:58 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id LAA29842; Wed, 5 Jul 2000 11:54:57 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from mail2.digital.com (mail2.digital.com [204.123.2.56]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id LAA18406 for ; Wed, 5 Jul 2000 11:54:55 +0200 (METDST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id CAA17395; Wed, 5 Jul 2000 02:53:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA15040; Wed, 5 Jul 2000 02:53:04 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id CAA01091; Wed, 5 Jul 2000 02:47:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id CAA18219; Wed, 5 Jul 2000 02:47:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail2.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA26871; Wed, 5 Jul 2000 02:47:32 -0700 Received: from hw.ia.ac.cn ([159.226.21.134]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with ESMTP id CAA25252 for ; Wed, 5 Jul 2000 02:47:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: from hw.ia.ac.cn ([159.226.21.171]) by hw.ia.ac.cn (8.9.3/8.8.7) with ESMTP id RAA15887; Wed, 5 Jul 2000 17:33:57 -0800 Message-Id: <396303C3.B97F77C4@hw.ia.ac.cn> Date: Wed, 05 Jul 2000 17:45:39 +0800 From: dai X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.7 [zh_CN] (X11; I; Linux 2.2.13 i686) X-Accept-Language: zh-CN, en Mime-Version: 1.0 To: nico@CAM.ORG, sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com, linux-arm@vger.rutgers.edu Subject: power management for Assabet? Content-Type: text/plain; charset=gb2312 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk nico, we seems to have fix UDA1341 driver.now itcan play 44.1k to 8k sound without noise,if you didnt fix it yet,i will mail it to you. is there anybody working on power management for Assabet?if not, could you give me some advice how to implement one? regards /dai From kramer@pa.dec.com Wed Jul 5 15:17:15 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id PAA01409; Wed, 5 Jul 2000 15:17:14 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from mail1.digital.com (mail1.digital.com [204.123.2.50]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id PAA26925 for ; Wed, 5 Jul 2000 15:17:11 +0200 (METDST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id GAA19093; Wed, 5 Jul 2000 06:15:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA04035; Wed, 5 Jul 2000 06:15:29 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id GAA23968; Wed, 5 Jul 2000 06:14:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id GAA21290; Wed, 5 Jul 2000 06:14:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail1.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA13992; Wed, 5 Jul 2000 06:14:40 -0700 Received: from caramon.arm.linux.org.uk (p16-robin-gui.tch.enablis.net [194.168.180.76]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with ESMTP id GAA18996 for ; Wed, 5 Jul 2000 06:14:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: from flint.arm.linux.org.uk (root@flint [192.168.0.4]) by caramon.arm.linux.org.uk (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id MAA03145; Wed, 5 Jul 2000 12:51:56 +0100 Received: (from linux@localhost) by flint.arm.linux.org.uk (8.9.3/8.9.3) id MAA02524; Wed, 5 Jul 2000 12:49:08 +0100 From: Russell King - ARM Linux Admin Message-Id: <200007051149.MAA02524@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> Subject: Re: power management for Assabet? To: dai@hw.ia.ac.cn (dai) Date: Wed, 5 Jul 2000 12:49:08 +0100 (BST) Cc: nico@CAM.ORG, sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com, linux-arm@vger.rutgers.edu In-Reply-To: <396303C3.B97F77C4@hw.ia.ac.cn> from "dai" at Jul 05, 2000 05:45:39 PM X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL1] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk dai writes: > is there anybody working on power management for Assabet? if not, > could you give me some advice how to implement one? Don't know if we've got proper power management yet, but I've added the "bare essentials" to the latest 2.4.0 ARM kernel. I have noticed that there may be a power management scheme in existance (to do with the mcp stuff?) already which does not use the 2.4.0 power management stuff. This appears to be incomplete in Nicos kernel. I'd like to persuade people to use the existing powermanagement APIs in the kernel, rather than re-inventing the square wheel. _____ |_____| ------------------------------------------------- ---+---+- | | Russell King linux@arm.linux.org.uk --- --- | | | | http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/ / / | | +-+-+ --- -+- / | THE developer of ARM Linux |+| /|\ / | | | --- | +-+-+ ------------------------------------------------- /\\\ | From kramer@pa.dec.com Wed Jul 5 15:43:39 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id PAA01581; Wed, 5 Jul 2000 15:43:38 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from mail1.digital.com (mail1.digital.com [204.123.2.50]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id PAA27930 for ; Wed, 5 Jul 2000 15:43:36 +0200 (METDST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id GAA20207; Wed, 5 Jul 2000 06:42:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA29735; Wed, 5 Jul 2000 06:42:16 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id GAA22013; Wed, 5 Jul 2000 06:42:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id GAA23731; Wed, 5 Jul 2000 06:42:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail2.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA25120; Wed, 5 Jul 2000 06:41:57 -0700 Received: from compaq.parker.boston.ma.us (h0000c06cf87e.ne.mediaone.net [24.147.212.45]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with ESMTP id GAA07910 for ; Wed, 5 Jul 2000 06:41:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: from p2.parker.boston.ma.us (p2 [192.245.5.16]) by compaq.parker.boston.ma.us (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id KAA26235; Wed, 5 Jul 2000 10:27:00 -0400 Received: from p2.parker.boston.ma.us (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by p2.parker.boston.ma.us (8.9.3/8.8.8) with ESMTP id JAA36192; Wed, 5 Jul 2000 09:39:27 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from brad@p2.parker.boston.ma.us) Message-Id: <200007051339.JAA36192@p2.parker.boston.ma.us> To: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com, linux-arm@vger.rutgers.edu Subject: Assabet dma & SA-1111.h GPIO defs Date: Wed, 05 Jul 2000 09:39:27 -0400 From: Brad Parker Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk Hi, I've added basic dma support for the SA-1100, mostly to support the internal USB function controller. Does anyone want this? Is there a BK tree somewhere to add things to? Also, are the GPIO defines in arch-sa1000/SA-1111.h correct? They look wrong to me. Specifically, shouldn't #define _PA_DDR _SA1111( 0x1000 ) ... be #define _PA_DDR _SA1111( 0x0e00 ) ... ? All the other defines match up with my docs correct, but the GPIO one maps to A12:9=8 and my docs say it should A12:9=7 (or 0x0e00). -brad From kramer@pa.dec.com Wed Jul 5 16:07:04 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id QAA01721; Wed, 5 Jul 2000 16:07:04 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from mail2.digital.com (mail2.digital.com [204.123.2.56]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id QAA29017 for ; Wed, 5 Jul 2000 16:07:01 +0200 (METDST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id HAA10672; Wed, 5 Jul 2000 07:05:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA14473; Wed, 5 Jul 2000 07:05:35 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id HAA09030; Wed, 5 Jul 2000 07:05:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id HAA24724; Wed, 5 Jul 2000 07:05:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail2.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA09377; Wed, 5 Jul 2000 07:05:15 -0700 Received: from smtp1.andrew.cmu.edu (SMTP1.ANDREW.CMU.EDU [128.2.10.81]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with ESMTP id HAA10385 for ; Wed, 5 Jul 2000 07:05:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: from unix10.andrew.cmu.edu (UNIX10.ANDREW.CMU.EDU [128.2.15.14]) by smtp1.andrew.cmu.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id KAA09213; Wed, 5 Jul 2000 10:01:45 -0400 (EDT) Date: Wed, 5 Jul 2000 10:01:46 -0400 (EDT) From: John G Dorsey To: Brad Parker Cc: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com, linux-arm@vger.rutgers.edu Subject: Re: Assabet dma & SA-1111.h GPIO defs In-Reply-To: <200007051339.JAA36192@p2.parker.boston.ma.us> Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk On Wed, 5 Jul 2000, Brad Parker wrote: > #define _PA_DDR _SA1111( 0x1000 ) ... > > ? All the other defines match up with my docs correct, but the GPIO > one maps to A12:9=8 and my docs say it should A12:9=7 (or 0x0e00). These came from section 10.3.6 ("Memory Map") of the SA-1111 developer's manual; this section doesn't seem to have been modified in the manual update. Since the block A GPIO drives the MAX1600 on Neponset, and that actually appears to work with the current definitions, I've felt comfortable believing that these macros were correct (at least in the patch I submitted to Nicolas; I haven't looked at the last few -np releases). Which part of the documentation seems in conflict? -jd From kramer@pa.dec.com Wed Jul 5 19:48:27 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id TAA03137; Wed, 5 Jul 2000 19:48:26 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from mail1.digital.com (mail1.digital.com [204.123.2.50]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id TAA07097 for ; Wed, 5 Jul 2000 19:48:25 +0200 (METDST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id KAA00426; Wed, 5 Jul 2000 10:46:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA32754; Wed, 5 Jul 2000 10:46:37 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id KAA32013; Wed, 5 Jul 2000 10:45:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id KAA00093; Wed, 5 Jul 2000 10:45:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail2.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA00165; Wed, 5 Jul 2000 10:45:51 -0700 Received: from compaq.parker.boston.ma.us (h0000c06cf87e.ne.mediaone.net [24.147.212.45]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with ESMTP id KAA30229 for ; Wed, 5 Jul 2000 10:45:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: from p2.parker.boston.ma.us (p2 [192.245.5.16]) by compaq.parker.boston.ma.us (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id OAA26662; Wed, 5 Jul 2000 14:30:54 -0400 Received: from p2.parker.boston.ma.us (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by p2.parker.boston.ma.us (8.9.3/8.8.8) with ESMTP id NAA36934; Wed, 5 Jul 2000 13:46:21 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from brad@p2.parker.boston.ma.us) Message-Id: <200007051746.NAA36934@p2.parker.boston.ma.us> To: John G Dorsey Cc: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com, linux-arm@vger.rutgers.edu Subject: Re: Assabet dma & SA-1111.h GPIO defs In-Reply-To: Your message of "Wed, 05 Jul 2000 10:01:46 EDT." Date: Wed, 05 Jul 2000 13:46:21 -0400 From: Brad Parker Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk John G Dorsey wrote: >On Wed, 5 Jul 2000, Brad Parker wrote: >> #define _PA_DDR _SA1111( 0x1000 ) >... >> >> ? All the other defines match up with my docs correct, but the GPIO >> one maps to A12:9=8 and my docs say it should A12:9=7 (or 0x0e00). > >These came from section 10.3.6 ("Memory Map") of the SA-1111 developer's >manual; this section doesn't seem to have been modified in the manual >update. Since the block A GPIO drives the MAX1600 on Neponset, and that >actually appears to work with the current definitions, I've felt >comfortable believing that these macros were correct (at least in the >patch I submitted to Nicolas; I haven't looked at the last few -np >releases). > >Which part of the documentation seems in conflict? Well, looking back at the docs now I'm totally confused. Yes, you are correct, 10.3.6 does say it should be at 0x1000. However, The SA-1111 developer's manual, pg 3-4 shows the GPIO at 0x1000-0x11ff (it also shows the OHCI controller at 0x400, which is what I really wanted) Page 4-2, however ("RAB Target Blocks/Address Assignment") shows a table where "Address A<12:9>" is 2 for the USB (this makes 0x400, which seems right) and 7 for the GPIO (which makes 0x0e00, *not* 0x1000). Further, it shows 8 (which makes 0x1000) as "reserved". In the "Specification Update October 1999", page 21, Figure 4-1 is updated and matches the "RAB Target Blocks/Address Assignment" table... I'll go with 10.3.6 :-) -brad From kramer@pa.dec.com Thu Jul 6 17:52:24 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id RAA09718; Thu, 6 Jul 2000 17:52:23 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from mail2.digital.com (mail2.digital.com [204.123.2.56]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id RAA19419 for ; Thu, 6 Jul 2000 17:52:20 +0200 (METDST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id IAA27025; Thu, 6 Jul 2000 08:50:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA15923; Thu, 6 Jul 2000 08:50:37 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id IAA18923; Thu, 6 Jul 2000 08:45:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id IAA19463; Thu, 6 Jul 2000 08:45:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail1.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA00684; Thu, 6 Jul 2000 08:44:33 -0700 Received: from ice.ar51.net (ice.fiftyone.com [208.225.80.11]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with ESMTP id IAA30838 for ; Thu, 6 Jul 2000 08:44:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: from server01.asi (akron-80-181.ar51.net [208.225.80.181]) by ice.ar51.net (8.9.3/8.8.7) with ESMTP id LAA19673; Thu, 6 Jul 2000 11:44:13 -0400 Received: by SERVER01 with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2448.0) id <3GR16V2L>; Thu, 6 Jul 2000 11:45:57 -0400 Message-Id: From: Jeff Sutherland To: "Linux ARM kernel mailing list (E-mail)" , "SA1100 Linux mailing list (E-mail)" Subject: NFS root mounting of Assabet's filesystem Date: Thu, 6 Jul 2000 11:45:51 -0400 Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2448.0) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk After a long struggle I'm happy to report that Nicolas Pitre's latest patch has fixed the problem with serial_sa1100.c that was preventing me from NFS mounting my Assabet's root filesystem. (This is in 2.4.0-test2-ac1-rmk2-np3). I have a slightly off-topic configuration question however: When the NFS root filesystem is first mounted (at the end of do_basic_setup() in init/main.c) it is mounted as read only. Where in the subsequent init process is it supposed to get remounted in read/write mode? I'm getting a lot of complaints from programs launched by the rc3.d startup scripts about not being able to write to /var/log/..., /tmp, and so forth, as you can imagine. All the other issues I'm currently facing are just the usual configuration problems, the kernel and the pcmcia networking appear to be working quite well at this point. Regards, //Jeff From kramer@pa.dec.com Thu Jul 6 18:41:18 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id SAA09919; Thu, 6 Jul 2000 18:41:18 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from mail2.digital.com (mail2.digital.com [204.123.2.56]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id SAA21183 for ; Thu, 6 Jul 2000 18:41:15 +0200 (METDST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id JAA27454; Thu, 6 Jul 2000 09:39:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA25051; Thu, 6 Jul 2000 09:39:20 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id JAA15222; Thu, 6 Jul 2000 09:38:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id JAA14723; Thu, 6 Jul 2000 09:38:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail1.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA16717; Thu, 6 Jul 2000 09:38:35 -0700 Received: from mail.netx4.com (216-064-003-018.inaddr.vitts.com [216.64.3.18]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with ESMTP id JAA08508 for ; Thu, 6 Jul 2000 09:38:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: from embeddededge.com (purp.netx4.com [192.168.253.32]) by mail.netx4.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id JAA15149; Thu, 6 Jul 2000 09:12:41 -0400 Message-Id: <3964B5D1.BB3A01A9@embeddededge.com> Date: Thu, 06 Jul 2000 12:37:37 -0400 From: Dan Malek Organization: Embedded Edge, LLC X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.6 [en] (X11; I; Linux 2.2.15-2.9.d ppc) X-Accept-Language: en Mime-Version: 1.0 To: Jeff Sutherland Cc: "Linux ARM kernel mailing list (E-mail)" , "SA1100 Linux mailing list (E-mail)" Subject: Re: NFS root mounting of Assabet's filesystem References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk Jeff Sutherland wrote: > .... I have a slightly off-topic configuration > question however: When the NFS root filesystem is first mounted (at the end > of do_basic_setup() in init/main.c) it is mounted as read only. Use the command line "root=/dev/nfs rw" to the kernel. -- Dan From kramer@pa.dec.com Thu Jul 6 20:06:29 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id UAA10255; Thu, 6 Jul 2000 20:06:29 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from mail2.digital.com (mail2.digital.com [204.123.2.56]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id UAA23881 for ; Thu, 6 Jul 2000 20:06:24 +0200 (METDST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id LAA00352; Thu, 6 Jul 2000 11:05:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA29664; Thu, 6 Jul 2000 11:04:55 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id LAA16852; Thu, 6 Jul 2000 11:04:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id LAA12433; Thu, 6 Jul 2000 11:04:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail1.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA20195; Thu, 6 Jul 2000 11:04:45 -0700 Received: from ADSServer.flatpanels.com (flatpanels.com [207.196.69.66] (may be forged)) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with ESMTP id LAA10031 for ; Thu, 6 Jul 2000 11:04:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: by flatpanels.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21) id <3MSHLR9A>; Thu, 6 Jul 2000 13:56:11 -0400 Message-Id: <91B07CA588CED3118CFE00105AC97594026F94@flatpanels.com> From: "Huh, Woojung" To: "Sa1100-Linux (E-mail)" Cc: "Nicolas Pitre (E-mail)" Subject: FW: Question about 2.4.0-test2-ac1-rmk2-np3 Date: Thu, 6 Jul 2000 13:56:10 -0400 Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk All; I upgraded to 2.4.0-test2-ac1-rmk2-np3 from 2.3.35. I had some problems. Some are fixed but some are not. I use ADS graphics client. 1. after booting, I execute "df" command. It displays Filesystem 1k-blocks Used Available Use% Mounted on none 5947 4886 754 87% / pipe:: No such file or directory none 5947 4886 754 87% / none 5947 4886 754 87% / /dev/root 5947 4886 754 87% / 2. I can not use flash file system. Errors are follows EXT2-fs error (device flash(60,2)): ext2_new_block: Allocating block in system zone - block = 8384 Flash driver: programming voltage error! end_request: I/O error, dev 3c:02 (flash), sector 2 3. Ethernet seems not to work. It displays wrong MAC address. Thanks in advance. Woojung Huh From kramer@pa.dec.com Thu Jul 6 20:06:29 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id UAA10254; Thu, 6 Jul 2000 20:06:29 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from mail1.digital.com (mail1.digital.com [204.123.2.50]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id UAA23883 for ; Thu, 6 Jul 2000 20:06:24 +0200 (METDST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id LAA08535; Thu, 6 Jul 2000 11:04:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA00369; Thu, 6 Jul 2000 11:04:47 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id LAA18290; Thu, 6 Jul 2000 11:03:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id LAA17776; Thu, 6 Jul 2000 11:03:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail1.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA11809; Thu, 6 Jul 2000 11:03:42 -0700 Received: from ice.ar51.net (ice.fiftyone.com [208.225.80.11]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with ESMTP id LAA12757 for ; Thu, 6 Jul 2000 11:03:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: from server01.asi (akron-80-181.ar51.net [208.225.80.181]) by ice.ar51.net (8.9.3/8.8.7) with ESMTP id OAA29439; Thu, 6 Jul 2000 14:03:36 -0400 Received: by SERVER01 with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2448.0) id <3GR16V2N>; Thu, 6 Jul 2000 14:05:21 -0400 Message-Id: From: Jeff Sutherland To: "'SA1100 Linux mailing list (E-mail)'" , "'Linux ARM kernel mailing list (E-mail)'" Subject: RE: NFS root mounting of Assabet's filesystem Date: Thu, 6 Jul 2000 14:05:17 -0400 Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2448.0) Content-Type: text/plain Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk > .... I have a slightly off-topic configuration > question however: When the NFS root filesystem is first mounted (at the end > of do_basic_setup() in init/main.c) it is mounted as read only. Use the command line "root=/dev/nfs rw" to the kernel. -- Dan Thanks, Dan, that did it! Mark suggested: mount -o remount,rw which 'appeared' to work (telinit 1 first, note), yet had no effect. Unmounting, then re-mounting also did not fix it. I am working on a HOWTO for NFS root mounting SA1100-based devices. For draft copies, comments, flames, etc., please email me privately off-list. Thanks! //Jeff mailto:jSutherland@accelent.com From kramer@pa.dec.com Thu Jul 6 20:30:13 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id UAA10372; Thu, 6 Jul 2000 20:30:13 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from mail1.digital.com (mail1.digital.com [204.123.2.50]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id UAA24725 for ; Thu, 6 Jul 2000 20:30:10 +0200 (METDST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id LAA15563; Thu, 6 Jul 2000 11:28:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA29404; Thu, 6 Jul 2000 11:28:51 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id LAA09452; Thu, 6 Jul 2000 11:28:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id LAA19308; Thu, 6 Jul 2000 11:28:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail2.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA25893; Thu, 6 Jul 2000 11:28:44 -0700 Received: from mail.netx4.com (216-064-003-018.inaddr.vitts.com [216.64.3.18]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with ESMTP id LAA04812 for ; Thu, 6 Jul 2000 11:28:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: from embeddededge.com (purp.netx4.com [192.168.253.32]) by mail.netx4.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id LAA15345; Thu, 6 Jul 2000 11:03:01 -0400 Message-Id: <3964CFAA.6ADA3289@embeddededge.com> Date: Thu, 06 Jul 2000 14:27:54 -0400 From: Dan Malek Organization: Embedded Edge, LLC X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.6 [en] (X11; I; Linux 2.2.15-2.9.d ppc) X-Accept-Language: en Mime-Version: 1.0 To: Jeff Sutherland Cc: "'SA1100 Linux mailing list (E-mail)'" , "'Linux ARM kernel mailing list (E-mail)'" Subject: Re: NFS root mounting of Assabet's filesystem References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk Jeff Sutherland wrote: > Mark suggested: > > mount -o remount,rw Hmmm....If is '/', that should have worked as well. > I am working on a HOWTO for NFS root mounting SA1100-based devices. A little off topic, but I needed to say this anyway. I have been requested to create a bootable image for SA like I did for the embedded PowerPC port. This is a compressed image that has the initrd attached, and can be flashed into rom. You just jump to the first instruction of the image, it relocates, uncompresses, starts the kernel and mounts the ram disk. If there are some comments about this, please let me know. -- Dan From kramer@pa.dec.com Thu Jul 6 20:29:43 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id UAA10364; Thu, 6 Jul 2000 20:29:41 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from mail1.digital.com (mail1.digital.com [204.123.2.50]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id UAA24696 for ; Thu, 6 Jul 2000 20:29:38 +0200 (METDST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id LAA15494; Thu, 6 Jul 2000 11:28:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA29591; Thu, 6 Jul 2000 11:28:19 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id LAA11600; Thu, 6 Jul 2000 11:28:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id LAA19776; Thu, 6 Jul 2000 11:28:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail2.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA29964; Thu, 6 Jul 2000 11:28:02 -0700 Received: from duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (duteinh.et.tudelft.nl [130.161.42.1]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with ESMTP id LAA03483 for ; Thu, 6 Jul 2000 11:28:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: from lumiere by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id UAA10348; Thu, 6 Jul 2000 20:26:27 +0200 (MET DST) Message-Id: <200007061826.UAA10348@duteinh.et.tudelft.nl> From: Erik Mouw To: linux@arm.linux.org.uk Cc: dai@hw.ia.ac.cn, nico@CAM.ORG, sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com, linux-arm@vger.rutgers.edu Subject: Re: power management for Assabet? In-Reply-To: <200007051149.MAA02524@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> Organization: Eric conspiracy secret labs Date: Thu 06 Jul 2000 20:26:26 +0100 (MDT) X-Face: "!Z|1XjFg!3Iw)BwM^M\k)J5KHiPddz}#/Zw%?$&Q!xqob"OA|})3_@&BTTiQERo?/^g[Z<9P4R8:5C:aqq.cw!hotLc=+u-"+1rq@9$V^8PbOUlodyi_sejt+D`iqkLpx$>.aXl%vnfPIt"LK|/%>94_Zrm8jy?`_[RKt'TuoxUxfk(gMhY(n|DBBl~c$dhO>G%6}R4+DGX3|idBm4oU&UM/XUP4I9aoN{]`ax%B?rgD(I3OJ<62Y6L X-Mailer: XCmail 1.2devel - with PGP support, PGP engine version 0.5 (IRIX64) X-Mailerorigin: http://www.fsai.fh-trier.de/~schmitzj/Xclasses/XCmail/ X-Eric-Conspiracy: There is no conspiracy! X-Loop: erik@it.et.tudelft.nl Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk On Wed, 5 Jul 2000 12:49:08 +0100 (BST), Russell King - ARM Linux Admin wrote: > dai writes: >> is there anybody working on power management for Assabet? if not, >> could you give me some advice how to implement one? > > Don't know if we've got proper power management yet, but I've added the > "bare essentials" to the latest 2.4.0 ARM kernel. Yup, I noticed, thanks. > I have noticed that there may be a power management scheme in existance > (to do with the mcp stuff?) already which does not use the 2.4.0 power > management stuff. This appears to be incomplete in Nicos kernel. The power management in the MCP audio is still from the old Itsy driver. I just ported the driver to linux-2.3.xx but didn't remove the cruft. > I'd like to persuade people to use the existing powermanagement APIs in > the kernel, rather than re-inventing the square wheel. That's actually my plan, too. Being compatible with the standard tools is a nice thing. Erik -- J.A.K. (Erik) Mouw, Information and Communication Theory Group, Department of Electrical Engineering, Faculty of Information Technology and Systems, Delft University of Technology, PO BOX 5031, 2600 GA Delft, The Netherlands Phone: +31-15-2783635 Fax: +31-15-2781843 Email: J.A.K.Mouw@its.tudelft.nl WWW: http://www-ict.its.tudelft.nl/~erik/ From kramer@pa.dec.com Thu Jul 6 21:59:55 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id VAA10647; Thu, 6 Jul 2000 21:59:55 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from mail2.digital.com (mail2.digital.com [204.123.2.56]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id VAA27898 for ; Thu, 6 Jul 2000 21:59:52 +0200 (METDST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id MAA09355; Thu, 6 Jul 2000 12:58:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA22824; Thu, 6 Jul 2000 12:58:19 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id MAA22313; Thu, 6 Jul 2000 12:57:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id MAA20440; Thu, 6 Jul 2000 12:57:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail1.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA06091; Thu, 6 Jul 2000 12:57:09 -0700 Received: from caramon.arm.linux.org.uk (p16-robin-gui.tch.enablis.net [194.168.180.76]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with ESMTP id MAA17813 for ; Thu, 6 Jul 2000 12:57:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: from flint.arm.linux.org.uk (root@flint [192.168.0.4]) by caramon.arm.linux.org.uk (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id UAA10133; Thu, 6 Jul 2000 20:56:29 +0100 Received: (from linux@localhost) by flint.arm.linux.org.uk (8.9.3/8.9.3) id UAA12525; Thu, 6 Jul 2000 20:53:38 +0100 From: Russell King - ARM Linux Admin Message-Id: <200007061953.UAA12525@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> Subject: Re: NFS root mounting of Assabet's filesystem To: dan@netx4.com (Dan Malek) Date: Thu, 6 Jul 2000 20:53:38 +0100 (BST) Cc: jsutherland@accelent.com (Jeff Sutherland), SA1100-linux@pa.dec.com ("'SA1100 Linux mailing list (E-mail)'"), linux-arm-kernel@lists.arm.linux.org.uk ("'Linux ARM kernel mailing list (E-mail)'") In-Reply-To: <3964CFAA.6ADA3289@embeddededge.com> from "Dan Malek" at Jul 06, 2000 02:27:54 PM X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL1] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk Dan Malek writes: > I have been requested to create a bootable image for SA like I did > for the embedded PowerPC port. This is a compressed image that has > the initrd attached, and can be flashed into rom. You just jump to > the first instruction of the image, it relocates, uncompresses, starts > the kernel and mounts the ram disk. If there are some comments about > this, please let me know. Hmm, its very very complicated, especially since there is no "standard" memory map that you can rely on. Really, you can not relocate the kernel from the point where the boot loader loaded it without running into many problems. Also, the size of the kernel + size of initrd is likely to overflow the amount of memory available in the first bank of RAM on banked RAM machines. About the only thing that can be considered is to relocate the initrd to some other address, and hope it exists... _____ |_____| ------------------------------------------------- ---+---+- | | Russell King linux@arm.linux.org.uk --- --- | | | | http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/ / / | | +-+-+ --- -+- / | THE developer of ARM Linux |+| /|\ / | | | --- | +-+-+ ------------------------------------------------- /\\\ | From kramer@pa.dec.com Thu Jul 6 22:33:27 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id WAA10770; Thu, 6 Jul 2000 22:33:27 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from mail1.digital.com (mail1.digital.com [204.123.2.50]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id WAA29082 for ; Thu, 6 Jul 2000 22:33:24 +0200 (METDST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id NAA14993; Thu, 6 Jul 2000 13:31:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA24998; Thu, 6 Jul 2000 13:31:56 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id NAA26220; Thu, 6 Jul 2000 13:31:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id NAA25601; Thu, 6 Jul 2000 13:31:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail2.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA02287; Thu, 6 Jul 2000 13:31:29 -0700 Received: from ice.ar51.net (ice.fiftyone.com [208.225.80.11]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with ESMTP id NAA11340 for ; Thu, 6 Jul 2000 13:31:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: from server01.asi (akron-80-173.ar51.net [208.225.80.173]) by ice.ar51.net (8.9.3/8.8.7) with ESMTP id QAA07077; Thu, 6 Jul 2000 16:31:16 -0400 Received: by SERVER01 with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2448.0) id <3GR16V2Q>; Thu, 6 Jul 2000 16:33:00 -0400 Message-Id: From: Jeff Sutherland To: "'Russell King - ARM Linux Admin'" , "'Dan Malek'" Cc: "'\"'SA1100 Linux mailing list (E-mail)'\"'" , "'\"'Linux ARM kernel mailing list (E-mail)'\"'" Subject: RE: NFS root mounting of Assabet's filesystem Date: Thu, 6 Jul 2000 16:32:47 -0400 Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2448.0) Content-Type: text/plain Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk Dan Malek writes: > I have been requested to create a bootable image for SA like I did > for the embedded PowerPC port. This is a compressed image that has > the initrd attached, and can be flashed into rom. You just jump to > the first instruction of the image, it relocates, uncompresses, starts > the kernel and mounts the ram disk. If there are some comments about > this, please let me know. Hmm, its very very complicated, especially since there is no "standard" memory map that you can rely on. Really, you can not relocate the kernel from the point where the boot loader loaded it without running into many problems. Also, the size of the kernel + size of initrd is likely to overflow the amount of memory available in the first bank of RAM on banked RAM machines. About the only thing that can be considered is to relocate the initrd to some other address, and hope it exists... _____ |_____| ------------------------------------------------- ---+---+- | | Russell King linux@arm.linux.org.uk --- --- | | | | http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/ / / | | +-+-+ --- -+- / | THE developer of ARM Linux |+| /|\ / | | | --- | +-+-+ ------------------------------------------------- /\\\ | Well, yes it is complicated, and is much more of a bootloading issue than a kernel or initrd issue. Our bootloader is able to 'dissect' the image in ROM and place the various parts (however many there may be) into the appropriate places in memory (specified in the ROM image), then jump to a specified starting address (obtained from the ROM image, of course) at the conclusion of the bootloader's activities. The kernel image and initrd are "wrapped" by the download utility that creates the single binary image and flashes it into memory, either via a serial port, PCMCIA socket, and (just this week) by an Ethernet connection. //Jeff From kramer@pa.dec.com Thu Jul 6 22:50:48 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id WAA10839; Thu, 6 Jul 2000 22:50:48 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from mail2.digital.com (mail2.digital.com [204.123.2.56]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id WAA29623 for ; Thu, 6 Jul 2000 22:50:45 +0200 (METDST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id NAA12969; Thu, 6 Jul 2000 13:49:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA02827; Thu, 6 Jul 2000 13:49:25 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id NAA26642; Thu, 6 Jul 2000 13:49:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id NAA26374; Thu, 6 Jul 2000 13:49:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail2.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA25931; Thu, 6 Jul 2000 13:49:12 -0700 Received: from mail.netx4.com (216-064-003-018.inaddr.vitts.com [216.64.3.18]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with ESMTP id NAA12040 for ; Thu, 6 Jul 2000 13:49:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: from embeddededge.com (purp.netx4.com [192.168.253.32]) by mail.netx4.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id NAA15449; Thu, 6 Jul 2000 13:23:11 -0400 Message-Id: <3964F081.F59A1435@embeddededge.com> Date: Thu, 06 Jul 2000 16:48:01 -0400 From: Dan Malek Organization: Embedded Edge, LLC X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.6 [en] (X11; I; Linux 2.2.15-2.9.d ppc) X-Accept-Language: en Mime-Version: 1.0 To: Russell King - ARM Linux Admin Cc: Dan Malek , Jeff Sutherland , "'SA1100 Linux mailing list (E-mail)'" , "'Linux ARM kernel mailing list (E-mail)'" Subject: Re: NFS root mounting of Assabet's filesystem References: <200007061953.UAA12525@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk Russell King - ARM Linux Admin wrote: > Hmm, its very very complicated, But....does this sound useful, or am I missing some other obvious way to do this? Should I have paid attention to the BLOB postings :-)? > ..... especially since there is no "standard" > memory map that you can rely on. Really, you can not relocate the > kernel from the point where the boot loader loaded it without running > into many problems. I don't relocate anything. I'll explain. Hit the big delete if you aren't interested (no, not you Russell :-). First, I don't understand why sometimes you load the image at a low address, uncompress into a high address, then copy back to the low address. Other times you load the image into the high address and uncompress into the low address. I would always do the latter. The uncompress code can either be written to run at any address, or it can relocate itself to a specific memory address. This is what I would reloate if necessary. For example. If the "head.S" and "misc.c" functions are linked to 0xc0200000, and are actually stored in flash, I would have a couple of lines of code that discovers this condition and copies the code to 0xc0200000 and executes from there. Then just pass the pointers into decompress_kernel and everything should uncompress properly. You can attach the compressed initrd to the same zImage, and have misc.c determine the location and size of this. It can pass this into the kernel. You get one image that can be loaded using your favorite method, and when you are happy with it, the exact same set of bits can be flashed. The Linux kernel requires the compressed ram disk is in ram because it deallocates the pages when finished. If necessary (and I don't yet understand this), misc.c can copy the image from the flash to another bank of ram. I guess some (or all) StrongARM memory isn't necessary contiguous? Compressed ram disks aren't usually that big (1.5 to 2 Mbytes or so). If the first ram bank is at least 4 Mbytes, this should work fine. You just need to add a few smarts to functions in misc.c. I also like the ability to get an interactive command prompt here so you can modify kernel command line paramters at this point. OK. I am ready to learn. Teach me what I need to know to either make this work or forget about it. Thanks. -- Dan From kramer@pa.dec.com Thu Jul 6 23:21:40 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id XAA10966; Thu, 6 Jul 2000 23:21:40 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from mail1.digital.com (mail1.digital.com [204.123.2.50]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id XAA00792 for ; Thu, 6 Jul 2000 23:21:38 +0200 (METDST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id OAA21074; Thu, 6 Jul 2000 14:20:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA07504; Thu, 6 Jul 2000 14:20:13 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id OAA27013; Thu, 6 Jul 2000 14:19:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id OAA26932; Thu, 6 Jul 2000 14:19:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail1.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA26777; Thu, 6 Jul 2000 14:19:37 -0700 Received: from caramon.arm.linux.org.uk (p16-robin-gui.tch.enablis.net [194.168.180.76]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with ESMTP id OAA21986 for ; Thu, 6 Jul 2000 14:19:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: from flint.arm.linux.org.uk (root@flint [192.168.0.4]) by caramon.arm.linux.org.uk (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id WAA10485; Thu, 6 Jul 2000 22:19:29 +0100 Received: (from linux@localhost) by flint.arm.linux.org.uk (8.9.3/8.9.3) id WAA12849; Thu, 6 Jul 2000 22:16:38 +0100 From: Russell King - ARM Linux Admin Message-Id: <200007062116.WAA12849@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> Subject: Re: NFS root mounting of Assabet's filesystem To: dan@netx4.com (Dan Malek) Date: Thu, 6 Jul 2000 22:16:38 +0100 (BST) Cc: jsutherland@accelent.com (Jeff Sutherland), SA1100-linux@pa.dec.com ("'SA1100 Linux mailing list (E-mail)'"), linux-arm-kernel@lists.arm.linux.org.uk ("'Linux ARM kernel mailing list (E-mail)'") In-Reply-To: <3964F081.F59A1435@embeddededge.com> from "Dan Malek" at Jul 06, 2000 04:48:01 PM X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL1] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk Dan Malek writes: > Russell King - ARM Linux Admin wrote: > > Hmm, its very very complicated, > > But....does this sound useful, or am I missing some other obvious > way to do this? Should I have paid attention to the BLOB postings :-)? Don't get me wrong - I'm not saying that its bad. I'm just mentioning that its a little more complicated. The reason I haven't done it yet is that there are more important things I have to do, and its going to take a lot of thinking to get the right method that works. > First, I don't understand why sometimes you load the image at a low > address, uncompress into a high address, then copy back to the low > address. Other times you load the image into the high address and > uncompress into the low address. I'm not exactly sure what you mean here. There are many different ARM machines which have their RAM located at a variety of different places. For instance, RiscPCs have DRAM in the range 0x10000000 to 0x20000000, but in 4 banks, whereas EBSAs and other SA110-based machines have it located at 0x00000000 in a contiguous chunk. SA11x0-based machines can have the memory located around 0xc0000000 to 0xe0000000, or even in the SRAM space (sorry, don't have the physical addresses to hand). All this means that head.S ends up being compiled to run at many different places depending on the architecture. Oh, and the kernel is always decompressed to the RAM directly following the image, and then is copied back down to the "correct" RAM location for calling it. The reason we need this is where you have a 2MB bank 0 on a RiscPC or similar machine - there is not really enough memory to place the compressed kernel at the 1MB mark and hope that during decompression that it doesn't overwrite the code doing the decompression. (In fact, this probably means that in this situation, a combined initrd/kernel solution is not going to work. > I would always do the latter. The uncompress code can either be > written to run at any address, or it can relocate itself to a specific > memory address. Note that the head.S code is already written to be mostly relocatable. (it requires a little more work around the ldmia instruction to fix this). The misc.c code is a little more of a headache though - if you compile it up -fPIC, then you need to fix up the relocations at run time. This is not impossible, but the kernel has already been modified such that it doesn't write into any part of the image during decompression. This is required for the situation where the decompressor is run from flash directly - flash devices don't generally like having random writes directed at them. > I guess some (or all) StrongARM memory isn't necessary contiguous? Correct. It depends on the machine you're talking about. > You just need to add a few smarts to functions in misc.c. I also > like the ability to get an interactive command prompt here so you can > modify kernel command line paramters at this point. Really, the way this is done on other architectures (and I'm talking generally) is that the loader provides this functionality. On ARM, we do have a generic parameter block where things like parameter lines can be passed. Unfortunately, not all ARM architectures use this. ;( _____ |_____| ------------------------------------------------- ---+---+- | | Russell King linux@arm.linux.org.uk --- --- | | | | http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/ / / | | +-+-+ --- -+- / | THE developer of ARM Linux |+| /|\ / | | | --- | +-+-+ ------------------------------------------------- /\\\ | From kramer@pa.dec.com Thu Jul 6 23:37:13 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id XAA11009; Thu, 6 Jul 2000 23:37:13 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from mail2.digital.com (mail2.digital.com [204.123.2.56]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id XAA01236 for ; Thu, 6 Jul 2000 23:37:11 +0200 (METDST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id OAA13844; Thu, 6 Jul 2000 14:35:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA24038; Thu, 6 Jul 2000 14:35:51 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id OAA29047; Thu, 6 Jul 2000 14:35:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id OAA29074; Thu, 6 Jul 2000 14:35:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail2.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AB15889; Thu, 6 Jul 2000 14:35:36 -0700 Received: from mail.netx4.com (216-064-003-018.inaddr.vitts.com [216.64.3.18]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with ESMTP id OAA14010 for ; Thu, 6 Jul 2000 14:35:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: from embeddededge.com (purp.netx4.com [192.168.253.32]) by mail.netx4.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id OAA15525; Thu, 6 Jul 2000 14:09:54 -0400 Message-Id: <3964FB74.275161BE@embeddededge.com> Date: Thu, 06 Jul 2000 17:34:44 -0400 From: Dan Malek Organization: Embedded Edge, LLC X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.6 [en] (X11; I; Linux 2.2.15-2.9.d ppc) X-Accept-Language: en Mime-Version: 1.0 To: Russell King - ARM Linux Admin Cc: Dan Malek , Jeff Sutherland , "'SA1100 Linux mailing list (E-mail)'" , "'Linux ARM kernel mailing list (E-mail)'" Subject: Re: NFS root mounting of Assabet's filesystem References: <200007062116.WAA12849@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk Russell King - ARM Linux Admin wrote: > Don't get me wrong - I'm not saying that its bad. I know. I understand. You gave me lots to think about. > .... The reason I haven't done it yet > is that there are more important things I have to do, OK. I'll read the to-do list :-). I will experiment with the couple of boards I have (Assabet and BrightStar Engineering) and at least try to provide something on those systems (since they asked for this). I'll park it on a server someplace and you canpick and choose from it when you wish. Thanks for the help and information. -- Dan From kramer@pa.dec.com Fri Jul 7 21:27:34 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id VAA17539; Fri, 7 Jul 2000 21:27:34 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from mail1.digital.com (mail1.digital.com [204.123.2.50]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id VAA08246 for ; Fri, 7 Jul 2000 21:27:32 +0200 (METDST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id MAA16359; Fri, 7 Jul 2000 12:26:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA15035; Fri, 7 Jul 2000 12:25:49 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id MAA04045; Fri, 7 Jul 2000 12:16:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id MAA18096; Fri, 7 Jul 2000 12:16:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail1.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA17761; Fri, 7 Jul 2000 12:16:28 -0700 Received: from compaq.parker.boston.ma.us (h0000c06cf87e.ne.mediaone.net [24.147.212.45]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with ESMTP id MAA19384 for ; Fri, 7 Jul 2000 12:16:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: from p2.parker.boston.ma.us (p2 [192.245.5.16]) by compaq.parker.boston.ma.us (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id PAA03102; Fri, 7 Jul 2000 15:16:22 -0400 Received: from p2.parker.boston.ma.us (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by p2.parker.boston.ma.us (8.9.3/8.8.8) with ESMTP id PAA04679; Fri, 7 Jul 2000 15:16:22 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from brad@p2.parker.boston.ma.us) Message-Id: <200007071916.PAA04679@p2.parker.boston.ma.us> To: "'SA1100 Linux mailing list (E-mail)'" , "'Linux ARM kernel mailing list (E-mail)'" Subject: interrupts from sa-1111 dev module? Date: Fri, 07 Jul 2000 15:16:22 -0400 From: Brad Parker Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk Hi, I'm trying to get the ohci usb controller on the intel sa-1111 development module to work. I can talk to the controller but I can't get interrupts to work. I've verified that the SA-1111's interupt enable bits are being set correctly by the inline routines in asm/arch-sa1100/irq.h.. I tried hitting the SA-1111's interrupt test registers with no luck. I'm running kernel "int2.4.0-test1-ac7-rmk1-np5" any ideas? I can't find any other kernel code which uses the sa-1111 dev modules interrupts. -brad From kramer@pa.dec.com Sat Jul 8 04:12:29 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id EAA18464; Sat, 8 Jul 2000 04:12:29 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from mail2.digital.com (mail2.digital.com [204.123.2.56]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id EAA17457 for ; Sat, 8 Jul 2000 04:12:27 +0200 (METDST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id TAA16888; Fri, 7 Jul 2000 19:10:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA29664; Fri, 7 Jul 2000 19:10:27 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id TAA22106; Fri, 7 Jul 2000 19:06:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id TAA02110; Fri, 7 Jul 2000 19:06:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail1.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA18604; Fri, 7 Jul 2000 19:06:56 -0700 Received: from xanadu.gn.com (modemcable248.137-200-24.mtl.mc.videotron.net [24.200.137.248]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with ESMTP id TAA00687 for ; Fri, 7 Jul 2000 19:06:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (nico@localhost) by xanadu.gn.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id WAA28016; Fri, 7 Jul 2000 22:06:01 -0400 X-Authentication-Warning: xanadu.gn.com: nico owned process doing -bs Date: Fri, 7 Jul 2000 22:06:01 -0400 (EDT) From: Nicolas Pitre X-Sender: nico@xanadu.gn.com To: Brad Parker Cc: "'SA1100 Linux mailing list (E-mail)'" , "'Linux ARM kernel mailing list (E-mail)'" Subject: Re: interrupts from sa-1111 dev module? In-Reply-To: <200007071916.PAA04679@p2.parker.boston.ma.us> Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk On Fri, 7 Jul 2000, Brad Parker wrote: > > Hi, > > I'm trying to get the ohci usb controller on the intel sa-1111 development > module to work. I can talk to the controller but I can't get interrupts > to work. > > I've verified that the SA-1111's interupt enable bits are being set > correctly by the inline routines in asm/arch-sa1100/irq.h.. > > I tried hitting the SA-1111's interrupt test registers with no luck. > > I'm running kernel "int2.4.0-test1-ac7-rmk1-np5" Please pick a later patch. The SA1111 IRQ handling was broken until recently. Nicolas From kramer@pa.dec.com Sat Jul 8 04:50:28 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id EAA18520; Sat, 8 Jul 2000 04:50:28 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from mail1.digital.com (mail1.digital.com [204.123.2.50]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id EAA17975 for ; Sat, 8 Jul 2000 04:50:26 +0200 (METDST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id TAA30768; Fri, 7 Jul 2000 19:49:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA26868; Fri, 7 Jul 2000 19:49:05 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id TAA22005; Fri, 7 Jul 2000 19:46:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id TAA18699; Fri, 7 Jul 2000 19:46:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail2.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA32331; Fri, 7 Jul 2000 19:46:12 -0700 Received: from xanadu.gn.com (modemcable248.137-200-24.mtl.mc.videotron.net [24.200.137.248]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with ESMTP id TAA15415 for ; Fri, 7 Jul 2000 19:46:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (nico@localhost) by xanadu.gn.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id WAA28044; Fri, 7 Jul 2000 22:44:23 -0400 X-Authentication-Warning: xanadu.gn.com: nico owned process doing -bs Date: Fri, 7 Jul 2000 22:44:23 -0400 (EDT) From: Nicolas Pitre X-Sender: nico@xanadu.gn.com To: "Huh, Woojung" Cc: "Sa1100-Linux (E-mail)" Subject: Re: FW: Question about 2.4.0-test2-ac1-rmk2-np3 In-Reply-To: <91B07CA588CED3118CFE00105AC97594026F94@flatpanels.com> Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk On Thu, 6 Jul 2000, Huh, Woojung wrote: > All; > > I upgraded to 2.4.0-test2-ac1-rmk2-np3 from 2.3.35. > I had some problems. Some are fixed but some are not. > I use ADS graphics client. > > 1. after booting, I execute "df" command. It displays > Filesystem 1k-blocks Used Available Use% Mounted on > none 5947 4886 754 > 87% / > pipe:: No such file or directory > none 5947 4886 754 > 87% / > none 5947 4886 754 > 87% / > /dev/root 5947 4886 754 > 87% / Either your /etc/fstab is wrong, df is broken or /etc/mtab points/contains wrong data. If the same ramdisk worked well in the past, then it might be some kernel changes that broke df. > 2. I can not use flash file system. Errors are follows > EXT2-fs error (device flash(60,2)): ext2_new_block: > Allocating block in system zone - block = 8384 > Flash driver: programming voltage error! > end_request: I/O error, dev 3c:02 (flash), sector 2 Do you see "architecture: ADS GraphicsClient" in the kernel startup messages? If so, you might want to have a look at drivers/block/flash-mem.h to doublecheck that flash access for GraphicsClient is correctly defined. > 3. Ethernet seems not to work. It displays wrong MAC address. My board'S MAC address has not been configured, so I bolted a dummy MAC adress in the code... and forgot to remove it. It should work for you too anyway. Nicolas From kramer@pa.dec.com Sat Jul 8 07:41:10 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id HAA18751; Sat, 8 Jul 2000 07:41:10 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from mail2.digital.com (mail2.digital.com [204.123.2.56]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id HAA20100 for ; Sat, 8 Jul 2000 07:41:08 +0200 (METDST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id WAA19626; Fri, 7 Jul 2000 22:39:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA00629; Fri, 7 Jul 2000 22:39:24 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id WAA28395; Fri, 7 Jul 2000 22:36:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id WAA28063; Fri, 7 Jul 2000 22:36:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail1.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA03974; Fri, 7 Jul 2000 22:36:06 -0700 Received: from mail2000.com.tw (mail2000.com.tw [139.175.250.58]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id WAA20887 for ; Fri, 7 Jul 2000 22:36:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: By OpenMail Mailer;Sat, 08 Jul 2000 13:33:34 +0800 (CST) From: "Chien-Min Lee" Reply-To: cm_lee@mail2000.com.tw Subject: Re: NFS root mounting of Assabet's filesystem Message-Id: <963034414.36283.cm_lee@mail2000.com.tw> To: "jsutherland" Cc: "linux-arm-kernel" , "SA1100-linux" Date: Sat, 08 Jul 2000 13:33:34 +0800 (CST) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Mime-Autoconverted: from 8bit to quoted-printable by mail1.digital.com id WAA20887 Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk Hello: > After a long struggle I'm happy to report that Nicolas Pitre's latest p= atch > has fixed the problem with serial_sa1100.c that was preventing me from = NFS > mounting my Assabet's root filesystem. (This is in 2.4.0-test2-ac1-rmk= 2-np3). Would you please provide a how-to guide for making NFS root work throu= gh PCMCIA card service on Assabet?? If yes, it would be very great. Thanks kirk ----=3D=3D Mailed via Openfind =3D=3D----- http://mail2000.com.tw/ =B4=A3=A8=D1=A7K=B6O=AA=BA e-mail =ABH=BDc=AAA=B0= =C8 From kramer@pa.dec.com Sat Jul 8 17:45:11 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id RAA19648; Sat, 8 Jul 2000 17:45:10 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from mail2.digital.com (mail2.digital.com [204.123.2.56]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id RAA28582 for ; Sat, 8 Jul 2000 17:45:08 +0200 (METDST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id IAA32369; Sat, 8 Jul 2000 08:43:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA19001; Sat, 8 Jul 2000 08:43:14 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id IAA05687; Sat, 8 Jul 2000 08:39:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id IAA07187; Sat, 8 Jul 2000 08:39:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: from crl.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA11640; Sat, 8 Jul 2000 08:39:09 -0700 Received: from crlwebmail.crl.dec.com (crlwebmail.crl.dec.com [16.11.0.2]) by crl.dec.com (8.8.8/RWD-1.2) with ESMTP id LAA24591; Sat, 8 Jul 2000 11:39:04 -0400 (EDT) Received: by crlwebmail.crl.dec.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21) id ; Sat, 8 Jul 2000 11:43:55 -0400 Message-Id: From: George France To: "'cm_lee@mail2000.com.tw'" Cc: linux-arm-kernel , SA1100-linux , jsutherland Subject: RE: NFS root mounting of Assabet's filesystem Date: Sat, 8 Jul 2000 11:39:01 -0400 Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk Hello Kirk; This is an interesting problem. To get PCMCIA working you need the = files from the root file system. The simplest method, is to create a ramdisk = with all of the PCMCIA files that you need to activate your PCMCIA card, = then do the nfsroot mount. It is sort of the chicken or the egg problem. I have the same item on my todo list. It will just be a week or two = before I get to it. I hope this helps. --George George France, france@crl.dec.com Cambridge Research Laboratory, Compaq Computer Corporation One Cambridgecenter MS: CRL Cambridge, MA 02142 USA -----Original Message----- From: Chien-Min Lee [mailto:cm_lee@mail2000.com.tw] Sent: Saturday, July 08, 2000 1:34 AM To: jsutherland Cc: linux-arm-kernel; SA1100-linux Subject: Re: NFS root mounting of Assabet's filesystem Hello: > After a long struggle I'm happy to report that Nicolas Pitre's latest patch > has fixed the problem with serial_sa1100.c that was preventing me = from NFS > mounting my Assabet's root filesystem. (This is in 2.4.0-test2-ac1-rmk2-np3). Would you please provide a how-to guide for making NFS root work = through PCMCIA card service on Assabet?? If yes, it would be very great. Thanks kirk ----=3D=3D Mailed via Openfind =3D=3D----- http://mail2000.com.tw/ =B4=A3=A8=D1=A7K=B6O=AA=BA e-mail = =ABH=BDc=AAA=B0=C8 unsubscribe: body of `unsubscribe linux-arm-kernel' to majordomo@lists.arm.linux.org.uk From kramer@pa.dec.com Sun Jul 9 10:52:20 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id KAA21476; Sun, 9 Jul 2000 10:52:20 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from mail2.digital.com (mail2.digital.com [204.123.2.56]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id KAA13006 for ; Sun, 9 Jul 2000 10:52:17 +0200 (METDST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id BAA21751; Sun, 9 Jul 2000 01:50:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA01639; Sun, 9 Jul 2000 01:50:31 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id BAA16496; Sun, 9 Jul 2000 01:44:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id BAA30296; Sun, 9 Jul 2000 01:44:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail1.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA07121; Sun, 9 Jul 2000 01:44:20 -0700 Received: from ns0.utdallas.edu (ns0.utdallas.edu [129.110.10.1]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with ESMTP id BAA06434 for ; Sun, 9 Jul 2000 01:44:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: from apache.utdallas.edu (apache.utdallas.edu [129.110.16.9]) by ns0.utdallas.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE09C1A0228; Sun, 9 Jul 2000 03:40:22 -0500 (CDT) Received: from localhost (vasantr@localhost) by apache.utdallas.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id DAA00528; Sun, 9 Jul 2000 03:40:34 -0500 (CDT) X-Authentication-Warning: apache.utdallas.edu: vasantr owned process doing -bs Date: Sun, 9 Jul 2000 03:40:34 -0500 (CDT) From: Vasant Ramasubramanian To: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com, linux-arm@vger.rutgers.edu Subject: Brutus/SA1100 Issues Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk Hello all; I am having difficulty getting my Brutus to work after it was sent in for repair and I'm not sure what the problem is yet... When I use Nico's brutustest kernel+ramdisk+angel on the debugging console I get some interesting startup messages. I get: ... Calibrating delay loop 194.15 BogoMIPS ... Starting kswapd 1.5 IRQ LOCK: IRQ 12 is locking the system, disabled Console: Switching to colour framebuffer device 40x30 and then it hangs. I notice that a few pixels on the Tux that appears on the LCD seem to be "blinking" after the hang. I poped open the CPU socket and apparently I have a "StrongARM SA-1100B" Anyone have any idea what speed grade this is? It wasn't listed in the SA1100 manual that I have. Any ideas? Thanks, Vasant. From kramer@pa.dec.com Mon Jul 10 04:19:08 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id EAA23346; Mon, 10 Jul 2000 04:19:08 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from mail2.digital.com (mail2.digital.com [204.123.2.56]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id EAA28927 for ; Mon, 10 Jul 2000 04:19:06 +0200 (METDST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id TAA13225; Sun, 9 Jul 2000 19:17:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA29189; Sun, 9 Jul 2000 19:17:27 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id TAA19531; Sun, 9 Jul 2000 19:12:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id TAA21490; Sun, 9 Jul 2000 19:12:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail1.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA27049; Sun, 9 Jul 2000 19:12:38 -0700 Received: from xanadu.gn.com (modemcable248.137-200-24.mtl.mc.videotron.net [24.200.137.248]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with ESMTP id TAA31638 for ; Sun, 9 Jul 2000 19:12:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (nico@localhost) by xanadu.gn.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id WAA00421; Sun, 9 Jul 2000 22:11:47 -0400 X-Authentication-Warning: xanadu.gn.com: nico owned process doing -bs Date: Sun, 9 Jul 2000 22:11:47 -0400 (EDT) From: Nicolas Pitre X-Sender: nico@xanadu.gn.com To: Vasant Ramasubramanian Cc: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com, linux-arm@vger.rutgers.edu Subject: Re: Brutus/SA1100 Issues In-Reply-To: Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk On Sun, 9 Jul 2000, Vasant Ramasubramanian wrote: > Hello all; > > I am having difficulty getting my Brutus to work after it was sent in for > repair and I'm not sure what the problem is yet... > > When I use Nico's brutustest kernel+ramdisk+angel on the debugging console > I get some interesting startup messages. > > I get: > > ... > Calibrating delay loop 194.15 BogoMIPS > ... > Starting kswapd 1.5 > IRQ LOCK: IRQ 12 is locking the system, disabled > Console: Switching to colour framebuffer device 40x30 IRQ 12 is attached to the SA1100 integrated LCD controller. Either your CPU is damaged or something on the board is wrong. Try replacing your CPU on your Brutus board and ensure the socket is perfectly clean while you're at it. Nicolas From kramer@pa.dec.com Mon Jul 10 18:52:01 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id SAA27558; Mon, 10 Jul 2000 18:52:01 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from mail1.digital.com (mail1.digital.com [204.123.2.50]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id SAA24528 for ; Mon, 10 Jul 2000 18:51:59 +0200 (METDST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id JAA01690; Mon, 10 Jul 2000 09:50:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA10453; Mon, 10 Jul 2000 09:50:16 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id JAA29000; Mon, 10 Jul 2000 09:42:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id JAA13276; Mon, 10 Jul 2000 09:42:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: from zmamail02.nz-tay.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA21045; Mon, 10 Jul 2000 09:42:08 -0700 Received: by zmamail02.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id DB44D8D3; Mon, 10 Jul 2000 12:42:07 -0400 (EDT) Received: from ADSServer.flatpanels.com (unknown [207.196.69.66]) by zmamail02.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 687C7A8E for ; Mon, 10 Jul 2000 12:42:06 -0400 (EDT) Received: by flatpanels.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21) id <3MSHLSVL>; Mon, 10 Jul 2000 12:34:44 -0400 Message-Id: <91B07CA588CED3118CFE00105AC97594026FA1@flatpanels.com> From: "Huh, Woojung" To: "'Nicolas Pitre'" Cc: "Sa1100-Linux (E-mail)" Subject: RE: FW: Question about 2.4.0-test2-ac1-rmk2-np3 Date: Mon, 10 Jul 2000 12:34:44 -0400 Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21) Content-Type: text/plain Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk Thanks, Nicolas. Number 2 (Flash problem) & 3 were solved. Flash problem was come from misconfiguration. And network is working fine. Woojung Huh -----Original Message----- From: Nicolas Pitre [SMTP:nico@CAM.ORG] Sent: Friday, July 07, 2000 10:44 PM To: Huh, Woojung Cc: Sa1100-Linux (E-mail) Subject: Re: FW: Question about 2.4.0-test2-ac1-rmk2-np3 On Thu, 6 Jul 2000, Huh, Woojung wrote: > All; > > I upgraded to 2.4.0-test2-ac1-rmk2-np3 from 2.3.35. > I had some problems. Some are fixed but some are not. > I use ADS graphics client. > > 1. after booting, I execute "df" command. It displays > Filesystem 1k-blocks Used Available Use% Mounted on > none 5947 4886 754 > 87% / > pipe:: No such file or directory > none 5947 4886 754 > 87% / > none 5947 4886 754 > 87% / > /dev/root 5947 4886 754 > 87% / Either your /etc/fstab is wrong, df is broken or /etc/mtab points/contains wrong data. If the same ramdisk worked well in the past, then it might be some kernel changes that broke df. > 2. I can not use flash file system. Errors are follows > EXT2-fs error (device flash(60,2)): ext2_new_block: > Allocating block in system zone - block = 8384 > Flash driver: programming voltage error! > end_request: I/O error, dev 3c:02 (flash), sector 2 Do you see "architecture: ADS GraphicsClient" in the kernel startup messages? If so, you might want to have a look at drivers/block/flash-mem.h to doublecheck that flash access for GraphicsClient is correctly defined. > 3. Ethernet seems not to work. It displays wrong MAC address. My board'S MAC address has not been configured, so I bolted a dummy MAC adress in the code... and forgot to remove it. It should work for you too anyway. Nicolas From kramer@pa.dec.com Mon Jul 10 20:11:26 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id UAA27852; Mon, 10 Jul 2000 20:11:26 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from mail1.digital.com (mail1.digital.com [204.123.2.50]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id UAA26868 for ; Mon, 10 Jul 2000 20:11:24 +0200 (METDST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id LAA12231; Mon, 10 Jul 2000 11:10:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA19247; Mon, 10 Jul 2000 11:09:57 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id LAA14922; Mon, 10 Jul 2000 11:06:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id LAA17452; Mon, 10 Jul 2000 11:06:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ztxmail02.nz-cce.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA25343; Mon, 10 Jul 2000 11:06:19 -0700 Received: by ztxmail02.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 4C7CD418E; Mon, 10 Jul 2000 13:06:19 -0500 (CDT) Received: from xanadu.vip.ca (unknown [205.250.170.220]) by ztxmail02.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F6394193; Mon, 10 Jul 2000 13:06:18 -0500 (CDT) Date: Mon, 10 Jul 2000 14:04:32 -0400 (EDT) From: Nicolas Pitre To: Deborah Wallach Cc: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com, linux-arm@vger.rutgers.edu, handhelds@handhelds.org Subject: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com mailing list In-Reply-To: <200007101730.AA23679@stowe.pa.dec.com> Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk On Mon, 10 Jul 2000, Deborah Wallach wrote: > > sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com > > StrongARM-1100 stuff ? > > I created this list for sa1100-specific linux issues (back when the sa1100 > port was less well-integrated with the general arm port). It's possible > that it's no longer needed. Does anyone on the sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com feel that this list is still required? I used it for my patch announcements and though it would be a good place for very SA11x0-specific Linux support discussions. Maybe this list can stay with its focus, maybe all the other lists can already do the job. Maybe concerned people can tell what they think? In all cases I would like to see someone to host an web archive of that list with as many old messages as we can gather. There were a lot of useful informations that went through. Nicolas From kramer@pa.dec.com Mon Jul 10 20:54:11 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id UAA27990; Mon, 10 Jul 2000 20:54:11 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from mail2.digital.com (mail2.digital.com [204.123.2.56]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id UAA28159 for ; Mon, 10 Jul 2000 20:54:10 +0200 (METDST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id LAA19253; Mon, 10 Jul 2000 11:52:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA19767; Mon, 10 Jul 2000 11:52:50 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id LAA19934; Mon, 10 Jul 2000 11:49:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id LAA19646; Mon, 10 Jul 2000 11:49:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ztxmail01.nz-cce.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA14123; Mon, 10 Jul 2000 11:49:45 -0700 Received: by ztxmail01.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id D5BF01F12; Mon, 10 Jul 2000 13:49:44 -0500 (CDT) Received: from web117.yahoomail.com (web117.yahoomail.com [205.180.60.91]) by ztxmail01.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 347C41FC5 for ; Mon, 10 Jul 2000 13:49:44 -0500 (CDT) Received: (qmail 19498 invoked by uid 60001); 10 Jul 2000 18:49:43 -0000 Message-Id: <20000710184943.19497.qmail@web117.yahoomail.com> Received: from [171.64.108.158] by web117.yahoomail.com; Mon, 10 Jul 2000 11:49:43 PDT Date: Mon, 10 Jul 2000 11:49:43 -0700 (PDT) From: Zsolt Kiraly Subject: Re: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com mailing list To: Nicolas Pitre , Deborah Wallach Cc: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com, linux-arm@vger.rutgers.edu, handhelds@handhelds.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk Hi Nico, Debbi, I think this list is still very useful in separating the generic ARMlinux messages from the StrongArmLinux specific ones. If the list does not put unbearable strains on the pa.dec.com server, then by all means please continue the service. An archive would be nice though. In any case, I would like to thank Compaq (nee Digital) for hosting this list, and I hope they will continue hosting it in the future. Zsolt --- Nicolas Pitre wrote: > > > On Mon, 10 Jul 2000, Deborah Wallach wrote: > > > > > sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com > > > > StrongARM-1100 stuff ? > > > > I created this list for sa1100-specific linux > issues (back when the sa1100 > > port was less well-integrated with the general arm > port). It's possible > > that it's no longer needed. > > Does anyone on the sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com feel that > this list is still > required? I used it for my patch announcements and > though it would be a > good place for very SA11x0-specific Linux support > discussions. Maybe this > list can stay with its focus, maybe all the other > lists can already do the > job. > > Maybe concerned people can tell what they think? > > In all cases I would like to see someone to host an > web archive of that > list with > as many old messages as we can gather. There were a > lot of useful > informations that went through. > > > Nicolas > ===== Zsolt Kiraly zskiraly@yahoo.com __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Get Yahoo! Mail  Free email you can access from anywhere! http://mail.yahoo.com/ From kramer@pa.dec.com Mon Jul 10 23:09:56 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id XAA28421; Mon, 10 Jul 2000 23:09:56 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from mail1.digital.com (mail1.digital.com [204.123.2.50]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id XAA02883 for ; Mon, 10 Jul 2000 23:09:54 +0200 (METDST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id OAA16434; Mon, 10 Jul 2000 14:08:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA26639; Mon, 10 Jul 2000 14:07:50 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id OAA23949; Mon, 10 Jul 2000 14:03:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id OAA24746; Mon, 10 Jul 2000 14:03:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: from crl.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA21058; Mon, 10 Jul 2000 14:03:48 -0700 Received: from crlwebmail.crl.dec.com (crlwebmail.crl.dec.com [16.11.0.2]) by crl.dec.com (8.8.8/RWD-1.2) with ESMTP id RAA02166; Mon, 10 Jul 2000 17:03:46 -0400 (EDT) Received: by crlwebmail.crl.dec.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21) id ; Mon, 10 Jul 2000 17:08:39 -0400 Message-Id: From: George France To: "'handhelds@handhelds.org'" , Deborah Wallach Cc: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com, linux-arm@vger.rutgers.edu Subject: RE: [Handhelds] sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com mailing list Date: Mon, 10 Jul 2000 17:03:44 -0400 Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk I suspect that the sa1100-linux list will still be useful for the next two or three months, as there are still some drivers to be completed. At that time we should re-evaluate. --George George France, france@crl.dec.com Cambridge Research Laboratory, Compaq Computer Corporation One Cambridgecenter MS: CRL Cambridge, MA 02142 USA -----Original Message----- From: Nicolas Pitre [mailto:nico@cam.org] Sent: Monday, July 10, 2000 2:05 PM To: Deborah Wallach Cc: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com; linux-arm@vger.rutgers.edu; handhelds@handhelds.org Subject: [Handhelds] sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com mailing list On Mon, 10 Jul 2000, Deborah Wallach wrote: > > sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com > > StrongARM-1100 stuff ? > > I created this list for sa1100-specific linux issues (back when the sa1100 > port was less well-integrated with the general arm port). It's possible > that it's no longer needed. Does anyone on the sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com feel that this list is still required? I used it for my patch announcements and though it would be a good place for very SA11x0-specific Linux support discussions. Maybe this list can stay with its focus, maybe all the other lists can already do the job. Maybe concerned people can tell what they think? In all cases I would like to see someone to host an web archive of that list with as many old messages as we can gather. There were a lot of useful informations that went through. Nicolas _______________________________________________ Handhelds mailing list Handhelds@handhelds.org http://handhelds.org/mailman/listinfo/handhelds From kramer@pa.dec.com Mon Jul 10 23:34:19 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id XAA28487; Mon, 10 Jul 2000 23:34:19 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from mail2.digital.com (mail2.digital.com [204.123.2.56]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id XAA03569 for ; Mon, 10 Jul 2000 23:34:18 +0200 (METDST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id OAA23049; Mon, 10 Jul 2000 14:33:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA07534; Mon, 10 Jul 2000 14:32:58 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id OAA23990; Mon, 10 Jul 2000 14:30:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id OAA21272; Mon, 10 Jul 2000 14:29:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail1.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA18601; Mon, 10 Jul 2000 14:29:59 -0700 Received: from tekincisnts-4.teklogix.com (mail.teklogix.com [207.219.2.10]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with ESMTP id OAA01115 for ; Mon, 10 Jul 2000 14:29:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: from DeadDuck (BILL [10.128.5.25]) by tekincisnts-4.teklogix.com with SMTP (Microsoft Exchange Internet Mail Service Version 5.5.2448.0) id 3C08SLDL; Mon, 10 Jul 2000 17:29:08 -0400 To: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Subject: Re: [Handhelds] sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com mailing list References: From: Bill Pringlemeir Organization: noitazinagro X-Home-Page: http://www.wwonline.com/~bpringle/ Date: 10 Jul 2000 17:33:42 -0400 In-Reply-To: George France's message of "Mon, 10 Jul 2000 17:03:44 -0400" Message-Id: Lines: 19 User-Agent: Gnus/5.0803 (Gnus v5.8.3) Emacs/20.6 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk Nicolas> Does anyone on the sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com feel that this Nicolas> list is still required? I used it for my patch Nicolas> announcements and though it would be a good place for very Nicolas> SA11x0-specific Linux support discussions. Maybe this list Nicolas> can stay with its focus, maybe all the other lists can Nicolas> already do the job. Can someone enumerate subscription info for the other lists that might do this job? Opps, answered my own question... "http://www.arm.uk.linux.org/armlinux/mailinglists.shtml" "http://handhelds.org/email_lists.html" Bill -- Yow! Maybe I should have asked for my Neutron Bomb in PAISLEY-- From kramer@pa.dec.com Tue Jul 11 03:18:09 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id DAA29108; Tue, 11 Jul 2000 03:18:09 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from mail1.digital.com (mail1.digital.com [204.123.2.50]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id DAA08689 for ; Tue, 11 Jul 2000 03:18:07 +0200 (METDST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id SAA23159; Mon, 10 Jul 2000 18:16:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA20419; Mon, 10 Jul 2000 18:16:18 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id SAA01137; Mon, 10 Jul 2000 18:12:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id SAA31047; Mon, 10 Jul 2000 18:12:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ztxmail02.nz-cce.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA30275; Mon, 10 Jul 2000 18:12:38 -0700 Received: by ztxmail02.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 28DEE4165; Mon, 10 Jul 2000 20:12:38 -0500 (CDT) Received: from funai-tky.co.jp (ns.funai-tky.co.jp [210.154.37.2]) by ztxmail02.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 863144133 for ; Mon, 10 Jul 2000 20:12:36 -0500 (CDT) Received: from hiropu ([192.168.1.19]) by funai-tky.co.jp (8.9.1/3.7Wpr7-98092916) with SMTP id KAA11280 for ; Tue, 11 Jul 2000 10:12:31 +0900 Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2000 10:12:31 +0900 From: Hiroshi Ishii To: sa1100 mailng list Subject: Re: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com mailing list In-Reply-To: <20000710184943.19497.qmail@web117.yahoomail.com> References: <20000710184943.19497.qmail@web117.yahoomail.com> Message-Id: <396A747F276.C4D7HIROSHI@ns.funai-tky.co.jp> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Becky! ver 1.26.03 Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk On Mon, 10 Jul 2000 11:49:43 -0700 (PDT) Zsolt Kiraly wrote: > Hi Nico, Debbi, > > I think this list is still very useful in separating > the generic ARMlinux messages from the StrongArmLinux Me too. ---- Funai Electric R & D System Software Engineer Hiroshi Ishii From kramer@pa.dec.com Tue Jul 11 06:57:57 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id GAA29599; Tue, 11 Jul 2000 06:57:57 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from mail2.digital.com (mail2.digital.com [204.123.2.56]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id GAA12078 for ; Tue, 11 Jul 2000 06:57:54 +0200 (METDST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id VAA31201; Mon, 10 Jul 2000 21:56:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA32722; Mon, 10 Jul 2000 21:56:27 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id VAA27587; Mon, 10 Jul 2000 21:53:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id VAA06996; Mon, 10 Jul 2000 21:53:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA11800; Mon, 10 Jul 2000 21:53:02 -0700 Received: from valrhona.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id VAA02773; Mon, 10 Jul 2000 21:53:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: from valrhona.pa.dec.com by valrhona.pa.dec.com (8.9.1/emg20000612) with ESMTP, id VAA29171; Mon, 10 Jul 2000 21:53:02 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <200007110453.VAA29171@valrhona.pa.dec.com> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.0.2 2/24/98 To: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Subject: List Archives X-Organization: Compaq Computer Corporation, Palo Alto Advanced Development X-Phone: +1.415.853.2108 X-Face: "LX60V1[A=EN[jjZKY=&,"HB8ahM8?VoL;=Y8oj4%JV\F"4sfgV*;8GgAk!3]}5OmF$/Njv jvRHqNwtZa7yO^g]9+<)e)'EL0?oPqczWF/"+d:XldxB"aLI.D_\|^e4F Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk An archive or all the messages to this list is now available via the mailman server at handhelds.org. Over the next week or so, we will also migrate the list to that server, but for now, please continue to post as always, to sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com. To peruse the archive, see http://handhelds.org/pipermail/sa1100/ (Actually, there might be a few messages from this afternoon missing; if there are, we'll insert them soon.) --Ed From kramer@pa.dec.com Tue Jul 11 09:27:45 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id JAA00259; Tue, 11 Jul 2000 09:27:44 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from mail1.digital.com (mail1.digital.com [204.123.2.50]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id JAA15063 for ; Tue, 11 Jul 2000 09:27:43 +0200 (METDST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id AAA26184; Tue, 11 Jul 2000 00:26:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA02805; Tue, 11 Jul 2000 00:25:58 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id AAA05389; Tue, 11 Jul 2000 00:22:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id AAA08368; Tue, 11 Jul 2000 00:22:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: from zmamail01.nz-tay.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA05737; Tue, 11 Jul 2000 00:22:28 -0700 Received: by zmamail01.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 5D3B03B6C; Tue, 11 Jul 2000 03:22:28 -0400 (EDT) Received: from ns0.utdallas.edu (ns0.utdallas.edu [129.110.10.1]) by zmamail01.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 39E893930 for ; Tue, 11 Jul 2000 03:22:28 -0400 (EDT) Received: from apache.utdallas.edu (apache.utdallas.edu [129.110.16.9]) by ns0.utdallas.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id C64511A00AD; Tue, 11 Jul 2000 02:22:13 -0500 (CDT) Received: from localhost (vasantr@localhost) by apache.utdallas.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id CAA03075; Tue, 11 Jul 2000 02:22:27 -0500 (CDT) X-Authentication-Warning: apache.utdallas.edu: vasantr owned process doing -bs Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2000 02:22:27 -0500 (CDT) From: Vasant Ramasubramanian To: linux-arm@vger.rutgers.edu, sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Subject: SDRAM Start-up code Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk I've spent the last few days trying very hard to get the SDRAM working on a custom SA1110 based board but have failed thus far. Does anyone (besides blob & Compaq/bootldr) have simple assembly code to "wake-up" the SDRAMs(follow through the state machine listed in the 1110 manual) and configure & enable them? At this point I am unable to read/write to SDRAM after trying my code; I do all my initalization after RESET so the MMU is unconfigured and caches are turned off. The hardware *looks* OK but I'm not rulling it out yet. Anyone know of good data sheets/SDRAM briefs that might show in detail waveforms expected to see during configuration and non-burst read/writes? We're using Micron 64Mbit x 16 SDRAMs; I have data sheets from both and IBM and both do a very crappy job of explaining terms and procedures to non-long time users of DRAM/SDRAM I'm at my wits end over here... Thanks, Vasant. From kramer@pa.dec.com Tue Jul 11 17:02:51 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id RAA03803; Tue, 11 Jul 2000 17:02:51 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from mail2.digital.com (mail2.digital.com [204.123.2.56]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id RAA01573 for ; Tue, 11 Jul 2000 17:02:48 +0200 (METDST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id IAA07746; Tue, 11 Jul 2000 08:01:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA32141; Tue, 11 Jul 2000 08:00:50 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id HAA21721; Tue, 11 Jul 2000 07:56:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id HAA18574; Tue, 11 Jul 2000 07:56:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail2.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA12709; Tue, 11 Jul 2000 07:56:58 -0700 Received: from tekincisnts-4.teklogix.com (mail.teklogix.com [207.219.2.10]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with ESMTP id HAA07154 for ; Tue, 11 Jul 2000 07:56:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: from DeadDuck (BILL [10.128.5.25]) by tekincisnts-4.teklogix.com with SMTP (Microsoft Exchange Internet Mail Service Version 5.5.2448.0) id 3C08SN37; Tue, 11 Jul 2000 10:56:05 -0400 To: Vasant Ramasubramanian Cc: linux-arm@vger.rutgers.edu, sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Subject: Re: SDRAM Start-up code References: From: Bill Pringlemeir Organization: noitazinagro X-Home-Page: http://www.wwonline.com/~bpringle/ Date: 11 Jul 2000 11:00:40 -0400 In-Reply-To: Vasant Ramasubramanian's message of "Tue, 11 Jul 2000 02:22:27 -0500 (CDT)" Message-Id: Lines: 114 User-Agent: Gnus/5.0803 (Gnus v5.8.3) Emacs/20.6 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk >>>>> "VR" == Vasant Ramasubramanian writes: VR> I've spent the last few days trying very hard to get the SDRAM VR> working on a custom SA1110 based board but have failed thus far. VR> Does anyone (besides blob & Compaq/bootldr) have simple assembly VR> code to "wake-up" the SDRAMs(follow through the state machine VR> listed in the 1110 manual) and configure & enable them? VR> At this point I am unable to read/write to SDRAM after trying my VR> code; I do all my initalization after RESET so the MMU is VR> unconfigured and caches are turned off. [snip] There are some problems with the SA1110 SDRAM controller. It only works at some speeds. I think that with a 1/4 speed bus, it will always work. However, using the 1/2 speed bus, it will work from 187-200Mhz and from 50-118Mhz depending on the CAS latency. I don't think this is mentioned in errata (or whatever they call it). Unfortunately, the SA1110 SDRAM controller doesn't give you control over the waveforms like say the UPM on an MPC860. This means that you have to work with the parameters that the SA1110 provides. Most SDRAM has the same state machine and commands. These are sent by three control lines (I forget which), so there are eight different commands (maybe more, one is an escape). Here are some 1/4 speed numbers. [start] ppcr_speed: .long 0x00000006 /* 147 Mhz */ mdcas00: .long 0xaaaaaa7f /* 1/4 speed */ mdrefr0: .long 0x00700321 /* 1/4 speed */ mdcas01: .long 0xaaaaaaaa mdcas02: .long 0xaaaaaaaa mdcnfg: .long 0x72547254 initSDRAM: ldr r0,memCfgAddr ldr r1,mdcas00 /* MDCAS00 value. */ str r1,[r0,#0x4] ldr r1,mdcas01 /* MDCAS01 value. */ str r1,[r0,#0x8] ldr r1,mdcas02 /* MDCAS02 value. */ str r1,[r0,#0xc] ldr r1,mdrefr0 /* MDREFR value. */ STR r1,[r0,#0x1c] ldr r1,mdcnfg /* turn on the DRAM */ STR r1,[r0] ldr r0,powCfgAddr mov r1,#0x08 /* clear the DRAM Hold bit */ STR r1,[r0,#0x4] /* Perform 8 reads from unenabled DRAM */ mov r1, #DRAM_PHYSICAL ldr r2, [r1] ldr r2, [r1] ldr r2, [r1] ldr r2, [r1] ldr r2, [r1] ldr r2, [r1] ldr r2, [r1] ldr r2, [r1] ldr r0,memCfgAddr ldr r1,mdcnfg /* enable the DRAM */ orr r1,r1,#1 STR r1,[r0] /* * Wait for DRAM to come up. */ MOV r1, #0x200 0: SUBS r1, r1, #1 BNE 0b mov pc,lr /* return to caller. */ [end] If 1/4 speed doesn't work, take a look at the hardware. If you are lucky enough to have the bus broken out, hook up a logic analyzer and take a look. Intel suggested added line traces/delay elements to get things working at 1/2 speed. If you have a large trace, then things might not work exactly like the Assabet, etc boards. This sucks and is frustrating to debug... hth, Bill -- CLICKED BY FIVE DESTROYERS. SINKING. U-829. From kramer@pa.dec.com Tue Jul 11 22:10:22 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id WAA05298; Tue, 11 Jul 2000 22:10:21 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from mail2.digital.com (mail2.digital.com [204.123.2.56]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id WAA12529 for ; Tue, 11 Jul 2000 22:10:20 +0200 (METDST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id NAA13431; Tue, 11 Jul 2000 13:08:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA03428; Tue, 11 Jul 2000 13:08:37 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id NAA32621; Tue, 11 Jul 2000 13:01:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id NAA32514; Tue, 11 Jul 2000 13:01:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ztxmail01.nz-cce.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA00789; Tue, 11 Jul 2000 13:01:29 -0700 Received: by ztxmail01.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 7548A4251; Tue, 11 Jul 2000 15:01:29 -0500 (CDT) Received: from mail.uni-greifswald.de (mail.uni-greifswald.de [141.53.8.33]) by ztxmail01.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A3990424A for ; Tue, 11 Jul 2000 15:01:28 -0500 (CDT) Received: from localhost (sh990154@localhost) by mail.uni-greifswald.de (8.9.2/8.9.2) with SMTP id WAA02650; Tue, 11 Jul 2000 22:01:15 +0200 (METDST) Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2000 22:01:14 +0200 (METDST) From: "Hanske;Stefan" To: Vasant Ramasubramanian Cc: linux-arm@vger.rutgers.edu, sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Subject: Re: SDRAM Start-up code In-Reply-To: Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk On Tue, 11 Jul 2000, Vasant Ramasubramanian wrote: > Anyone know of good data sheets/SDRAM briefs that might show in detail > waveforms expected to see during configuration and non-burst > read/writes? The processor manual should contain the pin descriptions and the hardware protokol (when which line is going high or low). At least it does in the <= ARM710 manual from ARM. From kramer@pa.dec.com Wed Jul 12 04:26:35 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id EAA06425; Wed, 12 Jul 2000 04:26:34 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from mail1.digital.com (mail1.digital.com [204.123.2.50]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id EAA21891 for ; Wed, 12 Jul 2000 04:26:33 +0200 (METDST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id TAA19443; Tue, 11 Jul 2000 19:24:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA27365; Tue, 11 Jul 2000 19:24:51 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id TAA04130; Tue, 11 Jul 2000 19:21:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id TAA09067; Tue, 11 Jul 2000 19:21:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ztxmail01.nz-cce.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA20753; Tue, 11 Jul 2000 19:21:05 -0700 Received: by ztxmail01.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 2DC621F1A; Tue, 11 Jul 2000 21:21:05 -0500 (CDT) Received: from mail2000.com.tw (mail2000.com.tw [139.175.250.58]) by ztxmail01.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 1256D1F01 for ; Tue, 11 Jul 2000 21:21:04 -0500 (CDT) Received: By OpenMail Mailer;Wed, 12 Jul 2000 10:20:26 +0800 (CST) From: "Chien-Min Lee" Reply-To: cm_lee@mail2000.com.tw Subject: Problem about NFS Root Message-Id: <963368424.13883.cm_lee@mail2000.com.tw> To: "linux-arm-kernel" , "SA1100-linux" Date: Wed, 12 Jul 2000 10:20:24 +0800 (CST) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk Dear All: I am trying NFSRoot of 2.4.0-test2-ac1-rmk2-np3 on my Asabet. NFS server is executed on a PC running RedHat6.2. However I only get the following error message: eth0: NE2000 found using IRQ 42 Looking up port of RPC 100003/2 on 210.68.44.71 Looking up port of RPC 100005/2 on 210.68.44.71 VFS: Mounted root (nfs filesystem). Freeing unused kernel memory: 68k init nfs: server 210.68.44.71 not responding, still trying nfs: server 210.68.44.71 not responding, still trying Device lo is down. Device lo is down. Device lo is down. Device lo is down. nfs: task 60 can't get a request slot nfs: task 61 can't get a request slot nfs: task 62 can't get a request slot nfs: task 63 can't get a request slot Could anyone tell me what's going wrong?? Thanks kirk ----== Mailed via Openfind ==----- http://mail2000.com.tw/ 4#(Q'K6O*: e-mail +H=c*A0H From kramer@pa.dec.com Thu Jul 13 01:46:31 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id BAA12388; Thu, 13 Jul 2000 01:46:31 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from mail2.digital.com (mail2.digital.com [204.123.2.56]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id BAA29601 for ; Thu, 13 Jul 2000 01:46:28 +0200 (METDST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id QAA17988; Wed, 12 Jul 2000 16:44:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA20979; Wed, 12 Jul 2000 16:44:48 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id QAA05012; Wed, 12 Jul 2000 16:38:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id QAA26595; Wed, 12 Jul 2000 16:38:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ztxmail01.nz-cce.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA06508; Wed, 12 Jul 2000 16:38:29 -0700 Received: by ztxmail01.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 1B416160D; Wed, 12 Jul 2000 18:38:29 -0500 (CDT) Received: from duke.electric.net (duke.electric.net [216.18.11.193]) by ztxmail01.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 853811600 for ; Wed, 12 Jul 2000 18:38:28 -0500 (CDT) Received: (qmail 25774 invoked from network); 12 Jul 2000 23:38:24 -0000 Received: from localhost (HELO relay.electric.net) (@127.0.0.1) by duke.electric.net with SMTP; 12 Jul 2000 23:38:24 -0000 Received: (from smtpd@localhost) by relay.electric.net (8.8.8/8.8.6) id QAA25769 for sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com; Wed, 12 Jul 2000 16:38:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: from cobra.intrinsyc.com(64.16.10.158), claiming to be "dp.intrinsyc.com" via SMTP by relay.electric.net, id smtpdI25722; Wed Jul 12 16:38:23 2000 Received: from ileong (helo=localhost) by dp.intrinsyc.com with local-esmtp (Exim 3.13 #1 (Debian)) id 13CW57-0000ID-00 for ; Wed, 12 Jul 2000 16:38:21 -0700 Date: Wed, 12 Jul 2000 16:38:21 -0700 (PDT) From: I-Gene Leong To: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Subject: 1100/1110 USB? Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk After (foolishly) expending 4 weeks of effort hacking my own driver, I have to ask... besides the Itsy one, are there any other drivers for the USB DC on the 11x0? (Mine just tries to make the USB port into a high-speed serial link... it uses the generic serial driver on the host side. Yes, the host runs Linux as well.) -- I-Gene Leong ileong@intrinsyc.com / 604-646-6962 "We see Linux as being much of a fad as the Internet was in 1995." - Irving Wladawsky-Berger, IBM VP of technology and strategy From kramer@pa.dec.com Thu Jul 13 02:02:20 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id CAA12428; Thu, 13 Jul 2000 02:02:20 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from mail1.digital.com (mail1.digital.com [204.123.2.50]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id CAA29877 for ; Thu, 13 Jul 2000 02:02:17 +0200 (METDST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id RAA13412; Wed, 12 Jul 2000 17:00:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA32611; Wed, 12 Jul 2000 17:00:41 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id QAA27604; Wed, 12 Jul 2000 16:58:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id QAA29495; Wed, 12 Jul 2000 16:58:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ztxmail01.nz-cce.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA30412; Wed, 12 Jul 2000 16:58:02 -0700 Received: by ztxmail01.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 69CEF2DB3; Wed, 12 Jul 2000 18:58:01 -0500 (CDT) Received: from empeg.com (morrison.empeg.co.uk [193.119.19.130]) by ztxmail01.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F28FF2D70 for ; Wed, 12 Jul 2000 18:57:59 -0500 (CDT) Received: from morcheeba (morcheeba.internal.empeg.com [10.1.1.34]) by empeg.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id BAA12667; Thu, 13 Jul 2000 01:05:05 +0100 Message-Id: <003901bfec5c$ec4f2760$2201010a@internal.empeg.com> From: "Hugo Fiennes" To: "I-Gene Leong" Cc: References: Subject: Re: 1100/1110 USB? Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2000 00:57:23 +0100 Organization: empeg ltd Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-Msmail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2919.6700 X-Mimeole: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2919.6700 Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk > After (foolishly) expending 4 weeks of effort hacking my own driver, I > have to ask... besides the Itsy one, are there any other drivers for the > USB DC on the 11x0? > > (Mine just tries to make the USB port into a high-speed serial link... it > uses the generic serial driver on the host side. Yes, the host runs Linux > as well.) I've not tried the internal driver, but have you considered starting with my USB slave driver (in the empeg SA1100 port - see www.empeg.com to find sources) and then hacking this about to work with the SA11x0 onboard USB controller? In the latest source there are two variants, one for each USB controller we used in each production model empeg. In the next month or so I may well be attempting to do this task myself, so if you're not in a hurry... the drivers do all the EP0 enumeration stuff and then set up a pair of bulk endpoints (in & out). There's a companion linux driver for 2.2 backported/2.3/2.4 x86 linux which talks to the empeg over USB too. Hugo empeg From kramer@pa.dec.com Thu Jul 13 02:04:02 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id CAA12438; Thu, 13 Jul 2000 02:04:02 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from mail2.digital.com (mail2.digital.com [204.123.2.56]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id CAA29939 for ; Thu, 13 Jul 2000 02:04:00 +0200 (METDST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id RAA19342; Wed, 12 Jul 2000 17:02:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA05796; Wed, 12 Jul 2000 17:02:41 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id RAA28242; Wed, 12 Jul 2000 17:00:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id RAA03586; Wed, 12 Jul 2000 17:00:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: from zmamail01.nz-tay.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA02085; Wed, 12 Jul 2000 17:00:17 -0700 Received: by zmamail01.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id C0F6C267F; Wed, 12 Jul 2000 20:00:16 -0400 (EDT) Received: from duke.electric.net (duke.electric.net [216.18.11.193]) by zmamail01.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 2BA0544A0 for ; Wed, 12 Jul 2000 20:00:16 -0400 (EDT) Received: (qmail 45114 invoked from network); 13 Jul 2000 00:00:12 -0000 Received: from localhost (HELO relay.electric.net) (@127.0.0.1) by duke.electric.net with SMTP; 13 Jul 2000 00:00:12 -0000 Received: (from smtpd@localhost) by relay.electric.net (8.8.8/8.8.6) id RAA45109; Wed, 12 Jul 2000 17:00:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: from cobra.intrinsyc.com(64.16.10.158), claiming to be "dp.intrinsyc.com" via SMTP by relay.electric.net, id smtpdG45092; Wed Jul 12 17:00:10 2000 Received: from ileong (helo=localhost) by dp.intrinsyc.com with local-esmtp (Exim 3.13 #1 (Debian)) id 13CWQE-0000Lp-00; Wed, 12 Jul 2000 17:00:10 -0700 Date: Wed, 12 Jul 2000 17:00:10 -0700 (PDT) From: I-Gene Leong To: Hugo Fiennes Cc: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Subject: Re: 1100/1110 USB? In-Reply-To: <003901bfec5c$ec4f2760$2201010a@internal.empeg.com> Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk On Thu, 13 Jul 2000, Hugo Fiennes wrote: > I've not tried the internal driver, but have you considered starting with my > USB slave driver (in the empeg SA1100 port - see www.empeg.com to find > sources) and then hacking this about to work with the SA11x0 onboard USB > controller? In the latest source there are two variants, one for each USB > controller we used in each production model empeg. I remember checking the empeg stuff awhile ago, but it was for some NCR USB chip... didn't think I could use it. Well, may as well check again, since it couldn't hurt... :) -- I-Gene Leong ileong@intrinsyc.com / 604-646-6962 "We see Linux as being much of a fad as the Internet was in 1995." - Irving Wladawsky-Berger, IBM VP of technology and strategy From kramer@pa.dec.com Thu Jul 13 15:47:57 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id PAA16088; Thu, 13 Jul 2000 15:47:56 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from mail2.digital.com (mail2.digital.com [204.123.2.56]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id PAA21473 for ; Thu, 13 Jul 2000 15:47:54 +0200 (METDST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id GAA29855; Thu, 13 Jul 2000 06:44:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA28696; Thu, 13 Jul 2000 06:44:07 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id GAA15882; Thu, 13 Jul 2000 06:41:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id GAA29288; Thu, 13 Jul 2000 06:41:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ztxmail01.nz-cce.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA19991; Thu, 13 Jul 2000 06:41:04 -0700 Received: by ztxmail01.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 73022176C; Thu, 13 Jul 2000 08:41:04 -0500 (CDT) Received: from note.orchestra.cse.unsw.EDU.AU (note.orchestra.cse.unsw.EDU.AU [129.94.242.29]) by ztxmail01.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 233A7175C for ; Thu, 13 Jul 2000 08:41:03 -0500 (CDT) Received: From paulaner With LocalMail ; Thu, 13 Jul 2000 23:39:55 +1000 From: "Adam 'WeirdArms' Wiggins" To: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com, lart@lart.tudelft.edu.nl, "utility account for group.pleb " Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2000 23:39:54 +1000 (EST) X-Sender: awiggins@paulaner.disy.cse.unsw.EDU.AU Subject: Interfacing an ADC Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk Hi all, I've got a project where we need to interface a 500Khz ADC to the SA1100. I've got two questions one related to the hardware design and one to linux. It seems the best way to interface it is to connect the device in parallel using one of the SRAM banks. With a 500Khz sampling rate we have 1000 cycles (with a 200Mhz part) between each sample to process it. The quesition is how much of that time (no of cycles) will be required to trap the interrupt and read the 12bit sample into a memory location and would it be better/possible to map the interrupt to the FIQ line? The hardware question is can anyone suggest an alternate ADC, the requirements are 500KHz sampling with 8 channels multiplexed. Substitutions like 250KHz with 4 channels multiplexed are also suitable. It would be preferable to get something using one of the SA-1100's high speed serial ports to make use of a DMA channel. The project is for sampling frog and possibly bird calls in the wild, I beleive about 40HKz or more is needed per channel. Any other comments/suggestions welcome :) Once sampled the signal if filtered and then put through a machine learning system to identify the species of the animal. Cheers Adam From kramer@pa.dec.com Thu Jul 13 16:14:29 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id QAA16278; Thu, 13 Jul 2000 16:14:28 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from mail1.digital.com (mail1.digital.com [204.123.2.50]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id QAA22582 for ; Thu, 13 Jul 2000 16:14:25 +0200 (METDST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id HAA11801; Thu, 13 Jul 2000 07:10:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA27133; Thu, 13 Jul 2000 07:10:24 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id HAA14477; Thu, 13 Jul 2000 07:09:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id HAA16728; Thu, 13 Jul 2000 07:09:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ztxmail01.nz-cce.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA29363; Thu, 13 Jul 2000 07:09:00 -0700 Received: by ztxmail01.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 028B91DCF; Thu, 13 Jul 2000 09:08:59 -0500 (CDT) Received: from empeg.com (morrison.empeg.co.uk [193.119.19.130]) by ztxmail01.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7149117BB for ; Thu, 13 Jul 2000 09:08:56 -0500 (CDT) Received: from morcheeba (morcheeba.internal.empeg.com [10.1.1.34]) by empeg.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id PAA00305; Thu, 13 Jul 2000 15:02:07 +0100 Message-Id: <008401bfecd2$deaf2210$2201010a@internal.empeg.com> From: "Hugo Fiennes" To: "Adam 'WeirdArms' Wiggins" , , , "utility account for group.pleb " References: Subject: Re: Interfacing an ADC Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2000 15:01:41 +0100 Organization: empeg ltd Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-Msmail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2919.6700 X-Mimeole: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2919.6700 Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk > Hi all, I've got a project where we need to interface a 500Khz ADC > to the SA1100. I've got two questions one related to the hardware design > and one to linux. It seems the best way to interface it is to connect the > device in parallel using one of the SRAM banks. With a 500Khz sampling > rate we have 1000 cycles (with a 200Mhz part) between each sample to > process it. The quesition is how much of that time (no of cycles) will be > required to trap the interrupt and read the 12bit sample into a memory > location and would it be better/possible to map the interrupt to the FIQ > line? Any GPIO line on the SA can generate a FIQ. To read the sample & store should be able to be done by simply using the banked FIQ registers - ie, no loads & stores. FIQs are *very* efficient - we use them to read audio out of the soundblaster-type chip for audio input on the empeg mk2, with one fiq reading 2-4 bytes about 20,000 times a sec. Can't really tell it's even happening... If you want any example code, try looking at either the acorn floppy fiq drivers or maybe the empeg_cs4231fiq.S/.c code in the empeg kernel source. Hugo From kramer@pa.dec.com Thu Jul 13 16:45:45 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id QAA16451; Thu, 13 Jul 2000 16:45:45 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from mail2.digital.com (mail2.digital.com [204.123.2.56]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id QAA23870 for ; Thu, 13 Jul 2000 16:45:42 +0200 (METDST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id HAA32393; Thu, 13 Jul 2000 07:44:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA01857; Thu, 13 Jul 2000 07:44:19 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id HAA18428; Thu, 13 Jul 2000 07:42:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id HAA17763; Thu, 13 Jul 2000 07:42:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ztxmail01.nz-cce.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA01911; Thu, 13 Jul 2000 07:42:36 -0700 Received: by ztxmail01.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id C136A14CB; Thu, 13 Jul 2000 09:42:35 -0500 (CDT) Received: from xanadu.vip.ca (unknown [205.250.170.220]) by ztxmail01.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 023291676 for ; Thu, 13 Jul 2000 09:42:34 -0500 (CDT) Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2000 10:40:43 -0400 (EDT) From: Nicolas Pitre To: "Adam 'WeirdArms' Wiggins" Cc: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com, lart@lart.tudelft.edu.nl, "utility account for group.pleb " Subject: Re: Interfacing an ADC In-Reply-To: Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk Hmmm... You really need to use one of the serial port with DMA. Most of those ports are able to take an external clock... but yet you need to check if they can scale up to 500 kHx * 16 bits i.e. 4 MHz which shouldn't be a problem. This, coupled with a shift register if your ADC is parallel, is probably the most reliable solution. Triggering an interrupt for each sample at that speed is simply not going to work IMHO... unless you actually poll the ADC. On Thu, 13 Jul 2000, Adam 'WeirdArms' Wiggins wrote: > Hi all, I've got a project where we need to interface a 500Khz ADC > to the SA1100. I've got two questions one related to the hardware design > and one to linux. It seems the best way to interface it is to connect the > device in parallel using one of the SRAM banks. With a 500Khz sampling > rate we have 1000 cycles (with a 200Mhz part) between each sample to > process it. The quesition is how much of that time (no of cycles) will be > required to trap the interrupt and read the 12bit sample into a memory > location and would it be better/possible to map the interrupt to the FIQ > line? > The hardware question is can anyone suggest an alternate ADC, the > requirements are 500KHz sampling with 8 channels multiplexed. > Substitutions like 250KHz with 4 channels multiplexed are also suitable. > It would be preferable to get something using one of the SA-1100's high > speed serial ports to make use of a DMA channel. > The project is for sampling frog and possibly bird calls in the > wild, I beleive about 40HKz or more is needed per channel. Any other > comments/suggestions welcome :) Once sampled the signal if filtered and > then put through a machine learning system to identify the species of the > animal. > > Cheers Adam > > From kramer@pa.dec.com Thu Jul 13 20:38:54 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id UAA17615; Thu, 13 Jul 2000 20:38:54 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from mail2.digital.com (mail2.digital.com [204.123.2.56]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id UAA01587 for ; Thu, 13 Jul 2000 20:38:49 +0200 (METDST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id LAA03238; Thu, 13 Jul 2000 11:37:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA05747; Thu, 13 Jul 2000 11:36:52 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id LAA28264; Thu, 13 Jul 2000 11:34:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id LAA17215; Thu, 13 Jul 2000 11:34:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail2.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA06705; Thu, 13 Jul 2000 11:34:44 -0700 Received: from compaq.parker.boston.ma.us (h0000c06cf87e.ne.mediaone.net [24.147.212.45]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with ESMTP id LAA23605 for ; Thu, 13 Jul 2000 11:34:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: from p2.parker.boston.ma.us (p2 [192.245.5.16]) by compaq.parker.boston.ma.us (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id OAA15430; Thu, 13 Jul 2000 14:34:38 -0400 Received: from p2.parker.boston.ma.us (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by p2.parker.boston.ma.us (8.9.3/8.8.8) with ESMTP id OAA24238; Thu, 13 Jul 2000 14:34:38 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from brad@p2.parker.boston.ma.us) Message-Id: <200007131834.OAA24238@p2.parker.boston.ma.us> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.arm.linux.org.uk, linux-usb-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Cc: linux-arm@vger.rutgers.edu, sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Subject: port of ARM SA-1100 itsy usb function driver to 2.4.0-test2 Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2000 14:34:38 -0400 From: Brad Parker Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk Hi, A few people asked about this, so I thought I'd put it up for ftp. I did an basic port of the Itsy usb function driver for the ARM SA-1100 to 2.4.0-test-blah. It's working now on a slightly out of rev 2.4.0-test2 tree. It implements a basic ethernet interface complete with and eth0 interface. I've not tried to pass packets to it (yet) but will in the next week or two. I don't know what the DECWRL folks talked to with it. Persumably they wrote some host code. I plan to implement the other side shortly. It does come up and talk to another usb host, takes an address and gives back it's config info, so the basics are working. here are diffs against a -test2 tree: ftp://ftp.parker.boston.ma.us/pub/arm/usbfunc.diffs.gz here are the raw files: ftp://ftp.parker.boston.ma.us/pub/arm/usbfunc.tar.gz If the diffs fail, I am sorry - I recently discovered that my -test2 may be stock from "ftp.kernel.org" with no/few arm patches. -brad From kramer@pa.dec.com Thu Jul 13 20:58:32 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id UAA17700; Thu, 13 Jul 2000 20:58:31 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from mail1.digital.com (mail1.digital.com [204.123.2.50]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id UAA02218 for ; Thu, 13 Jul 2000 20:58:29 +0200 (METDST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id LAA30847; Thu, 13 Jul 2000 11:56:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA26699; Thu, 13 Jul 2000 11:56:49 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id LAA26623; Thu, 13 Jul 2000 11:55:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id LAA24594; Thu, 13 Jul 2000 11:55:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: from stowe.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA15180; Thu, 13 Jul 2000 11:55:27 -0700 Received: by stowe.pa.dec.com; (5.65v4.0/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id AA30339; Thu, 13 Jul 2000 11:55:27 -0700 Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2000 11:55:27 -0700 Message-Id: <200007131855.AA30339@stowe.pa.dec.com> From: Deborah Wallach To: brad@parker.boston.ma.us Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.arm.linux.org.uk, linux-usb-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, linux-arm@vger.rutgers.edu, sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com In-Reply-To: <200007131834.OAA24238@p2.parker.boston.ma.us> (message from Brad Parker on Thu, 13 Jul 2000 14:34:38 -0400) Subject: Re: port of ARM SA-1100 itsy usb function driver to 2.4.0-test2 Address: Compaq Computer Corporation; Western Research Laboratory; 250 University Avenue; Palo Alto, CA 94301; USA Phone: 650-617-3315 Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk It implements a basic ethernet interface complete with and eth0 interface. I've not tried to pass packets to it (yet) but will in the next week or two. I don't know what the DECWRL folks talked to with it. Persumably they wrote some host code. I plan to implement the other side shortly. We talk to it using either Linux (2.3.34) on an x86 PC or Windows 95/2000. I haven't used the windows version myself, so I don't know anything about it. Yes, we wrote some host code for the linux setup, but it's flaky (the host machine crashes fairly often while using usb to the itsy), but if you think it would be useful I can see if I can dig it up and get it posted somewhere. -Debby From kramer@pa.dec.com Thu Jul 13 21:29:52 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id VAA17792; Thu, 13 Jul 2000 21:29:52 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from mail2.digital.com (mail2.digital.com [204.123.2.56]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id VAA03218 for ; Thu, 13 Jul 2000 21:29:49 +0200 (METDST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id MAA04301; Thu, 13 Jul 2000 12:28:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA08741; Thu, 13 Jul 2000 12:28:29 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id MAA28453; Thu, 13 Jul 2000 12:25:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id MAA18305; Thu, 13 Jul 2000 12:25:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail1.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA05696; Thu, 13 Jul 2000 12:25:51 -0700 Received: from cambridge.merl.com (cambridge.merl.com [137.203.190.1]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with ESMTP id MAA01962 for ; Thu, 13 Jul 2000 12:25:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: from merl.com (eagle.merl.com [137.203.128.4]) by cambridge.merl.com (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id PAA20002 for ; Thu, 13 Jul 2000 15:25:50 -0400 Received: from zathrus.merl.com (carbone@zathrus.merl.com [137.203.128.26]) by merl.com (8.8.7/8.8.4) with ESMTP id PAA20634 for ; Thu, 13 Jul 2000 15:25:49 -0400 Received: from localhost (carbone@localhost) by zathrus.merl.com (8.9.3/8.8.3) with ESMTP id PAA18796 for ; Thu, 13 Jul 2000 15:25:49 -0400 Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2000 15:25:49 -0400 (EDT) From: Marco Carbone To: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Subject: blob-1.0.8-pre1 stable for assabet? In-Reply-To: <200007051738.KAA30795@wera.pa.dec.com> Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk Hey all, I know that Erik has said in the past that he was writing a blob-1.0.8 for use on the Assabet - I'm wondering if the blob-1.0.8-pre1 on the LART page (http://www.lart.tudelft.nl/lartware/blob) is stable for use on the ASsabet, or if anyone has had any success yet with it. If not, what is the most recent Blob that does work on Assabet? Thanks, Marco Carbone From kramer@pa.dec.com Thu Jul 13 21:38:58 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id VAA17841; Thu, 13 Jul 2000 21:38:58 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from mail1.digital.com (mail1.digital.com [204.123.2.50]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id VAA03526 for ; Thu, 13 Jul 2000 21:38:54 +0200 (METDST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id MAA02930; Thu, 13 Jul 2000 12:37:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA23698; Thu, 13 Jul 2000 12:37:27 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id MAA19482; Thu, 13 Jul 2000 12:34:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id MAA31566; Thu, 13 Jul 2000 12:34:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: from zmamail01.nz-tay.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA32036; Thu, 13 Jul 2000 12:34:46 -0700 Received: by zmamail01.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 85C292446; Thu, 13 Jul 2000 15:34:46 -0400 (EDT) Received: from ganymede.or.intel.com (ganymede.or.intel.com [134.134.248.3]) by zmamail01.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 12DAC25B7 for ; Thu, 13 Jul 2000 15:34:46 -0400 (EDT) Received: from SMTP (orsmsxvs01-1.jf.intel.com [192.168.65.200]) by ganymede.or.intel.com (8.9.1a+p1/8.9.1/d: relay.m4,v 1.30 2000/06/08 18:25:35 dmccart Exp $) with SMTP id MAA12384; Thu, 13 Jul 2000 12:34:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: from orsmsx28.jf.intel.com ([192.168.70.28]) by 192.168.70.200 (Norton AntiVirus for Internet Email Gateways 1.0) ; Thu, 13 Jul 2000 19:34:43 0000 (GMT) Received: by orsmsx28.jf.intel.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21) id <3X42PK8D>; Thu, 13 Jul 2000 12:34:41 -0700 Message-Id: From: "Seger, Justin M" To: "'Marco Carbone'" , sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Subject: RE: blob-1.0.8-pre1 stable for assabet? Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2000 12:32:58 -0700 Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21) Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----_=_NextPart_000_01BFED01.262A9BA0" Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk This message is in MIME format. Since your mail reader does not understand this format, some or all of this message may not be legible. ------_=_NextPart_000_01BFED01.262A9BA0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" > -----Original Message----- > Hey all, > I know that Erik has said in the past that he was writing a > blob-1.0.8 for use on the Assabet - I'm wondering if the > blob-1.0.8-pre1 > on the LART page (http://www.lart.tudelft.nl/lartware/blob) > is stable for > use on the ASsabet, or if anyone has had any success yet with > it. If not, > what is the most recent Blob that does work on Assabet? Thanks, Try applying the attached patch to that version. Erik is currently working on a new version that will integrate this (and other) patches. Justin Seger ------_=_NextPart_000_01BFED01.262A9BA0 Content-Type: application/octet-stream; name="blob.assabet.patch3.gz" Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="blob.assabet.patch3.gz" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 H4sICMLbaTkAA2Jsb2IuYXNzYWJldC5wYXRjaDMA1Vrrc9pIEv8s/xV9zoe1A9h6ALa5unJkwAlr /CiEL1u75aKEGIzWQmJHUhz2/vnrnpHQ0473cXd72A4w6unp+fV7Jgt3uYQWj2HuBfOWdqQenbY2 nGnHru948YIdLz07XB2tys+PNnbkrNiiTLfXarW+xUv5zBbwfeyDfgqa2jPoF3RVVfcajcZbF1Iu uYtMPIAT0Lo9Teu1DcnkwwdodTtNTYcGvukafPiwB3vwbsGWrs9gdDOdXY5N69PswrSGcDCJfd/1 Hy95sB75EeO+7R0cwjn0LVVS9PCjJj4eIp/GO3eJnMC0LPNiOAU4PgYzDO05iyBkUYSsQnCCNYMl cgTP9eOvxwvufmE8PMa9OU9yB7M1WyNcjUQs5Wo4uRmOZ9bUnEwVRf2qqQKQ0uPx8IYeOoWHcHN/ PUsILsa3/StLOcjo4RiuzdGNfDKzRj/iNhoZGKPpZJCuepAXAhqQMalOSSTRT6uiJBSpKNmEelGY F7Kdeko4HJS01agygFdQODmsMBZyH1Ro4f0rnN+OEryCg96ussykKRDXSYNA+Qt3SaYcbTeMbDCM eOxE8K89UGJDV0L30bejmLO/7y2+5dZr2/Xf4NWS7FWnliR/zKcTHnmX7vTUs57azVzaOG1qGjTo 7TRx6QzORAcT81raiXgdqF/7OJssFOEre25mszhrMLKuirPFZGHcamqkufVentLOpqTqKgkplXp7 eWlR+MBJ6k7IVpl/gVaQpvxb+FOJRtU9VRkU9/SWGZUtJe8vGlnIneMwsnl0ZL2o+hxNrXnlnv8+ 28ozuA58YViaCmhVHaOQK07UpoG5At+kXSnilzOM5j3UiLsEidAC7q3hzDI1TVP3WsfoovYTgxD9 DaKVHcEz+w4/2s84enR0BO+PBdHl6IfrYQ9GIRK5IbK1PW8LPnMYJg2+PQfz0hxd4UMG/bt7+Dle b5A0EANCBvjCnCjgey0MCiiL7S8g8JEFfk4nId9lTGzl4oBwDrn7RFNQiCPONpHSbe+1FD/Y4HfU HrKTSgQUMduWoE9/kPuMxJ0JFHuICtJO2KMbYpYEe7FA8UKGyc72YY7pLohRNNeHn7QHMDcbYv8V TGIJr8KIgATPYOhPn34FhxIkbZ9SqYdbmeIWE9nszcbmzI8EfGyRAEoSK+vgi8K1JrxTv56p8oWj KKIYTZ7ocljrKd6CK1xvwk/JE815QPIojMToOw2/zNkvijZ/FSVFInLp8jBqwtoOn+D9e3M8fo96 okKCx5tIyAe18kFZvo6aWqTWwbrFOIOGZmjNzpm0SlxqShtGECLSuO1EsbClZcCFJaRVCFnHEYyW sA1iDvPA5gucjtYTk7YCJOW7SqVJRN95HqzsL4xwl+EEadaAdOxIzCSIcXkLmccbsZY1wHBByp7b /lMIqjBLjSgbtZRlFMwEBYWorwf9m8uPyApDbGJWidUo9JIUpqWqOWWjnuhFrMyiwvGJ0CJFLvms 7ol8Vv9EVU8u8Qlm14KVqO2HskTaf00i06yT6PRBKYuk/49F6qNIjZ2H/YOWphci2qhDtKzeKpGu 5oh0SVS3AopTs8LpQ1ldNSvkxdC11PYSCBVioyfmKqgmw8uJRLmEi/ESxkbdqKbX4Kf1H96+uf5D WfE1m8sjoOvJ5nDgYxDBgttrDAmpG+vCjY1zgM+U0Mh9V2ybJLOCVO3F3FEN/UQpIlJdnvZTAtMw 8mDulFpF06hH06hF0zipQRNtpyj3id5p018+7tTKrapS7jCeZ6u0y2ZSs6IIEm9QgoiTozCMKc3b C/znl5iFkcj9CxcjuYeZktQisiFlYCRZYmxcZSrMR3zYML6yN2EvpytN7Lm/yziFuECq0Ds5VQz7 9Vatn1X1kE6uGT2rs+pT1IOsQ0534UEVz+mBKEiwmP2tGaKh1Gq3I+YMfcJQGLG07pf0XLGFPUr3 VmRHrgPYpQd8C87K3WDS9LAUE/6SIN/LxQoQfAkCtsyL3rfqzfvktN68aXYddckB52eqUligoQRc PJa/XuhhJdPFtFtRhvpQldlZFGXWamXu/iGZdV3X9LZ2phQWqRGw/QYB9d8kIM2uo37BVlvCvayt 76x44Acx1u3BGoPjNvDZeTUY6tpZt9vN9vVSKC7GQhwq8rGXjkN/ko91nVpkFSEjUeFc0dRlIq2M wrNr07qCrNFQv867J+0lvpKqVZo2p+oPQhn/KehvePCIX9Y0jC7jclnD+rYHTuAv3UdkKCv/UBSf PjYXAPEjLoFluP94BNgaLLFi9B0GPxkPENke+pw9D+JIFOqYRfZaSeGMMoQU7og2qxFxnYgHnofl qTg620d/W7bSoEdCyu4gjILNvlhevt4jDx7EjyvBaxlQOyF2FzHZSj1iiMS3fXfhMZxIpXALXmEO BxhvI4w0S2p0RBN2WDctHdsEz4y3FsGzn47cfZ4Mbn5Iv9G64vNu9+mG12taGfG8ub0DLOP7t9fX 5s1gNrr5NLoYTZsJYf/2Zjq5HY+Hk57k+YrwxYVEcyIBWGWhM5CtY5K3U8WKadhfS/tsC0OzS90U jiZPtH6mygiu/MEF2udgMmrCdGJasHSZt9g1sg6GJgyd8MX2MMk14YkxKSjYMZIIAIEAhLmLATbN f+leaJXz83O4jnEz2MWQtWK6k+xEVqCeOInP+Jl64nCDPWKuFu6K7HRa2k8X99NNomL9eL52y1FT 7SbibQfH6K+bhpIOuWn7oajqnAYBxWFvsnDCh+w2T7WPxkl4a5P7GzHjSqdPBNvhDq6SbKKA1dP9 FYVUlD/fIosmOGCevYVnN1olu+PywD2nG6wEuJFr43k7H/15V4Q6T4mw+V9ZzBEcRYyccjtcYVPL jWa72c1xNHCamn4ho9V2HEmJ+m/Wzr7QRObpiXoOHI/ZHKzx5cT6RFooKGHuOnkl5IzvZUv5/Soo haG3KeAvroIc4EIBMrBKJ5C7Hmp3o5sK8mXzV7X/JPK5cP//avYUpXO4pzgT5qPBeLiPqGQBey1K 4wpqJbjgAGE8hJxakpyEyIq5TZmwRYpKg2DK7tn1PLC9MADHpohvw505TnzuDnPJyuaPDEwkEsX9 IczZMuCynOhfTOBAJJaE62FRNX3BkahIiuNkH1t0ZZGw5ox0BfMt+IHfmsdSPGzRgmUCgb/NWrQc C5Jkt9tcEt01YMn64wBrDDq12yUsP17PMZ9hXhayS3bVHWQoCWGLa53QyWVXESlcrjPl7uMjsiWe 6UzcFQFKhmiX9ydUb8uVvrm/rIXL/Oiz7UZiY+lquAFU6MZjWE39KdHmD5h+IzuXvOtf90cmlgi2 w9IODhv9UIAogSQBfIbl9Vwe9SYHoKSvtPpIWsZd+SSrkfQ01lkFIfNrSxFZw59oxVKkdBBcMz7X a6k7KfxMdrwljWG5tUw9Th6ZV3xLqvx6YmXut3KdVdoUhLkifR0s2G7LRQNUyxWjCLUamYhaNBGb 4jWy4uwvEQ2nMfepfqytRYndB8onkCWUA4JiljRc/zTH98OZ2sPI1zsYmneD3u2kd4Xvh4fVRGS8 UAIU+sCzs7ZNf3XHaafU+NH5BIW+RCXyiGL3nw/CVRB7CxHG0Ku3ogMKkkM8SOLvnKHToxGjZaC+ HdZMZy3JNqhn44wuZSlOpEcguzZQnjHRRUW73UXEG3pbb2rq7ppi5LuRa3vurzIcf7wbYEz7eDe6 hTvXh4FLrYCLeKd3SYd0kRDGaHA2Mni2t/I+jeaOhwPKLKQcn8TaoGSbgEfSa8UZmhdg6JLr4Ari iAjZcerBlfRISS9evTTKBwFtObwH+Wuq9E5V7OkCDVY7IVlSsVCmH13vSfZNhcsN5CXvmgREnS5h 09A7BBVB9I55uVUuJvfTewtHn20u4N5Pbwzl3TjivhA3M1FipYHP0gbugsdRHJI0CNEXlISubPbL K4zNyVQa+qtQtWqhqpyZtJNMtkNFN3KoNMF2sNlbiGOEAL4fXNSgc5ocR+YChL67YRE3ska3eQKN joFmZUizovu4DXf9aDbfRox8QHgyvRK+xdZu96RwudaoXEMOJyNzrEmLKM9J/wtOAc1slpHaUXWV 5GadcY6+tt8XnhNzW1i9GOyhu3L0EWnMPh3FS/5/28+u2SU+aulgTGC5cWjNNuLwb1viIYDBJQAA ------_=_NextPart_000_01BFED01.262A9BA0-- From kramer@pa.dec.com Thu Jul 13 22:15:04 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id WAA17950; Thu, 13 Jul 2000 22:15:03 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from mail1.digital.com (mail1.digital.com [204.123.2.50]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id WAA04508 for ; Thu, 13 Jul 2000 22:15:01 +0200 (METDST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id NAA04648; Thu, 13 Jul 2000 13:13:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA29073; Thu, 13 Jul 2000 13:13:22 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id NAA30744; Thu, 13 Jul 2000 13:10:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id NAA27828; Thu, 13 Jul 2000 13:10:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail1.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA18362; Thu, 13 Jul 2000 13:10:34 -0700 Received: from cambridge.merl.com (cambridge.merl.com [137.203.190.1]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with ESMTP id NAA02441 for ; Thu, 13 Jul 2000 13:10:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: from merl.com (eagle.merl.com [137.203.128.4]) by cambridge.merl.com (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id QAA20532; Thu, 13 Jul 2000 16:10:27 -0400 Received: from zathrus.merl.com (carbone@zathrus.merl.com [137.203.128.26]) by merl.com (8.8.7/8.8.4) with ESMTP id QAA21908; Thu, 13 Jul 2000 16:10:26 -0400 Received: from localhost (carbone@localhost) by zathrus.merl.com (8.9.3/8.8.3) with ESMTP id QAA18937; Thu, 13 Jul 2000 16:10:25 -0400 Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2000 16:10:23 -0400 (EDT) From: Marco Carbone To: "Seger, Justin M" Cc: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Subject: RE: blob-1.0.8-pre1 stable for assabet? In-Reply-To: Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk > Try applying the attached patch to that version. Erik is currently working > on a new > version that will integrate this (and other) patches. > > Justin Seger Thanks. The README file is quite specific to the LART board - is there any documentation on installing Blob on the Assabet? Marco Carbone From kramer@pa.dec.com Thu Jul 13 22:31:41 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id WAA18021; Thu, 13 Jul 2000 22:31:41 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from mail1.digital.com (mail1.digital.com [204.123.2.50]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id WAA05257 for ; Thu, 13 Jul 2000 22:31:38 +0200 (METDST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id NAA00134; Thu, 13 Jul 2000 13:30:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA28076; Thu, 13 Jul 2000 13:30:19 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id NAA28984; Thu, 13 Jul 2000 13:27:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id NAA15562; Thu, 13 Jul 2000 13:27:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: from zmamail01.nz-tay.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA12526; Thu, 13 Jul 2000 13:27:48 -0700 Received: by zmamail01.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id AB2A4277D; Thu, 13 Jul 2000 16:27:47 -0400 (EDT) Received: from baucis.sc.intel.com (baucis.sc.intel.com [143.183.152.22]) by zmamail01.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 40751271F for ; Thu, 13 Jul 2000 16:27:47 -0400 (EDT) Received: from SMTP (fmsmsxvs03-1.fm.intel.com [132.233.42.203]) by baucis.sc.intel.com (8.9.1a+p1/8.9.1/d: relay.m4,v 1.30 2000/06/08 18:25:35 dmccart Exp $) with SMTP id NAA10055; Thu, 13 Jul 2000 13:27:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: from fmsmsx19.fm.intel.com ([132.233.48.19]) by 132.233.48.203 (Norton AntiVirus for Internet Email Gateways 1.0) ; Thu, 13 Jul 2000 20:27:44 0000 (GMT) Received: by fmsmsx19.fm.intel.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2448.0) id <3ZRQXNW9>; Thu, 13 Jul 2000 13:27:43 -0700 Message-Id: From: "Seger, Justin M" To: "'Marco Carbone'" , "Seger, Justin M" Cc: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Subject: RE: blob-1.0.8-pre1 stable for assabet? Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2000 13:27:39 -0700 Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2448.0) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk > -----Original Message----- > > Try applying the attached patch to that version. Erik is > currently working > > on a new > > version that will integrate this (and other) patches. > > > > Justin Seger > > Thanks. The README file is quite specific to the LART board > - is there > any documentation on installing Blob on the Assabet? Not at present. Here's a quick overview of the procedure (from memory). No guarantees about it working though. This also assumes that you have a cross toolchain installed somewhere in the current PATH. This also assumes that you have compiled SA1110Jflash, and placed it somewhere in your PATH. %cd blob-1.0.8-pre1 %CC=arm-linux-gcc OBJCOPY=arm-linux-objcopy ./configure --with-linux-prefix=/path/to/armlinux/source --with-board=assabet arm-linux %make %cd src Connect the JTAG cable from your Assabet to the host's parallel port. Power up the Assabet %Jflash-linux blob Power cycle the Assabet, and you should see the bootloader starting up with output on the serial port. Good luck, Justin From kramer@pa.dec.com Fri Jul 14 12:50:46 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id MAA20866; Fri, 14 Jul 2000 12:50:45 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from mail1.digital.com (mail1.digital.com [204.123.2.50]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id MAA25613 for ; Fri, 14 Jul 2000 12:50:43 +0200 (METDST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id DAA12434; Fri, 14 Jul 2000 03:48:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA29085; Fri, 14 Jul 2000 03:48:53 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id DAA25226; Fri, 14 Jul 2000 03:44:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id DAA24382; Fri, 14 Jul 2000 03:44:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: from zmamail01.nz-tay.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA13450; Fri, 14 Jul 2000 03:44:15 -0700 Received: by zmamail01.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 8B9F62435; Fri, 14 Jul 2000 06:44:14 -0400 (EDT) Received: from duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (duteinh.et.tudelft.nl [130.161.42.1]) by zmamail01.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E967E3B88 for ; Fri, 14 Jul 2000 06:44:13 -0400 (EDT) Received: from lumiere by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id MAA20839; Fri, 14 Jul 2000 12:44:04 +0200 (MET DST) Message-Id: <200007141044.MAA20839@duteinh.et.tudelft.nl> From: Erik Mouw To: justin.m.seger@intel.com Cc: carbone@merl.com, sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Subject: RE: blob-1.0.8-pre1 stable for assabet? In-Reply-To: Organization: Eric conspiracy secret labs Date: Fri 14 Jul 2000 12:44:04 +0100 (MDT) X-Face: "!Z|1XjFg!3Iw)BwM^M\k)J5KHiPddz}#/Zw%?$&Q!xqob"OA|})3_@&BTTiQERo?/^g[Z<9P4R8:5C:aqq.cw!hotLc=+u-"+1rq@9$V^8PbOUlodyi_sejt+D`iqkLpx$>.aXl%vnfPIt"LK|/%>94_Zrm8jy?`_[RKt'TuoxUxfk(gMhY(n|DBBl~c$dhO>G%6}R4+DGX3|idBm4oU&UM/XUP4I9aoN{]`ax%B?rgD(I3OJ<62Y6L X-Mailer: XCmail 1.2devel - with PGP support, PGP engine version 0.5 (IRIX64) X-Mailerorigin: http://www.fsai.fh-trier.de/~schmitzj/Xclasses/XCmail/ X-Eric-Conspiracy: There is no conspiracy! X-Loop: erik@it.et.tudelft.nl Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk On Thu, 13 Jul 2000 12:32:58 -0700, Seger, Justin M wrote: >> -----Original Message----- >> Hey all, >> I know that Erik has said in the past that he was writing a >> blob-1.0.8 for use on the Assabet - I'm wondering if the >> blob-1.0.8-pre1 >> on the LART page (http://www.lart.tudelft.nl/lartware/blob) >> is stable for >> use on the ASsabet, or if anyone has had any success yet with >> it. If not, >> what is the most recent Blob that does work on Assabet? Thanks, > > Try applying the attached patch to that version. Erik is currently working > on a new > version that will integrate this (and other) patches. I promised to release blob-1.0.8-pre2 two days ago, but some things came through (like testing IDE drivers on LART. no luck yet, though). Everything is in place, but I have to test it on the LART first. I will also integrate your Assabet installation notes. Erik -- J.A.K. (Erik) Mouw, Information and Communication Theory Group, Department of Electrical Engineering, Faculty of Information Technology and Systems, Delft University of Technology, PO BOX 5031, 2600 GA Delft, The Netherlands Phone: +31-15-2783635 Fax: +31-15-2781843 Email: J.A.K.Mouw@its.tudelft.nl WWW: http://www-ict.its.tudelft.nl/~erik/ From kramer@pa.dec.com Fri Jul 14 17:33:24 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id RAA22634; Fri, 14 Jul 2000 17:33:24 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from mail2.digital.com (mail2.digital.com [204.123.2.56]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id RAA05785 for ; Fri, 14 Jul 2000 17:33:22 +0200 (METDST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id IAA22115; Fri, 14 Jul 2000 08:31:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA19612; Fri, 14 Jul 2000 08:31:23 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id IAA29819; Fri, 14 Jul 2000 08:30:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id IAA09937; Fri, 14 Jul 2000 08:30:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail2.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA05360; Fri, 14 Jul 2000 08:30:10 -0700 Received: from cambridge.merl.com (cambridge.merl.com [137.203.190.1]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with ESMTP id IAA18391 for ; Fri, 14 Jul 2000 08:30:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: from merl.com (eagle.merl.com [137.203.128.4]) by cambridge.merl.com (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id LAA26635; Fri, 14 Jul 2000 11:30:07 -0400 Received: from zathrus.merl.com (carbone@zathrus.merl.com [137.203.128.26]) by merl.com (8.8.7/8.8.4) with ESMTP id LAA10807; Fri, 14 Jul 2000 11:30:07 -0400 Received: from localhost (carbone@localhost) by zathrus.merl.com (8.9.3/8.8.3) with ESMTP id LAA21035; Fri, 14 Jul 2000 11:30:06 -0400 Date: Fri, 14 Jul 2000 11:30:06 -0400 (EDT) From: Marco Carbone To: "Seger, Justin M" Cc: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Subject: RE: blob-1.0.8-pre1 stable for assabet? In-Reply-To: Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk >Connect the JTAG cable from your Assabet to the host's parallel port. >Power up the Assabet > >%Jflash-linux blob > >Power cycle the Assabet, and you should see the bootloader starting up >with output on the serial port. Thanks, this worked fine. I'm able to download the kernel and ramdisk to RAM seemingly successfully, but when I run 'boot' the system hangs after it displays "Starting kernel ..." Maybe the system doesn't think the board's an Assabet so is looking in the wrong place for the kernel on boot (though I'm certain that when I configured the target board was an Assabet). I'm going to throw some debug output strings in the code to see if I can locate where it's hanging for now... From kramer@pa.dec.com Fri Jul 14 17:55:16 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id RAA22741; Fri, 14 Jul 2000 17:55:16 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from mail2.digital.com (mail2.digital.com [204.123.2.56]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id RAA06475 for ; Fri, 14 Jul 2000 17:55:14 +0200 (METDST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id IAA19862; Fri, 14 Jul 2000 08:53:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA23821; Fri, 14 Jul 2000 08:53:49 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id IAA13796; Fri, 14 Jul 2000 08:53:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id IAA23551; Fri, 14 Jul 2000 08:53:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ztxmail01.nz-cce.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA18358; Fri, 14 Jul 2000 08:53:31 -0700 Received: by ztxmail01.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id D481E1D82; Fri, 14 Jul 2000 10:53:30 -0500 (CDT) Received: from ice.ar51.net (ice.fiftyone.com [208.225.80.11]) by ztxmail01.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 613B21E86 for ; Fri, 14 Jul 2000 10:53:30 -0500 (CDT) Received: from server01.asi (akron-80-166.ar51.net [208.225.80.166]) by ice.ar51.net (8.9.3/8.8.7) with ESMTP id LAA14307; Fri, 14 Jul 2000 11:52:43 -0400 Received: by SERVER01 with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2448.0) id <3YXN8CZ2>; Fri, 14 Jul 2000 11:54:02 -0400 Message-Id: From: Jeff Sutherland To: "'Marco Carbone'" , "'Seger, Justin M'" Cc: "'sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com'" Subject: RE: blob-1.0.8-pre1 stable for assabet? Date: Fri, 14 Jul 2000 11:53:59 -0400 Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2448.0) Content-Type: text/plain Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk > >Connect the JTAG cable from your Assabet to the host's parallel port. > >Power up the Assabet > > > >%Jflash-linux blob > > > >Power cycle the Assabet, and you should see the bootloader > starting up > >with output on the serial port. > > Thanks, this worked fine. I'm able to download the kernel > and ramdisk to > RAM seemingly successfully, but when I run 'boot' the system > hangs after > it displays "Starting kernel ..." > > Maybe the system doesn't think the board's an Assabet so is > looking in the > wrong place for the kernel on boot (though I'm certain that when I > configured the target board was an Assabet). I'm going to throw some > debug output strings in the code to see if I can locate where > it's hanging > for now... Maybe it doesn't. The kernel (in arch/arm/boot/compressed/head-sa1100.S) expects to have its architecture number passed in from the bootloader. I suggest you hack this file starting somewhere around line 8 to do this: mov r8, #0 mov r9, #25 and delete the lines which load r0 into r8, and r1 into r9. Rebuild zImage and try again. //Jeff From kramer@pa.dec.com Fri Jul 14 18:50:47 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id SAA22904; Fri, 14 Jul 2000 18:50:46 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from mail1.digital.com (mail1.digital.com [204.123.2.50]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id SAA08035 for ; Fri, 14 Jul 2000 18:50:42 +0200 (METDST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id JAA19165; Fri, 14 Jul 2000 09:49:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA02965; Fri, 14 Jul 2000 09:49:17 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id JAA20386; Fri, 14 Jul 2000 09:45:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id JAA00934; Fri, 14 Jul 2000 09:45:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ztxmail01.nz-cce.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA01950; Fri, 14 Jul 2000 09:45:42 -0700 Received: by ztxmail01.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 7D1C24295; Fri, 14 Jul 2000 11:45:42 -0500 (CDT) Received: from thalia.fm.intel.com (thalia.fm.intel.com [132.233.247.11]) by ztxmail01.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E4AE14181 for ; Fri, 14 Jul 2000 11:45:41 -0500 (CDT) Received: from SMTP (fmsmsxvs02-1.fm.intel.com [132.233.42.202]) by thalia.fm.intel.com (8.9.1a+p1/8.9.1/d: relay.m4,v 1.30 2000/06/08 18:25:35 dmccart Exp $) with SMTP id QAA08677; Fri, 14 Jul 2000 16:46:19 GMT Received: from fmsmsx29.FM.INTEL.COM ([132.233.48.29]) by 132.233.48.202 (Norton AntiVirus for Internet Email Gateways 1.0) ; Fri, 14 Jul 2000 16:45:23 0000 (GMT) Received: by fmsmsx29.fm.intel.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2448.0) id ; Fri, 14 Jul 2000 09:45:22 -0700 Message-Id: From: "Seger, Justin M" To: "'Jeff Sutherland'" , "'Marco Carbone'" , "Seger, Justin M" Cc: "'sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com'" Subject: RE: blob-1.0.8-pre1 stable for assabet? Date: Fri, 14 Jul 2000 09:45:11 -0700 Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2448.0) Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----_=_NextPart_000_01BFEDB2.E680A491" Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk This message is in MIME format. Since your mail reader does not understand this format, some or all of this message may not be legible. ------_=_NextPart_000_01BFEDB2.E680A491 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" > -----Original Message----- > > >Connect the JTAG cable from your Assabet to the host's > parallel port. > > >Power up the Assabet > > > > > >%Jflash-linux blob > > > > > >Power cycle the Assabet, and you should see the bootloader > > starting up > > >with output on the serial port. > > > > Thanks, this worked fine. I'm able to download the kernel > > and ramdisk to > > RAM seemingly successfully, but when I run 'boot' the system > > hangs after > > it displays "Starting kernel ..." > > > > Maybe the system doesn't think the board's an Assabet so is > > looking in the > > wrong place for the kernel on boot (though I'm certain that when I > > configured the target board was an Assabet). I'm going to > throw some > > debug output strings in the code to see if I can locate where > > it's hanging > > for now... > > Maybe it doesn't. The kernel (in > arch/arm/boot/compressed/head-sa1100.S) > expects to have its architecture number passed in from the > bootloader. I > suggest you hack this file starting somewhere around line 8 > to do this: > > mov r8, #0 > mov r9, #25 > > and delete the lines which load r0 into r8, and r1 into r9. > Rebuild zImage > and try again. > Actually, the problem is probably occuring when compressed/head-sa1100.S tries to call Angel which obviously isn't present on a system running blob. Attached is a patch that adds a configuration option CONFIG_SA1100_ANGEL that must be turned on for Angel support. So, to build a blob kernel, apply this patch, then make sure you do a make config and DISABLE CONFIG_SA1100_ANGEL. Good luck, Justin Seger ------_=_NextPart_000_01BFEDB2.E680A491 Content-Type: application/octet-stream; name="diff-2.4.0-test2-ac1-rmk2-np3-jms1.gz" Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="diff-2.4.0-test2-ac1-rmk2-np3-jms1.gz" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 H4sICNcNYzkAA2RpZmYtMi40LjAtdGVzdDItYWMxLXJtazItbnAzLWptczEA7Vrtb9pIE//c/BWr 5sO1BzRgA4FIlWpsA279drYhyaNHshwwiVXAyDa9Rro//pm1Mfau1yStru09p9yHXLIzOztvO/vz TFutFvKixcOFF20u7sIwuViEm13kx7G/vHjwvWUr9jqddvud/S6MgvtX1/4SfdyvEeqhdv+q073i +ohrt9tnjUbjmYJoGcOrdi+T8eEDanFcc4ga8PMSffhwhl692oRfXkWDJorax7+G8FfnDJ21zoPV q6W/Crb+8g0SDX2sTFxbwMe4gm0LI9lBb9Fff6H/nrXq+EbWzJnZT7I5U0UXVUXWQeJZA84FPvpE fSKrZ+gDGoH1wfYeraJwg4Ttvb9G4OWtD2YnIfK3iR8hey6iTbj0z9B5diLyMKNrXyuR78Xh1pUx H2Zrf+1cIoQufs8Egn/fPTRRsM12oDjcRwsf/X7BEOUKlobegACO7/b6b89a5Wgvwu0quH8XbL8l ssdNFD/XueJLUexdNvuoAT+zKMJ/kBJr9BtCynax3i99FO93uzBK0CqM0DxYJGH0G+XPuSI6hgVW PbHbCVbhlt7sKGNDf3rvjTnot+m96eJZ44mtWWAl/25/j7RwGzAsOGTEKoBcBVXGwf0+8lG4T9Cf D37yAGmQPAQxih/jxN+gfezHiOu37oIEgXyeS38TzVn8jgwcRLmVxSG+8OLYu/OTbwkhYzsdTO6K HxTB5HkcTPiZBfO8/mqAMdswQbGfVNkmlmBOFdF+BmsW+TJLg+HY949n+T5wkstzeOG8vATml48h mL90gb3WrRAXCHkAdzXzLAQY/LNFnSG45ao3vOL5JzxbSKCd27vi+FK9a3Z7UO+a3eHBucI+CTde Eiy89foR3ftbP/ISkLDxPvsok36FlpDxCfKXAfbe0TK47WBUo3DnCCobwwMzRer0sbfSzcAOhQjk J/soSB7R2v8CiR3ukiDcxmXx8o0pW4oG0RNU4hxjZBuq7MjEWXhn6xzZWXJ72yXaReEC3gPI7eRx 5+P9B6KD/zyoklsiTvEPdppk1N6nMrVFUi2T2NsgqaLBDXonZMujNNHY8seG4YwsRZrIJ054FhOl JEHLMh27GXalvoKFr22kbHZrfwNp5WXxaZxX70/+9p26Y4d3j2nhgUXWTHlykkNx7NvTpzzJoQqW c/IMU5VHLC9Vqg9x/f+OolNRJX1UCI4DXVJs+M1RJpqMbyCVi4JoWPpPqGblpSJ9ntLl2Xld0N2p YTtPMgmSpDDNprxVWGmKCjtEii3UElxJE2qiNqpLcFPUREVgRVJQlYmOS5zrQOqUaqQaekvvbu1j 1LZfH6FAhna4FO30m4OshmP+SVq411j4fofXCh9NDcdUZxO2A6uq5RRddkpBtm/tuWKKhP9GtuSa liHKtg2BFokQYT37fJPjUKM/bHa6qab5PkUfa44rq2NSXLasQbjqaqUznZFXBpyM/Wx6YPsanpEU LuW+ymi5oYJlGuTdPyawJqmKLr9/HQGSfr9dxa9Lh6qyZLOyih05OE/hDLT0vwSLImiNOg1RWUO8 kZk+QHBHqiHWPECYrAp6PdEWbaWeiiNYkxsMlx3SzVwDDMWPrLn2Hg8wYR+lb0Qa+uGwOWyjxvCy 2emRKG6kfnIlee6qc40d5ZxBk9h0TXJxtISa2glk27EUU5bYRgHdEhSpfZLaOUntsZIoV9sSUlBU XXVt5T/y+2572K/sUXTFsaTSbcsJY1Wwp6XcEh8gjRb4gy7LsDjN8cOmuUO8BXMHcIeOkRKr8NgA rQS1qNvM9VwAITfjqCmB2W75xpF1iYxAhUkH2Y6gS4IlsRSc6crNcOCazq1dUq9YBd1m8Ajz3LEI KJzIvvqYwCgaGjiQZIQCrhkzW67JrArpsPtjCLgyWHyOSWkfjVvbUepu7R+K2OZcRzCZIq+9ZPGw DO+R6EVLSu614IhTyaiBSvocco1NshymH+bB0g/RGHCyGmz3X8nD5ookGzgX2SIlR62xz+KH/W4N YjZNVRENjaXMOPF2fhM+VH20Woe73SPCC3lBXUbBFz8iNRxXfFhoZ9V4AgiuI41vavSbmCzVRMC/ 4TpXggrKfCKcum7jEU7i3MbI2/itu/1qBRe5nLEEc67qTNNuyxfxyFS6vIUzRhAxy5nVXdDxCH4B qDQXdFFm3ruMQxyPOOKww2KXtTioLAJuda4VyZkOXENXb5l0m1QcVtzB1wFTpYyWfkNSO+yZjgl1 X07AYcJLoVYkkzwpSq3w4JDAs6P7yZ9h9Bl32BgfqaYgfkqBUvpx3bnE3cROt90ckq+eYhK5VsI0 8HH7iU2SZFGXa3BvFTgX+264mm9NVTBHbC+cEqeqNXBMhv/XffVdC7prGTNHJl7p1Ec814SANTq9 HqBYwkkgDbDKlMzL/OkTNl7i7yNkecsgZNf5qaBZgqQYrMurRJKA3gTbVeRF/vJtzUNhScKJFKBh XSkNQHWokQpA4UMq8O0uBuk4IzqUmdckVkMHtM42sEEgeYaB+fd6nYGEANrAxuF7HrLwAgr9hTbW LixVJSwsNksyHUy+00+t5IfNS8pKGnTmZjLhcVlFEgUThCoKJskUCiaJtEIktYKCc7fakg6K3mVN U0pVTGPsqaI0vF5GaYUMNko7frFTKI25XnocCrmOMROntmjJsn5gY9te5qt0T0qtvQroo2lM0Fdh qgF9uV0k6KuuFqDvGJ8S6KPyiBnPFPQRjCzQV4L8FdJhdwH6CGks0FdQ2aAvF0mBPkIuC/SVjNUd WXUtvYZcwYQFicKEuSo0JiR0YWLCgkxjwtJhNCYsdYsYmDBX5lmYkNCwgglL2lk1nmBhwpJ+JCbM C+c4wL2ZtDbEZLX8Y2Y4QqVe9tNXgT9OqnLHGIbj6mOb6IfA3zWfwJjizvmaYGOiIxLqHm/hTLey Jk7+uEM9lchOpjZyx3ZF8UEvVfxy2OSpsYwpWI7iKDWw8niPbMmwC17SUNVmllEKb5M5yMbbeclI IfQxf1h4u1SSM+YavF0wsZqcbLxdptfh7QbBccDblcUua3HAWkzRMblaReFVuk2aw0DhDZKWnfMk Cqc4mCic4mGi8OM4Itxvl2QK2PAWVKEipNXMHhX4rm7kdhftk338veO2bDc9auOvOtzLqO1l1PZz R20kRzZoIzt2/+j5Gs3wM+b7L6O2Gvq/cdRWuIkY2bBejl84dSt3QZjX+zsHcHw2gOv/XwzgXhfA VJbsMk6FP+GSarJFL8KVIO/C6SD/qgHdL5jBQZVodgaoMRw2u4OXIdzzh3AVL6RjOGbPrqZvRnYi pJqyezxZkl3NkGT7NNuUdGYOHnBiMc+tNLyOLZMf14H7SU02xGqylfDsnPzXOewmG9WaOr6rzPUf 12QrwZVKk42mMZtsFaaaJltaE/ghfsU6/cHxX1dSXScCrH9H16n0kNFdp4JEdZ1QplsPChU8V53B kJ4MUN2X4zj8ZSL3t0/kqE4Aa0h3ct72oydyrfqqS85ypJqh8MmqW2Ujq26uAlF1iXMrD/1hhvSN nUKuy2WTld5Lw+3f13CrXrJKD+5kO+0f3HD7H+oqcafiMwAA ------_=_NextPart_000_01BFEDB2.E680A491-- From kramer@pa.dec.com Fri Jul 14 20:25:13 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id UAA23271; Fri, 14 Jul 2000 20:25:12 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from mail2.digital.com (mail2.digital.com [204.123.2.56]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id UAA11056 for ; Fri, 14 Jul 2000 20:25:10 +0200 (METDST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id LAA25392; Fri, 14 Jul 2000 11:23:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA13520; Fri, 14 Jul 2000 11:23:27 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id LAA07699; Fri, 14 Jul 2000 11:23:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id LAA07379; Fri, 14 Jul 2000 11:23:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ztxmail01.nz-cce.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA08438; Fri, 14 Jul 2000 11:23:02 -0700 Received: by ztxmail01.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 5C4344277; Fri, 14 Jul 2000 13:23:02 -0500 (CDT) Received: from cambridge.merl.com (cambridge.merl.com [137.203.190.1]) by ztxmail01.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C5BF216CF for ; Fri, 14 Jul 2000 13:23:01 -0500 (CDT) Received: from merl.com (eagle.merl.com [137.203.128.4]) by cambridge.merl.com (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id OAA28332 for ; Fri, 14 Jul 2000 14:23:00 -0400 Received: from zathrus.merl.com (carbone@zathrus.merl.com [137.203.128.26]) by merl.com (8.8.7/8.8.4) with ESMTP id OAA15336 for ; Fri, 14 Jul 2000 14:23:00 -0400 Received: from localhost (carbone@localhost) by zathrus.merl.com (8.9.3/8.8.3) with ESMTP id OAA21558 for ; Fri, 14 Jul 2000 14:22:59 -0400 Date: Fri, 14 Jul 2000 14:22:59 -0400 (EDT) From: Marco Carbone To: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Subject: RE: blob-1.0.8-pre1 stable for assabet? In-Reply-To: Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk > Attached is a patch that adds a configuration option CONFIG_SA1100_ANGEL > that must > be turned on for Angel support. So, to build a blob kernel, apply this > patch, then > make sure you do a make config and DISABLE CONFIG_SA1100_ANGEL. The patch did the trick - I disabled Angel and the kernel booted successfully. I had to manually do some of the patching on def-config/assabet and config.in when to Hunks failed however (I'm using 2.4.0-test1-ac7-rmk1-np6) - but all worked out well. Thanks everyone for the help. Marco Carbone From kramer@pa.dec.com Fri Jul 14 19:59:44 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id TAA23169; Fri, 14 Jul 2000 19:59:44 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from mail1.digital.com (mail1.digital.com [204.123.2.50]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id TAA10025 for ; Fri, 14 Jul 2000 19:59:42 +0200 (METDST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id KAA22904; Fri, 14 Jul 2000 10:58:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA04090; Fri, 14 Jul 2000 10:58:04 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id KAA06152; Fri, 14 Jul 2000 10:57:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id KAA06652; Fri, 14 Jul 2000 10:57:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ztxmail01.nz-cce.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA29386; Fri, 14 Jul 2000 10:57:14 -0700 Received: by ztxmail01.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 90DE91712; Fri, 14 Jul 2000 12:57:13 -0500 (CDT) Received: from duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (duteinh.et.tudelft.nl [130.161.42.1]) by ztxmail01.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E1B6F17B4 for ; Fri, 14 Jul 2000 12:57:12 -0500 (CDT) Received: from lumiere by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id TAA23147; Fri, 14 Jul 2000 19:57:11 +0200 (MET DST) Message-Id: <200007141757.TAA23147@duteinh.et.tudelft.nl> From: Erik Mouw To: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Subject: Blob-1.0.8-pre2 released Organization: Eric conspiracy secret labs Date: Fri 14 Jul 2000 19:57:10 +0100 (MDT) X-Face: "!Z|1XjFg!3Iw)BwM^M\k)J5KHiPddz}#/Zw%?$&Q!xqob"OA|})3_@&BTTiQERo?/^g[Z<9P4R8:5C:aqq.cw!hotLc=+u-"+1rq@9$V^8PbOUlodyi_sejt+D`iqkLpx$>.aXl%vnfPIt"LK|/%>94_Zrm8jy?`_[RKt'TuoxUxfk(gMhY(n|DBBl~c$dhO>G%6}R4+DGX3|idBm4oU&UM/XUP4I9aoN{]`ax%B?rgD(I3OJ<62Y6L X-Mailer: XCmail 1.2devel - with PGP support, PGP engine version 0.5 (IRIX64) X-Mailerorigin: http://www.fsai.fh-trier.de/~schmitzj/Xclasses/XCmail/ X-Eric-Conspiracy: There is no conspiracy! X-Loop: erik@it.et.tudelft.nl Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk Hi all, I just released blob-1.0.8-pre2, the SA-11x0 bootloader. This version contains an RTC fix from Mark Huang, and Assabet fixes from Justin Seger. In contrast with the previous release, this one is actually tested on the LART (it works). It should work on the Assabet, too; Justin's version also did. There is some initial support in blob for Brutus and PLEB, but that's not yet tested (I don't have such boards). Get blob at http://www.lart.tudelft.nl/lartware/blob/ Please download and test this version. Erik -- J.A.K. (Erik) Mouw, Information and Communication Theory Group, Department of Electrical Engineering, Faculty of Information Technology and Systems, Delft University of Technology, PO BOX 5031, 2600 GA Delft, The Netherlands Phone: +31-15-2783635 Fax: +31-15-2781843 Email: J.A.K.Mouw@its.tudelft.nl WWW: http://www-ict.its.tudelft.nl/~erik/ From kramer@pa.dec.com Sat Jul 15 14:52:23 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id OAA25325; Sat, 15 Jul 2000 14:52:22 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from zmamail04.zma.compaq.com (zmamail04.zma.compaq.com [161.114.64.104]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id OAA29916 for ; Sat, 15 Jul 2000 14:52:21 +0200 (METDST) Received: by zmamail04.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 6F80367E; Sat, 15 Jul 2000 08:51:49 -0400 (EDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by zmamail04.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id CB65F42D; Sat, 15 Jul 2000 08:51:46 -0400 (EDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA19165; Sat, 15 Jul 2000 05:51:33 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id FAA17880; Sat, 15 Jul 2000 05:46:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id FAA06046; Sat, 15 Jul 2000 05:46:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail2.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA23461; Sat, 15 Jul 2000 05:46:31 -0700 Received: from eising.k-net.dk (eising.k-net.dtu.dk [130.225.71.227]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with ESMTP id FAA04316 for ; Sat, 15 Jul 2000 05:46:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: from obelix.vkr.k-net.dk (obelix.vkr.k-net.dk [192.38.209.3]) by eising.k-net.dk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1545BC641 for ; Sat, 15 Jul 2000 14:46:29 +0200 (CEST) Received: by OBELIX with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21) id <31SPRVQ2>; Sat, 15 Jul 2000 14:46:16 +0200 Message-Id: From: Anders Frederiksen To: "'sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com'" Subject: Basic SA1100 knowledge. Date: Sat, 15 Jul 2000 14:46:14 +0200 Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk Referring to table 4-1 the SA11x0 issues most instructions in one "cycle". Are these cycles equal to clock cycles (when running from caches - that is not dependent on external memory accesses)? (And how does a Pentium 2/3 compare regarding clockcycles per instruction?) Thanx, Anders Frederiksen From kramer@pa.dec.com Sun Jul 16 05:41:44 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id FAA26488; Sun, 16 Jul 2000 05:41:43 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from zmamail04.zma.compaq.com (zmamail04.zma.compaq.com [161.114.64.104]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id FAA11916 for ; Sun, 16 Jul 2000 05:41:42 +0200 (METDST) Received: by zmamail04.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 270425F9; Sat, 15 Jul 2000 23:41:11 -0400 (EDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by zmamail04.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 732657F4; Sat, 15 Jul 2000 23:41:08 -0400 (EDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA14251; Sat, 15 Jul 2000 20:40:59 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id UAA28995; Sat, 15 Jul 2000 20:39:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id UAA27016; Sat, 15 Jul 2000 20:39:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: from zmamail01.nz-tay.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA07124; Sat, 15 Jul 2000 20:39:33 -0700 Received: by zmamail01.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id B771325E1; Sat, 15 Jul 2000 23:39:32 -0400 (EDT) Received: from tomts1-srv.bellnexxia.net (tomts1.bellnexxia.net [209.226.175.139]) by zmamail01.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 57D27273E; Sat, 15 Jul 2000 23:39:32 -0400 (EDT) Received: from Nightbird.TZoNE.ORG ([216.209.192.14]) by tomts1-srv.bellnexxia.net (InterMail vM.4.01.03.00 201-229-121) with ESMTP id <20000716033931.JBQ8304.tomts1-srv.bellnexxia.net@Nightbird.TZoNE.ORG>; Sat, 15 Jul 2000 23:39:31 -0400 Received: (from fabien@localhost) by Nightbird.TZoNE.ORG (8.11.0.Beta1/8.11.0.Beta1/Debian 8.11.0-1) id e6G3dNm22502; Sat, 15 Jul 2000 23:39:23 -0400 From: Fabien Ninoles Date: Sat, 15 Jul 2000 23:39:19 -0400 To: Deborah Wallach Cc: brad@parker.boston.ma.us, linux-arm-kernel@lists.arm.linux.org.uk, linux-usb-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, linux-arm@vger.rutgers.edu, sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Subject: Re: port of ARM SA-1100 itsy usb function driver to 2.4.0-test2 Message-Id: <20000715233918.A22473@Nightbird.TZoNE.ORG> References: <200007131834.OAA24238@p2.parker.boston.ma.us> <200007131855.AA30339@stowe.pa.dec.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit User-Agent: Mutt/1.2i In-Reply-To: <200007131855.AA30339@stowe.pa.dec.com>; from kerr@pa.dec.com on Thu, Jul 13, 2000 at 11:55:27AM -0700 Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk On Thu, Jul 13, 2000 at 11:55:27AM -0700, Deborah Wallach wrote: > > It implements a basic ethernet interface complete with and eth0 > interface. I've not tried to pass packets to it (yet) but will in the > next week or two. I don't know what the DECWRL folks talked to with > it. Persumably they wrote some host code. I plan to implement the > other side shortly. > > We talk to it using either Linux (2.3.34) on an x86 PC or Windows 95/2000. > I haven't used the windows version myself, so I don't know anything about > it. Yes, we wrote some host code for the linux setup, but it's flaky (the > host machine crashes fairly often while using usb to the itsy), but if you > think it would be useful I can see if I can dig it up and get it posted > somewhere. I will be very interested by all those code (both client and host, Win and Linux) since I already try to implement something like this. I got the usb pipe #0 running correctly and Linux (2.3.99preX) configuring it correctly but can get the other pipe running. On the windows side, I ask a demonstrator for the SA-1111 to show me some code (both WinCE embedded or WinDriver Host) and the only thing he could find me is a USB Mouse Driver (really... they're very stupid sometime - we really have a lot of fun imagining what we can do with a mouse running a StrongArm :) I can myself send you the module I create for the linux host side, although the bulk pipes were never tested. BTW, do you think we can used a common DeviceID/VendorID for the code in the both kernel? Especially since the driver implementation will all be the same (mainly a network driver with a ppp-like connection). > > -Debby -- -------------------------------* *------------------------- Fabien Niqoles / / fabien@tzone.org Chevalier Servant de Sa Dame / / C15D FE9E BB35 F596 127F Veneur Gris par la Clef / / BF7D 8F1F DFC9 BCE0 9436 Chaton pour Debian / / http://www.tzone.org/~fabien --------------------------* *------------------------------ From kramer@pa.dec.com Mon Jul 17 19:59:57 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id TAA02357; Mon, 17 Jul 2000 19:59:56 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from ztxmail05.ztx.compaq.com (ztxmail05.ztx.compaq.com [161.114.1.209]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id TAA27018 for ; Mon, 17 Jul 2000 19:59:54 +0200 (METDST) Received: by ztxmail05.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 79949564; Mon, 17 Jul 2000 12:59:12 -0500 (CDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by ztxmail05.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 1ACAE66A; Mon, 17 Jul 2000 12:59:10 -0500 (CDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA03966; Mon, 17 Jul 2000 10:59:09 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id KAA15467; Mon, 17 Jul 2000 10:58:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id KAA15473; Mon, 17 Jul 2000 10:58:57 -0700 (PDT) From: Received: from zmamail01.nz-tay.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA29014; Mon, 17 Jul 2000 10:58:55 -0700 Received: by zmamail01.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id DD8DF3B99; Mon, 17 Jul 2000 13:58:54 -0400 (EDT) Received: from linux.org.tw (tlug.sinica.edu.tw [140.109.13.42]) by zmamail01.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B56526D9 for ; Mon, 17 Jul 2000 13:58:53 -0400 (EDT) Received: from localhost (chester@localhost) by linux.org.tw (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id AAA13458; Tue, 18 Jul 2000 00:14:43 +0800 Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2000 00:14:42 +0800 (CST) To: Jamey Hicks Cc: handhelds@handhelds.org, sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com, chester@linux.org.tw Subject: RE: [Handhelds] Xfree86 In-Reply-To: Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk Update doc for cross-compile XFree86-4.0,it's simple howto :) http://www.linux.org.tw/~chester/cross-build-X.txt enjoy it! Chester On Mon, 17 Jul 2000 chester@localhost.localdomain wrote: > Hi, > > I have built Xfree86-4.0 from handhelds CVS (July 15),and modified > something to let > it can cross-compile on my PC.But i not test it yet :) > Just grab it from > ftp://ftp.netwinder.org/users/c/chester/xfree86-4.x-armv4l.tar.gz > > And i will put a mini cross howto for it. > > > Good luck, > > Chester > > > > > > All the sources are available. > > > > In the earlier ramdisks on handhelds.org, the X libraries were built from > > XFree86 3.3.3 by Carleton University in Canada. I assume they built from > > the original sources, but we do have the source RPMS. > > > > As soon as we got XFree86 4.0 built, we switched to those libraries. We did > > not have to change them at all, so that part of the X source tree is > > unchanged in our CVS repository. The Xfbdev X server will be generated in > > xc/program/Xserver. > > > > I added a Howto for building X, but I haven't actually built X, so it may be > > incorrect. It's certainly incomplete. I think it needs to say how to > > cross-compile. > > http://www.handhelds.org/minihowto/building-x.html > > > > -Jamey > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: S A McConnell [mailto:samcconn@cotw.com] > > > Sent: Wednesday, July 12, 2000 6:02 PM > > > To: handhelds@handhelds.org; samcconn@inav.net > > > Subject: [Handhelds] Xfree86 > > > > > > > > > The FAQ talks about the compact size of of the X system running on the > > > IPaq. Is all the source available? > > > > > > I found the binaries for Xfbdev and X-libraries. Browsing the cvs > > > repository I found the X source. > > > > > > I assume the libraries were built from those sources? Unmodified? > > > > > > I did not see the source for Xfbdev? Did I miss it? > > > > > > Does the cvs site contain all the source used to build the X code that > > > is on the RAMDISK at the ftp.handhelds.org site? > > > > > > Thanks, > > > SAM > > > _______________________________________________ > > > Handhelds mailing list > > > Handhelds@handhelds.org > > > http://handhelds.org/mailman/listinfo/handhelds > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Handhelds mailing list > > Handhelds@handhelds.org > > http://handhelds.org/mailman/listinfo/handhelds > > > > From kramer@pa.dec.com Mon Jul 17 19:05:42 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id TAA02021; Mon, 17 Jul 2000 19:05:40 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from zmamail03.zma.compaq.com (zmamail03.zma.compaq.com [161.114.64.103]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id TAA25212 for ; Mon, 17 Jul 2000 19:05:39 +0200 (METDST) Received: by zmamail03.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 8C7F95E03; Mon, 17 Jul 2000 13:05:03 -0400 (EDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by zmamail03.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 59C935E5E; Mon, 17 Jul 2000 13:04:58 -0400 (EDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA07250; Mon, 17 Jul 2000 10:04:48 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id KAA12401; Mon, 17 Jul 2000 10:00:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pachyderm.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id KAA12907; Mon, 17 Jul 2000 10:00:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: by pachyderm.pa.dec.com; id KAA16477; Mon, 17 Jul 2000 10:00:37 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2000 10:00:37 -0700 (PDT) From: jg@pa.dec.com (Jim Gettys) Message-Id: <200007171700.KAA16477@pachyderm.pa.dec.com> X-Mailer: Pachyderm (client pachyderm.pa-x.dec.com, user jg) To: chester@linux.org.tw Cc: Jamey Hicks , handhelds@handhelds.org, sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com In-Reply-To: Subject: Re: [Handhelds] Xfree86 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk Actually, the distribution in CVS is ready to cross compile out of the box and doesn't need the described procedure.: To build the XFree86 bits in the handhelds.org CVS repository, just check out a copy, and do "make World". The site.cf file is set up to do cross compilation out of the box, building a fbdev server, using our touch screen driver (for the moment). Sorry I didn't have a chance to pipe up earlier with this... - Jim -- Jim Gettys Technology and Corporate Development Compaq Computer Corporation jg@pa.dec.com From kramer@pa.dec.com Mon Jul 17 19:41:37 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id TAA02254; Mon, 17 Jul 2000 19:41:37 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from ztxmail04.ztx.compaq.com (ztxmail04.ztx.compaq.com [161.114.1.208]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id TAA26389 for ; Mon, 17 Jul 2000 19:41:35 +0200 (METDST) Received: by ztxmail04.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 83A6A471; Mon, 17 Jul 2000 12:40:33 -0500 (CDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by ztxmail04.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id D8A33550; Mon, 17 Jul 2000 12:40:31 -0500 (CDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA24201; Mon, 17 Jul 2000 10:40:26 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id KAA11130; Mon, 17 Jul 2000 10:40:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id KAA16600; Mon, 17 Jul 2000 10:40:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail2.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA08348; Mon, 17 Jul 2000 10:40:15 -0700 Received: from ice.ar51.net (ice.fiftyone.com [208.225.80.11]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with ESMTP id KAA04628 for ; Mon, 17 Jul 2000 10:40:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: from server01.asi (akron-80-189.ar51.net [208.225.80.189]) by ice.ar51.net (8.9.3/8.8.7) with ESMTP id NAA05599; Mon, 17 Jul 2000 13:39:52 -0400 Received: by SERVER01 with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2448.0) id <3YXN8C5A>; Mon, 17 Jul 2000 13:41:38 -0400 Message-Id: From: Jeff Sutherland To: "SA1100 Linux mailing list (E-mail)" Cc: "Nicolas Pitre (E-mail)" Subject: Mixer device for Assabet 1341 audio driver Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2000 13:41:37 -0400 Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2448.0) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk Does anyone have something like 'aumix' running on the Assabet yet? Nico's driver has all the IOCTL's in there to do the work it looks like. I'd like to play around with the volume and eq settings a little. Thanks, //Jeff From kramer@pa.dec.com Mon Jul 17 19:51:48 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id TAA02303; Mon, 17 Jul 2000 19:51:48 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from ztxmail03.ztx.compaq.com (ztxmail03.ztx.compaq.com [161.114.1.207]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id TAA26757 for ; Mon, 17 Jul 2000 19:51:46 +0200 (METDST) Received: by ztxmail03.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 872A41B7E; Mon, 17 Jul 2000 12:51:14 -0500 (CDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by ztxmail03.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id C6A7A1884; Mon, 17 Jul 2000 12:51:12 -0500 (CDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA27634; Mon, 17 Jul 2000 10:51:11 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id KAA16169; Mon, 17 Jul 2000 10:51:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id KAA27260; Mon, 17 Jul 2000 10:51:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: from zmamail01.nz-tay.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA10943; Mon, 17 Jul 2000 10:51:01 -0700 Received: by zmamail01.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id D475724C3; Mon, 17 Jul 2000 13:51:00 -0400 (EDT) Received: from xanadu.vipswitch.com (unknown [205.250.170.220]) by zmamail01.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 99DCD37E4 for ; Mon, 17 Jul 2000 13:50:59 -0400 (EDT) Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2000 13:47:47 -0400 (EDT) From: Nicolas Pitre To: Jeff Sutherland Cc: "SA1100 Linux mailing list (E-mail)" Subject: Re: Mixer device for Assabet 1341 audio driver In-Reply-To: Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk On Mon, 17 Jul 2000, Jeff Sutherland wrote: > Does anyone have something like 'aumix' running on the Assabet yet? Nico's > driver has all the IOCTL's in there to do the work it looks like. I'd like > to play around with the volume and eq settings a little. My "splay" ramdisk contains a little mixer program called "mix". Otherwise any other mixer program should do. Nicolas From kramer@pa.dec.com Mon Jul 17 22:58:11 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id WAA02958; Mon, 17 Jul 2000 22:58:10 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from zmamail03.zma.compaq.com (zmamail03.zma.compaq.com [161.114.64.103]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id WAA02740 for ; Mon, 17 Jul 2000 22:58:07 +0200 (METDST) Received: by zmamail03.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 4FDB35D2B; Mon, 17 Jul 2000 16:57:35 -0400 (EDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by zmamail03.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id C1B4F4265; Mon, 17 Jul 2000 16:57:32 -0400 (EDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA13528; Mon, 17 Jul 2000 13:56:08 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id NAA16153; Mon, 17 Jul 2000 13:54:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id NAA20811; Mon, 17 Jul 2000 13:54:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: from zmamail01.nz-tay.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA08783; Mon, 17 Jul 2000 13:54:52 -0700 Received: by zmamail01.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 413103A33; Mon, 17 Jul 2000 16:54:49 -0400 (EDT) Received: from xanadu.vipswitch.com (unknown [205.250.170.220]) by zmamail01.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 07F863AFB for ; Mon, 17 Jul 2000 16:54:48 -0400 (EDT) Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2000 16:51:54 -0400 (EDT) From: Nicolas Pitre To: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Subject: OLS Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk Is anyone on this list going to the Ottawa Linux Symposium this week? Nicolas From kramer@pa.dec.com Tue Jul 18 05:06:30 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id FAA03873; Tue, 18 Jul 2000 05:06:30 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from zmamail04.zma.compaq.com (zmamail04.zma.compaq.com [161.114.64.104]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id FAA10875 for ; Tue, 18 Jul 2000 05:06:29 +0200 (METDST) Received: by zmamail04.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id A6CE4284; Mon, 17 Jul 2000 23:05:57 -0400 (EDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by zmamail04.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id EF20B2C8; Mon, 17 Jul 2000 23:05:54 -0400 (EDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA01266; Mon, 17 Jul 2000 20:05:51 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id UAA03243; Mon, 17 Jul 2000 20:05:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id UAA03520; Mon, 17 Jul 2000 20:05:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ztxmail01.nz-cce.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA12494; Mon, 17 Jul 2000 20:05:01 -0700 Received: by ztxmail01.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 12EB74388; Mon, 17 Jul 2000 22:05:00 -0500 (CDT) Received: from xanadu.gn.com (modemcable248.137-200-24.mtl.mc.videotron.net [24.200.137.248]) by ztxmail01.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 31AD04066 for ; Mon, 17 Jul 2000 22:05:00 -0500 (CDT) Received: from localhost (nico@localhost) by xanadu.gn.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id XAA03297 for ; Mon, 17 Jul 2000 23:04:11 -0400 X-Authentication-Warning: xanadu.gn.com: nico owned process doing -bs Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2000 23:04:11 -0400 (EDT) From: Nicolas Pitre X-Sender: nico@xanadu.gn.com To: SA-1100/Linux Subject: diff-2.4.0-test4-np1.gz Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk ... is available from the following sites: ftp://ftp.netwinder.org/users/n/nico/ ftp://ftp.arm.linux.org.uk/pub/linux/arm/people/nico/ ftp://ftp.handhelds.org/pub/linux/arm/sa-1100-patches/ Note: This patch should apply over a clean linux-2.4.0-test4 tree. Russell King's latest ARM patch (patch-2.4.0-test3-pre7-rmk1) is exceptionnaly already included, so no other patch but this one is required for SA11x0 support. This includes: - serial_sa1100 fix (John G Dorsey) - AngelBoot support now configurable (Justin M Seger) - ... and a lot of minor cleanups Tested compilation for Assabet, Assabet+Neponset, Brutus, ThinClient. Tested execution on Assabet only. Hopefully this patch should be a lot better than the latest one. Have fun! Nicolas From kramer@pa.dec.com Tue Jul 18 16:16:34 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id QAA06665; Tue, 18 Jul 2000 16:16:33 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from ztxmail04.ztx.compaq.com (ztxmail04.ztx.compaq.com [161.114.1.208]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id QAA04637 for ; Tue, 18 Jul 2000 16:16:31 +0200 (METDST) Received: by ztxmail04.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 00910F50; Tue, 18 Jul 2000 09:15:59 -0500 (CDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by ztxmail04.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id E5EC76A9; Tue, 18 Jul 2000 09:15:57 -0500 (CDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA17738; Tue, 18 Jul 2000 07:15:47 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id HAA16579; Tue, 18 Jul 2000 07:11:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id HAA18095; Tue, 18 Jul 2000 07:11:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ztxmail01.nz-cce.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA05215; Tue, 18 Jul 2000 07:11:48 -0700 Received: by ztxmail01.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id C969E43B7; Tue, 18 Jul 2000 09:11:47 -0500 (CDT) Received: from ADSServer.flatpanels.com (unknown [207.196.69.66]) by ztxmail01.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D4ED31493 for ; Tue, 18 Jul 2000 09:11:46 -0500 (CDT) Received: by flatpanels.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21) id ; Tue, 18 Jul 2000 10:03:34 -0400 Message-Id: <91B07CA588CED3118CFE00105AC97594026FB8@flatpanels.com> From: "Huh, Woojung" To: "Sa1100-Linux (E-mail)" , "Linux-Arm (E-mail)" Cc: "Nicolas Pitre (E-mail)" Subject: [Q] gdb on ARM Linux Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2000 10:03:33 -0400 X-Ms-Tnef-Correlator: <91B07CA588CED3118CFE00105AC97594026FB8@flatpanels.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21) Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----_=_NextPart_000_01BFF0C0.F623E330" Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk This message is in MIME format. Since your mail reader does not understand this format, some or all of this message may not be legible. ------_=_NextPart_000_01BFF0C0.F623E330 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Hi, I'm trying to use gdb on ARM linux (2.4.0-test2-ac1-rmk2-np3) I am able to run "gdb" itself and execute some internal commands. But when I tried to load application with "file" command or execute "gdb xxx". Then gdb displays "gdb: error in loading shared libraries: gdb: undefined symbol: __umodsi3" as follows. I'm using original ramdisk_img.gz Is there anyone who used gdb ? Thanks, [root@Linux /root]$gdb GNU gdb 19991011 Copyright 1998 Free Software Foundation, Inc. GDB is free software, covered by the GNU General Public License, and you are welcome to change it and/or distribute copies of it under certain conditions. Type "show copying" to see the conditions. There is absolutely no warranty for GDB. Type "show warranty" for details. This GDB was configured as "armv4l-redhat-linux". (gdb) (gdb) (gdb) (gdb) file a gdb: error in loading shared libraries: gdb: undefined symbol: __umodsi3 Woojung Huh ------_=_NextPart_000_01BFF0C0.F623E330 Content-Type: application/ms-tnef Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 eJ8+IiMOAQaQCAAEAAAAAAABAAEAAQeQBgAIAAAA5AQAAAAAAADoAAEIgAcAGAAAAElQTS5NaWNy b3NvZnQgTWFpbC5Ob3RlADEIAQWAAwAOAAAA0AcHABIACgADACEAAgAgAQEggAMADgAAANAHBwAS AAoAAwAiAAIAIQEBCYABACEAAABGMDQ5MTM0MEQyNUJENDExOEQzQjAwMTA1QUM5NzU5NADvBgEE gAEAFQAAAFtRXSBnZGIgb24gQVJNIExpbnV4AIMGAQ2ABAACAAAAAgACAAEDkAYASA0AAC0AAAAD AFuACCAGAAAAAADAAAAAAAAARgAAAABShQAAdBAAAB4AXIAIIAYAAAAAAMAAAAAAAABGAAAAAFSF AAABAAAABQAAADguMDIAAAAAAwAOgAggBgAAAAAAwAAAAAAAAEYAAAAAAYUAAAAAAAALABCACCAG AAAAAADAAAAAAAAARgAAAAADhQAAAAAAAAsAEYAIIAYAAAAAAMAAAAAAAABGAAAAAA6FAAAAAAAA AwA3gAggBgAAAAAAwAAAAAAAAEYAAAAAEIUAAAAAAAADADiACCAGAAAAAADAAAAAAAAARgAAAAAR hQAAAAAAAAMAPoAIIAYAAAAAAMAAAAAAAABGAAAAABiFAAAAAAAAHgBLgAggBgAAAAAAwAAAAAAA AEYAAAAANoUAAAEAAAABAAAAAAAAAB4ATIAIIAYAAAAAAMAAAAAAAABGAAAAADeFAAABAAAAAQAA AAAAAAAeAE2ACCAGAAAAAADAAAAAAAAARgAAAAA4hQAAAQAAAAEAAAAAAAAAAgEJEAEAAAAMCAAA CAgAAIASAABMWkZ1CZLu1QMACgByY3BnMTI1cjIMYGMxAzABBwtgbpEOEDAzMw8WZmUPkk8B9wKk A2MCAGNoCsBzhGV0AtFwcnEyAACSKgqhbm8SUCAwAdCFAdA2D6AwNTA0FCHzAdAUEDR9B20CgwBQ A9T7Ef8TC2IT4RRQE7IY9BTQ+wcTFeQ1Fk8XXxhnFBQY0tkU0WFoA3EV5DYafxuPDjAg3yEAGaQg KFBDSEw2KQKDOTgRjjIWMyNBG6IgB20gQ0U9IuQ5I18UQCSPJZV5cv0V5DAWMRGsHpAWMSffA4L6 RwnRaylVDlAp7y0xKy+9A4JUCHApVQ/ALV44HqHrLp8DgkIHQHQN4ClVJ6H/HtwkWCIkJfUPkBpv J4g1tf0pNzcevirYIiQseiNBOY7/LmYiJC/oJnE5jTGnIiQzOt44PC8kWR3zNgc4Pt8niXtDdSk2 ORY/KtlDdCx5Oe8tMTxfQvwv5zkwgT8PQvxXMzYCkQjmOwlvMFAfZf0OMDVRSlJhUh9TKVE0U1J/ Ub9Vj1VNVM9S/1FPEGAy/jhbGlwxW+9c+VE0XSJbj/9fX18dXp9cz2CUSfFj5Enxh11jSfACgnN0 eWwHkBpoCeB0AAAD8GRjdMZsCrEAYGRqdWawBRDcZ2gFQkciDAFjCcBngOEDMHNuZXgfoAewBbCL AMACc3MAUHNiMhRQpWagYRPwXGsJ4HALkK9neAhgZ7ALgGVm4HZtIP8BQGgbDDBo5CNAa8AEoAuA pmddMWlmYmEfgGQCIJ9qIGnGZxBoEG9RIDFmc/8OUGsfbC9tMwBRbbwAoGju/3A/cUZmZA/Ack9z X20zDlBvba92D3cfcXMzAoITEGM/auB94WgQcXAzYG1QIERJARBhdTNQIFAKwGHBCcBhcGggRgIh aqT5NqFpLTwBAUBs8IJzZ3h6YgsgcglQg9IfEIPSd/Y0WoEfcHAB0H+yaD9839995hpQgNAFEAIw LYFwA2EKOjIgb4kwU3ViagUFkHSJMERhdGU6/2qkHqGCX4NvhH+FjGcAcWO/DiF94W52DlCG74f+ Um1B+R9xIEhxUQSQaqQ5UYsPf4wfjS9sv45vD4EhAAjQYvkKsHQ4fDoPVHkQkH+RhueaAJKQC1B5 L4GAjXALEf2TBXNqpCNBlA+VH5YvhY//hp+cL505iVKI9IopJnBnfzuilJmzOaLfo++pIERv/GN1 B4ACMAXQgUBPQadS3G93p5CgkQGAbomwAGC/CfB/4KuAAgFqYI8SZQDwS6uAZsBwU8BcdgiQd/pr C4BkJ6CvIgTwB0AQYb8BQA4AoGJxQrCFAhBvBUJ3H5ES8opAbQtRikAl4DrUXFyIgG+BIW2BcAMQ mweQszBNDeADYHNvAYBcIE8BIA3grnBctOZF6wDAAxAufbB0rFAfgKeQ22mhl3J4AUCtgW5nEFAw e7aEgHRjAyAS8wCABZBs/nZ0oXnQDnBqYLkSAZAAIP+5oq9xq8EBwbkRH1APcAAA53nQDNABkCAu T1K5CA5Q/7nCM1Bn8Lo/u0+8Xw/AedBvBYG9/78PwB9sJ6B50Gz3vb/Cf8OFKbyMNqDBX8Y//cN0 YiJwApHHX7lTHqDFD//Jz8rfy++5gDlQzTK6D86f/8+vvIwjQM0/0r/Tz9TfuYD/JnDRv9dP2F/Z ZAr5AzCnbx+in2mRCMFpcmogSGksywqFCoVJABBxdbHAE4CLs7Df8HlxgnRvIN/QOROAZ2TYwAIg NaBSTRIgl3F1eCJwMi40mC4wLYpAZrAyLQDQFDEtamBr5kBucDN6KeKGILOhAaBm4OQCcup1A6Fs 5JBs4yTkgQAQzejXIIAAH4BsZuewrZD+IGnwBZCXUBOAtJAHgOpALwIwBJEiUQWgbQOBZHPKLgqF QpdQIHdnEAOgf+eg3/EJgOQCCQDfoOewcLcLUA3gijBp5MED8HSBYP/ouZ7QZuDpmuxl5LAFwOsG uei8IHjz0OmZ7OZU7bLv5IJxcKHAC2B5BCHoy4kw/wSQA2AFwN7B7qJxgo8RUDHv5SGgYArACJBz iTD3A+iANwEBl4FpoHMGw4kwX1//q6AEcACQD8DpqX2A8KAG8P8JAK/w7Obi+d/QcYIFsOAQTwuA IlGzkfXBa18HcGf4Lmd6/PYEIO/Qt8HqsX55AiATgO2g5CNpoOSCP8fiHPUwDbBrcyzidgqFz94k 3u/f9R5kY2aQZWogplsRoLHAQEzlQy8HcoxdJOSBCoVHTlXkcxdHACZgKaExBAVDb3D/KTB78wmx mgCI8FCgiYC0oT+dkROAgYD50e9TA3BJbuJj7OZHRELqQPxRC6I/tJIMIgNw8bCSse5BYnm7AHIJ I0dQsOwAIlFQiaD97yEgB8C1ILkxA3DqwgEA7nXnsFAwBAV3l6Dxsegj3x9Bj2DrsbHQ6sEv8jH1 we3f8WLrQvGwcPkx5LDqoP8UMfnSAvC1IE/Q3rLxsK2Ql4ABfcDs11Su0SAiZwD3rKAVcuPCIuQC IKDoIRAB/xc/9SIAsQ4h5/C0kFEAikD9nTAgIIDtkARAgQDdoA/Q+63xDdIu6jAYWRzWGXAdYvv5 8BbhbBrZDiEN4p2Q9jC7GkGe0Gcv8O5B/EEiBEDwbXY0bOaQUEA6AIjA9eUzIuzmKOSB5yYkDyUa //Cj57AEDwUfBi/hsfcP+B//+S/6P/tCMCMGmycG4VcwCO+pUDainqHhdVexsN/AcZE4SHVoNkKK sjCtfQABNPADACYAAAAAAAMANgAAAAAACwACAAEAAAAeAHAAAQAAABUAAABbUV0gZ2RiIG9uIEFS TSBMaW51eAAAAAACAXEAAQAAABYAAAABv/DBpRMMnU5D+rJNpJxH4/DS5xlrAABAADkAkCni9cDw vwEDAPE/CQQAAB4AMUABAAAABQAAAFdIVUgAAAAAAwAaQAAAAAAeADBAAQAAAAUAAABXSFVIAAAA AAMAGUAAAAAAAwD9P+QEAAADAIAQ/////wIBRwABAAAAOwAAAGM9VVM7YT0gO3A9QXBwbGllZCBE YXRhIFN5cztsPUFEU19TRVJWRVItMDAwNzE4MTQwMzMzWi0yMTgAAAIB+T8BAAAAXAAAAAAAAADc p0DIwEIQGrS5CAArL+GCAQAAAAAAAAAvTz1BUFBMSUVEIERBVEEgU1lTVEVNUy9PVT1GTEFUUEFO RUxTLkNPTS9DTj1SRUNJUElFTlRTL0NOPVdIVUgAHgD4PwEAAAAJAAAASHVoLCBXb28AAAAAHgA4 QAEAAAAFAAAAV0hVSAAAAAACAfs/AQAAAFwAAAAAAAAA3KdAyMBCEBq0uQgAKy/hggEAAAAAAAAA L089QVBQTElFRCBEQVRBIFNZU1RFTVMvT1U9RkxBVFBBTkVMUy5DT00vQ049UkVDSVBJRU5UUy9D Tj1XSFVIAB4A+j8BAAAADQAAAEh1aCwgV29vanVuZwAAAAAeADlAAQAAAAUAAABXSFVIAAAAAEAA BzCgcygUwPC/AUAACDAw4yP2wPC/AR4APQABAAAAAQAAAAAAAAAeAB0OAQAAABUAAABbUV0gZ2Ri IG9uIEFSTSBMaW51eAAAAAAeADUQAQAAADgAAAA8OTFCMDdDQTU4OENFRDMxMThDRkUwMDEwNUFD OTc1OTQwMjZGQjhAZmxhdHBhbmVscy5jb20+AAsAKQAAAAAACwAjAAAAAAADAAYQaWFTzgMABxDu AgAAAwAQEAAAAAADABEQAAAAAB4ACBABAAAAZQAAAEhJLElNVFJZSU5HVE9VU0VHREJPTkFSTUxJ TlVYKDI0MC1URVNUMi1BQzEtUk1LMi1OUDMpSUFNQUJMRVRPUlVOIkdEQiJJVFNFTEZBTkRFWEVD VVRFU09NRUlOVEVSTkFMQ08AAAAAAgF/AAEAAAA4AAAAPDkxQjA3Q0E1ODhDRUQzMTE4Q0ZFMDAx MDVBQzk3NTk0MDI2RkI4QGZsYXRwYW5lbHMuY29tPgCFTg== ------_=_NextPart_000_01BFF0C0.F623E330-- From kramer@pa.dec.com Thu Jul 20 10:58:45 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id KAA15094; Thu, 20 Jul 2000 10:58:45 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from zmamail04.zma.compaq.com (zmamail04.zma.compaq.com [161.114.64.104]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id KAA09522 for ; Thu, 20 Jul 2000 10:58:43 +0200 (METDST) Received: by zmamail04.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 074122AF; Thu, 20 Jul 2000 04:58:12 -0400 (EDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by zmamail04.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 1DEE213C; Thu, 20 Jul 2000 04:58:08 -0400 (EDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA20747; Thu, 20 Jul 2000 01:57:59 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id BAA11852; Thu, 20 Jul 2000 01:53:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ztxmail01.ztx.compaq.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id BAA23304; Thu, 20 Jul 2000 01:53:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: by ztxmail01.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 244BF1D87; Thu, 20 Jul 2000 03:53:14 -0500 (CDT) Received: from navigator.sw.com.sg (navigator.sw.com.sg [195.16.40.131]) by ztxmail01.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E9091D0E for ; Thu, 20 Jul 2000 03:53:11 -0500 (CDT) Received: from slider.sw.ru (slider.sw.com.sg [195.16.40.254]) by navigator.sw.com.sg (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id MAA26910 for ; Thu, 20 Jul 2000 12:53:14 +0400 (MSD) Received: (from root@localhost) by slider.sw.ru (8.9.1/8.9.1) id MAA00544 for sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com.procmail@slider.sw.ru; Thu, 20 Jul 2000 12:53:07 +0400 (MSD) Received: from exchruhydro.sw.com.sg (exchruhydro.sw.com.sg [195.16.40.3]) by slider.sw.ru (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id MAA00530 for ; Thu, 20 Jul 2000 12:53:06 +0400 (MSD) Received: from CYBER ([192.168.9.14]) by exchruhydro.sw.com.sg with SMTP (Microsoft Exchange Internet Mail Service Version 5.5.2650.21) id PDSFCJQJ; Thu, 20 Jul 2000 12:53:06 +0400 Message-Id: <003401bff227$ebe0fc60$0e09a8c0@cyber> From: "Gennadiy M. Kurtsman" To: Subject: Linux and SA-1100's FIQ Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2000 12:53:06 +0400 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="koi8-r" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-Msmail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 4.72.3110.5 X-Mimeole: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.3110.3 Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk Hello everybody, I've tried to program ICLR register of interrupt controller of SA-1100 (revision G) so that level 11 interrupt was routed to CPU FIQ interrupt input. Then after interrupt pending Linux became dead (hung up without any reaction). When I don't touch ICLR register all work well. Am I wrong or it is defect of Linux or SA-1100? Any hint will be greatly appreciated. Gena Kurtsman. From kramer@pa.dec.com Thu Jul 20 14:42:06 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id OAA16045; Thu, 20 Jul 2000 14:42:05 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from ztxmail05.ztx.compaq.com (ztxmail05.ztx.compaq.com [161.114.1.209]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id OAA16792 for ; Thu, 20 Jul 2000 14:42:02 +0200 (METDST) Received: by ztxmail05.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 9D07D696; Thu, 20 Jul 2000 07:41:30 -0500 (CDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by ztxmail05.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id CCAB14E7; Thu, 20 Jul 2000 07:41:28 -0500 (CDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA24165; Thu, 20 Jul 2000 05:41:25 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id FAA27471; Thu, 20 Jul 2000 05:38:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ztxmail01.ztx.compaq.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id FAA11702; Thu, 20 Jul 2000 05:38:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: by ztxmail01.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 0B9E71D30; Thu, 20 Jul 2000 07:38:36 -0500 (CDT) Received: from empeg.com (morrison.empeg.co.uk [193.119.19.130]) by ztxmail01.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A0C894380 for ; Thu, 20 Jul 2000 07:38:34 -0500 (CDT) Received: from morcheeba (morcheeba.internal.empeg.com [10.1.1.34]) by empeg.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id NAA29745; Thu, 20 Jul 2000 13:38:19 +0100 Message-Id: <019701bff247$378b2950$2201010a@internal.empeg.com> From: "Hugo Fiennes" To: "Gennadiy M. Kurtsman" , References: <003401bff227$ebe0fc60$0e09a8c0@cyber> Subject: Re: Linux and SA-1100's FIQ Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2000 13:37:07 +0100 Organization: empeg ltd Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="koi8-r" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-Msmail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2919.6700 X-Mimeole: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2919.6700 Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk > I've tried to program ICLR register of interrupt controller of SA-1100 > (revision G) so that level 11 interrupt was routed to CPU FIQ interrupt > input. Then after interrupt pending Linux became dead (hung up without any > reaction). When I don't touch ICLR register all work well. Am I wrong or it > is defect of Linux or SA-1100? Any hint will be greatly appreciated. A few things: - Have you installed a FIQ handler? You need to write your own interrupt handler for FIQs. - In the FIQ handler, have you remembered to clear the GEDR bit for the interrupt? (this is done automatically in the IRQ handler in linux) Hugo empeg From kramer@pa.dec.com Thu Jul 20 21:25:09 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id VAA17606; Thu, 20 Jul 2000 21:25:08 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from ztxmail03.ztx.compaq.com (ztxmail03.ztx.compaq.com [161.114.1.207]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id VAA00423 for ; Thu, 20 Jul 2000 21:25:06 +0200 (METDST) Received: by ztxmail03.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 4EB081B7E; Thu, 20 Jul 2000 14:24:29 -0500 (CDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by ztxmail03.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 885531A68; Thu, 20 Jul 2000 14:24:27 -0500 (CDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA17370; Thu, 20 Jul 2000 12:24:18 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id MAA01637; Thu, 20 Jul 2000 12:22:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id MAA16423; Thu, 20 Jul 2000 12:22:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: from zmamail01.nz-tay.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA31567; Thu, 20 Jul 2000 12:22:49 -0700 Received: by zmamail01.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 19D033958; Thu, 20 Jul 2000 15:22:49 -0400 (EDT) Received: from cambridge.merl.com (cambridge.merl.com [137.203.190.1]) by zmamail01.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E656039A0 for ; Thu, 20 Jul 2000 15:22:48 -0400 (EDT) Received: from merl.com (eagle.merl.com [137.203.128.4]) by cambridge.merl.com (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id PAA01643 for ; Thu, 20 Jul 2000 15:22:48 -0400 Received: from zathrus.merl.com (carbone@zathrus.merl.com [137.203.128.26]) by merl.com (8.8.7/8.8.4) with ESMTP id PAA06695 for ; Thu, 20 Jul 2000 15:22:48 -0400 Received: from localhost (carbone@localhost) by zathrus.merl.com (8.9.3/8.8.3) with ESMTP id PAA08817 for ; Thu, 20 Jul 2000 15:22:48 -0400 Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2000 15:22:47 -0400 (EDT) From: Marco Carbone To: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Subject: [SA1100] Re: [Handhelds] Xfree86 Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk Jim Gettys wrote: >Actually, the distribution in CVS is ready to cross compile out of the >box and doesn't need the described procedure.: > >To build the XFree86 bits in the handhelds.org CVS repository, just >check out a copy, and do "make World". > >The site.cf file is set up to do cross compilation out of the box, >building a fbdev server, using our touch screen driver (for the moment). > >Sorry I didn't have a chance to pipe up earlier with this... > > - Jim Has anyone managed to do this yet on the Assabet? - marco carbone From kramer@pa.dec.com Fri Jul 21 13:46:29 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id NAA20173; Fri, 21 Jul 2000 13:46:28 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from zmamail03.zma.compaq.com (zmamail03.zma.compaq.com [161.114.64.103]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id NAA24083 for ; Fri, 21 Jul 2000 13:46:27 +0200 (METDST) Received: by zmamail03.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 2DD2D42A1; Fri, 21 Jul 2000 07:46:24 -0400 (EDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by zmamail03.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 889DC42F3; Fri, 21 Jul 2000 07:46:21 -0400 (EDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA08940; Fri, 21 Jul 2000 04:46:03 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id EAA16642; Fri, 21 Jul 2000 04:37:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id EAA15446; Fri, 21 Jul 2000 04:37:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: from zmamail01.nz-tay.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA25664; Fri, 21 Jul 2000 04:37:40 -0700 Received: by zmamail01.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 77C75269A; Fri, 21 Jul 2000 07:37:39 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mail.crs4.it (michelle.crs4.it [156.148.1.33]) by zmamail01.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 185042688 for ; Fri, 21 Jul 2000 07:37:39 -0400 (EDT) Received: from crs4.it (selenium.crs4.it [156.148.2.81]) by mail.crs4.it (Postfix) with ESMTP id EDAED10D0 for ; Fri, 21 Jul 2000 13:44:11 +0200 (METDST) Message-Id: <39783724.EB745A95@crs4.it> Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2000 13:42:28 +0200 From: Graziano Meola X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.7 [en] (WinNT; I) X-Accept-Language: en Mime-Version: 1.0 To: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Subject: Creative WebCam II on Neponset Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk I would like to connect a Creative webcam II to the USB port of a SA1111 (Neponset) development board: are the necessary device drivers available ? Where can I found them ? thanks in advance -- Graziano From kramer@pa.dec.com Fri Jul 21 15:24:32 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id PAA20533; Fri, 21 Jul 2000 15:24:31 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from ztxmail04.ztx.compaq.com (ztxmail04.ztx.compaq.com [161.114.1.208]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id PAA27215 for ; Fri, 21 Jul 2000 15:24:29 +0200 (METDST) Received: by ztxmail04.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id A5F41157; Fri, 21 Jul 2000 08:23:57 -0500 (CDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by ztxmail04.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id C14F212B2; Fri, 21 Jul 2000 08:23:54 -0500 (CDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA06610; Fri, 21 Jul 2000 06:23:52 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id GAA20296; Fri, 21 Jul 2000 06:20:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id GAA20281; Fri, 21 Jul 2000 06:20:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: from zmamail01.nz-tay.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA08883; Fri, 21 Jul 2000 06:20:13 -0700 Received: by zmamail01.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id C70A03AE4; Fri, 21 Jul 2000 09:20:12 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mail.crs4.it (michelle.crs4.it [156.148.1.33]) by zmamail01.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 61C3B3AC7 for ; Fri, 21 Jul 2000 09:20:12 -0400 (EDT) Received: from crs4.it (selenium.crs4.it [156.148.2.81]) by mail.crs4.it (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A85410D0 for ; Fri, 21 Jul 2000 15:26:47 +0200 (METDST) Message-Id: <39784F2F.54DB3E95@crs4.it> Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2000 15:25:03 +0200 From: Graziano Meola X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.7 [en] (WinNT; I) X-Accept-Language: en Mime-Version: 1.0 To: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Subject: [Fwd: Creative WebCam II on Neponset] Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk -------- Original Message -------- From: Graziano Meola Subject: Creative WebCam II on Neponset To: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com I would like to connect a Creative webcam II to the USB port of a SA1111 (Neponset) development board: are the necessary device drivers available ? Where can I found them ? thanks in advance -- Graziano From kramer@pa.dec.com Fri Jul 21 22:07:34 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id WAA21833; Fri, 21 Jul 2000 22:07:33 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from zmamail04.zma.compaq.com (zmamail04.zma.compaq.com [161.114.64.104]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id WAA09077 for ; Fri, 21 Jul 2000 22:07:32 +0200 (METDST) Received: by zmamail04.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 5BE67395; Fri, 21 Jul 2000 16:07:00 -0400 (EDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by zmamail04.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 937253F1; Fri, 21 Jul 2000 16:06:57 -0400 (EDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA14202; Fri, 21 Jul 2000 13:06:47 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id NAA01422; Fri, 21 Jul 2000 13:06:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id NAA02316; Fri, 21 Jul 2000 13:06:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: from zmamail01.nz-tay.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA28773; Fri, 21 Jul 2000 13:06:03 -0700 Received: by zmamail01.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 8677439C8; Fri, 21 Jul 2000 16:06:02 -0400 (EDT) Received: from thalia.fm.intel.com (thalia.fm.intel.com [132.233.247.11]) by zmamail01.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 079413975 for ; Fri, 21 Jul 2000 16:06:02 -0400 (EDT) Received: from SMTP (fmsmsxvs01-1.fm.intel.com [132.233.42.201]) by thalia.fm.intel.com (8.9.1a+p1/8.9.1/d: relay.m4,v 1.30 2000/06/08 18:25:35 dmccart Exp $) with SMTP id UAA23586; Fri, 21 Jul 2000 20:06:36 GMT Received: from fmsmsx17.intel.com ([132.233.48.17]) by 132.233.48.201 (Norton AntiVirus for Internet Email Gateways 1.0) ; Fri, 21 Jul 2000 20:05:40 0000 (GMT) Received: by fmsmsx17.fm.intel.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21) id ; Fri, 21 Jul 2000 13:05:37 -0700 Message-Id: From: "Chagas, Jason" To: linux@handhelds.org, linux-arm@vger.rutgers.edu, nanogui@linuxhacker.org, linuxce-devel@linuxce.org, sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Cc: "Chagas, Jason" Subject: Easy installation kit for StrongARM* Linux cross development tool s AVAILABLE!! Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2000 13:05:24 -0700 Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk An easy to install RPM based kit for StrongARM* Linux cross development tools is available for download (in both x386 binary and source code formats) at the following location: ftp://ftp.netwinder.org/users/c/chagas/arm-linux-cross This toolkit allows development of applications, device drivers and kernel development for StrongARM* Linux. Please refer to the README file for detailed installation instructions. Note, the kit also includes Linux v2.4 for the SA1110/SA1111 "Assabet" Development Board (http://developer.intel.com/design/strong/quicklist/eval-plat/). Although the binaries were compiled with RedHat v6.1 Linux, they should also run on other distributions of Linux. Regards, Jason *StrongARM(r) is a trademark of Advanced RISC Machines, Ltd. From kramer@pa.dec.com Sat Jul 22 07:24:37 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id HAA23084; Sat, 22 Jul 2000 07:24:36 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from zmamail05.zma.compaq.com (zmamail05.zma.compaq.com [161.114.64.105]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id HAA19623 for ; Sat, 22 Jul 2000 07:24:35 +0200 (METDST) Received: by zmamail05.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 205275A7B; Sat, 22 Jul 2000 01:24:04 -0400 (EDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by zmamail05.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 51BE65BB8; Sat, 22 Jul 2000 01:24:01 -0400 (EDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA06434; Fri, 21 Jul 2000 22:23:40 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id WAA18029; Fri, 21 Jul 2000 22:22:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id WAA14466; Fri, 21 Jul 2000 22:22:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: from zmamail01.nz-tay.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA03133; Fri, 21 Jul 2000 22:22:33 -0700 Received: by zmamail01.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id CE89025F; Sat, 22 Jul 2000 01:22:32 -0400 (EDT) Received: from localhost.localdomain (grey.csa.iisc.ernet.in [144.16.67.177]) by zmamail01.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 190D839E for ; Sat, 22 Jul 2000 01:22:30 -0400 (EDT) Received: from localhost (alex@localhost) by localhost.localdomain (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id KAA10350; Sat, 22 Jul 2000 10:41:10 +0530 Date: Sat, 22 Jul 2000 10:41:10 +0530 (IST) From: Alex M Alex To: "Chagas, Jason" Cc: linux@handhelds.org, linux-arm@vger.rutgers.edu, nanogui@linuxhacker.org, linuxce-devel@linuxce.org, sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Subject: Re: [linuxce-devel] Easy installation kit for StrongARM* Linux cross development tool s AVAILABLE!! In-Reply-To: Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk HI, I am able to down load the images to SA1110 board but i am unable to get any display.But I was able to get even X working on Brutus board. regards alex On Fri, 21 Jul 2000, Chagas, Jason wrote: > An easy to install RPM based kit for StrongARM* Linux cross development > tools is available for download (in both x386 binary and source code > formats) at the following location: > > ftp://ftp.netwinder.org/users/c/chagas/arm-linux-cross > > This toolkit allows development of applications, device drivers and kernel > development for StrongARM* Linux. Please refer to the README file for > detailed installation instructions. Note, the kit also includes Linux v2.4 > for the SA1110/SA1111 "Assabet" Development Board > (http://developer.intel.com/design/strong/quicklist/eval-plat/). > > Although the binaries were compiled with RedHat v6.1 Linux, they should also > run on other distributions of Linux. > > Regards, > > Jason > > *StrongARM(r) is a trademark of Advanced RISC Machines, Ltd. > > > _______________________________________________ > linuxce-devel mailing list > linuxce-devel@linuxce.org > http://mailman.bok.net/mailman/listinfo/linuxce-devel > From kramer@pa.dec.com Sat Jul 22 09:10:46 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id JAA23271; Sat, 22 Jul 2000 09:10:45 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from ztxmail04.ztx.compaq.com (ztxmail04.ztx.compaq.com [161.114.1.208]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id JAA20837 for ; Sat, 22 Jul 2000 09:10:44 +0200 (METDST) Received: by ztxmail04.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 25D85CE9; Sat, 22 Jul 2000 02:10:09 -0500 (CDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by ztxmail04.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id A7FDD647; Sat, 22 Jul 2000 02:10:05 -0500 (CDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA01216; Sat, 22 Jul 2000 00:09:48 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id AAA22322; Sat, 22 Jul 2000 00:06:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id AAA20561; Sat, 22 Jul 2000 00:06:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: from zmamail01.nz-tay.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA12594; Sat, 22 Jul 2000 00:06:25 -0700 Received: by zmamail01.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id DC65127D7; Sat, 22 Jul 2000 03:06:20 -0400 (EDT) Received: from violet.csa.iisc.ernet.in (violet.csa.iisc.ernet.in [144.16.67.198]) by zmamail01.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B7AA525C7 for ; Sat, 22 Jul 2000 03:06:17 -0400 (EDT) Received: from localhost (alex@localhost) by violet.csa.iisc.ernet.in (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id MAA06982; Sat, 22 Jul 2000 12:48:37 +0530 Date: Sat, 22 Jul 2000 12:48:37 +0530 (IST) From: Alex M Alex To: "Chagas, Jason" Cc: linux@handhelds.org, linux-arm@vger.rutgers.edu, nanogui@linuxhacker.org, linuxce-devel@linuxce.org, sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Subject: Re: [linuxce-devel] Easy installation kit for StrongARM* Linux cross development tool s AVAILABLE!! Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk HI, I am able to down load the images to SA1110 board but i am unable to get any display.But I was able to get even X working on Brutus board. regards alex On Fri, 21 Jul 2000, Chagas, Jason wrote: > An easy to install RPM based kit for StrongARM* Linux cross development > tools is available for download (in both x386 binary and source code > formats) at the following location: > > ftp://ftp.netwinder.org/users/c/chagas/arm-linux-cross > > This toolkit allows development of applications, device drivers and kernel > development for StrongARM* Linux. Please refer to the README file for > detailed installation instructions. Note, the kit also includes Linux v2.4 > for the SA1110/SA1111 "Assabet" Development Board > (http://developer.intel.com/design/strong/quicklist/eval-plat/). > > Although the binaries were compiled with RedHat v6.1 Linux, they should also > run on other distributions of Linux. > > Regards, > > Jason > > *StrongARM(r) is a trademark of Advanced RISC Machines, Ltd. > > From kramer@pa.dec.com Sun Jul 23 00:06:52 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id AAA24699; Sun, 23 Jul 2000 00:06:52 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from zmamail04.zma.compaq.com (zmamail04.zma.compaq.com [161.114.64.104]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id AAA03283 for ; Sun, 23 Jul 2000 00:06:51 +0200 (METDST) Received: by zmamail04.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 9BD0E8E2; Sat, 22 Jul 2000 18:06:19 -0400 (EDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by zmamail04.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id CD5E6B85; Sat, 22 Jul 2000 18:06:16 -0400 (EDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA09153; Sat, 22 Jul 2000 15:04:48 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id OAA06437; Sat, 22 Jul 2000 14:55:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id OAA21739; Sat, 22 Jul 2000 14:55:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail1.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA25786; Sat, 22 Jul 2000 14:55:47 -0700 Received: from smtprelay2.adelphia.net (smtprelay2.adelphia.net [64.8.25.7]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with ESMTP id OAA02382 for ; Sat, 22 Jul 2000 14:55:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: from jrn ([24.51.176.100]) by smtprelay2.adelphia.net (Netscape Messaging Server 4.15) with SMTP id FY4CPP00.59J for ; Sat, 22 Jul 2000 17:51:25 -0400 Message-Id: <000a01bff426$70765100$64b03318@wre.adelphia.net> From: "Jim Norton" To: Subject: Looking for Mpeg video player for StrongARM and Linux Date: Sat, 22 Jul 2000 17:47:26 -0400 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0007_01BFF404.E63765E0" X-Priority: 3 X-Msmail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 X-Mimeole: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400 Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0007_01BFF404.E63765E0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Any suggestions? ------=_NextPart_000_0007_01BFF404.E63765E0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Any = suggestions?
------=_NextPart_000_0007_01BFF404.E63765E0-- From kramer@pa.dec.com Mon Jul 24 20:38:02 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id UAA00379; Mon, 24 Jul 2000 20:38:02 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from ztxmail03.ztx.compaq.com (ztxmail03.ztx.compaq.com [161.114.1.207]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id UAA26602 for ; Mon, 24 Jul 2000 20:38:00 +0200 (METDST) Received: by ztxmail03.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 8AF731BC6; Mon, 24 Jul 2000 13:37:27 -0500 (CDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by ztxmail03.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 9EC7619DD; Mon, 24 Jul 2000 13:37:25 -0500 (CDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA13879; Mon, 24 Jul 2000 11:34:32 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id LAA32545; Mon, 24 Jul 2000 11:30:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id LAA00189; Mon, 24 Jul 2000 11:30:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: from zmamail01.nz-tay.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA20766; Mon, 24 Jul 2000 11:30:14 -0700 Received: by zmamail01.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 836362CB; Mon, 24 Jul 2000 14:30:14 -0400 (EDT) Received: from cambridge.merl.com (cambridge.merl.com [137.203.190.1]) by zmamail01.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 44829305 for ; Mon, 24 Jul 2000 14:30:14 -0400 (EDT) Received: from merl.com (eagle.merl.com [137.203.128.4]) by cambridge.merl.com (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id OAA21218 for ; Mon, 24 Jul 2000 14:30:14 -0400 Received: from zathrus.merl.com (carbone@zathrus.merl.com [137.203.128.26]) by merl.com (8.8.7/8.8.4) with ESMTP id OAA31057 for ; Mon, 24 Jul 2000 14:30:13 -0400 Received: from localhost (carbone@localhost) by zathrus.merl.com (8.9.3/8.8.3) with ESMTP id OAA18142 for ; Mon, 24 Jul 2000 14:30:13 -0400 Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2000 14:30:13 -0400 (EDT) From: Marco Carbone To: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Subject: backlight inverter circuit info needed Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk Hi, I know there's a post from a few months ago pointing out a supplier for a backlight inverter circuit, but I'm looking to see if I can find an equivalent part from another supplier. I've been trying to find out the voltage and current specs for the backlight, but have failed everywhere I've looked, including the Intel SA-1110 User's Guide. Does anyone happen to have this info jotted down somewhere and is willing to post it? Or, any suggestions where to find the information? Also, on the Intel Assabet Product Highlights page (http://developer.intel.com/design/strong/quicklist/eval-plat/sa-1110.htm), they list the items shipped with the SA-1110 Development Board. One of the items listed is: "6-volt 2.5-amp universal input brick" What is this referring to? Thanks, Marco From kramer@pa.dec.com Tue Jul 25 02:39:20 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id CAA01281; Tue, 25 Jul 2000 02:39:19 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from zmamail04.zma.compaq.com (zmamail04.zma.compaq.com [161.114.64.104]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id CAA07042 for ; Tue, 25 Jul 2000 02:39:18 +0200 (METDST) Received: by zmamail04.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id D4BE6453; Mon, 24 Jul 2000 20:38:46 -0400 (EDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by zmamail04.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id EE47B6C1; Mon, 24 Jul 2000 20:38:43 -0400 (EDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA32745; Mon, 24 Jul 2000 17:35:59 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id RAA16129; Mon, 24 Jul 2000 17:32:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id RAA03371; Mon, 24 Jul 2000 17:32:57 -0700 (PDT) From: Received: from ztxmail01.nz-cce.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA09923; Mon, 24 Jul 2000 17:32:56 -0700 Received: by ztxmail01.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 6F88F4243; Mon, 24 Jul 2000 19:32:56 -0500 (CDT) Received: from lhs.com (lnsmtpbos00.lhs.com [208.162.98.43]) by ztxmail01.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id C26D54238 for ; Mon, 24 Jul 2000 19:32:55 -0500 (CDT) Received: by lhs.com(Lotus SMTP MTA v4.6.6 (890.1 7-16-1999)) id 85256927.000402BB ; Mon, 24 Jul 2000 20:43:48 -0400 X-Lotus-Fromdomain: LHS To: Marco Carbone Cc: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Message-Id: <85256927.000401F6.00@lhs.com> Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2000 20:29:23 -0400 Subject: Re: backlight inverter circuit info needed Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk Marco, After talking with intel, i was given a list of "suggested" vendors for the frontlight inverter circuit for assabet. I called all of them and only one had made the circuit for the screen . Aparantly the screen was quite new (at the time) and companies were just getting around to making the component. You might want to call the sharp directly and ask them if they have any suggestions. As for the specifications, i have a PDF file from ERG which gives the input and output specifictions for their inverter circuit. If you would like it i can send it to you on friday. (i am currently in korea, and will be back in my office on friday) I have been running the inverter from ERG for a few days now, and it seems to work well, and is quite compact (small enough to fit inside the assabet casing). The only difficult part is making the cable to interface from the assabet to the inverter circuit. The Minitek contact pins are a real pain to work with. They are quite small. All of the parts needed are included in a file in the arm linux documentation directory: linux/Documentation/arm/SA1100/Assabet_frontlight If you find another vendor / solution, please post the information.. i am sure others will be interested. Good Luck, -Nick Marco Carbone on 07/24/2000 02:30:13 PM To: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com cc: (bcc: Nicholas Mistry/USER/US/LHS) Subject: backlight inverter circuit info needed Hi, I know there's a post from a few months ago pointing out a supplier for a backlight inverter circuit, but I'm looking to see if I can find an equivalent part from another supplier. I've been trying to find out the voltage and current specs for the backlight, but have failed everywhere I've looked, including the Intel SA-1110 User's Guide. Does anyone happen to have this info jotted down somewhere and is willing to post it? Or, any suggestions where to find the information? Also, on the Intel Assabet Product Highlights page (http://developer.intel.com/design/strong/quicklist/eval-plat/sa-1110.htm), they list the items shipped with the SA-1110 Development Board. One of the items listed is: "6-volt 2.5-amp universal input brick" What is this referring to? Thanks, Marco From kramer@pa.dec.com Tue Jul 25 13:38:42 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id NAA03145; Tue, 25 Jul 2000 13:38:42 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from zmamail03.zma.compaq.com (zmamail03.zma.compaq.com [161.114.64.103]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id NAA22796 for ; Tue, 25 Jul 2000 13:38:41 +0200 (METDST) Received: by zmamail03.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id B3F475F85; Tue, 25 Jul 2000 07:38:09 -0400 (EDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by zmamail03.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id C342E5C44; Tue, 25 Jul 2000 07:38:06 -0400 (EDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA28124; Tue, 25 Jul 2000 04:35:23 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id EAA29785; Tue, 25 Jul 2000 04:32:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id EAA28833; Tue, 25 Jul 2000 04:32:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail2.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA16585; Tue, 25 Jul 2000 04:32:33 -0700 Received: from duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (duteinh.et.tudelft.nl [130.161.42.1]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with ESMTP id EAA32726 for ; Tue, 25 Jul 2000 04:32:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: from dutein75 by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id NAA03117; Tue, 25 Jul 2000 13:31:09 +0200 (MET DST) Message-Id: <200007251131.NAA03117@duteinh.et.tudelft.nl> From: Erik Mouw To: carbone@merl.com Cc: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Subject: Re: backlight inverter circuit info needed In-Reply-To: Organization: Eric conspiracy secret labs Date: Tue 25 Jul 2000 13:31:08 +0100 (MDT) X-Face: "!Z|1XjFg!3Iw)BwM^M\k)J5KHiPddz}#/Zw%?$&Q!xqob"OA|})3_@&BTTiQERo?/^g[Z<9P4R8:5C:aqq.cw!hotLc=+u-"+1rq@9$V^8PbOUlodyi_sejt+D`iqkLpx$>.aXl%vnfPIt"LK|/%>94_Zrm8jy?`_[RKt'TuoxUxfk(gMhY(n|DBBl~c$dhO>G%6}R4+DGX3|idBm4oU&UM/XUP4I9aoN{]`ax%B?rgD(I3OJ<62Y6L X-Mailer: XCmail 1.2devel - with PGP support, PGP engine version 0.5 (IRIX64) X-Mailerorigin: http://www.fsai.fh-trier.de/~schmitzj/Xclasses/XCmail/ X-Eric-Conspiracy: There is no conspiracy! X-Loop: erik@it.et.tudelft.nl Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk On Mon, 24 Jul 2000 14:30:13 -0400 (EDT), Marco Carbone wrote: > Also, on the Intel Assabet Product Highlights page > (http://developer.intel.com/design/strong/quicklist/eval-plat/sa-1110.htm), > they list the items shipped with the SA-1110 Development Board. One of > the items listed is: > > "6-volt 2.5-amp universal input brick" > > What is this referring to? A power supply with 100 to 240 V input voltage so it can be used throughout the world. Erik -- Real Programmers consider "what you see is what you get" to be just as bad a concept in Text Editors as it is in women. No, the Real Programmer wants a "you asked for it, you got it" text editor -- complicated, cryptic, powerful, unforgiving, dangerous. From kramer@pa.dec.com Wed Jul 26 00:02:55 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id AAA05321; Wed, 26 Jul 2000 00:02:54 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from zmamail05.zma.compaq.com (zmamail05.zma.compaq.com [161.114.64.105]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id AAA13468 for ; Wed, 26 Jul 2000 00:02:52 +0200 (METDST) Received: by zmamail05.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 51C4657DE; Tue, 25 Jul 2000 18:02:21 -0400 (EDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by zmamail05.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id A602159FD; Tue, 25 Jul 2000 18:02:18 -0400 (EDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA07990; Tue, 25 Jul 2000 15:01:56 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id OAA20406; Tue, 25 Jul 2000 14:56:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id OAA19675; Tue, 25 Jul 2000 14:56:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: from zmamail01.nz-tay.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA25043; Tue, 25 Jul 2000 14:56:47 -0700 Received: by zmamail01.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 611DD304; Tue, 25 Jul 2000 17:56:47 -0400 (EDT) Received: from ADSServer.flatpanels.com (unknown [207.196.69.66]) by zmamail01.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CEE3E2D4 for ; Tue, 25 Jul 2000 17:56:46 -0400 (EDT) Received: by ADS_SERVER with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21) id ; Tue, 25 Jul 2000 17:48:46 -0400 Message-Id: <91B07CA588CED3118CFE00105AC97594026FDD@ADS_SERVER> From: "Huh, Woojung" To: "SA1100-Linux (E-mail)" Cc: "Nicolas Pitre (E-mail)" Subject: minix fs Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2000 17:48:45 -0400 Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21) Content-Type: text/plain Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk I use minix filesystem on flash ROM with Linux 2.3.35. When I use ext2 fs, there is no problem, but minix fs has file truncation problem. If I create several files on minix fs, some file is truncated. Truncation size and file is arbitrary. I tried to upgrade only minix fs (linux/fs/minix) to 2.3.99 and 2.4.0. But I can not complie, some structure is changed. Is there any bug on minix fs of 2.3.35 ? Do I have to upgrade ? Thanks, Woojung Huh From kramer@pa.dec.com Wed Jul 26 14:09:44 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id OAA07481; Wed, 26 Jul 2000 14:09:43 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from zmamail05.zma.compaq.com (zmamail05.zma.compaq.com [161.114.64.105]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id OAA02439 for ; Wed, 26 Jul 2000 14:09:41 +0200 (METDST) Received: by zmamail05.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id A69A658E2; Wed, 26 Jul 2000 08:09:10 -0400 (EDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by zmamail05.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id E94F75B48; Wed, 26 Jul 2000 08:09:07 -0400 (EDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA30850; Wed, 26 Jul 2000 05:09:02 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id FAA08990; Wed, 26 Jul 2000 05:06:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id FAA08570; Wed, 26 Jul 2000 05:06:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail2.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA28141; Wed, 26 Jul 2000 05:06:03 -0700 Received: from duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (duteinh.et.tudelft.nl [130.161.42.1]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with ESMTP id FAA21172 for ; Wed, 26 Jul 2000 05:06:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: from dutein75 by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id OAA07459; Wed, 26 Jul 2000 14:04:42 +0200 (MET DST) Message-Id: <200007261204.OAA07459@duteinh.et.tudelft.nl> From: Erik Mouw To: WHuh@flatpanels.com Cc: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com, nico@CAM.ORG Subject: Re: minix fs In-Reply-To: <91B07CA588CED3118CFE00105AC97594026FDD@ADS_SERVER> Organization: Eric conspiracy secret labs Date: Wed 26 Jul 2000 14:04:40 +0100 (MDT) X-Face: "!Z|1XjFg!3Iw)BwM^M\k)J5KHiPddz}#/Zw%?$&Q!xqob"OA|})3_@&BTTiQERo?/^g[Z<9P4R8:5C:aqq.cw!hotLc=+u-"+1rq@9$V^8PbOUlodyi_sejt+D`iqkLpx$>.aXl%vnfPIt"LK|/%>94_Zrm8jy?`_[RKt'TuoxUxfk(gMhY(n|DBBl~c$dhO>G%6}R4+DGX3|idBm4oU&UM/XUP4I9aoN{]`ax%B?rgD(I3OJ<62Y6L X-Mailer: XCmail 1.2devel - with PGP support, PGP engine version 0.5 (IRIX64) X-Mailerorigin: http://www.fsai.fh-trier.de/~schmitzj/Xclasses/XCmail/ X-Eric-Conspiracy: There is no conspiracy! X-Loop: erik@it.et.tudelft.nl Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk On Tue, 25 Jul 2000 17:48:45 -0400, Huh, Woojung wrote: > I use minix filesystem on flash ROM with Linux 2.3.35. > When I use ext2 fs, there is no problem, but minix fs has file truncation > problem. > If I create several files on minix fs, some file is truncated. > Truncation size and file is arbitrary. > I tried to upgrade only minix fs (linux/fs/minix) to 2.3.99 and 2.4.0. > But I can not complie, some structure is changed. > Is there any bug on minix fs of 2.3.35 ? > Do I have to upgrade ? Yes. Somewhere around 2.3.35 a new VM system was introduced into the mainline kernel which broke all filesystems. Linus only fixed the ext2 and nfs filesystems, because that are the ones he uses most. The other filesystems were left as an "excercise to the reader" (where "reader" == "filesystem maintainer"). Of course this introduced many bugs into the kernel, so it is very well possible that you see one of them right now. I recommend upgrading to linux-2.4.0-test4-np1. Erik -- Yes, it works sometimes. If you need something that "works sometimes" use Windows! -- Victor Khimenko on linux-kernel From kramer@pa.dec.com Thu Jul 27 06:47:24 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id GAA10077; Thu, 27 Jul 2000 06:47:24 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from ztxmail04.ztx.compaq.com (ztxmail04.ztx.compaq.com [161.114.1.208]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id GAA29462 for ; Thu, 27 Jul 2000 06:47:21 +0200 (METDST) Received: by ztxmail04.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id E92A132E; Wed, 26 Jul 2000 23:46:48 -0500 (CDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by ztxmail04.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 2A4083D0; Wed, 26 Jul 2000 23:46:47 -0500 (CDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA10934; Wed, 26 Jul 2000 21:46:35 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id VAA25233; Wed, 26 Jul 2000 21:41:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id VAA16313; Wed, 26 Jul 2000 21:41:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ztxmail01.nz-cce.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA07786; Wed, 26 Jul 2000 21:41:44 -0700 Received: by ztxmail01.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 6E6874245; Wed, 26 Jul 2000 23:41:44 -0500 (CDT) Received: from xanadu.gn.com (modemcable248.137-200-24.mtl.mc.videotron.net [24.200.137.248]) by ztxmail01.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 953E01F46 for ; Wed, 26 Jul 2000 23:41:43 -0500 (CDT) Received: from localhost (nico@localhost) by xanadu.gn.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id AAA17083 for ; Thu, 27 Jul 2000 00:40:54 -0400 X-Authentication-Warning: xanadu.gn.com: nico owned process doing -bs Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2000 00:40:53 -0400 (EDT) From: Nicolas Pitre X-Sender: nico@xanadu.gn.com To: SA-1100/Linux Subject: diff-2.4.0-test4-rmk1-np1 Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk ... is available at the usual places This contains: - updated to 2.4.0-test4-rmk1 - duplicate machine selection macros removed - FrameBuffer driver updates/fixes Jamey Hicks & Jeff Sutherland - New BSE's "nanoEngine" SBC support Stuart Adams - New Intrinsyc CerfBoard SBC support I-Gene Leong BTW: Support for the following SA1100 targets is wether incomplete or apparently not maintained anymore: - Tifon - Penny I would like to get any sign of life for those, otherwise I'll remove the existing but incomplete code pertaining to them from the tree in a near future. If you are the author/maintainer of those, please get in touch with me ASAP. Have fun! Nicolas From kramer@pa.dec.com Thu Jul 27 10:41:26 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id KAA10654; Thu, 27 Jul 2000 10:41:25 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from zmamail05.zma.compaq.com (zmamail05.zma.compaq.com [161.114.64.105]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id KAA04649 for ; Thu, 27 Jul 2000 10:41:22 +0200 (METDST) Received: by zmamail05.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 358625B40; Thu, 27 Jul 2000 04:40:51 -0400 (EDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by zmamail05.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 0BAA1588F; Thu, 27 Jul 2000 04:40:48 -0400 (EDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA09360; Thu, 27 Jul 2000 01:40:40 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id BAA21184; Thu, 27 Jul 2000 01:35:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id BAA19653; Thu, 27 Jul 2000 01:34:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: from zmamail01.nz-tay.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA17898; Thu, 27 Jul 2000 01:34:53 -0700 Received: by zmamail01.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id B775F351; Thu, 27 Jul 2000 04:34:47 -0400 (EDT) Received: from www.ntust.edu.tw (www.ntust.edu.tw [140.118.31.56]) by zmamail01.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 396113D3 for ; Thu, 27 Jul 2000 04:34:01 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mail.ntust.edu.tw (mail.ntust.edu.tw [140.118.31.60]) by www.ntust.edu.tw (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id QAA27800; Thu, 27 Jul 2000 16:33:31 +0800 (CST) Received: from mail.ntust.edu.tw (mail.ntust.edu.tw [140.118.31.60]) by mail.ntust.edu.tw (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id QAA29422; Thu, 27 Jul 2000 16:33:24 +0800 (CST) Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2000 16:33:24 +0800 (CST) From: Chester To: Erik Mouw Cc: WHuh@flatpanels.com, sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com, nico@CAM.ORG, chester@linux.org.tw Subject: Re: minix fs In-Reply-To: <200007261204.OAA07459@duteinh.et.tudelft.nl> Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk minix fs have size limition with it. BTW,has anyone try with intel startaflash 28F128J3A with flash block driver?? I can create ext2 file system with flash and mount it,and it's disk size match for flash_mem.h defined.Also i can put some package on it,umount/mount. But can't run program when mount it. Any comment or suggestion?? Chester __ __ _ __ __ __ ___ ___ | | | | | \ | | | | | | \ \ / / -o) | | | | | \_| | | | | | \ \/ / (o- /\\ | |__ | | | | | |_| | / /\ \ //\ _\_v |_____||__| |__|\___| \_______| /__/ \__\ v_/_ http://www.linux.org.tw/~chester chester@wahoo.com.tw , chester@linux.org.tw On Wed, 26 Jul 2000, Erik Mouw wrote: > On Tue, 25 Jul 2000 17:48:45 -0400, Huh, Woojung wrote: > > I use minix filesystem on flash ROM with Linux 2.3.35. > > When I use ext2 fs, there is no problem, but minix fs has file truncation > > problem. > > If I create several files on minix fs, some file is truncated. > > Truncation size and file is arbitrary. > > I tried to upgrade only minix fs (linux/fs/minix) to 2.3.99 and 2.4.0. > > But I can not complie, some structure is changed. > > Is there any bug on minix fs of 2.3.35 ? > > Do I have to upgrade ? > > Yes. Somewhere around 2.3.35 a new VM system was introduced into the > mainline kernel which broke all filesystems. Linus only fixed the ext2 > and nfs filesystems, because that are the ones he uses most. The other > filesystems were left as an "excercise to the reader" (where "reader" == > "filesystem maintainer"). Of course this introduced many bugs into the > kernel, so it is very well possible that you see one of them right now. I > recommend upgrading to linux-2.4.0-test4-np1. > > > Erik > > -- > Yes, it works sometimes. If you need something that "works sometimes" > use Windows! -- Victor Khimenko on linux-kernel > > > From kramer@pa.dec.com Thu Jul 27 14:02:21 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id OAA11588; Thu, 27 Jul 2000 14:02:21 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from zmamail04.zma.compaq.com (zmamail04.zma.compaq.com [161.114.64.104]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id OAA11692 for ; Thu, 27 Jul 2000 14:02:18 +0200 (METDST) Received: by zmamail04.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id B2DF357C; Thu, 27 Jul 2000 08:01:47 -0400 (EDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by zmamail04.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 086AD6BB; Thu, 27 Jul 2000 08:01:45 -0400 (EDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA08409; Thu, 27 Jul 2000 05:01:39 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id EAA06029; Thu, 27 Jul 2000 04:58:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id EAA26655; Thu, 27 Jul 2000 04:58:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail1.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA17504; Thu, 27 Jul 2000 04:58:35 -0700 Received: from ns0.utdallas.edu (ns0.utdallas.edu [129.110.10.1]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with ESMTP id EAA27678 for ; Thu, 27 Jul 2000 04:58:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: from apache.utdallas.edu (apache.utdallas.edu [129.110.16.9]) by ns0.utdallas.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 372D81A0003; Thu, 27 Jul 2000 06:54:18 -0500 (CDT) Received: from localhost (vasantr@localhost) by apache.utdallas.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id GAA03461; Thu, 27 Jul 2000 06:54:49 -0500 (CDT) X-Authentication-Warning: apache.utdallas.edu: vasantr owned process doing -bs Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2000 06:54:49 -0500 (CDT) From: Vasant Ramasubramanian To: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com, linux-arm@vger.rutgers.edu, handhelds@handhelds.org Subject: GDB stubs for ARM Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk I've asked around but no one so far seems to have complete GDB stubs for ARM, or am I mistaken? (StrongARM hopefully). I know of the Arnold bootloader, but honestly that code is hard to follow since it links in so much functionality... Suggestions? Thanks, Vasant. From kramer@pa.dec.com Thu Jul 27 16:14:55 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id QAA12134; Thu, 27 Jul 2000 16:14:54 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from zmamail05.zma.compaq.com (zmamail05.zma.compaq.com [161.114.64.105]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id QAA16844 for ; Thu, 27 Jul 2000 16:14:52 +0200 (METDST) Received: by zmamail05.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 966A657F5; Thu, 27 Jul 2000 10:14:21 -0400 (EDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by zmamail05.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 99BDA5A71; Thu, 27 Jul 2000 10:14:18 -0400 (EDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA25512; Thu, 27 Jul 2000 07:14:11 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id HAA28283; Thu, 27 Jul 2000 07:12:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id HAA27572; Thu, 27 Jul 2000 07:12:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: from zmamail01.nz-tay.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA26233; Thu, 27 Jul 2000 07:12:47 -0700 Received: by zmamail01.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id DAE57208; Thu, 27 Jul 2000 10:12:46 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailgate.keith-koep.com (mailgate.keith-koep.com [195.8.230.32]) by zmamail01.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E10F2BD for ; Thu, 27 Jul 2000 10:12:46 -0400 (EDT) Received: from otto (otto [195.8.230.40]) by mailgate.keith-koep.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id PAA08177 for ; Thu, 27 Jul 2000 15:18:00 +0200 Message-Id: <200007271318.PAA08177@mailgate.keith-koep.com> Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2000 16:11:43 +0200 (MET DST) From: keith Reply-To: keith Subject: GDB stubs for ARM available here ! To: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Md5: EkZTwuBsY3SE+WHSvA6vHg== X-Mailer: dtmail 1.2.0 CDE Version 1.2 SunOS 5.6 sun4u sparc Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk We wrote a stub for strongarm. It works very well. We added a udp interface to get it working over ip. Volker _________________________________________________________________ | | | KEITH & KOEP GMBH DEVELOPMENT OF EMBEDDED CONTROL SYSTEMS | | KOENIGSBERGER STR.2 PHONE +49 (0)202 2525 30 | | D-42277 WUPPERTAL FAX +49 (0)202 2525 333 | | GERMANY keith@keith-koep.com | |_________________________________________________________________| From kramer@pa.dec.com Thu Jul 27 16:20:04 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id QAA12151; Thu, 27 Jul 2000 16:20:03 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from ztxmail05.ztx.compaq.com (ztxmail05.ztx.compaq.com [161.114.1.209]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id QAA17046 for ; Thu, 27 Jul 2000 16:20:01 +0200 (METDST) Received: by ztxmail05.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id B2BDC551; Thu, 27 Jul 2000 09:19:29 -0500 (CDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by ztxmail05.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 01AB346B; Thu, 27 Jul 2000 09:19:27 -0500 (CDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA05844; Thu, 27 Jul 2000 07:19:27 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id HAA25554; Thu, 27 Jul 2000 07:19:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id HAA22541; Thu, 27 Jul 2000 07:19:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: from crl.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA21010; Thu, 27 Jul 2000 07:19:11 -0700 Received: from ims.crl.dec.com (ims.crl.dec.com [16.11.0.11]) by crl.dec.com (8.8.8/RWD-1.2) with ESMTP id KAA23420; Thu, 27 Jul 2000 10:19:04 -0400 (EDT) Received: by ims.crl.dec.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21) id ; Thu, 27 Jul 2000 10:24:30 -0400 Message-Id: From: George France To: "'keith'" , sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Subject: RE: GDB stubs for ARM available here ! Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2000 10:19:07 -0400 Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk Where????? > -----Original Message----- > From: keith [mailto:keith@mailgate.keith-koep.com] > Sent: Thursday, July 27, 2000 10:12 AM > To: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com > Subject: GDB stubs for ARM available here ! > > > We wrote a stub for strongarm. It works very well. We added a > udp interface to get it working over ip. > > Volker > _________________________________________________________________ > | | > | KEITH & KOEP GMBH DEVELOPMENT OF EMBEDDED CONTROL SYSTEMS | > | KOENIGSBERGER STR.2 PHONE +49 (0)202 2525 30 | > | D-42277 WUPPERTAL FAX +49 (0)202 2525 333 | > | GERMANY keith@keith-koep.com | > |_________________________________________________________________| > > From kramer@pa.dec.com Thu Jul 27 17:55:00 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id RAA12588; Thu, 27 Jul 2000 17:54:59 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from ztxmail03.ztx.compaq.com (ztxmail03.ztx.compaq.com [161.114.1.207]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id RAA21174 for ; Thu, 27 Jul 2000 17:54:56 +0200 (METDST) Received: by ztxmail03.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id B2C6D1A30; Thu, 27 Jul 2000 10:54:24 -0500 (CDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by ztxmail03.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id C9A4F1B6C; Thu, 27 Jul 2000 10:54:22 -0500 (CDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA08830; Thu, 27 Jul 2000 08:54:20 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id IAA01196; Thu, 27 Jul 2000 08:52:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id IAA31377; Thu, 27 Jul 2000 08:52:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: from zmamail01.nz-tay.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA23756; Thu, 27 Jul 2000 08:52:34 -0700 Received: by zmamail01.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 199992732; Thu, 27 Jul 2000 11:52:30 -0400 (EDT) Received: from ns.centurysoftware.com (NS.CenSoft.COM [208.219.23.2]) by zmamail01.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8DA5C3B93 for ; Thu, 27 Jul 2000 11:52:29 -0400 (EDT) Received: from censoft.com (IDENT:markl@penguin.CenSoft.COM [208.219.23.17]) by ns.centurysoftware.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id JAA18726 for ; Thu, 27 Jul 2000 09:52:11 -0700 (MST) Message-Id: <39805ABC.79EB9054@censoft.com> Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2000 09:52:28 -0600 From: Mark Lehrer Reply-To: markl@censoft.com Organization: Century Software X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.74 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.2.16 i686) X-Accept-Language: en Mime-Version: 1.0 To: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Subject: pthreads? Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk I am having some weird issues with pthreads - can someone else confirm whether (or not) they are having any luck using pthreads on arm-linux? The symptom is a complete kernel freeze - it always happens when the threaded process terminates, and randomly happens while the process is running. The problem could of course be elsewhere, I just want to get a comfort level that someone, somewhere, is having success with pthreads. FYI I'm currently using libpthread-0.8.so (size 252238) which came with the LART package. Thanks! Mark From kramer@pa.dec.com Thu Jul 27 18:06:03 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id SAA12663; Thu, 27 Jul 2000 18:06:03 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from zmamail03.zma.compaq.com (zmamail03.zma.compaq.com [161.114.64.103]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id SAA21792 for ; Thu, 27 Jul 2000 18:06:00 +0200 (METDST) Received: by zmamail03.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 60CDD5ECF; Thu, 27 Jul 2000 12:05:29 -0400 (EDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by zmamail03.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 9556E5F8B; Thu, 27 Jul 2000 12:05:26 -0400 (EDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA02789; Thu, 27 Jul 2000 09:05:25 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id JAA31809; Thu, 27 Jul 2000 09:04:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id JAA28717; Thu, 27 Jul 2000 09:04:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail1.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA25203; Thu, 27 Jul 2000 09:03:34 -0700 Received: from ns0.utdallas.edu (ns0.utdallas.edu [129.110.10.1]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with ESMTP id JAA32410 for ; Thu, 27 Jul 2000 09:03:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: from apache.utdallas.edu (apache.utdallas.edu [129.110.16.9]) by ns0.utdallas.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id DCB171A04C5; Thu, 27 Jul 2000 10:59:16 -0500 (CDT) Received: from localhost (vasantr@localhost) by apache.utdallas.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id KAA07059; Thu, 27 Jul 2000 10:59:48 -0500 (CDT) X-Authentication-Warning: apache.utdallas.edu: vasantr owned process doing -bs Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2000 10:59:47 -0500 (CDT) From: Vasant Ramasubramanian To: keith Cc: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Subject: Re: GDB stubs for ARM available here ! In-Reply-To: <200007271318.PAA08177@mailgate.keith-koep.com> Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk On Thu, 27 Jul 2000, keith wrote: > We wrote a stub for strongarm. It works very well. We added a > udp interface to get it working over ip. I grabbed the source awhile ago, the one for Arnold but the code was lacking in documentation/useful comments making it hard for me to follow. George: Goto'e Keith's FTP site and get his bootloader for Arnold(a Kieth & Koep product). It has some interesting stuff though a bit too much is mashed together. Thanks, Vasant. From kramer@pa.dec.com Thu Jul 27 18:30:42 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id SAA12770; Thu, 27 Jul 2000 18:30:42 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from zmamail03.zma.compaq.com (zmamail03.zma.compaq.com [161.114.64.103]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id SAA22524 for ; Thu, 27 Jul 2000 18:30:39 +0200 (METDST) Received: by zmamail03.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 0B88F5F54; Thu, 27 Jul 2000 12:30:08 -0400 (EDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by zmamail03.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 085D95F56; Thu, 27 Jul 2000 12:30:05 -0400 (EDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA23845; Thu, 27 Jul 2000 09:30:03 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id JAA00443; Thu, 27 Jul 2000 09:29:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id JAA30747; Thu, 27 Jul 2000 09:29:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: from zmamail01.nz-tay.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA30228; Thu, 27 Jul 2000 09:29:28 -0700 Received: by zmamail01.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id D85163995; Thu, 27 Jul 2000 12:29:27 -0400 (EDT) Received: from empeg.com (morrison.empeg.co.uk [193.119.19.130]) by zmamail01.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 53337381E for ; Thu, 27 Jul 2000 12:29:26 -0400 (EDT) Received: from dodgy (dodgy.internal.empeg.com [10.1.1.32]) by empeg.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id RAA12499; Thu, 27 Jul 2000 17:29:20 +0100 Message-Id: <00a101bff7e7$d0f5f7f0$0104060a@internal.empeg.com> From: "Mike Crowe" To: , References: <39805ABC.79EB9054@censoft.com> Subject: Re: pthreads? Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2000 17:29:20 +0100 Organization: empeg ltd Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-Msmail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2919.6700 X-Mimeole: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2919.6700 Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk Mark Lehrer wrote: > I am having some weird issues with pthreads - can someone else confirm > whether (or not) they are having any luck using pthreads on arm-linux? We reasonably heavily use pthreads on a linux-2.2.14-rmk5-np17-empeg31 kernel. We have around fifteen threads running constantly at varying priorities using the round-robin scheduler. > The symptom is a complete kernel freeze - it always happens when the > threaded process terminates, and randomly happens while the process is > running. We don't see any of these problems. > The problem could of course be elsewhere, I just want to get a comfort > level that someone, somewhere, is having success with pthreads. FYI I'm > currently using libpthread-0.8.so (size 252238) which came with the LART > package. We're using our own compiled version of 0.8. Our .so is considerably smaller - it must be stripped. -- Mike Crowe empeg ltd From kramer@pa.dec.com Thu Jul 27 19:17:07 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id TAA12937; Thu, 27 Jul 2000 19:17:07 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from zmamail04.zma.compaq.com (zmamail04.zma.compaq.com [161.114.64.104]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id TAA23952 for ; Thu, 27 Jul 2000 19:17:04 +0200 (METDST) Received: by zmamail04.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 8CA1F4CA; Thu, 27 Jul 2000 13:16:33 -0400 (EDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by zmamail04.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 94A3D773; Thu, 27 Jul 2000 13:16:30 -0400 (EDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA04699; Thu, 27 Jul 2000 10:16:28 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id KAA23194; Thu, 27 Jul 2000 10:15:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id KAA03471; Thu, 27 Jul 2000 10:15:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: from zmamail01.nz-tay.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA04060; Thu, 27 Jul 2000 10:15:23 -0700 Received: by zmamail01.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id C6BF22A1; Thu, 27 Jul 2000 13:15:22 -0400 (EDT) Received: from tazenda.demon.co.uk (tazenda.demon.co.uk [158.152.220.239]) by zmamail01.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E6AF7235 for ; Thu, 27 Jul 2000 13:15:20 -0400 (EDT) Received: from kings-cross.london.uk.eu.org [::ffff:192.168.2.83] by tazenda.demon.co.uk with esmtp (Exim 3.11 #1 (Debian)) id 13Hqmz-0004jL-00; Thu, 27 Jul 2000 17:45:41 +0100 Received: from localhost ([::ffff:127.0.0.1] helo=tazenda.demon.co.uk ident=pb) by kings-cross.london.uk.eu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 13HqkM-0000Fk-00; Thu, 27 Jul 2000 17:42:58 +0100 X-Mailer: exmh version 2.1.1 10/15/1999 (debian) To: markl@censoft.com Cc: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Subject: Re: pthreads? In-Reply-To: Message from Mark Lehrer of "Thu, 27 Jul 2000 09:52:28 MDT." <39805ABC.79EB9054@censoft.com> References: <39805ABC.79EB9054@censoft.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2000 17:42:58 +0100 From: Philip Blundell Message-Id: Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk >I am having some weird issues with pthreads - can someone else confirm >whether (or not) they are having any luck using pthreads on arm-linux? Yes, I've used threads with no problems. >The symptom is a complete kernel freeze - it always happens when the >threaded process terminates, and randomly happens while the process is >running. I guess this could be an SA-1100 specific problem; I've only tested on SA-110 and ARM7. You don't say what version of the kernel you're using so that might also be an issue. Can you distill the program down to a simple test case that others could try? p. From kramer@pa.dec.com Thu Jul 27 20:23:21 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id UAA13129; Thu, 27 Jul 2000 20:23:20 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from zmamail04.zma.compaq.com (zmamail04.zma.compaq.com [161.114.64.104]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id UAA25824 for ; Thu, 27 Jul 2000 20:23:18 +0200 (METDST) Received: by zmamail04.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id CE307773; Thu, 27 Jul 2000 14:22:47 -0400 (EDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by zmamail04.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id D9A384CD; Thu, 27 Jul 2000 14:22:44 -0400 (EDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA08757; Thu, 27 Jul 2000 11:22:38 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id LAA23129; Thu, 27 Jul 2000 11:19:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id LAA02702; Thu, 27 Jul 2000 11:19:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail1.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA13771; Thu, 27 Jul 2000 11:19:36 -0700 Received: from ns.centurysoftware.com (NS.CenSoft.COM [208.219.23.2]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with ESMTP id LAA31956 for ; Thu, 27 Jul 2000 11:19:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: from censoft.com (IDENT:markl@penguin.CenSoft.COM [208.219.23.17]) by ns.centurysoftware.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id MAA20997; Thu, 27 Jul 2000 12:18:13 -0700 (MST) Message-Id: <39807CF6.226A0919@censoft.com> Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2000 12:18:30 -0600 From: Mark Lehrer Organization: Century Software X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.74 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.2.16 i686) X-Accept-Language: en Mime-Version: 1.0 To: Philip Blundell Cc: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Subject: Re: pthreads? References: <39805ABC.79EB9054@censoft.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk Philip Blundell wrote: > >I am having some weird issues with pthreads - can someone else confirm > >whether (or not) they are having any luck using pthreads on arm-linux? > > Yes, I've used threads with no problems. OK thanks. > >The symptom is a complete kernel freeze - it always happens when the > >threaded process terminates, and randomly happens while the process is > >running. > > I guess this could be an SA-1100 specific problem; I've only tested on SA-110 > and ARM7. You don't say what version of the kernel you're using so that might > also be an issue. > > Can you distill the program down to a simple test case that others could try? Probably, but I don't want to waste anyone else's time with this - it is most likely either a problem in my graphics library or the sound driver. I just wanted to get a feel for where to look first, and a couple of success stories with pthreads means to look . Thanks! Mark From kramer@pa.dec.com Fri Jul 28 02:17:44 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id CAA14143; Fri, 28 Jul 2000 02:17:43 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from zmamail04.zma.compaq.com (zmamail04.zma.compaq.com [161.114.64.104]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id CAA06841 for ; Fri, 28 Jul 2000 02:17:42 +0200 (METDST) Received: by zmamail04.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 2859C7F6; Thu, 27 Jul 2000 20:17:11 -0400 (EDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by zmamail04.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 5FAAA79F; Thu, 27 Jul 2000 20:17:08 -0400 (EDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA14851; Thu, 27 Jul 2000 17:17:00 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id RAA20160; Thu, 27 Jul 2000 17:14:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id RAA16703; Thu, 27 Jul 2000 17:14:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ztxmail01.nz-cce.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA13161; Thu, 27 Jul 2000 17:14:24 -0700 Received: by ztxmail01.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id E360417D0; Thu, 27 Jul 2000 19:14:23 -0500 (CDT) Received: from neo-dial.neo.rr.com (neo-dial.neo.rr.com [204.210.223.26]) by ztxmail01.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D41D158A for ; Thu, 27 Jul 2000 19:14:23 -0500 (CDT) Received: from mail.cannet.com (c1-1g185.neo.rr.com [24.93.216.185]) by neo-dial.neo.rr.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id XAA29090; Thu, 27 Jul 2000 23:11:05 -0400 (EDT) Message-Id: <3980CF90.45A16390@mail.cannet.com> Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2000 20:10:56 -0400 From: David Plentovich X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.72 [en] (WinNT; I) X-Accept-Language: en Mime-Version: 1.0 To: Mark Lehrer Cc: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Subject: Re: pthreads? References: <39805ABC.79EB9054@censoft.com> <39807CF6.226A0919@censoft.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk Mark, I have had a similar problem using the pthread library with certain versions of arm-linux. We built kernel 2.2.14 and 2.3.99 for the Brutus and everything worked fine. When I purchased a Netwinder (SA110) it was loaded with 2.2.13 and pthreads did not work. I did not get a chance to load 2.2.14 on Netwinder (tools problem). Good luck, David Plentovich Mark Lehrer wrote: > Philip Blundell wrote: > > > >I am having some weird issues with pthreads - can someone else confirm > > >whether (or not) they are having any luck using pthreads on arm-linux? > > > > Yes, I've used threads with no problems. > > OK thanks. > > > >The symptom is a complete kernel freeze - it always happens when the > > >threaded process terminates, and randomly happens while the process is > > >running. > > > > I guess this could be an SA-1100 specific problem; I've only tested on SA-110 > > and ARM7. You don't say what version of the kernel you're using so that might > > also be an issue. > > > > Can you distill the program down to a simple test case that others could try? > > Probably, but I don't want to waste anyone else's time with this - it is most > likely either a problem in my graphics library or the sound driver. I just wanted > to get a feel for where to look first, and a couple of success stories with > pthreads means to look . > > Thanks! > Mark From kramer@pa.dec.com Fri Jul 28 10:57:14 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id KAA15504; Fri, 28 Jul 2000 10:57:13 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from ztxmail03.ztx.compaq.com (ztxmail03.ztx.compaq.com [161.114.1.207]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id KAA23796 for ; Fri, 28 Jul 2000 10:57:11 +0200 (METDST) Received: by ztxmail03.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 244C71940; Fri, 28 Jul 2000 03:56:39 -0500 (CDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by ztxmail03.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 803CF1959; Fri, 28 Jul 2000 03:56:37 -0500 (CDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA14507; Fri, 28 Jul 2000 01:53:40 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id BAA32435; Fri, 28 Jul 2000 01:48:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id BAA31618; Fri, 28 Jul 2000 01:48:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: from zmamail01.nz-tay.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA05932; Fri, 28 Jul 2000 01:48:14 -0700 Received: by zmamail01.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 8E2A725CF; Fri, 28 Jul 2000 04:48:13 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailgate.keith-koep.com (mailgate.keith-koep.com [195.8.230.32]) by zmamail01.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C173C1D3 for ; Fri, 28 Jul 2000 04:48:12 -0400 (EDT) Received: from otto (otto [195.8.230.40]) by mailgate.keith-koep.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id JAA02875 for ; Fri, 28 Jul 2000 09:53:53 +0200 Message-Id: <200007280753.JAA02875@mailgate.keith-koep.com> Date: Fri, 28 Jul 2000 10:47:10 +0200 (MET DST) From: keith Reply-To: keith Subject: RE: GDB stubs for ARM available here :) To: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Md5: XnkGyy4eJMQvwaVkvng0Hw== X-Mailer: dtmail 1.2.0 CDE Version 1.2 SunOS 5.6 sun4u sparc Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk Where????? > -----Original Message----- Look at ftp://www.keith-koep.com/pub/arm-tools/gdbstub Volker From kramer@pa.dec.com Sat Jul 29 06:01:28 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id GAA18831; Sat, 29 Jul 2000 06:01:27 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from zmamail04.zma.compaq.com (zmamail04.zma.compaq.com [161.114.64.104]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id GAA00565 for ; Sat, 29 Jul 2000 06:01:26 +0200 (METDST) Received: by zmamail04.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 1D0F96AF; Sat, 29 Jul 2000 00:00:55 -0400 (EDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by zmamail04.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 53E455D6; Sat, 29 Jul 2000 00:00:52 -0400 (EDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA02876; Fri, 28 Jul 2000 21:00:51 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id VAA02203; Fri, 28 Jul 2000 21:00:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id VAA01541; Fri, 28 Jul 2000 21:00:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail2.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA15161; Fri, 28 Jul 2000 21:00:42 -0700 Received: from ns4.sony.co.jp (ns4.Sony.CO.JP [202.238.80.4]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with ESMTP id VAA03700 for ; Fri, 28 Jul 2000 21:00:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail2.sony.co.jp (gatekeeper7.Sony.CO.JP [202.238.80.21]) by ns4.sony.co.jp (R8) with ESMTP id MAA64425; Sat, 29 Jul 2000 12:59:38 +0900 (JST) Received: from smail1.sm.sony.co.jp (smail1.sm.sony.co.jp [43.11.253.1]) by mail2.sony.co.jp (R8) with ESMTP id MAA28003; Sat, 29 Jul 2000 12:59:50 +0900 (JST) Received: from email.sm.sony.co.jp (email.sm.sony.co.jp [43.11.253.2]) by smail1.sm.sony.co.jp (8.8.8/3.6W) with ESMTP id MAA27775; Sat, 29 Jul 2000 12:58:47 +0900 (JST) Received: from sm.sony.co.jp (kei@gaia.sm.sony.co.jp [43.11.132.48]) by email.sm.sony.co.jp (8.8.8/3.6W) with ESMTP id MAA24795; Sat, 29 Jul 2000 12:54:43 +0900 (JST) Message-Id: <200007290354.MAA24795@email.sm.sony.co.jp> To: Alex M Alex Cc: linux@handhelds.org, linux-arm@vger.rutgers.edu, nanogui@linuxhacker.org, linuxce-devel@linuxce.org, sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Subject: Re: [Linux] Perl port In-Reply-To: Your message of Sun, 13 Aug 2000 09:51:15 +0530. Date: Sat, 29 Jul 2000 12:59:36 +0900 From: Hiroshi Kawashima Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk Hi. > Hi all, > Did any one ported perl to > Linux CE. Perl 5.00503 is working on my hard-float userland. You can access all my hard-float RPMS from: http://www.peanuts.gr.jp/~kei/Hard-Float/ ---- Kawashima From kramer@pa.dec.com Sat Jul 29 20:13:34 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id UAA19890; Sat, 29 Jul 2000 20:13:34 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from ztxmail05.ztx.compaq.com (ztxmail05.ztx.compaq.com [161.114.1.209]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id UAA13405 for ; Sat, 29 Jul 2000 20:13:32 +0200 (METDST) Received: by ztxmail05.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id A70AD927; Sat, 29 Jul 2000 13:13:00 -0500 (CDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by ztxmail05.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id F1D51BC0; Sat, 29 Jul 2000 13:12:58 -0500 (CDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA28295; Sat, 29 Jul 2000 11:10:15 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id LAA19774; Sat, 29 Jul 2000 11:04:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id LAA17339; Sat, 29 Jul 2000 11:04:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail2.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA01587; Sat, 29 Jul 2000 11:04:01 -0700 Received: from csa.iisc.ernet.in (csa.iisc.ernet.in [144.16.67.8]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with ESMTP id LAA14273 for ; Sat, 29 Jul 2000 11:03:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: from diamond.csa.iisc.ernet.in (IDENT:root@diamond.csa.iisc.ernet.in [144.16.67.28]) by csa.iisc.ernet.in (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id XAA08139 for ; Sat, 29 Jul 2000 23:34:05 +0530 Received: from localhost (phanit@localhost) by diamond.csa.iisc.ernet.in (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id XAA03396 for ; Sat, 29 Jul 2000 23:33:48 +0530 X-Authentication-Warning: diamond.csa.iisc.ernet.in: phanit owned process doing -bs Date: Sat, 29 Jul 2000 23:33:47 +0530 (IST) From: Phani Kishore Talluri To: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Subject: Doubt Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk Sir I want to have the latest bin utilities and also glibc so that i can cross compile the perl-5.6 and can install it on the sa1110 Assabet platform . Suggest me some method and also the location where i can get the sources for the utils and compiler. If i can directly get the sa1110 compatible thing then tell me the address so that i can download that. thank you sir waiting for your reply sincerely phani "God never plays dice with universe" --ALBERT EINSTEIN ********************************************************************** T.Phani Kishore ( CSA dept ) | S/O T Sambasiva Rao (lecturer) room#:E89,IISc hostel, | Nehru Nagar, Nandigama,Krishna dt, Bangalore. 560012 | AP 521185 ********************************************************************** PHONE NO: $room:(080)3092622 $Lab: (080)3602095 $Home :(08678)77275 visit me:www2.csa.iisc.ernet.in/~phanit From kramer@pa.dec.com Sat Jul 29 22:24:52 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id WAA20094; Sat, 29 Jul 2000 22:24:52 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from ztxmail04.ztx.compaq.com (ztxmail04.ztx.compaq.com [161.114.1.208]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id WAA16573 for ; Sat, 29 Jul 2000 22:24:50 +0200 (METDST) Received: by ztxmail04.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 6E9EC431; Sat, 29 Jul 2000 15:24:18 -0500 (CDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by ztxmail04.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id A1E84563; Sat, 29 Jul 2000 15:24:16 -0500 (CDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA09686; Sat, 29 Jul 2000 13:21:33 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id NAA21662; Sat, 29 Jul 2000 13:14:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id NAA21652; Sat, 29 Jul 2000 13:14:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail1.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA14552; Sat, 29 Jul 2000 13:14:30 -0700 Received: from duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (duteinh.et.tudelft.nl [130.161.42.1]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with ESMTP id NAA07595 for ; Sat, 29 Jul 2000 13:14:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: from kalman.et.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id WAA20083; Sat, 29 Jul 2000 22:13:12 +0200 (MET DST) Received: (from erik@localhost) by kalman.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.8/8.8.8/Debian/GNU) id WAA09068; Sat, 29 Jul 2000 22:13:11 +0200 Message-Id: <200007292013.WAA09068@kalman.et.tudelft.nl> Subject: Re: Doubt In-Reply-To: from Phani Kishore Talluri at "Jul 29, 0 11:33:47 pm" To: phanit@csa.iisc.ernet.in (Phani Kishore Talluri) Date: Sat, 29 Jul 2000 22:13:11 +0200 (CEST) Cc: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com From: J.A.K.Mouw@ITS.TUDelft.NL (Erik Mouw) Organization: Eric Conspiracy Secret Labs X-Eric-Conspiracy: There is no conspiracy! X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL39 (25)] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk Phani Kishore Talluri wrote: > I want to have the latest bin utilities and also glibc so that i > can cross compile the perl-5.6 and can install it on the sa1110 Assabet > platform . Suggest me some method and also the location where i can get > the sources for the utils and compiler. If i can directly get the sa1110 > compatible thing then tell me the address so that i can download that. You can get a precompiled cross compiler for arm-linux from http://www.lart.tudelft.nl/ or from http://www.handhelds.org/ . The LART site also has links to all necessary sources if you want to compile the cross compiler yourself. Erik -- J.A.K. (Erik) Mouw, Information and Communication Theory Group, Department of Electrical Engineering, Faculty of Information Technology and Systems, Delft University of Technology, PO BOX 5031, 2600 GA Delft, The Netherlands Phone: +31-15-2783635 Fax: +31-15-2781843 Email: J.A.K.Mouw@its.tudelft.nl WWW: http://www-ict.its.tudelft.nl/~erik/ From kramer@pa.dec.com Sun Jul 30 06:12:25 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id GAA20761; Sun, 30 Jul 2000 06:12:25 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from ztxmail05.ztx.compaq.com (ztxmail05.ztx.compaq.com [161.114.1.209]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id GAA22350 for ; Sun, 30 Jul 2000 06:12:24 +0200 (METDST) Received: by ztxmail05.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 121E77B6; Sat, 29 Jul 2000 23:11:52 -0500 (CDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by ztxmail05.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 6132174B; Sat, 29 Jul 2000 23:11:50 -0500 (CDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA27612; Sat, 29 Jul 2000 21:09:06 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id VAA10991; Sat, 29 Jul 2000 21:04:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id VAA29464; Sat, 29 Jul 2000 21:04:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: from zmamail01.nz-tay.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA20491; Sat, 29 Jul 2000 21:04:38 -0700 Received: by zmamail01.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 6A75E26B1; Sun, 30 Jul 2000 00:04:38 -0400 (EDT) Received: from xanadu.gn.com (modemcable248.137-200-24.mtl.mc.videotron.net [24.200.137.248]) by zmamail01.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D4BBE260F for ; Sun, 30 Jul 2000 00:04:37 -0400 (EDT) Received: from localhost (nico@localhost) by xanadu.gn.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id AAA29431 for ; Sun, 30 Jul 2000 00:03:48 -0400 X-Authentication-Warning: xanadu.gn.com: nico owned process doing -bs Date: Sun, 30 Jul 2000 00:03:48 -0400 (EDT) From: Nicolas Pitre X-Sender: nico@xanadu.gn.com To: SA-1100/Linux Subject: diff-2.4.0-test5-rmk1-np1 Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk ... is available at the usual sites. This contains: - updated to 2.4.0-test5-rmk1 - ... oh well... some little tweaks and fixes (forgive me but I'm pretty sleepy ATM) Anyway this will be my last patch for the next two weeks. I'm on vacation effective from now... and I'm going to bed right away. If anyone produce a patch which might be of general interest, please CC the list as wel as sending it to me. I'll process them only in two weeks. Ciao! Nicolas From kramer@pa.dec.com Mon Jul 31 09:29:43 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id JAA23253; Mon, 31 Jul 2000 09:29:42 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from ztxmail05.ztx.compaq.com (ztxmail05.ztx.compaq.com [161.114.1.209]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id JAA15139 for ; Mon, 31 Jul 2000 09:29:40 +0200 (METDST) Received: by ztxmail05.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id B1AEA65F; Mon, 31 Jul 2000 02:29:08 -0500 (CDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by ztxmail05.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id A91D06B2; Mon, 31 Jul 2000 02:29:04 -0500 (CDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA01442; Mon, 31 Jul 2000 00:26:19 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id AAA32442; Mon, 31 Jul 2000 00:20:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id AAA01137; Mon, 31 Jul 2000 00:20:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: from zmamail01.nz-tay.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA13144; Mon, 31 Jul 2000 00:20:54 -0700 Received: by zmamail01.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 1352E36AD; Mon, 31 Jul 2000 03:20:54 -0400 (EDT) Received: from gate2.mn.man.de (gate2.mn.man.de [151.136.100.137]) by zmamail01.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F66136B4 for ; Mon, 31 Jul 2000 03:20:53 -0400 (EDT) Received: by gate2.mn.man.de (8.9.0/8.9.0) id JAA23886; Mon, 31 Jul 2000 09:20:18 +0200 (CEST) From: Martin_Doering@mn.man.de Received: (from smtp-gw@localhost) by gate2.mn.man.de (MSCAN) id 3/gate2.mn.man.de/smtp-gw/mscan; Mon Jul 31 09:20:17 2000 Cc: alex@violet.csa.iisc.ernet.in, linux@handhelds.org, linux-arm@vger.rutgers.edu, linuxce-devel@linuxce.org, nanogui@linuxhacker.org, sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Date: Mon, 31 Jul 2000 09:14:02 +0200 Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Subject: Antwort: Re: [Linux] Perl port To: Hiroshi Kawashima X-Mailer: Lotus Notes Version 5.0.2c (Intl) 08 Februar 2000 X-Mimetrack: Serialize by Router on MMMAIL001/SRV/MAN_Nutzfahrzeuge(Release 5.0.4 |June 8, 2000) at 07/31/2000 09:14:03 AM, Serialize complete at 07/31/2000 09:14:03 AM, Itemize by SMTP Server on MMHUB001/SRV/MAN_Nutzfahrzeuge(Release 5.0.4 |June 8, 2000) at 07/31/2000 09:21:16 AM, Serialize by Router on MMHUB001/SRV/MAN_Nutzfahrzeuge(Release 5.0.4 |June 8, 2000) at 07/31/2000 09:21:19 AM, Serialize complete at 07/31/2000 09:21:19 AM Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk What means hard-float? What a project is this? Regards, ---------------------------------------------------------------------------= ----------------------------- Martin D=F6ring, Systemtechnik (IDT) MAN Nutzfahrzeuge AG Dachauerstra=DFe 667 D-80995 M=FCnchen Tel.: +49(0)89 / 1580 - 1199 Fax: +49(0)89 / 1580 - 91-1199 E-Mail: Martin=5FDoering@mn.man.de From kramer@pa.dec.com Mon Jul 31 12:02:18 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id MAA24013; Mon, 31 Jul 2000 12:02:17 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from ztxmail04.ztx.compaq.com (ztxmail04.ztx.compaq.com [161.114.1.208]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id MAA20358 for ; Mon, 31 Jul 2000 12:02:15 +0200 (METDST) Received: by ztxmail04.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 9DC99590; Mon, 31 Jul 2000 05:01:43 -0500 (CDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by ztxmail04.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 6F9D07C1; Mon, 31 Jul 2000 05:01:41 -0500 (CDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA09931; Mon, 31 Jul 2000 02:59:00 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id CAA32458; Mon, 31 Jul 2000 02:56:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id CAA11100; Mon, 31 Jul 2000 02:56:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: from zmamail01.nz-tay.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA13890; Mon, 31 Jul 2000 02:56:58 -0700 Received: by zmamail01.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 9F2683634; Mon, 31 Jul 2000 05:56:57 -0400 (EDT) Received: from duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (duteinh.et.tudelft.nl [130.161.42.1]) by zmamail01.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E82D3674 for ; Mon, 31 Jul 2000 05:56:57 -0400 (EDT) Received: from dutein75 by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id LAA23955; Mon, 31 Jul 2000 11:55:42 +0200 (MET DST) Message-Id: <200007310955.LAA23955@duteinh.et.tudelft.nl> From: Erik Mouw To: Martin_Doering@mn.man.de Cc: alex@violet.csa.iisc.ernet.in, linux@handhelds.org, linux-arm@vger.rutgers.edu, linuxce-devel@linuxce.org, nanogui@linuxhacker.org, sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Subject: Re: Antwort: Re: [Linux] Perl port In-Reply-To: Organization: Eric conspiracy secret labs Date: Mon 31 Jul 2000 11:55:41 +0100 (MDT) X-Face: "!Z|1XjFg!3Iw)BwM^M\k)J5KHiPddz}#/Zw%?$&Q!xqob"OA|})3_@&BTTiQERo?/^g[Z<9P4R8:5C:aqq.cw!hotLc=+u-"+1rq@9$V^8PbOUlodyi_sejt+D`iqkLpx$>.aXl%vnfPIt"LK|/%>94_Zrm8jy?`_[RKt'TuoxUxfk(gMhY(n|DBBl~c$dhO>G%6}R4+DGX3|idBm4oU&UM/XUP4I9aoN{]`ax%B?rgD(I3OJ<62Y6L X-Mailer: XCmail 1.2devel - with PGP support, PGP engine version 0.5 (IRIX64) X-Mailerorigin: http://www.fsai.fh-trier.de/~schmitzj/Xclasses/XCmail/ X-Eric-Conspiracy: There is no conspiracy! X-Loop: erik@it.et.tudelft.nl Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk On Mon, 31 Jul 2000 09:14:02 +0200, Martin_Doering@mn.man.de wrote: > What means hard-float? What a project is this? Hard-float means that you're using the floating point unit in the CPU (or emulate them in the OS). Soft-float means that you're emulating the floating point instructions in a software library. I can imagine that you can't follow this, I think you're subscribed to the nanogui list and this question is waaaaaaay off-topic for that list. People, _please_ don't cross post, but post your questions to the relevant mailing list. Erik -- LART. 250 MIPS under one Watt. Free hardware design files. http://www.lart.tudelft.nl/ From kramer@pa.dec.com Mon Jul 31 13:04:23 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id NAA24321; Mon, 31 Jul 2000 13:04:23 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from ztxmail03.ztx.compaq.com (ztxmail03.ztx.compaq.com [161.114.1.207]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id NAA22373 for ; Mon, 31 Jul 2000 13:04:21 +0200 (METDST) Received: by ztxmail03.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id C23041AFA; Mon, 31 Jul 2000 06:03:49 -0500 (CDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by ztxmail03.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id A6FC418A8; Mon, 31 Jul 2000 06:03:47 -0500 (CDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA12466; Mon, 31 Jul 2000 04:01:05 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id DAA02952; Mon, 31 Jul 2000 03:59:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id DAA03846; Mon, 31 Jul 2000 03:59:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: from zmamail01.nz-tay.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA14993; Mon, 31 Jul 2000 03:58:59 -0700 Received: by zmamail01.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id AB8B53434; Mon, 31 Jul 2000 06:58:58 -0400 (EDT) Received: from www.ntust.edu.tw (www.ntust.edu.tw [140.118.31.56]) by zmamail01.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 58641366E for ; Mon, 31 Jul 2000 06:58:19 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mail.ntust.edu.tw (mail.ntust.edu.tw [140.118.31.60]) by www.ntust.edu.tw (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id SAA00387; Mon, 31 Jul 2000 18:57:58 +0800 (CST) Received: from mail.ntust.edu.tw (mail.ntust.edu.tw [140.118.31.60]) by mail.ntust.edu.tw (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id SAA16322; Mon, 31 Jul 2000 18:57:57 +0800 (CST) Date: Mon, 31 Jul 2000 18:57:57 +0800 (CST) From: Chester To: Alex M Alex Cc: Martin_Doering@mn.man.de, sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Subject: Re: Has anybody ported perl to SA1110 In-Reply-To: Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk Look at netwinder package, $which perl /usr/bin/perl $ I think it's all armv4l __ __ _ __ __ __ ___ ___ | | | | | \ | | | | | | \ \ / / -o) | | | | | \_| | | | | | \ \/ / (o- /\\ | |__ | | | | | |_| | / /\ \ //\ _\_v |_____||__| |__|\___| \_______| /__/ \__\ v_/_ http://www.linux.org.tw/~chester chester@wahoo.com.tw , chester@linux.org.tw On Tue, 15 Aug 2000, Alex M Alex wrote: > Hi all > I like to know any one has ported perl to strong arm . > regards > alex > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: nanogui-unsubscribe@linuxhacker.org > For additional commands, e-mail: nanogui-help@linuxhacker.org > From kramer@pa.dec.com Mon Jul 31 12:40:30 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id MAA24214; Mon, 31 Jul 2000 12:40:29 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from zmamail05.zma.compaq.com (zmamail05.zma.compaq.com [161.114.64.105]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id MAA21780 for ; Mon, 31 Jul 2000 12:40:28 +0200 (METDST) Received: by zmamail05.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 972BD5B30; Mon, 31 Jul 2000 06:39:56 -0400 (EDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by zmamail05.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id A396B584B; Mon, 31 Jul 2000 06:39:53 -0400 (EDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA08457; Mon, 31 Jul 2000 03:37:06 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id DAA14531; Mon, 31 Jul 2000 03:32:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id DAA21249; Mon, 31 Jul 2000 03:32:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ztxmail01.nz-cce.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA26330; Mon, 31 Jul 2000 03:32:39 -0700 Received: by ztxmail01.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id AD3584330; Mon, 31 Jul 2000 05:32:38 -0500 (CDT) Received: from duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (duteinh.et.tudelft.nl [130.161.42.1]) by ztxmail01.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D29514174 for ; Mon, 31 Jul 2000 05:32:37 -0500 (CDT) Received: from dutein75 by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id MAA24163; Mon, 31 Jul 2000 12:32:30 +0200 (MET DST) Message-Id: <200007311032.MAA24163@duteinh.et.tudelft.nl> From: Erik Mouw To: nico@CAM.ORG Cc: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Subject: Re: diff-2.4.0-test5-rmk1-np1 In-Reply-To: Organization: Eric conspiracy secret labs Date: Mon 31 Jul 2000 12:32:28 +0100 (MDT) X-Face: "!Z|1XjFg!3Iw)BwM^M\k)J5KHiPddz}#/Zw%?$&Q!xqob"OA|})3_@&BTTiQERo?/^g[Z<9P4R8:5C:aqq.cw!hotLc=+u-"+1rq@9$V^8PbOUlodyi_sejt+D`iqkLpx$>.aXl%vnfPIt"LK|/%>94_Zrm8jy?`_[RKt'TuoxUxfk(gMhY(n|DBBl~c$dhO>G%6}R4+DGX3|idBm4oU&UM/XUP4I9aoN{]`ax%B?rgD(I3OJ<62Y6L X-Mailer: XCmail 1.2devel - with PGP support, PGP engine version 0.5 (IRIX64) X-Mailerorigin: http://www.fsai.fh-trier.de/~schmitzj/Xclasses/XCmail/ X-Eric-Conspiracy: There is no conspiracy! X-Loop: erik@it.et.tudelft.nl Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk On Sun, 30 Jul 2000 00:03:48 -0400 (EDT), Nicolas Pitre wrote: > If anyone produce a patch which might be of general interest, please CC > the list as wel as sending it to me. I'll process them only in two weeks. OK, I had some stuff lying aroung, so I made a patch. It's available from: http://www.lart.tudelft.nl/lartware/port/diff-2.4.0-test5-rmk1-np1-em1.gz This patch contains: - New LART default configuration - LART Flash memory suport (not yet tested) - Fixes in the sa1100 mcp (UCB1200 audio) driver - Fixes in the UCB 1200 touch screen driver - Fix a race condition in the SA100 SSP driver (BB 1710 audio) - IDE driver can be compiled as a module - Initial IDE support for LART Can somebody test the IDE driver? I'm getting oopses when I use it, and I suspect that it's not LART related. Erik -- J.A.K. (Erik) Mouw, Information and Communication Theory Group, Department of Electrical Engineering, Faculty of Information Technology and Systems, Delft University of Technology, PO BOX 5031, 2600 GA Delft, The Netherlands Phone: +31-15-2783635 Fax: +31-15-2781843 Email: J.A.K.Mouw@its.tudelft.nl WWW: http://www-ict.its.tudelft.nl/~erik/ From kramer@pa.dec.com Tue Aug 1 19:20:17 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id TAA00981; Tue, 1 Aug 2000 19:20:17 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from zmamail05.zma.compaq.com (zmamail05.zma.compaq.com [161.114.64.105]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id TAA16629 for ; Tue, 1 Aug 2000 19:20:15 +0200 (METDST) Received: by zmamail05.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id D5C995937; Tue, 1 Aug 2000 13:19:43 -0400 (EDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by zmamail05.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 2301A58E2; Tue, 1 Aug 2000 13:19:41 -0400 (EDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA08516; Tue, 1 Aug 2000 10:16:49 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id KAA20487; Tue, 1 Aug 2000 10:10:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail1.digital.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id KAA13752; Tue, 1 Aug 2000 10:10:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: from server2.williamsappraisers.com (server2.williamsappraisers.com [216.2.240.35]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with ESMTP id KAA22411 for ; Tue, 1 Aug 2000 10:10:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: from wilee by server2.williamsappraisers.com with local (Exim 2.05 #1 (Debian)) id 13JfYQ-00013o-00; Tue, 1 Aug 2000 13:10:10 -0400 Date: Tue, 1 Aug 2000 13:10:10 -0400 From: Andrew Puch To: sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Subject: Ipac and PC Card Expansion Pack Message-Id: <20000801131010.A3984@server2.williamsappraisers.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.95.3i Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk Does any know the status of PC Card Expansion Pack , and if you can plug a Usb hub into the Ipac ?? If so that would be too cool . nice usb keyboard , usb ethernet , IBM micro drive in the PC card . 1 Gig PDA , hell I could run gnome on it From kramer@pa.dec.com Tue Aug 1 20:24:51 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id UAA01181; Tue, 1 Aug 2000 20:24:51 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from zmamail05.zma.compaq.com (zmamail05.zma.compaq.com [161.114.64.105]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id UAA18698 for ; Tue, 1 Aug 2000 20:24:49 +0200 (METDST) Received: by zmamail05.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id C21135A6F; Tue, 1 Aug 2000 14:24:18 -0400 (EDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by zmamail05.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id E4F515913; Tue, 1 Aug 2000 14:24:15 -0400 (EDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA28796; Tue, 1 Aug 2000 11:21:23 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id LAA25748; Tue, 1 Aug 2000 11:18:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail1.digital.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id LAA25401; Tue, 1 Aug 2000 11:18:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: from server2.williamsappraisers.com (server2.williamsappraisers.com [216.2.240.35]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with ESMTP id LAA24167 for ; Tue, 1 Aug 2000 11:18:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: from wilee by server2.williamsappraisers.com with local (Exim 2.05 #1 (Debian)) id 13Jgc8-0001ET-00; Tue, 1 Aug 2000 14:18:04 -0400 Date: Tue, 1 Aug 2000 14:18:04 -0400 From: Andrew Puch To: sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Subject: USB to Serial Message-Id: <20000801141804.A4694@server2.williamsappraisers.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.95.3i Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk I would like to be sure on this before I fry my ipac I would like to be sure before I go about messing with the Ipac http://www.jimpick.com/pub/photos/2000/ipaq/ I would like to make a cable that does not do nasty hardware hacks I should be able to use the USB 2 serial conversion . aka take usb male end to a female usb end then do hardware magic ?? or am I smoking crack ?? From kramer@pa.dec.com Tue Aug 1 19:36:37 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id TAA01037; Tue, 1 Aug 2000 19:36:37 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from ztxmail03.ztx.compaq.com (ztxmail03.ztx.compaq.com [161.114.1.207]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id TAA17107 for ; Tue, 1 Aug 2000 19:36:34 +0200 (METDST) Received: by ztxmail03.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 8448F1A29; Tue, 1 Aug 2000 12:36:03 -0500 (CDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by ztxmail03.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id B88E7783; Tue, 1 Aug 2000 12:36:01 -0500 (CDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA14153; Tue, 1 Aug 2000 10:33:20 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id KAA24026; Tue, 1 Aug 2000 10:31:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id KAA24766; Tue, 1 Aug 2000 10:31:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail2.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA08159; Tue, 1 Aug 2000 10:31:38 -0700 Received: from duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (duteinh.et.tudelft.nl [130.161.42.1]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with ESMTP id KAA30868 for ; Tue, 1 Aug 2000 10:31:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: from dutein75 by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id TAA01017; Tue, 1 Aug 2000 19:30:11 +0200 (MET DST) Message-Id: <200008011730.TAA01017@duteinh.et.tudelft.nl> From: Erik Mouw To: wilee@williamsappraisers.com Cc: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Subject: Re: Ipac and PC Card Expansion Pack In-Reply-To: <20000801131010.A3984@server2.williamsappraisers.com> Organization: Eric conspiracy secret labs Date: Tue 01 Aug 2000 19:30:10 +0100 (MDT) X-Face: "!Z|1XjFg!3Iw)BwM^M\k)J5KHiPddz}#/Zw%?$&Q!xqob"OA|})3_@&BTTiQERo?/^g[Z<9P4R8:5C:aqq.cw!hotLc=+u-"+1rq@9$V^8PbOUlodyi_sejt+D`iqkLpx$>.aXl%vnfPIt"LK|/%>94_Zrm8jy?`_[RKt'TuoxUxfk(gMhY(n|DBBl~c$dhO>G%6}R4+DGX3|idBm4oU&UM/XUP4I9aoN{]`ax%B?rgD(I3OJ<62Y6L X-Mailer: XCmail 1.2devel - with PGP support, PGP engine version 0.5 (IRIX64) X-Mailerorigin: http://www.fsai.fh-trier.de/~schmitzj/Xclasses/XCmail/ X-Eric-Conspiracy: There is no conspiracy! X-Loop: erik@it.et.tudelft.nl Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk On Tue, 1 Aug 2000 13:10:10 -0400, Andrew Puch wrote: > Does any know the status of PC Card Expansion Pack , It works. Have a look at http://www.handhelds.org/ for more information. > and if you can plug a Usb hub into the Ipac ?? > > If so that would be too cool . > > nice usb keyboard , usb ethernet , Because the iPAQ has an SA1110 CPU, you can only use it as an USB client device, not as an USB master, so connecting a hub or a keyboard doesn't make sense. > IBM micro drive in the PC card . That's already done, although the guys at CRL used a 340MB drive. > 1 Gig PDA , hell I could run gnome on it In theory. In practice you will be limited by the amount of memory. The question is if the GNOME desktop metaphor will scale to a handheld computer. The Windoze CE metaphor didn't, that's one of the reasons why PalmOS is so popular. Erik -- In theory, practice and theory are the same, but in practice they are different -- Larry McVoy From kramer@pa.dec.com Wed Aug 2 21:26:03 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id VAA05698; Wed, 2 Aug 2000 21:26:03 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from ztxmail05.ztx.compaq.com (ztxmail05.ztx.compaq.com [161.114.1.209]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id VAA03514 for ; Wed, 2 Aug 2000 21:25:12 +0200 (METDST) Received: by ztxmail05.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 15AFD851; Wed, 2 Aug 2000 14:24:40 -0500 (CDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by ztxmail05.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 652A2B33; Wed, 2 Aug 2000 14:24:38 -0500 (CDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA19685; Wed, 2 Aug 2000 12:21:41 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id MAA29387; Wed, 2 Aug 2000 12:16:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id MAA02761; Wed, 2 Aug 2000 12:16:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ztxmail01.nz-cce.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA06579; Wed, 2 Aug 2000 12:16:54 -0700 Received: by ztxmail01.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 4A6571658; Wed, 2 Aug 2000 14:16:54 -0500 (CDT) Received: from cambridge.merl.com (cambridge.merl.com [137.203.190.1]) by ztxmail01.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6106D22D2 for ; Wed, 2 Aug 2000 14:16:22 -0500 (CDT) Received: from merl.com (eagle.merl.com [137.203.128.4]) by cambridge.merl.com (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id PAA16772 for ; Wed, 2 Aug 2000 15:16:18 -0400 Received: from zathrus.merl.com (root@zathrus.merl.com [137.203.128.26]) by merl.com (8.8.7/8.8.4) with ESMTP id JAA27592 for ; Wed, 2 Aug 2000 09:50:12 -0400 Received: from localhost (carbone@localhost) by zathrus.merl.com (8.9.3/8.8.3) with ESMTP id QAA08005 for ; Tue, 1 Aug 2000 16:33:11 -0400 Date: Tue, 1 Aug 2000 16:33:11 -0400 (EDT) From: Marco Carbone To: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Subject: Li-Ion Battery Charging Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk Hello all, Today I started to play w/ my Assabet on battery power by disconnecting the AC adapter and connecting the jumper for J22. It ran fine for a bit and I used it a couple times. Later in the day, I tried booting and in the middle of the kernel init, the Assabet rebooted and started the flash init. all over again. It did this repeatedly. I assume that this is because the battery power is low. Now, my question is: how do I recharge the Li-Ion battery? Does it recharge automatically when the AC adapter is plugged in? Does J22 need to be enabled for it to recharge? (I'm wary here - the manual is pretty clear that J22 should be clear when the AC is plugged in and vice versa) Can anyone who's done this point me in the right direction? Thanks, Marco Carbone From kramer@pa.dec.com Wed Aug 2 04:04:13 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id EAA02406; Wed, 2 Aug 2000 04:04:12 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from zmamail04.zma.compaq.com (zmamail04.zma.compaq.com [161.114.64.104]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id EAA01507 for ; Wed, 2 Aug 2000 04:04:11 +0200 (METDST) Received: by zmamail04.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 7B9A98E4; Tue, 1 Aug 2000 22:03:39 -0400 (EDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by zmamail04.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id C148E9FE; Tue, 1 Aug 2000 22:03:36 -0400 (EDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA22064; Tue, 1 Aug 2000 19:00:53 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id SAA08614; Tue, 1 Aug 2000 18:58:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id SAA08967; Tue, 1 Aug 2000 18:58:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ztxmail01.nz-cce.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA26274; Tue, 1 Aug 2000 18:58:06 -0700 Received: by ztxmail01.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 752B12103; Tue, 1 Aug 2000 20:58:06 -0500 (CDT) Received: from exchange.kanald.com.tr (exchange.kanald.com.tr [194.133.169.12]) by ztxmail01.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EDAF72291 for ; Tue, 1 Aug 2000 20:58:02 -0500 (CDT) Received: from host (ip188.providence11.ri.pub-ip.psi.net [38.26.242.188]) by exchange.kanald.com.tr with SMTP (Microsoft Exchange Internet Mail Service Version 5.5.2650.21) id 36BX77CK; Wed, 2 Aug 2000 05:02:51 +0300 From: "Dennis Deern" Subject: Join Us... #6CD2 To: today373c@pa.dec.com X-Mailer: DiffondiCool V3,1,6,0 (W95/NT) (Build: Oct 18 1999) Mime-Version: 1.0 Date: Tue, 01 Aug 2000 21:50:03 -0500 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_007F_01BDF6C7.FABAC1B0" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <20000802015806.752B12103@ztxmail01.ztx.compaq.com> Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk This is a MIME Message ------=_NextPart_000_007F_01BDF6C7.FABAC1B0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_001_0080_01BDF6C7.FABAC1B0" ------=_NextPart_001_0080_01BDF6C7.FABAC1B0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable ***** This is an HTML Message ! ***** ------=_NextPart_001_0080_01BDF6C7.FABAC1B0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Executive Guild Membership ApplicationResponse-O-Matic Form Dear Candidate,

You were recently selected by The Office of the Managing
Director for a free listing on The International Executive
Who's Who=2E

Our Researchers gather information from many recognized
sources, including professional associations and societies,
trade organizations, newspaper and magazine articles,
professional reference publications, web presence, and
referrals from existing members=2E

As a highly respected professional in your field of
expertise, we believe your contributions merit very
serious consideration for inclusion on The International
Executive Who's Who=2E  To maintain the highest
level of accuracy, we ask you fill out the brief bit of
information below required for inclusion=2E

There is no cost or obligation to be listed on The
International Executive Who's Who=2E
 

My Sincere Thanks,

Lorraine A=2E Michaels
Office Of Managing Director


The International Executive Who's Who is not affiliated or associated with Marquis Who's Who=2E

If you wish to be removed from our list, please submit your request
at the bottom of this email=2E
International Executive Who's Who
Registration Form
(US and Canada Only)
Please fill out this form if you would like to be included on The International Executive Who's Who=2E For accuracy and publication purposes, please complete and send this form at the earliest opportunity=2E There is no charge or obligation to be listed on The International Executive Who's Who=2E
Your Name
Your Company
Title
Address
City
State or Province
Country
ZIP/Postal Code
Day Time Telephone
Home Phone
 (Not To Be Published)
Email

TO HELP US IN CONSIDERING YOUR APPLICATION, PLEASE TELL US A LITTLE ABOUT YOURSELF=2E=2E=2E
Your Business
(Financial Svcs, Banking, Computer Hardware, Software, Professional Svcs, Chemicals, Apparel, Aerospace, Food, Government, Utility, etc=2E)
Type of Organization
(M= fg, Dist/Wholesaler, Retailer, Law Firm,
Investment Bank, Commercial Bank, University,
Financial Consultants, Ad Agency, Contractor, Broker, etc=2E)
Your Business Expertise
(Corp=2EMgmt, Marketing, Civil Engineering,
Tax Law, Nuclear Physics, Database Development, Operations, Pathologist, Mortgage Banking, etc=2E)
Major Product Line
(Integrated Circuits, Commercial Aircraft, Adhesives, Cosmetics, Plastic Components, Snack Foods, etc=2E)


Note: Submitting this form= will be made by email, not by use of www=2E  Confirmation of its delivery= is made by browsing your outgoing mail=2E

Thank you for filling in this form, we will contact you with more information=2E

The International Executive is not affiliated or associated with Marquis Who's Who=2E

List Removal
Click Here
------=_NextPart_001_0080_01BDF6C7.FABAC1B0-- ------=_NextPart_000_007F_01BDF6C7.FABAC1B0-- From kramer@pa.dec.com Wed Aug 2 23:22:44 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id XAA06094; Wed, 2 Aug 2000 23:22:44 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from ztxmail05.ztx.compaq.com (ztxmail05.ztx.compaq.com [161.114.1.209]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id XAA07000 for ; Wed, 2 Aug 2000 23:22:00 +0200 (METDST) Received: by ztxmail05.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 8C047A55; Wed, 2 Aug 2000 16:21:28 -0500 (CDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by ztxmail05.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 9FD478F5; Wed, 2 Aug 2000 16:21:26 -0500 (CDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA05308; Wed, 2 Aug 2000 14:21:23 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id OAA08324; Wed, 2 Aug 2000 14:20:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id OAA07363; Wed, 2 Aug 2000 14:20:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ztxmail01.nz-cce.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA20869; Wed, 2 Aug 2000 14:20:32 -0700 Received: by ztxmail01.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id B8B6A2243; Wed, 2 Aug 2000 16:20:27 -0500 (CDT) Received: from ADSServer.flatpanels.com (adsserver.flatpanels.com [207.196.69.66]) by ztxmail01.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3355F1F5B for ; Wed, 2 Aug 2000 16:20:27 -0500 (CDT) Received: by adsserver.flatpanels.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21) id ; Wed, 2 Aug 2000 17:11:45 -0400 Message-Id: <91B07CA588CED3118CFE00105AC9759402700D@adsserver.flatpanels.com> From: "Huh, Woojung" To: "SA1100-Linux (E-mail)" Cc: "Nicolas Pitre (E-mail)" Subject: sync() does not write to actual Hardware Date: Wed, 2 Aug 2000 17:11:39 -0400 Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk Hi, All, I'm testing on 2.4.0-test4-np1 on ADS Graphics Client. When I execute "sync" command, it does not write to flash memory. Flash is updated when "umount" is executed. I also tested on 2.3.35, the result is same. Did anybody experience it ? Regards, Woojung Huh Applied Data Systems, Inc. E-mail whuh@applieddata.net Internet http://www.applieddata.net Phone 301.490.4007 x27 Information Enabling Tools. Embedded Computer Solutions. From kramer@pa.dec.com Thu Aug 3 03:48:52 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id DAA06834; Thu, 3 Aug 2000 03:48:51 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from zmamail03.zma.compaq.com (zmamail03.zma.compaq.com [161.114.64.103]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id DAA13944 for ; Thu, 3 Aug 2000 03:48:16 +0200 (METDST) Received: by zmamail03.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id EADDC5C86; Wed, 2 Aug 2000 21:47:44 -0400 (EDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by zmamail03.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 180725E72; Wed, 2 Aug 2000 21:47:42 -0400 (EDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA20077; Wed, 2 Aug 2000 18:44:58 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id SAA17175; Wed, 2 Aug 2000 18:41:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id SAA04264; Wed, 2 Aug 2000 18:41:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ztxmail01.nz-cce.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA26756; Wed, 2 Aug 2000 18:41:07 -0700 Received: by ztxmail01.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 788494474; Wed, 2 Aug 2000 20:41:06 -0500 (CDT) Received: from ms4.hinet.net (ms4.hinet.net [168.95.4.40]) by ztxmail01.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C652A45D0 for ; Wed, 2 Aug 2000 20:41:02 -0500 (CDT) Received: from server.animeta.com (www.animeta.com [211.75.26.90]) by ms4.hinet.net (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id JAA16779; Thu, 3 Aug 2000 09:40:44 +0800 (CST) Received: from animeta.com (IDENT:sthsu@midway.animeta.com [192.168.1.134]) by server.animeta.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id JAA00457; Thu, 3 Aug 2000 09:40:45 +0800 Message-Id: <3988CD3E.FF73AF79@animeta.com> Date: Thu, 03 Aug 2000 09:39:10 +0800 From: Shang-te Hsu X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.7 [zh_TW] (X11; I; Linux 2.2.14-3.0 i686) X-Accept-Language: zh-TW, en Mime-Version: 1.0 To: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Cc: Marco Carbone Subject: Re: Li-Ion Battery Charging References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk Marco, To charge battery, just connecting J22 with a jumper and plugging AC adapter. Intel manual did not describe how to charge battery very clearly. Only in "Intel StrongARM SA-1110/SA-1111 Development Kit Quick Start" User's Guide(page 8) have a paragraph describe how to change. (can be download from Intel web site) Shang-te Hsu. From kramer@pa.dec.com Thu Aug 3 17:14:31 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id RAA09280; Thu, 3 Aug 2000 17:14:31 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from zmamail05.zma.compaq.com (zmamail05.zma.compaq.com [161.114.64.105]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id RAA08131 for ; Thu, 3 Aug 2000 17:14:29 +0200 (METDST) Received: by zmamail05.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id AFB925AAA; Thu, 3 Aug 2000 11:13:58 -0400 (EDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by zmamail05.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id A8AC959E8; Thu, 3 Aug 2000 11:13:55 -0400 (EDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA05813; Thu, 3 Aug 2000 08:11:05 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id IAA16292; Thu, 3 Aug 2000 08:08:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id IAA28531; Thu, 3 Aug 2000 08:08:32 -0700 (PDT) From: Received: from mail2.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA16339; Thu, 3 Aug 2000 08:08:32 -0700 Received: from lhs.com (lnsmtpbos00.lhs.com [208.162.98.43]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with SMTP id IAA28752 for ; Thu, 3 Aug 2000 08:08:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: by lhs.com(Lotus SMTP MTA v4.6.6 (890.1 7-16-1999)) id 85256930.0054232F ; Thu, 3 Aug 2000 11:19:00 -0400 X-Lotus-Fromdomain: LHS To: Marco Carbone Cc: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Message-Id: <85256930.00542308.00@lhs.com> Date: Thu, 3 Aug 2000 11:03:54 -0400 Subject: Re: Li-Ion Battery Charging Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk Marco, Depending on which revision of the assabet board, you can recharge the battery by connecting both J22, and the power simultaneously. You might want to contact intel regarding which version you have.. -N ps, i havent forgotten about your frontlight inverter spec.... Marco Carbone on 08/01/2000 04:33:11 PM To: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com cc: (bcc: Nicholas Mistry/USER/US/LHS) Subject: Li-Ion Battery Charging Hello all, Today I started to play w/ my Assabet on battery power by disconnecting the AC adapter and connecting the jumper for J22. It ran fine for a bit and I used it a couple times. Later in the day, I tried booting and in the middle of the kernel init, the Assabet rebooted and started the flash init. all over again. It did this repeatedly. I assume that this is because the battery power is low. Now, my question is: how do I recharge the Li-Ion battery? Does it recharge automatically when the AC adapter is plugged in? Does J22 need to be enabled for it to recharge? (I'm wary here - the manual is pretty clear that J22 should be clear when the AC is plugged in and vice versa) Can anyone who's done this point me in the right direction? Thanks, Marco Carbone From kramer@pa.dec.com Fri Aug 4 14:07:55 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id OAA13031; Fri, 4 Aug 2000 14:07:54 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from zmamail03.zma.compaq.com (zmamail03.zma.compaq.com [161.114.64.103]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id OAA10365 for ; Fri, 4 Aug 2000 14:07:53 +0200 (METDST) Received: by zmamail03.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 460B1409C; Fri, 4 Aug 2000 08:07:22 -0400 (EDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by zmamail03.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 989BF41D1; Fri, 4 Aug 2000 08:07:19 -0400 (EDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA03990; Fri, 4 Aug 2000 05:04:23 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id EAA03054; Fri, 4 Aug 2000 04:59:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id EAA09032; Fri, 4 Aug 2000 04:59:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail1.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA17706; Fri, 4 Aug 2000 04:59:07 -0700 Received: from pat.bath.ac.uk (pat.bath.ac.uk [138.38.32.2]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with ESMTP id EAA29125 for ; Fri, 4 Aug 2000 04:59:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mary.bath.ac.uk ([138.38.32.14] helo=bath.ac.uk ident=mmdf) by pat.bath.ac.uk with smtp (Exim 3.12 #1) id 13Kg4l-0004hi-00 for sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com; Fri, 04 Aug 2000 12:55:43 +0100 Date: Fri, 4 Aug 2000 12:55:42 +0100 (BST) From: James Alford To: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Subject: SA1100 kernel booting problem. Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk (Sorry if you got this twice) I am trying to get the Intel StrongARM SA1100 Multimedia Development Board working with a linux kernel. It is unfortunatly not a Brutus (or Assabet). I can get the 2.2.14-rmk5-np17 kernel up but it crashes at "POSIX conformance teting by UNIFIX" This is probably due to the fact that the kernel is built for a Brutus. I have not yet started to edit the arch specfic bits yet. My problem is that with 2.4.0-test5-rmk1-np1. I can't get the kernel to start. The head stuff starts ok and decompresses the kernel outputing the line "Uncompressing Linux........................ done, botting the kernel." It just stops there, it does not seem to step into the uncompressed kernel. I think that the 2.5-test5 head stuff is working as it will boot the 2.2.14 kernel. I would prefer to modify the 2.4 tree to work with the SA1100 MM devel board rather than the 2.2 tree. If anybody could point me in the right direction to sort this out I would be most gratefull. James Alford From kramer@pa.dec.com Fri Aug 4 17:27:55 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id RAA13686; Fri, 4 Aug 2000 17:27:55 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from ztxmail04.ztx.compaq.com (ztxmail04.ztx.compaq.com [161.114.1.208]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id RAA17268 for ; Fri, 4 Aug 2000 17:27:53 +0200 (METDST) Received: by ztxmail04.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 0C6C8AF7; Fri, 4 Aug 2000 10:27:22 -0500 (CDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by ztxmail04.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 2DD2940A; Fri, 4 Aug 2000 10:27:20 -0500 (CDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA14389; Fri, 4 Aug 2000 08:24:37 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id IAA07132; Fri, 4 Aug 2000 08:22:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id IAA09674; Fri, 4 Aug 2000 08:22:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ztxmail01.nz-cce.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA03066; Fri, 4 Aug 2000 08:22:07 -0700 Received: by ztxmail01.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 12E631F05; Fri, 4 Aug 2000 10:22:07 -0500 (CDT) Received: from ADSServer.flatpanels.com (adsserver.flatpanels.com [207.196.69.66]) by ztxmail01.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BBD4820A1 for ; Fri, 4 Aug 2000 10:22:05 -0500 (CDT) Received: by adsserver.flatpanels.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21) id ; Fri, 4 Aug 2000 11:13:35 -0400 Message-Id: <91B07CA588CED3118CFE00105AC97594027022@adsserver.flatpanels.com> From: "Huh, Woojung" To: "'James Alford'" Cc: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Subject: RE: SA1100 kernel booting problem. Date: Fri, 4 Aug 2000 11:13:35 -0400 Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk I have no experience on SA1100 MM Dev. Board. But if you failed to boot after displaying "Uncompressed..." message. I think the problem came from initial architecture code. You have to specify initial architecture code to r1 at /arch/arm/boot/compressed/head.S, if your boot ROM does not pass it. Regards, Woojung Huh Applied Data Systems, Inc. E-mail whuh@applieddata.net Internet http://www.applieddata.net Phone 301.490.4007 x27 Information Enabling Tools. Embedded Computer Solutions. -----Original Message----- From: James Alford [SMTP:ee7joa@bath.ac.uk] Sent: Friday, August 04, 2000 7:56 AM To: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Subject: SA1100 kernel booting problem. (Sorry if you got this twice) I am trying to get the Intel StrongARM SA1100 Multimedia Development Board working with a linux kernel. It is unfortunatly not a Brutus (or Assabet). I can get the 2.2.14-rmk5-np17 kernel up but it crashes at "POSIX conformance teting by UNIFIX" This is probably due to the fact that the kernel is built for a Brutus. I have not yet started to edit the arch specfic bits yet. My problem is that with 2.4.0-test5-rmk1-np1. I can't get the kernel to start. The head stuff starts ok and decompresses the kernel outputing the line "Uncompressing Linux........................ done, botting the kernel." It just stops there, it does not seem to step into the uncompressed kernel. I think that the 2.5-test5 head stuff is working as it will boot the 2.2.14 kernel. I would prefer to modify the 2.4 tree to work with the SA1100 MM devel board rather than the 2.2 tree. If anybody could point me in the right direction to sort this out I would be most gratefull. James Alford From kramer@pa.dec.com Fri Aug 4 17:59:34 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id RAA13813; Fri, 4 Aug 2000 17:59:34 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from zmamail04.zma.compaq.com (zmamail04.zma.compaq.com [161.114.64.104]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id RAA18293 for ; Fri, 4 Aug 2000 17:59:33 +0200 (METDST) Received: by zmamail04.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 61D4C76C; Fri, 4 Aug 2000 11:59:02 -0400 (EDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by zmamail04.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 25B117A6; Fri, 4 Aug 2000 11:58:56 -0400 (EDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA10777; Fri, 4 Aug 2000 08:56:13 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id IAA00153; Fri, 4 Aug 2000 08:54:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail1.digital.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id IAA14294; Fri, 4 Aug 2000 08:54:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: from navigator.sw.com.sg (navigator.sw.com.sg [195.16.40.131]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with ESMTP id IAA17761 for ; Fri, 4 Aug 2000 08:54:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: from slider.sw.ru (slider.sw.com.sg [195.16.40.254]) by navigator.sw.com.sg (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id TAA05210 for ; Fri, 4 Aug 2000 19:34:38 +0400 (MSD) Received: (from root@localhost) by slider.sw.ru (8.9.1/8.9.1) id TAA02988 for sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com.procmail@slider.sw.ru; Fri, 4 Aug 2000 19:34:29 +0400 (MSD) Received: from exchruhydro.sw.com.sg (exchruhydro.sw.com.sg [195.16.40.3]) by slider.sw.ru (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id TAA02974 for ; Fri, 4 Aug 2000 19:34:28 +0400 (MSD) Received: from CYBER ([192.168.9.14]) by exchruhydro.sw.com.sg with SMTP (Microsoft Exchange Internet Mail Service Version 5.5.2650.21) id QDP3PQN6; Fri, 4 Aug 2000 19:35:11 +0400 Message-Id: <001101bffe29$6fe0f030$0e09a8c0@cyber> From: "Gennadiy M. Kurtsman" To: Subject: Q: Interrupt handler registration in 2.4.0 kernel Date: Fri, 4 Aug 2000 19:34:08 +0400 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="koi8-r" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-Msmail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 4.72.3110.5 X-Mimeole: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.3110.3 Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk Hello, now I'm porting Linux device driver from 2.2.14 kernel to 2.4.0 one. I try to register irq #11. GPIO_25 is interrupt source. Return code from *request_irq* procedure is -EBUSY. Looks like I need to describe GPIO_25 in GPIO_11-27 list. Which routines doing it are added in 2.4.0 kernel ? Something else ideas? Thank you. Gena Kurtsman. From kramer@pa.dec.com Fri Aug 4 21:02:15 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id VAA14379; Fri, 4 Aug 2000 21:02:15 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from ztxmail03.ztx.compaq.com (ztxmail03.ztx.compaq.com [161.114.1.207]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id VAA23328 for ; Fri, 4 Aug 2000 21:02:13 +0200 (METDST) Received: by ztxmail03.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 18E32AB0; Fri, 4 Aug 2000 14:01:42 -0500 (CDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by ztxmail03.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 4A4B8A14; Fri, 4 Aug 2000 14:01:40 -0500 (CDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA04409; Fri, 4 Aug 2000 11:58:52 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id LAA30915; Fri, 4 Aug 2000 11:56:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail2.digital.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id LAA03523; Fri, 4 Aug 2000 11:56:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pigeon.maya.com (po.maya.com [192.70.254.2]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with ESMTP id LAA17600 for ; Fri, 4 Aug 2000 11:55:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: from maya.com (cook-pc.maya.com [192.70.254.33]) by pigeon.maya.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 51F823EDA for ; Fri, 4 Aug 2000 14:44:52 -0400 (EDT) Message-Id: <398B12EA.B7030896@maya.com> Date: Fri, 04 Aug 2000 15:00:58 -0400 From: Nicole Cook X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.72 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.2.14-5.0 i686) X-Accept-Language: en Mime-Version: 1.0 To: sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Subject: gdbserver on sa1110 based board Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk I'm trying to get gdbserver running on an Intrynsic Cerfboard (which uses a sa1110 processor). Has anyone else done this? I have it going through a breakout board so I can use more than one serial input. When I try to run gdbserver I get: [root@CerfLinux /]$gdbserver /dev/ttyS1 helloarm Process helloarm created; pid = 76 Remote debugging using /dev/ttyS1 readchar: Got EOF Remote side has terminated connection. GDBserver will reopen the connection. Remote debugging using /dev/ttyS1 readchar: Got EOF (continues endlessly) Is there another method that people prefer to use to remote debug these and similar boards? Sorry if these are commonly asked questions - handhelds.org lists this as having no archive. Nicole Cook MAYA Design From kramer@pa.dec.com Fri Aug 4 21:56:55 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id VAA14508; Fri, 4 Aug 2000 21:56:54 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from ztxmail03.ztx.compaq.com (ztxmail03.ztx.compaq.com [161.114.1.207]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id VAA24948 for ; Fri, 4 Aug 2000 21:56:53 +0200 (METDST) Received: by ztxmail03.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 8991BAB4; Fri, 4 Aug 2000 14:56:21 -0500 (CDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by ztxmail03.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id C8B0AA3D; Fri, 4 Aug 2000 14:56:19 -0500 (CDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA00986; Fri, 4 Aug 2000 12:53:38 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id MAA03593; Fri, 4 Aug 2000 12:52:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail1.digital.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id MAA22088; Fri, 4 Aug 2000 12:52:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: from tazenda.demon.co.uk (tazenda.demon.co.uk [158.152.220.239]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with ESMTP id MAA20007 for ; Fri, 4 Aug 2000 12:51:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: from kings-cross.london.uk.eu.org [::ffff:192.168.2.83] by tazenda.demon.co.uk with esmtp (Exim 3.11 #1 (Debian)) id 13KnVG-0000Gl-00; Fri, 04 Aug 2000 20:51:34 +0100 Received: from localhost ([::ffff:127.0.0.1] helo=tazenda.demon.co.uk ident=pb) by kings-cross.london.uk.eu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 13KnVw-0000ct-00; Fri, 04 Aug 2000 20:52:16 +0100 X-Mailer: exmh version 2.1.1 10/15/1999 (debian) To: Nicole Cook Cc: sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Subject: Re: gdbserver on sa1110 based board In-Reply-To: Message from Nicole Cook of "Fri, 04 Aug 2000 15:00:58 EDT." <398B12EA.B7030896@maya.com> References: <398B12EA.B7030896@maya.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Fri, 04 Aug 2000 20:52:16 +0100 From: Philip Blundell Message-Id: Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk >I'm trying to get gdbserver running on an Intrynsic Cerfboard (which >uses a sa1110 processor). Has anyone else done this? I have it going >through a breakout board so I can use more than one serial input. When >I try to run gdbserver I get: I've only ever used gdbserver with a network connection rather than over the serial line. You could try that. >readchar: Got >EOF What do you see if you strace the gdbserver process? p. From kramer@pa.dec.com Mon Aug 7 21:01:06 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id VAA23559; Mon, 7 Aug 2000 21:01:06 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from ztxmail05.ztx.compaq.com (ztxmail05.ztx.compaq.com [161.114.1.209]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id VAA18654 for ; Mon, 7 Aug 2000 21:01:04 +0200 (METDST) Received: by ztxmail05.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id C1404756; Mon, 7 Aug 2000 14:00:31 -0500 (CDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by ztxmail05.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id EF7CF790; Mon, 7 Aug 2000 14:00:29 -0500 (CDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA22565; Mon, 7 Aug 2000 11:58:56 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id LAA21478; Mon, 7 Aug 2000 11:51:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id LAA22002; Mon, 7 Aug 2000 11:51:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: from crl.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA32585; Mon, 7 Aug 2000 11:51:54 -0700 Received: from highwind.crl.dec.com (highwind.crl.dec.com [16.11.0.177]) by crl.dec.com (8.8.8/RWD-1.2) with ESMTP id OAA23760; Mon, 7 Aug 2000 14:51:50 -0400 (EDT) Received: (from jamey@localhost) by highwind.crl.dec.com (8.9.3/RWD-8.8.8) id OAA16004; Mon, 7 Aug 2000 14:51:41 -0400 Date: Mon, 7 Aug 2000 14:51:41 -0400 Message-Id: <200008071851.OAA16004@highwind.crl.dec.com> X-Authentication-Warning: highwind.crl.dec.com: jamey set sender to jamey@highwind.crl.dec.com using -f From: James Hicks To: john+@cs.cmu.edu, sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com, nico@CAM.ORG Subject: patch to sa1100_generic.c Reply-To: jamey@crl.dec.com Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk This patch modifies sa1100_generic.c to use a kernel thread for invoking the handlers rather than invoking them directly from the interrupt handler. Without this change, inserting a card causes a panic because the scheduler gets called while in interrupt. This patch probably needs some work, but it seems like the right approach to me. -Jamey PATCH FOLLOWS Index: drivers/pcmcia/sa1100_generic.c =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/linux/kernel/drivers/pcmcia/sa1100_generic.c,v retrieving revision 1.5 diff -u -r1.5 sa1100_generic.c --- drivers/pcmcia/sa1100_generic.c 2000/07/28 21:10:38 1.5 +++ drivers/pcmcia/sa1100_generic.c 2000/08/07 18:14:53 @@ -67,8 +67,8 @@ MODULE_AUTHOR("John Dorsey "); MODULE_DESCRIPTION("Linux PCMCIA Card Services: SA-1100 Socket Controller"); +DECLARE_WAIT_QUEUE_HEAD(sa1100cs_wait); - /* This structure maintains housekeeping state for each socket, such * as the last known values of the card detect pins, or the Card Services * callback value associated with the socket: @@ -99,6 +99,7 @@ static void sa1100_pcmcia_driver_shutdown(void); static void sa1100_pcmcia_interrupt(int irq, void *dev, struct pt_regs *regs); +static void sa1100_pcmcia_event_handler(int irq); static int sa1100_pcmcia_proc_status(char *buf, char **start, off_t pos, int count, int *eof, void *data); @@ -318,6 +319,30 @@ } + + +static int last_irq = 0; +static int sa1100cs_active = 1; +static int sa1100_pcmcia_driver_thread(void *unused) +{ + struct task_struct *tsk = current; + + tsk->session = 1; + tsk->pgrp = 1; + strcpy(tsk->comm, "sa1100cs_thread"); + sigfillset(&tsk->blocked); + + while (sa1100cs_active) { + interruptible_sleep_on(&sa1100cs_wait); + sa1100_pcmcia_event_handler(last_irq); + } +} + + + + + + /* sa1100_pcmcia_driver_init() * ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ * This routine used to be named sa1100_pcmcia_init(). @@ -446,6 +471,9 @@ return -1; } + /* this thread calls the handlers, so that they are not called in interrupt context */ + kernel_thread(sa1100_pcmcia_driver_thread, NULL, 0); + DEBUG(1, "sa1100: initialization complete\n"); return 0; @@ -462,6 +490,7 @@ */ static void __exit sa1100_pcmcia_driver_shutdown(void){ + sa1100cs_active = 0; unregister_ss_entry(&sa1100_pcmcia_operations); pcmcia_low_level->shutdown(); @@ -521,7 +550,14 @@ * */ static void sa1100_pcmcia_interrupt(int irq, void *dev, - struct pt_regs *regs){ + struct pt_regs *regs) +{ + last_irq = irq; + wake_up_interruptible(&sa1100cs_wait); +} /* sa1100_pcmcia_interrupt() */ + +static void sa1100_pcmcia_event_handler(int irq) +{ unsigned int i, events; int irq_status; struct pcmcia_state state[SA1100_PCMCIA_MAX_SOCK]; @@ -598,9 +634,8 @@ events); } /* for(i=0; ...) */ - -} /* sa1100_pcmcia_interrupt() */ +} /* sa1100_pcmcia_event_handler() */ /* sa1100_pcmcia_register_callback() * ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ From kramer@pa.dec.com Wed Aug 9 17:11:48 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id RAA03375; Wed, 9 Aug 2000 17:11:48 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from ztxmail03.ztx.compaq.com (ztxmail03.ztx.compaq.com [161.114.1.207]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id RAA02207 for ; Wed, 9 Aug 2000 17:11:45 +0200 (METDST) Received: by ztxmail03.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 8EF1C12D0; Wed, 9 Aug 2000 10:11:13 -0500 (CDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by ztxmail03.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 9248813F5; Wed, 9 Aug 2000 10:11:11 -0500 (CDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA04244; Wed, 9 Aug 2000 08:08:19 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id IAA30977; Wed, 9 Aug 2000 08:03:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id IAA29412; Wed, 9 Aug 2000 08:03:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ztxmail01.nz-cce.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA12199; Wed, 9 Aug 2000 08:03:41 -0700 Received: by ztxmail01.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id D5A432DEF; Wed, 9 Aug 2000 10:03:40 -0500 (CDT) Received: from ice.ar51.net (ice.fiftyone.com [208.225.80.11]) by ztxmail01.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 47B082E9E for ; Wed, 9 Aug 2000 10:03:39 -0500 (CDT) Received: from server01.asi (gnede.ar51.net [208.225.80.76] (may be forged)) by ice.ar51.net (8.9.3/8.8.7) with ESMTP id LAA09162 for ; Wed, 9 Aug 2000 11:03:04 -0400 Received: by SERVER01 with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2448.0) id ; Wed, 9 Aug 2000 11:05:02 -0400 Message-Id: From: Jeff Sutherland To: "'SA1100 Linux mailing list (E-mail)'" Subject: Patch for the SA1100 frame buffer driver for Assabet users Date: Wed, 9 Aug 2000 11:05:01 -0400 Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2448.0) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk Since Nicolas Pitre is still on vacation, I'm posting this here for Assabet users of recent kernel versions (2.4.0-testx series) if you wish to experiment with this. Tak-Shing Chan & I resolved an issue caused by a change made to the Assabet's PLD earlier this year which broke the frame buffer driver for newer Phase 4 Assabets. The patch also includes a fix to a bug which showed up in -test4-rmk1-np1 I believe. Some other parameters were changed to optimize for the Sharp display. The vertical alignment is now correct, and the frame rate is approximately 60Hz. The display's pixel clock divisor is now determined at runtime so feel free to experiment with your cpu speed settings without fear of messing up your display :) This patch was made against the SA1100 frame buffer driver in 2.4.0-test5-rmk1-np1: --- sa1100fb.c_orig Thu Aug 3 15:25:49 2000 +++ sa1100fb.c Mon Aug 7 12:27:44 2000 @@ -357,8 +357,8 @@ var->transp.offset = 0; } else { var->red.length = 5; - var->blue.length = 6; - var->green.length = 5; + var->blue.length = 5; + var->green.length = 6; var->transp.length = 0; var->red.offset = 11; var->green.offset = 5; @@ -641,6 +641,7 @@ init_var.blue.length = 5; init_var.grayscale = 0; init_var.sync = 0; + init_var.pixclock = 171521; } else if (machine_is_bitsy()) { current_par.max_xres = 320; current_par.max_yres = 240; @@ -813,6 +814,12 @@ /* the last multiplication by 1.2 is to handle */ /* sync problems */ } + if (machine_is_assabet()) { + pcd = frequency[PPCR & 0xf] / 1000; + pcd *= pixclock / 1000; + pcd = pcd / 1000000; + pcd++; /* make up for integer math truncations */ + } return pcd; } @@ -850,15 +857,15 @@ LCCR0_LDM + LCCR0_BAM + LCCR0_ERM + LCCR0_Act + LCCR0_LtlEnd + LCCR0_DMADel(0); lcd_shadow.lccr1 = - LCCR1_DisWdth(var->xres) + LCCR1_HorSnchWdth(4) + - LCCR1_BegLnDel(30) + LCCR1_EndLnDel(30); + LCCR1_DisWdth(var->xres) + LCCR1_HorSnchWdth(6) + + LCCR1_BegLnDel(61) + LCCR1_EndLnDel(9); lcd_shadow.lccr2 = LCCR2_DisHght(var->yres) + LCCR2_VrtSnchWdth(1) + - LCCR2_BegFrmDel(0) + LCCR2_EndFrmDel(0); + LCCR2_BegFrmDel(3) + LCCR2_EndFrmDel(0); lcd_shadow.lccr3 = LCCR3_OutEnH + LCCR3_PixFlEdg + LCCR3_VrtSnchH + LCCR3_HorSnchH + LCCR3_ACBsCntOff + - LCCR3_ACBsDiv(2) + LCCR3_PixClkDiv(28); + LCCR3_ACBsDiv(2) + LCCR3_PixClkDiv(pcd); /* Set board control register to handle new color depth */ sa1100fb_assabet_set_truecolor(var->bits_per_pixel >= 16); Regards, //Jeff Sutherland Accelent Systems, Inc. From kramer@pa.dec.com Thu Aug 10 20:51:37 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id UAA09253; Thu, 10 Aug 2000 20:51:36 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from ztxmail03.ztx.compaq.com (ztxmail03.ztx.compaq.com [161.114.1.207]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id UAA19798 for ; Thu, 10 Aug 2000 20:51:34 +0200 (METDST) Received: by ztxmail03.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 34C481117; Thu, 10 Aug 2000 13:51:02 -0500 (CDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by ztxmail03.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 64A5513BF; Thu, 10 Aug 2000 13:51:00 -0500 (CDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA21648; Thu, 10 Aug 2000 11:50:50 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id LAA18771; Thu, 10 Aug 2000 11:46:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id LAA07093; Thu, 10 Aug 2000 11:46:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail1.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA02651; Thu, 10 Aug 2000 11:46:48 -0700 Received: from pigeon.maya.com (po.maya.com [192.70.254.2]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with ESMTP id LAA26029 for ; Thu, 10 Aug 2000 11:46:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: from maya.com (cook-pc.maya.com [192.70.254.33]) by pigeon.maya.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C847F3EE7 for ; Thu, 10 Aug 2000 14:46:02 -0400 (EDT) Message-Id: <3992F9CD.4FDF10FF@maya.com> Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2000 14:51:57 -0400 From: Nicole Cook X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.72 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.2.14-5.0 i686) X-Accept-Language: en Mime-Version: 1.0 To: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Subject: building 2.4.0-test5 kernel for an SA-1110 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk I'm building a newer kernel for the Intrinsyc Cerfboard, in the hopes that I will be able to get the compact pcmcia slot working. I'm building linux-2.4.0-test5, with patch-2.4.0-test5-rmk1 and diff-2.4.0-test5-rmk1-np1 applied. I'm cross-compiling from i686-pc-linux-gnu to arm-linux. I have the 2.95.2 cross compiling tools supplied by Intrinsyc for an i386. I built the 2.3.99 kernel from the source they supplied without any trouble. I am not having such an easy time of building this new kernel. I run make_config, make menuconfig, save the config, run make dep, and up to that point everything is fine. Then I run make zImage, and I get make zImage gcc -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer -o scripts/split-include scripts/split-include.c In file included from /usr/include/bits/errno.h:25, from /usr/include/errno.h:36, from scripts/split-include.c:26: /usr/include/linux/errno.h:4: asm/errno.h: No such file or directory make: *** [scripts/split-include] Error 1 [root@cook-pc linux]# cd .. This seems to be wrong - why gcc and not arm-linux-gcc? Why is it looking in /usr/include instead of its own kernel headers? Is there something wrong with the steps I'm taking (they're the steps suggested in Intrinsyc's guide and in the handhelds.org cvs tree)? Nicole From kramer@pa.dec.com Thu Aug 10 21:10:26 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id VAA09303; Thu, 10 Aug 2000 21:10:25 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from ztxmail05.ztx.compaq.com (ztxmail05.ztx.compaq.com [161.114.1.209]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id VAA20421 for ; Thu, 10 Aug 2000 21:10:22 +0200 (METDST) Received: by ztxmail05.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 4BB7D113F; Thu, 10 Aug 2000 14:09:50 -0500 (CDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by ztxmail05.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 4A0DE13C6; Thu, 10 Aug 2000 14:09:48 -0500 (CDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA24519; Thu, 10 Aug 2000 12:09:47 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id MAA20235; Thu, 10 Aug 2000 12:09:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id MAA19752; Thu, 10 Aug 2000 12:09:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail2.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA03133; Thu, 10 Aug 2000 12:09:25 -0700 Received: from pigeon.maya.com (po.maya.com [192.70.254.2]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with ESMTP id MAA06098 for ; Thu, 10 Aug 2000 12:09:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: from maya.com (cook-pc.maya.com [192.70.254.33]) by pigeon.maya.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA3203EE6; Thu, 10 Aug 2000 15:08:43 -0400 (EDT) Message-Id: <3992FF1E.A4644B1A@maya.com> Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2000 15:14:38 -0400 From: Nicole Cook X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.72 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.2.14-5.0 i686) X-Accept-Language: en Mime-Version: 1.0 To: markl@censoft.com, sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Subject: Re: building 2.4.0-test5 kernel for an SA-1110 References: <3992F9CD.4FDF10FF@maya.com> <3992FC3C.5DE96B9B@censoft.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk Mark Lehrer wrote: > > Nicole Cook wrote: > > > This seems to be wrong - why gcc and not arm-linux-gcc? Why is it > > looking in /usr/include instead of its own kernel headers? Is there > > something wrong with the steps I'm taking (they're the steps suggested > > in Intrinsyc's guide and in the handhelds.org cvs tree)? > > In the kernel Makefile, set CROSS_COMPILE to: arm-linux- > > That should do it. > > Mark I've included below the relevant section of the kernel Makefile - it does have the cross compiler set, but that seems to have no effect on make zImage. Nicole VERSION = 2 PATCHLEVEL = 4 SUBLEVEL = 0 EXTRAVERSION = -test5-rmk1-np1 KERNELRELEASE=$(VERSION).$(PATCHLEVEL).$(SUBLEVEL)$(EXTRAVERSION) #ARCH := $(shell uname -m | sed -e s/i.86/i386/ -e s/sun4u/sparc64/ -e s/arm.*/a rm/ -e s/sa110/arm/) ARCH := arm CONFIG_SHELL := $(shell if [ -x "$$BASH" ]; then echo $$BASH; \ else if [ -x /bin/bash ]; then echo /bin/bash; \ else echo sh; fi ; fi) TOPDIR := $(shell if [ "$$PWD" != "" ]; then echo $$PWD; else pwd; fi) HPATH = $(TOPDIR)/include FINDHPATH = $(HPATH)/asm $(HPATH)/linux $(HPATH)/scsi $(HPATH)/net HOSTCC = gcc HOSTCFLAGS = -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer CROSS_COMPILE = arm-linux- AS = $(CROSS_COMPILE)as LD = $(CROSS_COMPILE)ld CC = $(CROSS_COMPILE)gcc CPP = $(CC) -E AR = $(CROSS_COMPILE)ar NM = $(CROSS_COMPILE)nm STRIP = $(CROSS_COMPILE)strip OBJCOPY = $(CROSS_COMPILE)objcopy OBJDUMP = $(CROSS_COMPILE)objdump MAKEFILES = $(TOPDIR)/.config GENKSYMS = /sbin/genksyms MODFLAGS = -DMODULE CFLAGS_KERNEL = PERL = perl From kramer@pa.dec.com Thu Aug 10 21:18:17 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id VAA09339; Thu, 10 Aug 2000 21:18:17 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from zmamail04.zma.compaq.com (zmamail04.zma.compaq.com [161.114.64.104]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id VAA20686 for ; Thu, 10 Aug 2000 21:18:15 +0200 (METDST) Received: by zmamail04.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 50B8D9DA; Thu, 10 Aug 2000 15:17:41 -0400 (EDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by zmamail04.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id BBEEB43C; Thu, 10 Aug 2000 15:17:38 -0400 (EDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA13658; Thu, 10 Aug 2000 12:17:27 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id MAA00148; Thu, 10 Aug 2000 12:17:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id MAA19703; Thu, 10 Aug 2000 12:17:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: from zmamail02.nz-tay.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA01751; Thu, 10 Aug 2000 12:17:16 -0700 Received: by zmamail02.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id ABBC08B7; Thu, 10 Aug 2000 15:17:15 -0400 (EDT) Received: from ns.centurysoftware.com (NS.CenSoft.COM [208.219.23.2]) by zmamail02.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2FA379DF for ; Thu, 10 Aug 2000 15:17:15 -0400 (EDT) Received: from censoft.com (IDENT:markl@penguin.CenSoft.COM [208.219.23.17]) by ns.centurysoftware.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id NAA27358; Thu, 10 Aug 2000 13:18:33 -0700 (MST) Message-Id: <3992FFB9.B8CA5646@censoft.com> Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2000 13:17:13 -0600 From: Mark Lehrer Reply-To: markl@censoft.com Organization: Century Software X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.74 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.2.16 i686) X-Accept-Language: en Mime-Version: 1.0 To: Nicole Cook Cc: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Subject: Re: building 2.4.0-test5 kernel for an SA-1110 References: <3992F9CD.4FDF10FF@maya.com> <3992FC3C.5DE96B9B@censoft.com> <3992FF1E.A4644B1A@maya.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk Nicole Cook wrote: > Mark Lehrer wrote: > > > > Nicole Cook wrote: > > > > > This seems to be wrong - why gcc and not arm-linux-gcc? Why is it > > > looking in /usr/include instead of its own kernel headers? Is there > > > something wrong with the steps I'm taking (they're the steps suggested > > > in Intrinsyc's guide and in the handhelds.org cvs tree)? The files that are in scripts/ do not get cross compiled; apparently they're used during xconfig or perhaps some other host operation. Are you building this in /usr/src/linux or some other location? I always cross compile kernels in a completely different directory, otherwise some of these includes could get hosed up during non-cross-compiles... If that's not the problem I'm not sure what it is. Mark From kramer@pa.dec.com Fri Aug 11 16:24:08 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id QAA01145; Fri, 11 Aug 2000 16:24:08 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from ztxmail03.ztx.compaq.com (ztxmail03.ztx.compaq.com [161.114.1.207]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id QAA20123 for ; Fri, 11 Aug 2000 16:24:05 +0200 (METDST) Received: by ztxmail03.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 66D2D1076; Fri, 11 Aug 2000 09:23:33 -0500 (CDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by ztxmail03.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 9DF58AA3; Fri, 11 Aug 2000 09:23:31 -0500 (CDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA17861; Fri, 11 Aug 2000 07:20:48 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id HAA15389; Fri, 11 Aug 2000 07:17:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id HAA24235; Fri, 11 Aug 2000 07:17:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail2.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA31105; Fri, 11 Aug 2000 07:17:53 -0700 Received: from ns0.utdallas.edu (ns0.utdallas.edu [129.110.10.1]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with ESMTP id HAA31886 for ; Fri, 11 Aug 2000 07:17:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: from apache.utdallas.edu (apache.utdallas.edu [129.110.16.9]) by ns0.utdallas.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id AFD8A1A01E1; Fri, 11 Aug 2000 09:13:21 -0500 (CDT) Received: from localhost (vasantr@localhost) by apache.utdallas.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id JAA11922; Fri, 11 Aug 2000 09:14:06 -0500 (CDT) X-Authentication-Warning: apache.utdallas.edu: vasantr owned process doing -bs Date: Fri, 11 Aug 2000 09:14:06 -0500 (CDT) From: Vasant Ramasubramanian To: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com, linux-arm@vger.rutgers.edu Subject: SA1110 Kernel Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk For reasons that I don't want to get into, I wanted to know if someone could send me a working SA1110 kernel, one that expects that the kernel is placed @ the start of RAM (0xc0000000). I am not really concerned which version of the kernel as long as it expects console on serial 3 (@9600) and boots on an SA1110. Thanks, Vasant. P.S. I assume the Zsolt K era RAMDISK should work? From kramer@pa.dec.com Fri Aug 11 18:22:48 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id SAA01698; Fri, 11 Aug 2000 18:22:47 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from ztxmail04.ztx.compaq.com (ztxmail04.ztx.compaq.com [161.114.1.208]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id SAA24438 for ; Fri, 11 Aug 2000 18:22:46 +0200 (METDST) Received: by ztxmail04.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 571BF1B83; Fri, 11 Aug 2000 11:22:14 -0500 (CDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by ztxmail04.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 448C41893; Fri, 11 Aug 2000 11:22:12 -0500 (CDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA09165; Fri, 11 Aug 2000 09:19:31 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id JAA24423; Fri, 11 Aug 2000 09:17:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id JAA26313; Fri, 11 Aug 2000 09:17:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail1.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA26297; Fri, 11 Aug 2000 09:17:48 -0700 Received: from www.linux.org.uk (parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk [195.92.249.252]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with ESMTP id JAA02306 for ; Fri, 11 Aug 2000 09:17:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: from dyn-33.linux.theplanet.co.uk ([195.92.244.33] helo=caramon.arm.linux.org.uk) by www.linux.org.uk with esmtp (Exim 3.13 #1) id 13NHUj-0008Lr-00; Fri, 11 Aug 2000 17:17:22 +0100 Received: from flint.arm.linux.org.uk (root@flint [192.168.0.4]) by caramon.arm.linux.org.uk (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id QAA22978; Fri, 11 Aug 2000 16:10:34 +0100 Received: (from linux@localhost) by flint.arm.linux.org.uk (8.9.3/8.9.3) id QAA03849; Fri, 11 Aug 2000 16:08:35 +0100 From: Russell King - ARM Linux Admin Message-Id: <200008111508.QAA03849@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> Subject: Re: SA1110 Kernel To: vasantr@utdallas.edu (Vasant Ramasubramanian) Date: Fri, 11 Aug 2000 16:08:35 +0100 (BST) Cc: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com, linux-arm@vger.rutgers.edu In-Reply-To: from "Vasant Ramasubramanian" at Aug 11, 2000 09:14:06 AM X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL1] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk Vasant Ramasubramanian writes: > For reasons that I don't want to get into, I wanted to know if someone > could send me a working SA1110 kernel, one that expects that the kernel is > placed @ the start of RAM (0xc0000000). I am not really concerned which > version of the kernel as long as it expects console on serial 3 > (@9600) and boots on an SA1110. No kernels which can be built out of either Nico's or my trees to run at 0xc0000000 will do anything useful - the kernel text segment will be overwritten by the pagetables. _____ |_____| ------------------------------------------------- ---+---+- | | Russell King linux@arm.linux.org.uk --- --- | | | | http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/ / / | | +-+-+ --- -+- / | THE developer of ARM Linux |+| /|\ / | | | --- | +-+-+ ------------------------------------------------- /\\\ | From kramer@pa.dec.com Fri Aug 11 17:54:42 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id RAA01618; Fri, 11 Aug 2000 17:54:41 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from zmamail04.zma.compaq.com (zmamail04.zma.compaq.com [161.114.64.104]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id RAA23362 for ; Fri, 11 Aug 2000 17:54:39 +0200 (METDST) Received: by zmamail04.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 77B767AB; Fri, 11 Aug 2000 11:54:08 -0400 (EDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by zmamail04.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id C427675F; Fri, 11 Aug 2000 11:54:05 -0400 (EDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA07729; Fri, 11 Aug 2000 08:51:23 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id IAA27096; Fri, 11 Aug 2000 08:48:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id IAA15846; Fri, 11 Aug 2000 08:48:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail2.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA27155; Fri, 11 Aug 2000 08:48:58 -0700 Received: from www.palmpalm.com ([211.44.193.250]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with ESMTP id IAA02259 for ; Fri, 11 Aug 2000 08:48:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nam9 (s211-49-21-15.thrunet.ne.kr [211.49.21.15]) by www.palmpalm.com (8.9.3/8.8.7) with SMTP id AAA22354 for ; Sat, 12 Aug 2000 00:52:30 +0900 Message-Id: <000701c003ab$4af5fd60$0f1531d3@nam9.w-seoul.thrunet.com> Reply-To: "nkkim(palmpalm)" From: "nkkim(palmpalm)" To: Date: Sat, 12 Aug 2000 00:46:18 +0900 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0004_01C003F6.BA575E60" X-Priority: 3 X-Msmail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 4.72.3155.0 X-Mimeole: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.3155.0 Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0004_01C003F6.BA575E60 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="euc-kr" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 c3Vic2NyaWJlIHNhMTEwMC1saW51eCBua2tpbUByaWNsLmtvbmt1ay5hYy5rcg0K ------=_NextPart_000_0004_01C003F6.BA575E60 Content-Type: text/html; charset="euc-kr" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 PCFET0NUWVBFIEhUTUwgUFVCTElDICItLy9XM0MvL0RURCBXMyBIVE1MLy9FTiI+DQo8SFRNTD4N CjxIRUFEPg0KDQo8TUVUQSBjb250ZW50PSJ0ZXh0L2h0bWw7IGNoYXJzZXQ9a3NfY181NjAxLTE5 ODciIGh0dHAtZXF1aXY9Q29udGVudC1UeXBlPg0KPE1FVEEgY29udGVudD0nIk1TSFRNTCA0Ljcy LjM1MjUuNjAwIicgbmFtZT1HRU5FUkFUT1I+DQo8L0hFQUQ+DQo8Qk9EWSBiZ0NvbG9yPSNmZmZm ZmY+DQo8RElWPjxGT05UIGNvbG9yPSMwMDAwMDAgc2l6ZT0yPnN1YnNjcmliZSBzYTExMDAtbGlu dXggPEEgDQpocmVmPSJtYWlsdG86bmtraW1AcmljbC5rb25rdWsuYWMua3IiPm5ra2ltQHJpY2wu a29ua3VrLmFjLmtyPC9BPjwvRk9OVD48L0RJVj48L0JPRFk+PC9IVE1MPg0K ------=_NextPart_000_0004_01C003F6.BA575E60-- From kramer@pa.dec.com Fri Aug 11 19:06:52 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id TAA01823; Fri, 11 Aug 2000 19:06:52 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from zmamail04.zma.compaq.com (zmamail04.zma.compaq.com [161.114.64.104]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id TAA25620 for ; Fri, 11 Aug 2000 19:06:51 +0200 (METDST) Received: by zmamail04.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 1A7BF77C; Fri, 11 Aug 2000 13:06:20 -0400 (EDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by zmamail04.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 707AABD7; Fri, 11 Aug 2000 13:06:17 -0400 (EDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA06026; Fri, 11 Aug 2000 10:03:35 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id KAA02539; Fri, 11 Aug 2000 10:01:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id KAA29477; Fri, 11 Aug 2000 10:01:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ztxmail01.nz-cce.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA26310; Fri, 11 Aug 2000 10:01:34 -0700 Received: by ztxmail01.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 90C7B4459; Fri, 11 Aug 2000 12:01:33 -0500 (CDT) Received: from xanadu.gn.com (modemcable248.137-200-24.mtl.mc.videotron.net [24.200.137.248]) by ztxmail01.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 66A5A45A4 for ; Fri, 11 Aug 2000 12:01:32 -0500 (CDT) Received: from localhost (nico@localhost) by xanadu.gn.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id NAA04648; Fri, 11 Aug 2000 13:00:40 -0400 X-Authentication-Warning: xanadu.gn.com: nico owned process doing -bs Date: Fri, 11 Aug 2000 13:00:40 -0400 (EDT) From: Nicolas Pitre X-Sender: nico@xanadu.gn.com To: Vasant Ramasubramanian Cc: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com, linux-arm@vger.rutgers.edu Subject: Re: SA1110 Kernel In-Reply-To: Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk On Fri, 11 Aug 2000, Vasant Ramasubramanian wrote: > For reasons that I don't want to get into, I wanted to know if someone > could send me a working SA1110 kernel, one that expects that the kernel is > placed @ the start of RAM (0xc0000000). I am not really concerned which > version of the kernel as long as it expects console on serial 3 > (@9600) and boots on an SA1110. Why do you want the kernel to be at 0xc0000000? What is your hardware actually? Which bootloader do you use? Did you modify the kernel source according to your architecture? Unfortunately the reasons that you don't want to get into can't be avoided with a single kernel binary. Nicolas From kramer@pa.dec.com Fri Aug 11 19:38:12 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id TAA01938; Fri, 11 Aug 2000 19:38:12 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from ztxmail04.ztx.compaq.com (ztxmail04.ztx.compaq.com [161.114.1.208]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id TAA26452 for ; Fri, 11 Aug 2000 19:38:10 +0200 (METDST) Received: by ztxmail04.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 456B61A0E; Fri, 11 Aug 2000 12:37:39 -0500 (CDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by ztxmail04.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 45A9E19C9; Fri, 11 Aug 2000 12:37:37 -0500 (CDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA12177; Fri, 11 Aug 2000 10:34:52 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id KAA30798; Fri, 11 Aug 2000 10:30:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id KAA24851; Fri, 11 Aug 2000 10:30:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ztxmail01.nz-cce.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA10992; Fri, 11 Aug 2000 10:30:11 -0700 Received: by ztxmail01.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id D70702C97; Fri, 11 Aug 2000 12:30:10 -0500 (CDT) Received: from ns0.utdallas.edu (ns0.utdallas.edu [129.110.10.1]) by ztxmail01.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 930232F45 for ; Fri, 11 Aug 2000 12:30:10 -0500 (CDT) Received: from apache.utdallas.edu (apache.utdallas.edu [129.110.16.9]) by ns0.utdallas.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 464351A06A6; Fri, 11 Aug 2000 12:29:24 -0500 (CDT) Received: from localhost (vasantr@localhost) by apache.utdallas.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id MAA28349; Fri, 11 Aug 2000 12:30:09 -0500 (CDT) X-Authentication-Warning: apache.utdallas.edu: vasantr owned process doing -bs Date: Fri, 11 Aug 2000 12:30:09 -0500 (CDT) From: Vasant Ramasubramanian To: Nicolas Pitre Cc: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com, linux-arm@vger.rutgers.edu Subject: Re: SA1110 Kernel In-Reply-To: Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk On Fri, 11 Aug 2000, Nicolas Pitre wrote: > > Why do you want the kernel to be at 0xc0000000? Because the software person told me that's where it had to be ;). I was under the impression that's where it went, my mistake. Looking at the BLOB source, I see the KERNEL_RAM_BASE to be defined @ 0xc0008000, so perhaps that's where it should be. > What is your hardware actually? Custom SA1110 hardware, not a commercially available product (yet). > Which bootloader do you use? A modified version of BLOB (it retains the location where images are place in RAM so wherever LART needs them is where I would too). > Did you modify the kernel source according to your architecture? > Unfortunately the reasons that you don't want to get into can't be > avoided with a single kernel binary. Well the issue was that my toolchain was out of date (waaay out of date) and lacking decent access at the moment I wanted to avoid large downloads (20meg toolchain, 20+ kernel source, etc). Our hardware almost boots a 2.2.12 kernel for which I used the LART config. I get the "Uncompressing .." and then "Booting the kernel" but nothing afterwards. Since I haven't altered the memory map I figured an "off the shelf" kernel would function, am I wrong? Also I wanted to know does the SA1110 JTAG Flash burner depend on any Assabet specifics besides the obvious SA1110 + supported Flash part? I tried the software(Linux executable) with cable I built with no success; the JTAG Burner from Keith & Koep almost works but does not seem to program the flash part. We are using a supported Flash part (The StrataFlash 128J3). Thanks, Vasant. From kramer@pa.dec.com Fri Aug 11 20:34:44 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id UAA02128; Fri, 11 Aug 2000 20:34:44 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from ztxmail04.ztx.compaq.com (ztxmail04.ztx.compaq.com [161.114.1.208]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id UAA27851 for ; Fri, 11 Aug 2000 20:34:43 +0200 (METDST) Received: by ztxmail04.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 778621BE4; Fri, 11 Aug 2000 13:34:11 -0500 (CDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by ztxmail04.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 63BB61950; Fri, 11 Aug 2000 13:34:09 -0500 (CDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA00826; Fri, 11 Aug 2000 11:31:24 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id LAA32090; Fri, 11 Aug 2000 11:29:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id LAA13469; Fri, 11 Aug 2000 11:29:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail2.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA14338; Fri, 11 Aug 2000 11:29:32 -0700 Received: from www.linux.org.uk (parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk [195.92.249.252]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with ESMTP id LAA05002 for ; Fri, 11 Aug 2000 11:29:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: from dyn-33.linux.theplanet.co.uk ([195.92.244.33] helo=caramon.arm.linux.org.uk) by www.linux.org.uk with esmtp (Exim 3.13 #1) id 13NJYV-0002Bj-00; Fri, 11 Aug 2000 19:29:19 +0100 Received: from flint.arm.linux.org.uk (root@flint [192.168.0.4]) by caramon.arm.linux.org.uk (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id TAA23946; Fri, 11 Aug 2000 19:29:17 +0100 Received: (from linux@localhost) by flint.arm.linux.org.uk (8.9.3/8.9.3) id TAA07278; Fri, 11 Aug 2000 19:27:16 +0100 From: Russell King - ARM Linux Admin Message-Id: <200008111827.TAA07278@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> Subject: Re: SA1110 Kernel To: vasantr@utdallas.edu (Vasant Ramasubramanian) Date: Fri, 11 Aug 2000 19:27:14 +0100 (BST) Cc: nico@CAM.ORG (Nicolas Pitre), sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com, linux-arm@vger.rutgers.edu In-Reply-To: from "Vasant Ramasubramanian" at Aug 11, 2000 12:30:09 PM X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL1] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk Vasant Ramasubramanian writes: > Our hardware almost boots a 2.2.12 kernel for which I used the LART > config. I get the "Uncompressing .." and then "Booting the kernel" but > nothing afterwards. Since I haven't altered the memory map I figured an > "off the shelf" kernel would function, am I wrong? No, its because the kernel doesn't support the SA1110 processor. _____ |_____| ------------------------------------------------- ---+---+- | | Russell King linux@arm.linux.org.uk --- --- | | | | http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/ / / | | +-+-+ --- -+- / | THE developer of ARM Linux |+| /|\ / | | | --- | +-+-+ ------------------------------------------------- /\\\ | From kramer@pa.dec.com Fri Aug 11 20:50:32 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id UAA02166; Fri, 11 Aug 2000 20:50:31 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from zmamail05.zma.compaq.com (zmamail05.zma.compaq.com [161.114.64.105]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id UAA28282 for ; Fri, 11 Aug 2000 20:50:30 +0200 (METDST) Received: by zmamail05.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id DA7E05A21; Fri, 11 Aug 2000 14:49:58 -0400 (EDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by zmamail05.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id E9E5F5998; Fri, 11 Aug 2000 14:49:55 -0400 (EDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA17131; Fri, 11 Aug 2000 11:47:14 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id LAA01061; Fri, 11 Aug 2000 11:45:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id LAA18841; Fri, 11 Aug 2000 11:45:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: from zmamail01.nz-tay.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA20332; Fri, 11 Aug 2000 11:45:36 -0700 Received: by zmamail01.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id CAD842764; Fri, 11 Aug 2000 14:45:35 -0400 (EDT) Received: from ADSServer.flatpanels.com (adsserver.flatpanels.com [207.196.69.66]) by zmamail01.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 77B46343A for ; Fri, 11 Aug 2000 14:45:31 -0400 (EDT) Received: by adsserver.flatpanels.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21) id ; Fri, 11 Aug 2000 14:36:48 -0400 Message-Id: <91B07CA588CED3118CFE00105AC97594027053@adsserver.flatpanels.com> From: "Huh, Woojung" To: "'Russell King - ARM Linux Admin'" , vasantr@utdallas.edu Cc: nico@CAM.ORG, sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com, linux-arm@vger.rutgers.edu Subject: RE: SA1110 Kernel Date: Fri, 11 Aug 2000 14:36:39 -0400 Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk Is there not a big difference between SA1110 & SA1110. I'm running Linux 2.3.x and 2.4.0-x with SA1110 ADS Graphics Client + machine. Woojung Huh whuh@applieddata.net Applied Data Systems, Inc. http://www.applieddata.net 301.490.4007 x27 > -----Original Message----- > From: Russell King - ARM Linux Admin [mailto:linux@arm.linux.org.uk] > Sent: Friday, August 11, 2000 2:27 PM > To: vasantr@utdallas.edu > Cc: nico@cam.org; sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com; > linux-arm@vger.rutgers.edu > Subject: Re: SA1110 Kernel > > > Vasant Ramasubramanian writes: > > Our hardware almost boots a 2.2.12 kernel for which I > used the LART > > config. I get the "Uncompressing .." and then "Booting > the kernel" but > > nothing afterwards. Since I haven't altered the memory > map I figured an > > "off the shelf" kernel would function, am I wrong? > > No, its because the kernel doesn't support the SA1110 processor. > _____ > |_____| ------------------------------------------------- > ---+---+- > | | Russell King linux@arm.linux.org.uk > --- --- > | | | | http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/ / / | > | +-+-+ > --- -+- > / | THE developer of ARM Linux > |+| /|\ > / | | | --- | > +-+-+ ------------------------------------------------- /\\\ | > > unsubscribe: body of `unsubscribe linux-arm' to > majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu > ++ Please use > linux-arm-kernel@lists.arm.linux.org.uk for ++ > ++ kernel-related discussions. > ++ > From kramer@pa.dec.com Fri Aug 11 20:54:23 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id UAA02189; Fri, 11 Aug 2000 20:54:22 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from ztxmail04.ztx.compaq.com (ztxmail04.ztx.compaq.com [161.114.1.208]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id UAA28424 for ; Fri, 11 Aug 2000 20:54:21 +0200 (METDST) Received: by ztxmail04.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id C266C1911; Fri, 11 Aug 2000 13:53:49 -0500 (CDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by ztxmail04.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 0D1BC1B06; Fri, 11 Aug 2000 13:53:48 -0500 (CDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA20723; Fri, 11 Aug 2000 11:51:03 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id LAA00130; Fri, 11 Aug 2000 11:48:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id LAA13199; Fri, 11 Aug 2000 11:48:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: from zmamail01.nz-tay.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA24307; Fri, 11 Aug 2000 11:48:18 -0700 Received: by zmamail01.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 3B42B3A17; Fri, 11 Aug 2000 14:48:18 -0400 (EDT) Received: from xanadu.gn.com (modemcable248.137-200-24.mtl.mc.videotron.net [24.200.137.248]) by zmamail01.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 823D32489 for ; Fri, 11 Aug 2000 14:48:17 -0400 (EDT) Received: from localhost (nico@localhost) by xanadu.gn.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id OAA04723; Fri, 11 Aug 2000 14:43:24 -0400 X-Authentication-Warning: xanadu.gn.com: nico owned process doing -bs Date: Fri, 11 Aug 2000 14:43:24 -0400 (EDT) From: Nicolas Pitre X-Sender: nico@xanadu.gn.com To: James Alford Cc: SA-1100/Linux , linux-arm-kernel@lists.arm.linux.org.uk Subject: Re: SA1100 kernel booting problem. In-Reply-To: Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk On Fri, 4 Aug 2000, James Alford wrote: > I am trying to get the Intel StrongARM SA1100 Multimedia Development Board > working with a linux kernel. It is unfortunatly not a Brutus (or Assabet). > > I can get the 2.2.14-rmk5-np17 kernel up but it crashes at > "POSIX conformance teting by UNIFIX" > This is probably due to the fact that the kernel is built for a Brutus. I > have not yet started to edit the arch specfic bits yet. This is most likely because the memory declaration is wrong for your board. > My problem is that with 2.4.0-test5-rmk1-np1. I can't get the kernel to > start. The head stuff starts ok and decompresses the kernel outputing the > line > > "Uncompressing Linux........................ done, botting the kernel." > > It just stops there, it does not seem to step into the uncompressed > kernel. I think that the 2.5-test5 head stuff is working as it will boot > the 2.2.14 kernel. The uncompressed kernel expects some specific values to be passed in r0/r1 registers by the bootloader. In the 2.2.x kernels those values were bolted into the code because they were the same for all SA1100 designs. See linux/Documentation/arm/README.txt (near the end) for details. Nicolas From kramer@pa.dec.com Fri Aug 11 21:00:29 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id VAA02209; Fri, 11 Aug 2000 21:00:28 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from zmamail04.zma.compaq.com (zmamail04.zma.compaq.com [161.114.64.104]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id VAA28653 for ; Fri, 11 Aug 2000 21:00:27 +0200 (METDST) Received: by zmamail04.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 7D2FF583; Fri, 11 Aug 2000 14:59:56 -0400 (EDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by zmamail04.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id EAAF7500; Fri, 11 Aug 2000 14:59:53 -0400 (EDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA20997; Fri, 11 Aug 2000 11:57:12 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id LAA00706; Fri, 11 Aug 2000 11:55:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id LAA02376; Fri, 11 Aug 2000 11:55:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: from zmamail01.nz-tay.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA18913; Fri, 11 Aug 2000 11:55:36 -0700 Received: by zmamail01.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id D15E31A2E; Fri, 11 Aug 2000 14:55:35 -0400 (EDT) Received: from xanadu.gn.com (modemcable248.137-200-24.mtl.mc.videotron.net [24.200.137.248]) by zmamail01.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 78FAE1A55 for ; Fri, 11 Aug 2000 14:55:35 -0400 (EDT) Received: from localhost (nico@localhost) by xanadu.gn.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id OAA04732; Fri, 11 Aug 2000 14:54:37 -0400 X-Authentication-Warning: xanadu.gn.com: nico owned process doing -bs Date: Fri, 11 Aug 2000 14:54:37 -0400 (EDT) From: Nicolas Pitre X-Sender: nico@xanadu.gn.com To: "Huh, Woojung" Cc: "SA1100-Linux (E-mail)" , linux-arm@vger.rutgers.edu Subject: Re: sync() does not write to actual Hardware In-Reply-To: <91B07CA588CED3118CFE00105AC9759402700D@adsserver.flatpanels.com> Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk On Wed, 2 Aug 2000, Huh, Woojung wrote: > Hi, All, > > I'm testing on 2.4.0-test4-np1 on ADS Graphics Client. > When I execute "sync" command, it does not write to flash memory. > Flash is updated when "umount" is executed. > I also tested on 2.3.35, the result is same. > Did anybody experience it ? In order to cope with large flash page which are much larger than what the block device layer can handle, there is another cache locally to the flash driver. Unfortunately I didn't find a way to hook into the kernel so the driver could be noticed when a sync() occured. For instance the cache is always cleaned on close() (or unmount). So you can ensure the flash has been written with the following: sync ; true < /dev/flash Nicolas From kramer@pa.dec.com Fri Aug 11 22:54:02 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id WAA02512; Fri, 11 Aug 2000 22:54:02 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from zmamail04.zma.compaq.com (zmamail04.zma.compaq.com [161.114.64.104]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id WAA01904 for ; Fri, 11 Aug 2000 22:54:00 +0200 (METDST) Received: by zmamail04.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id AAC61AFD; Fri, 11 Aug 2000 16:53:29 -0400 (EDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by zmamail04.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 2CB8ABF4; Fri, 11 Aug 2000 16:53:27 -0400 (EDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA31057; Fri, 11 Aug 2000 13:50:34 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id NAA05840; Fri, 11 Aug 2000 13:48:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id NAA23899; Fri, 11 Aug 2000 13:48:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail1.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA21166; Fri, 11 Aug 2000 13:48:20 -0700 Received: from duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (duteinh.et.tudelft.nl [130.161.42.1]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with ESMTP id NAA10238 for ; Fri, 11 Aug 2000 13:48:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: from kalman.et.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id WAA02467; Fri, 11 Aug 2000 22:46:50 +0200 (MET DST) Received: (from erik@localhost) by kalman.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.8/8.8.8/Debian/GNU) id WAA25733; Fri, 11 Aug 2000 22:46:50 +0200 Message-Id: <200008112046.WAA25733@kalman.et.tudelft.nl> Subject: Re: SA1110 Kernel In-Reply-To: from Vasant Ramasubramanian at "Aug 11, 0 12:30:09 pm" To: vasantr@utdallas.edu (Vasant Ramasubramanian) Date: Fri, 11 Aug 2000 22:46:50 +0200 (CEST) Cc: nico@CAM.ORG, sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com, linux-arm@vger.rutgers.edu From: J.A.K.Mouw@ITS.TUDelft.NL (Erik Mouw) Organization: Eric Conspiracy Secret Labs X-Eric-Conspiracy: There is no conspiracy! X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL39 (25)] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk Vasant Ramasubramanian wrote: > On Fri, 11 Aug 2000, Nicolas Pitre wrote: > > Did you modify the kernel source according to your architecture? > > Unfortunately the reasons that you don't want to get into can't be > > avoided with a single kernel binary. > > Well the issue was that my toolchain was out of date (waaay out of > date) and lacking decent access at the moment I wanted to avoid large > downloads (20meg toolchain, 20+ kernel source, etc). > > Our hardware almost boots a 2.2.12 kernel for which I used the LART > config. I get the "Uncompressing .." and then "Booting the kernel" but > nothing afterwards. Since I haven't altered the memory map I figured an > "off the shelf" kernel would function, am I wrong? Watch out with using the LART configuration. The LART has a bit unusual memory layout in that it has holes in its memory banks (the LART doesn't use A23 in bank 0 and 1). If your architecture has a "normal" memory layout, you can get *very* strange results. If your architecture has at least 4MB in each bank, you'd better use the Brutus setup. > Also I wanted to know does the SA1110 JTAG Flash burner depend on any > Assabet specifics besides the obvious SA1110 + supported Flash part? I > tried the software(Linux executable) with cable I built with no success; > the JTAG Burner from Keith & Koep almost works but does not seem to > program the flash part. We are using a supported Flash part (The > StrataFlash 128J3). The SA1110 Flash burner doesn't work on SA1100 boards because the JTAG ID code is different. Have a look at the LART site: since this afternoon we have a page with hard- and software to burn the LART flash (LART is an SA1100 board): http://www.lart.tudelft.nl/projects/jtag/ Erik -- J.A.K. (Erik) Mouw, Information and Communication Theory Group, Department of Electrical Engineering, Faculty of Information Technology and Systems, Delft University of Technology, PO BOX 5031, 2600 GA Delft, The Netherlands Phone: +31-15-2783635 Fax: +31-15-2781843 Email: J.A.K.Mouw@its.tudelft.nl WWW: http://www-ict.its.tudelft.nl/~erik/ From kramer@pa.dec.com Fri Aug 11 22:55:22 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id WAA02516; Fri, 11 Aug 2000 22:55:21 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from ztxmail05.ztx.compaq.com (ztxmail05.ztx.compaq.com [161.114.1.209]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id WAA01945 for ; Fri, 11 Aug 2000 22:55:20 +0200 (METDST) Received: by ztxmail05.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id DF6F2139E; Fri, 11 Aug 2000 15:54:47 -0500 (CDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by ztxmail05.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id F33F11126; Fri, 11 Aug 2000 15:54:45 -0500 (CDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA22356; Fri, 11 Aug 2000 13:52:01 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id NAA00710; Fri, 11 Aug 2000 13:50:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id NAA00521; Fri, 11 Aug 2000 13:50:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail1.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA08185; Fri, 11 Aug 2000 13:50:27 -0700 Received: from duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (duteinh.et.tudelft.nl [130.161.42.1]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with ESMTP id NAA07574 for ; Fri, 11 Aug 2000 13:50:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: from kalman.et.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id WAA02480; Fri, 11 Aug 2000 22:48:58 +0200 (MET DST) Received: (from erik@localhost) by kalman.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.8/8.8.8/Debian/GNU) id WAA25744; Fri, 11 Aug 2000 22:48:58 +0200 Message-Id: <200008112048.WAA25744@kalman.et.tudelft.nl> Subject: Re: SA1110 Kernel In-Reply-To: <91B07CA588CED3118CFE00105AC97594027053@adsserver.flatpanels.com> from "Huh, Woojung" at "Aug 11, 0 02:36:39 pm" To: WHuh@applieddata.net (Huh Woojung) Date: Fri, 11 Aug 2000 22:48:58 +0200 (CEST) Cc: linux@arm.linux.org.uk, vasantr@utdallas.edu, nico@CAM.ORG, sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com, linux-arm@vger.rutgers.edu From: J.A.K.Mouw@ITS.TUDelft.NL (Erik Mouw) Organization: Eric Conspiracy Secret Labs X-Eric-Conspiracy: There is no conspiracy! X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL39 (25)] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk Huh Woojung wrote: > Is there not a big difference between SA1110 & SA1110. No, the SA1110 is an SA1100 with SDRAM interface and some silicon errors fixed. And it comes in BGA only, which is terrible for prototypes. Erik -- J.A.K. (Erik) Mouw, Information and Communication Theory Group, Department of Electrical Engineering, Faculty of Information Technology and Systems, Delft University of Technology, PO BOX 5031, 2600 GA Delft, The Netherlands Phone: +31-15-2783635 Fax: +31-15-2781843 Email: J.A.K.Mouw@its.tudelft.nl WWW: http://www-ict.its.tudelft.nl/~erik/ From kramer@pa.dec.com Sat Aug 12 03:18:25 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id DAA03144; Sat, 12 Aug 2000 03:18:25 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from zmamail05.zma.compaq.com (zmamail05.zma.compaq.com [161.114.64.105]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id DAA07800 for ; Sat, 12 Aug 2000 03:18:23 +0200 (METDST) Received: by zmamail05.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 34E0C5AE4; Fri, 11 Aug 2000 21:17:52 -0400 (EDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by zmamail05.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id BCBB7592B; Fri, 11 Aug 2000 21:17:49 -0400 (EDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA03704; Fri, 11 Aug 2000 18:15:06 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id SAA15960; Fri, 11 Aug 2000 18:12:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: from zmamail02.zma.compaq.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id SAA17922; Fri, 11 Aug 2000 18:12:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: by zmamail02.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 51F58B36; Fri, 11 Aug 2000 21:12:08 -0400 (EDT) Received: from xanadu.gn.com (modemcable248.137-200-24.mtl.mc.videotron.net [24.200.137.248]) by zmamail02.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DBC11942 for ; Fri, 11 Aug 2000 21:12:07 -0400 (EDT) Received: from localhost (nico@localhost) by xanadu.gn.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id VAA05377; Fri, 11 Aug 2000 21:11:14 -0400 X-Authentication-Warning: xanadu.gn.com: nico owned process doing -bs Date: Fri, 11 Aug 2000 21:11:14 -0400 (EDT) From: Nicolas Pitre X-Sender: nico@xanadu.gn.com To: "Gennadiy M. Kurtsman" Cc: sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Subject: Re: Q: Interrupt handler registration in 2.4.0 kernel In-Reply-To: <001101bffe29$6fe0f030$0e09a8c0@cyber> Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk On Fri, 4 Aug 2000, Gennadiy M. Kurtsman wrote: > Hello, > now I'm porting Linux device driver from 2.2.14 kernel to 2.4.0 one. I try > to register irq #11. GPIO_25 is interrupt source. Return code from > *request_irq* procedure is -EBUSY. Looks like I need to describe GPIO_25 in > GPIO_11-27 list. Which routines doing it are added in 2.4.0 kernel ? > Something else ideas? You can't register for IRQ 11 anymore. It's used by the GPIO_11_to_27 IRQ demux handler. If you want to register for the IRQ generated by GPIO 25, you must do the following: #include /* set GPIO 25 direction to input */ GPDR |= GPIO_GPIO25; /* * Configure the edge detection for IRQ on GPIO 25. * NEVER use GFER/GRER/GEDR directly. * The first argument is a GPIO mask. * The second argument is either GPIO_RISING_EDGE, * GPIO_FALLING_EDGE or GPIO_BOTH_EDGES. */ set_GPIO_IRQ_edge( GPIO_GPIO25, GPIO_FALLING_EDGE ); /* * Now register IRQ for GPIO 25. Note that GPIO 25 does NOT * correspond to IRQ 25. You should use predefined definitions * for better clarity. */ request_irq( IRQ_GPIO_GPIO25, irq_handler, flags, "GPIO 25", dev_id ); For an example of the above usage you might have a look at linux/drivers/pcmcia/sa1100_assabet.c Nicolas From kramer@pa.dec.com Sat Aug 12 08:49:41 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id IAA03732; Sat, 12 Aug 2000 08:49:41 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from ztxmail03.ztx.compaq.com (ztxmail03.ztx.compaq.com [161.114.1.207]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id IAA12507 for ; Sat, 12 Aug 2000 08:49:39 +0200 (METDST) Received: by ztxmail03.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 08AEB815; Sat, 12 Aug 2000 01:49:07 -0500 (CDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by ztxmail03.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 541C0975; Sat, 12 Aug 2000 01:49:03 -0500 (CDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA29542; Fri, 11 Aug 2000 23:46:19 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id XAA25747; Fri, 11 Aug 2000 23:42:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id XAA27655; Fri, 11 Aug 2000 23:42:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail2.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA11256; Fri, 11 Aug 2000 23:42:03 -0700 Received: from ns0.utdallas.edu (ns0.utdallas.edu [129.110.10.1]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with ESMTP id XAA15545 for ; Fri, 11 Aug 2000 23:41:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: from apache.utdallas.edu (apache.utdallas.edu [129.110.16.9]) by ns0.utdallas.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4298E1A0712; Sat, 12 Aug 2000 01:37:14 -0500 (CDT) Received: from localhost (vasantr@localhost) by apache.utdallas.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id BAA07537; Sat, 12 Aug 2000 01:38:00 -0500 (CDT) X-Authentication-Warning: apache.utdallas.edu: vasantr owned process doing -bs Date: Sat, 12 Aug 2000 01:37:59 -0500 (CDT) From: Vasant Ramasubramanian To: Erik Mouw Cc: nico@CAM.ORG, sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com, linux-arm@vger.rutgers.edu Subject: Re: SA1110 Kernel In-Reply-To: <200008112046.WAA25733@kalman.et.tudelft.nl> Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk On Fri, 11 Aug 2000, Erik Mouw wrote: > Watch out with using the LART configuration. The LART has a bit > unusual memory layout in that it has holes in its memory banks (the > LART doesn't use A23 in bank 0 and 1). If your architecture has a > "normal" memory layout, you can get *very* strange results. If your > architecture has at least 4MB in each bank, you'd better use the > Brutus setup. Hrm, this is a good tip, I'll keep that in mind. We have 16MB(MegaBytes) of SDRAM in bank 0 and that's it for the moment. We may add 16MEG more in other banks... > > > Also I wanted to know does the SA1110 JTAG Flash burner depend on any > > Assabet specifics besides the obvious SA1110 + supported Flash part? I > > tried the software(Linux executable) with cable I built with no success; > > the JTAG Burner from Keith & Koep almost works but does not seem to > > program the flash part. We are using a supported Flash part (The > > StrataFlash 128J3). > > The SA1110 Flash burner doesn't work on SA1100 boards because the > JTAG ID code is different. Have a look at the LART site: since this > afternoon we have a page with hard- and software to burn the LART > flash (LART is an SA1100 board): > We actually *do* have an SA-1110 platform, not an SA-1100. I am aware of the LART being SA1100, my question was actually more directed towards if the Assabet JTAG burner requires any specific parts other than a standard JTAG port(i.e. the programmer tries to shift data through the CPLD or something...). Or is the jflash on Nico's site an SA1100 burner? Thanks, Vasant. From kramer@pa.dec.com Sat Aug 12 13:25:45 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id NAA04228; Sat, 12 Aug 2000 13:24:25 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from zmamail04.zma.compaq.com (zmamail04.zma.compaq.com [161.114.64.104]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id NAA16605 for ; Sat, 12 Aug 2000 13:24:23 +0200 (METDST) Received: by zmamail04.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 74BA2B23; Sat, 12 Aug 2000 07:23:52 -0400 (EDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by zmamail04.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 0FBE0A21; Sat, 12 Aug 2000 07:23:50 -0400 (EDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA09114; Sat, 12 Aug 2000 03:58:23 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id BAA25396; Sat, 12 Aug 2000 01:49:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ztxmail02.ztx.compaq.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id BAA22715; Sat, 12 Aug 2000 01:49:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: by ztxmail02.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 0332E3BB8; Sat, 12 Aug 2000 03:49:46 -0500 (CDT) Received: from navigator.sw.com.sg (navigator.sw.com.sg [195.16.40.131]) by ztxmail02.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B94B3F05 for ; Sat, 12 Aug 2000 03:48:52 -0500 (CDT) Received: from slider.sw.ru (slider.sw.com.sg [195.16.40.254]) by navigator.sw.com.sg (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id MAA18189 for ; Sat, 12 Aug 2000 12:48:32 +0400 (MSD) Received: (from root@localhost) by slider.sw.ru (8.9.1/8.9.1) id MAA04687 for sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com.procmail@slider.sw.ru; Sat, 12 Aug 2000 12:48:21 +0400 (MSD) Received: from exchruhydro.sw.com.sg (exchruhydro.sw.com.sg [195.16.40.3]) by slider.sw.ru (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id MAA04673 for ; Sat, 12 Aug 2000 12:48:21 +0400 (MSD) Received: from CYBER2 ([192.168.9.15]) by exchruhydro.sw.com.sg with SMTP (Microsoft Exchange Internet Mail Service Version 5.5.2650.21) id QDP3Q54Q; Sat, 12 Aug 2000 12:48:26 +0400 Message-Id: <004801c0043a$0a9c3ec0$0f09a8c0@sw.ru> From: "Gennadiy M. Kurtsman" To: References: Subject: Re: Q: Interrupt handler registration in 2.4.0 kernel Date: Sat, 12 Aug 2000 12:48:09 +0400 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-Msmail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2615.200 X-Mimeole: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2615.200 Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk Thanks a lot for the response. BTW is there full list of such kind changes in 2.4.0 kernel comparing with 2.2... kernel? I sought in .../Documentation directory and at some Web sites and didn't find anything useful for device drivers developer. Kind regards, GK. ----- Original Message ----- From: Nicolas Pitre To: Gennadiy M. Kurtsman Cc: Sent: Saturday, August 12, 2000 5:11 AM Subject: Re: Q: Interrupt handler registration in 2.4.0 kernel > You can't register for IRQ 11 anymore. It's used by the GPIO_11_to_27 IRQ > demux handler. > > If you want to register for the IRQ generated by GPIO 25, you must do the > following: > > #include > > /* set GPIO 25 direction to input */ > GPDR |= GPIO_GPIO25; > < snip > From kramer@pa.dec.com Sat Aug 12 18:40:26 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id SAA04805; Sat, 12 Aug 2000 18:40:25 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from zmamail04.zma.compaq.com (zmamail04.zma.compaq.com [161.114.64.104]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id SAA21886 for ; Sat, 12 Aug 2000 18:40:24 +0200 (METDST) Received: by zmamail04.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id E1A1FB7F; Sat, 12 Aug 2000 12:39:52 -0400 (EDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by zmamail04.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 6E1EF887; Sat, 12 Aug 2000 12:39:50 -0400 (EDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA13847; Sat, 12 Aug 2000 09:37:09 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id JAA06634; Sat, 12 Aug 2000 09:34:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id JAA06001; Sat, 12 Aug 2000 09:34:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ztxmail01.nz-cce.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA02198; Sat, 12 Aug 2000 09:34:00 -0700 Received: by ztxmail01.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 6C6F2451C; Sat, 12 Aug 2000 11:34:00 -0500 (CDT) Received: from tazenda.demon.co.uk (tazenda.demon.co.uk [158.152.220.239]) by ztxmail01.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A01E845E6 for ; Sat, 12 Aug 2000 11:33:58 -0500 (CDT) Received: from kings-cross.london.uk.eu.org [::ffff:192.168.2.83] by tazenda.demon.co.uk with esmtp (Exim 3.11 #1 (Debian)) id 13NX8X-0004SE-00; Sat, 12 Aug 2000 09:59:25 +0100 Received: from localhost ([::ffff:127.0.0.1] helo=tazenda.demon.co.uk ident=pb) by kings-cross.london.uk.eu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 13NX6x-00088Q-00; Sat, 12 Aug 2000 09:57:47 +0100 X-Mailer: exmh version 2.1.1 10/15/1999 (debian) To: Nicole Cook Cc: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Subject: Re: building 2.4.0-test5 kernel for an SA-1110 In-Reply-To: Message from Nicole Cook of "Thu, 10 Aug 2000 14:51:57 EDT." <3992F9CD.4FDF10FF@maya.com> References: <3992F9CD.4FDF10FF@maya.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Sat, 12 Aug 2000 09:57:47 +0100 From: Philip Blundell Message-Id: Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk >/usr/include/linux/errno.h:4: asm/errno.h: No such file or directory You don't have your host development environment properly set up. It's missing the kernel headers. >This seems to be wrong - why gcc and not arm-linux-gcc? Why is it >looking in /usr/include instead of its own kernel headers? The split-include program runs on your build machine. I don't really know why it's using at all, though. p. From kramer@pa.dec.com Sat Aug 12 18:08:21 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id SAA04730; Sat, 12 Aug 2000 18:08:21 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from zmamail03.zma.compaq.com (zmamail03.zma.compaq.com [161.114.64.103]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id SAA21472 for ; Sat, 12 Aug 2000 18:08:19 +0200 (METDST) Received: by zmamail03.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 8D2D64193; Sat, 12 Aug 2000 12:07:43 -0400 (EDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by zmamail03.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 000844052; Sat, 12 Aug 2000 12:07:40 -0400 (EDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA26736; Sat, 12 Aug 2000 09:04:56 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id JAA29442; Sat, 12 Aug 2000 09:00:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: from zmamail02.zma.compaq.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id JAA22108; Sat, 12 Aug 2000 09:00:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: by zmamail02.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id C29CA17D8; Sat, 12 Aug 2000 11:59:59 -0400 (EDT) Received: from xanadu.gn.com (modemcable248.137-200-24.mtl.mc.videotron.net [24.200.137.248]) by zmamail02.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 87A9814C4 for ; Sat, 12 Aug 2000 11:59:59 -0400 (EDT) Received: from localhost (nico@localhost) by xanadu.gn.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id LAA09582; Sat, 12 Aug 2000 11:03:16 -0400 X-Authentication-Warning: xanadu.gn.com: nico owned process doing -bs Date: Sat, 12 Aug 2000 11:03:16 -0400 (EDT) From: Nicolas Pitre X-Sender: nico@xanadu.gn.com To: "Gennadiy M. Kurtsman" Cc: sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Subject: Re: Q: Interrupt handler registration in 2.4.0 kernel In-Reply-To: Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk I apparently goofed my own example: On Fri, 11 Aug 2000, Nicolas Pitre wrote: > If you want to register for the IRQ generated by GPIO 25, you must do the > following: > > #include > > /* set GPIO 25 direction to input */ > GPDR |= GPIO_GPIO25; This should have been GPDR &= ~GPIO_GPIO25; > /* > * Configure the edge detection for IRQ on GPIO 25. > * NEVER use GFER/GRER/GEDR directly. > * The first argument is a GPIO mask. > * The second argument is either GPIO_RISING_EDGE, > * GPIO_FALLING_EDGE or GPIO_BOTH_EDGES. > */ > set_GPIO_IRQ_edge( GPIO_GPIO25, GPIO_FALLING_EDGE ); > > /* > * Now register IRQ for GPIO 25. Note that GPIO 25 does NOT > * correspond to IRQ 25. You should use predefined definitions > * for better clarity. > */ > request_irq( IRQ_GPIO_GPIO25, irq_handler, flags, "GPIO 25", Here it should be IRQ_GPIO25.... Nicolas From kramer@pa.dec.com Sat Aug 12 18:08:24 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id SAA04734; Sat, 12 Aug 2000 18:08:23 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from ztxmail05.ztx.compaq.com (ztxmail05.ztx.compaq.com [161.114.1.209]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id SAA21474 for ; Sat, 12 Aug 2000 18:08:20 +0200 (METDST) Received: by ztxmail05.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 9FB1B10AA; Sat, 12 Aug 2000 11:07:42 -0500 (CDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by ztxmail05.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id D194111E8; Sat, 12 Aug 2000 11:07:40 -0500 (CDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA09350; Sat, 12 Aug 2000 09:04:56 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id JAA29511; Sat, 12 Aug 2000 09:00:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: from zmamail02.zma.compaq.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id JAA04499; Sat, 12 Aug 2000 09:00:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: by zmamail02.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 6BFA31478; Sat, 12 Aug 2000 11:59:59 -0400 (EDT) Received: from xanadu.gn.com (modemcable248.137-200-24.mtl.mc.videotron.net [24.200.137.248]) by zmamail02.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B89D14C4 for ; Sat, 12 Aug 2000 11:59:59 -0400 (EDT) Received: from localhost (nico@localhost) by xanadu.gn.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id LAA09591; Sat, 12 Aug 2000 11:11:56 -0400 X-Authentication-Warning: xanadu.gn.com: nico owned process doing -bs Date: Sat, 12 Aug 2000 11:11:56 -0400 (EDT) From: Nicolas Pitre X-Sender: nico@xanadu.gn.com To: "Gennadiy M. Kurtsman" Cc: sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Subject: Re: Q: Interrupt handler registration in 2.4.0 kernel In-Reply-To: <004801c0043a$0a9c3ec0$0f09a8c0@sw.ru> Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk On Sat, 12 Aug 2000, Gennadiy M. Kurtsman wrote: > Thanks a lot for the response. BTW is there full list of such kind changes > in 2.4.0 kernel comparing with 2.2... kernel? I sought in .../Documentation > directory and at some Web sites and didn't find anything useful for device > drivers developer. Not that I'm aware of, unfortunately. The IRQ stuff should probably be documented since this isn't quite obvious. However the code is still the ultimate documentation because even the documentation might be out of date. Nicolas From kramer@pa.dec.com Sun Aug 13 00:27:41 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id AAA05442; Sun, 13 Aug 2000 00:27:41 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from ztxmail05.ztx.compaq.com (ztxmail05.ztx.compaq.com [161.114.1.209]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id AAA27479 for ; Sun, 13 Aug 2000 00:27:35 +0200 (METDST) Received: by ztxmail05.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 104DD12D8; Sat, 12 Aug 2000 17:27:04 -0500 (CDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by ztxmail05.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 22AF41316; Sat, 12 Aug 2000 17:27:02 -0500 (CDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA24363; Sat, 12 Aug 2000 15:24:17 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id PAA08395; Sat, 12 Aug 2000 15:19:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id PAA11051; Sat, 12 Aug 2000 15:19:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: from zmamail02.nz-tay.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA28094; Sat, 12 Aug 2000 15:19:18 -0700 Received: by zmamail02.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 76B96174C; Sat, 12 Aug 2000 18:19:18 -0400 (EDT) Received: from xanadu.gn.com (modemcable248.137-200-24.mtl.mc.videotron.net [24.200.137.248]) by zmamail02.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 21C29192B for ; Sat, 12 Aug 2000 18:19:18 -0400 (EDT) Received: from localhost (nico@localhost) by xanadu.gn.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id SAA13285 for ; Sat, 12 Aug 2000 18:18:27 -0400 X-Authentication-Warning: xanadu.gn.com: nico owned process doing -bs Date: Sat, 12 Aug 2000 18:18:27 -0400 (EDT) From: Nicolas Pitre X-Sender: nico@xanadu.gn.com To: SA-1100/Linux Subject: diff-2.4.0-test6-rmk2-np1 Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk ... is now available. This contains: - ... well a lot of tweaks from a lot of people whose names are lost somewhere in my inbox. It should be noted that the files that were in the linux/arch/arm/special directory are still there, however they aren't linked in any way anymore. Those are there for reference only. Stuff in there deserve major cleanup/rewrite, especially the UCB1200 stuff. Have fun! Nicolas From kramer@pa.dec.com Sat Jul 29 05:58:19 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id FAA18826; Sat, 29 Jul 2000 05:58:19 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from ztxmail04.ztx.compaq.com (ztxmail04.ztx.compaq.com [161.114.1.208]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id FAA00511 for ; Sat, 29 Jul 2000 05:58:17 +0200 (METDST) Received: by ztxmail04.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 24AB1B63; Fri, 28 Jul 2000 22:57:46 -0500 (CDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by ztxmail04.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 1750EA6D; Fri, 28 Jul 2000 22:57:44 -0500 (CDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA18309; Fri, 28 Jul 2000 20:57:40 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id UAA21236; Fri, 28 Jul 2000 20:54:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id UAA03841; Fri, 28 Jul 2000 20:54:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail1.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA25936; Fri, 28 Jul 2000 20:54:54 -0700 Received: from violet.csa.iisc.ernet.in (violet.csa.iisc.ernet.in [144.16.67.198]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with ESMTP id UAA29712 for ; Fri, 28 Jul 2000 20:54:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (alex@localhost) by violet.csa.iisc.ernet.in (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id JAA03165; Sun, 13 Aug 2000 09:51:15 +0530 Date: Sun, 13 Aug 2000 09:51:15 +0530 (IST) From: Alex M Alex To: linux@handhelds.org, linux-arm@vger.rutgers.edu, nanogui@linuxhacker.org Cc: linuxce-devel@linuxce.org, sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Subject: Perl port Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk Hi all, Did any one ported perl to Linux CE. regards alex From kramer@pa.dec.com Mon Aug 14 10:11:08 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id KAA09570; Mon, 14 Aug 2000 10:11:08 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from ztxmail05.ztx.compaq.com (ztxmail05.ztx.compaq.com [161.114.1.209]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id KAA27259 for ; Mon, 14 Aug 2000 10:11:06 +0200 (METDST) Received: by ztxmail05.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 353EC1353; Mon, 14 Aug 2000 03:10:34 -0500 (CDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by ztxmail05.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 47C4E135B; Mon, 14 Aug 2000 03:10:25 -0500 (CDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA21512; Mon, 14 Aug 2000 01:07:27 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id BAA21291; Mon, 14 Aug 2000 01:01:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id BAA23646; Mon, 14 Aug 2000 01:01:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail2.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA22229; Mon, 14 Aug 2000 01:01:19 -0700 Received: from duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (duteinh.et.tudelft.nl [130.161.42.1]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with ESMTP id BAA11629 for ; Mon, 14 Aug 2000 01:01:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: from dutein75 by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id JAA09464; Mon, 14 Aug 2000 09:59:43 +0200 (MET DST) Message-Id: <200008140759.JAA09464@duteinh.et.tudelft.nl> From: Erik Mouw To: vasantr@utdallas.edu Cc: nico@CAM.ORG, sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com, linux-arm@vger.rutgers.edu Subject: Re: SA1110 Kernel In-Reply-To: Organization: Eric conspiracy secret labs Date: Mon 14 Aug 2000 09:59:42 +0100 (MDT) X-Face: "!Z|1XjFg!3Iw)BwM^M\k)J5KHiPddz}#/Zw%?$&Q!xqob"OA|})3_@&BTTiQERo?/^g[Z<9P4R8:5C:aqq.cw!hotLc=+u-"+1rq@9$V^8PbOUlodyi_sejt+D`iqkLpx$>.aXl%vnfPIt"LK|/%>94_Zrm8jy?`_[RKt'TuoxUxfk(gMhY(n|DBBl~c$dhO>G%6}R4+DGX3|idBm4oU&UM/XUP4I9aoN{]`ax%B?rgD(I3OJ<62Y6L X-Mailer: XCmail 1.2devel - with PGP support, PGP engine version 0.5 (IRIX64) X-Mailerorigin: http://www.fsai.fh-trier.de/~schmitzj/Xclasses/XCmail/ X-Eric-Conspiracy: There is no conspiracy! X-Loop: erik@it.et.tudelft.nl Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk On Sat, 12 Aug 2000 01:37:59 -0500 (CDT), Vasant Ramasubramanian wrote: > On Fri, 11 Aug 2000, Erik Mouw wrote: >> The SA1110 Flash burner doesn't work on SA1100 boards because the >> JTAG ID code is different. Have a look at the LART site: since this >> afternoon we have a page with hard- and software to burn the LART >> flash (LART is an SA1100 board): >> > > We actually *do* have an SA-1110 platform, not an SA-1100. I am aware of > the LART being SA1100, my question was actually more directed towards if Bzzt, you're right, sorry. > the Assabet JTAG burner requires any specific parts other than a standard > JTAG port(i.e. the programmer tries to shift data through the CPLD or > something...). Or is the jflash on Nico's site an SA1100 burner? I don't know about CPLDs on the Assabet (I don't have one) , but there might be another difference: the Assabet has two 16 bit flash chips in parallel on its bus. If your system has only one 16 bit flash on the bus, the Assabet JTAG programmer will be quite confused. Erik -- Yes, it works sometimes. If you need something that "works sometimes" use Windows! -- Victor Khimenko on linux-kernel From kramer@pa.dec.com Mon Aug 14 21:16:54 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id VAA13486; Mon, 14 Aug 2000 21:16:53 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from zmamail05.zma.compaq.com (zmamail05.zma.compaq.com [161.114.64.105]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id VAA22095 for ; Mon, 14 Aug 2000 21:16:51 +0200 (METDST) Received: by zmamail05.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 79BC524C3; Mon, 14 Aug 2000 15:16:20 -0400 (EDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by zmamail05.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id C85452641; Mon, 14 Aug 2000 15:16:17 -0400 (EDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA03324; Mon, 14 Aug 2000 12:13:30 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id MAA06958; Mon, 14 Aug 2000 12:08:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id MAA30859; Mon, 14 Aug 2000 12:08:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ztxmail02.nz-cce.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA18209; Mon, 14 Aug 2000 12:08:11 -0700 Received: by ztxmail02.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 7D79C38C1; Mon, 14 Aug 2000 14:08:10 -0500 (CDT) Received: from ns0.utdallas.edu (ns0.utdallas.edu [129.110.10.1]) by ztxmail02.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 15DEB3AEA for ; Mon, 14 Aug 2000 14:08:10 -0500 (CDT) Received: from apache.utdallas.edu (apache.utdallas.edu [129.110.16.9]) by ns0.utdallas.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 71D461A02D6; Mon, 14 Aug 2000 14:07:20 -0500 (CDT) Received: from localhost (vasantr@localhost) by apache.utdallas.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id OAA29973; Mon, 14 Aug 2000 14:08:08 -0500 (CDT) X-Authentication-Warning: apache.utdallas.edu: vasantr owned process doing -bs Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2000 14:08:07 -0500 (CDT) From: Vasant Ramasubramanian To: handhelds@handhelds.org, sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Subject: Kernel customization? Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk Hello all. I am trying to get our hardware platform booting a Linux kernel. Our hardware uses an SA1110 processor with 16MegaBytes of SDRAM in bank0. We are using a customized version of BLOB, we aren't using the MMU or doing anything else that is weird(ala Angel). SDRAM starts at 0xc0000000 and we use the BLOB default and place the RAMDISK @ 0xc0400000.(we are using the ramdisk_img.gz from Nico's ftp site on Netwinder). I've built a new kernel based on 2.4.0.test5-rmk1 & np1; I used the Brutus config as my base(make brutus_config) and modified /arch/arm/kernel/arch.c and changed the RAM in bank 0 to 16 * 1024 * 1024, changed nr_banks =1 and changed the setup_intrd to use (0xc0400000, 4*1024*1024). Following that I did a make xconfig and chose additional options. Followed by that was a 'make dep' and then a 'make zImage' both of which executed properly. We we tried booting the Linux, passing the kernel 0,18 we got as far as "Uncompressing.... booting" and then a hang. If I the kernel is passed 0,16 (Brutus numbers if I recall) I don't seem to get anything on the console. (serial 1 or serial 3). What I'd like to know is if there is a plain vanilla SA1110 configuration we could use as our base, and have console on Serial 3? (I tried the ThinClient/Graphics client but that died near the end of the make zImage) What files would I need to alter to get Linux booting on our vanilla hardware? Do I need to pass the kernel anything besides the arch numbers? Where are the arch numbers listed -- I couldn't find them in my /Documentation/arm Thanks, Vasant. From kramer@pa.dec.com Mon Aug 14 21:41:00 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id VAA13588; Mon, 14 Aug 2000 21:41:00 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from zmamail03.zma.compaq.com (zmamail03.zma.compaq.com [161.114.64.103]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id VAA22958 for ; Mon, 14 Aug 2000 21:40:56 +0200 (METDST) Received: by zmamail03.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 18ED941EB; Mon, 14 Aug 2000 15:40:25 -0400 (EDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by zmamail03.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 7A97B429C; Mon, 14 Aug 2000 15:40:22 -0400 (EDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA20113; Mon, 14 Aug 2000 12:37:41 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id MAA08043; Mon, 14 Aug 2000 12:36:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id MAA03805; Mon, 14 Aug 2000 12:36:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: from zmamail01.nz-tay.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA04578; Mon, 14 Aug 2000 12:36:03 -0700 Received: by zmamail01.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 5A9491819; Mon, 14 Aug 2000 15:36:03 -0400 (EDT) Received: from ns0.utdallas.edu (ns0.utdallas.edu [129.110.10.1]) by zmamail01.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 361091B58 for ; Mon, 14 Aug 2000 15:36:03 -0400 (EDT) Received: from apache.utdallas.edu (apache.utdallas.edu [129.110.16.9]) by ns0.utdallas.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 187A01A02F6; Mon, 14 Aug 2000 14:35:03 -0500 (CDT) Received: from localhost (vasantr@localhost) by apache.utdallas.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id OAA01808; Mon, 14 Aug 2000 14:35:50 -0500 (CDT) X-Authentication-Warning: apache.utdallas.edu: vasantr owned process doing -bs Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2000 14:35:50 -0500 (CDT) From: Vasant Ramasubramanian To: Erik Mouw Cc: nico@CAM.ORG, sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com, linux-arm@vger.rutgers.edu Subject: Re: SA1110 Kernel In-Reply-To: <200008140759.JAA09464@duteinh.et.tudelft.nl> Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk On Mon, 14 Aug 2000, Erik Mouw wrote: > > I don't know about CPLDs on the Assabet (I don't have one) , but there > might be another difference: the Assabet has two 16 bit flash chips in > parallel on its bus. If your system has only one 16 bit flash on the bus, > the Assabet JTAG programmer will be quite confused. > True but it doesn't even read the processor ID correctly. Vasant. From kramer@pa.dec.com Tue Aug 15 04:16:08 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id EAA15041; Tue, 15 Aug 2000 04:16:07 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from ztxmail05.ztx.compaq.com (ztxmail05.ztx.compaq.com [161.114.1.209]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id EAA03545 for ; Tue, 15 Aug 2000 04:16:06 +0200 (METDST) Received: by ztxmail05.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 7B5831190; Mon, 14 Aug 2000 21:15:34 -0500 (CDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by ztxmail05.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id A467F127A; Mon, 14 Aug 2000 21:15:28 -0500 (CDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA09520; Mon, 14 Aug 2000 19:12:43 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id TAA20805; Mon, 14 Aug 2000 19:09:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id TAA15730; Mon, 14 Aug 2000 19:09:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ztxmail01.nz-cce.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA04857; Mon, 14 Aug 2000 19:09:32 -0700 Received: by ztxmail01.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 14B4D44B4; Mon, 14 Aug 2000 21:09:32 -0500 (CDT) Received: from xanadu.vipswitch.com (unknown [205.250.170.220]) by ztxmail01.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48DC64794 for ; Mon, 14 Aug 2000 21:09:31 -0500 (CDT) Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2000 22:07:17 -0400 (EDT) From: Nicolas Pitre To: Vasant Ramasubramanian Cc: handhelds@handhelds.org, sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Subject: Re: [Handhelds] Kernel customization? In-Reply-To: Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk On Mon, 14 Aug 2000, Vasant Ramasubramanian wrote: > Hello all. > > I am trying to get our hardware platform booting a Linux kernel. Our > hardware uses an SA1110 processor with 16MegaBytes of SDRAM in bank0. > > We are using a customized version of BLOB, we aren't using the MMU or > doing anything else that is weird(ala Angel). SDRAM starts at 0xc0000000 > and we use the BLOB default and place the RAMDISK @ 0xc0400000.(we are > using the ramdisk_img.gz from Nico's ftp site on Netwinder). > > I've built a new kernel based on 2.4.0.test5-rmk1 & np1; I used the Brutus > config as my base(make brutus_config) and modified /arch/arm/kernel/arch.c > and changed the RAM in bank 0 to 16 * 1024 * 1024, changed nr_banks =1 and > changed the setup_intrd to use (0xc0400000, 4*1024*1024). > > Following that I did a make xconfig and chose additional options. Followed > by that was a 'make dep' and then a 'make zImage' both of which executed > properly. > > We we tried booting the Linux, passing the kernel 0,18 we got as far as > "Uncompressing.... booting" and then a hang. This is typically because you passed the wrong architecture number. Since your base configuration is Brutus, you should have passed 16 in r1. > If I the kernel is passed > 0,16 (Brutus numbers if I recall) I don't seem to get anything on the > console. (serial 1 or serial 3). Here you should note that Brutus has its console on serial 1 and that serial 1 on the SA1100 can be wired to two different set of pins -- Brutus using the alternate function of GPIO 14 and 15 which might not be your case. > What I'd like to know is if there is a plain vanilla SA1110 configuration > we could use as our base, and have console on Serial 3? Not really. First, get an architecture number from Russell as it is explained at the end of linux/Documentation/arm/README. > What files would I need to alter to get Linux booting on our vanilla > hardware? Do I need to pass the kernel anything besides the arch numbers? > Where are the arch numbers listed -- I couldn't find them in my > /Documentation/arm Next, add a configuration choice for your architecture in linux/arch/arm/config.in. All architecture numbers are listed in linux/include/asm-arm/system.h (this changed location in latest Russell's tree, but I didn't produce a patch against it yet). Add your architecture there, along with the appropriate machine_is_xyz() macros. Using "CONFIG_SA1100_" and "machine_is_" as search strings, find all occurence of them in the whole source tree. Add the necessary code around those occurence for your architecture as needed. The typical files you should check are: linux/arch/arm/config.in linux/include/asm-arm/system.h linux/arch/arm/boot/compressed/setup_sa1100.S linux/include/asm-arm/arch-sa1100/uncompress.h linux/drivers/char/serial_sa1100.c linux/arch/arm/kernel/arch.c linux/arch/arm/mm/mm-sa1100.c Like I said above, in future kernel patches the architecture number will be defined in linux/arch/arm/tools/mach-types instead of linux/include/asm-arm/system.h, so editing system.h won't be required anymore. By inspection of those files above, it should be easy to add a new architecture definition and get a bare kernel with serial console working pretty quickly on any new SA11x0 systems. I think that's it! Oh! ... and don't forget to pass the correct architecture number in r1 from the bootloader. Nicolas From kramer@pa.dec.com Mon Jul 31 11:55:56 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id LAA23960; Mon, 31 Jul 2000 11:55:55 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from zmamail03.zma.compaq.com (zmamail03.zma.compaq.com [161.114.64.103]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id LAA20181 for ; Mon, 31 Jul 2000 11:55:54 +0200 (METDST) Received: by zmamail03.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 92B0A5CB4; Mon, 31 Jul 2000 05:55:22 -0400 (EDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by zmamail03.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id D35BF5F5E; Mon, 31 Jul 2000 05:55:19 -0400 (EDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA17725; Mon, 31 Jul 2000 02:52:32 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id CAA03664; Mon, 31 Jul 2000 02:50:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id CAA00332; Mon, 31 Jul 2000 02:50:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail1.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA03614; Mon, 31 Jul 2000 02:50:08 -0700 Received: from violet.csa.iisc.ernet.in (violet.csa.iisc.ernet.in [144.16.67.198]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with ESMTP id CAA23148 for ; Mon, 31 Jul 2000 02:50:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (alex@localhost) by violet.csa.iisc.ernet.in (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id PAA09640; Tue, 15 Aug 2000 15:45:22 +0530 Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2000 15:45:21 +0530 (IST) From: Alex M Alex To: Martin_Doering@mn.man.de Cc: linux@handhelds.org, linux-arm@vger.rutgers.edu, linuxce-devel@linuxce.org, nanogui@linuxhacker.org, sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Subject: Has anybody ported perl to SA1110 In-Reply-To: Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk Hi all I like to know any one has ported perl to strong arm . regards alex From kramer@pa.dec.com Tue Aug 15 16:07:40 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id QAA18562; Tue, 15 Aug 2000 16:07:40 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from ztxmail04.ztx.compaq.com (ztxmail04.ztx.compaq.com [161.114.1.208]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id QAA25797 for ; Tue, 15 Aug 2000 16:07:37 +0200 (METDST) Received: by ztxmail04.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id C8DAC1AA7; Tue, 15 Aug 2000 09:07:04 -0500 (CDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by ztxmail04.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id BD6931815; Tue, 15 Aug 2000 09:07:02 -0500 (CDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA04447; Tue, 15 Aug 2000 07:04:15 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id HAA00559; Tue, 15 Aug 2000 07:00:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id HAA04582; Tue, 15 Aug 2000 07:00:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: from zmamail02.nz-tay.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA09482; Tue, 15 Aug 2000 07:00:14 -0700 Received: by zmamail02.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 1B9DBBAC; Tue, 15 Aug 2000 10:00:14 -0400 (EDT) Received: from baucis.sc.intel.com (baucis.sc.intel.com [143.183.152.22]) by zmamail02.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7054E1B37 for ; Tue, 15 Aug 2000 10:00:13 -0400 (EDT) Received: from SMTP (fmsmsxvs03-1.fm.intel.com [132.233.42.203]) by baucis.sc.intel.com (8.9.1a+p1/8.9.1/d: relay.m4,v 1.30 2000/06/08 18:25:35 dmccart Exp $) with SMTP id HAA00196 for ; Tue, 15 Aug 2000 07:00:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: from fmsmsx19.fm.intel.com ([132.233.48.19]) by 132.233.48.203 (Norton AntiVirus for Internet Email Gateways 1.0) ; Tue, 15 Aug 2000 14:00:06 0000 (GMT) Received: by fmsmsx19.fm.intel.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21) id ; Tue, 15 Aug 2000 07:00:04 -0700 Message-Id: From: "Seger, Justin M" To: "'sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com'" Subject: Assabet Frontlight Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2000 07:00:04 -0700 Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk Has anyone had any problems with an Assabet and the frontlight driver? If I do an "insmod sa1100_frontlight.o" I get: Frontlight Driver Initialized... Then the frontlight turns on, the system works normally, and then the system resets in about 10 seconds. Anyone have any ideas? I'm running 2.4.0-test5-rmk1-np1 Thanks, Justin Seger From kramer@pa.dec.com Wed Aug 16 22:02:41 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id WAA25993; Wed, 16 Aug 2000 22:02:41 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from zmamail05.zma.compaq.com (zmamail05.zma.compaq.com [161.114.64.105]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id WAA19290 for ; Wed, 16 Aug 2000 22:02:38 +0200 (METDST) Received: by zmamail05.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 66F4A14EB; Wed, 16 Aug 2000 16:02:07 -0400 (EDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by zmamail05.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id A500C3AF8; Wed, 16 Aug 2000 16:02:04 -0400 (EDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA06811; Wed, 16 Aug 2000 12:59:08 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id MAA22034; Wed, 16 Aug 2000 12:49:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id MAA22837; Wed, 16 Aug 2000 12:49:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ztxmail02.nz-cce.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA32133; Wed, 16 Aug 2000 12:49:20 -0700 Received: by ztxmail02.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 9A3E22007; Wed, 16 Aug 2000 14:49:20 -0500 (CDT) Received: from ns0.utdallas.edu (ns0.utdallas.edu [129.110.10.1]) by ztxmail02.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B5CB22AB for ; Wed, 16 Aug 2000 14:49:20 -0500 (CDT) Received: from apache.utdallas.edu (apache.utdallas.edu [129.110.16.9]) by ns0.utdallas.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id C2F8319FFC4; Wed, 16 Aug 2000 14:48:28 -0500 (CDT) Received: from localhost (vasantr@localhost) by apache.utdallas.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id OAA22296; Wed, 16 Aug 2000 14:49:18 -0500 (CDT) X-Authentication-Warning: apache.utdallas.edu: vasantr owned process doing -bs Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2000 14:49:18 -0500 (CDT) From: Vasant Ramasubramanian To: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com, linux-arm@vger.rutgers.edu, handhelds@handhelds.org Subject: MTD, RAMDISK & MISC Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk Sorry for the cross-post, just didn't know where to ask... First, we've been able to get Linux running on our SA1110 hardware, so thanks very much to everyone! (A 2.4.0.test5.rmk1.np1 kernel). Secondly, I've compiled MTD support in (we're using the StrataFlash 128J3) and I've added what I believe is the necc. code into the flash_mem.h. My question is then does anyone have sample code which accesses their FlashROM/MTD device? I want to write our bootloader/Linux Kernel & RAMDISK to Flash. Also we're using the RAMDISK from Nico's Netwinder site; our kernel is setup to do 115200 on the serial, but after the kernel is done loading and gets to the log in prompt, we can't see anything/login in till the terminal is switched to 9600(STTY 115200 fixes it after I'm logged in). Any ideas what needs to be changed? Is there a newer/better RAMDISK out that works on generic SA1110 platforms? To use the CompactFlash slot on our hardware what files need to be modified(address of slot, what GPIO handles which signals, etc)? I assume we would use PCMCIA CS too, so do we add in PCMCIA support to the kernel? Finally, we get these weird error messages every now and then: INIT: Id "1" respawning too fast: disabled for 5 minutes INIT: Id "2" respawning too fast: disabled for 5 minutes I believe this means the processes 1 & 2 started by the init scripts are dying too fast? TOP shows PID1 & PID2 as init and kswapd respectively. Thanks! Vasant. From kramer@pa.dec.com Wed Aug 16 23:24:07 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id XAA26258; Wed, 16 Aug 2000 23:24:06 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from ztxmail05.ztx.compaq.com (ztxmail05.ztx.compaq.com [161.114.1.209]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id XAA21763 for ; Wed, 16 Aug 2000 23:24:05 +0200 (METDST) Received: by ztxmail05.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 8D96E131F; Wed, 16 Aug 2000 16:23:32 -0500 (CDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by ztxmail05.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 7A89F132C; Wed, 16 Aug 2000 16:23:30 -0500 (CDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA08983; Wed, 16 Aug 2000 14:20:48 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id OAA22950; Wed, 16 Aug 2000 14:14:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id OAA24398; Wed, 16 Aug 2000 14:14:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail2.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA21498; Wed, 16 Aug 2000 14:14:27 -0700 Received: from cambridge.merl.com (cambridge.merl.com [137.203.190.1]) by mail2.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with ESMTP id OAA20404 for ; Wed, 16 Aug 2000 14:14:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: from merl.com (eagle.merl.com [137.203.128.4]) by cambridge.merl.com (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id RAA21170 for ; Wed, 16 Aug 2000 17:14:27 -0400 Received: from zathrus.merl.com (carbone@zathrus.merl.com [137.203.128.26]) by merl.com (8.8.7/8.8.4) with ESMTP id RAA11521 for ; Wed, 16 Aug 2000 17:14:26 -0400 Received: from localhost (carbone@localhost) by zathrus.merl.com (8.9.3/8.8.3) with ESMTP id RAA27778 for ; Wed, 16 Aug 2000 17:14:26 -0400 Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2000 17:14:26 -0400 (EDT) From: Marco Carbone To: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Subject: telnet and su In-Reply-To: Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk Hello all, So I'm desiring the capability to 'su root' on my assabet through telnet. I can telnet fine with an added user but when I try su-ing to root, it always fails. I've tried updating the /etc/securetty file with all of the /dev/tty* files but still no luck. Has anyone been able to use su? As a note, my ramdisk is a variant of Nico's. (I just tried using su using 'login ' and that doesn't work as well, so the problem seems more general: su isn't working at all). any ideas? Thanks, marco From kramer@pa.dec.com Wed Aug 16 23:27:14 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id XAA26268; Wed, 16 Aug 2000 23:27:13 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from zmamail04.zma.compaq.com (zmamail04.zma.compaq.com [161.114.64.104]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id XAA21866 for ; Wed, 16 Aug 2000 23:27:12 +0200 (METDST) Received: by zmamail04.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 1526A54E; Wed, 16 Aug 2000 17:26:35 -0400 (EDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by zmamail04.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 58B1778C; Wed, 16 Aug 2000 17:26:28 -0400 (EDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA28453; Wed, 16 Aug 2000 14:23:47 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id OAA16549; Wed, 16 Aug 2000 14:17:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id OAA19900; Wed, 16 Aug 2000 14:17:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: from zmamail02.nz-tay.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA06976; Wed, 16 Aug 2000 14:17:54 -0700 Received: by zmamail02.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 868761561; Wed, 16 Aug 2000 17:17:54 -0400 (EDT) Received: from thalia.fm.intel.com (thalia.fm.intel.com [132.233.247.11]) by zmamail02.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E3551507 for ; Wed, 16 Aug 2000 17:17:54 -0400 (EDT) Received: from SMTP (fmsmsxvs05-1.fm.intel.com [132.233.42.205]) by thalia.fm.intel.com (8.9.1a+p1/8.9.1/d: relay.m4,v 1.30 2000/06/08 18:25:35 dmccart Exp $) with SMTP id VAA17757 for ; Wed, 16 Aug 2000 21:18:52 GMT Received: from fmsmsx28.fm.intel.com ([132.233.48.28]) by 132.233.48.205 (Norton AntiVirus for Internet Email Gateways 1.0) ; Wed, 16 Aug 2000 21:17:53 0000 (GMT) Received: by fmsmsx28.fm.intel.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21) id ; Wed, 16 Aug 2000 14:17:52 -0700 Message-Id: <794826DE8867D411BAB8009027AE9EB92AFF15@FMSMSX38> From: "Rao, Ram R" To: "'sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com'" Subject: blinking cursor Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2000 14:17:49 -0700 Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk Hi, Does anyone know how to hide the cursor on an Assabet? I am displaying images to the LCD by directly writing to /dev/fb, and I can't seem to get rid of the cursor. I've tried doing a setterm -cursor off > /dev/tty1, but this had no effect. Is there a way to do this through either a user level program, or by altering the kernel? Thanks, Ram From kramer@pa.dec.com Thu Aug 17 01:10:17 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id BAA26568; Thu, 17 Aug 2000 01:10:17 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from zmamail05.zma.compaq.com (zmamail05.zma.compaq.com [161.114.64.105]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id BAA24938 for ; Thu, 17 Aug 2000 01:10:15 +0200 (METDST) Received: by zmamail05.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id BB6B4172E; Wed, 16 Aug 2000 19:09:44 -0400 (EDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by zmamail05.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 16B30385C; Wed, 16 Aug 2000 19:09:42 -0400 (EDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA16445; Wed, 16 Aug 2000 16:06:58 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id PAA30832; Wed, 16 Aug 2000 15:59:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id PAA00005; Wed, 16 Aug 2000 15:59:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ztxmail02.nz-cce.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA18155; Wed, 16 Aug 2000 15:59:04 -0700 Received: by ztxmail02.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id DA9C51080; Wed, 16 Aug 2000 17:59:03 -0500 (CDT) Received: from xanadu.vipswitch.com (unknown [205.250.170.220]) by ztxmail02.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3EEC62069 for ; Wed, 16 Aug 2000 17:59:03 -0500 (CDT) Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2000 18:58:00 -0400 (EDT) From: Nicolas Pitre To: "Rao, Ram R" Cc: "'sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com'" Subject: Re: blinking cursor In-Reply-To: <794826DE8867D411BAB8009027AE9EB92AFF15@FMSMSX38> Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk On Wed, 16 Aug 2000, Rao, Ram R wrote: > Hi, > Does anyone know how to hide the cursor on an Assabet? I am > displaying images to the LCD by directly writing to /dev/fb, and I can't > seem to get rid of the cursor. I've tried doing a setterm -cursor off > > /dev/tty1, but this had no effect. Is there a way to do this through either > a user level program, or by altering the kernel? Try configuring out support for virtual terminals while leaving the framebuffer support in. Then you won't have access to /dev/tty1 and no cursor nor any text randering facility from the kernel but only access to the raw /dev/fb. It should reduce your kernel size as well. Nicolas From kramer@pa.dec.com Thu Aug 17 22:42:47 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id WAA01517; Thu, 17 Aug 2000 22:42:47 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from ztxmail03.ztx.compaq.com (ztxmail03.ztx.compaq.com [161.114.1.207]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id WAA00101 for ; Thu, 17 Aug 2000 22:42:45 +0200 (METDST) Received: by ztxmail03.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 0DFB710DC; Thu, 17 Aug 2000 15:42:13 -0500 (CDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by ztxmail03.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 1800413C9; Thu, 17 Aug 2000 15:42:11 -0500 (CDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA22985; Thu, 17 Aug 2000 13:39:22 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id NAA23804; Thu, 17 Aug 2000 13:35:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id NAA18671; Thu, 17 Aug 2000 13:35:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ztxmail01.nz-cce.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA12461; Thu, 17 Aug 2000 13:35:09 -0700 Received: by ztxmail01.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id B04502497; Thu, 17 Aug 2000 15:35:08 -0500 (CDT) Received: from mail.livetoy.com (gw.livetoy.com [64.55.67.250]) by ztxmail01.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B8DB113B7 for ; Thu, 17 Aug 2000 15:35:07 -0500 (CDT) Received: from livetoy.com (IDENT:mhuang@hotrod.livetoy.com [192.168.3.15]) by mail.livetoy.com (8.11.0/8.9.3) with ESMTP id e7HKZ7f07476 for ; Thu, 17 Aug 2000 16:35:07 -0400 Message-Id: <399C4C7A.D2A20804@livetoy.com> Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2000 16:35:07 -0400 From: Mark Huang Organization: LiveToy Networks, Inc. X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.72 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.2.14 i686) X-Accept-Language: en Mime-Version: 1.0 To: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Subject: 2.4.0 booting problems Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk Hi, I'm having a weird problem with booting 2.4.0-test6-rmk2-np1 on my SA-1100. If I instruct the bootloader to simply boot the kernel, it hangs somewhere early on in the kernel initialization. However, if I instruct the bootloader to download a 2.3.99 kernel, boot from that, hit the reset button, and then try booting 2.4.0 again, it boots fine after every reset until I power off the board, after which I must "initialize" with the 2.3.99 kernel again. Once in a blue moon, 2.4.0 will boot without having to do all of this, but I haven't been able to track down the reason. I'm wondering if the bootloader is neglecting to set something up in memory that the 2.3.99 kernel is initializing and that reset doesn't overwrite. My bootloader doesn't zero RAM, although I've tried doing it without success. What are the other responsibilities of the bootloader besides passing the architecture number? Anyway, if anyone has some insight, I'd appreciate it. Thanks! --Mark -- Mark Huang Systems Development Manager LiveToy Networks, Inc. From kramer@pa.dec.com Thu Aug 17 23:11:46 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id XAA01609; Thu, 17 Aug 2000 23:11:45 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from ztxmail05.ztx.compaq.com (ztxmail05.ztx.compaq.com [161.114.1.209]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id XAA01068 for ; Thu, 17 Aug 2000 23:11:44 +0200 (METDST) Received: by ztxmail05.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id EE66011CC; Thu, 17 Aug 2000 16:11:11 -0500 (CDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by ztxmail05.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 36FFD112E; Thu, 17 Aug 2000 16:11:08 -0500 (CDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA15830; Thu, 17 Aug 2000 14:08:26 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id OAA17848; Thu, 17 Aug 2000 14:06:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id OAA04563; Thu, 17 Aug 2000 14:06:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ztxmail02.nz-cce.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA25890; Thu, 17 Aug 2000 14:06:51 -0700 Received: by ztxmail02.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id D3A8613AB; Thu, 17 Aug 2000 16:06:50 -0500 (CDT) Received: from xanadu.vipswitch.com (unknown [205.250.170.220]) by ztxmail02.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E7C53CF4 for ; Thu, 17 Aug 2000 16:06:49 -0500 (CDT) Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2000 17:05:16 -0400 (EDT) From: Nicolas Pitre To: Mark Huang Cc: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Subject: Re: 2.4.0 booting problems In-Reply-To: <399C4C7A.D2A20804@livetoy.com> Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk On Thu, 17 Aug 2000, Mark Huang wrote: > Hi, > > I'm having a weird problem with booting 2.4.0-test6-rmk2-np1 on my > SA-1100. If I instruct the bootloader to simply boot the kernel, it > hangs somewhere early on in the kernel initialization. However, if I > instruct the bootloader to download a 2.3.99 kernel, boot from that, hit > the reset button, and then try booting 2.4.0 again, it boots fine after > every reset until I power off the board, after which I must > "initialize" with the 2.3.99 kernel again. Once in a blue moon, 2.4.0 > will boot without having to do all of this, but I haven't been able to > track down the reason. Maybe you could have a look at the early serial port setup in linux/arch/arm/boot/compressed/setup-sa1100.S. Maybe a serial port was initialized correctly for you in 2.3.99 but not in 2.4.0 and subsequent code that is trying to send some stuff out gets stuck. Also be sure the serial port selection in include/asm/arch/uncompress.h, if you use it, matches what is initialized in setup-sa1100.S. Nicolas From kramer@pa.dec.com Mon Aug 21 21:21:59 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id VAA16607; Mon, 21 Aug 2000 21:21:54 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from ztxmail05.ztx.compaq.com (ztxmail05.ztx.compaq.com [161.114.1.209]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id VAA28103 for ; Mon, 21 Aug 2000 21:21:52 +0200 (METDST) Received: by ztxmail05.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 1D8BC165A; Mon, 21 Aug 2000 14:21:20 -0500 (CDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by ztxmail05.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 5FC3117AB; Mon, 21 Aug 2000 14:21:18 -0500 (CDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA02490; Mon, 21 Aug 2000 12:21:10 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id MAA26606; Mon, 21 Aug 2000 12:17:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id MAA27511; Mon, 21 Aug 2000 12:17:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ztxmail01.nz-cce.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA01355; Mon, 21 Aug 2000 12:16:31 -0700 Received: by ztxmail01.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 89BAE1E96; Mon, 21 Aug 2000 14:16:27 -0500 (CDT) Received: from mail.livetoy.com (gw.livetoy.com [64.55.67.250]) by ztxmail01.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB99A1D96 for ; Mon, 21 Aug 2000 14:16:10 -0500 (CDT) Received: from livetoy.com (IDENT:mhuang@hotrod.livetoy.com [192.168.3.15]) by mail.livetoy.com (8.11.0/8.9.3) with ESMTP id e7LJFUf20265; Mon, 21 Aug 2000 15:15:31 -0400 Message-Id: <39A17FD2.CF1B7FD3@livetoy.com> Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2000 15:15:30 -0400 From: Mark Huang Organization: LiveToy Networks, Inc. X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.72 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.2.14 i686) X-Accept-Language: en Mime-Version: 1.0 To: Nicolas Pitre Cc: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Subject: Re: 2.4.0 booting problems References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk Hmm, no luck. I did neglect to specify the UART in uncompress.h and fixed that, but I still only get to Uncompressing Linux............................ done, booting the kernel. before it hangs. By monitoring the power consumption, I can pretty much tell that the CPU is just spinning somewhere. I'll do some more serious debugging and try to figure out exactly where it's stopping. This problem is very curious. Nicolas Pitre wrote: > Maybe you could have a look at the early serial port setup in > linux/arch/arm/boot/compressed/setup-sa1100.S. Maybe a serial port was > initialized correctly for you in 2.3.99 but not in 2.4.0 and subsequent > code that is trying to send some stuff out gets stuck. Also be sure the > serial port selection in include/asm/arch/uncompress.h, if you use it, > matches what is initialized in setup-sa1100.S. > > Nicolas -- Mark Huang Systems Development Manager LiveToy Networks, Inc. From kramer@pa.dec.com Mon Aug 21 23:21:20 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id XAA17106; Mon, 21 Aug 2000 23:21:19 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from zmamail03.zma.compaq.com (zmamail03.zma.compaq.com [161.114.64.103]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id XAA02292 for ; Mon, 21 Aug 2000 23:21:18 +0200 (METDST) Received: by zmamail03.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id E32024F26; Mon, 21 Aug 2000 17:20:46 -0400 (EDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by zmamail03.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 411314ED1; Mon, 21 Aug 2000 17:20:44 -0400 (EDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA05008; Mon, 21 Aug 2000 14:20:38 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id OAA30293; Mon, 21 Aug 2000 14:20:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id OAA30219; Mon, 21 Aug 2000 14:20:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: from zmamail01.nz-tay.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA04429; Mon, 21 Aug 2000 14:20:01 -0700 Received: by zmamail01.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id C94D32100; Mon, 21 Aug 2000 17:20:00 -0400 (EDT) Received: from xanadu.vipswitch.com (unknown [205.250.170.220]) by zmamail01.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 170A821E3 for ; Mon, 21 Aug 2000 17:19:58 -0400 (EDT) Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2000 17:18:35 -0400 (EDT) From: Nicolas Pitre To: Mark Huang Cc: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Subject: Re: 2.4.0 booting problems In-Reply-To: <39A17FD2.CF1B7FD3@livetoy.com> Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk On Mon, 21 Aug 2000, Mark Huang wrote: > Hmm, no luck. I did neglect to specify the UART in uncompress.h and fixed > that, but I still only get to > > Uncompressing Linux............................ done, booting the kernel. > > before it hangs. By monitoring the power consumption, I can pretty much tell > that the CPU is just spinning somewhere. This is most probably an indication that your bootloader is not passing the right architecture ID in r1 before branching into the kernel. See the mailing list archive. I posted the possible reasons and fixes for that problem quite recently. Nicolas From kramer@pa.dec.com Tue Aug 22 18:17:17 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id SAA22236; Tue, 22 Aug 2000 18:17:17 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from ztxmail05.ztx.compaq.com (ztxmail05.ztx.compaq.com [161.114.1.209]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id SAA07445 for ; Tue, 22 Aug 2000 18:17:15 +0200 (METDST) Received: by ztxmail05.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 6610516AF; Tue, 22 Aug 2000 11:16:43 -0500 (CDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by ztxmail05.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 82ED614A6; Tue, 22 Aug 2000 11:16:41 -0500 (CDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA06013; Tue, 22 Aug 2000 09:13:54 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id JAA32480; Tue, 22 Aug 2000 09:09:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id JAA30281; Tue, 22 Aug 2000 09:09:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ztxmail01.nz-cce.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA13662; Tue, 22 Aug 2000 09:09:22 -0700 Received: by ztxmail01.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 06CAA415A; Tue, 22 Aug 2000 11:09:21 -0500 (CDT) Received: from xanadu.vipswitch.com (unknown [205.250.170.220]) by ztxmail01.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B74822C90 for ; Tue, 22 Aug 2000 11:09:20 -0500 (CDT) Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2000 12:08:51 -0400 (EDT) From: Nicolas Pitre To: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Subject: diff-2.4.0-test6-rmk5-np1 Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk ... is available from your favorite mirror. This contains: - update to test6-rmk5 - fix to mem_map holes freeing (used by the LART) - new generic SA11x0 DMA support (I still have to document it a bit... and see if it is not lacking in some way for some drivers like USB) - updated the UDA1341 to use the new DMA stuff - fixes to the serial driver Mark Salter - IDE include cleanup Erik Mouw - sa1100fb fixes Tak-Shing Chan - UCB1200 touchscreen driver update Tak-Shing Chan (now implements the same interface as the iPAQ's) - sa1100fb command line option support + doc Mark Huang - IR setup for UART2 on iPAQ George France This one has been very lightly tested. I wanted to rush it out quickly since many people are waiting for it. There seem to be some odd segfaults during my boot sequence but I didn't have time to investigate them yet. Be warned! The big change is the new DMA code. Like I said, there is no documentation yet, but it should be quite easy to figure out how it works. The interface function prototypes are in include/asm/arch/dma.h and a nice implementation example can be found in the sa1100-uda1341.c driver. If you have any comments about the code please don't hesitate to send them to me. Have fun! Nicolas From kramer@pa.dec.com Wed Aug 23 17:06:28 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id RAA27736; Wed, 23 Aug 2000 17:06:23 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from zmamail04.zma.compaq.com (zmamail04.zma.compaq.com [161.114.64.104]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id RAA17253 for ; Wed, 23 Aug 2000 17:06:21 +0200 (METDST) Received: by zmamail04.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 5030E645; Wed, 23 Aug 2000 11:05:50 -0400 (EDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by zmamail04.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 997F97F4; Wed, 23 Aug 2000 11:05:47 -0400 (EDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA31477; Wed, 23 Aug 2000 08:05:30 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id IAA03005; Wed, 23 Aug 2000 08:00:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id IAA07823; Wed, 23 Aug 2000 08:00:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: from zmamail01.nz-tay.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA10804; Wed, 23 Aug 2000 08:00:54 -0700 Received: by zmamail01.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 9C7AE1961; Wed, 23 Aug 2000 11:00:53 -0400 (EDT) Received: from duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (duteinh.et.tudelft.nl [130.161.42.1]) by zmamail01.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DEF142287 for ; Wed, 23 Aug 2000 11:00:52 -0400 (EDT) Received: from dutein75 by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id RAA27700; Wed, 23 Aug 2000 17:00:49 +0200 (MET DST) Message-Id: <200008231500.RAA27700@duteinh.et.tudelft.nl> From: Erik Mouw To: nico@CAM.ORG Cc: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Subject: Re: diff-2.4.0-test6-rmk5-np1 In-Reply-To: Organization: Eric conspiracy secret labs Date: Wed 23 Aug 2000 17:00:47 +0100 (MDT) X-Face: "!Z|1XjFg!3Iw)BwM^M\k)J5KHiPddz}#/Zw%?$&Q!xqob"OA|})3_@&BTTiQERo?/^g[Z<9P4R8:5C:aqq.cw!hotLc=+u-"+1rq@9$V^8PbOUlodyi_sejt+D`iqkLpx$>.aXl%vnfPIt"LK|/%>94_Zrm8jy?`_[RKt'TuoxUxfk(gMhY(n|DBBl~c$dhO>G%6}R4+DGX3|idBm4oU&UM/XUP4I9aoN{]`ax%B?rgD(I3OJ<62Y6L X-Mailer: XCmail 1.2devel - with PGP support, PGP engine version 0.5 (IRIX64) X-Mailerorigin: http://www.fsai.fh-trier.de/~schmitzj/Xclasses/XCmail/ X-Eric-Conspiracy: There is no conspiracy! X-Loop: erik@it.et.tudelft.nl Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk On Tue, 22 Aug 2000 12:08:51 -0400 (EDT), Nicolas Pitre wrote: > ... is available from your favorite mirror. > > This contains: [...] > This one has been very lightly tested. I wanted to rush it out quickly > since many people are waiting for it. There seem to be some odd segfaults > during my boot sequence but I didn't have time to investigate them yet. > Be warned! No such problems on the LART, it works perfectly well. > The big change is the new DMA code. Like I said, there is no > documentation yet, but it should be quite easy to figure out how it works. > The interface function prototypes are in include/asm/arch/dma.h and a nice > implementation example can be found in the sa1100-uda1341.c driver. If > you have any comments about the code please don't hesitate to send them to > me. If you're going to document the interface anyway, could you use the new Linux documentation style? In that way "make pdfdocs" generates the complete kernel API in a single PDF file. For functions it's just a matter of using some magic characters in the comments. Have a look at Documentation/kernel-doc-nano-HOWTO.txt for information. Erik -- J.A.K. (Erik) Mouw, Information and Communication Theory Group, Department of Electrical Engineering, Faculty of Information Technology and Systems, Delft University of Technology, PO BOX 5031, 2600 GA Delft, The Netherlands Phone: +31-15-2783635 Fax: +31-15-2781843 Email: J.A.K.Mouw@its.tudelft.nl WWW: http://www-ict.its.tudelft.nl/~erik/ From kramer@pa.dec.com Wed Aug 23 19:02:24 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id TAA28411; Wed, 23 Aug 2000 19:02:24 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from ztxmail05.ztx.compaq.com (ztxmail05.ztx.compaq.com [161.114.1.209]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id TAA21518 for ; Wed, 23 Aug 2000 19:02:22 +0200 (METDST) Received: by ztxmail05.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 8288315F0; Wed, 23 Aug 2000 12:01:50 -0500 (CDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by ztxmail05.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 918AB1512; Wed, 23 Aug 2000 12:01:48 -0500 (CDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA10314; Wed, 23 Aug 2000 10:01:46 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id JAA13305; Wed, 23 Aug 2000 09:59:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id JAA09567; Wed, 23 Aug 2000 09:59:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: from zmamail02.nz-tay.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA05051; Wed, 23 Aug 2000 09:59:33 -0700 Received: by zmamail02.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 9AAEA1AAC; Wed, 23 Aug 2000 12:59:32 -0400 (EDT) Received: from xanadu.vipswitch.com (unknown [205.250.170.220]) by zmamail02.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 239851818 for ; Wed, 23 Aug 2000 12:59:32 -0400 (EDT) Date: Wed, 23 Aug 2000 12:58:53 -0400 (EDT) From: Nicolas Pitre To: ebunce@lhsl.com Cc: jamey@crl.dec.com, sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Subject: Re: patch-linux-2.4.0-test6-rmk2-np1-elb1 In-Reply-To: <85256944.005A0755.00@lhs.com> Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; CHARSET=US-ASCII Content-Id: Content-Disposition: INLINE Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk On Wed, 23 Aug 2000 ebunce@lhsl.com wrote: > > Nico, > Here's the patch that I was telling you about, and yes, this is against > liinux-2.4.0-test6-rmk2-np1, and not the latest. I'm still trying to figure out > how to get some of my mods to work with the new DMA scheme, specifically the > poll, SNDCTL_DSP_GETISPACE, and DMA tuning for fragment size support in the > audio driver; but I figured it would be good to get the changes out there so as > to not get further out of sync. The resulting files have been verified to work I'll have a look at it. > both on Assabet and iPAQ. It contains the following modifications: > sa1100-uda1341.c - support for poll API call, improved DMA/fragment size > handling > (to tune for userspace downsampling). Added SNDCTL_DSP_GETISPACE > support, > made more inline with OSS API and UDA1341 docs including fixed > AGC and > audio source handling. Great! > flash_mem.{h,c} - cleaner, more flexible flash handling, especially for > Assabet and iPAQ. Unfortunately flash-mem.c is probably bound to die now that MTD is part of the kernel. It also has a generic CFI implementation... > scale.c - Add initial Compaq Bitsy support, default speed and limit per > platform support, > add timing loop recalibration (yeah....), now just gotta knock of > pcmcia timing recalibration.... ... and UDA1341 clock source, at least for Assabet. Nicolas From kramer@pa.dec.com Thu Aug 24 05:28:27 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id FAA00795; Thu, 24 Aug 2000 05:28:26 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from ztxmail04.ztx.compaq.com (ztxmail04.ztx.compaq.com [161.114.1.208]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id FAA07182 for ; Thu, 24 Aug 2000 05:28:23 +0200 (METDST) Received: by ztxmail04.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 17B35191A; Wed, 23 Aug 2000 22:27:52 -0500 (CDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by ztxmail04.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 9A6611848; Wed, 23 Aug 2000 22:27:49 -0500 (CDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA02520; Wed, 23 Aug 2000 20:27:41 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id UAA11578; Wed, 23 Aug 2000 20:25:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id UAA04347; Wed, 23 Aug 2000 20:25:23 -0700 (PDT) From: Received: from ztxmail02.nz-cce.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA31537; Wed, 23 Aug 2000 20:25:22 -0700 Received: by ztxmail02.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 5CC63116D; Wed, 23 Aug 2000 22:25:22 -0500 (CDT) Received: from linux.org.tw (tlug.sinica.edu.tw [140.109.13.42]) by ztxmail02.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2EDBA3C54 for ; Wed, 23 Aug 2000 22:25:21 -0500 (CDT) Received: from localhost (chester@localhost) by linux.org.tw (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id LAA04693 for ; Thu, 24 Aug 2000 11:28:06 +0800 Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2000 11:28:06 +0800 (CST) To: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Subject: MediaQ-200 vga code Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk Hi, i have made a mediaQ-200 framebuffer code,and it works with my assabet board. If anyone interesting to debug it,let me know,else i will send it to nico recently. Best regards, Chester From kramer@pa.dec.com Thu Aug 24 07:59:10 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id HAA01132; Thu, 24 Aug 2000 07:59:10 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from zmamail04.zma.compaq.com (zmamail04.zma.compaq.com [161.114.64.104]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id HAA09670 for ; Thu, 24 Aug 2000 07:59:08 +0200 (METDST) Received: by zmamail04.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id DE9A7B91; Thu, 24 Aug 2000 01:58:36 -0400 (EDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by zmamail04.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 6EDA78A2; Thu, 24 Aug 2000 01:58:34 -0400 (EDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA25811; Wed, 23 Aug 2000 22:58:27 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id WAA10222; Wed, 23 Aug 2000 22:57:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id WAA10498; Wed, 23 Aug 2000 22:57:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ztxmail02.nz-cce.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA02986; Wed, 23 Aug 2000 22:57:55 -0700 Received: by ztxmail02.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 255023C54; Thu, 24 Aug 2000 00:57:55 -0500 (CDT) Received: from xanadu.gn.com (modemcable248.137-200-24.mtl.mc.videotron.net [24.200.137.248]) by ztxmail02.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 754C0285E for ; Thu, 24 Aug 2000 00:57:54 -0500 (CDT) Received: from localhost (nico@localhost) by xanadu.gn.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id BAA05853 for ; Thu, 24 Aug 2000 01:57:02 -0400 X-Authentication-Warning: xanadu.gn.com: nico owned process doing -bs Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2000 01:57:02 -0400 (EDT) From: Nicolas Pitre X-Sender: nico@xanadu.gn.com To: SA-1100/Linux Subject: diff-2.4.0-test6-rmk5-np2 Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk ... is available! This contains: - PCMCIA segfault fix - generic SA1100 DMA functions now exported - UDA1341 mixer fixes Erik Bunce - UDA1341 poll support Erik Bunce (Things have changed a bit so I ported Erik's poll implementation. I didn't test it though.) - flash-mem updates Erik Bunce - initial CPU clock scaling support for iPAQ Erik Bunce Enjoy! Nicolas From kramer@pa.dec.com Thu Aug 24 10:41:23 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id KAA02162; Thu, 24 Aug 2000 10:41:21 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from zmamail04.zma.compaq.com (zmamail04.zma.compaq.com [161.114.64.104]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id KAA14575 for ; Thu, 24 Aug 2000 10:41:19 +0200 (METDST) Received: by zmamail04.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id E5FABB55; Thu, 24 Aug 2000 04:40:47 -0400 (EDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by zmamail04.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 61A14ABD; Thu, 24 Aug 2000 04:40:45 -0400 (EDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA03769; Thu, 24 Aug 2000 01:40:42 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id BAA11129; Thu, 24 Aug 2000 01:39:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id BAA15377; Thu, 24 Aug 2000 01:39:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ztxmail01.nz-cce.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA00438; Thu, 24 Aug 2000 01:39:40 -0700 Received: by ztxmail01.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 3A2662E33; Thu, 24 Aug 2000 03:39:40 -0500 (CDT) Received: from mail.crs4.it (michelle.crs4.it [156.148.1.33]) by ztxmail01.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F44E2C4C for ; Thu, 24 Aug 2000 03:39:39 -0500 (CDT) Received: from crs4.it (selenium.crs4.it [156.148.2.81]) by mail.crs4.it (Postfix) with ESMTP id B5FDF10C9 for ; Thu, 24 Aug 2000 10:46:35 +0200 (METDST) Message-Id: <39A4E091.518DAF61@crs4.it> Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2000 10:45:05 +0200 From: Graziano Meola X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.7 [en] (WinNT; I) X-Accept-Language: en Mime-Version: 1.0 To: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Subject: Re: diff-2.4.0-test6-rmk5-np2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk Is the Neponset USB controller supported ? -- Graziano From kramer@pa.dec.com Fri Aug 25 01:13:03 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id BAA06893; Fri, 25 Aug 2000 01:13:03 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from ztxmail03.ztx.compaq.com (ztxmail03.ztx.compaq.com [161.114.1.207]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id BAA15298 for ; Fri, 25 Aug 2000 01:13:01 +0200 (METDST) Received: by ztxmail03.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 74768B70; Thu, 24 Aug 2000 18:12:29 -0500 (CDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by ztxmail03.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id C0EEF9CC; Thu, 24 Aug 2000 18:12:26 -0500 (CDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA32112; Thu, 24 Aug 2000 16:09:35 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id QAA12331; Thu, 24 Aug 2000 16:03:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id QAA10982; Thu, 24 Aug 2000 16:03:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ztxmail02.nz-cce.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA21099; Thu, 24 Aug 2000 16:03:57 -0700 Received: by ztxmail02.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id CAFBD1269; Thu, 24 Aug 2000 18:03:56 -0500 (CDT) Received: from xanadu.vipswitch.com (unknown [205.250.170.220]) by ztxmail02.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 003931080 for ; Thu, 24 Aug 2000 18:03:55 -0500 (CDT) Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2000 19:03:19 -0400 (EDT) From: Nicolas Pitre To: Graziano Meola Cc: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Subject: Re: diff-2.4.0-test6-rmk5-np2 In-Reply-To: <39A4E091.518DAF61@crs4.it> Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk On Thu, 24 Aug 2000, Graziano Meola wrote: > > Is the Neponset USB controller supported ? Not quite yet. Nicolas From kramer@pa.dec.com Fri Aug 25 17:59:58 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id RAA02179; Fri, 25 Aug 2000 17:59:58 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from zmamail05.zma.compaq.com (zmamail05.zma.compaq.com [161.114.64.105]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id RAA16447 for ; Fri, 25 Aug 2000 17:59:56 +0200 (METDST) Received: by zmamail05.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id C65A52631; Fri, 25 Aug 2000 11:59:24 -0400 (EDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by zmamail05.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id ED961258A; Fri, 25 Aug 2000 11:59:21 -0400 (EDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA11522; Fri, 25 Aug 2000 08:56:37 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id IAA04774; Fri, 25 Aug 2000 08:53:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id IAA08855; Fri, 25 Aug 2000 08:53:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: from zmamail01.nz-tay.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA25612; Fri, 25 Aug 2000 08:53:40 -0700 Received: by zmamail01.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id E4E9623E5; Fri, 25 Aug 2000 11:53:39 -0400 (EDT) Received: from xanadu.vipswitch.com (unknown [205.250.170.220]) by zmamail01.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D43D21CF for ; Fri, 25 Aug 2000 11:53:39 -0400 (EDT) Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2000 11:53:11 -0400 (EDT) From: Nicolas Pitre To: Tak-Shing Chan Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.arm.linux.org.uk, sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Subject: Re: test6-rmk5-np1 PCMCIA / UCB1200 audio? In-Reply-To: Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk On Fri, 25 Aug 2000, Tak-Shing Chan wrote: > On Thu, 24 Aug 2000, S A McConnell wrote: > > > I am interested in a "generic" interface to the UCB1200 that can be used > > to support touch screen, audio and telephony drivers. > We can perhaps reuse arch/arm/special/mcp_common.c. Yes, and rename it to ucb1200-generic.c, or better yet sa1100-ucb1200.c for more clarity. This could become ucb1200-xyz.c if ever some other architecture xyz uses the UCB1200 chip. The slave drivers could be ucb1200-ts for touchscreen, ucb1200-audio for audio, etc. > And before anyone writes or modifies anything, should we > have a who's-doing-what list in order to minimize duplicated > efforts? I guess volunteers might identify themselves on this list. You are one? :-) Nicolas From kramer@pa.dec.com Fri Aug 25 18:01:54 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id SAA02191; Fri, 25 Aug 2000 18:01:53 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from zmamail04.zma.compaq.com (zmamail04.zma.compaq.com [161.114.64.104]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id SAA16529 for ; Fri, 25 Aug 2000 18:01:51 +0200 (METDST) Received: by zmamail04.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 3A2F06A1; Fri, 25 Aug 2000 12:01:20 -0400 (EDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by zmamail04.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id D5FF94CC; Fri, 25 Aug 2000 12:01:16 -0400 (EDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA24703; Fri, 25 Aug 2000 08:58:35 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id IAA18165; Fri, 25 Aug 2000 08:56:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id IAA09631; Fri, 25 Aug 2000 08:56:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ztxmail01.nz-cce.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA01293; Fri, 25 Aug 2000 08:56:54 -0700 Received: by ztxmail01.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id BA0E813E4; Fri, 25 Aug 2000 10:56:53 -0500 (CDT) Received: from pigeon.maya.com (po.maya.com [192.70.254.2]) by ztxmail01.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3AA333FE3 for ; Fri, 25 Aug 2000 10:56:53 -0500 (CDT) Received: from maya.com (cook-pc.maya.com [192.70.254.33]) by pigeon.maya.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E5093ED2 for ; Fri, 25 Aug 2000 11:57:04 -0400 (EDT) Message-Id: <39A69901.5D06886E@maya.com> Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2000 12:04:17 -0400 From: Nicole Cook X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.72 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.2.14-5.0 i686) X-Accept-Language: en Mime-Version: 1.0 To: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Subject: user space access to memory Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk This is maybe a bit of a general linux question, but having seen a little bit of discussion on this maybe someone has a suggestion. We're using cerfboards to develop/debug code that will eventually run without linux. One of the things we want to make is an LCD controller. Is there a way, on an SA-1110 board running linux, to run a user space program that converts virtual memory to physical memory so that the registers that control the LCD work? Can this be done via /dev/fb or a pseudo-device driver? ------------------------------ Nicole Cook Software Engineer MAYA Design From kramer@pa.dec.com Fri Aug 25 18:18:19 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id SAA02273; Fri, 25 Aug 2000 18:18:18 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from zmamail03.zma.compaq.com (zmamail03.zma.compaq.com [161.114.64.103]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id SAA17215 for ; Fri, 25 Aug 2000 18:18:16 +0200 (METDST) Received: by zmamail03.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 414D25F65; Fri, 25 Aug 2000 12:17:45 -0400 (EDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by zmamail03.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 634385CD3; Fri, 25 Aug 2000 12:17:42 -0400 (EDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA19144; Fri, 25 Aug 2000 09:15:01 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id JAA10572; Fri, 25 Aug 2000 09:13:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id JAA22545; Fri, 25 Aug 2000 09:13:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ztxmail01.nz-cce.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA06057; Fri, 25 Aug 2000 09:13:18 -0700 Received: by ztxmail01.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 50EAC2E66; Fri, 25 Aug 2000 11:13:18 -0500 (CDT) Received: from empeg.com (morrison.empeg.co.uk [193.119.19.130]) by ztxmail01.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4EC532FC9 for ; Fri, 25 Aug 2000 11:13:16 -0500 (CDT) Received: from morcheeba (morcheeba.internal.empeg.com [10.1.1.34]) by empeg.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id RAA16080; Fri, 25 Aug 2000 17:12:53 +0100 Message-Id: <00c301c00eaf$3a890da0$2201010a@internal.empeg.com> From: "Hugo Fiennes" To: "Nicole Cook" , References: <39A69901.5D06886E@maya.com> Subject: Re: user space access to memory Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2000 17:12:12 +0100 Organization: empeg ltd Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-Msmail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.3018.1300 X-Mimeole: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400 Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk > Is there a way, on an SA-1110 board running linux, to run a user space > program that converts virtual memory to physical memory so that the > registers that control the LCD work? Can this be done via /dev/fb or a > pseudo-device driver? The easiest way is probably to use /dev/fb, which as I understand it (we don't use it ourselves) allows you to mmap() a bit of kernel memory (which may well have the LCD controller pointed at it) into user space. Hugo From kramer@pa.dec.com Fri Aug 25 20:14:00 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id UAA02658; Fri, 25 Aug 2000 20:13:59 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from ztxmail05.ztx.compaq.com (ztxmail05.ztx.compaq.com [161.114.1.209]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id UAA20925 for ; Fri, 25 Aug 2000 20:13:57 +0200 (METDST) Received: by ztxmail05.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 7F4C31635; Fri, 25 Aug 2000 13:13:25 -0500 (CDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by ztxmail05.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id A6AE41581; Fri, 25 Aug 2000 13:13:23 -0500 (CDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA05680; Fri, 25 Aug 2000 11:10:41 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id LAA13690; Fri, 25 Aug 2000 11:08:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id LAA12532; Fri, 25 Aug 2000 11:08:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ztxmail01.nz-cce.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA21812; Fri, 25 Aug 2000 11:08:30 -0700 Received: by ztxmail01.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 969EA1CC8; Fri, 25 Aug 2000 13:08:30 -0500 (CDT) Received: from hyperspace (unknown [213.108.20.4]) by ztxmail01.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 71FC41D9E for ; Fri, 25 Aug 2000 13:08:29 -0500 (CDT) Received: (qmail 2071 invoked from network); 25 Aug 2000 18:04:20 -0000 Received: from localhost (alex@127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 25 Aug 2000 18:04:20 -0000 Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2000 19:04:20 +0100 (GMT) From: Alex Holden To: Nicole Cook Cc: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Subject: Re: user space access to memory In-Reply-To: <00c301c00eaf$3a890da0$2201010a@internal.empeg.com> Message-Id: X-Subliminal-Message: Use Linux! Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk On Fri, 25 Aug 2000, Hugo Fiennes wrote: > The easiest way is probably to use /dev/fb, which as I understand it (we > don't use it ourselves) allows you to mmap() a bit of kernel memory (which > may well have the LCD controller pointed at it) into user space. If you just want to map some arbitrary piece of physical memory into a process space in order to develop a device driver in user space, you can mmap() /dev/mem. A framebuffer driver does quite a bit more including initialising the graphics chip, providing a virtual terminal on it, etc. One thing you can't do from user space is to handle interrupts. -- --------------- Linux- the choice of a GNU generation. -------------- : Alex Holden (M1CJD)- Caver, Programmer, Land Rover nut, Radio Ham : -------------------- http://www.linuxhacker.org/ -------------------- From kramer@pa.dec.com Fri Aug 25 21:36:16 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id VAA02879; Fri, 25 Aug 2000 21:36:15 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from ztxmail04.ztx.compaq.com (ztxmail04.ztx.compaq.com [161.114.1.208]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id VAA23640 for ; Fri, 25 Aug 2000 21:36:13 +0200 (METDST) Received: by ztxmail04.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 1F7D91A4B; Fri, 25 Aug 2000 14:35:41 -0500 (CDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by ztxmail04.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 5ECB518FF; Fri, 25 Aug 2000 14:35:38 -0500 (CDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA03440; Fri, 25 Aug 2000 12:32:46 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id MAA00821; Fri, 25 Aug 2000 12:30:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id MAA17488; Fri, 25 Aug 2000 12:30:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: from zmamail01.nz-tay.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA21939; Fri, 25 Aug 2000 12:30:35 -0700 Received: by zmamail01.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id BA99C238; Fri, 25 Aug 2000 15:30:34 -0400 (EDT) Received: from cvsftp.cotw.com (cvsftp.cotw.com [208.242.241.39]) by zmamail01.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B91583BB7 for ; Fri, 25 Aug 2000 15:30:33 -0400 (EDT) Received: from cotw.com (IDENT:samcconn@ptecdev2.ptec.com [192.168.10.4]) by cvsftp.cotw.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id OAA24023; Fri, 25 Aug 2000 14:29:44 -0500 Message-Id: <39A6C9D5.606F5F82@cotw.com> Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2000 14:32:37 -0500 From: S A McConnell Reply-To: samcconn@cotw.com X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.7 [en] (X11; I; Linux 2.2.14 i686) X-Accept-Language: en Mime-Version: 1.0 To: Nicolas Pitre Cc: Tak-Shing Chan , linux-arm-kernel@lists.arm.linux.org.uk, sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Subject: Re: test6-rmk5-np1 PCMCIA / UCB1200 audio? References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk Nicolas Pitre wrote: > > Yes, and rename it to ucb1200-generic.c, or better yet sa1100-ucb1200.c > for more clarity. This could become ucb1200-xyz.c if ever some > other architecture xyz uses the UCB1200 chip. Lets use the generic name. The LinkUp L7200 & L7205 uses the UCB1200 (ARM720) > > The slave drivers could be ucb1200-ts for touchscreen, ucb1200-audio for > audio, etc. > > > And before anyone writes or modifies anything, should we > > have a who's-doing-what list in order to minimize duplicated > > efforts? > > I guess volunteers might identify themselves on this list. > You are one? :-) I am interested in the TS at this point. Scott From kramer@pa.dec.com Mon Aug 28 03:50:16 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id DAA09216; Mon, 28 Aug 2000 03:50:15 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from ztxmail04.ztx.compaq.com (ztxmail04.ztx.compaq.com [161.114.1.208]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id DAA09199 for ; Mon, 28 Aug 2000 03:50:14 +0200 (METDST) Received: by ztxmail04.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 3A9E51909; Sun, 27 Aug 2000 20:49:42 -0500 (CDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by ztxmail04.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 75C751832; Sun, 27 Aug 2000 20:49:40 -0500 (CDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA20362; Sun, 27 Aug 2000 18:46:47 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id SAA01494; Sun, 27 Aug 2000 18:40:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id SAA12088; Sun, 27 Aug 2000 18:40:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ztxmail01.nz-cce.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA26367; Sun, 27 Aug 2000 18:40:11 -0700 Received: by ztxmail01.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 994AE1120; Sun, 27 Aug 2000 20:40:10 -0500 (CDT) Received: from pikachu.idthk.com (pc125.idthk.com [210.184.5.125]) by ztxmail01.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E1F292CF1 for ; Sun, 27 Aug 2000 20:40:07 -0500 (CDT) Received: from localhost (thomas@localhost) by pikachu.idthk.com (8.9.3/8.8.7) with ESMTP id JAA31181; Mon, 28 Aug 2000 09:39:42 +0800 Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2000 09:39:42 +0800 (CST) From: Tak-Shing Chan To: Nicolas Pitre Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.arm.linux.org.uk, sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Subject: Re: test6-rmk5-np1 PCMCIA / UCB1200 audio? In-Reply-To: Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk On Fri, 25 Aug 2000, Nicolas Pitre wrote: > I guess volunteers might identify themselves on this list. > You are one? :-) Sure. I plan to port the latest Itsy drivers (Y2K version) from 2.0.30 to 2.4.0-test6-rmk5-np1 (quite a tedious task but hopefully I can start from Erik Mouw's port of an older version), and rename them to the ones you proposed... I'll also make their TS driver iPAQ-compatible. This seems to solve all the problems at once. Is there anyone else already doing this? Tak-Shing Chan From kramer@pa.dec.com Mon Aug 28 07:36:45 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id HAA09745; Mon, 28 Aug 2000 07:36:44 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from ztxmail04.ztx.compaq.com (ztxmail04.ztx.compaq.com [161.114.1.208]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id HAA12039 for ; Mon, 28 Aug 2000 07:36:43 +0200 (METDST) Received: by ztxmail04.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 7E7501B80; Mon, 28 Aug 2000 00:36:11 -0500 (CDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by ztxmail04.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 70A381904; Mon, 28 Aug 2000 00:36:05 -0500 (CDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA17456; Sun, 27 Aug 2000 22:33:21 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id WAA03449; Sun, 27 Aug 2000 22:29:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id WAA08443; Sun, 27 Aug 2000 22:29:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: from zmamail01.nz-tay.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA10108; Sun, 27 Aug 2000 22:29:23 -0700 Received: by zmamail01.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id E33FF1A31; Mon, 28 Aug 2000 01:29:22 -0400 (EDT) Received: from funai-tky.co.jp (ns.funai-tky.co.jp [210.154.37.2]) by zmamail01.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A08E51BE2 for ; Mon, 28 Aug 2000 01:29:21 -0400 (EDT) Received: from hiropu ([192.168.1.19]) by funai-tky.co.jp (8.9.1/3.7Wpr7-98092916) with SMTP id OAA08020 for ; Mon, 28 Aug 2000 14:29:19 +0900 Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2000 14:29:20 +0900 From: Hiroshi Ishii To: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Subject: How to control volume. Message-Id: <39A9F8B04D.3C71HIROSHI@ns.funai-tky.co.jp> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Becky! ver 1.26.05 Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk Hello, Is there way to control UCB1200 volume(assabet) ? thanks. ---- Funai Electric R & D System Software Engineer Hiroshi Ishii From kramer@pa.dec.com Mon Aug 28 17:16:29 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id RAA13654; Mon, 28 Aug 2000 17:16:29 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from ztxmail04.ztx.compaq.com (ztxmail04.ztx.compaq.com [161.114.1.208]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id RAA06573 for ; Mon, 28 Aug 2000 17:16:27 +0200 (METDST) Received: by ztxmail04.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 8BA141B8F; Mon, 28 Aug 2000 10:15:55 -0500 (CDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by ztxmail04.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id D4DCE19F4; Mon, 28 Aug 2000 10:15:53 -0500 (CDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA26712; Mon, 28 Aug 2000 08:13:09 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id IAA23904; Mon, 28 Aug 2000 08:10:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id IAA23569; Mon, 28 Aug 2000 08:10:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: from zmamail01.nz-tay.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA14091; Mon, 28 Aug 2000 08:10:16 -0700 Received: by zmamail01.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 8645720B0; Mon, 28 Aug 2000 11:10:15 -0400 (EDT) Received: from ADSServer.flatpanels.com (adsserver.flatpanels.com [207.196.69.66]) by zmamail01.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1FC96237E for ; Mon, 28 Aug 2000 11:10:15 -0400 (EDT) Received: by ADS_SERVER with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21) id ; Mon, 28 Aug 2000 11:01:34 -0400 Message-Id: <91B07CA588CED3118CFE00105AC975941402E8@ADS_SERVER> From: "Baik, John" To: Hiroshi Ishii , sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Subject: RE: How to control volume. Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2000 11:01:33 -0400 Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21) Content-Type: text/plain Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk You can control the volume with Audio Output Attenuation setting in Audio Control Register B. This value can be changed from 0 to 32, 0 for MAX and 32 for MIN. You can play with that value. Jonghyeon Baik Sr. S/W Engineer Applied Data Systems 301- 490-4007 x15 http://www.applieddata.net -----Original Message----- From: Hiroshi Ishii [SMTP:hiroshi@funai-tky.co.jp] Sent: Monday, August 28, 2000 1:29 AM To: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Subject: How to control volume. Hello, Is there way to control UCB1200 volume(assabet) ? thanks. ---- Funai Electric R & D System Software Engineer Hiroshi Ishii From kramer@pa.dec.com Tue Aug 29 03:44:46 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id DAA16389; Tue, 29 Aug 2000 03:44:46 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from ztxmail03.ztx.compaq.com (ztxmail03.ztx.compaq.com [161.114.1.207]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id DAA24724 for ; Tue, 29 Aug 2000 03:44:44 +0200 (METDST) Received: by ztxmail03.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id F141912AC; Mon, 28 Aug 2000 20:44:12 -0500 (CDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by ztxmail03.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 8B8F811D4; Mon, 28 Aug 2000 20:44:10 -0500 (CDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA28965; Mon, 28 Aug 2000 18:41:26 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id SAA17956; Mon, 28 Aug 2000 18:38:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id SAA14327; Mon, 28 Aug 2000 18:38:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: from zmamail01.nz-tay.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA15630; Mon, 28 Aug 2000 18:38:54 -0700 Received: by zmamail01.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id D41C52720; Mon, 28 Aug 2000 21:38:53 -0400 (EDT) Received: from funai-tky.co.jp (ns.funai-tky.co.jp [210.154.37.2]) by zmamail01.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C8300183F for ; Mon, 28 Aug 2000 21:38:52 -0400 (EDT) Received: from hiropu ([192.168.1.19]) by funai-tky.co.jp (8.9.1/3.7Wpr7-98092916) with SMTP id KAA14482 for ; Tue, 29 Aug 2000 10:38:50 +0900 Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2000 10:38:51 +0900 From: Hiroshi Ishii To: sa1100 mailng list Subject: Re: How to control volume. In-Reply-To: <91B07CA588CED3118CFE00105AC975941402E8@ADS_SERVER> References: <91B07CA588CED3118CFE00105AC975941402E8@ADS_SERVER> Message-Id: <39AB142B19E.0D3AHIROSHI@ns.funai-tky.co.jp> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Becky! ver 1.26.05 Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk On Mon, 28 Aug 2000 11:01:33 -0400 "Baik, John" wrote: > You can control the volume with Audio Output Attenuation setting in Audio > Control Register B. > This value can be changed from 0 to 32, 0 for MAX and 32 for MIN. > You can play with that value. I found "SOUND_MIXER_WRITE_VOLUME" in sa1100-uda1341.c So, handling it with small application, I got it. Thank you. ---- Funai Electric R & D System Software Engineer Hiroshi Ishii From kramer@pa.dec.com Tue Aug 29 18:04:44 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id SAA20823; Tue, 29 Aug 2000 18:04:44 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from ztxmail05.ztx.compaq.com (ztxmail05.ztx.compaq.com [161.114.1.209]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id SAA25692 for ; Tue, 29 Aug 2000 18:04:42 +0200 (METDST) Received: by ztxmail05.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 59A4016E5; Tue, 29 Aug 2000 11:04:10 -0500 (CDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by ztxmail05.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 6C38D165A; Tue, 29 Aug 2000 11:04:08 -0500 (CDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA11162; Tue, 29 Aug 2000 09:01:13 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id IAA19564; Tue, 29 Aug 2000 08:51:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id IAA02872; Tue, 29 Aug 2000 08:51:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ztxmail01.nz-cce.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA12717; Tue, 29 Aug 2000 08:51:35 -0700 Received: by ztxmail01.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 3799727B8; Tue, 29 Aug 2000 10:51:35 -0500 (CDT) Received: from gate1.itt.com (gate1.itt.com [151.190.254.100]) by ztxmail01.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 565402447 for ; Tue, 29 Aug 2000 10:51:27 -0500 (CDT) Received: from fwemail2.de.ittind.com by gate1.itt.com via smtpd (for ztxmail01.ztx.compaq.com [161.114.1.205]) with SMTP; 29 Aug 2000 15:51:27 UT Received: by fwemail2.de.ittind.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21) id ; Tue, 29 Aug 2000 10:51:26 -0500 Message-Id: From: "Latham, Steve" To: "'sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com'" , linux-arm-kernel@lists.arm.linux.org.uk Cc: "'jason.chagas@intel.com'" Subject: Consecutive Telnet sessions on assabet don't work Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2000 10:48:17 -0500 Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk I downloaded and used blob-kit-assabet-1.3.tar.gz that uses 2.4.0-test5-rmk1-np1 and telnet works great but only the first time. Subsequent sessions hang at "connected", to local or remote clients. I've had this problem on earlier versions of kernel/ramdisk combinations as well. Is anyone else experiencing this problem? Is it possible that sockets aren't cleaned up? Steve ************************************ If this email is not intended for you, or you are not responsible for the delivery of this message to the addressee, please note that this message may contain ITT Privileged/Proprietary Information. In such a case, you may not copy or deliver this message to anyone. You should destroy this message and kindly notify the sender by reply email. Information contained in this message that does not relate to the business of ITT is neither endorsed by nor attributable to ITT. ************************************ From kramer@pa.dec.com Wed Aug 30 13:57:15 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id NAA25745; Wed, 30 Aug 2000 13:57:15 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from zmamail05.zma.compaq.com (zmamail05.zma.compaq.com [161.114.64.105]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id NAA00860 for ; Wed, 30 Aug 2000 13:57:13 +0200 (METDST) Received: by zmamail05.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 1E68A267A; Wed, 30 Aug 2000 07:56:42 -0400 (EDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by zmamail05.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 92EC32623; Wed, 30 Aug 2000 07:56:39 -0400 (EDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA00518; Wed, 30 Aug 2000 04:53:44 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id EAA11565; Wed, 30 Aug 2000 04:49:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id EAA10504; Wed, 30 Aug 2000 04:49:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: from zmamail01.nz-tay.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA13331; Wed, 30 Aug 2000 04:49:25 -0700 Received: by zmamail01.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 08A3B5845; Wed, 30 Aug 2000 07:49:25 -0400 (EDT) Received: from pikachu.idthk.com (pc125.idthk.com [210.184.5.125]) by zmamail01.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 83AA55B27 for ; Wed, 30 Aug 2000 07:49:23 -0400 (EDT) Received: from localhost (thomas@localhost) by pikachu.idthk.com (8.9.3/8.8.7) with ESMTP id TAA12917; Wed, 30 Aug 2000 19:49:44 +0800 Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2000 19:49:43 +0800 (CST) From: Tak-Shing Chan To: Tak-Shing Chan Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.arm.linux.org.uk, sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Subject: Re: test6-rmk5-np1 PCMCIA / UCB1200 audio? In-Reply-To: Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk Dear ARM Linux people, I apologize for replying to my own post--my plan of porting has to be canceled as I have to finish up some urgent tasks before I leave my present job. I guess I need to pull my name off the volunteers list for now... In the past six months I have learned a great deal about ARM Linux just by reading your discussions. Thanks for the advices and knowledge given to me during my stay! Cheers and farewell, Tak-Shing Chan On Mon, 28 Aug 2000, Tak-Shing Chan wrote: > Sure. I plan to port the latest Itsy drivers (Y2K version) > from 2.0.30 to 2.4.0-test6-rmk5-np1 (quite a tedious task but > hopefully I can start from Erik Mouw's port of an older version), > and rename them to the ones you proposed... I'll also make their > TS driver iPAQ-compatible. This seems to solve all the problems > at once. Is there anyone else already doing this? From kramer@pa.dec.com Wed Aug 30 17:49:52 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id RAA27426; Wed, 30 Aug 2000 17:49:52 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from zmamail04.zma.compaq.com (zmamail04.zma.compaq.com [161.114.64.104]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id RAA10972 for ; Wed, 30 Aug 2000 17:49:50 +0200 (METDST) Received: by zmamail04.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 12B12A4A; Wed, 30 Aug 2000 11:49:19 -0400 (EDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by zmamail04.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 79ECC8B5; Wed, 30 Aug 2000 11:49:16 -0400 (EDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA05226; Wed, 30 Aug 2000 08:46:33 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id IAA04472; Wed, 30 Aug 2000 08:43:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id IAA18654; Wed, 30 Aug 2000 08:43:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ztxmail01.nz-cce.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA31131; Wed, 30 Aug 2000 08:43:53 -0700 Received: by ztxmail01.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id EACF525B7; Wed, 30 Aug 2000 10:43:52 -0500 (CDT) Received: from pigeon.maya.com (po.maya.com [192.70.254.2]) by ztxmail01.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 92BFD1EDE for ; Wed, 30 Aug 2000 10:43:52 -0500 (CDT) Received: from maya.com (cook-pc.maya.com [192.70.254.33]) by pigeon.maya.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5232D3EC4 for ; Wed, 30 Aug 2000 11:44:36 -0400 (EDT) Message-Id: <39AD2D76.A70F8E78@maya.com> Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2000 11:51:18 -0400 From: Nicole Cook X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.72 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.2.14-5.0 i686) X-Accept-Language: en Mime-Version: 1.0 To: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Subject: /dev/fb problems Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk I'm trying to use /dev/fb, but attempting to access it returns "no such device", even though it appears in /dev. Is this because the kernel doesn't include the video driver? If so, how do I get the video driver to build in the kernel - I can't seem to figure out what to set in make config to do that. I'm running 2.4.0-test4-np1 on a cerfboard. Nicole ------------------------------ Nicole Cook Software Engineer MAYA Design From kramer@pa.dec.com Wed Aug 30 22:56:09 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id WAA28802; Wed, 30 Aug 2000 22:56:09 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from ztxmail05.ztx.compaq.com (ztxmail05.ztx.compaq.com [161.114.1.209]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id WAA20914 for ; Wed, 30 Aug 2000 22:56:06 +0200 (METDST) Received: by ztxmail05.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 797C5161A; Wed, 30 Aug 2000 15:55:29 -0500 (CDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by ztxmail05.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 8214C1494; Wed, 30 Aug 2000 15:55:27 -0500 (CDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA23294; Wed, 30 Aug 2000 13:52:39 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id NAA31500; Wed, 30 Aug 2000 13:49:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id NAA30742; Wed, 30 Aug 2000 13:49:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: from zmamail01.nz-tay.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA01423; Wed, 30 Aug 2000 13:49:06 -0700 Received: by zmamail01.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 4ECC447A7; Wed, 30 Aug 2000 16:49:06 -0400 (EDT) Received: from duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (duteinh.et.tudelft.nl [130.161.42.1]) by zmamail01.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF59622C1 for ; Wed, 30 Aug 2000 16:49:00 -0400 (EDT) Received: from kalman.et.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id WAA28755; Wed, 30 Aug 2000 22:47:39 +0200 (MET DST) Received: (from erik@localhost) by kalman.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.8/8.8.8/Debian/GNU) id WAA04879; Wed, 30 Aug 2000 22:47:38 +0200 Message-Id: <200008302047.WAA04879@kalman.et.tudelft.nl> Subject: Re: /dev/fb problems In-Reply-To: <39AD2D76.A70F8E78@maya.com> from Nicole Cook at "Aug 30, 0 11:51:18 am" To: cook@maya.com (Nicole Cook) Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2000 22:47:38 +0200 (CEST) Cc: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com From: J.A.K.Mouw@ITS.TUDelft.NL (Erik Mouw) Organization: Eric Conspiracy Secret Labs X-Eric-Conspiracy: There is no conspiracy! X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL39 (25)] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk Nicole Cook wrote: > I'm trying to use /dev/fb, but attempting to access it returns "no such > device", even though it appears in /dev. > > Is this because the kernel doesn't include the video driver? If so, how Yes, the driver isn't included. Try "cat /proc/devices" to see which devices are available. > do I get the video driver to build in the kernel - I can't seem to > figure out what to set in make config to do that. That's a tricky one: enable "virtual console" in the Character devices menu, go back to the main menu, and it will contain a Console drivers menu in which you can enable the SA1100 frame buffer. > I'm running 2.4.0-test4-np1 on a cerfboard. Hmm, what I described was for 2.4.0-test6-rmk5-np2, but I suppose it is also valid for 2.4.0-test4-np1. Erik -- J.A.K. (Erik) Mouw, Information and Communication Theory Group, Department of Electrical Engineering, Faculty of Information Technology and Systems, Delft University of Technology, PO BOX 5031, 2600 GA Delft, The Netherlands Phone: +31-15-2783635 Fax: +31-15-2781843 Email: J.A.K.Mouw@its.tudelft.nl WWW: http://www-ict.its.tudelft.nl/~erik/ From kramer@pa.dec.com Mon Sep 4 03:05:33 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id DAA17494; Mon, 4 Sep 2000 03:05:33 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from zmamail03.zma.compaq.com (zmamail03.zma.compaq.com [161.114.64.103]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id DAA06959 for ; Mon, 4 Sep 2000 03:05:31 +0200 (METDST) Received: by zmamail03.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id C0E58F9F; Sun, 3 Sep 2000 21:04:56 -0400 (EDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by zmamail03.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 363C2F11; Sun, 3 Sep 2000 21:04:54 -0400 (EDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA01609; Sun, 3 Sep 2000 18:04:50 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id RAA28380; Sun, 3 Sep 2000 17:59:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id RAA29459; Sun, 3 Sep 2000 17:59:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: from zmamail01.nz-tay.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA26034; Sun, 3 Sep 2000 17:59:13 -0700 Received: by zmamail01.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id DAE354AEE; Sun, 3 Sep 2000 20:59:11 -0400 (EDT) Received: from xanadu.gn.com (modemcable248.137-200-24.mtl.mc.videotron.net [24.200.137.248]) by zmamail01.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B7DE4B8B for ; Sun, 3 Sep 2000 20:59:11 -0400 (EDT) Received: from localhost (nico@localhost) by xanadu.gn.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id UAA00802 for ; Sun, 3 Sep 2000 20:58:19 -0400 X-Authentication-Warning: xanadu.gn.com: nico owned process doing -bs Date: Sun, 3 Sep 2000 20:58:19 -0400 (EDT) From: Nicolas Pitre X-Sender: nico@xanadu.gn.com To: SA-1100/Linux Subject: diff-2.4.0-test6-rmk6-np1.gz Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk ... is available from your favorite mirror site. This contains: - updated to test6-rmk6 (files moved, etc.) - support for 512MB of RAM i.e. the 32MB per bank limit is gone! (tested on Assabet, Brutus, ThinClient) - ioremap() of PCMCIA memory required by the above John G Dorsey - kernel panic while trying to reboot fixed - better idle mode handling (will enable clock switching before IRQ handlers are run now) - first attempt to implement sleep mode when told to power off (not to confuse with suspend) - MediQ-200 frame buffer Chester - GraphicsClient drivers (keyboard, PCMCIA) Huh, Woojung - SA1100 DMA API documentation (feel free to correct my spelling...) - minor assorted cleanups The big change here is the removal of the memory bank size limit which was 32MB before. It is now set to 128MB for each bank which is the hardware limit anyway. This implied many scattered little changes. Let's hope I didn't forget one. Have fun! Nicolas From kramer@pa.dec.com Wed Sep 6 20:22:41 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id UAA06069; Wed, 6 Sep 2000 20:22:41 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from zmamail03.zma.compaq.com (zmamail03.zma.compaq.com [161.114.64.103]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id UAA18772 for ; Wed, 6 Sep 2000 20:22:39 +0200 (METDST) Received: by zmamail03.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 6F15B78D; Wed, 6 Sep 2000 14:22:07 -0400 (EDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by zmamail03.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id A9241612; Wed, 6 Sep 2000 14:22:04 -0400 (EDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA22997; Wed, 6 Sep 2000 11:21:55 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id LAA29351; Wed, 6 Sep 2000 11:16:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id LAA22805; Wed, 6 Sep 2000 11:16:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ztxmail01.nz-cce.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA19640; Wed, 6 Sep 2000 11:16:35 -0700 Received: by ztxmail01.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id A3FFB2621; Wed, 6 Sep 2000 13:16:34 -0500 (CDT) Received: from duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (duteinh.et.tudelft.nl [130.161.42.1]) by ztxmail01.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 441BC2F45 for ; Wed, 6 Sep 2000 13:16:30 -0500 (CDT) Received: from kalman.et.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id UAA06038; Wed, 6 Sep 2000 20:16:29 +0200 (MET DST) Received: (from erik@localhost) by kalman.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.8/8.8.8/Debian/GNU) id UAA29999; Wed, 6 Sep 2000 20:16:26 +0200 Message-Id: <200009061816.UAA29999@kalman.et.tudelft.nl> Subject: Re: diff-2.4.0-test6-rmk6-np1.gz In-Reply-To: from Nicolas Pitre at "Sep 3, 0 08:58:19 pm" To: nico@CAM.ORG (Nicolas Pitre) Date: Wed, 6 Sep 2000 20:16:26 +0200 (CEST) Cc: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com From: J.A.K.Mouw@ITS.TUDelft.NL (Erik Mouw) Organization: Eric Conspiracy Secret Labs X-Eric-Conspiracy: There is no conspiracy! X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL39 (25)] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk Nicolas Pitre wrote: > The big change here is the removal of the memory bank size limit which was > 32MB before. It is now set to 128MB for each bank which is the hardware > limit anyway. This implied many scattered little changes. Let's hope I > didn't forget one. It works on a LART with 96MB (default 32MB + 64MB on a daugtherboard), which seems the most picky architecture. It broke the sa1100_ssp audio driver, but I'll fix that. Erik -- J.A.K. (Erik) Mouw, Information and Communication Theory Group, Department of Electrical Engineering, Faculty of Information Technology and Systems, Delft University of Technology, PO BOX 5031, 2600 GA Delft, The Netherlands Phone: +31-15-2783635 Fax: +31-15-2781843 Email: J.A.K.Mouw@its.tudelft.nl WWW: http://www-ict.its.tudelft.nl/~erik/ From kramer@pa.dec.com Wed Sep 6 22:32:40 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id WAA06403; Wed, 6 Sep 2000 22:32:39 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from ztxmail05.ztx.compaq.com (ztxmail05.ztx.compaq.com [161.114.1.209]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id WAA23452 for ; Wed, 6 Sep 2000 22:32:37 +0200 (METDST) Received: by ztxmail05.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id E49A115D2; Wed, 6 Sep 2000 15:32:04 -0500 (CDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by ztxmail05.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id B77EC1591; Wed, 6 Sep 2000 15:32:02 -0500 (CDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA18526; Wed, 6 Sep 2000 13:30:25 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id NAA06493; Wed, 6 Sep 2000 13:25:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id NAA00246; Wed, 6 Sep 2000 13:25:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: from zmamail01.nz-tay.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA32534; Wed, 6 Sep 2000 13:25:22 -0700 Received: by zmamail01.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 7E0F6484E; Wed, 6 Sep 2000 16:25:22 -0400 (EDT) Received: from smtp6.mindspring.com (smtp6.mindspring.com [207.69.200.110]) by zmamail01.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0DFAD47F2 for ; Wed, 6 Sep 2000 16:25:22 -0400 (EDT) Received: from cementship.extenex.net (user-33qthii.dialup.mindspring.com [199.174.198.82]) by smtp6.mindspring.com (8.9.3/8.8.5) with ESMTP id QAA04553 for ; Wed, 6 Sep 2000 16:25:20 -0400 (EDT) Received: from blowhole.extenex.net (blowhole.extenex.net [192.168.100.100]) by cementship.extenex.net (8.9.3/8.8.7) with ESMTP id NAA00826 for ; Wed, 6 Sep 2000 13:26:46 -0700 Received: from wardw by blowhole.extenex.net with local (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 13Wlii-0000AL-00 for ; Wed, 06 Sep 2000 13:22:56 -0700 Date: Wed, 6 Sep 2000 13:22:55 -0700 From: Ward Willats To: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Subject: Neponset SMSC 9169 ethernet Message-Id: <20000906132255.A618@extenex.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii User-Agent: Mutt/1.0.1i Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk Hello. Is anyone using the Neponset on-board ethernet controller? Or is this unsupported currently? I'm running an MQ-200 card in the Assabet, so can't network out the CF socket. That leaves the Neponset 9196 NIC, Neponset PCMCIA, or a USB NIC to run the network with. The on-board NIC seemed easiest hardware-wise, since it is not on the "far side" of the SA-1111, but I also see the Neponset PCMCIA driver, so perhaps that is the most supported approach? Any pointers appreciated. Thanks. -- Ward From kramer@pa.dec.com Thu Sep 7 00:03:10 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id AAA06700; Thu, 7 Sep 2000 00:03:10 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from ztxmail04.ztx.compaq.com (ztxmail04.ztx.compaq.com [161.114.1.208]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id AAA26876 for ; Thu, 7 Sep 2000 00:03:08 +0200 (METDST) Received: by ztxmail04.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 8CF7D1825; Wed, 6 Sep 2000 17:02:36 -0500 (CDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by ztxmail04.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id A08871AC4; Wed, 6 Sep 2000 17:02:34 -0500 (CDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA05334; Wed, 6 Sep 2000 15:02:32 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id PAA11293; Wed, 6 Sep 2000 15:01:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id PAA07293; Wed, 6 Sep 2000 15:01:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ztxmail02.nz-cce.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA11071; Wed, 6 Sep 2000 15:01:56 -0700 Received: by ztxmail02.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 831B2208E; Wed, 6 Sep 2000 17:01:55 -0500 (CDT) Received: from mail.netx4.com (216-064-003-018.inaddr.vitts.com [216.64.3.18]) by ztxmail02.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0851413E3 for ; Wed, 6 Sep 2000 17:01:51 -0500 (CDT) Received: from mvista.com (greeny.netx4.com [192.168.253.30]) by mail.netx4.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id OAA29537; Wed, 6 Sep 2000 14:21:12 -0400 Message-Id: <39B6C045.AFBC74F6@mvista.com> Date: Wed, 06 Sep 2000 18:08:05 -0400 From: "George G. Davis" Organization: MontaVista Software, Inc. X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.7 [en] (X11; I; Linux 2.4.0-test5 ppc) X-Accept-Language: en Mime-Version: 1.0 To: Ward Willats Cc: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Subject: Re: Neponset SMC 91C96 ethernet References: <20000906132255.A618@extenex.com> Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="------------201435AF613EE1A87CB6C596" Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------201435AF613EE1A87CB6C596 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Ward Willats wrote: > > Hello. > > Is anyone using the Neponset on-board ethernet controller? Or is this > unsupported currently? Haven't been able to get this going just yet. The smc9194 driver, CONFIG_SMC9194, seems the right choice. But it requires some fixups for use on Neponset. Also, the CPLD on Neponset may need to be updated as well. Not quite sure what the problem with the PLD is yet (if any). But it's rumored that the SMC91C96 i/f logic in it is wrong. Check developer.intel.com for Neponset CPLD updates. > > I'm running an MQ-200 card in the Assabet, so can't network out the CF > socket. That leaves the Neponset 9196 NIC, Neponset PCMCIA, or a USB > NIC to run the network with. > > The on-board NIC seemed easiest hardware-wise, since it is not on the > "far side" of the SA-1111, but I also see the Neponset PCMCIA driver, > so perhaps that is the most supported approach? The Socket LP-E Compact Flash+ card works in the Neponset PCMCIA slot(s). You'll need the CF to PCMCIA adapter/carrier to plug it in. I've been using this to NFS mount an Assabet file system on my development host (iMac). N.B. I've not been able to get any TCP related stuff to work, i.e. telnet, ftp, etc.,. It seems that only UDP traffic is working, e.g. NFS, RPC. Oh, and even NFS exhibits problems - it takes about five minutes to 'mount' the remote NFS file system. Although, all seems OK thereafter. Use CONFIG_PCMCIA_PCNET for LP-E card. I've used this successfully in the latest linux-2.4.0-test6-rmk6-np1 kernel. You'll need to get a copy of the 'kitchen sink' ramdisk at: http://www.cs.cmu.edu/~wearable/software/assabet.html for an example implementation of how to configure PCMCIA networking, etc.,. > > Any pointers appreciated. Thanks. > > -- Ward -- Regards, George --------------201435AF613EE1A87CB6C596 Content-Type: text/x-vcard; charset=us-ascii; name="davis_g.vcf" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Description: Card for George G. Davis Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="davis_g.vcf" begin:vcard n:Davis;George tel;work:603/880-1414 x-mozilla-html:FALSE url:http://www.mvista.com org:MontaVista Software, Inc. adr:;;46 Pine Street Extension;Nashua;NH;03060;USA version:2.1 email;internet:davis_g@mvista.com title:Software Engineer x-mozilla-cpt:;-5376 fn:George G. Davis end:vcard --------------201435AF613EE1A87CB6C596-- From kramer@pa.dec.com Thu Sep 7 07:10:00 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id HAA07573; Thu, 7 Sep 2000 07:09:59 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from ztxmail05.ztx.compaq.com (ztxmail05.ztx.compaq.com [161.114.1.209]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id HAA08545 for ; Thu, 7 Sep 2000 07:09:57 +0200 (METDST) Received: by ztxmail05.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 4B45C14B6; Thu, 7 Sep 2000 00:09:26 -0500 (CDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by ztxmail05.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 8CE9616F3; Thu, 7 Sep 2000 00:09:24 -0500 (CDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA13353; Wed, 6 Sep 2000 22:09:00 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id WAA01366; Wed, 6 Sep 2000 22:02:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id WAA01362; Wed, 6 Sep 2000 22:02:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ztxmail01.nz-cce.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA00252; Wed, 6 Sep 2000 22:02:18 -0700 Received: by ztxmail01.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 410EB25FC; Thu, 7 Sep 2000 00:02:18 -0500 (CDT) Received: from note.orchestra.cse.unsw.EDU.AU (note.orchestra.cse.unsw.EDU.AU [129.94.242.29]) by ztxmail01.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id D2E9F1246 for ; Thu, 7 Sep 2000 00:02:16 -0500 (CDT) Received: From paulaner With LocalMail ; Thu, 7 Sep 2000 16:02:02 +1100 From: Daniel Potts To: Ward Willats Date: Thu, 7 Sep 2000 16:02:02 +1100 (EST) X-Sender: danielp@paulaner.disy.cse.unsw.EDU.AU Cc: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Subject: Re: Neponset SMSC 9169 ethernet In-Reply-To: <20000906132255.A618@extenex.com> Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk On Wed, 6 Sep 2000, Ward Willats wrote: > Hello. > > Is anyone using the Neponset on-board ethernet controller? Or is this > unsupported currently? > > I'm running an MQ-200 card in the Assabet, so can't network out the CF > socket. That leaves the Neponset 9196 NIC, Neponset PCMCIA, or a USB > NIC to run the network with. > > The on-board NIC seemed easiest hardware-wise, since it is not on the > "far side" of the SA-1111, but I also see the Neponset PCMCIA driver, > so perhaps that is the most supported approach? > > Any pointers appreciated. Thanks. PLEB uses the 9196 as it's ethernet. I've gotten the smc9194.c driver to work flawlessly once I set up the basic stuff such as ioaddr, interrupts etc. There was one bug in the code however which might catch someone - smc_rcv() was skipping a word near the end of the packet due to incorrect calculation of the size of the packet - however I think this was a result of some code added by some other ARM linux hacker. It looks like getting it to work on Neponset wouldn't be too much of an issue.... Cheers, Daniel. From kramer@pa.dec.com Tue Sep 12 00:09:08 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id AAA19557; Tue, 12 Sep 2000 00:09:07 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from zmamail04.zma.compaq.com (zmamail04.zma.compaq.com [161.114.64.104]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id AAA03241 for ; Tue, 12 Sep 2000 00:09:06 +0200 (METDST) Received: by zmamail04.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id E76519F3; Mon, 11 Sep 2000 18:08:33 -0400 (EDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by zmamail04.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 4FFD09F6; Mon, 11 Sep 2000 18:08:31 -0400 (EDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA07697; Mon, 11 Sep 2000 15:08:23 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id PAA17522; Mon, 11 Sep 2000 15:03:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id PAA18182; Mon, 11 Sep 2000 15:03:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ztxmail01.nz-cce.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA26218; Mon, 11 Sep 2000 15:03:48 -0700 Received: by ztxmail01.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id D9D3E13C5; Mon, 11 Sep 2000 17:03:47 -0500 (CDT) Received: from xanadu.gn.com (modemcable248.137-200-24.mtl.mc.videotron.net [24.200.137.248]) by ztxmail01.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1348426E3 for ; Mon, 11 Sep 2000 17:03:47 -0500 (CDT) Received: from localhost (nico@localhost) by xanadu.gn.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id SAA26827 for ; Mon, 11 Sep 2000 18:02:54 -0400 X-Authentication-Warning: xanadu.gn.com: nico owned process doing -bs Date: Mon, 11 Sep 2000 18:02:54 -0400 (EDT) From: Nicolas Pitre X-Sender: nico@xanadu.gn.com To: SA-1100/Linux Subject: diff-2.4.0-test8-rmk1-np1 Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk ... is available from your favorite mirror. This is mostly the update to test8-rmk1. Nothing especially new at this time. Enhoy! Nicolas From linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Thu Sep 14 13:30:14 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id NAA06015; Thu, 14 Sep 2000 13:30:13 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [199.183.24.194]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id NAA02420 for ; Thu, 14 Sep 2000 13:30:12 +0200 (METDST) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 14 Sep 2000 07:27:15 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 14 Sep 2000 07:27:06 -0400 Received: from hermes.mixx.net ([212.84.196.2]:33552 "HELO hermes.mixx.net") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Thu, 14 Sep 2000 07:26:53 -0400 Received: from mate.bln.innominate.de (cerberus.berlin.innominate.de [212.84.234.251]) by hermes.mixx.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id D76EAF805 for ; Thu, 14 Sep 2000 13:29:24 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mate.bln.innominate.de (Postfix, from userid 9) id 617E12CA6D; Thu, 14 Sep 2000 13:29:24 +0200 (CEST) From: Daniel Phillips Reply-To: Daniel Phillips X-Newsgroups: innominate.list.linux.kernel Subject: Re: need some advice Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2000 13:29:24 +0200 Organization: innominate Lines: 25 Distribution: local Message-ID: References: <39C15A89.EEADA26B@sri.receiptcity.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: mate.bln.innominate.de 968930964 2837 10.0.0.90 (14 Sep 2000 11:29:24 GMT) X-Complaints-To: news@innominate.de To: podda X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.72 [de] (X11; U; Linux 2.4.0-test6 i586) X-Accept-Language: en To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org podda wrote: > > i'm a linux newbie trying to learn kernel magic. i would be glad if > someone can advice me where to look for to get an idea of the linux > kernel. hey i don't need that one. ( "use the force, read the source" ) > > i already tried to use the force , but can't figure out where i should > concentrate to get an idea of linux core kernel. > > any advice or suggestions are welcome. For beginner/intermediate: http://linuxdoc.org/LDP/tlk/tlk.html For intermediate/advanced: http://linuxdoc.org/LDP/lki/index.html Use the source: http://innominate.org/~graichen/projects/lxr/source/init/main.c?v=v2.3#L742 -- Daniel - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ From kramer@pa.dec.com Thu Sep 14 16:21:54 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id QAA07002; Thu, 14 Sep 2000 16:21:53 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from ztxmail04.ztx.compaq.com (ztxmail04.ztx.compaq.com [161.114.1.208]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id QAA12087 for ; Thu, 14 Sep 2000 16:21:51 +0200 (METDST) Received: by ztxmail04.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 9F9C51A7A; Thu, 14 Sep 2000 09:21:19 -0500 (CDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by ztxmail04.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 9F60C1BCE; Thu, 14 Sep 2000 09:21:17 -0500 (CDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA19714; Thu, 14 Sep 2000 07:21:08 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id HAA06898; Thu, 14 Sep 2000 07:15:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id HAA06763; Thu, 14 Sep 2000 07:15:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: from zmamail01.nz-tay.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA02286; Thu, 14 Sep 2000 07:15:36 -0700 Received: by zmamail01.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 9592E541D; Thu, 14 Sep 2000 10:15:35 -0400 (EDT) Received: from xanadu.vipswitch.com (unknown [205.250.170.220]) by zmamail01.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE1E6594B for ; Thu, 14 Sep 2000 10:15:34 -0400 (EDT) Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2000 10:15:59 -0400 (EDT) From: Nicolas Pitre To: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Subject: diff-2.4.0-test8-rmk2-np1 Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk ... is available at the usual places. This contains: - updated to RMK2 - some PCMCIA cleanups - TouchScreen selections are back - SA1111 defines additions Enjoy! Nicolas From kramer@pa.dec.com Thu Sep 14 19:49:10 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id TAA07961; Thu, 14 Sep 2000 19:49:09 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from ztxmail03.ztx.compaq.com (ztxmail03.ztx.compaq.com [161.114.1.207]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id TAA22987 for ; Thu, 14 Sep 2000 19:49:06 +0200 (METDST) Received: by ztxmail03.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 134BF1015; Thu, 14 Sep 2000 12:48:35 -0500 (CDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by ztxmail03.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id A86921187; Thu, 14 Sep 2000 12:48:32 -0500 (CDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA25310; Thu, 14 Sep 2000 10:48:26 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id KAA14370; Thu, 14 Sep 2000 10:46:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id KAA14270; Thu, 14 Sep 2000 10:46:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: from zmamail02.nz-tay.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA30215; Thu, 14 Sep 2000 10:46:44 -0700 Received: by zmamail02.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id EFC9D1A2D; Thu, 14 Sep 2000 13:46:43 -0400 (EDT) Received: from femail3.sdc1.sfba.home.com (femail3.sdc1.sfba.home.com [24.0.95.83]) by zmamail02.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 722A7D46 for ; Thu, 14 Sep 2000 13:46:43 -0400 (EDT) Received: from satora.com ([24.20.128.101]) by femail3.sdc1.sfba.home.com (InterMail vM.4.01.03.00 201-229-121) with ESMTP id <20000914174602.GZQZ2358.femail3.sdc1.sfba.home.com@satora.com> for ; Thu, 14 Sep 2000 10:46:02 -0700 Message-Id: <39C0E44C.54AE1C9@satora.com> Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2000 10:44:28 -0400 From: Mark Huang Organization: Satora, Inc. X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.72 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.2.16-3smp i686) X-Accept-Language: en Mime-Version: 1.0 To: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Subject: FADES1100EF Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk Hi, I was wondering whether anybody has had experience with the low-power EF versions of the SA-1100 (190 MHz, 1.5 V Vdd). I've happily run Linux on a whole batch of DA-based boards with no problems, but attempting to run the same binary code on my EF-based boards results in odd behavior. The EF-based boards I have fabbed are slightly different, but, if anything, they should run more stably than my DA-based ones (shorter trace lengths, lower power, better passives). The symptoms are remniscent of an e-mail from December: ---- On Wed, 22 Dec 1999, J.D. Bakker wrote: > At 10:58 +0100 22-12-1999, Ivo Clarysse wrote: > > >Now, we're assuming this is due to a hardware problem, > > That would be my guess. Probably the added capacity of the daughterboard > increases your effective memory access timings, or the total trace lengths > become such that you are seeing transmission line effects. That or your CPU > power supply decoupling is inadequate. Try increasing your memory timings; > my first hack would be to set CDB2 to one and see what happens next. With CDB2=1 and an extended CAS waveform, it crashes a bit further in the boot process, during the ramdisk decompression (inflate_dynamic -> huft_build -> malloc -> kmalloc). ---- but I don't have a daughterboard, the trace lengths are very short, and the power lines look cleaner than on my DA-based board. I've clocked the EF down to 59 MHz with no help; it still crashes during kernel and ramdisk decompression. If this thread was resolved offline, I'd appreciate knowing what the conclusion was. I'm assuming that all of the SA versions should run the same binary code identically, but it'd be great if someone could confirm this. If not, I'll keep hacking on it and try and figure out what's going on. Thanks, --Mark From kramer@pa.dec.com Thu Sep 14 23:57:55 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id XAA08755; Thu, 14 Sep 2000 23:57:54 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from ztxmail05.ztx.compaq.com (ztxmail05.ztx.compaq.com [161.114.1.209]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id XAA03314 for ; Thu, 14 Sep 2000 23:57:53 +0200 (METDST) Received: by ztxmail05.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 0B6C01659; Thu, 14 Sep 2000 16:57:21 -0500 (CDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by ztxmail05.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 1EFEC1769; Thu, 14 Sep 2000 16:57:19 -0500 (CDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA27890; Thu, 14 Sep 2000 14:57:16 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id OAA24494; Thu, 14 Sep 2000 14:55:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id OAA18307; Thu, 14 Sep 2000 14:55:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ztxmail01.nz-cce.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA14305; Thu, 14 Sep 2000 14:55:54 -0700 Received: by ztxmail01.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 6903627C7; Thu, 14 Sep 2000 16:55:54 -0500 (CDT) Received: from duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (duteinh.et.tudelft.nl [130.161.42.1]) by ztxmail01.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 37E0C272B for ; Thu, 14 Sep 2000 16:55:53 -0500 (CDT) Received: from kalman.et.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id XAA08749; Thu, 14 Sep 2000 23:55:40 +0200 (MET DST) Received: (from erik@localhost) by kalman.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.8/8.8.8/Debian/GNU) id XAA04797; Thu, 14 Sep 2000 23:55:40 +0200 Message-Id: <200009142155.XAA04797@kalman.et.tudelft.nl> Subject: Re: FADES1100EF In-Reply-To: <39C0E44C.54AE1C9@satora.com> from Mark Huang at "Sep 14, 0 10:44:28 am" To: mhuang@satora.com (Mark Huang) Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2000 23:55:40 +0200 (CEST) Cc: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com From: J.A.K.Mouw@ITS.TUDelft.NL (Erik Mouw) Organization: Eric Conspiracy Secret Labs X-Eric-Conspiracy: There is no conspiracy! X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL39 (25)] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk Mark Huang wrote: > I was wondering whether anybody has had experience with the low-power EF > versions of the SA-1100 (190 MHz, 1.5 V Vdd). I've happily run Linux on > a whole batch of DA-based boards with no problems, but attempting to run > the same binary code on my EF-based boards results in odd behavior. The > EF-based boards I have fabbed are slightly different, but, if anything, > they should run more stably than my DA-based ones (shorter trace > lengths, lower power, better passives). [snip] > but I don't have a daughterboard, the trace lengths are very short, and > the power lines look cleaner than on my DA-based board. I've clocked the > EF down to 59 MHz with no help; it still crashes during kernel and > ramdisk decompression. If this thread was resolved offline, I'd > appreciate knowing what the conclusion was. AFAIK, it was not resolved offline, but maybe JDB has some more information on this. I don't know if you have a complete sa1100-linux archive from that time (I will gladly send you my archive), but Jan-Derk also suggested that there might be an excessive capative load on the nWE line. > I'm assuming that all of the SA versions should run the same binary code > identically, but it'd be great if someone could confirm this. If not, > I'll keep hacking on it and try and figure out what's going on. Yes, I can confirm that both versions run the same binary code. We have both 1.5V 190MHz and 2.0V 220MHz CPUs -- if I'm correct DE-S1100DA and FADES100EF (please correct me if I'm wrong, JDB) -- and both CPUs run exactly the same linux kernel. Some educated guesses what might be wrong: - Memory setup. Try to use the same setup you used for the 2.0V CPUs. In our experience the 1.5V CPUs run perfectly well at 220MHz with exactly the same memory setup. - You said this is a new board. Try to mount an old 2.0V CPU on this board and see if it has the same behaviour. Of course you have to change the core voltage, although it will most probably run on low clock speeds. - Try the other way around: use the 1.5V CPU on the old board. Change the core voltage, because 2.0V will definitively burn the CPU (been there, done that). - Decoupling. - If you have buffers in address/data/control lines: timing problems in the buffers. I'm sure there are many more explanations, but I never designed a SA1100 board. Erik [currently debugging a video out on LCD port board that also seems to have timing problems] -- J.A.K. (Erik) Mouw, Information and Communication Theory Group, Department of Electrical Engineering, Faculty of Information Technology and Systems, Delft University of Technology, PO BOX 5031, 2600 GA Delft, The Netherlands Phone: +31-15-2783635 Fax: +31-15-2781843 Email: J.A.K.Mouw@its.tudelft.nl WWW: http://www-ict.its.tudelft.nl/~erik/ From kramer@pa.dec.com Fri Sep 15 02:33:26 2000 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id CAA09290; Fri, 15 Sep 2000 02:33:25 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from ztxmail04.ztx.compaq.com (ztxmail04.ztx.compaq.com [161.114.1.208]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id CAA09176 for ; Fri, 15 Sep 2000 02:33:23 +0200 (METDST) Received: by ztxmail04.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 3DBA91955; Thu, 14 Sep 2000 19:32:51 -0500 (CDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by ztxmail04.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 857D71974; Thu, 14 Sep 2000 19:32:49 -0500 (CDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA12220; Thu, 14 Sep 2000 17:32:47 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id RAA21145; Thu, 14 Sep 2000 17:31:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id RAA31038; Thu, 14 Sep 2000 17:31:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ztxmail02.nz-cce.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA23637; Thu, 14 Sep 2000 17:31:48 -0700 Received: by ztxmail02.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 56A772B5F; Thu, 14 Sep 2000 19:31:48 -0500 (CDT) Received: from xanadu.vipswitch.com (unknown [205.250.170.220]) by ztxmail02.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A3AC2B3D for ; Thu, 14 Sep 2000 19:31:47 -0500 (CDT) Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2000 20:32:05 -0400 (EDT) From: Nicolas Pitre To: Mark Huang Cc: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Subject: Re: FADES1100EF In-Reply-To: <39C0E44C.54AE1C9@satora.com> Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk On Thu, 14 Sep 2000, Mark Huang wrote: > Hi, > > I was wondering whether anybody has had experience with the low-power EF > versions of the SA-1100 (190 MHz, 1.5 V Vdd). I've happily run Linux on [...] > With CDB2=1 and an extended CAS waveform, it crashes > a bit further in > the boot process, during the ramdisk decompression > (inflate_dynamic -> > huft_build -> malloc -> kmalloc). You might try linking a memory test routine with your bootloader and see if there is a problem with your RAM somehow. It can be either bad memory settings or bad hardware. Also if you configured more than 32 MB per bank in the kernel be sure you're using a recent patch. Older kernels went funny when more than 32 MB per bank were used. Nicolas From kramer@pa.dec.com Thu Sep 21 06:50:44 2000 Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (root@mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id GAA02035 for ; Thu, 21 Sep 2000 06:50:44 +0200 Received: from ztxmail04.ztx.compaq.com (ztxmail04.ztx.compaq.com [161.114.1.208]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id GAA14269 for ; Thu, 21 Sep 2000 06:50:42 +0200 (METDST) Received: by ztxmail04.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id D694219CE; Wed, 20 Sep 2000 23:48:55 -0500 (CDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by ztxmail04.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 04AAF1937; Wed, 20 Sep 2000 23:48:55 -0500 (CDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA19039; Wed, 20 Sep 2000 21:48:53 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id VAA25056; Wed, 20 Sep 2000 21:40:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id VAA25189; Wed, 20 Sep 2000 21:40:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ztxmail02.nz-cce.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA20013; Wed, 20 Sep 2000 21:40:28 -0700 Received: by ztxmail02.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 49A5A227C; Wed, 20 Sep 2000 23:40:28 -0500 (CDT) Received: from xanadu.gn.com (modemcable248.137-200-24.mtl.mc.videotron.ca [24.200.137.248]) by ztxmail02.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 95BD322EA for ; Wed, 20 Sep 2000 23:40:27 -0500 (CDT) Received: from localhost (nico@localhost) by xanadu.gn.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id BAA01082 for ; Thu, 21 Sep 2000 01:19:58 -0400 X-Authentication-Warning: xanadu.gn.com: nico owned process doing -bs Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2000 01:19:58 -0400 (EDT) From: Nicolas Pitre X-Sender: nico@xanadu.gn.com To: SA-1100/Linux Subject: diff-2.4.0-test8-rmk2-np2.gz Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk ... is available at the usual places. This contains: - addition of the Sherman architecture - UDA1341 audio on iPAQ fixed (at least for me) Note that I still have some pending patches, like one to make the UCB1200 support one more machine... but they shouldn't affect many people. Enjoy! Nicolas From kramer@pa.dec.com Mon Sep 25 09:03:03 2000 Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (root@mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id JAA12456 for ; Mon, 25 Sep 2000 09:03:02 +0200 Received: from zmamail04.zma.compaq.com (zmamail04.zma.compaq.com [161.114.64.104]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id JAA23769 for ; Mon, 25 Sep 2000 09:03:00 +0200 (METDST) Received: by zmamail04.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id B9EA495E; Mon, 25 Sep 2000 03:01:14 -0400 (EDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by zmamail04.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 5435A97C; Mon, 25 Sep 2000 03:01:13 -0400 (EDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA09949; Mon, 25 Sep 2000 00:01:11 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id XAA16908; Sun, 24 Sep 2000 23:53:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id XAA16964; Sun, 24 Sep 2000 23:53:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: from zmamail02.nz-tay.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA15207; Sun, 24 Sep 2000 23:53:05 -0700 Received: by zmamail02.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 91FA93261; Mon, 25 Sep 2000 02:53:04 -0400 (EDT) Received: from silk.tisi.go.th (unknown [203.154.78.1]) by zmamail02.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 47ACD320D; Mon, 25 Sep 2000 02:52:37 -0400 (EDT) Received: from smtp.indiatimes.com by silk.tisi.go.th (8.8.8/1.1.20.8/19Sep00-0525PM) id NAA0000002631; Mon, 25 Sep 2000 13:48:46 +0700 (ICT) To: yourfreetva@yahoo.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Subject: Love Movies? Click Here For FREE Movies Reply-To: getafreetv3@indiatimes.com Date: Fri, 07 Jan 2000 13:03:36 -0500 Message-Id: From: satellite4freeb3@indiatimes.com Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk FREE SATELLITE T.V. SYSTEM For a limited time we'll give you this top of the line Digital Satellite System for FREE! We'll even include Free installation and 3 FREE months of all the Movie Channels! Enjoy over 500 Channels of Quality Digital Television on your FREE Satellite TV System. Why pay over $900 retail for these items, when we're giving you this satellite package for free. Call 888-514-6881 to Arrange Your Free Delivery Today This is the New Dishplayer 500. This Innovative 18" Satellite has a digital 12 hour recording system so you can throw away that old VCR. It also has WEB T.V., interactive T.V and a gameing system. PLUS on screen graphics, stereo receiver and infrared remote. For less than the monthly cost of cable tv, Satellite television offers over 500 channels of all digital video and cd audio sound, while not missing out on local channels. Call 888-514-6881 to Begin Surfing through 500 Channels Today! To be removed send email to eliminate12@yahoo.com From kramer@pa.dec.com Mon Sep 25 22:51:33 2000 Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (root@mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id WAA14650 for ; Mon, 25 Sep 2000 22:51:32 +0200 Received: from zmamail03.zma.compaq.com (zmamail03.zma.compaq.com [161.114.64.103]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id WAA06779 for ; Mon, 25 Sep 2000 22:51:30 +0200 (METDST) Received: by zmamail03.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 58FF61D7D; Mon, 25 Sep 2000 16:49:38 -0400 (EDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by zmamail03.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id EC2B71F64; Mon, 25 Sep 2000 16:49:36 -0400 (EDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA08538; Mon, 25 Sep 2000 13:49:35 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id NAA14015; Mon, 25 Sep 2000 13:46:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id NAA13310; Mon, 25 Sep 2000 13:46:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: from zmamail01.nz-tay.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA26392; Mon, 25 Sep 2000 13:46:57 -0700 Received: by zmamail01.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 3560E2F3F; Mon, 25 Sep 2000 16:46:52 -0400 (EDT) Received: from compuhardt.net (unknown [208.203.79.62]) by zmamail01.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 55FA94A80; Mon, 25 Sep 2000 16:46:50 -0400 (EDT) Received: from yahoo.com [206.133.122.40] by compuhardt.net (SMTPD32-5.05) id AB024070156; Mon, 25 Sep 2000 15:52:18 -0500 From: Subject: ALL YOUNG TEENS GETTING WILD XXX Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2000 16:50:24 Message-Id: <610.509701.591199@yahoo.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Apparently-To: Apparently-To: Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk

100 PERCENT FREE to join.. Come see the hot teens..
There waiting for you.

JUST CLICK HERE

From kramer@pa.dec.com Tue Sep 26 04:50:57 2000 Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (root@mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id EAA15629 for ; Tue, 26 Sep 2000 04:50:47 +0200 Received: from zmamail05.zma.compaq.com (zmamail05.zma.compaq.com [161.114.64.105]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id EAA16322 for ; Tue, 26 Sep 2000 04:50:45 +0200 (METDST) Received: by zmamail05.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id AABB62550; Mon, 25 Sep 2000 22:48:58 -0400 (EDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by zmamail05.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 5D1461583; Mon, 25 Sep 2000 22:48:57 -0400 (EDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA22079; Mon, 25 Sep 2000 19:48:55 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id TAA26885; Mon, 25 Sep 2000 19:46:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id TAA29686; Mon, 25 Sep 2000 19:46:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ztxmail02.nz-cce.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA12521; Mon, 25 Sep 2000 19:46:37 -0700 Received: by ztxmail02.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id DD00B2D34; Mon, 25 Sep 2000 21:46:36 -0500 (CDT) Received: from xanadu.gn.com (modemcable248.137-200-24.mtl.mc.videotron.ca [24.200.137.248]) by ztxmail02.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F8E62FE0 for ; Mon, 25 Sep 2000 21:46:36 -0500 (CDT) Received: from localhost (nico@localhost) by xanadu.gn.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id XAA18127 for ; Mon, 25 Sep 2000 23:28:52 -0400 X-Authentication-Warning: xanadu.gn.com: nico owned process doing -bs Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2000 23:28:52 -0400 (EDT) From: Nicolas Pitre X-Sender: nico@xanadu.gn.com To: SA-1100/Linux Subject: diff-2.4.0-test8-rmk2-np3 Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk ... is available at the usual locations: This contains: - Since nobody seems to care for Tifon and Penny anymore, those dead pieces of code are removed. - ThinClient configuration no longer exist -- it has been folded with GraphicsClient configuration. - The default serial port baudrate is now configurable within 'make config' & cie. - Neponset on-board ethernet (CONFIG_SMC9194) support Brad Parker - SA1111 PS/2 keyboard/mouse driver Kunihiko IMAI Notes: - Beware the baudrate configuration - This patch is completely untested. I had time to verify that it compiles and that's it. (release early, release often they say?) Enjoy! Nicolas From kramer@pa.dec.com Tue Sep 26 09:48:31 2000 Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (root@mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id JAA15959 for ; Tue, 26 Sep 2000 09:48:30 +0200 Received: from zmamail03.zma.compaq.com (zmamail03.zma.compaq.com [161.114.64.103]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id JAA24490 for ; Tue, 26 Sep 2000 09:48:28 +0200 (METDST) Received: by zmamail03.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id EA7DE1ECB; Tue, 26 Sep 2000 03:46:41 -0400 (EDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by zmamail03.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 77E631CD0; Tue, 26 Sep 2000 03:46:40 -0400 (EDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA28277; Tue, 26 Sep 2000 00:46:38 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id AAA06209; Tue, 26 Sep 2000 00:41:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id AAA03679; Tue, 26 Sep 2000 00:41:53 -0700 (PDT) From: Received: from ztxmail01.nz-cce.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA28066; Tue, 26 Sep 2000 00:41:53 -0700 Received: by ztxmail01.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 4EA9D1038; Tue, 26 Sep 2000 02:41:52 -0500 (CDT) Received: from HKGWEB01.VTECH.COM.HK (unknown [202.64.202.139]) by ztxmail01.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 5686032B4 for ; Tue, 26 Sep 2000 02:41:48 -0500 (CDT) Received: by HKGWEB01.VTECH.COM.HK(Lotus SMTP MTA v4.6.5 (863.2 5-20-1999)) id 48256966.00297A5A ; Tue, 26 Sep 2000 15:33:02 +0800 X-Lotus-Fromdomain: VTECH To: tang-hao@263.net, sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Message-Id: <48256966.002978E9.00@HKGWEB01.VTECH.COM.HK> Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2000 15:32:25 +0800 Subject: Re: [Linux] problems of fltk run on microwindows Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk eric_wong@vtech.com on 09/26/2000 03:03:32 PM To: tang_hao@263.net sa1100@pa.dec.com linux@handhelds.org cc: Subject: [Linux] problems of fltk run on microwindows Hello Tang, I find it is very powerful development tools and easy to use. I know you sucessfully port fltk on Microwindows. Now, I'd like to port it on my target Assabet board (Intel StrongARM SA1110 board) and hope to add the following extra functions: 1. How to set the program always running (actively display) on the top of other programs? 2. How to rotate the display window by 90 degree, eg. change screen size 240X320 to 320X240 ? 3. How to configure fltk such that it runs on top of Microwindows (finally on Assabet board)? 4. How to send a key event to focused input field by clicking the virtual keyboard button (by modifying the keyboard demo program) ? 5. How to change the cursor blinking or change the cursor size in input field? I am using Microwindows-0.88pre9 and flnx-0.10. All demo program of Microwindows can work in my target Assabet board. I can play mine game on my own board now! However, flnx seems cannot work properly although no error occur during building the elf. e.g. I got the following message when I run hello or tabs* this is in nano-X But the LCD screen is all black. No response! * It can be run in native linux (X86) environment. Your help and advice is highly appreciated. Hifi Wong. _______________________________________________ Linux mailing list Linux@handhelds.org http://handhelds.org/mailman/listinfo/linux From kramer@pa.dec.com Wed Sep 27 08:17:14 2000 Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (root@mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id IAA18752 for ; Wed, 27 Sep 2000 08:17:13 +0200 Received: from zmamail03.zma.compaq.com (zmamail03.zma.compaq.com [161.114.64.103]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id IAA15975 for ; Wed, 27 Sep 2000 08:17:12 +0200 (METDST) Received: by zmamail03.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 195FD1E94; Wed, 27 Sep 2000 02:15:27 -0400 (EDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by zmamail03.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 767461C78; Wed, 27 Sep 2000 02:15:25 -0400 (EDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA06808; Tue, 26 Sep 2000 23:15:23 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id XAA21238; Tue, 26 Sep 2000 23:10:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id XAA21172; Tue, 26 Sep 2000 23:10:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ztxmail02.nz-cce.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA26661; Tue, 26 Sep 2000 23:10:28 -0700 Received: by ztxmail02.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id E90782232; Wed, 27 Sep 2000 01:10:27 -0500 (CDT) Received: from xanadu.gn.com (modemcable248.137-200-24.mtl.mc.videotron.ca [24.200.137.248]) by ztxmail02.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3555B20F5 for ; Wed, 27 Sep 2000 01:10:27 -0500 (CDT) Received: from localhost (nico@localhost) by xanadu.gn.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id CAA23507 for ; Wed, 27 Sep 2000 02:52:42 -0400 X-Authentication-Warning: xanadu.gn.com: nico owned process doing -bs Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2000 02:52:42 -0400 (EDT) From: Nicolas Pitre X-Sender: nico@xanadu.gn.com To: SA-1100/Linux Subject: diff-2.4.0-test8-rmk4-np1 Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk ... is now available at the usual places. This contains: - update to 2.4.0-test8-rmk4 - Pangolin support added Murphy C. Chen - serial_sa1100 now uses its official major/minor Note to all ramdisk image and filesystem maintainers: Because the SA1100 serial has to have its own major/minor number for acceptance into the main Linux kernel tree, I registered them and this is effective FROM NOW! (time is short and I want this to be merged before 2.4.0). If you want the full story, please have a look at the linux-arm-kernel mailing list archive. Therefore some breakage is expected from this release if you don't modify your filesystem appropriately. To do so, please read Documentation/arm/SA1100/serial_UART for the procedure. The modifications are pretty simple and should be backward compatible with older kernels. I apologize for the hassle this may cause. Thanks for your collaboration. Nicolas From kramer@pa.dec.com Wed Sep 27 22:38:51 2000 Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (root@mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id WAA20456 for ; Wed, 27 Sep 2000 22:38:50 +0200 Received: from ztxmail05.ztx.compaq.com (ztxmail05.ztx.compaq.com [161.114.1.209]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id WAA26597 for ; Wed, 27 Sep 2000 22:38:48 +0200 (METDST) Received: by ztxmail05.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 5E37F1528; Wed, 27 Sep 2000 15:37:01 -0500 (CDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by ztxmail05.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 7376A1258; Wed, 27 Sep 2000 15:36:59 -0500 (CDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA30832; Wed, 27 Sep 2000 13:36:47 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id NAA17297; Wed, 27 Sep 2000 13:28:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: from zmamail01.zma.compaq.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id NAA17249; Wed, 27 Sep 2000 13:28:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: by zmamail01.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 135F87270; Wed, 27 Sep 2000 16:27:43 -0400 (EDT) Received: from pigeon.maya.com (po.maya.com [192.70.254.2]) by zmamail01.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 890B0728E for ; Wed, 27 Sep 2000 16:27:43 -0400 (EDT) Received: from maya.com (cook-pc.maya.com [192.70.254.33]) by pigeon.maya.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 28E813EEE for ; Wed, 27 Sep 2000 16:08:49 -0400 (EDT) Message-Id: <39D25A98.C7AEB313@maya.com> Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2000 16:37:44 -0400 From: Nicole Cook X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.72 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.2.14-5.0 i686) X-Accept-Language: en Mime-Version: 1.0 To: "sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com" Subject: frame buffer Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk Is there currently a 2.4.0-test kernel with working frame buffer support? Is there one that works or can be made to work for the CerfBoard? Nicole ------------------------------ Nicole Cook Software Engineer MAYA Design From kramer@pa.dec.com Wed Sep 27 23:14:54 2000 Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (root@mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id XAA20531 for ; Wed, 27 Sep 2000 23:14:53 +0200 Received: from ztxmail03.ztx.compaq.com (ztxmail03.ztx.compaq.com [161.114.1.207]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id XAA28039 for ; Wed, 27 Sep 2000 23:14:46 +0200 (METDST) Received: by ztxmail03.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 33B8C512; Wed, 27 Sep 2000 16:13:00 -0500 (CDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by ztxmail03.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 242C44F0; Wed, 27 Sep 2000 16:12:59 -0500 (CDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA02483; Wed, 27 Sep 2000 14:12:58 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id OAA17585; Wed, 27 Sep 2000 14:11:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ztxmail01.ztx.compaq.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id OAA19250; Wed, 27 Sep 2000 14:11:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: by ztxmail01.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 8BC6C4183; Wed, 27 Sep 2000 16:11:43 -0500 (CDT) Received: from duke.electric.net (duke.electric.net [216.18.11.193]) by ztxmail01.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id D87832746 for ; Wed, 27 Sep 2000 16:11:41 -0500 (CDT) Received: (qmail 11118 invoked from network); 27 Sep 2000 21:11:38 -0000 Received: from localhost (HELO relay.electric.net) (@127.0.0.1) by duke.electric.net with SMTP; 27 Sep 2000 21:11:38 -0000 Received: (from smtpd@localhost) by relay.electric.net (8.8.8/8.8.6) id OAA11018; Wed, 27 Sep 2000 14:11:37 -0700 (PDT) X-Emc-Authenticated-Sender: Received: from cobra.intrinsyc.com(64.16.10.158), claiming to be "nitt" via SMTP by relay.electric.net, id smtpdW10846; Wed Sep 27 14:11:31 2000 From: Chester Carey Organization: Intrinsyc To: Nicole Cook Subject: Re: frame buffer Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2000 14:12:57 -0700 X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.0.29] Content-Type: text/plain References: <39D25A98.C7AEB313@maya.com> In-Reply-To: <39D25A98.C7AEB313@maya.com> Cc: sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <00092714143702.26342@nitt> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk Test6-rmk5-np2 nuff said? Chester Carey Intrinsyc Software (Home of the Cerf) From kramer@pa.dec.com Thu Sep 28 07:27:35 2000 Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (root@mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id HAA22222 for ; Thu, 28 Sep 2000 07:27:34 +0200 Received: from zmamail05.zma.compaq.com (zmamail05.zma.compaq.com [161.114.64.105]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id HAA11472 for ; Thu, 28 Sep 2000 07:27:33 +0200 (METDST) Received: by zmamail05.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id A74A95A32; Thu, 28 Sep 2000 01:25:46 -0400 (EDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by zmamail05.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 5692D5AC8; Thu, 28 Sep 2000 01:25:45 -0400 (EDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA08684; Wed, 27 Sep 2000 22:25:43 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id WAA13763; Wed, 27 Sep 2000 22:22:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id WAA04776; Wed, 27 Sep 2000 22:22:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ztxmail02.nz-cce.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA10559; Wed, 27 Sep 2000 22:22:16 -0700 Received: by ztxmail02.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id ACB3A2019; Thu, 28 Sep 2000 00:22:16 -0500 (CDT) Received: from xanadu.gn.com (modemcable248.137-200-24.mtl.mc.videotron.ca [24.200.137.248]) by ztxmail02.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 06D793C6D for ; Thu, 28 Sep 2000 00:22:16 -0500 (CDT) Received: from localhost (nico@localhost) by xanadu.gn.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id BAA29691 for ; Thu, 28 Sep 2000 01:23:10 -0400 X-Authentication-Warning: xanadu.gn.com: nico owned process doing -bs Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2000 01:23:10 -0400 (EDT) From: Nicolas Pitre X-Sender: nico@xanadu.gn.com To: SA-1100/Linux Subject: diff-2.4.0-test8-rmk4-np2 Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk ... is available at the usual places. This version is only a revert to /dev/ttyS0 usage for the SA1100 serial port, while still being able to use the regular 16x50 serial driver without conflicts as per Erik Mouw's suggestion. The modification required to do so is very small, and already used by another architecture in the mainline kernel tree. Therefore ttyS0, ttyS1 and ttyS2 are used by the SA1100 serial port, while ttyS3 and over are used by the 16x50-based serial ports. I actually tested that both drivers can actually coexist. A minor bug was also fixed to allow serial.c to compile. This means that all filesystems may continue to use ttyS0 and friends in /etc/inittab. Therefore you should ignore the mail I sent yesterday on that topic. Also the use of /dev/console as argument to getty in /etc/inittab (as I have suggested) isn't recommanded anymore. It's apparently not possible to have job control working through that device. So to resume, everything is back as it was before yesterday, but both serial drivers work now (PCMCIA modems should work with no more changes). We'll see if such patch may reach Linus' tree one day... I appologize again for the inconvenience this may have caused to certain individuals... Nicolas From kramer@pa.dec.com Fri Sep 29 19:50:49 2000 Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (root@mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id TAA26540 for ; Fri, 29 Sep 2000 19:50:48 +0200 Received: from zmamail05.zma.compaq.com (zmamail05.zma.compaq.com [161.114.64.105]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id TAA05486 for ; Fri, 29 Sep 2000 19:50:47 +0200 (METDST) Received: by zmamail05.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id D07172C3C; Fri, 29 Sep 2000 13:49:00 -0400 (EDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by zmamail05.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 7F08F2D36; Fri, 29 Sep 2000 13:48:59 -0400 (EDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA14261; Fri, 29 Sep 2000 10:48:57 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id KAA13200; Fri, 29 Sep 2000 10:43:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id KAA14383; Fri, 29 Sep 2000 10:43:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ztxmail02.nz-cce.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA20479; Fri, 29 Sep 2000 10:43:46 -0700 Received: by ztxmail02.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 15D8121EF; Fri, 29 Sep 2000 12:43:46 -0500 (CDT) Received: from xanadu.gn.com (modemcable248.137-200-24.mtl.mc.videotron.ca [24.200.137.248]) by ztxmail02.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5041B23A3 for ; Fri, 29 Sep 2000 12:43:45 -0500 (CDT) Received: from localhost (nico@localhost) by xanadu.gn.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id NAA06544 for ; Fri, 29 Sep 2000 13:44:53 -0400 X-Authentication-Warning: xanadu.gn.com: nico owned process doing -bs Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2000 13:44:53 -0400 (EDT) From: Nicolas Pitre X-Sender: nico@xanadu.gn.com To: SA-1100/Linux Subject: diff-2.4.0-test8-rmk4-np3 Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk ... is available at the usual places. This contains: - UDA1341 module unload fix. - UDA1341 works again on my Assabet (I didn't test it against the iPAQ yet) I wanted to fix the UDA1341 for Assabet users now because I'm off for the weekend. If there are still problems with it just send me a mail and I'll have a look at it when I'm back. Enjoy! Nicolas From kramer@pa.dec.com Sat Sep 30 01:08:41 2000 Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (root@mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id BAA27525 for ; Sat, 30 Sep 2000 01:08:40 +0200 Received: from zmamail03.zma.compaq.com (zmamail03.zma.compaq.com [161.114.64.103]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id BAA15621 for ; Sat, 30 Sep 2000 01:08:38 +0200 (METDST) Received: by zmamail03.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 6A8831CAF; Fri, 29 Sep 2000 19:06:52 -0400 (EDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by zmamail03.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 1C69A1EC7; Fri, 29 Sep 2000 19:06:51 -0400 (EDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA25343; Fri, 29 Sep 2000 16:06:49 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id QAA27542; Fri, 29 Sep 2000 16:03:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id QAA28363; Fri, 29 Sep 2000 16:03:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ztxmail01.nz-cce.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA25688; Fri, 29 Sep 2000 16:03:09 -0700 Received: by ztxmail01.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 4ABBE1231; Fri, 29 Sep 2000 18:03:09 -0500 (CDT) Received: from duke.electric.net (duke.electric.net [216.18.11.193]) by ztxmail01.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id C86161DC4 for ; Fri, 29 Sep 2000 18:03:08 -0500 (CDT) Received: (qmail 23837 invoked from network); 29 Sep 2000 23:03:01 -0000 Received: from localhost (HELO relay.electric.net) (@127.0.0.1) by duke.electric.net with SMTP; 29 Sep 2000 23:03:00 -0000 Received: (from smtpd@localhost) by relay.electric.net (8.8.8/8.8.6) id QAA23671 for sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com; Fri, 29 Sep 2000 16:02:58 -0700 (PDT) X-Emc-Authenticated-Sender: Received: from cobra.intrinsyc.com(64.16.10.158), claiming to be "intrinsyc.com" via SMTP by relay.electric.net, id smtpdR23529; Fri Sep 29 16:02:53 2000 Message-Id: <39D52046.18921151@intrinsyc.com> Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2000 16:05:42 -0700 From: Ben Kohlen X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.72 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.4.0-test6 i686) X-Accept-Language: en Mime-Version: 1.0 To: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Subject: UCB1200/Resistive touchscreen Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk I will be taking over work for touchscreen on the cerfboard. Can anyone tell me where to get started, and if there are any other lists I should be on? Thanks kindly, - Ben From kramer@pa.dec.com Sat Sep 30 01:13:14 2000 Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (root@mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id BAA27549 for ; Sat, 30 Sep 2000 01:13:13 +0200 Received: from ztxmail04.ztx.compaq.com (ztxmail04.ztx.compaq.com [161.114.1.208]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id BAA15756 for ; Sat, 30 Sep 2000 01:13:11 +0200 (METDST) Received: by ztxmail04.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 05B1219CD; Fri, 29 Sep 2000 18:11:23 -0500 (CDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by ztxmail04.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id E03221887; Fri, 29 Sep 2000 18:11:22 -0500 (CDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA00710; Fri, 29 Sep 2000 16:11:21 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id QAA28720; Fri, 29 Sep 2000 16:10:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id QAA28648; Fri, 29 Sep 2000 16:10:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: from crl.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA31641; Fri, 29 Sep 2000 16:10:35 -0700 Received: from ims.crl.dec.com (ims.crl.dec.com [16.11.0.11]) by crl.dec.com (8.8.8/RWD-1.2) with ESMTP id TAA04581; Fri, 29 Sep 2000 19:09:19 -0400 (EDT) Received: by ims.crl.dec.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21) id ; Fri, 29 Sep 2000 19:15:38 -0400 Message-Id: From: George France To: "'Ben Kohlen'" , sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Subject: RE: UCB1200/Resistive touchscreen Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2000 19:09:31 -0400 Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk Hello Ben; linux@handhelds.org handhelds@handhelds.org http://www.handhelds.org/projects/ts_spec.html is a generic spec of what we are trying to accomplish. I hope this helps you. Best Regards, --George > -----Original Message----- > From: Ben Kohlen [mailto:bkohlen@intrinsyc.com] > Sent: Friday, September 29, 2000 7:06 PM > To: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com > Subject: UCB1200/Resistive touchscreen > > > I will be taking over work for touchscreen on the cerfboard. > Can anyone > tell me where to get started, and if there are any other > lists I should > be on? > > Thanks kindly, > - Ben > From kramer@pa.dec.com Mon Oct 2 18:38:16 2000 Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (root@mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id SAA01928 for ; Mon, 2 Oct 2000 18:38:11 +0200 Received: from ztxmail03.ztx.compaq.com (ztxmail03.ztx.compaq.com [161.114.1.207]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id SAA22858 for ; Mon, 2 Oct 2000 18:38:04 +0200 (METDST) Received: by ztxmail03.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 562717A5; Mon, 2 Oct 2000 11:36:17 -0500 (CDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by ztxmail03.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 5F130790; Mon, 2 Oct 2000 11:36:16 -0500 (CDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA16367; Mon, 2 Oct 2000 09:36:11 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id JAA08407; Mon, 2 Oct 2000 09:28:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id JAA08227; Mon, 2 Oct 2000 09:28:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: from zmamail01.nz-tay.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA10587; Mon, 2 Oct 2000 09:28:57 -0700 Received: by zmamail01.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id E64FD720F; Mon, 2 Oct 2000 12:28:56 -0400 (EDT) Received: from duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (duteinh.et.tudelft.nl [130.161.42.1]) by zmamail01.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6ACC97121 for ; Mon, 2 Oct 2000 12:28:56 -0400 (EDT) Received: from dutein75 by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id SAA06382; Mon, 2 Oct 2000 18:02:03 +0200 (MET DST) Message-Id: <200010021602.SAA06382@duteinh.et.tudelft.nl> From: Erik Mouw To: bkohlen@intrinsyc.com Cc: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Subject: Re: UCB1200/Resistive touchscreen In-Reply-To: <39D52046.18921151@intrinsyc.com> Organization: Eric conspiracy secret labs Date: Mon 02 Oct 2000 18:02:02 +0100 (MDT) X-Face: "!Z|1XjFg!3Iw)BwM^M\k)J5KHiPddz}#/Zw%?$&Q!xqob"OA|})3_@&BTTiQERo?/^g[Z<9P4R8:5C:aqq.cw!hotLc=+u-"+1rq@9$V^8PbOUlodyi_sejt+D`iqkLpx$>.aXl%vnfPIt"LK|/%>94_Zrm8jy?`_[RKt'TuoxUxfk(gMhY(n|DBBl~c$dhO>G%6}R4+DGX3|idBm4oU&UM/XUP4I9aoN{]`ax%B?rgD(I3OJ<62Y6L X-Mailer: XCmail 1.2devel - with PGP support, PGP engine version 0.5 (IRIX64) X-Mailerorigin: http://www.fsai.fh-trier.de/~schmitzj/Xclasses/XCmail/ X-Eric-Conspiracy: There is no conspiracy! X-Loop: erik@it.et.tudelft.nl Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk On Fri, 29 Sep 2000 16:05:42 -0700, Ben Kohlen wrote: > I will be taking over work for touchscreen on the cerfboard. Can anyone > tell me where to get started, and if there are any other lists I should > be on? I'll need to get the MCP audio driver working again, so I'll volunteer to write a framework for the low-level UCB 1200 driver (I'm actually working on it right now). So yes, Nico, you found a volunteer :-) Erik -- J.A.K. (Erik) Mouw, Information and Communication Theory Group, Department of Electrical Engineering, Faculty of Information Technology and Systems, Delft University of Technology, PO BOX 5031, 2600 GA Delft, The Netherlands Phone: +31-15-2783635 Fax: +31-15-2781843 Email: J.A.K.Mouw@its.tudelft.nl WWW: http://www-ict.its.tudelft.nl/~erik/ From kramer@pa.dec.com Mon Oct 2 19:07:52 2000 Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (root@mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id TAA02013 for ; Mon, 2 Oct 2000 19:07:51 +0200 Received: from ztxmail05.ztx.compaq.com (ztxmail05.ztx.compaq.com [161.114.1.209]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id TAA23915 for ; Mon, 2 Oct 2000 19:07:49 +0200 (METDST) Received: by ztxmail05.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id E82D21751; Mon, 2 Oct 2000 12:06:02 -0500 (CDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by ztxmail05.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id D096A1599; Mon, 2 Oct 2000 12:06:01 -0500 (CDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA18885; Mon, 2 Oct 2000 10:06:00 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id KAA10141; Mon, 2 Oct 2000 10:04:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id KAA09616; Mon, 2 Oct 2000 10:04:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ztxmail02.nz-cce.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA20967; Mon, 2 Oct 2000 10:04:46 -0700 Received: by ztxmail02.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 475242162; Mon, 2 Oct 2000 12:04:46 -0500 (CDT) Received: from duke.electric.net (duke.electric.net [216.18.11.193]) by ztxmail02.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id C043F2157 for ; Mon, 2 Oct 2000 12:04:45 -0500 (CDT) Received: (qmail 12078 invoked from network); 2 Oct 2000 17:04:43 -0000 Received: from localhost (HELO relay.electric.net) (@127.0.0.1) by duke.electric.net with SMTP; 2 Oct 2000 17:04:43 -0000 Received: (from smtpd@localhost) by relay.electric.net (8.8.8/8.8.6) id KAA11972; Mon, 2 Oct 2000 10:04:42 -0700 (PDT) X-Emc-Authenticated-Sender: Received: from cobra.intrinsyc.com(64.16.10.158), claiming to be "nitt" via SMTP by relay.electric.net, id smtpdX11766; Mon Oct 2 10:04:36 2000 From: Chester Carey Organization: Intrinsyc To: Erik Mouw Subject: Re: UCB1200/Resistive touchscreen Date: Mon, 2 Oct 2000 10:05:57 -0700 X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.0.29] Content-Type: text/plain References: <200010021602.SAA06382@duteinh.et.tudelft.nl> In-Reply-To: <200010021602.SAA06382@duteinh.et.tudelft.nl> Cc: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <0010021007310W.26342@nitt> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk On Mon, 02 Oct 2000, you wrote: > On Fri, 29 Sep 2000 16:05:42 -0700, Ben Kohlen wrote: > > I will be taking over work for touchscreen on the cerfboard. Can anyone > > tell me where to get started, and if there are any other lists I should > > be on? > > I'll need to get the MCP audio driver working again, so I'll volunteer to > write a framework for the low-level UCB 1200 driver (I'm actually working > on it right now). Music to my ears, what exactly happened to the previous driver? Chester Carey Linux Evangelist Intrinsyc Software > > So yes, Nico, you found a volunteer :-) > > > Erik > > -- > J.A.K. (Erik) Mouw, Information and Communication Theory Group, Department > of Electrical Engineering, Faculty of Information Technology and Systems, > Delft University of Technology, PO BOX 5031, 2600 GA Delft, The Netherlands > Phone: +31-15-2783635 Fax: +31-15-2781843 Email: J.A.K.Mouw@its.tudelft.nl > WWW: http://www-ict.its.tudelft.nl/~erik/ From kramer@pa.dec.com Mon Oct 2 20:12:31 2000 Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (root@mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id UAA02117 for ; Mon, 2 Oct 2000 20:12:20 +0200 Received: from ztxmail03.ztx.compaq.com (ztxmail03.ztx.compaq.com [161.114.1.207]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id UAA26417 for ; Mon, 2 Oct 2000 20:12:13 +0200 (METDST) Received: by ztxmail03.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id C0E03635; Mon, 2 Oct 2000 13:10:27 -0500 (CDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by ztxmail03.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 88AC26DC; Mon, 2 Oct 2000 13:10:26 -0500 (CDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA22710; Mon, 2 Oct 2000 11:10:25 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id LAA13589; Mon, 2 Oct 2000 11:08:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id LAA13604; Mon, 2 Oct 2000 11:08:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: from zmamail01.nz-tay.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA09653; Mon, 2 Oct 2000 11:08:49 -0700 Received: by zmamail01.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 86DA74067; Mon, 2 Oct 2000 14:08:49 -0400 (EDT) Received: from duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (duteinh.et.tudelft.nl [130.161.42.1]) by zmamail01.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC46165AC for ; Mon, 2 Oct 2000 14:08:48 -0400 (EDT) Received: from dutein75 by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id UAA06997; Mon, 2 Oct 2000 20:08:42 +0200 (MET DST) Message-Id: <200010021808.UAA06997@duteinh.et.tudelft.nl> From: Erik Mouw To: ccarey@intrinsyc.com Cc: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Subject: Re: UCB1200/Resistive touchscreen In-Reply-To: <0010021007310W.26342@nitt> Organization: Eric conspiracy secret labs Date: Mon 02 Oct 2000 20:08:42 +0100 (MDT) X-Face: "!Z|1XjFg!3Iw)BwM^M\k)J5KHiPddz}#/Zw%?$&Q!xqob"OA|})3_@&BTTiQERo?/^g[Z<9P4R8:5C:aqq.cw!hotLc=+u-"+1rq@9$V^8PbOUlodyi_sejt+D`iqkLpx$>.aXl%vnfPIt"LK|/%>94_Zrm8jy?`_[RKt'TuoxUxfk(gMhY(n|DBBl~c$dhO>G%6}R4+DGX3|idBm4oU&UM/XUP4I9aoN{]`ax%B?rgD(I3OJ<62Y6L X-Mailer: XCmail 1.2devel - with PGP support, PGP engine version 0.5 (IRIX64) X-Mailerorigin: http://www.fsai.fh-trier.de/~schmitzj/Xclasses/XCmail/ X-Eric-Conspiracy: There is no conspiracy! X-Loop: erik@it.et.tudelft.nl Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk On Mon, 2 Oct 2000 10:05:57 -0700, Chester Carey wrote: > On Mon, 02 Oct 2000, you wrote: >> I'll need to get the MCP audio driver working again, so I'll volunteer to >> write a framework for the low-level UCB 1200 driver (I'm actually working >> on it right now). > > Music to my ears, what exactly happened to the previous driver? It was broken. I ported it from linux-2.2 to 2.3.99-pre3, but just to get it working at all, not to port it cleanly. Russell removed the arch/arm/special directory, so it was removed from the ARM Linux tree, but it still is in Nico's tree. Erik -- J.A.K. (Erik) Mouw, Information and Communication Theory Group, Department of Electrical Engineering, Faculty of Information Technology and Systems, Delft University of Technology, PO BOX 5031, 2600 GA Delft, The Netherlands Phone: +31-15-2783635 Fax: +31-15-2781843 Email: J.A.K.Mouw@its.tudelft.nl WWW: http://www-ict.its.tudelft.nl/~erik/ From kramer@pa.dec.com Tue Oct 3 15:11:18 2000 Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (root@mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id PAA04041 for ; Tue, 3 Oct 2000 15:11:16 +0200 Received: from zmamail03.zma.compaq.com (zmamail03.zma.compaq.com [161.114.64.103]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id PAA05466 for ; Tue, 3 Oct 2000 15:11:13 +0200 (METDST) Received: by zmamail03.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 80A561E4D; Tue, 3 Oct 2000 09:09:27 -0400 (EDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by zmamail03.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 277381ECC; Tue, 3 Oct 2000 09:09:26 -0400 (EDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA27848; Tue, 3 Oct 2000 06:09:24 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id GAA14046; Tue, 3 Oct 2000 06:02:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id GAA12033; Tue, 3 Oct 2000 06:02:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: from zmamail01.nz-tay.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA16460; Tue, 3 Oct 2000 06:02:29 -0700 Received: by zmamail01.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 2D565779B; Tue, 3 Oct 2000 09:02:29 -0400 (EDT) Received: from note.orchestra.cse.unsw.EDU.AU (note.orchestra.cse.unsw.EDU.AU [129.94.242.29]) by zmamail01.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id AD3F777BB for ; Tue, 3 Oct 2000 09:02:25 -0400 (EDT) Received: From paulaner With LocalMail ; Wed, 4 Oct 2000 00:02:20 +1100 From: "Adam 'WeirdArms' Wiggins" To: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Date: Wed, 4 Oct 2000 00:02:20 +1100 (EST) X-Sender: awiggins@paulaner.disy.cse.unsw.EDU.AU Subject: Watchdog support (SA1100) Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk Is there support in linux for the SA1100 watchdog? A quick look hasn't revealed anything. Cheers Adam From kramer@pa.dec.com Tue Oct 3 15:26:18 2000 Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (root@mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id PAA04071 for ; Tue, 3 Oct 2000 15:26:18 +0200 Received: from zmamail04.zma.compaq.com (zmamail04.zma.compaq.com [161.114.64.104]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id PAA06648 for ; Tue, 3 Oct 2000 15:26:16 +0200 (METDST) Received: by zmamail04.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id F162D930; Tue, 3 Oct 2000 09:24:29 -0400 (EDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by zmamail04.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id A00A295D; Tue, 3 Oct 2000 09:24:28 -0400 (EDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA23914; Tue, 3 Oct 2000 06:24:27 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id GAA04022; Tue, 3 Oct 2000 06:20:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: from zmamail02.zma.compaq.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id GAA13850; Tue, 3 Oct 2000 06:20:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: by zmamail02.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 87B162079; Tue, 3 Oct 2000 09:20:26 -0400 (EDT) Received: from niebla.vtools.es (vtools.es [194.179.104.137]) by zmamail02.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E2EC35F0 for ; Tue, 3 Oct 2000 09:20:18 -0400 (EDT) Received: from vtools.es (miguelg.vtools.es [192.67.79.17]) by niebla.vtools.es (8.10.1/8.10.1) with ESMTP id e93DKqf11898 for ; Tue, 3 Oct 2000 15:20:52 +0200 Message-Id: <39D9DDC6.564CE9E2@vtools.es> Date: Tue, 03 Oct 2000 15:23:18 +0200 From: Miguel Garcia Lopez Organization: Visual Tools X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.5 [en] (Win95; I) X-Accept-Language: en Mime-Version: 1.0 To: sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Subject: Compatibility between SA1100 and SA1110 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl id PAA04071 Hello; I am intending to port ARM Linux to a SA1110. As a beginner, I have found several documents on the web (for example at http://developer.intel.com/design/strong/) detailing the whole building and instalation process, but they all refer to the SA1100. I would like to know wether this information is also valid for the SA1110 and, if not, where I could find similar documentation for this board. Thanks in advance, Miguel García Visual Tools http://www.vtools.es From kramer@pa.dec.com Tue Oct 3 16:04:01 2000 Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (root@mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id QAA04211 for ; Tue, 3 Oct 2000 16:04:00 +0200 Received: from zmamail03.zma.compaq.com (zmamail03.zma.compaq.com [161.114.64.103]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id QAA08731 for ; Tue, 3 Oct 2000 16:03:58 +0200 (METDST) Received: by zmamail03.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id ED7601D9F; Tue, 3 Oct 2000 10:02:12 -0400 (EDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by zmamail03.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 448001E73; Tue, 3 Oct 2000 10:02:11 -0400 (EDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA27384; Tue, 3 Oct 2000 07:02:10 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id GAA15927; Tue, 3 Oct 2000 06:58:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id GAA15852; Tue, 3 Oct 2000 06:58:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: from zmamail02.nz-tay.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA22664; Tue, 3 Oct 2000 06:58:27 -0700 Received: by zmamail02.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 826222EB8; Tue, 3 Oct 2000 09:58:27 -0400 (EDT) Received: from server01.asi (unknown [64.19.30.250]) by zmamail02.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 08B8C2F08 for ; Tue, 3 Oct 2000 09:58:27 -0400 (EDT) Received: by SERVER01 with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2448.0) id ; Tue, 3 Oct 2000 10:01:26 -0400 Message-Id: From: Jeff Sutherland To: "'Adam 'WeirdArms' Wiggins'" , "'sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com'" Subject: RE: Watchdog support (SA1100) Date: Tue, 3 Oct 2000 10:01:24 -0400 Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2448.0) Content-Type: text/plain Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk I'm working on one based on the Dallas DS1501 rtc chip. Don't know when it will be ready for prime time, though, and you need some hardware to make this work. There may be a way to do a "software" watchdog using the built in RTC portion of the SA1110. //Jeff > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com > [mailto:owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com]On Behalf Of Adam > 'WeirdArms' Wiggins > Sent: Tuesday, October 03, 2000 9:02 AM > To: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com > Subject: Watchdog support (SA1100) > > > Is there support in linux for the SA1100 watchdog? A quick look > hasn't revealed anything. > > Cheers Adam > From kramer@pa.dec.com Tue Oct 3 16:11:32 2000 Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (root@mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id QAA04232 for ; Tue, 3 Oct 2000 16:11:32 +0200 Received: from zmamail04.zma.compaq.com (zmamail04.zma.compaq.com [161.114.64.104]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id QAA09163 for ; Tue, 3 Oct 2000 16:11:30 +0200 (METDST) Received: by zmamail04.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id E5844A36; Tue, 3 Oct 2000 10:09:43 -0400 (EDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by zmamail04.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 7B911889; Tue, 3 Oct 2000 10:09:42 -0400 (EDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA29948; Tue, 3 Oct 2000 07:09:41 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id HAA13185; Tue, 3 Oct 2000 07:06:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id HAA16041; Tue, 3 Oct 2000 07:06:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ztxmail01.nz-cce.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA22097; Tue, 3 Oct 2000 07:06:02 -0700 Received: by ztxmail01.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id E4F9F45F5; Tue, 3 Oct 2000 09:06:01 -0500 (CDT) Received: from duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (duteinh.et.tudelft.nl [130.161.42.1]) by ztxmail01.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1FC4A14BD for ; Tue, 3 Oct 2000 09:06:01 -0500 (CDT) Received: from dutein75 by duteinh.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/BB-2.0) id QAA01253; Tue, 3 Oct 2000 16:05:57 +0200 (MET DST) Message-Id: <200010031405.QAA01253@duteinh.et.tudelft.nl> From: Erik Mouw To: mgarcia@vtools.es Cc: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Subject: Re: Compatibility between SA1100 and SA1110 In-Reply-To: <39D9DDC6.564CE9E2@vtools.es> Organization: Eric conspiracy secret labs Date: Tue 03 Oct 2000 16:05:55 +0100 (MDT) X-Face: "!Z|1XjFg!3Iw)BwM^M\k)J5KHiPddz}#/Zw%?$&Q!xqob"OA|})3_@&BTTiQERo?/^g[Z<9P4R8:5C:aqq.cw!hotLc=+u-"+1rq@9$V^8PbOUlodyi_sejt+D`iqkLpx$>.aXl%vnfPIt"LK|/%>94_Zrm8jy?`_[RKt'TuoxUxfk(gMhY(n|DBBl~c$dhO>G%6}R4+DGX3|idBm4oU&UM/XUP4I9aoN{]`ax%B?rgD(I3OJ<62Y6L X-Mailer: XCmail 1.2devel - with PGP support, PGP engine version 0.5 (IRIX64) X-Mailerorigin: http://www.fsai.fh-trier.de/~schmitzj/Xclasses/XCmail/ X-Eric-Conspiracy: There is no conspiracy! X-Loop: erik@it.et.tudelft.nl Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk On Tue, 03 Oct 2000 15:23:18 +0200, Miguel Garcia Lopez wrote: > I am intending to port ARM Linux to a SA1110. As a beginner, I have > found several > documents on the web (for example at > http://developer.intel.com/design/strong/) detailing the whole building > and instalation process, but they all refer to the SA1100. The SA1110 is just an SA1100 with an SDRAM interface and some silicon bugs fixed. > I would like to know wether this information is also valid for the > SA1110 and, if not, where I could find similar documentation for this > board. That information is ancient. In the mean time, ARM Linux has been ported to quite some SA11x0 boards, and porting it to a new board is quite easy. What board do you have? Erik -- LART. 250 MIPS under one Watt. Free hardware design files. http://www.lart.tudelft.nl/ From kramer@pa.dec.com Tue Oct 3 16:29:29 2000 Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (root@mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id QAA04263 for ; Tue, 3 Oct 2000 16:29:19 +0200 Received: from zmamail05.zma.compaq.com (zmamail05.zma.compaq.com [161.114.64.105]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id QAA09957 for ; Tue, 3 Oct 2000 16:29:12 +0200 (METDST) Received: by zmamail05.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id BB39A2641; Tue, 3 Oct 2000 10:27:25 -0400 (EDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by zmamail05.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id A5CE725D4; Tue, 3 Oct 2000 10:27:21 -0400 (EDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA30195; Tue, 3 Oct 2000 07:27:20 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id HAA15028; Tue, 3 Oct 2000 07:23:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id HAA16427; Tue, 3 Oct 2000 07:23:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ztxmail01.nz-cce.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA22778; Tue, 3 Oct 2000 07:23:52 -0700 Received: by ztxmail01.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 849AC4560; Tue, 3 Oct 2000 09:23:51 -0500 (CDT) Received: from xanadu.vipswitch.com (unknown [205.250.170.220]) by ztxmail01.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE56845F4 for ; Tue, 3 Oct 2000 09:23:50 -0500 (CDT) Date: Tue, 3 Oct 2000 10:19:21 -0400 (EDT) From: Nicolas Pitre To: "Adam 'WeirdArms' Wiggins" Cc: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Subject: Re: Watchdog support (SA1100) In-Reply-To: Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk On Wed, 4 Oct 2000, Adam 'WeirdArms' Wiggins wrote: > Is there support in linux for the SA1100 watchdog? A quick look > hasn't revealed anything. Look in my 2.2.x patches. There is a driver there that hasn't been ported to 2.4 yet. Nicolas From kramer@pa.dec.com Wed Oct 4 06:50:03 2000 Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (root@mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id GAA05802 for ; Wed, 4 Oct 2000 06:50:03 +0200 Received: from zmamail05.zma.compaq.com (zmamail05.zma.compaq.com [161.114.64.105]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id GAA08538 for ; Wed, 4 Oct 2000 06:49:56 +0200 (METDST) Received: by zmamail05.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 1E40D5AC1; Wed, 4 Oct 2000 00:48:10 -0400 (EDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by zmamail05.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id A368D5ABD; Wed, 4 Oct 2000 00:48:08 -0400 (EDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA24349; Tue, 3 Oct 2000 21:48:07 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id VAA15855; Tue, 3 Oct 2000 21:44:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id VAA15841; Tue, 3 Oct 2000 21:44:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ztxmail02.nz-cce.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA32049; Tue, 3 Oct 2000 21:44:13 -0700 Received: by ztxmail02.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 9F6811165; Tue, 3 Oct 2000 23:44:12 -0500 (CDT) Received: from xanadu.gn.com (modemcable248.137-200-24.mtl.mc.videotron.ca [24.200.137.248]) by ztxmail02.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E874E1199 for ; Tue, 3 Oct 2000 23:44:11 -0500 (CDT) Received: from localhost (nico@localhost) by xanadu.gn.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id AAA12344 for ; Wed, 4 Oct 2000 00:45:51 -0400 X-Authentication-Warning: xanadu.gn.com: nico owned process doing -bs Date: Wed, 4 Oct 2000 00:45:51 -0400 (EDT) From: Nicolas Pitre X-Sender: nico@xanadu.gn.com To: SA-1100/Linux Subject: diff-2.4.0-test8-rmk5-np1 Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk ... is available at the usual places. This contains: - SA1100 USB client for establishing a network link - USB host module that goes with the above - SA1111 USB support The bulk of the changes in this patch are credited to Brad Parker. Yes, it should work. I couldn't test that it actually works yet, but it at least compiles to a module and initializes. See Documentation/arm/SA1100_USB for quick instructions. Note that, for instance, the UDA1341 audio driver must be initialized after the sa1100_usbd module, otherwise the sa1100_usbd module will complain about DMA being unavailable. This is a limitation that should be removed in the future, but this can be easily worked around with module load order for now. Here comes the easy NFS root support for iPAQ and others... Enjoy! Nicolas From kramer@pa.dec.com Wed Oct 4 15:19:27 2000 Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (root@mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id PAA06919 for ; Wed, 4 Oct 2000 15:19:26 +0200 Received: from zmamail04.zma.compaq.com (zmamail04.zma.compaq.com [161.114.64.104]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id PAA01389 for ; Wed, 4 Oct 2000 15:19:24 +0200 (METDST) Received: by zmamail04.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id CC7E9A5D; Wed, 4 Oct 2000 09:17:37 -0400 (EDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by zmamail04.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 582D8B75; Wed, 4 Oct 2000 09:17:36 -0400 (EDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA01894; Wed, 4 Oct 2000 06:17:20 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id GAA27342; Wed, 4 Oct 2000 06:05:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id GAA27302; Wed, 4 Oct 2000 06:05:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: from zmamail02.nz-tay.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA07184; Wed, 4 Oct 2000 06:05:58 -0700 Received: by zmamail02.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 132C1347B; Wed, 4 Oct 2000 09:05:58 -0400 (EDT) Received: from empeg.com (morrison.empeg.co.uk [193.119.19.130]) by zmamail02.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DDF1A35F5 for ; Wed, 4 Oct 2000 09:05:56 -0400 (EDT) Received: from localhost (IDENT:altman@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by empeg.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id OAA25730; Wed, 4 Oct 2000 14:05:38 +0100 Date: Wed, 4 Oct 2000 14:05:38 +0100 (BST) From: Hugo Fiennes X-Sender: altman@fatboy.internal.empeg.com To: Jeff Sutherland Cc: "'sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com'" Subject: RE: Watchdog support (SA1100) In-Reply-To: Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk On Tue, 3 Oct 2000, Jeff Sutherland wrote: > I'm working on one based on the Dallas DS1501 rtc chip. Don't know when it > will be ready for prime time, though, and you need some hardware to make > this work. There may be a way to do a "software" watchdog using the built > in RTC portion of the SA1110. The watchdog in the SA1100/1110 is definitely *NOT* a "software" watchdog - for example, the enable bit is "set-only" - a runaway program (taking random pot-shots at 4Gb of address space) could not turn the watchdog off. I really don't see any advantage of using an external watchdog, unless the internal one doesn't trigger RST-OUT (ie, doesn't do a HW reset of attached hardware when it times out). Hugo From kramer@pa.dec.com Sat Oct 7 01:15:50 2000 Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (root@mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id BAA14148 for ; Sat, 7 Oct 2000 01:15:50 +0200 Received: from zmamail03.zma.compaq.com (zmamail03.zma.compaq.com [161.114.64.103]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id BAA23230 for ; Sat, 7 Oct 2000 01:15:48 +0200 (METDST) Received: by zmamail03.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 5324B1E28; Fri, 6 Oct 2000 19:14:02 -0400 (EDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by zmamail03.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 008B51DDB; Fri, 6 Oct 2000 19:14:00 -0400 (EDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA26715; Fri, 6 Oct 2000 16:13:54 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id QAA01490; Fri, 6 Oct 2000 16:07:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id QAA01581; Fri, 6 Oct 2000 16:07:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: from zmamail01.nz-tay.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA27422; Fri, 6 Oct 2000 16:07:18 -0700 Received: by zmamail01.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 596047BDF; Fri, 6 Oct 2000 19:07:18 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mxr01.hvn01.dsl.net (mxr01.hvn01.dsl.net [209.87.64.79]) by zmamail01.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1189D7FBB for ; Fri, 6 Oct 2000 19:07:18 -0400 (EDT) Received: from cementship.extenex.net (64-51-136-194.client.dsl.net [64.51.136.194]) by mxr01.hvn01.dsl.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E11934115 for ; Fri, 6 Oct 2000 19:07:16 -0400 (EDT) Received: from blowhole.extenex.net (blowhole.extenex.net [192.168.100.100]) by cementship.extenex.net (8.9.3/8.8.7) with ESMTP id QAA03854 for ; Fri, 6 Oct 2000 16:07:15 -0700 Received: from wardw by blowhole.extenex.net with local (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 13hgaA-0000jo-00 for ; Fri, 06 Oct 2000 16:07:14 -0700 Date: Fri, 6 Oct 2000 16:07:13 -0700 From: Ward Willats To: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Subject: GEDR beater Message-Id: <20001006160713.A2832@extenex.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii User-Agent: Mutt/1.0.1i Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk On my Assabet board I've got some custom IR hardware generating interrupts on GPIO 1. In my driver for this hardware I sometimes call disable_irq() when an error happens and latch into an error state for a while until the hardware quiets down. Some 100ms later when a kernel timer of mine fires off I reset my driver state machine and turn everything back on. While the IRQ is disabled, the hardware keeps making interrupt requests for a while until it goes quiescent. When my timer handler calls enable_irq(), I find that 70ms later (long time) my ISR is entered even thoguh the hardware has not wiggled GPIO. I found that manually clearing GEDR before calling enable_irq() stops this delayed interrupt from occuring. Now, I don't understand this since it looks like do_IRQ() would be clearing GEDR in sa1100_mask_and_ack_GPIO0_10_irq() as each interrupt comes in while I am disabled, but I throw this anecdote out there in case I am missing something obvious or it points to a problem with SA interrupt management. -- Ward From kramer@pa.dec.com Sat Oct 7 01:33:39 2000 Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (root@mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id BAA14195 for ; Sat, 7 Oct 2000 01:33:38 +0200 Received: from zmamail03.zma.compaq.com (zmamail03.zma.compaq.com [161.114.64.103]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id BAA23926 for ; Sat, 7 Oct 2000 01:33:36 +0200 (METDST) Received: by zmamail03.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id EC7111DEF; Fri, 6 Oct 2000 19:31:49 -0400 (EDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by zmamail03.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 9A06D1E0C; Fri, 6 Oct 2000 19:31:48 -0400 (EDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA04664; Fri, 6 Oct 2000 16:31:47 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id QAA15989; Fri, 6 Oct 2000 16:29:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id QAA10544; Fri, 6 Oct 2000 16:29:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: from zmamail01.nz-tay.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA02703; Fri, 6 Oct 2000 16:29:45 -0700 Received: by zmamail01.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 267F87E48; Fri, 6 Oct 2000 19:29:45 -0400 (EDT) Received: from xanadu.gn.com (modemcable248.137-200-24.mtl.mc.videotron.ca [24.200.137.248]) by zmamail01.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C2AFC7E06 for ; Fri, 6 Oct 2000 19:29:44 -0400 (EDT) Received: from localhost (nico@localhost) by xanadu.gn.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id TAA19552; Fri, 6 Oct 2000 19:31:14 -0400 X-Authentication-Warning: xanadu.gn.com: nico owned process doing -bs Date: Fri, 6 Oct 2000 19:31:14 -0400 (EDT) From: Nicolas Pitre X-Sender: nico@xanadu.gn.com To: Ward Willats Cc: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Subject: Re: GEDR beater In-Reply-To: <20001006160713.A2832@extenex.com> Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk Did you call set_GPIO_IRQ_edge() before request_irq()? On Fri, 6 Oct 2000, Ward Willats wrote: > On my Assabet board I've got some custom IR hardware generating > interrupts on GPIO 1. In my driver for this hardware I sometimes call > disable_irq() when an error happens and latch into an error state for > a while until the hardware quiets down. Some 100ms later when a kernel > timer of mine fires off I reset my driver state machine and turn > everything back on. > > While the IRQ is disabled, the hardware keeps making interrupt > requests for a while until it goes quiescent. > > When my timer handler calls enable_irq(), I find that 70ms later (long > time) my ISR is entered even thoguh the hardware has not wiggled GPIO. > > I found that manually clearing GEDR before calling enable_irq() stops > this delayed interrupt from occuring. > > Now, I don't understand this since it looks like do_IRQ() would be clearing > GEDR in sa1100_mask_and_ack_GPIO0_10_irq() as each interrupt comes in > while I am disabled, but I throw this anecdote out there in case I am > missing something obvious or it points to a problem with SA interrupt > management. > > -- Ward > > > From kramer@pa.dec.com Sat Oct 7 01:43:19 2000 Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (root@mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id BAA14217 for ; Sat, 7 Oct 2000 01:43:19 +0200 Received: from ztxmail04.ztx.compaq.com (ztxmail04.ztx.compaq.com [161.114.1.208]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id BAA24103 for ; Sat, 7 Oct 2000 01:43:17 +0200 (METDST) Received: by ztxmail04.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 7CAE6198F; Fri, 6 Oct 2000 18:41:30 -0500 (CDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by ztxmail04.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 7FAB9171F; Fri, 6 Oct 2000 18:41:29 -0500 (CDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA28850; Fri, 6 Oct 2000 16:41:28 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id QAA05170; Fri, 6 Oct 2000 16:40:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id QAA05730; Fri, 6 Oct 2000 16:40:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: from zmamail01.nz-tay.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA32019; Fri, 6 Oct 2000 16:40:55 -0700 Received: by zmamail01.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 0F7C87C5D; Fri, 6 Oct 2000 19:40:55 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mxr01.hvn01.dsl.net (mxr01.hvn01.dsl.net [209.87.64.79]) by zmamail01.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE02267B2 for ; Fri, 6 Oct 2000 19:40:54 -0400 (EDT) Received: from cementship.extenex.net (64-51-136-194.client.dsl.net [64.51.136.194]) by mxr01.hvn01.dsl.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E4823400B for ; Fri, 6 Oct 2000 19:40:53 -0400 (EDT) Received: from blowhole.extenex.net (blowhole.extenex.net [192.168.100.100]) by cementship.extenex.net (8.9.3/8.8.7) with ESMTP id QAA03879 for ; Fri, 6 Oct 2000 16:40:53 -0700 Received: from wardw by blowhole.extenex.net with local (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 13hh6j-0000q3-00 for ; Fri, 06 Oct 2000 16:40:53 -0700 Date: Fri, 6 Oct 2000 16:40:53 -0700 From: Ward Willats To: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Subject: Re: GEDR beater Message-Id: <20001006164053.A3154@extenex.com> References: <20001006160713.A2832@extenex.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii User-Agent: Mutt/1.0.1i In-Reply-To: ; from nico@cam.org on Fri, Oct 06, 2000 at 07:31:14PM -0400 Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk On Fri, Oct 06, 2000 at 07:31:14PM -0400, Nicolas Pitre wrote: > > Did you call set_GPIO_IRQ_edge() before request_irq()? Yes. You can't take any interrupts at all until you do. GPIO_FALLING_EDGE. Also, I misspoke, I am using GPIO zero. From kramer@pa.dec.com Mon Oct 9 10:07:36 2000 Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (root@mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id KAA18149 for ; Mon, 9 Oct 2000 10:07:34 +0200 Received: from ztxmail03.ztx.compaq.com (ztxmail03.ztx.compaq.com [161.114.1.207]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id KAA03770 for ; Mon, 9 Oct 2000 10:07:26 +0200 (METDST) Received: by ztxmail03.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id D36406FA; Mon, 9 Oct 2000 03:05:36 -0500 (CDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by ztxmail03.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id F0CF86D1; Mon, 9 Oct 2000 03:05:35 -0500 (CDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA19730; Mon, 9 Oct 2000 01:05:33 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id AAA08796; Mon, 9 Oct 2000 00:57:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id AAA06245; Mon, 9 Oct 2000 00:57:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ztxmail01.nz-cce.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA21523; Mon, 9 Oct 2000 00:57:44 -0700 Received: by ztxmail01.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 2434643CC; Mon, 9 Oct 2000 02:57:44 -0500 (CDT) Received: from niebla.vtools.es (vtools.es [194.179.104.137]) by ztxmail01.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7597C46AB for ; Mon, 9 Oct 2000 02:57:38 -0500 (CDT) Received: from vtools.es (miguelg.vtools.es [192.67.79.17]) by niebla.vtools.es (8.10.1/8.10.1) with ESMTP id e997w5X13445 for ; Mon, 9 Oct 2000 09:58:12 +0200 Message-Id: <39E17B05.7CF84BF8@vtools.es> Date: Mon, 09 Oct 2000 10:00:05 +0200 From: Miguel =?iso-8859-1?Q?Garc=EDa=20L=F3pez?= X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.51 [es] (Win98; I) X-Accept-Language: es Mime-Version: 1.0 To: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Subject: Missing files for x-devel environment Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk Hello; I am trying to build a cross development environment for the SA1110, as described in http://developer.intel.com/design/strong/applnots/sa1100lx/sa1100lx.htm. I cannot download several files mentioned in this document (binutils-2.9.1.0.19a.tar.gz from ftp://sunsite.unc.edu/pub/Linux/GCC/, for example). Where can I find all the needed files? Did they change name? Or have they been moved to other sites? Thanks in advance, Miguel From kramer@pa.dec.com Mon Oct 9 10:42:08 2000 Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (root@mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id KAA18197 for ; Mon, 9 Oct 2000 10:42:08 +0200 Received: from ztxmail05.ztx.compaq.com (ztxmail05.ztx.compaq.com [161.114.1.209]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id KAA05628 for ; Mon, 9 Oct 2000 10:42:05 +0200 (METDST) Received: by ztxmail05.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id C26A514D5; Mon, 9 Oct 2000 03:40:18 -0500 (CDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by ztxmail05.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 9E1781664; Mon, 9 Oct 2000 03:40:17 -0500 (CDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA06515; Mon, 9 Oct 2000 01:40:16 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id BAA10400; Mon, 9 Oct 2000 01:36:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id BAA09676; Mon, 9 Oct 2000 01:36:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ztxmail01.nz-cce.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA17229; Mon, 9 Oct 2000 01:36:33 -0700 Received: by ztxmail01.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 8A91A43C0; Mon, 9 Oct 2000 03:36:32 -0500 (CDT) Received: from mail.futuretv.com (salisbury.labs.futuretv.com [194.216.164.17]) by ztxmail01.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0CEBC431A for ; Mon, 9 Oct 2000 03:36:13 -0500 (CDT) Received: from fountain.labs.futuretv.com ([192.168.33.3]) by mail.futuretv.com with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1) id 13iYPZ-0000Hs-00; Mon, 09 Oct 2000 09:35:53 +0100 Received: from localhost ([::ffff:127.0.0.1] helo=fountain.labs.futuretv.com ident=pb) by fountain.labs.futuretv.com with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1) id 13iYPY-00019n-00; Mon, 09 Oct 2000 09:35:52 +0100 X-Mailer: exmh version 2.1.1 10/15/1999 (debian) To: Miguel =?iso-8859-1?Q?Garc=EDa=20L=F3pez?= Cc: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Subject: Re: Missing files for x-devel environment In-Reply-To: Your message of "Mon, 09 Oct 2000 10:00:05 +0200." <39E17B05.7CF84BF8@vtools.es> From: Philip Blundell Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Mon, 09 Oct 2000 09:35:52 +0100 Message-Id: Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk In message <39E17B05.7CF84BF8@vtools.es>, Miguel =?iso-8859-1?Q?Garc=EDa=20L=F3 pez?= writes: >I am trying to build a cross development environment for the SA1110, as >described in >http://developer.intel.com/design/strong/applnots/sa1100lx/sa1100lx.htm. > >I cannot download several files mentioned in this document >(binutils-2.9.1.0.19a.tar.gz from ftp://sunsite.unc.edu/pub/Linux/GCC/, >for example). Those tools are pretty outdated now. I think you will find it hard to get hold of them. It might be better to try with a newer release, say binutils 2.10 and the Rebel.com 2.95.2 compiler. (See http://www.netwinder.org/ and follow the links for tools.) p. From kramer@pa.dec.com Tue Oct 10 19:43:50 2000 Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (root@mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id TAA22757 for ; Tue, 10 Oct 2000 19:43:49 +0200 Received: from zmamail04.zma.compaq.com (zmamail04.zma.compaq.com [161.114.64.104]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id TAA05283 for ; Tue, 10 Oct 2000 19:43:47 +0200 (METDST) Received: by zmamail04.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 12C6D93D; Tue, 10 Oct 2000 13:42:01 -0400 (EDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by zmamail04.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 13F899A4; Tue, 10 Oct 2000 13:41:59 -0400 (EDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA32131; Tue, 10 Oct 2000 10:41:53 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id KAA11038; Tue, 10 Oct 2000 10:34:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id KAA18623; Tue, 10 Oct 2000 10:34:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ztxmail01.nz-cce.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA00733; Tue, 10 Oct 2000 10:34:45 -0700 Received: by ztxmail01.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id AEFA52843; Tue, 10 Oct 2000 12:34:44 -0500 (CDT) Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by ztxmail01.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA243291B for ; Tue, 10 Oct 2000 12:34:43 -0500 (CDT) Received: from arthur.ubicom.tudelft.nl (root@arthur.ubicom.tudelft.nl [130.161.43.222]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id TAA04912 for ; Tue, 10 Oct 2000 19:34:41 +0200 (METDST) Received: (from erik@localhost) by arthur.ubicom.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3/SuSE Linux 8.9.3-0.1) id TAA28536 for sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com; Tue, 10 Oct 2000 19:33:41 +0200 Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2000 19:33:41 +0200 From: Erik Mouw To: SA1100 linux mailing list Subject: List archive online Message-Id: <20001010193341.A18187@arthur.ubicom.tudelft.nl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0.1i Organization: Eric Conspiracy Secret Labs X-Eric-Conspiracy: There is no conspiracy! X-Loop: erik@arthur.ubicom.tudelft.nl Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk Hi all, I just wanted to let you know that we have an archive of this list online at the LART site: http://www.lart.tudelft.nl/list/list.php3?arc=sa1100-linux You can browse through the archive online, but you can also download it as a standard UNIX mbox file (which can be read by Elm, Mutt, Netscape, Pine, etc.). It dates back to July 5, 1999, the day I subscribed to this list. Many kudos go to Marc Joosen, our HTML/PHP3 guru for implementing this archive. Have fun, Erik -- J.A.K. (Erik) Mouw, Information and Communication Theory Group, Department of Electrical Engineering, Faculty of Information Technology and Systems, Delft University of Technology, PO BOX 5031, 2600 GA Delft, The Netherlands Phone: +31-15-2783635 Fax: +31-15-2781843 Email: J.A.K.Mouw@its.tudelft.nl WWW: http://www-ict.its.tudelft.nl/~erik/ From kramer@pa.dec.com Tue Oct 10 21:12:45 2000 Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (root@mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id VAA23364 for ; Tue, 10 Oct 2000 21:12:45 +0200 Received: from ztxmail04.ztx.compaq.com (ztxmail04.ztx.compaq.com [161.114.1.208]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id VAA08878 for ; Tue, 10 Oct 2000 21:12:43 +0200 (METDST) Received: by ztxmail04.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 5607116B9; Tue, 10 Oct 2000 14:10:57 -0500 (CDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by ztxmail04.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id C7B091607; Tue, 10 Oct 2000 14:10:55 -0500 (CDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA16898; Tue, 10 Oct 2000 12:10:50 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id MAA18699; Tue, 10 Oct 2000 12:09:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id MAA18550; Tue, 10 Oct 2000 12:09:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: from zmamail01.nz-tay.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA02605; Tue, 10 Oct 2000 12:09:06 -0700 Received: by zmamail01.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 1AC1F610E; Tue, 10 Oct 2000 15:09:06 -0400 (EDT) Received: from duke.electric.net (duke.electric.net [216.18.11.193]) by zmamail01.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 5F0F37204 for ; Tue, 10 Oct 2000 15:09:05 -0400 (EDT) Received: (qmail 88062 invoked from network); 10 Oct 2000 19:09:02 -0000 Received: from localhost (HELO relay.electric.net) (@127.0.0.1) by duke.electric.net with SMTP; 10 Oct 2000 19:09:02 -0000 Received: (from smtpd@localhost) by relay.electric.net (8.8.8/8.8.6) id MAA88048 for sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com; Tue, 10 Oct 2000 12:09:02 -0700 (PDT) X-Emc-Authenticated-Sender: Received: from cobra.intrinsyc.com(64.16.10.158), claiming to be "intrinsyc.com" via SMTP by relay.electric.net, id smtpdq87946; Tue Oct 10 12:08:58 2000 Message-Id: <39E36A00.840257F6@intrinsyc.com> Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2000 12:12:00 -0700 From: Ben Kohlen X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.72 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.4.0-test6 i686) X-Accept-Language: en Mime-Version: 1.0 To: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Subject: StrongARM Sleep Mode Support Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk Does it exist? If so, how is it used/turned on? TIA - Ben From kramer@pa.dec.com Tue Oct 10 21:25:22 2000 Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (root@mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id VAA23449 for ; Tue, 10 Oct 2000 21:25:22 +0200 Received: from ztxmail05.ztx.compaq.com (ztxmail05.ztx.compaq.com [161.114.1.209]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id VAA09329 for ; Tue, 10 Oct 2000 21:25:20 +0200 (METDST) Received: by ztxmail05.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id BBE4D146D; Tue, 10 Oct 2000 14:23:33 -0500 (CDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by ztxmail05.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 6A33E1544; Tue, 10 Oct 2000 14:23:32 -0500 (CDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA13026; Tue, 10 Oct 2000 12:23:31 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id MAA15040; Tue, 10 Oct 2000 12:22:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id MAA02861; Tue, 10 Oct 2000 12:22:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: from zmamail01.nz-tay.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA14755; Tue, 10 Oct 2000 12:22:20 -0700 Received: by zmamail01.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 648BF713F; Tue, 10 Oct 2000 15:22:20 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by zmamail01.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BCEBD7E4B for ; Tue, 10 Oct 2000 15:22:19 -0400 (EDT) Received: from arthur.ubicom.tudelft.nl (root@arthur.ubicom.tudelft.nl [130.161.43.222]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id VAA09217; Tue, 10 Oct 2000 21:22:17 +0200 (METDST) Received: (from erik@localhost) by arthur.ubicom.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3/SuSE Linux 8.9.3-0.1) id VAA29487; Tue, 10 Oct 2000 21:21:56 +0200 Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2000 21:21:56 +0200 From: Erik Mouw To: Ben Kohlen Cc: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Subject: Re: StrongARM Sleep Mode Support Message-Id: <20001010212155.B29372@arthur.ubicom.tudelft.nl> References: <39E36A00.840257F6@intrinsyc.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0.1i In-Reply-To: <39E36A00.840257F6@intrinsyc.com>; from bkohlen@intrinsyc.com on Tue, Oct 10, 2000 at 12:12:00PM -0700 Organization: Eric Conspiracy Secret Labs X-Eric-Conspiracy: There is no conspiracy! X-Loop: erik@arthur.ubicom.tudelft.nl Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk On Tue, Oct 10, 2000 at 12:12:00PM -0700, Ben Kohlen wrote: > Does it exist? If so, how is it used/turned on? Yes, it does exist. Have a look at the "power manager" section in the SA1100/SA1110 manual. It is however non-trivial, because the boot loader and the kernel have to support it. The difference between wake-up from a sleep and a reset is a single bit in the power manager status register. If the boot loader detects a wake-up from sleep, it has to restore the complete memory setup, memory mappings, etc. and give control back to the kernel. It's not too difficult, but basically a lot of work. Erik -- J.A.K. (Erik) Mouw, Information and Communication Theory Group, Department of Electrical Engineering, Faculty of Information Technology and Systems, Delft University of Technology, PO BOX 5031, 2600 GA Delft, The Netherlands Phone: +31-15-2783635 Fax: +31-15-2781843 Email: J.A.K.Mouw@its.tudelft.nl WWW: http://www-ict.its.tudelft.nl/~erik/ From kramer@pa.dec.com Tue Oct 10 21:30:13 2000 Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (root@mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id VAA23467 for ; Tue, 10 Oct 2000 21:30:13 +0200 Received: from ztxmail04.ztx.compaq.com (ztxmail04.ztx.compaq.com [161.114.1.208]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id VAA09445 for ; Tue, 10 Oct 2000 21:30:11 +0200 (METDST) Received: by ztxmail04.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 5A8D9171A; Tue, 10 Oct 2000 14:28:25 -0500 (CDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by ztxmail04.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id D2DD81418; Tue, 10 Oct 2000 14:28:23 -0500 (CDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA00506; Tue, 10 Oct 2000 12:28:22 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id MAA24699; Tue, 10 Oct 2000 12:27:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id MAA15449; Tue, 10 Oct 2000 12:27:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ztxmail01.nz-cce.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA24242; Tue, 10 Oct 2000 12:27:47 -0700 Received: by ztxmail01.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 018CF2845; Tue, 10 Oct 2000 14:27:46 -0500 (CDT) Received: from xanadu.vipswitch.com (unknown [205.250.170.220]) by ztxmail01.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C56B29E5 for ; Tue, 10 Oct 2000 14:27:46 -0500 (CDT) Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2000 15:23:34 -0400 (EDT) From: Nicolas Pitre To: Ben Kohlen Cc: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Subject: Re: StrongARM Sleep Mode Support In-Reply-To: <39E36A00.840257F6@intrinsyc.com> Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk On Tue, 10 Oct 2000, Ben Kohlen wrote: > Does it exist? It is just not implemented in Linux yet. > If so, how is it used/turned on? The SA1110 manual describe that with plenty of details. Nicolas From kramer@pa.dec.com Tue Oct 10 21:43:56 2000 Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (root@mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id VAA23522 for ; Tue, 10 Oct 2000 21:43:56 +0200 Received: from zmamail05.zma.compaq.com (zmamail05.zma.compaq.com [161.114.64.105]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id UAA07033 for ; Tue, 10 Oct 2000 20:25:15 +0200 (METDST) Received: by zmamail05.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 2B79A5804; Tue, 10 Oct 2000 14:23:29 -0400 (EDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by zmamail05.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 61A8A5848; Tue, 10 Oct 2000 14:23:27 -0400 (EDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA01523; Tue, 10 Oct 2000 11:23:21 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id LAA24331; Tue, 10 Oct 2000 11:22:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id LAA24182; Tue, 10 Oct 2000 11:22:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ztxmail01.nz-cce.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA09496; Tue, 10 Oct 2000 11:22:30 -0700 Received: by ztxmail01.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id EA61A2A8E; Tue, 10 Oct 2000 13:22:29 -0500 (CDT) Received: from xanadu.vipswitch.com (unknown [205.250.170.220]) by ztxmail01.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 240D82B25 for ; Tue, 10 Oct 2000 13:22:29 -0500 (CDT) Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2000 14:18:18 -0400 (EDT) From: Nicolas Pitre To: Erik Mouw Cc: SA1100 linux mailing list Subject: Re: List archive online In-Reply-To: <20001010193341.A18187@arthur.ubicom.tudelft.nl> Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk On Tue, 10 Oct 2000, Erik Mouw wrote: > Hi all, > > I just wanted to let you know that we have an archive of this list > online at the LART site: > > http://www.lart.tudelft.nl/list/list.php3?arc=sa1100-linux > > You can browse through the archive online, but you can also download it > as a standard UNIX mbox file (which can be read by Elm, Mutt, Netscape, > Pine, etc.). It dates back to July 5, 1999, the day I subscribed to this > list. For older messages, you can have a look at the handhelds.org list archive at http://www.handhelds.org/pipermail/sa1100/. Unfortunately their list archive apparently stopped archiving last september... Nicolas From kramer@pa.dec.com Tue Oct 10 23:54:47 2000 Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (root@mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id XAA24046 for ; Tue, 10 Oct 2000 23:54:47 +0200 Received: from zmamail03.zma.compaq.com (zmamail03.zma.compaq.com [161.114.64.103]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id XAA21038 for ; Tue, 10 Oct 2000 23:54:44 +0200 (METDST) Received: by zmamail03.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 896B21EDC; Tue, 10 Oct 2000 17:52:58 -0400 (EDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by zmamail03.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id D82DC1DB3; Tue, 10 Oct 2000 17:52:56 -0400 (EDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA19487; Tue, 10 Oct 2000 14:52:21 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id OAA28919; Tue, 10 Oct 2000 14:50:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id OAA07225; Tue, 10 Oct 2000 14:50:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ztxmail01.nz-cce.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA23317; Tue, 10 Oct 2000 14:50:01 -0700 Received: by ztxmail01.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id A5B2E28D7; Tue, 10 Oct 2000 16:50:01 -0500 (CDT) Received: from mxr01.nyc01.dsl.net (mxr01.nyc01.dsl.net [216.175.203.53]) by ztxmail01.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 55E9027FC for ; Tue, 10 Oct 2000 16:50:01 -0500 (CDT) Received: from cementship.extenex.net (64-51-136-194.client.dsl.net [64.51.136.194]) by mxr01.nyc01.dsl.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id C927C343AB for ; Tue, 10 Oct 2000 17:49:59 -0400 (EDT) Received: from blowhole.extenex.net (blowhole.extenex.net [192.168.100.100]) by cementship.extenex.net (8.9.3/8.8.7) with ESMTP id OAA02610 for ; Tue, 10 Oct 2000 14:49:58 -0700 Received: from wardw by blowhole.extenex.net with local (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 13j7Ha-0000I1-00 for ; Tue, 10 Oct 2000 14:49:58 -0700 Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2000 14:49:58 -0700 From: Ward Willats To: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Subject: smc9194.c MAC patch Message-Id: <20001010144958.A872@extenex.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii User-Agent: Mutt/1.0.1i Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk I've been using Brad Parker's patched smc9194.c driver to run ethernet on Neponset. The MAC address code keeps changing, and it didn't set a correct value on my unitialized board on test8-rmk5-np1 or, previously, test8-rmk2-np3. This stopped telnet and other stuff from working. Changing if (dev->dev_addr[i] != 0 || dev->dev_addr[i] != 0xff) to if (dev->dev_addr[i] != 0 && dev->dev_addr[i] != 0xff) fixed it. -- Ward ------------------------------------------------------------- *** smc9194.c 2000/10/09 23:52:38 1.5 --- smc9194.c 2000/10/10 21:36:57 *************** *** 1045,1051 **** * (many boards got out uninitialized) */ for ( i = 0; i < 6; i++ ) ! if (dev->dev_addr[i] != 0 || dev->dev_addr[i] != 0xff) break; /* If so, add a dummy one */ if (i == 6) --- 1045,1051 ---- * (many boards got out uninitialized) */ for ( i = 0; i < 6; i++ ) ! if (dev->dev_addr[i] != 0 && dev->dev_addr[i] != 0xff) break; /* If so, add a dummy one */ if (i == 6) From kramer@pa.dec.com Wed Oct 11 02:06:54 2000 Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (root@mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id CAA24788 for ; Wed, 11 Oct 2000 02:06:54 +0200 Received: from zmamail04.zma.compaq.com (zmamail04.zma.compaq.com [161.114.64.104]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id CAA25770 for ; Wed, 11 Oct 2000 02:06:53 +0200 (METDST) Received: by zmamail04.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id B8D60BA8; Tue, 10 Oct 2000 20:05:06 -0400 (EDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by zmamail04.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 2016BA92; Tue, 10 Oct 2000 20:05:05 -0400 (EDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA31358; Tue, 10 Oct 2000 17:05:03 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id RAA03912; Tue, 10 Oct 2000 17:02:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id RAA11448; Tue, 10 Oct 2000 17:02:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: from zmamail01.nz-tay.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA23328; Tue, 10 Oct 2000 17:02:52 -0700 Received: by zmamail01.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id DFA8B413A; Tue, 10 Oct 2000 20:02:51 -0400 (EDT) Received: from xanadu.gn.com (modemcable248.137-200-24.mtl.mc.videotron.ca [24.200.137.248]) by zmamail01.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 59CE152F4 for ; Tue, 10 Oct 2000 20:02:51 -0400 (EDT) Received: from localhost (nico@localhost) by xanadu.gn.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id UAA05286; Tue, 10 Oct 2000 20:05:09 -0400 X-Authentication-Warning: xanadu.gn.com: nico owned process doing -bs Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2000 20:05:09 -0400 (EDT) From: Nicolas Pitre X-Sender: nico@xanadu.gn.com To: Ward Willats Cc: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Subject: Re: smc9194.c MAC patch In-Reply-To: <20001010144958.A872@extenex.com> Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk On Tue, 10 Oct 2000, Ward Willats wrote: > I've been using Brad Parker's patched smc9194.c driver to run ethernet > on Neponset. The MAC address code keeps changing, and it didn't set a > correct value on my unitialized board on test8-rmk5-np1 or, > previously, test8-rmk2-np3. This stopped telnet and other stuff from > working. > > Changing > > if (dev->dev_addr[i] != 0 || dev->dev_addr[i] != 0xff) > > to > > if (dev->dev_addr[i] != 0 && dev->dev_addr[i] != 0xff) > > fixed it. Already fixed in 2.4.0-test8-rmk5-np2. Nicolas From kramer@pa.dec.com Wed Oct 11 11:40:06 2000 Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (root@mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id LAA26211 for ; Wed, 11 Oct 2000 11:40:05 +0200 Received: from ztxmail05.ztx.compaq.com (ztxmail05.ztx.compaq.com [161.114.1.209]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id LAA14533 for ; Wed, 11 Oct 2000 11:40:03 +0200 (METDST) Received: by ztxmail05.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 6D06215D2; Wed, 11 Oct 2000 04:38:16 -0500 (CDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by ztxmail05.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 47E431706; Wed, 11 Oct 2000 04:38:15 -0500 (CDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA11660; Wed, 11 Oct 2000 02:38:08 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id CAA17646; Wed, 11 Oct 2000 02:33:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id CAA14761; Wed, 11 Oct 2000 02:33:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ztxmail01.nz-cce.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA07859; Wed, 11 Oct 2000 02:33:49 -0700 Received: by ztxmail01.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 4CE8E418F; Wed, 11 Oct 2000 04:33:44 -0500 (CDT) Received: from www.hw-agent.de (www.hw-agent.de [212.63.43.180]) by ztxmail01.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 716EE43FF for ; Wed, 11 Oct 2000 04:33:43 -0500 (CDT) Received: from hw-mail.hoeft-wessel.de (unknown [172.26.252.3]) by www.hw-agent.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id C088A7763D; Wed, 11 Oct 2000 11:32:22 +0200 (CEST) Received: by HW_MAIL with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21) id ; Wed, 11 Oct 2000 11:32:13 +0200 Message-Id: <81413F587EB9D1118F56000092941A3EA78D2F@HW_MAIL> From: "JOR. - Jordan, Roman" To: "'Nicolas Pitre'" , Ben Kohlen Cc: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Subject: AW: StrongARM Sleep Mode Support Date: Wed, 11 Oct 2000 11:32:13 +0200 Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl id LAA26211 If you want to use POWER Management, first take a look in the strongarm 'secification updates'. There are some bugs with the SDRAM. greetings, Roman -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- Von: Nicolas Pitre [mailto:nico@CAM.ORG] Gesendet am: Tuesday, October 10, 2000 21:24 An: Ben Kohlen Cc: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Betreff: Re: StrongARM Sleep Mode Support On Tue, 10 Oct 2000, Ben Kohlen wrote: > Does it exist? It is just not implemented in Linux yet. > If so, how is it used/turned on? The SA1110 manual describe that with plenty of details. Nicolas From kramer@pa.dec.com Wed Oct 11 15:53:14 2000 Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (root@mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id PAA26659 for ; Wed, 11 Oct 2000 15:53:14 +0200 Received: from zmamail05.zma.compaq.com (zmamail05.zma.compaq.com [161.114.64.105]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id PAA28807 for ; Wed, 11 Oct 2000 15:53:12 +0200 (METDST) Received: by zmamail05.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 84D7A24AA; Wed, 11 Oct 2000 09:51:26 -0400 (EDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by zmamail05.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id C4C7D2452; Wed, 11 Oct 2000 09:51:24 -0400 (EDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA07862; Wed, 11 Oct 2000 06:51:14 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id GAA19104; Wed, 11 Oct 2000 06:48:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id GAA16633; Wed, 11 Oct 2000 06:48:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ztxmail01.nz-cce.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA10916; Wed, 11 Oct 2000 06:48:37 -0700 Received: by ztxmail01.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 613CD4676; Wed, 11 Oct 2000 08:48:31 -0500 (CDT) Received: from chmls20.mediaone.net (chmls20.mediaone.net [24.147.1.156]) by ztxmail01.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5CF07476A for ; Wed, 11 Oct 2000 08:48:31 -0500 (CDT) Received: from mvista.com (davisg.ne.mediaone.net [24.128.16.82]) by chmls20.mediaone.net (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id JAA11964; Wed, 11 Oct 2000 09:48:30 -0400 (EDT) Message-Id: <39E46F3D.9B8895EB@mvista.com> Date: Wed, 11 Oct 2000 09:46:37 -0400 From: "George G. Davis" Organization: Monta Vista Software, Inc. X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.72 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.2.16 i686) X-Accept-Language: en Mime-Version: 1.0 To: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Cc: davis_g@mvista.com Subject: Re: smc9194.c MAC patch References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk Nicolas Pitre wrote: > Already fixed in 2.4.0-test8-rmk5-np2. > BTW, I would recommend adding a printk indicating the use of a *_temporary_* MAC address so people don't assume that there hardware is using a valid MAC address. Otherwise, someone, somewhere is going to be asking why they're having network problems with their cluster of Assabets+Neponsets! : ) Regards, George From kramer@pa.dec.com Wed Oct 11 16:01:50 2000 Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (root@mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id QAA26694 for ; Wed, 11 Oct 2000 16:01:50 +0200 Received: from zmamail03.zma.compaq.com (zmamail03.zma.compaq.com [161.114.64.103]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id QAA29304 for ; Wed, 11 Oct 2000 16:01:49 +0200 (METDST) Received: by zmamail03.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id A9DFF1E2F; Wed, 11 Oct 2000 10:00:02 -0400 (EDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by zmamail03.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id EA0131D81; Wed, 11 Oct 2000 10:00:00 -0400 (EDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA18109; Wed, 11 Oct 2000 06:59:59 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id GAA08877; Wed, 11 Oct 2000 06:59:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id GAA10747; Wed, 11 Oct 2000 06:59:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: from zmamail01.nz-tay.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA05713; Wed, 11 Oct 2000 06:59:21 -0700 Received: by zmamail01.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id BEB3C799E; Wed, 11 Oct 2000 09:59:20 -0400 (EDT) Received: from xanadu.vipswitch.com (unknown [205.250.170.220]) by zmamail01.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A8097D0C for ; Wed, 11 Oct 2000 09:59:20 -0400 (EDT) Date: Wed, 11 Oct 2000 09:55:14 -0400 (EDT) From: Nicolas Pitre To: "George G. Davis" Cc: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Subject: Re: smc9194.c MAC patch In-Reply-To: <39E46F3D.9B8895EB@mvista.com> Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk On Wed, 11 Oct 2000, George G. Davis wrote: > Nicolas Pitre wrote: > > Already fixed in 2.4.0-test8-rmk5-np2. > > > > BTW, I would recommend adding a printk indicating the use of > a *_temporary_* MAC address so people don't assume that there > hardware is using a valid MAC address. Otherwise, someone, > somewhere is going to be asking why they're having network > problems with their cluster of Assabets+Neponsets! : ) Yeah... good idea. Nicolas From kramer@pa.dec.com Wed Oct 11 18:50:05 2000 Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (root@mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id SAA27078 for ; Wed, 11 Oct 2000 18:50:05 +0200 Received: from zmamail03.zma.compaq.com (zmamail03.zma.compaq.com [161.114.64.103]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id SAA09323 for ; Wed, 11 Oct 2000 18:50:03 +0200 (METDST) Received: by zmamail03.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 30CD61C3A; Wed, 11 Oct 2000 12:48:17 -0400 (EDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by zmamail03.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 228411EB8; Wed, 11 Oct 2000 12:48:13 -0400 (EDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA14319; Wed, 11 Oct 2000 09:48:12 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id JAA12763; Wed, 11 Oct 2000 09:46:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id JAA07310; Wed, 11 Oct 2000 09:46:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: from stowe.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA03238; Wed, 11 Oct 2000 09:46:38 -0700 Received: by stowe.pa.dec.com; (5.65v4.0/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id AA16489; Wed, 11 Oct 2000 09:46:38 -0700 Date: Wed, 11 Oct 2000 09:46:38 -0700 Message-Id: <200010111646.AA16489@stowe.pa.dec.com> From: Deborah Wallach To: bkohlen@intrinsyc.com Cc: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com In-Reply-To: (message from Nicolas Pitre on Tue, 10 Oct 2000 15:23:34 -0400 (EDT)) Subject: Re: StrongARM Sleep Mode Support Address: Compaq Computer Corporation; Western Research Laboratory; 250 University Avenue; Palo Alto, CA 94301; USA Phone: 650-617-3315 Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk There is support for sleep mode for the Itsy (SA1100) in the version of Linux that we released last year (available at http://research.compaq.com/wrl/projects/itsy/Xdownload.html). Unfortunately, this is for Linux 2.0.30. I believe that Jamey is in the process of reworking it to work with the 2.4 Linux on the iPAQ. -Deborah Wallach From kramer@pa.dec.com Thu Oct 12 15:20:36 2000 Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (root@mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id PAA29758 for ; Thu, 12 Oct 2000 15:20:35 +0200 Received: from zmamail04.zma.compaq.com (zmamail04.zma.compaq.com [161.114.64.104]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id PAA27761 for ; Thu, 12 Oct 2000 15:20:34 +0200 (METDST) Received: by zmamail04.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id C932E89D; Thu, 12 Oct 2000 09:18:47 -0400 (EDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by zmamail04.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id BB9849AF; Thu, 12 Oct 2000 09:18:44 -0400 (EDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA23956; Thu, 12 Oct 2000 06:18:42 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id GAA05890; Thu, 12 Oct 2000 06:12:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id GAA05644; Thu, 12 Oct 2000 06:12:06 -0700 (PDT) From: Received: from zmamail01.nz-tay.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA13540; Thu, 12 Oct 2000 06:12:05 -0700 Received: by zmamail01.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 0F9EF7E30; Thu, 12 Oct 2000 09:12:05 -0400 (EDT) Received: from fsserver.virtense.com (virtense.ch [194.148.50.104]) by zmamail01.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 95F277C3A for ; Thu, 12 Oct 2000 09:12:04 -0400 (EDT) Received: from 63.36.97.123 (unverified [63.36.97.123]) by fsserver.virtense.com (Rockliffe SMTPRA 4.2.4) with SMTP id ; Thu, 12 Oct 2000 15:15:23 +0200 Message-Id: <000027644eff$00004353$000051b6@> To: Subject: Receive a FREE $1000 Satellite T.V. System Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2000 10:57:08 -0400 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-Msmail-Priority: Normal Reply-To: getfreetv13@mailbox.gr Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk FREE Satellite T.V. System and FREE Instalation For a limited time we'll give you this top of the line Digital Satellite System for FREE! We'll even include Free installation. Enjoy over 500 Channels of crystal clear digital picture and cd stereo sound on your FREE Satellite TV System. Why pay over $900 retail for these items, when we're giving you this satellite package for free. Call 888-514-6881 to be Guaranteed Your FREE Satellite Today This innovative 20" satellite includes a stereo receiver and an infrared remote. With this FREE offer you will have both Interactive Television Capability and an On Screen Program Guide. This limited time FREE offer is much less than the monthly cost of cable tv. All you have to do is call us to arrange delivery. If you call today, we'll throw in a second receiver for your second T.V. free. Call 888-514-6881 to Begin Surfing through 500 Channels Today! To be removed send email to datyups@yahoo.com From kramer@pa.dec.com Fri Oct 13 19:13:58 2000 Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (root@mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id TAA00770 for ; Fri, 13 Oct 2000 19:13:58 +0200 Received: from ztxmail03.ztx.compaq.com (ztxmail03.ztx.compaq.com [161.114.1.207]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id TAA07423 for ; Fri, 13 Oct 2000 19:13:56 +0200 (METDST) Received: by ztxmail03.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 5BFCD61E; Fri, 13 Oct 2000 12:12:09 -0500 (CDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by ztxmail03.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id C39C57AF; Fri, 13 Oct 2000 12:12:06 -0500 (CDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA02367; Fri, 13 Oct 2000 10:11:49 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id KAA20336; Fri, 13 Oct 2000 10:00:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id KAA29781; Fri, 13 Oct 2000 10:00:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: from zmamail01.nz-tay.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA21023; Fri, 13 Oct 2000 10:00:18 -0700 Received: by zmamail01.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 7D52488D3; Fri, 13 Oct 2000 13:00:17 -0400 (EDT) Received: from duke.electric.net (duke.electric.net [216.18.11.193]) by zmamail01.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id CA00D8A14 for ; Fri, 13 Oct 2000 13:00:12 -0400 (EDT) Received: (qmail 85991 invoked from network); 13 Oct 2000 17:00:06 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO relay.electric.net) (@127.0.0.1) by duke.electric.net with SMTP; 13 Oct 2000 17:00:06 -0000 Received: (from smtpd@localhost) by relay.electric.net (8.8.8/8.8.6) id KAA85875 for sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com; Fri, 13 Oct 2000 10:00:04 -0700 (PDT) X-Emc-Authenticated-Sender: Received: from cobra.intrinsyc.com(64.16.10.158), claiming to be "intrinsyc.com" via SMTP by relay.electric.net, id smtpdT85586; Fri Oct 13 09:59:56 2000 Message-Id: <39E74051.70AB90FF@intrinsyc.com> Date: Fri, 13 Oct 2000 10:03:13 -0700 From: Ben Kohlen X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.72 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.4.0-test6 i686) X-Accept-Language: en Mime-Version: 1.0 To: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Subject: Serial ports... Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk How do I get use of all 3 UARTS? The test8-rmk5-np2 (I think that's the one) patch seemed to provide access to all serial ports (with the proper changes to the filesystem), but what needs to be done when using ttyS# devices rather than the ttySA# devices? TIA - Ben From kramer@pa.dec.com Fri Oct 13 20:41:27 2000 Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (root@mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id UAA01092 for ; Fri, 13 Oct 2000 20:41:26 +0200 Received: from zmamail04.zma.compaq.com (zmamail04.zma.compaq.com [161.114.64.104]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id UAA10944 for ; Fri, 13 Oct 2000 20:41:25 +0200 (METDST) Received: by zmamail04.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 502F6B97; Fri, 13 Oct 2000 14:39:39 -0400 (EDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by zmamail04.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 63F679D7; Fri, 13 Oct 2000 14:39:37 -0400 (EDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA17122; Fri, 13 Oct 2000 11:39:36 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id LAA06465; Fri, 13 Oct 2000 11:34:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id LAA10963; Fri, 13 Oct 2000 11:34:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ztxmail02.nz-cce.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA27168; Fri, 13 Oct 2000 11:34:58 -0700 Received: by ztxmail02.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 160D623DF; Fri, 13 Oct 2000 13:34:58 -0500 (CDT) Received: from xanadu.vipswitch.com (unknown [205.250.170.220]) by ztxmail02.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 486B1223B for ; Fri, 13 Oct 2000 13:34:57 -0500 (CDT) Date: Fri, 13 Oct 2000 14:30:50 -0400 (EDT) From: Nicolas Pitre To: Ben Kohlen Cc: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Subject: Re: Serial ports... In-Reply-To: <39E74051.70AB90FF@intrinsyc.com> Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk On Fri, 13 Oct 2000, Ben Kohlen wrote: > How do I get use of all 3 UARTS? The test8-rmk5-np2 (I think that's the > one) patch seemed to provide access to all serial ports (with the proper > changes to the filesystem), but what needs to be done when using ttyS# > devices rather than the ttySA# devices? I'm not sure to understand... Please have a look at Documentation/arm/SA1100/serial_UART and post again if it doesn't answer your questions. Nicolas From kramer@pa.dec.com Fri Oct 13 23:42:40 2000 Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (root@mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id XAA01523 for ; Fri, 13 Oct 2000 23:42:40 +0200 Received: from zmamail04.zma.compaq.com (zmamail04.zma.compaq.com [161.114.64.104]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id XAA18052 for ; Fri, 13 Oct 2000 23:42:39 +0200 (METDST) Received: by zmamail04.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 39FD8A2F; Fri, 13 Oct 2000 17:40:53 -0400 (EDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by zmamail04.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 520C1BC5; Fri, 13 Oct 2000 17:40:51 -0400 (EDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA20506; Fri, 13 Oct 2000 14:40:39 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id OAA09634; Fri, 13 Oct 2000 14:38:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id OAA11005; Fri, 13 Oct 2000 14:38:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ztxmail01.nz-cce.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA24869; Fri, 13 Oct 2000 14:38:37 -0700 Received: by ztxmail01.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 5B78D4630; Fri, 13 Oct 2000 16:38:37 -0500 (CDT) Received: from duke.electric.net (duke.electric.net [216.18.11.193]) by ztxmail01.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id B9BB7445E for ; Fri, 13 Oct 2000 16:38:36 -0500 (CDT) Received: (qmail 53449 invoked from network); 13 Oct 2000 21:38:30 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO relay.electric.net) (@127.0.0.1) by duke.electric.net with SMTP; 13 Oct 2000 21:38:30 -0000 Received: (from smtpd@localhost) by relay.electric.net (8.8.8/8.8.6) id OAA53442; Fri, 13 Oct 2000 14:38:30 -0700 (PDT) X-Emc-Authenticated-Sender: Received: from cobra.intrinsyc.com(64.16.10.158), claiming to be "intrinsyc.com" via SMTP by relay.electric.net, id smtpdA53409; Fri Oct 13 14:38:28 2000 Message-Id: <39E781A2.FC471661@intrinsyc.com> Date: Fri, 13 Oct 2000 14:41:54 -0700 From: Ben Kohlen X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.72 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.4.0-test6 i686) X-Accept-Language: en Mime-Version: 1.0 To: Nicolas Pitre Cc: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Subject: Re: Serial ports... References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk Nicolas Pitre wrote: > On Fri, 13 Oct 2000, Ben Kohlen wrote: > > > How do I get use of all 3 UARTS? The test8-rmk5-np2 (I think that's the > > one) patch seemed to provide access to all serial ports (with the proper > > changes to the filesystem), but what needs to be done when using ttyS# > > devices rather than the ttySA# devices? > > I'm not sure to understand... Please have a look at > Documentation/arm/SA1100/serial_UART and post again if it doesn't answer > your questions. > > Nicolas Sorry for my earlier vagueness - here is my setup on the StrongARM based board: ttyS0 : major 4, minor 64 (works) ttyS1 : major 4, minor 65 (works) ttyS2 : major 4, minor 66 (doesn't work) The error i get when sending through ttyS2 is: cat: write error: Input/output error Thank you for any help, - Ben From kramer@pa.dec.com Sat Oct 14 22:56:30 2000 Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (root@mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id WAA03449 for ; Sat, 14 Oct 2000 22:56:30 +0200 Received: from ztxmail03.ztx.compaq.com (ztxmail03.ztx.compaq.com [161.114.1.207]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id WAA21682 for ; Sat, 14 Oct 2000 22:56:28 +0200 (METDST) Received: by ztxmail03.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id B24D11230; Sat, 14 Oct 2000 15:54:41 -0500 (CDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by ztxmail03.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 5EB1E1308; Sat, 14 Oct 2000 15:54:40 -0500 (CDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA28968; Sat, 14 Oct 2000 13:54:27 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id NAA14726; Sat, 14 Oct 2000 13:43:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id NAA17100; Sat, 14 Oct 2000 13:43:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ztxmail01.nz-cce.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA24344; Sat, 14 Oct 2000 13:43:56 -0700 Received: by ztxmail01.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 53C193E76; Sat, 14 Oct 2000 15:43:56 -0500 (CDT) Received: from xanadu.gn.com (modemcable248.137-200-24.mtl.mc.videotron.ca [24.200.137.248]) by ztxmail01.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8EBC04439 for ; Sat, 14 Oct 2000 15:43:55 -0500 (CDT) Received: from localhost (nico@localhost) by xanadu.gn.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id QAA14656; Sat, 14 Oct 2000 16:46:13 -0400 X-Authentication-Warning: xanadu.gn.com: nico owned process doing -bs Date: Sat, 14 Oct 2000 16:46:13 -0400 (EDT) From: Nicolas Pitre X-Sender: nico@xanadu.gn.com To: Ben Kohlen Cc: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com, Nicolas Pitre Subject: Re: Serial ports... In-Reply-To: <39E781A2.FC471661@intrinsyc.com> Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk On Fri, 13 Oct 2000, Ben Kohlen wrote: > Sorry for my earlier vagueness - here is my setup on the StrongARM based > board: > > ttyS0 : major 4, minor 64 (works) > ttyS1 : major 4, minor 65 (works) > ttyS2 : major 4, minor 66 (doesn't work) > > The error i get when sending through ttyS2 is: > > cat: write error: Input/output error This is probably because you don't have the third serial port enabled on your architecture. You should find out looking at the kernel boot messages. If so, look into drivers/char/serial_sa1100.c to enable it for your machine. Nicolas From kramer@pa.dec.com Wed Oct 18 17:12:35 2000 Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (root@mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id RAA15438 for ; Wed, 18 Oct 2000 17:12:35 +0200 Received: from ztxmail04.ztx.compaq.com (ztxmail04.ztx.compaq.com [161.114.1.208]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id RAA09032 for ; Wed, 18 Oct 2000 17:12:33 +0200 (METDST) Received: by ztxmail04.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 55FF1190E; Wed, 18 Oct 2000 10:10:47 -0500 (CDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by ztxmail04.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id B9C581A2A; Wed, 18 Oct 2000 10:10:36 -0500 (CDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA12094; Wed, 18 Oct 2000 08:10:25 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id IAA13020; Wed, 18 Oct 2000 08:02:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id IAA02354; Wed, 18 Oct 2000 08:02:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ztxmail01.nz-cce.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA24042; Wed, 18 Oct 2000 08:02:46 -0700 Received: by ztxmail01.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 76A0644C1; Wed, 18 Oct 2000 10:02:45 -0500 (CDT) Received: from xanadu.vipswitch.com (unknown [205.250.170.220]) by ztxmail01.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B3E604487 for ; Wed, 18 Oct 2000 10:02:41 -0500 (CDT) Date: Wed, 18 Oct 2000 10:58:45 -0400 (EDT) From: Nicolas Pitre To: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Cc: brad@parker.boston.ma.us Subject: diff-2.4.0-test9-rmk1-np1 Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk ... is available at the usual sites. This contains: - update to 2.4.0-test9-rmk1 - support for magic sysrq through the serial console (Erik Mouw) - fixes to sa1100fb and various LART stuff (Erik Mouw) - Pangolin updates (murphychen@kimo.com.tw) - SA1111 USB support temporarily removed - proper SA1111 DMA memory initialisation So this version should be able to get DMA-able memory for the SA1111 by using the GFP_DMA flags with no extra hacks and fuss. Brad --> I removed the SA1111 USB patch because it clashed with current USB code. Please could you send me an updated patch also with your DMA hacks removed? Thanks. I'm (slowly but surely) merging John Dorsey's SA1111 SAC support... Enjoy! Nicolas From kramer@pa.dec.com Thu Oct 26 04:56:59 2000 Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (root@mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id EAA01677 for ; Thu, 26 Oct 2000 04:56:59 +0200 Received: from zmamail04.zma.compaq.com (zmamail04.zma.compaq.com [161.114.64.104]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id EAA13692 for ; Thu, 26 Oct 2000 04:56:58 +0200 (METDST) Received: by zmamail04.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 562CBA61; Wed, 25 Oct 2000 22:55:12 -0400 (EDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by zmamail04.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 5C2429AD; Wed, 25 Oct 2000 22:55:10 -0400 (EDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA24196; Wed, 25 Oct 2000 19:55:02 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id TAA04339; Wed, 25 Oct 2000 19:48:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id TAA26847; Wed, 25 Oct 2000 19:48:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: from zmamail02.nz-tay.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA28616; Wed, 25 Oct 2000 19:48:40 -0700 Received: by zmamail02.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 9FC9F44D1; Wed, 25 Oct 2000 22:48:39 -0400 (EDT) Received: from xanadu.gn.com (modemcable248.137-200-24.mtl.mc.videotron.ca [24.200.137.248]) by zmamail02.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 34D9347C8 for ; Wed, 25 Oct 2000 22:48:39 -0400 (EDT) Received: from localhost (nico@localhost) by xanadu.gn.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id WAA15839 for ; Wed, 25 Oct 2000 22:52:41 -0400 X-Authentication-Warning: xanadu.gn.com: nico owned process doing -bs Date: Wed, 25 Oct 2000 22:52:41 -0400 (EDT) From: Nicolas Pitre X-Sender: nico@xanadu.gn.com To: SA-1100/Linux Subject: 2.4.0-test9-rmk1-np2 Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk ... is available at the usual places. This contains: - merged John Dorsey's SA1111 SAC DMA support (but not in uda1341.c yet) - George G. Davis' Neponset PCMCIA fixes - SA1111 console now compiles with Magic SysRQ enabled Enjoy! Nicolas From kramer@pa.dec.com Thu Oct 26 10:17:20 2000 Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (root@mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id KAA02158 for ; Thu, 26 Oct 2000 10:17:20 +0200 Received: from zmamail05.zma.compaq.com (zmamail05.zma.compaq.com [161.114.64.105]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id KAA24620 for ; Thu, 26 Oct 2000 10:17:17 +0200 (METDST) Received: by zmamail05.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 146462B5B; Thu, 26 Oct 2000 04:15:30 -0400 (EDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by zmamail05.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 08B4729CA; Thu, 26 Oct 2000 04:15:28 -0400 (EDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA24842; Thu, 26 Oct 2000 01:15:20 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id BAA19224; Thu, 26 Oct 2000 01:12:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id BAA13215; Thu, 26 Oct 2000 01:12:56 -0700 (PDT) From: Received: from ztxmail01.nz-cce.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA01042; Thu, 26 Oct 2000 01:12:55 -0700 Received: by ztxmail01.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 7DCAB3E3A; Thu, 26 Oct 2000 03:12:55 -0500 (CDT) Received: from lnsmtpbos00.lhs.com (lnsmtpbos00.lhs.com [208.162.98.43]) by ztxmail01.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 311983F37 for ; Thu, 26 Oct 2000 03:12:55 -0500 (CDT) Subject: kernel.org down?? To: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com X-Mailer: Lotus Notes Release 5.0.4 June 8, 2000 Message-Id: Date: Thu, 26 Oct 2000 04:12:52 -0400 X-Mimetrack: Serialize by Router on LNSMTPBOS00/SERVER/US/LHS(Release 5.0.4 |June 8, 2000) at 10/26/2000 04:27:33 AM Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk does anyone else have trouble connecting to ftp.kernel.org? or to www.kernel.org? If it is down can anyone tell me a location of a mirror for the kernel sources ... im looking to refresh my copy of linux-2.4.0-test9.tar.gz thanks. -N -- Nicholas N. Mistry Software Engineer, Innovations Group Lernout and Hauspie; 52 Third Avenue; Burlington, MA 01803 Tel: (781) 203-5062 Fax: (781) 238-0986 E-Mail: nmistry@lhsl.com Pager: (888) 561-4737 or pagenmistry@lhsl.com From kramer@pa.dec.com Thu Oct 26 13:48:56 2000 Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (root@mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id NAA02713 for ; Thu, 26 Oct 2000 13:48:56 +0200 Received: from ztxmail04.ztx.compaq.com (ztxmail04.ztx.compaq.com [161.114.1.208]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id NAA09918 for ; Thu, 26 Oct 2000 13:48:54 +0200 (METDST) Received: by ztxmail04.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id EB1581AA5; Thu, 26 Oct 2000 06:47:07 -0500 (CDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by ztxmail04.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 812491953; Thu, 26 Oct 2000 06:47:06 -0500 (CDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA06685; Thu, 26 Oct 2000 04:47:04 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id EAA18790; Thu, 26 Oct 2000 04:44:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id EAA17152; Thu, 26 Oct 2000 04:44:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: from zmamail01.nz-tay.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA13369; Thu, 26 Oct 2000 04:44:47 -0700 Received: by zmamail01.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 698017AEF; Thu, 26 Oct 2000 07:44:47 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by zmamail01.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BCCEF9425 for ; Thu, 26 Oct 2000 07:44:46 -0400 (EDT) Received: from arthur.ubicom.tudelft.nl (root@arthur.ubicom.tudelft.nl [130.161.43.222]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id NAA09612; Thu, 26 Oct 2000 13:44:44 +0200 (METDST) Received: (from erik@localhost) by arthur.ubicom.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3/SuSE Linux 8.9.3-0.1) id NAA27038; Thu, 26 Oct 2000 13:44:22 +0200 Date: Thu, 26 Oct 2000 13:44:22 +0200 From: Erik Mouw To: nmistry@lhsl.com Cc: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Subject: Re: kernel.org down?? Message-Id: <20001026134422.D26210@arthur.ubicom.tudelft.nl> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0.1i In-Reply-To: ; from nmistry@lhsl.com on Thu, Oct 26, 2000 at 04:12:52AM -0400 Organization: Eric Conspiracy Secret Labs X-Eric-Conspiracy: There is no conspiracy! X-Loop: erik@arthur.ubicom.tudelft.nl Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk On Thu, Oct 26, 2000 at 04:12:52AM -0400, nmistry@lhsl.com wrote: > does anyone else have trouble connecting to ftp.kernel.org? or to > www.kernel.org? Yes, Peter Anvin announced on the linux-kernel mailing list that {ftp|www|finger|rsync}.kernel.org would be down for several hours. > If it is down can anyone tell me a location of a mirror for the kernel > sources ... im looking to refresh my copy of linux-2.4.0-test9.tar.gz Try one of the mirrors at ftp..kernel.org. Erik -- J.A.K. (Erik) Mouw, Information and Communication Theory Group, Department of Electrical Engineering, Faculty of Information Technology and Systems, Delft University of Technology, PO BOX 5031, 2600 GA Delft, The Netherlands Phone: +31-15-2783635 Fax: +31-15-2781843 Email: J.A.K.Mouw@its.tudelft.nl WWW: http://www-ict.its.tudelft.nl/~erik/ From kramer@pa.dec.com Fri Oct 27 18:02:24 2000 Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (root@mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id SAA06919 for ; Fri, 27 Oct 2000 18:02:24 +0200 Received: from ztxmail04.ztx.compaq.com (ztxmail04.ztx.compaq.com [161.114.1.208]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id SAA01021 for ; Fri, 27 Oct 2000 18:02:21 +0200 (METDST) Received: by ztxmail04.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 41B981AD8; Fri, 27 Oct 2000 11:00:28 -0500 (CDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by ztxmail04.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 2BF511A54; Fri, 27 Oct 2000 11:00:23 -0500 (CDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA00124; Fri, 27 Oct 2000 09:00:21 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id IAA00914; Fri, 27 Oct 2000 08:52:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id IAA32024; Fri, 27 Oct 2000 08:52:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: from zmamail02.nz-tay.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA30957; Fri, 27 Oct 2000 08:52:41 -0700 Received: by zmamail02.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id A451F3F0E; Fri, 27 Oct 2000 11:52:38 -0400 (EDT) Received: from xanadu.vipswitch.com (unknown [205.250.170.220]) by zmamail02.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B64F3E6C for ; Fri, 27 Oct 2000 11:52:37 -0400 (EDT) Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2000 11:47:27 -0400 (EDT) From: Nicolas Pitre To: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Cc: linux-arm-announce@lists.arm.linux.org.uk Subject: diff-2.4.0-test9-rmk1-np3 Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk [it seems that not all interested people are subscribed to sa1100-linux so I will send those announcements to linux-arm-announce as well] diff-2.4.0-test9-rmk1-np3 is now available at the following locations: ftp://ftp.netwinder.org/users/n/nico/ ftp://ftp.arm.linux.org.uk/pub/linux/arm/people/nico/ ftp://ftp.handhelds.org/pub/linux/arm/sa-1100-patches/ This patch is of course intended to add SA11x0 support and assorted drivers to the ARM Linux kernel. It must be applied over a kernel tree already patched with Russell King's patch available at: ftp://ftp.arm.linux.org.uk/pub/linux/arm/source/kernel-patches/v2.4/ (mirrors are also available -- see http://www.arm.linux.org.uk) Changes for this patch:: - Neponset PCMCIA fix (John G. Dorsey, George G. Davis) - More generic PCMCIA fixes (John G. Dorsey) - mods to the UDA1341 audio driver for SA1111 SAC (John G. Dorsey) - SA11x0 USB network connectivity fixes (Brad Parker) - some UCB1200 cleanups (John G. Dorsey) - SA1111 USB OHCI support is back (Brad Parker) - i2c support for the Assabet ADV7171 video encoder (Brad Parker) - minor cleanups For previous changelogs, see the sa1100-linux archive at: http://www.lart.tudelft.nl/list/list.php3?arc=sa1100-linux As always, information and references on supported hardware should be available in the linux/Documentation/arm/SA1100/ directory. Enjoy! Nicolas From kramer@pa.dec.com Tue Oct 31 07:28:43 2000 Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (root@mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id HAA21011 for ; Tue, 31 Oct 2000 07:28:43 +0100 Received: from zmamail03.zma.compaq.com (zmamail03.zma.compaq.com [161.114.64.103]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id HAA24973 for ; Tue, 31 Oct 2000 07:28:42 +0100 (MET) Received: by zmamail03.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 815991D8F; Tue, 31 Oct 2000 01:26:55 -0500 (EST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by zmamail03.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 66DC24E9C; Tue, 31 Oct 2000 01:26:53 -0500 (EST) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA23351; Mon, 30 Oct 2000 22:26:46 -0800 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id WAA02678; Mon, 30 Oct 2000 22:19:09 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id WAA08366; Mon, 30 Oct 2000 22:19:05 -0800 (PST) Received: from ztxmail02.nz-cce.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA13187; Mon, 30 Oct 2000 22:19:05 -0800 Received: by ztxmail02.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id AC55313B0; Tue, 31 Oct 2000 00:19:04 -0600 (CST) Received: from cgh.com.sg (unknown [203.126.191.202]) by ztxmail02.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id EE8131032 for ; Tue, 31 Oct 2000 00:19:02 -0600 (CST) Received: from dicc.co.kr ([216.126.153.76]) by cgh.com.sg (Lotus SMTP MTA v4.6.7 (934.1 12-30-1999)) with SMTP id 48256989.0022DC5F; Tue, 31 Oct 2000 14:20:49 +0800 From: Christopher@e-net.co.kr Subject: Receive a FREE $1000 Satellite T.V. System. Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Message-Id: <246oxh3njl1v8ocy4ue.6ur5dpd7h23j1fnmun8@dicc.co.kr> Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2000 01:15:33 -0500 To: blustnw@dns.haru-net.ne.jp Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk FREE Satellite T.V. System and FREE Installation For a limited time we'll give you this top of the line Digital Satellite System for FREE! We'll even include Free installation. Enjoy over 500 Channels of crystal clear digital picture and cd stereo sound on your FREE Satellite TV System. Why pay over $900 retail for these items, when we're giving you this satellite package for free. Call 888-514-6881 to be Guaranteed Your FREE Satellite Today This Innovative 20" Satellite includes a stereo receiver and an infrared remote. With this FREE offer you will have both Interactive Television Capability and an On Screen Program Guide. This limited time FREE offer is much less than the monthly cost of cable tv. All you have to do is call us to arrange delivery. If you call today, we'll throw in a second receiver for your second T.V. free. Call 888-514-6881 to Begin Surfing through 500 Channels Today! To be removed send email to umefoola@yahoo.com From kramer@pa.dec.com Tue Oct 31 13:33:46 2000 Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (root@mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id NAA21604 for ; Tue, 31 Oct 2000 13:33:45 +0100 Received: from zmamail05.zma.compaq.com (zmamail05.zma.compaq.com [161.114.64.105]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id NAA14893 for ; Tue, 31 Oct 2000 13:33:44 +0100 (MET) Received: by zmamail05.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 71BB92BDF; Tue, 31 Oct 2000 07:31:58 -0500 (EST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by zmamail05.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 39352265B; Tue, 31 Oct 2000 07:31:56 -0500 (EST) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA18770; Tue, 31 Oct 2000 04:31:54 -0800 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id EAA19949; Tue, 31 Oct 2000 04:29:17 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id EAA25787; Tue, 31 Oct 2000 04:29:16 -0800 (PST) Received: from ztxmail01.nz-cce.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA01273; Tue, 31 Oct 2000 04:29:16 -0800 Received: by ztxmail01.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 25A76415E; Tue, 31 Oct 2000 06:29:16 -0600 (CST) Received: from lakdiva.slt.lk (nlakdiva.slt.lk [203.115.0.1]) by ztxmail01.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8467312EC for ; Tue, 31 Oct 2000 06:29:14 -0600 (CST) Received: from obelix.atpos.lk ([203.115.31.220]) by lakdiva.slt.lk (8.10.2/8.10.2) with ESMTP id e9VCTZR29089; Tue, 31 Oct 2000 18:29:36 +0600 (GMT) Received: from RUWAN ([192.1.1.11]) by obelix.atpos.lk with SMTP (Microsoft Exchange Internet Mail Service Version 5.5.2650.21) id V7T9MNV2; Tue, 31 Oct 2000 18:20:32 +0600 From: "J.K.D. Ruwan Jayanetti" To: Cc: Subject: Gold Plated StrongARM! Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2000 18:28:20 +0600 Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-Msmail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) Importance: Normal X-Mimeole: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2314.1300 Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk Hi All, I'm having lot of trouble with StrongARM CPU holder in the Brutus Board. Some times it get loose connect and giving lot of problems. Some times it does not start, some time it starts but with an error. Then I have to use contact cleaner and clean the holder and the CPU pins. It seems to be CPU pins get corroded. Does anybody experienced this and had a solution? I'm planning to electroplate gold on the pins of StrongARM CPU by placing the CPU on a square made of razor blades to connect all the pins together. Any comments? Regards, Ruwan. From kramer@pa.dec.com Tue Oct 31 13:41:37 2000 Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (root@mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id NAA21625 for ; Tue, 31 Oct 2000 13:41:37 +0100 Received: from ztxmail04.ztx.compaq.com (ztxmail04.ztx.compaq.com [161.114.1.208]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id NAA15303 for ; Tue, 31 Oct 2000 13:41:35 +0100 (MET) Received: by ztxmail04.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 353C11803; Tue, 31 Oct 2000 06:39:48 -0600 (CST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by ztxmail04.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 6F55E1923; Tue, 31 Oct 2000 06:39:46 -0600 (CST) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA26699; Tue, 31 Oct 2000 04:39:45 -0800 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id EAA02145; Tue, 31 Oct 2000 04:39:15 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id EAA15328; Tue, 31 Oct 2000 04:39:15 -0800 (PST) Received: from ztxmail02.nz-cce.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA14185; Tue, 31 Oct 2000 04:39:14 -0800 Received: by ztxmail02.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id A9C912906; Tue, 31 Oct 2000 06:39:14 -0600 (CST) Received: from ns0.utdallas.edu (ns0.utdallas.edu [129.110.10.1]) by ztxmail02.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 50C3A2A30 for ; Tue, 31 Oct 2000 06:39:14 -0600 (CST) Received: from apache.utdallas.edu (apache.utdallas.edu [129.110.16.9]) by ns0.utdallas.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id A786D1A01DF; Tue, 31 Oct 2000 06:39:04 -0600 (CST) Received: from localhost (vasantr@localhost) by apache.utdallas.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id GAA17765; Tue, 31 Oct 2000 06:39:04 -0600 (CST) X-Authentication-Warning: apache.utdallas.edu: vasantr owned process doing -bs Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2000 06:39:04 -0600 (CST) From: Vasant Ramasubramanian To: "J.K.D. Ruwan Jayanetti" Cc: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com, linux-arm-announce@lists.arm.linux.org.uk Subject: Re: Gold Plated StrongARM! In-Reply-To: Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk On Tue, 31 Oct 2000, J.K.D. Ruwan Jayanetti wrote: > Hi All, > > does not start, some time it starts but with an error. Then I have to use > contact cleaner and clean the holder and the CPU pins. It seems to be CPU > pins get corroded. > > Does anybody experienced this and had a solution? Yes, I have a Brutus and have seen others[Brutea] exhibit these kinds of problems. I was told that one could open the CPU socket and lightly push on the CPU to break oxidization. Oxidation is my guess part of the problem, but not all of fit. I also found that taking a small piece of paper and folding it a few times (but not too many) and placing it in between the top of the CPU socket and the part that's on a spring puts a bit of additional force onto the CPU when the top is latched -- this helps to keep the CPU's pins firmly planted on the socket(ensuring a nice solid connection). > > I'm planning to electroplate gold on the pins of StrongARM CPU by placing > the CPU on a square made of razor blades to connect all the pins together. > Any comments? > If you do this, I want to see pictures! I think the bit of paper will help, just make sure your Brutus doesn't experience any shock or vibration if possible. Also don't mess with switches S17 & S18, I've seen odd behavior after having done this. Thanks, Vasant. From kramer@pa.dec.com Tue Oct 31 23:01:22 2000 Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (root@mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id XAA22962 for ; Tue, 31 Oct 2000 23:01:22 +0100 Received: from zmamail05.zma.compaq.com (zmamail05.zma.compaq.com [161.114.64.105]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id XAA17591 for ; Tue, 31 Oct 2000 23:01:20 +0100 (MET) Received: by zmamail05.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id BF4C32E37; Tue, 31 Oct 2000 16:59:33 -0500 (EST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by zmamail05.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 355B62FA6; Tue, 31 Oct 2000 16:59:31 -0500 (EST) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA06174; Tue, 31 Oct 2000 13:59:15 -0800 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id NAA32357; Tue, 31 Oct 2000 13:54:49 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id NAA20651; Tue, 31 Oct 2000 13:54:48 -0800 (PST) Received: from ztxmail01.nz-cce.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA18306; Tue, 31 Oct 2000 13:54:46 -0800 Received: by ztxmail01.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id C44E63E89; Tue, 31 Oct 2000 15:54:45 -0600 (CST) Received: from ragnarok.msa.cmst.csiro.au (ragnarok.preston.cmst.csiro.au [138.194.112.1]) by ztxmail01.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 5CB093FAF for ; Tue, 31 Oct 2000 15:54:44 -0600 (CST) Received: (qmail 11396 invoked by alias); 31 Oct 2000 21:54:41 -0000 Message-Id: <20001031215441.11395.qmail@msa.cmst.csiro.au> Received: (qmail 11375 invoked from network); 31 Oct 2000 21:54:40 -0000 Received: from gefjon.msa.cmst.csiro.au (HELO msa.cmst.csiro.au) (138.194.112.53) by ragnarok.preston.cmst.csiro.au with SMTP; 31 Oct 2000 21:54:40 -0000 X-Mailer: exmh version 2.0.2 2/24/98 (patchlevel 15 12-Feb-99) To: "J.K.D. Ruwan Jayanetti" Cc: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com, linux-arm-announce@lists.arm.linux.org.uk, Patrick.Kearney@cmst.csiro.au Subject: Re: Gold Plated StrongARM! In-Reply-To: Your message of "Tue, 31 Oct 2000 18:28:20 +0600." Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Wed, 01 Nov 2000 08:54:40 +1100 From: Patrick Kearney Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk Ruwan, I have had similar problems with QFP sockets on a variety of boards. I have found that Wahl hair clipper oil prevents the pin corrosion. Clean the pins by rubbing the chip over clean white paper on a flat surface. Do the same with a little oil spread on the paper. The remedy came from some electric model train enthusiasts who use this oil to improve contact performance. I have found it to work much better than commercial contact protection products. Patrick From kramer@pa.dec.com Tue Oct 31 23:43:58 2000 Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (root@mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id XAA23083 for ; Tue, 31 Oct 2000 23:43:58 +0100 Received: from zmamail03.zma.compaq.com (zmamail03.zma.compaq.com [161.114.64.103]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id XAA19757 for ; Tue, 31 Oct 2000 23:43:56 +0100 (MET) Received: by zmamail03.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id D1AF54D8C; Tue, 31 Oct 2000 17:42:09 -0500 (EST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by zmamail03.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 936553F53; Tue, 31 Oct 2000 17:42:07 -0500 (EST) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA16191; Tue, 31 Oct 2000 14:21:30 -0800 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id OAA22695; Tue, 31 Oct 2000 14:18:18 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id OAA18020; Tue, 31 Oct 2000 14:18:18 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail1.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA04217; Tue, 31 Oct 2000 14:18:17 -0800 Received: from ztxmail01.ztx.compaq.com (ztxmail01.ztx.compaq.com [161.114.1.205]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with ESMTP id OAA12661 for ; Tue, 31 Oct 2000 14:18:16 -0800 (PST) Received: by ztxmail01.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 59F2D2EC9; Tue, 31 Oct 2000 16:17:01 -0600 (CST) Received: from note.orchestra.cse.unsw.EDU.AU (note.orchestra.cse.unsw.EDU.AU [129.94.242.29]) by ztxmail01.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 385F53FBF for ; Tue, 31 Oct 2000 16:17:00 -0600 (CST) Received: From paulaner With LocalMail ; Wed, 1 Nov 2000 09:15:33 +1100 From: "Adam 'WeirdArms' Wiggins" To: "J.K.D. Ruwan Jayanetti" Date: Wed, 1 Nov 2000 09:15:33 +1100 (EST) X-Sender: awiggins@paulaner.disy.cse.unsw.EDU.AU Cc: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com, linux-arm-announce@lists.arm.linux.org.uk Subject: Re: Gold Plated StrongARM! In-Reply-To: Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk On Tue, 31 Oct 2000, J.K.D. Ruwan Jayanetti wrote: > Hi All, > > I'm having lot of trouble with StrongARM CPU holder in the Brutus Board. > Some times it get loose connect and giving lot of problems. Some times it > does not start, some time it starts but with an error. Then I have to use > contact cleaner and clean the holder and the CPU pins. It seems to be CPU > pins get corroded. > > Does anybody experienced this and had a solution? We are having problems with our brutus similar to what you discribe. It sometimes doesn't reset properly and its getting worse (it seems to not be resetting at all properly now. > > I'm planning to electroplate gold on the pins of StrongARM CPU by placing > the CPU on a square made of razor blades to connect all the pins together. > Any comments? Please let us know if this helps the situation or not. Cheers Adam From kramer@pa.dec.com Wed Nov 1 02:34:33 2000 Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (root@mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id CAA23598 for ; Wed, 1 Nov 2000 02:34:32 +0100 Received: from zmamail03.zma.compaq.com (zmamail03.zma.compaq.com [161.114.64.103]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id CAA26670 for ; Wed, 1 Nov 2000 02:34:31 +0100 (MET) Received: by zmamail03.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 6198F3C31; Tue, 31 Oct 2000 20:32:44 -0500 (EST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by zmamail03.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 334CC3CD1; Tue, 31 Oct 2000 20:32:42 -0500 (EST) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA05236; Tue, 31 Oct 2000 17:32:40 -0800 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id RAA04775; Tue, 31 Oct 2000 17:28:22 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id RAA11732; Tue, 31 Oct 2000 17:28:21 -0800 (PST) Received: from ztxmail01.nz-cce.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA23229; Tue, 31 Oct 2000 17:28:21 -0800 Received: by ztxmail01.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 4C6272192; Tue, 31 Oct 2000 19:28:21 -0600 (CST) Received: from fire.he.net (fire.he.net [216.218.144.2]) by ztxmail01.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B1CE02003 for ; Tue, 31 Oct 2000 19:28:20 -0600 (CST) Received: from cementship.extenex.net (64-51-136-194.client.dsl.net [64.51.136.194]) by fire.he.net (8.8.6/8.8.2) with ESMTP id RAA08213; Tue, 31 Oct 2000 17:28:15 -0800 Received: from blowhole.extenex.net (blowhole.extenex.net [192.168.100.100]) by cementship.extenex.net (8.9.3/8.8.7) with ESMTP id RAA10881; Tue, 31 Oct 2000 17:27:46 -0800 Received: from wardw by blowhole.extenex.net with local (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 13qmgs-0000QI-00; Tue, 31 Oct 2000 17:27:46 -0800 Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2000 17:27:46 -0800 From: Ward Willats To: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Subject: Character intf for USB function driver Message-Id: <20001031172746.A1162@extenex.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii User-Agent: Mutt/1.0.1i Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk Howdy. The Itsy USB function driver with the network stuff is way cool, but we needed a simple byte-pipe too -- and ideally a way to flip back and forth so we could do both. So, I've coded a character driver interface for the USB function stuff and I've got it passing data back and forth. It hasn't had a lot of testing, and I'm working against test8-rmk5-np1 so don't have the latest/greatest. Still, if you'd find this useful you can snag a copy at: ftp://ftp.extenex.com/pub/extenex/patches/diff-2.4.0-test8-rmk5-np1-ex1.gz Some background comments from the sources follow. -- Ward =========================== /* * usb-char.c * * Miscellaneous character device interface for SA1100 USB function * driver. * * Background: * The SA1100 function driver ported from the Compaq Itsy project * has an interface, usb-eth.c, to feed network packets over the * usb wire and into the Linux TCP/IP stack. * * This file replaces that one with a simple character device * interface that allows unstructured "byte pipe" style reads and * writes over the USB bulk endpoints by userspace programs. * * A new define, CONFIG_SA1100_USB_NETLINK, has been created that, * when set, (the default) causes the original Compaq USB * ethernet interface to be used. When not set, this more pedestrian * character interface is linked in instead. * * The low-level driver files, usb_send.c, usb_receive.c and usb_ctl.c * were also modified in #ifdef blocks to remove dependencies on the * network stack and socket packet transfer buffers. */ From kramer@pa.dec.com Wed Nov 1 04:18:12 2000 Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (root@mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id EAA23766 for ; Wed, 1 Nov 2000 04:18:12 +0100 Received: from zmamail05.zma.compaq.com (zmamail05.zma.compaq.com [161.114.64.105]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id EAA29498 for ; Wed, 1 Nov 2000 04:18:10 +0100 (MET) Received: by zmamail05.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 2EAE3168F; Tue, 31 Oct 2000 22:16:24 -0500 (EST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by zmamail05.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 0C8E71700; Tue, 31 Oct 2000 22:16:22 -0500 (EST) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA31698; Tue, 31 Oct 2000 19:16:20 -0800 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id TAA20284; Tue, 31 Oct 2000 19:15:00 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id TAA08007; Tue, 31 Oct 2000 19:15:00 -0800 (PST) Received: from zmamail02.nz-tay.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA28671; Tue, 31 Oct 2000 19:14:59 -0800 Received: by zmamail02.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 84BAB453B; Tue, 31 Oct 2000 22:14:59 -0500 (EST) Received: from ns0.utdallas.edu (ns0.utdallas.edu [129.110.10.1]) by zmamail02.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A2E448E6 for ; Tue, 31 Oct 2000 22:14:59 -0500 (EST) Received: from apache.utdallas.edu (apache.utdallas.edu [129.110.16.9]) by ns0.utdallas.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E7991A0256; Tue, 31 Oct 2000 21:14:58 -0600 (CST) Received: from localhost (vasantr@localhost) by apache.utdallas.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id VAA08264; Tue, 31 Oct 2000 21:14:58 -0600 (CST) X-Authentication-Warning: apache.utdallas.edu: vasantr owned process doing -bs Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2000 21:14:57 -0600 (CST) From: Vasant Ramasubramanian To: "Adam 'WeirdArms' Wiggins" Cc: "J.K.D. Ruwan Jayanetti" , sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com, linux-arm@lists.arm.linux.org.uk Subject: Re: Gold Plated StrongARM! In-Reply-To: Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk On Wed, 1 Nov 2000, Adam 'WeirdArms' Wiggins wrote: > > We are having problems with our brutus similar to what you > discribe. It sometimes doesn't reset properly and its getting worse (it > seems to not be resetting at all properly now. What version of Angel are you using? 1.2 seemed to work better than 1.05, it at least doesn't break on serial downloads(hasn't yet). I found that after power on, if the green LEDs don't blink in the correct sequence, the board more than likely will not work even if it is reset and released. However on one particular board, the green LEDs would not flash in the right sequence, but applying reset for a few seconds and pulling it out allowed it to function. This had to be done every time the board was used (powered on). You might want to leave reset on before you turn the board on, then pull it out of reset manually when the board is up. I found that messing with S17 and S18 usually leads to "bad things" (weird POR conditions) so I don't suggest you use them unless you need to. I did find however after using my paper trick (basically putting a little more pressure on the CPU) it would POR more reliably. You might also try power cycling the power supply... If you are to replace your StrongARM part, try getting a 190MHz version. You can't drop it in however, a resistor will have to modified to allow it to run at a lower voltage, but these parts seem a little more reliable. Sorry if I'm rambling, I've met a few Brutea and they all have done weird things. Thanks, Vasant. From kramer@pa.dec.com Fri Nov 3 23:11:06 2000 Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (root@mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id XAA00291 for ; Fri, 3 Nov 2000 23:11:06 +0100 Received: from zmamail05.zma.compaq.com (zmamail05.zma.compaq.com [161.114.64.105]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id XAA08645 for ; Fri, 3 Nov 2000 23:11:05 +0100 (MET) Received: by zmamail05.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id EB9C12FA1; Fri, 3 Nov 2000 17:09:18 -0500 (EST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by zmamail05.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 535F12C8F; Fri, 3 Nov 2000 17:09:15 -0500 (EST) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA28880; Fri, 3 Nov 2000 14:09:03 -0800 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id OAA23197; Fri, 3 Nov 2000 14:02:23 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id OAA19597; Fri, 3 Nov 2000 14:02:23 -0800 (PST) Received: from zmamail01.nz-tay.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA16774; Fri, 3 Nov 2000 14:02:10 -0800 Received: by zmamail01.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 2053C9217; Fri, 3 Nov 2000 17:02:10 -0500 (EST) Received: from cougar.intrinsyc.com (unknown [64.16.10.150]) by zmamail01.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 976D190A0 for ; Fri, 3 Nov 2000 17:02:09 -0500 (EST) Received: from nitt (192.168.1.3 [192.168.1.3]) by cougar.intrinsyc.com with SMTP (Microsoft Exchange Internet Mail Service Version 5.5.2650.21) id WG1SP3DH; Fri, 3 Nov 2000 14:02:08 -0800 From: Chester Carey Organization: Intrinsyc To: Subject: Network Driver Support Date: Fri, 3 Nov 2000 13:59:56 -0800 X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.0.29] Content-Type: text/plain References: <007401c0457d$8c076fa0$4e01a8c0@linux.emsoftltd.com> In-Reply-To: <007401c0457d$8c076fa0$4e01a8c0@linux.emsoftltd.com> Cc: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <00110314053708.00999@nitt> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk Hello, A while back someone mentioned doing some work on the cs89x0 driver for the Arm. What is the current status of this driver? Is it complete? I am running an older kernel, test6, on my Sa1110 device. Would a newer one give me full cs89x0 support? Chester Carey Linux Support Intinsyc Software From kramer@pa.dec.com Fri Nov 3 23:37:23 2000 Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (root@mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id XAA00330 for ; Fri, 3 Nov 2000 23:37:23 +0100 Received: from zmamail05.zma.compaq.com (zmamail05.zma.compaq.com [161.114.64.105]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id XAA09709 for ; Fri, 3 Nov 2000 23:37:21 +0100 (MET) Received: by zmamail05.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 28B722CD7; Fri, 3 Nov 2000 17:35:34 -0500 (EST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by zmamail05.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id EB7EC5A0D; Fri, 3 Nov 2000 17:35:24 -0500 (EST) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA21452; Fri, 3 Nov 2000 14:35:22 -0800 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id OAA28367; Fri, 3 Nov 2000 14:31:30 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id OAA06498; Fri, 3 Nov 2000 14:31:30 -0800 (PST) Received: from ztxmail01.nz-cce.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA18130; Fri, 3 Nov 2000 14:31:29 -0800 Received: by ztxmail01.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 749221154; Fri, 3 Nov 2000 16:31:29 -0600 (CST) Received: from tazenda.demon.co.uk (tazenda.demon.co.uk [158.152.220.239]) by ztxmail01.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D3321167 for ; Fri, 3 Nov 2000 16:31:18 -0600 (CST) Received: from kings-cross.london.uk.eu.org [::ffff:192.168.2.83] by tazenda.demon.co.uk with esmtp (Exim 3.11 #1 (Debian)) id 13rpXR-0002WO-00; Fri, 03 Nov 2000 22:42:21 +0000 Received: from [::ffff:127.0.0.1] (helo=tazenda.demon.co.uk) by kings-cross.london.uk.eu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 13rp5T-0001Gv-00; Fri, 03 Nov 2000 22:13:27 +0000 X-Mailer: exmh version 2.1.1 10/15/1999 (debian) To: Chester Carey Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.arm.linux.org.uk, sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Subject: Re: Network Driver Support In-Reply-To: Message from Chester Carey of "Fri, 03 Nov 2000 13:59:56 PST." <00110314053708.00999@nitt> References: <007401c0457d$8c076fa0$4e01a8c0@linux.emsoftltd.com> <00110314053708.00999@nitt> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Fri, 03 Nov 2000 22:13:27 +0000 From: Philip Blundell Message-Id: Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk >A while back someone mentioned doing some work on the cs89x0 driver for the >Arm. What is the current status of this driver? Is it complete? It runs on sharks and Cirrus evaluation boards. Don't know about SA1100. p. From kramer@pa.dec.com Fri Nov 3 23:48:45 2000 Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (root@mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id XAA00375 for ; Fri, 3 Nov 2000 23:48:45 +0100 Received: from ztxmail04.ztx.compaq.com (ztxmail04.ztx.compaq.com [161.114.1.208]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id XAA10099 for ; Fri, 3 Nov 2000 23:48:43 +0100 (MET) Received: by ztxmail04.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 7FDD71B8B; Fri, 3 Nov 2000 16:46:57 -0600 (CST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by ztxmail04.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 9EE12186B; Fri, 3 Nov 2000 16:46:55 -0600 (CST) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA18141; Fri, 3 Nov 2000 14:46:54 -0800 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id OAA03812; Fri, 3 Nov 2000 14:45:53 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id OAA10582; Fri, 3 Nov 2000 14:45:53 -0800 (PST) Received: from zmamail02.nz-tay.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA21895; Fri, 3 Nov 2000 14:45:41 -0800 Received: by zmamail02.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 709083EA6; Fri, 3 Nov 2000 17:44:25 -0500 (EST) Received: from weak.org (weak.org [216.103.110.222]) by zmamail02.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C4A4D3D40 for ; Fri, 3 Nov 2000 17:44:24 -0500 (EST) Received: (from jammer@localhost) by weak.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) id OAA11384; Fri, 3 Nov 2000 14:44:12 -0800 (PST) Date: Fri, 3 Nov 2000 14:44:11 -0800 From: Jon McClintock To: Chester Carey Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.arm.linux.org.uk, sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Subject: Re: Network Driver Support Message-Id: <20001103144411.C8645@weak.org> References: <007401c0457d$8c076fa0$4e01a8c0@linux.emsoftltd.com> <00110314053708.00999@nitt> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.2i In-Reply-To: <00110314053708.00999@nitt>; from ccarey@intrinsyc.com on Fri, Nov 03, 2000 at 01:59:56PM -0800 Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk On Fri, Nov 03, 2000 at 01:59:56PM -0800, Chester Carey wrote: > A while back someone mentioned doing some work on the cs89x0 driver for the > Arm. What is the current status of this driver? Is it complete? I am running an > older kernel, test6, on my Sa1110 device. Would a newer one give me full cs89x0 > support? The Cirrus Logic EDB-7211 eval board has a cs8900a ethernet chip on it. To get it to work, I took the existing Linux cs89x0 driver and simply changed the I/O ports. I also had to hardwire it to use twisted pair media, but all in all it was fairly simple to get it to work. You can download the entire patch at http://www.bluemug.com/~miket/arm/linux-ep7211/v2.4/, or if you'd like, I can email you just the modifications to the cs89x0 driver. -Jon From kramer@pa.dec.com Sat Nov 4 00:50:20 2000 Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (root@mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id AAA00512 for ; Sat, 4 Nov 2000 00:50:20 +0100 Received: from zmamail03.zma.compaq.com (zmamail03.zma.compaq.com [161.114.64.103]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id AAA12721 for ; Sat, 4 Nov 2000 00:50:18 +0100 (MET) Received: by zmamail03.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 701B63D03; Fri, 3 Nov 2000 18:48:32 -0500 (EST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by zmamail03.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 02CDB5E6C; Fri, 3 Nov 2000 18:48:27 -0500 (EST) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA04224; Fri, 3 Nov 2000 15:48:26 -0800 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id PAA16104; Fri, 3 Nov 2000 15:47:00 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id PAA02151; Fri, 3 Nov 2000 15:47:00 -0800 (PST) Received: from ztxmail01.nz-cce.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA11202; Fri, 3 Nov 2000 15:46:59 -0800 Received: by ztxmail01.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 457D512DF; Fri, 3 Nov 2000 17:46:59 -0600 (CST) Received: from cougar.intrinsyc.com (unknown [64.16.10.150]) by ztxmail01.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B2B0E11CA for ; Fri, 3 Nov 2000 17:46:58 -0600 (CST) Received: from nitt (192.168.1.3 [192.168.1.3]) by cougar.intrinsyc.com with SMTP (Microsoft Exchange Internet Mail Service Version 5.5.2650.21) id WG1SP3LH; Fri, 3 Nov 2000 15:46:58 -0800 From: Chester Carey Organization: Intrinsyc To: Jon McClintock Subject: Re: Network Driver Support Date: Fri, 3 Nov 2000 15:49:03 -0800 X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.0.29] Content-Type: text/plain Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.arm.linux.org.uk, sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com References: <007401c0457d$8c076fa0$4e01a8c0@linux.emsoftltd.com> <00110314053708.00999@nitt> <20001103144411.C8645@weak.org> In-Reply-To: <20001103144411.C8645@weak.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <00110315502409.00999@nitt> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk Has anyone tested multicasting with this driver? It does not seem to want to work for me. The platfrom I am using is the Cerf. Chester Carey Intrinsyc Software > > The Cirrus Logic EDB-7211 eval board has a cs8900a ethernet chip on it. To > get it to work, I took the existing Linux cs89x0 driver and simply changed > the I/O ports. I also had to hardwire it to use twisted pair media, but all > in all it was fairly simple to get it to work. > > You can download the entire patch at > http://www.bluemug.com/~miket/arm/linux-ep7211/v2.4/, or if you'd like, > I can email you just the modifications to the cs89x0 driver. > > -Jon > > _______________________________________________ > http://lists.arm.linux.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel From kramer@pa.dec.com Sat Nov 4 00:53:17 2000 Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (root@mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id AAA00529 for ; Sat, 4 Nov 2000 00:53:16 +0100 Received: from zmamail05.zma.compaq.com (zmamail05.zma.compaq.com [161.114.64.105]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id AAA12834 for ; Sat, 4 Nov 2000 00:53:14 +0100 (MET) Received: by zmamail05.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 38F27587E; Fri, 3 Nov 2000 18:51:28 -0500 (EST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by zmamail05.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 043505B23; Fri, 3 Nov 2000 18:51:24 -0500 (EST) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA25855; Fri, 3 Nov 2000 15:51:23 -0800 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id PAA08161; Fri, 3 Nov 2000 15:50:52 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id PAA20996; Fri, 3 Nov 2000 15:50:51 -0800 (PST) Received: from zmamail02.nz-tay.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA18865; Fri, 3 Nov 2000 15:50:31 -0800 Received: by zmamail02.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 502303EF9; Fri, 3 Nov 2000 18:50:31 -0500 (EST) Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by zmamail02.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A939D3F9C for ; Fri, 3 Nov 2000 18:50:30 -0500 (EST) Received: from arthur.ubicom.tudelft.nl (erik.et.tudelft.nl [130.161.48.56]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id AAA12726; Sat, 4 Nov 2000 00:50:28 +0100 (MET) Received: (from erik@localhost) by arthur.ubicom.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3/SuSE Linux 8.9.3-0.1) id AAA06021; Sat, 4 Nov 2000 00:50:06 +0100 Date: Sat, 4 Nov 2000 00:50:06 +0100 From: Erik Mouw To: Philip Blundell Cc: Chester Carey , linux-arm-kernel@lists.arm.linux.org.uk, sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Subject: Re: Network Driver Support Message-Id: <20001104005004.A5993@arthur.ubicom.tudelft.nl> References: <007401c0457d$8c076fa0$4e01a8c0@linux.emsoftltd.com> <00110314053708.00999@nitt> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0.1i In-Reply-To: ; from philb@gnu.org on Fri, Nov 03, 2000 at 10:13:27PM +0000 Organization: Eric Conspiracy Secret Labs X-Eric-Conspiracy: There is no conspiracy! X-Loop: erik@arthur.ubicom.tudelft.nl Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk On Fri, Nov 03, 2000 at 10:13:27PM +0000, Philip Blundell wrote: > >A while back someone mentioned doing some work on the cs89x0 driver for the > >Arm. What is the current status of this driver? Is it complete? > > It runs on sharks and Cirrus evaluation boards. Don't know about SA1100. Well, I'm having big problems with it on the LART (SA1100). I can basically *send* packets, but I'm not able to *receive* them. I do get interrupts on send packets, but I don't see any interrupt on received packets (even not with a scope), although the link LED is on. We're still not sure if this is a hardware or a software error, so therefore we're making a couple of test PCBs: - one with LEDs on everything that can drive a LED, and with the RJ45 connector on that same PCB (instead of a second PCB connected with a short flatcable) - one ISA test PCB so we can test the LART ethernet PCB in a genuine PC with the i386 driver Note that we don't have an EEPROM connected to the cs8900a, so it is still possible that we have a software problem because we don't initialise the chip properly. Erik -- J.A.K. (Erik) Mouw, Information and Communication Theory Group, Department of Electrical Engineering, Faculty of Information Technology and Systems, Delft University of Technology, PO BOX 5031, 2600 GA Delft, The Netherlands Phone: +31-15-2783635 Fax: +31-15-2781843 Email: J.A.K.Mouw@its.tudelft.nl WWW: http://www-ict.its.tudelft.nl/~erik/ From kramer@pa.dec.com Sat Nov 4 16:27:39 2000 Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (root@mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id QAA01656 for ; Sat, 4 Nov 2000 16:27:38 +0100 Received: from ztxmail03.ztx.compaq.com (ztxmail03.ztx.compaq.com [161.114.1.207]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id QAA06121 for ; Sat, 4 Nov 2000 16:27:37 +0100 (MET) Received: by ztxmail03.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 81423124D; Sat, 4 Nov 2000 09:25:50 -0600 (CST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by ztxmail03.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id EE9241190; Sat, 4 Nov 2000 09:25:48 -0600 (CST) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA27816; Sat, 4 Nov 2000 07:25:47 -0800 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id HAA31508; Sat, 4 Nov 2000 07:20:48 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id HAA08614; Sat, 4 Nov 2000 07:20:47 -0800 (PST) Received: from zmamail02.nz-tay.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA15723; Sat, 4 Nov 2000 07:20:39 -0800 Received: by zmamail02.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id C2F4345AB; Sat, 4 Nov 2000 10:20:38 -0500 (EST) Received: from mailgate.keith-koep.com (mailgate.keith-koep.com [195.8.230.32]) by zmamail02.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD14845F3 for ; Sat, 4 Nov 2000 10:20:37 -0500 (EST) Received: from otto (otto [195.8.230.40]) by mailgate.keith-koep.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id QAA07908 for ; Sat, 4 Nov 2000 16:26:26 +0100 Message-Id: <200011041526.QAA07908@mailgate.keith-koep.com> Date: Sat, 4 Nov 2000 16:20:32 +0100 (MET) From: keith Reply-To: keith Subject: Re: Network Driver Support To: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Md5: 03gdcvFSbdQLhFMxNN/EeA== X-Mailer: dtmail 1.2.0 CDE Version 1.2 SunOS 5.6 sun4u sparc Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk I tested it one yaer ago on a sa1100 based webpad. It was very easy to get it working. We connected it in I/O Mode to the pcmcia signals which are very x86 like.... Volker Keith _________________________________________________________________ | | | KEITH & KOEP GMBH DEVELOPMENT OF EMBEDDED CONTROL SYSTEMS | | KOENIGSBERGER STR.2 PHONE +49 (0)202 2525 30 | | D-42277 WUPPERTAL FAX +49 (0)202 2525 333 | | GERMANY keith@keith-koep.com | |_________________________________________________________________| From kramer@pa.dec.com Mon Nov 6 03:28:06 2000 Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (root@mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id DAA04665 for ; Mon, 6 Nov 2000 03:28:06 +0100 Received: from zmamail04.zma.compaq.com (zmamail04.zma.compaq.com [161.114.64.104]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id DAA04167 for ; Mon, 6 Nov 2000 03:28:04 +0100 (MET) Received: by zmamail04.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 35C48305; Sun, 5 Nov 2000 21:26:18 -0500 (EST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by zmamail04.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id B4C47288; Sun, 5 Nov 2000 21:26:13 -0500 (EST) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA02566; Sun, 5 Nov 2000 18:24:37 -0800 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id SAA00932; Sun, 5 Nov 2000 18:16:08 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id SAA06365; Sun, 5 Nov 2000 18:16:07 -0800 (PST) From: Received: from ztxmail01.nz-cce.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA09897; Sun, 5 Nov 2000 18:16:06 -0800 Received: by ztxmail01.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 1E11916C2; Sun, 5 Nov 2000 20:16:06 -0600 (CST) Received: from mail2.medimpex.hu (unknown [194.143.225.226]) by ztxmail01.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B1E232B01; Sun, 5 Nov 2000 20:15:57 -0600 (CST) Received: from pc253.medimpex.hu (from) [192.168.1.253] by mail2.medimpex.hu with smtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 13sc3b-0006a4-00; Mon, 06 Nov 2000 03:30:49 +0100 To: Subject: Fast Cash.....Quick Approvals for Dept Consolidation 22637 Date: Sun, 05 Nov 2000 19:26:22 -0400 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Priority: 3 X-Msmail-Priority: Normal Reply-To: marketing29@uole.com Message-Id: Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk The Lender

The Lender's Network Mortgage Specialists

For U.S.A. Homeowners Only Save Now!

We Shop The Best Loan For You!

The Lenders Network is a 100% free s= ervice which lets you shop for a mortgage conveniently and securely from the comfort of = your home. Using our vast network of lenders across the U.S., we will search our database o= f loan programs for the best loans that fit your needs.  Even if you're currently wor= king with another lender or have been turned down before, we can still help.

Our loan programs = can get you the cash you need for:

  • Debt Consolidation
  • 2nd Mortgage
  • Refinance
  • Credit Repair
  • Home Improvement
  • New Car
  • Dream Vacation
  • College Tuition ..and much, much more.

F= unding borrowers with less than perfect credit is our specialty!

Incredibly low monthly payments

We can get you the loa= n you need.
Regardless of whether you have good or bad credit, we can help you.

Ready to get starte= d?
Simply fill out the form below, and we'll begin shopping for your loan=   It's that easy!

Free Mortgage Quote
Contact Information (* required info)

   
Name: *
Address: *
City: *
State(US Only): *
Zip/Postal Code: *
Home Phone:  *
Work Phone: *
Email Address:
Best Time to Call:
Do You Own Your Home? Mobile Homes DO NOT Qualify=
Current Property Value: * See Below For Qualifications
1st Mortgage Owed: * 
2nd Mortgage Owed: *
Amount You Wish To Borrow: *
Interest Rate on Current Mortgage: *
Monthly Gross Household Income *
Monthly Debt (excluding current mortgage(s= )) *
Credit Rating: *
Loan Interested In: *

Email List Removal
Click Her= e

From kramer@pa.dec.com Mon Nov 6 21:35:19 2000 Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (root@mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id VAA07071 for ; Mon, 6 Nov 2000 21:35:19 +0100 Received: from zmamail03.zma.compaq.com (zmamail03.zma.compaq.com [161.114.64.103]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id VAA02044 for ; Mon, 6 Nov 2000 21:35:18 +0100 (MET) Received: by zmamail03.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 26F501F3D; Mon, 6 Nov 2000 15:33:31 -0500 (EST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by zmamail03.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 16CCF1DE8; Mon, 6 Nov 2000 15:33:28 -0500 (EST) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA05231; Mon, 6 Nov 2000 12:33:10 -0800 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id MAA15000; Mon, 6 Nov 2000 12:26:51 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id MAA14742; Mon, 6 Nov 2000 12:26:47 -0800 (PST) Received: from ztxmail01.nz-cce.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA11100; Mon, 6 Nov 2000 12:26:47 -0800 Received: by ztxmail01.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 6C637109D; Mon, 6 Nov 2000 14:26:46 -0600 (CST) Received: from cougar.intrinsyc.com (unknown [64.16.10.150]) by ztxmail01.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 005C3138C for ; Mon, 6 Nov 2000 14:26:45 -0600 (CST) Received: from nitt (192.168.1.3 [192.168.1.3]) by cougar.intrinsyc.com with SMTP (Microsoft Exchange Internet Mail Service Version 5.5.2650.21) id WMRTPYQ2; Mon, 6 Nov 2000 12:26:45 -0800 From: Chester Carey Organization: Intrinsyc To: Subject: Test9-rmk1-np3 Date: Mon, 6 Nov 2000 12:30:07 -0800 X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.0.29] Content-Type: text/plain Cc: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com References: <007401c0457d$8c076fa0$4e01a8c0@linux.emsoftltd.com> <00110314053708.00999@nitt> In-Reply-To: <00110314053708.00999@nitt> Mime-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <0011061228250A.00999@nitt> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk I cannot seem to get this kernel to compile with a standard: make cerf_config make menuconfig (no options changed) make dep make zImage Produces make[2]: Entering directory `/home/ccarey/kernel9/linux/arch/arm/mach-sa1100' arm-linux-gcc -D__KERNEL__ -I/home/ccarey/kernel9/linux/include -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes -O2 -pipe -msoft-float -mshort-load-bytes -march=armv4 -mtune=strongarm110 -fno-strict-aliasing -DEXPORT_SYMTAB -c hw.c hw.c: In function `hw_sa1100_init': hw.c:179: `BCR' undeclared (first use in this function) hw.c:179: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once hw.c:179: for each function it appears in.) hw.c:179: `BCR_value' undeclared (first use in this function) hw.c:179: `BCR_DB1111' undeclared (first use in this function) make[2]: *** [hw.o] Error 1 make[1]: *** [first_rule] Error 2 make: *** [_dir_arch/arm/mach-sa1100] Error 2 make[2]: Leaving directory `/home/ccarey/kernel9/linux/arch/arm/mach-sa1100' make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/ccarey/kernel9/linux/arch/arm/mach-sa1100' How do I go about fixing this? Chester Carey Intrinsyc Software From kramer@pa.dec.com Mon Nov 6 21:35:21 2000 Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (root@mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id VAA07077 for ; Mon, 6 Nov 2000 21:35:21 +0100 Received: from zmamail04.zma.compaq.com (zmamail04.zma.compaq.com [161.114.64.104]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id VAA02048 for ; Mon, 6 Nov 2000 21:35:19 +0100 (MET) Received: by zmamail04.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 0E0543B5; Mon, 6 Nov 2000 15:33:33 -0500 (EST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by zmamail04.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 02304142; Mon, 6 Nov 2000 15:33:27 -0500 (EST) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA27566; Mon, 6 Nov 2000 12:33:11 -0800 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id MAA09588; Mon, 6 Nov 2000 12:26:48 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id MAA19742; Mon, 6 Nov 2000 12:26:47 -0800 (PST) Received: from ztxmail01.nz-cce.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA22711; Mon, 6 Nov 2000 12:26:47 -0800 Received: by ztxmail01.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 5A02F1357; Mon, 6 Nov 2000 14:26:46 -0600 (CST) Received: from cougar.intrinsyc.com (unknown [64.16.10.150]) by ztxmail01.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB88E109D for ; Mon, 6 Nov 2000 14:26:45 -0600 (CST) Received: from nitt (192.168.1.3 [192.168.1.3]) by cougar.intrinsyc.com with SMTP (Microsoft Exchange Internet Mail Service Version 5.5.2650.21) id WMRTPYQG; Mon, 6 Nov 2000 12:26:45 -0800 From: Chester Carey Organization: Intrinsyc To: Subject: Test9-rmk1-np3 Date: Mon, 6 Nov 2000 11:53:48 -0800 X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.0.29] Content-Type: text/plain Cc: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com References: <007401c0457d$8c076fa0$4e01a8c0@linux.emsoftltd.com> <00110314053708.00999@nitt> In-Reply-To: <00110314053708.00999@nitt> Mime-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <0011061228250A.00999@nitt> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk I cannot seem to get this kernel to compile with a standard: make cerf_config make menuconfig (no options changed) make dep make zImage Produces make[2]: Entering directory `/home/ccarey/kernel9/linux/arch/arm/mach-sa1100' arm-linux-gcc -D__KERNEL__ -I/home/ccarey/kernel9/linux/include -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes -O2 -pipe -msoft-float -mshort-load-bytes -march=armv4 -mtune=strongarm110 -fno-strict-aliasing -DEXPORT_SYMTAB -c hw.c hw.c: In function `hw_sa1100_init': hw.c:179: `BCR' undeclared (first use in this function) hw.c:179: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once hw.c:179: for each function it appears in.) hw.c:179: `BCR_value' undeclared (first use in this function) hw.c:179: `BCR_DB1111' undeclared (first use in this function) make[2]: *** [hw.o] Error 1 make[1]: *** [first_rule] Error 2 make: *** [_dir_arch/arm/mach-sa1100] Error 2 make[2]: Leaving directory `/home/ccarey/kernel9/linux/arch/arm/mach-sa1100' make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/ccarey/kernel9/linux/arch/arm/mach-sa1100' How do I go about fixing this? Chester Carey Intrinsyc Software From kramer@pa.dec.com Mon Nov 6 21:35:24 2000 Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (root@mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id VAA07083 for ; Mon, 6 Nov 2000 21:35:24 +0100 Received: from ztxmail03.ztx.compaq.com (ztxmail03.ztx.compaq.com [161.114.1.207]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id VAA02052 for ; Mon, 6 Nov 2000 21:35:22 +0100 (MET) Received: by ztxmail03.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 0059D1372; Mon, 6 Nov 2000 14:33:34 -0600 (CST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by ztxmail03.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id BFFDF108B; Mon, 6 Nov 2000 14:33:32 -0600 (CST) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA26117; Mon, 6 Nov 2000 12:33:27 -0800 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id MAA15474; Mon, 6 Nov 2000 12:32:49 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id MAA23019; Mon, 6 Nov 2000 12:32:49 -0800 (PST) Received: from zmamail01.nz-tay.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA20202; Mon, 6 Nov 2000 12:32:46 -0800 Received: by zmamail01.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 5F06AA9F; Mon, 6 Nov 2000 15:32:40 -0500 (EST) Received: from xanadu.gn.com (modemcable248.137-200-24.mtl.mc.videotron.ca [24.200.137.248]) by zmamail01.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C522A073 for ; Mon, 6 Nov 2000 15:32:40 -0500 (EST) Received: from localhost (nico@localhost) by xanadu.gn.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id UAA03040; Mon, 6 Nov 2000 20:44:04 -0500 X-Authentication-Warning: xanadu.gn.com: nico owned process doing -bs Date: Mon, 6 Nov 2000 20:44:04 -0500 (EST) From: Nicolas Pitre X-Sender: nico@xanadu.gn.com To: Chester Carey Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.arm.linux.org.uk, sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Subject: Re: Test9-rmk1-np3 In-Reply-To: <0011061228250A.00999@nitt> Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk On Mon, 6 Nov 2000, Chester Carey wrote: > I cannot seem to get this kernel to compile with a standard: > > make cerf_config > make menuconfig (no options changed) > make dep > make zImage > > Produces > > make[2]: Entering directory `/home/ccarey/kernel9/linux/arch/arm/mach-sa1100' > arm-linux-gcc -D__KERNEL__ -I/home/ccarey/kernel9/linux/include -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes -O2 -pipe -msoft-float -mshort-load-bytes -march=armv4 -mtune=strongarm110 -fno-strict-aliasing -DEXPORT_SYMTAB -c hw.c > hw.c: In function `hw_sa1100_init': > hw.c:179: `BCR' undeclared (first use in this function) > hw.c:179: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once > hw.c:179: for each function it appears in.) > hw.c:179: `BCR_value' undeclared (first use in this function) > hw.c:179: `BCR_DB1111' undeclared (first use in this function) > make[2]: *** [hw.o] Error 1 > make[1]: *** [first_rule] Error 2 > make: *** [_dir_arch/arm/mach-sa1100] Error 2 > make[2]: Leaving directory `/home/ccarey/kernel9/linux/arch/arm/mach-sa1100' > make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/ccarey/kernel9/linux/arch/arm/mach-sa1100' > > How do I go about fixing this? For instance, just comment out line 179 of arch/arm/mach-sa1100/hw.c. It shouldn't matter as long as you don't compile for Assabet. The proper fix will be part of the next patch. Nicolas From kramer@pa.dec.com Mon Nov 6 22:17:20 2000 Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (root@mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id WAA07170 for ; Mon, 6 Nov 2000 22:17:20 +0100 Received: from ztxmail03.ztx.compaq.com (ztxmail03.ztx.compaq.com [161.114.1.207]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id WAA03983 for ; Mon, 6 Nov 2000 22:17:18 +0100 (MET) Received: by ztxmail03.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 61FAC1378; Mon, 6 Nov 2000 15:15:31 -0600 (CST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by ztxmail03.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 40A471222; Mon, 6 Nov 2000 15:15:26 -0600 (CST) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA31378; Mon, 6 Nov 2000 13:15:24 -0800 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id NAA24312; Mon, 6 Nov 2000 13:14:49 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id NAA30988; Mon, 6 Nov 2000 13:14:49 -0800 (PST) Received: from ztxmail02.nz-cce.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA02757; Mon, 6 Nov 2000 13:14:48 -0800 Received: by ztxmail02.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 269981764; Mon, 6 Nov 2000 15:14:48 -0600 (CST) Received: from pigeon.maya.com (po.maya.com [192.70.254.2]) by ztxmail02.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C8F6715C3 for ; Mon, 6 Nov 2000 15:14:47 -0600 (CST) Received: from maya.com (hoffmann-pc.maya.com [192.70.254.34]) by pigeon.maya.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B7363EF3 for ; Mon, 6 Nov 2000 15:58:44 -0500 (EST) Message-Id: <3A071F71.8AE005F0@maya.com> Date: Mon, 06 Nov 2000 16:15:29 -0500 From: Kevin Hoffmann X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.72 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.2.14-5.0 i686) X-Accept-Language: en Mime-Version: 1.0 To: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Subject: TFT 640x480 Support References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk I am trying to get the SA1110 (CErfBoard with Linux) running in TrueColor mode with an active, TFT display. Has anyone tried this before with any success? Or anything remotely close? It does not appear that any of the kernel support is for TrueColor mode. Any info or help would be great. Thanks Kevin Hoffmann hoffmann@maya.com From kramer@pa.dec.com Mon Nov 6 23:19:40 2000 Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (root@mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id XAA07338 for ; Mon, 6 Nov 2000 23:19:40 +0100 Received: from zmamail03.zma.compaq.com (zmamail03.zma.compaq.com [161.114.64.103]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id XAA07438 for ; Mon, 6 Nov 2000 23:19:39 +0100 (MET) Received: by zmamail03.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 39B9F1CB4; Mon, 6 Nov 2000 17:17:52 -0500 (EST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by zmamail03.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 157A21CD6; Mon, 6 Nov 2000 17:17:48 -0500 (EST) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA08647; Mon, 6 Nov 2000 14:17:47 -0800 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id OAA16658; Mon, 6 Nov 2000 14:16:28 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id OAA04757; Mon, 6 Nov 2000 14:16:27 -0800 (PST) Received: from zmamail01.nz-tay.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA01042; Mon, 6 Nov 2000 14:16:18 -0800 Received: by zmamail01.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 0DBBDA465; Mon, 6 Nov 2000 17:16:18 -0500 (EST) Received: from cougar.intrinsyc.com (unknown [64.16.10.150]) by zmamail01.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1CBD2A776 for ; Mon, 6 Nov 2000 17:16:16 -0500 (EST) Received: from nitt (192.168.1.3 [192.168.1.3]) by cougar.intrinsyc.com with SMTP (Microsoft Exchange Internet Mail Service Version 5.5.2650.21) id WMRTPYYC; Mon, 6 Nov 2000 14:16:13 -0800 From: Chester Carey Organization: Intrinsyc To: Nicolas Pitre Subject: Re: Test9-rmk1-np3 Date: Mon, 6 Nov 2000 14:17:49 -0800 X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.0.29] Content-Type: text/plain Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.arm.linux.org.uk, sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com References: In-Reply-To: Mime-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <0011061419230E.00999@nitt> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk Call me whiney but shouldn't a default kernel work without me having to edit source code, especially if it was working ok previously? Chester > > For instance, just comment out line 179 of arch/arm/mach-sa1100/hw.c. It > shouldn't matter as long as you don't compile for Assabet. > > The proper fix will be part of the next patch. > > > Nicolas > > > _______________________________________________ > http://lists.arm.linux.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel From kramer@pa.dec.com Mon Nov 6 23:26:40 2000 Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (root@mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id XAA07349 for ; Mon, 6 Nov 2000 23:26:40 +0100 Received: from zmamail03.zma.compaq.com (zmamail03.zma.compaq.com [161.114.64.103]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id XAA07692 for ; Mon, 6 Nov 2000 23:26:38 +0100 (MET) Received: by zmamail03.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 7A4DF3EEA; Mon, 6 Nov 2000 17:24:52 -0500 (EST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by zmamail03.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 839664E96; Mon, 6 Nov 2000 17:24:49 -0500 (EST) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA02239; Mon, 6 Nov 2000 14:24:47 -0800 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id OAA29107; Mon, 6 Nov 2000 14:24:21 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id OAA17279; Mon, 6 Nov 2000 14:24:20 -0800 (PST) Received: from ztxmail01.nz-cce.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA18832; Mon, 6 Nov 2000 14:24:20 -0800 Received: by ztxmail01.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id C486E1F39; Mon, 6 Nov 2000 16:24:19 -0600 (CST) Received: from xanadu.gn.com (modemcable248.137-200-24.mtl.mc.videotron.ca [24.200.137.248]) by ztxmail01.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF17A1C3F for ; Mon, 6 Nov 2000 16:24:17 -0600 (CST) Received: from localhost (nico@localhost) by xanadu.gn.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id WAA04130; Mon, 6 Nov 2000 22:35:49 -0500 X-Authentication-Warning: xanadu.gn.com: nico owned process doing -bs Date: Mon, 6 Nov 2000 22:35:49 -0500 (EST) From: Nicolas Pitre X-Sender: nico@xanadu.gn.com To: Chester Carey Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.arm.linux.org.uk, sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Subject: Re: Test9-rmk1-np3 In-Reply-To: <0011061419230E.00999@nitt> Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk On Mon, 6 Nov 2000, Chester Carey wrote: > Call me whiney but shouldn't a default kernel work without me having to edit > source code, especially if it was working ok previously? Humans make mistakes. Nicolas From kramer@pa.dec.com Mon Nov 6 23:47:30 2000 Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (root@mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id XAA07431 for ; Mon, 6 Nov 2000 23:47:30 +0100 Received: from zmamail04.zma.compaq.com (zmamail04.zma.compaq.com [161.114.64.104]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id XAA08463 for ; Mon, 6 Nov 2000 23:47:28 +0100 (MET) Received: by zmamail04.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id E76E9367; Mon, 6 Nov 2000 17:45:41 -0500 (EST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by zmamail04.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id BDF0F189; Mon, 6 Nov 2000 17:45:38 -0500 (EST) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA16736; Mon, 6 Nov 2000 14:45:37 -0800 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id OAA00572; Mon, 6 Nov 2000 14:44:32 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id OAA26879; Mon, 6 Nov 2000 14:44:30 -0800 (PST) Received: from zmamail01.nz-tay.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA06639; Mon, 6 Nov 2000 14:44:24 -0800 Received: by zmamail01.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 3D55CA5D2; Mon, 6 Nov 2000 17:44:23 -0500 (EST) Received: from www.linux.org.uk (parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk [195.92.249.252]) by zmamail01.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6ABBDA4CC for ; Mon, 6 Nov 2000 17:44:22 -0500 (EST) Received: from dyn-33.linux.theplanet.co.uk ([195.92.244.33] helo=caramon.arm.linux.org.uk) by www.linux.org.uk with esmtp (Exim 3.13 #1) id 13suyQ-0001Uy-00; Mon, 06 Nov 2000 22:42:42 +0000 Received: from flint.arm.linux.org.uk (IDENT:root@flint [192.168.0.4]) by caramon.arm.linux.org.uk (8.11.0/8.11.0) with ESMTP id eA6MgZI05137; Mon, 6 Nov 2000 22:42:35 GMT Received: (from linux@localhost) by flint.arm.linux.org.uk (8.11.0/8.11.0) id eA6MgYM19434; Mon, 6 Nov 2000 22:42:34 GMT From: Russell King - ARM Linux Admin Message-Id: <200011062242.eA6MgYM19434@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> Subject: Re: Test9-rmk1-np3 To: ccarey@intrinsyc.com (Chester Carey) Date: Mon, 6 Nov 2000 22:42:34 +0000 (GMT) Cc: nico@CAM.ORG (Nicolas Pitre), linux-arm-kernel@lists.arm.linux.org.uk, sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com In-Reply-To: <0011061419230E.00999@nitt> from "Chester Carey" at Nov 06, 2000 02:17:49 PM X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL3] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk Chester Carey writes: > Call me whiney but shouldn't a default kernel work without me having to edit > source code, especially if it was working ok previously? Generally yes, but note the version of the kernel you are using. "-test". That means that it is not a stable release, and you can expect things to break from time to time. However, we hope that they are minor things by now. _____ |_____| ------------------------------------------------- ---+---+- | | Russell King linux@arm.linux.org.uk --- --- | | | | http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/ / / | | +-+-+ --- -+- / | THE developer of ARM Linux |+| /|\ / | | | --- | +-+-+ ------------------------------------------------- /\\\ | From kramer@pa.dec.com Mon Nov 6 23:55:41 2000 Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (root@mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id XAA07458 for ; Mon, 6 Nov 2000 23:55:41 +0100 Received: from ztxmail03.ztx.compaq.com (ztxmail03.ztx.compaq.com [161.114.1.207]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id XAA08854 for ; Mon, 6 Nov 2000 23:55:39 +0100 (MET) Received: by ztxmail03.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 0DE7F1102; Mon, 6 Nov 2000 16:53:53 -0600 (CST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by ztxmail03.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 1E7001031; Mon, 6 Nov 2000 16:53:50 -0600 (CST) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA07213; Mon, 6 Nov 2000 14:53:45 -0800 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id OAA00550; Mon, 6 Nov 2000 14:53:08 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id OAA10912; Mon, 6 Nov 2000 14:53:07 -0800 (PST) Received: from ztxmail01.nz-cce.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA26522; Mon, 6 Nov 2000 14:53:07 -0800 Received: by ztxmail01.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 2960D1399; Mon, 6 Nov 2000 16:53:07 -0600 (CST) Received: from cougar.intrinsyc.com (unknown [64.16.10.150]) by ztxmail01.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B38012B7 for ; Mon, 6 Nov 2000 16:53:06 -0600 (CST) Received: from nitt (192.168.1.3 [192.168.1.3]) by cougar.intrinsyc.com with SMTP (Microsoft Exchange Internet Mail Service Version 5.5.2650.21) id WMRTPY5W; Mon, 6 Nov 2000 14:53:05 -0800 From: Chester Carey Organization: Intrinsyc To: Russell King - ARM Linux Admin , ccarey@intrinsyc.com (Chester Carey) Subject: Re: Test9-rmk1-np3 Date: Mon, 6 Nov 2000 14:53:35 -0800 X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.0.29] Content-Type: text/plain Cc: nico@CAM.ORG (Nicolas Pitre), linux-arm-kernel@lists.arm.linux.org.uk, sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com References: <200011062242.eA6MgYM19434@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> In-Reply-To: <200011062242.eA6MgYM19434@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <00110614561500.29628@nitt> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk Well it looks like my touchscreen support is totally gone but other than that nothing major seems messed up. Is there some sort of unified UCB1200 touchscreen/sound support for the SA1100 yet? Also does the SA1100 have multicast support or is it just my Etherchips driver that is lacking? Chester Carey Linux Support Intrinsyc Software > > Generally yes, but note the version of the kernel you are using. "-test". > That means that it is not a stable release, and you can expect things to > break from time to time. However, we hope that they are minor things by > now. > _____ > |_____| ------------------------------------------------- ---+---+- > | | Russell King linux@arm.linux.org.uk --- --- > | | | | http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/ / / | > | +-+-+ --- -+- > / | THE developer of ARM Linux |+| /|\ > / | | | --- | > +-+-+ ------------------------------------------------- /\\\ | From kramer@pa.dec.com Tue Nov 7 00:28:44 2000 Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (root@mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id AAA07559 for ; Tue, 7 Nov 2000 00:28:44 +0100 Received: from ztxmail03.ztx.compaq.com (ztxmail03.ztx.compaq.com [161.114.1.207]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id AAA10722 for ; Tue, 7 Nov 2000 00:28:42 +0100 (MET) Received: by ztxmail03.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id D42901202; Mon, 6 Nov 2000 17:26:55 -0600 (CST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by ztxmail03.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 6596A1350; Mon, 6 Nov 2000 17:26:52 -0600 (CST) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA17045; Mon, 6 Nov 2000 15:26:50 -0800 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id PAA23179; Mon, 6 Nov 2000 15:22:55 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id PAA08379; Mon, 6 Nov 2000 15:22:54 -0800 (PST) Received: from ztxmail02.nz-cce.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA00755; Mon, 6 Nov 2000 15:22:53 -0800 Received: by ztxmail02.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 2C0DC174D; Mon, 6 Nov 2000 17:22:53 -0600 (CST) Received: from xanadu.gn.com (modemcable248.137-200-24.mtl.mc.videotron.ca [24.200.137.248]) by ztxmail02.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 396791716 for ; Mon, 6 Nov 2000 17:22:52 -0600 (CST) Received: from localhost (nico@localhost) by xanadu.gn.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id XAA04253; Mon, 6 Nov 2000 23:34:19 -0500 X-Authentication-Warning: xanadu.gn.com: nico owned process doing -bs Date: Mon, 6 Nov 2000 23:34:19 -0500 (EST) From: Nicolas Pitre X-Sender: nico@xanadu.gn.com To: Russell King - ARM Linux Admin Cc: Chester Carey , linux-arm-kernel@lists.arm.linux.org.uk, sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Subject: Re: Test9-rmk1-np3 In-Reply-To: <200011062242.eA6MgYM19434@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk On Mon, 6 Nov 2000, Russell King - ARM Linux Admin wrote: > Chester Carey writes: > > Call me whiney but shouldn't a default kernel work without me having to edit > > source code, especially if it was working ok previously? > > Generally yes, but note the version of the kernel you are using. "-test". > That means that it is not a stable release, and you can expect things to > break from time to time. However, we hope that they are minor things by > now. Yup. Only a missing #ifdef CONFIG_SA1100_ASSABET ... #endif Nicolas From kramer@pa.dec.com Tue Nov 7 00:32:39 2000 Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (root@mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id AAA07575 for ; Tue, 7 Nov 2000 00:32:38 +0100 Received: from zmamail05.zma.compaq.com (zmamail05.zma.compaq.com [161.114.64.105]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id AAA10902 for ; Tue, 7 Nov 2000 00:32:37 +0100 (MET) Received: by zmamail05.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 653802F1B; Mon, 6 Nov 2000 18:30:51 -0500 (EST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by zmamail05.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 68D3C2D12; Mon, 6 Nov 2000 18:30:41 -0500 (EST) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA10576; Mon, 6 Nov 2000 15:30:40 -0800 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id PAA31148; Mon, 6 Nov 2000 15:27:19 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id PAA10508; Mon, 6 Nov 2000 15:27:18 -0800 (PST) Received: from ztxmail01.nz-cce.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA17417; Mon, 6 Nov 2000 15:27:18 -0800 Received: by ztxmail01.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id A5DE01510; Mon, 6 Nov 2000 17:27:17 -0600 (CST) Received: from xanadu.gn.com (modemcable248.137-200-24.mtl.mc.videotron.ca [24.200.137.248]) by ztxmail01.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 07A6F154A for ; Mon, 6 Nov 2000 17:27:17 -0600 (CST) Received: from localhost (nico@localhost) by xanadu.gn.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id XAA04270; Mon, 6 Nov 2000 23:38:46 -0500 X-Authentication-Warning: xanadu.gn.com: nico owned process doing -bs Date: Mon, 6 Nov 2000 23:38:46 -0500 (EST) From: Nicolas Pitre X-Sender: nico@xanadu.gn.com To: Chester Carey Cc: Russell King - ARM Linux Admin , linux-arm-kernel@lists.arm.linux.org.uk, sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Subject: Re: Test9-rmk1-np3 In-Reply-To: <00110614561500.29628@nitt> Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk On Mon, 6 Nov 2000, Chester Carey wrote: > Well it looks like my touchscreen support is totally gone but other than that > nothing major seems messed up. > > Is there some sort of unified UCB1200 touchscreen/sound support for the SA1100 > yet? Not as far as I know. > Also does the SA1100 have multicast support or is it just my Etherchips driver > that is lacking? Multicast is supported independently of the CPU. The driver is most probably the culprit. Nicolas From kramer@pa.dec.com Sat Nov 11 05:49:00 2000 Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (root@mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id FAA21621 for ; Sat, 11 Nov 2000 05:49:00 +0100 Received: from zmamail05.zma.compaq.com (zmamail05.zma.compaq.com [161.114.64.105]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id FAA28814 for ; Sat, 11 Nov 2000 05:48:58 +0100 (MET) Received: by zmamail05.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 208C7290A; Fri, 10 Nov 2000 23:47:11 -0500 (EST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by zmamail05.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id BA3082841; Fri, 10 Nov 2000 23:47:08 -0500 (EST) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA15513; Fri, 10 Nov 2000 20:46:55 -0800 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id UAA25274; Fri, 10 Nov 2000 20:36:33 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id UAA21969; Fri, 10 Nov 2000 20:36:32 -0800 (PST) Received: from ztxmail01.nz-cce.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA13501; Fri, 10 Nov 2000 20:36:32 -0800 Received: by ztxmail01.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id F31D82B17; Fri, 10 Nov 2000 22:36:31 -0600 (CST) Received: from xanadu.gn.com (modemcable248.137-200-24.mtl.mc.videotron.ca [24.200.137.248]) by ztxmail01.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 357362AAD for ; Fri, 10 Nov 2000 22:36:31 -0600 (CST) Received: from localhost (nico@localhost) by xanadu.gn.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id XAA11000; Fri, 10 Nov 2000 23:49:03 -0500 X-Authentication-Warning: xanadu.gn.com: nico owned process doing -bs Date: Fri, 10 Nov 2000 23:49:03 -0500 (EST) From: Nicolas Pitre X-Sender: nico@xanadu.gn.com To: SA-1100/Linux Cc: linux-arm-announce@lists.arm.linux.org.uk Subject: diff-2.4.0-test10-rmk1-np1.gz Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk ... is now available at the usual sites. This contains: - updated to 2.4.0-test10-rmk1 - PCMCIA cleanup (John Dorsey) - Pangolin update () - zImage size now available in its "header" - MTD code merge - MTD map driver for SA11x0 flash access + partitions - Latest JFFS code merge - miscelaneous small fixes What is probably broken: - SA1111 ohci USB support (the patch didn't apply cleanly) [Brad, could you please have a look at it again?] The big new chunk in there is the MTD code. That's what I've been working on lately, especially the block device interface to flash memory which now is offering the same functionality as the flash-mem driver, but through a much better implementation and no system latency problem. So the flash-mem driver is now considered deprecated. The SA11x0 driver is in the driver/mtd/sa1100-flash.c and it also contains the partition information. The big advantage of using the MTd driver is, of course, the possibility to use JFFS on some flash partitions while using a different filesystem on another partition simultaneously.. You may even store your root filesystem on a JFFS partition and boot on it. JFFS is also much more efficient and reliable than say ext2 for a read-write filesystem on flash memory. Please consider switching to MTD since flash_mem.c will eventually disappear. (for those interested, I also wrote a MTD map driver for the 21285 Footbridge) Now what would be cool is to get the loopback interface to work over JFFS. This way it could be possible to have about the entire flash be a JFFS filesystem and mount cramfs images through the loopback interface. This would save the wasted gap between cramfs partitions on iPAQ. Finally having a little function library that could be used within bootloaders to copy the kernel binary directly from a JFFS filesystem would allow for pretty easy kernel image storage and upgrades. Enjoy! Nicolas From kramer@pa.dec.com Sun Nov 12 04:29:18 2000 Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (root@mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id EAA23711 for ; Sun, 12 Nov 2000 04:29:18 +0100 Received: from ztxmail03.ztx.compaq.com (ztxmail03.ztx.compaq.com [161.114.1.207]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id EAA05729 for ; Sun, 12 Nov 2000 04:29:16 +0100 (MET) Received: by ztxmail03.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 5CCC9578; Sat, 11 Nov 2000 21:27:29 -0600 (CST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by ztxmail03.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id EFC50521; Sat, 11 Nov 2000 21:27:26 -0600 (CST) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA18015; Sat, 11 Nov 2000 19:26:04 -0800 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id TAA10496; Sat, 11 Nov 2000 19:22:55 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id TAA27852; Sat, 11 Nov 2000 19:22:55 -0800 (PST) Received: from ztxmail01.nz-cce.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA27879; Sat, 11 Nov 2000 19:22:54 -0800 Received: by ztxmail01.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id DD2F02303; Sat, 11 Nov 2000 21:22:53 -0600 (CST) Received: from mail.megatrans.co.kr (unknown [211.119.128.43]) by ztxmail01.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9FF382D00 for ; Sat, 11 Nov 2000 21:22:52 -0600 (CST) Received: from estanflux.es (cmci012p12.toll.micron.net [206.80.120.183]) by mail.megatrans.co.kr (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id MAA25815; Sun, 12 Nov 2000 12:21:23 +0900 Message-Id: <355n1q57s.56368u2@estanflux.es> Subject: Receive a FREE $1000 Satellite T.V. System. To: McLean@d10.de Date: Sat, 11 Nov 2000 22:13:54 +0500 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT From: Vantil@dns1.tohokudenshi.co.jp Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk FREE Satellite T.V. System and FREE Installation For a limited time we'll give you this top of the line Digital Satellite System for FREE! We'll even include Free installation. Enjoy over 500 Channels of crystal clear digital picture and cd stereo sound on your FREE Satellite TV System. Why pay over $900 retail for these items, when we're giving you this satellite package for free. Call 888-514-6881 to be Guaranteed Your FREE Satellite Today This Innovative 20" Satellite includes a stereo receiver and an infrared remote. With this FREE offer you will have both Interactive Television Capability and an On Screen Program Guide. This limited time FREE offer is much less than the monthly cost of cable tv. All you have to do is call us to arrange delivery. If you call today, we'll throw in a second receiver for your second T.V. free. Call 888-514-6881 to Begin Surfing through 500 Channels Today! To be removed send email to socpcf@yahoo.com From kramer@pa.dec.com Mon Nov 13 10:32:17 2000 Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (root@mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id KAA25884 for ; Mon, 13 Nov 2000 10:32:17 +0100 Received: from zmamail05.zma.compaq.com (zmamail05.zma.compaq.com [161.114.64.105]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id KAA28800 for ; Mon, 13 Nov 2000 10:32:14 +0100 (MET) Received: by zmamail05.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 6D95C49E8; Mon, 13 Nov 2000 04:30:25 -0500 (EST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by zmamail05.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 1627859EE; Mon, 13 Nov 2000 04:30:23 -0500 (EST) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA10280; Mon, 13 Nov 2000 01:28:45 -0800 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id BAA27298; Mon, 13 Nov 2000 01:18:26 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id BAA12281; Mon, 13 Nov 2000 01:18:24 -0800 (PST) Received: from ztxmail02.nz-cce.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA31614; Mon, 13 Nov 2000 01:18:21 -0800 Received: by ztxmail02.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 70F461CFA; Mon, 13 Nov 2000 03:18:19 -0600 (CST) Received: from hanwang.com.cn (unknown [211.101.142.162]) by ztxmail02.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E5D201BF9 for ; Mon, 13 Nov 2000 03:18:13 -0600 (CST) Received: from hanwang.com.cn ([172.16.1.66]) by hanwang.com.cn (8.9.3/8.8.7) with ESMTP id RAA06475; Mon, 13 Nov 2000 17:04:19 -0800 Message-Id: <3A0FB1A3.A455D0EE@hanwang.com.cn> Date: Mon, 13 Nov 2000 17:17:23 +0800 From: dai hongbo X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.72 [zh_CN] (X11; I; Linux 2.2.16 i686) X-Accept-Language: en Mime-Version: 1.0 To: Nicolas Pitre Cc: SA-1100/Linux , linux-arm-kernel@lists.arm.linux.org.uk Subject: Re: diff-2.4.0-test10-rmk1-np1.gz References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=gb2312 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk nico: i tried to run linux directly from flash on assabet,just the way uclinux do. but i found it's much more complex to make it,for MMU problem. i modified the vmlinux-armv.lds.in and some other files,so that data and bss section in physical memory and text,ro and init section in flash(0xe8000000 or 0x00000000?),and cat linux.data and linux.bin together to make linux.bin,the flash kernel image. and i modified head-armv.S,map in 2M bytes flash to 0xe8000000 for the kernel. at the first stage of booting, clear bss and copy data section to the place,and do the normal booting work. but when the first stage goes over,system hangs somewhere. it bothered me dayes,could you give me some advice? From kramer@pa.dec.com Mon Nov 13 10:55:30 2000 Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (root@mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id KAA25954 for ; Mon, 13 Nov 2000 10:55:30 +0100 Received: from ztxmail03.ztx.compaq.com (ztxmail03.ztx.compaq.com [161.114.1.207]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id KAA00374 for ; Mon, 13 Nov 2000 10:55:28 +0100 (MET) Received: by ztxmail03.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 3AADA4B5; Mon, 13 Nov 2000 03:53:42 -0600 (CST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by ztxmail03.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id A7BD8682; Mon, 13 Nov 2000 03:53:39 -0600 (CST) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA09463; Mon, 13 Nov 2000 01:52:17 -0800 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id BAA11215; Mon, 13 Nov 2000 01:49:44 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id BAA16453; Mon, 13 Nov 2000 01:49:44 -0800 (PST) Received: from zmamail01.nz-tay.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA11540; Mon, 13 Nov 2000 01:49:43 -0800 Received: by zmamail01.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 3D1FFB724; Mon, 13 Nov 2000 04:49:43 -0500 (EST) Received: from relay.lep-philips.fr (relay.lep-philips.fr [212.208.209.250]) by zmamail01.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 79F8FB690 for ; Mon, 13 Nov 2000 04:49:42 -0500 (EST) Received: from relais.lep.research.philips.com (relais.lep.research.philips.com [130.142.21.30]) by relay.lep-philips.fr (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id KAA20987 for ; Mon, 13 Nov 2000 10:49:41 +0100 (MET) Received: from lep-philips.fr (relais [130.142.21.30]) by relais.lep.research.philips.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id KAA24460 for ; Mon, 13 Nov 2000 10:49:38 +0100 (MET) Message-Id: <3A0FBA77.97BF3A22@lep-philips.fr> Date: Mon, 13 Nov 2000 10:55:03 +0100 From: Guillaume Jaunet X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.72 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.2.14-5.0 i686) X-Accept-Language: fr, en, de Mime-Version: 1.0 To: SA-1100/Linux Subject: Re: diff-2.4.0-test10-rmk1-np1.gz References: <3A0FB1A3.A455D0EE@hanwang.com.cn> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk dai hongbo wrote: > > nico: > i tried to run linux directly from flash on assabet,just the way uclinux > do. > but i found it's much more complex to make it,for MMU problem. > i modified the vmlinux-armv.lds.in and some other files,so that data and > bss section in physical memory and text,ro and init section in > flash(0xe8000000 or 0x00000000?),and cat linux.data and linux.bin together to > make linux.bin,the flash kernel image. > and i modified head-armv.S,map in 2M bytes flash to 0xe8000000 for the > kernel. > at the first stage of booting, clear bss and copy data section to the > place,and do the normal booting work. > but when the first stage goes over,system hangs somewhere. > it bothered me dayes,could you give me some advice? I've also thought about running linux directly from flash. But a few drawbacks made me change my mind. 1) Flash is MUCH slower than RAM. Your linux box would become quite slow. So why using a fast processor? 2) If you want to use mtd driver for memory, I think that the code performing the writes in flash must not run from this flash. It would mess up the flash commands. Not absolutely sure, but big suspicions. 3) MMU considerations make it difficult to run kernel from flash. Not impossible, but not easy either. I think that you agree with me on that point. Here is just my point of view ;-) Guillaume J. From kramer@pa.dec.com Mon Nov 13 11:29:42 2000 Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (root@mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id LAA26025 for ; Mon, 13 Nov 2000 11:29:42 +0100 Received: from zmamail04.zma.compaq.com (zmamail04.zma.compaq.com [161.114.64.104]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id LAA02560 for ; Mon, 13 Nov 2000 11:29:40 +0100 (MET) Received: by zmamail04.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 7125D38C; Mon, 13 Nov 2000 05:27:54 -0500 (EST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by zmamail04.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 3CFD223A; Mon, 13 Nov 2000 05:27:52 -0500 (EST) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA18932; Mon, 13 Nov 2000 02:26:31 -0800 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id CAA00774; Mon, 13 Nov 2000 02:22:38 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id CAA15911; Mon, 13 Nov 2000 02:22:37 -0800 (PST) Received: from zmamail01.nz-tay.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA26452; Mon, 13 Nov 2000 02:22:37 -0800 Received: by zmamail01.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 03541B685; Mon, 13 Nov 2000 05:22:36 -0500 (EST) Received: from relay.lep-philips.fr (relay.lep-philips.fr [212.208.209.250]) by zmamail01.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D5C0B68F for ; Mon, 13 Nov 2000 05:22:35 -0500 (EST) Received: from relais.lep.research.philips.com (relais.lep.research.philips.com [130.142.21.30]) by relay.lep-philips.fr (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id LAA22064; Mon, 13 Nov 2000 11:22:25 +0100 (MET) Received: from lep-philips.fr (relais [130.142.21.30]) by relais.lep.research.philips.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id LAA24909; Mon, 13 Nov 2000 11:22:23 +0100 (MET) Message-Id: <3A0FC223.A2114E39@lep-philips.fr> Date: Mon, 13 Nov 2000 11:27:47 +0100 From: Guillaume Jaunet X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.72 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.2.14-5.0 i686) X-Accept-Language: fr, en, de Mime-Version: 1.0 To: "ipaq@handhelds.org" , SA-1100/Linux , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.arm.linux.org.uk" Subject: mounting Ramdisk with loopback Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk I've got an an assabet platform with a Microdrive. I'm starting Linux from flash with a Ramdisk. I'd like to be able to modify this ramdisk directly from the embedded platform. So I tried to mount the corresponding file with the following command : mount -o loop -t ext2 ramdisk_ks /mnt/ramdisk But this command fails. I get no output messages and loose control over the box. But the scheduler is still running, as a flashing led indicates me. I thought about memory lack (the kernel would do calls to free some) but I've still got 12Mb of available memory to mount a 8Mb ramdisk. I've compiled kernel with loopback support, the ramdisk_ks file is the decompressed image of my ramdisk and the mount point exists. I,ve debugged the mount program with gdb, and it seems that the problem is in the kernel : I can get to the mount system call, and then it "hangs". Guillaume J. From kramer@pa.dec.com Mon Nov 13 21:52:09 2000 Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (root@mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id VAA27244 for ; Mon, 13 Nov 2000 21:52:09 +0100 Received: from ztxmail04.ztx.compaq.com (ztxmail04.ztx.compaq.com [161.114.1.208]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id VAA11249 for ; Mon, 13 Nov 2000 21:52:07 +0100 (MET) Received: by ztxmail04.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 2FB391BBE; Mon, 13 Nov 2000 14:50:21 -0600 (CST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by ztxmail04.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 5F7DE1A8C; Mon, 13 Nov 2000 14:50:18 -0600 (CST) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA28770; Mon, 13 Nov 2000 12:48:53 -0800 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id MAA08935; Mon, 13 Nov 2000 12:40:10 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id MAA24472; Mon, 13 Nov 2000 12:40:10 -0800 (PST) Received: from zmamail01.nz-tay.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA09608; Mon, 13 Nov 2000 12:40:09 -0800 Received: by zmamail01.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 44C51B680; Mon, 13 Nov 2000 15:40:08 -0500 (EST) Received: from xanadu.gn.com (modemcable248.137-200-24.mtl.mc.videotron.ca [24.200.137.248]) by zmamail01.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 27057B670 for ; Mon, 13 Nov 2000 15:40:03 -0500 (EST) Received: from localhost (nico@localhost) by xanadu.gn.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id PAA16578; Mon, 13 Nov 2000 15:52:29 -0500 X-Authentication-Warning: xanadu.gn.com: nico owned process doing -bs Date: Mon, 13 Nov 2000 15:52:29 -0500 (EST) From: Nicolas Pitre X-Sender: nico@xanadu.gn.com To: dai hongbo Cc: SA-1100/Linux , linux-arm-kernel@lists.arm.linux.org.uk Subject: Re: diff-2.4.0-test10-rmk1-np1.gz In-Reply-To: <3A0FB1A3.A455D0EE@hanwang.com.cn> Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk On Mon, 13 Nov 2000, dai hongbo wrote: > nico: > i tried to run linux directly from flash on assabet,just the way uclinux > do. > but i found it's much more complex to make it,for MMU problem. > i modified the vmlinux-armv.lds.in and some other files,so that data and > bss section in physical memory and text,ro and init section in > flash(0xe8000000 or 0x00000000?),and cat linux.data and linux.bin together to > make linux.bin,the flash kernel image. > and i modified head-armv.S,map in 2M bytes flash to 0xe8000000 for the > kernel. > at the first stage of booting, clear bss and copy data section to the > place,and do the normal booting work. > but when the first stage goes over,system hangs somewhere. > it bothered me dayes,could you give me some advice? You don't have many choices. Try to use printascii() provided by arch/arm/kernel/debug-armv.S (define CONFIG_DEBUG_LL) and trace it up to the point where it crashes. Nicolas From kramer@pa.dec.com Mon Nov 13 23:13:43 2000 Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (root@mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id XAA27371 for ; Mon, 13 Nov 2000 23:13:43 +0100 Received: from ztxmail05.ztx.compaq.com (ztxmail05.ztx.compaq.com [161.114.1.209]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id XAA15257 for ; Mon, 13 Nov 2000 23:13:40 +0100 (MET) Received: by ztxmail05.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 32D7AD72; Mon, 13 Nov 2000 16:11:52 -0600 (CST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by ztxmail05.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id BB1C61082; Mon, 13 Nov 2000 16:11:49 -0600 (CST) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA20371; Mon, 13 Nov 2000 14:10:25 -0800 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id OAA22381; Mon, 13 Nov 2000 14:00:23 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id OAA01690; Mon, 13 Nov 2000 14:00:22 -0800 (PST) Received: from ztxmail01.nz-cce.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA09165; Mon, 13 Nov 2000 14:00:21 -0800 Received: by ztxmail01.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 42B3A2B60; Mon, 13 Nov 2000 16:00:21 -0600 (CST) Received: from mail.vi-internet.de (unknown [195.182.114.102]) by ztxmail01.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E7B892CEF for ; Mon, 13 Nov 2000 16:00:19 -0600 (CST) Received: from master ([62.180.147.84]) by mail.vi-internet.de with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.5.1877.537.53); Mon, 13 Nov 2000 22:59:32 +0100 Message-Id: <000a01c04dbf$5b9927b0$5493b43e@master> From: "Roman.Jordan" To: Cc: Subject: Linux on Strongarm Date: Mon, 13 Nov 2000 23:16:22 +0100 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0007_01C04DC7.BCBB8350" X-Priority: 3 X-Msmail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 X-Mimeole: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400 Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0007_01C04DC7.BCBB8350 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hello, i have a question about the period the display is running. After some = minutes it is blanked. Where can i modify this time? Thanks in advance, Roman Jordan ------=_NextPart_000_0007_01C04DC7.BCBB8350 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hello,
i have a question about = the period the=20 display is running. After some minutes it is blanked. Where can i modify = this=20 time?
 
Thanks in advance,
Roman Jordan
------=_NextPart_000_0007_01C04DC7.BCBB8350-- From kramer@pa.dec.com Tue Nov 14 21:46:59 2000 Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (root@mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id VAA30371 for ; Tue, 14 Nov 2000 21:46:58 +0100 Received: from ztxmail03.ztx.compaq.com (ztxmail03.ztx.compaq.com [161.114.1.207]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id VAA29398 for ; Tue, 14 Nov 2000 21:46:56 +0100 (MET) Received: by ztxmail03.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 472B4982; Tue, 14 Nov 2000 14:45:08 -0600 (CST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by ztxmail03.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id CF04C57E; Tue, 14 Nov 2000 14:45:05 -0600 (CST) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA29095; Tue, 14 Nov 2000 12:43:27 -0800 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id MAA23638; Tue, 14 Nov 2000 12:31:33 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id MAA23755; Tue, 14 Nov 2000 12:31:32 -0800 (PST) Received: from zmamail01.nz-tay.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA01650; Tue, 14 Nov 2000 12:31:32 -0800 Received: by zmamail01.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id F36E7B1F9; Tue, 14 Nov 2000 15:31:30 -0500 (EST) Received: from callisto.yi.org (unknown [213.8.185.209]) by zmamail01.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B64BAB341 for ; Tue, 14 Nov 2000 15:31:13 -0500 (EST) Received: from localhost (karrde@localhost) by callisto.yi.org (8.9.3/8.8.7) with ESMTP id WAA22546 for ; Tue, 14 Nov 2000 22:28:18 +0200 Date: Tue, 14 Nov 2000 22:28:15 +0200 (IST) From: Dan Aloni To: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Subject: [PATCH] sa1100fb.c - __initdata proper data initialization Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk This little one caught my eye (apply to the latest): --- linux/drivers/video/sa1100fb.c.orig Tue Nov 14 22:09:58 2000 +++ linux/drivers/video/sa1100fb.c Tue Nov 14 22:11:29 2000 @@ -189,7 +189,7 @@ static struct display global_disp; /* Initial (default) Display Settings */ static struct fb_info fb_info; static struct sa1100fb_par current_par; -static struct fb_var_screeninfo __initdata init_var = {}; +static struct fb_var_screeninfo __initdata init_var = {0}; static struct sa1100fb_lcd_reg lcd_shadow; -- Dan Aloni dax@karrde.org From kramer@pa.dec.com Tue Nov 14 22:04:55 2000 Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (root@mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id WAA30451 for ; Tue, 14 Nov 2000 22:04:54 +0100 Received: from zmamail05.zma.compaq.com (zmamail05.zma.compaq.com [161.114.64.105]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id WAA00360 for ; Tue, 14 Nov 2000 22:04:53 +0100 (MET) Received: by zmamail05.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 0CFC25AA2; Tue, 14 Nov 2000 16:03:06 -0500 (EST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by zmamail05.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id CAD442D9B; Tue, 14 Nov 2000 16:03:03 -0500 (EST) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA12317; Tue, 14 Nov 2000 13:01:34 -0800 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id MAA30451; Tue, 14 Nov 2000 12:57:06 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id MAA15002; Tue, 14 Nov 2000 12:57:05 -0800 (PST) Received: from zmamail01.nz-tay.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA31073; Tue, 14 Nov 2000 12:57:05 -0800 Received: by zmamail01.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id E9531B324; Tue, 14 Nov 2000 15:57:04 -0500 (EST) Received: from xanadu.gn.com (modemcable248.137-200-24.mtl.mc.videotron.ca [24.200.137.248]) by zmamail01.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5132AAFBC for ; Tue, 14 Nov 2000 15:57:04 -0500 (EST) Received: from localhost (nico@localhost) by xanadu.gn.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id QAA20162; Tue, 14 Nov 2000 16:09:21 -0500 X-Authentication-Warning: xanadu.gn.com: nico owned process doing -bs Date: Tue, 14 Nov 2000 16:09:21 -0500 (EST) From: Nicolas Pitre X-Sender: To: Dan Aloni Cc: Subject: Re: [PATCH] sa1100fb.c - __initdata proper data initialization In-Reply-To: Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk On Tue, 14 Nov 2000, Dan Aloni wrote: > > This little one caught my eye (apply to the latest): > > --- linux/drivers/video/sa1100fb.c.orig Tue Nov 14 22:09:58 2000 > +++ linux/drivers/video/sa1100fb.c Tue Nov 14 22:11:29 2000 > @@ -189,7 +189,7 @@ > static struct display global_disp; /* Initial (default) Display Settings */ > static struct fb_info fb_info; > static struct sa1100fb_par current_par; > -static struct fb_var_screeninfo __initdata init_var = {}; > +static struct fb_var_screeninfo __initdata init_var = {0}; I think it produces the same result. Isn't it? Nicolas From kramer@pa.dec.com Tue Nov 14 22:57:20 2000 Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (root@mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id WAA30589 for ; Tue, 14 Nov 2000 22:57:20 +0100 Received: from zmamail05.zma.compaq.com (zmamail05.zma.compaq.com [161.114.64.105]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id WAA03004 for ; Tue, 14 Nov 2000 22:57:18 +0100 (MET) Received: by zmamail05.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id D6D862E3C; Tue, 14 Nov 2000 16:55:30 -0500 (EST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by zmamail05.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id A032F2E6A; Tue, 14 Nov 2000 16:55:28 -0500 (EST) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA20189; Tue, 14 Nov 2000 13:54:02 -0800 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id NAA29256; Tue, 14 Nov 2000 13:48:44 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id NAA04982; Tue, 14 Nov 2000 13:48:44 -0800 (PST) Received: from zmamail01.nz-tay.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA12347; Tue, 14 Nov 2000 13:48:43 -0800 Received: by zmamail01.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id BABA0B53E; Tue, 14 Nov 2000 16:48:42 -0500 (EST) Received: from callisto.yi.org (unknown [213.8.185.152]) by zmamail01.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D1FCB154 for ; Tue, 14 Nov 2000 16:48:37 -0500 (EST) Received: from localhost (karrde@localhost) by callisto.yi.org (8.9.3/8.8.7) with ESMTP id XAA23812; Tue, 14 Nov 2000 23:48:22 +0200 Date: Tue, 14 Nov 2000 23:48:21 +0200 (IST) From: Dan Aloni To: Nicolas Pitre Cc: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Subject: Re: [PATCH] sa1100fb.c - __initdata proper data initialization In-Reply-To: Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk On Tue, 14 Nov 2000, Nicolas Pitre wrote: > > This little one caught my eye (apply to the latest): > > > > --- linux/drivers/video/sa1100fb.c.orig Tue Nov 14 22:09:58 2000 > > +++ linux/drivers/video/sa1100fb.c Tue Nov 14 22:11:29 2000 > > @@ -189,7 +189,7 @@ > > static struct display global_disp; /* Initial (default) Display Settings */ > > static struct fb_info fb_info; > > static struct sa1100fb_par current_par; > > -static struct fb_var_screeninfo __initdata init_var = {}; > > +static struct fb_var_screeninfo __initdata init_var = {0}; > > I think it produces the same result. Isn't it? Could be, but you shouldn't assume this, see, if you 'grep' the kernel for __initdata, you see that everywhere __initdata is used, the variable/struct is initialized with at least a {0}, or a {0,}. Just consistancy. -- Dan Aloni dax@karrde.org From kramer@pa.dec.com Tue Nov 14 23:06:57 2000 Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (root@mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id XAA30616 for ; Tue, 14 Nov 2000 23:06:57 +0100 Received: from ztxmail03.ztx.compaq.com (ztxmail03.ztx.compaq.com [161.114.1.207]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id XAA03442 for ; Tue, 14 Nov 2000 23:06:54 +0100 (MET) Received: by ztxmail03.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 4647F105D; Tue, 14 Nov 2000 16:05:08 -0600 (CST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by ztxmail03.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 878E010F8; Tue, 14 Nov 2000 16:05:02 -0600 (CST) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA15525; Tue, 14 Nov 2000 14:03:36 -0800 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id NAA14327; Tue, 14 Nov 2000 13:59:57 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id NAA22572; Tue, 14 Nov 2000 13:59:56 -0800 (PST) Received: from ztxmail01.nz-cce.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA11329; Tue, 14 Nov 2000 13:59:55 -0800 Received: by ztxmail01.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id A07A31FFA; Tue, 14 Nov 2000 15:59:51 -0600 (CST) Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by ztxmail01.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 546F02CCB for ; Tue, 14 Nov 2000 15:59:45 -0600 (CST) Received: from arthur.ubicom.tudelft.nl (root@arthur.ubicom.tudelft.nl [130.161.43.222]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id WAA03100; Tue, 14 Nov 2000 22:59:39 +0100 (MET) Received: (from erik@localhost) by arthur.ubicom.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3/SuSE Linux 8.9.3-0.1) id WAA24691; Tue, 14 Nov 2000 22:36:22 +0100 Date: Tue, 14 Nov 2000 22:36:22 +0100 From: Erik Mouw To: Dan Aloni Cc: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Subject: Re: [PATCH] sa1100fb.c - __initdata proper data initialization Message-Id: <20001114223622.J12931@arthur.ubicom.tudelft.nl> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0.1i In-Reply-To: ; from karrde@callisto.yi.org on Tue, Nov 14, 2000 at 10:28:15PM +0200 Organization: Eric Conspiracy Secret Labs X-Eric-Conspiracy: There is no conspiracy! Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk On Tue, Nov 14, 2000 at 10:28:15PM +0200, Dan Aloni wrote: > This little one caught my eye (apply to the latest): > > --- linux/drivers/video/sa1100fb.c.orig Tue Nov 14 22:09:58 2000 > +++ linux/drivers/video/sa1100fb.c Tue Nov 14 22:11:29 2000 > @@ -189,7 +189,7 @@ > static struct display global_disp; /* Initial (default) Display Settings */ > static struct fb_info fb_info; > static struct sa1100fb_par current_par; > -static struct fb_var_screeninfo __initdata init_var = {}; > +static struct fb_var_screeninfo __initdata init_var = {0}; > static struct sa1100fb_lcd_reg lcd_shadow; Yes, variables in the __initdata segment aren't inialised at 0. This is however a temporary fix, because the real problem is in the function sa1100fb_init_fbinfo(): /* * setup initial parameters */ memset(&init_var, 0, sizeof(init_var)); init_var.transp.length = 0; ... And in sa1100fb_init(): if (sa1100fb_set_var(&init_var, -1, &fb_info)) current_par.allow_modeset = 0; sa1100fb_decode_var(&init_var, ¤t_par); So what happens? We have a structure init_var in the __initdata segment, it is filled with architecture specific static data in sa1100_init_fbinfo(), copied to the display in sa1100fb_set_var() and thrown away. I think it's better to have a init_var structure for each architecture, like: static struct __initdata fb_var_screeninfo init_var_assabet = { /* ... */ }; static struct __initdata fb_var_screeninfo init_var_lart = { /* ... */ }; Comments? Erik -- J.A.K. (Erik) Mouw, Information and Communication Theory Group, Department of Electrical Engineering, Faculty of Information Technology and Systems, Delft University of Technology, PO BOX 5031, 2600 GA Delft, The Netherlands Phone: +31-15-2783635 Fax: +31-15-2781843 Email: J.A.K.Mouw@its.tudelft.nl WWW: http://www-ict.its.tudelft.nl/~erik/ From kramer@pa.dec.com Tue Nov 14 23:07:04 2000 Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (root@mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id XAA30626 for ; Tue, 14 Nov 2000 23:07:04 +0100 Received: from ztxmail03.ztx.compaq.com (ztxmail03.ztx.compaq.com [161.114.1.207]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id XAA03459 for ; Tue, 14 Nov 2000 23:07:02 +0100 (MET) Received: by ztxmail03.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 5675510A9; Tue, 14 Nov 2000 16:05:16 -0600 (CST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by ztxmail03.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id E036A10F8; Tue, 14 Nov 2000 16:05:13 -0600 (CST) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA21334; Tue, 14 Nov 2000 14:03:47 -0800 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id NAA31336; Tue, 14 Nov 2000 13:59:57 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id NAA19553; Tue, 14 Nov 2000 13:59:56 -0800 (PST) Received: from ztxmail01.nz-cce.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA00473; Tue, 14 Nov 2000 13:59:55 -0800 Received: by ztxmail01.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 551242E1F; Tue, 14 Nov 2000 15:59:52 -0600 (CST) Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by ztxmail01.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EDCE420B3 for ; Tue, 14 Nov 2000 15:59:45 -0600 (CST) Received: from arthur.ubicom.tudelft.nl (root@arthur.ubicom.tudelft.nl [130.161.43.222]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id WAA03104; Tue, 14 Nov 2000 22:59:41 +0100 (MET) Received: (from erik@localhost) by arthur.ubicom.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3/SuSE Linux 8.9.3-0.1) id WAA24702; Tue, 14 Nov 2000 22:38:25 +0100 Date: Tue, 14 Nov 2000 22:38:25 +0100 From: Erik Mouw To: Nicolas Pitre Cc: Dan Aloni , sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Subject: Re: [PATCH] sa1100fb.c - __initdata proper data initialization Message-Id: <20001114223825.K12931@arthur.ubicom.tudelft.nl> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0.1i In-Reply-To: ; from nico@CAM.ORG on Tue, Nov 14, 2000 at 04:09:21PM -0500 Organization: Eric Conspiracy Secret Labs X-Eric-Conspiracy: There is no conspiracy! Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk On Tue, Nov 14, 2000 at 04:09:21PM -0500, Nicolas Pitre wrote: > > > On Tue, 14 Nov 2000, Dan Aloni wrote: > > > > > This little one caught my eye (apply to the latest): > > > > --- linux/drivers/video/sa1100fb.c.orig Tue Nov 14 22:09:58 2000 > > +++ linux/drivers/video/sa1100fb.c Tue Nov 14 22:11:29 2000 > > @@ -189,7 +189,7 @@ > > static struct display global_disp; /* Initial (default) Display Settings */ > > static struct fb_info fb_info; > > static struct sa1100fb_par current_par; > > -static struct fb_var_screeninfo __initdata init_var = {}; > > +static struct fb_var_screeninfo __initdata init_var = {0}; > > I think it produces the same result. Isn't it? Yes, because there is a memset(&init_var, 0, sizeof(init_var)) in the code, but that shouldn't be needed. Erik [who invited Dan to post to this list] -- J.A.K. (Erik) Mouw, Information and Communication Theory Group, Department of Electrical Engineering, Faculty of Information Technology and Systems, Delft University of Technology, PO BOX 5031, 2600 GA Delft, The Netherlands Phone: +31-15-2783635 Fax: +31-15-2781843 Email: J.A.K.Mouw@its.tudelft.nl WWW: http://www-ict.its.tudelft.nl/~erik/ From kramer@pa.dec.com Tue Nov 14 23:35:54 2000 Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (root@mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id XAA30681 for ; Tue, 14 Nov 2000 23:35:53 +0100 Received: from ztxmail05.ztx.compaq.com (ztxmail05.ztx.compaq.com [161.114.1.209]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id XAA04803 for ; Tue, 14 Nov 2000 23:35:52 +0100 (MET) Received: by ztxmail05.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id EF3E63EF; Tue, 14 Nov 2000 16:34:02 -0600 (CST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by ztxmail05.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 5DA9A3D9; Tue, 14 Nov 2000 16:34:00 -0600 (CST) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA25000; Tue, 14 Nov 2000 14:32:39 -0800 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id OAA05994; Tue, 14 Nov 2000 14:27:46 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id OAA13491; Tue, 14 Nov 2000 14:27:46 -0800 (PST) Received: from zmamail01.nz-tay.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA26437; Tue, 14 Nov 2000 14:27:45 -0800 Received: by zmamail01.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 5516EB4DB; Tue, 14 Nov 2000 17:27:45 -0500 (EST) Received: from xanadu.gn.com (modemcable248.137-200-24.mtl.mc.videotron.ca [24.200.137.248]) by zmamail01.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ADB3BB4B3 for ; Tue, 14 Nov 2000 17:27:44 -0500 (EST) Received: from localhost (nico@localhost) by xanadu.gn.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id RAA20533; Tue, 14 Nov 2000 17:40:05 -0500 X-Authentication-Warning: xanadu.gn.com: nico owned process doing -bs Date: Tue, 14 Nov 2000 17:40:05 -0500 (EST) From: Nicolas Pitre X-Sender: To: Erik Mouw Cc: Dan Aloni , Subject: Re: [PATCH] sa1100fb.c - __initdata proper data initialization In-Reply-To: <20001114223622.J12931@arthur.ubicom.tudelft.nl> Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk On Tue, 14 Nov 2000, Erik Mouw wrote: > On Tue, Nov 14, 2000 at 10:28:15PM +0200, Dan Aloni wrote: > > This little one caught my eye (apply to the latest): > > > > --- linux/drivers/video/sa1100fb.c.orig Tue Nov 14 22:09:58 2000 > > +++ linux/drivers/video/sa1100fb.c Tue Nov 14 22:11:29 2000 > > @@ -189,7 +189,7 @@ > > static struct display global_disp; /* Initial (default) Display Settings */ > > static struct fb_info fb_info; > > static struct sa1100fb_par current_par; > > -static struct fb_var_screeninfo __initdata init_var = {}; > > +static struct fb_var_screeninfo __initdata init_var = {0}; > > static struct sa1100fb_lcd_reg lcd_shadow; > > Yes, variables in the __initdata segment aren't inialised at 0. This is > however a temporary fix, because the real problem is in the function > sa1100fb_init_fbinfo(): > > /* > * setup initial parameters > */ > memset(&init_var, 0, sizeof(init_var)); > > init_var.transp.length = 0; > ... > > And in sa1100fb_init(): > > if (sa1100fb_set_var(&init_var, -1, &fb_info)) > current_par.allow_modeset = 0; > sa1100fb_decode_var(&init_var, ¤t_par); > > So what happens? We have a structure init_var in the __initdata > segment, it is filled with architecture specific static data in > sa1100_init_fbinfo(), copied to the display in sa1100fb_set_var() and > thrown away. I think it's better to have a init_var structure for each > architecture, like: > > static struct __initdata fb_var_screeninfo init_var_assabet = { > /* ... */ > }; > static struct __initdata fb_var_screeninfo init_var_lart = { > /* ... */ > }; > > Comments? Agreed. Do you volunteer? ;-) Nicolas From kramer@pa.dec.com Fri Nov 17 05:33:54 2000 Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (root@mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id FAA03251 for ; Fri, 17 Nov 2000 05:33:54 +0100 Received: from zmamail03.zma.compaq.com (zmamail03.zma.compaq.com [161.114.64.103]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id FAA27277 for ; Fri, 17 Nov 2000 05:33:53 +0100 (MET) Received: by zmamail03.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id D3123518; Thu, 16 Nov 2000 23:32:06 -0500 (EST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by zmamail03.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id B94BD4AB; Thu, 16 Nov 2000 23:32:04 -0500 (EST) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA09832; Thu, 16 Nov 2000 20:31:52 -0800 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id UAA18878; Thu, 16 Nov 2000 20:24:59 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id UAA19139; Thu, 16 Nov 2000 20:24:58 -0800 (PST) Received: from ztxmail02.nz-cce.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AB29716; Thu, 16 Nov 2000 20:24:58 -0800 Received: by ztxmail02.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 940F0EA0; Thu, 16 Nov 2000 22:24:57 -0600 (CST) Received: from xanadu.gn.com (modemcable248.137-200-24.mtl.mc.videotron.ca [24.200.137.248]) by ztxmail02.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0FDF3C8B for ; Thu, 16 Nov 2000 22:24:57 -0600 (CST) Received: from localhost (nico@localhost) by xanadu.gn.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id XAA12347; Thu, 16 Nov 2000 23:37:29 -0500 X-Authentication-Warning: xanadu.gn.com: nico owned process doing -bs Date: Thu, 16 Nov 2000 23:37:29 -0500 (EST) From: Nicolas Pitre X-Sender: To: SA-1100/Linux Cc: Subject: diff-2.4.0-t10-rmk2-np1 Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk ... is available at the usual place. This contains: - SA1111 USB works again (Brad Parker) - Initial Yopy stuff (Tred Lim) - Initial Freebird stuff (Chester) - MTD update and fixes (me) Enjoy! Nicolas From kramer@pa.dec.com Sat Nov 18 19:02:46 2000 Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (root@mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id TAA07512 for ; Sat, 18 Nov 2000 19:02:46 +0100 Received: from zmamail03.zma.compaq.com (zmamail03.zma.compaq.com [161.114.64.103]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id TAA20617 for ; Sat, 18 Nov 2000 19:02:45 +0100 (MET) Received: by zmamail03.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 4A1BD68A; Sat, 18 Nov 2000 13:00:58 -0500 (EST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by zmamail03.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 2189A46E; Sat, 18 Nov 2000 13:00:56 -0500 (EST) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA31375; Sat, 18 Nov 2000 10:00:53 -0800 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id JAA22164; Sat, 18 Nov 2000 09:54:59 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id JAA22159; Sat, 18 Nov 2000 09:54:59 -0800 (PST) Received: from ztxmail02.nz-cce.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA23218; Sat, 18 Nov 2000 09:54:59 -0800 Received: by ztxmail02.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 953A41F5B; Sat, 18 Nov 2000 11:54:58 -0600 (CST) Received: from tricycle.netport.com.au (tricycle.netport.com.au [61.8.3.2]) by ztxmail02.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 154561E03 for ; Sat, 18 Nov 2000 11:54:57 -0600 (CST) Received: from 63.52.248.71 (pool-63.52.248.71.ipls.grid.net [63.52.248.71]) by tricycle.netport.com.au (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id EAB31260; Sun, 19 Nov 2000 04:56:45 +1100 From: Elad@fc.univ.trieste.it Message-Id: <00000b3d39de$000015ad$00001a68@> To: Subject: Brand New FREE Satellite System. Date: Sat, 18 Nov 2000 12:41:37 -0400 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-Msmail-Priority: Normal Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk FREE Satellite T.V. System and FREE Installation For a limited time we'll give you this top of the line Digital Satellite System for FREE! We'll even include Free installation. Enjoy over 500 Channels of crystal clear digital picture and cd stereo sound on your FREE Satellite TV System. Why pay for these items in a retail store, when we're giving you the same satellite package for free. Call 888-514-6881 to be Guaranteed Your FREE Satellite Today This Innovative 20" Satellite includes a stereo receiver and an infrared remote. With this FREE offer you will have both Interactive Television Capability and an On Screen Program Guide. This limited time FREE offer is much less than the monthly cost of cable tv. All you have to do is call us to arrange delivery. If you call today, we'll throw in a second receiver for your second T.V. free. Call 888-514-6881 to Begin Surfing through 500 Channels Today! To be removed send email to tcaiom@yahoo.com From kramer@pa.dec.com Sun Nov 19 17:19:15 2000 Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (root@mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id RAA09614 for ; Sun, 19 Nov 2000 17:19:14 +0100 Received: from zmamail04.zma.compaq.com (zmamail04.zma.compaq.com [161.114.64.104]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id RAA22844 for ; Sun, 19 Nov 2000 17:19:13 +0100 (MET) Received: by zmamail04.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 32087465; Sun, 19 Nov 2000 11:17:25 -0500 (EST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by zmamail04.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id E03F17E9; Sun, 19 Nov 2000 11:17:22 -0500 (EST) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA19311; Sun, 19 Nov 2000 08:17:11 -0800 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id IAA22218; Sun, 19 Nov 2000 08:13:24 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id IAA22224; Sun, 19 Nov 2000 08:13:23 -0800 (PST) Received: from ztxmail01.nz-cce.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA22864; Sun, 19 Nov 2000 08:13:22 -0800 Received: by ztxmail01.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id EB4602A24; Sun, 19 Nov 2000 10:13:21 -0600 (CST) Received: from mail.secsm.org (unknown [210.118.74.2]) by ztxmail01.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 594AF2B13 for ; Sun, 19 Nov 2000 10:13:20 -0600 (CST) Received: from rtos21 ([210.118.74.190]) by mail.secsm.org (8.10.1/8.10.1) with SMTP id eAJGD8Y17838 for ; Mon, 20 Nov 2000 01:13:09 +0900 Message-Id: <000d01c05243$740401c0$be4a76d2@rtos21> From: "rtos21(SSM)" To: Subject: Send mail to sa1100-linux- Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2000 01:12:01 +0900 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_000A_01C0528E.E3516590" X-Priority: 3 X-Msmail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2919.6700 X-Mimeole: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2919.6700 Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_000A_01C0528E.E3516590 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ks_c_5601-1987" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 DQo= ------=_NextPart_000_000A_01C0528E.E3516590 Content-Type: text/html; charset="ks_c_5601-1987" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 PCFET0NUWVBFIEhUTUwgUFVCTElDICItLy9XM0MvL0RURCBIVE1MIDQuMCBUcmFuc2l0aW9uYWwv L0VOIj4NCjxIVE1MPjxIRUFEPg0KPE1FVEEgY29udGVudD0idGV4dC9odG1sOyBjaGFyc2V0PWtz X2NfNTYwMS0xOTg3IiBodHRwLWVxdWl2PUNvbnRlbnQtVHlwZT4NCjxNRVRBIGNvbnRlbnQ9Ik1T SFRNTCA1LjAwLjI5MjAuMCIgbmFtZT1HRU5FUkFUT1I+DQo8U1RZTEU+PC9TVFlMRT4NCjwvSEVB RD4NCjxCT0RZIGJnQ29sb3I9I2ZmZmZmZj4NCjxESVY+Jm5ic3A7PC9ESVY+PC9CT0RZPjwvSFRN TD4NCg== ------=_NextPart_000_000A_01C0528E.E3516590-- From kramer@pa.dec.com Sun Nov 19 19:25:04 2000 Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (root@mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id TAA09746 for ; Sun, 19 Nov 2000 19:25:04 +0100 Received: from zmamail05.zma.compaq.com (zmamail05.zma.compaq.com [161.114.64.105]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id TAA26895 for ; Sun, 19 Nov 2000 19:25:02 +0100 (MET) Received: by zmamail05.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 8C33E28AB; Sun, 19 Nov 2000 13:23:11 -0500 (EST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by zmamail05.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 408DB2B19; Sun, 19 Nov 2000 13:23:09 -0500 (EST) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA02148; Sun, 19 Nov 2000 10:21:46 -0800 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id KAA27610; Sun, 19 Nov 2000 10:16:42 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id KAA27807; Sun, 19 Nov 2000 10:16:41 -0800 (PST) From: Received: from zmamail01.nz-tay.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA21243; Sun, 19 Nov 2000 10:16:40 -0800 Received: by zmamail01.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id E6A7FAE4B; Sun, 19 Nov 2000 13:16:39 -0500 (EST) Received: from NRMiFW1.nexacor.ca (nexacor.ca [207.61.28.130]) by zmamail01.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id B2B70AD46; Sun, 19 Nov 2000 13:16:38 -0500 (EST) Received: id NAH27918; Sun, 19 Nov 2000 13:09:27 -0500 Received: by gateway id NAA11975 ([256.005.36.4]) by Pena with ESMTP; Sun, 19 Nov 2000 13:06:46 -0400 Message-Id: <0000359474a7$000055a6$00007bca@from houifecj.cc.com.ar([256.44.30.4]) by irs5s2.daidacentotere.chua.caimetv.net.ie (8.9.1a/8.9.1/1.0) with SMTP id NAA11975 ([256.005.36.4])> To: Subject: Latest Stock Pick...NRGE - "Buy Alert" 31690 Date: Sun, 19 Nov 2000 13:06:35 -0400 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Priority: 3 X-Msmail-Priority: Normal Reply-To: marketing24@uole.com Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk THE KONLIN LETTER

Nu Electric Corporation

Symbol= : NRGE
Traded: OTC Bulletin Board
Recent Price: 1 3/4
Shares Outstanding: 4.7 Million
Approximate Float: 900,000
52 Week Trading Range: 11/16 - $3

KONLIN Letter Sets $4 - $5 Target On Nu Electric (NRGE)

THE KONLIN LETTER

Nu Electric Corporation (NRGE - OTCBB - 1 3/4) is an incubator company= that identifies, acquires, develops, and markets emerging technologies that conserve en= ergy and protect and enhance the world’s natural resources. NRGE recently acquired Cle= an Water Technologies, Inc., which gives NRGE exclusive worldwide license to it= s proprietary technology (developed at the University of South Florida by Dr. Dagmar= Bonnin) for the removal of arsenic from drinking water using zeolite minerals. Recent = studies show arsenic to be even more toxic than was previously thought, which prompted the = EPA to classify arsenic as a human carcinogen. The EPA is proposing (by January 2001) = to lower the maximum allowable concentration level of arsenic for drinking water from the p= resent 50 parts per billion (ppb) to 5 ppb or less. This will meet the new proposed standa= rd intended to protect consumers against the effects of long-term, chronic exposure t= o arsenic in drinking water. The new standard will apply to all 54,000 community wa= ter systems, serving approximately 254 million people.

NRGE has also recently acq= uired Zorax, Inc., which owns the exclusive worldwide license for a technology that= extracts and identifies dangerous Cryptosporidium and Giardia, two waterborne paras= ites that can cause serious gastrointestinal problems. NRGE, a fully reporting company wit= h no long-term debt, has yet to record revenues, but is emerging from the current developme= nt stage and should become a profitable company in a multi-billion dollar market. Of the <= /font>4,712,855 shares outstanding, insiders hold 34%. The stock has pulled back on top of su= pport in the 1 1/4-1 1/2 area where we would Add/Buy for a 1st objective up into the 4-5 ar= ea.

NRGE has entered into a li= censing agreement with GSA Resources, Inc. to act as the exclusive sublicensee for the m= anufacturing and marketing of NRGE’s superior state-of-the-art zeolite patented te= chnology for the removal of arsenic from drinking water for the next 20 years. Buy for = an ultimate target up into the 9-10 area.

Please take the time to visit the Nu Electric Web Site for complete re= ports and
additional details: Nu Electri= c Web Site

To SUBSCRIBE to future communications or to receive ADDITIONAL  INFORMATION re= garding NU ELECTRIC please click on the link below and hit send:

SUBSCRIBE

To UNSUBSCRIBE to future communications please click on the link below and hit send:<= /font>

UNSUBSCRIBE<= /strong>

DISCLAIMER: The KONLIN LETTER is a monthly newsletter with a 22 year track record, mai= led first-class to subscribers at a cost of $95 for one year. It does NOT charge or accep= t fees for writing about any of the stocks that are researched. The cost of this mailing = has been paid for by a shareholder, who may buy or sell shares at any time. Purchase of thi= s stock may be considered speculative, and may result in the loss of some or all of a= ny investment made.

   

From kramer@pa.dec.com Tue Nov 21 05:47:53 2000 Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (root@mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id FAA14294 for ; Tue, 21 Nov 2000 05:47:53 +0100 Received: from zmamail03.zma.compaq.com (zmamail03.zma.compaq.com [161.114.64.103]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id FAA28624 for ; Tue, 21 Nov 2000 05:47:52 +0100 (MET) Received: by zmamail03.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 9D4A05F50; Mon, 20 Nov 2000 23:46:04 -0500 (EST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by zmamail03.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 4DBBD5C61; Mon, 20 Nov 2000 23:46:02 -0500 (EST) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA02001; Mon, 20 Nov 2000 20:45:58 -0800 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id UAA13836; Mon, 20 Nov 2000 20:39:29 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id UAA13927; Mon, 20 Nov 2000 20:39:28 -0800 (PST) Received: from zmamail02.nz-tay.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA28213; Mon, 20 Nov 2000 20:39:28 -0800 Received: by zmamail02.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 7C8E84F15; Mon, 20 Nov 2000 23:39:25 -0500 (EST) Received: from xanadu.gn.com (modemcable248.137-200-24.mtl.mc.videotron.ca [24.200.137.248]) by zmamail02.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F04C04E87 for ; Mon, 20 Nov 2000 23:39:24 -0500 (EST) Received: from localhost (nico@localhost) by xanadu.gn.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id XAA11578; Mon, 20 Nov 2000 23:39:24 -0500 X-Authentication-Warning: xanadu.gn.com: nico owned process doing -bs Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2000 23:39:24 -0500 (EST) From: Nicolas Pitre X-Sender: To: SA-1100/Linux Cc: Subject: diff-2.4.0-test10-rmk2-np2 Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk ... is available at the usual places. ChangeLog: - more Yopy integration (Tred Lim) - assorted fixes (Oleg Drokin) - sa1100-uda1341 now compiles for Assabet without Neponset - insw() bug fixed (me) - while at it, optimized outsw() a bit (me) - PCMCIA init code back in __init section (me) - PCMCIA thread now exits on module unload (me) Note: PCMCIA was broken for me in the last patch. It is still more obviously broken now i.e. "Bad mode in prefetch abort handler detected". Don't use these patches if you need PCMCIA. What's probably more interesting is the insw() bug. It didn't behave correctly at the end of a buffer that wasn't word aligned (while still half-word aligned). This is especially the case for ethernet packet buffers which are moved two bytes off for IP address alignment. This bug has been there for ages and is probably the cause for various mysterious ethernet malfunctions at the moment... Incidentally, the on-board SMC 9196 on my GraphicsClient now works like a charm! Enjoy! Nicolas From kramer@pa.dec.com Tue Nov 21 07:21:45 2000 Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (root@mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id HAA14449 for ; Tue, 21 Nov 2000 07:21:45 +0100 Received: from ztxmail03.ztx.compaq.com (ztxmail03.ztx.compaq.com [161.114.1.207]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id HAA01526 for ; Tue, 21 Nov 2000 07:21:43 +0100 (MET) Received: by ztxmail03.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 40BA718C0; Tue, 21 Nov 2000 00:19:57 -0600 (CST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by ztxmail03.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id BD4581981; Tue, 21 Nov 2000 00:19:54 -0600 (CST) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA28257; Mon, 20 Nov 2000 22:19:52 -0800 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id WAA20709; Mon, 20 Nov 2000 22:17:16 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id WAA20708; Mon, 20 Nov 2000 22:17:16 -0800 (PST) Received: from ztxmail02.nz-cce.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA30303; Mon, 20 Nov 2000 22:17:15 -0800 Received: by ztxmail02.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 9B7662EFE; Tue, 21 Nov 2000 00:17:14 -0600 (CST) Received: from smtp2.andrew.cmu.edu (SMTP2.ANDREW.CMU.EDU [128.2.10.82]) by ztxmail02.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF9FD2C29 for ; Tue, 21 Nov 2000 00:17:13 -0600 (CST) Received: from unix10.andrew.cmu.edu (UNIX10.ANDREW.CMU.EDU [128.2.15.14]) by smtp2.andrew.cmu.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id BAA08525; Tue, 21 Nov 2000 01:17:11 -0500 (EST) Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2000 01:17:12 -0500 (EST) From: John G Dorsey To: Nicolas Pitre Cc: SA-1100/Linux Subject: Re: diff-2.4.0-test10-rmk2-np2 In-Reply-To: Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk On Mon, 20 Nov 2000, Nicolas Pitre wrote: > Note: PCMCIA was broken for me in the last patch. It is still more > obviously broken now i.e. "Bad mode in prefetch abort handler detected". I'm getting a little behind in servicing PCMCIA gripes, but luckily, I think this one is easy to fix. In sa1100_pcmcia_thread(), try adding: state_array.size=sa1100_pcmcia_socket_count; state_array.state=state; ...just before the do {...} while() loop. Sorry, -jd From kramer@pa.dec.com Tue Nov 21 16:25:39 2000 Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (root@mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id QAA15551 for ; Tue, 21 Nov 2000 16:25:38 +0100 Received: from zmamail05.zma.compaq.com (zmamail05.zma.compaq.com [161.114.64.105]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id QAA04642 for ; Tue, 21 Nov 2000 16:25:30 +0100 (MET) Received: by zmamail05.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 9E3313BD4; Tue, 21 Nov 2000 10:23:38 -0500 (EST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by zmamail05.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 25B0D380A; Tue, 21 Nov 2000 10:23:36 -0500 (EST) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA08156; Tue, 21 Nov 2000 07:23:33 -0800 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id HAA05145; Tue, 21 Nov 2000 07:21:10 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id HAA03894; Tue, 21 Nov 2000 07:21:10 -0800 (PST) Received: from ztxmail01.nz-cce.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA26267; Tue, 21 Nov 2000 07:21:09 -0800 Received: by ztxmail01.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 50939207C; Tue, 21 Nov 2000 09:21:09 -0600 (CST) Received: from xanadu.gn.com (modemcable248.137-200-24.mtl.mc.videotron.ca [24.200.137.248]) by ztxmail01.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE1EF226E for ; Tue, 21 Nov 2000 09:21:08 -0600 (CST) Received: from localhost (nico@localhost) by xanadu.gn.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id KAA12579; Tue, 21 Nov 2000 10:21:01 -0500 X-Authentication-Warning: xanadu.gn.com: nico owned process doing -bs Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2000 10:21:01 -0500 (EST) From: Nicolas Pitre X-Sender: To: John G Dorsey Cc: SA-1100/Linux Subject: Re: diff-2.4.0-test10-rmk2-np2 In-Reply-To: Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk On Tue, 21 Nov 2000, John G Dorsey wrote: > On Mon, 20 Nov 2000, Nicolas Pitre wrote: > > Note: PCMCIA was broken for me in the last patch. It is still more > > obviously broken now i.e. "Bad mode in prefetch abort handler detected". > > I'm getting a little behind in servicing PCMCIA gripes, but luckily, I > think this one is easy to fix. In sa1100_pcmcia_thread(), try adding: > > state_array.size=sa1100_pcmcia_socket_count; > state_array.state=state; > > ...just before the do {...} while() loop. > > Sorry, This one is certainly my fault. I moved things a bit yesterday night and decided to release a patch anyway without fixing it so I could go to bed... Nicolas From kramer@pa.dec.com Tue Nov 21 22:40:22 2000 Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (root@mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id WAA16429 for ; Tue, 21 Nov 2000 22:40:21 +0100 Received: from zmamail05.zma.compaq.com (zmamail05.zma.compaq.com [161.114.64.105]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id WAA25401 for ; Tue, 21 Nov 2000 22:40:19 +0100 (MET) Received: by zmamail05.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 80B572D5B; Tue, 21 Nov 2000 16:38:31 -0500 (EST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by zmamail05.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id A74F62CD3; Tue, 21 Nov 2000 16:38:25 -0500 (EST) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA01587; Tue, 21 Nov 2000 13:38:16 -0800 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id NAA16750; Tue, 21 Nov 2000 13:34:28 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id NAA16399; Tue, 21 Nov 2000 13:34:28 -0800 (PST) Received: from ztxmail01.nz-cce.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA23092; Tue, 21 Nov 2000 13:34:27 -0800 Received: by ztxmail01.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 69BF9447F; Tue, 21 Nov 2000 15:34:27 -0600 (CST) Received: from smtp2.andrew.cmu.edu (SMTP2.ANDREW.CMU.EDU [128.2.10.82]) by ztxmail01.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7AB6C433A for ; Tue, 21 Nov 2000 15:34:26 -0600 (CST) Received: from unix10.andrew.cmu.edu (UNIX10.ANDREW.CMU.EDU [128.2.15.14]) by smtp2.andrew.cmu.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id QAA02879; Tue, 21 Nov 2000 16:34:19 -0500 (EST) Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2000 16:34:20 -0500 (EST) From: John G Dorsey To: Nicolas Pitre Cc: SA-1100/Linux Subject: Re: diff-2.4.0-test10-rmk2-np2 In-Reply-To: Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk On Tue, 21 Nov 2000, Nicolas Pitre wrote: > This one is certainly my fault. I moved things a bit yesterday night and > decided to release a patch anyway without fixing it so I could go to bed... The problems with -test10-rmk2-np2 require a little bit more than the two-line patch I posted last night. I've posted 2.4.0-test10-rmk2-np2-jd1 on my Assabet page under "Bleeding Edge." Briefly, this patch restores the socket driver to its -test9-rmk2-np3-jd2 state, modulo the Yopy addition and a card detection change. (The socket driver has been receiving card detect interrupts, but has not been propagating them to the PCMCIA core because a SetSocket command is no longer being issued to initialize each socket. The SetSocket command, among other things, enables the card detection event in the mask which controls event callback to the core.) Also note that this patch does not terminate the "PCMCIA Watcher" thread during module removal. I didn't add support for this in my original re-org because the Yenta driver doesn't do it either; after a conversation with David Hinds, it sounds like the convention for removing socket drivers is going to involve a userland killproc or similar before rmmod. I'd be happy to hear arguments for other approaches, of course. Have fun, -jd From kramer@pa.dec.com Tue Nov 21 23:37:39 2000 Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (root@mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id XAA16594 for ; Tue, 21 Nov 2000 23:37:39 +0100 Received: from ztxmail03.ztx.compaq.com (ztxmail03.ztx.compaq.com [161.114.1.207]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id XAA28469 for ; Tue, 21 Nov 2000 23:37:37 +0100 (MET) Received: by ztxmail03.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 6AA41107D; Tue, 21 Nov 2000 16:35:56 -0600 (CST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by ztxmail03.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id C2B531026; Tue, 21 Nov 2000 16:35:54 -0600 (CST) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA15192; Tue, 21 Nov 2000 14:35:53 -0800 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id OAA31794; Tue, 21 Nov 2000 14:34:12 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id OAA17932; Tue, 21 Nov 2000 14:34:12 -0800 (PST) Received: from zmamail02.nz-tay.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA05536; Tue, 21 Nov 2000 14:34:11 -0800 Received: by zmamail02.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 5604C590D; Tue, 21 Nov 2000 17:34:11 -0500 (EST) Received: from xanadu.gn.com (modemcable248.137-200-24.mtl.mc.videotron.ca [24.200.137.248]) by zmamail02.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EAEEC584B for ; Tue, 21 Nov 2000 17:34:10 -0500 (EST) Received: from localhost (nico@localhost) by xanadu.gn.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id RAA13625; Tue, 21 Nov 2000 17:34:07 -0500 X-Authentication-Warning: xanadu.gn.com: nico owned process doing -bs Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2000 17:34:07 -0500 (EST) From: Nicolas Pitre X-Sender: To: John G Dorsey Cc: SA-1100/Linux Subject: Re: diff-2.4.0-test10-rmk2-np2 In-Reply-To: Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk On Tue, 21 Nov 2000, John G Dorsey wrote: > The problems with -test10-rmk2-np2 require a little bit more than the > two-line patch I posted last night. I've posted 2.4.0-test10-rmk2-np2-jd1 > on my Assabet page under "Bleeding Edge." > > Briefly, this patch restores the socket driver to its -test9-rmk2-np3-jd2 > state, modulo the Yopy addition and a card detection change. In test10-rmk2-np2 I moved initialisation stuff out of the watcher thread so the insmod operation could fail right away if an initialisation error ocured. It also had the tiny advantage of being marked as __init code which get discarded after usage for the compiled-in case. Right now the thread terminates but there is no clue to the user (and the previous version forgot to decrease module use count). > Also note that this patch does not terminate the "PCMCIA Watcher" thread > during module removal. I didn't add support for this in my original re-org > because the Yenta driver doesn't do it either; after a conversation with > David Hinds, it sounds like the convention for removing socket drivers is > going to involve a userland killproc or similar before rmmod. Do you know what's his rational for that? > I'd be happy to hear arguments for other approaches, of course. IMHO: - counter-intuitive - if you kill it by mistake, you have to reload everything (the reason for blocking signals previously) - makes no sense for the compiled-in case I might be wrong though. Nicolas From kramer@pa.dec.com Fri Nov 24 23:59:23 2000 Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (root@mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id XAA28973 for ; Fri, 24 Nov 2000 23:59:22 +0100 Received: from zmamail05.zma.compaq.com (zmamail05.zma.compaq.com [161.114.64.105]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id XAA12257 for ; Fri, 24 Nov 2000 23:59:21 +0100 (MET) Received: by zmamail05.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id D1CD02F93; Fri, 24 Nov 2000 17:57:34 -0500 (EST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by zmamail05.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id B7D062DCB; Fri, 24 Nov 2000 17:57:32 -0500 (EST) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA02947; Fri, 24 Nov 2000 14:57:29 -0800 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id OAA06214; Fri, 24 Nov 2000 14:48:46 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id OAA13368; Fri, 24 Nov 2000 14:48:46 -0800 (PST) Received: from ztxmail01.nz-cce.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA16611; Fri, 24 Nov 2000 14:48:46 -0800 Received: by ztxmail01.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 83F3D45DF; Fri, 24 Nov 2000 16:48:45 -0600 (CST) Received: from xanadu.gn.com (modemcable248.137-200-24.mtl.mc.videotron.ca [24.200.137.248]) by ztxmail01.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F2D12287F for ; Fri, 24 Nov 2000 16:48:44 -0600 (CST) Received: from localhost (nico@localhost) by xanadu.gn.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id RAA01257; Fri, 24 Nov 2000 17:48:43 -0500 X-Authentication-Warning: xanadu.gn.com: nico owned process doing -bs Date: Fri, 24 Nov 2000 17:48:43 -0500 (EST) From: Nicolas Pitre X-Sender: To: SA-1100/Linux Cc: Subject: diff-2.4.0-test10-rmk2-np3 Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk ... is now available at the usual locations. ChangeLog: - PCMCIA fixes (John G Dorsey) - SA11x0 in-kernel profiler ( Deborah Wallach) - SA11x0 USB network link fixes (Oleg Drokin) - small setup-sa1100.S fix (George G. Davis) - CPU speedscale + power management (Oleg Drokin) - schedule_task() (David Woodhouse) - Use schedule_task() for PCMCIA (me) - MTD Flash specific geometry selection (me) - LP-E hack for odd-length packets removed from pcnet-cs (me) [the insw() bugfix allowed for this. maybe the virtual bus ops stuff could go away too... John?] - small mtdblock possible coherency problem fixed (me) - probably other minor small things Have a good weekend! Nicolas From kramer@pa.dec.com Sat Nov 25 00:54:15 2000 Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (root@mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id AAA29125 for ; Sat, 25 Nov 2000 00:54:15 +0100 Received: from ztxmail04.ztx.compaq.com (ztxmail04.ztx.compaq.com [161.114.1.208]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id AAA14253 for ; Sat, 25 Nov 2000 00:54:14 +0100 (MET) Received: by ztxmail04.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 76E0FD7F; Fri, 24 Nov 2000 17:52:27 -0600 (CST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by ztxmail04.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 0A93CFB9; Fri, 24 Nov 2000 17:52:25 -0600 (CST) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA29252; Fri, 24 Nov 2000 15:52:19 -0800 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id PAA07819; Fri, 24 Nov 2000 15:48:40 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id PAA08324; Fri, 24 Nov 2000 15:48:39 -0800 (PST) Received: from ztxmail01.nz-cce.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA07108; Fri, 24 Nov 2000 15:48:39 -0800 Received: by ztxmail01.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 47CF2167C; Fri, 24 Nov 2000 17:48:38 -0600 (CST) Received: from amsmta05-svc.chello.nl (mail-out.chello.nl [213.46.240.7]) by ztxmail01.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D7A243C7 for ; Fri, 24 Nov 2000 17:48:37 -0600 (CST) Received: from d4050.dtk.chello.nl ([213.46.4.50]) by amsmta05-svc.chello.nl (InterMail vK.4.02.00.10 201-232-116-110 license 1753790c58305fd3f286395c4a42fdc7) with ESMTP id <20001124235006.KTKV5688.amsmta05-svc@d4050.dtk.chello.nl> for ; Sat, 25 Nov 2000 00:50:06 +0100 Received: from kero by d4050.dtk.chello.nl with local (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 13zSXW-0000UG-00 for ; Sat, 25 Nov 2000 00:45:58 +0100 Date: Sat, 25 Nov 2000 00:45:58 +0100 From: Kero van Gelder To: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Subject: too active sound patch Message-Id: <20001125004558.A1843@d4050.dtk.chello.nl> Reply-To: kero@dds.nl Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="zhXaljGHf11kAtnf" Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk --zhXaljGHf11kAtnf Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Hello, Since you know how to turn off the speaker on an ipaq/sa1100, why not just turn it off when the module gets unloaded? Patch against 2.4.0-test8 attached (but it is so simple, you can figure out how to apply it, if patch won;t take it on your brand new test10 :-) Bye, Kero. +--- Kero --------------------------------- kero@dds.nl ---+ | Don't split your mentality without thinking twice | | Proud like a God -- Guano Apes | +--- M38c ------------------ http://huizen.dds.nl/~kero ---+ --zhXaljGHf11kAtnf Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="soundmod.unload.patch" 1465c1465 < static void audio_uda1341_reset() --- > static void audio_uda1341_reset(void) 1484a1485,1498 > static void audio_uda1341_suspend(void) { > audio_uda1341_reset(); > /* power down audio */ > if (machine_is_assabet()) audio_assabet_shutdown(); > if (machine_is_bitsy()) audio_bitsy_shutdown(); > } > > static void audio_uda1341_resume(void) { > L3_init(); > if (machine_is_assabet()) audio_assabet_init(); > if (machine_is_bitsy()) audio_bitsy_init(); > audio_uda1341_reset(); > } > 1489,1495c1503 < audio_uda1341_reset(); < /* power down audio */ < if (machine_is_assabet()) < audio_assabet_shutdown(); < if (machine_is_bitsy()) < audio_bitsy_shutdown(); < --- > audio_uda1341_suspend(); 1498,1503c1506 < L3_init(); < if (machine_is_assabet()) < audio_assabet_init(); < if (machine_is_bitsy()) < audio_bitsy_init(); < audio_uda1341_reset(); --- > audio_uda1341_resume(); 1532,1538c1535 < L3_init(); < < if (machine_is_assabet()) < audio_assabet_init(); < if (machine_is_bitsy()) < audio_bitsy_init(); < audio_uda1341_reset(); --- > audio_uda1341_resume(); 1582a1580 > audio_uda1341_suspend(); --zhXaljGHf11kAtnf-- From kramer@pa.dec.com Thu Nov 30 23:35:26 2000 Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (root@mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id XAA20420 for ; Thu, 30 Nov 2000 23:35:26 +0100 Received: from ztxmail03.ztx.compaq.com (ztxmail03.ztx.compaq.com [161.114.1.207]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id XAA07619 for ; Thu, 30 Nov 2000 23:35:24 +0100 (MET) Received: by ztxmail03.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 2876A10C1; Thu, 30 Nov 2000 16:33:37 -0600 (CST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by ztxmail03.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 5EA2710CF; Thu, 30 Nov 2000 16:33:34 -0600 (CST) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA02991; Thu, 30 Nov 2000 14:33:30 -0800 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id OAA26802; Thu, 30 Nov 2000 14:27:15 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id OAA21339; Thu, 30 Nov 2000 14:27:14 -0800 (PST) Received: from ztxmail01.nz-cce.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA02990; Thu, 30 Nov 2000 14:27:14 -0800 Received: by ztxmail01.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 2B8A929CC; Thu, 30 Nov 2000 16:27:14 -0600 (CST) Received: from mail-blue.research.att.com (mail-blue.research.att.com [135.207.30.102]) by ztxmail01.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E450D2A0D for ; Thu, 30 Nov 2000 16:27:13 -0600 (CST) Received: from hermes.research.att.com (hermes.research.att.com [135.207.16.38]) by mail-blue.research.att.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6BD194CE46 for ; Thu, 30 Nov 2000 17:27:13 -0500 (EST) Received: from research.att.com (gliss [135.207.17.204]) by hermes.research.att.com (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id RAA09721 for ; Thu, 30 Nov 2000 17:22:47 -0500 (EST) Message-Id: <3A26D53B.61937E20@research.att.com> Date: Thu, 30 Nov 2000 17:31:23 -0500 From: "Jack T.C. Chang" X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.61 [en] (X11; U; IRIX 6.3 IP32) X-Accept-Language: en Mime-Version: 1.0 To: SA-1100/Linux Subject: sa1110 control registers Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk I tried to read the values of sa-1110 internal control registers (e.g. LCCR...)under Linux. Should I use their physical address? I tried the virtual address according hardware.h and got segmentation fault.... thx -- ====== Jack T. Chang From kramer@pa.dec.com Thu Nov 30 23:45:33 2000 Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (root@mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id XAA20516 for ; Thu, 30 Nov 2000 23:45:32 +0100 Received: from ztxmail03.ztx.compaq.com (ztxmail03.ztx.compaq.com [161.114.1.207]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id XAA08066 for ; Thu, 30 Nov 2000 23:45:31 +0100 (MET) Received: by ztxmail03.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id C556B10CF; Thu, 30 Nov 2000 16:43:44 -0600 (CST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by ztxmail03.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id F368111D1; Thu, 30 Nov 2000 16:43:42 -0600 (CST) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA18262; Thu, 30 Nov 2000 14:43:37 -0800 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id OAA29121; Thu, 30 Nov 2000 14:42:53 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id OAA10998; Thu, 30 Nov 2000 14:42:53 -0800 (PST) Received: from ztxmail01.nz-cce.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA16097; Thu, 30 Nov 2000 14:42:52 -0800 Received: by ztxmail01.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 995F129DD; Thu, 30 Nov 2000 16:42:52 -0600 (CST) Received: from xanadu.gn.com (modemcable248.137-200-24.mtl.mc.videotron.ca [24.200.137.248]) by ztxmail01.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E03FB443B for ; Thu, 30 Nov 2000 16:42:51 -0600 (CST) Received: from localhost (nico@localhost) by xanadu.gn.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id RAA14750; Thu, 30 Nov 2000 17:42:50 -0500 X-Authentication-Warning: xanadu.gn.com: nico owned process doing -bs Date: Thu, 30 Nov 2000 17:42:50 -0500 (EST) From: Nicolas Pitre X-Sender: To: "Jack T.C. Chang" Cc: SA-1100/Linux Subject: Re: sa1110 control registers In-Reply-To: <3A26D53B.61937E20@research.att.com> Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk On Thu, 30 Nov 2000, Jack T.C. Chang wrote: > I tried to read the values of sa-1110 internal control registers (e.g. > LCCR...)under Linux. > Should I use their physical address? I tried the virtual address > according hardware.h and got segmentation > fault.... thx You can't read it from user space. Nicolas From kramer@pa.dec.com Thu Nov 30 23:59:13 2000 Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (root@mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id XAA20578 for ; Thu, 30 Nov 2000 23:59:13 +0100 Received: from ztxmail05.ztx.compaq.com (ztxmail05.ztx.compaq.com [161.114.1.209]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id XAA08768 for ; Thu, 30 Nov 2000 23:59:10 +0100 (MET) Received: by ztxmail05.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 724F116B4; Thu, 30 Nov 2000 16:57:23 -0600 (CST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by ztxmail05.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id C375215FA; Thu, 30 Nov 2000 16:57:21 -0600 (CST) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA14550; Thu, 30 Nov 2000 14:57:17 -0800 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id OAA31265; Thu, 30 Nov 2000 14:56:42 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id OAA30358; Thu, 30 Nov 2000 14:56:41 -0800 (PST) Received: from ztxmail01.nz-cce.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA18756; Thu, 30 Nov 2000 14:56:40 -0800 Received: by ztxmail01.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 8FCA3203C; Thu, 30 Nov 2000 16:56:39 -0600 (CST) Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by ztxmail01.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A0FB82873 for ; Thu, 30 Nov 2000 16:56:38 -0600 (CST) Received: from arthur.ubicom.tudelft.nl (erik.et.tudelft.nl [130.161.48.56]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id XAA08573; Thu, 30 Nov 2000 23:56:28 +0100 (MET) Received: (from erik@localhost) by arthur.ubicom.tudelft.nl (8.11.0/8.11.0/SuSE Linux 8.11.0-0.4) id eAUMuG811890; Thu, 30 Nov 2000 23:56:16 +0100 Date: Thu, 30 Nov 2000 23:56:16 +0100 From: Erik Mouw To: "Jack T.C. Chang" Cc: SA-1100/Linux Subject: Re: sa1110 control registers Message-Id: <20001130235616.E11138@arthur.ubicom.tudelft.nl> References: <3A26D53B.61937E20@research.att.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="yrj/dFKFPuw6o+aM" Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <3A26D53B.61937E20@research.att.com>; from tcc@research.att.com on Thu, Nov 30, 2000 at 05:31:23PM -0500 Organization: Eric Conspiracy Secret Labs X-Eric-Conspiracy: There is no conspiracy! Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk --yrj/dFKFPuw6o+aM Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Thu, Nov 30, 2000 at 05:31:23PM -0500, Jack T.C. Chang wrote: > I tried to read the values of sa-1110 internal control registers (e.g. > LCCR...)under Linux. > Should I use their physical address? I tried the virtual address > according hardware.h and got segmentation > fault.... thx Open /dev/mem, you can mmap physical addresses with it. Attached is an example program. Compile with "arm-linux-gcc -O2 -o devmem devmem.c" Erik -- J.A.K. (Erik) Mouw, Information and Communication Theory Group, Department of Electrical Engineering, Faculty of Information Technology and Systems, Delft University of Technology, PO BOX 5031, 2600 GA Delft, The Netherlands Phone: +31-15-2783635 Fax: +31-15-2781843 Email: J.A.K.Mouw@its.tudelft.nl WWW: http://www-ict.its.tudelft.nl/~erik/ --yrj/dFKFPuw6o+aM Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="devmem.c" /* devmem2.c Simple program to read/write from/to any location in memory. */ #include #include #include #include #include #include #include #include #include #include #include #define FATAL do { fprintf(stderr, "Error at line %d, file %s (%d) [%s]\n", \ __LINE__, __FILE__, errno, strerror(errno)); exit(1); } while(0) #define MAP_SIZE 4096UL #define MAP_MASK (MAP_SIZE - 1) int main(int argc, char **argv) { int fd; void *map_base, *virt_addr; unsigned long read_result, writeval; off_t target; int access_type = 'w'; if(argc < 2) { fprintf(stderr, "\nUsage:\t%s { address } [ type [ data ] ]\n" "\taddress : memory address to act upon\n" "\ttype : access operation type : [b]yte, [h]alfword, [w]ord\n" "\tdata : data to be written\n\n", argv[0]); exit(1); } target = strtoul(argv[1], 0, 0); if(argc > 2) access_type = tolower(argv[2][0]); if((fd = open("/dev/mem", O_RDWR | O_SYNC)) == -1) FATAL; printf("/dev/mem opened.\n"); fflush(stdout); /* Map one page */ map_base = mmap(0, MAP_SIZE, PROT_READ | PROT_WRITE, MAP_SHARED, fd, target & ~MAP_MASK); if(map_base == (void *) -1) FATAL; printf("Memory mapped at address %p.\n", map_base); fflush(stdout); virt_addr = map_base + (target & MAP_MASK); switch(access_type) { case 'b': read_result = *((unsigned char *) virt_addr); break; case 'h': read_result = *((unsigned short *) virt_addr); break; case 'w': read_result = *((unsigned long *) virt_addr); break; default: fprintf(stderr, "Illegal data type '%c'.\n", access_type); exit(2); } printf("Value at address 0x%X (%p): 0x%X\n", target, virt_addr, read_result); fflush(stdout); if(argc > 3) { writeval = strtoul(argv[3], 0, 0); switch(access_type) { case 'b': *((unsigned char *) virt_addr) = writeval; read_result = *((unsigned char *) virt_addr); break; case 'h': *((unsigned short *) virt_addr) = writeval; read_result = *((unsigned short *) virt_addr); break; case 'w': *((unsigned long *) virt_addr) = writeval; read_result = *((unsigned long *) virt_addr); break; } printf("Written 0x%X; readback 0x%X\n", writeval, read_result); fflush(stdout); } if(munmap(map_base, MAP_SIZE) == -1) FATAL; close(fd); return 0; } --yrj/dFKFPuw6o+aM-- From kramer@pa.dec.com Fri Dec 1 03:41:11 2000 Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (root@mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id DAA21552 for ; Fri, 1 Dec 2000 03:41:11 +0100 Received: from ztxmail04.ztx.compaq.com (ztxmail04.ztx.compaq.com [161.114.1.208]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id DAA17680 for ; Fri, 1 Dec 2000 03:41:10 +0100 (MET) Received: by ztxmail04.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 0442CEAA; Thu, 30 Nov 2000 20:39:23 -0600 (CST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by ztxmail04.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 3F2AACE4; Thu, 30 Nov 2000 20:39:21 -0600 (CST) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA25734; Thu, 30 Nov 2000 18:39:13 -0800 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id SAA25677; Thu, 30 Nov 2000 18:37:07 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id SAA06368; Thu, 30 Nov 2000 18:37:06 -0800 (PST) Received: from ztxmail02.nz-cce.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA05661; Thu, 30 Nov 2000 18:37:04 -0800 Received: by ztxmail02.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 4B8961DE4; Thu, 30 Nov 2000 20:37:03 -0600 (CST) Received: from hanwang.com.cn (unknown [211.101.142.162]) by ztxmail02.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F12BB1E35 for ; Thu, 30 Nov 2000 20:37:01 -0600 (CST) Received: from hanwang.com.cn ([172.16.1.66]) by hanwang.com.cn (8.9.3/8.8.7) with ESMTP id KAA17951; Fri, 1 Dec 2000 10:23:17 -0800 Message-Id: <3A270EA5.D446F13E@hanwang.com.cn> Date: Fri, 01 Dec 2000 10:36:21 +0800 From: dai hongbo X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.72 [zh_CN] (X11; I; Linux 2.2.16 i686) X-Accept-Language: en Mime-Version: 1.0 To: Guillaume Jaunet Cc: "ipaq@handhelds.org" , SA-1100/Linux , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.arm.linux.org.uk" Subject: Re: mounting Ramdisk with loopback References: <3A0FC223.A2114E39@lep-philips.fr> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=gb2312 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk i meet the same problem,though i 'm using linux-2.40-test10-rmk2-np3. i tried to mout loopback device on flash and nfs file system,but the system just hang. i did some printk work to find what's going wrong,and found in fuction "do_lo_request" (loop.c), system doing infinite loop. Guillaume Jaunet wrote: > I've got an an assabet platform with a Microdrive. I'm starting Linux > from flash with a Ramdisk. I'd like to be able to modify this ramdisk > directly from the embedded platform. So I tried to mount the > corresponding file with the following command : > > mount -o loop -t ext2 ramdisk_ks /mnt/ramdisk > > But this command fails. I get no output messages and loose control over > the box. But the scheduler is still running, as a flashing led indicates > me. > I thought about memory lack (the kernel would do calls to free some) but > I've still got 12Mb of available memory to mount a 8Mb ramdisk. > > I've compiled kernel with loopback support, the ramdisk_ks file is the > decompressed image of my ramdisk and the mount point exists. > > I,ve debugged the mount program with gdb, and it seems that the problem > is in the kernel : I can get to the mount system call, and then it > "hangs". > > Guillaume J. > > _______________________________________________ > http://lists.arm.linux.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel From kramer@pa.dec.com Sat Dec 2 03:11:00 2000 Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (root@mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id DAA26479 for ; Sat, 2 Dec 2000 03:11:00 +0100 Received: from zmamail04.zma.compaq.com (zmamail04.zma.compaq.com [161.114.64.104]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id DAA28898 for ; Sat, 2 Dec 2000 03:10:58 +0100 (MET) Received: by zmamail04.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id A3FE1431; Fri, 1 Dec 2000 21:09:11 -0500 (EST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by zmamail04.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 54DC650A; Fri, 1 Dec 2000 21:09:09 -0500 (EST) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA01259; Fri, 1 Dec 2000 18:09:02 -0800 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id SAA07262; Fri, 1 Dec 2000 18:00:52 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id SAA29906; Fri, 1 Dec 2000 18:00:51 -0800 (PST) From: Received: from zmamail01.nz-tay.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA26391; Fri, 1 Dec 2000 18:00:50 -0800 Received: by zmamail01.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id EA11CC094; Fri, 1 Dec 2000 21:00:49 -0500 (EST) Received: from aset.com.tw (ftp.aset.com.tw [210.68.241.2]) by zmamail01.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 7D495BFEE; Fri, 1 Dec 2000 21:00:44 -0500 (EST) Received: from from pouifesi.cc.org.ar ([256.45.36.4]) by ris5s2.daidacenottere1.chuea.ceaimtv.net.ie (8.9.1a/8.9.1/1.0) with SMTP id NAE11975 ([256.45.256.4]) by aset.com.tw (SMI-8.6/SMI-SVR4) id JAA12995; Sat, 2 Dec 2000 09:57:28 +0800 Message-Id: <0000440c604e$000031d2$0000283c@from pouifesi.cc.org.ar ([256.45.36.4]) by ris5s2.daidacenottere1.chuea.ceaimtv.net.ie (8.9.1a/8.9.1/1.0) with SMTP id NAE11975 ([256.45.256.4])> To: Subject: Need Extra Cash? We say YES to home loans! 10300 Date: Mon, 22 May 2000 05:05:39 -0700 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Priority: 3 X-Msmail-Priority: Normal Reply-To: return65@uole.com Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk The Lender

The Lender's Network Mortgage Specia= lists

For U.S.A. Homeowners Only
Save Now!

We Shop The Best Loan For You!

The Lenders Network i= s a 100% free service which lets you shop for a mortgage conveniently and securely from the = comfort of your home. Using our vast network of lenders across the U.S., we will searc= h our database of loan programs for the best loans that fit your needs.  Even if yo= u're currently working with another lender or have been turned down before, we can st= ill help. 

Our= loan programs can get you the cash you need for:

  • Debt Consolidation
  • 2nd Mortgage
  • Refinance
  • Credit Repair
  • Home Improvement
  • New Car
  • Dream Vacation
  • College Tuition
  • To start a new business ..and much, much more!

F= unding borrowers with less than perfect credit is our specialty!

Incredibly low monthly payments

We can get you the loa= n you need. 
Regardless of whether you have good or bad= credit, we can help you.

Ready to get starte= d? 
Simply fill out the form below, and we'll = begin shopping for your loan.  It's that easy! 

Free Mortgage Quote

 

Contact Information (* required info)
Name: *
Address: *
City: *
State(US Only): *
Zip/Postal Code: *
Home Phone:  *
Work Phone: *
Email Address:
Best Time to Call:
Do You Own Your Home? Mobile Homes DO NOT Qualify=
Property Value: * 
Property Type:
Purchase Price: *
Year Acquired: *
1st Mortgage Balance Owe= d: * 
1st Mortgage Interest Ra= te: *
Is 1st Adjustable or Fix= ed?: *
2nd Mortgage Balance Owe= d: *
Amount You Wish To Borro= w: *
Employer:
Monthly Gross Household = Income *
Cre= dit Rating: *
Loan Interested In: *


Removal Instructions:
Click on the below link to be exclude from further communication.
Click Here<= /a>

From kramer@pa.dec.com Mon Dec 4 02:28:45 2000 Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (root@mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id CAA00142 for ; Mon, 4 Dec 2000 02:28:45 +0100 Received: from zmamail04.zma.compaq.com (zmamail04.zma.compaq.com [161.114.64.104]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id CAA13135 for ; Mon, 4 Dec 2000 02:28:43 +0100 (MET) Received: by zmamail04.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id BF59E46E; Sun, 3 Dec 2000 20:26:56 -0500 (EST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by zmamail04.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id B4228789; Sun, 3 Dec 2000 20:26:54 -0500 (EST) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA05187; Sun, 3 Dec 2000 17:26:46 -0800 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id RAA10452; Sun, 3 Dec 2000 17:17:26 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id RAA00364; Sun, 3 Dec 2000 17:17:26 -0800 (PST) Received: from zmamail01.nz-tay.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA19211; Sun, 3 Dec 2000 17:17:25 -0800 Received: by zmamail01.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 8F9F7BC2D; Sun, 3 Dec 2000 20:17:25 -0500 (EST) Received: from xanadu.gn.com (modemcable248.137-200-24.mtl.mc.videotron.ca [24.200.137.248]) by zmamail01.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2FA37BE9C for ; Sun, 3 Dec 2000 20:17:25 -0500 (EST) Received: from localhost (nico@localhost) by xanadu.gn.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id UAA30759; Sun, 3 Dec 2000 20:17:24 -0500 X-Authentication-Warning: xanadu.gn.com: nico owned process doing -bs Date: Sun, 3 Dec 2000 20:17:24 -0500 (EST) From: Nicolas Pitre X-Sender: To: SA-1100/Linux Cc: Subject: diff-2.4.0-test11-rmk1-np1 Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk ... is now available. However, since ftp.netwinder.org is out at the moment, this patch is available only at: ftp://ftp.arm.linux.org.uk/pub/linux/arm/people/nico/ ftp://ftp.handhelds.org/pub/linux/arm/sa-1100-patches/ ChangeLog: - SA1100 Watchdog driver (Oleg Drokin) - SA1100 RTC driver (Nils Faerber) - UDA1341 driver now accepts mono audio (me) - more UDA1341 fixes for mixer, power usage, etc. (me) [power is now applied at open and removed at release time] - block loop remapper (Jens Axboe) [this allows storing cramfs (or any other) filesystem images on a JFFS filesystem and mounting them via the loop interface. It only works read-only for now though.] - fixes to the new assembly {in,out}s[bwl]() functions (me) - timer for the in-kernel profiler made modular (me) Reminder: The next patch will finally have the flash-mem.c driver removed. This driver is now obsolete since the MTD subsystem is offering the same capabilities with a far better implementation. Please have a look at drivers/mtd/sa1100-flash.c for the spot where you should add your flash definitions. Enjoy! Nicolas From kramer@pa.dec.com Mon Dec 4 15:31:24 2000 Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (root@mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id PAA02450 for ; Mon, 4 Dec 2000 15:31:23 +0100 Received: from zmamail03.zma.compaq.com (zmamail03.zma.compaq.com [161.114.64.103]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id PAA18664 for ; Mon, 4 Dec 2000 15:31:22 +0100 (MET) Received: by zmamail03.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 150074CAF; Mon, 4 Dec 2000 09:29:35 -0500 (EST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by zmamail03.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id AB4D84D1E; Mon, 4 Dec 2000 09:29:32 -0500 (EST) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA02186; Mon, 4 Dec 2000 06:29:15 -0800 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id GAA10339; Mon, 4 Dec 2000 06:23:43 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id GAA21840; Mon, 4 Dec 2000 06:23:42 -0800 (PST) Received: from zmamail01.nz-tay.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA12172; Mon, 4 Dec 2000 06:23:40 -0800 Received: by zmamail01.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id F2CC8C2FA; Mon, 4 Dec 2000 09:23:39 -0500 (EST) Received: from www.hw-agent.de (www.hw-agent.de [212.63.43.180]) by zmamail01.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 673A8C076 for ; Mon, 4 Dec 2000 09:23:39 -0500 (EST) Received: from hw-mail.hoeft-wessel.de (unknown [172.26.252.3]) by www.hw-agent.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 04FE17763D for ; Mon, 4 Dec 2000 15:22:38 +0100 (CET) Received: by HW_MAIL with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21) id ; Mon, 4 Dec 2000 15:23:37 +0100 Message-Id: <81413F587EB9D1118F56000092941A3EA78D94@HW_MAIL> From: "JOR. - Jordan, Roman" To: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Subject: page allocation Date: Mon, 4 Dec 2000 15:23:29 +0100 Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk Hi all, i have the following problem. I want to share memory between the linux kernel and my bootloader. Thats sounds easy, but this area should be max. 64 kByte and should not be used from linux kernel as normal RAM. This information are for initializing some parts of hardware. I use the 2.4.0-test8-rmk4-np3 kernel. In the file 'mm-sa1100' i can insert some RAM area as IO area. But it works only, if the size is 1MByte or bigger. A second question. Where is the best place to get information form loader (from my own shared memory). At the moment i get it in 'main.c'. Thanks, in advance Roman Jordan From kramer@pa.dec.com Mon Dec 4 16:07:27 2000 Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (root@mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id QAA02586 for ; Mon, 4 Dec 2000 16:07:27 +0100 Received: from zmamail03.zma.compaq.com (zmamail03.zma.compaq.com [161.114.64.103]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id QAA21008 for ; Mon, 4 Dec 2000 16:07:25 +0100 (MET) Received: by zmamail03.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id D030240F; Mon, 4 Dec 2000 10:05:38 -0500 (EST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by zmamail03.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 3D770654; Mon, 4 Dec 2000 10:05:35 -0500 (EST) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA04538; Mon, 4 Dec 2000 07:05:29 -0800 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id HAA21656; Mon, 4 Dec 2000 07:02:10 -0800 (PST) Received: from zmamail01.zma.compaq.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id HAA25697; Mon, 4 Dec 2000 07:02:10 -0800 (PST) From: Received: by zmamail01.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 238CCC280; Mon, 4 Dec 2000 10:02:09 -0500 (EST) Received: from mail.ixcelerator.com (wsa-245.sibintek.net [213.128.193.245]) by zmamail01.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 92525C308 for ; Mon, 4 Dec 2000 10:02:03 -0500 (EST) Received: from morgoth.ixcelerator.com (IDENT:root@morgoth.ixcel.ru [172.16.10.70]) by mail.ixcelerator.com (8.10.1/8.10.1) with ESMTP id eB4IxOn01559; Mon, 4 Dec 2000 21:59:28 +0300 Received: (from green@localhost) by morgoth.ixcelerator.com (8.10.1/8.10.1) id eB4F0Gu14644; Mon, 4 Dec 2000 18:00:16 +0300 Date: Mon, 4 Dec 2000 18:00:16 +0300 Message-Id: <200012041500.eB4F0Gu14644@morgoth.ixcelerator.com> To: nico@CAM.ORG, sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Subject: Re: diff-2.4.0-test11-rmk1-np1 X-Newsgroups: linux.arm-announce In-Reply-To: User-Agent: tin/1.4.2-20000205 ("Possession") (UNIX) (Linux/2.4.0-test11 (i686)) Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk > - more UDA1341 fixes for mixer, power usage, etc. (me) > [power is now applied at open and removed at release time] Without patch below, it is not possible to build sound module with CONFIG_PM enabled. --- drivers/sound/sa1100-uda1341.c.orig Mon Dec 4 17:49:24 2000 +++ drivers/sound/sa1100-uda1341.c Mon Dec 4 17:55:20 2000 @@ -542,7 +542,9 @@ static int audio_dev_dsp; /* registered ID for DSP device */ static int audio_dev_mixer; /* registered ID for mixer device */ static int audio_mix_modcnt; /* mixer mods count */ - +#ifdef CONFIG_PM +static struct pm_dev *audio_pm_dev; /* registered PM device */ +#endif /* * This function frees all buffers @@ -1818,7 +1820,7 @@ } -static void audio_uda1341_reset() +static void audio_uda1341_reset(void) { /* Reset the chip */ STATUS_0.reset = 1; @@ -1975,6 +1977,10 @@ void __exit audio_uda1341_exit(void) { +#ifdef CONFIG_PM + if (audio_pm_dev) + pm_unregister(audio_pm_dev); +#endif /* unregister driver and IRQ */ unregister_sound_dsp(audio_dev_dsp); unregister_sound_mixer(audio_dev_mixer); Bye, Oleg From kramer@pa.dec.com Mon Dec 4 21:27:34 2000 Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (root@mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id VAA03632 for ; Mon, 4 Dec 2000 21:27:34 +0100 Received: from zmamail03.zma.compaq.com (zmamail03.zma.compaq.com [161.114.64.103]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id VAA10181 for ; Mon, 4 Dec 2000 21:27:32 +0100 (MET) Received: by zmamail03.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 6091C1990; Mon, 4 Dec 2000 15:25:45 -0500 (EST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by zmamail03.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 2F2B31A78; Mon, 4 Dec 2000 15:25:43 -0500 (EST) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA01619; Mon, 4 Dec 2000 12:25:36 -0800 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id MAA11068; Mon, 4 Dec 2000 12:22:55 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id MAA00543; Mon, 4 Dec 2000 12:22:55 -0800 (PST) Received: from zmamail02.nz-tay.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA21305; Mon, 4 Dec 2000 12:22:54 -0800 Received: by zmamail02.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 4957758C3; Mon, 4 Dec 2000 15:22:54 -0500 (EST) Received: from xanadu.gn.com (modemcable248.137-200-24.mtl.mc.videotron.ca [24.200.137.248]) by zmamail02.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D935F5B27 for ; Mon, 4 Dec 2000 15:22:53 -0500 (EST) Received: from localhost (nico@localhost) by xanadu.gn.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id PAA05574; Mon, 4 Dec 2000 15:22:53 -0500 X-Authentication-Warning: xanadu.gn.com: nico owned process doing -bs Date: Mon, 4 Dec 2000 15:22:53 -0500 (EST) From: Nicolas Pitre X-Sender: To: SA-1100/Linux Cc: Subject: diff-2.4.0-test11-rmk1-np2 Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk ... is now available at the usual sites. This is mainly fixing the buglets that turned up this morning... ChangeLog: - UDA1341 + CONFIG_PM compile fix (green@ixcelerator.com) - Freebird updates (Chester) - duplicate EXPORT_SYMBOL() removed - little loop block interface fix Enjoy! Nicolas From kramer@pa.dec.com Tue Dec 5 09:57:45 2000 Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (root@mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id JAA05701 for ; Tue, 5 Dec 2000 09:57:44 +0100 Received: from zmamail03.zma.compaq.com (zmamail03.zma.compaq.com [161.114.64.103]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id JAA22316 for ; Tue, 5 Dec 2000 09:57:42 +0100 (MET) Received: by zmamail03.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 84CDF197D; Tue, 5 Dec 2000 03:55:56 -0500 (EST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by zmamail03.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 5F6961B85; Tue, 5 Dec 2000 03:55:54 -0500 (EST) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA10407; Tue, 5 Dec 2000 00:55:46 -0800 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id AAA10366; Tue, 5 Dec 2000 00:49:49 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id AAA08820; Tue, 5 Dec 2000 00:49:49 -0800 (PST) Received: from ztxmail01.nz-cce.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA25976; Tue, 5 Dec 2000 00:49:48 -0800 Received: by ztxmail01.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 896A746C9; Tue, 5 Dec 2000 02:49:48 -0600 (CST) Received: from server.wipol.uni-essen.de (server.wipol.uni-essen.de [132.252.57.7]) by ztxmail01.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 5935143F4 for ; Tue, 5 Dec 2000 02:49:44 -0600 (CST) Received: from 63.20.241.106 (unverified [63.20.241.106]) by server.wipol.uni-essen.de (EMWAC SMTPRS 0.83) with SMTP id ; Tue, 05 Dec 2000 09:42:13 +0100 Message-Id: <00000a821659$000033db$0000248b@> To: From: Turner@edhaus.co.kr Subject: Get a FREE Satellite T.V. System!! Date: Tue, 05 Dec 2000 03:30:11 -0500 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-Msmail-Priority: Normal Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk FREE Satellite T.V. System and FREE Installation For a limited time we'll give you this top of the line Digital Satellite System for FREE! We'll even include Free installation. Enjoy over 500 Channels of crystal clear digital picture and cd stereo sound on your FREE Satellite TV System. Why pay for these items in a retail store, when we're giving you the same satellite package for free. Call 888-514-6881 to be Guaranteed Your FREE Satellite Today This Innovative 20" Satellite includes a stereo receiver and an infrared remote. With this FREE offer you will have both Interactive Television Capability and an On Screen Program Guide. This limited time FREE offer is much less than the monthly cost of cable tv. All you have to do is call us to arrange delivery. If you call today, we'll throw in a second receiver for your second T.V. free. Call 888-514-6881 to Begin Surfing through 500 Channels Today! To be removed send email to caleboom@yahoo.com From kramer@pa.dec.com Tue Dec 5 22:40:42 2000 Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (root@mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id WAA07835 for ; Tue, 5 Dec 2000 22:40:41 +0100 Received: from zmamail04.zma.compaq.com (zmamail04.zma.compaq.com [161.114.64.104]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id WAA07085 for ; Tue, 5 Dec 2000 22:40:39 +0100 (MET) Received: by zmamail04.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 72217C23; Tue, 5 Dec 2000 16:38:53 -0500 (EST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by zmamail04.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 4D610D02; Tue, 5 Dec 2000 16:38:51 -0500 (EST) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA30774; Tue, 5 Dec 2000 13:38:48 -0800 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id NAA31322; Tue, 5 Dec 2000 13:36:10 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id NAA27442; Tue, 5 Dec 2000 13:36:10 -0800 (PST) Received: from ztxmail01.nz-cce.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA07696; Tue, 5 Dec 2000 13:36:10 -0800 Received: by ztxmail01.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 7C8D546FE; Tue, 5 Dec 2000 15:36:09 -0600 (CST) Received: from fire.he.net (fire.he.net [216.218.144.2]) by ztxmail01.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D90874164 for ; Tue, 5 Dec 2000 15:36:03 -0600 (CST) Received: from cementship.extenex.net (64-51-136-194.client.dsl.net [64.51.136.194]) by fire.he.net (8.8.6/8.8.2) with ESMTP id NAA01772 for ; Tue, 5 Dec 2000 13:36:01 -0800 Received: from blowhole.extenex.net (blowhole.extenex.net [192.168.100.100]) by cementship.extenex.net (8.9.3/8.8.7) with ESMTP id NAA12695 for ; Tue, 5 Dec 2000 13:35:32 -0800 Received: from wardw by blowhole.extenex.net with local (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 143PkJ-00004r-00 for ; Tue, 05 Dec 2000 13:35:31 -0800 Date: Tue, 5 Dec 2000 13:35:31 -0800 From: Ward Willats To: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Subject: Why MTD? Message-Id: <20001205133531.A272@extenex.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii User-Agent: Mutt/1.0.1i Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk The MTD driver, while certainly more general-purpose, is also larger, more complicated and comes with ominous patent infringement warnings for non-PCMCIA applications. So why should I prefer it to flash_mem in my little embedded box where I don't write the flash very often? (Other than flash_mem's deprecated status...) -- Ward From kramer@pa.dec.com Tue Dec 5 22:40:44 2000 Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (root@mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id WAA07841 for ; Tue, 5 Dec 2000 22:40:44 +0100 Received: from ztxmail04.ztx.compaq.com (ztxmail04.ztx.compaq.com [161.114.1.208]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id WAA07088 for ; Tue, 5 Dec 2000 22:40:41 +0100 (MET) Received: by ztxmail04.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id AA767F64; Tue, 5 Dec 2000 15:38:53 -0600 (CST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by ztxmail04.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id C0698DB4; Tue, 5 Dec 2000 15:38:51 -0600 (CST) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA11485; Tue, 5 Dec 2000 13:38:50 -0800 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id NAA18219; Tue, 5 Dec 2000 13:36:31 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id NAA13730; Tue, 5 Dec 2000 13:36:30 -0800 (PST) Received: from zmamail02.nz-tay.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA03521; Tue, 5 Dec 2000 13:36:30 -0800 Received: by zmamail02.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 50637587D; Tue, 5 Dec 2000 16:36:29 -0500 (EST) Received: from mail.netx4.com (216-064-003-018.inaddr.vitts.com [216.64.3.18]) by zmamail02.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE68D589E for ; Tue, 5 Dec 2000 16:36:28 -0500 (EST) Received: from mvista.com (greeny.netx4.com [192.168.253.30]) by mail.netx4.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id NAA31310; Tue, 5 Dec 2000 13:39:56 -0500 Message-Id: <3A2D5FA0.D2D21437@mvista.com> Date: Tue, 05 Dec 2000 16:35:28 -0500 From: "George G. Davis" Organization: MontaVista Software, Inc. X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.7 [en] (X11; I; Linux 2.4.0-test11 ppc) X-Accept-Language: en Mime-Version: 1.0 To: StrongArm Linux , Arm Linux Cc: "George G. Davis" Subject: Ooops in 2.4.0-test10-rmk2-np3 on Assabet+Neponset w/PCMCIA and USB in kernel Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="------------4BB7EA79CCE4726192CF4A9D" Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------4BB7EA79CCE4726192CF4A9D Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Greetings, I'm getting an oops apparently caused by the SA-1111 USB OHCI interrupt handler (hc_interrupt) while accessing an IBM microdrive installed in an SA-1111 PCMCIA socket. The USB sub-system is effectively idle with no devices plugged in when this occurs. I've watched /proc/interrupts for a while prior to accessing the microdrive and found that no interrupts are coming in via the SA-1111 usb-ohci handler. Yet, I'm getting an oops apparently caused by the usb-ohci handler being invoked while accessing the microdrive. My guess is something may be wrong with demux of the SA-1111 shared interrupt line? The microdrive works reliably when I remove SA-1111 USB support from the kernel. I've attached the oops trace below. Anyone else see this and/or have any clues? I'll dig a little deeper in the meantime... BTW, has anyone successfully built and used ksymoops to analyze dumps from a foreign target, i.e. use ksymoops on an iMac/PPC host to analyze dumps from an ARM target? My guess is that this should be as easy as upgrading my host's binutils? TIA! -- Regards, George =========================== Uncompressing Linux.................................................... done, booting the kernel. Linux version 2.4.0-test10-rmk2-np3 (davis_g@geefour.netx4.com) (gcc version 2.95.2 19991030 (2.95.3 prerelease/franzo)) #2 Tue Dec 5 13:55:35 EST 2000 Processor: Intel StrongARM-1110 revision 5 Architecture: Intel-Assabet Neponset expansion board detected On node 0 totalpages: 8192 zone(0): 256 pages. zone(1): 7936 pages. zone(2): 0 pages. Kernel command line: root=/dev/nfs Console: colour dummy device 80x30 Calibrating delay loop... 138.44 BogoMIPS Memory: 32MB = 32MB total Memory: 30448KB available (1394K code, 258K data, 76K init) Dentry-cache hash table entries: 4096 (order: 3, 32768 bytes) Buffer-cache hash table entries: 1024 (order: 0, 4096 bytes) Page-cache hash table entries: 8192 (order: 3, 32768 bytes) Inode-cache hash table entries: 2048 (order: 2, 16384 bytes) POSIX conformance testing by UNIFIX Linux NET4.0 for Linux 2.4 Based upon Swansea University Computer Society NET3.039 SA-1111 Microprocessor Companion Chip: silicon revision 1, metal revision 1 usb-ohci.c: USB OHCI at membase 0xf4000400, IRQ 93 usb-ohci.c: usb-builtin, usb-ohci usb-ohci-sa1111.h: allocated pages; mem c2800000 (c00f0000) usb.c: new USB bus registered, assigned bus number 1 usb.c: USB device 1 (vend/prod 0x0/0x0) is not claimed by any active driver. scale: SA-1110 clock scaling initialized, clock speed is 148 MHz early initialization of device usbf is deferred arch_request_dma() allocating dma channel 0 arch_request_dma() allocating dma channel 1 Starting kswapd v1.8 Console: switching to colour frame buffer device 40x30 pty: 256 Unix98 ptys configured Uniform Multi-Platform E-IDE driver Revision: 6.31 ide: Assuming 50MHz system bus speed for PIO modes; override with idebus=xx smc9194.c:v0.13 04/14/00 by Erik Stahlman (erik@vt.edu) SMC9194: uninitialized MAC address detected -- using a dummy one SMC9194: SMC91C96(r:9) at 0xc283a000 IRQ:104 INTF:TP MEM:6144b ADDR: 00:01:02:03:04:05 SA1100 serial driver version 1.3 ttyS0 on SA1100 UART3 (irq 17) ttyS1 on SA1100 UART1 (irq 15) ttyS2 on SA1100 UART2 (irq 16), using IRDA UDA1341 audio driver (SA-1111 L3 Control Bus) initialized Linux PCMCIA Card Services 3.1.22 options: none SA-1100 PCMCIA (CS release 3.1.22) usb.c: registered new driver usbdevfs usb.c: registered new driver hub hub.c: USB hub found hub.c: 1 port detected usb.c: registered new driver hid usb.c: registered new driver net_host usb_net_host: USB net host registered. mice: PS/2 mouse device common for all mice NET4: Linux TCP/IP 1.0 for NET4.0 IP Protocols: ICMP, UDP, TCP IP: routing cache hash table of 512 buckets, 4Kbytes TCP: Hash tables configured (established 2048 bind 2048) Sending BOOTP requests.... OK IP-Config: Got BOOTP answer from 192.168.253.222, my address is 192.168.253.83 NET4: Unix domain sockets 1.0/SMP for Linux NET4.0. NetWinder Floating Point Emulator V0.95 (c) 1998-1999 Rebel.com Looking up port of RPC 100003/2 on 192.168.253.222 Looking up port of RPC 100005/2 on 192.168.253.222 VFS: Mounted root (nfs filesystem) readonly. Freeing init memory: 76K INIT: version 2.77 booting INIT: Entering runlevel: 3 sh-2.03# cat /proc/devices Character devices: 1 mem 2 pty 3 ttyp 4 ttyS 5 cua 7 vcs 10 misc 13 input 14 sound 29 fb 128 ptm 136 pts 162 raw 180 usb 254 pcmcia Block devices: sh-2.03# cardmgr sh-2.03# cardmgr[26]: starting, version is 3.1.11 cardmgr[26]: cannot access /lib/modules/2.4.0-test10-rmk2-np3: No such file or directory cardmgr[26]: watching 2 sockets cardmgr[26]: Card Services release does not match cardmgr[26]: initializing socket 1 cardmgr[26]: socket 1: ATA/IDE Fixed Disk hda: IBM-DMDM-10340, ATA DISK drive ide0 at 0xf7000000-0xf7000007,0xf700000e on irq 99 hda: 700560 sectors (359 MB) w/96KiB Cache, CHS=695/16/63 Partition check: hda: hda1 hda2 ide_cs: hda: Vcc = 3.3, Vpp = 0.0 cardmgr[26]: executing: './ide start hda' sh-2.03# cardctl config Socket 0: not configured Socket 1: Vcc 3.3V Vpp1 0.0V Vpp2 0.0V interface type is "memory and I/O" irq 99 [exclusive] [level] function 0: config base 0x0200 option 0x41 status 0x00 pin 0x00 copy 0x00 io 0xf7000000-0xf700000f [auto] sh-2.03# sh-2.03# sh-2.03# cardctl status Socket 0: no card Socket 1: 3.3V 16-bit PC Card function 0: [ready], [bat dead], [bat low] sh-2.03# cardctl idents Socket 0: no product info available Socket 1: product info: "IBM", "microdrive" manfid: 0x00a4, 0x0000 function: 4 (fixed disk) sh-2.03# sh-2.03# pwd / sh-2.03# fsck /dev/hda1 Parallelizing fsck version 1.18 (11-Nov-1999) e2fsck 1.18, hda: 11-Nov-1999 for EXT2 FS 0.5b, 95/08/09 hda1 hda2 /dev/hda1: clean, 276/76912 files, 31075/307408 blocks sh-2.03# mount /dev/hda1 /mnt/hda/ hda: hda1 hda2 hda: hda1 hda2 hda: hda1 hda2 sh-2.03# find /mnt/hda1 -type f -exec cat {} > /dev/null \; find: /mnt/hda1: No such file or directory sh-2.03# find /mnt/hda1P-type f -exec cat {} > /dev/null \; Unable to handle kernel paging request at virtual address 06711e70 pgd = c1d90000 *pgd = 00000000, *pmd = 00000000 Internal error: Oops: 2 CPU: 0 pc : [] lr : [<06711e70>] sp : c1d97bd0 ip : c00f0000 fp : c1d97bec r10: 00000066 r9 : c03a4320 r8 : f4000410 r7 : 00000000 r6 : 20000013 r5 : c0476000 r4 : 00000002 r3 : c03b768c r2 : c03a1e8c r1 : 43f11e70 r0 : 06711e70 Flags: nzCv IRQs off FIQs on Mode SVC_32 Segment user Control: C1D9117F Table: C1D9117F DAC: 00000015 Process cat (pid: 41, stackpage=c1d97000) Stack: c1d97bc0: 06711e70 c02df764 20000093 ffffffff 00000002 f4000400 c0476000 c038f784 c1d97be0: c1d97c18 c1d97bf0 c02e09d8 c02df72c c044d240 0000005d 04000000 c038f784 c1d97c00: c038ebe4 c03a4320 c1d97d0c c1d97c44 c1d97c1c c021d0d0 c02e096c 0000002c c1d97c20: 00000001 00001000 0000002e c1d97d0c c03a4320 c1d97d0c c1d97c68 c1d97c48 c1d97c40: c021cc7c c021d01c 00000004 c1d97d0c 00000000 0000002e c038ebe4 c1d97c88 c1d97c60: c1d97c6c c021cde4 c021cc04 c037ace0 0000002e 20000000 c038f1a4 c1d97cb4 c1d97c80: c1d97c8c c021d0d0 c021cd84 00000019 02000000 c1d97d0c fa040014 c038f92c c1d97ca0: c03a4320 fa040010 c1d97cdc c1d97cb8 c021ca50 c021d01c c037acb0 0000000b c1d97cc0: 20000000 c038ed44 c038ebe4 c1d97d0c c1d97d08 c1d97ce0 c021d0d0 c021c9c4 c1d97ce0: fa050000 c1d97d54 00000002 c022c56c 20000013 ffffffff c037a040 c1d97d7c c1d97d00: c1d97d0c c021bf80 c021d01c c0380d04 c0380d04 c1d9603c a0000013 c0378000 c1d97d20: c1d96000 c0380d04 c0378000 00000000 c03a4320 c037a040 c1d97d7c fffffc18 c1d97d40: c1d97d54 c024c194 c022c56c 20000013 ffffffff 00000000 c1db7c60 c1d96000 c1d97d60: 00000000 c0386e20 c1d97d80 c1db7ca8 c1d97db8 c1d97d80 c024c194 c022c3c4 c1d97d80: 01234567 c1d96000 c1db7cac c1db7cac c1d97df4 00000001 c1db1cc0 00000301 c1d97da0: c1d97df0 00000002 c1d97df4 c1d97dd0 c1d97dbc c024d4ac c024c0b8 c1db7c60 c1d97dc0: c1d97df4 c1d97e5c c1d97dd4 c026fb9c c024d464 c1d97dfc 00000400 c1d97e24 c1d97de0: 00000000 c1cc17e0 0000000c 00000000 00000000 c1db1ddc 00004192 00000000 c1d97e00: 00000001 c0438a54 000f4240 c1cc1558 c1cc1540 00000003 00000000 c0438a54 c1d97e20: c1db1cc0 0000000c 00000000 c1db1cc0 00000003 c1cc17e0 0000ed65 0000000c c1d97e40: c0438a54 00000400 c1db1cc0 00000000 c1d97ebc c1d97e60 c024e2b8 c026fb00 c1d97e60: 00000000 00000000 c1cc17e0 0000003b c026faf4 c037b290 00000000 00000005 c1d97e80: 00001644 00000000 00000003 c1d97ea8 c1d97e9c 00000000 00000000 c0438a54 c1d97ea0: c1db1d5c c1e69740 00000000 00000003 c1d97ecc c1d97ec0 c0270258 c024e1cc c1d97ec0: c1d97f10 c1d97ed0 c023d610 c027024c 0000001f 00000003 00000003 00000000 c1d97ee0: 0000000e 00000001 c0439538 c0454b08 00000000 c1db1d5c 00001000 00000000 c1d97f00: 00000000 c1d97f58 c1d97f14 c023dab0 c023d384 00000001 00000000 c1db1cc0 c1d97f20: c023dd1c c1d97f5c c1e69760 c1e69740 00000000 c1e69760 00000000 00001000 c1d97f40: 0200a4a0 00000003 0200a410 c1d97f80 c1d97f5c c023ddf4 c023d714 00000000 c1d97f60: 00001000 0200a4a0 00000000 c1e69740 ffffffea c1d97fac c1d97f84 c024b0d4 c1d97f80: c023dd98 c1d97fb4 c1d97f94 00001000 00001000 20000010 00000004 c021c3e4 c1d97fa0: 00000000 c1d97fb0 c021c260 c024b004 00001000 c02222f0 00000004 0200a4a0 c1d97fc0: 00001000 00000000 00001000 00001000 0200a4a0 00000004 0200a4a0 0200a414 c1d97fe0: 0200a410 bffffcc4 400adda0 bffffca8 02001914 400adda4 20000010 00000004 Backtrace: Function entered at [] from [] r7 = C038F784 r6 = C0476000 r5 = F4000400 r4 = 00000002 Function entered at [] from [] Function entered at [] from [] Function entered at [] from [] r8 = C038EBE4 r7 = 0000002E r6 = 00000000 r5 = C1D97D0C r4 = 00000004 Function entered at [] from [] r7 = C038F1A4 r6 = 20000000 r5 = 0000002E r4 = C037ACE0 Function entered at [] from [] Function entered at [] from [] Function entered at [] from [] Function entered at [] from [] Function entered at [] from [] Function entered at [] from [] r4 = C1D97DF4 Function entered at [] from [] Function entered at [] from [] Function entered at [] from [] Function entered at [] from [] Function entered at [] from [] Function entered at [] from [] r5 = FFFFFFEA r4 = C1E69740 Function entered at [] from [] r8 = C021C3E4 r7 = 00000004 r6 = 20000010 r5 = 00001000 r4 = 00001000 Code: ebfff57a e1a0e000 (e59e3000) e1b03e23 0a00001f ========================================================= >>NIP; c02df764 <===== Trace; c02df720 Trace; c02e09d8 Trace; c02e0960 Trace; c021d0d0 Trace; c021d010 Trace; c021cc7c Trace; c021cbf8 Trace; c021cde4 Trace; c021cd78 Trace; c021d0d0 Trace; c021d010 Trace; c021ca50 Trace; c021c9b8 Trace; c021d0d0 Trace; c021d010 Trace; c021bf80 <__irq_svc+20/a0> Trace; c022c3b8 Trace; c024c194 <__wait_on_buffer+e8/134> Trace; c024c0ac <__wait_on_buffer+0/134> Trace; c024d4ac Trace; c024d458 Trace; c026fb9c Trace; c026faf4 Trace; c024e2b8 Trace; c024e1c0 Trace; c0270258 Trace; c0270240 Trace; c023d610 Trace; c023d378 Trace; c023dab0 Trace; c023d708 Trace; c023ddf4 Trace; c023dd8c Trace; c024b0d4 Trace; c024aff8 Trace; c021c260 ========================================================= Aiee, killing interrupt handler Scheduling in interrupt kernel BUG at sched.c:692! Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual address 00000000 pgd = c0204000 *pgd = c03be001, *pmd = c03be001, *pte = c03bd08b, *ppte = c03bd00a Internal error: Oops: 0 CPU: 0 pc : [] lr : [] sp : c1d97a38 ip : c1d979f4 fp : c1d97a48 r10: c033f904 r9 : c03a4320 r8 : 00000000 r7 : 0000000b r6 : 00000000 r5 : c1d96000 r4 : 00000000 r3 : 00000000 r2 : c0380dd4 r1 : 00000021 r0 : 00000001 Flags: nZCv IRQs on FIQs on Mode SVC_32 Segment user Control: C1D9117F Table: C1D9117F DAC: 00000015 Process cat (pid: 41, stackpage=c1d97000) Stack: c1d97a20: c022f724 c02214fc 60000013 ffffffff c04a2260 c1d97a74 . . . --------------4BB7EA79CCE4726192CF4A9D Content-Type: text/x-vcard; charset=us-ascii; name="davis_g.vcf" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Description: Card for George G. Davis Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="davis_g.vcf" begin:vcard n:Davis;George tel;work:603/880-1414 x-mozilla-html:FALSE url:http://www.mvista.com org:MontaVista Software, Inc. adr:;;46 Pine Street Extension;Nashua;NH;03060;USA version:2.1 email;internet:davis_g@mvista.com title:Software Engineer x-mozilla-cpt:;-5376 fn:George G. Davis end:vcard --------------4BB7EA79CCE4726192CF4A9D-- From kramer@pa.dec.com Tue Dec 5 23:59:47 2000 Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (root@mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id XAA08126 for ; Tue, 5 Dec 2000 23:59:47 +0100 Received: from ztxmail03.ztx.compaq.com (ztxmail03.ztx.compaq.com [161.114.1.207]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id XAA11088 for ; Tue, 5 Dec 2000 23:59:45 +0100 (MET) Received: by ztxmail03.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id E2F72731; Tue, 5 Dec 2000 16:57:53 -0600 (CST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by ztxmail03.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 3C5AF691; Tue, 5 Dec 2000 16:57:52 -0600 (CST) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA20433; Tue, 5 Dec 2000 14:57:50 -0800 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id OAA07659; Tue, 5 Dec 2000 14:56:20 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id OAA01192; Tue, 5 Dec 2000 14:56:20 -0800 (PST) Received: from zmamail01.nz-tay.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA26329; Tue, 5 Dec 2000 14:56:19 -0800 Received: by zmamail01.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id A4F7EC313; Tue, 5 Dec 2000 17:56:18 -0500 (EST) Received: from compaq.parker.boston.ma.us (h0000c06cf87e.ne.mediaone.net [24.147.209.173]) by zmamail01.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 45143C0C4 for ; Tue, 5 Dec 2000 17:56:18 -0500 (EST) Received: from p2.parker.boston.ma.us (p2 [192.245.5.16]) by compaq.parker.boston.ma.us (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id RAA15777; Tue, 5 Dec 2000 17:56:15 -0500 Received: from p2.parker.boston.ma.us (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by p2.parker.boston.ma.us (8.9.3/8.8.8) with ESMTP id RAA55238; Tue, 5 Dec 2000 17:56:14 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from brad@p2.parker.boston.ma.us) Message-Id: <200012052256.RAA55238@p2.parker.boston.ma.us> To: "George G. Davis" Cc: StrongArm Linux , Arm Linux Subject: Re: Ooops in 2.4.0-test10-rmk2-np3 on Assabet+Neponset w/PCMCIA and USB in kernel In-Reply-To: Your message of "Tue, 05 Dec 2000 16:35:28 EST." <3A2D5FA0.D2D21437@mvista.com> Date: Tue, 05 Dec 2000 17:56:14 -0500 From: Brad Parker Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk it's a little hard to tell (it would help if you'd run gdb on your kernel and disassemble around the crash pc), but it looks like something may have corrupted the control block ptr coming into the isr... I may be wrong. also, if the usb bus is idle you should not be in the routine your crashed in, further obfiscating things... if the crash is reproducible (i.e. always in the same place) I'd put a printk in just before the call to dl_reverse_done_list() and show the values of ohci and ints... (I'll bet something is haywire) -brad "George G. Davis" wrote: >This is a multi-part message in MIME format. >--------------4BB7EA79CCE4726192CF4A9D >Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii >Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit > >Greetings, > >I'm getting an oops apparently caused by the SA-1111 USB OHCI >interrupt handler (hc_interrupt) while accessing an IBM microdrive >installed in an SA-1111 PCMCIA socket. The USB sub-system is >effectively idle with no devices plugged in when this occurs. > >I've watched /proc/interrupts for a while prior to accessing the >microdrive and found that no interrupts are coming in via the >SA-1111 usb-ohci handler. Yet, I'm getting an oops apparently caused by >the usb-ohci handler being invoked while accessing the microdrive. > >My guess is something may be wrong with demux of the SA-1111 shared >interrupt line? > >The microdrive works reliably when I remove SA-1111 USB support >from the kernel. > >I've attached the oops trace below. > > >Anyone else see this and/or have any clues? > > >I'll dig a little deeper in the meantime... > > >BTW, has anyone successfully built and used ksymoops to analyze >dumps from a foreign target, i.e. use ksymoops on an iMac/PPC >host to analyze dumps from an ARM target? My guess is that this >should be as easy as upgrading my host's binutils? > > >TIA! > >-- >Regards, >George > >=========================== >Uncompressing Linux.................................................... done, >booting the kernel. >Linux version 2.4.0-test10-rmk2-np3 (davis_g@geefour.netx4.com) (gcc version 2 >.95.2 19991030 (2.95.3 prerelease/franzo)) #2 Tue Dec 5 13:55:35 EST 2000 >Processor: Intel StrongARM-1110 revision 5 >Architecture: Intel-Assabet >Neponset expansion board detected >On node 0 totalpages: 8192 >zone(0): 256 pages. >zone(1): 7936 pages. >zone(2): 0 pages. >Kernel command line: root=/dev/nfs >Console: colour dummy device 80x30 >Calibrating delay loop... 138.44 BogoMIPS >Memory: 32MB = 32MB total >Memory: 30448KB available (1394K code, 258K data, 76K init) >Dentry-cache hash table entries: 4096 (order: 3, 32768 bytes) >Buffer-cache hash table entries: 1024 (order: 0, 4096 bytes) >Page-cache hash table entries: 8192 (order: 3, 32768 bytes) >Inode-cache hash table entries: 2048 (order: 2, 16384 bytes) >POSIX conformance testing by UNIFIX >Linux NET4.0 for Linux 2.4 >Based upon Swansea University Computer Society NET3.039 >SA-1111 Microprocessor Companion Chip: silicon revision 1, metal revision 1 >usb-ohci.c: USB OHCI at membase 0xf4000400, IRQ 93 >usb-ohci.c: usb-builtin, usb-ohci >usb-ohci-sa1111.h: allocated pages; mem c2800000 (c00f0000) >usb.c: new USB bus registered, assigned bus number 1 >usb.c: USB device 1 (vend/prod 0x0/0x0) is not claimed by any active driver. >scale: SA-1110 clock scaling initialized, clock speed is 148 MHz >early initialization of device usbf is deferred >arch_request_dma() allocating dma channel 0 >arch_request_dma() allocating dma channel 1 >Starting kswapd v1.8 >Console: switching to colour frame buffer device 40x30 >pty: 256 Unix98 ptys configured >Uniform Multi-Platform E-IDE driver Revision: 6.31 >ide: Assuming 50MHz system bus speed for PIO modes; override with idebus=xx >smc9194.c:v0.13 04/14/00 by Erik Stahlman (erik@vt.edu) >SMC9194: uninitialized MAC address detected -- using a dummy one >SMC9194: SMC91C96(r:9) at 0xc283a000 IRQ:104 INTF:TP MEM:6144b ADDR: 00:01:02: >03:04:05 >SA1100 serial driver version 1.3 >ttyS0 on SA1100 UART3 (irq 17) >ttyS1 on SA1100 UART1 (irq 15) >ttyS2 on SA1100 UART2 (irq 16), using IRDA >UDA1341 audio driver (SA-1111 L3 Control Bus) initialized >Linux PCMCIA Card Services 3.1.22 > options: none >SA-1100 PCMCIA (CS release 3.1.22) >usb.c: registered new driver usbdevfs >usb.c: registered new driver hub >hub.c: USB hub found >hub.c: 1 port detected >usb.c: registered new driver hid >usb.c: registered new driver net_host >usb_net_host: USB net host registered. >mice: PS/2 mouse device common for all mice >NET4: Linux TCP/IP 1.0 for NET4.0 >IP Protocols: ICMP, UDP, TCP >IP: routing cache hash table of 512 buckets, 4Kbytes >TCP: Hash tables configured (established 2048 bind 2048) >Sending BOOTP requests.... OK >IP-Config: Got BOOTP answer from 192.168.253.222, my address is 192.168.253.83 >NET4: Unix domain sockets 1.0/SMP for Linux NET4.0. >NetWinder Floating Point Emulator V0.95 (c) 1998-1999 Rebel.com >Looking up port of RPC 100003/2 on 192.168.253.222 >Looking up port of RPC 100005/2 on 192.168.253.222 >VFS: Mounted root (nfs filesystem) readonly. >Freeing init memory: 76K >INIT: version 2.77 booting >INIT: Entering runlevel: 3 >sh-2.03# cat /proc/devices >Character devices: > 1 mem > 2 pty > 3 ttyp > 4 ttyS > 5 cua > 7 vcs > 10 misc > 13 input > 14 sound > 29 fb >128 ptm >136 pts >162 raw >180 usb >254 pcmcia > >Block devices: >sh-2.03# cardmgr >sh-2.03# cardmgr[26]: starting, version is 3.1.11 >cardmgr[26]: cannot access /lib/modules/2.4.0-test10-rmk2-np3: No such file or > directory >cardmgr[26]: watching 2 sockets >cardmgr[26]: Card Services release does not match >cardmgr[26]: initializing socket 1 >cardmgr[26]: socket 1: ATA/IDE Fixed Disk >hda: IBM-DMDM-10340, ATA DISK drive >ide0 at 0xf7000000-0xf7000007,0xf700000e on irq 99 >hda: 700560 sectors (359 MB) w/96KiB Cache, CHS=695/16/63 >Partition check: > hda: hda1 hda2 >ide_cs: hda: Vcc = 3.3, Vpp = 0.0 >cardmgr[26]: executing: './ide start hda' > >sh-2.03# cardctl config >Socket 0: > not configured >Socket 1: > Vcc 3.3V Vpp1 0.0V Vpp2 0.0V > interface type is "memory and I/O" > irq 99 [exclusive] [level] > function 0: > config base 0x0200 > option 0x41 status 0x00 pin 0x00 copy 0x00 > io 0xf7000000-0xf700000f [auto] >sh-2.03# >sh-2.03# >sh-2.03# cardctl status >Socket 0: > no card >Socket 1: > 3.3V 16-bit PC Card > function 0: [ready], [bat dead], [bat low] >sh-2.03# cardctl idents >Socket 0: > no product info available >Socket 1: > product info: "IBM", "microdrive" > manfid: 0x00a4, 0x0000 > function: 4 (fixed disk) >sh-2.03# >sh-2.03# pwd >/ >sh-2.03# fsck /dev/hda1 >Parallelizing fsck version 1.18 (11-Nov-1999) >e2fsck 1.18, hda: 11-Nov-1999 for EXT2 FS 0.5b, 95/08/09 > hda1 hda2 >/dev/hda1: clean, 276/76912 files, 31075/307408 blocks >sh-2.03# mount /dev/hda1 /mnt/hda/ > hda: hda1 hda2 > hda: hda1 hda2 > hda: hda1 hda2 >sh-2.03# find /mnt/hda1 -type f -exec cat {} > /dev/null \; >find: /mnt/hda1: No such file or directory >sh-2.03# find /mnt/hda1P-type f -exec cat {} > /dev/null \; >Unable to handle kernel paging request at virtual address 06711e70 >pgd = c1d90000 >*pgd = 00000000, *pmd = 00000000 >Internal error: Oops: 2 >CPU: 0 >pc : [] lr : [<06711e70>] >sp : c1d97bd0 ip : c00f0000 fp : c1d97bec >r10: 00000066 r9 : c03a4320 r8 : f4000410 >r7 : 00000000 r6 : 20000013 r5 : c0476000 r4 : 00000002 >r3 : c03b768c r2 : c03a1e8c r1 : 43f11e70 r0 : 06711e70 >Flags: nzCv IRQs off FIQs on Mode SVC_32 Segment user >Control: C1D9117F Table: C1D9117F DAC: 00000015 >Process cat (pid: 41, stackpage=c1d97000) >Stack: >c1d97bc0: 06711e70 c02df764 20000093 ffffffff 00000002 f4000400 c0476000 c038 >f784 >c1d97be0: c1d97c18 c1d97bf0 c02e09d8 c02df72c c044d240 0000005d 04000000 c038 >f784 >c1d97c00: c038ebe4 c03a4320 c1d97d0c c1d97c44 c1d97c1c c021d0d0 c02e096c 0000 >002c >c1d97c20: 00000001 00001000 0000002e c1d97d0c c03a4320 c1d97d0c c1d97c68 c1d9 >7c48 >c1d97c40: c021cc7c c021d01c 00000004 c1d97d0c 00000000 0000002e c038ebe4 c1d9 >7c88 >c1d97c60: c1d97c6c c021cde4 c021cc04 c037ace0 0000002e 20000000 c038f1a4 c1d9 >7cb4 >c1d97c80: c1d97c8c c021d0d0 c021cd84 00000019 02000000 c1d97d0c fa040014 c038 >f92c >c1d97ca0: c03a4320 fa040010 c1d97cdc c1d97cb8 c021ca50 c021d01c c037acb0 0000 >000b >c1d97cc0: 20000000 c038ed44 c038ebe4 c1d97d0c c1d97d08 c1d97ce0 c021d0d0 c021 >c9c4 >c1d97ce0: fa050000 c1d97d54 00000002 c022c56c 20000013 ffffffff c037a040 c1d9 >7d7c >c1d97d00: c1d97d0c c021bf80 c021d01c c0380d04 c0380d04 c1d9603c a0000013 c037 >8000 >c1d97d20: c1d96000 c0380d04 c0378000 00000000 c03a4320 c037a040 c1d97d7c ffff >fc18 >c1d97d40: c1d97d54 c024c194 c022c56c 20000013 ffffffff 00000000 c1db7c60 c1d9 >6000 >c1d97d60: 00000000 c0386e20 c1d97d80 c1db7ca8 c1d97db8 c1d97d80 c024c194 c022 >c3c4 >c1d97d80: 01234567 c1d96000 c1db7cac c1db7cac c1d97df4 00000001 c1db1cc0 0000 >0301 >c1d97da0: c1d97df0 00000002 c1d97df4 c1d97dd0 c1d97dbc c024d4ac c024c0b8 c1db >7c60 >c1d97dc0: c1d97df4 c1d97e5c c1d97dd4 c026fb9c c024d464 c1d97dfc 00000400 c1d9 >7e24 >c1d97de0: 00000000 c1cc17e0 0000000c 00000000 00000000 c1db1ddc 00004192 0000 >0000 >c1d97e00: 00000001 c0438a54 000f4240 c1cc1558 c1cc1540 00000003 00000000 c043 >8a54 >c1d97e20: c1db1cc0 0000000c 00000000 c1db1cc0 00000003 c1cc17e0 0000ed65 0000 >000c >c1d97e40: c0438a54 00000400 c1db1cc0 00000000 c1d97ebc c1d97e60 c024e2b8 c026 >fb00 >c1d97e60: 00000000 00000000 c1cc17e0 0000003b c026faf4 c037b290 00000000 0000 >0005 >c1d97e80: 00001644 00000000 00000003 c1d97ea8 c1d97e9c 00000000 00000000 c043 >8a54 >c1d97ea0: c1db1d5c c1e69740 00000000 00000003 c1d97ecc c1d97ec0 c0270258 c024 >e1cc >c1d97ec0: c1d97f10 c1d97ed0 c023d610 c027024c 0000001f 00000003 00000003 0000 >0000 >c1d97ee0: 0000000e 00000001 c0439538 c0454b08 00000000 c1db1d5c 00001000 0000 >0000 >c1d97f00: 00000000 c1d97f58 c1d97f14 c023dab0 c023d384 00000001 00000000 c1db >1cc0 >c1d97f20: c023dd1c c1d97f5c c1e69760 c1e69740 00000000 c1e69760 00000000 0000 >1000 >c1d97f40: 0200a4a0 00000003 0200a410 c1d97f80 c1d97f5c c023ddf4 c023d714 0000 >0000 >c1d97f60: 00001000 0200a4a0 00000000 c1e69740 ffffffea c1d97fac c1d97f84 c024 >b0d4 >c1d97f80: c023dd98 c1d97fb4 c1d97f94 00001000 00001000 20000010 00000004 c021 >c3e4 >c1d97fa0: 00000000 c1d97fb0 c021c260 c024b004 00001000 c02222f0 00000004 0200 >a4a0 >c1d97fc0: 00001000 00000000 00001000 00001000 0200a4a0 00000004 0200a4a0 0200 >a414 >c1d97fe0: 0200a410 bffffcc4 400adda0 bffffca8 02001914 400adda4 20000010 0000 >0004 >Backtrace: >Function entered at [] from [] > r7 = C038F784 r6 = C0476000 r5 = F4000400 r4 = 00000002 >Function entered at [] from [] >Function entered at [] from [] >Function entered at [] from [] > r8 = C038EBE4 r7 = 0000002E r6 = 00000000 r5 = C1D97D0C > r4 = 00000004 >Function entered at [] from [] > r7 = C038F1A4 r6 = 20000000 r5 = 0000002E r4 = C037ACE0 >Function entered at [] from [] >Function entered at [] from [] >Function entered at [] from [] >Function entered at [] from [] >Function entered at [] from [] >Function entered at [] from [] > r4 = C1D97DF4 >Function entered at [] from [] >Function entered at [] from [] >Function entered at [] from [] >Function entered at [] from [] >Function entered at [] from [] >Function entered at [] from [] > r5 = FFFFFFEA r4 = C1E69740 >Function entered at [] from [] > r8 = C021C3E4 r7 = 00000004 r6 = 20000010 r5 = 00001000 > r4 = 00001000 >Code: ebfff57a e1a0e000 (e59e3000) e1b03e23 0a00001f >========================================================= >>>NIP; c02df764 <===== >Trace; c02df720 >Trace; c02e09d8 >Trace; c02e0960 >Trace; c021d0d0 >Trace; c021d010 >Trace; c021cc7c >Trace; c021cbf8 >Trace; c021cde4 >Trace; c021cd78 >Trace; c021d0d0 >Trace; c021d010 >Trace; c021ca50 >Trace; c021c9b8 >Trace; c021d0d0 >Trace; c021d010 >Trace; c021bf80 <__irq_svc+20/a0> >Trace; c022c3b8 >Trace; c024c194 <__wait_on_buffer+e8/134> >Trace; c024c0ac <__wait_on_buffer+0/134> >Trace; c024d4ac >Trace; c024d458 >Trace; c026fb9c >Trace; c026faf4 >Trace; c024e2b8 >Trace; c024e1c0 >Trace; c0270258 >Trace; c0270240 >Trace; c023d610 >Trace; c023d378 >Trace; c023dab0 >Trace; c023d708 >Trace; c023ddf4 >Trace; c023dd8c >Trace; c024b0d4 >Trace; c024aff8 >Trace; c021c260 >========================================================= >Aiee, killing interrupt handler >Scheduling in interrupt >kernel BUG at sched.c:692! >Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual address 00000000 >pgd = c0204000 >*pgd = c03be001, *pmd = c03be001, *pte = c03bd08b, *ppte = c03bd00a >Internal error: Oops: 0 >CPU: 0 >pc : [] lr : [] >sp : c1d97a38 ip : c1d979f4 fp : c1d97a48 >r10: c033f904 r9 : c03a4320 r8 : 00000000 >r7 : 0000000b r6 : 00000000 r5 : c1d96000 r4 : 00000000 >r3 : 00000000 r2 : c0380dd4 r1 : 00000021 r0 : 00000001 >Flags: nZCv IRQs on FIQs on Mode SVC_32 Segment user >Control: C1D9117F Table: C1D9117F DAC: 00000015 >Process cat (pid: 41, stackpage=c1d97000) >Stack: >c1d97a20: c022f724 c02214fc 60000013 ffffffff c04a2260 c1d9 >7a74 >. >. >. >--------------4BB7EA79CCE4726192CF4A9D >Content-Type: text/x-vcard; charset=us-ascii; > name="davis_g.vcf" >Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit >Content-Description: Card for George G. Davis >Content-Disposition: attachment; > filename="davis_g.vcf" > >begin:vcard >n:Davis;George >tel;work:603/880-1414 >x-mozilla-html:FALSE >url:http://www.mvista.com >org:MontaVista Software, Inc. >adr:;;46 Pine Street Extension;Nashua;NH;03060;USA >version:2.1 >email;internet:davis_g@mvista.com >title:Software Engineer >x-mozilla-cpt:;-5376 >fn:George G. Davis >end:vcard > >--------------4BB7EA79CCE4726192CF4A9D-- > From kramer@pa.dec.com Wed Dec 6 00:01:49 2000 Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (root@mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id AAA08150 for ; Wed, 6 Dec 2000 00:01:49 +0100 Received: from ztxmail04.ztx.compaq.com (ztxmail04.ztx.compaq.com [161.114.1.208]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id AAA11261 for ; Wed, 6 Dec 2000 00:01:47 +0100 (MET) Received: by ztxmail04.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 2D08CFB4; Tue, 5 Dec 2000 17:00:00 -0600 (CST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by ztxmail04.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 8F5EEF17; Tue, 5 Dec 2000 16:59:58 -0600 (CST) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA01946; Tue, 5 Dec 2000 14:59:57 -0800 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id OAA03500; Tue, 5 Dec 2000 14:59:30 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id OAA12208; Tue, 5 Dec 2000 14:59:29 -0800 (PST) Received: from ztxmail02.nz-cce.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA02638; Tue, 5 Dec 2000 14:59:29 -0800 Received: by ztxmail02.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id E3E991EAA; Tue, 5 Dec 2000 16:59:28 -0600 (CST) Received: from xanadu.gn.com (modemcable248.137-200-24.mtl.mc.videotron.ca [24.200.137.248]) by ztxmail02.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 20A5C1F6F for ; Tue, 5 Dec 2000 16:59:28 -0600 (CST) Received: from localhost (nico@localhost) by xanadu.gn.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id RAA03951; Tue, 5 Dec 2000 17:59:25 -0500 X-Authentication-Warning: xanadu.gn.com: nico owned process doing -bs Date: Tue, 5 Dec 2000 17:59:25 -0500 (EST) From: Nicolas Pitre X-Sender: To: Ward Willats Cc: Subject: Re: Why MTD? In-Reply-To: <20001205133531.A272@extenex.com> Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk On Tue, 5 Dec 2000, Ward Willats wrote: > The MTD driver, while certainly more general-purpose, is also larger, > more complicated and comes with ominous patent infringement warnings > for non-PCMCIA applications. That apply *only* to the FTL (flash translation layer) module which you certainly don't need since you didn't use it before anyway. > So why should I prefer it to flash_mem in my little embedded box where > I don't write the flash very often? (Other than flash_mem's deprecated > status...) It is mainstream and way better maintained. It allows you to use JFFS which you should strongly consider if you are writing to your flash during normal operation. It doesn't freeze the whole system while the flash is being erased and written to. What you actually need to have the same functionality as flash-mem.c is: CONFIG_MTD=y CONFIG_MTD_CFI=y CONFIG_MTD_CFI_INTELEXT=y CONFIG_MTD_SA1100=y CONFIG_MTD_BLOCK=y That's all. If you are further concerned by the code size, you can add: CONFIG_MTD_CFI_GEOMETRY=y ... plus the right geometry for your board. For example on Assabet: CONFIG_MTD_CFI_B4=y CONFIG_MTD_CFI_I2=y This being said, you can continue to use flash-mem.c. It is GPL. I just won't maintain it any longer. Nicolas From kramer@pa.dec.com Wed Dec 6 00:54:17 2000 Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (root@mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id AAA08328 for ; Wed, 6 Dec 2000 00:54:17 +0100 Received: from zmamail04.zma.compaq.com (zmamail04.zma.compaq.com [161.114.64.104]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id AAA13930 for ; Wed, 6 Dec 2000 00:54:15 +0100 (MET) Received: by zmamail04.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 0CD31C12; Tue, 5 Dec 2000 18:52:29 -0500 (EST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by zmamail04.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id DBF97C90; Tue, 5 Dec 2000 18:52:26 -0500 (EST) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA10546; Tue, 5 Dec 2000 15:52:25 -0800 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id PAA00592; Tue, 5 Dec 2000 15:51:07 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id PAA09894; Tue, 5 Dec 2000 15:51:06 -0800 (PST) Received: from ztxmail01.nz-cce.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA08454; Tue, 5 Dec 2000 15:51:02 -0800 Received: by ztxmail01.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 7A284423D; Tue, 5 Dec 2000 17:51:02 -0600 (CST) Received: from mail.netx4.com (216-064-003-018.inaddr.vitts.com [216.64.3.18]) by ztxmail01.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D07AD40C0 for ; Tue, 5 Dec 2000 17:51:01 -0600 (CST) Received: from mvista.com (greeny.netx4.com [192.168.253.30]) by mail.netx4.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id PAA31454; Tue, 5 Dec 2000 15:54:20 -0500 Message-Id: <3A2D7F1C.43F01468@mvista.com> Date: Tue, 05 Dec 2000 18:49:48 -0500 From: "George G. Davis" Organization: MontaVista Software, Inc. X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.7 [en] (X11; I; Linux 2.4.0-test11 ppc) X-Accept-Language: en Mime-Version: 1.0 To: Brad Parker Cc: StrongArm Linux , Arm Linux Subject: Re: Ooops in 2.4.0-test10-rmk2-np3 on Assabet+Neponset w/PCMCIA and USB in kernel References: <200012052256.RAA55238@p2.parker.boston.ma.us> Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="------------786EE47A766F8F17B5547A7B" Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------786EE47A766F8F17B5547A7B Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Brad Parker wrote: > > it's a little hard to tell (it would help if you'd run gdb on your kernel > and disassemble around the crash pc), but it looks like something may have > corrupted the control block ptr coming into the isr... I may be wrong. Hmmm, would an objdump disassemly be as useful? I don't have gdb installed for the target architecture at the moment. Assuming obdump is OK, would you care to take a look at it? > also, if the usb bus is idle you should not be in the routine your crashed > in, further obfiscating things... I didn't think so... > if the crash is reproducible (i.e. always in the same place) I'd put a > printk in just before the call to dl_reverse_done_list() and show the > values of ohci and ints... (I'll bet something is haywire) It's highly reproducible! I'm slowly drilling down into hc_interrupt. I've already put printk's in there. But haven't instrumented as you suggest above yet. I'll do this now! Done... Here's what I get now: sh-2.03# fsck /dev/hda1 Parallelizing fsck version 1.18 (11-Nov-1999) e2fsck 1.18,VFS: Disk change detected on device ide0(3,1) 11-Nov- hda:1999 for EXT2 FS 0.5b, 95/08/09 hda1 hda2 /dev/hda1 was not cleanly unmounted, check forced. Pass 1: Checking inodes, blocks, and sizes usb-ohci.c: hc_interrupt(irq: 93, __ohci: 0xc0474000, regs: 0xc1da7fb8) usb-ohci.c: hc_interrupt: How did I get here? usb-ohci.c: hc_interrupt: ints: 66, ohci: 0xc0474000 Does anything look out of the ordinary? All for now. More later/tomorrow... -- Regards, George --------------786EE47A766F8F17B5547A7B Content-Type: text/x-vcard; charset=us-ascii; name="davis_g.vcf" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Description: Card for George G. Davis Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="davis_g.vcf" begin:vcard n:Davis;George tel;work:603/880-1414 x-mozilla-html:FALSE url:http://www.mvista.com org:MontaVista Software, Inc. adr:;;46 Pine Street Extension;Nashua;NH;03060;USA version:2.1 email;internet:davis_g@mvista.com title:Software Engineer x-mozilla-cpt:;-5376 fn:George G. Davis end:vcard --------------786EE47A766F8F17B5547A7B-- From kramer@pa.dec.com Wed Dec 6 01:22:32 2000 Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (root@mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id BAA08589 for ; Wed, 6 Dec 2000 01:22:32 +0100 Received: from zmamail03.zma.compaq.com (zmamail03.zma.compaq.com [161.114.64.103]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id BAA15097 for ; Wed, 6 Dec 2000 01:22:30 +0100 (MET) Received: by zmamail03.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 18322187A; Tue, 5 Dec 2000 19:20:43 -0500 (EST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by zmamail03.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id ADEDB1A6A; Tue, 5 Dec 2000 19:20:40 -0500 (EST) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA13766; Tue, 5 Dec 2000 16:20:39 -0800 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id QAA00348; Tue, 5 Dec 2000 16:19:22 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id QAA14022; Tue, 5 Dec 2000 16:19:22 -0800 (PST) Received: from zmamail01.nz-tay.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA22080; Tue, 5 Dec 2000 16:19:21 -0800 Received: by zmamail01.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 01D93C133; Tue, 5 Dec 2000 19:19:20 -0500 (EST) Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by zmamail01.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D3BCC286 for ; Tue, 5 Dec 2000 19:19:05 -0500 (EST) Received: from arthur.ubicom.tudelft.nl (erik.et.tudelft.nl [130.161.48.56]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id BAA14960; Wed, 6 Dec 2000 01:19:03 +0100 (MET) Received: (from erik@localhost) by arthur.ubicom.tudelft.nl (8.11.0/8.11.0/SuSE Linux 8.11.0-0.4) id eB60IWp19206; Wed, 6 Dec 2000 01:18:32 +0100 Date: Wed, 6 Dec 2000 01:18:32 +0100 From: Erik Mouw To: Nicolas Pitre Cc: Ward Willats , sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Subject: Re: Why MTD? Message-Id: <20001206011832.E15420@arthur.ubicom.tudelft.nl> References: <20001205133531.A272@extenex.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: ; from nico@CAM.ORG on Tue, Dec 05, 2000 at 05:59:25PM -0500 Organization: Eric Conspiracy Secret Labs X-Eric-Conspiracy: There is no conspiracy! Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk On Tue, Dec 05, 2000 at 05:59:25PM -0500, Nicolas Pitre wrote: > On Tue, 5 Dec 2000, Ward Willats wrote: > > > The MTD driver, while certainly more general-purpose, is also larger, > > more complicated and comes with ominous patent infringement warnings > > for non-PCMCIA applications. > > That apply *only* to the FTL (flash translation layer) module which you > certainly don't need since you didn't use it before anyway. And apart from that, it doesn't matter. The patent stuff is only a warning that in the non-free parts of the world local laws might prevent you from using the code. There recently was a thread about this on the linux-kernel mailing list, check out: http://kt.linuxcare.com/kernel-traffic/kt20001106_92.epl#9 I actually like the last remark Alan Cox made in this thread ;-). Erik -- J.A.K. (Erik) Mouw, Information and Communication Theory Group, Department of Electrical Engineering, Faculty of Information Technology and Systems, Delft University of Technology, PO BOX 5031, 2600 GA Delft, The Netherlands Phone: +31-15-2783635 Fax: +31-15-2781843 Email: J.A.K.Mouw@its.tudelft.nl WWW: http://www-ict.its.tudelft.nl/~erik/ From kramer@pa.dec.com Thu Dec 7 11:16:42 2000 Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (root@mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id LAA13383 for ; Thu, 7 Dec 2000 11:16:42 +0100 Received: from zmamail03.zma.compaq.com (zmamail03.zma.compaq.com [161.114.64.103]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id LAA19547 for ; Thu, 7 Dec 2000 11:16:41 +0100 (MET) Received: by zmamail03.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 4CD1A1BB9; Thu, 7 Dec 2000 05:14:54 -0500 (EST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by zmamail03.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 29BCC1827; Thu, 7 Dec 2000 05:14:52 -0500 (EST) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA08523; Thu, 7 Dec 2000 02:13:19 -0800 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id BAA21372; Thu, 7 Dec 2000 01:57:56 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id BAA01327; Thu, 7 Dec 2000 01:57:55 -0800 (PST) Received: from ztxmail01.nz-cce.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA00381; Thu, 7 Dec 2000 01:57:54 -0800 Received: by ztxmail01.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id BDFBB22CC; Thu, 7 Dec 2000 03:57:53 -0600 (CST) Received: from www.hw-agent.de (www.hw-agent.de [212.63.43.180]) by ztxmail01.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC0E3232C for ; Thu, 7 Dec 2000 03:57:52 -0600 (CST) Received: from hw-mail.hoeft-wessel.de (unknown [172.26.252.3]) by www.hw-agent.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C4657763B for ; Thu, 7 Dec 2000 10:56:47 +0100 (CET) Received: by HW_MAIL with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21) id ; Thu, 7 Dec 2000 10:57:48 +0100 Message-Id: <81413F587EB9D1118F56000092941A3E01F45750@HW_MAIL> From: "JOR. - Jordan, Roman" To: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Subject: question about modules Date: Thu, 7 Dec 2000 10:57:47 +0100 Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk Hello, the actual kernel sources consists of modules. But i can't find some documentation about building the kernel and modules. There is only 'make zImage' in documantation. Whats about the modules? Do i need a 'make modules' and 'make modules_install' also? And if so, can i start 'make modules_install' with a paramter for the destination path? Thanks, in advance Roman Jordan From kramer@pa.dec.com Thu Dec 7 18:12:18 2000 Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (root@mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id SAA15726 for ; Thu, 7 Dec 2000 18:12:17 +0100 Received: from zmamail05.zma.compaq.com (zmamail05.zma.compaq.com [161.114.64.105]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id SAA18374 for ; Thu, 7 Dec 2000 18:12:16 +0100 (MET) Received: by zmamail05.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id E2E1E3ADA; Thu, 7 Dec 2000 12:10:29 -0500 (EST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by zmamail05.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id A5D8F2D89; Thu, 7 Dec 2000 12:10:27 -0500 (EST) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA12921; Thu, 7 Dec 2000 09:10:16 -0800 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id JAA12809; Thu, 7 Dec 2000 09:07:13 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id JAA20681; Thu, 7 Dec 2000 09:07:13 -0800 (PST) Received: from zmamail01.nz-tay.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA31439; Thu, 7 Dec 2000 09:07:12 -0800 Received: by zmamail01.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 82957B83C; Thu, 7 Dec 2000 12:07:11 -0500 (EST) Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by zmamail01.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 290B6C429 for ; Thu, 7 Dec 2000 12:07:07 -0500 (EST) Received: from arthur.ubicom.tudelft.nl (arthur.ubicom.tudelft.nl [130.161.43.222]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id SAA18114; Thu, 7 Dec 2000 18:07:05 +0100 (MET) Received: (from erik@localhost) by arthur.ubicom.tudelft.nl (8.11.0/8.11.0/SuSE Linux 8.11.0-0.4) id eB7H6UD09925; Thu, 7 Dec 2000 18:06:30 +0100 Date: Thu, 7 Dec 2000 18:06:30 +0100 From: Erik Mouw To: "JOR. - Jordan, Roman" Cc: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Subject: Re: question about modules Message-Id: <20001207180630.T847@arthur.ubicom.tudelft.nl> References: <81413F587EB9D1118F56000092941A3E01F45750@HW_MAIL> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <81413F587EB9D1118F56000092941A3E01F45750@HW_MAIL>; from JOR@hoeft-wessel.de on Thu, Dec 07, 2000 at 10:57:47AM +0100 Organization: Eric Conspiracy Secret Labs X-Eric-Conspiracy: There is no conspiracy! Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk On Thu, Dec 07, 2000 at 10:57:47AM +0100, JOR. - Jordan, Roman wrote: > the actual kernel sources consists of modules. But i can't find some > documentation about building the kernel and modules. There is only 'make > zImage' in documantation. Whats about the modules? Do i need a 'make > modules' and 'make modules_install' also? And if so, can i start 'make > modules_install' with a paramter for the destination path? Ehm, it *is* in the documentation. Check out the README file in the root of the kernel tree. But yes, "make modules" makes the modules. "make modules_install" will put the modules in /lib/modules/$version, but from reading the main Makefile, you can override it with: make INSTALL_MOD_PATH=/tmp/arm modules_install And your modules will be installed in /tmp/arm/lib/modules/$version. Erik -- J.A.K. (Erik) Mouw, Information and Communication Theory Group, Department of Electrical Engineering, Faculty of Information Technology and Systems, Delft University of Technology, PO BOX 5031, 2600 GA Delft, The Netherlands Phone: +31-15-2783635 Fax: +31-15-2781843 Email: J.A.K.Mouw@its.tudelft.nl WWW: http://www-ict.its.tudelft.nl/~erik/ From kramer@pa.dec.com Fri Dec 8 05:27:19 2000 Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (root@mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id FAA17994 for ; Fri, 8 Dec 2000 05:27:19 +0100 Received: from ztxmail04.ztx.compaq.com (ztxmail04.ztx.compaq.com [161.114.1.208]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id FAA15995 for ; Fri, 8 Dec 2000 05:27:17 +0100 (MET) Received: by ztxmail04.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 2830FDEB; Thu, 7 Dec 2000 22:25:30 -0600 (CST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by ztxmail04.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id A1D852DE; Thu, 7 Dec 2000 22:25:28 -0600 (CST) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA10882; Thu, 7 Dec 2000 20:25:25 -0800 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id UAA16067; Thu, 7 Dec 2000 20:22:18 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id UAA25405; Thu, 7 Dec 2000 20:22:17 -0800 (PST) Received: from zmamail01.nz-tay.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA04021; Thu, 7 Dec 2000 20:22:17 -0800 Received: by zmamail01.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id D4725B578; Thu, 7 Dec 2000 23:22:16 -0500 (EST) Received: from mail-blue.research.att.com (mail-blue.research.att.com [135.207.30.102]) by zmamail01.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD4E5BABB for ; Thu, 7 Dec 2000 23:22:16 -0500 (EST) Received: from hermes.research.att.com (hermes.research.att.com [135.207.16.38]) by mail-blue.research.att.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 527C94CE38 for ; Thu, 7 Dec 2000 23:22:16 -0500 (EST) Received: from research.att.com ([135.207.8.150]) by hermes.research.att.com (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id XAA16838 for ; Thu, 7 Dec 2000 23:17:39 -0500 (EST) Message-Id: <3A30615B.AA59B96B@research.att.com> Date: Thu, 07 Dec 2000 23:19:39 -0500 From: Jack Chang Organization: AT&T Labs-Research X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.76 [en] (Win98; U) X-Accept-Language: en,zh-TW Mime-Version: 1.0 To: SA-1100/Linux Subject: Re: assabet console and irda keyborad Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk Greetings, Currently I'm still using minicom as console for assabet, how do I switch the console to assabet ? And what should I do to get irda keyboard to work on assabet at the same time? Thanks -- Jack T. Chang From kramer@pa.dec.com Fri Dec 8 07:08:48 2000 Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (root@mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id HAA18098 for ; Fri, 8 Dec 2000 07:08:48 +0100 Received: from zmamail05.zma.compaq.com (zmamail05.zma.compaq.com [161.114.64.105]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id HAA19322 for ; Fri, 8 Dec 2000 07:08:46 +0100 (MET) Received: by zmamail05.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id EE5DF5AF2; Fri, 8 Dec 2000 01:06:57 -0500 (EST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by zmamail05.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 73B5E2B85; Fri, 8 Dec 2000 01:06:55 -0500 (EST) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA02474; Thu, 7 Dec 2000 22:06:50 -0800 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id WAA26079; Thu, 7 Dec 2000 22:05:14 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id WAA10890; Thu, 7 Dec 2000 22:05:13 -0800 (PST) From: Received: from ztxmail02.nz-cce.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA21922; Thu, 7 Dec 2000 22:05:12 -0800 Received: by ztxmail02.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 26E391DBB; Fri, 8 Dec 2000 00:05:12 -0600 (CST) Received: from rnd. (unknown [210.111.23.67]) by ztxmail02.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 7841D1CB9 for ; Fri, 8 Dec 2000 00:05:09 -0600 (CST) Received: from 210.111.23.67 by rnd. (SMI-8.6/SMI-SVR4) id IAA27878; Fri, 8 Dec 2000 08:46:54 +0900 Received: from mailhost.enterprises2001.com (alt1.enterprises2001.com(208.5.67.10)) by enterprises2001.com (8.8.5/8.6.5) with SMTP id GAA05435 for ; Thu, 07 Dec 2000 14:20:04 -0600 (EST) Date: Thu, 07 Dec 00 14:20:04 EST To: frontunax@radiant.com Subject: YOU CAN MAKE ALOT OF MONEY AT HOME, PART-TIME. Message-Id: Reply-To: frontunax@radiant.com X-Pmflags: 128 0 X-Uidl: 57484839872987388761098273678937187382 Comments: Authenticated sender is Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk Dear Friend, You can earn $50,000 or more in next the 90 days sending e-mail, seem impossible? Read on for details (no, there is no 'catch')... Here's an opportunity that I genuinely believe satisfies the criteria we all seek in a Good Business Opportunity. I can confirm from my research this is an ethical opportunity that does indeed provide significant returns. There are plenty of people doing this in the UK, States and Canada; genuine people who are willing to assist you. I send this to you as I received it. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- THIS IS A LEGITIMATE, LEGAL, MONEY MAKING OPPORTUNITY. But before you make your decision as to whether or not you participate in this program, please answer one question... "DO YOU WANT TO MAKE A CHANGE IN YOUR LIFE?" If the answer is yes, please look at the following facts about this program: ------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. YOU WOULD BE SELLING A PRODUCT WHICH DOES NOT COST ANYTHING TO PRODUCE! 2. YOU WOULD BE SELLING A PRODUCT WHICH DOES NOT COST ANYTHING TO SHIP! 3. AND IT IS A PRODUCT WHICH DOES NOT COST YOU ANYTHING TO ADVERTISE! 4. YOU ARE UTILIZING THE POWER OF THE INTERNET AND THE POWER OF MULTI-LEVEL MARKETING TO DISTRIBUTE YOUR PRODUCT ALL OVER THE WORLD! 5. YOUR ONLY EXPENSE OTHER THAN YOUR INITIAL $20 INVESTMENT IS YOUR TIME! 6. VIRTUALLY ALL OF THE INCOME YOU GENERATE FROM THIS PROGRAM IS PURE PROFIT! 7. THIS PROGRAM MAY CHANGE YOUR LIFE FOREVER. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- *** Print This Now For Future Reference *** The following income opportunity is one you may be interested in taking a look at. It can be started with VERY LITTLE investment and the income return is TREMENDOUS!!! If you would like to make at least $50,000 in less than 90 days! Please read the enclosed program...THEN READ IT AGAIN!!! ------------------------------------------------------------------------- MULTI-LEVEL MARKETING (MLM) has finally gained respectability. It is being taught in the Harvard Business School, and both Stanford Research and the Wall Street Journal have stated that between 50% and 65% of all goods and services will be sold through multi-level methods by the mid to late 1990's. This is a Multi-Billion Dollar industry and of the 500,000 millionaires in the U.S., 20% (100,000) made their fortune in the last several years in MLM. Moreover, statistics show 45 people become millionaires everyday through Multi-Level Marketing. You may have heard this story before, but over the summer Donald Trump (A MULTI-BILLIONAIRE, ONE OF THE WEALTHIEST MEN IN THE WORLD) made an appearance on the David Letterman show. Dave asked him what he would do if he lost everything and had to start over from scratch. Without hesitating, Trump said he would find a good network marketing company and get to work. The audience started to hoot and boo him. He looked out at the audience and dead-panned his response "That's why I'm sitting up here and you are all sitting out there!" With network marketing you have two sources of income. Direct commissions from sales you make yourself and commissions from sales made by people you introduce to the business. Residual income is the secret of the wealthy. It means investing time or money once and getting paid again and again and again. In network marketing, it also means getting paid for the work of others. The enclosed information is something I almost let slip through my fingers. Fortunately, sometime later I re-read everything and gave some thought and study to it. A NOTE FROM THE ORIGINATOR: My name is Johnathon Rourke. Two years ago, the corporation I worked at for the past twelve years down-sized and my position was eliminated. After unproductive job interviews, I decided to open my own business. Over the past year, I incurred many unforeseen financial problems. I owed my family, friends and creditors over $35,000. The economy was taking a toll on my business and I just couldn't seem to make ends meet. I had to refinance and borrow against my home to support my family and struggling business. AT THAT MOMENT something significant happened in my life and I am writing to share the experience in the hope that this will change your life FOREVER FINANCIALLY!!! In mid December, I received this program via e-mail. Six months prior to receiving this program I had been sending away for information on various business opportunities. All of the programs I received, in my opinion, were not cost effective. They were either too difficult for me to comprehend or the initial investment was too much for me to risk to see if they would work or not. One claimed that I would make a million dollars in one year...it didn't tell me I'd have to write a book to make it! But like I was saying, in December of 1997 I received this program. I didn't send for it, or ask for it, they just got my name off a mailing list. THANK GOODNESS FOR THAT!!! After reading it several times, to make sure I was reading it correctly, I couldn't believe my eyes. Here was a MONEY MAKING PHENOMENON. I could invest as much as I wanted to start, without putting me further into debt. After I got a pencil and paper and figured it out, I would at least get my money back. But like most of you I was still a little skeptical and a little worried about the legal aspects of it all. After determining the program was LEGAL and NOT A CHAIN LETTER, I decided "WHY NOT?" Initially I sent out 100,000 e-mails. It cost me about $15 for my time on-line. The great thing about e-mail is that I don't need any money for printing to send out the program, and because all of my orders are fulfilled via e-mail, the only expense is my time. I am telling you like it is, I hope it doesn't turn you off, but I promised myself that I would not "rip-off" anyone, no matter how much money it cost me. In less than one week, I was starting to receive orders for REPORT #1. By January 13, I had received 26 orders for REPORT #1. Your goal is to "RECEIVE at least 20 ORDERS FOR REPORT #1 WITHIN 2 WEEKS. IF YOU DON'T, SEND OUT MORE PROGRAMS UNTIL YOU DO!" My first step in making $55,000 in 90 days was done. By January 30, I had received 196 orders for REPORT #2. Your goal is to "RECEIVE AT LEAST 100+ ORDERS FOR REPORT #2 WITHIN 2 WEEKS. IF NOT, SEND OUT MORE PROGRAMS UNTIL YOU DO. ONCE YOU HAVE 100 ORDERS, THE REST IS EASY, RELAX, YOU WILL MAKE YOUR $55,000 GOAL." Well, I had 196 orders for REPORT #2, 96 more than I needed. So I sat back and relaxed. By March 1, of my e-mailing of 100,000, I received $58,000 with more coming in every day. I paid off ALL my debts and bought a much needed new car. Please take time to read the attached program, IT WILL CHANGE YOUR LIFE FOREVER!!! Remember, it won't work if you don't try it. This program does work, but you must follow it EXACTLY! Especially the rules of not trying to place your name in a different place. It won't work, you'll lose out on a lot of money! In order for this program to work, you must meet your goal of 20+ orders for REPORT #1, and 100+ orders for REPORT #2 and you will make $55,000 or more in 90 days. I AM LIVING PROOF THAT IT WORKS!!! If you choose not to participate in this program, I am sorry. It really is a great opportunity with little cost or risk to you. If you choose to participate, follow the program and you will be on your way to financial security. If you are a fellow business owner and are in financial trouble like I was, or you want to start your own business, consider this a sign. I DID! P.S. Do you have any idea what 11,700 $5 bills ($58,000) look like piled up on a kitchen table? Johnathon Rourke ------------------------------------------------------------------------- With "NO RISK" and "JUST A LITTLE BIT OF EFFORT", you can make more money in the next few months than you have ever imagined. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- HERE'S HOW THIS AMAZING PROGRAM WILL MAKE YOU THOUSANDS OF DOLLAR$ ------------------------------------------------------------------------- INSTRUCTIONS: This method of raising capital REALLY WORKS 100% EVERY TIME. I am sure that you could use up to $50,000 or more in the next 90 days. Before you say "BULL... ", please read this program carefully. This is not a chain letter, but a perfectly legal money making opportunity. Basically, this is what you do: As with all multi-level businesses, we build our business by recruiting new partners and selling our products. Because of the global nature of the internet, you will be able to recruit new multi-level business partners from all over the world, and we offer a product for EVERY dollar sent. YOUR ORDERS COME BY MAIL AND ARE FILLED BY E-MAIL, so you are not involved in personal selling. You do it privately in your own home, store or office. This is the GREATEST Multi-Level Mail Order Marketing anywhere: This is what you MUST do: 1. Order all 4 reports shown on the list below (you can't sell them if you don't order them). These 4 reports show you how to actually do this online business! * For each report, send $5.00 CASH, the NAME & NUMBER OF THE REPORT YOU ARE ORDERING, YOUR E-MAIL ADDRESS, and YOUR NAME & RETURN ADDRESS (in case of a problem) to the person whose name appears on the list next to the report. AND MAKE SURE YOUR RETURN ADDRESS IS ON YOUR ENVELOPE IN CASE OF ANY MAIL PROBLEMS! * When you place your order, make sure you order each of the four reports. You will need all four reports so that you can save them on your computer and resell them. * Within a few days you will receive, via e-mail, each of the four reports. Save them on your computer so they will be accessible for you to send to the 1,000's of people who will order them from you. 2. IMPORTANT-- DO NOT alter the names of the people who are listed next to each report, or their sequence on the list, in any way other than is instructed below in steps "a" through "f" or you will lose out on the majority of your profits. Once you understand the way this works, you'll also see how it doesn't work if you change it. Remember, this method has been tested, and if you alter it, it will not work. a. Look below for the listing of available reports. b. After you've ordered the four reports, take this advertisement and remove the name and address under REPORT #4. This person has made it through the cycle and is no doubt counting their $50,000. c. Move the name and address under REPORT #3 down to REPORT #4. d. Move the name and address under REPORT #2 down to REPORT #3. e. Move the name and address under REPORT #1 down to REPORT #2. f. Insert your name/address in the REPORT #1 position. Please make sure you copy every name and address ACCURATELY! 3. Take this entire letter, including the modified list of names, and save it to your computer. Make NO changes to the instruction portion of this letter. Your cost to participate in this is practically nothing (surely you can afford $20). You obviously already have an Internet connection and e-mail is FREE! To assist you with marketing your business on the internet, the 4 reports you purchase will provide you with invaluable marketing information which includes how to send bulk e-mails, where to find thousands of free classified ads and much, much more. There are two primary methods of building your downline: METHOD #1: SENDING BULK E-MAIL Let's say that you decide to start small, just to see how it goes, and we'll assume you and all those involved send out only 2,000 programs each. Let's also assume that the mailing receives a 0.5% response. Using a good list the response could be much better. Also, many people will send out hundreds of thousands of programs instead of 2,000. But continuing with this example, you send out only 2,000 programs. With a 0.5% response, that is only 10 orders for REPORT #1. Those 10 people respond by sending out 2,000 programs each for a total of 20,000. Out of those 0.5%, 100 people respond and order REPORT #2. Those 100 mail out 2,000 programs each for a total of 200,000. The 0.5% response to that is 1000 orders for REPORT #3. Those 1000 send out 2,000 programs each for a 2,000,000 total. The 0.5% response to that is 10,000 orders for REPORT #4. That's 11,110 $5 bills for you. CASH!!! Your total income in this example is $50 + $500 + $5,000 + $50,000 for a total of $55,550!!! REMEMBER, THIS IS ASSUMING 1,990 OUT OF THE 2,000 PEOPLE YOU MAIL TO WILL DO ABSOLUTELY NOTHING AND TRASH THIS PROGRAM! DARE TO THINK FOR A MOMENT WHAT WOULD HAPPEN IF EVERYONE, OR EVEN HALF SENT OUT 100,000 PROGRAMS INSTEAD OF 2,000. Believe me, many people will do just that, and more! REPORT #2 will show you the best methods for bulk e-mailing, tell you where to obtain free bulk e-mail software and where to obtain e-mail lists and show you how to send out 1,000,000 e-mails for free. METHOD #2 - PLACING FREE ADS ON THE INTERNET 1. Advertising on the 'Net is very, very inexpensive, and there are HUNDREDS of FREE places to advertise. Let's say you decide to start small just to see how well it works. Assume your goal is to get ONLY 10 people to participate on your first level. (Placing a lot of FREE ads on the Internet will EASILY get a larger response.) Also assume that everyone else in YOUR ORGANIZATION gets ONLY 6 downline members. Follow this example to achieve the STAGGERING results below. 1st level--your 10 members with $5 ($5 x 10).................$50 2nd level--10 members from those 10 ($5 x 100)..............$500 3rd level--10 members from those 100 ($5 x 1000)......... $5,000 4th level--10 members from those 1000 ($5 x 10,000)......$50,000 THIS TOTALS ---------------------------------------------$55,550 Remember friends, this assumes that the people who participate only recruit 10 people each. Think for a moment what would happen if they got 20 people to participate! Many people will get 100's of participants! THINK ABOUT IT! For every $5.00 you receive, all you must do is e-mail them the report they ordered. THAT'S IT! ALWAYS PROVIDE SAME-DAY SERVICE ON ALL ORDERS! This will guarantee that the e-mail THEY send out, with YOUR name and address on it, will be prompt because they can't advertise until they receive the report! ------------------------------------------ AVAILABLE REPORTS ------------------------------------------ *** Order Each REPORT by NUMBER and NAME *** Notes: - ALWAYS SEND $5 CASH (U.S. CURRENCY) FOR EACH REPORT. CHEQUES NOT ACCEPTED. - ALWAYS SEND YOUR ORDER VIA FIRST CLASS MAIL - Make sure the cash is concealed by wrapping it in at least two sheets of paper - On one of those sheets of paper, include: (a) the number & name of the report you are ordering, (b) your e-mail address, and (c) your name & postal address. PLACE YOUR ORDER FOR THESE REPORTS NOW: ______________________________________________________ REPORT #1 "The Insider's Guide to Advertising for Free on the Internet" ORDER REPORT #1 FROM: Yuko Imports 2187 East 8th Avenue Vancouver, British Columbia Canada V5N1V4 ______________________________________________________ REPORT #2 "The Insider's Guide to Sending Bulk E-mail on the Internet" ORDER REPORT #2 FROM: IPS Network 355-2252 Kingsway Ave. Vancouver B.C. Canada V5N5X6 ______________________________________________________ REPORT #3 "The Secrets to Multilevel Marketing on the Internet" ORDER REPORT #3 FROM: Sarah Harris PO Box 4271 Verwood BH31 6FW UK ______________________________________________________ REPORT #4 "How to become a Millionaire utilizing the Power of Multilevel Marketing and the Internet" ORDER REPORT #4 FROM: Anthony Thomas 2 Hazelwood Drive Dorset BH31 6YQ UK ----------------------------------------------------------------------- There are currently more than 175,000,000 people online worldwide! ******* TIPS FOR SUCCESS ******* * TREAT THIS AS YOUR BUSINESS! Be prompt, professional, and follow the directions accurately. * Send for the four reports IMMEDIATELY so you will have them when the orders start coming in because: When you receive a $5 order, you MUST send out the requested product/report. * ALWAYS PROVIDE SAME-DAY SERVICE ON THE ORDERS YOU RECEIVE. * Be patient and persistent with this program. If you follow the instructions exactly, your results WILL BE SUCCESSFUL! * ABOVE ALL, HAVE FAITH IN YOURSELF AND KNOW YOU WILL SUCCEED! ******* YOUR SUCCESS GUIDELINES ******* Follow these guidelines to guarantee your success: If you don't receive 20 orders for REPORT #1 within two weeks, continue advertising or sending e-mails until you do. Then, a couple of weeks later you should receive at least 100 orders for REPORT#2. If you don't, continue advertising or sending e-mails until you do. Once you have received 100-150 or more orders for REPORT #2, YOU CAN RELAX, because the system is already working for you, and the cash will continue to roll in! THIS IS IMPORTANT TO REMEMBER: Every time your name is moved down on the list, you are placed in front of a DIFFERENT report. You can KEEP TRACK of your PROGRESS by watching which report people are ordering from you. If you want to generate more income, send another batch of e-mails or continue placing ads and start the whole process again! There is no limit to the income you will generate from this business! ORDER YOUR REPORTS TODAY AND GET STARTED ON YOUR ROAD TO FINANCIAL FREEDOM! NOW IS THE TIME FOR YOUR TURN. DECISIVE ACTION YIELDS POWERFUL RESULTS. From kramer@pa.dec.com Fri Dec 8 16:10:25 2000 Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (root@mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id QAA19701 for ; Fri, 8 Dec 2000 16:10:25 +0100 Received: from ztxmail04.ztx.compaq.com (ztxmail04.ztx.compaq.com [161.114.1.208]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id QAA19926 for ; Fri, 8 Dec 2000 16:10:23 +0100 (MET) Received: by ztxmail04.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 49D42F1C; Fri, 8 Dec 2000 09:08:35 -0600 (CST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by ztxmail04.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id AF2F2D67; Fri, 8 Dec 2000 09:08:33 -0600 (CST) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA11936; Fri, 8 Dec 2000 07:08:19 -0800 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id GAA18524; Fri, 8 Dec 2000 06:50:02 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id GAA21588; Fri, 8 Dec 2000 06:50:01 -0800 (PST) Received: from ztxmail01.nz-cce.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA04407; Fri, 8 Dec 2000 06:49:56 -0800 Received: by ztxmail01.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 4E54421DC; Fri, 8 Dec 2000 08:49:50 -0600 (CST) Received: from xanadu.gn.com (modemcable248.137-200-24.mtl.mc.videotron.ca [24.200.137.248]) by ztxmail01.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E87C41FB for ; Fri, 8 Dec 2000 08:49:49 -0600 (CST) Received: from localhost (nico@localhost) by xanadu.gn.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id JAA06174; Fri, 8 Dec 2000 09:49:37 -0500 X-Authentication-Warning: xanadu.gn.com: nico owned process doing -bs Date: Fri, 8 Dec 2000 09:49:37 -0500 (EST) From: Nicolas Pitre X-Sender: To: Jack Chang Cc: SA-1100/Linux Subject: Re: assabet console and irda keyborad In-Reply-To: <3A30615B.AA59B96B@research.att.com> Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk On Thu, 7 Dec 2000, Jack Chang wrote: > Greetings, > Currently I'm still using minicom as console for assabet, how do I > switch the console to assabet ? > And what should I do to get irda keyboard to work on assabet at the same > time? Thanks You'll need to write a new keyboard driver. Nicolas From kramer@pa.dec.com Fri Dec 8 17:10:47 2000 Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (root@mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id RAA19826 for ; Fri, 8 Dec 2000 17:10:47 +0100 Received: from zmamail05.zma.compaq.com (zmamail05.zma.compaq.com [161.114.64.105]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id RAA24072 for ; Fri, 8 Dec 2000 17:10:46 +0100 (MET) Received: by zmamail05.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id DA61F388A; Fri, 8 Dec 2000 11:08:59 -0500 (EST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by zmamail05.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id A58421531; Fri, 8 Dec 2000 11:08:57 -0500 (EST) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA31514; Fri, 8 Dec 2000 08:08:51 -0800 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id HAA22727; Fri, 8 Dec 2000 07:54:02 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id HAA31912; Fri, 8 Dec 2000 07:54:01 -0800 (PST) Received: from ztxmail01.nz-cce.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA30784; Fri, 8 Dec 2000 07:54:01 -0800 Received: by ztxmail01.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id B04244251; Fri, 8 Dec 2000 09:54:00 -0600 (CST) Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by ztxmail01.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 736E229C1 for ; Fri, 8 Dec 2000 09:53:56 -0600 (CST) Received: from arthur.ubicom.tudelft.nl (arthur.ubicom.tudelft.nl [130.161.43.222]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id QAA22842; Fri, 8 Dec 2000 16:53:54 +0100 (MET) Received: (from erik@localhost) by arthur.ubicom.tudelft.nl (8.11.0/8.11.0/SuSE Linux 8.11.0-0.4) id eB8Foed18869; Fri, 8 Dec 2000 16:50:40 +0100 Date: Fri, 8 Dec 2000 16:50:40 +0100 From: Erik Mouw To: Nicolas Pitre Cc: Jack Chang , SA-1100/Linux Subject: Re: assabet console and irda keyborad Message-Id: <20001208165040.J847@arthur.ubicom.tudelft.nl> References: <3A30615B.AA59B96B@research.att.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: ; from nico@CAM.ORG on Fri, Dec 08, 2000 at 09:49:37AM -0500 Organization: Eric Conspiracy Secret Labs X-Eric-Conspiracy: There is no conspiracy! Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk On Fri, Dec 08, 2000 at 09:49:37AM -0500, Nicolas Pitre wrote: > On Thu, 7 Dec 2000, Jack Chang wrote: > > And what should I do to get irda keyboard to work on assabet at the same > > time? Thanks > > You'll need to write a new keyboard driver. The linux-console project is working on a new model for input devices, check out http://linuxconsole.sourceforge.net/ . Erik -- J.A.K. (Erik) Mouw, Information and Communication Theory Group, Department of Electrical Engineering, Faculty of Information Technology and Systems, Delft University of Technology, PO BOX 5031, 2600 GA Delft, The Netherlands Phone: +31-15-2783635 Fax: +31-15-2781843 Email: J.A.K.Mouw@its.tudelft.nl WWW: http://www-ict.its.tudelft.nl/~erik/ From kramer@pa.dec.com Fri Dec 8 21:22:14 2000 Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (root@mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id VAA21676 for ; Fri, 8 Dec 2000 21:22:14 +0100 Received: from ztxmail05.ztx.compaq.com (ztxmail05.ztx.compaq.com [161.114.1.209]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id VAA06561 for ; Fri, 8 Dec 2000 21:22:12 +0100 (MET) Received: by ztxmail05.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id DE8EB1161; Fri, 8 Dec 2000 14:20:19 -0600 (CST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by ztxmail05.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id D26A01199; Fri, 8 Dec 2000 14:20:17 -0600 (CST) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA00437; Fri, 8 Dec 2000 12:20:10 -0800 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id MAA06252; Fri, 8 Dec 2000 12:03:43 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id MAA02179; Fri, 8 Dec 2000 12:03:43 -0800 (PST) Received: from ztxmail02.nz-cce.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA17608; Fri, 8 Dec 2000 12:03:42 -0800 Received: by ztxmail02.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 80CB01EFF; Fri, 8 Dec 2000 14:03:42 -0600 (CST) Received: from mail.netx4.com (216-064-003-018.inaddr.vitts.com [216.64.3.18]) by ztxmail02.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E45CA1DDD for ; Fri, 8 Dec 2000 14:03:41 -0600 (CST) Received: from mvista.com (greeny.netx4.com [192.168.253.30]) by mail.netx4.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id PAA02920; Fri, 8 Dec 2000 15:02:52 -0500 Message-Id: <3A313E60.236B3033@mvista.com> Date: Fri, 08 Dec 2000 15:02:40 -0500 From: "George G. Davis" Organization: MontaVista Software, Inc. X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.7 [en] (X11; I; Linux 2.4.0-test11 ppc) X-Accept-Language: en Mime-Version: 1.0 To: StrongArm Linux , Arm Linux , "George G. Davis" Subject: Re: Newbie question on Neponset sound support References: <3A313DFE.354F906A@mvista.com> Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="------------3BBD97E1B2BDECDFCAD3A89F" Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------3BBD97E1B2BDECDFCAD3A89F Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit "George G. Davis" wrote: > I'm running linux-2.4.0-test10-rmk1-np2 on Assabet+Neponset with CONFIG_SOUND_UDA1341 Oops, that's supposed to be rmk2-np3! -- Regards, George --------------3BBD97E1B2BDECDFCAD3A89F Content-Type: text/x-vcard; charset=iso-8859-1; name="davis_g.vcf" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-Description: Card for George G. Davis Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="davis_g.vcf" YmVnaW46dmNhcmQgCm46RGF2aXM7R2VvcmdlCnRlbDt3b3JrOjYwMy84ODAtMTQxNAp4LW1v emlsbGEtaHRtbDpGQUxTRQp1cmw6aHR0cDovL3d3dy5tdmlzdGEuY29tCm9yZzpNb250YVZp c3RhIFNvZnR3YXJlLCBJbmMuCmFkcjo7OzQ2IFBpbmUgU3RyZWV0IEV4dGVuc2lvbjtOYXNo dWE7Tkg7MDMwNjA7VVNBCnZlcnNpb246Mi4xCmVtYWlsO2ludGVybmV0OmRhdmlzX2dAbXZp c3RhLmNvbQp0aXRsZTpTb2Z0d2FyZSBFbmdpbmVlcgp4LW1vemlsbGEtY3B0OjstNTM3Ngpm bjpHZW9yZ2UgRy4gRGF2aXMKZW5kOnZjYXJkCg== --------------3BBD97E1B2BDECDFCAD3A89F-- From kramer@pa.dec.com Fri Dec 8 21:22:17 2000 Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (root@mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id VAA21682 for ; Fri, 8 Dec 2000 21:22:17 +0100 Received: from ztxmail03.ztx.compaq.com (ztxmail03.ztx.compaq.com [161.114.1.207]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id VAA06565 for ; Fri, 8 Dec 2000 21:22:15 +0100 (MET) Received: by ztxmail03.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 907D02153; Fri, 8 Dec 2000 14:20:22 -0600 (CST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by ztxmail03.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id DDE65218D; Fri, 8 Dec 2000 14:20:19 -0600 (CST) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA15010; Fri, 8 Dec 2000 12:20:14 -0800 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id MAA20927; Fri, 8 Dec 2000 12:02:11 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id MAA06156; Fri, 8 Dec 2000 12:02:10 -0800 (PST) Received: from ztxmail02.nz-cce.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA23380; Fri, 8 Dec 2000 12:02:06 -0800 Received: by ztxmail02.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id A4A6F1CD0; Fri, 8 Dec 2000 14:02:05 -0600 (CST) Received: from mail.netx4.com (216-064-003-018.inaddr.vitts.com [216.64.3.18]) by ztxmail02.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0802D1D52 for ; Fri, 8 Dec 2000 14:02:05 -0600 (CST) Received: from mvista.com (greeny.netx4.com [192.168.253.30]) by mail.netx4.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id PAA02911; Fri, 8 Dec 2000 15:01:15 -0500 Message-Id: <3A313DFE.354F906A@mvista.com> Date: Fri, 08 Dec 2000 15:01:03 -0500 From: "George G. Davis" Organization: MontaVista Software, Inc. X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.7 [en] (X11; I; Linux 2.4.0-test11 ppc) X-Accept-Language: en Mime-Version: 1.0 To: StrongArm Linux , Arm Linux Cc: "George G. Davis" Subject: Newbie question on Neponset sound support Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="------------E69C2FCA3957DA52A347C24C" Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------E69C2FCA3957DA52A347C24C Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Greetings, I'm having problems figuring out how to unmute the audio on Assabet+Neponset. I'm running linux-2.4.0-test10-rmk1-np2 on Assabet+Neponset with CONFIG_SOUND_UDA1341 enabled. I've built splay, v0.8.2, and it seems to be 'playing'. But no sound? I've found a few sound utils that I've also built which do ioctl's to /dev/mixer to set the volume. But still no sound? I've also attempted dumping audio direct to /dev/audio and /dev/dsp. ...and still no sound? I've built the various audio dev files according to the major/minors contained in Documentation/devices.txt for this release of the kernel. Meanwhile, no complaints from anything about opening/reading/writing these dev files. Any tips are greatly appreciated. BTW, should I actaully expect to see anything when cat'ing /dev/sndstat? I'm getting "no such device". -- Regards, George --------------E69C2FCA3957DA52A347C24C Content-Type: text/x-vcard; charset=iso-8859-1; name="davis_g.vcf" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-Description: Card for George G. Davis Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="davis_g.vcf" YmVnaW46dmNhcmQgCm46RGF2aXM7R2VvcmdlCnRlbDt3b3JrOjYwMy84ODAtMTQxNAp4LW1v emlsbGEtaHRtbDpGQUxTRQp1cmw6aHR0cDovL3d3dy5tdmlzdGEuY29tCm9yZzpNb250YVZp c3RhIFNvZnR3YXJlLCBJbmMuCmFkcjo7OzQ2IFBpbmUgU3RyZWV0IEV4dGVuc2lvbjtOYXNo dWE7Tkg7MDMwNjA7VVNBCnZlcnNpb246Mi4xCmVtYWlsO2ludGVybmV0OmRhdmlzX2dAbXZp c3RhLmNvbQp0aXRsZTpTb2Z0d2FyZSBFbmdpbmVlcgp4LW1vemlsbGEtY3B0OjstNTM3Ngpm bjpHZW9yZ2UgRy4gRGF2aXMKZW5kOnZjYXJkCg== --------------E69C2FCA3957DA52A347C24C-- From kramer@pa.dec.com Fri Dec 8 21:34:43 2000 Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (root@mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id VAA21753 for ; Fri, 8 Dec 2000 21:34:43 +0100 Received: from zmamail04.zma.compaq.com (zmamail04.zma.compaq.com [161.114.64.104]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id VAA07234 for ; Fri, 8 Dec 2000 21:34:41 +0100 (MET) Received: by zmamail04.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id DC6A0B27; Fri, 8 Dec 2000 15:32:50 -0500 (EST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by zmamail04.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id AE72D9D1; Fri, 8 Dec 2000 15:32:48 -0500 (EST) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA24006; Fri, 8 Dec 2000 12:32:43 -0800 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id MAA18721; Fri, 8 Dec 2000 12:16:55 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id MAA31582; Fri, 8 Dec 2000 12:16:55 -0800 (PST) Received: from zmamail02.nz-tay.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA19238; Fri, 8 Dec 2000 12:16:54 -0800 Received: by zmamail02.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 3BC055B02; Fri, 8 Dec 2000 15:16:54 -0500 (EST) Received: from xanadu.gn.com (modemcable248.137-200-24.mtl.mc.videotron.ca [24.200.137.248]) by zmamail02.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CAA585B34 for ; Fri, 8 Dec 2000 15:16:53 -0500 (EST) Received: from localhost (nico@localhost) by xanadu.gn.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id PAA07244; Fri, 8 Dec 2000 15:16:51 -0500 X-Authentication-Warning: xanadu.gn.com: nico owned process doing -bs Date: Fri, 8 Dec 2000 15:16:51 -0500 (EST) From: Nicolas Pitre X-Sender: To: "George G. Davis" Cc: StrongArm Linux , Arm Linux Subject: Re: Newbie question on Neponset sound support In-Reply-To: <3A313DFE.354F906A@mvista.com> Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk On Fri, 8 Dec 2000, George G. Davis wrote: > Greetings, > > I'm having problems figuring out how to unmute the audio on Assabet+Neponset. > I'm running linux-2.4.0-test10-rmk1-np2 on Assabet+Neponset with CONFIG_SOUND_UDA1341 > enabled. I've built splay, v0.8.2, and it seems to be 'playing'. But no sound? 1- upgrade to test11-rmk1-np2 2- don't unload the sa1100-uda1341 module as it apparently does funky things when re-inserted (go figure why(, Nicolas From kramer@pa.dec.com Fri Dec 8 21:39:25 2000 Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (root@mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id VAA21795 for ; Fri, 8 Dec 2000 21:39:25 +0100 Received: from ztxmail03.ztx.compaq.com (ztxmail03.ztx.compaq.com [161.114.1.207]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id VAA07577 for ; Fri, 8 Dec 2000 21:39:23 +0100 (MET) Received: by ztxmail03.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id CB640215A; Fri, 8 Dec 2000 14:37:32 -0600 (CST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by ztxmail03.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id B5333201F; Fri, 8 Dec 2000 14:37:30 -0600 (CST) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA16399; Fri, 8 Dec 2000 12:37:29 -0800 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id MAA08721; Fri, 8 Dec 2000 12:21:40 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id MAA07851; Fri, 8 Dec 2000 12:21:39 -0800 (PST) Received: from ztxmail02.nz-cce.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA22393; Fri, 8 Dec 2000 12:21:39 -0800 Received: by ztxmail02.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id D1C601CA6; Fri, 8 Dec 2000 14:21:38 -0600 (CST) Received: from mail.netx4.com (216-064-003-018.inaddr.vitts.com [216.64.3.18]) by ztxmail02.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 346601EC1 for ; Fri, 8 Dec 2000 14:21:38 -0600 (CST) Received: from mvista.com (greeny.netx4.com [192.168.253.30]) by mail.netx4.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id PAA03008; Fri, 8 Dec 2000 15:20:46 -0500 Message-Id: <3A314292.788FCB6D@mvista.com> Date: Fri, 08 Dec 2000 15:20:34 -0500 From: "George G. Davis" Organization: MontaVista Software, Inc. X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.7 [en] (X11; I; Linux 2.4.0-test11 ppc) X-Accept-Language: en Mime-Version: 1.0 To: Nicolas Pitre Cc: StrongArm Linux , Arm Linux Subject: Re: Newbie question on Neponset sound support References: Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="------------9B1285A873E4AEDAE9E914BC" Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------9B1285A873E4AEDAE9E914BC Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Nicolas Pitre wrote: > > On Fri, 8 Dec 2000, George G. Davis wrote: > > > Greetings, > > > > I'm having problems figuring out how to unmute the audio on Assabet+Neponset. > > I'm running linux-2.4.0-test10-rmk1-np2 on Assabet+Neponset with CONFIG_SOUND_UDA1341 > > enabled. I've built splay, v0.8.2, and it seems to be 'playing'. But no sound? > > 1- upgrade to test11-rmk1-np2 I was doing that just now! : ) > 2- don't unload the sa1100-uda1341 module as it apparently does funky things > when re-inserted (go figure why(, It was built-in in rmk2-np3. So I shouldn't any mod inst/remove problems? Or are there known problems when it's statically bound too? Thanks! -- Regards, George --------------9B1285A873E4AEDAE9E914BC Content-Type: text/x-vcard; charset=iso-8859-1; name="davis_g.vcf" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-Description: Card for George G. Davis Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="davis_g.vcf" YmVnaW46dmNhcmQgCm46RGF2aXM7R2VvcmdlCnRlbDt3b3JrOjYwMy84ODAtMTQxNAp4LW1v emlsbGEtaHRtbDpGQUxTRQp1cmw6aHR0cDovL3d3dy5tdmlzdGEuY29tCm9yZzpNb250YVZp c3RhIFNvZnR3YXJlLCBJbmMuCmFkcjo7OzQ2IFBpbmUgU3RyZWV0IEV4dGVuc2lvbjtOYXNo dWE7Tkg7MDMwNjA7VVNBCnZlcnNpb246Mi4xCmVtYWlsO2ludGVybmV0OmRhdmlzX2dAbXZp c3RhLmNvbQp0aXRsZTpTb2Z0d2FyZSBFbmdpbmVlcgp4LW1vemlsbGEtY3B0OjstNTM3Ngpm bjpHZW9yZ2UgRy4gRGF2aXMKZW5kOnZjYXJkCg== --------------9B1285A873E4AEDAE9E914BC-- From kramer@pa.dec.com Fri Dec 8 21:46:21 2000 Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (root@mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id VAA21854 for ; Fri, 8 Dec 2000 21:46:20 +0100 Received: from ztxmail05.ztx.compaq.com (ztxmail05.ztx.compaq.com [161.114.1.209]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id VAA07853 for ; Fri, 8 Dec 2000 21:46:18 +0100 (MET) Received: by ztxmail05.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 32B0CFFF; Fri, 8 Dec 2000 14:44:30 -0600 (CST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by ztxmail05.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id C7D8C1344; Fri, 8 Dec 2000 14:44:28 -0600 (CST) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA32187; Fri, 8 Dec 2000 12:44:27 -0800 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id MAA14971; Fri, 8 Dec 2000 12:28:36 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id MAA03824; Fri, 8 Dec 2000 12:28:36 -0800 (PST) Received: from zmamail02.nz-tay.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA24601; Fri, 8 Dec 2000 12:28:35 -0800 Received: by zmamail02.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 59F625A07; Fri, 8 Dec 2000 15:28:35 -0500 (EST) Received: from xanadu.gn.com (modemcable248.137-200-24.mtl.mc.videotron.ca [24.200.137.248]) by zmamail02.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D5A65451 for ; Fri, 8 Dec 2000 15:28:32 -0500 (EST) Received: from localhost (nico@localhost) by xanadu.gn.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id PAA07308; Fri, 8 Dec 2000 15:28:22 -0500 X-Authentication-Warning: xanadu.gn.com: nico owned process doing -bs Date: Fri, 8 Dec 2000 15:28:22 -0500 (EST) From: Nicolas Pitre X-Sender: To: "George G. Davis" Cc: StrongArm Linux , Arm Linux Subject: Re: Newbie question on Neponset sound support In-Reply-To: <3A314292.788FCB6D@mvista.com> Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk On Fri, 8 Dec 2000, George G. Davis wrote: > Nicolas Pitre wrote: > > > > On Fri, 8 Dec 2000, George G. Davis wrote: > > > > > Greetings, > > > > > > I'm having problems figuring out how to unmute the audio on Assabet+Neponset. > > > I'm running linux-2.4.0-test10-rmk1-np2 on Assabet+Neponset with CONFIG_SOUND_UDA1341 > > > enabled. I've built splay, v0.8.2, and it seems to be 'playing'. But no sound? > > > > 1- upgrade to test11-rmk1-np2 > > I was doing that just now! : ) > > > > 2- don't unload the sa1100-uda1341 module as it apparently does funky things > > when re-inserted (go figure why(, > > It was built-in in rmk2-np3. So I shouldn't any mod inst/remove problems? > Or are there known problems when it's statically bound too? Not as far as I know. Nicolas From kramer@pa.dec.com Fri Dec 8 23:05:20 2000 Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (root@mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id XAA22372 for ; Fri, 8 Dec 2000 23:05:20 +0100 Received: from zmamail04.zma.compaq.com (zmamail04.zma.compaq.com [161.114.64.104]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id XAA11068 for ; Fri, 8 Dec 2000 23:05:18 +0100 (MET) Received: by zmamail04.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 59545876; Fri, 8 Dec 2000 17:03:31 -0500 (EST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by zmamail04.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id F32AF8C3; Fri, 8 Dec 2000 17:03:28 -0500 (EST) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA20292; Fri, 8 Dec 2000 14:03:22 -0800 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id NAA20844; Fri, 8 Dec 2000 13:46:50 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id NAA25621; Fri, 8 Dec 2000 13:46:49 -0800 (PST) Received: from ztxmail01.nz-cce.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA11549; Fri, 8 Dec 2000 13:46:49 -0800 Received: by ztxmail01.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 1AA66292E; Fri, 8 Dec 2000 15:46:49 -0600 (CST) Received: from flex.lvc.de (unknown [195.145.186.15]) by ztxmail01.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD69228AB for ; Fri, 8 Dec 2000 15:46:47 -0600 (CST) Received: from 63.20.241.106 (1Cust106.tnt1.madison.wi.da.uu.net [63.20.241.106]) by flex.lvc.de (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id JAA13629; Tue, 5 Dec 2000 09:39:11 +0100 From: Perez@e-net.co.kr Message-Id: <000020ec5627$00004808$00002290@> To: Subject: Give the Perfect Gift - Free Satellite T.V. System ... Date: Tue, 05 Dec 2000 03:27:31 -0500 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-Msmail-Priority: Normal Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk FREE Satellite T.V. System and FREE Installation For a limited time we'll give you this top of the line Digital Satellite System for FREE! We'll even include Free installation. Enjoy over 500 Channels of crystal clear digital picture and cd stereo sound on your FREE Satellite TV System. Why pay for these items in a retail store, when we're giving you the same satellite package for free. Call 888-514-6881 to be Guaranteed Your FREE Satellite Today This Innovative 20" Satellite includes a stereo receiver and an infrared remote. With this FREE offer you will have both Interactive Television Capability and an On Screen Program Guide. This limited time FREE offer is much less than the monthly cost of cable tv. All you have to do is call us to arrange delivery. If you call today, we'll throw in a second receiver for your second T.V. free. Call 888-514-6881 to Begin Surfing through 500 Channels Today! To be removed send email to caleboom@yahoo.com From kramer@pa.dec.com Fri Dec 8 23:47:02 2000 Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (root@mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id XAA23838 for ; Fri, 8 Dec 2000 23:47:02 +0100 Received: from ztxmail04.ztx.compaq.com (ztxmail04.ztx.compaq.com [161.114.1.208]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id XAA12831 for ; Fri, 8 Dec 2000 23:47:00 +0100 (MET) Received: by ztxmail04.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id EE524EC9; Fri, 8 Dec 2000 16:45:12 -0600 (CST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by ztxmail04.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 67DE8BFB; Fri, 8 Dec 2000 16:45:11 -0600 (CST) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA08076; Fri, 8 Dec 2000 14:45:05 -0800 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id OAA06871; Fri, 8 Dec 2000 14:26:43 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id OAA06459; Fri, 8 Dec 2000 14:26:42 -0800 (PST) Received: from zmamail02.nz-tay.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA30889; Fri, 8 Dec 2000 14:26:42 -0800 Received: by zmamail02.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id C69EA5563; Fri, 8 Dec 2000 17:26:41 -0500 (EST) Received: from mail.netx4.com (216-064-003-018.inaddr.vitts.com [216.64.3.18]) by zmamail02.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 716AD573C for ; Fri, 8 Dec 2000 17:26:41 -0500 (EST) Received: from mvista.com (greeny.netx4.com [192.168.253.30]) by mail.netx4.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id RAA03160; Fri, 8 Dec 2000 17:25:47 -0500 Message-Id: <3A315FDB.875E4B43@mvista.com> Date: Fri, 08 Dec 2000 17:25:31 -0500 From: "George G. Davis" Organization: MontaVista Software, Inc. X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.7 [en] (X11; I; Linux 2.4.0-test11 ppc) X-Accept-Language: en Mime-Version: 1.0 To: StrongArm Linux , Arm Linux Cc: "George G. Davis" Subject: NFS broken in linux-2.4.0-test11-rmk1-np2? Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="------------1023C75E57F6669768BA682F" Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------1023C75E57F6669768BA682F Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Greetings, Is anyone seeing problems using CONFIG_ROOT_NFS in 2.4.0-test11-rmk1-np2? I've been using it all along to mount my target's (Assabet) root file system via NFS. I've just upgraded from test10-rmk2-np3 to test11 and found that it no longer appears to be working. I've compared tcpdumps between both releases and don't see the problem yet (although I'm only seeing half of the conversation at the moment - gotta work on the filter 'expression' I guess : ). The symptom is that test11 hangs after the second "looking up port of RPC" message. Is this a known or new problem (or is it just me! :( ? -- Regards, George --------------1023C75E57F6669768BA682F Content-Type: text/x-vcard; charset=iso-8859-1; name="davis_g.vcf" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-Description: Card for George G. Davis Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="davis_g.vcf" YmVnaW46dmNhcmQgCm46RGF2aXM7R2VvcmdlCnRlbDt3b3JrOjYwMy84ODAtMTQxNAp4LW1v emlsbGEtaHRtbDpGQUxTRQp1cmw6aHR0cDovL3d3dy5tdmlzdGEuY29tCm9yZzpNb250YVZp c3RhIFNvZnR3YXJlLCBJbmMuCmFkcjo7OzQ2IFBpbmUgU3RyZWV0IEV4dGVuc2lvbjtOYXNo dWE7Tkg7MDMwNjA7VVNBCnZlcnNpb246Mi4xCmVtYWlsO2ludGVybmV0OmRhdmlzX2dAbXZp c3RhLmNvbQp0aXRsZTpTb2Z0d2FyZSBFbmdpbmVlcgp4LW1vemlsbGEtY3B0OjstNTM3Ngpm bjpHZW9yZ2UgRy4gRGF2aXMKZW5kOnZjYXJkCg== --------------1023C75E57F6669768BA682F-- From kramer@pa.dec.com Sat Dec 9 00:55:01 2000 Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (root@mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id AAA23999 for ; Sat, 9 Dec 2000 00:55:01 +0100 Received: from ztxmail03.ztx.compaq.com (ztxmail03.ztx.compaq.com [161.114.1.207]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id AAA15676 for ; Sat, 9 Dec 2000 00:54:59 +0100 (MET) Received: by ztxmail03.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id AC73B1FF8; Fri, 8 Dec 2000 17:53:12 -0600 (CST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by ztxmail03.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id D89BC239F; Fri, 8 Dec 2000 17:53:10 -0600 (CST) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA15603; Fri, 8 Dec 2000 15:52:54 -0800 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id PAA05129; Fri, 8 Dec 2000 15:40:48 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id PAA21252; Fri, 8 Dec 2000 15:40:48 -0800 (PST) Received: from ztxmail02.nz-cce.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA03036; Fri, 8 Dec 2000 15:40:47 -0800 Received: by ztxmail02.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 92A991EDA; Fri, 8 Dec 2000 17:40:47 -0600 (CST) Received: from xanadu.gn.com (modemcable248.137-200-24.mtl.mc.videotron.ca [24.200.137.248]) by ztxmail02.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D0B411CE4 for ; Fri, 8 Dec 2000 17:40:46 -0600 (CST) Received: from localhost (nico@localhost) by xanadu.gn.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id SAA11415; Fri, 8 Dec 2000 18:38:54 -0500 X-Authentication-Warning: xanadu.gn.com: nico owned process doing -bs Date: Fri, 8 Dec 2000 18:38:54 -0500 (EST) From: Nicolas Pitre X-Sender: To: "George G. Davis" Cc: StrongArm Linux , Arm Linux Subject: Re: NFS broken in linux-2.4.0-test11-rmk1-np2? In-Reply-To: <3A315FDB.875E4B43@mvista.com> Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk On Fri, 8 Dec 2000, George G. Davis wrote: > Greetings, > > Is anyone seeing problems using CONFIG_ROOT_NFS in 2.4.0-test11-rmk1-np2? I've > been using it all along to mount my target's (Assabet) root file system via NFS. > I've just upgraded from test10-rmk2-np3 to test11 and found that it no longer > appears to be working. I've compared tcpdumps between both releases and don't > see the problem yet (although I'm only seeing half of the conversation at the > moment - gotta work on the filter 'expression' I guess : ). > > The symptom is that test11 hangs after the second "looking up port of RPC" > message. > > Is this a known or new problem (or is it just me! :( ? Just tried on my GraphicsClient and everything work fine. Nicolas From kramer@pa.dec.com Sat Dec 9 04:48:29 2000 Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (root@mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id EAA24634 for ; Sat, 9 Dec 2000 04:48:29 +0100 Received: from ztxmail03.ztx.compaq.com (ztxmail03.ztx.compaq.com [161.114.1.207]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id EAA23058 for ; Sat, 9 Dec 2000 04:48:27 +0100 (MET) Received: by ztxmail03.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 9DCB320A2; Fri, 8 Dec 2000 21:46:39 -0600 (CST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by ztxmail03.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id B792F20DE; Fri, 8 Dec 2000 21:46:37 -0600 (CST) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA05991; Fri, 8 Dec 2000 19:46:35 -0800 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id TAA04460; Fri, 8 Dec 2000 19:41:14 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id TAA16066; Fri, 8 Dec 2000 19:41:13 -0800 (PST) Received: from ztxmail02.nz-cce.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA04384; Fri, 8 Dec 2000 19:41:12 -0800 Received: by ztxmail02.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 13AEB1E5E; Fri, 8 Dec 2000 21:41:12 -0600 (CST) Received: from chmls06.mediaone.net (chmls06.mediaone.net [24.147.1.144]) by ztxmail02.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A4E0F1C0F for ; Fri, 8 Dec 2000 21:41:11 -0600 (CST) Received: from mediaone.net (davisg.ne.mediaone.net [24.128.16.82]) by chmls06.mediaone.net (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id WAA01479; Fri, 8 Dec 2000 22:39:04 -0500 (EST) Message-Id: <3A31A8C8.744CD64F@mediaone.net> Date: Fri, 08 Dec 2000 22:36:40 -0500 From: "George G. Davis" X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.72 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.4.0-test11 i686) X-Accept-Language: en Mime-Version: 1.0 To: Nicolas Pitre Cc: "George G. Davis" , StrongArm Linux , Arm Linux Subject: Re: NFS broken in linux-2.4.0-test11-rmk1-np2? References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk Nicolas Pitre wrote: > > On Fri, 8 Dec 2000, George G. Davis wrote: > > > Greetings, > > > > Is anyone seeing problems using CONFIG_ROOT_NFS in 2.4.0-test11-rmk1-np2? I've > > been using it all along to mount my target's (Assabet) root file system via NFS. > > I've just upgraded from test10-rmk2-np3 to test11 and found that it no longer > > appears to be working. I've compared tcpdumps between both releases and don't > > see the problem yet (although I'm only seeing half of the conversation at the > > moment - gotta work on the filter 'expression' I guess : ). > > > > The symptom is that test11 hangs after the second "looking up port of RPC" > > message. Err, that was a bad description. It doesn't hang. It 'times out' waiting for a response from the NFS server with the message "mount: server w.x.y.z not responding, timed out". > > Is this a known or new problem (or is it just me! :( ? > > Just tried on my GraphicsClient and everything work fine. Thanks! I'll dig a bit more... -- Regards, George From kramer@pa.dec.com Sun Dec 10 06:29:00 2000 Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (root@mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id GAA27731 for ; Sun, 10 Dec 2000 06:29:00 +0100 Received: from zmamail04.zma.compaq.com (zmamail04.zma.compaq.com [161.114.64.104]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id GAA05876 for ; Sun, 10 Dec 2000 06:28:58 +0100 (MET) Received: by zmamail04.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id BF037A58; Sun, 10 Dec 2000 00:27:11 -0500 (EST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by zmamail04.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 6A5FAB75; Sun, 10 Dec 2000 00:27:09 -0500 (EST) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA06436; Sat, 9 Dec 2000 21:26:54 -0800 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id VAA13433; Sat, 9 Dec 2000 21:07:42 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id VAA21753; Sat, 9 Dec 2000 21:07:42 -0800 (PST) Received: from ztxmail02.nz-cce.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA08123; Sat, 9 Dec 2000 21:07:41 -0800 Received: by ztxmail02.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 235D91FE7; Sat, 9 Dec 2000 23:07:41 -0600 (CST) Received: from chmls06.mediaone.net (chmls06.mediaone.net [24.147.1.144]) by ztxmail02.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CAE541DBE for ; Sat, 9 Dec 2000 23:07:40 -0600 (CST) Received: from mvista.com (davisg.ne.mediaone.net [24.128.16.82]) by chmls06.mediaone.net (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id AAA06028; Sun, 10 Dec 2000 00:07:39 -0500 (EST) Message-Id: <3A330F05.41144D3@mvista.com> Date: Sun, 10 Dec 2000 00:05:09 -0500 From: "George G. Davis" Organization: Monta Vista Software, Inc. X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.72 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.4.0-test11 i686) X-Accept-Language: en Mime-Version: 1.0 To: StrongArm Linux , Arm Linux Cc: Nicolas Pitre Subject: Re: NFS broken in linux-2.4.0-test11-rmk1-np2? References: <3A31A8C8.744CD64F@mediaone.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk "George G. Davis" wrote: > > Nicolas Pitre wrote: > > > > On Fri, 8 Dec 2000, George G. Davis wrote: > > > > > Greetings, > > > > > > Is anyone seeing problems using CONFIG_ROOT_NFS in 2.4.0-test11-rmk1-np2? I've > > > been using it all along to mount my target's (Assabet) root file system via NFS. > > > I've just upgraded from test10-rmk2-np3 to test11 and found that it no longer > > > appears to be working. I've compared tcpdumps between both releases and don't > > > see the problem yet (although I'm only seeing half of the conversation at the > > > moment - gotta work on the filter 'expression' I guess : ). > > > > > > The symptom is that test11 hangs after the second "looking up port of RPC" > > > message. > > Err, that was a bad description. It doesn't hang. It 'times out' waiting for a response > from the NFS server with the message "mount: server w.x.y.z not responding, timed out". > > > > Is this a known or new problem (or is it just me! :( ? > > > > Just tried on my GraphicsClient and everything work fine. > > Thanks! I'll dig a bit more... Ok, I've determined that my NFS mount path is getting clobbered somewhere between getting the correct 'string' from bootp and then using a corrupted string in the RPC NFS mount call. I haven't found out where it's getting clobbered yet... Here's a trace obtained from the wire (I guess I still don't know for certain yet that the bootp packet was rcvd w/o corruption - but then again the UDP checksum should have detected a problem in this case I guess): Frame 2 (406 on wire, 406 captured) Arrival Time: Dec 9, 2000 23:18:44.9643 Time delta from previous packet: 0.007211 seconds Frame Number: 2 Packet Length: 406 bytes Capture Length: 406 bytes Ethernet II Destination: 00:01:02:03:04:05 (00:01:02:03:04:05) Source: 00:a0:c9:55:ff:7c (00:a0:c9:55:ff:7c) Type: IP (0x0800) Internet Protocol Version: 4 Header length: 20 bytes Differentiated Services Field: 0x00 (DSCP 0x00: Default; ECN: 0x00) 0000 00.. = Differentiated Services Codepoint: Default (0x00) .... ..0. = ECN-Capable Transport (ECT): 0 .... ...0 = ECN-CE: 0 Total Length: 392 Identification: 0x0000 Flags: 0x04 .1.. = Don't fragment: Set ..0. = More fragments: Not set Fragment offset: 0 Time to live: 64 Protocol: UDP (0x11) Header checksum: 0xb4c3 (correct) Source: 192.168.1.254 (192.168.1.254) Destination: 192.168.1.83 (192.168.1.83) User Datagram Protocol Source port: 67 (67) Destination port: 68 (68) Length: 372 Checksum: 0xb810 Bootstrap Protocol Boot Reply Hardware type: Ethernet Hardware address length: 6 Hops: 0 Transaction ID: 0x7ece863f Seconds elapsed: 0 Broadcast flag: 0x0000 Client IP address: 0.0.0.0 (0.0.0.0) Your (client) IP address: 192.168.1.83 (192.168.1.83) Next server IP address: 192.168.1.254 (192.168.1.254) Relay agent IP address: 0.0.0.0 (0.0.0.0) Client hardware address: 00:01:02:03:04:05 Server host name: eeyore.davisg.ne.mediaone.net Boot file name not given Magic cookie: (OK) Option 1: Subnet Mask = 255.255.255.0 Option 3: Router = 192.168.1.2 Option 17: Root Path = /opt/hardhat/devkit/arm/sa110_le/target Option 6: Domain Name Server = 192.168.1.2 Option 15: Domain Name = davisg.ne.mediaone.net Option 12: Host Name = neponset End Option Padding 0 0001 0203 0405 00a0 c955 ff7c 0800 4500 .........U.|..E. 10 0188 0000 4000 4011 b4c3 c0a8 01fe c0a8 ....@.@......... 20 0153 0043 0044 0174 b810 0201 0600 7ece .S.C.D.t......~. 30 863f 0000 0000 0000 0000 c0a8 0153 c0a8 .?...........S.. 40 01fe 0000 0000 0001 0203 0405 0000 0000 ................ 50 0000 0000 0000 6565 796f 7265 2e64 6176 ......eeyore.dav 60 6973 672e 6e65 2e6d 6564 6961 6f6e 652e isg.ne.mediaone. 70 6e65 7400 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 net............. 80 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 ................ 90 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 ................ a0 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 ................ b0 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 ................ c0 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 ................ d0 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 ................ e0 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 ................ f0 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 ................ 100 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 ................ 110 0000 0000 0000 6382 5363 0104 ffff ff00 ......c.Sc...... 120 0304 c0a8 0102 1127 2f6f 7074 2f68 6172 .......'/opt/har 130 6468 6174 2f64 6576 6b69 742f 6172 6d2f dhat/devkit/arm/ 140 7361 3131 305f 6c65 2f74 6172 6765 7406 sa110_le/target. 150 04c0 a801 020f 1664 6176 6973 672e 6e65 .......davisg.ne 160 2e6d 6564 6961 6f6e 652e 6e65 740c 086e .mediaone.net..n 170 6570 6f6e 7365 74ff 0000 0000 0000 0000 eponset......... 180 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 ................ 190 0000 0000 0000 ...... Frame 9 (126 on wire, 126 captured) Arrival Time: Dec 9, 2000 23:18:45.2845 Time delta from previous packet: 0.001216 seconds Frame Number: 9 Packet Length: 126 bytes Capture Length: 126 bytes Ethernet II Destination: 00:a0:c9:55:ff:7c (00:a0:c9:55:ff:7c) Source: 00:01:02:03:04:05 (00:01:02:03:04:05) Type: IP (0x0800) Internet Protocol Version: 4 Header length: 20 bytes Differentiated Services Field: 0x00 (DSCP 0x00: Default; ECN: 0x00) 0000 00.. = Differentiated Services Codepoint: Default (0x00) .... ..0. = ECN-Capable Transport (ECT): 0 .... ...0 = ECN-CE: 0 Total Length: 112 Identification: 0x0000 Flags: 0x04 .1.. = Don't fragment: Set ..0. = More fragments: Not set Fragment offset: 0 Time to live: 64 Protocol: UDP (0x11) Header checksum: 0xb5db (correct) Source: 192.168.1.83 (192.168.1.83) Destination: 192.168.1.254 (192.168.1.254) User Datagram Protocol Source port: 800 (800) Destination port: 760 (760) Length: 92 Checksum: 0x03f7 Remote Procedure Call XID: 0x2600000 (39845888) Message Type: Call (0) RPC Version: 2 Program: MOUNT (100005) Program Version: 1 Procedure: MNT (1) Credentials Flavor: AUTH_NULL (0) Length: 0 Verifier Flavor: AUTH_NULL (0) Length: 0 Mount Service Program Version: 1 Procedure: MNT (1) Path: /opt/hardhat/devkit/arm/sa110_le/tar0_l length: 39 contents: /opt/hardhat/devkit/arm/sa110_le/tar0_l fill bytes: opaque data 0 00a0 c955 ff7c 0001 0203 0405 0800 4500 ...U.|........E. 10 0070 0000 4000 4011 b5db c0a8 0153 c0a8 .p..@.@......S.. 20 01fe 0320 02f8 005c 03f7 0260 0000 0000 ... ...\...`.... 30 0000 0000 0002 0001 86a5 0000 0001 0000 ................ 40 0001 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 ................ 50 0000 0000 0027 2f6f 7074 2f68 6172 6468 .....'/opt/hardh 60 6174 2f64 6576 6b69 742f 6172 6d2f 7361 at/devkit/arm/sa 70 3131 305f 6c65 2f74 6172 305f 6c65 110_le/tar0_le Hmm, rather curious that the last 3 chars have been clobbered with "0_l", a substring starting 8 bytes before the start of the corrupted portion of the string? bootp GOOD /opt/hardhat/devkit/arm/sa110_le/target RPC MntCall BAD /opt/hardhat/devkit/arm/sa110_le/tar0_l Has someone optimized string copy functions or something? Gee, maybe my 39Byte mount path string is too long? It was OK before! Nico, can you try using a long mount path to see if this breaks your GraphicsClient? Well, back to digging... -- Regards, George P.S. I really am having fun - just not fast enough yet! : ) From kramer@pa.dec.com Sun Dec 10 11:29:09 2000 Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (root@mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id LAA28209 for ; Sun, 10 Dec 2000 11:29:09 +0100 Received: from zmamail03.zma.compaq.com (zmamail03.zma.compaq.com [161.114.64.103]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id LAA12811 for ; Sun, 10 Dec 2000 11:29:08 +0100 (MET) Received: by zmamail03.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id AE4AC4D6D; Sun, 10 Dec 2000 05:27:20 -0500 (EST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by zmamail03.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 7F87C4D31; Sun, 10 Dec 2000 05:27:18 -0500 (EST) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA07951; Sun, 10 Dec 2000 02:27:12 -0800 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id CAA12660; Sun, 10 Dec 2000 02:21:17 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id CAA30895; Sun, 10 Dec 2000 02:21:15 -0800 (PST) Received: from ztxmail02.nz-cce.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA19845; Sun, 10 Dec 2000 02:21:15 -0800 Received: by ztxmail02.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 49F451E37; Sun, 10 Dec 2000 04:21:13 -0600 (CST) Received: from www.linux.org.uk (parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk [195.92.249.252]) by ztxmail02.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8CEEF1C0F for ; Sun, 10 Dec 2000 04:21:12 -0600 (CST) Received: from dyn-33.linux.theplanet.co.uk ([195.92.244.33] helo=caramon.arm.linux.org.uk) by www.linux.org.uk with esmtp (Exim 3.13 #1) id 1453bN-00049R-00; Sun, 10 Dec 2000 10:21:06 +0000 Received: from flint.arm.linux.org.uk (IDENT:root@flint.arm.linux.org.uk [192.168.0.4]) by caramon.arm.linux.org.uk (8.11.0/8.11.0) with ESMTP id eBAAKxd25382; Sun, 10 Dec 2000 10:20:59 GMT Received: (from linux@localhost) by flint.arm.linux.org.uk (8.11.0/8.11.0) id eBAAKr231780; Sun, 10 Dec 2000 10:20:53 GMT From: Russell King - ARM Linux Message-Id: <200012101020.eBAAKr231780@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> Subject: Re: NFS broken in linux-2.4.0-test11-rmk1-np2? To: davis_g@mvista.com (George G. Davis) Date: Sun, 10 Dec 2000 10:20:52 +0000 (GMT) Cc: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com (StrongArm Linux), linux-arm-kernel@lists.arm.linux.org.uk (Arm Linux), nico@CAM.ORG (Nicolas Pitre) In-Reply-To: <3A330F05.41144D3@mvista.com> from "George G. Davis" at Dec 10, 2000 12:05:09 AM X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL3] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk George G. Davis writes: > User Datagram Protocol > Source port: 800 (800) > Destination port: 760 (760) > Length: 92 > Checksum: 0x03f7 > > 0 00a0 c955 ff7c 0001 0203 0405 0800 4500 ...U.|........E. > 10 0070 0000 4000 4011 b5db c0a8 0153 c0a8 .p..@.@......S.. > 20 01fe 0320 02f8 005c 03f7 0260 0000 0000 ... ...\...`.... > 30 0000 0000 0002 0001 86a5 0000 0001 0000 ................ > 40 0001 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 ................ > 50 0000 0000 0027 2f6f 7074 2f68 6172 6468 .....'/opt/hardh > 60 6174 2f64 6576 6b69 742f 6172 6d2f 7361 at/devkit/arm/sa > 70 3131 305f 6c65 2f74 6172 305f 6c65 110_le/tar0_le > > Hmm, rather curious that the last 3 chars have been clobbered > with "0_l", a substring starting 8 bytes before the start of > the corrupted portion of the string? Its actually 4 bytes == 1 world. Instead of it being "get\0", it is "0_le" > Has someone optimized string copy functions or something? Nope. I've just run the memcpy function through my all alignment, 1 to 1020-byte comprehensive test and it all passes. Why did I look at memcpy? Because the xdr function that encodes a string uses memcpy to place the string into the packet. My guess would be the netcard driver. I don't see any evidence of your sniffer checking the UDP packet checksum (it doesn't confirm if the checksum is correct or not), so I'm assuming it doesn't. Maybe if your NFS server is a Linux box you could look at /proc/net/snmp for any UDP "InErrors" ? _____ |_____| ------------------------------------------------- ---+---+- | | Russell King linux@arm.linux.org.uk --- --- | | | | http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/ / / | | +-+-+ --- -+- / | THE developer of ARM Linux |+| /|\ / | | | --- | +-+-+ ------------------------------------------------- /\\\ | From kramer@pa.dec.com Mon Dec 11 04:25:08 2000 Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (root@mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id EAA30640 for ; Mon, 11 Dec 2000 04:25:08 +0100 Received: from zmamail03.zma.compaq.com (zmamail03.zma.compaq.com [161.114.64.103]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id EAA15094 for ; Mon, 11 Dec 2000 04:25:06 +0100 (MET) Received: by zmamail03.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id AC43F4C26; Sun, 10 Dec 2000 22:23:19 -0500 (EST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by zmamail03.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 576064EEC; Sun, 10 Dec 2000 22:23:17 -0500 (EST) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA29257; Sun, 10 Dec 2000 19:23:06 -0800 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id TAA21150; Sun, 10 Dec 2000 19:16:19 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id TAA28974; Sun, 10 Dec 2000 19:16:18 -0800 (PST) Received: from ztxmail02.nz-cce.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA05750; Sun, 10 Dec 2000 19:16:18 -0800 Received: by ztxmail02.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 0EF763E4D; Sun, 10 Dec 2000 21:16:18 -0600 (CST) Received: from chmls05.mediaone.net (chmls05.mediaone.net [24.147.1.143]) by ztxmail02.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9552D3C91 for ; Sun, 10 Dec 2000 21:16:17 -0600 (CST) Received: from mvista.com (davisg.ne.mediaone.net [24.128.16.82]) by chmls05.mediaone.net (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id WAA17119; Sun, 10 Dec 2000 22:15:53 -0500 (EST) Message-Id: <3A34466B.8303CC27@mvista.com> Date: Sun, 10 Dec 2000 22:13:47 -0500 From: "George G. Davis" Organization: Monta Vista Software, Inc. X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.72 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.4.0-test11 i686) X-Accept-Language: en Mime-Version: 1.0 To: Russell King - ARM Linux Cc: StrongArm Linux , Arm Linux , Nicolas Pitre Subject: Re: NFS broken in linux-2.4.0-test11-rmk1-np2? References: <200012101020.eBAAKr231780@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > > George G. Davis writes: > > User Datagram Protocol > > Source port: 800 (800) > > Destination port: 760 (760) > > Length: 92 > > Checksum: 0x03f7 > > > > 0 00a0 c955 ff7c 0001 0203 0405 0800 4500 ...U.|........E. > > 10 0070 0000 4000 4011 b5db c0a8 0153 c0a8 .p..@.@......S.. > > 20 01fe 0320 02f8 005c 03f7 0260 0000 0000 ... ...\...`.... > > 30 0000 0000 0002 0001 86a5 0000 0001 0000 ................ > > 40 0001 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 ................ > > 50 0000 0000 0027 2f6f 7074 2f68 6172 6468 .....'/opt/hardh > > 60 6174 2f64 6576 6b69 742f 6172 6d2f 7361 at/devkit/arm/sa > > 70 3131 305f 6c65 2f74 6172 305f 6c65 110_le/tar0_le > > > > Hmm, rather curious that the last 3 chars have been clobbered > > with "0_l", a substring starting 8 bytes before the start of > > the corrupted portion of the string? > > Its actually 4 bytes == 1 world. Instead of it being "get\0", it > is "0_le" I meant an 8 Byte offset from start of first sub-string to start of next: 0x7a: 305f 6c == "0_le" - 0x72: 305f 6c == "0_le" offset 8 Bytes ; ) > > Has someone optimized string copy functions or something? > > Nope. I've just run the memcpy function through my all alignment, > 1 to 1020-byte comprehensive test and it all passes. Why did I look > at memcpy? Because the xdr function that encodes a string uses > memcpy to place the string into the packet. Ok, I've followed the packet from top-to-bottom (maybe I should've started bottom up! : ( of the stack and can see that the packet is correct inside proc smc_hardware_send_packet (drivers/net/smc9194.c). It's getting clobbered somewhere between SMC_outsw -> outsb -> __arch_writesb and the wire. My guess is the newly (for SMC9194 drvr) speed optimized code for __arch_writesb either has a locic error or the SMC9194 needs some recovery time between writes (wild guess on this later one). I've changed the SMC_outsw and SMC_insw macros back to non-optimized loops calling outsb and insb respectively. Problem goes away. I don't have enough time to dig into analyzing the arch/arm/lib/io-writesb/readsb optimized code right now. Neponset SMC9194 networking is working again. Good enough for me for now... Here's the temporary hack to work around this problem for now: --- linux.orig/drivers/net/smc9194.h Fri Dec 8 22:46:13 2000 +++ linux/drivers/net/smc9194.h Sun Dec 10 11:11:58 2000 @@ -116,9 +116,21 @@ IODELAY;\ SMC_outb((d)>>8, (r)+1);} while (0) +#if defined(CONFIG_SMC9194_SPEEDOPT) /* We remove PCIO_BASE that is added in insb()/outsb() */ #define SMC_insw( r, b, l ) insb(ioaddr+((r)<<2)-PCIO_BASE,(b),(l)<<1) #define SMC_outsw( r, b, l ) outsb(ioaddr+((r)<<2)-PCIO_BASE,(b),(l)<<1) +#else +#define SMC_insw( r, b, l ) \ + do { int i; unsigned char *p = b;\ + for(i=0;i<(l);i++) { *p++=SMC_inb(r); *p++=SMC_inb(r); };\ + } while (0) + +#define SMC_outsw( r, b, l ) \ + do { int i; unsigned char *p = b;\ + for(i=0;i<(l);i++) { SMC_outb(*p++,r); SMC_outb(*p++,r); };\ + } while (0) +#endif #endif The above just reverts back to the really slow outb/inb loops we had when we first got this thing working. I know, it's slow. But it works for now and I have other things to do... BTW, I don't know if SMC_insw -> insb -> __arch_readsb has a similar problem. I've *_only_* seen problems with __arch_writesb. AFAIK, there's nothing wrong with __arch_readsb. > My guess would be the netcard driver. I don't see any evidence of your > sniffer checking the UDP packet checksum (it doesn't confirm if the > checksum is correct or not), so I'm assuming it doesn't. Maybe if your > NFS server is a Linux box you could look at /proc/net/snmp for any > UDP "InErrors" ? Thanks! : ) -- Regards, George From kramer@pa.dec.com Mon Dec 11 05:35:56 2000 Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (root@mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id FAA30832 for ; Mon, 11 Dec 2000 05:35:55 +0100 Received: from zmamail03.zma.compaq.com (zmamail03.zma.compaq.com [161.114.64.103]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id FAA16900 for ; Mon, 11 Dec 2000 05:35:54 +0100 (MET) Received: by zmamail03.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 4F50D4C97; Sun, 10 Dec 2000 23:34:07 -0500 (EST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by zmamail03.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 10C9D4E9A; Sun, 10 Dec 2000 23:34:05 -0500 (EST) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA05714; Sun, 10 Dec 2000 20:34:02 -0800 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id UAA14839; Sun, 10 Dec 2000 20:29:48 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id UAA06408; Sun, 10 Dec 2000 20:29:47 -0800 (PST) Received: from zmamail02.nz-tay.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA01029; Sun, 10 Dec 2000 20:29:47 -0800 Received: by zmamail02.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id EEFCE5A30; Sun, 10 Dec 2000 23:29:46 -0500 (EST) Received: from xanadu.gn.com (modemcable248.137-200-24.mtl.mc.videotron.ca [24.200.137.248]) by zmamail02.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D55865B04 for ; Sun, 10 Dec 2000 23:29:45 -0500 (EST) Received: from localhost (nico@localhost) by xanadu.gn.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id XAA09311; Sun, 10 Dec 2000 23:29:35 -0500 X-Authentication-Warning: xanadu.gn.com: nico owned process doing -bs Date: Sun, 10 Dec 2000 23:29:35 -0500 (EST) From: Nicolas Pitre X-Sender: To: "George G. Davis" Cc: Russell King - ARM Linux , StrongArm Linux , Arm Linux Subject: Re: NFS broken in linux-2.4.0-test11-rmk1-np2? In-Reply-To: <3A34466B.8303CC27@mvista.com> Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk On Sun, 10 Dec 2000, George G. Davis wrote: > Ok, I've followed the packet from top-to-bottom (maybe I should've > started bottom up! : ( of the stack and can see that the packet is > correct inside proc smc_hardware_send_packet (drivers/net/smc9194.c). > > It's getting clobbered somewhere between SMC_outsw -> outsb -> __arch_writesb > and the wire. My guess is the newly (for SMC9194 drvr) speed optimized code > for __arch_writesb either has a locic error or the SMC9194 needs some recovery > time between writes (wild guess on this later one). Probably. Looking at the code it looks like the default timing for static bank 3 are left to their defaults which might be too fast for the ethernet chip. It is the case at least for GraphicsClient. > I've changed the SMC_outsw and SMC_insw macros back to non-optimized > loops calling outsb and insb respectively. Problem goes away. I don't > have enough time to dig into analyzing the arch/arm/lib/io-writesb/readsb > optimized code right now. I already did look at them last week for other reasons. They should be OK in your case. > Neponset SMC9194 networking is working again. > Good enough for me for now... Could you try this: At line 753 of drivers/net/smc9194.c (in a PN patched tree) add the following: MSC1 |= 0xe0000000; /* max recovery timing on static bank 3 */ and back out your inb/outb loop. Tell me if it works. BTW before someone else asks: the odd SMC_insw() using insb() actually is intentional because of hardware restrictions. Nicolas From kramer@pa.dec.com Mon Dec 11 10:31:21 2000 Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (root@mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id KAA31374 for ; Mon, 11 Dec 2000 10:31:21 +0100 Received: from zmamail04.zma.compaq.com (zmamail04.zma.compaq.com [161.114.64.104]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id KAA28076 for ; Mon, 11 Dec 2000 10:31:19 +0100 (MET) Received: by zmamail04.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 4B3B2A45; Mon, 11 Dec 2000 04:29:33 -0500 (EST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by zmamail04.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 1A11AB7C; Mon, 11 Dec 2000 04:29:31 -0500 (EST) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA21075; Mon, 11 Dec 2000 01:29:23 -0800 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id BAA18218; Mon, 11 Dec 2000 01:24:30 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id BAA23145; Mon, 11 Dec 2000 01:24:29 -0800 (PST) Received: from ztxmail02.nz-cce.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA31371; Mon, 11 Dec 2000 01:24:28 -0800 Received: by ztxmail02.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 1FD773DBD; Mon, 11 Dec 2000 03:24:28 -0600 (CST) Received: from www.linux.org.uk (parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk [195.92.249.252]) by ztxmail02.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F5AA1D1D for ; Mon, 11 Dec 2000 03:24:27 -0600 (CST) Received: from dyn-33.linux.theplanet.co.uk ([195.92.244.33] helo=caramon.arm.linux.org.uk) by www.linux.org.uk with esmtp (Exim 3.13 #1) id 145PC1-000818-00; Mon, 11 Dec 2000 09:24:22 +0000 Received: from flint.arm.linux.org.uk (IDENT:root@flint.arm.linux.org.uk [192.168.0.4]) by caramon.arm.linux.org.uk (8.11.0/8.11.0) with ESMTP id eBB7GGV02019; Mon, 11 Dec 2000 07:16:16 GMT Received: (from linux@localhost) by flint.arm.linux.org.uk (8.11.0/8.11.0) id eBB7Brx01953; Mon, 11 Dec 2000 07:11:53 GMT From: Russell King - ARM Linux Message-Id: <200012110711.eBB7Brx01953@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> Subject: Re: NFS broken in linux-2.4.0-test11-rmk1-np2? To: davis_g@mvista.com (George G. Davis) Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2000 07:11:52 +0000 (GMT) Cc: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com (StrongArm Linux), linux-arm-kernel@lists.arm.linux.org.uk (Arm Linux), nico@CAM.ORG (Nicolas Pitre) In-Reply-To: <3A34466B.8303CC27@mvista.com> from "George G. Davis" at Dec 10, 2000 10:13:47 PM X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL3] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk George G. Davis writes: > > Its actually 4 bytes == 1 world. Instead of it being "get\0", it > > is "0_le" > > I meant an 8 Byte offset from start of first sub-string to start of next: > > 0x7a: 305f 6c == "0_le" > - 0x72: 305f 6c == "0_le" > offset 8 Bytes ; ) Both observations are very important. This becomes obvious when you look at the fix: --- orig/arch/arm/lib/io-writesb.S Thu Nov 30 19:15:23 2000 +++ linux/arch/arm/lib/io-writesb.S Mon Dec 11 07:13:27 2000 @@ -76,7 +76,7 @@ .outsb_no_16: tst r2, #8 beq .outsb_no_8 - ldmia r1, {r3, r4} + ldmia r1!, {r3, r4} strb r3, [r0] mov r3, r3, lsr #8 _____ |_____| ------------------------------------------------- ---+---+- | | Russell King linux@arm.linux.org.uk --- --- | | | | http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/ / / | | +-+-+ --- -+- / | THE developer of ARM Linux |+| /|\ / | | | --- | +-+-+ ------------------------------------------------- /\\\ | From kramer@pa.dec.com Mon Dec 11 16:33:22 2000 Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (root@mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id QAA32067 for ; Mon, 11 Dec 2000 16:33:22 +0100 Received: from zmamail03.zma.compaq.com (zmamail03.zma.compaq.com [161.114.64.103]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id QAA23565 for ; Mon, 11 Dec 2000 16:33:20 +0100 (MET) Received: by zmamail03.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 62A5E4EEC; Mon, 11 Dec 2000 10:31:33 -0500 (EST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by zmamail03.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id DBE5E4C26; Mon, 11 Dec 2000 10:31:30 -0500 (EST) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA22994; Mon, 11 Dec 2000 07:31:11 -0800 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id HAA00568; Mon, 11 Dec 2000 07:28:55 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id HAA03971; Mon, 11 Dec 2000 07:25:51 -0800 (PST) Received: from zmamail02.nz-tay.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA23601; Mon, 11 Dec 2000 07:25:50 -0800 Received: by zmamail02.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 951AB5A8B; Mon, 11 Dec 2000 10:25:50 -0500 (EST) Received: from xanadu.gn.com (modemcable248.137-200-24.mtl.mc.videotron.ca [24.200.137.248]) by zmamail02.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 430CD5B0A for ; Mon, 11 Dec 2000 10:25:50 -0500 (EST) Received: from localhost (nico@localhost) by xanadu.gn.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id KAA10472; Mon, 11 Dec 2000 10:23:19 -0500 X-Authentication-Warning: xanadu.gn.com: nico owned process doing -bs Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2000 10:23:19 -0500 (EST) From: Nicolas Pitre X-Sender: To: Russell King - ARM Linux Cc: "George G. Davis" , StrongArm Linux , Arm Linux Subject: Re: NFS broken in linux-2.4.0-test11-rmk1-np2? In-Reply-To: <200012110711.eBB7Brx01953@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk On Mon, 11 Dec 2000, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > George G. Davis writes: > > > Its actually 4 bytes == 1 world. Instead of it being "get\0", it > > > is "0_le" > > > > I meant an 8 Byte offset from start of first sub-string to start of next: > > > > 0x7a: 305f 6c == "0_le" > > - 0x72: 305f 6c == "0_le" > > offset 8 Bytes ; ) > > Both observations are very important. This becomes obvious when you look > at the fix: > > --- orig/arch/arm/lib/io-writesb.S Thu Nov 30 19:15:23 2000 > +++ linux/arch/arm/lib/io-writesb.S Mon Dec 11 07:13:27 2000 > @@ -76,7 +76,7 @@ > .outsb_no_16: tst r2, #8 > beq .outsb_no_8 > > - ldmia r1, {r3, r4} > + ldmia r1!, {r3, r4} > > strb r3, [r0] > mov r3, r3, lsr #8 Nice catch Russell! I missed that one. Nicolas From kramer@pa.dec.com Mon Dec 11 16:41:08 2000 Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (root@mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id QAA32146 for ; Mon, 11 Dec 2000 16:41:08 +0100 Received: from ztxmail03.ztx.compaq.com (ztxmail03.ztx.compaq.com [161.114.1.207]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id QAA24149 for ; Mon, 11 Dec 2000 16:41:05 +0100 (MET) Received: by ztxmail03.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id D11BA1B6D; Mon, 11 Dec 2000 09:39:18 -0600 (CST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by ztxmail03.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id E67821832; Mon, 11 Dec 2000 09:39:15 -0600 (CST) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA00849; Mon, 11 Dec 2000 07:39:10 -0800 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id HAA00583; Mon, 11 Dec 2000 07:38:22 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id HAA00565; Mon, 11 Dec 2000 07:38:21 -0800 (PST) Received: from ztxmail01.nz-cce.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA24728; Mon, 11 Dec 2000 07:36:35 -0800 Received: by ztxmail01.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 541BE464D; Mon, 11 Dec 2000 09:36:35 -0600 (CST) Received: from chmls06.mediaone.net (chmls06.mediaone.net [24.147.1.144]) by ztxmail01.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 112E9470F for ; Mon, 11 Dec 2000 09:36:35 -0600 (CST) Received: from mvista.com (davisg.ne.mediaone.net [24.128.16.82]) by chmls06.mediaone.net (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id KAA02520; Mon, 11 Dec 2000 10:36:20 -0500 (EST) Message-Id: <3A34F3F3.9741E931@mvista.com> Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2000 10:34:11 -0500 From: "George G. Davis" Organization: Monta Vista Software, Inc. X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.72 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.4.0-test11 i686) X-Accept-Language: en Mime-Version: 1.0 To: Nicolas Pitre Cc: Russell King - ARM Linux , StrongArm Linux , Arm Linux Subject: Re: NFS broken in linux-2.4.0-test11-rmk1-np2? References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk Nicolas Pitre wrote: > > On Mon, 11 Dec 2000, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > > > George G. Davis writes: > > > > Its actually 4 bytes == 1 world. Instead of it being "get\0", it > > > > is "0_le" > > > > > > I meant an 8 Byte offset from start of first sub-string to start of next: > > > > > > 0x7a: 305f 6c == "0_le" > > > - 0x72: 305f 6c == "0_le" > > > offset 8 Bytes ; ) > > > > Both observations are very important. This becomes obvious when you look > > at the fix: > > > > --- orig/arch/arm/lib/io-writesb.S Thu Nov 30 19:15:23 2000 > > +++ linux/arch/arm/lib/io-writesb.S Mon Dec 11 07:13:27 2000 > > @@ -76,7 +76,7 @@ > > .outsb_no_16: tst r2, #8 > > beq .outsb_no_8 > > > > - ldmia r1, {r3, r4} > > + ldmia r1!, {r3, r4} > > > > strb r3, [r0] > > mov r3, r3, lsr #8 > > Nice catch Russell! I missed that one. Ok, this fix works for me too. Thanks! -- Regards George From kramer@pa.dec.com Mon Dec 11 21:53:57 2000 Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (root@mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id VAA32723 for ; Mon, 11 Dec 2000 21:53:57 +0100 Received: from zmamail03.zma.compaq.com (zmamail03.zma.compaq.com [161.114.64.103]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id VAA10877 for ; Mon, 11 Dec 2000 21:53:55 +0100 (MET) Received: by zmamail03.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 6C7F44C09; Mon, 11 Dec 2000 15:52:08 -0500 (EST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by zmamail03.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 61C974DE7; Mon, 11 Dec 2000 15:52:02 -0500 (EST) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA02679; Mon, 11 Dec 2000 12:51:53 -0800 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id MAA10970; Mon, 11 Dec 2000 12:49:07 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id MAA10966; Mon, 11 Dec 2000 12:49:06 -0800 (PST) Received: from zmamail02.nz-tay.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA28367; Mon, 11 Dec 2000 12:49:06 -0800 Received: by zmamail02.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id BE0B85824; Mon, 11 Dec 2000 15:49:05 -0500 (EST) Received: from mail.netx4.com (216-064-003-018.inaddr.vitts.com [216.64.3.18]) by zmamail02.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF7E3580F for ; Mon, 11 Dec 2000 15:49:04 -0500 (EST) Received: from mvista.com (greeny.netx4.com [192.168.253.30]) by mail.netx4.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id PAA05492; Mon, 11 Dec 2000 15:49:39 -0500 Message-Id: <3A353D7C.B92D4292@mvista.com> Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2000 15:47:56 -0500 From: "George G. Davis" Organization: MontaVista Software, Inc. X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.7 [en] (X11; I; Linux 2.4.0-test11 ppc) X-Accept-Language: en Mime-Version: 1.0 To: Nicolas Pitre Cc: StrongArm Linux , Arm Linux Subject: Re: Newbie question on Neponset sound support References: Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="------------1C9E78736D3CA02A57E59272" Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------1C9E78736D3CA02A57E59272 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Nicolas Pitre wrote: > > On Fri, 8 Dec 2000, George G. Davis wrote: > > > Greetings, > > > > I'm having problems figuring out how to unmute the audio on Assabet+Neponset. > > I'm running linux-2.4.0-test10-rmk1-np2 on Assabet+Neponset with CONFIG_SOUND_UDA1341 > > enabled. I've built splay, v0.8.2, and it seems to be 'playing'. But no sound? > > 1- upgrade to test11-rmk1-np2 Done! Same results here. I'm using splay-0.8.2-fp1. It appears to be 'playing'. But no sound? Only a very short faint noise when first started. Any tips on other useful diagnostics are apreciated. -- Regards, George --------------1C9E78736D3CA02A57E59272 Content-Type: text/x-vcard; charset=iso-8859-1; name="davis_g.vcf" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-Description: Card for George G. Davis Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="davis_g.vcf" YmVnaW46dmNhcmQgCm46RGF2aXM7R2VvcmdlCnRlbDt3b3JrOjYwMy84ODAtMTQxNAp4LW1v emlsbGEtaHRtbDpGQUxTRQp1cmw6aHR0cDovL3d3dy5tdmlzdGEuY29tCm9yZzpNb250YVZp c3RhIFNvZnR3YXJlLCBJbmMuCmFkcjo7OzQ2IFBpbmUgU3RyZWV0IEV4dGVuc2lvbjtOYXNo dWE7Tkg7MDMwNjA7VVNBCnZlcnNpb246Mi4xCmVtYWlsO2ludGVybmV0OmRhdmlzX2dAbXZp c3RhLmNvbQp0aXRsZTpTb2Z0d2FyZSBFbmdpbmVlcgp4LW1vemlsbGEtY3B0OjstNTM3Ngpm bjpHZW9yZ2UgRy4gRGF2aXMKZW5kOnZjYXJkCg== --------------1C9E78736D3CA02A57E59272-- From kramer@pa.dec.com Mon Dec 11 22:14:14 2000 Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (root@mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id WAA32758 for ; Mon, 11 Dec 2000 22:14:14 +0100 Received: from zmamail03.zma.compaq.com (zmamail03.zma.compaq.com [161.114.64.103]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id WAA11877 for ; Mon, 11 Dec 2000 22:14:12 +0100 (MET) Received: by zmamail03.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id D41224DF8; Mon, 11 Dec 2000 16:12:23 -0500 (EST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by zmamail03.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 92C624C09; Mon, 11 Dec 2000 16:12:21 -0500 (EST) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA27873; Mon, 11 Dec 2000 13:12:14 -0800 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id NAA11427; Mon, 11 Dec 2000 13:11:26 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id NAA11424; Mon, 11 Dec 2000 13:11:25 -0800 (PST) Received: from zmamail02.nz-tay.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA06087; Mon, 11 Dec 2000 13:11:25 -0800 Received: by zmamail02.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 9D02958C6; Mon, 11 Dec 2000 16:11:24 -0500 (EST) Received: from xanadu.gn.com (modemcable248.137-200-24.mtl.mc.videotron.ca [24.200.137.248]) by zmamail02.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 306BF5B76 for ; Mon, 11 Dec 2000 16:11:24 -0500 (EST) Received: from localhost (nico@localhost) by xanadu.gn.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id QAA30414; Mon, 11 Dec 2000 16:10:58 -0500 X-Authentication-Warning: xanadu.gn.com: nico owned process doing -bs Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2000 16:10:58 -0500 (EST) From: Nicolas Pitre X-Sender: To: "George G. Davis" Cc: StrongArm Linux , Arm Linux Subject: Re: Newbie question on Neponset sound support In-Reply-To: <3A353D7C.B92D4292@mvista.com> Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk On Mon, 11 Dec 2000, George G. Davis wrote: > Nicolas Pitre wrote: > > > > On Fri, 8 Dec 2000, George G. Davis wrote: > > > > > Greetings, > > > > > > I'm having problems figuring out how to unmute the audio on Assabet+Neponset. > > > I'm running linux-2.4.0-test10-rmk1-np2 on Assabet+Neponset with CONFIG_SOUND_UDA1341 > > > enabled. I've built splay, v0.8.2, and it seems to be 'playing'. But no sound? > > > > 1- upgrade to test11-rmk1-np2 > > Done! > > Same results here. I'm using splay-0.8.2-fp1. It appears to be 'playing'. > But no sound? Only a very short faint noise when first started. > > Any tips on other useful diagnostics are apreciated. Are you using a stand-alone Assabet or you are trying to play sound through the Neponset? If the later I can't be of much help since my Assabet doesn't boot at all when Neponset is attached... Nicolas From kramer@pa.dec.com Mon Dec 11 22:35:59 2000 Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (root@mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id WAA00030 for ; Mon, 11 Dec 2000 22:35:59 +0100 Received: from ztxmail05.ztx.compaq.com (ztxmail05.ztx.compaq.com [161.114.1.209]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id WAA12990 for ; Mon, 11 Dec 2000 22:35:57 +0100 (MET) Received: by ztxmail05.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 90BFBA3C; Mon, 11 Dec 2000 15:34:10 -0600 (CST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by ztxmail05.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id CCD7C93F; Mon, 11 Dec 2000 15:34:08 -0600 (CST) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA19806; Mon, 11 Dec 2000 13:34:06 -0800 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id NAA13027; Mon, 11 Dec 2000 13:33:16 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id NAA13023; Mon, 11 Dec 2000 13:33:15 -0800 (PST) Received: from ztxmail01.nz-cce.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA31178; Mon, 11 Dec 2000 13:33:15 -0800 Received: by ztxmail01.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 2BAEA44D2; Mon, 11 Dec 2000 15:33:15 -0600 (CST) Received: from mail.netx4.com (216-064-003-018.inaddr.vitts.com [216.64.3.18]) by ztxmail01.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7AF9C45F4 for ; Mon, 11 Dec 2000 15:33:14 -0600 (CST) Received: from mvista.com (greeny.netx4.com [192.168.253.30]) by mail.netx4.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id QAA05566; Mon, 11 Dec 2000 16:33:48 -0500 Message-Id: <3A3547D4.979B9569@mvista.com> Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2000 16:32:04 -0500 From: "George G. Davis" Organization: MontaVista Software, Inc. X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.7 [en] (X11; I; Linux 2.4.0-test11 ppc) X-Accept-Language: en Mime-Version: 1.0 To: Nicolas Pitre Cc: StrongArm Linux , Arm Linux Subject: Re: Newbie question on Neponset sound support References: Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="------------7DF82C1B5561AD1251E49830" Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------7DF82C1B5561AD1251E49830 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Nicolas Pitre wrote: > > On Mon, 11 Dec 2000, George G. Davis wrote: > > > Nicolas Pitre wrote: > > > > > > On Fri, 8 Dec 2000, George G. Davis wrote: > > > > > > > Greetings, > > > > > > > > I'm having problems figuring out how to unmute the audio on Assabet+Neponset. > > > > I'm running linux-2.4.0-test10-rmk1-np2 on Assabet+Neponset with CONFIG_SOUND_UDA1341 > > > > enabled. I've built splay, v0.8.2, and it seems to be 'playing'. But no sound? > > > > > > 1- upgrade to test11-rmk1-np2 > > > > Done! > > > > Same results here. I'm using splay-0.8.2-fp1. It appears to be 'playing'. > > But no sound? Only a very short faint noise when first started. > > > > Any tips on other useful diagnostics are apreciated. > > Are you using a stand-alone Assabet or you are trying to play sound through > the Neponset? If the later I can't be of much help since my Assabet doesn't > boot at all when Neponset is attached... I'm using Neponset. I'm checking my hardware revs and ECO's. I'll also try using linux-2.4.0-test9-rmk1-np2-jd1 to checkout my hardware as it was known to work. -- Regards, George --------------7DF82C1B5561AD1251E49830 Content-Type: text/x-vcard; charset=iso-8859-1; name="davis_g.vcf" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-Description: Card for George G. Davis Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="davis_g.vcf" YmVnaW46dmNhcmQgCm46RGF2aXM7R2VvcmdlCnRlbDt3b3JrOjYwMy84ODAtMTQxNAp4LW1v emlsbGEtaHRtbDpGQUxTRQp1cmw6aHR0cDovL3d3dy5tdmlzdGEuY29tCm9yZzpNb250YVZp c3RhIFNvZnR3YXJlLCBJbmMuCmFkcjo7OzQ2IFBpbmUgU3RyZWV0IEV4dGVuc2lvbjtOYXNo dWE7Tkg7MDMwNjA7VVNBCnZlcnNpb246Mi4xCmVtYWlsO2ludGVybmV0OmRhdmlzX2dAbXZp c3RhLmNvbQp0aXRsZTpTb2Z0d2FyZSBFbmdpbmVlcgp4LW1vemlsbGEtY3B0OjstNTM3Ngpm bjpHZW9yZ2UgRy4gRGF2aXMKZW5kOnZjYXJkCg== --------------7DF82C1B5561AD1251E49830-- From kramer@pa.dec.com Tue Dec 12 05:52:19 2000 Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (root@mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id FAA01291 for ; Tue, 12 Dec 2000 05:52:19 +0100 Received: from ztxmail03.ztx.compaq.com (ztxmail03.ztx.compaq.com [161.114.1.207]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id FAA28544 for ; Tue, 12 Dec 2000 05:52:17 +0100 (MET) Received: by ztxmail03.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 53CB41AF3; Mon, 11 Dec 2000 22:50:30 -0600 (CST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by ztxmail03.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 9E58E1868; Mon, 11 Dec 2000 22:50:28 -0600 (CST) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA32618; Mon, 11 Dec 2000 20:50:08 -0800 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id UAA26841; Mon, 11 Dec 2000 20:44:29 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id UAA26840; Mon, 11 Dec 2000 20:44:28 -0800 (PST) Received: from zmamail01.nz-tay.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA02609; Mon, 11 Dec 2000 20:44:28 -0800 Received: by zmamail01.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id E25CFC39F; Mon, 11 Dec 2000 23:44:27 -0500 (EST) Received: from chmls05.mediaone.net (chmls05.mediaone.net [24.147.1.143]) by zmamail01.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A2A3EC4C1 for ; Mon, 11 Dec 2000 23:44:27 -0500 (EST) Received: from mvista.com (davisg.ne.mediaone.net [24.128.16.82]) by chmls05.mediaone.net (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id XAA17711; Mon, 11 Dec 2000 23:44:21 -0500 (EST) Message-Id: <3A35ACA0.41D1251F@mvista.com> Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2000 23:42:08 -0500 From: "George G. Davis" Organization: Monta Vista Software, Inc. X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.72 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.4.0-test11 i686) X-Accept-Language: en Mime-Version: 1.0 To: StrongArm Linux , Arm Linux Cc: Nicolas Pitre Subject: Re: Newbie question on Neponset sound support References: <3A3547D4.979B9569@mvista.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk "George G. Davis" wrote: > I'm checking my hardware revs and ECO's. Thanks (again) to John Dorsey's "ARM Linux on Assabet" online documentation available at: http://www.cs.cmu.edu/~wearable/software/assabet.html I've found that my Neponset was missing an ECO of an ECO which is not mentioned in the Intel spec updates for Neponset. Move one green wire 0.100" to enable sound! : ) Refer to "Section 5 Fixing Neponset" at the above URL for details. Now I can listen to music while I work! : ) Thanks! -- Regards George P.S. I'm really starting to have fun now! Now if I can only find out why SA-1111 PCMCIA access causes 'ooops' when SA-1111 USB is installed? From kramer@pa.dec.com Thu Dec 14 09:22:19 2000 Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (root@mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id JAA09248 for ; Thu, 14 Dec 2000 09:22:19 +0100 Received: from zmamail05.zma.compaq.com (zmamail05.zma.compaq.com [161.114.64.105]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id JAA02048 for ; Thu, 14 Dec 2000 09:22:17 +0100 (MET) Received: by zmamail05.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 59AD82C14; Thu, 14 Dec 2000 03:20:31 -0500 (EST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by zmamail05.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id E95012E98; Thu, 14 Dec 2000 03:20:28 -0500 (EST) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA08840; Thu, 14 Dec 2000 00:20:18 -0800 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id AAA00192; Thu, 14 Dec 2000 00:11:28 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id AAA00080; Thu, 14 Dec 2000 00:11:27 -0800 (PST) Received: from ztxmail01.nz-cce.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA07247; Thu, 14 Dec 2000 00:11:26 -0800 Received: by ztxmail01.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 068A54736; Thu, 14 Dec 2000 02:11:25 -0600 (CST) Received: from chmls05.mediaone.net (chmls05.mediaone.net [24.147.1.143]) by ztxmail01.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 622364749 for ; Thu, 14 Dec 2000 02:11:25 -0600 (CST) Received: from mvista.com (davisg.ne.mediaone.net [24.128.16.82]) by chmls05.mediaone.net (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id DAA19690; Thu, 14 Dec 2000 03:11:08 -0500 (EST) Message-Id: <3A38800B.2894B435@mvista.com> Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2000 03:08:43 -0500 From: "George G. Davis" Organization: Monta Vista Software, Inc. X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.72 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.4.0-test11 i686) X-Accept-Language: en Mime-Version: 1.0 To: StrongArm Linux , Arm Linux , "George G. Davis" Subject: Ooops in 2.4.0-test11-rmk1-np2 on Assabet+Neponset w/PCMCIA and USB in kernel References: <3A2D5FA0.D2D21437@mvista.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk Greetings, I'm still seeing an oops in 2.4.0-test11-rmk1-np2 on Assabet w/Neponset module when both SA-1111 PCMCIA and SA-1111 USB are configured in the kernel. The symptoms are not always consistent. Although there's _always_ a catastrophic error when attempting to access an IBM CF microdrive (no other PCMCIA/CF devices tested) while the SA-1111 USB host is idle w/o any devices devices plugged in. Typically the symptom is an oops during interrupt handling where we're often found servicing an hc_interrupt and calling dl_reverse_done. Other times, the system simply hangs for a long period followed by a spurious reset. During the course of digging into this, I've inserted debug prints into sa1111_irq_demux and hc_interrupt to dump SA-1111 INSTATCLR registers (only when ints active for USB) and the USB OHCI registers. I've found that SA-1111 INTSTATCLR bit 44 (nIrqHciM) is typically set when the crash occurs. I've also typically found that the USB controller HcInterruptStatus is 0x65 when it is called. Maybe all meaningless. But, as long as I don't access the microdrive, I never see any interrupts from the SA-1111 USB controller. So why should I start getting USB interrupts when accessing another device? BTW, I've played audio via the SA-1111 SAC interface before proceeding with the PCMCIA access of doom. Interestingly, the audio played fine (via NFS root mounted FS). Then the machine died promptly when proceeding with the PCMCIA testing. So here's the latest oops which of course differs from my typical crash scenario in that I die due to corruption of r4 on return from an 'ide' interrupt handler (first time I've seen this one)? I'ld appreciate any insights! I'll be digging this hole a little deeper in the meantime... Anyone have Assabet+Neponset? Please give this a try! Oh yeah, SA-1111 PCMCIA access (using IBM CF microdrive) works fine as longs as I don't config SA-1111 USB into the kernel. -- Regards, George ================================ Uncompressing Linux............................................... done, booting the kernel. Linux version 2.4.0-test11-rmk1-np2 (mvista@eeyore.davisg.ne.mediaone.net) (gcc version 2.95.2 19991030 (2.95.3 prerelease/franzo)) #2 Wed Dec 13 22:47:24 EST 2000 Processor: Intel StrongARM-1110 revision 5 Architecture: Intel-Assabet Neponset expansion board detected On node 0 totalpages: 8192 zone(0): 256 pages. zone(1): 7936 pages. zone(2): 0 pages. Kernel command line: root=/dev/nfs Calibrating delay loop... 138.44 BogoMIPS Memory: 32MB = 32MB total Memory: 30656KB available (1255K code, 217K data, 52K init) Dentry-cache hash table entries: 4096 (order: 3, 32768 bytes) Buffer-cache hash table entries: 1024 (order: 0, 4096 bytes) Page-cache hash table entries: 8192 (order: 3, 32768 bytes) Inode-cache hash table entries: 2048 (order: 2, 16384 bytes) POSIX conformance testing by UNIFIX Linux NET4.0 for Linux 2.4 Based upon Swansea University Computer Society NET3.039 SA-1111 Microprocessor Companion Chip: silicon revision 1, metal revision 1 usb-ohci.c: USB OHCI at membase 0xf4000400, IRQ 93 usb-ohci.c: usb-builtin, usb-ohci usb-ohci-sa1111.h: allocated pages; mem c2800000 (c00f0000) usb-ohci.c: USB HC reset_hc usb-builtin: ctrl = 0x0 ; usb.c: new USB bus registered, assigned bus number 1 usb-ohci.c: SUB URB:[ 5] dev: 0,ep: 0-O,type:CTRL,flags: 0,len:0/0,stat:0(0) usb-ohci.c: cmd(8): 00 05 01 00 00 00 00 00 usb-ohci.c: rh_submit_urb, req = 1280(500) len=0 usb-ohci.c: RET(rh) URB:[ bd] dev: 0,ep: 0-O,type:CTRL,flags: 0,len:0/0,stat:0(0) usb-ohci.c: SUB URB:[ 126] dev: 1,ep: 0-I,type:CTRL,flags: 0,len:0/8,stat:0(0) usb-ohci.c: rh_submit_urb, req = 1664(680) len=8 usb-ohci.c: RET(rh) URB:[ 1af] dev: 1,ep: 0-I,type:CTRL,flags: 0,len:8/8,stat:0(0) usb-ohci.c: cmd(8): 80 06 00 01 00 00 08 00 usb-ohci.c: data(8/8): 12 01 10 01 09 00 00 08 stat:0 usb-ohci.c: SUB URB:[ 271] dev: 1,ep: 0-I,type:CTRL,flags: 0,len:0/18,stat:0(0) usb-ohci.c: rh_submit_urb, req = 1664(680) len=18 usb-ohci.c: RET(rh) URB:[ 2fc] dev: 1,ep: 0-I,type:CTRL,flags: 0,len:18/18,stat:0(0) usb-ohci.c: cmd(8): 80 06 00 01 00 00 12 00 usb-ohci.c: data(18/18): 12 01 10 01 09 00 00 08 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 02... stat:0 usb-ohci.c: SUB URB:[ 3de] dev: 1,ep: 0-I,type:CTRL,flags: 0,len:0/8,stat:0(0) usb-ohci.c: rh_submit_urb, req = 1664(680) len=8 usb-ohci.c: RET(rh) URB:[ 468] dev: 1,ep: 0-I,type:CTRL,flags: 0,len:8/8,stat:0(0) usb-ohci.c: cmd(8): 80 06 00 02 00 00 08 00 usb-ohci.c: data(8/8): 09 02 19 00 01 01 00 40 stat:0 usb-ohci.c: SUB URB:[ 52a] dev: 1,ep: 0-I,type:CTRL,flags: 0,len:0/25,stat:0(0) usb-ohci.c: rh_submit_urb, req = 1664(680) len=25 usb-ohci.c: RET(rh) URB:[ 5b5] dev: 1,ep: 0-I,type:CTRL,flags: 0,len:25/25,stat:0(0) usb-ohci.c: cmd(8): 80 06 00 02 00 00 19 00 usb-ohci.c: data(25/25): 09 02 19 00 01 01 00 40 00 09 04 00 00 01 09 00... stat:0 usb.c: kmalloc IF c04352c0, numif 1 usb-ohci.c: SUB URB:[ 6be] dev: 1,ep: 0-O,type:CTRL,flags: 0,len:0/0,stat:0(0) usb-ohci.c: cmd(8): 00 09 01 00 00 00 00 00 usb-ohci.c: rh_submit_urb, req = 2304(900) len=0 usb-ohci.c: RET(rh) URB:[ 776] dev: 1,ep: 0-O,type:CTRL,flags: 0,len:0/0,stat:0(0) usb.c: new device strings: Mfr=0, Product=2, SerialNumber=1 usb-ohci.c: SUB URB:[ 80f] dev: 1,ep: 0-I,type:CTRL,flags: 0,len:0/4,stat:0(0) usb-ohci.c: rh_submit_urb, req = 1664(680) len=4 usb-ohci.c: RET(rh) URB:[ 899] dev: 1,ep: 0-I,type:CTRL,flags: 0,len:4/4,stat:0(0) usb-ohci.c: cmd(8): 80 06 00 03 00 00 04 00 usb-ohci.c: data(4/4): 04 03 00 00 stat:0 usb.c: USB device number 1 default language ID 0x0 usb-ohci.c: SUB URB:[ 984] dev: 1,ep: 0-I,type:CTRL,flags: 0,len:0/255,stat:0(0) usb-ohci.c: rh_submit_urb, req = 1664(680) len=255 usb-ohci.c: RET(rh) URB:[ a12] dev: 1,ep: 0-I,type:CTRL,flags: 0,len:36/255,stat:0(0) usb-ohci.c: cmd(8): 80 06 02 03 00 00 ff 00 usb-ohci.c: data(36/255): 24 03 55 00 53 00 42 00 20 00 4f 00 48 00 43 00... stat:0 Product: USB OHCI Root Hub usb-ohci.c: SUB URB:[ b13] dev: 1,ep: 0-I,type:CTRL,flags: 0,len:0/255,stat:0(0) usb-ohci.c: rh_submit_urb, req = 1664(680) len=255 usb-ohci.c: RET(rh) URB:[ ba1] dev: 1,ep: 0-I,type:CTRL,flags: 0,len:18/255,stat:0(0) usb-ohci.c: cmd(8): 80 06 01 03 00 00 ff 00 usb-ohci.c: data(18/255): 12 03 66 00 34 00 30 00 30 00 30 00 34 00 30 00... stat:0 SerialNumber: f4000400 usb.c: unhandled interfaces on device usb.c: USB device 1 (vend/prod 0x0/0x0) is not claimed by any active driver. Length = 18 DescriptorType = 01 USB version = 1.10 Vendor:Product = 0000:0000 MaxPacketSize0 = 8 NumConfigurations = 1 Device version = 0.00 Device Class:SubClass:Protocol = 09:00:00 Hub device class Configuration: bLength = 9 bDescriptorType = 02 wTotalLength = 0019 bNumInterfaces = 01 bConfigurationValue = 01 iConfiguration = 00 bmAttributes = 40 MaxPower = 0mA Interface: 0 Alternate Setting: 0 bLength = 9 bDescriptorType = 04 bInterfaceNumber = 00 bAlternateSetting = 00 bNumEndpoints = 01 bInterface Class:SubClass:Protocol = 09:00:00 iInterface = 00 Endpoint: bLength = 7 bDescriptorType = 05 bEndpointAddress = 81 (in) bmAttributes = 03 (Interrupt) wMaxPacketSize = 0002 bInterval = ff usb.c: call_policy add, num 1 -- no FS yet usb-ohci.c: OHCI controller usb-builtin state usb-ohci.c: control: 0x0000008f HCFS=operational IE PLE CBSR=3 usb-ohci.c: cmdstatus: 0x00000000 SOC=0 usb-ohci.c: intrstatus: 0x00000044 RHSC SF usb-ohci.c: intrenable: 0x80000013 MIE UE WDH SO usb-ohci.c: ed_periodcurrent 00000000 usb-ohci.c: ed_controlhead 00000000 usb-ohci.c: donehead 00000000 ed_rm_list 00000000, 00000000; disabled 0 usb-ohci.c: hcca frame #132b usb-ohci.c: roothub.a: 02000201 POTPGT=2 NPS NDP=1 usb-ohci.c: roothub.b: 00000000 PPCM=0000 DR=0000 usb-ohci.c: roothub.status: 00000000 usb-ohci.c: roothub.portstatus [0] = 0x00000100 PPS Starting kswapd v1.8 Keyboard timed out[1] initialize_kbd: Keyboard reset failed, no ACK Keyboard timed out[1] keyboard: Timeout - AT keyboard not present? Keyboard timed out[1] keyboard: Timeout - AT keyboard not present? Uniform Multi-Platform E-IDE driver Revision: 6.31 ide: Assuming 50MHz system bus speed for PIO modes; override with idebus=xx smc9194.c:v0.13 04/14/00 by Erik Stahlman (erik@vt.edu) SMC9194: uninitialized MAC address detected -- using a dummy one SMC9194: SMC91C96(r:9) at 0xc2811000 IRQ:104 INTF:TP MEM:6144b ADDR: 00:01:02:03:04:05 SA1100 serial driver version 1.3 ttyS0 on SA1100 UART3 (irq 17) ttyS1 on SA1100 UART1 (irq 15) ttyS2 on SA1100 UART2 (irq 16), using IRDA Linux PCMCIA Card Services 3.1.22 options: none SA-1100 PCMCIA (CS release 3.1.22) usb.c: registered new driver usbdevfs usb.c: registered new driver hub hub.c: USB hub found usb-ohci.c: SUB URB:[26ba] dev: 1,ep: 0-I,type:CTRL,flags: 0,len:0/39,stat:0(0) usb-ohci.c: rh_submit_urb, req = 1696(6a0) len=39 usb-ohci.c: RET(rh) URB:[2746] dev: 1,ep: 0-I,type:CTRL,flags: 0,len:9/39,stat:0(0) usb-ohci.c: cmd(8): a0 06 00 29 00 00 27 00 usb-ohci.c: data(9/39): 09 29 01 00 00 02 00 00 ff stat:0 hub.c: 1 port detected hub.c: standalone hub hub.c: ganged power switching hub.c: global over-current protection hub.c: power on to power good time: 4ms hub.c: hub controller current requirement: 0mA hub.c: port removable status: R usb-ohci.c: SUB URB:[2906] dev: 1,ep: 0-I,type:CTRL,flags: 0,len:0/4,stat:0(0) usb-ohci.c: rh_submit_urb, req = 160(a0) len=4 usb-ohci.c: RET(rh) URB:[298d] dev: 1,ep: 0-I,type:CTRL,flags: 0,len:4/4,stat:0(0) usb-ohci.c: cmd(8): a0 00 00 00 00 00 04 00 usb-ohci.c: data(4/4): 00 00 00 00 stat:0 hub.c: local power source is good hub.c: no over-current condition exists usb-ohci.c: SUB URB:[2a91] dev: 1,ep: 1-I,type:INTR,flags: 0,len:0/1,stat:0(0) hub.c: enabling power on all ports usb-ohci.c: SUB URB:[2b0c] dev: 1,ep: 0-O,type:CTRL,flags: 0,len:0/0,stat:0(0) usb-ohci.c: cmd(8): 23 03 08 00 01 00 00 00 usb-ohci.c: rh_submit_urb, req = 803(323) len=0 usb-ohci.c: RET(rh) URB:[2bc3] dev: 1,ep: 0-O,type:CTRL,flags: 0,len:0/0,stat:0(0) usb.c: hub driver claimed interface c04352c0 NET4: Linux TCP/IP 1.0 for NET4.0 IP Protocols: ICMP, UDP, TCP IP: routing cache hash table of 512 buckets, 4Kbytes TCP: Hash tables configured (established 2048 bind 2048) Sending BOOTP requests.... OK IP-Config: Got BOOTP answer from 192.168.1.254, my address is 192.168.1.83 NET4: Unix domain sockets 1.0/SMP for Linux NET4.0. NetWinder Floating Point Emulator V0.95 (c) 1998-1999 Rebel.com Looking up port of RPC 100003/2 on 192.168.1.254 Looking up port of RPC 100005/2 on 192.168.1.254 VFS: Mounted root (nfs filesystem) readonly. Freeing init memory: 52K INIT: version 2.77 booting INIT: Entering runlevel: 3 sh-2.03# cardmgr -o cardmgr[19]: starting, version is 3.1.11 cardmgr[19]: cannot access /lib/modules/2.4.0-test11-rmk1-np2: No such file or directory cardmgr[19]: watching 2 sockets cardmgr[19]: Card Services release does not match cardmgr[19]: initializing socket 1 cardmgr[19]: socket 1: ATA/IDE Fixed Disk hda: IBM-DMDM-10340, ATA DISK drive ide0 at 0xf7000000-0xf7000007,0xf700000e on irq 99 hda: 700560 sectors (359 MB) w/96KiB Cache, CHS=695/16/63 Partition check: hda: hda1 hda2 ide_cs: hda: Vcc = 3.3, Vpp = 0.0 cardmgr[19]: executing: './ide start hda' cardmgr[19]: exiting sh-2.03# strace -vx fsck /dev/hda1 execve("/sbin/fsck", ["fsck", "/dev/hda1"], [/* 15 vars */]) = 0 brk(0) = 0x200b270 open("/etc/ld.so.preload", O_RDONLY) = -1 ENOENT (No such file or directory) open("/etc/ld.so.cache", O_RDONLY) = -1 ENOENT (No such file or directory) open("/opt/hardhat/devkit/arm/sa110_le/armv4l-hardhat-linux/lib/v4l/libc.so.6", O_RDONLY) = -1 ENOENT (No such file or directory) stat("/opt/hardhat/devkit/arm/sa110_le/armv4l-hardhat-linux/lib/v4l", 0xbffff848) = -1 ENOENT (No such file or directory) open("/opt/hardhat/devkit/arm/sa110_le/armv4l-hardhat-linux/lib/libc.so.6", O_RDONLY) = 3 fstat(3, {st_dev=makedev(0, 5), st_ino=138271, st_mode=S_IFREG|0755, st_nlink=1, st_uid=0, st_gid=0, st_blksize=4096, st_blocks=7608, st_size=3889172, st_atime=2000/12/14-00:54:17, st_mtime=2000/08/11-15:05:07, st_ctime=2000/09/14-00:22:19}) = 0 read(3, "\x7f\x45\x4c\x46\x01\x01\x01\x61\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00"..., 4096) = 4096 old_mmap(NULL, 965788, PROT_READ|PROT_EXEC, MAP_PRIVATE, 3, 0) = 0x4001e000 mprotect(0x400fa000, 64668, PROT_NONE) = 0 old_mmap(0x400fe000, 36864, PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE, MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_FIXED, 3, 0xd8000) = 0x400fe000 old_mmap(0x40107000, 11420, PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE, MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_FIXED|MAP_ANONYMOUS, -1, 0) = 0x40107000 close(3) = 0 personality(PER_LINUX) = 8388608 getpid() = 24 brk(0) = 0x200b270 brk(0x200b290) VFS: Disk change detected on device ide0(3,1) = 0x200b hda:290 brk(0x200c000) = 0x200c000 fstat64(0x1, 0xbffff70c) = 0 old_mmap(NULL, 4096, PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE, MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_ANONYMOUS, -1, 0) = 0x40015000 ioctl(1, TCGETS, {c_iflags=0xd04, c_oflags=0x5, c_cflags=0xc3d, c_lflags=0xe0b, c_line=0, c_cc="\x03\x1c\x7f\x18\x04\x00\x01\x00\x11\x13\x1a\x00\x12\x0f\x17\x16\x00\x00\x00\x00\x10\x00\x00\x90\x29\x10\x40\x00\xf7\xff\xbf\xb8"}) = 0 write(1, "Parallelizing fsck version 1.18 "..., 46Parallelizing fsck version 1.18 (11-Nov-1999) ) = 46 open("/etc/fstab", O_RDONLY) = 3 fstat64(0x3, 0xbffff83c) = 0 old_mmap(NULL, 4096, PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE, MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_ANONYMOUS, -1, 0) = 0x40016000 read(3, "/dev/n hda1fs\t/\t\ hda2tnfs\tde faults\t0 0\nnon"..., 4096) = 108 read(3, "", 4096) = 0 close(3) Unable to handle kernel paging request at virtual address c4475b74 pgd = c0204000 *pgd = 00000000, *pmd = 00000000 Internal error: Oops: 2 CPU: 0 pc : [] lr : [] sp : c0351e78 ip : c0383a70 fp : c0351ea0 r10: c0351f68 r9 : c0375900 r8 : c0374640 r7 : c03752a0 r6 : 24040000 r5 : 04000063 r4 : c4475b60 r3 : c0383a70 r2 : 00000000 r1 : c0383a70 r0 : c0428e60 Flags: nZCv IRQs off FIQs on Mode SVC_32 Segment kernel Control: C1E4917F Table: C1E4917F DAC: 0000001D Process swapper (pid: 0, stackpage=c0351000) >>EIP; c0216cb0 <===== Stack: c0351e60: c0383a70 c0216cb0 60000093 ffffffff 00000032 00000001 c0351e80: 00040000 0000002e c0351f68 c0375900 c0351f68 c0351ec4 c0351ea4 c021b95c c0351ea0: c0216bfc 00000004 c0351f68 00000000 0000002e c0374640 c0351ee4 c0351ec8 c0351ec0: c021bac4 c021b8e4 c03532a4 0000002e 20000000 c0374c00 c0351f10 c0351ee8 c0351ee0: c0216cb0 c021ba64 00000019 02000000 c0351f68 fa040014 c0363ba0 c0375900 c0351f00: fa040010 c0351f38 c0351f14 c021b730 c0216bfc c0353274 0000000b 20000000 c0351f20: c03747a0 c0374640 c0351f68 c0351f64 c0351f3c c0216cb0 c021b6a4 fa050000 c0351f40: c0351fb0 00000002 c02178e8 60000013 ffffffff c03745fc c0351fbc c0351f68 c0351f60: c0215b00 c0216bfc 00000000 00000000 60000013 600000d3 c02178c8 c0350000 c0351f80: c0350000 c0352c44 c02178c8 6901b115 c03745fc c0351fbc c0351fc0 c0351fb0 c0351fa0: c02178e8 c02178e8 60000013 ffffffff c0351fe4 c0351fc0 c02171e4 c02178d4 c0351fc0: 00002000 c038545c c03745e4 c0374630 c0352c8c c021381c c0351ffc c0351fe8 c0351fe0: c02088f8 c0217188 c0352d1c c038545c 00000000 c0352000 c0208080 c02087d8 Backtrace: Function entered at [] from [] Function entered at [] from [] r8 = C0374640 r7 = 0000002E r6 = 00000000 r5 = C0351F68 r4 = 00000004 Function entered at [] from [] r7 = C0374C00 r6 = 20000000 r5 = 0000002E r4 = C03532A4 Function entered at [] from [] Function entered at [] from [] Function entered at [] from [] Function entered at [] from [] Function entered at [] from [] Function entered at [] from [] r4 = C038545C Aiee, killing interrupt handler ================================= Trace; c0216bf0 Trace; c021b95c Trace; c021b8d8 Trace; c021bac4 Trace; c021ba58 Trace; c0216cb0 Trace; c0216bf0 Trace; c021b730 Trace; c021b698 Trace; c0216cb0 Trace; c0216bf0 Trace; c0215b00 <__irq_svc+20/a0> Trace; c02178c8 Trace; c02171e4 Trace; c021717c Trace; c02088f8 Trace; c02087cc Trace; c0208080 <__mmap_switched+0/34> ================================= = 0 mKernel panic: Attempted to kill the idle task! unmap(0xIn interrupt handler - not syncing 40016000, 4096) = 0 stat("/sbin/fsck.ext2", {st_dev=makedev(0, 5), st_ino=23395, st_mode=S_IFREG|0755, st_nlink=2, st_uid=0, st_gid=0, st_blksize=4096, st_blocks=856, st_size=433936, st_atime=2000/12/14-00:49:20, st_mtime=2000/08/11-15:50:14, st_ctime=2000/09/14-00:21:46}) = 0 fork() = 25 time(NULL) = 51 wait4(-1, e2fsck 1.18, 11-Nov-1999 for EXT2 FS 0.5b, 95/08/09 ~. Disconnected. This is small useful segment of System.map for lr : [] from above: c0382900 B kbd_table c0382a00 B con_buf c0383a00 B video_font_height c0383a04 B sel_cons c0383a10 B ide_modules c0383a14 B ide_devfs_handle c0383a18 B ide_probe c0383a20 B ide_hwifs c0384600 B socket_table c0384620 B mem_dma Here's: the disassembly of the +/- crash pc : []: c0216bf0 : c0216bf0: e1a0c00d mov ip, sp c0216bf4: e92ddff0 stmdb sp!, {r4, r5, r6, r7, r8, r9, sl, fp, ip, lr, pc} c0216bf8: e24cb004 sub fp, ip, #4 ; 0x4 c0216bfc: e1a05000 mov r5, r0 c0216c00: e3550069 cmp r5, #105 ; 0x69 c0216c04: e1a0a001 mov sl, r1 c0216c08: ca000046 bgt c0216d28 c0216c0c: e59f8134 ldr r8, [pc, #134] ; c0216d48 c0216c10: e1a06285 mov r6, r5, lsl #5 c0216c14: e0867008 add r7, r6, r8 c0216c18: e1a0e00f mov lr, pc c0216c1c: e597f004 ldr pc, [r7, #4] c0216c20: e59f0124 ldr r0, [pc, #124] ; c0216d4c c0216c24: e59f1124 ldr r1, [pc, #124] ; c0216d50 c0216c28: e5903008 ldr r3, [r0, #8] c0216c2c: e7d62008 ldrb r2, [r6, r8] c0216c30: e2833001 add r3, r3, #1 ; 0x1 c0216c34: e5803008 str r3, [r0, #8] c0216c38: e3822004 orr r2, r2, #4 ; 0x4 c0216c3c: e7c62008 strb r2, [r6, r8] c0216c40: e1a02105 mov r2, r5, lsl #2 c0216c44: e7913002 ldr r3, [r1, r2] c0216c48: e1a09000 mov r9, r0 c0216c4c: e5974010 ldr r4, [r7, #16] c0216c50: e2833001 add r3, r3, #1 ; 0x1 c0216c54: e3540000 cmp r4, #0 ; 0x0 c0216c58: e7813002 str r3, [r1, r2] c0216c5c: 0a000024 beq c0216cf4 c0216c60: e7d63008 ldrb r3, [r6, r8] c0216c64: e3a06000 mov r6, #0 ; 0x0 c0216c68: e3130001 tst r3, #1 ; 0x1 c0216c6c: 0a000002 beq c0216c7c c0216c70: e1a00005 mov r0, r5 c0216c74: e1a0e00f mov lr, pc c0216c78: e597f00c ldr pc, [r7, #12] c0216c7c: e5943004 ldr r3, [r4, #4] c0216c80: e3130202 tst r3, #536870912 ; 0x20000000 c0216c84: 1a000002 bne c0216c94 c0216c88: e10f3000 mrs r3, CPSR c0216c8c: e3c33080 bic r3, r3, #128 ; 0x80 c0216c90: e121f003 msr CPSR_c, r3 c0216c94: e1a00005 mov r0, r5 c0216c98: e5943004 ldr r3, [r4, #4] c0216c9c: e1a0200a mov r2, sl c0216ca0: e5941010 ldr r1, [r4, #16] c0216ca4: e1866003 orr r6, r6, r3 c0216ca8: e1a0e00f mov lr, pc c0216cac: e594f000 ldr pc, [r4] ===================================================== c0216cb0: e5944014 ldr r4, [r4, #20] ===================================================== c0216cb4: e3540000 cmp r4, #0 ; 0x0 c0216cb8: 1afffff5 bne c0216c94 c0216cbc: e3160201 tst r6, #268435456 ; 0x10000000 c0216cc0: 0a000001 beq c0216ccc c0216cc4: e1a00005 mov r0, r5 c0216cc8: eb01cbb0 bl c0289b90 c0216ccc: e10f2000 mrs r2, CPSR c0216cd0: e3822080 orr r2, r2, #128 ; 0x80 c0216cd4: e121f002 msr CPSR_c, r2 c0216cd8: e5d73000 ldrb r3, [r7] c0216cdc: e2033003 and r3, r3, #3 ; 0x3 c0216ce0: e3530002 cmp r3, #2 ; 0x2 c0216ce4: 1a000002 bne c0216cf4 c0216ce8: e1a00005 mov r0, r5 c0216cec: e1a0e00f mov lr, pc c0216cf0: e597f00c ldr pc, [r7, #12] c0216cf4: e1a00007 mov r0, r7 c0216cf8: e1a01005 mov r1, r5 c0216cfc: e1a0200a mov r2, sl c0216d00: ebffff93 bl c0216b54 c0216d04: e899000c ldmia r9, {r2, r3} c0216d08: e0022003 and r2, r2, r3 c0216d0c: e5993008 ldr r3, [r9, #8] c0216d10: e3520000 cmp r2, #0 ; 0x0 c0216d14: e2433001 sub r3, r3, #1 ; 0x1 c0216d18: e5893008 str r3, [r9, #8] c0216d1c: 0a000008 beq c0216d44 c0216d20: eb005133 bl c022b1f4 c0216d24: e91baff0 ldmdb fp, {r4, r5, r6, r7, r8, r9, sl, fp, sp, pc} c0216d28: e59f2024 ldr r2, [pc, #24] ; c0216d54 c0216d2c: e5923000 ldr r3, [r2] c0216d30: e1a01005 mov r1, r5 c0216d34: e59f001c ldr r0, [pc, #1c] ; c0216d58 c0216d38: e2833001 add r3, r3, #1 ; 0x1 c0216d3c: e5823000 str r3, [r2] c0216d40: eb003efc bl c0226938 c0216d44: e91baff0 ldmdb fp, {r4, r5, r6, r7, r8, r9, sl, fp, sp, pc} c0216d48: c0374640 eorgts r4, r7, r0, asr #12 c0216d4c: c0375900 eorgts r5, r7, r0, lsl #18 c0216d50: c0377dac eorgts r7, r7, ip, lsr #27 c0216d54: c0363b7c eorgts r3, r6, ip, ror fp c0216d58: c031b588 eorgts fp, r1, r8, lsl #11 From kramer@pa.dec.com Thu Dec 14 16:53:24 2000 Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (root@mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id QAA10429 for ; Thu, 14 Dec 2000 16:53:24 +0100 Received: from zmamail03.zma.compaq.com (zmamail03.zma.compaq.com [161.114.64.103]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id QAA03359 for ; Thu, 14 Dec 2000 16:53:21 +0100 (MET) Received: by zmamail03.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id E7D3D1B9A; Thu, 14 Dec 2000 10:51:33 -0500 (EST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by zmamail03.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 698494E06; Thu, 14 Dec 2000 10:51:31 -0500 (EST) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA02454; Thu, 14 Dec 2000 07:51:29 -0800 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id HAA03312; Thu, 14 Dec 2000 07:46:03 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id HAA03392; Thu, 14 Dec 2000 07:46:02 -0800 (PST) Received: from zmamail01.nz-tay.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA04741; Thu, 14 Dec 2000 07:46:01 -0800 Received: by zmamail01.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id DF43CC1A1; Thu, 14 Dec 2000 10:45:59 -0500 (EST) Received: from chmls06.mediaone.net (chmls06.mediaone.net [24.147.1.144]) by zmamail01.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 477E8C347 for ; Thu, 14 Dec 2000 10:45:59 -0500 (EST) Received: from mvista.com (davisg.ne.mediaone.net [24.128.16.82]) by chmls06.mediaone.net (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id KAA09551; Thu, 14 Dec 2000 10:45:51 -0500 (EST) Message-Id: <3A38EAB3.7BA84AA3@mvista.com> Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2000 10:43:47 -0500 From: "George G. Davis" Organization: Monta Vista Software, Inc. X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.72 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.4.0-test11 i686) X-Accept-Language: en Mime-Version: 1.0 To: StrongArm Linux , Arm Linux , "George G. Davis" Subject: Re: Ooops in 2.4.0-test11-rmk1-np2 on Assabet+Neponset w/PCMCIA and USB in kernel References: <3A2D5FA0.D2D21437@mvista.com> <3A38800B.2894B435@mvista.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk Greetings, Here's another oops. This one is the more typical scenario I described previously... I'm still coming up to speed reading these dumps. I'm still reviewing this one. Meanwhile, if anyone sees anything obvious or has any suggestions on other diagnostics to insert into the code, I'ld appreciate your input. : ) Hopefully test12-p7-rmk1-np1 cures this one too! : ) TIA! -- Regards, George INIT: Entering runlevel: 3 sh-2.03# sh-2.03# cardmgr -o cardmgr[19]: starting, version is 3.1.11 cardmgr[19]: cannot access /lib/modules/2.4.0-test11-rmk1-np2: No such file or directory cardmgr[19]: watching 2 sockets cardmgr[19]: Card Services release does not match cardmgr[19]: initializing socket 1 cardmgr[19]: socket 1: ATA/IDE Fixed Disk hda: IBM-DMDM-10340, ATA DISK drive ide0 at 0xf7000000-0xf7000007,0xf700000e on irq 99 hda: 700560 sectors (359 MB) w/96KiB Cache, CHS=695/16/63 Partition check: hda: hda1 hda2 ide_cs: hda: Vcc = 3.3, Vpp = 0.0 cardmgr[19]: executing: './ide start hda' cardmgr[19]: exiting sh-2.03# fsck /dev/hda1 Parallelizing fsck version 1.18 (11-Nov-1999) e2fsck 1.18, 11-VFS: Disk change detected on device ide0(3,1) Nov-1999 hda: for EXT2 FS 0.5b, 95/08/09 hda1 hda2 usb-ohci.c: hc_interrupt(93, 0xc042a000, 0xc0351f68) usb-ohci.c: Interrupt: 0x00000065 frame: 0x0000385e usb-ohci.c: OHCI controller usb-builtin state usb-ohci.c: control: 0x0000008f HCFS=operational IE PLE CBSR=3 usb-ohci.c: cmdstatus: 0x00010000 SOC=1 usb-ohci.c: intrstatus: 0x00000065 RHSC FNO SF SO usb-ohci.c: intrenable: 0x80000013 MIE UE WDH SO usb-ohci.c: ed_periodcurrent 00000000 usb-ohci.c: ed_controlhead 00000000 usb-ohci.c: donehead 00000000 ed_rm_list 00000000, 00000000; disabled 0 usb-ohci.c: hcca frame #3a3a usb-ohci.c: roothub.a: 02000201 POTPGT=2 NPS NDP=1 usb-ohci.c: roothub.b: 00000000 PPCM=0000 DR=0000 usb-ohci.c: roothub.status: 00000000 usb-ohci.c: roothub.portstatus [0] = 0x00000100 PPS usb-ohci.c: USB root hub status change usb-ohci.c: hc_interrupt(93, 0xc042a000, 0xc0351f68) usb-ohci.c: Interrupt: 0x00000006 frame: 0x00003be1 usb-ohci.c: OHCI controller usb-builtin state usb-ohci.c: control: 0x0000008f HCFS=operational IE PLE CBSR=3 usb-ohci.c: cmdstatus: 0x00010000 SOC=1 usb-ohci.c: intrstatus: 0x00000006 SF WDH usb-ohci.c: intrenable: 0x80000053 MIE RHSC UE WDH SO usb-ohci.c: ed_periodcurrent 00000000 usb-ohci.c: ed_controlhead 00000000 usb-ohci.c: donehead 00000000 ed_rm_list 00000000, 00000000; disabled 0 usb-ohci.c: hcca frame #3dba usb-ohci.c: roothub.a: 02000201 POTPGT=2 NPS NDP=1 usb-ohci.c: roothub.b: 00000000 PPCM=0000 DR=0000 usb-ohci.c: roothub.status: 00000000 usb-ohci.c: roothub.portstatus [0] = 0x00000100 PPS Unable to handle kernel paging request at virtual address 0271e1a0 pgd = c0204000 *pgd = 00000000, *pmd = 00000000 Internal error: Oops: 2 CPU: 0 pc : [] lr : [] sp : c0351e28 ip : c00f0000 fp : c0351e48 r10: f4000410 r9 : c0375900 r8 : 00000000 r7 : 20000013 r6 : c042a000 r5 : 0000e1a0 r4 : 0271e1a0 r3 : c0384620 r2 : c0372a1c r1 : 3ff1e1a0 r0 : 0271e1a0 Flags: nzCv IRQs off FIQs on Mode SVC_32 Segment kernel Control: C1E7D17F Table: C1E7D17F DAC: 0000001D Process swapper (pid: 0, stackpage=c0351000) >>EIP; c02c0dd8 <===== Stack: c0351e00: c02c0dd4 c02c0dd8 c0351e20: 20000093 ffffffff 00000002 c042a000 f4000400 c03751e0 00000006 c0351e74 c0351e40: c0351e4c c02c21a4 c02c0d9c c0435240 0000005d 04000000 c03751e0 c0374640 c0351e60: c0375900 c0351f68 c0351ea0 c0351e78 c0216cb0 c02c2104 0000002c 00000001 c0351e80: 00001000 0000002e c0351f68 c0375900 c0351f68 c0351ec4 c0351ea4 c021b95c c0351ea0: c0216bfc 00000004 c0351f68 00000000 0000002e c0374640 c0351ee4 c0351ec8 c0351ec0: c021bac4 c021b8e4 c03532a4 0000002e 20000000 c0374c00 c0351f10 c0351ee8 c0351ee0: c0216cb0 c021ba64 00000019 02000000 c0351f68 fa040014 c0363ba0 c0375900 c0351f00: fa040010 c0351f38 c0351f14 c021b730 c0216bfc c0353274 0000000b 20000000 c0351f20: c03747a0 c0374640 c0351f68 c0351f64 c0351f3c c0216cb0 c021b6a4 fa050000 c0351f40: c0351fb0 00000002 c02178e8 60000013 ffffffff c03745fc c0351fbc c0351f68 c0351f60: c0215b00 c0216bfc 00000000 00000000 60000013 600000d3 c02178c8 c0350000 c0351f80: c0350000 c0352c44 c02178c8 6901b115 c03745fc c0351fbc c0351fc0 c0351fb0 c0351fa0: c02178e8 c02178e8 60000013 ffffffff c0351fe4 c0351fc0 c02171e4 c02178d4 c0351fc0: 00002000 c038545c c03745e4 c0374630 c0352c8c c021381c c0351ffc c0351fe8 c0351fe0: c02088f8 c0217188 c0352d1c c038545c 00000000 c0352000 c0208080 c02087d8 Backtrace: Function entered at [] from [] r8 = 00000006 r7 = C03751E0 r6 = F4000400 r5 = C042A000 r4 = 00000002 Function entered at [] from [] Function entered at [] from [] Function entered at [] from [] r8 = C0374640 r7 = 0000002E r6 = 00000000 r5 = C0351F68 r4 = 00000004 Function entered at [] from [] r7 = C0374C00 r6 = 20000000 r5 = 0000002E r4 = C03532A4 Function entered at [] from [] Function entered at [] from [] Function entered at [] from [] Function entered at [] from [] Function entered at [] from [] Function entered at [] from [] r4 = C038545C ================================================== Trace; c02c0d90 Trace; c02c21a4 Trace; c02c20f8 Trace; c0216cb0 Trace; c0216bf0 Trace; c021b95c Trace; c021b8d8 Trace; c021bac4 Trace; c021ba58 Trace; c0216cb0 Trace; c0216bf0 Trace; c021b730 Trace; c021b698 Trace; c0216cb0 Trace; c0216bf0 Trace; c0215b00 <__irq_svc+20/a0> Trace; c02178c8 Trace; c02171e4 Trace; c021717c Trace; c02088f8 Trace; c02087cc Trace; c0208080 <__mmap_switched+0/34> ================================================== Aiee, killing interrupt handler Kernel panic: Attempted to kill the idle task! In interrupt handler - not syncing ~. Disconnected. c02c0d90 : c02c0d90: e1a0c00d mov ip, sp c02c0d94: e92dd9f0 stmdb sp!, {r4, r5, r6, r7, r8, fp, ip, lr, pc} c02c0d98: e24cb004 sub fp, ip, #4 ; 0x4 c02c0d9c: e3a04000 mov r4, #0 ; 0x0 c02c0da0: e1a08004 mov r8, r4 c02c0da4: e1a06000 mov r6, r0 c02c0da8: e10f7000 mrs r7, CPSR c02c0dac: e3873080 orr r3, r7, #128 ; 0x80 c02c0db0: e121f003 msr CPSR_c, r3 c02c0db4: e5962000 ldr r2, [r6] c02c0db8: e5923084 ldr r3, [r2, #132] c02c0dbc: e5824084 str r4, [r2, #132] c02c0dc0: e3d3500f bics r5, r3, #15 ; 0xf c02c0dc4: 0a00003c beq c02c0ebc c02c0dc8: e1a00006 mov r0, r6 c02c0dcc: e1a01005 mov r1, r5 c02c0dd0: ebfff4ee bl c02be190 c02c0dd4: e1a04000 mov r4, r0 ================================================ c02c0dd8: e5943000 ldr r3, [r4] ================================================ c02c0ddc: e1b01e23 movs r1, r3, lsr #28 c02c0de0: 0a000030 beq c02c0ea8 c02c0de4: e59f00dc ldr r0, [pc, #dc] ; c02c0ec8 c02c0de8: e1a02004 mov r2, r4 c02c0dec: e594c01c ldr ip, [r4, #28] c02c0df0: e1a03005 mov r3, r5 c02c0df4: e59c5004 ldr r5, [ip, #4] c02c0df8: ebfd96ce bl c0226938 c02c0dfc: e59f00c8 ldr r0, [pc, #c8] ; c02c0ecc c02c0e00: e5942004 ldr r2, [r4, #4] c02c0e04: e594c01c ldr ip, [r4, #28] c02c0e08: e594300c ldr r3, [r4, #12] c02c0e0c: e59c1024 ldr r1, [ip, #36] c02c0e10: ebfd96c8 bl c0226938 c02c0e14: e594301c ldr r3, [r4, #28] c02c0e18: e59f00b0 ldr r0, [pc, #b0] ; c02c0ed0 c02c0e1c: e5932018 ldr r2, [r3, #24] c02c0e20: e1d411b0 ldrh r1, [r4, #16] c02c0e24: e1a02422 mov r2, r2, lsr #8 c02c0e28: e202207f and r2, r2, #127 ; 0x7f c02c0e2c: ebfd96c1 bl c0226938 c02c0e30: e594c014 ldr ip, [r4, #20] c02c0e34: e59c0008 ldr r0, [ip, #8] c02c0e38: e3100001 tst r0, #1 ; 0x1 c02c0e3c: 0a000019 beq c02c0ea8 c02c0e40: e3550000 cmp r5, #0 ; 0x0 c02c0e44: 0a000013 beq c02c0e98 c02c0e48: e5d43013 ldrb r3, [r4, #19] c02c0e4c: e1d520b4 ldrh r2, [r5, #4] c02c0e50: e2833001 add r3, r3, #1 ; 0x1 c02c0e54: e1530002 cmp r3, r2 c02c0e58: aa00000e bge c02c0e98 c02c0e5c: e0852102 add r2, r5, r2, lsl #2 c02c0e60: e5921014 ldr r1, [r2, #20] c02c0e64: e5913008 ldr r3, [r1, #8] c02c0e68: e2002002 and r2, r0, #2 ; 0x2 c02c0e6c: e3c3300f bic r3, r3, #15 ; 0xf c02c0e70: e1833002 orr r3, r3, r2 c02c0e74: e58c3008 str r3, [ip, #8] c02c0e78: e5d41013 ldrb r1, [r4, #19] c02c0e7c: e1d530b4 ldrh r3, [r5, #4] c02c0e80: e1d520b6 ldrh r2, [r5, #6] c02c0e84: e0613003 rsb r3, r1, r3 c02c0e88: e2433001 sub r3, r3, #1 ; 0x1 c02c0e8c: e0822003 add r2, r2, r3 c02c0e90: e1c520b6 strh r2, [r5, #6] c02c0e94: ea000003 b c02c0ea8 c02c0e98: e5942014 ldr r2, [r4, #20] c02c0e9c: e5923008 ldr r3, [r2, #8] c02c0ea0: e3c3300d bic r3, r3, #13 ; 0xd c02c0ea4: e5823008 str r3, [r2, #8] c02c0ea8: e5848018 str r8, [r4, #24] c02c0eac: e5943008 ldr r3, [r4, #8] c02c0eb0: e1a08004 mov r8, r4 c02c0eb4: e3d3500f bics r5, r3, #15 ; 0xf c02c0eb8: 1affffc2 bne c02c0dc8 c02c0ebc: e121f007 msr CPSR_c, r7 c02c0ec0: e1a00004 mov r0, r4 c02c0ec4: e91ba9f0 ldmdb fp, {r4, r5, r6, r7, r8, fp, sp, pc} c02c0ec8: c033b300 eorgts fp, r3, r0, lsl #6 c02c0ecc: c033b334 eorgts fp, r3, r4, lsr r3 c02c0ed0: c033b370 eorgts fp, r3, r0, ror r3 ============= c02be190 : c02be190: e1a0c00d mov ip, sp c02be194: e92dd800 stmdb sp!, {fp, ip, lr, pc} c02be198: e59f3018 ldr r3, [pc, #18] ; c02be1b8 c02be19c: e59f2018 ldr r2, [pc, #18] ; c02be1bc c02be1a0: e24cb004 sub fp, ip, #4 ; 0x4 c02be1a4: e593c000 ldr ip, [r3] c02be1a8: e5920000 ldr r0, [r2] c02be1ac: e06c1001 rsb r1, ip, r1 c02be1b0: e0800001 add r0, r0, r1 c02be1b4: e91ba800 ldmdb fp, {fp, sp, pc} c02be1b8: c0384620 eorgts r4, r8, r0, lsr #12 c02be1bc: c0372a1c eorgts r2, r7, ip, lsl sl From kramer@pa.dec.com Thu Dec 14 23:48:54 2000 Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (root@mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id XAA11518 for ; Thu, 14 Dec 2000 23:48:54 +0100 Received: from zmamail05.zma.compaq.com (zmamail05.zma.compaq.com [161.114.64.105]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id XAA24932 for ; Thu, 14 Dec 2000 23:48:52 +0100 (MET) Received: by zmamail05.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 565E29E7; Thu, 14 Dec 2000 17:47:05 -0500 (EST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by zmamail05.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 13D66BCA; Thu, 14 Dec 2000 17:47:03 -0500 (EST) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA22945; Thu, 14 Dec 2000 14:46:57 -0800 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id OAA21907; Thu, 14 Dec 2000 14:44:12 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id OAA26483; Thu, 14 Dec 2000 14:44:11 -0800 (PST) Received: from stowe.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA22545; Thu, 14 Dec 2000 14:44:11 -0800 Received: by stowe.pa.dec.com; (5.65v4.0/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id AA09523; Thu, 14 Dec 2000 14:44:11 -0800 Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2000 14:44:11 -0800 Message-Id: <200012142244.AA09523@stowe.pa.dec.com> From: Deborah Wallach To: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com, linux@handhelds.org Subject: ANNOUNCE: profiler for SA-1100 based machines Address: Compaq Computer Corporation; Western Research Laboratory; 250 University Avenue; Palo Alto, CA 94301; USA Phone: 650-617-3315 Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk We built an an interrupt-driven statistical profiler for the Itsy. I have ported it to the iPAQ (and as far as I know it should work on all SA1100 Linux machines). The advantage of this type of profiler is that it can profile unmodified applications, libraries, kernel modules, and even the kernel itself (but only where interrupts are not disabled). The information is automatically broken down into gross categories (X% of the time spend in one application, Y% in another, Z% is the kernel). For any profiled code that you have unstripped versions of, the information can be broken down into a function-by-function basis (the profiling can be done on stripped code, but an unstripped version is needed in the post-processing phase). The source code (daemon and scripts) and documentation for the profiler is available in the Open Handheld CVS Repository, under "tools" (as opposed to "kernel" or "apps"). Support for the profiler module started in linux-2.4.0-test10-rmk2-np3. One major caveat is that I am the only person to have tried using it on the iPAQ; bugs may exist, and I'm sure the instructions are less than perfect. Brave alpha testers please try it out, and let me know what you think. -Debby PS I've attached the instructions for using it (also available in tools/profiling/documentation/profiler.txt). =============================================================================== The Compaq Simple Instruction Profiler for Handhelds ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Overview Profiling is done in two steps: 1. Data is gathered about applications as they run on the client machine. This step is called profiling. 2. The acquired data is processed. This step is may be done on a host computer or on a client. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Installation You must have the profiler module (profiler.o) loaded on your client machine in order to profile. When the module is inserted, a major number will be dynamically allocated for it. Make sure that a: mknod /dev/prof c 0 has been done before trying to use it. You must also have the profiler daemon (profd). In order to get the greatest advantage out of profiling, you will also need a set of unstripped versions of every binary/library/kernel that you are running on the client machine that you are interested in getting detailed information about. For example, if you do not have such information, the profiler may tell you that 4% of the time was spent in libc.so.6. If you have an unstripped version of libc.so.6, it will be able to give a function by function breakdown of the time spent in libc.so.6. At the current time, there is no canonical directory of unstripped libraries. When there is, it can be added to the iscan perl script so that the script will automatically scan it. Notes: 1. Make sure the iprof, iscan, and imageid binaries are in your path before attempting to process profile data. The iprof and iscan scripts can be found in tools/profiling/utilities; imageid will be in tools/profiling/daemon (arm, alpha, or x86 versions can be compiled). 2. profd can be built, if needed, from the tools/profiling/daemon directory. Make sure you have built libutilities.a in tools/util first. You will have to set the LINUXHOME variable in the Makefiles to the location of your linux directory, if it is not where the makefile expects it. 3. Directories containing the basic set of libraries, applications, and the location of linux kernels that you'd like scanned should be added to iscan perl script (or they can be passed as arguments). For example, in my script I have: @libs = ( "/skiff/local/lib/gcc-lib/arm-linux/2.95.2/", "/wrl/proj/itsy/kerr/ipaq/lib", ); @apps = ( ); @linuxdirs = ( "/wrl/proj/itsy/kerr/linuxes/linux-2.4.0-test8-rmk5-np2-hh2/kernel" "/wrl/proj/itsy/kerr/linuxes/linux-2.4.0-test10-rmk2-np2/kernel" ); You can now process the profile data. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Profiling (i.e., Gathering Data) The Itsy profiler is an interrupt-driven statistical profiler. The profiling functionality is provided by the profd daemon. To start profiling, on the client create an empty "database" directory (i.e., db) for storing profiles, and then invoke profd. For example: % mkdir db % profd db & profd accepts a number of comman-line options. These are: * a "-f" option to specify the sampling frequency in samples per second (defaults to 256); * a "-r" option to specify whether or not to randomize the sampling period (on by default), * a "-p" option to separate out data by process id (pid); and * a "-v" option that will result in verbose logging. To stop profiling, kill the profd process. Profd will catch the signal, save its in-memory sample data to files in "db", and terminate. Here is an example directory listing after running profd on an Itsy for a couple of minutes: /bin/ls -l db total 30 -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 134 Jun 4 12:05 bash-0e3383fb.prof -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 130 Jun 4 12:05 gmanager-d98893c8.prof -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 191 Jun 4 12:05 kaffe-dce80653.prof -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 2079 Jun 4 12:05 kernel-00000000.prof -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 13022 Jun 4 12:05 kernel.syms -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 305 Jun 4 12:05 ldso1-4631481a.prof -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 408 Jun 4 12:05 libawtso-73723a7c.prof -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 155 Jun 4 12:05 libcso4627-5f673247.prof -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 411 Jun 4 12:05 libcso6-0fa854e0.prof -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 211 Jun 4 12:05 libggiso-bb74823f.prof -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 717 Jun 4 12:05 libkaffevmso-e86f76dc.prof -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 234 Jun 4 12:05 libnativeso-50d434a5.prof -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 220 Jun 4 12:05 nomap-00000000.prof -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 122 Jun 4 12:05 open-b03fac0d.prof -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 138 Jun 4 12:05 tcsh-80dc1857.prof The filename format is name-imageid[-pid].prof, where name is the executable image whose unique identifier (i.e., signature) is imageid, and pid is the process id of the executable. Note that the imageid is generated by iscan, and pid is included only if the -p option is given to profd. Also, note that profd scans the entire system starting at "/" upon startup. Each .prof profile is simply a plain ASCII file (future versions could use compression via zlib). The profile starts with a short hearder containing key/value paris that indicate the image pathnames, profiler verison, etc. This hearder is followed by sample data, arranged in lines. Each line has the format "offset count", where "offset" is a hex file offset -- i.e. a byte offset into the executable image, suitable for lseek-ing, and "count" is the number of samples that landed on the instruction at that offset. Finally, note that the SA1100 drains its pipeline before handling an interrupt (we believe), so instructions may not be uniformly sampled. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Processing the Data Data processing is done on any machine that has access to the unstripped versions of the binaries/libraries that you are interested in getting access to. If necessary, copy the entire profile directory created by profd to this machine for processing. The most basic level of information available is a summary of where the cycles (i.e., samples) were spent on a per-image basis. Here is typical output: iprof *.prof -------------------------------------------------------------- cycles % cum% image 67448 58.37% 58.37% crafty 28278 24.47% 82.84% kernel 8477 7.34% 90.18% libkaffevm.so 4951 4.28% 94.47% libc.so.6 4008 3.47% 97.93% libawt.so 1321 1.14% 99.08% kaffe 876 0.76% 99.84% nomap 49 0.04% 99.88% profd 49 0.04% 99.92% libggi.so 32 0.03% 99.95% libnative.so 25 0.02% 99.97% ld.so.1 17 0.01% 99.98% pppd 10 0.01% 99.99% libui.so 2 0.00% 99.99% libm.so.6 1 0.00% 100.00% libc.so.4.6.27 1 0.00% 100.00% open 1 0.00% 100.00% liboss.so 1 0.00% 100.00% bash 1 0.00% 100.00% gmanager 1 0.00% 100.00% libio.so 115549 Total -------------------------------------------------------------- All you need to generate this is a set of profile data. profd (see above) will generate these files for you. Note that: 1. "kernel" includes time spent in loaded modules 2. "nomap" includes all instructions not associated with image files (e.g. jit'ed java code) Also available is a per-function breakdown (for all images for which unstripped versions are available). Because we keep mostly stripped images on the Itsy, the profiler generates a signature of the image at run time, and compares this signature to the versions available when iprof digests the data. A per-user map from signatures to file locations needs to be generated before running the profiler in the per-function mode: iscan > MAPFILE Note that iscan searches a set of default directories for unstripped binaries. You can specify other directories on the command line, separating each with a space. Also note that you will have to regenerate this map file every time the images that you are profiling change. A simple function breakdown example is: iprof -f -mapfile map crafty-c642cf09.prof -------------------------------------------------------------- /wrl/proj/itsy/profile/apps/crafty cycles % cum% addr function 13830 20.50% 20.50% 0x02004934 Evaluate 5497 8.15% 28.65% 0x02016224 Attacked 5024 7.45% 36.10% 0x0201173c MakeMove 4576 6.78% 42.89% 0x0201a7d4 ClearHashTables 4297 6.37% 49.26% 0x0200bdd4 GenerateCaptures 4202 6.23% 55.49% 0x02001f64 Search 3765 5.58% 61.07% 0x02038248 Iterate ... 1 0.00% 100.00% 0x0202053c EPDTokenize 67448 Total -------------------------------------------------------------- If you want a function breakdown of kernel code, you will need to specify the kernel map file to iprof with the "-kernelmapfile KERNELMAPFILE" flag, where KERNELMAPFILE is automatically generated by profd, is called kernel.syms, and will be stored in the same directory as the *.prof files. iprof has been designed to work with jit'ed code as well. If an appropriate map file is generated, a function-by-function breakdown can be done. An early version of kaffe was capable of dumpting such a file, but at this time it probably does not work. If anyone is interested in profiling jit'ed code, they will have to do some hacking. Please note that the version of the files that you are running on your client machine may not match anything the profiler can find. Finally, the command line iprof -f -mapfile map -kernelmapfile kernel.syms *.prof will generate the most complete listing possible, showing the number of cycles attributable to each function profiled sorted in order of the most frequently profiled to the least frequently profiled, where kernel.syms is the kernel map file. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ This profiler was originally written for the Itsy Pocket Computer, a joint project between Compaq's Western Research Laboratory and Systems Research Center, by Carl Waldspurger and Deborah A. Wallach. Use consistent with the GNU GPL is permitted, provided that this copyright notice is preserved in its entirety in all copies and derived works. COMPAQ COMPUTER CORPORATION MAKES NO WARRANTIES, EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED, AS TO THE USEFULNESS OR CORRECTNESS OF THIS CODE OR ITS FITNESS FOR ANY PARTICULAR PURPOSE. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ From kramer@pa.dec.com Fri Dec 15 23:27:19 2000 Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (root@mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id XAA14359 for ; Fri, 15 Dec 2000 23:27:19 +0100 Received: from ztxmail04.ztx.compaq.com (ztxmail04.ztx.compaq.com [161.114.1.208]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id XAA00454 for ; Fri, 15 Dec 2000 23:27:17 +0100 (MET) Received: by ztxmail04.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 4F8C2DA8; Fri, 15 Dec 2000 16:25:30 -0600 (CST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by ztxmail04.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 96A40EDF; Fri, 15 Dec 2000 16:25:27 -0600 (CST) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA24376; Fri, 15 Dec 2000 14:25:24 -0800 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id OAA09432; Fri, 15 Dec 2000 14:18:21 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id OAA09452; Fri, 15 Dec 2000 14:18:21 -0800 (PST) Received: from ztxmail02.nz-cce.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA27309; Fri, 15 Dec 2000 14:18:20 -0800 Received: by ztxmail02.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 2B3CC1F7E; Fri, 15 Dec 2000 16:18:20 -0600 (CST) Received: from xanadu.gn.com (modemcable248.137-200-24.mtl.mc.videotron.ca [24.200.137.248]) by ztxmail02.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF4E53CA5 for ; Fri, 15 Dec 2000 16:18:18 -0600 (CST) Received: from localhost (nico@localhost) by xanadu.gn.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id RAA03477; Fri, 15 Dec 2000 17:18:17 -0500 X-Authentication-Warning: xanadu.gn.com: nico owned process doing -bs Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2000 17:18:17 -0500 (EST) From: Nicolas Pitre X-Sender: To: SA-1100/Linux Cc: Subject: diff-2.4.0-test11-rmk1-np3.gz Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk ... is now available at the usual places. It was ment to be a patch against 2.4.0-test12-pre7-rmk1 however I wasn't able to make it even approaching a state where it is stable enough to be useful (even borrowing pieces from the real test12 didn't help)... So here it is, against 2.4.0-test11-rmk1. ChangeLog: - iPAQ power management fixes to the audio driver (Deborah Wallach) - SA1100 PCMCIA timed event polling is back (me) - Cerf updates (Daniel Chemko) - initial PLEB support (Daniel Potts) - multi-node bootmem allocation fix (Russell King) - do_vmalloc_fault() usage fix (Russell King) - and flash-mem.c removed as promised (me) One issue, read mistery, that I didn't resolve yet is the problem with the sa1100-uda1341 module which doesn't produce any sound when re-loaded. Not only it doesn't play any longer until a reboot, but sometimes it trash my Assabet's flash which won't reboot until a bootloader is reflashed... And that without any MTD support... Go figure... Enjoy! Nicolas From kramer@pa.dec.com Sun Dec 17 07:53:03 2000 Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (root@mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id HAA17392 for ; Sun, 17 Dec 2000 07:53:02 +0100 Received: from zmamail05.zma.compaq.com (zmamail05.zma.compaq.com [161.114.64.105]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id HAA23337 for ; Sun, 17 Dec 2000 07:53:01 +0100 (MET) Received: by zmamail05.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 7EE78A30; Sun, 17 Dec 2000 01:51:10 -0500 (EST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by zmamail05.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 0F276818; Sun, 17 Dec 2000 01:51:08 -0500 (EST) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA28877; Sat, 16 Dec 2000 22:50:56 -0800 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id WAA02221; Sat, 16 Dec 2000 22:43:14 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id WAA02256; Sat, 16 Dec 2000 22:43:13 -0800 (PST) From: Received: from zmamail01.nz-tay.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA04258; Sat, 16 Dec 2000 22:43:13 -0800 Received: by zmamail01.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id A02E8C964; Sun, 17 Dec 2000 01:43:12 -0500 (EST) Received: from c000.zsm.cp.net (c000-h008.c000.zsm.cp.net [209.228.56.67]) by zmamail01.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 1FCE4C941 for ; Sun, 17 Dec 2000 01:43:12 -0500 (EST) Received: (cpmta 27250 invoked from network); 16 Dec 2000 22:43:12 -0800 Date: 16 Dec 2000 22:43:12 -0800 Message-Id: <20001217064312.27249.cpmta@c000.zsm.cp.net> X-Sent: 17 Dec 2000 06:43:12 GMT Received: from [203.115.31.220] by mail.www.com with HTTP; 16 Dec 2000 22:43:11 PST Content-Type: text/plain; charset=unicode-1-1-utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Mime-Version: 1.0 To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.arm.linux.org.uk Cc: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com X-Mailer: Web Mail 3.0 Subject: Kernel Hangup Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk Hi, Thanks Eric for the patch. Now we get kernel messages out! But the kernel hangs after following point. Linux version 2.4.0-test5-rmk1-np1 (root@podda.tux) (gcc version 2.95.2 19991024 (release)) #12 Sat Dec 16 11:28:47 GMT+6 2000 Processor: Intel StrongARM-1100 revision 9 Architecture: Intel Brutus (SA1100 eval board) On node 0 totalpages: 1024 zone(0): 1024 pages. zone(1): 0 pages. zone(2): 0 pages. On node 1 totalpages: 1024 zone(0): 1024 pages. zone(1): 0 pages. zone(2): 0 pages. On node 2 totalpages: 1024 The same kernel works fine on Brutus board. In this area if the kernel hangs is it suppose to give a kernel dump? In this memory initialization routines is it try to detect the system memory configuration or is it hard coded at least up to some extent? TIA, Dhammika. ______________________________________________________ Listen to your favorite music while you work! - http://www.com/ From kramer@pa.dec.com Sun Dec 17 17:40:20 2000 Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (root@mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id RAA18231 for ; Sun, 17 Dec 2000 17:40:20 +0100 Received: from ztxmail03.ztx.compaq.com (ztxmail03.ztx.compaq.com [161.114.1.207]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id RAA08838 for ; Sun, 17 Dec 2000 17:40:18 +0100 (MET) Received: by ztxmail03.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id B77CF1A02; Sun, 17 Dec 2000 10:38:31 -0600 (CST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by ztxmail03.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 380C21B07; Sun, 17 Dec 2000 10:38:29 -0600 (CST) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA29405; Sun, 17 Dec 2000 08:38:23 -0800 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id IAA17255; Sun, 17 Dec 2000 08:35:15 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id IAA17301; Sun, 17 Dec 2000 08:35:14 -0800 (PST) Received: from ztxmail01.nz-cce.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA31481; Sun, 17 Dec 2000 08:35:13 -0800 Received: by ztxmail01.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 46F8A43EE; Sun, 17 Dec 2000 10:35:13 -0600 (CST) Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by ztxmail01.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 39AC144B7 for ; Sun, 17 Dec 2000 10:35:12 -0600 (CST) Received: from arthur.ubicom.tudelft.nl (erik.et.tudelft.nl [130.161.48.56]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id RAA08711; Sun, 17 Dec 2000 17:35:08 +0100 (MET) Received: (from erik@localhost) by arthur.ubicom.tudelft.nl (8.11.0/8.11.0/SuSE Linux 8.11.0-0.4) id eBHGT0309879; Sun, 17 Dec 2000 17:29:00 +0100 Date: Sun, 17 Dec 2000 17:29:00 +0100 From: Erik Mouw To: rjayanetti@www.com Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.arm.linux.org.uk, sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Subject: Re: Kernel Hangup Message-Id: <20001217172900.M4841@arthur.ubicom.tudelft.nl> References: <20001217064312.27249.cpmta@c000.zsm.cp.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <20001217064312.27249.cpmta@c000.zsm.cp.net>; from rjayanetti@www.com on Sat, Dec 16, 2000 at 10:43:12PM -0800 Organization: Eric Conspiracy Secret Labs X-Eric-Conspiracy: There is no conspiracy! Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk On Sat, Dec 16, 2000 at 10:43:12PM -0800, rjayanetti@www.com wrote: > Thanks Eric for the patch. Now we get kernel messages out! Russell, can we get this one line patch in printk.c somewhere in a FAQ on the ARM Linux pages? It's especially useful for debugging memory setup problems. > But the kernel hangs after following point. > > > Linux version 2.4.0-test5-rmk1-np1 (root@podda.tux) (gcc version 2.95.2 19991024 > (release)) #12 Sat Dec 16 11:28:47 GMT+6 2000 > Processor: Intel StrongARM-1100 revision 9 > Architecture: Intel Brutus (SA1100 eval board) > On node 0 totalpages: 1024 > zone(0): 1024 pages. > zone(1): 0 pages. > zone(2): 0 pages. > On node 1 totalpages: 1024 > zone(0): 1024 pages. > zone(1): 0 pages. > zone(2): 0 pages. > On node 2 totalpages: 1024 > > > The same kernel works fine on Brutus board. In this area if the > kernel hangs is it suppose to give a kernel dump? No, you won't get a memory dump, because the system isn't completely initialised at this point. You only get an Oops when the kernel is able to detect a bad memory access, but at this point it is just trying to figure out how much memory you have. > In this memory initialization routines is it try to detect the system > memory configuration or is it hard coded at least up to some extent? It is hard coded in arch/arm/mach-sa1100/arch.c. In the function fixup_sa1100() you'll find the initialisation for each SA1100 platform. The Brutus has 4MB in each bank. If your system has memory at other locations, you should change the memory layout around line 375. BTW: I'm talking about linux-2.4.0-test11-rmk1-np3. There were quite some changes in the memory setup code after 2.4.0-test5-rmk1-np1. As a matter of fact, the file arch/arm/mach-sa1100/arch.c doesn't even exist in test5-rmk1-np1; it was introduced at the great architecture cleanup in 2.4.0-test6-rmk6. It might be easier to for us to help if you upgrade to test11-rmk1-np3. Erik -- J.A.K. (Erik) Mouw, Information and Communication Theory Group, Department of Electrical Engineering, Faculty of Information Technology and Systems, Delft University of Technology, PO BOX 5031, 2600 GA Delft, The Netherlands Phone: +31-15-2783635 Fax: +31-15-2781843 Email: J.A.K.Mouw@its.tudelft.nl WWW: http://www-ict.its.tudelft.nl/~erik/ From kramer@pa.dec.com Mon Dec 18 17:04:29 2000 Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (root@mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id RAA21372 for ; Mon, 18 Dec 2000 17:04:29 +0100 Received: from ztxmail04.ztx.compaq.com (ztxmail04.ztx.compaq.com [161.114.1.208]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id RAA08129 for ; Mon, 18 Dec 2000 17:04:26 +0100 (MET) Received: by ztxmail04.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 930DCC15; Mon, 18 Dec 2000 10:02:59 -0600 (CST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by ztxmail04.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id F0FF9C8C; Mon, 18 Dec 2000 10:02:56 -0600 (CST) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA30767; Mon, 18 Dec 2000 08:02:53 -0800 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id HAA24401; Mon, 18 Dec 2000 07:57:49 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id HAA31224; Mon, 18 Dec 2000 07:57:18 -0800 (PST) Received: from zmamail01.nz-tay.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA24865; Mon, 18 Dec 2000 07:57:14 -0800 Received: by zmamail01.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 1FD13C993; Mon, 18 Dec 2000 10:57:14 -0500 (EST) Received: from pigeon.maya.com (po.maya.com [192.70.254.2]) by zmamail01.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C0545CB43 for ; Mon, 18 Dec 2000 10:57:13 -0500 (EST) Received: from SNIPE.maya.com (snipe.maya.com [192.70.254.125]) by pigeon.maya.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 53B423080D; Mon, 18 Dec 2000 10:35:27 -0500 (EST) To: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.arm.linux.org.uk Subject: Re: Kernel Hangup References: <20001217064312.27249.cpmta@c000.zsm.cp.net> <20001217172900.M4841@arthur.ubicom.tudelft.nl> Organization: MAYA Design Group From: Jeff Senn X-Face: ._HOR,#9~<*ir.> Message-Id: <66khwwmh.fsf@SNIPE.maya.com> Lines: 20 User-Agent: Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) XEmacs/21.2 (Peisino,Ak(B) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk Erik Mouw writes: > > In this memory initialization routines is it try to detect the system > > memory configuration or is it hard coded at least up to some extent? > > It is hard coded in arch/arm/mach-sa1100/arch.c. In the function > fixup_sa1100() you'll find the initialisation for each SA1100 platform. > The Brutus has 4MB in each bank. If your system has memory at other > locations, you should change the memory layout around line 375. Hm. I've been meaning to ask: why doesn't the kernel probe for memory? I realize this is hard (or time consuming) in general, but for most of the platforms a quick check could differentiate common configurations. Is there some fundamental reason, or is it just not a priority? -- -Jas -------------------- www.maya.com Jeff Senn | / / |-/ \ / /| Chief Technologist | /|/| |/ o | /-| Head of R&D | Taming Complexity From kramer@pa.dec.com Mon Dec 18 17:10:49 2000 Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (root@mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id RAA21405 for ; Mon, 18 Dec 2000 17:10:49 +0100 Received: from zmamail04.zma.compaq.com (zmamail04.zma.compaq.com [161.114.64.104]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id RAA08469 for ; Mon, 18 Dec 2000 17:10:46 +0100 (MET) Received: by zmamail04.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id DAA8A977; Mon, 18 Dec 2000 11:08:59 -0500 (EST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by zmamail04.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 837DB1D5; Mon, 18 Dec 2000 11:08:53 -0500 (EST) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA01486; Mon, 18 Dec 2000 08:08:52 -0800 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id IAA21618; Mon, 18 Dec 2000 08:08:20 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id IAA21471; Mon, 18 Dec 2000 08:08:20 -0800 (PST) Received: from ztxmail01.nz-cce.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA04822; Mon, 18 Dec 2000 08:08:19 -0800 Received: by ztxmail01.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 1958E444A; Mon, 18 Dec 2000 10:08:19 -0600 (CST) Received: from xanadu.gn.com (modemcable248.137-200-24.mtl.mc.videotron.ca [24.200.137.248]) by ztxmail01.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 43DD645D9 for ; Mon, 18 Dec 2000 10:08:18 -0600 (CST) Received: from localhost (nico@localhost) by xanadu.gn.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id LAA04847; Mon, 18 Dec 2000 11:08:11 -0500 X-Authentication-Warning: xanadu.gn.com: nico owned process doing -bs Date: Mon, 18 Dec 2000 11:08:11 -0500 (EST) From: Nicolas Pitre X-Sender: To: Jeff Senn Cc: , Subject: Re: Kernel Hangup In-Reply-To: <66khwwmh.fsf@SNIPE.maya.com> Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk On 18 Dec 2000, Jeff Senn wrote: > > Erik Mouw writes: > > > In this memory initialization routines is it try to detect the system > > > memory configuration or is it hard coded at least up to some extent? > > > > It is hard coded in arch/arm/mach-sa1100/arch.c. In the function > > fixup_sa1100() you'll find the initialisation for each SA1100 platform. > > The Brutus has 4MB in each bank. If your system has memory at other > > locations, you should change the memory layout around line 375. > > Hm. I've been meaning to ask: why doesn't the kernel probe for memory? > I realize this is hard (or time consuming) in general, but for most of > the platforms a quick check could differentiate common configurations. > Is there some fundamental reason, or is it just not a priority? Last time I checked, the CPU simply crash if trying to access non-existent memory. The cleanest way to do it at the moment is to pass a parameter structure to the kernel with all memory information. This structure has to be filled by the bootloader though. Nicolas From kramer@pa.dec.com Mon Dec 18 17:20:46 2000 Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (root@mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id RAA21464 for ; Mon, 18 Dec 2000 17:20:46 +0100 Received: from zmamail04.zma.compaq.com (zmamail04.zma.compaq.com [161.114.64.104]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id RAA09074 for ; Mon, 18 Dec 2000 17:20:44 +0100 (MET) Received: by zmamail04.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id B47064BF; Mon, 18 Dec 2000 11:18:57 -0500 (EST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by zmamail04.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 8F9CA538; Mon, 18 Dec 2000 11:18:52 -0500 (EST) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA10694; Mon, 18 Dec 2000 08:18:51 -0800 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id IAA17753; Mon, 18 Dec 2000 08:18:10 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id IAA27519; Mon, 18 Dec 2000 08:18:09 -0800 (PST) Received: from zmamail01.nz-tay.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA22148; Mon, 18 Dec 2000 08:18:09 -0800 Received: by zmamail01.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id C3AE7AA4E; Mon, 18 Dec 2000 11:18:04 -0500 (EST) Received: from relay.lep-philips.fr (relay.lep-philips.fr [212.208.209.250]) by zmamail01.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3664AC1F3 for ; Mon, 18 Dec 2000 11:18:04 -0500 (EST) Received: from relais.lep.research.philips.com (relais.lep.research.philips.com [130.142.21.30]) by relay.lep-philips.fr (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id RAA15371; Mon, 18 Dec 2000 17:17:59 +0100 (MET) Received: from lep-philips.fr (relais [130.142.21.30]) by relais.lep.research.philips.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id RAA10289; Mon, 18 Dec 2000 17:17:58 +0100 (MET) Message-Id: <3A3E3A4F.7722B10@lep-philips.fr> Date: Mon, 18 Dec 2000 17:24:47 +0100 From: Guillaume Jaunet X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.72 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.2.14-5.0 i686) X-Accept-Language: fr, en, de Mime-Version: 1.0 To: Nicolas Pitre Cc: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.arm.linux.org.uk Subject: Re: Kernel Hangup References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk Nicolas Pitre wrote: > > On 18 Dec 2000, Jeff Senn wrote: > > > > > Erik Mouw writes: > > > > In this memory initialization routines is it try to detect the system > > > > memory configuration or is it hard coded at least up to some extent? > > > > > > It is hard coded in arch/arm/mach-sa1100/arch.c. In the function > > > fixup_sa1100() you'll find the initialisation for each SA1100 platform. > > > The Brutus has 4MB in each bank. If your system has memory at other > > > locations, you should change the memory layout around line 375. > > > > Hm. I've been meaning to ask: why doesn't the kernel probe for memory? > > I realize this is hard (or time consuming) in general, but for most of > > the platforms a quick check could differentiate common configurations. > > Is there some fundamental reason, or is it just not a priority? > > Last time I checked, the CPU simply crash if trying to access non-existent > memory. > No way to play with MMU default_page exception? A special routine could be used there to avoid "crashing", but resuming execution sending a message to the memory detection routine. Maybe I'm just a fool after all... Guillaume From kramer@pa.dec.com Mon Dec 18 17:32:56 2000 Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (root@mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id RAA21525 for ; Mon, 18 Dec 2000 17:32:55 +0100 Received: from zmamail05.zma.compaq.com (zmamail05.zma.compaq.com [161.114.64.105]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id RAA09942 for ; Mon, 18 Dec 2000 17:32:23 +0100 (MET) Received: by zmamail05.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 69E9F4871; Mon, 18 Dec 2000 11:30:14 -0500 (EST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by zmamail05.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 621214A53; Mon, 18 Dec 2000 11:30:07 -0500 (EST) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA31118; Mon, 18 Dec 2000 08:30:06 -0800 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id IAA28212; Mon, 18 Dec 2000 08:29:29 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id IAA18805; Mon, 18 Dec 2000 08:29:28 -0800 (PST) Received: from zmamail01.nz-tay.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA30264; Mon, 18 Dec 2000 08:29:28 -0800 Received: by zmamail01.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 10DA3CABE; Mon, 18 Dec 2000 11:29:28 -0500 (EST) Received: from pigeon.maya.com (po.maya.com [192.70.254.2]) by zmamail01.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C83FBC94B for ; Mon, 18 Dec 2000 11:29:27 -0500 (EST) Received: from SNIPE.maya.com (snipe.maya.com [192.70.254.125]) by pigeon.maya.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 9DB833080D; Mon, 18 Dec 2000 11:07:41 -0500 (EST) To: Nicolas Pitre Cc: , Subject: Re: Kernel Hangup References: Organization: MAYA Design Group From: Jeff Senn X-Face: ._HOR,#9~<*ir.> Message-Id: <1yv5wv4r.fsf@SNIPE.maya.com> Lines: 24 User-Agent: Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) XEmacs/21.2 (Peisino,Ak(B) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk Nicolas Pitre writes: > > Hm. I've been meaning to ask: why doesn't the kernel probe for memory? > > I realize this is hard (or time consuming) in general, but for most of > > the platforms a quick check could differentiate common configurations. > > Is there some fundamental reason, or is it just not a priority? > > Last time I checked, the CPU simply crash if trying to access non-existent > memory. > > The cleanest way to do it at the moment is to pass a parameter structure to > the kernel with all memory information. This structure has to be filled by > the bootloader though. Hm. It doesn't on my cerf -- well, that is to say: if you do it early enough when exceptions are not yet enabled it doesn't. Also I guess my configuration has the advantage that I know the chip(s) is/are there -- just not how many banks and where they are... (in which case you just have to figure out with address lines are significant -- That is to say: if the chip is there, there isn't any "non-existent" memory -- it just exists at a different-possibly-overlapping place.) -- -Jas From kramer@pa.dec.com Mon Dec 18 19:32:52 2000 Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (root@mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id TAA21650 for ; Mon, 18 Dec 2000 19:32:23 +0100 Received: from zmamail03.zma.compaq.com (zmamail03.zma.compaq.com [161.114.64.103]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id TAA14331 for ; Mon, 18 Dec 2000 19:32:21 +0100 (MET) Received: by zmamail03.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id DC0EAEEC; Mon, 18 Dec 2000 12:06:17 -0500 (EST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by zmamail03.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 8A13225A0; Mon, 18 Dec 2000 12:06:15 -0500 (EST) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA10685; Mon, 18 Dec 2000 09:06:14 -0800 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id JAA29026; Mon, 18 Dec 2000 09:04:57 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id JAA29072; Mon, 18 Dec 2000 09:04:57 -0800 (PST) Received: from crl-mail.crl.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA05421; Mon, 18 Dec 2000 09:04:54 -0800 Received: from ims.crl.dec.com (ims.crl.dec.com [16.11.0.11]) by crl-mail.dec.com (8.11.1/8.11.1) with ESMTP id eBIH3vk142656; Mon, 18 Dec 2000 12:03:57 -0500 (EST) Received: by ims.crl.dec.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21) id ; Mon, 18 Dec 2000 12:12:19 -0500 Message-Id: From: Jamey Hicks To: Jeff Senn Cc: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.arm.linux.org.uk Subject: RE: Kernel Hangup Date: Mon, 18 Dec 2000 12:05:04 -0500 Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21) Content-Type: text/plain Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk It's really a firmware function to probe for memory. It's something that has to be done on some platforms (including the SA1110) while running from ROM/Flash. Our firmware (bootldr) probes for up to 64MB of memory in the iPAQ handheld. -Jamey -----Original Message----- From: Nicolas Pitre [mailto:nico@cam.org] Sent: Monday, December 18, 2000 11:08 AM To: Jeff Senn Cc: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com; linux-arm-kernel@lists.arm.linux.org.uk Subject: Re: Kernel Hangup On 18 Dec 2000, Jeff Senn wrote: > > Erik Mouw writes: > > > In this memory initialization routines is it try to detect the system > > > memory configuration or is it hard coded at least up to some extent? > > > > It is hard coded in arch/arm/mach-sa1100/arch.c. In the function > > fixup_sa1100() you'll find the initialisation for each SA1100 platform. > > The Brutus has 4MB in each bank. If your system has memory at other > > locations, you should change the memory layout around line 375. > > Hm. I've been meaning to ask: why doesn't the kernel probe for memory? > I realize this is hard (or time consuming) in general, but for most of > the platforms a quick check could differentiate common configurations. > Is there some fundamental reason, or is it just not a priority? Last time I checked, the CPU simply crash if trying to access non-existent memory. The cleanest way to do it at the moment is to pass a parameter structure to the kernel with all memory information. This structure has to be filled by the bootloader though. Nicolas _______________________________________________ http://lists.arm.linux.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel From kramer@pa.dec.com Tue Dec 19 03:13:51 2000 Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (root@mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id DAA22737 for ; Tue, 19 Dec 2000 03:13:51 +0100 Received: from ztxmail03.ztx.compaq.com (ztxmail03.ztx.compaq.com [161.114.1.207]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id DAA06610 for ; Tue, 19 Dec 2000 03:13:49 +0100 (MET) Received: by ztxmail03.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 522C61940; Mon, 18 Dec 2000 20:12:02 -0600 (CST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by ztxmail03.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id B0C8318B1; Mon, 18 Dec 2000 20:11:59 -0600 (CST) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA10684; Mon, 18 Dec 2000 18:11:57 -0800 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id SAA15744; Mon, 18 Dec 2000 18:09:34 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id SAA15863; Mon, 18 Dec 2000 18:09:33 -0800 (PST) Received: from ztxmail01.nz-cce.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA32642; Mon, 18 Dec 2000 18:09:33 -0800 Received: by ztxmail01.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 0F49D44A5; Mon, 18 Dec 2000 20:09:33 -0600 (CST) Received: from fire.he.net (fire.he.net [216.218.144.2]) by ztxmail01.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6EFB1458E for ; Mon, 18 Dec 2000 20:09:32 -0600 (CST) Received: from cementship.extenex.net (64-51-136-194.client.dsl.net [64.51.136.194]) by fire.he.net (8.8.6/8.8.2) with ESMTP id SAA05203; Mon, 18 Dec 2000 18:09:27 -0800 Received: from blowhole.extenex.net (blowhole.extenex.net [192.168.100.100]) by cementship.extenex.net (8.9.3/8.8.7) with ESMTP id SAA08879; Mon, 18 Dec 2000 18:08:58 -0800 Received: from wardw by blowhole.extenex.net with local (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 148CD2-0002nG-00; Mon, 18 Dec 2000 18:08:56 -0800 Date: Mon, 18 Dec 2000 18:08:56 -0800 From: Ward Willats To: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Subject: USB Function driver, FIFO not empty Message-Id: <20001218180856.A9544@extenex.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii User-Agent: Mutt/1.0.1i Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk Last month I wrote a character interface to the SA-1100 USB function driver so it can be used as a byte pipe as well as a network link. I've gone back to working on it this week, and have gotten an interesting oops I'm curious if anyone can comment on. usb_recv.c DMAs 64 byte packets into its input buffer. Before it turns on DMA it makes sure 64 bytes are available in the ring buffer. But I'm seeing a crazy situation where I have received a full 64 bytes, via DMA, but the "receive fifo not empty" bit (UDCCS1_RNE) is still set and delivers an additional 7-8 bytes of data. If this happens at the end of the ring buffer, the ISR writes off the end and oops! Here is some of my debug output ep1 rx isr(): ENTER max pkt size (UDCOMP+1)=64 ep1 rx isr(): ABOUT TO OOPS! dmabuf=c9045000 fifo byte#=1 dma_address=C8428000 receive_page_start=c9044fc0 count received=64 Emtying FIFO: FF F2 AE F7 D1 8D 44 Had 7 bytes available Unable to handle kernel paging request at virtual address c9045000 pgd = c841c000 *pgd = c86e7821, *pmd = c86e7821, *pte = 00000000, *ppte = 00000000 Internal error: Oops: 0 The max OUT packet register seems to have the correct value in it. Before I code a hack around this I thought I'd see what the group thinks. This whole business of using the processor to clean up after the DMA xfer seems pretty strange to me. (And clean up it does, regularly fetching from 1 to 10 bytes of data from the FIFO) What chip design problem is this approach solving? And why are there more bytes in the FIFO when the max packet size has already been delivered? The other goofy thing about this driver is all the loops to be sure values are set OK per the note on pp 11-63 of the SA-1110 Developer's Manual. Seems to me, if you want to check a value has "taken" you don't keep slamming it over and over in a tight loop. I'm trying a different recipe with an occasional write and a decaying udelay(), but both approaches seem like hack city to me. -- Ward From kramer@pa.dec.com Tue Dec 19 10:51:01 2000 Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (root@mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id KAA23288 for ; Tue, 19 Dec 2000 10:51:01 +0100 Received: from ztxmail05.ztx.compaq.com (ztxmail05.ztx.compaq.com [161.114.1.209]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id KAA23041 for ; Tue, 19 Dec 2000 10:50:59 +0100 (MET) Received: by ztxmail05.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 0165DA58; Tue, 19 Dec 2000 03:49:12 -0600 (CST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by ztxmail05.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 68BB198E; Tue, 19 Dec 2000 03:49:10 -0600 (CST) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA00398; Tue, 19 Dec 2000 01:49:04 -0800 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id BAA02298; Tue, 19 Dec 2000 01:46:15 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id BAA02384; Tue, 19 Dec 2000 01:46:14 -0800 (PST) Received: from oils.ozy.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA03354; Tue, 19 Dec 2000 01:46:08 -0800 Received: from ozy.dec.com by oils.ozy.dec.com (8.8.8/1.1.10.5/12Oct99-0148PM) id TAA0000011590; Tue, 19 Dec 2000 19:45:55 +1000 (EST) Message-Id: <3A3F20D4.47AF59E4@ozy.dec.com> Date: Tue, 19 Dec 2000 19:48:21 +1100 From: Charlie Flynn X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.7 [en] (WinNT; I) X-Accept-Language: en Mime-Version: 1.0 To: Ward Willats Cc: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Subject: Re: USB Function driver, FIFO not empty References: <20001218180856.A9544@extenex.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk Ward Willats wrote: > > usb_recv.c DMAs 64 byte packets into its input buffer. Before it turns > on DMA it makes sure 64 bytes are available in the ring buffer. But > I'm seeing a crazy situation where I have received a full 64 bytes, > via DMA, but the "receive fifo not empty" bit (UDCCS1_RNE) is still > set and delivers an additional 7-8 bytes of data. I haven't worked on USB development for a few months now but here is some information from the top of my head, When I investigated this the sum of the bytes transferred to the DMA's target buffer plus the residue left in the FIFO was always the requested packet size of 64 bytes. I never saw an oops. > > The max. OUT packet register seems to have the correct value in it. > > Before I code a hack around this I thought I'd see what the group > thinks. This whole business of using the processor to clean up after > the DMA xfer seems pretty strange to me. (And clean up it does, > regularly fetching from 1 to 10 bytes of data from the FIFO) What > chip design problem is this approach solving? And why are there more > bytes in the FIFO when the max packet size has already been delivered? There are two interrupts associated with the USB receive side. The first one interrupts when a 64 byte packet has been received. The RPC bit is set and the RIR (receive irq request) interrupt service routine is entered.The second irq happens when your DMA controller signals it has transferred its data to the nominated buffer. I noticed that the RIR ISR was entered _before the DMA controller had finished it's transfer of data to the user requested buffer. This meant that the DMA had transferred (say) 58 bytes to the buffer and there was still 6 bytes left in the FIFO which had to be extracted "by hand" from the FIFO. In all cases the sum of the transfer always equaled 64. I verified this by reading the DMA residue register to confirm how many bytes were left to transfer. I double checked this by executed a simple test ( called the half duplex test) all data transmitted was correctly received. In my version of the USB DMA implementation I disabled the DMA interrupt and relied on the RIR interrupt.When the RPC triggered this interrupt I cleaned up the residue from the FIFO. I am not saying this is correct but in the time I had it worked for me and I learned a lot in the process. > The other goofy thing about this driver is all the loops to be sure > values are set OK per the note on pp 11-63 of the SA-1110 Developer's > Manual. Seems to me, if you want to check a value has "taken" you > don't keep slamming it over and over in a tight loop. Yep the book says you got to keep on reading or writing until it finally registers the data. This means looping until done. > I'm trying a > different recipe with an occasional write and a decaying udelay(), > but both approaches seem like hack city to me. Be careful with delays in the ISR you may get FIFO overruns > > Last month I wrote a character interface to the SA-1100 USB function > driver so it can be used as a byte pipe as well as a network > link. Maybe you can consider using it as a USB test driver. Something which sends known data over the USB link and gets it checked by the receiver at the other end. I put a posting in last week on these lines. FYI You can find my code described in:- http://www.handhelds.org/projects/usbconfig_old.html and the half duplex test I executed at:- http://www.handhelds.org/projects/usbhdx.html Even with it's klunky DMA the above driver works and may give you some insight to the problem you described. > Good Luck Charlie > > > From kramer@pa.dec.com Tue Dec 19 15:03:15 2000 Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (root@mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id PAA23784 for ; Tue, 19 Dec 2000 15:03:14 +0100 Received: from ztxmail04.ztx.compaq.com (ztxmail04.ztx.compaq.com [161.114.1.208]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id PAA10806 for ; Tue, 19 Dec 2000 15:03:10 +0100 (MET) Received: by ztxmail04.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 2DF99E3A; Tue, 19 Dec 2000 08:01:22 -0600 (CST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by ztxmail04.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 914EEBFC; Tue, 19 Dec 2000 08:01:19 -0600 (CST) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA06137; Tue, 19 Dec 2000 06:01:17 -0800 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id FAA10101; Tue, 19 Dec 2000 05:59:15 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id FAA06815; Tue, 19 Dec 2000 05:59:15 -0800 (PST) Received: from ztxmail01.nz-cce.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA17097; Tue, 19 Dec 2000 05:59:14 -0800 Received: by ztxmail01.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id C45564624; Tue, 19 Dec 2000 07:59:13 -0600 (CST) Received: from mail.ixcelerator.com (wsa-245.sibintek.net [213.128.193.245]) by ztxmail01.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 459D5461E for ; Tue, 19 Dec 2000 07:58:55 -0600 (CST) Received: from valinor.ixcel.ru (IDENT:root@valinor.ixcel.ru [172.16.10.74]) by mail.ixcelerator.com (8.10.1/8.10.1) with ESMTP id eBJDv6w05176; Tue, 19 Dec 2000 16:57:06 +0300 Received: (from maple@localhost) by valinor.ixcel.ru (8.10.1/8.10.1) id eBJDufq24551; Tue, 19 Dec 2000 16:56:41 +0300 Date: Tue, 19 Dec 2000 16:56:41 +0300 From: "Vladimir V. Klenov" To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.arm.linux.org.uk Cc: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Subject: nfs module fails to insert Message-Id: <20001219165641.A24533@valinor.ixcel.ru> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0.1i Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk Hi! attemting to insert nfs.o on 2.4.0-test11-rmk1-np2 I found that it fails not finding alloc_pages symbol in /proc/ksyms. next small patch improved situation for me --- ksyms.c.orig Tue Dec 19 16:50:44 2000 +++ ksyms.c Tue Dec 19 16:28:57 2000 @@ -89,6 +89,7 @@ /* internal kernel memory management */ EXPORT_SYMBOL(__alloc_pages); +EXPORT_SYMBOL(alloc_pages); EXPORT_SYMBOL(alloc_pages_node); EXPORT_SYMBOL(__get_free_pages); EXPORT_SYMBOL(get_zeroed_page); SY, Vladimir From kramer@pa.dec.com Tue Dec 19 17:00:39 2000 Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (root@mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id RAA24071 for ; Tue, 19 Dec 2000 17:00:39 +0100 Received: from zmamail05.zma.compaq.com (zmamail05.zma.compaq.com [161.114.64.105]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id RAA20175 for ; Tue, 19 Dec 2000 17:00:37 +0100 (MET) Received: by zmamail05.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id B32DF14D4; Tue, 19 Dec 2000 10:58:15 -0500 (EST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by zmamail05.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 6F2821441; Tue, 19 Dec 2000 10:58:06 -0500 (EST) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA02942; Tue, 19 Dec 2000 07:58:05 -0800 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id HAA12251; Tue, 19 Dec 2000 07:56:26 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id HAA12233; Tue, 19 Dec 2000 07:56:25 -0800 (PST) Received: from ztxmail01.nz-cce.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA23708; Tue, 19 Dec 2000 07:56:24 -0800 Received: by ztxmail01.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 498854487; Tue, 19 Dec 2000 09:56:24 -0600 (CST) Received: from fire.he.net (fire.he.net [216.218.144.2]) by ztxmail01.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9132C472C; Tue, 19 Dec 2000 09:56:23 -0600 (CST) Received: from [192.168.23.2] (wardco.com [165.227.105.2]) by fire.he.net (8.8.6/8.8.2) with ESMTP id HAA26591; Tue, 19 Dec 2000 07:56:21 -0800 Mime-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: In-Reply-To: <3A3F20D4.47AF59E4@ozy.dec.com> References: <20001218180856.A9544@extenex.com> <3A3F20D4.47AF59E4@ozy.dec.com> Date: Tue, 19 Dec 2000 07:56:08 -0800 To: Charlie Flynn From: Ward Willats Subject: Re: USB Function driver, FIFO not empty Cc: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" ; format="flowed" Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk At 7:48 PM +1100 12/19/00, Charlie Flynn wrote: >I noticed that the RIR ISR was entered _before the DMA controller had finished >it's transfer of data to the user requested buffer. This meant that >the DMA had transferred (say) 58 bytes to the buffer and there was >still 6 bytes left in the FIFO which had to be extracted "by hand" >from the FIFO. In all cases the sum of the transfer always equaled >64. I verified this by reading the DMA residue register to confirm >how many bytes were left to transfer. >I double checked this by executed a simple test ( called the half >duplex test) all data transmitted was correctly received. Interesting. I will check the DMA usage when I get into work today. I believe sa1100_dma_get_address() -- or something like that -- is called to get the point DMA trailed off. Bytes transfered so far are calculated by doing pointer arithmetic on this value. Perhaps this is the wrong approach. >In my version of the USB DMA implementation I disabled the DMA interrupt and >relied on the RIR interrupt I think this is how this one works as well. (This port may have started life as your version...?) >Yep the book says you got to keep on reading or writing until it >finally registers the data. This means looping until done. Agreed, but it doesn't mean re-writing the value all the time on a register you want to go quiescent. >Be careful with delays in the ISR you may get FIFO overruns > Good point. When I do this in the ISR, all the DMA is off and RPC has not been cleared yet so I figured the UDC was NAKing the host. But... >Maybe you can consider using it as a USB test driver. It sort of winds up being that by default, since a big continuous data stream hits the driver harder than the packet-oriented netlink. Thanks for your help. I'll take a look at the URLs you suggest. -- Ward From kramer@pa.dec.com Tue Dec 19 17:26:05 2000 Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (root@mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id RAA24117 for ; Tue, 19 Dec 2000 17:26:05 +0100 Received: from ztxmail05.ztx.compaq.com (ztxmail05.ztx.compaq.com [161.114.1.209]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id RAA22115 for ; Tue, 19 Dec 2000 17:26:01 +0100 (MET) Received: by ztxmail05.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 24C98A93; Tue, 19 Dec 2000 10:24:12 -0600 (CST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by ztxmail05.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 65AC1912; Tue, 19 Dec 2000 10:24:09 -0600 (CST) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA02775; Tue, 19 Dec 2000 08:24:07 -0800 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id IAA32224; Tue, 19 Dec 2000 08:21:29 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id IAA01062; Tue, 19 Dec 2000 08:21:29 -0800 (PST) Received: from ztxmail01.nz-cce.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA30267; Tue, 19 Dec 2000 08:21:28 -0800 Received: by ztxmail01.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 59A7B4545; Tue, 19 Dec 2000 10:21:28 -0600 (CST) Received: from xanadu.home (modemcable248.137-200-24.mtl.mc.videotron.ca [24.200.137.248]) by ztxmail01.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CDFC54632 for ; Tue, 19 Dec 2000 10:21:27 -0600 (CST) Received: from localhost (nico@localhost) by xanadu.home (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id LAA08072; Tue, 19 Dec 2000 11:21:23 -0500 X-Authentication-Warning: xanadu.home: nico owned process doing -bs Date: Tue, 19 Dec 2000 11:21:23 -0500 (EST) From: Nicolas Pitre X-Sender: To: Ward Willats Cc: Charlie Flynn , Subject: Re: USB Function driver, FIFO not empty In-Reply-To: Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk On Tue, 19 Dec 2000, Ward Willats wrote: > At 7:48 PM +1100 12/19/00, Charlie Flynn wrote: > >I noticed that the RIR ISR was entered _before the DMA controller had finished > >it's transfer of data to the user requested buffer. This meant that > >the DMA had transferred (say) 58 bytes to the buffer and there was > >still 6 bytes left in the FIFO which had to be extracted "by hand" > >from the FIFO. In all cases the sum of the transfer always equaled > >64. I verified this by reading the DMA residue register to confirm > >how many bytes were left to transfer. > >I double checked this by executed a simple test ( called the half > >duplex test) all data transmitted was correctly received. > > Interesting. I will check the DMA usage when I get into work today. I > believe sa1100_dma_get_address() -- or something like that -- is > called to get the point DMA trailed off. Bytes transfered so far are > calculated by doing pointer arithmetic on this value. Perhaps this is > the wrong approach. Just to let you know: I started consolidating the DMA usage of the usb driver with the DMA API used by other devices. Otherwise things are becoming a mess since every drivers are using DMA differently. I'm also taking the opportunity to kill the USB transmit/receive static buffer (memcpu is ugly for such drivers...) > >Yep the book says you got to keep on reading or writing until it > >finally registers the data. This means looping until done. > > Agreed, but it doesn't mean re-writing the value all the time on a > register you want to go quiescent. Probably a single write might not stick. Anyway looping on the register is even consuming less power than say a call to udelay() which makes the CPU spin full speed in the cache. Nicolas From kramer@pa.dec.com Tue Dec 19 19:12:55 2000 Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (root@mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id TAA24381 for ; Tue, 19 Dec 2000 19:12:55 +0100 Received: from ztxmail04.ztx.compaq.com (ztxmail04.ztx.compaq.com [161.114.1.208]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id TAA28734 for ; Tue, 19 Dec 2000 19:12:53 +0100 (MET) Received: by ztxmail04.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 14EBED29; Tue, 19 Dec 2000 12:11:06 -0600 (CST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by ztxmail04.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 7B4FACCA; Tue, 19 Dec 2000 12:11:03 -0600 (CST) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA17549; Tue, 19 Dec 2000 10:10:56 -0800 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id KAA15346; Tue, 19 Dec 2000 10:09:12 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id KAA18115; Tue, 19 Dec 2000 10:09:12 -0800 (PST) Received: from ztxmail01.nz-cce.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA15823; Tue, 19 Dec 2000 10:09:11 -0800 Received: by ztxmail01.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 1C20F4653; Tue, 19 Dec 2000 12:09:11 -0600 (CST) Received: from thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (thorgal.et.tudelft.nl [130.161.40.91]) by ztxmail01.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1034145C8 for ; Tue, 19 Dec 2000 12:09:10 -0600 (CST) Received: from [130.161.40.82] (tvs082.et.tudelft.nl [130.161.40.82]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id TAA24364; Tue, 19 Dec 2000 19:09:06 +0100 Message-Id: In-Reply-To: References: <20001219120107.A16131@trinity.fluff.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Date: Tue, 19 Dec 2000 19:09:02 +0100 To: Nicolas Pitre From: "J.D. Bakker" Subject: Re: Kernel Hangup Cc: , , sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk At 16:41 +0100 19-12-2000, Nicolas Pitre wrote: >In any case, if someone is willing to write a generic SA1100 memory >detection then we might consider removing all the hardcoded memory >definitions in the kernel. This is quite nontrivial to do when your code runs from the RAM you're trying to autodetect. The blob code has a first try (the alias detection code) but that runs from ROM. It also depends on how generic you want the tester to be. The big issue is that memory holes in active banks show up as aliases of 'active' pieces of address space. I know of no way to do alias resolving, and unless you are *very* careful you might step on the very code you're running. And from there on it's a one way trip to Crash Street. I suppose it could be done, if there is a way to find the (physical) start-end addresses of a given function. Does it sound too restrictive to assume that all memory chunks are 2^n pages, where n is constant within one bank ? >Any volunteer? I will take a stab at this, initially for SA-11x0 only. Nicolas/Russell, where would you like me to hook this into the kernel ? I would prefer a location before the MMU or interrupts are enabled. JDB. -- If you see a long line of rats streaming off of a ship, the correct assumption is *not* "gosh, I bet that's a real nice boat now that those rats are gone". -- Mike Sphar in the Monastery From kramer@pa.dec.com Tue Dec 19 19:35:18 2000 Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (root@mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id TAA24460 for ; Tue, 19 Dec 2000 19:35:18 +0100 Received: from zmamail04.zma.compaq.com (zmamail04.zma.compaq.com [161.114.64.104]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id TAA29737 for ; Tue, 19 Dec 2000 19:35:16 +0100 (MET) Received: by zmamail04.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 4D8B9779; Tue, 19 Dec 2000 13:33:29 -0500 (EST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by zmamail04.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 05F2D72F; Tue, 19 Dec 2000 13:33:25 -0500 (EST) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA26943; Tue, 19 Dec 2000 10:33:23 -0800 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id KAA19957; Tue, 19 Dec 2000 10:32:33 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id KAA19891; Tue, 19 Dec 2000 10:32:32 -0800 (PST) Received: from ztxmail01.nz-cce.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA31855; Tue, 19 Dec 2000 10:32:31 -0800 Received: by ztxmail01.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 695C34449; Tue, 19 Dec 2000 12:32:31 -0600 (CST) Received: from xanadu.home (modemcable248.137-200-24.mtl.mc.videotron.ca [24.200.137.248]) by ztxmail01.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BECBE46FC for ; Tue, 19 Dec 2000 12:32:30 -0600 (CST) Received: from localhost (nico@localhost) by xanadu.home (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id NAA08451; Tue, 19 Dec 2000 13:31:20 -0500 X-Authentication-Warning: xanadu.home: nico owned process doing -bs Date: Tue, 19 Dec 2000 13:31:20 -0500 (EST) From: Nicolas Pitre X-Sender: To: "J.D. Bakker" Cc: , , Subject: Re: Kernel Hangup In-Reply-To: Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk On Tue, 19 Dec 2000, J.D. Bakker wrote: > At 16:41 +0100 19-12-2000, Nicolas Pitre wrote: > >In any case, if someone is willing to write a generic SA1100 memory > >detection then we might consider removing all the hardcoded memory > >definitions in the kernel. > > This is quite nontrivial to do when your code runs from the RAM you're > trying to autodetect. The blob code has a first try (the alias detection > code) but that runs from ROM. It also depends on how generic you want the > tester to be. If you are probing aliases by toggling bytes in 1 MB increment, then it's easy to assume that your probing routine isn't on a 1MB boundary. > The big issue is that memory holes in active banks show up as aliases of > 'active' pieces of address space. I know of no way to do alias resolving, > and unless you are *very* careful you might step on the very code you're > running. And from there on it's a one way trip to Crash Street. > > I suppose it could be done, if there is a way to find the (physical) > start-end addresses of a given function. Does it sound too restrictive to > assume that all memory chunks are 2^n pages, where n is constant within one > bank ? I don't think so. Anyway you are the one with the funkiest case to probe... ;-) > >Any volunteer? > > I will take a stab at this, initially for SA-11x0 only. Nicolas/Russell, > where would you like me to hook this into the kernel ? I would prefer a > location before the MMU or interrupts are enabled. The only place it can be is in arch/arm/boot/compressed/head-sa1100.S. There you only have to care about preserving r7/r8. Then simply create a zero-terminated array at a fixed physical memory address, say 0xc0000080, with the physical start address and the size for each memory chunk. The kernel will be able to retrieve that information early in the boot process in the fixup function before it gets overwritten. Nicolas From kramer@pa.dec.com Tue Dec 19 19:53:46 2000 Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (root@mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id TAA24505 for ; Tue, 19 Dec 2000 19:53:46 +0100 Received: from ztxmail03.ztx.compaq.com (ztxmail03.ztx.compaq.com [161.114.1.207]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id TAA00850 for ; Tue, 19 Dec 2000 19:53:44 +0100 (MET) Received: by ztxmail03.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id D7D131952; Tue, 19 Dec 2000 12:51:57 -0600 (CST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by ztxmail03.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 0A03F1A7F; Tue, 19 Dec 2000 12:51:55 -0600 (CST) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA10228; Tue, 19 Dec 2000 10:51:50 -0800 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id KAA16149; Tue, 19 Dec 2000 10:51:05 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id KAA16197; Tue, 19 Dec 2000 10:51:05 -0800 (PST) Received: from zmamail01.nz-tay.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA06164; Tue, 19 Dec 2000 10:50:56 -0800 Received: by zmamail01.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id B88C7C2EC; Tue, 19 Dec 2000 13:50:55 -0500 (EST) Received: from thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (thorgal.et.tudelft.nl [130.161.40.91]) by zmamail01.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0DE7AC0F3 for ; Tue, 19 Dec 2000 13:50:55 -0500 (EST) Received: from [130.161.40.82] (tvs082.et.tudelft.nl [130.161.40.82]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id TAA24496; Tue, 19 Dec 2000 19:50:46 +0100 Message-Id: In-Reply-To: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Date: Tue, 19 Dec 2000 19:50:34 +0100 To: Nicolas Pitre From: "J.D. Bakker" Subject: Re: Kernel Hangup Cc: , , Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk At 19:31 +0100 19-12-2000, Nicolas Pitre wrote: >If you are probing aliases by toggling bytes in 1 MB increment, then it's >easy to assume that your probing routine isn't on a 1MB boundary. I sort of prefer 'guarantee' over 'assume' in these cases. Making assumptions here could easily lead to subtle bugs down the road ("I added CONFIG_X to my kernel and now it won't boot"). Would it be acceptable (and possible in gas) to page align this function ? That way I could place a sentinel at the beginning of the page. >The only place it can be is in arch/arm/boot/compressed/head-sa1100.S. >There you only have to care about preserving r7/r8. Then simply create a >zero-terminated array at a fixed physical memory address, say 0xc0000080, >with the physical start address and the size for each memory chunk. Will do. This is *after* the kernel decompression, right ? JDB [knee deep in deadlines] -- Jan-Derk Bakker, bakker@mmc.et.tudelft.nl The lazy man's proverb: 'There's no business like slow business !' From kramer@pa.dec.com Tue Dec 19 20:09:06 2000 Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (root@mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id UAA24556 for ; Tue, 19 Dec 2000 20:09:06 +0100 Received: from ztxmail05.ztx.compaq.com (ztxmail05.ztx.compaq.com [161.114.1.209]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id UAA01545 for ; Tue, 19 Dec 2000 20:09:04 +0100 (MET) Received: by ztxmail05.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id D025CAE5; Tue, 19 Dec 2000 13:07:17 -0600 (CST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by ztxmail05.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id DA687B5D; Tue, 19 Dec 2000 13:07:14 -0600 (CST) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA16461; Tue, 19 Dec 2000 11:07:13 -0800 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id LAA17272; Tue, 19 Dec 2000 11:06:34 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id LAA15945; Tue, 19 Dec 2000 11:06:33 -0800 (PST) Received: from zmamail01.nz-tay.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA28178; Tue, 19 Dec 2000 11:06:33 -0800 Received: by zmamail01.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id A5B5FC4D3; Tue, 19 Dec 2000 14:06:32 -0500 (EST) Received: from fire.he.net (fire.he.net [216.218.144.2]) by zmamail01.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B9CBC5BD for ; Tue, 19 Dec 2000 14:06:32 -0500 (EST) Received: from cementship.extenex.net (64-51-136-194.client.dsl.net [64.51.136.194]) by fire.he.net (8.8.6/8.8.2) with ESMTP id LAA00435; Tue, 19 Dec 2000 11:06:27 -0800 Received: from blowhole.extenex.net (blowhole.extenex.net [192.168.100.100]) by cementship.extenex.net (8.9.3/8.8.7) with ESMTP id LAA10015; Tue, 19 Dec 2000 11:05:57 -0800 Received: from wardw by blowhole.extenex.net with local (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 148S5D-00005B-00; Tue, 19 Dec 2000 11:05:55 -0800 Date: Tue, 19 Dec 2000 11:05:54 -0800 From: Ward Willats To: Nicolas Pitre Cc: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Subject: Re: USB Function driver, FIFO not empty Message-Id: <20001219110554.A314@extenex.com> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii User-Agent: Mutt/1.0.1i In-Reply-To: ; from nico@CAM.ORG on Tue, Dec 19, 2000 at 11:21:23AM -0500 Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk On Tue, Dec 19, 2000 at 11:21:23AM -0500, Nicolas Pitre wrote: > Just to let you know: I started consolidating the DMA usage of the usb > driver with the DMA API used by other devices. Otherwise things are > becoming a mess since every drivers are using DMA differently. I'm also > taking the opportunity to kill the USB transmit/receive static buffer > (memcpu is ugly for such drivers...) That's fine. I'm going to write my own usb_recv file that is stream oriented. The in-grained packet orientation and network interface pollution of the current file is getting too hard to #ifdef around. I'll port your DMA API changes into my stuff when I see them. > Probably a single write might not stick. Anyway looping on the register is > even consuming less power than say a call to udelay() which makes the CPU > spin full speed in the cache. I believe the "not stick" since I've seen it now and then. But I'm not sure a full-out slam fest gets you to a quiet register sooner. I hadn't considered the power issue though. That does argue in favor of some sort of looping. -- Ward From kramer@pa.dec.com Tue Dec 19 20:12:28 2000 Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (root@mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id UAA24576 for ; Tue, 19 Dec 2000 20:12:28 +0100 Received: from ztxmail05.ztx.compaq.com (ztxmail05.ztx.compaq.com [161.114.1.209]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id UAA01662 for ; Tue, 19 Dec 2000 20:12:26 +0100 (MET) Received: by ztxmail05.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 994DBA66; Tue, 19 Dec 2000 13:10:39 -0600 (CST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by ztxmail05.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id E3C1C82B; Tue, 19 Dec 2000 13:10:36 -0600 (CST) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA16203; Tue, 19 Dec 2000 11:10:35 -0800 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id LAA05880; Tue, 19 Dec 2000 11:10:00 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id LAA05857; Tue, 19 Dec 2000 11:09:59 -0800 (PST) Received: from zmamail02.nz-tay.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA23020; Tue, 19 Dec 2000 11:09:59 -0800 Received: by zmamail02.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 9E1A155EE; Tue, 19 Dec 2000 14:09:58 -0500 (EST) Received: from xanadu.home (modemcable248.137-200-24.mtl.mc.videotron.ca [24.200.137.248]) by zmamail02.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F57D5459 for ; Tue, 19 Dec 2000 14:09:58 -0500 (EST) Received: from localhost (nico@localhost) by xanadu.home (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id OAA08549; Tue, 19 Dec 2000 14:08:41 -0500 X-Authentication-Warning: xanadu.home: nico owned process doing -bs Date: Tue, 19 Dec 2000 14:08:41 -0500 (EST) From: Nicolas Pitre X-Sender: To: "J.D. Bakker" Cc: , , Subject: Re: Kernel Hangup In-Reply-To: Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk On Tue, 19 Dec 2000, J.D. Bakker wrote: > At 19:31 +0100 19-12-2000, Nicolas Pitre wrote: > >If you are probing aliases by toggling bytes in 1 MB increment, then it's > >easy to assume that your probing routine isn't on a 1MB boundary. > > I sort of prefer 'guarantee' over 'assume' in these cases. Making > assumptions here could easily lead to subtle bugs down the road ("I added > CONFIG_X to my kernel and now it won't boot"). Would it be acceptable (and > possible in gas) to page align this function ? That way I could place a > sentinel at the beginning of the page. > > >The only place it can be is in arch/arm/boot/compressed/head-sa1100.S. > >There you only have to care about preserving r7/r8. Then simply create a > >zero-terminated array at a fixed physical memory address, say 0xc0000080, > >with the physical start address and the size for each memory chunk. > > Will do. This is *after* the kernel decompression, right ? No. That's before decompression, a dozen instructions after the kernel entry point. Therefore you know that it will exist in ram at the very beginning of zImage which isn't likely to cross a 1MB boundary, unless your zImage is copied in ram at an odd location. Nicolas From kramer@pa.dec.com Tue Dec 19 20:26:51 2000 Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (root@mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id UAA24612 for ; Tue, 19 Dec 2000 20:26:51 +0100 Received: from zmamail04.zma.compaq.com (zmamail04.zma.compaq.com [161.114.64.104]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id UAA02338 for ; Tue, 19 Dec 2000 20:26:48 +0100 (MET) Received: by zmamail04.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id EDEEE8E4; Tue, 19 Dec 2000 14:20:21 -0500 (EST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by zmamail04.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 642CFA3F; Tue, 19 Dec 2000 14:20:19 -0500 (EST) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA25979; Tue, 19 Dec 2000 11:20:18 -0800 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id LAA17874; Tue, 19 Dec 2000 11:19:36 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id LAA17373; Tue, 19 Dec 2000 11:19:35 -0800 (PST) Received: from zmamail02.nz-tay.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA15186; Tue, 19 Dec 2000 11:19:35 -0800 Received: by zmamail02.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id C9E34567B; Tue, 19 Dec 2000 14:19:34 -0500 (EST) Received: from xanadu.home (modemcable248.137-200-24.mtl.mc.videotron.ca [24.200.137.248]) by zmamail02.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B9B3576C for ; Tue, 19 Dec 2000 14:19:34 -0500 (EST) Received: from localhost (nico@localhost) by xanadu.home (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id OAA08585; Tue, 19 Dec 2000 14:19:30 -0500 X-Authentication-Warning: xanadu.home: nico owned process doing -bs Date: Tue, 19 Dec 2000 14:19:29 -0500 (EST) From: Nicolas Pitre X-Sender: To: Ward Willats Cc: Subject: Re: USB Function driver, FIFO not empty In-Reply-To: <20001219110554.A314@extenex.com> Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk On Tue, 19 Dec 2000, Ward Willats wrote: > On Tue, Dec 19, 2000 at 11:21:23AM -0500, Nicolas Pitre wrote: > > > Just to let you know: I started consolidating the DMA usage of the usb > > driver with the DMA API used by other devices. Otherwise things are > > becoming a mess since every drivers are using DMA differently. I'm also > > taking the opportunity to kill the USB transmit/receive static buffer > > (memcpu is ugly for such drivers...) > > That's fine. I'm going to write my own usb_recv file that is stream > oriented. The in-grained packet orientation and network interface > pollution of the current file is getting too hard to #ifdef > around. I'll port your DMA API changes into my stuff when I see them. Well... I'm taking the opportunity to clean the transmit/receive code as well. It truely requires it. The network should only be concentrated and visible in usb_eth.c. Nicolas From kramer@pa.dec.com Tue Dec 19 21:18:04 2000 Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (root@mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id VAA24678 for ; Tue, 19 Dec 2000 21:18:04 +0100 Received: from ztxmail03.ztx.compaq.com (ztxmail03.ztx.compaq.com [161.114.1.207]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id VAA04773 for ; Tue, 19 Dec 2000 21:18:02 +0100 (MET) Received: by ztxmail03.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 6383B1AA8; Tue, 19 Dec 2000 14:16:15 -0600 (CST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by ztxmail03.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 6D5651AE2; Tue, 19 Dec 2000 14:16:12 -0600 (CST) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA05642; Tue, 19 Dec 2000 12:16:06 -0800 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id MAA14246; Tue, 19 Dec 2000 12:12:22 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id MAA24713; Tue, 19 Dec 2000 12:12:21 -0800 (PST) Received: from ztxmail01.nz-cce.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA28510; Tue, 19 Dec 2000 12:12:19 -0800 Received: by ztxmail01.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id DE3EF4541; Tue, 19 Dec 2000 14:12:18 -0600 (CST) Received: from www.linux.org.uk (parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk [195.92.249.252]) by ztxmail01.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C9824507 for ; Tue, 19 Dec 2000 14:12:16 -0600 (CST) Received: from dyn-33.linux.theplanet.co.uk ([195.92.244.33] helo=caramon.arm.linux.org.uk) by www.linux.org.uk with esmtp (Exim 3.13 #1) id 148T79-0005Qr-00; Tue, 19 Dec 2000 20:12:00 +0000 Received: from flint.arm.linux.org.uk (IDENT:root@flint.arm.linux.org.uk [192.168.0.4]) by caramon.arm.linux.org.uk (8.11.0/8.11.0) with ESMTP id eBJKATV16643; Tue, 19 Dec 2000 20:10:29 GMT Received: (from linux@localhost) by flint.arm.linux.org.uk (8.11.0/8.11.0) id eBJKAS022601; Tue, 19 Dec 2000 20:10:28 GMT From: Russell King - ARM Linux Message-Id: <200012192010.eBJKAS022601@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> Subject: Re: Kernel Hangup To: bakker@thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (J.D. Bakker) Date: Tue, 19 Dec 2000 20:10:28 +0000 (GMT) Cc: nico@CAM.ORG (Nicolas Pitre), ben@fluff.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.arm.linux.org.uk, sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com In-Reply-To: from "J.D. Bakker" at Dec 19, 2000 07:09:02 PM X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL3] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk J.D. Bakker writes: > I will take a stab at this, initially for SA-11x0 only. Nicolas/Russell, > where would you like me to hook this into the kernel ? I would prefer a > location before the MMU or interrupts are enabled. I frowned at this when I first read it and hoped that it would die away. I don't think that this is a good idea at all. It is another architecture specific thing that the kernel would have to deal with, and it couldn't be written in C (since the MMU stuff won't be completely setup at that time). Things like this are best left to boot loaders; for each machine there are potentially different pitfalls that have to be avoided. For instance, DC21285-based systems need to setup the SDRAM. The SDRAM initialisation finds out how much memory is there, and therefore it has the information already prepared for the kernel. So, rather than repeat the generation of this information, and risk getting it wrong, why not pass it to the kernel instead? We have a perfectly adequate way of passing this sort of information from a boot loader (eg, blob) into the kernel already, and this is the way it should be done. Incidentally, while we're on this subject, we now have an additional, more flexible method of passing information from the boot loader to the kernel. Its a tagged list of items, and it gets around many of the problems of the param_struct method. We are no longer limited to 4 banks of memory; you could have 4 million banks of memory with this method. (just hope you have enough space to store the information) ;) So, what about the old param_struct? Well, its not going to be phased out tomorrow, or the day after. It will remain, along side the tag stuff until at least 5 years from now. [make a note in setup.c to phase out after 2006]. The only objection to this tag list that could possibly remain is that it starts from a fixed address, just like the param_struct was. If this bothers you, then the philosophy that I adopted in ARMs milo (for Integrator and Prospector720 platforms) was to place the structure at KERNEL - 0x7f00. This means that you're only dealing with one fixed address in the boot loader. _____ |_____| ------------------------------------------------- ---+---+- | | Russell King linux@arm.linux.org.uk --- --- | | | | http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/ / / | | +-+-+ --- -+- / | THE developer of ARM Linux |+| /|\ / | | | --- | +-+-+ ------------------------------------------------- /\\\ | From kramer@pa.dec.com Tue Dec 19 21:32:16 2000 Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (root@mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id VAA24708 for ; Tue, 19 Dec 2000 21:32:16 +0100 Received: from zmamail04.zma.compaq.com (zmamail04.zma.compaq.com [161.114.64.104]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id VAA05348 for ; Tue, 19 Dec 2000 21:32:14 +0100 (MET) Received: by zmamail04.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 3A35BC9C; Tue, 19 Dec 2000 15:30:27 -0500 (EST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by zmamail04.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id A0D33CB6; Tue, 19 Dec 2000 15:30:24 -0500 (EST) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA27428; Tue, 19 Dec 2000 12:30:23 -0800 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id MAA26643; Tue, 19 Dec 2000 12:26:52 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id MAA26627; Tue, 19 Dec 2000 12:26:51 -0800 (PST) Received: from ztxmail01.nz-cce.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA18495; Tue, 19 Dec 2000 12:26:51 -0800 Received: by ztxmail01.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id D611047C4; Tue, 19 Dec 2000 14:26:50 -0600 (CST) Received: from thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (thorgal.et.tudelft.nl [130.161.40.91]) by ztxmail01.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD4E244F5 for ; Tue, 19 Dec 2000 14:26:49 -0600 (CST) Received: from [130.161.40.82] (tvs082.et.tudelft.nl [130.161.40.82]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id VAA24693; Tue, 19 Dec 2000 21:26:39 +0100 Message-Id: In-Reply-To: <200012192010.eBJKAS022601@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> References: from "J.D. Bakker" at Dec 19, 2000 07:09:02 PM Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Date: Tue, 19 Dec 2000 21:26:15 +0100 To: Russell King - ARM Linux From: "J.D. Bakker" Subject: Re: Kernel Hangup Cc: nico@CAM.ORG (Nicolas Pitre), ben@fluff.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.arm.linux.org.uk, sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk At 21:10 +0100 19-12-2000, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: >Things like this are best left to boot loaders; for each machine there are >potentially different pitfalls that have to be avoided. For instance, >DC21285-based systems need to setup the SDRAM. The SDRAM initialisation >finds out how much memory is there, and therefore it has the information >already prepared for the kernel. So, rather than repeat the generation >of this information, and risk getting it wrong, why not pass it to the >kernel instead? We have a perfectly adequate way of passing this sort of >information from a boot loader (eg, blob) into the kernel already, and >this is the way it should be done. Makes sense. I'll do it in blob and post to the list once it's done so all the other bootloaders can copy it ;-) Anyway, I expect to be able to use C as all I need to do is set up a stack and not use globals. JDB. -- If you think the problem is bad now, just wait until we've solved it. -- Arthur Kasspe From kramer@pa.dec.com Tue Dec 19 23:26:35 2000 Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (root@mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id XAA24966 for ; Tue, 19 Dec 2000 23:26:34 +0100 Received: from zmamail04.zma.compaq.com (zmamail04.zma.compaq.com [161.114.64.104]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id XAA11152 for ; Tue, 19 Dec 2000 23:26:32 +0100 (MET) Received: by zmamail04.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 70015EB1; Tue, 19 Dec 2000 17:24:46 -0500 (EST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by zmamail04.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id BE9DCECF; Tue, 19 Dec 2000 17:24:43 -0500 (EST) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA30281; Tue, 19 Dec 2000 14:24:42 -0800 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id OAA29359; Tue, 19 Dec 2000 14:22:44 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id OAA28546; Tue, 19 Dec 2000 14:22:43 -0800 (PST) Received: from ztxmail01.nz-cce.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA10698; Tue, 19 Dec 2000 14:22:42 -0800 Received: by ztxmail01.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 03E24456B; Tue, 19 Dec 2000 16:22:42 -0600 (CST) Received: from www.linux.org.uk (parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk [195.92.249.252]) by ztxmail01.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6696D460C for ; Tue, 19 Dec 2000 16:22:32 -0600 (CST) Received: from dyn-33.linux.theplanet.co.uk ([195.92.244.33] helo=caramon.arm.linux.org.uk) by www.linux.org.uk with esmtp (Exim 3.13 #1) id 148V9L-0007Nr-00; Tue, 19 Dec 2000 22:22:23 +0000 Received: from flint.arm.linux.org.uk (IDENT:root@flint.arm.linux.org.uk [192.168.0.4]) by caramon.arm.linux.org.uk (8.11.0/8.11.0) with ESMTP id eBJMG6V16815; Tue, 19 Dec 2000 22:16:46 GMT Received: (from linux@localhost) by flint.arm.linux.org.uk (8.11.0/8.11.0) id eBJMG5122702; Tue, 19 Dec 2000 22:16:05 GMT From: Russell King - ARM Linux Message-Id: <200012192216.eBJMG5122702@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> Subject: Re: nfs module fails to insert To: maple@ixcelerator.com (Vladimir V. Klenov) Date: Tue, 19 Dec 2000 22:16:05 +0000 (GMT) Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.arm.linux.org.uk, sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com In-Reply-To: <20001219165641.A24533@valinor.ixcel.ru> from "Vladimir V. Klenov" at Dec 19, 2000 04:56:41 PM X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL3] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk Vladimir V. Klenov writes: > attemting to insert nfs.o on 2.4.0-test11-rmk1-np2 I found that it > fails not finding alloc_pages symbol in /proc/ksyms. > next small patch improved situation for me > > --- ksyms.c.orig Tue Dec 19 16:50:44 2000 > +++ ksyms.c Tue Dec 19 16:28:57 2000 > @@ -89,6 +89,7 @@ > > /* internal kernel memory management */ > EXPORT_SYMBOL(__alloc_pages); > +EXPORT_SYMBOL(alloc_pages); > EXPORT_SYMBOL(alloc_pages_node); > EXPORT_SYMBOL(__get_free_pages); > EXPORT_SYMBOL(get_zeroed_page); This is the wrong fix for the problem. We only need to export alloc_pages when we are using discontiguous memory. Thanks for the report. _____ |_____| ------------------------------------------------- ---+---+- | | Russell King linux@arm.linux.org.uk --- --- | | | | http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/ / / | | +-+-+ --- -+- / | THE developer of ARM Linux |+| /|\ / | | | --- | +-+-+ ------------------------------------------------- /\\\ | From kramer@pa.dec.com Tue Dec 19 23:26:37 2000 Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (root@mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id XAA24972 for ; Tue, 19 Dec 2000 23:26:36 +0100 Received: from ztxmail05.ztx.compaq.com (ztxmail05.ztx.compaq.com [161.114.1.209]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id XAA11156 for ; Tue, 19 Dec 2000 23:26:34 +0100 (MET) Received: by ztxmail05.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id C029DA88; Tue, 19 Dec 2000 16:24:47 -0600 (CST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by ztxmail05.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id C8169A81; Tue, 19 Dec 2000 16:24:44 -0600 (CST) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA11819; Tue, 19 Dec 2000 14:24:39 -0800 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id OAA29565; Tue, 19 Dec 2000 14:23:14 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id OAA29530; Tue, 19 Dec 2000 14:22:43 -0800 (PST) Received: from zmamail02.nz-tay.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA15051; Tue, 19 Dec 2000 14:22:42 -0800 Received: by zmamail02.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 24AE05701; Tue, 19 Dec 2000 17:22:42 -0500 (EST) Received: from www.linux.org.uk (parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk [195.92.249.252]) by zmamail02.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B2715597 for ; Tue, 19 Dec 2000 17:22:41 -0500 (EST) Received: from dyn-33.linux.theplanet.co.uk ([195.92.244.33] helo=caramon.arm.linux.org.uk) by www.linux.org.uk with esmtp (Exim 3.13 #1) id 148V9R-0007Nr-00; Tue, 19 Dec 2000 22:22:30 +0000 Received: from flint.arm.linux.org.uk (IDENT:root@flint.arm.linux.org.uk [192.168.0.4]) by caramon.arm.linux.org.uk (8.11.0/8.11.0) with ESMTP id eBJM7hV16811; Tue, 19 Dec 2000 22:08:24 GMT Received: (from linux@localhost) by flint.arm.linux.org.uk (8.11.0/8.11.0) id eBJM7hG22692; Tue, 19 Dec 2000 22:07:43 GMT From: Russell King - ARM Linux Message-Id: <200012192207.eBJM7hG22692@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> Subject: Re: Kernel Hangup To: nico@CAM.ORG (Nicolas Pitre) Date: Tue, 19 Dec 2000 22:07:43 +0000 (GMT) Cc: bakker@thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (J.D. Bakker), ben@fluff.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.arm.linux.org.uk, sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com In-Reply-To: from "Nicolas Pitre" at Dec 19, 2000 01:31:20 PM X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL3] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk Nicolas Pitre writes: > Then simply create a > zero-terminated array at a fixed physical memory address, say 0xc0000080, > with the physical start address and the size for each memory chunk. The > kernel will be able to retrieve that information early in the boot process > in the fixup function before it gets overwritten. Yuck yuck yuck yuck yuck. Yet another specific hack. Hacks are bad. Very bad. Don't do them. Invent ways that are generic, that can be used in the future, that can be extended. That is the way forward. With now 50 different ARM-based machines out there, it is rediculous to go and invent 50 different ways of passing information to the kernel. There should be ONE way and one way only. _____ |_____| ------------------------------------------------- ---+---+- | | Russell King linux@arm.linux.org.uk --- --- | | | | http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/ / / | | +-+-+ --- -+- / | THE developer of ARM Linux |+| /|\ / | | | --- | +-+-+ ------------------------------------------------- /\\\ | From kramer@pa.dec.com Tue Dec 19 23:32:33 2000 Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (root@mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id XAA25080 for ; Tue, 19 Dec 2000 23:32:33 +0100 Received: from ztxmail04.ztx.compaq.com (ztxmail04.ztx.compaq.com [161.114.1.208]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id XAA11439 for ; Tue, 19 Dec 2000 23:32:31 +0100 (MET) Received: by ztxmail04.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 3856ECA3; Tue, 19 Dec 2000 16:30:44 -0600 (CST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by ztxmail04.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 46528F64; Tue, 19 Dec 2000 16:30:41 -0600 (CST) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA19794; Tue, 19 Dec 2000 14:30:40 -0800 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id OAA29996; Tue, 19 Dec 2000 14:30:07 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id OAA30482; Tue, 19 Dec 2000 14:30:06 -0800 (PST) Received: from ztxmail02.nz-cce.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA29067; Tue, 19 Dec 2000 14:30:06 -0800 Received: by ztxmail02.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id D1B103DEA; Tue, 19 Dec 2000 16:30:05 -0600 (CST) Received: from www.linux.org.uk (parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk [195.92.249.252]) by ztxmail02.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C878C1E49 for ; Tue, 19 Dec 2000 16:30:04 -0600 (CST) Received: from dyn-33.linux.theplanet.co.uk ([195.92.244.33] helo=caramon.arm.linux.org.uk) by www.linux.org.uk with esmtp (Exim 3.13 #1) id 148VGZ-0007VL-00; Tue, 19 Dec 2000 22:29:51 +0000 Received: from flint.arm.linux.org.uk (IDENT:root@flint.arm.linux.org.uk [192.168.0.4]) by caramon.arm.linux.org.uk (8.11.0/8.11.0) with ESMTP id eBJMThV16985; Tue, 19 Dec 2000 22:29:43 GMT Received: (from linux@localhost) by flint.arm.linux.org.uk (8.11.0/8.11.0) id eBJMTcd22875; Tue, 19 Dec 2000 22:29:38 GMT From: Russell King - ARM Linux Message-Id: <200012192229.eBJMTcd22875@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> Subject: Re: Kernel Hangup To: bakker@thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (J.D. Bakker) Date: Tue, 19 Dec 2000 22:29:38 +0000 (GMT) Cc: nico@CAM.ORG (Nicolas Pitre), ben@fluff.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.arm.linux.org.uk, sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com In-Reply-To: from "J.D. Bakker" at Dec 19, 2000 09:26:15 PM X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL3] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk J.D. Bakker writes: > Makes sense. I'll do it in blob and post to the list once it's done so all > the other bootloaders can copy it ;-) Anyway, I expect to be able to use C > as all I need to do is set up a stack and not use globals. I have actually released a test12-pre7 patch, and I have a test12 patch that never made it to the FTP site due to severe lack of time on my part. (Time is one thing that is in short supply here at the moment, to the extent that so far I've only been able to work half-days thus far this week). Major hastle, major hastle ;( Will try to get test12 out tonight with the release notes. No promises. Hope normality returns soon. _____ |_____| ------------------------------------------------- ---+---+- | | Russell King linux@arm.linux.org.uk --- --- | | | | http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/ / / | | +-+-+ --- -+- / | THE developer of ARM Linux |+| /|\ / | | | --- | +-+-+ ------------------------------------------------- /\\\ | From kramer@pa.dec.com Wed Dec 20 01:05:17 2000 Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (root@mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id BAA25533 for ; Wed, 20 Dec 2000 01:05:17 +0100 Received: from ztxmail05.ztx.compaq.com (ztxmail05.ztx.compaq.com [161.114.1.209]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id BAA15745 for ; Wed, 20 Dec 2000 01:05:15 +0100 (MET) Received: by ztxmail05.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 0023BAB5; Tue, 19 Dec 2000 18:03:28 -0600 (CST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by ztxmail05.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id E64C8A96; Tue, 19 Dec 2000 18:03:25 -0600 (CST) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA24960; Tue, 19 Dec 2000 16:03:24 -0800 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id QAA00761; Tue, 19 Dec 2000 16:00:04 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id PAA32678; Tue, 19 Dec 2000 15:59:03 -0800 (PST) Received: from zmamail01.nz-tay.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA12581; Tue, 19 Dec 2000 15:59:02 -0800 Received: by zmamail01.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 0EA13CB7F; Tue, 19 Dec 2000 18:59:02 -0500 (EST) Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by zmamail01.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 17F8DC8BD for ; Tue, 19 Dec 2000 18:59:01 -0500 (EST) Received: from arthur.ubicom.tudelft.nl (erik.et.tudelft.nl [130.161.48.56]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id AAA15451; Wed, 20 Dec 2000 00:58:57 +0100 (MET) Received: (from erik@localhost) by arthur.ubicom.tudelft.nl (8.11.0/8.11.0/SuSE Linux 8.11.0-0.4) id eBJNvW928885; Wed, 20 Dec 2000 00:57:32 +0100 Date: Wed, 20 Dec 2000 00:57:32 +0100 From: Erik Mouw To: Russell King - ARM Linux Cc: "J.D. Bakker" , Nicolas Pitre , ben@fluff.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.arm.linux.org.uk, sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Subject: Re: Kernel Hangup Message-Id: <20001220005732.I960@arthur.ubicom.tudelft.nl> References: <200012192010.eBJKAS022601@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <200012192010.eBJKAS022601@flint.arm.linux.org.uk>; from linux@arm.linux.org.uk on Tue, Dec 19, 2000 at 08:10:28PM +0000 Organization: Eric Conspiracy Secret Labs X-Eric-Conspiracy: There is no conspiracy! Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk On Tue, Dec 19, 2000 at 08:10:28PM +0000, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > J.D. Bakker writes: > > I will take a stab at this, initially for SA-11x0 only. Nicolas/Russell, > > where would you like me to hook this into the kernel ? I would prefer a > > location before the MMU or interrupts are enabled. [snip] Hmm, so I go to a concert in Amsterdam, and my fellow LARTer decides to write memory detection routines... ;-) > Things like this are best left to boot loaders; for each machine there are > potentially different pitfalls that have to be avoided. For instance, > DC21285-based systems need to setup the SDRAM. The SDRAM initialisation > finds out how much memory is there, and therefore it has the information > already prepared for the kernel. So, rather than repeat the generation > of this information, and risk getting it wrong, why not pass it to the > kernel instead? We have a perfectly adequate way of passing this sort of > information from a boot loader (eg, blob) into the kernel already, and > this is the way it should be done. I think you're right. On all other platforms I know (Sun, SGI, PC) the BIOS/PROM probes the memory and presents it in a uniform way to the OS kernel. > Incidentally, while we're on this subject, we now have an additional, more > flexible method of passing information from the boot loader to the kernel. > Its a tagged list of items, and it gets around many of the problems of the > param_struct method. We are no longer limited to 4 banks of memory; you > could have 4 million banks of memory with this method. (just hope you have > enough space to store the information) ;) Could you point me to the place where this lives in the kernel? I can see a minor change you made in setup.c in test11-rmk1, but that can't be the flexible method you're talking about. Or is it in the soon-to-be-released test12-rmk1? > The only objection to this tag list that could possibly remain is that it > starts from a fixed address, just like the param_struct was. If this > bothers you, then the philosophy that I adopted in ARMs milo (for Integrator > and Prospector720 platforms) was to place the structure at KERNEL - 0x7f00. > This means that you're only dealing with one fixed address in the boot > loader. I don't see a real problem in using a fixed address. Yes, it's yet another failure mode, but we have the same problems with ramdisks loaded add incorrect locations. Erik -- J.A.K. (Erik) Mouw, Information and Communication Theory Group, Department of Electrical Engineering, Faculty of Information Technology and Systems, Delft University of Technology, PO BOX 5031, 2600 GA Delft, The Netherlands Phone: +31-15-2783635 Fax: +31-15-2781843 Email: J.A.K.Mouw@its.tudelft.nl WWW: http://www-ict.its.tudelft.nl/~erik/ From kramer@pa.dec.com Wed Dec 20 01:46:07 2000 Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (root@mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id BAA25668 for ; Wed, 20 Dec 2000 01:46:07 +0100 Received: from ztxmail05.ztx.compaq.com (ztxmail05.ztx.compaq.com [161.114.1.209]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id BAA17726 for ; Wed, 20 Dec 2000 01:46:05 +0100 (MET) Received: by ztxmail05.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 78ED3ACB; Tue, 19 Dec 2000 18:44:10 -0600 (CST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by ztxmail05.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 617F1A79; Tue, 19 Dec 2000 18:44:07 -0600 (CST) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA28743; Tue, 19 Dec 2000 16:44:06 -0800 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id QAA26003; Tue, 19 Dec 2000 16:43:10 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id QAA26287; Tue, 19 Dec 2000 16:43:09 -0800 (PST) Received: from zmamail01.nz-tay.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA20176; Tue, 19 Dec 2000 16:43:09 -0800 Received: by zmamail01.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 1ECEBBFE4; Tue, 19 Dec 2000 19:43:09 -0500 (EST) Received: from xanadu.home (modemcable248.137-200-24.mtl.mc.videotron.ca [24.200.137.248]) by zmamail01.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD349C1A6 for ; Tue, 19 Dec 2000 19:43:08 -0500 (EST) Received: from localhost (nico@localhost) by xanadu.home (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id TAA09088; Tue, 19 Dec 2000 19:40:46 -0500 X-Authentication-Warning: xanadu.home: nico owned process doing -bs Date: Tue, 19 Dec 2000 19:40:46 -0500 (EST) From: Nicolas Pitre X-Sender: To: Russell King - ARM Linux Cc: "J.D. Bakker" , , , Subject: Re: Kernel Hangup In-Reply-To: <200012192207.eBJM7hG22692@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk On Tue, 19 Dec 2000, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > With now 50 different ARM-based machines out there, it is rediculous to go > and invent 50 different ways of passing information to the kernel. There > should be ONE way and one way only. I should really have a shot at your tagged parameter stuff... Nicolas From kramer@pa.dec.com Wed Dec 20 02:10:19 2000 Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (root@mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id CAA25723 for ; Wed, 20 Dec 2000 02:10:19 +0100 Received: from ztxmail05.ztx.compaq.com (ztxmail05.ztx.compaq.com [161.114.1.209]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id CAA18700 for ; Wed, 20 Dec 2000 02:10:17 +0100 (MET) Received: by ztxmail05.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id D752986B; Tue, 19 Dec 2000 19:08:29 -0600 (CST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by ztxmail05.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id DA51D8E5; Tue, 19 Dec 2000 19:08:26 -0600 (CST) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA29479; Tue, 19 Dec 2000 17:08:25 -0800 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id RAA15579; Tue, 19 Dec 2000 17:07:36 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id RAA15655; Tue, 19 Dec 2000 17:07:35 -0800 (PST) Received: from ztxmail02.nz-cce.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA30167; Tue, 19 Dec 2000 17:07:34 -0800 Received: by ztxmail02.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 7DBA91D69; Tue, 19 Dec 2000 19:07:34 -0600 (CST) Received: from xanadu.home (modemcable248.137-200-24.mtl.mc.videotron.ca [24.200.137.248]) by ztxmail02.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 91C131DD1 for ; Tue, 19 Dec 2000 19:07:33 -0600 (CST) Received: from localhost (nico@localhost) by xanadu.home (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id TAA09071; Tue, 19 Dec 2000 19:16:55 -0500 X-Authentication-Warning: xanadu.home: nico owned process doing -bs Date: Tue, 19 Dec 2000 19:16:55 -0500 (EST) From: Nicolas Pitre X-Sender: To: Russell King - ARM Linux Cc: "J.D. Bakker" , , , Subject: Re: Kernel Hangup In-Reply-To: <200012192207.eBJM7hG22692@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk On Tue, 19 Dec 2000, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > Nicolas Pitre writes: > > Then simply create a > > zero-terminated array at a fixed physical memory address, say 0xc0000080, > > with the physical start address and the size for each memory chunk. The > > kernel will be able to retrieve that information early in the boot process > > in the fixup function before it gets overwritten. > > Yuck yuck yuck yuck yuck. Yet another specific hack. Hacks are bad. Very > bad. Don't do them. Invent ways that are generic, that can be used in the > future, that can be extended. That is the way forward. Well... That data was intended to be created by head-sa1100.S and consumed by fixup_sa1100() only. Both source files distributed in the same package. > With now 50 different ARM-based machines out there, it is rediculous to go > and invent 50 different ways of passing information to the kernel. There > should be ONE way and one way only. That wasn't in a context of passing information to the kernel from the exterior, but rather the kernel passing information to itself. Nicolas From kramer@pa.dec.com Fri Dec 22 01:03:41 2000 Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (root@mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id BAA32241 for ; Fri, 22 Dec 2000 01:03:40 +0100 Received: from ztxmail03.ztx.compaq.com (ztxmail03.ztx.compaq.com [161.114.1.207]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id BAA05583 for ; Fri, 22 Dec 2000 01:03:38 +0100 (MET) Received: by ztxmail03.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 549601907; Thu, 21 Dec 2000 18:01:51 -0600 (CST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by ztxmail03.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 806D41BE6; Thu, 21 Dec 2000 18:01:48 -0600 (CST) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA12994; Thu, 21 Dec 2000 16:01:41 -0800 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id PAA11992; Thu, 21 Dec 2000 15:57:36 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id PAA26641; Thu, 21 Dec 2000 15:57:35 -0800 (PST) Received: from zmamail01.nz-tay.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA29721; Thu, 21 Dec 2000 15:57:34 -0800 Received: by zmamail01.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 1B473C2B3; Thu, 21 Dec 2000 18:57:34 -0500 (EST) Received: from fire.he.net (fire.he.net [216.218.144.2]) by zmamail01.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 723D4C1A0 for ; Thu, 21 Dec 2000 18:57:33 -0500 (EST) Received: from cementship.extenex.net (64-51-136-194.client.dsl.net [64.51.136.194]) by fire.he.net (8.8.6/8.8.2) with ESMTP id PAA10781; Thu, 21 Dec 2000 15:57:28 -0800 Received: from blowhole.extenex.net (blowhole.extenex.net [192.168.100.100]) by cementship.extenex.net (8.9.3/8.8.7) with ESMTP id PAA13334; Thu, 21 Dec 2000 15:57:00 -0800 Received: from wardw by blowhole.extenex.net with local (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 149FZz-0000mT-00; Thu, 21 Dec 2000 15:56:59 -0800 Date: Thu, 21 Dec 2000 15:56:59 -0800 From: Ward Willats To: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Subject: SA USB Function driver, more info Message-Id: <20001221155659.A2388@extenex.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii User-Agent: Mutt/1.0.1i Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk As I wrote earlier this week, I am working on a character-oriented byte-pipe variation of the USB function driver. It is finally working, and I now have more information on the behavior I was seeing that made it look like more bytes than specified by max OUT packet size were coming in. The existing usb_recv.c calls (the evil) get_dma_address_sa1100() to get the ending address of the transfer and to decide where to put any leftover bytes in the UDC input FIFO. This routine reads BSA of the DMA channel. usb_recv.c then does some pointer math to figure out how many bytes came in. Sometimes, under heavy load (I'm running full 256 byte packets into my new character oriented receiver) the address returned will be 1 past the end of a max packet (indicating max packet bytes received) BUT THERE WILL STILL BE BYTES IN THE FIFO. When math is done after retrieving these (typically 8) bytes, it looks like a packet of 264 bytes has been received. What is happening is that the address is wrong, and the DMA controller has "jumped ahead" to the end of the transfer, even though it didn't move the last 8 bytes. These bytes are then in the FIFO to be retrieved. (Perhaps a transfer error?) To make matters worse, sometimes the address is right, and the FIFO bytes need to be copied over as Charlie Flynn described. I have "fixed" the problem for now with the following algorithm: 1. If end address at end of dma buffer and nothing in FIFO, done. 2. If end address < dma_buffer + max packet and bytes in FIFO, copy FIFO bytes to end address. (as per usb_recv.c) 3. If end address one past end of a max packet and bytes in FIFO, there has been a DMA jump, stick FIFO bytes at end of max packet, no matter what dma address says. The miserable code looks like this, FWIW: unsigned char *pEnd = dma_ptov( get_dma_address_sa1100( rxep.channel ) ); unsigned char *p; invalidate_dcache_range( (unsigned long) rxep.dma_buffer, (unsigned long) rxep.dma_buffer + DMA_BUF_SIZE ); for( p = temp_buffer ; *UDCCS1 & UDCCS1_RNE ; p++ ) *p = (unsigned char) *UDCDR; n = p - temp_buffer; /* number of FIFO bytes sucked */ if ( pEnd == &dma_buffer[ usbd_info.rx_pktsize ] ) memcpy( pEnd - n, temp_buffer, n ); /* lay into end of packet */ else { memcpy( pEnd, temp_buffer, n ); /* tack onto partial xfer */ pEnd += n; } // so what do we have? bytes_to_move = pEnd - rxep.dma_buffer; What is really needed is an accurate count of bytes transferred by the DMA engine (and/or drive the receiver off DMA interrupts). Or a better DMA error indication. I know Nicolas is reworking things to use the "standard" DMA API, of which I know very little, so I'll probably look at his work and adapt it to my receiver in the futre. But I'm open to theories about what is happening and how this hack can be improved, or ideally, removed. Thanks, -- Ward From kramer@pa.dec.com Fri Dec 22 08:14:52 2000 Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (root@mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id IAA00312 for ; Fri, 22 Dec 2000 08:14:52 +0100 Received: from zmamail04.zma.compaq.com (zmamail04.zma.compaq.com [161.114.64.104]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id IAA20015 for ; Fri, 22 Dec 2000 08:14:51 +0100 (MET) Received: by zmamail04.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 28FDF8C9; Fri, 22 Dec 2000 02:13:04 -0500 (EST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by zmamail04.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id DAAF1AE3; Fri, 22 Dec 2000 02:13:01 -0500 (EST) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA00480; Thu, 21 Dec 2000 23:13:00 -0800 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id XAA22639; Thu, 21 Dec 2000 23:10:17 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id XAA21165; Thu, 21 Dec 2000 23:10:13 -0800 (PST) Received: from zmamail01.nz-tay.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA04706; Thu, 21 Dec 2000 23:10:09 -0800 Received: by zmamail01.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 9BDF3C067; Fri, 22 Dec 2000 02:10:08 -0500 (EST) Received: from chmls05.mediaone.net (chmls05.mediaone.net [24.147.1.143]) by zmamail01.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A91DC2C8 for ; Fri, 22 Dec 2000 02:10:08 -0500 (EST) Received: from mvista.com (davisg.ne.mediaone.net [24.128.16.82]) by chmls05.mediaone.net (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id CAA16162; Fri, 22 Dec 2000 02:10:07 -0500 (EST) Message-Id: <3A42FDAA.7EF32EF9@mvista.com> Date: Fri, 22 Dec 2000 02:07:22 -0500 From: "George G. Davis" Organization: Monta Vista Software, Inc. X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.72 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.4.0-test11 i686) X-Accept-Language: en Mime-Version: 1.0 To: StrongArm Linux , Arm Linux , "George G. Davis" Subject: Re: Ooops in 2.4.0-test11-rmk1-np2 on Assabet+Neponset w/PCMCIA and USB in kernel References: <3A2D5FA0.D2D21437@mvista.com> <3A38800B.2894B435@mvista.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk In the category of "things everyone else knew all along and I'm just know figuring out": Long/short story: If you're experiencing problems using Neponset PCMCIA concurrently with USB OHCI and/or SA-1111 SAC (UDA1341) drivers, visit developer.intel.com to get the latest Assabet control CPLD files and update your Assabet control CPLD to the latest rev. Older rev Assabets contained buggy control CPLD code which causes bus contention (between the X-bus xcvrs and the SA-1111) during DMA cycles when PCMCIA access occurs coincident with SA-1111 DMA activity. The reason for this is due to a curious condition in which the SA-1110 leaves the PCMCIA nCE[1:0] lines asserted (my guess is because it has additional PCMCIA access cycles pending) when it reliquishes control of the bus to the SA-1111 for DMA. Since the older Assabet control CPLD code used the PCMCIA nCE[1:0] lines to control the X-bus xcvrs (without qualifying them with MBGNT and others as in the new code), this condition results in ambiguous control signals to the X-bus xcvrs and bus contention between the SA-1111 mastered DMA and the X-bus xcvrs. You can use all the printk's/printascii's you want and you won't find any code problems here folks. You will get random corruption of code and data with 100% guaranteed certainty due to bus contention though. Trying to determine what happened from oops trace analysis is hopeless in this case. You can see bad pointers everywhere. But not where they're coming from? Nothing beats a logic analyzer in these cases! ; ) Of course, reading the latest Assabet CPLD code provides the answer in plain daylight! Darn,... I wish I did that sooner! Instructions on updating the Assabet CPLDs are contained in a README file packaged with the Assabet CPLD updates obtained from Intel. Oh, if you decide to 'fix it' yourself, I accept no liability for any damage you may cause. : ) -- Regards, George "George G. Davis" wrote: > > Greetings, > > I'm still seeing an oops in 2.4.0-test11-rmk1-np2 on Assabet w/Neponset module > when both SA-1111 PCMCIA and SA-1111 USB are configured in the kernel. The > symptoms are not always consistent. Although there's _always_ a catastrophic > error when attempting to access an IBM CF microdrive (no other PCMCIA/CF > devices tested) while the SA-1111 USB host is idle w/o any devices devices > plugged in. > > Typically the symptom is an oops during interrupt handling where we're often > found servicing an hc_interrupt and calling dl_reverse_done. Other times, the > system simply hangs for a long period followed by a spurious reset. > > During the course of digging into this, I've inserted debug prints into > sa1111_irq_demux and hc_interrupt to dump SA-1111 INSTATCLR registers (only > when ints active for USB) and the USB OHCI registers. I've found that SA-1111 > INTSTATCLR bit 44 (nIrqHciM) is typically set when the crash occurs. I've > also typically found that the USB controller HcInterruptStatus is 0x65 when > it is called. > > Maybe all meaningless. But, as long as I don't access the microdrive, I never > see any interrupts from the SA-1111 USB controller. So why should I start > getting USB interrupts when accessing another device? > > BTW, I've played audio via the SA-1111 SAC interface before proceeding with > the PCMCIA access of doom. Interestingly, the audio played fine (via NFS root > mounted FS). Then the machine died promptly when proceeding with the PCMCIA > testing. > > So here's the latest oops which of course differs from my typical crash > scenario in that I die due to corruption of r4 on return from an 'ide' > interrupt handler (first time I've seen this one)? > > I'ld appreciate any insights! I'll be digging this hole a little deeper > in the meantime... > > Anyone have Assabet+Neponset? Please give this a try! > > Oh yeah, SA-1111 PCMCIA access (using IBM CF microdrive) works fine > as longs as I don't config SA-1111 USB into the kernel. From kramer@pa.dec.com Fri Dec 22 11:50:33 2000 Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (root@mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id LAA00840 for ; Fri, 22 Dec 2000 11:50:32 +0100 Received: from zmamail04.zma.compaq.com (zmamail04.zma.compaq.com [161.114.64.104]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id LAA02083 for ; Fri, 22 Dec 2000 11:50:31 +0100 (MET) Received: by zmamail04.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 3F682A6D; Fri, 22 Dec 2000 05:48:43 -0500 (EST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by zmamail04.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id DD545B62; Fri, 22 Dec 2000 05:48:40 -0500 (EST) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA01030; Fri, 22 Dec 2000 02:48:33 -0800 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id CAA26858; Fri, 22 Dec 2000 02:39:34 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id CAA27326; Fri, 22 Dec 2000 02:39:34 -0800 (PST) Received: from zmamail01.nz-tay.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA15952; Fri, 22 Dec 2000 02:39:33 -0800 Received: by zmamail01.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 02130C1FD; Fri, 22 Dec 2000 05:39:32 -0500 (EST) Received: from mail.ixcelerator.com (wsa-246.sibintek.net [213.128.193.246]) by zmamail01.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F3395B39F for ; Fri, 22 Dec 2000 05:39:25 -0500 (EST) Received: from morgoth.ixcelerator.com (IDENT:root@[172.16.10.70]) by mail.ixcelerator.com (8.10.1/8.10.1) with ESMTP id eBMAbJQ25655; Fri, 22 Dec 2000 13:37:20 +0300 Received: (from green@localhost) by morgoth.ixcelerator.com (8.10.1/8.10.1) id eBMAZa808680; Fri, 22 Dec 2000 13:35:36 +0300 Date: Fri, 22 Dec 2000 13:35:36 +0300 From: Oleg Drokin To: ipaq@handhelds.org, nico@CAM.ORG, sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Cc: brad@parker.boston.ma.us Subject: one more USB client bug squashed! Message-Id: <20001222133536.A8627@iXcelerator.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0.1i Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk Hello! I have finally found that bug, that did not allowed me to use USB link reliably. (e.g. for compilations over NFS) So, here is a patch: --- arch/arm/mach-sa1100/usb_send.c.orig Thu Dec 21 11:21:46 2000 +++ arch/arm/mach-sa1100/usb_send.c Fri Dec 22 12:59:08 2000 @@ -319,10 +319,6 @@ memcpy(send_page, (send_skb->data+10), send_len); send_ptr = send_page; - send_page[0] = (char) (send_len & 0x00ff); - send_page[1] = (char) ((send_len & 0xff00) >> 8) ; -flush_cache_all(); - /* if the packet is aligned on a 256 byte boundary then send * an extra byte so the host doesn't stall. */ @@ -336,6 +332,10 @@ send_len++; } + send_page[0] = (char) (send_len & 0x00ff); + send_page[1] = (char) ((send_len & 0xff00) >> 8) ; +flush_cache_all(); + /* flush the cache of the transmit page. */ /* processor.u.armv3v4._flush_cache_area((unsigned int) send_page, PAGE_SIZE, 0);*/ Bye, Oleg From kramer@pa.dec.com Wed Dec 27 09:11:43 2000 Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (root@mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id JAA11503 for ; Wed, 27 Dec 2000 09:11:43 +0100 Received: from ztxmail03.ztx.compaq.com (ztxmail03.ztx.compaq.com [161.114.1.207]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id JAA27998 for ; Wed, 27 Dec 2000 09:11:41 +0100 (MET) Received: by ztxmail03.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 9622B2302; Wed, 27 Dec 2000 02:09:54 -0600 (CST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by ztxmail03.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id F3FE420F5; Wed, 27 Dec 2000 02:09:51 -0600 (CST) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA30852; Wed, 27 Dec 2000 00:09:43 -0800 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id XAA12126; Tue, 26 Dec 2000 23:59:37 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id XAA14579; Tue, 26 Dec 2000 23:59:36 -0800 (PST) Received: from ztxmail01.nz-cce.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA01962; Tue, 26 Dec 2000 23:59:35 -0800 Received: by ztxmail01.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 5C32746EC; Wed, 27 Dec 2000 01:59:35 -0600 (CST) Received: from mail3.ntu.edu.sg (mail3.ntu.edu.sg [155.69.1.91]) by ztxmail01.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C28B46ED for ; Wed, 27 Dec 2000 01:59:33 -0600 (CST) Received: by mail3.ntu.edu.sg with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21) id ; Wed, 27 Dec 2000 15:59:19 +0800 Message-Id: From: #YANG XIAOYONG# <143097320@ntu.edu.sg> To: "'sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com'" Date: Wed, 27 Dec 2000 15:59:28 +0800 Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk From kramer@pa.dec.com Fri Dec 29 14:48:08 2000 Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (root@mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id OAA17860 for ; Fri, 29 Dec 2000 14:48:08 +0100 Received: from ztxmail03.ztx.compaq.com (ztxmail03.ztx.compaq.com [161.114.1.207]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id OAA14180 for ; Fri, 29 Dec 2000 14:48:06 +0100 (MET) Received: by ztxmail03.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id C6AF6438; Fri, 29 Dec 2000 07:46:18 -0600 (CST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by ztxmail03.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 226182097; Fri, 29 Dec 2000 07:46:15 -0600 (CST) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA23901; Fri, 29 Dec 2000 05:46:06 -0800 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id FAA31660; Fri, 29 Dec 2000 05:33:45 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id FAA14125; Fri, 29 Dec 2000 05:33:44 -0800 (PST) Received: from ztxmail01.nz-cce.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA27942; Fri, 29 Dec 2000 05:33:44 -0800 Received: by ztxmail01.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 7E80944D1; Fri, 29 Dec 2000 07:33:43 -0600 (CST) Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by ztxmail01.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6732C4606 for ; Fri, 29 Dec 2000 07:33:42 -0600 (CST) Received: from arthur.ubicom.tudelft.nl (arthur.ubicom.tudelft.nl [130.161.43.222]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id OAA13587; Fri, 29 Dec 2000 14:33:39 +0100 (MET) Received: (from erik@localhost) by arthur.ubicom.tudelft.nl (8.11.0/8.11.0/SuSE Linux 8.11.0-0.4) id eBTDSvo28866; Fri, 29 Dec 2000 14:28:57 +0100 Date: Fri, 29 Dec 2000 14:28:57 +0100 From: Erik Mouw To: Dell Chen Cc: linux-usb-users@lists.sourceforge.net, SA1100 linux mailing list Subject: Re: [Linux-usb-users] SA1110/Assabet board, UDC address register (0x80000004) can not be setted Message-Id: <20001229142857.N22081@arthur.ubicom.tudelft.nl> References: <009e01c07091$d1a11ea0$970102c8@sc.mcel.mot.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <009e01c07091$d1a11ea0$970102c8@sc.mcel.mot.com>; from ningch@sc.mcel.mot.com on Thu, Dec 28, 2000 at 01:48:34PM +0800 Organization: Eric Conspiracy Secret Labs X-Eric-Conspiracy: There is no conspiracy! Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk On Thu, Dec 28, 2000 at 01:48:34PM +0800, Dell Chen wrote: > I got a trouble with your SA1110/Assabet board. This is not the correct mailing list because the SA1100 USB driver is part of SA1100 ARM linux. Please use the SA1100 Linux mailing list (sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com) or the linux-arm-kernel (linux-arm-kernel@lists.arm.linux.org.uk) list. If people don't react these days, it usually means that they are on holiday. I've set a followup to the SA1100 Linux list; please remove the linux-usb list if you reply to this message. > When I write a USB program. The UDC address register (0x80000004) can not > write address into it (debugging tools can not write data into it too !). > But other UDC registers worked all right !!! Did you read section 11.8.4 in the SA1110 developers manual? You are not supposed to write data to the address register whenever you feel like it, but only when you get a SET_ADDRESS command from the USB host controller. > I can not ensure that this is a hardware error. Can you help me ensure that > all Assabet board have this error? or is there another reasons? There are some known hardware problems with the USB client implementation on the SA1100/SA1110 CPUs. Check out the errata on Intel's site. Erik -- J.A.K. (Erik) Mouw, Information and Communication Theory Group, Department of Electrical Engineering, Faculty of Information Technology and Systems, Delft University of Technology, PO BOX 5031, 2600 GA Delft, The Netherlands Phone: +31-15-2783635 Fax: +31-15-2781843 Email: J.A.K.Mouw@its.tudelft.nl WWW: http://www-ict.its.tudelft.nl/~erik/ From kramer@pa.dec.com Sun Dec 31 22:48:20 2000 Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (root@mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id WAA23660 for ; Sun, 31 Dec 2000 22:48:19 +0100 Received: from ztxmail03.ztx.compaq.com (ztxmail03.ztx.compaq.com [161.114.1.207]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id WAA16125 for ; Sun, 31 Dec 2000 22:48:17 +0100 (MET) Received: by ztxmail03.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 5ACA862B; Sun, 31 Dec 2000 15:46:29 -0600 (CST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by ztxmail03.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 65E16750; Sun, 31 Dec 2000 15:46:22 -0600 (CST) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA18297; Sun, 31 Dec 2000 13:46:05 -0800 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id NAA22890; Sun, 31 Dec 2000 13:36:39 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id NAA23024; Sun, 31 Dec 2000 13:36:38 -0800 (PST) From: Received: from zmamail01.nz-tay.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA00362; Sun, 31 Dec 2000 13:36:37 -0800 Received: by zmamail01.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id D735AE75C; Sun, 31 Dec 2000 16:36:36 -0500 (EST) Received: from saden.com (unknown [202.107.228.140]) by zmamail01.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9224AE5EE; Sun, 31 Dec 2000 16:36:34 -0500 (EST) Received: from pob23uifesi.cc.org.ar ([61.48.316.4]) by ris5s2.daidacenott14se [63.59.170.239] by saden.com (SMTPD32-6.00) id A03F84D034C; Mon, 01 Jan 2001 05:08:15 +0800 Message-Id: <000050f953c7$000076a2$00004390@pob23uifesi.cc.org.ar ([61.48.316.4]) by ris5s2.daidacenott14sere1.chuea.cesaimtv.net.ie (8.9.1a/8.9.1/1.0) with SMTP id NAE11975 ([217.45.256.4])> To: Subject: Low Interest Loans From Competing Funding Institutions! 17296 Date: Wed, 17 May 2000 05:48:37 -0700 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Priority: 3 X-Msmail-Priority: Normal Reply-To: a1@naa.go.jp Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk The Lender

The Lender's Network Mortgage Specia= lists

For U.S.A. Homeowners Only
Save Now!

We Shop The Best Loan For You!

The Lenders Network i= s a 100% free service which lets you shop for a mortgage conveniently and securely from the = comfort of your home. Using our vast network of lenders across the U.S., we will searc= h our database of loan programs for the best loans that fit your needs.  Even if yo= u're currently working with another lender or have been turned down before, we can st= ill help. 

Our= loan programs can get you the cash you need for:

  • Debt Consolidation
  • 2nd Mortgage
  • Refinance
  • Credit Repair
  • Home Improvement
  • New Car
  • Dream Vacation
  • College Tuition
  • To start a new business ..and much, much more!

F= unding borrowers with less than perfect credit is our specialty!

We can get you the loa= n you need. 
Regardless of whether you have good or bad= credit, we can help you.

Ready to get starte= d? 
Simply fill out the form below, and we'll = begin shopping for your loan.  It's that easy! 

Free Mortgage Quote

Contact Information: * required info

Name: *
Address: *
City: *
State US Only): *
Zip/Postal Code: *
Home Phone:  *
Work Phone: *
Email Address: *
Best Time to Call:
Do You Own Your Home?: Mobile Homes DO NOT Qualify
Property Value: * 
Property Type:
Purchase Price: *
Year Acquired: *
1st Mortgage Balance Owed:<= /font> * 
1st Mortgage Interest Rate:= *
Is 1st Adjustable or Fixed?= : *
2nd Mortgage Balance Owed:<= /font> *
Amount You Wish To Borrow:<= /font> *
Employer:
Monthly Gross Household Inc= ome: *
Credit Rating: *
Loan Interested In:<= /td> *


Removal Instructions:
Click on the below link to be exclude from further communication.
Click Here

From kramer@pa.dec.com Wed Jan 3 08:35:41 2001 Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (root@mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id IAA30325 for ; Wed, 3 Jan 2001 08:35:41 +0100 Received: from ztxmail03.ztx.compaq.com (ztxmail03.ztx.compaq.com [161.114.1.207]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id IAA14227 for ; Wed, 3 Jan 2001 08:35:39 +0100 (MET) Received: by ztxmail03.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 905C41823; Wed, 3 Jan 2001 01:33:50 -0600 (CST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by ztxmail03.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 05B581A3A; Wed, 3 Jan 2001 01:33:48 -0600 (CST) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA08243; Tue, 2 Jan 2001 23:33:34 -0800 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id XAA12158; Tue, 2 Jan 2001 23:24:01 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id XAA27044; Tue, 2 Jan 2001 23:24:00 -0800 (PST) Received: from zmamail01.nz-tay.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA15588; Tue, 2 Jan 2001 23:24:00 -0800 Received: by zmamail01.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 0935EDE32; Wed, 3 Jan 2001 02:23:59 -0500 (EST) Received: from mail-blue.research.att.com (mail-blue.research.att.com [135.207.30.102]) by zmamail01.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2919BDE3E for ; Wed, 3 Jan 2001 02:23:59 -0500 (EST) Received: from hermes.research.att.com (hermes.research.att.com [135.207.16.38]) by mail-blue.research.att.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EEAF14CE13 for ; Wed, 3 Jan 2001 02:23:54 -0500 (EST) Received: from research.att.com (brookline.research.att.com [135.207.8.146]) by hermes.research.att.com (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id CAA21933 for ; Wed, 3 Jan 2001 02:18:37 -0500 (EST) Message-Id: <3A52D364.8AA896F0@research.att.com> Date: Wed, 03 Jan 2001 02:23:16 -0500 From: Jack Chang Organization: AT&T Labs-Research X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.76 [en] (Win98; U) X-Accept-Language: en,zh-TW Mime-Version: 1.0 To: SA-1100/Linux Subject: uda1341 on assabet Content-Type: text/plain; charset=big5 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk On assabet, what's the formula to scale the SDRAM (bank 2)clock? and how many different clock rates we can have? Thx -- Jack T. Chang From kramer@pa.dec.com Wed Jan 3 16:00:58 2001 Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (root@mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id QAA32025 for ; Wed, 3 Jan 2001 16:00:58 +0100 Received: from zmamail04.zma.compaq.com (zmamail04.zma.compaq.com [161.114.64.104]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id QAA09551 for ; Wed, 3 Jan 2001 16:00:56 +0100 (MET) Received: by zmamail04.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id D368C132; Wed, 3 Jan 2001 09:58:30 -0500 (EST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by zmamail04.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 0F9ED2F6; Wed, 3 Jan 2001 09:58:27 -0500 (EST) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA12844; Wed, 3 Jan 2001 06:58:25 -0800 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id GAA18382; Wed, 3 Jan 2001 06:50:55 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id GAA20770; Wed, 3 Jan 2001 06:50:54 -0800 (PST) Received: from zmamail01.nz-tay.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA17088; Wed, 3 Jan 2001 06:50:54 -0800 Received: by zmamail01.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id A2C6BDF92; Wed, 3 Jan 2001 09:50:53 -0500 (EST) Received: from ispname.net (qmail1.ispname.net [64.19.9.36]) by zmamail01.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 5D3ABCDE4 for ; Wed, 3 Jan 2001 09:50:53 -0500 (EST) Received: (qmail 11610 invoked from network); 3 Jan 2001 15:02:23 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO server01.asi) (64.19.30.250) by qmail.ispname.net with SMTP; 3 Jan 2001 15:02:23 -0000 Received: by SERVER01 with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) id ; Wed, 3 Jan 2001 09:55:11 -0500 Message-Id: From: Jeff Sutherland To: "'Jack Chang'" , "'SA-1100/Linux'" Subject: RE: uda1341 on assabet Date: Wed, 3 Jan 2001 09:55:10 -0500 Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="big5" Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk Which version of the Assabet do you have? Early ones (prior to phase 4) had to have CPU clock set to 147MHz and sdram bank 2 clock set to CLK/4 in order to generate the correct clock for the uda1341 codec. The audio driver can handle the standard playback rates after that, although I've only used mine at 44.1KHz. Phase 4 units updated the PLD so that you have more choice of CPU clocks when using the 1341, but I never used that one. It's all in the online PDF manuals from developer.intel.com. > On assabet, what's the formula to scale the SDRAM (bank > 2)clock? and how > many different clock rates we can have? > Thx > -- > > Jack T. Chang > > From kramer@pa.dec.com Wed Jan 3 20:33:35 2001 Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (root@mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id UAA00461 for ; Wed, 3 Jan 2001 20:33:35 +0100 Received: from ztxmail03.ztx.compaq.com (ztxmail03.ztx.compaq.com [161.114.1.207]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id UAA25616 for ; Wed, 3 Jan 2001 20:33:33 +0100 (MET) Received: by ztxmail03.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 0AA4A1A60; Wed, 3 Jan 2001 13:31:46 -0600 (CST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by ztxmail03.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 8961F18BD; Wed, 3 Jan 2001 13:31:42 -0600 (CST) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA30880; Wed, 3 Jan 2001 11:31:40 -0800 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id LAA13402; Wed, 3 Jan 2001 11:27:08 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id LAA29659; Wed, 3 Jan 2001 11:27:07 -0800 (PST) Received: from zmamail02.nz-tay.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA20045; Wed, 3 Jan 2001 11:27:07 -0800 Received: by zmamail02.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id DE00B4E02; Wed, 3 Jan 2001 14:27:06 -0500 (EST) Received: from fire.he.net (fire.he.net [216.218.144.2]) by zmamail02.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 62DDD4C49 for ; Wed, 3 Jan 2001 14:27:06 -0500 (EST) Received: from cementship.extenex.net (64-51-136-194.client.dsl.net [64.51.136.194]) by fire.he.net (8.8.6/8.8.2) with ESMTP id LAA32341 for ; Wed, 3 Jan 2001 11:26:59 -0800 Received: from blowhole.extenex.net ([192.168.100.100]) by cementship.extenex.net (8.9.3/8.8.7) with ESMTP id LAA09968 for ; Wed, 3 Jan 2001 11:26:29 -0800 Received: from wardw by blowhole.extenex.net with local (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 14DtYK-00009I-00 for ; Wed, 03 Jan 2001 11:26:28 -0800 Date: Wed, 3 Jan 2001 11:26:28 -0800 From: Ward Willats To: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Subject: sa1100_timer_interrupt understanding Message-Id: <20010103112628.A329@extenex.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii User-Agent: Mutt/1.0.1i Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk I am poking around in operating system timer match register land and using it for my current project seems straightforward. But, just for my own curiosity, I was trying to understand the front-line timer tick handler in linux/include/asm-arm/arch-sa1100/time.h: do { do_leds(); save_flags_cli( flags ); do_timer(regs); OSSR = OSSR_M0; /* Clear match on timer 0 */ next_match = (OSMR0 += LATCH); restore_flags( flags ); } while( (signed long)(next_match - OSCR) <= 0 ); Is it correct to say that most of the time this loop is excuted only once (every 10ms)? BUT, when the OSCR wraps over to zero it entered one more time to put the match ahead of the OSCR. Does this mean that, while you do not lose any ticks (so overall counts and timekeeping are correct) a strict 10ms interval between do_timer() execution is not guaranteed? (In that, at every wrap around, you'll count two ticks back to back.) I see no problem with this, I'm just trying to deeply understand it. -- Ward From kramer@pa.dec.com Wed Jan 3 21:01:04 2001 Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (root@mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id VAA00539 for ; Wed, 3 Jan 2001 21:01:04 +0100 Received: from ztxmail05.ztx.compaq.com (ztxmail05.ztx.compaq.com [161.114.1.209]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id VAA27161 for ; Wed, 3 Jan 2001 21:01:02 +0100 (MET) Received: by ztxmail05.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 7B0BF8FF; Wed, 3 Jan 2001 13:59:14 -0600 (CST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by ztxmail05.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 9B751876; Wed, 3 Jan 2001 13:59:11 -0600 (CST) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA17728; Wed, 3 Jan 2001 11:59:10 -0800 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id LAA13981; Wed, 3 Jan 2001 11:55:36 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id LAA07728; Wed, 3 Jan 2001 11:55:35 -0800 (PST) Received: from zmamail02.nz-tay.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA08439; Wed, 3 Jan 2001 11:55:35 -0800 Received: by zmamail02.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id A6D224F8C; Wed, 3 Jan 2001 14:55:34 -0500 (EST) Received: from xanadu.home (modemcable248.137-200-24.mtl.mc.videotron.ca [24.200.137.248]) by zmamail02.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 212EF4C5A for ; Wed, 3 Jan 2001 14:55:34 -0500 (EST) Received: from localhost (nico@localhost) by xanadu.home (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id OAA18214; Wed, 3 Jan 2001 14:55:30 -0500 X-Authentication-Warning: xanadu.home: nico owned process doing -bs Date: Wed, 3 Jan 2001 14:55:30 -0500 (EST) From: Nicolas Pitre X-Sender: To: Ward Willats Cc: Subject: Re: sa1100_timer_interrupt understanding In-Reply-To: <20010103112628.A329@extenex.com> Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk On Wed, 3 Jan 2001, Ward Willats wrote: > I am poking around in operating system timer match register land and > using it for my current project seems straightforward. > > But, just for my own curiosity, I was trying to understand the > front-line timer tick handler in > linux/include/asm-arm/arch-sa1100/time.h: > > do { > do_leds(); > save_flags_cli( flags ); > do_timer(regs); > OSSR = OSSR_M0; /* Clear match on timer 0 */ > next_match = (OSMR0 += LATCH); > restore_flags( flags ); > } while( (signed long)(next_match - OSCR) <= 0 ); > > Is it correct to say that most of the time this loop is excuted only > once (every 10ms)? Yes. > BUT, when the OSCR wraps over to zero it entered > one more time to put the match ahead of the OSCR. I don't see how. The wrap around should be correctly be handled, unless something disabled interrupts for more than the half of the OSCR range, which is about 10 min... very unlikely. > Does this mean that, > while you do not lose any ticks (so overall counts and timekeeping are > correct) a strict 10ms interval between do_timer() execution is not > guaranteed? Exact. However if the previous tick interval was longer because of interrupt disabled, the next should be shortened accordingly. The overall mean interval will always be exactly 10 ms. > (In that, at every wrap around, you'll count two ticks back > to back.) Please explain. > I see no problem with this, I'm just trying to deeply understand > it. You could always add 10 ms to the current time each time, but this has the effect of loosing ticks overtime. Countdown timers have that unfortunate property. Nicolas From kramer@pa.dec.com Wed Jan 3 21:37:09 2001 Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (root@mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id VAA00681 for ; Wed, 3 Jan 2001 21:37:09 +0100 Received: from ztxmail04.ztx.compaq.com (ztxmail04.ztx.compaq.com [161.114.1.208]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id VAA28933 for ; Wed, 3 Jan 2001 21:37:07 +0100 (MET) Received: by ztxmail04.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id CC4CE165; Wed, 3 Jan 2001 14:35:15 -0600 (CST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by ztxmail04.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id AD4E73B5; Wed, 3 Jan 2001 14:35:12 -0600 (CST) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA28094; Wed, 3 Jan 2001 12:35:11 -0800 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id MAA25078; Wed, 3 Jan 2001 12:31:09 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id MAA28716; Wed, 3 Jan 2001 12:31:08 -0800 (PST) Received: from ztxmail02.nz-cce.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA08740; Wed, 3 Jan 2001 12:31:08 -0800 Received: by ztxmail02.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id EE76F1F7D; Wed, 3 Jan 2001 14:31:07 -0600 (CST) Received: from fire.he.net (fire.he.net [216.218.144.2]) by ztxmail02.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E61D1EB1 for ; Wed, 3 Jan 2001 14:31:07 -0600 (CST) Received: from cementship.extenex.net (64-51-136-194.client.dsl.net [64.51.136.194]) by fire.he.net (8.8.6/8.8.2) with ESMTP id MAA12490 for ; Wed, 3 Jan 2001 12:31:05 -0800 Received: from blowhole.extenex.net ([192.168.100.100]) by cementship.extenex.net (8.9.3/8.8.7) with ESMTP id MAA10076 for ; Wed, 3 Jan 2001 12:30:36 -0800 Received: from wardw by blowhole.extenex.net with local (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 14DuYO-0000AD-00 for ; Wed, 03 Jan 2001 12:30:36 -0800 Date: Wed, 3 Jan 2001 12:30:36 -0800 From: Ward Willats To: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Subject: Re: sa1100_timer_interrupt understanding Message-Id: <20010103123036.A612@extenex.com> References: <20010103112628.A329@extenex.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii User-Agent: Mutt/1.0.1i In-Reply-To: ; from nico@cam.org on Wed, Jan 03, 2001 at 02:55:30PM -0500 Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk On Wed, Jan 03, 2001 at 02:55:30PM -0500, Nicolas Pitre wrote: > I don't see how. The wrap around should be correctly be handled, unless > something disabled interrupts for more than the half of the OSCR range, > which is about 10 min... very unlikely. OK. I'm an idiot (should have had lunch first). For some reason I was thinking next_match would run off the end of the range as though it had more bits of precision than OSCR. Instead it rolls nicely around just like OSCR. To much hunger and "visual thinking" I guess. So...after advancing, you find the OSCR still ahead, you know interrupts were off enough to miss the next scheduled tick and you do a "make up." And the next interval between OSCR and next_match will be shorter to adjust the mean freqency. And if you're still behind, you keep repeating. Mmm. Well, let me see if I can use any of this knowledge to mess up my own code! Thanks, -- Ward From kramer@pa.dec.com Wed Jan 3 23:38:06 2001 Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (root@mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id XAA01522 for ; Wed, 3 Jan 2001 23:38:06 +0100 Received: from zmamail04.zma.compaq.com (zmamail04.zma.compaq.com [161.114.64.104]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id XAA05468 for ; Wed, 3 Jan 2001 23:38:04 +0100 (MET) Received: by zmamail04.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 9052B380; Wed, 3 Jan 2001 17:36:18 -0500 (EST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by zmamail04.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 647D83D3; Wed, 3 Jan 2001 17:36:16 -0500 (EST) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA28134; Wed, 3 Jan 2001 14:36:14 -0800 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id OAA22201; Wed, 3 Jan 2001 14:31:43 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id OAA20488; Wed, 3 Jan 2001 14:31:42 -0800 (PST) Received: from ztxmail01.nz-cce.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA01315; Wed, 3 Jan 2001 14:31:42 -0800 Received: by ztxmail01.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 98D674622; Wed, 3 Jan 2001 16:31:41 -0600 (CST) Received: from fire.he.net (fire.he.net [216.218.144.2]) by ztxmail01.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 358304467 for ; Wed, 3 Jan 2001 16:31:41 -0600 (CST) Received: from cementship.extenex.net (64-51-136-194.client.dsl.net [64.51.136.194]) by fire.he.net (8.8.6/8.8.2) with ESMTP id OAA32077 for ; Wed, 3 Jan 2001 14:31:38 -0800 Received: from blowhole.extenex.net ([192.168.100.100]) by cementship.extenex.net (8.9.3/8.8.7) with ESMTP id OAA10207 for ; Wed, 3 Jan 2001 14:31:09 -0800 Received: from wardw by blowhole.extenex.net with local (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 14DwR1-0000C4-00 for ; Wed, 03 Jan 2001 14:31:07 -0800 Date: Wed, 3 Jan 2001 14:31:07 -0800 From: Ward Willats To: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Subject: hwtimer.c Message-Id: <20010103143107.A743@extenex.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii User-Agent: Mutt/1.0.1i Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk Mmmm. What about this hwtimer.c stuff from Compaq that multiplexes OST2, normally for profiling? Think this sort of general purpose mechanism will become institutionalized on SA? Or should I just go head and hack directly into OST1 -- which, um...I've alreay done. -- Ward From kramer@pa.dec.com Thu Jan 4 01:09:49 2001 Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (root@mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id BAA01975 for ; Thu, 4 Jan 2001 01:09:49 +0100 Received: from ztxmail04.ztx.compaq.com (ztxmail04.ztx.compaq.com [161.114.1.208]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id BAA09850 for ; Thu, 4 Jan 2001 01:09:47 +0100 (MET) Received: by ztxmail04.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id E03F0D06; Wed, 3 Jan 2001 18:08:00 -0600 (CST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by ztxmail04.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 5D58ED54; Wed, 3 Jan 2001 18:07:58 -0600 (CST) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA00962; Wed, 3 Jan 2001 16:07:57 -0800 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id QAA01770; Wed, 3 Jan 2001 16:04:00 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id QAA24623; Wed, 3 Jan 2001 16:03:59 -0800 (PST) Received: from zmamail01.nz-tay.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA08138; Wed, 3 Jan 2001 16:03:59 -0800 Received: by zmamail01.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id CF558E084; Wed, 3 Jan 2001 19:03:58 -0500 (EST) Received: from xanadu.home (modemcable248.137-200-24.mtl.mc.videotron.ca [24.200.137.248]) by zmamail01.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7EBA1E2DD for ; Wed, 3 Jan 2001 19:03:58 -0500 (EST) Received: from localhost (nico@localhost) by xanadu.home (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id TAA00622; Wed, 3 Jan 2001 19:03:05 -0500 X-Authentication-Warning: xanadu.home: nico owned process doing -bs Date: Wed, 3 Jan 2001 19:03:05 -0500 (EST) From: Nicolas Pitre X-Sender: To: Ward Willats Cc: Subject: Re: hwtimer.c In-Reply-To: <20010103143107.A743@extenex.com> Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk On Wed, 3 Jan 2001, Ward Willats wrote: > Mmmm. What about this hwtimer.c stuff from Compaq that multiplexes > OST2, normally for profiling? Think this sort of general purpose > mechanism will become institutionalized on SA? Or should I just go > head and hack directly into OST1 -- which, um...I've alreay done. In your case I'd suggest that you use your own timer since what you want is as little overhead as possible. Nicolas From kramer@pa.dec.com Sat Jan 6 09:48:50 2001 Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (root@mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id JAA11895 for ; Sat, 6 Jan 2001 09:48:49 +0100 Received: from zmamail04.zma.compaq.com (zmamail04.zma.compaq.com [161.114.64.104]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id JAA12266 for ; Sat, 6 Jan 2001 09:48:48 +0100 (MET) Received: by zmamail04.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 37D53AA2; Sat, 6 Jan 2001 03:47:02 -0500 (EST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by zmamail04.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id C545F841; Sat, 6 Jan 2001 03:46:59 -0500 (EST) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA16015; Sat, 6 Jan 2001 00:46:56 -0800 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id AAA27016; Sat, 6 Jan 2001 00:40:23 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id AAA24580; Sat, 6 Jan 2001 00:40:22 -0800 (PST) Received: from zmamail02.nz-tay.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA09961; Sat, 6 Jan 2001 00:40:21 -0800 Received: by zmamail02.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 6292553DC; Sat, 6 Jan 2001 03:40:21 -0500 (EST) Received: from xanadu.home (modemcable248.137-200-24.mtl.mc.videotron.ca [24.200.137.248]) by zmamail02.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E120F54AE for ; Sat, 6 Jan 2001 03:40:20 -0500 (EST) Received: from localhost (nico@localhost) by xanadu.home (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id DAA28394; Sat, 6 Jan 2001 03:40:20 -0500 X-Authentication-Warning: xanadu.home: nico owned process doing -bs Date: Sat, 6 Jan 2001 03:40:20 -0500 (EST) From: Nicolas Pitre X-Sender: To: SA-1100/Linux Cc: Subject: At last: diff-2.4.0-rmk1-np1 Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk ... is available at the usual sites, which are: ftp://ftp.netwinder.org/users/n/nico/ ftp://ftp.arm.linux.org.uk/pub/linux/arm/people/nico/ ftp://ftp.handhelds.org/pub/linux/arm/sa-1100-patches/ This has been lightly tested on Assabet and GraphicsClient only. There are probably things that are still broken, but this patch has to go out so other people can test and help me fix what's left. There were many modifications mainly to catch up with the current kernel source base. The highlights are: - updated to 2.4.0-rmk1 (me) - Freebird updates (Chester) - initial huw_webpanel support (Roman Jordan) - Yopy updates (Tred Lim) - new SA1100 USB-ethernet driver (me) - generic interface to SA1100 USB client driver (me) - generic framework for UCB1200 support (Tred Lim) It's possible that some parts of patches I received lately might have fallen into cracks -- please check your stuff. UCB1200: I would like for someone to look at the generic UCB1200 driver and complete/debug/fix/enhance it. I know that the ucb1200_ts.c driver still compiles but doesn't work anymore on Assabet (and probably others). SA1100 USB: I rewrote many parts of the SA1100 USB driver which was IMHO a big f***ing unmaintainable mess. The most notable changes happened in usb_send.c, usb_recv.c and usb-eth.c which got completely rewritten. Now the ethernet function is entirely isolated in usb-eth.c and can (could) be interchanged with any other function driver. The wasteful usage of memcpy() for rx and tx streams is now gone. DMA usage has also been consolidated with the same API as the one used by the audio drivers. The USB ethernet link is therefore slightly faster, but still as unreliable as the previous driver unfortunately. The connection isn't able to survive more than a few seconds with a 'ping -f', but at this point it seems to be due to problems with the usb-net-host (the PC side) driver, which is also a big big mess BTW. It probably would require auditing from someone who knows USB better than me. At least the client (SA1100) side is readable and more generic now... So... enjoy! Nicolas From kramer@pa.dec.com Sun Jan 7 14:21:43 2001 Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (root@mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id OAA14929 for ; Sun, 7 Jan 2001 14:21:43 +0100 Received: from ztxmail04.ztx.compaq.com (ztxmail04.ztx.compaq.com [161.114.1.208]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id OAA03695 for ; Sun, 7 Jan 2001 14:21:41 +0100 (MET) Received: by ztxmail04.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id AD8602B1; Sun, 7 Jan 2001 07:19:54 -0600 (CST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by ztxmail04.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 31BC31AE; Sun, 7 Jan 2001 07:19:52 -0600 (CST) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA18449; Sun, 7 Jan 2001 05:19:43 -0800 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id FAA03757; Sun, 7 Jan 2001 05:09:58 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id FAA06414; Sun, 7 Jan 2001 05:09:58 -0800 (PST) Received: from zmamail01.nz-tay.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA18721; Sun, 7 Jan 2001 05:09:57 -0800 Received: by zmamail01.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 637C7DBA0; Sun, 7 Jan 2001 08:09:57 -0500 (EST) Received: from web4402.mail.yahoo.com (web4402.mail.yahoo.com [216.115.105.32]) by zmamail01.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id E6BB6DD09 for ; Sun, 7 Jan 2001 08:09:56 -0500 (EST) Message-Id: <20010107130956.11308.qmail@web4402.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [202.156.2.242] by web4402.mail.yahoo.com; Sun, 07 Jan 2001 21:09:56 CST Date: Sun, 7 Jan 2001 21:09:56 +0800 (CST) From: =?iso-8859-1?q?Supriyo=20Chatterjea?= Subject: iPAQ X-Server compatible with Assabet(SA-1110)? To: handhelds@handhelds.org, ipaq@handhelds.org, sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk Hi, I understand that the Linux distribution of the iPAQ includes an X Server. 1. Does this Linux distribution work on the Intel Assabet (which also uses the SA-1110) as well? But then again I guess some of the drivers might be different isn't it? 2. But how about just the X Server for the iPAQ? Is that compatible with the Assabet? (I need to run an application that uses FLTK on the Assabet which in turn requires the X Server.) Any comments/remarks will be greatly appreciated! Thanks, Supriyo __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail  Free email you can access from anywhere! http://mail.yahoo.com.sg/ From kramer@pa.dec.com Sun Jan 7 17:27:41 2001 Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (root@mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id RAA15324 for ; Sun, 7 Jan 2001 17:27:41 +0100 Received: from zmamail05.zma.compaq.com (zmamail05.zma.compaq.com [161.114.64.105]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id RAA10654 for ; Sun, 7 Jan 2001 17:27:40 +0100 (MET) Received: by zmamail05.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id D47602536; Sun, 7 Jan 2001 11:25:52 -0500 (EST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by zmamail05.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 4AC272528; Sun, 7 Jan 2001 11:25:50 -0500 (EST) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA19629; Sun, 7 Jan 2001 08:25:48 -0800 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id IAA13528; Sun, 7 Jan 2001 08:24:04 -0800 (PST) Received: from src-mail.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id IAA19242; Sun, 7 Jan 2001 08:24:04 -0800 (PST) Received: by src-mail.pa.dec.com; id IAA00178; Sun, 7 Jan 2001 08:23:53 -0800 (PST) From: jg@pa.dec.com (Jim Gettys) Received: (from pachydrm@localhost) by pachyderm.pa.dec.com (8.11.1/8.11.1) id f07GNpc320653; Sun, 7 Jan 2001 08:23:51 -0800 (PST) Date: Sun, 7 Jan 2001 08:23:51 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <200101071623.f07GNpc320653@pachyderm.pa.dec.com> X-Mailer: Pachyderm (client pachyderm.pa-x.dec.com, user jg) To: =?iso-8859-1?q?Supriyo=20Chatterjea?= Cc: handhelds@handhelds.org, ipaq@handhelds.org, sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com In-Reply-To: <20010107130956.11308.qmail@web4402.mail.yahoo.com> Subject: Re: [iPAQ] iPAQ X-Server compatible with Assabet(SA-1110)? Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk > Sender: ipaq-admin@handhelds.org > From: =?iso-8859-1?q?Supriyo=20Chatterjea?= > Date: Sun, 7 Jan 2001 21:09:56 +0800 (CST) > To: handhelds@handhelds.org, ipaq@handhelds.org, sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com > Subject: [iPAQ] iPAQ X-Server compatible with Assabet(SA-1110)? > ----- > Hi, > > I understand that the Linux distribution of the iPAQ > includes an X Server. > > 1. Does this Linux distribution work on the Intel > Assabet (which also uses the SA-1110) as well? But > then again I guess some of the drivers might be > different isn't it? The server uses the fbdev driver, and should run on any system that provides the fbdev driver. > > 2. But how about just the X Server for the iPAQ? Is > that compatible with the Assabet? (I need to run an > application that uses FLTK on the Assabet which in > turn requires the X Server.) > I think the X server should run, unless it fails attempting to open the non-existant touch screen device you'd not have. - Jim -- Jim Gettys Technology and Corporate Development Compaq Computer Corporation jg@pa.dec.com From kramer@pa.dec.com Sun Jan 7 19:04:16 2001 Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (root@mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id TAA15588 for ; Sun, 7 Jan 2001 19:04:16 +0100 Received: from zmamail05.zma.compaq.com (zmamail05.zma.compaq.com [161.114.64.105]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id TAA14294 for ; Sun, 7 Jan 2001 19:04:14 +0100 (MET) Received: by zmamail05.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 14DFA15FE; Sun, 7 Jan 2001 13:02:27 -0500 (EST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by zmamail05.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id CA4271589; Sun, 7 Jan 2001 13:02:24 -0500 (EST) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA13936; Sun, 7 Jan 2001 10:02:23 -0800 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id KAA18975; Sun, 7 Jan 2001 10:01:05 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id KAA20836; Sun, 7 Jan 2001 10:01:04 -0800 (PST) Received: from zmamail01.nz-tay.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA10066; Sun, 7 Jan 2001 10:01:04 -0800 Received: by zmamail01.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 0700DDE82; Sun, 7 Jan 2001 13:01:04 -0500 (EST) Received: from usc.edu (usc.edu [128.125.253.136]) by zmamail01.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A441DC70 for ; Sun, 7 Jan 2001 13:01:03 -0500 (EST) Received: from scf-fs.usc.edu (root@scf-fs.usc.edu [128.125.253.183]) by usc.edu (8.9.3.1/8.9.3/usc) with ESMTP id KAA11495; Sun, 7 Jan 2001 10:01:02 -0800 (PST) Received: from aludra.usc.edu (dantu@aludra.usc.edu [128.125.253.184]) by scf-fs.usc.edu (8.9.3.1/8.9.3/usc) with ESMTP id KAA25388; Sun, 7 Jan 2001 10:01:02 -0800 (PST) Date: Sun, 7 Jan 2001 10:01:01 -0800 (PST) From: Karthik DK To: =?iso-8859-1?q?Supriyo=20Chatterjea?= Cc: handhelds@handhelds.org, ipaq@handhelds.org, sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Subject: Re: iPAQ X-Server compatible with Assabet(SA-1110)? In-Reply-To: <20010107130956.11308.qmail@web4402.mail.yahoo.com> Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk Hi > 1. Does this Linux distribution work on the Intel > Assabet (which also uses the SA-1110) as well? But > then again I guess some of the drivers might be > different isn't it? > I am desperately trying the same. I also have an assabet board with fb driver and am trying to cross-compile X for it. If u make any progress on these lines pls keep me posted. I too am not sure of the changes needed for X to run, between the iPAQ and the assabet board. It would be nice if somebody on the list elaborated on these lines. > 2. But how about just the X Server for the iPAQ? Is > that compatible with the Assabet? (I need to run an > application that uses FLTK on the Assabet which in > turn requires the X Server.) > Yes. I have already tried this. I got the Xfbdev( X server for framebuffer) binary from one of the guys on the list and was successful in running it on assabet. If u want, I could mail u the binary. Here, I have one more question, and this might be offtopic, but Ill ask anyway. What else do I need to do to run an application now? I tried running just the X server on one of my PCs and then running an X client on it ( which in my limited knowledge must work) but I got a "Cannot open display" error. I dont think authentication is a problem if I run X server and client on the same machine, right? So, what am I missing here? Thanks KAR. From kramer@pa.dec.com Mon Jan 8 01:02:22 2001 Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (root@mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id BAA16348 for ; Mon, 8 Jan 2001 01:02:22 +0100 Received: from zmamail05.zma.compaq.com (zmamail05.zma.compaq.com [161.114.64.105]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id BAA28532 for ; Mon, 8 Jan 2001 01:02:20 +0100 (MET) Received: by zmamail05.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 50DD51540; Sun, 7 Jan 2001 19:00:34 -0500 (EST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by zmamail05.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 199D4154A; Sun, 7 Jan 2001 19:00:32 -0500 (EST) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA14536; Sun, 7 Jan 2001 16:00:26 -0800 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id PAA14768; Sun, 7 Jan 2001 15:58:38 -0800 (PST) Received: from src-mail.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id PAA20013; Sun, 7 Jan 2001 15:58:38 -0800 (PST) Received: by src-mail.pa.dec.com; id PAA05882; Sun, 7 Jan 2001 15:58:30 -0800 (PST) From: jg@pa.dec.com (Jim Gettys) Received: (from pachydrm@localhost) by pachyderm.pa.dec.com (8.11.1/8.11.1) id f07NwSq402979; Sun, 7 Jan 2001 15:58:28 -0800 (PST) Date: Sun, 7 Jan 2001 15:58:28 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <200101072358.f07NwSq402979@pachyderm.pa.dec.com> X-Mailer: Pachyderm (client pachyderm.pa-x.dec.com, user jg) To: Karthik DK Cc: =?iso-8859-1?q?Supriyo=20Chatterjea?= , handhelds@handhelds.org, ipaq@handhelds.org, sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com In-Reply-To: Subject: Re: [Handhelds] Re: iPAQ X-Server compatible with Assabet(SA-1110)? Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk > Here, I have one more question, and this might be > offtopic, but Ill ask anyway. What else do I need to do to run an > application now? I tried running just the X server on one of my PCs and > then running an X client on it ( which in my limited knowledge must > work) but I got a "Cannot open display" error. I dont think authentication > is a problem if I run X server and client on the same machine, right? So, > what am I missing here? > You might want to install more fonts in appropriate locations. There are only a small number of fonts built into the server binary. Clients give that error message if they don't know what display to open. This is generally by setting the DISPLAY environment variable. e.g. export DISPLAY=:0 (for the local machine) or export DISPLAY=hostname:0 for remote, or in a -display or --display command line argument. 0 Hun -- Jim Gettys Technology and Corporate Development Compaq Computer Corporation jg@pa.dec.com From kramer@pa.dec.com Mon Jan 8 23:29:24 2001 Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (root@mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id XAA20670 for ; Mon, 8 Jan 2001 23:29:24 +0100 Received: from zmamail05.zma.compaq.com (zmamail05.zma.compaq.com [161.114.64.105]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id XAA10206 for ; Mon, 8 Jan 2001 23:29:22 +0100 (MET) Received: by zmamail05.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 363482651; Mon, 8 Jan 2001 17:27:35 -0500 (EST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by zmamail05.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id F2FB82422; Mon, 8 Jan 2001 17:27:32 -0500 (EST) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA23631; Mon, 8 Jan 2001 14:27:29 -0800 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id OAA11679; Mon, 8 Jan 2001 14:20:10 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id OAA12737; Mon, 8 Jan 2001 14:20:09 -0800 (PST) Received: from zmamail02.nz-tay.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA20323; Mon, 8 Jan 2001 14:20:08 -0800 Received: by zmamail02.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 1FBCF5A09; Mon, 8 Jan 2001 17:20:08 -0500 (EST) Received: from dryline-fw.wireless-sys.com (dryline-fw.wireless-sys.com [216.126.67.45]) by zmamail02.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA0045866 for ; Mon, 8 Jan 2001 17:20:07 -0500 (EST) Received: from SomaNetworks.com (sklindsa@gordon.yyz.somanetworks.com [10.11.10.138]) by dryline-fw.wireless-sys.com (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id RAA16669; Mon, 8 Jan 2001 17:20:07 -0500 Message-Id: <3A5A3D16.A616F6E6@SomaNetworks.com> Date: Mon, 08 Jan 2001 17:20:06 -0500 From: "Scott K. Lindsay, P.Eng." Reply-To: Scott.Lindsay@SomaNetworks.com Organization: Soma Networks X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.7 [en] (X11; I; Linux 2.2.14-15mdk i686) X-Accept-Language: en Mime-Version: 1.0 To: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com, nico@CAM.ORG Subject: linux-2.4.0-rmk1-np1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk make xconfig chokes. Here's a patch: # This is a BitKeeper generated patch for the following project: # Project Name: Trans Lab NetPort Linux Sub-Gate # This patch format is intended for GNU patch command version 2.5 or higher. # This patch includes the following deltas: # ChangeSet 1.68.1.1 -> 1.68.1.2 # drivers/char/Config.in 1.14 -> 1.15 # # The following is the BitKeeper ChangeSet Log # -------------------------------------------- # 01/01/08 sklindsa@gordon.yyz.somanetworks.com 1.68.1.2 # Fix script so xconfig works again. # -------------------------------------------- # diff -Nru a/drivers/char/Config.in b/drivers/char/Config.in --- a/drivers/char/Config.in Mon Jan 8 15:59:07 2001 +++ b/drivers/char/Config.in Mon Jan 8 15:59:07 2001 @@ -75,7 +75,7 @@ bool ' Console on SA1100 serial port' CONFIG_SERIAL_SA1100_CONSOLE int ' Default SA1100 serial baudrate' CONFIG_SA1100_DEFAULT_BAUDRATE 9600 fi - dep_tristate 'UCB1200 touchscreen support(SA1100 only)' CONFIG_TOUCHSCREEN_UCB1200 $(CONFIG_UCB1200) + dep_tristate 'UCB1200 touchscreen support(SA1100 only)' CONFIG_TOUCHSCREEN_UCB1200 $CONFIG_UCB1200 tristate 'Bitsy touchscreen support' CONFIG_TOUCHSCREEN_BITSY if [ "$CONFIG_SA1100_ASSABET" = "y" ]; then tristate 'SA-1100 switches support' CONFIG_SA1100_SWITCHES -- Scott K. Lindsay, P.Eng. Soma Networks Scott.Lindsay@SomaNetworks.com From kramer@pa.dec.com Tue Jan 9 19:43:47 2001 Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (root@mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id TAA24039 for ; Tue, 9 Jan 2001 19:43:47 +0100 Received: from zmamail03.zma.compaq.com (zmamail03.zma.compaq.com [161.114.64.103]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id TAA18788 for ; Tue, 9 Jan 2001 19:43:45 +0100 (MET) Received: by zmamail03.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id EFCE86E05; Tue, 9 Jan 2001 13:41:57 -0500 (EST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by zmamail03.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id A89816D2D; Tue, 9 Jan 2001 13:41:55 -0500 (EST) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA00213; Tue, 9 Jan 2001 10:41:53 -0800 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id KAA21484; Tue, 9 Jan 2001 10:32:57 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id KAA22161; Tue, 9 Jan 2001 10:32:57 -0800 (PST) Received: from zmamail01.nz-tay.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA03308; Tue, 9 Jan 2001 10:32:56 -0800 Received: by zmamail01.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 1AC1ADEAB; Tue, 9 Jan 2001 13:32:56 -0500 (EST) Received: from fire.he.net (fire.he.net [216.218.144.2]) by zmamail01.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8EC25DF67 for ; Tue, 9 Jan 2001 13:32:55 -0500 (EST) Received: from cementship.extenex.net (64-51-136-194.client.dsl.net [64.51.136.194]) by fire.he.net (8.8.6/8.8.2) with ESMTP id KAA23088; Tue, 9 Jan 2001 10:32:50 -0800 Received: from blowhole.extenex.net (blowhole.extenex.net [192.168.100.100]) by cementship.extenex.net (8.9.3/8.8.7) with ESMTP id KAA07409; Tue, 9 Jan 2001 10:32:21 -0800 Received: from wardw by blowhole.extenex.net with local (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 14G3ZF-0002AS-00; Tue, 09 Jan 2001 10:32:21 -0800 Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2001 10:32:21 -0800 From: Ward Willats To: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Subject: SA1110 USB Function driver Message-Id: <20010109103221.A8299@extenex.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii User-Agent: Mutt/1.0.1i Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk I am bolting my character-oriented ring-buffer onto the new SA USB function driver. In general, the new code looks to be a great improvement. I still not to testing, but I believe it is not an error in the vanilla bulk transfer case for the last DATA0/1 to be short. This is "short packet retirement" in the spec. Windows drivers have a flag that sets whether this is an error or not. The callback needs to be able to tell the difference between an RPE and short packet. I've changed short packet to -EPIPE and left RPE at -EIO. I will test and report. Another mystery: the USB spec says the maximum supported size of a bulk transfer DATA0/1 is 64 bytes. But SA hardware goes to 256 and the spec says DATA0/1 can be up to 1023 (in what context I'm not sure). I've done 256 bulk without problems on several Windows and Linux hosts, so my guess is that, while a USB host is only _required_ to support up to 64 bytes, most can go (illegally) larger, at the expense of possibly not being scheduled as regularly in a frame if there is a a lot of higher-prioirty (isochronous) traffic on the wire. -- Ward From kramer@pa.dec.com Wed Jan 10 02:29:27 2001 Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (root@mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id CAA25359 for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2001 02:29:27 +0100 Received: from ztxmail03.ztx.compaq.com (ztxmail03.ztx.compaq.com [161.114.1.207]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id CAA12025 for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2001 02:29:25 +0100 (MET) Received: by ztxmail03.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 22B2E18A9; Tue, 9 Jan 2001 19:27:38 -0600 (CST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by ztxmail03.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 547B31AEA; Tue, 9 Jan 2001 19:27:36 -0600 (CST) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA16161; Tue, 9 Jan 2001 17:27:33 -0800 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id RAA26174; Tue, 9 Jan 2001 17:19:44 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id RAA25131; Tue, 9 Jan 2001 17:19:43 -0800 (PST) Received: from zmamail01.nz-tay.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA16572; Tue, 9 Jan 2001 17:19:43 -0800 Received: by zmamail01.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id AC555DF50; Tue, 9 Jan 2001 20:19:42 -0500 (EST) Received: from localhostnl (localhostnl.demon.nl [195.11.248.215]) by zmamail01.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id A5BBEE19A for ; Tue, 9 Jan 2001 20:19:41 -0500 (EST) Subject: itsy replaced by bitsy? From: William Staniewicz Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2001 02:16:10 -0500 To: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <20010110011942.AC555DF50@zmamail01.zma.compaq.com> Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk Does research still actively go on with the itsy or is the bitsy now the platform used for testing and development? Also, how many itsy's were actually made? Bill From kramer@pa.dec.com Wed Jan 10 03:19:25 2001 Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (root@mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id DAA25490 for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2001 03:19:25 +0100 Received: from zmamail05.zma.compaq.com (zmamail05.zma.compaq.com [161.114.64.105]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id DAA13954 for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2001 03:19:23 +0100 (MET) Received: by zmamail05.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id E7173174D; Tue, 9 Jan 2001 21:17:36 -0500 (EST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by zmamail05.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 9C4FA2516; Tue, 9 Jan 2001 21:17:34 -0500 (EST) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA13092; Tue, 9 Jan 2001 18:17:33 -0800 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id SAA23975; Tue, 9 Jan 2001 18:12:40 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id SAA23520; Tue, 9 Jan 2001 18:12:39 -0800 (PST) Received: from stowe.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA14648; Tue, 9 Jan 2001 18:12:39 -0800 Received: by stowe.pa.dec.com; (5.65v4.0/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id AA23539; Tue, 9 Jan 2001 18:12:39 -0800 Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2001 18:12:39 -0800 Message-Id: <200101100212.AA23539@stowe.pa.dec.com> From: Deborah Wallach To: wstan@localhostnl.demon.nl Cc: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com In-Reply-To: <20010110011942.AC555DF50@zmamail01.zma.compaq.com> (message from William Staniewicz on Wed, 10 Jan 2001 02:16:10 -0500) Subject: Re: itsy replaced by bitsy? Address: Compaq Computer Corporation; Western Research Laboratory; 250 University Avenue; Palo Alto, CA 94301; USA Phone: 650-617-3315 Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk Does research still actively go on with the itsy or is the bitsy now the platform used for testing and development? Also, how many itsy's were actually made? Yes, research still actively occurs on the Itsy, since we built certain features into the Itsy which were not included on the iPAQ product (for example, hooks for onboard power monitoring). Research also occurs on the iPAQ, since it is a widely available platform with a potentially large user base. About 75 Itsy version 1 units were built, and about 25 Itsy version 2 units have been built to this date. -Debby From kramer@pa.dec.com Wed Jan 10 19:08:42 2001 Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (root@mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id TAA27853 for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2001 19:08:42 +0100 Received: from ztxmail04.ztx.compaq.com (ztxmail04.ztx.compaq.com [161.114.1.208]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id TAA06755 for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2001 19:08:39 +0100 (MET) Received: by ztxmail04.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id CEF271FA; Wed, 10 Jan 2001 12:06:19 -0600 (CST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by ztxmail04.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 2875D163; Wed, 10 Jan 2001 12:06:18 -0600 (CST) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA06391; Wed, 10 Jan 2001 10:06:11 -0800 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id JAA28614; Wed, 10 Jan 2001 09:57:57 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id JAA05937; Wed, 10 Jan 2001 09:57:56 -0800 (PST) Received: from stowe.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA03569; Wed, 10 Jan 2001 09:57:56 -0800 Received: by stowe.pa.dec.com; (5.65v4.0/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id AA24220; Wed, 10 Jan 2001 09:57:51 -0800 Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2001 09:57:51 -0800 Message-Id: <200101101757.AA24220@stowe.pa.dec.com> From: Deborah Wallach To: Nize@vkr.k-net.dk Cc: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com In-Reply-To: (message from Anders Frederiksen on Wed, 10 Jan 2001 03:36:06 +0100) Subject: Re: SV: itsy replaced by bitsy? Address: Compaq Computer Corporation; Western Research Laboratory; 250 University Avenue; Palo Alto, CA 94301; USA Phone: 650-617-3315 Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk From: Anders Frederiksen Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2001 03:36:06 +0100 Is bitsy=iPAQ? I should clarify my answer. In the linux kernel sources, "BITSY" referes to the Compaq iPAQ 3600 series handheld. There is also a product called a 'bitsy', offered by Applied Data Sources, which is a 3" x 4" embedded StrongARM SA-1110 Platform. I don't know anything about this product, and the web pages for it, although still cached by google, appear to have disappeared. -Debby > -----Oprindelig meddelelse----- > Fra: Deborah Wallach [mailto:kerr@pa.dec.com] > Sendt: 10. januar 2001 03:13 > Til: wstan@localhostnl.demon.nl > Cc: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com > Emne: Re: itsy replaced by bitsy? > > > > Does research still actively go on with the itsy > or is the bitsy now the platform used for testing and > development? Also, how many itsy's were actually > made? > > Yes, research still actively occurs on the Itsy, since we > built certain > features into the Itsy which were not included on the iPAQ > product (for > example, hooks for onboard power monitoring). Research also > occurs on the > iPAQ, since it is a widely available platform with a > potentially large user > base. > > About 75 Itsy version 1 units were built, and about 25 Itsy > version 2 units > have been built to this date. > > -Debby > > > From kramer@pa.dec.com Wed Jan 10 19:21:24 2001 Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (root@mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id TAA27885 for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2001 19:21:24 +0100 Received: from zmamail05.zma.compaq.com (zmamail05.zma.compaq.com [161.114.64.105]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id TAA07480 for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2001 19:21:20 +0100 (MET) Received: by zmamail05.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 3B79C24E7; Wed, 10 Jan 2001 13:19:01 -0500 (EST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by zmamail05.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id C9AE9265E; Wed, 10 Jan 2001 13:18:58 -0500 (EST) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA03274; Wed, 10 Jan 2001 10:18:56 -0800 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id KAA18476; Wed, 10 Jan 2001 10:15:19 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id KAA09319; Wed, 10 Jan 2001 10:15:18 -0800 (PST) Received: from ztxmail01.nz-cce.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA27400; Wed, 10 Jan 2001 10:15:18 -0800 Received: by ztxmail01.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id D1134440B; Wed, 10 Jan 2001 12:15:17 -0600 (CST) Received: from localhostnl (localhostnl.demon.nl [195.11.248.215]) by ztxmail01.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id A3BB0460A for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2001 12:15:15 -0600 (CST) Subject: pooling resources to build an Itsy From: William Staniewicz Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2001 19:11:43 -0500 To: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <20010110181517.D1134440B@ztxmail01.ztx.compaq.com> Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk Although I have only begun to read the information on how to build the Itsy, I already know some things to be assumed. That is, it is not possible as an individual to build one. If I understand correctly, it is because certain key items are not available in single quantities or the pricing on a single item would be astronomical. I guess another thing is that much of the assembly requires great precision, something that would not be likely at the kitchen table while watching X-files. But, would it be legal and feasible to pool together the resources of indiduals so that items could be bought in quantity or certain key items could be partially assembled to exact tolerences by a qualified firm? I guess it all seems a little crazy when you can get an IPAQ already packaged and have the support of Compaq behind you but I think there are are few of us who would think it worth while to have something special and put in the extra effort and cost. One other small question. Are the assembly directions for version 2 available or is 1.5 as far as it goes now? What are the differences between the versions? Thank you, Bill From kramer@pa.dec.com Wed Jan 10 20:15:04 2001 Received: from ns1.et.tudelft.nl (root@ns1.et.tudelft.nl [130.161.33.17]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id UAA28025 for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2001 20:15:04 +0100 Received: from ztxmail04.ztx.compaq.com (ztxmail04.ztx.compaq.com [161.114.1.208]) by ns1.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3 (PHNE_18979)/8.9.3) with ESMTP id UAA25015 for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2001 20:15:01 +0100 (MET) Received: by ztxmail04.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id A548D38A; Wed, 10 Jan 2001 13:11:09 -0600 (CST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by ztxmail04.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id E95592D8; Wed, 10 Jan 2001 13:11:07 -0600 (CST) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA32122; Wed, 10 Jan 2001 11:11:06 -0800 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id LAA30542; Wed, 10 Jan 2001 11:07:07 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id LAA01518; Wed, 10 Jan 2001 11:07:06 -0800 (PST) Received: from zmamail01.nz-tay.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA21240; Wed, 10 Jan 2001 11:07:06 -0800 Received: by zmamail01.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id B8DC4DF8A; Wed, 10 Jan 2001 14:07:05 -0500 (EST) Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by zmamail01.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C4541DD6B for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2001 14:07:01 -0500 (EST) Received: from arthur.ubicom.tudelft.nl (arthur.ubicom.tudelft.nl [130.161.43.222]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id UAA10130; Wed, 10 Jan 2001 20:06:59 +0100 (MET) Received: (from erik@localhost) by arthur.ubicom.tudelft.nl (8.11.0/8.11.0/SuSE Linux 8.11.0-0.4) id f0AJ6Ea16727; Wed, 10 Jan 2001 20:06:14 +0100 Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2001 20:06:14 +0100 From: Erik Mouw To: William Staniewicz Cc: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Subject: Re: pooling resources to build an Itsy Message-Id: <20010110200614.M13334@arthur.ubicom.tudelft.nl> References: <20010110181517.D1134440B@ztxmail01.ztx.compaq.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <20010110181517.D1134440B@ztxmail01.ztx.compaq.com>; from wstan@localhostnl.demon.nl on Wed, Jan 10, 2001 at 07:11:43PM -0500 Organization: Eric Conspiracy Secret Labs X-Eric-Conspiracy: There is no conspiracy! Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk On Wed, Jan 10, 2001 at 07:11:43PM -0500, William Staniewicz wrote: > But, would it be legal and feasible to pool together > the resources of indiduals so that items could be bought > in quantity or certain key items could be partially > assembled to exact tolerences by a qualified firm? Sure, that's exactly what happens on the LART mailing list. > I guess it all seems a little crazy when you can get an > IPAQ already packaged and have the support of Compaq > behind you but I think there are are few of us who > would think it worth while to have something special and > put in the extra effort and cost. Maybe I'm biased as a LART developer, but as far as I know there is currently much more interest in building LARTs than Itsys. There are already some "collectives" formed on the LART mailing list, you might consider joining one of them. The LART is not as tightly integrated as the Itsy, but that's because the LART had different design goals. For more info on the LART, see http://www.lart.tudelft.nl/ . Erik -- J.A.K. (Erik) Mouw, Information and Communication Theory Group, Department of Electrical Engineering, Faculty of Information Technology and Systems, Delft University of Technology, PO BOX 5031, 2600 GA Delft, The Netherlands Phone: +31-15-2783635 Fax: +31-15-2781843 Email: J.A.K.Mouw@its.tudelft.nl WWW: http://www-ict.its.tudelft.nl/~erik/ From kramer@pa.dec.com Wed Jan 10 21:08:03 2001 Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (root@mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id VAA28235 for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2001 21:08:03 +0100 Received: from ztxmail03.ztx.compaq.com (ztxmail03.ztx.compaq.com [161.114.1.207]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id VAA13483 for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2001 21:08:01 +0100 (MET) Received: by ztxmail03.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 3D811B64; Wed, 10 Jan 2001 14:05:40 -0600 (CST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by ztxmail03.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 7BCC99E9; Wed, 10 Jan 2001 14:05:38 -0600 (CST) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA08702; Wed, 10 Jan 2001 12:05:32 -0800 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id MAA32355; Wed, 10 Jan 2001 12:01:34 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id MAA01225; Wed, 10 Jan 2001 12:01:33 -0800 (PST) Received: from ztxmail01.nz-cce.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA12724; Wed, 10 Jan 2001 12:01:33 -0800 Received: by ztxmail01.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id EFEAD443D; Wed, 10 Jan 2001 14:01:32 -0600 (CST) Received: from cc234543-a.vron1.nj.home.com (cc234543-a.vron1.nj.home.com [24.3.211.180]) by ztxmail01.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7652E41D5 for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2001 14:01:32 -0600 (CST) Received: from localhost (localhost [[UNIX: localhost]]) by cc234543-a.vron1.nj.home.com (8.11.1/8.11.1/Debian 8.11.0-6) id f0AK5AR05033; Wed, 10 Jan 2001 15:05:10 -0500 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" From: Edward Muller Reply-To: edwardam@home.com To: handhelds@handhelds.org Subject: Re: [Handhelds] test Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2001 15:05:10 -0500 X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.2] References: <01011014421504.03921@cc234543-a> In-Reply-To: <01011014421504.03921@cc234543-a> Mime-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <01011015051006.03921@cc234543-a> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk On Wednesday 10 January 2001 2:42 pm, Edward Muller wrote: > test It looks like we're back. Mail stopped being delivered for some reason sometime on Monday (for most people). I restarted sendmail today and it looks like we are back in business. Emails that were sent were recieved and are in the mailing list archives (http://www.handhelds.org/email_lists.html). So please re-send and hopefully things will get back to normal. -- Edward Muller - edwardam@home.com - edwardam@handhelds.org 'It's because crappy programs offend me.' --Eric Raymond From kramer@pa.dec.com Wed Jan 10 23:12:40 2001 Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (root@mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id XAA28732 for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2001 23:12:40 +0100 Received: from zmamail03.zma.compaq.com (zmamail03.zma.compaq.com [161.114.64.103]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id XAA20965 for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2001 23:12:38 +0100 (MET) Received: by zmamail03.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id E0F61823F; Wed, 10 Jan 2001 17:10:18 -0500 (EST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by zmamail03.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 895F82A27; Wed, 10 Jan 2001 17:10:16 -0500 (EST) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA03196; Wed, 10 Jan 2001 14:10:14 -0800 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id OAA21102; Wed, 10 Jan 2001 14:02:17 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id OAA02435; Wed, 10 Jan 2001 14:02:16 -0800 (PST) Received: from zmamail01.nz-tay.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA08618; Wed, 10 Jan 2001 14:02:16 -0800 Received: by zmamail01.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id B5469CE28; Wed, 10 Jan 2001 17:02:14 -0500 (EST) Received: from pigeon.maya.com (po.maya.com [192.70.254.2]) by zmamail01.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 58DD3CD2B for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2001 17:02:14 -0500 (EST) Received: from SNIPE.maya.com (snipe.maya.com [192.70.254.125]) by pigeon.maya.com (Postfix) with SMTP id C810330817; Wed, 10 Jan 2001 16:35:07 -0500 (EST) To: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Subject: Re: pooling resources to build an Itsy References: <20010110181517.D1134440B@ztxmail01.ztx.compaq.com> Organization: MAYA Design Group From: Jeff Senn X-Face: ._HOR,#9~<*ir.> Message-Id: Lines: 27 User-Agent: Gnus/5.090001 (Oort Gnus v0.01) XEmacs/21.2 (Peisino,Ak(B) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk William Staniewicz writes: > But, would it be legal and feasible to pool together > the resources of indiduals so that items could be bought > in quantity or certain key items could be partially > assembled to exact tolerences by a qualified firm? > > I guess it all seems a little crazy when you can get an > IPAQ already packaged and have the support of Compaq > behind you but I think there are are few of us who > would think it worth while to have something special and > put in the extra effort and cost. Well... we have a research project involving the SA, and before we started to try to build our own board (a little less than a year ago) I could not conceive of how difficult it has been -- we have put that part of the project on hold (and are using an OEM board) until part shortages and other issues ease... I'd love to hear someone's success story about building low/medium volumes of a SA design for a reasonable cost... -- -Jas -------------------- www.maya.com Jeff Senn | / / |-/ \ / /| Chief Technologist | /|/| |/ o | /-| Head of R&D | Taming Complexity From kramer@pa.dec.com Wed Jan 10 23:39:42 2001 Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (root@mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id XAA28810 for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2001 23:39:42 +0100 Received: from ztxmail05.ztx.compaq.com (ztxmail05.ztx.compaq.com [161.114.1.209]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id XAA22475 for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2001 23:39:40 +0100 (MET) Received: by ztxmail05.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 927A7914; Wed, 10 Jan 2001 16:37:20 -0600 (CST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by ztxmail05.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id D807B989; Wed, 10 Jan 2001 16:37:18 -0600 (CST) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA19658; Wed, 10 Jan 2001 14:37:14 -0800 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id OAA05702; Wed, 10 Jan 2001 14:34:46 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id OAA28945; Wed, 10 Jan 2001 14:34:45 -0800 (PST) Received: from zmamail02.nz-tay.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA15413; Wed, 10 Jan 2001 14:34:45 -0800 Received: by zmamail02.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 024FE5B77; Wed, 10 Jan 2001 17:34:44 -0500 (EST) Received: from smtp1.andrew.cmu.edu (SMTP1.ANDREW.CMU.EDU [128.2.10.81]) by zmamail02.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B0C3558C9 for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2001 17:34:44 -0500 (EST) Received: from UNIX10.ANDREW.CMU.EDU (UNIX10.ANDREW.CMU.EDU [128.2.11.210]) by smtp1.andrew.cmu.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id RAA11960; Wed, 10 Jan 2001 17:34:43 -0500 (EST) Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2001 17:34:42 -0500 (EST) From: John G Dorsey To: Jeff Senn Cc: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Subject: Re: pooling resources to build an Itsy In-Reply-To: Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk On 10 Jan 2001, Jeff Senn wrote: > I'd love to hear someone's success story about building low/medium > volumes of a SA design for a reasonable cost... I just got the first Spot (www.wearablegroup.org/hardware/spot) boards back from manufacturing today. Technically this won't be a "success" story until it includes some mention of running code, but hopefully that isn't so far off. =) I don't know if you get to build interesting StrongARM designs in small numbers on the cheap. There are thousands of US$ in memory tied up in our first run of four prototypes. Convincing distributors to cough up the StrataFlash parts, the SA-1110, and the UDA1341 in particular was something of an exercise for us. Less exciting issues include finding a board shop that would make a mixed flex/rigid board, and an assembly shop that could mount the BGAs. Quite seriously, unless you have a requirement that just couldn't possibly be satisfied by an Itsy/Bitsy, "rolling your own" seems like an endeavor one should undertake with hesitation. In our case, we wanted lots of main memory, standardized digital video out, more interesting peripheral interconnects, more flexible power supply options, and on-board power instrumentation, among some other things. Good luck with your hardware, -jd From kramer@pa.dec.com Thu Jan 11 01:12:08 2001 Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (root@mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id BAA29233 for ; Thu, 11 Jan 2001 01:12:08 +0100 Received: from zmamail03.zma.compaq.com (zmamail03.zma.compaq.com [161.114.64.103]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id BAA28028 for ; Thu, 11 Jan 2001 01:12:07 +0100 (MET) Received: by zmamail03.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 2C7C89BE9; Wed, 10 Jan 2001 19:09:40 -0500 (EST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by zmamail03.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 182389C22; Wed, 10 Jan 2001 19:09:38 -0500 (EST) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA26142; Wed, 10 Jan 2001 16:09:37 -0800 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id QAA22897; Wed, 10 Jan 2001 16:07:30 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id QAA14801; Wed, 10 Jan 2001 16:07:30 -0800 (PST) Received: from zmamail02.nz-tay.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA12430; Wed, 10 Jan 2001 16:07:29 -0800 Received: by zmamail02.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 5992A4C6A; Wed, 10 Jan 2001 19:07:29 -0500 (EST) Received: from hooper2.licor.com (unknown [204.214.131.136]) by zmamail02.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id AD0464DC8 for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2001 19:07:28 -0500 (EST) Received: by hooper2.licor.com(Lotus SMTP MTA v4.6.2 (693.3 8-11-1998)) id 862569D1.00010212 ; Wed, 10 Jan 2001 18:11:00 -0600 X-Lotus-Fromdomain: LI-COR From: "Chris Lesiak" To: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Message-Id: <862569D1.00010115.00@hooper2.licor.com> Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2001 17:47:44 -0600 Subject: Problem with JTAG programming of flash on Assabet Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk I've been working with the Assabet board am having a problem communication with the flash parts using the JTAG port. At one point, I was able to program the flash over the JTAG port. It worked properly the half a dozen times I tried it last week. Then I started to get the following message: JFLASH Version 1.2 Using LPT port at 0x378 SA-1110 revision B4 error reading flash attribute space check cables, power and flash sockets Note that the above message is from the Linux version of the Jflash software. I also tried the Windows version and that also failed. As the flash is not socketed on this revision of the board, I doubt that is the problem. All of the cables seem to be well connected. Looking at the source code for the Jflash utility, I see that the problem occurs when trying to read the Common Flash Interface Query Identification String. It fails to match the first letter in the string, a "Q". Note that this failure occurs after the JTAG ID code for the SA1110 is read correctly. Any help you could give on this problem would be greatly appreciated. Sincerely, Chris Lesiak Development Engineer, Software LI-COR, Inc. ph. 402-467-0693 email. clesiak@licor.com From kramer@pa.dec.com Thu Jan 11 02:37:16 2001 Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (root@mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id CAA29445 for ; Thu, 11 Jan 2001 02:37:16 +0100 Received: from ztxmail05.ztx.compaq.com (ztxmail05.ztx.compaq.com [161.114.1.209]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id CAA01773 for ; Thu, 11 Jan 2001 02:37:14 +0100 (MET) Received: by ztxmail05.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 3AF53B4D; Wed, 10 Jan 2001 19:34:53 -0600 (CST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by ztxmail05.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 7FD05BD8; Wed, 10 Jan 2001 19:34:51 -0600 (CST) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA17054; Wed, 10 Jan 2001 17:34:44 -0800 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id RAA01364; Wed, 10 Jan 2001 17:28:06 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id RAA12526; Wed, 10 Jan 2001 17:28:06 -0800 (PST) Received: from zmamail01.nz-tay.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA27943; Wed, 10 Jan 2001 17:28:05 -0800 Received: by zmamail01.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 4A394E246; Wed, 10 Jan 2001 20:28:05 -0500 (EST) Received: from xanadu.home (modemcable248.137-200-24.mtl.mc.videotron.ca [24.200.137.248]) by zmamail01.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B0295E071 for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2001 20:28:04 -0500 (EST) Received: from localhost (nico@localhost) by xanadu.home (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id UAA20207; Wed, 10 Jan 2001 20:27:56 -0500 X-Authentication-Warning: xanadu.home: nico owned process doing -bs Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2001 20:27:56 -0500 (EST) From: Nicolas Pitre X-Sender: To: Chris Lesiak Cc: Subject: Re: Problem with JTAG programming of flash on Assabet In-Reply-To: <862569D1.00010115.00@hooper2.licor.com> Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk On Wed, 10 Jan 2001, Chris Lesiak wrote: > > > > I've been working with the Assabet board am having a problem > communication with the flash parts using the JTAG port. > > At one point, I was able to program the flash over the JTAG port. > It worked properly the half a dozen times I tried it last week. Then > I started to get the following message: > > JFLASH Version 1.2 > Using LPT port at 0x378 > SA-1110 revision B4 > error reading flash attribute space > check cables, power and flash sockets > > Note that the above message is from the Linux version of the > Jflash software. I also tried the Windows version and that also > failed. As the flash is not socketed on this revision of the board, > I doubt that is the problem. All of the cables seem to be well > connected. > > Looking at the source code for the Jflash utility, I see that the > problem occurs when trying to read the Common Flash Interface > Query Identification String. It fails to match the first letter in the > string, a "Q". Note that this failure occurs after the JTAG ID code > for the SA1110 is read correctly. > > Any help you could give on this problem would be greatly appreciated. Try the following: Unplug the AC adaptor, unplug the battery, and leave your unit alone for 30 min to be sure the backup capacitor is completely discharged. Then try to reflash it again. Nicolas From kramer@pa.dec.com Thu Jan 11 09:10:04 2001 Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (root@mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id JAA30123 for ; Thu, 11 Jan 2001 09:10:04 +0100 Received: from ztxmail05.ztx.compaq.com (ztxmail05.ztx.compaq.com [161.114.1.209]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id JAA15237 for ; Thu, 11 Jan 2001 09:10:02 +0100 (MET) Received: by ztxmail05.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 3867B8A6; Thu, 11 Jan 2001 02:07:43 -0600 (CST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by ztxmail05.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 793119BA; Thu, 11 Jan 2001 02:07:41 -0600 (CST) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA19956; Thu, 11 Jan 2001 00:07:39 -0800 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id XAA31251; Wed, 10 Jan 2001 23:59:37 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id XAA31745; Wed, 10 Jan 2001 23:59:36 -0800 (PST) From: Received: from zmamail01.nz-tay.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA12629; Wed, 10 Jan 2001 23:59:36 -0800 Received: by zmamail01.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id DE69BE2C1; Thu, 11 Jan 2001 02:59:35 -0500 (EST) Received: from mail.ixcelerator.com (wsa-246.sibintek.net [213.128.193.246]) by zmamail01.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B326DE93 for ; Thu, 11 Jan 2001 02:59:12 -0500 (EST) Received: from morgoth.ixcelerator.com (IDENT:root@morgoth.ixcel.ru [172.16.10.70]) by mail.ixcelerator.com (8.10.1/8.10.1) with ESMTP id f0B7v9512350; Thu, 11 Jan 2001 10:57:11 +0300 Received: (from green@localhost) by morgoth.ixcelerator.com (8.10.1/8.10.1) id f0B7s3c01859; Thu, 11 Jan 2001 10:54:03 +0300 Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2001 10:54:03 +0300 Message-Id: <200101110754.f0B7s3c01859@morgoth.ixcelerator.com> To: nico@CAM.ORG, sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Subject: Re: At last: diff-2.4.0-rmk1-np1 X-Newsgroups: sa1100.linux In-Reply-To: User-Agent: tin/1.4.2-20000205 ("Possession") (UNIX) (Linux/2.4.0 (i686)) Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk In article you wrote: > This has been lightly tested on Assabet and GraphicsClient only. There are Works on IPAQ, too. > probably things that are still broken, but this patch has to go out so other > people can test and help me fix what's left. PCMCIA still oopses on start ocasionally since 2.4.0-test11-something. > SA1100 USB: > I rewrote many parts of the SA1100 USB driver which was IMHO a big f***ing > unmaintainable mess. The most notable changes happened in usb_send.c, > usb_recv.c and usb-eth.c which got completely rewritten. Now the ethernet > function is entirely isolated in usb-eth.c and can (could) be interchanged > with any other function driver. The wasteful usage of memcpy() for rx and > tx streams is now gone. DMA usage has also been consolidated with the same > API as the one used by the audio drivers. The USB ethernet link is > therefore slightly faster, but still as unreliable as the previous driver > unfortunately. The connection isn't able to survive more than a few seconds Previous driver was much-much more reliable, unfortunatelly. > with a 'ping -f', but at this point it seems to be due to problems with the > usb-net-host (the PC side) driver, which is also a big big mess BTW. It Yes, it is. > probably would require auditing from someone who knows USB better than me. > At least the client (SA1100) side is readable and more generic now... Unfortunatelly, I must say that current USB client implementation tends to miss symbols (RX errors) much-much often than old one. Also this little obviously correct patch allows to use FTP and so on, again. --- arch/arm/mach-sa1100/usb-eth.c.orig Thu Jan 11 04:16:06 2001 +++ arch/arm/mach-sa1100/usb-eth.c Thu Jan 11 04:17:33 2001 @@ -74,7 +74,7 @@ skb_put(skb, size); if (skb->len > 2) { pktlen = le16_to_cpu(*(u16*)skb->data); - if (pktlen < 2 || pktlen > 1502) { + if (pktlen < 2 || pktlen > 1504) { pktlen = 0; usbd_info.eth_stats.rx_frame_errors++; } But if you use it, you'll see that on host side usb-net-host driver complains about stalls. Each stall means that usb-client got RX error. Also, if you do ifcondif usbf down on usb interface, you'll get nice sweet oops. (But it seems modutils hates ARM platform, do anyone have recent modutils, or insmod -m working?). But because of modutils problem, I have no decoded one, sorry. I use USB client as module. If you'd have trouble reproducing this problem, tell me and I'll think up something. Bye, Oleg From kramer@pa.dec.com Thu Jan 11 09:10:49 2001 Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (root@mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id JAA30135 for ; Thu, 11 Jan 2001 09:10:48 +0100 Received: from ztxmail05.ztx.compaq.com (ztxmail05.ztx.compaq.com [161.114.1.209]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id JAA15264 for ; Thu, 11 Jan 2001 09:10:46 +0100 (MET) Received: by ztxmail05.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 32602AC2; Thu, 11 Jan 2001 02:08:27 -0600 (CST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by ztxmail05.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 7141D8A8; Thu, 11 Jan 2001 02:08:25 -0600 (CST) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA26478; Thu, 11 Jan 2001 00:08:24 -0800 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id AAA15019; Thu, 11 Jan 2001 00:05:13 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id AAA10513; Thu, 11 Jan 2001 00:05:12 -0800 (PST) Received: from zmamail02.nz-tay.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA08329; Thu, 11 Jan 2001 00:05:11 -0800 Received: by zmamail02.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 21A0A4D81; Thu, 11 Jan 2001 03:05:11 -0500 (EST) Received: from balder.inter.net.il (balder.inter.net.il [192.114.186.15]) by zmamail02.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4ED7D4C4D for ; Thu, 11 Jan 2001 03:05:10 -0500 (EST) Received: from gad ([213.8.203.141]) by balder.inter.net.il (Mirapoint) with SMTP id AHL33635; Thu, 11 Jan 2001 10:04:32 +0200 (IST) Mailguardian-Version: 1.1V Reply-To: From: "Gad Hayisraeli" To: "Linux-Arm-kernel List" , "Sa1100-Linux list" Subject: speed of the jflash Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2001 10:06:09 +0200 Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0006_01C07BB6.1E80DD80" X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-Msmail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) Importance: Normal X-Mimeole: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2314.1300 X-Ms-Tnef-Correlator: Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0006_01C07BB6.1E80DD80 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1255" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit i'm using intel jflash utility in order to burn images on the assabet. but it seems that the download speed is only 9600 ! while this utility uses the paralel port, who's speed can reach above 1 mbit ! what can i do in order to download faster ? Gad ------=_NextPart_000_0006_01C07BB6.1E80DD80 Content-Type: application/ms-tnef; name="winmail.dat" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="winmail.dat" eJ8+IgkIAQaQCAAEAAAAAAABAAEAAQeQBgAIAAAA5wQAAAAAAADrAAEIgAcAGAAAAElQTS5NaWNy b3NvZnQgTWFpbC5Ob3RlADEIAQ2ABAACAAAAAgACAAEGgAMADgAAANEHAQALAAoABgAAAAQA+AAB A5AGAJQFAAAlAAAACwACAAEAAAALACMAAAAAAAMAJgAAAAAACwApAAAAAAADADYAAAAAAB4AcAAB AAAAFAAAAHNwZWVkIG9mIHRoZSBqZmxhc2gAAgFxAAEAAAAWAAAAAcB7pVouGGvybOejEdSaAQDQ t0zQ+wAAAgEdDAEAAAAVAAAAU01UUDpHQURAU1lFVEUuQ08uSUwAAAAACwABDgAAAABAAAYOACR2 VaV7wAECAQoOAQAAABgAAAAAAAAAHTUldGO21BGaAADQt0zQ+8KAAAALAB8OAQAAAAIBCRABAAAA SgEAAEYBAACfAQAATFpGdQdwkxLhAAVmYmlkBAAAZABygGNwZzEyNTUA+MULYG4OgDAzNwH3AqQT A+MCAGNoCsBzZXSsMCAHEwKAfQqBdgiQpHdrC4BkNAxgYwBQMQsDbHRyCrELpiBp8CdtIHUAkA+Q FKACMEplAyBqD2FzaBTgdNEDEGl0eRVBIAWwBIHgIHRvIGIIcAOgB3AcYWcHkQIgFyBoZSDtFeBz AaARoC4KogqAF2DLBUAWYCARkGVtBCAYUIZhBUAYUmRvd24JAPRhZBnQcAngG0AEABgRomwWgDk2 MBHAIRkU/HdoAxAYcBhQG8EWJhTwXweRGFIKsQdAFYFwCREssiAdAG8nBCAbZGMDkU8JcADQFgAB oG92GHAxfiAG0BmxHJUcphphIGJpdxrBFpsa12YV4BVwBcA/XSHqRxswGRQSUQAm4AAACwAAgAgg BgAAAAAAwAAAAAAAAEYAAAAAA4UAAAAAAAADAAKACCAGAAAAAADAAAAAAAAARgAAAAAQhQAAAAAA AAMAB4AIIAYAAAAAAMAAAAAAAABGAAAAAFKFAACOagEAHgAJgAggBgAAAAAAwAAAAAAAAEYAAAAA VIUAAAEAAAAEAAAAOS4wAB4ACoAIIAYAAAAAAMAAAAAAAABGAAAAADaFAAABAAAAAQAAAAAAAAAe AAuACCAGAAAAAADAAAAAAAAARgAAAAA3hQAAAQAAAAEAAAAAAAAAHgAMgAggBgAAAAAAwAAAAAAA AEYAAAAAOIUAAAEAAAABAAAAAAAAAAsADYAIIAYAAAAAAMAAAAAAAABGAAAAAIKFAAABAAAACwAR gAggBgAAAAAAwAAAAAAAAEYAAAAABoUAAAAAAAADABKACCAGAAAAAADAAAAAAAAARgAAAAABhQAA AAAAAAsAG4AIIAYAAAAAAMAAAAAAAABGAAAAAA6FAAAAAAAAAwAcgAggBgAAAAAAwAAAAAAAAEYA AAAAEYUAAAAAAAADAB6ACCAGAAAAAADAAAAAAAAARgAAAAAYhQAAAAAAAAIB+A8BAAAAEAAAAB01 JXRjttQRmgAA0LdM0PsCAfoPAQAAABAAAAAdNSV0Y7bUEZoAANC3TND7AgH7DwEAAACCAAAAAAAA ADihuxAF5RAaobsIACsqVsIAAFBTVFBSWC5ETEwAAAAAAAAAAE5JVEH5v7gBAKoAN9luAAAAQzpc V0lORE9XU1xMb2NhbCBTZXR0aW5nc1xBcHBsaWNhdGlvbiBEYXRhXE1pY3Jvc29mdFxPdXRsb29r XG1haWxib3gucHN0AAAAAwD+DwUAAAADAA00/TcAAAIBfwABAAAALwAAADxORUJCSktBQUJOT0ZK Q0RJTERFTk1FTE1DQUFBLmdhZEBzeWV0ZS5jby5pbD4AAAMABhBLbiIBAwAHEMMAAAADABAQAAAA AAMAERAAAAAAHgAIEAEAAABlAAAASU1VU0lOR0lOVEVMSkZMQVNIVVRJTElUWUlOT1JERVJUT0JV Uk5JTUFHRVNPTlRIRUFTU0FCRVRCVVRJVFNFRU1TVEhBVFRIRURPV05MT0FEU1BFRURJU09OTFk5 NjAwV0hJTAAAAAA6GA== ------=_NextPart_000_0006_01C07BB6.1E80DD80-- From kramer@pa.dec.com Thu Jan 11 10:21:59 2001 Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (root@mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id KAA30293 for ; Thu, 11 Jan 2001 10:21:58 +0100 Received: from ztxmail05.ztx.compaq.com (ztxmail05.ztx.compaq.com [161.114.1.209]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id KAA19733 for ; Thu, 11 Jan 2001 10:21:56 +0100 (MET) Received: by ztxmail05.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id EF394A61; Thu, 11 Jan 2001 03:19:35 -0600 (CST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by ztxmail05.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 22E74B20; Thu, 11 Jan 2001 03:19:34 -0600 (CST) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA31282; Thu, 11 Jan 2001 01:19:33 -0800 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id BAA25429; Thu, 11 Jan 2001 01:15:39 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id BAA02473; Thu, 11 Jan 2001 01:15:38 -0800 (PST) Received: from zmamail01.nz-tay.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA15819; Thu, 11 Jan 2001 01:15:37 -0800 Received: by zmamail01.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id EBA49DE86; Thu, 11 Jan 2001 04:15:36 -0500 (EST) Received: from heimdall.inter.net.il (heimdall.inter.net.il [192.114.186.17]) by zmamail01.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 28346DCB3 for ; Thu, 11 Jan 2001 04:15:36 -0500 (EST) Received: from gad ([213.8.203.141]) by heimdall.inter.net.il (Mirapoint) with SMTP id AHW38908; Thu, 11 Jan 2001 11:12:33 +0200 (IST) Mailguardian-Version: 1.1V Reply-To: From: "Gad Hayisraeli" To: "Sa1100-Linux list" , "Linux-Arm-kernel List" Subject: downloading files to the assabet / sa1110 Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2001 11:14:09 +0200 Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0011_01C07BBF.9EBF96E0" X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-Msmail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) Importance: Normal X-Mimeole: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2314.1300 X-Ms-Tnef-Correlator: Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0011_01C07BBF.9EBF96E0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1255" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit after downloading all the blob-kernel-ramdisk image, using jflash, after long time (...), i tried to download files using zmodem protocol, thru minicom. but i could not adjust the download speed to 115200. if i did so, the download fails. i can only download at 9600. can someone tell the procedure in order to download faster using standard protocols like zmodem ? Gad ------=_NextPart_000_0011_01C07BBF.9EBF96E0 Content-Type: application/ms-tnef; name="winmail.dat" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="winmail.dat" eJ8+IgkJAQaQCAAEAAAAAAABAAEAAQeQBgAIAAAA5wQAAAAAAADrAAEIgAcAGAAAAElQTS5NaWNy b3NvZnQgTWFpbC5Ob3RlADEIAQ2ABAACAAAAAgACAAEGgAMADgAAANEHAQALAAsADgAAAAQAAQEB A5AGAAQGAAAlAAAACwACAAEAAAALACMAAAAAAAMAJgAAAAAACwApAAAAAAADADYAAAAAAB4AcAAB AAAAKgAAAGRvd25sb2FkaW5nIGZpbGVzIHRvIHRoZSBhc3NhYmV0IC8gc2ExMTEwAAAAAgFxAAEA AAAWAAAAAcB7rtqyGGvypOejEdSaAQDQt0zQ+wAAAgEdDAEAAAAVAAAAU01UUDpHQURAU1lFVEUu Q08uSUwAAAAACwABDgAAAABAAAYOALxU1a57wAECAQoOAQAAABgAAAAAAAAAHTUldGO21BGaAADQ t0zQ+8KAAAALAB8OAQAAAAIBCRABAAAAogEAAJ4BAAA4AgAATFpGde+PzCnhAAVmYmlkBAAAZABy gGNwZzEyNTUA+MULYG4OgDAzNwH3AqcJAgBjaArAc2V0MD4gBxMCgw1BA+MRH319JQqBdgiQd2sL gGQ0jQxgYwBQCwNsdHIKsTEL0jQgYQGABJAgZOhvd24JAGENkA+QFiBCbAMgdGhlIAJgbwhiLWsE kWVsLXIkYW0NkWsgB3BhZ7BlLCB1AJAXIWoPYbxzaBlgFjQJABchdAdxqCAoLhtwKRlgaReAlQiB ZBeAbxaHIGYDEIsHkRmEegRibSBwA2APHFAI4RlgF5BydSBtNwuADlADcC4K4wqAYnWnBUAb0AWg dWwcMG4eYHkWIGRqGYAFQBeSHIdzRnAJ4BwzMTE1AdAw3x+gBpAbwQ2QIkFvHsIhueJmC3Bscy4f xCBhA5EpAiBseRx4YQVAOTb/IzEfxCXyJAAHgAIgF7AWUPsXZR5BYwmACHAXsAuAJiD/CyAWYRxb GhAWUhmEIWAAcM5kCxEeNwQgbGkYIB3G9j8fxB/ERxbwLgUSUwwBCx/TFAEAMHAAAAsAAIAIIAYA AAAAAMAAAAAAAABGAAAAAAOFAAAAAAAAAwACgAggBgAAAAAAwAAAAAAAAEYAAAAAEIUAAAAAAAAD AAeACCAGAAAAAADAAAAAAAAARgAAAABShQAAjmoBAB4ACYAIIAYAAAAAAMAAAAAAAABGAAAAAFSF AAABAAAABAAAADkuMAAeAAqACCAGAAAAAADAAAAAAAAARgAAAAA2hQAAAQAAAAEAAAAAAAAAHgAL gAggBgAAAAAAwAAAAAAAAEYAAAAAN4UAAAEAAAABAAAAAAAAAB4ADIAIIAYAAAAAAMAAAAAAAABG AAAAADiFAAABAAAAAQAAAAAAAAALAA2ACCAGAAAAAADAAAAAAAAARgAAAACChQAAAQAAAAsAEYAI IAYAAAAAAMAAAAAAAABGAAAAAAaFAAAAAAAAAwASgAggBgAAAAAAwAAAAAAAAEYAAAAAAYUAAAAA AAALABuACCAGAAAAAADAAAAAAAAARgAAAAAOhQAAAAAAAAMAHIAIIAYAAAAAAMAAAAAAAABGAAAA ABGFAAAAAAAAAwAegAggBgAAAAAAwAAAAAAAAEYAAAAAGIUAAAAAAAACAfgPAQAAABAAAAAdNSV0 Y7bUEZoAANC3TND7AgH6DwEAAAAQAAAAHTUldGO21BGaAADQt0zQ+wIB+w8BAAAAggAAAAAAAAA4 obsQBeUQGqG7CAArKlbCAABQU1RQUlguRExMAAAAAAAAAABOSVRB+b+4AQCqADfZbgAAAEM6XFdJ TkRPV1NcTG9jYWwgU2V0dGluZ3NcQXBwbGljYXRpb24gRGF0YVxNaWNyb3NvZnRcT3V0bG9va1xt YWlsYm94LnBzdAAAAAMA/g8FAAAAAwANNP03AAACAX8AAQAAAC8AAAA8TkVCQkpLQUFCTk9GSkNE SUxERU5HRUxPQ0FBQS5nYWRAc3lldGUuY28uaWw+AAADAAYQPkfgtQMABxAtAQAAAwAQEAAAAAAD ABEQAAAAAB4ACBABAAAAZQAAAEFGVEVSRE9XTkxPQURJTkdBTExUSEVCTE9CLUtFUk5FTC1SQU1E SVNLSU1BR0UsVVNJTkdKRkxBU0gsQUZURVJMT05HVElNRSgpLElUUklFRFRPRE9XTkxPQURGSUxF U1VTSU4AAAAAdjo= ------=_NextPart_000_0011_01C07BBF.9EBF96E0-- From kramer@pa.dec.com Thu Jan 11 12:19:18 2001 Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (root@mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id MAA30717 for ; Thu, 11 Jan 2001 12:19:17 +0100 Received: from zmamail05.zma.compaq.com (zmamail05.zma.compaq.com [161.114.64.105]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id MAA27463 for ; Thu, 11 Jan 2001 12:19:16 +0100 (MET) Received: by zmamail05.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id DC7412516; Thu, 11 Jan 2001 06:16:55 -0500 (EST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by zmamail05.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id A066926E8; Thu, 11 Jan 2001 06:16:53 -0500 (EST) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA10983; Thu, 11 Jan 2001 03:16:48 -0800 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id DAA02489; Thu, 11 Jan 2001 03:11:49 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id DAA25383; Thu, 11 Jan 2001 03:11:49 -0800 (PST) Received: from zmamail01.nz-tay.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA22052; Thu, 11 Jan 2001 03:11:48 -0800 Received: by zmamail01.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 1E90BDA9B; Thu, 11 Jan 2001 06:11:48 -0500 (EST) Received: from thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (thorgal.et.tudelft.nl [130.161.40.91]) by zmamail01.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9EB70E1B4 for ; Thu, 11 Jan 2001 06:11:47 -0500 (EST) Received: from [130.161.40.82] (tvs082.et.tudelft.nl [130.161.40.82]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id MAA30692; Thu, 11 Jan 2001 12:11:40 +0100 Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Sender: bakker@mmc.et.tudelft.nl (Unverified) Message-Id: In-Reply-To: References: <20010110181517.D1134440B@ztxmail01.ztx.compaq.com> Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2001 10:08:04 +0100 To: Jeff Senn From: "J.D. Bakker" Subject: Re: pooling resources to build an Itsy Cc: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" ; format="flowed" Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk >I'd love to hear someone's success story about building low/medium >volumes of a SA design for a reasonable cost... The prototype LARTs cost us between $400-$500 each in qty 6. Spending a lot of time minimizing the use of non-standard components does pay off. Besides that, the LART uses no BGAs which makes assembly easier (and thus cheaper). JDB. -- LART. 250 MIPS under one Watt. Free hardware design files. http://www.lart.tudelft.nl/ From kramer@pa.dec.com Thu Jan 11 13:41:45 2001 Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (root@mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id NAA30993 for ; Thu, 11 Jan 2001 13:41:45 +0100 Received: from ztxmail04.ztx.compaq.com (ztxmail04.ztx.compaq.com [161.114.1.208]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id NAA03518 for ; Thu, 11 Jan 2001 13:41:43 +0100 (MET) Received: by ztxmail04.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id CC8731140; Thu, 11 Jan 2001 06:39:23 -0600 (CST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by ztxmail04.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id E00D812D6; Thu, 11 Jan 2001 06:39:21 -0600 (CST) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA24725; Thu, 11 Jan 2001 04:39:20 -0800 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id EAA30764; Thu, 11 Jan 2001 04:37:34 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id EAA03158; Thu, 11 Jan 2001 04:37:33 -0800 (PST) Received: from ztxmail02.nz-cce.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA32296; Thu, 11 Jan 2001 04:37:33 -0800 Received: by ztxmail02.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id CD1941D79; Thu, 11 Jan 2001 06:37:32 -0600 (CST) Received: from web4401.mail.yahoo.com (web4401.mail.yahoo.com [216.115.105.31]) by ztxmail02.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 5E3BC1C5B for ; Thu, 11 Jan 2001 06:37:32 -0600 (CST) Message-Id: <20010111123731.28772.qmail@web4401.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [202.156.2.92] by web4401.mail.yahoo.com; Thu, 11 Jan 2001 20:37:31 CST Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2001 20:37:31 +0800 (CST) From: =?iso-8859-1?q?Supriyo=20Chatterjea?= Subject: Problem with iPAQ touchscreen driver on Assabet To: handhelds@handhelds.org, ipaq@handhelds.org, sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk Hi all, I've managed to get the Assabet touchscreen to work using the iPAQ driver except that the touchscreen doesn't seem to be calibrated. I've noticed that when I press say the top left hand corner of the screen, the bottom right hand corner is activated instead. So it's 180 degrees off where it should be. Here are some details which I think might be important: 1. Kernel version: - linux-2.4.0-test11 2. Also used the following patches: - patch-2.4.0-test11-rmk1 - diff-2.4.0-test11-rmk1-np3 3. I'm using Microwindows...so here are the settings in the Microwindows config file: IPAQMOUSE = Y All the rest = N So that would mean that I was using mou_ipaq.c driver (found in microwin/src/drivers/). After "make" the mou_ipaq.o file was created. 4. Major/minor #s mknod /dev/h3600_ts c 11 0 - Could someone please tell me how I could calibrate the screen? I mean do I need to modify some part of mou_ipaq.c so that I can rotate the activated points by 180 degrees? Or is there some other file I need to modify? - Some people here have mentioned getting the ADS driver to work on the Assabet. I tried with the following settings but encountered errors: 1. Same kernel configuration as above. 2. ADSMOUSE = Y All the rest = N 3. Used the following driver found in microwin/src/drivers: mou_ads.c 4. . Major/minor #s mknod /dev/ts c 190 34 (Got 190 and 34 from the mou_ads.c file.) This is the error message I got when I tried running the Microwindows "mine" demo: Error 19 opening touch panel Cannot initialise mouse. Also, cat /dev/ts gave me the following error message: No such device - Does the ADS driver REALLY work on the Assabet? From what I see it seems that it doesn't! But everyone here keeps on mentioning the ADS driver. So what am I missing out? I'm keen on trying out the ADS driver cause I'm hoping that it might work properly and I wouldn't have to calibrate the screen. Thanks, Supriyo __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail  Free email you can access from anywhere! http://mail.yahoo.com.sg/ From kramer@pa.dec.com Thu Jan 11 15:34:22 2001 Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (root@mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id PAA31378 for ; Thu, 11 Jan 2001 15:34:22 +0100 Received: from zmamail04.zma.compaq.com (zmamail04.zma.compaq.com [161.114.64.104]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id PAA12205 for ; Thu, 11 Jan 2001 15:34:21 +0100 (MET) Received: by zmamail04.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 7827E144A; Thu, 11 Jan 2001 09:32:34 -0500 (EST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by zmamail04.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 27177306; Thu, 11 Jan 2001 09:32:32 -0500 (EST) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA11681; Thu, 11 Jan 2001 06:32:25 -0800 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id GAA31348; Thu, 11 Jan 2001 06:29:04 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id GAA06284; Thu, 11 Jan 2001 06:29:00 -0800 (PST) Received: from ztxmail01.nz-cce.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA18885; Thu, 11 Jan 2001 06:29:00 -0800 Received: by ztxmail01.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id D564745C9; Thu, 11 Jan 2001 08:28:59 -0600 (CST) Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by ztxmail01.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C056B4447 for ; Thu, 11 Jan 2001 08:28:58 -0600 (CST) Received: from arthur.ubicom.tudelft.nl (arthur.ubicom.tudelft.nl [130.161.43.222]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id PAA11715; Thu, 11 Jan 2001 15:28:56 +0100 (MET) Received: (from erik@localhost) by arthur.ubicom.tudelft.nl (8.11.0/8.11.0/SuSE Linux 8.11.0-0.4) id f0BES7Y20660; Thu, 11 Jan 2001 15:28:07 +0100 Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2001 15:28:07 +0100 From: Erik Mouw To: Gad Hayisraeli Cc: Linux-Arm-kernel List , Sa1100-Linux list Subject: Re: speed of the jflash Message-Id: <20010111152807.R13334@arthur.ubicom.tudelft.nl> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: ; from gad@syete.co.il on Thu, Jan 11, 2001 at 10:06:09AM +0200 Organization: Eric Conspiracy Secret Labs X-Eric-Conspiracy: There is no conspiracy! Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk On Thu, Jan 11, 2001 at 10:06:09AM +0200, Gad Hayisraeli wrote: > i'm using intel jflash utility in order to burn images on the assabet. > but it seems that the download speed is only 9600 ! > while this utility uses the paralel port, who's speed can reach above 1 mbit > ! The parallel is quite high, but... in order to write a word to flash, the complete state of almost all (about 200) pins of the CPU have to be clocked in for each state that the flash writing needs. So yes, the effective write speed comes in the order of 9600 baud. > what can i do in order to download faster ? Nothing. Erik -- J.A.K. (Erik) Mouw, Information and Communication Theory Group, Department of Electrical Engineering, Faculty of Information Technology and Systems, Delft University of Technology, PO BOX 5031, 2600 GA Delft, The Netherlands Phone: +31-15-2783635 Fax: +31-15-2781843 Email: J.A.K.Mouw@its.tudelft.nl WWW: http://www-ict.its.tudelft.nl/~erik/ From kramer@pa.dec.com Thu Jan 11 15:40:25 2001 Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (root@mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id PAA31409 for ; Thu, 11 Jan 2001 15:40:25 +0100 Received: from ztxmail03.ztx.compaq.com (ztxmail03.ztx.compaq.com [161.114.1.207]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id PAA12717 for ; Thu, 11 Jan 2001 15:40:21 +0100 (MET) Received: by ztxmail03.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 739A19DF; Thu, 11 Jan 2001 08:38:30 -0600 (CST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by ztxmail03.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id A0007923; Thu, 11 Jan 2001 08:38:28 -0600 (CST) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA31348; Thu, 11 Jan 2001 06:37:11 -0800 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id GAA29858; Thu, 11 Jan 2001 06:34:06 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id GAA10668; Thu, 11 Jan 2001 06:34:05 -0800 (PST) Received: from ztxmail01.nz-cce.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA27861; Thu, 11 Jan 2001 06:34:05 -0800 Received: by ztxmail01.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 446C04570; Thu, 11 Jan 2001 08:34:05 -0600 (CST) Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by ztxmail01.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A4C4464E for ; Thu, 11 Jan 2001 08:34:04 -0600 (CST) Received: from arthur.ubicom.tudelft.nl (arthur.ubicom.tudelft.nl [130.161.43.222]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id PAA12194; Thu, 11 Jan 2001 15:34:01 +0100 (MET) Received: (from erik@localhost) by arthur.ubicom.tudelft.nl (8.11.0/8.11.0/SuSE Linux 8.11.0-0.4) id f0BET2820674; Thu, 11 Jan 2001 15:29:02 +0100 Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2001 15:29:02 +0100 From: Erik Mouw To: Gad Hayisraeli Cc: Sa1100-Linux list , Linux-Arm-kernel List Subject: Re: downloading files to the assabet / sa1110 Message-Id: <20010111152902.S13334@arthur.ubicom.tudelft.nl> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: ; from gad@syete.co.il on Thu, Jan 11, 2001 at 11:14:09AM +0200 Organization: Eric Conspiracy Secret Labs X-Eric-Conspiracy: There is no conspiracy! Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk On Thu, Jan 11, 2001 at 11:14:09AM +0200, Gad Hayisraeli wrote: > but i could not adjust the download speed to 115200. if i did so, the > download fails. > i can only download at 9600. > can someone tell the procedure in order to download faster using standard > protocols like zmodem ? stty ispeed 115200 Erik -- J.A.K. (Erik) Mouw, Information and Communication Theory Group, Department of Electrical Engineering, Faculty of Information Technology and Systems, Delft University of Technology, PO BOX 5031, 2600 GA Delft, The Netherlands Phone: +31-15-2783635 Fax: +31-15-2781843 Email: J.A.K.Mouw@its.tudelft.nl WWW: http://www-ict.its.tudelft.nl/~erik/ From kramer@pa.dec.com Thu Jan 11 15:48:16 2001 Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (root@mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id PAA31431 for ; Thu, 11 Jan 2001 15:48:16 +0100 Received: from ztxmail04.ztx.compaq.com (ztxmail04.ztx.compaq.com [161.114.1.208]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id PAA13432 for ; Thu, 11 Jan 2001 15:48:13 +0100 (MET) Received: by ztxmail04.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 622011040; Thu, 11 Jan 2001 08:46:26 -0600 (CST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by ztxmail04.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 64FE42D1; Thu, 11 Jan 2001 08:46:24 -0600 (CST) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA07561; Thu, 11 Jan 2001 06:46:23 -0800 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id GAA29119; Thu, 11 Jan 2001 06:45:47 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id GAA04480; Thu, 11 Jan 2001 06:45:46 -0800 (PST) Received: from zmamail01.nz-tay.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AB09064; Thu, 11 Jan 2001 06:45:46 -0800 Received: by zmamail01.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 9D829E0BB; Thu, 11 Jan 2001 09:45:45 -0500 (EST) Received: from pigeon.maya.com (po.maya.com [192.70.254.2]) by zmamail01.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 691C9E311 for ; Thu, 11 Jan 2001 09:45:45 -0500 (EST) Received: from SNIPE.maya.com (snipe.maya.com [192.70.254.125]) by pigeon.maya.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 2B28B30806; Thu, 11 Jan 2001 09:18:42 -0500 (EST) To: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Subject: Re: pooling resources to build an Itsy References: <20010110181517.D1134440B@ztxmail01.ztx.compaq.com> Organization: MAYA Design Group From: Jeff Senn X-Face: ._HOR,#9~<*ir.> Message-Id: Lines: 13 User-Agent: Gnus/5.090001 (Oort Gnus v0.01) XEmacs/21.2 (Peisino,Ak(B) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk "J.D. Bakker" writes: > The prototype LARTs cost us between $400-$500 each in qty 6. Spending > a lot of time minimizing the use of non-standard components does pay > off. Besides that, the LART uses no BGAs which makes assembly easier > (and thus cheaper). True, but I'm leary about any future availability for a non-BGA (and hence large footprint) chip with that many pins -- especially when all of the big market is in tiny cell phones and handhelds... -- -Jas From kramer@pa.dec.com Thu Jan 11 15:58:00 2001 Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (root@mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id PAA31506 for ; Thu, 11 Jan 2001 15:58:00 +0100 Received: from zmamail03.zma.compaq.com (zmamail03.zma.compaq.com [161.114.64.103]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id PAA14273 for ; Thu, 11 Jan 2001 15:57:58 +0100 (MET) Received: by zmamail03.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 93BCD6A09; Thu, 11 Jan 2001 09:56:11 -0500 (EST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by zmamail03.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id AA9D76BC5; Thu, 11 Jan 2001 09:56:08 -0500 (EST) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA13069; Thu, 11 Jan 2001 06:56:04 -0800 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id GAA22552; Thu, 11 Jan 2001 06:55:36 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id GAA14922; Thu, 11 Jan 2001 06:55:35 -0800 (PST) Received: from ztxmail02.nz-cce.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA03820; Thu, 11 Jan 2001 06:55:35 -0800 Received: by ztxmail02.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id A7A5D1D3A; Thu, 11 Jan 2001 08:55:34 -0600 (CST) Received: from xanadu.home (modemcable248.137-200-24.mtl.mc.videotron.ca [24.200.137.248]) by ztxmail02.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DFE9F1CB5 for ; Thu, 11 Jan 2001 08:55:33 -0600 (CST) Received: from localhost (nico@localhost) by xanadu.home (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id JAA21903; Thu, 11 Jan 2001 09:55:13 -0500 X-Authentication-Warning: xanadu.home: nico owned process doing -bs Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2001 09:55:13 -0500 (EST) From: Nicolas Pitre X-Sender: To: Gad Hayisraeli Cc: Linux-Arm-kernel List , Sa1100-Linux list Subject: Re: speed of the jflash In-Reply-To: Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk On Thu, 11 Jan 2001, Gad Hayisraeli wrote: > i'm using intel jflash utility in order to burn images on the assabet. > but it seems that the download speed is only 9600 ! > while this utility uses the paralel port, who's speed can reach above 1 mbit > ! > > what can i do in order to download faster ? Get yourself a JTAG microcontroller. The JTAG is sort of a serial protocol which toggles every single bits, including address bits, one at a time. To communicate it uses about two wires, therefore your parallel port is actually only using two pins, one for data, the other for the clock. The software behind the parallel port has to wiggle all signals i.e. send a 1 then a 0 to strobe the clock signal. This is extremely CPU intensive (it typically uses 100% of my Pentium-III at 600MHz). There are dedicated microcontroller for JTAG communication out there, but then you have the task of writing software to interface with it. Nicolas From kramer@pa.dec.com Thu Jan 11 16:28:42 2001 Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (root@mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id QAA31625 for ; Thu, 11 Jan 2001 16:28:42 +0100 Received: from ztxmail05.ztx.compaq.com (ztxmail05.ztx.compaq.com [161.114.1.209]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id QAA16755 for ; Thu, 11 Jan 2001 16:28:40 +0100 (MET) Received: by ztxmail05.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 4C148867; Thu, 11 Jan 2001 09:26:53 -0600 (CST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by ztxmail05.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 88948BDF; Thu, 11 Jan 2001 09:26:51 -0600 (CST) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA23128; Thu, 11 Jan 2001 07:26:50 -0800 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id HAA30087; Thu, 11 Jan 2001 07:26:12 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id HAA29495; Thu, 11 Jan 2001 07:26:12 -0800 (PST) Received: from ztxmail01.nz-cce.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA27653; Thu, 11 Jan 2001 07:26:11 -0800 Received: by ztxmail01.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 6446C45E4; Thu, 11 Jan 2001 09:26:11 -0600 (CST) Received: from stuart.FreedomScientific.com (unknown [216.85.232.69]) by ztxmail01.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A8EA444C for ; Thu, 11 Jan 2001 09:26:10 -0600 (CST) Received: by STUART with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21) id ; Thu, 11 Jan 2001 10:23:51 -0800 Message-Id: <3706DBB87DAED411BE350002B302A5990AAB6C@STUART> From: Michael Reynolds To: "'Jeff Senn'" Cc: "'sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com'" Subject: RE: pooling resources to build an Itsy Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2001 10:23:44 -0800 Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk We have found that the uBGA packaging of the SA1110 does not help in the cost of developement. Multilayer boards and manufacturers that can mount the uBGA on board is not for the low budget. Mike -----Original Message----- From: Jeff Senn [mailto:senn@maya.com] Sent: Wednesday, January 10, 2001 4:55 PM To: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Subject: Re: pooling resources to build an Itsy William Staniewicz writes: > But, would it be legal and feasible to pool together > the resources of indiduals so that items could be bought > in quantity or certain key items could be partially > assembled to exact tolerences by a qualified firm? > > I guess it all seems a little crazy when you can get an > IPAQ already packaged and have the support of Compaq > behind you but I think there are are few of us who > would think it worth while to have something special and > put in the extra effort and cost. Well... we have a research project involving the SA, and before we started to try to build our own board (a little less than a year ago) I could not conceive of how difficult it has been -- we have put that part of the project on hold (and are using an OEM board) until part shortages and other issues ease... I'd love to hear someone's success story about building low/medium volumes of a SA design for a reasonable cost... -- -Jas -------------------- www.maya.com Jeff Senn | / / |-/ \ / /| Chief Technologist | /|/| |/ o | /-| Head of R&D | Taming Complexity From kramer@pa.dec.com Thu Jan 11 16:34:45 2001 Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (root@mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id QAA31657 for ; Thu, 11 Jan 2001 16:34:45 +0100 Received: from zmamail03.zma.compaq.com (zmamail03.zma.compaq.com [161.114.64.103]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id QAA17345 for ; Thu, 11 Jan 2001 16:34:43 +0100 (MET) Received: by zmamail03.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id E411E7B81; Thu, 11 Jan 2001 10:32:56 -0500 (EST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by zmamail03.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 4257D7A98; Thu, 11 Jan 2001 10:32:53 -0500 (EST) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA00578; Thu, 11 Jan 2001 07:32:52 -0800 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id HAA32348; Thu, 11 Jan 2001 07:32:19 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id HAA28912; Thu, 11 Jan 2001 07:32:18 -0800 (PST) Received: from zmamail02.nz-tay.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA17773; Thu, 11 Jan 2001 07:32:18 -0800 Received: by zmamail02.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id BF0BA591F; Thu, 11 Jan 2001 10:32:16 -0500 (EST) Received: from violet.csa.iisc.ernet.in (violet.csa.iisc.ernet.in [144.16.67.198]) by zmamail02.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E2335A6D for ; Thu, 11 Jan 2001 10:32:13 -0500 (EST) Received: from localhost (ajit@localhost) by violet.csa.iisc.ernet.in (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id VAA04437; Thu, 11 Jan 2001 21:00:36 +0530 X-Authentication-Warning: violet.csa.iisc.ernet.in: ajit owned process doing -bs Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2001 21:00:36 +0530 (IST) From: Ajit Anvekar X-Sender: ajit@violet.csa.iisc.ernet.in To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.arm.linux.org.uk Cc: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Subject: Assabet flash reading Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk Hello, Is there a way the Assabet's flash can be read/accessed when one has booted using the Neponset flash. If so, how can it be done ?? Thanking you for all the help, Ajit From kramer@pa.dec.com Thu Jan 11 16:54:33 2001 Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (root@mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id QAA31739 for ; Thu, 11 Jan 2001 16:54:32 +0100 Received: from ztxmail05.ztx.compaq.com (ztxmail05.ztx.compaq.com [161.114.1.209]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id QAA18680 for ; Thu, 11 Jan 2001 16:54:30 +0100 (MET) Received: by ztxmail05.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id A5ECFA0F; Thu, 11 Jan 2001 09:52:43 -0600 (CST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by ztxmail05.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id B597D89A; Thu, 11 Jan 2001 09:52:40 -0600 (CST) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA10993; Thu, 11 Jan 2001 07:51:19 -0800 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id HAA14820; Thu, 11 Jan 2001 07:50:02 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id HAA06038; Thu, 11 Jan 2001 07:50:01 -0800 (PST) Received: from zmamail01.nz-tay.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA12832; Thu, 11 Jan 2001 07:50:01 -0800 Received: by zmamail01.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id B43C6E15C; Thu, 11 Jan 2001 10:49:56 -0500 (EST) Received: from xanadu.home (modemcable248.137-200-24.mtl.mc.videotron.ca [24.200.137.248]) by zmamail01.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6725DE06A for ; Thu, 11 Jan 2001 10:49:56 -0500 (EST) Received: from localhost (nico@localhost) by xanadu.home (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id KAA22093; Thu, 11 Jan 2001 10:49:37 -0500 X-Authentication-Warning: xanadu.home: nico owned process doing -bs Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2001 10:49:37 -0500 (EST) From: Nicolas Pitre X-Sender: To: Ajit Anvekar Cc: , Subject: Re: Assabet flash reading In-Reply-To: Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk On Thu, 11 Jan 2001, Ajit Anvekar wrote: > Hello, > Is there a way the Assabet's flash can be read/accessed when one > has booted using the Neponset flash. If so, how can it be done ?? You only need to map it in both arch/arm/mm/mm-sa1100.c and drivers/mtd/sa1100-flash.c. Nicolas From kramer@pa.dec.com Fri Jan 12 02:30:55 2001 Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (root@mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id CAA00948 for ; Fri, 12 Jan 2001 02:30:55 +0100 Received: from zmamail05.zma.compaq.com (zmamail05.zma.compaq.com [161.114.64.105]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id CAA21734 for ; Fri, 12 Jan 2001 02:30:53 +0100 (MET) Received: by zmamail05.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 0B7262528; Thu, 11 Jan 2001 20:29:07 -0500 (EST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by zmamail05.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id A9DA217CF; Thu, 11 Jan 2001 20:29:04 -0500 (EST) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA23768; Thu, 11 Jan 2001 17:29:02 -0800 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id RAA31273; Thu, 11 Jan 2001 17:23:30 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id RAA32180; Thu, 11 Jan 2001 17:23:29 -0800 (PST) Received: from zmamail01.nz-tay.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA27426; Thu, 11 Jan 2001 17:23:28 -0800 Received: by zmamail01.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id F0628DC64; Thu, 11 Jan 2001 20:23:27 -0500 (EST) Received: from mail.neotec.com.tw (unknown [211.72.51.29]) by zmamail01.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0011BDD6B for ; Thu, 11 Jan 2001 20:23:25 -0500 (EST) Received: by mail.neoteco.com.tw with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21) id ; Fri, 12 Jan 2001 09:36:06 +0800 Message-Id: From: Rex Juo To: "'Supriyo Chatterjea'" Cc: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com, handhelds@handhelds.org Subject: RE: Problem with iPAQ touchscreen driver on Assabet Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2001 09:36:02 +0800 Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21) Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----_=_NextPart_001_01C07C38.08251070" Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk This message is in MIME format. Since your mail reader does not understand this format, some or all of this message may not be legible. ------_=_NextPart_001_01C07C38.08251070 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="big5" >I've managed to get the Assabet touchscreen to work >using the iPAQ driver except that the touchscreen >doesn't seem to be calibrated. i guess u mean using ipq's nxcal to calibrate assabet's ucb1200_ts driver. cos the compatibility between ucb1200 and h3600_ts is still under todo list, u'd better to write your own calibration program for now or help driver development. here is a ugly solution just for fun on assabet ==== int fd; if ((fd = open(DEV_NODE, O_RDONLY)) < 0) { printf("ERROR: unable to open %s",DEV_NODE); exit(1); } k=1; ioctl(fd, 13, k); ioctl(fd, 15, k); ioctl(fd, 16, k); close(fd); ==== ref xcalibrate (www.handhelds.org) :pserver:anoncvs@cvs.handhelds.org:/cvs apps/xcalibrate driver (kernel source tree) /drivers/char/h3600_ts.c, .h /dirvers/char/ucb1200_ts.c .h ------_=_NextPart_001_01C07C38.08251070 Content-Type: text/html; charset="big5" RE: Problem with iPAQ touchscreen driver on Assabet

>I've managed to get the Assabet touchscreen to work
>using the iPAQ driver except that the touchscreen
>doesn't seem to be calibrated.

i guess u mean using ipq's nxcal to calibrate assabet's ucb1200_ts driver.
cos the compatibility between ucb1200 and h3600_ts is still under todo list,
u'd better to write your own calibration program for now or help driver development.
here is a ugly solution just for fun on assabet
====
   int fd;

    if ((fd = open(DEV_NODE, O_RDONLY)) < 0)
    {
        printf("ERROR: unable to open %s",DEV_NODE);
        exit(1);
    }

    k=1;
    ioctl(fd, 13, k);
    ioctl(fd, 15, k);
    ioctl(fd, 16, k);

    close(fd);
====
ref
        xcalibrate (www.handhelds.org)
        :pserver:anoncvs@cvs.handhelds.org:/cvs apps/xcalibrate

        driver (kernel source tree)
        /drivers/char/h3600_ts.c, .h
        /dirvers/char/ucb1200_ts.c .h

------_=_NextPart_001_01C07C38.08251070-- From kramer@pa.dec.com Mon Jan 15 11:55:16 2001 Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (root@mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id LAA09954 for ; Mon, 15 Jan 2001 11:55:16 +0100 Received: from ztxmail03.ztx.compaq.com (ztxmail03.ztx.compaq.com [161.114.1.207]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id LAA26010 for ; Mon, 15 Jan 2001 11:55:14 +0100 (MET) Received: by ztxmail03.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id B0DF61AE4; Mon, 15 Jan 2001 04:53:27 -0600 (CST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by ztxmail03.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 1B901966; Mon, 15 Jan 2001 04:53:26 -0600 (CST) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA28378; Mon, 15 Jan 2001 02:53:11 -0800 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id CAA28402; Mon, 15 Jan 2001 02:42:42 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id CAA27080; Mon, 15 Jan 2001 02:42:42 -0800 (PST) Received: from ztxmail01.nz-cce.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA22265; Mon, 15 Jan 2001 02:42:41 -0800 Received: by ztxmail01.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id BDB8C43EC; Mon, 15 Jan 2001 04:42:40 -0600 (CST) Received: from note.orchestra.cse.unsw.EDU.AU (note.orchestra.cse.unsw.EDU.AU [129.94.242.29]) by ztxmail01.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 8C7554606 for ; Mon, 15 Jan 2001 04:42:39 -0600 (CST) Received: From paulaner With LocalMail ; Mon, 15 Jan 2001 21:42:33 +1100 From: "Adam 'WeirdArms' Wiggins" To: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2001 21:42:32 +1100 (EST) X-Sender: awiggins@paulaner.disy.cse.unsw.EDU.AU Subject: exit_mmap() (fwd) Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk This went to the linux-mm list but I'd like to get feedback from the SA-11X0 developers. David Miller mentioned that in 2.2 did it how I would expect, and he's not sure why it changed in 2.4 The function exit_mmap() in linux/mm/mmap.c does something that I can't figure. The function as far as I can tell loops on each vm_area_struct of the mm_struct to tear them down. What I don't understand is that while doing this if calls flush_cache_range() on the range covered by the vm_area_struct. exit_mmap() is called by exec_mmap() in linux/fs/exec.c (which calls flush_cache_mm() before exit_mmap() already) and by mmput() in linux/kernel/fork.c Why does exit_mmap() not just call flush_cache_mm() before the while loop? On the StrongARM processor it seems that the expensive cpu_cache_clean_invalidate_range() function is going to be called a lot in this while loop of exit_mmap(), repeatedly cleaning/invalidating already clean entries in the caches and wasting cycles. Has anyone profiled this function call on the StrongARM (or any other platform)? Would it be possible to flag when the caches (from the user space point of view) are completely clean and avoid the clean/invalidate operation? Cheers Adam From kramer@pa.dec.com Tue Jan 16 00:17:05 2001 Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (root@mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id AAA11913 for ; Tue, 16 Jan 2001 00:17:05 +0100 Received: from ztxmail05.ztx.compaq.com (ztxmail05.ztx.compaq.com [161.114.1.209]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id AAA15414 for ; Tue, 16 Jan 2001 00:17:03 +0100 (MET) Received: by ztxmail05.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 78086A1E; Mon, 15 Jan 2001 17:15:16 -0600 (CST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by ztxmail05.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id D4E04B44; Mon, 15 Jan 2001 17:15:14 -0600 (CST) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA31844; Mon, 15 Jan 2001 15:15:03 -0800 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id PAA18645; Mon, 15 Jan 2001 15:06:55 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id PAA18614; Mon, 15 Jan 2001 15:06:54 -0800 (PST) Received: from ztxmail01.nz-cce.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA05160; Mon, 15 Jan 2001 15:06:54 -0800 Received: by ztxmail01.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id DDBA6476A; Mon, 15 Jan 2001 17:06:53 -0600 (CST) Received: from fire.he.net (fire.he.net [216.218.144.2]) by ztxmail01.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4DC194740 for ; Mon, 15 Jan 2001 17:06:53 -0600 (CST) Received: from cementship.extenex.net (64-51-136-194.client.dsl.net [64.51.136.194]) by fire.he.net (8.8.6/8.8.2) with ESMTP id PAA10035; Mon, 15 Jan 2001 15:06:47 -0800 Received: from blowhole.extenex.net (blowhole.extenex.net [192.168.100.100]) by cementship.extenex.net (8.9.3/8.8.7) with ESMTP id PAA10583; Mon, 15 Jan 2001 15:06:18 -0800 Received: from wardw by blowhole.extenex.net with local (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 14IIhd-0000iY-00; Mon, 15 Jan 2001 15:06:17 -0800 Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2001 15:06:17 -0800 From: Ward Willats To: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Subject: SA-1110 USB Function RPC Message-Id: <20010115150617.A2286@extenex.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii User-Agent: Mutt/1.0.1i Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk I am bolting my misc character driver interface onto Nicolas' new generic send/receive layers for SA1100 USB client function. In usb_recv.c I have moved the UDC_flip(Ser0UDCCS1, UDCCS1_RPC); that clears recevied packet complete in the no-error case from the interrupt handler to the end of ep1_start(). This holds RPC asserted while the completion routine is running, and makes the UDC NAK OUT packets until the dma machinery is ready again. Otherwise, a full buffer or other minor slowdown in my completion routines causes a cascade of usb_recv: RPC for non-existent buffer ...errors, as the UDC receiver would be overrun with no DMA going and never catch up. Does this seem correct? It certainly fixed my problem (pouring huge amounts of bulk data into the UDC receiver). -- Ward From kramer@pa.dec.com Tue Jan 16 02:07:25 2001 Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (root@mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id CAA12323 for ; Tue, 16 Jan 2001 02:07:25 +0100 Received: from zmamail04.zma.compaq.com (zmamail04.zma.compaq.com [161.114.64.104]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id CAA21011 for ; Tue, 16 Jan 2001 02:07:21 +0100 (MET) Received: by zmamail04.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 5A4D4DDF; Mon, 15 Jan 2001 20:05:34 -0500 (EST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by zmamail04.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 27F2357D; Mon, 15 Jan 2001 20:05:32 -0500 (EST) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA10909; Mon, 15 Jan 2001 17:05:25 -0800 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id QAA18516; Mon, 15 Jan 2001 16:58:27 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id QAA18487; Mon, 15 Jan 2001 16:58:27 -0800 (PST) Received: from ztxmail01.nz-cce.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA11094; Mon, 15 Jan 2001 16:58:27 -0800 Received: by ztxmail01.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id AFDAC47BF; Mon, 15 Jan 2001 18:58:26 -0600 (CST) Received: from xanadu.home (modemcable248.137-200-24.mtl.mc.videotron.ca [24.200.137.248]) by ztxmail01.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E8C09447F for ; Mon, 15 Jan 2001 18:58:25 -0600 (CST) Received: from localhost (nico@localhost) by xanadu.home (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id TAA02356; Mon, 15 Jan 2001 19:58:15 -0500 X-Authentication-Warning: xanadu.home: nico owned process doing -bs Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2001 19:58:15 -0500 (EST) From: Nicolas Pitre X-Sender: To: Ward Willats Cc: Subject: Re: SA-1110 USB Function RPC In-Reply-To: <20010115150617.A2286@extenex.com> Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk On Mon, 15 Jan 2001, Ward Willats wrote: > I am bolting my misc character driver interface onto Nicolas' new > generic send/receive layers for SA1100 USB client function. > > In usb_recv.c I have moved the > > UDC_flip(Ser0UDCCS1, UDCCS1_RPC); > > that clears recevied packet complete in the no-error case from the > interrupt handler to the end of ep1_start(). This holds RPC asserted > while the completion routine is running, and makes the UDC NAK OUT > packets until the dma machinery is ready again. Otherwise, a full > buffer or other minor slowdown in my completion routines causes a > cascade of > > usb_recv: RPC for non-existent buffer > > ...errors, as the UDC receiver would be overrun with no DMA going > and never catch up. > > Does this seem correct? It certainly fixed my problem (pouring huge > amounts of bulk data into the UDC receiver). My strategy in the eth driver was to always have a new buffer handy and restart the receive process before doing any serious processing on the current buffer. But your fix is probably the right thing to do anyway. Could you send me a patch? Nicolas From kramer@pa.dec.com Tue Jan 16 02:48:50 2001 Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (root@mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id CAA12512 for ; Tue, 16 Jan 2001 02:48:50 +0100 Received: from ztxmail04.ztx.compaq.com (ztxmail04.ztx.compaq.com [161.114.1.208]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id CAA22523 for ; Tue, 16 Jan 2001 02:48:48 +0100 (MET) Received: by ztxmail04.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 6135B127B; Mon, 15 Jan 2001 19:47:01 -0600 (CST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by ztxmail04.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 8DD191211; Mon, 15 Jan 2001 19:46:59 -0600 (CST) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA01019; Mon, 15 Jan 2001 17:46:53 -0800 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id RAA23756; Mon, 15 Jan 2001 17:40:41 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id RAA23755; Mon, 15 Jan 2001 17:40:41 -0800 (PST) Received: from ztxmail01.nz-cce.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA27362; Mon, 15 Jan 2001 17:40:41 -0800 Received: by ztxmail01.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id AA70046E4; Mon, 15 Jan 2001 19:40:40 -0600 (CST) Received: from fire.he.net (fire.he.net [216.218.144.2]) by ztxmail01.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E0B984483 for ; Mon, 15 Jan 2001 19:40:39 -0600 (CST) Received: from cementship.extenex.net (64-51-136-194.client.dsl.net [64.51.136.194]) by fire.he.net (8.8.6/8.8.2) with ESMTP id RAA05281; Mon, 15 Jan 2001 17:40:33 -0800 Received: from blowhole.extenex.net (blowhole.extenex.net [192.168.100.100]) by cementship.extenex.net (8.9.3/8.8.7) with ESMTP id RAA00781; Mon, 15 Jan 2001 17:40:05 -0800 Received: from wardw by blowhole.extenex.net with local (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 14IL6T-0000Fd-00; Mon, 15 Jan 2001 17:40:05 -0800 Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2001 17:40:05 -0800 From: Ward Willats To: Nicolas Pitre Cc: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Subject: Re: SA-1110 USB Function RPC Message-Id: <20010115174005.A623@extenex.com> References: <20010115150617.A2286@extenex.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii User-Agent: Mutt/1.0.1i In-Reply-To: ; from nico@cam.org on Mon, Jan 15, 2001 at 07:58:15PM -0500 Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk On Mon, Jan 15, 2001 at 07:58:15PM -0500, Nicolas Pitre wrote: > Could you send me a patch? --- /home/wardw/pure-24/linux/arch/arm/mach-sa1100/usb_recv.c Mon Jan 8 11:22:08 2001 +++ linux/arch/arm/mach-sa1100/usb_recv.c Mon Jan 15 17:17:55 2001 @@ -48,8 +48,7 @@ ep1_curdmapos = pci_map_single(NULL, ep1_curdmabuf, ep1_curdmalen, PCI_DMA_FROMDEVICE); } - - //UDC_write(Ser0UDCOMP, ep1_curdmalen-1); + UDC_flip(Ser0UDCCS1, UDCCS1_RPC); sa1100_dma_queue_buffer(dmachn_rx, NULL, ep1_curdmapos, ep1_curdmalen); } @@ -147,7 +146,7 @@ } ep1_curdmalen = 0; /* dma unmap already done */ ep1_remain -= len; - UDC_flip(Ser0UDCCS1, UDCCS1_RPC); + ep1_done((len) ? 0 : -EIO); } else { //printk("usb_recv: UDCCS1 = %x\n", status); From kramer@pa.dec.com Tue Jan 16 02:57:32 2001 Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (root@mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id CAA12547 for ; Tue, 16 Jan 2001 02:57:32 +0100 Received: from ztxmail03.ztx.compaq.com (ztxmail03.ztx.compaq.com [161.114.1.207]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id CAA22764 for ; Tue, 16 Jan 2001 02:57:30 +0100 (MET) Received: by ztxmail03.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 8F4D71883; Mon, 15 Jan 2001 19:55:43 -0600 (CST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by ztxmail03.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id B2CBA1B2B; Mon, 15 Jan 2001 19:55:41 -0600 (CST) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA10482; Mon, 15 Jan 2001 17:55:35 -0800 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id RAA23974; Mon, 15 Jan 2001 17:49:41 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id RAA23915; Mon, 15 Jan 2001 17:49:41 -0800 (PST) Received: from ztxmail01.nz-cce.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA28948; Mon, 15 Jan 2001 17:49:40 -0800 Received: by ztxmail01.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 4270C4765; Mon, 15 Jan 2001 19:49:40 -0600 (CST) Received: from fire.he.net (fire.he.net [216.218.144.2]) by ztxmail01.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F212457F for ; Mon, 15 Jan 2001 19:49:36 -0600 (CST) Received: from cementship.extenex.net (64-51-136-194.client.dsl.net [64.51.136.194]) by fire.he.net (8.8.6/8.8.2) with ESMTP id RAA06659; Mon, 15 Jan 2001 17:49:30 -0800 Received: from blowhole.extenex.net (blowhole.extenex.net [192.168.100.100]) by cementship.extenex.net (8.9.3/8.8.7) with ESMTP id RAA00791; Mon, 15 Jan 2001 17:49:01 -0800 Received: from wardw by blowhole.extenex.net with local (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 14ILF7-0000Fv-00; Mon, 15 Jan 2001 17:49:01 -0800 Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2001 17:49:01 -0800 From: Ward Willats To: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Subject: SA USB Function transmitter stall Message-Id: <20010115174901.A982@extenex.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii User-Agent: Mutt/1.0.1i Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk Now I am working with the transmitter in usb_send.c. When I plug in my board, the host resets me, so stall=1, and a moment later I am configured, but no interrupts come through or anything so stall continues to be 1 and the transmitter is locked up. I'm not sure how usb-eth.c gets around this...but maybe if I understood this it might guide whatever hack I do next to unwedge things! :-) -- Ward From kramer@pa.dec.com Wed Jan 17 03:47:36 2001 Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (root@mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id DAA16728 for ; Wed, 17 Jan 2001 03:47:36 +0100 Received: from ztxmail05.ztx.compaq.com (ztxmail05.ztx.compaq.com [161.114.1.209]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id DAA15081 for ; Wed, 17 Jan 2001 03:47:34 +0100 (MET) Received: by ztxmail05.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 5F7AEB4D; Tue, 16 Jan 2001 20:45:41 -0600 (CST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by ztxmail05.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id CF038AFC; Tue, 16 Jan 2001 20:45:39 -0600 (CST) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA24301; Tue, 16 Jan 2001 18:44:06 -0800 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id SAA14659; Tue, 16 Jan 2001 18:33:06 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id SAA14756; Tue, 16 Jan 2001 18:33:05 -0800 (PST) Received: from zmamail01.nz-tay.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA28811; Tue, 16 Jan 2001 18:33:05 -0800 Received: by zmamail01.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id D794ED39C; Tue, 16 Jan 2001 21:33:04 -0500 (EST) Received: from LinuxServer.gicom.com.cn (unknown [210.72.229.174]) by zmamail01.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id BAF72D60A for ; Tue, 16 Jan 2001 21:33:01 -0500 (EST) Received: (qmail 3518 invoked from network); 13 Jan 2001 14:44:29 -0000 Received: from max2-60.madison.corecomm.net (HELO dns1.autotrading.co.jp) (216.214.83.252) by linuxserver.gicom.com.cn with SMTP; 13 Jan 2001 14:44:29 -0000 Message-Id: <1ydw3kvn.q35bsx0udi8d4a@dns1.autotrading.co.jp> Subject: Intensify Pleasure and Orgasms in Sex From: Orgasm@dns1.tohokudenshi.co.jp Date: Sat, 13 Jan 2001 08:42:02 -0500 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT To: Falkner@eei.cz Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk Get your Sex Life Roaring with IMPULSE http://www.cosmoseffect.com/impulse.html IMPULSE for MEN: Intensifies Pleasure and Satisfaction Increases Energy and Endurance Longer Lasting and Firmer Erections IMPULSE for WOMEN: Formula Designed Especially for Women by Women Intensifies Pleasure, Enhances Orgasms Revitalizes Sex Drive Enhances Vaginal Lubrication It's Fun, Safe, and Effective. and you don't even need a perscription. Get more information NOW Go to: http://www.cosmoseffect.com/impulse.html To be removed send email to hh2you@yahoo.com From kramer@pa.dec.com Thu Jan 18 05:25:42 2001 Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (root@mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id FAA21416 for ; Thu, 18 Jan 2001 05:25:41 +0100 Received: from zmamail05.zma.compaq.com (zmamail05.zma.compaq.com [161.114.64.105]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id FAA05877 for ; Thu, 18 Jan 2001 05:25:40 +0100 (MET) Received: by zmamail05.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 813A13571; Wed, 17 Jan 2001 23:23:52 -0500 (EST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by zmamail05.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id B81DE1589; Wed, 17 Jan 2001 23:23:49 -0500 (EST) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA24370; Wed, 17 Jan 2001 20:22:18 -0800 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id UAA20651; Wed, 17 Jan 2001 20:10:44 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id UAA02979; Wed, 17 Jan 2001 20:10:43 -0800 (PST) Received: from ztxmail01.nz-cce.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA06819; Wed, 17 Jan 2001 20:10:43 -0800 Received: by ztxmail01.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 3BA274536; Wed, 17 Jan 2001 22:10:42 -0600 (CST) Received: from mail.neotec.com.tw (unknown [211.72.51.29]) by ztxmail01.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EEA6D4417 for ; Wed, 17 Jan 2001 22:10:40 -0600 (CST) Received: by mail.neoteco.com.tw with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21) id ; Thu, 18 Jan 2001 12:24:14 +0800 Message-Id: From: Rex Juo To: "'sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com'" Subject: UCB1200 touch screen driver stuff Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2001 12:24:13 +0800 Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21) Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----_=_NextPart_001_01C08106.835F4980" Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk This message is in MIME format. Since your mail reader does not understand this format, some or all of this message may not be legible. ------_=_NextPart_001_01C08106.835F4980 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="big5" in linux kernel source tree 2.4.0-rmk1-np1 /drivers/char/Makefile ====== 106: obj-$(CONFIG_TOUCHSCREEN_UCB1200) += ucb1200_ts.o 219: obj-$(CONFIG_UCB1200) += ucb1200.o ====== i think it'll cause problems when ucb1200_ts.o tries to init, because it need to stack on ucb1200.o, if we statically link both of them into kernel. who shall i report this stuff to? ------_=_NextPart_001_01C08106.835F4980 Content-Type: text/html; charset="big5" UCB1200 touch screen driver stuff

in linux kernel source tree 2.4.0-rmk1-np1
/drivers/char/Makefile
======
106: obj-$(CONFIG_TOUCHSCREEN_UCB1200) += ucb1200_ts.o
219: obj-$(CONFIG_UCB1200) += ucb1200.o
======

i think it'll cause problems when ucb1200_ts.o tries to init,
because it need to stack on ucb1200.o, if we statically link both of them into kernel.

who shall i report this stuff to?

------_=_NextPart_001_01C08106.835F4980-- From kramer@pa.dec.com Thu Jan 18 05:33:46 2001 Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (root@mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id FAA21434 for ; Thu, 18 Jan 2001 05:33:46 +0100 Received: from ztxmail03.ztx.compaq.com (ztxmail03.ztx.compaq.com [161.114.1.207]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id FAA06122 for ; Thu, 18 Jan 2001 05:33:44 +0100 (MET) Received: by ztxmail03.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id C79778F2; Wed, 17 Jan 2001 22:31:56 -0600 (CST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by ztxmail03.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 42AC21B64; Wed, 17 Jan 2001 22:31:55 -0600 (CST) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA20234; Wed, 17 Jan 2001 20:30:34 -0800 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id UAA04852; Wed, 17 Jan 2001 20:25:50 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id UAA04739; Wed, 17 Jan 2001 20:25:49 -0800 (PST) Received: from zmamail01.nz-tay.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA25548; Wed, 17 Jan 2001 20:25:49 -0800 Received: by zmamail01.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id D7A1611388; Wed, 17 Jan 2001 23:25:48 -0500 (EST) Received: from xanadu.home (modemcable248.137-200-24.mtl.mc.videotron.ca [24.200.137.248]) by zmamail01.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6AC8EDBF1 for ; Wed, 17 Jan 2001 23:25:48 -0500 (EST) Received: from localhost (nico@localhost) by xanadu.home (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id XAA18416; Wed, 17 Jan 2001 23:25:39 -0500 X-Authentication-Warning: xanadu.home: nico owned process doing -bs Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2001 23:25:39 -0500 (EST) From: Nicolas Pitre X-Sender: To: Rex Juo Cc: "'sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com'" Subject: Re: UCB1200 touch screen driver stuff In-Reply-To: Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk On Thu, 18 Jan 2001, Rex Juo wrote: > in linux kernel source tree 2.4.0-rmk1-np1 > /drivers/char/Makefile > ====== > 106: obj-$(CONFIG_TOUCHSCREEN_UCB1200) += ucb1200_ts.o > 219: obj-$(CONFIG_UCB1200) += ucb1200.o > ====== > > i think it'll cause problems when ucb1200_ts.o tries to init, > because it need to stack on ucb1200.o, if we statically link both of them > into kernel. > > who shall i report this stuff to? Me and this mailing list. This should be fixed in 2.4.0-rmk2-np1 which I plan to release in a few moment. Nicolas From kramer@pa.dec.com Thu Jan 18 06:26:19 2001 Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (root@mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id GAA21554 for ; Thu, 18 Jan 2001 06:26:19 +0100 Received: from zmamail04.zma.compaq.com (zmamail04.zma.compaq.com [161.114.64.104]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id GAA07545 for ; Thu, 18 Jan 2001 06:26:18 +0100 (MET) Received: by zmamail04.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 08D022109; Thu, 18 Jan 2001 00:24:31 -0500 (EST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by zmamail04.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 4CAF32126; Thu, 18 Jan 2001 00:24:28 -0500 (EST) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA04776; Wed, 17 Jan 2001 21:23:06 -0800 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id VAA06396; Wed, 17 Jan 2001 21:18:08 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id VAA07067; Wed, 17 Jan 2001 21:18:07 -0800 (PST) Received: from zmamail02.nz-tay.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA11006; Wed, 17 Jan 2001 21:18:07 -0800 Received: by zmamail02.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 0A4445434; Thu, 18 Jan 2001 00:18:07 -0500 (EST) Received: from xanadu.home (modemcable248.137-200-24.mtl.mc.videotron.ca [24.200.137.248]) by zmamail02.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A502755F4 for ; Thu, 18 Jan 2001 00:18:06 -0500 (EST) Received: from localhost (nico@localhost) by xanadu.home (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id AAA18859; Thu, 18 Jan 2001 00:18:06 -0500 X-Authentication-Warning: xanadu.home: nico owned process doing -bs Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2001 00:18:06 -0500 (EST) From: Nicolas Pitre X-Sender: To: SA-1100/Linux Cc: Subject: diff-2.4.0-rmk2-np1 In-Reply-To: Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk ... is now available at the usual sites, which are: ftp://ftp.netwinder.org/users/n/nico/ ftp://ftp.arm.linux.org.uk/pub/linux/arm/people/nico/ ftp://ftp.handhelds.org/pub/linux/arm/sa-1100-patches/ The highlights are: - buglet in SA1100 RTC driver (Jordi Colomer) - SA1100.h MCP DMA definition fixes (Ajit Anvekar) - bug fixes for ucb1200_generic (Tred Lim) - ucb1200-ts driver appears to work again, please confirm... (me) - small usb-eth driver fix (Oleg Drokin) - usb-recv NACK packets until a buffer is available now (Ward Willats) - Pangolin update (Murphy Chen) - updated MTD stuff to get rid of some CFI probe bugs (me) - fix for crashing kernels when SA1111 support + param struct (me) Enjoy! Nicolas From kramer@pa.dec.com Fri Jan 19 00:46:56 2001 Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (root@mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id AAA24625 for ; Fri, 19 Jan 2001 00:46:55 +0100 Received: from ztxmail05.ztx.compaq.com (ztxmail05.ztx.compaq.com [161.114.1.209]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id AAA20638 for ; Fri, 19 Jan 2001 00:46:53 +0100 (MET) Received: by ztxmail05.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 5E060BC4; Thu, 18 Jan 2001 17:45:07 -0600 (CST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by ztxmail05.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id C103FA5B; Thu, 18 Jan 2001 17:45:05 -0600 (CST) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA03703; Thu, 18 Jan 2001 15:45:04 -0800 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id PAA00660; Thu, 18 Jan 2001 15:42:23 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id PAA30346; Thu, 18 Jan 2001 15:42:22 -0800 (PST) Received: from zmamail01.nz-tay.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA30745; Thu, 18 Jan 2001 15:42:21 -0800 Received: by zmamail01.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 4ADD6D68C; Thu, 18 Jan 2001 18:42:21 -0500 (EST) Received: from email.nist.gov (email.nist.gov [129.6.2.7]) by zmamail01.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 06B2FD683 for ; Thu, 18 Jan 2001 18:42:21 -0500 (EST) Received: from nist.gov (sandbar.dmz.cme.nist.gov [129.6.78.200]) by email.nist.gov (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id SAA02961 for ; Thu, 18 Jan 2001 18:42:20 -0500 (EST) Message-Id: <3A677FDD.EFB21F45@nist.gov> Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2001 18:44:29 -0500 From: Rick Schneeman Organization: NIST X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.76 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.2.12-20 i686) X-Accept-Language: en Mime-Version: 1.0 To: SA-1100 Linux List Subject: diff information.... Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk I am using the latest Linux version 2.4.0-rmk2-np1 on Assabet+Neponset. I have a CF Socket Ethernet and IBM 1G Microdrive in the two slots on the Neponset. During the booting phase, Linux hangs and I get a timeout error from card services (shown below). Interestingly, when I remove the cards out of Neponset from the running system, I get the login prompt and the system is fine. I am using the Compaq bootldr with John Dorsey's patch and I have expanded the flash segments to accomodate larger kernels. The same kernel and ramdisk will boot just fine using the normal angelboot process. Nicolas mentioned in the latest diff that he had applied that the kernel was crashing with SA1111 support. Does anyone have any ideas why the difference in boot loaders makes a difference or is it something else? .... NET4: Unix domain sockets 1.0/SMP for Linux NET4.0. NetWinder Floating Point Emulator V0.95 (c) 1998-1999 Rebel.com cs: socket c0478800 timed out during reset. Try increasing setup_delay. cs: socket c19bc000 timed out during reset. Try increasing setup_delay. EXT2-fs warning: maximal mount count reached, running e2fsck is recommended .... Thanks, Rick Schneeman (rschneeman@nist.gov) -- Rick Schneeman, Computer Scientist National Institute of Standards and Technology Gaithersburg, Maryland 20899 USA From kramer@pa.dec.com Fri Jan 19 04:25:19 2001 Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (root@mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id EAA25430 for ; Fri, 19 Jan 2001 04:25:19 +0100 Received: from zmamail03.zma.compaq.com (zmamail03.zma.compaq.com [161.114.64.103]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id EAA01595 for ; Fri, 19 Jan 2001 04:25:17 +0100 (MET) Received: by zmamail03.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 8D04290E9; Thu, 18 Jan 2001 22:23:29 -0500 (EST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by zmamail03.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 3781D6BBB; Thu, 18 Jan 2001 22:23:27 -0500 (EST) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA13531; Thu, 18 Jan 2001 19:23:12 -0800 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id TAA18035; Thu, 18 Jan 2001 19:18:32 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id TAA18755; Thu, 18 Jan 2001 19:18:31 -0800 (PST) Received: from zmamail01.nz-tay.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA18301; Thu, 18 Jan 2001 19:18:31 -0800 Received: by zmamail01.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id F3021DD19; Thu, 18 Jan 2001 22:18:30 -0500 (EST) Received: from xanadu.home (modemcable248.137-200-24.mtl.mc.videotron.ca [24.200.137.248]) by zmamail01.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 921C6DD56 for ; Thu, 18 Jan 2001 22:18:30 -0500 (EST) Received: from localhost (nico@localhost) by xanadu.home (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id WAA24119; Thu, 18 Jan 2001 22:18:30 -0500 X-Authentication-Warning: xanadu.home: nico owned process doing -bs Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2001 22:18:29 -0500 (EST) From: Nicolas Pitre X-Sender: To: SA-1100/Linux Cc: Subject: diff-2.4.0-rmk2-np2 In-Reply-To: Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk ... is there! ftp://ftp.netwinder.org/users/n/nico/ ftp://ftp.arm.linux.org.uk/pub/linux/arm/people/nico/ ftp://ftp.handhelds.org/pub/linux/arm/sa-1100-patches/ Because rmk2-np1 had too many stupid bugs, I though it was better to zap them sooner: - spurious "endmenu" removed (many people) - fix for poll() in ucb1200-ts (Jordi Colomer) - MTD partition code funnies (Remi Depommier) Enjoy! Nicolas From kramer@pa.dec.com Sat Jan 20 09:24:40 2001 Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (root@mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id JAA29167 for ; Sat, 20 Jan 2001 09:24:40 +0100 Received: from zmamail04.zma.compaq.com (zmamail04.zma.compaq.com [161.114.64.104]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id JAA25452 for ; Sat, 20 Jan 2001 09:24:38 +0100 (MET) Received: by zmamail04.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id EB504341; Sat, 20 Jan 2001 03:22:50 -0500 (EST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by zmamail04.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id B9E99219; Sat, 20 Jan 2001 03:22:48 -0500 (EST) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA29385; Sat, 20 Jan 2001 00:22:36 -0800 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id AAA09237; Sat, 20 Jan 2001 00:09:20 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id AAA09193; Sat, 20 Jan 2001 00:09:19 -0800 (PST) Received: from zmamail01.nz-tay.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA05332; Sat, 20 Jan 2001 00:09:18 -0800 Received: by zmamail01.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 1E2E2114F5; Sat, 20 Jan 2001 03:09:18 -0500 (EST) Received: from mail3.ntu.edu.sg (mail3.ntu.edu.sg [155.69.1.91]) by zmamail01.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 015CB116F5 for ; Sat, 20 Jan 2001 03:09:16 -0500 (EST) Received: by mail3.ntu.edu.sg with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21) id ; Sat, 20 Jan 2001 16:08:58 +0800 Message-Id: From: #YANG XIAOYONG# <143097320@ntu.edu.sg> To: "'Greg Haerr'" Cc: "'nanogui@linuxhacker.org'" , "'linux-arm@lists.arm.linux.org.uk'" , "'sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com'" Subject: RE: Microwindows PDA operating environment binary distribution av ailable for iPAQ Date: Sat, 20 Jan 2001 16:08:43 +0800 Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk Hi Greq, I am a newbie to embedded Linux. Since you says there is no modification needed to port Microwindows PDA operating environment binary distribution to Assbet, I tried to port the binary by just simply run the exe in windows. Then it did transferring anything over. please don't blame my stupid question. since both Ipaq and Assabet are using the SA1110 processor and the memory allocation is control by the angel boot for assabet. why the applications for Ipaq could not run on the Assabet? why I need to recompile the iPAQ Microwindows PDA operating environment? Regards, Xiaoyong -----Original Message----- From: Greg Haerr [mailto:greg@censoft.com] Sent: Thursday, January 11, 2001 9:47 AM To: #YANG XIAOYONG# Subject: Re: Microwindows PDA operating environment binary distribution available for iPAQ : I am very glad to hear that Centry can help me. My project is only for : research purpose. Learning how to port embedded Linux is part of our job. : Would you like to point it out for me? What might be the modification we : should take note if we want to port the PDA environment to Assabet? There shouldn't be any modifications. Just compile up the source for the kernel and Microwindows. The binaries that we distribute for the iPAQ .rpm's should run unmodified. Regards, Greg From kramer@pa.dec.com Mon Jan 22 19:42:51 2001 Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (root@mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id TAA01968 for ; Mon, 22 Jan 2001 19:42:50 +0100 Received: from ztxmail04.ztx.compaq.com (ztxmail04.ztx.compaq.com [161.114.1.208]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id TAA13655 for ; Mon, 22 Jan 2001 19:42:48 +0100 (MET) Received: by ztxmail04.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 4016B12E1; Mon, 22 Jan 2001 12:41:01 -0600 (CST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by ztxmail04.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id F041B1249; Mon, 22 Jan 2001 12:40:58 -0600 (CST) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA24850; Mon, 22 Jan 2001 10:40:47 -0800 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id KAA27771; Mon, 22 Jan 2001 10:28:41 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id KAA10422; Mon, 22 Jan 2001 10:28:41 -0800 (PST) Received: from ztxmail02.nz-cce.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA13895; Mon, 22 Jan 2001 10:28:40 -0800 Received: by ztxmail02.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 679EF1DB9; Mon, 22 Jan 2001 12:28:39 -0600 (CST) Received: from balder.inter.net.il (balder.inter.net.il [192.114.186.15]) by ztxmail02.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A4BB1C81 for ; Mon, 22 Jan 2001 12:28:38 -0600 (CST) Received: from gad ([213.8.210.152]) by balder.inter.net.il (Mirapoint) with SMTP id AIC02158; Mon, 22 Jan 2001 20:28:33 +0200 (IST) Mailguardian-Version: 1.1V Reply-To: From: "Gad Hayisraeli" To: "Sa1100-Linux list" , "Linux-Arm-kernel List" Subject: large ramdisk fails to load Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2001 20:30:47 +0200 Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0003_01C084B2.33DADB40" X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-Msmail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) Importance: Normal X-Ms-Tnef-Correlator: X-Mimeole: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2314.1300 Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0003_01C084B2.33DADB40 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1255" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit i'm working on the Assabet sa1110 cpu. i tried to make larger ramdisk than the default (2560k). i used: blob 1.08pre2 zImage - of Lart (i think 2.4.0-pre8-rmk?-np?) when i used the many types of ramdisks less than 3Mb in size - all worked fine. but when i made ramdisk that its size is about 3.4 Mb (and overall image to Jflash to target is about 4.3 mb), the blob and zImage loads and then i get this message: "RAMDISK: found ramdisk in block 0" (sort of...) and then all stops and the ramdisk dont load !! so what is the problem and how can i overcome it ? (i need to download mp3 files to this target...) thanks Gad ------=_NextPart_000_0003_01C084B2.33DADB40 Content-Type: application/ms-tnef; name="winmail.dat" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="winmail.dat" eJ8+Ii8SAQaQCAAEAAAAAAABAAEAAQeQBgAIAAAA5wQAAAAAAADrAAEIgAcAGAAAAElQTS5NaWNy b3NvZnQgTWFpbC5Ob3RlADEIAQ2ABAACAAAAAgACAAEGgAMADgAAANEHAQAWABQAHgAAAAEAIgEB A5AGALQGAAAlAAAACwACAAEAAAALACMAAAAAAAMAJgAAAAAACwApAAAAAAADADYAAAAAAB4AcAAB AAAAHAAAAGxhcmdlIHJhbWRpc2sgZmFpbHMgdG8gbG9hZAACAXEAAQAAABYAAAABwIShb+VDN34k 8KQR1JoBANC3TND7AAACAR0MAQAAABUAAABTTVRQOkdBREBTWUVURS5DTy5JTAAAAAALAAEOAAAA AEAABg4ABPxToYTAAQIBCg4BAAAAGAAAAAAAAAAdNSV0Y7bUEZoAANC3TND7woAAAAsAHw4BAAAA AgEJEAEAAABiAgAAXgIAADkDAABMWkZ1K6YFJ+EABWZiaWQEAABkAHKAY3BnMTI1NQD4xQtgbg6A MDM3AfcCpBMD4wIAY2gKwHNldKwwIAcTAoB9CoF2CJCkd2sLgGQ0DGBjAFAxCwNsdHIKsQumIGkw J20gdwWwEtFnIOECICB0aGUR0AQQAaB1EaAgFgAxFoARwA5gdbYuCqIKgGkVkAiBZBWQNG8gAMBr FcALYHJnoQSQIHJhbQ2RaxWRJwORFaIBAWF1E8AgKKEOoDYwaykXB3URkAxkOhcUAmBvYiAxUC4w OHAJcDIXFHomSQDAGKAgLRVgZiBuTArAGlEXcWgLgBlAMhQuNByALRyxOC1yAG1rPy1ucD8pfRcU dxWwA6AbVBWTA4F5eRWQeXAHkR3hGOUEIGznB5AEIBljM00cUAuAFlB8aXodogdAAyAU8hfBZuUL gGUXBWJ1BUAglQDA5wEAGNoFQGl0BCAkEwQAdyRwBuAl8TMfAAXQHFAo8wBwF9BvdgSQJIIHcB2C 5RfxSg9hc2gX4gGQGJEXJ5EoVh8QMxgQYiks/xWTHCMpUh1VCQAmoChRKWH/FaEgwityHpEEIAeB FgAYoAEbtSJSQU1ESVP8SzolIAhgKWEY5iPhHCHSYxlAMCIaYHMJER3RXi4zUCAlLnckgnMX8HAb LlcY12QCIS4DICEh/xcUMuAmESeCIzIVwBywHECnIwAU0ClSaG8H4GMDkS8XcCmSBaAHgCAnoSA/ nxcUHmElUBfENiB3bjZz/G1wLGAlMCMBKwMvcitE3zNYFxQZYiLQPdpHJqAXFAUSUQBAgAAACwAA gAggBgAAAAAAwAAAAAAAAEYAAAAAA4UAAAAAAAADAAKACCAGAAAAAADAAAAAAAAARgAAAAAQhQAA AAAAAAMAB4AIIAYAAAAAAMAAAAAAAABGAAAAAFKFAACOagEAHgAJgAggBgAAAAAAwAAAAAAAAEYA AAAAVIUAAAEAAAAEAAAAOS4wAB4ACoAIIAYAAAAAAMAAAAAAAABGAAAAADaFAAABAAAAAQAAAAAA AAAeAAuACCAGAAAAAADAAAAAAAAARgAAAAA3hQAAAQAAAAEAAAAAAAAAHgAMgAggBgAAAAAAwAAA AAAAAEYAAAAAOIUAAAEAAAABAAAAAAAAAAsADYAIIAYAAAAAAMAAAAAAAABGAAAAAIKFAAABAAAA CwARgAggBgAAAAAAwAAAAAAAAEYAAAAABoUAAAAAAAADABKACCAGAAAAAADAAAAAAAAARgAAAAAB hQAAAAAAAAsAG4AIIAYAAAAAAMAAAAAAAABGAAAAAA6FAAAAAAAAAwAcgAggBgAAAAAAwAAAAAAA AEYAAAAAEYUAAAAAAAADAB6ACCAGAAAAAADAAAAAAAAARgAAAAAYhQAAAAAAAAIB+A8BAAAAEAAA AB01JXRjttQRmgAA0LdM0PsCAfoPAQAAABAAAAAdNSV0Y7bUEZoAANC3TND7AgH7DwEAAACCAAAA AAAAADihuxAF5RAaobsIACsqVsIAAFBTVFBSWC5ETEwAAAAAAAAAAE5JVEH5v7gBAKoAN9luAAAA QzpcV0lORE9XU1xMb2NhbCBTZXR0aW5nc1xBcHBsaWNhdGlvbiBEYXRhXE1pY3Jvc29mdFxPdXRs b29rXG1haWxib3gucHN0AAAAAwD+DwUAAAADAA00/TcAAAIBfwABAAAALwAAADxORUJCSktBQUJO T0ZKQ0RJTERFTk9FUEhDQUFBLmdhZEBzeWV0ZS5jby5pbD4AAAMABhAArLOAAwAHEOIBAAADABAQ AAAAAAMAERAAAAAAHgAIEAEAAABlAAAASU1XT1JLSU5HT05USEVBU1NBQkVUU0ExMTEwQ1BVSVRS SUVEVE9NQUtFTEFSR0VSUkFNRElTS1RIQU5USEVERUZBVUxUKDI1NjBLKUlVU0VEOkJMT0IxMDhQ UkUyWklNQUdFLQAAAAArbQ== ------=_NextPart_000_0003_01C084B2.33DADB40-- From kramer@pa.dec.com Mon Jan 22 22:01:51 2001 Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (root@mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id WAA02273 for ; Mon, 22 Jan 2001 22:01:51 +0100 Received: from zmamail05.zma.compaq.com (zmamail05.zma.compaq.com [161.114.64.105]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id WAA21944 for ; Mon, 22 Jan 2001 22:01:49 +0100 (MET) Received: by zmamail05.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id E752831ED; Mon, 22 Jan 2001 16:00:01 -0500 (EST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by zmamail05.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 39FE833C2; Mon, 22 Jan 2001 15:59:57 -0500 (EST) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA16952; Mon, 22 Jan 2001 12:59:55 -0800 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id MAA24191; Mon, 22 Jan 2001 12:54:07 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id MAA18805; Mon, 22 Jan 2001 12:54:07 -0800 (PST) Received: from ztxmail02.nz-cce.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA04674; Mon, 22 Jan 2001 12:54:06 -0800 Received: by ztxmail02.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 36DED1CE3; Mon, 22 Jan 2001 14:54:06 -0600 (CST) Received: from xanadu.home (modemcable248.137-200-24.mtl.mc.videotron.ca [24.200.137.248]) by ztxmail02.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A28861D7E for ; Mon, 22 Jan 2001 14:54:05 -0600 (CST) Received: from localhost (nico@localhost) by xanadu.home (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id PAA10257; Mon, 22 Jan 2001 15:53:53 -0500 X-Authentication-Warning: xanadu.home: nico owned process doing -bs Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2001 15:53:53 -0500 (EST) From: Nicolas Pitre X-Sender: To: Gad Hayisraeli Cc: Sa1100-Linux list , Linux-Arm-kernel List Subject: Re: large ramdisk fails to load In-Reply-To: Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk On Mon, 22 Jan 2001, Gad Hayisraeli wrote: > i'm working on the Assabet sa1110 cpu. > i tried to make larger ramdisk than the default (2560k). > i used: > blob 1.08pre2 > zImage - of Lart (i think 2.4.0-pre8-rmk?-np?) > when i used the many types of ramdisks less than 3Mb in size - all worked > fine. > but when i made ramdisk that its size is about 3.4 Mb (and overall image to > Jflash to target is about 4.3 mb), the blob and zImage loads and then i get > this message: > "RAMDISK: found ramdisk in block 0" (sort of...) > and then all stops and the ramdisk dont load !! > so what is the problem and how can i overcome it ? > (i need to download mp3 files to this target...) Use JFFS on a 16MB flash. Nicolas From kramer@pa.dec.com Tue Jan 23 11:24:22 2001 Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (root@mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id LAA04169 for ; Tue, 23 Jan 2001 11:24:21 +0100 Received: from ztxmail04.ztx.compaq.com (ztxmail04.ztx.compaq.com [161.114.1.208]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id LAA03289 for ; Tue, 23 Jan 2001 11:24:18 +0100 (MET) Received: by ztxmail04.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 3234111E5; Tue, 23 Jan 2001 04:22:30 -0600 (CST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by ztxmail04.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 94E61305; Tue, 23 Jan 2001 04:22:26 -0600 (CST) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA12478; Tue, 23 Jan 2001 02:22:24 -0800 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id CAA16173; Tue, 23 Jan 2001 02:11:41 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id CAA27651; Tue, 23 Jan 2001 02:11:40 -0800 (PST) Received: from zmamail01.nz-tay.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA07454; Tue, 23 Jan 2001 02:11:40 -0800 Received: by zmamail01.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id E03FF1128A; Tue, 23 Jan 2001 05:11:30 -0500 (EST) Received: from eising.k-net.dk (eising.k-net.dtu.dk [130.225.71.229]) by zmamail01.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B46B111FC for ; Tue, 23 Jan 2001 05:11:30 -0500 (EST) Received: from obelix.vkr.k-net.dk (obelix.vkr.k-net.dk [192.38.209.3]) by eising.k-net.dk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 73A7DC580 for ; Tue, 23 Jan 2001 11:11:29 +0100 (CET) Received: by obelix.vkr.k-net.dk with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21) id ; Tue, 23 Jan 2001 11:12:38 +0100 Message-Id: From: Anders Frederiksen To: "'Sa1100-Linux list '" Subject: JTAG interface functionality Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2001 11:12:36 +0100 Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk A quick hardware related question: Is it possible to program the flash via the SA1110 JTAG interface? I'm thinking of initial setup of a new system with empty flash... Thanx, Anders Frederiksen From kramer@pa.dec.com Tue Jan 23 12:03:04 2001 Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (root@mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id MAA04278 for ; Tue, 23 Jan 2001 12:03:04 +0100 Received: from zmamail05.zma.compaq.com (zmamail05.zma.compaq.com [161.114.64.105]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id MAA06570 for ; Tue, 23 Jan 2001 12:03:02 +0100 (MET) Received: by zmamail05.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 8D5ADC52; Tue, 23 Jan 2001 06:01:15 -0500 (EST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by zmamail05.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 2F485DDC; Tue, 23 Jan 2001 06:01:13 -0500 (EST) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA04275; Tue, 23 Jan 2001 03:01:11 -0800 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id CAA28855; Tue, 23 Jan 2001 02:53:56 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id CAA28691; Tue, 23 Jan 2001 02:53:55 -0800 (PST) Received: from ztxmail02.nz-cce.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA03183; Tue, 23 Jan 2001 02:53:54 -0800 Received: by ztxmail02.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 5DD231F49; Tue, 23 Jan 2001 04:53:54 -0600 (CST) Received: from relay.lep-philips.fr (relay.lep-philips.fr [212.208.209.250]) by ztxmail02.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 952251EE8 for ; Tue, 23 Jan 2001 04:53:53 -0600 (CST) Received: from relais.lep.research.philips.com (relais.lep.research.philips.com [130.142.21.30]) by relay.lep-philips.fr (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id LAA08938; Tue, 23 Jan 2001 11:53:52 +0100 (MET) Received: from lep-philips.fr (relais [130.142.21.30]) by relais.lep.research.philips.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id LAA12460; Tue, 23 Jan 2001 11:53:49 +0100 (MET) Message-Id: <3A6D64AA.4967C24A@lep-philips.fr> Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2001 12:02:02 +0100 From: Guillaume Jaunet X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.72 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.2.16-22 i686) X-Accept-Language: fr, en, de Mime-Version: 1.0 To: Anders Frederiksen Cc: "'Sa1100-Linux list '" Subject: Re: JTAG interface functionality References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk Which platform are you thinking of? If it's Assabet, the JTAG interface is not a real JTAG interface. I mean that there lack some signals. Nevertheless, some tools exist, ollawing programming flash with this "JTAG", such as JFlash. I use it from Linux, and it work quite well. I don't know if it's the last version, but here is a link. I think there is some Windows binaries also... ftp://ftp.netwinder.org/users/n/nico/SA1110Jflash.tgz Guillaume Anders Frederiksen wrote: > > A quick hardware related question: > Is it possible to program the flash via the SA1110 JTAG interface? I'm > thinking of initial setup of a new system with empty flash... > > Thanx, > Anders Frederiksen From kramer@pa.dec.com Tue Jan 23 14:49:11 2001 Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (root@mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id OAA04662 for ; Tue, 23 Jan 2001 14:49:11 +0100 Received: from ztxmail03.ztx.compaq.com (ztxmail03.ztx.compaq.com [161.114.1.207]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id OAA18094 for ; Tue, 23 Jan 2001 14:49:09 +0100 (MET) Received: by ztxmail03.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 19D2DA40; Tue, 23 Jan 2001 07:47:22 -0600 (CST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by ztxmail03.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id A5EEBA0F; Tue, 23 Jan 2001 07:47:16 -0600 (CST) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA05356; Tue, 23 Jan 2001 05:47:14 -0800 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id FAA24862; Tue, 23 Jan 2001 05:36:25 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id FAA30776; Tue, 23 Jan 2001 05:36:24 -0800 (PST) Received: from zmamail02.nz-tay.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA14981; Tue, 23 Jan 2001 05:36:24 -0800 Received: by zmamail02.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 9741F4F86; Tue, 23 Jan 2001 08:36:23 -0500 (EST) Received: from eising.k-net.dk (eising.k-net.dtu.dk [130.225.71.229]) by zmamail02.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 308C74E15 for ; Tue, 23 Jan 2001 08:36:23 -0500 (EST) Received: from obelix.vkr.k-net.dk (obelix.vkr.k-net.dk [192.38.209.3]) by eising.k-net.dk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 68F97C4E0 for ; Tue, 23 Jan 2001 14:36:22 +0100 (CET) Received: by obelix.vkr.k-net.dk with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21) id ; Tue, 23 Jan 2001 14:37:30 +0100 Message-Id: From: Anders Frederiksen To: "''Sa1100-Linux list ' '" Subject: RE: JTAG interface functionality Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2001 14:37:29 +0100 Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk I wasn't thinking of a specific platform but rather "generic" hardware. So I was wondering whether the SA1110 jtag interface provides sufficient control of the SA1110 to allow for programming an arbitrary bank of flash. I guess if it works on Assabet it will work on any platform (?)... Regards, Anders -----Original Message----- From: Guillaume Jaunet Which platform are you thinking of? If it's Assabet, the JTAG interface is not a real JTAG interface. I mean that there lack some signals. Nevertheless, some tools exist, ollawing programming flash with this "JTAG", such as JFlash. I use it from Linux, and it work quite well. I don't know if it's the last version, but here is a link. I think there is some Windows binaries also... ftp://ftp.netwinder.org/users/n/nico/SA1110Jflash.tgz Guillaume Anders Frederiksen wrote: > > A quick hardware related question: > Is it possible to program the flash via the SA1110 JTAG interface? I'm > thinking of initial setup of a new system with empty flash... > > Thanx, > Anders Frederiksen From kramer@pa.dec.com Tue Jan 23 15:15:08 2001 Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (root@mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id PAA04739 for ; Tue, 23 Jan 2001 15:15:07 +0100 Received: from ztxmail04.ztx.compaq.com (ztxmail04.ztx.compaq.com [161.114.1.208]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id PAA20239 for ; Tue, 23 Jan 2001 15:15:05 +0100 (MET) Received: by ztxmail04.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 383511167; Tue, 23 Jan 2001 08:13:18 -0600 (CST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by ztxmail04.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 787C2261; Tue, 23 Jan 2001 08:13:14 -0600 (CST) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA08441; Tue, 23 Jan 2001 06:13:13 -0800 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id GAA19593; Tue, 23 Jan 2001 06:05:55 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id GAA29253; Tue, 23 Jan 2001 06:05:54 -0800 (PST) Received: from ztxmail01.nz-cce.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA21678; Tue, 23 Jan 2001 06:05:53 -0800 Received: by ztxmail01.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 54D9A2875; Tue, 23 Jan 2001 08:05:53 -0600 (CST) Received: from note.orchestra.cse.unsw.EDU.AU (note.orchestra.cse.unsw.EDU.AU [129.94.242.29]) by ztxmail01.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 3AF2A2B41 for ; Tue, 23 Jan 2001 08:05:52 -0600 (CST) Received: From paulaner With LocalMail ; Wed, 24 Jan 2001 01:05:35 +1100 From: "Adam 'WeirdArms' Wiggins" To: Guillaume Jaunet Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2001 01:05:35 +1100 (EST) X-Sender: awiggins@paulaner.disy.cse.unsw.EDU.AU Cc: Anders Frederiksen , "'Sa1100-Linux list '" Subject: Re: JTAG interface functionality In-Reply-To: <3A6D64AA.4967C24A@lep-philips.fr> Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk On Tue, 23 Jan 2001, Guillaume Jaunet wrote: > Which platform are you thinking of? If it's Assabet, the JTAG interface > is not a real JTAG interface. I mean that there lack some signals. > Nevertheless, some tools exist, ollawing programming flash with this > "JTAG", such as JFlash. I use it from Linux, and it work quite well. I > don't know if it's the last version, but here is a link. I think there > is some Windows binaries also... What do you mean not a real JTAG interface, it is the full JTAG standard. The optional nTRST (TAP Reset) line is not exported but it only needs to be reset on power up anyway Much to some peoples pain I'm doing a little /dev/tap JTAG device driver for linux, yes you can do it in user space but let me enjoy my learning ;) Cheers Adam From kramer@pa.dec.com Tue Jan 23 15:49:32 2001 Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (root@mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id PAA04883 for ; Tue, 23 Jan 2001 15:49:31 +0100 Received: from zmamail04.zma.compaq.com (zmamail04.zma.compaq.com [161.114.64.104]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id PAA23141 for ; Tue, 23 Jan 2001 15:49:27 +0100 (MET) Received: by zmamail04.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 322822F70; Tue, 23 Jan 2001 09:47:39 -0500 (EST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by zmamail04.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id D7F042671; Tue, 23 Jan 2001 09:47:36 -0500 (EST) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA06459; Tue, 23 Jan 2001 06:47:35 -0800 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id GAA12713; Tue, 23 Jan 2001 06:39:54 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id GAA26288; Tue, 23 Jan 2001 06:39:53 -0800 (PST) Received: from ztxmail01.nz-cce.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA14555; Tue, 23 Jan 2001 06:39:52 -0800 Received: by ztxmail01.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id E2DA12933; Tue, 23 Jan 2001 08:39:51 -0600 (CST) Received: from relay.lep-philips.fr (relay.lep-philips.fr [212.208.209.250]) by ztxmail01.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B5282919 for ; Tue, 23 Jan 2001 08:39:50 -0600 (CST) Received: from relais.lep.research.philips.com (relais.lep.research.philips.com [130.142.21.30]) by relay.lep-philips.fr (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id PAA15273; Tue, 23 Jan 2001 15:39:48 +0100 (MET) Received: from lep-philips.fr (relais [130.142.21.30]) by relais.lep.research.philips.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id PAA14978; Tue, 23 Jan 2001 15:39:45 +0100 (MET) Message-Id: <3A6D999F.3ECBEE8E@lep-philips.fr> Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2001 15:47:59 +0100 From: Guillaume Jaunet X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.72 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.2.16-22 i686) X-Accept-Language: fr, en, de Mime-Version: 1.0 To: "Adam 'WeirdArms' Wiggins" Cc: Anders Frederiksen , "'Sa1100-Linux list '" Subject: Re: JTAG interface functionality References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk Oops!!! You're completely right. I made a REAL BIG confusion. I remembered there was a limitation. Theris indeed : In-Circuit Emulation is not supported. But that doesn't mean that itsn't not a real JTAG. Sorry again. Good luck in your developpement... Guillaume, (who should think more before speaking) Adam 'WeirdArms' Wiggins wrote: > > On Tue, 23 Jan 2001, Guillaume Jaunet wrote: > > > Which platform are you thinking of? If it's Assabet, the JTAG interface > > is not a real JTAG interface. I mean that there lack some signals. > > Nevertheless, some tools exist, ollawing programming flash with this > > "JTAG", such as JFlash. I use it from Linux, and it work quite well. I > > don't know if it's the last version, but here is a link. I think there > > is some Windows binaries also... > > What do you mean not a real JTAG interface, it is the full JTAG > standard. The optional nTRST (TAP Reset) line is not exported but it only > needs to be reset on power up anyway > Much to some peoples pain I'm doing a little /dev/tap JTAG device > driver for linux, yes you can do it in user space but let me enjoy my > learning ;) > > Cheers Adam From kramer@pa.dec.com Tue Jan 23 17:45:09 2001 Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (root@mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id RAA05202 for ; Tue, 23 Jan 2001 17:45:09 +0100 Received: from ztxmail04.ztx.compaq.com (ztxmail04.ztx.compaq.com [161.114.1.208]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id RAA02616 for ; Tue, 23 Jan 2001 17:45:07 +0100 (MET) Received: by ztxmail04.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 9D9981275; Tue, 23 Jan 2001 10:43:20 -0600 (CST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by ztxmail04.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 302401161; Tue, 23 Jan 2001 10:43:17 -0600 (CST) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA17977; Tue, 23 Jan 2001 08:43:16 -0800 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id IAA00481; Tue, 23 Jan 2001 08:37:06 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id IAA00544; Tue, 23 Jan 2001 08:37:04 -0800 (PST) Received: from ztxmail02.nz-cce.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA07205; Tue, 23 Jan 2001 08:37:04 -0800 Received: by ztxmail02.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 53EE41C7D; Tue, 23 Jan 2001 10:37:03 -0600 (CST) Received: from xanadu.home (modemcable248.137-200-24.mtl.mc.videotron.ca [24.200.137.248]) by ztxmail02.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7462C1DB8 for ; Tue, 23 Jan 2001 10:37:02 -0600 (CST) Received: from localhost (nico@localhost) by xanadu.home (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id LAA13858; Tue, 23 Jan 2001 11:36:59 -0500 X-Authentication-Warning: xanadu.home: nico owned process doing -bs Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2001 11:36:59 -0500 (EST) From: Nicolas Pitre X-Sender: To: Anders Frederiksen Cc: "''Sa1100-Linux list ' '" Subject: RE: JTAG interface functionality In-Reply-To: Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk On Tue, 23 Jan 2001, Anders Frederiksen wrote: > I wasn't thinking of a specific platform but rather "generic" hardware. So I > was wondering whether the SA1110 jtag interface provides sufficient control > of the SA1110 to allow for programming an arbitrary bank of flash. > I guess if it works on Assabet it will work on any platform (?)... Yes it does. Nicolas From kramer@pa.dec.com Tue Jan 23 18:01:32 2001 Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (root@mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id SAA05260 for ; Tue, 23 Jan 2001 18:01:32 +0100 Received: from ztxmail05.ztx.compaq.com (ztxmail05.ztx.compaq.com [161.114.1.209]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id SAA03864 for ; Tue, 23 Jan 2001 18:01:30 +0100 (MET) Received: by ztxmail05.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 5A072A5D; Tue, 23 Jan 2001 10:58:55 -0600 (CST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by ztxmail05.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 8F790B21; Tue, 23 Jan 2001 10:58:51 -0600 (CST) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA23415; Tue, 23 Jan 2001 08:58:49 -0800 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id IAA04536; Tue, 23 Jan 2001 08:53:54 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id IAA04391; Tue, 23 Jan 2001 08:53:53 -0800 (PST) Received: from zmamail01.nz-tay.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA01958; Tue, 23 Jan 2001 08:53:53 -0800 Received: by zmamail01.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 89C3DD316; Tue, 23 Jan 2001 11:53:52 -0500 (EST) Received: from fire.he.net (fire.he.net [216.218.144.2]) by zmamail01.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5CC1ECDE8 for ; Tue, 23 Jan 2001 11:53:48 -0500 (EST) Received: from cementship.extenex.net (64-51-136-194.client.dsl.net [64.51.136.194]) by fire.he.net (8.8.6/8.8.2) with ESMTP id IAA31593; Tue, 23 Jan 2001 08:53:45 -0800 Received: from blowhole.extenex.com (blowhole.extenex.net [192.168.100.100]) by cementship.extenex.net (8.9.3/8.8.7) with ESMTP id IAA01316; Tue, 23 Jan 2001 08:53:11 -0800 Message-Id: <5.0.0.25.2.20010123084928.02336820@extenex.com> X-Sender: extenex.com/wardw@extenex.com X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.0 Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2001 08:53:05 -0800 To: Anders Frederiksen From: Ward Willats Subject: RE: JTAG interface functionality Cc: In-Reply-To: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk At 02:37 PM 1/23/2001 +0100, Anders Frederiksen wrote: >I wasn't thinking of a specific platform but rather "generic" hardware. So I >was wondering whether the SA1110 jtag interface provides sufficient control >of the SA1110 to allow for programming an arbitrary bank of flash. >I guess if it works on Assabet it will work on any platform (?)... As Nicolas said, it does. To convert from Assabet to a generic SA only board, you need to remove the two bits that tickle the 2 CPLDs on Assabet. The LART folks have done this, and I did a significantly cleaned up version of JFLASH/Linux for our use here without so much paranoid state-machine voodo and actual comments. Let me know if you;d like a copy. -- Ward From kramer@pa.dec.com Tue Jan 23 20:42:34 2001 Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (root@mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id UAA05719 for ; Tue, 23 Jan 2001 20:42:34 +0100 Received: from ztxmail03.ztx.compaq.com (ztxmail03.ztx.compaq.com [161.114.1.207]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id UAA13572 for ; Tue, 23 Jan 2001 20:42:32 +0100 (MET) Received: by ztxmail03.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 538754CD; Tue, 23 Jan 2001 13:40:45 -0600 (CST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by ztxmail03.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 643D34F1; Tue, 23 Jan 2001 13:40:43 -0600 (CST) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA27240; Tue, 23 Jan 2001 11:40:40 -0800 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id LAA16027; Tue, 23 Jan 2001 11:29:27 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id LAA11298; Tue, 23 Jan 2001 11:29:27 -0800 (PST) Received: from ztxmail02.nz-cce.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA11567; Tue, 23 Jan 2001 11:29:26 -0800 Received: by ztxmail02.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 873D91F7E; Tue, 23 Jan 2001 13:29:26 -0600 (CST) Received: from pigeon.maya.com (po.maya.com [192.70.254.2]) by ztxmail02.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 31DEB1DC8 for ; Tue, 23 Jan 2001 13:29:26 -0600 (CST) Received: from SNIPE.maya.com (snipe.maya.com [192.70.254.125]) by pigeon.maya.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 809F130806; Tue, 23 Jan 2001 14:03:10 -0500 (EST) To: Sa1100-Linux list , Linux-Arm-kernel List Subject: Re: large ramdisk fails to load References: Organization: MAYA Design Group From: Jeff Senn X-Face: ._HOR,#9~<*ir.> (Nicolas Pitre's message of "Mon, 22 Jan 2001 15:53:53 -0500 (EST)") Message-Id: Lines: 40 User-Agent: Gnus/5.090001 (Oort Gnus v0.01) XEmacs/21.2 (Poseidon) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk > On Mon, 22 Jan 2001, Gad Hayisraeli wrote: > > > i'm working on the Assabet sa1110 cpu. > > i tried to make larger ramdisk than the default (2560k). > > i used: > > blob 1.08pre2 > > zImage - of Lart (i think 2.4.0-pre8-rmk?-np?) > > when i used the many types of ramdisks less than 3Mb in size - all worked > > fine. > > but when i made ramdisk that its size is about 3.4 Mb (and overall image to > > Jflash to target is about 4.3 mb), the blob and zImage loads and then i get > > this message: > > "RAMDISK: found ramdisk in block 0" (sort of...) > > and then all stops and the ramdisk dont load !! > > so what is the problem and how can i overcome it ? > > (i need to download mp3 files to this target...) > Hm. We were having a similar problem -- a larger (>3Mb) ramdisk image seems to work... it boots...but later when stuff gets written to the ramdisk something bombs out and the page table gets all screwy... Take a look at your platform section of mach-sa1100/arch.c -- the max ramdisk size (setup_initrd after setup_ramdisk) is probably 3Mb. In your case (and mine :-) ) a bigger number is probably in order... [I still have some problem with a stray kupdate page request error... but that might be unrelated....] Nicolas Pitre writes: > Use JFFS on a 16MB flash. Well... that would also work :-) -- -Jas -------------------- www.maya.com Jeff Senn | / / |-/ \ / /| Chief Technologist | /|/| |/ o | /-| Head of R&D | Taming Complexity From kramer@pa.dec.com Wed Jan 24 15:45:54 2001 Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (root@mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id PAA07999 for ; Wed, 24 Jan 2001 15:45:53 +0100 Received: from ztxmail04.ztx.compaq.com (ztxmail04.ztx.compaq.com [161.114.1.208]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id PAA16756 for ; Wed, 24 Jan 2001 15:45:51 +0100 (MET) Received: by ztxmail04.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id CBB8B125E; Wed, 24 Jan 2001 08:44:03 -0600 (CST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by ztxmail04.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id B46632F9; Wed, 24 Jan 2001 08:44:01 -0600 (CST) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA15571; Wed, 24 Jan 2001 06:43:59 -0800 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id GAA27126; Wed, 24 Jan 2001 06:36:54 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id GAA25949; Wed, 24 Jan 2001 06:36:54 -0800 (PST) Received: from ztxmail01.nz-cce.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA24920; Wed, 24 Jan 2001 06:36:52 -0800 Received: by ztxmail01.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 1634A452E; Wed, 24 Jan 2001 08:35:55 -0600 (CST) Received: from heimdall.inter.net.il (heimdall.inter.net.il [192.114.186.17]) by ztxmail01.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C941345F2 for ; Wed, 24 Jan 2001 08:34:58 -0600 (CST) Received: from gad ([213.8.202.167]) by heimdall.inter.net.il (Mirapoint) with SMTP id AIN10667; Wed, 24 Jan 2001 16:32:41 +0200 (IST) Reply-To: From: "Gad Hayisraeli" To: "Erik Mouw" Subject: info on JFFS Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2001 16:35:01 +0200 Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0041_01C08623.9909AF60" X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-Msmail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) Importance: Normal X-Ms-Tnef-Correlator: X-Mimeole: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2314.1300 Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0041_01C08623.9909AF60 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1255" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit can you point me to docs telling how to use JFFS on the arm/blob/bootldr and so on ? and how to make ramdisk with JFFS ? does the blob 1.08pre2 support JFFS ? is JFFS suitable for the type of flash of the Assabet ? (i think strataflash) i use 2.4.0-rmk2,np2 kernel, for the Assabet. Gad ------=_NextPart_000_0041_01C08623.9909AF60 Content-Type: application/ms-tnef; name="winmail.dat" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="winmail.dat" eJ8+IgEOAQaQCAAEAAAAAAABAAEAAQeQBgAIAAAA5wQAAAAAAADrAAEIgAcAGAAAAElQTS5NaWNy b3NvZnQgTWFpbC5Ob3RlADEIAQ2ABAACAAAAAgACAAEGgAMADgAAANEHAQAYAA8AAwAAAAMABgEB A5AGAMAFAAAlAAAACwACAAEAAAALACMAAAAAAAMAJgAAAAAACwApAAAAAAADADYAAAAAAB4AcAAB AAAADQAAAGluZm8gb24gSkZGUwAAAAACAXEAAQAAABYAAAABwIYGF8WL7ta08gkR1JoBANC3TND7 AAACAR0MAQAAABUAAABTTVRQOkdBREBTWUVURS5DTy5JTAAAAAALAAEOAAAAAEAABg4AGmH6BYbA AQIBCg4BAAAAGAAAAAAAAAAdNSV0Y7bUEZoAANC3TND7woAAAAsAHw4BAAAAAgEJEAEAAAB8AQAA eAEAAOkBAABMWkZ14cUN2eEABWZiaWQEAABkAHKAY3BnMTI1NQD4xQtgbg6AMDM3AfcCpwkCAGNo CsBzZXQwPiAHEwKDDUED4xEffX0lCoF2CJB3awuAZDSNDGBjAFALA2x0cgqxUQvSNCBjA5F5CGAg HHBvC4AFQAeAIHRvECBkb2MEIHRlbMJsC4BnIGhvB+AXQcJ1EXAgSkZGBfACIE0XMGgXIArAbS8C YG+CYhngb290bGQFwLEAcGQgcxdQGUE/CqIvCoAawhhFAMBrFyByYfJtDZFrIAPwGXAY5BtlDxdw B5EZchnyIDEuMJQ4cAlwMhrwdXAWsH8AIB2bBAAY5B/QHWABoGyPFyACEAXAGXJ0eXAXIOxvZiIQ C2BzHYAi8RlyHkEEEAGgEYAbUCAoadcZYQuAHTBzFYBhAZAjI0YpILUYozIuNB9QLcEZwGsyLG5w H7AcoNsEoBfQLCIXI/UuG3QbdPxHYQsxKTMSUwwBG4MUAQIAK4ALAACACCAGAAAAAADAAAAAAAAA RgAAAAADhQAAAAAAAAMAAoAIIAYAAAAAAMAAAAAAAABGAAAAABCFAAAAAAAAAwAHgAggBgAAAAAA wAAAAAAAAEYAAAAAUoUAAI5qAQAeAAmACCAGAAAAAADAAAAAAAAARgAAAABUhQAAAQAAAAQAAAA5 LjAAHgAKgAggBgAAAAAAwAAAAAAAAEYAAAAANoUAAAEAAAABAAAAAAAAAB4AC4AIIAYAAAAAAMAA AAAAAABGAAAAADeFAAABAAAAAQAAAAAAAAAeAAyACCAGAAAAAADAAAAAAAAARgAAAAA4hQAAAQAA AAEAAAAAAAAACwANgAggBgAAAAAAwAAAAAAAAEYAAAAAgoUAAAEAAAALABGACCAGAAAAAADAAAAA AAAARgAAAAAGhQAAAAAAAAMAEoAIIAYAAAAAAMAAAAAAAABGAAAAAAGFAAAAAAAACwAbgAggBgAA AAAAwAAAAAAAAEYAAAAADoUAAAAAAAADAByACCAGAAAAAADAAAAAAAAARgAAAAARhQAAAAAAAAMA HoAIIAYAAAAAAMAAAAAAAABGAAAAABiFAAAAAAAAAgH4DwEAAAAQAAAAHTUldGO21BGaAADQt0zQ +wIB+g8BAAAAEAAAAB01JXRjttQRmgAA0LdM0PsCAfsPAQAAAIIAAAAAAAAAOKG7EAXlEBqhuwgA KypWwgAAUFNUUFJYLkRMTAAAAAAAAAAATklUQfm/uAEAqgA32W4AAABDOlxXSU5ET1dTXExvY2Fs IFNldHRpbmdzXEFwcGxpY2F0aW9uIERhdGFcTWljcm9zb2Z0XE91dGxvb2tcbWFpbGJveC5wc3QA AAADAP4PBQAAAAMADTT9NwAAAgF/AAEAAAAvAAAAPE5FQkJKS0FBQk5PRkpDRElMREVOR0VCQ0NC QUEuZ2FkQHN5ZXRlLmNvLmlsPgAAAwAGENHqXPgDAAcQ4wAAAAMAEBAAAAAAAwAREAAAAAAeAAgQ AQAAAGUAAABDQU5ZT1VQT0lOVE1FVE9ET0NTVEVMTElOR0hPV1RPVVNFSkZGU09OVEhFQVJNL0JM T0IvQk9PVExEUkFORFNPT04/QU5ESE9XVE9NQUtFUkFNRElTS1dJVEhKRkZTP0RPRVNUAAAAAOgo ------=_NextPart_000_0041_01C08623.9909AF60-- From kramer@pa.dec.com Thu Jan 25 00:03:29 2001 Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (root@mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id AAA09351 for ; Thu, 25 Jan 2001 00:03:28 +0100 Received: from ztxmail04.ztx.compaq.com (ztxmail04.ztx.compaq.com [161.114.1.208]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id AAA17819 for ; Thu, 25 Jan 2001 00:03:26 +0100 (MET) Received: by ztxmail04.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 74EB21297; Wed, 24 Jan 2001 17:01:39 -0600 (CST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by ztxmail04.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 90C6612AD; Wed, 24 Jan 2001 17:01:37 -0600 (CST) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA24573; Wed, 24 Jan 2001 15:01:28 -0800 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id OAA16822; Wed, 24 Jan 2001 14:51:49 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id OAA11474; Wed, 24 Jan 2001 14:51:48 -0800 (PST) Received: from ztxmail01.nz-cce.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA29916; Wed, 24 Jan 2001 14:51:47 -0800 Received: by ztxmail01.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 2391D41FB; Wed, 24 Jan 2001 16:51:47 -0600 (CST) Received: from wombat.is.fh-hamburg.de (wombat.is.fh-hamburg.de [141.22.192.33]) by ztxmail01.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B6C35426E for ; Wed, 24 Jan 2001 16:51:45 -0600 (CST) Received: from fbi010.informatik.fh-hamburg.de (fbi010.informatik.fh-hamburg.de [141.22.10.10]) by wombat.is.fh-hamburg.de (8.11.0/8.11.0) with ESMTP id f0OMphx05817 for ; Wed, 24 Jan 2001 23:51:44 +0100 (MET) Received: from fbi010.informatik.fh-hamburg.de by fbi010.informatik.fh-hamburg.de (8.8.8/1.1.22.3/10Aug00-0433PM) id XAA0000032430; Wed, 24 Jan 2001 23:51:43 +0100 (MET) Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2001 23:51:43 +0100 (MET) From: sticke_m To: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Subject: misc internal iPAQ connector Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk Hi. After I have opened my iPAQ I have noticed a connector on one side of the PCB that is unused. May that be some kind of JTAG interface? I know that Compaq reflashes iPAQ's which flash is accidently flashed and are not working. The onyl way for this is a ROM with a minimalistic flash-software or a JTAG interface or the possibility to program the flashes directly "in-curcuit". Michael Stickel sticke_m@informatik.fh-hamburg.de stickel@lisa.de LISA systems From kramer@pa.dec.com Thu Jan 25 14:32:59 2001 Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (root@mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id OAA11936 for ; Thu, 25 Jan 2001 14:32:58 +0100 Received: from ztxmail05.ztx.compaq.com (ztxmail05.ztx.compaq.com [161.114.1.209]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id OAA29178 for ; Thu, 25 Jan 2001 14:32:55 +0100 (MET) Received: by ztxmail05.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 7BD719F4; Thu, 25 Jan 2001 07:31:06 -0600 (CST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by ztxmail05.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 6B2C3BF0; Thu, 25 Jan 2001 07:31:04 -0600 (CST) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA13549; Thu, 25 Jan 2001 05:30:55 -0800 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id FAA22609; Thu, 25 Jan 2001 05:19:58 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id FAA23615; Thu, 25 Jan 2001 05:19:57 -0800 (PST) Received: from ztxmail01.nz-cce.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA15059; Thu, 25 Jan 2001 05:19:56 -0800 Received: by ztxmail01.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 6FE2129AC; Thu, 25 Jan 2001 07:19:56 -0600 (CST) Received: from wombat.is.fh-hamburg.de (wombat.is.fh-hamburg.de [141.22.192.33]) by ztxmail01.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 979A54787 for ; Thu, 25 Jan 2001 07:19:55 -0600 (CST) Received: from fbi010.informatik.fh-hamburg.de (fbi010.informatik.fh-hamburg.de [141.22.10.10]) by wombat.is.fh-hamburg.de (8.11.0/8.11.0) with ESMTP id f0PDJrx07625 for ; Thu, 25 Jan 2001 14:19:53 +0100 (MET) Received: from fbi010.informatik.fh-hamburg.de by fbi010.informatik.fh-hamburg.de (8.8.8/1.1.22.3/10Aug00-0433PM) id OAA0000022213; Thu, 25 Jan 2001 14:19:54 +0100 (MET) Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2001 14:19:54 +0100 (MET) From: sticke_m To: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Subject: Re: misc internal iPAQ connector In-Reply-To: Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk After opening another one I found two unused connectors. One is called CON2 and has 8 pins and the other one is called CON8 and has 24 pins. May be one of them is. On Wed, 24 Jan 2001, sticke_m wrote: > After I have opened my iPAQ I have noticed a connector on one > side of the PCB that is unused. May that be some kind of JTAG > interface? I know that Compaq reflashes iPAQ's which flash > is accidently flashed and are not working. > The onyl way for this is a ROM with a minimalistic > flash-software or a JTAG interface or the possibility > to program the flashes directly "in-curcuit". Michael Stickel sticke_m@informatik.fh-hamburg.de stickel@lisa.de LISA systems From kramer@pa.dec.com Thu Jan 25 15:31:23 2001 Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (root@mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id PAA12058 for ; Thu, 25 Jan 2001 15:31:22 +0100 Received: from ztxmail04.ztx.compaq.com (ztxmail04.ztx.compaq.com [161.114.1.208]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id PAA03240 for ; Thu, 25 Jan 2001 15:31:17 +0100 (MET) Received: by ztxmail04.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 19D1310A7; Thu, 25 Jan 2001 08:28:57 -0600 (CST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by ztxmail04.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 5AA6A13EC; Thu, 25 Jan 2001 08:28:55 -0600 (CST) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA20141; Thu, 25 Jan 2001 06:28:54 -0800 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id GAA32150; Thu, 25 Jan 2001 06:21:11 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id GAA00763; Thu, 25 Jan 2001 06:21:10 -0800 (PST) Received: from crl-mail.crl.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA04643; Thu, 25 Jan 2001 06:21:07 -0800 Received: from crlwebmail.crl.dec.com (crlwebmail.crl.dec.com [16.11.0.2]) by crl-mail.crl.dec.com (8.11.1/8.11.1) with ESMTP id f0PEIpL394432; Thu, 25 Jan 2001 09:18:51 -0500 (EST) Received: by crlwebmail.crl.dec.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21) id ; Thu, 25 Jan 2001 09:26:44 -0500 Message-Id: From: Jamey Hicks To: "'sticke_m'" , sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Subject: RE: misc internal iPAQ connector Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2001 09:20:16 -0500 Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21) Content-Type: text/plain Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk There is no JTAG connector in the iPAQ H36xx (color) or H31xx (monochrome). -----Original Message----- From: sticke_m [mailto:sticke_m@informatik.fh-hamburg.de] Sent: Thursday, January 25, 2001 8:20 AM To: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Subject: Re: misc internal iPAQ connector After opening another one I found two unused connectors. One is called CON2 and has 8 pins and the other one is called CON8 and has 24 pins. May be one of them is. On Wed, 24 Jan 2001, sticke_m wrote: > After I have opened my iPAQ I have noticed a connector on one > side of the PCB that is unused. May that be some kind of JTAG > interface? I know that Compaq reflashes iPAQ's which flash > is accidently flashed and are not working. > The onyl way for this is a ROM with a minimalistic > flash-software or a JTAG interface or the possibility > to program the flashes directly "in-curcuit". Michael Stickel sticke_m@informatik.fh-hamburg.de stickel@lisa.de LISA systems From kramer@pa.dec.com Thu Jan 25 16:20:13 2001 Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (root@mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id QAA12159 for ; Thu, 25 Jan 2001 16:20:13 +0100 Received: from zmamail05.zma.compaq.com (zmamail05.zma.compaq.com [161.114.64.105]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id QAA06880 for ; Thu, 25 Jan 2001 16:20:11 +0100 (MET) Received: by zmamail05.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 3B429A14; Thu, 25 Jan 2001 10:18:24 -0500 (EST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by zmamail05.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 525249A4; Thu, 25 Jan 2001 10:18:15 -0500 (EST) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA16586; Thu, 25 Jan 2001 07:18:14 -0800 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id HAA08697; Thu, 25 Jan 2001 07:10:25 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id HAA10116; Thu, 25 Jan 2001 07:10:24 -0800 (PST) Received: from ztxmail01.nz-cce.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA06910; Thu, 25 Jan 2001 07:10:24 -0800 Received: by ztxmail01.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id C45A9291E; Thu, 25 Jan 2001 09:10:23 -0600 (CST) Received: from pigeon.maya.com (po.maya.com [192.70.254.2]) by ztxmail01.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 58444288A for ; Thu, 25 Jan 2001 09:10:23 -0600 (CST) Received: from SNIPE.maya.com (snipe.maya.com [192.70.254.125]) by pigeon.maya.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 8CCCF30806; Thu, 25 Jan 2001 09:44:19 -0500 (EST) To: sticke_m Cc: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Subject: Re: misc internal iPAQ connector References: Organization: MAYA Design Group From: Jeff Senn X-Face: ._HOR,#9~<*ir.> (sticke_m's message of "Thu, 25 Jan 2001 14:19:54 +0100 (MET)") Message-Id: Lines: 27 User-Agent: Gnus/5.090001 (Oort Gnus v0.01) XEmacs/21.2 (Poseidon) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk sticke_m writes: > After opening another one I found two unused connectors. > One is called CON2 and has 8 pins and the other one is > called CON8 and has 24 pins. May be one of them is. > > On Wed, 24 Jan 2001, sticke_m wrote: > > After I have opened my iPAQ I have noticed a connector on one > > side of the PCB that is unused. May that be some kind of JTAG > > interface? I know that Compaq reflashes iPAQ's which flash > > is accidently flashed and are not working. > > The onyl way for this is a ROM with a minimalistic > > flash-software or a JTAG interface or the possibility > > to program the flashes directly "in-curcuit". It is certainly possible that one of them is a JTAG interface (it takes about 6 pins) and given the way that the memory interfaces work on the SA and the reset conditions, in-circuit programming is nearly impossible(?) w/o JTAG (and using ROM-based flasher might limit substituting flash parts in the future). -- -Jas -------------------- www.maya.com Jeff Senn | / / |-/ \ / /| Chief Technologist | /|/| |/ o | /-| Head of R&D | Taming Complexity From kramer@pa.dec.com Sat Jan 27 20:34:43 2001 Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (root@mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id UAA20065 for ; Sat, 27 Jan 2001 20:34:43 +0100 Received: from zmamail04.zma.compaq.com (zmamail04.zma.compaq.com [161.114.64.104]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id UAA22587 for ; Sat, 27 Jan 2001 20:34:41 +0100 (MET) Received: by zmamail04.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 9AD654B46; Sat, 27 Jan 2001 14:33:00 -0500 (EST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by zmamail04.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 66CF53898; Sat, 27 Jan 2001 14:32:58 -0500 (EST) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA24213; Sat, 27 Jan 2001 11:32:50 -0800 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id LAA07096; Sat, 27 Jan 2001 11:21:03 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id LAA24959; Sat, 27 Jan 2001 11:21:03 -0800 (PST) Received: from ztxmail02.nz-cce.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA27133; Sat, 27 Jan 2001 11:21:02 -0800 Received: by ztxmail02.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 7864F1F25; Sat, 27 Jan 2001 13:21:01 -0600 (CST) Received: from frigg.inter.net.il (frigg.inter.net.il [192.114.186.16]) by ztxmail02.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A4D11E9B for ; Sat, 27 Jan 2001 13:21:00 -0600 (CST) Received: from gad ([213.8.202.88]) by frigg.inter.net.il (Mirapoint) with SMTP id AIM70530; Sat, 27 Jan 2001 21:20:22 +0200 (IST) Reply-To: From: "Gad Hayisraeli" To: "Sa1100-Linux list" Subject: flash mount on assabet Date: Sat, 27 Jan 2001 21:22:27 +0200 Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0006_01C088A7.3F9020A0" X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-Msmail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) X-Mimeole: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2314.1300 Importance: Normal X-Ms-Tnef-Correlator: Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0006_01C088A7.3F9020A0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1255" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit when i try to mount the flash /dev entry on the assabet, i get "wrong major or minor number" my settings are: /dev/flh0 /dev/flh1 /dev/flh2 /dev/flh3 (i use blob 108 pre2, kernel 2.4.0-rmk2-np2, ramdisk of nicolas). what are the right major, minor numbers ? can i "mount -t ext2 /dev/flh2 /mnt" and by this use the flash partition as hard disk ? how can i add more partititons to the flash (is it in blob or in the kerenl src ?) (i enabled cfi and the mtd_block in kernel config). Gad ------=_NextPart_000_0006_01C088A7.3F9020A0 Content-Type: application/ms-tnef; name="winmail.dat" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="winmail.dat" eJ8+IhsTAQaQCAAEAAAAAAABAAEAAQeQBgAIAAAA5wQAAAAAAADrAAEIgAcAGAAAAElQTS5NaWNy b3NvZnQgTWFpbC5Ob3RlADEIAQ2ABAACAAAAAgACAAEGgAMADgAAANEHAQAbABUAFgAAAAYAJQEB A5AGAEwGAAAlAAAACwACAAEAAAALACMAAAAAAAMAJgAAAAAACwApAAAAAAADADYAAAAAAB4AcAAB AAAAFwAAAGZsYXNoIG1vdW50IG9uIGFzc2FiZXQAAAIBcQABAAAAFgAAAAHAiJZ4U0kCGBb0lxHU mgEA0LdM0PsAAAIBHQwBAAAAFQAAAFNNVFA6R0FEQFNZRVRFLkNPLklMAAAAAAsAAQ4AAAAAQAAG DgD8tmuWiMABAgEKDgEAAAAYAAAAAAAAAB01JXRjttQRmgAA0LdM0PvCgAAACwAfDgEAAAACAQkQ AQAAAP0BAAD5AQAArQIAAExaRnXpItf24QAFZmJpZAQAAGQAcoBjcGcxMjU1APjFC2BuDoAwMzcB 9wKkEwPjAgBjaArAc2V0rDAgBxMCgH0KgXYIkKR3awuAZDQMYGMAUDELA2x0cgqxC6Ygd6JoCfAg aSAT0HkVEHRvIARgdQIwFRAUwCAhD2FzaCAvAQB2IN8J8BUiAiAV4xZQcwGgEaCKLBTxZxGgICJ3 A2CzD5AVgGFqBbEFsW0LgNkFsW51BtAEkCIKogqA1m0VQBGRdAuAZwQgCsCsZToadBaSLw9gaAFA 1xvrE1McGDIb3DMadBp0KigVAHURkCACYG9ioiAPsDggcAlwMhggCmsEkWUDIDIuNC4AMC1ybWsy LW6icCGBcmFtDZFrFzCeZhnwDlAG8BZQKS4adD0UsGEFQBuRFeMFEGdoXwVAGRMYIBmqBCA/GnRj KwORFQAiFZQtBUBleFx0MhaDHlMWgG0CMCLvF6AS8CCwFUFoBAAgcxX43wqxGzAbMBdBFlAgEWEq IDMjUydFaG8H4Ce0YWT/KiAEYCUhK6UVYAYxFWEV+P8gUAQgK+AU8AOgIMMFsTCxjxXyIbEJ8AMg c3JjJzBuKR/3CfABoGwJgC2wZocuASoRFfJtdGRfIMFeYyOAMLEhtQWgbjPAZ7skRhp0Ry4gGnQS UQA3wAAAAAsAAIAIIAYAAAAAAMAAAAAAAABGAAAAAAOFAAAAAAAAAwACgAggBgAAAAAAwAAAAAAA AEYAAAAAEIUAAAAAAAADAAeACCAGAAAAAADAAAAAAAAARgAAAABShQAAjmoBAB4ACYAIIAYAAAAA AMAAAAAAAABGAAAAAFSFAAABAAAABAAAADkuMAAeAAqACCAGAAAAAADAAAAAAAAARgAAAAA2hQAA AQAAAAEAAAAAAAAAHgALgAggBgAAAAAAwAAAAAAAAEYAAAAAN4UAAAEAAAABAAAAAAAAAB4ADIAI IAYAAAAAAMAAAAAAAABGAAAAADiFAAABAAAAAQAAAAAAAAALAA2ACCAGAAAAAADAAAAAAAAARgAA AACChQAAAQAAAAsAEYAIIAYAAAAAAMAAAAAAAABGAAAAAAaFAAAAAAAAAwASgAggBgAAAAAAwAAA AAAAAEYAAAAAAYUAAAAAAAALABuACCAGAAAAAADAAAAAAAAARgAAAAAOhQAAAAAAAAMAHIAIIAYA AAAAAMAAAAAAAABGAAAAABGFAAAAAAAAAwAegAggBgAAAAAAwAAAAAAAAEYAAAAAGIUAAAAAAAAC AfgPAQAAABAAAAAdNSV0Y7bUEZoAANC3TND7AgH6DwEAAAAQAAAAHTUldGO21BGaAADQt0zQ+wIB +w8BAAAAggAAAAAAAAA4obsQBeUQGqG7CAArKlbCAABQU1RQUlguRExMAAAAAAAAAABOSVRB+b+4 AQCqADfZbgAAAEM6XFdJTkRPV1NcTG9jYWwgU2V0dGluZ3NcQXBwbGljYXRpb24gRGF0YVxNaWNy b3NvZnRcT3V0bG9va1xtYWlsYm94LnBzdAAAAAMA/g8FAAAAAwANNP03AAACAX8AAQAAAC8AAAA8 TkVCQkpLQUFCTk9GSkNESUxERU5BRUNEQ0JBQS5nYWRAc3lldGUuY28uaWw+AAADAAYQzs/N0AMA BxCFAQAAAwAQEAAAAAADABEQAAAAAB4ACBABAAAAZQAAAFdIRU5JVFJZVE9NT1VOVFRIRUZMQVNI L0RFVkVOVFJZT05USEVBU1NBQkVULElHRVQiV1JPTkdNQUpPUk9STUlOT1JOVU1CRVIiTVlTRVRU SU5HU0FSRTovREVWL0ZMSDAvREUAAAAAaFc= ------=_NextPart_000_0006_01C088A7.3F9020A0-- From kramer@pa.dec.com Sun Jan 28 00:02:14 2001 Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (root@mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id AAA20496 for ; Sun, 28 Jan 2001 00:02:14 +0100 Received: from ztxmail03.ztx.compaq.com (ztxmail03.ztx.compaq.com [161.114.1.207]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id AAA29688 for ; Sun, 28 Jan 2001 00:02:11 +0100 (MET) Received: by ztxmail03.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id EB6BD902; Sat, 27 Jan 2001 17:00:24 -0600 (CST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by ztxmail03.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 7B3C78E7; Sat, 27 Jan 2001 17:00:21 -0600 (CST) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA25763; Sat, 27 Jan 2001 15:00:14 -0800 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id OAA22063; Sat, 27 Jan 2001 14:53:29 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id OAA07837; Sat, 27 Jan 2001 14:53:26 -0800 (PST) Received: from zmamail01.nz-tay.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA18258; Sat, 27 Jan 2001 14:53:26 -0800 Received: by zmamail01.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id D119010C65; Sat, 27 Jan 2001 17:53:25 -0500 (EST) Received: from dredd.crimea.edu (unknown [213.128.193.148]) by zmamail01.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A7B2BDE4D for ; Sat, 27 Jan 2001 17:53:24 -0500 (EST) Received: (from uucp@localhost) by dredd.crimea.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with UUCP id BAA05069; Sun, 28 Jan 2001 01:52:46 +0300 Received: (from green@localhost) by notebook1.ixcel.ru (8.10.1/8.10.1) id f0RMjda23633; Sun, 28 Jan 2001 01:45:39 +0300 Date: Sun, 28 Jan 2001 01:45:39 +0300 From: Oleg Drokin To: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com, nico@CAM.ORG, ipaq@handhelds.org, brad@parker.boston.ma.us Subject: USB in 2.4.0-rmk2-np2 (fixes and stuff) Message-Id: <20010128014539.A23617@dredd.crimea.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0.1i Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk Hello! I am attaching patch that, if applied to 2.4.0-rmk2-np2, allows to use USB netlink almost like usual ethernet (I mean that you really can use, not observe errors scrolled all over your screen). Now some comments. Patch to usb-eth.c fixes oops on "ifconfig usbf down". Patch to usb_recv.c seems to be right for me (without it, if you have large rx_pkt_size - you'll often get "too much data in fifo" message, but without it you get slightly higher transfer rates with rx_pkt_size = 64) Last hunk is the root of all evil. It seems that SA1110 cannot keep up, when its fed with big packets, DMA overflow occurs. It tried to play with rx_pkt_size and found that 80 is marginal value, when things mostly works (tested on ipaq only, for now). Strangely enough, more your host (PC) loaded means more packet errors on SA11x0 side with big packets (eg 80+). Transfer rates on ftp, I observed:with rx_pkt_size=64: ~500kb/s, with rx_pkt_size=80: ~550kb/s TODO: I see that when we drop broken frame, host still sends rest of frames, no matter we do not want to receive 'em. Bye, Oleg --- arch/arm/mach-sa1100/usb-eth.c.orig Sun Jan 28 01:22:27 2001 +++ arch/arm/mach-sa1100/usb-eth.c Sun Jan 28 01:27:34 2001 @@ -259,10 +259,14 @@ terminating = 1; sa1100_usb_send_reset(); sa1100_usb_recv_reset(); - kfree_skb(cur_tx_skb); - kfree_skb(next_tx_skb); - kfree_skb(cur_rx_skb); - kfree_skb(next_rx_skb); + if (cur_tx_skb) + kfree_skb(cur_tx_skb); + if (next_tx_skb) + kfree_skb(next_tx_skb); + if (cur_rx_skb) + kfree_skb(cur_rx_skb); + if (next_rx_skb) + kfree_skb(next_rx_skb); MOD_DEC_USE_COUNT; return 0; } --- arch/arm/mach-sa1100/usb_recv.c.orig Sat Jan 27 19:04:25 2001 +++ arch/arm/mach-sa1100/usb_recv.c Sun Jan 28 00:44:03 2001 @@ -133,7 +133,7 @@ if (len < ep1_curdmalen) { char *buf = ep1_curdmabuf + len; while (Ser0UDCCS1 & UDCCS1_RNE) { - if (len >= ep1_curdmalen) { + if (len > ep1_curdmalen) { printk("usb_recv: too much data in fifo\n"); break; } --- arch/arm/mach-sa1100/usb_ctl.c.orig Sat Jan 27 23:49:33 2001 +++ arch/arm/mach-sa1100/usb_ctl.c Sun Jan 28 00:59:53 2001 @@ -41,7 +41,7 @@ * Prototypes */ -void udc_int_hndlr(int, void *, struct pt_regs *); +static void udc_int_hndlr(int, void *, struct pt_regs *); void usbctl_create_descriptors(void); int udc_stallep(int ep); @@ -91,7 +91,7 @@ * module symbol table. */ int usbd_tx_pktsize = 256; -int usbd_rx_pktsize = 256; +int usbd_rx_pktsize = 64; int udc_init(void) From kramer@pa.dec.com Sun Jan 28 20:07:06 2001 Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (root@mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id UAA23072 for ; Sun, 28 Jan 2001 20:07:06 +0100 Received: from ztxmail05.ztx.compaq.com (ztxmail05.ztx.compaq.com [161.114.1.209]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id UAA05898 for ; Sun, 28 Jan 2001 20:07:04 +0100 (MET) Received: by ztxmail05.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id AFC48B8C; Sun, 28 Jan 2001 13:05:17 -0600 (CST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by ztxmail05.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 1EF2DA31; Sun, 28 Jan 2001 13:05:16 -0600 (CST) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA23960; Sun, 28 Jan 2001 11:05:14 -0800 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id KAA03007; Sun, 28 Jan 2001 10:58:19 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id KAA13958; Sun, 28 Jan 2001 10:58:18 -0800 (PST) Received: from ztxmail01.nz-cce.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA20071; Sun, 28 Jan 2001 10:58:17 -0800 Received: by ztxmail01.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 8A54A478F; Sun, 28 Jan 2001 12:58:17 -0600 (CST) Received: from fire.he.net (fire.he.net [216.218.144.2]) by ztxmail01.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E1694759 for ; Sun, 28 Jan 2001 12:58:17 -0600 (CST) Received: from [192.168.23.2] (wardco.com [165.227.105.2]) by fire.he.net (8.8.6/8.8.2) with ESMTP id KAA31093; Sun, 28 Jan 2001 10:57:36 -0800 Mime-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: In-Reply-To: <20010128014539.A23617@dredd.crimea.edu> References: <20010128014539.A23617@dredd.crimea.edu> Date: Sun, 28 Jan 2001 10:57:25 -0800 To: Oleg Drokin From: Ward Willats Subject: Re: USB in 2.4.0-rmk2-np2 (fixes and stuff) Cc: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com, nico@CAM.ORG, ipaq@handhelds.org, brad@parker.boston.ma.us Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" ; format="flowed" Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk Hi Oleg: I have cleaned up a lot of usb_ctl and rewritten usb_ep0 entirely and am now testing character oriented bulk transfer and configuration. I got a CATC USB bus analyizer in on Friday. It helps. Along the way I made (fairly small) changes to usb_recv -- to clean up race conditions and problems with my delayed NAKing, also to drain the FIFO on errors, lest they cascade. I am using a 64 byte packet since that is what the USB 1.0 spec says is the maximum allowed -- even though every host seems to be able to do better. I will take a look and probably add your ep1_curdmalen > len patch on Monday. I have seen the DMA controller produce wild values for the len calculation, but for the last few days it has been working well for me -- but I haven't tried large packets, done printk()s or other ISR slowdowns for a while either. Anyway, my device doesn't have a network stack so we've been using the USB as straight byte pipe that daylights as a misc character driver on the SA-1110. I haven't tested the network link with my stuff at all. I'm wondering if I could send along at least my usb_recv and have you try it in the netlink world? I'd really like to know if I am making things better or worse over there! :-) Thanks, -- Ward From kramer@pa.dec.com Sun Jan 28 22:02:38 2001 Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (root@mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id WAA23337 for ; Sun, 28 Jan 2001 22:02:37 +0100 Received: from zmamail03.zma.compaq.com (zmamail03.zma.compaq.com [161.114.64.103]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id WAA09986 for ; Sun, 28 Jan 2001 22:02:35 +0100 (MET) Received: by zmamail03.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 1209D6E28; Sun, 28 Jan 2001 16:00:49 -0500 (EST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by zmamail03.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id D63A36CDD; Sun, 28 Jan 2001 16:00:46 -0500 (EST) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA09089; Sun, 28 Jan 2001 13:00:34 -0800 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id MAA28579; Sun, 28 Jan 2001 12:53:37 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id MAA30971; Sun, 28 Jan 2001 12:53:37 -0800 (PST) Received: from ztxmail01.nz-cce.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA17227; Sun, 28 Jan 2001 12:53:36 -0800 Received: by ztxmail01.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 51B9B426C; Sun, 28 Jan 2001 14:53:36 -0600 (CST) Received: from dredd.crimea.edu (unknown [213.128.193.148]) by ztxmail01.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4DAD5413A for ; Sun, 28 Jan 2001 14:53:32 -0600 (CST) Received: (from uucp@localhost) by dredd.crimea.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with UUCP id XAA08979; Sun, 28 Jan 2001 23:53:14 +0300 Received: (from green@localhost) by notebook1.ixcel.ru (8.10.1/8.10.1) id f0SKqDn01315; Sun, 28 Jan 2001 23:52:13 +0300 Date: Sun, 28 Jan 2001 23:52:13 +0300 From: Oleg Drokin To: Ward Willats Cc: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com, nico@CAM.ORG, ipaq@handhelds.org, brad@parker.boston.ma.us Subject: Re: USB in 2.4.0-rmk2-np2 (fixes and stuff) Message-Id: <20010128235213.A1302@dredd.crimea.edu> References: <20010128014539.A23617@dredd.crimea.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0.1i In-Reply-To: ; from ward.willats@extenex.com on Sun, Jan 28, 2001 at 10:57:25AM -0800 Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk Hello! On Sun, Jan 28, 2001 at 10:57:25AM -0800, Ward Willats wrote: > I have cleaned up a lot of usb_ctl and rewritten usb_ep0 entirely and Is this code available somewhere on th Net? > I am using a 64 byte packet since that is what the USB 1.0 spec says > is the maximum allowed -- even though every host seems to be able to > do better. Ah. It seems I overlooked that bit in spec. Now I have a justice to have rx_pkt_size == 64 ;) > Anyway, my device doesn't have a network stack so we've been using > the USB as straight byte pipe that daylights as a misc character > driver on the SA-1110. I haven't tested the network link with my I believe, this has its own use, to implement ActiveSync protocol for those poor people, who should stick with Windows on their desktops. > stuff at all. I'm wondering if I could send along at least my > usb_recv and have you try it in the netlink world? I'd really like to > know if I am making things better or worse over there! :-) Sure, feel free to send me any code to try. Bye, Oleg From kramer@pa.dec.com Mon Jan 29 05:58:18 2001 Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (root@mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id FAA24354 for ; Mon, 29 Jan 2001 05:58:18 +0100 Received: from zmamail04.zma.compaq.com (zmamail04.zma.compaq.com [161.114.64.104]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id FAA24066 for ; Mon, 29 Jan 2001 05:58:16 +0100 (MET) Received: by zmamail04.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 0499F3919; Sun, 28 Jan 2001 23:56:30 -0500 (EST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by zmamail04.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id CBB2953D2; Sun, 28 Jan 2001 23:56:27 -0500 (EST) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA06972; Sun, 28 Jan 2001 20:56:22 -0800 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id UAA09262; Sun, 28 Jan 2001 20:47:20 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id UAA00289; Sun, 28 Jan 2001 20:47:19 -0800 (PST) Received: from zmamail01.nz-tay.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA12176; Sun, 28 Jan 2001 20:47:18 -0800 Received: by zmamail01.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 63A75110EB; Sun, 28 Jan 2001 23:47:18 -0500 (EST) Received: from mail.lge.com (unknown [156.147.1.150]) by zmamail01.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 413BB115C5 for ; Sun, 28 Jan 2001 23:47:17 -0500 (EST) Received: from jangwon ([150.150.74.249]) by mail.lge.com (8.8.4_hhk9703/8.6.9) with SMTP id NAA19639; Mon, 29 Jan 2001 13:34:22 +0900 (KST) Message-Id: <008a01c089ae$f2fb8aa0$f94a9696@jangwon> From: "Jangwon Boo" To: , "Sa1100-Linux list" , "Linux-Arm-kernel List" References: Subject: Re: large ramdisk fails to load Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2001 13:48:38 +0900 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1255" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-Msmail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2919.6700 X-Mimeole: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2919.6700 Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk As far as I understand, size of initial ramdisk (gzipped) for blob to load from flash to SDRAM is defined in blob-1.0.8/include/flash.h as follows. #ifdef ASSABET // Assabet settings come from linux/drivers/block/flash_mem.h #define KERNEL_START 0x10000 #define KERNEL_LEN 0xc0000 #define NUM_KERNEL_BLOCKS (KERNEL_LEN / MAIN_BLOCK_SIZE) #define INITRD_START (KERNEL_START + KERNEL_LEN) #define INITRD_LEN 0x280000 <------ here !!! (this is only 2.56MB) #define NUM_INITRD_BLOCKS (INITRD_LEN / MAIN_BLOCK_SIZE) #else blah.. blah... And also, I think you need to modify parameter of setup_ramdisk & setup_initrd in arch/arm/mach-sa1100/arch.c static void __init fixup_sa1100(struct machine_desc *desc, struct param_struct *params, char **cmdline, struct meminfo *mi) { pm_power_off = sa1100_power_off; if (machine_is_assabet()) { blah... blah.. ROOT_DEV = MKDEV(RAMDISK_MAJOR,0); setup_ramdisk( 1, 0, 0, 8192 ); <--- full size of initrd setup_initrd( 0xc0800000, 3*1024*1024 ); <--- gzipped size of initrd } please reply me if it works. Wish you luck. ----- Original Message ----- From: To: "Sa1100-Linux list" ; "Linux-Arm-kernel List" Sent: Tuesday, January 23, 2001 3:30 AM Subject: large ramdisk fails to load > i'm working on the Assabet sa1110 cpu. > i tried to make larger ramdisk than the default (2560k). > i used: > blob 1.08pre2 > zImage - of Lart (i think 2.4.0-pre8-rmk?-np?) > when i used the many types of ramdisks less than 3Mb in size - all worked > fine. > but when i made ramdisk that its size is about 3.4 Mb (and overall image to > Jflash to target is about 4.3 mb), the blob and zImage loads and then i get > this message: > "RAMDISK: found ramdisk in block 0" (sort of...) > and then all stops and the ramdisk dont load !! > so what is the problem and how can i overcome it ? > (i need to download mp3 files to this target...) > > thanks > > Gad > From kramer@pa.dec.com Mon Jan 29 12:22:46 2001 Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (root@mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id MAA25436 for ; Mon, 29 Jan 2001 12:22:46 +0100 Received: from ztxmail03.ztx.compaq.com (ztxmail03.ztx.compaq.com [161.114.1.207]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id MAA14369 for ; Mon, 29 Jan 2001 12:22:44 +0100 (MET) Received: by ztxmail03.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 76E7CB49; Mon, 29 Jan 2001 05:20:58 -0600 (CST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by ztxmail03.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 9434A968; Mon, 29 Jan 2001 05:20:56 -0600 (CST) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA21578; Mon, 29 Jan 2001 03:20:53 -0800 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id DAA17810; Mon, 29 Jan 2001 03:14:23 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id DAA21255; Mon, 29 Jan 2001 03:14:22 -0800 (PST) Received: from ztxmail02.nz-cce.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA19177; Mon, 29 Jan 2001 03:14:22 -0800 Received: by ztxmail02.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id DAB361C57; Mon, 29 Jan 2001 05:14:21 -0600 (CST) Received: from mail.ixcelerator.com (unknown [213.128.193.82]) by ztxmail02.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F5401D46 for ; Mon, 29 Jan 2001 05:14:09 -0600 (CST) Received: from morgoth.ixcelerator.com (IDENT:root@morgoth.ixcel.ru [172.16.10.70]) by mail.ixcelerator.com (8.10.1/8.10.1) with ESMTP id f0TB8el24113; Mon, 29 Jan 2001 14:08:40 +0300 Received: (from green@localhost) by morgoth.ixcelerator.com (8.10.1/8.10.1) id f0TBBc406747; Mon, 29 Jan 2001 14:11:38 +0300 Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2001 14:11:38 +0300 From: Oleg Drokin To: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com, nico@CAM.ORG, ipaq@handhelds.org, brad@parker.boston.ma.us Subject: USB in 2.4.0-rmk2-np2, host side Message-Id: <20010129141138.A6726@iXcelerator.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2i Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk Hello! After I tested stuff at work with NFS, today, I came with this patch, that is required for USB netlink to work correctly. (e.g. to compile glibc over it). BTW, does anybody have stable network-swapping solution? Or at least some ideas? --- /skiff/srcs/linux/drivers/usb/usb-net-host.c Fri Jan 19 12:42:19 2001 +++ usb-net-host.c Mon Jan 29 14:03:43 2001 @@ -450,6 +450,7 @@ nhs->recv_skb = NULL; } nhs->pktlen = 0; + nhs->eth_stats.rx_dropped++; return; } @@ -478,10 +479,11 @@ /* TODO I have assumed that len is >=2 to do this */ nhs->pktlen = (data[0] & 0xff); nhs->pktlen += ( (data[1] & 0xff) << 8 ); - if (nhs->pktlen < 2 || nhs->pktlen > 1502) { + if (nhs->pktlen < 2 || nhs->pktlen > 1504) { dev_kfree_skb(nhs->recv_skb); nhs->recv_skb = NULL; nhs->pktlen = 0; + nhs->eth_stats.rx_frame_errors++; return; } } @@ -498,6 +500,7 @@ dev_kfree_skb(nhs->recv_skb); nhs->recv_skb = NULL; } + nhs->eth_stats.rx_over_errors++; nhs->pktlen = 0; return; } Bye, Oleg From kramer@pa.dec.com Tue Jan 30 08:23:31 2001 Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (root@mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id IAA28775 for ; Tue, 30 Jan 2001 08:23:31 +0100 Received: from zmamail04.zma.compaq.com (zmamail04.zma.compaq.com [161.114.64.104]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id IAA18198 for ; Tue, 30 Jan 2001 08:23:30 +0100 (MET) Received: by zmamail04.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 08049558F; Tue, 30 Jan 2001 02:21:43 -0500 (EST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by zmamail04.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id C8D8A5728; Tue, 30 Jan 2001 02:21:40 -0500 (EST) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA06075; Mon, 29 Jan 2001 23:21:36 -0800 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id XAA01049; Mon, 29 Jan 2001 23:10:35 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id XAA01027; Mon, 29 Jan 2001 23:10:34 -0800 (PST) Received: from zmamail02.nz-tay.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA03086; Mon, 29 Jan 2001 23:10:33 -0800 Received: by zmamail02.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 66C135AB6; Tue, 30 Jan 2001 02:10:33 -0500 (EST) Received: from xanadu.home (modemcable248.137-200-24.mtl.mc.videotron.ca [24.200.137.248]) by zmamail02.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F0735AF5 for ; Tue, 30 Jan 2001 02:10:33 -0500 (EST) Received: from localhost (nico@localhost) by xanadu.home (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id CAA17645 for ; Tue, 30 Jan 2001 02:10:32 -0500 X-Authentication-Warning: xanadu.home: nico owned process doing -bs Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2001 02:10:32 -0500 (EST) From: Nicolas Pitre X-Sender: To: SA-1100/Linux Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk Hi Just to let everybody who sent me patches that it will probably take me some extra time before I actually merge and release a new diff. I; Tue, 30 Jan 2001 16:36:38 +0100 Received: from ztxmail05.ztx.compaq.com (ztxmail05.ztx.compaq.com [161.114.1.209]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id QAA23342 for ; Tue, 30 Jan 2001 16:36:37 +0100 (MET) Received: by ztxmail05.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id B81EA8D8; Tue, 30 Jan 2001 09:34:50 -0600 (CST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by ztxmail05.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 8840199A; Tue, 30 Jan 2001 09:34:48 -0600 (CST) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA02338; Tue, 30 Jan 2001 07:34:46 -0800 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id HAA02633; Tue, 30 Jan 2001 07:25:35 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id HAA11903; Tue, 30 Jan 2001 07:25:35 -0800 (PST) Received: from zmamail02.nz-tay.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA07187; Tue, 30 Jan 2001 07:25:34 -0800 Received: by zmamail02.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id C94474C6A; Tue, 30 Jan 2001 10:25:33 -0500 (EST) Received: from balder.inter.net.il (balder.inter.net.il [192.114.186.15]) by zmamail02.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2BC004D4A for ; Tue, 30 Jan 2001 10:25:33 -0500 (EST) Received: from gad ([213.8.210.26]) by balder.inter.net.il (Mirapoint) with SMTP id AIM02480; Tue, 30 Jan 2001 17:24:56 +0200 (IST) Reply-To: From: "Gad Hayisraeli" To: "Nicolas Pitre" , "SA-1100/Linux" Subject: RE: Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2001 17:27:36 +0200 Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-Msmail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) In-Reply-To: Importance: Normal X-Mimeole: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2314.1300 Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk you're just great ! thanks for all your help ! keep doing things that helps people ... Gad > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com > [mailto:owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com]On Behalf Of Nicolas Pitre > Sent: Tuesday, January 30, 2001 9:11 AM > To: SA-1100/Linux > Subject: > > > > Hi > > Just to let everybody who sent me patches that it will probably > take me some > extra time before I actually merge and release a new diff. I currently in > New York City far from my test setup for LinuxWorld. > > If you'll be there then come say hello by MontaVista's booth > where I should > be hanging around! > > > Nicolas > From kramer@pa.dec.com Wed Jan 31 13:38:44 2001 Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (root@mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id NAA01450 for ; Wed, 31 Jan 2001 13:38:44 +0100 Received: from zmamail05.zma.compaq.com (zmamail05.zma.compaq.com [161.114.64.105]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id NAA01835 for ; Wed, 31 Jan 2001 13:38:42 +0100 (MET) Received: by zmamail05.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 1C1A8315F; Wed, 31 Jan 2001 07:36:55 -0500 (EST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by zmamail05.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id EC0C42FF2; Wed, 31 Jan 2001 07:36:52 -0500 (EST) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA10102; Wed, 31 Jan 2001 04:36:49 -0800 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id EAA14932; Wed, 31 Jan 2001 04:22:41 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id EAA19257; Wed, 31 Jan 2001 04:22:40 -0800 (PST) Received: from ztxmail01.nz-cce.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA04216; Wed, 31 Jan 2001 04:22:40 -0800 Received: by ztxmail01.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 8DB2A4561; Wed, 31 Jan 2001 06:22:39 -0600 (CST) Received: from violet.csa.iisc.ernet.in (violet.csa.iisc.ernet.in [144.16.67.198]) by ztxmail01.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 34D6A4784 for ; Wed, 31 Jan 2001 06:22:37 -0600 (CST) Received: (from ksvivek@localhost) by violet.csa.iisc.ernet.in (8.9.3/8.9.3) id SAA04843 for sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com; Wed, 31 Jan 2001 18:47:24 +0530 Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2001 18:47:24 +0530 From: ksvivek@csa.iisc.ernet.in To: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Subject: JTAG specification for SA1110 Message-Id: <20010131184724.A4795@csa.iisc.ernet.in> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2i Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk Hi, Where can I find the specification for the instruction set used in JTAG programming ? (For ex: IDCODE is 00110). By looking at the Jflash.cpp code, It is not very clear as to what is happenning. Any pointers/help will be very much appreciated. Thanx and Regards, Vivek From kramer@pa.dec.com Wed Jan 31 16:04:48 2001 Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (root@mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id QAA01972 for ; Wed, 31 Jan 2001 16:04:48 +0100 Received: from ztxmail04.ztx.compaq.com (ztxmail04.ztx.compaq.com [161.114.1.208]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id QAA12163 for ; Wed, 31 Jan 2001 16:04:44 +0100 (MET) Received: by ztxmail04.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id F2EB21234; Wed, 31 Jan 2001 09:03:20 -0600 (CST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by ztxmail04.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id E4D9FEA0; Wed, 31 Jan 2001 09:03:18 -0600 (CST) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA15048; Wed, 31 Jan 2001 07:03:17 -0800 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id GAA25041; Wed, 31 Jan 2001 06:56:18 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id GAA25028; Wed, 31 Jan 2001 06:56:17 -0800 (PST) Received: from zmamail01.nz-tay.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA26693; Wed, 31 Jan 2001 06:56:14 -0800 Received: by zmamail01.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 0E14311598; Wed, 31 Jan 2001 09:56:13 -0500 (EST) Received: from nychoteldns01.stsn.com (p5.usnyc1.stsn.com [199.106.216.5]) by zmamail01.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA2BC11279 for ; Wed, 31 Jan 2001 09:56:08 -0500 (EST) Received: from arthur.ubicom.tudelft.nl ([10.0.133.145]) by nychoteldns01.stsn.com (8.11.0/8.11.0) with SMTP id f0VEsWn02471; Wed, 31 Jan 2001 09:54:52 -0500 Received: (from erik@localhost) by arthur.ubicom.tudelft.nl (8.11.0/8.11.0/SuSE Linux 8.11.0-0.4) id f0VEoTf02149; Wed, 31 Jan 2001 15:50:29 +0100 Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2001 15:50:29 +0100 From: Erik Mouw To: ksvivek@csa.iisc.ernet.in Cc: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Subject: Re: JTAG specification for SA1110 Message-Id: <20010131155029.C1670@arthur.ubicom.tudelft.nl> References: <20010131184724.A4795@csa.iisc.ernet.in> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <20010131184724.A4795@csa.iisc.ernet.in>; from ksvivek@csa.iisc.ernet.in on Wed, Jan 31, 2001 at 06:47:24PM +0530 Organization: Eric Conspiracy Secret Labs X-Eric-Conspiracy: There is no conspiracy! Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk On Wed, Jan 31, 2001 at 06:47:24PM +0530, ksvivek@csa.iisc.ernet.in wrote: > Where can I find the specification for the instruction set used in JTAG > programming ? (For ex: IDCODE is 00110). By looking at the Jflash.cpp code, It > is not very clear as to what is happenning. Any pointers/help will be very > much appreciated. There is an explanation in one of the appendices of the SA1100/SA1110 manual. Erik -- J.A.K. (Erik) Mouw, Information and Communication Theory Group, Department of Electrical Engineering, Faculty of Information Technology and Systems, Delft University of Technology, PO BOX 5031, 2600 GA Delft, The Netherlands Phone: +31-15-2783635 Fax: +31-15-2781843 Email: J.A.K.Mouw@its.tudelft.nl WWW: http://www-ict.its.tudelft.nl/~erik/ From kramer@pa.dec.com Thu Feb 1 05:40:50 2001 Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (root@mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id FAA04558 for ; Thu, 1 Feb 2001 05:40:50 +0100 Received: from zmamail04.zma.compaq.com (zmamail04.zma.compaq.com [161.114.64.104]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id FAA23927 for ; Thu, 1 Feb 2001 05:40:48 +0100 (MET) Received: by zmamail04.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id A70FB320A; Wed, 31 Jan 2001 23:39:01 -0500 (EST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by zmamail04.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 1CBE631C1; Wed, 31 Jan 2001 23:38:59 -0500 (EST) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA15167; Wed, 31 Jan 2001 20:38:57 -0800 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id UAA10376; Wed, 31 Jan 2001 20:29:32 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id UAA21006; Wed, 31 Jan 2001 20:29:32 -0800 (PST) Received: from zmamail02.nz-tay.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA27320; Wed, 31 Jan 2001 20:29:31 -0800 Received: by zmamail02.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 94C104DDF; Wed, 31 Jan 2001 23:29:31 -0500 (EST) Received: from gmate.gmate.co.kr (unknown [211.113.71.2]) by zmamail02.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D99684CC1 for ; Wed, 31 Jan 2001 23:29:29 -0500 (EST) Received: from trlim.gmate.co.kr (trlim@[211.113.71.41]) by gmate.gmate.co.kr (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id NAA29139 for ; Thu, 1 Feb 2001 13:40:46 +0900 Date: Thu, 1 Feb 2001 13:31:00 +0900 (KST) From: Tred Lim To: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Subject: About TS spec. In-Reply-To: Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk I found there are differences between Handhelds' TS spec and current ts drivers. My references are for TS spec, http://www.handhelds.org/projects/ts_spec.html and for ts drivers, 2.4.0-rmk2-np2. These are differences, * TS_EVENT structure format ts spec: typedef struct { short pressure; int x; int y; int millisecs; }; ucb1200_ts: typedef struct { short pressure; short x; short y; short millisecs; } TS_EVENT; h3600_ts: typedef struct { unsigned short pressure; unsigned short x; unsigned short y; unsigned short pad; } TS_EVENT; * IOC_MAGIC ts spec : 't' ucb1200_ts : none h3600_ts : 'f' * IOCTLs ts spec: #define TS_SET_CALIBRATE _IOW(IOC_MAGIC,0,TS_CAL); #define TS_GET_CALIBRATE _IOW(IOC_MAGIC,1,TS_CAL); ucb1200_ts: No ioctl exist which uses TS_CAL. h3600_ts: #define TS_GET_CAL _IOR(IOC_MAGIC, 10, TS_CAL) #define TS_SET_CAL _IOW(IOC_MAGIC, 11, TS_CAL) Is there anybody who knows why? Thanks, Tred Lim trlim@gmate.co.kr From kramer@pa.dec.com Sun Feb 4 23:59:13 2001 Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (root@mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id XAA17641 for ; Sun, 4 Feb 2001 23:59:13 +0100 Received: from ztxmail04.ztx.compaq.com (ztxmail04.ztx.compaq.com [161.114.1.208]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id XAA22436 for ; Sun, 4 Feb 2001 23:59:11 +0100 (MET) Received: by ztxmail04.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 74EFDA89; Sun, 4 Feb 2001 16:57:24 -0600 (CST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by ztxmail04.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id F1D4EA43; Sun, 4 Feb 2001 16:57:22 -0600 (CST) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA02938; Sun, 4 Feb 2001 14:57:20 -0800 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id OAA16197; Sun, 4 Feb 2001 14:43:35 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id OAA20471; Sun, 4 Feb 2001 14:43:35 -0800 (PST) From: Received: from ztxmail02.nz-cce.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA03815; Sun, 4 Feb 2001 14:43:34 -0800 Received: by ztxmail02.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 5B6751FB3; Sun, 4 Feb 2001 16:43:34 -0600 (CST) Received: from pcd116 (unknown [210.151.183.189]) by ztxmail02.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B52031F12 for ; Sun, 4 Feb 2001 16:43:32 -0600 (CST) Received: from dbQxkhX07 (max1-41.losangeles.corecomm.net [216.214.106.169]) by pcd116 (2.5 Build 2640 (Berkeley 8.8.6)/8.8.4) with SMTP id HAA04482; Mon, 05 Feb 2001 07:40:48 +0900 Date: 04 Feb 01 2:45:54 PM Message-Id: <4cg70Qm1N8bP1rmJ23h> Subject: Work in your underwear! Stay at home and make big money! Apparently-To: Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk Researched, Legitimate... Work-At-Home Jobs and Opportunities!! ***HOME WORKERS NEEDED*** Never before have so many businesses aggressively sought home workers! You can chose from hundreds of EASY JOBS and other opportunities! Over 150 legitimate companies are NOW HIRING!! Make excellent pay! Yes!!... You can increase your income by performing assembly or clerical work in your home! Introducing the ... Work-At-Home Directory [The Most Complete Home Employment Source Book] ORDER NOW!!! and get your free bonus -- The Business Opportunity Guide The Work-At-Home Directory offers the best home employment opportunities in the USA with some in Canada. The Directory includes the names and addresses of each company with a full description of the assembly or clerical work offered. In most cases no special training, skills or equipment is required. Instructions are easy to follow [these companies WANT you to do this work] and can be mastered immediately. Many of these opportunities are businesses you can start from your own home with very little investment, on a part or full time basis, if youre sincere in starting your own business. **************************************************** TAKE IMMEDIATE ADVANTAGE OF THESE UNIQUE OPPORTUNITIES!!! The Work-At-Home Directory is just $19.95 [shipping and handling included]. We accept checks, money orders, even cash. Print the following form and mail it to: Watkins Associates WAH Directory 3104 E. Camelback Road, #754 Phoenix, AZ 85016 Ship to: _________________________________________________________ Shipping Address: _________________________________________________ City: ___________________________________________________________ State: ___________________________________________________________ Zip Code: ________________________________________________________ Your email: _______________________________________________________ Make your check payable to: Watkins Associates All orders ship within 24 hours. ** REMOVE ** REMOVE ** REMOVE ** REMOVE ** REMOVE ** To be removed from our mailing list, please email hk67hk89@yahoo.com All REMOVE requests AUTOMATICALLY honored upon receipt. PLEASE understand that any effort to disrupt, close or block this REMOVE account can only result in difficulties for others wanting to be removed from our mailing list as it will be impossible to take anyone off the list if the remove instruction can not be received. From kramer@pa.dec.com Mon Feb 5 00:13:03 2001 Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (root@mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id AAA17679 for ; Mon, 5 Feb 2001 00:13:03 +0100 Received: from zmamail04.zma.compaq.com (zmamail04.zma.compaq.com [161.114.64.104]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id AAA23200 for ; Mon, 5 Feb 2001 00:13:01 +0100 (MET) Received: by zmamail04.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id B2F4F48ED; Sun, 4 Feb 2001 18:11:14 -0500 (EST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by zmamail04.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id DBC523A91; Sun, 4 Feb 2001 18:11:10 -0500 (EST) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA15982; Sun, 4 Feb 2001 15:11:09 -0800 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id PAA13630; Sun, 4 Feb 2001 15:03:48 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id PAA15793; Sun, 4 Feb 2001 15:03:48 -0800 (PST) Received: from ztxmail02.nz-cce.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA32378; Sun, 4 Feb 2001 15:03:47 -0800 Received: by ztxmail02.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 811011FEE; Sun, 4 Feb 2001 17:03:47 -0600 (CST) Received: from www.linux.org.uk (parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk [195.92.249.252]) by ztxmail02.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A73571DAF for ; Sun, 4 Feb 2001 17:03:46 -0600 (CST) Received: from dyn-33.linux.theplanet.co.uk ([195.92.244.33] helo=caramon.arm.linux.org.uk) by www.linux.org.uk with esmtp (Exim 3.13 #1) id 14PYBu-0000U3-00; Sun, 04 Feb 2001 23:03:31 +0000 Received: from raistlin.arm.linux.org.uk (IDENT:root@raistlin.arm.linux.org.uk [192.168.0.3]) by caramon.arm.linux.org.uk (8.11.0/8.11.0) with ESMTP id f14N3QO02380; Sun, 4 Feb 2001 23:03:26 GMT From: Russell King Received: (from rmk@localhost) by raistlin.arm.linux.org.uk (8.7.4/8.7.3) id XAA01278; Sun, 4 Feb 2001 23:03:14 GMT Message-Id: <200102042303.XAA01278@raistlin.arm.linux.org.uk> Subject: Re: FIR support for SA1100 (ipaq - tested and assabet - untested) To: green@dredd.crimea.edu (Oleg Drokin) Date: Sun, 4 Feb 2001 23:03:13 +0000 (GMT) Cc: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com, nico@CAM.ORG, ipaq@handhelds.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.arm.linux.org.uk In-Reply-To: <20010205012025.B1300@dredd.crimea.edu> from "Oleg Drokin" at Feb 05, 2001 01:20:25 AM X-Location: london.england.earth.mulky-way.universe X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL3] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk Oleg Drokin writes: > - si->speed = 9600; > + // Why not to start with higher speed? If people wish so, they can > + // reduce it later (or even use ir_tty) > + si->speed = 4000000; We don't start with a higher speed because there is no point. The negotiation is handled at 9600 no matter what. If both endpoints are capable of the higher speed, this is negotiated, and the speed increases accordingly. Apart from the above, the patch looks good. -- Russell King (rmk@arm.linux.org.uk) The developer of ARM Linux http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/personal/aboutme.html From kramer@pa.dec.com Mon Feb 5 17:09:56 2001 Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (root@mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id RAA20916 for ; Mon, 5 Feb 2001 17:09:55 +0100 Received: from zmamail04.zma.compaq.com (zmamail04.zma.compaq.com [161.114.64.104]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id RAA15524 for ; Mon, 5 Feb 2001 17:09:54 +0100 (MET) Received: by zmamail04.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 15D3D4889; Mon, 5 Feb 2001 11:08:08 -0500 (EST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by zmamail04.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 6E71039C9; Mon, 5 Feb 2001 11:07:50 -0500 (EST) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA25964; Mon, 5 Feb 2001 08:07:44 -0800 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id HAA04823; Mon, 5 Feb 2001 07:58:52 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id HAA32066; Mon, 5 Feb 2001 07:58:51 -0800 (PST) Received: from zmamail02.nz-tay.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA16631; Mon, 5 Feb 2001 07:58:50 -0800 Received: by zmamail02.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 6FC1A4EA4; Mon, 5 Feb 2001 10:58:50 -0500 (EST) Received: from pigeon.maya.com (po.maya.com [192.70.254.2]) by zmamail02.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 17F2C3E17 for ; Mon, 5 Feb 2001 10:58:50 -0500 (EST) Received: from maya.com (cook-pc.maya.com [192.70.254.33]) by pigeon.maya.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C25E730806; Mon, 5 Feb 2001 10:33:24 -0500 (EST) Message-Id: <3A7ED040.6FBA0801@maya.com> Date: Mon, 05 Feb 2001 11:09:36 -0500 From: Nicole Cook X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.72 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.2.14-5.0 i686) X-Accept-Language: en Mime-Version: 1.0 To: Russell King Cc: Oleg Drokin , sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Subject: Re: FIR support for SA1100 (ipaq - tested and assabet - untested) References: <200102042303.XAA01278@raistlin.arm.linux.org.uk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk Has this patch been sent to the SA1100-linux mailing list? I want to get FIR support working on the cerfboard and would like to test this driver rather than write another one. Nicole From kramer@pa.dec.com Mon Feb 5 17:17:52 2001 Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (root@mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id RAA20952 for ; Mon, 5 Feb 2001 17:17:51 +0100 Received: from ztxmail03.ztx.compaq.com (ztxmail03.ztx.compaq.com [161.114.1.207]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id RAA16085 for ; Mon, 5 Feb 2001 17:17:47 +0100 (MET) Received: by ztxmail03.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 861371B15; Mon, 5 Feb 2001 10:15:59 -0600 (CST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by ztxmail03.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id C30DC1A71; Mon, 5 Feb 2001 10:15:57 -0600 (CST) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA06109; Mon, 5 Feb 2001 08:15:56 -0800 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id IAA15514; Mon, 5 Feb 2001 08:08:48 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id IAA20896; Mon, 5 Feb 2001 08:08:47 -0800 (PST) Received: from zmamail02.nz-tay.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA03329; Mon, 5 Feb 2001 08:08:45 -0800 Received: by zmamail02.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 469B54FB0; Mon, 5 Feb 2001 11:08:45 -0500 (EST) Received: from xanadu.home (modemcable248.137-200-24.mtl.mc.videotron.ca [24.200.137.248]) by zmamail02.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D09F34C05 for ; Mon, 5 Feb 2001 11:08:44 -0500 (EST) Received: from localhost (nico@localhost) by xanadu.home (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id LAA26735; Mon, 5 Feb 2001 11:08:36 -0500 X-Authentication-Warning: xanadu.home: nico owned process doing -bs Date: Mon, 5 Feb 2001 11:08:36 -0500 (EST) From: Nicolas Pitre X-Sender: To: Nicole Cook Cc: Russell King , Oleg Drokin , Subject: Re: FIR support for SA1100 (ipaq - tested and assabet - untested) In-Reply-To: <3A7ED040.6FBA0801@maya.com> Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk On Mon, 5 Feb 2001, Nicole Cook wrote: > Has this patch been sent to the SA1100-linux mailing list? I want to get > FIR support working on the cerfboard and would like to test this driver > rather than write another one. If you're willing to wait a couple hours, I should release a new patch with all the newest goodies included (USB, FIR, etc). Nicolas From kramer@pa.dec.com Mon Feb 5 17:27:18 2001 Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (root@mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id RAA21005 for ; Mon, 5 Feb 2001 17:27:18 +0100 Received: from zmamail04.zma.compaq.com (zmamail04.zma.compaq.com [161.114.64.104]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id RAA16821 for ; Mon, 5 Feb 2001 17:27:16 +0100 (MET) Received: by zmamail04.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id EABB04424; Mon, 5 Feb 2001 11:25:29 -0500 (EST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by zmamail04.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id AE78D49C0; Mon, 5 Feb 2001 11:25:24 -0500 (EST) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA05415; Mon, 5 Feb 2001 08:25:23 -0800 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id IAA23383; Mon, 5 Feb 2001 08:18:15 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id IAA17863; Mon, 5 Feb 2001 08:18:14 -0800 (PST) Received: from ztxmail01.nz-cce.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA30165; Mon, 5 Feb 2001 08:18:13 -0800 Received: by ztxmail01.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 3F42546C7; Mon, 5 Feb 2001 10:18:13 -0600 (CST) Received: from dredd.crimea.edu (unknown [213.128.193.148]) by ztxmail01.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 28A854777 for ; Mon, 5 Feb 2001 10:18:10 -0600 (CST) Received: (from uucp@localhost) by dredd.crimea.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with UUCP id BAA08257; Mon, 5 Feb 2001 01:20:37 +0300 Received: (from green@localhost) by dredd.crimea.edu (8.10.1/8.10.1) id f14MKPx01459; Mon, 5 Feb 2001 01:20:25 +0300 Date: Mon, 5 Feb 2001 01:20:25 +0300 From: Oleg Drokin To: rmk@arm.linux.org.uk Cc: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com, nico@CAM.ORG, ipaq@handhelds.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.arm.linux.org.uk Subject: FIR support for SA1100 (ipaq - tested and assabet - untested) Message-Id: <20010205012025.B1300@dredd.crimea.edu> References: <20010128014539.A23617@dredd.crimea.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="bCsyhTFzCvuiizWE" X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0.1i In-Reply-To: ; from ward.willats@extenex.com on Sun, Jan 28, 2001 at 10:57:25AM -0800 Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk --bCsyhTFzCvuiizWE Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Hello! It seems I got FIR to work on SA11x0. Tested on iPAQ, but I think Assabet should work, too. Patch is against 2.4.0-rmk2-np2 Have fun! Bye, Oleg --bCsyhTFzCvuiizWE Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="irda.diff" --- drivers/net/irda/sa1100_ir.c.orig Sat Feb 3 21:27:34 2001 +++ drivers/net/irda/sa1100_ir.c Mon Feb 5 01:11:18 2001 @@ -5,7 +5,11 @@ * * (C) 2000 Russell King * - * We currently only use HP-SIR mode. + * + * 04 Feb 2001 green@iXcelerator.com - FIR support. + * + * TODO: get rid of data copying between skb & rx buffer, when using HSSP + * */ #include #include @@ -24,8 +28,11 @@ #include #include +#include #include #include +#include +#include MODULE_AUTHOR("Russell King "); MODULE_DESCRIPTION("StrongARM SA1100 IrDA driver"); @@ -54,8 +61,13 @@ iobuff_t tx_buff; iobuff_t rx_buff; + }; +int rxdma, txdma; +dma_addr_t dmaposrx, dmapostx; +static void sa1100_irda_rxdma_irq( void *buf_id, int size ); +static void sa1100_irda_dma_receive(struct net_device *dev); /* * Set the IrDA communications speed. */ @@ -79,11 +91,16 @@ Ser2UTCR2 = brd; Ser2UTCR3 = si->utcr3 = UTCR3_RIE | UTCR3_RXE | UTCR3_TXE; + Ser2HSCR2 = HSCR2_RcDataH | HSCR2_TrDataH; #ifdef CONFIG_SA1100_ASSABET if (machine_is_assabet()) BCR_clear(BCR_IRDA_FSEL); #endif +#ifdef CONFIG_SA1100_BITSY + if (machine_is_bitsy()) + clr_bitsy_egpio(EGPIO_BITSY_IR_FSEL); +#endif si->speed = speed; si->using_hssr = 0; @@ -94,14 +111,16 @@ case 4000000: /* not currently supported */ -#if 0 + //printk("sa1100_ir: Enabling FIR\n"); +#if 1 save_flags(flags); cli(); Ser2UTCR3 = si->utcr3 & ~(UTCR3_TXE | UTCR3_RXE); Ser2HSCR0 = si->hscr0 & ~(HSCR0_TXE | HSCR0_RXE); - - si->hscr0 = HSCR0_RIE | HSCR0_TXE | HSCR0_RXE | HSCR0_HSSP; + Ser2HSSR0 = 0xff; // clear all error conditions + + si->hscr0 = HSCR0_HSSP | HSCR0_TXE /*| HSCR0_LBM */; si->utcr3 = 0; Ser2HSCR0 = si->hscr0; @@ -109,14 +128,21 @@ si->speed = speed; si->using_hssr = 1; + Ser2HSCR2 = HSCR2_RcDataL | HSCR2_TrDataH; #ifdef CONFIG_SA1100_ASSABET if (machine_is_assabet()) BCR_set(BCR_IRDA_FSEL); #endif +#ifdef CONFIG_SA1100_BITSY + if (machine_is_bitsy()) + set_bitsy_egpio(EGPIO_BITSY_IR_FSEL); +#endif restore_flags(flags); #endif + sa1100_irda_dma_receive(netdev); + ret = 0; break; default: @@ -268,6 +294,148 @@ } #endif +static void sa1100_irda_dma_receive(struct net_device *dev) +{ + struct sa1100_irda *si = dev->priv; + + //printk("sa1100_ir: Started FIR receive\n"); + // First empty receive FIFO + Ser2HSCR0 = si->hscr0 & ~HSCR0_RXE; + si->hscr0 |= HSCR0_RXE; + Ser2HSCR0 = si->hscr0; + si->rx_buff.data = si->rx_buff.head; + + // Here one would enable DMA and stuff + sa1100_dma_stop(rxdma); + sa1100_dma_flush_all(rxdma); + if (dmaposrx) + pci_unmap_single(NULL, dmaposrx, si->rx_buff.truesize, PCI_DMA_FROMDEVICE); + dmaposrx = pci_map_single(NULL, si->rx_buff.data, si->rx_buff.truesize, PCI_DMA_FROMDEVICE); + sa1100_dma_set_callback(rxdma, sa1100_irda_rxdma_irq); + sa1100_dma_queue_buffer(rxdma, NULL, dmaposrx, si->rx_buff.truesize); +} + +static void sa1100_irda_rxdma_irq( void *buf_id, int size ) +{ + struct sa1100_irda *si = netdev->priv; + // Strange, we should never get here. + printk("sa1100_irda_rxdma_irq: Should never get here\n"); + si->stats.rx_over_errors++; + sa1100_irda_dma_receive(netdev); +} + +static void sa1100_irda_txdma_irq( void *buf_id, int size ) +{ + struct sa1100_irda *si = netdev->priv; + + sa1100_irda_dma_receive(netdev); + si->stats.tx_packets++; + si->stats.tx_bytes+=size; + sa1100_dma_set_callback(txdma, NULL); + pci_unmap_single(NULL, dmapostx, size, PCI_DMA_TODEVICE); + dmapostx=0; + dev_kfree_skb_irq((struct sk_buff *)buf_id); + netif_wake_queue(netdev); +} + +static void sa1100_irda_dma_receive_complete(struct net_device *dev) +{ + struct sa1100_irda *si = dev->priv; + struct sk_buff *skb; + dma_addr_t dma_addr; + int len,bad=0; + + //printk("sa1100_ir: sa1100_irda_dma_receive_complete\n"); + sa1100_dma_set_callback(rxdma, NULL); + sa1100_dma_stop(rxdma); + sa1100_dma_get_current(rxdma, NULL, &dma_addr); + // STOP DMA and obtain DMA count + pci_unmap_single(NULL, dmaposrx, si->rx_buff.truesize, PCI_DMA_FROMDEVICE); + len = dma_addr - dmaposrx; + dmaposrx = 0; + si->rx_buff.data += len; + + while (Ser2HSSR0 & HSSR0_EIF) { + int bstat; + + bstat = Ser2HSSR1; + + if (bstat & HSSR1_ROR) + si->stats.rx_fifo_errors++; + if (bstat & HSSR1_CRE) + si->stats.rx_crc_errors++; + if ( bstat & ( HSSR1_ROR | HSSR1_CRE) ) + bad++; + + *(si->rx_buff.data++) = Ser2HSDR; + } + if (bad) + return; + + Ser2HSCR0 = si->hscr0 = si->hscr0 & ~HSCR0_RXE; + len = si->rx_buff.data - si->rx_buff.head; +// printk("sa1100_irda_dma_receive_complete: %d\n",len); + + if (len) { + skb = dev_alloc_skb(len+1); + if (skb == NULL) { + si->stats.rx_dropped++; + return; + } + skb_reserve(skb, 1); + skb_put(skb, len); + memcpy(skb->data, si->rx_buff.data, len); + skb->dev = dev; + skb->mac.raw = skb->data; + skb->protocol = htons(ETH_P_IRDA); + netif_rx(skb); + si->stats.rx_packets++; + si->stats.rx_bytes += len; + } + + return; +} + + +/* + * HSSP format interrupt service routines. + */ +static void sa1100_irda_hssp_irq(int irq, void *dev_id, struct pt_regs *regs) +{ + struct net_device *dev = dev_id; + struct sa1100_irda *si = dev->priv; + int status; + + status = Ser2HSSR0; + //printk("sa1100_irda_hssp_irq: %x %x\n",status,Ser2HSSR1); + + /* + * Deal with any receive errors first. The bytes in error may be + * the only bytes in the receive FIFO, so we do this first. + */ + while (status & HSSR0_EIF) { + sa1100_irda_dma_receive_complete(dev); + sa1100_irda_dma_receive(dev); + status = Ser2HSSR0; + } + + if (status & HSSR0_TUR) { + // strange - why are we here? + Ser2HSSR0 = HSSR0_TUR; + } + + if (status & HSSR0_RAB) { + Ser2HSSR0 = HSSR0_RAB; + sa1100_irda_dma_receive_complete(dev); + sa1100_irda_dma_receive(dev); + } + + if (status & HSSR0_FRE) { + si->stats.rx_frame_errors++; + Ser2HSSR0 = HSSR0_FRE; + } +} + /* * HP-SIR format interrupt service routines. */ @@ -372,10 +540,48 @@ Ser2UTSR0 = status; } +/* Generic irq routinue that chooses actual one on basis of format */ +static void sa1100_irda_irq(int irq, void *dev_id, struct pt_regs *regs) +{ + struct sa1100_irda *si = ((struct net_device *)dev_id)->priv; + if ( si->using_hssr) { + sa1100_irda_hssp_irq(irq, dev_id, regs); + } else { + sa1100_irda_hpsir_irq(irq, dev_id, regs); + } +} + +static int sa1100_irda_dma_xmit(struct sk_buff *skb, struct net_device *dev) +{ + struct sa1100_irda *si = dev->priv; + + if (dmapostx) { + netif_stop_queue(dev); + return 1; + } + + si->tx_buff.data = si->tx_buff.head; + + if (skb->len > 2047) { + printk("sa1100_ir: Trying to send too big packet, size=%d\n", skb->len); + si->stats.tx_dropped++; + return 1; + } + si->tx_buff.data=skb->data; + dmapostx = pci_map_single(NULL, si->tx_buff.data, skb->len, PCI_DMA_TODEVICE); + Ser2HSCR0 = si->hscr0 & ~HSCR0_RXE; + sa1100_dma_set_callback(txdma, sa1100_irda_txdma_irq); + sa1100_dma_queue_buffer(txdma, skb, dmapostx, skb->len); + dev->trans_start = jiffies; + + return 0; +} + static int sa1100_irda_hard_xmit(struct sk_buff *skb, struct net_device *dev) { struct sa1100_irda *si = dev->priv; int speed = irda_get_speed(skb); + int ret = 0; /* * If the speed has changed, schedule an update just @@ -401,13 +607,16 @@ Ser2UTCR3 = si->utcr3; restore_flags(flags); - dev->trans_start = jiffies; + kfree_skb(skb); + + } else { + ret = sa1100_irda_dma_xmit(skb, dev); } - kfree_skb(skb); + //printk("sa1100_ir: Queued TX packet for transmission %d\n",ret); - return 0; + return ret; } static int sa1100_irda_ioctl(struct net_device *dev, struct ifreq *ifreq, @@ -496,6 +705,11 @@ { si->open = 0; +#ifdef CONFIG_SA1100_BITSY + if (machine_is_bitsy()) + clr_bitsy_egpio(EGPIO_BITSY_IR_ON); +#endif + /* Disable the port. */ si->utcr3 = 0; si->hscr0 = 0; @@ -510,9 +724,11 @@ MOD_INC_USE_COUNT; - si->speed = 9600; + // Why not to start with higher speed? If people wish so, they can + // reduce it later (or even use ir_tty) + si->speed = 4000000; - err = request_irq(dev->irq, sa1100_irda_hpsir_irq, 0, dev->name, dev); + err = request_irq(dev->irq, sa1100_irda_irq, 0, dev->name, dev); if (err) goto out; @@ -521,6 +737,10 @@ */ disable_irq(dev->irq); +#ifdef CONFIG_SA1100_BITSY + if (machine_is_bitsy()) + set_bitsy_egpio(EGPIO_BITSY_IR_ON); +#endif /* * Setup the serial port for the specified speed. */ @@ -616,17 +836,17 @@ irda_init_max_qos_capabilies(&si->qos); /* - * We support original IRDA up to 115k2. (we don't currently - * support 4Mbps). Min Turn Time set to 1ms or greater. + * We support original IRDA up to 115k2 and IrDA 1.2 FIR at 4 Mbps + * Min Turn Time set to 1ms or greater. */ si->qos.baud_rate.bits &= IR_9600|IR_19200|IR_38400|IR_57600| - IR_115200/*|IR_4000000*/; + IR_115200|IR_4000000; si->qos.min_turn_time.bits = 7; irda_qos_bits_to_value(&si->qos); /* - * Enable HP-SIR modulation, and ensure that the port is disabled. + * Enable HP-SIR modulation for the beginning, and ensure that the port is disabled. */ Ser2UTCR3 = si->utcr3 = 0; Ser2UTCR4 = si->utcr4 = UTCR4_HPSIR | UTCR4_Z3_16Bit; @@ -669,6 +889,9 @@ pm_unregister(si->pmdev); + if (dmaposrx) + pci_unmap_single(NULL, dmaposrx, si->rx_buff.truesize, PCI_DMA_FROMDEVICE); + kfree(si->tx_buff.head); kfree(si->rx_buff.head); kfree(si); @@ -682,6 +905,17 @@ struct net_device *dev; int err; + err = sa1100_request_dma(&rxdma, "IrDA receive"); + if (err) { + printk("sa1100_ir: unable to register rx dma\n"); + goto err_rx_dma; + } + err = sa1100_request_dma(&txdma, "IrDA transmit"); + if (err) { + printk("sa1100_ir: unable to register tx dma\n"); + goto err_tx_dma; + } + rtnl_lock(); dev = dev_alloc("irda%d", &err); if (dev) { @@ -692,11 +926,21 @@ err = register_netdevice(dev); if (err) - kfree(dev); + goto err_net_dev; else netdev = dev; } rtnl_unlock(); + sa1100_dma_set_device(rxdma, DMA_Ser2HSSPRd); + sa1100_dma_set_device(txdma, DMA_Ser2HSSPWr); + return 0; + +err_net_dev: + kfree(dev); + sa1100_free_dma(txdma); +err_tx_dma: + sa1100_free_dma(rxdma); +err_rx_dma: return err; } @@ -717,6 +961,9 @@ * which may still be present is the netdevice, which will get * cleaned up by net/core/dev.c */ + + sa1100_free_dma(txdma); + sa1100_free_dma(rxdma); } #ifdef MODULE --bCsyhTFzCvuiizWE-- From kramer@pa.dec.com Tue Feb 6 08:46:17 2001 Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (root@mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id IAA23876 for ; Tue, 6 Feb 2001 08:46:17 +0100 Received: from ztxmail05.ztx.compaq.com (ztxmail05.ztx.compaq.com [161.114.1.209]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id IAA01745 for ; Tue, 6 Feb 2001 08:46:15 +0100 (MET) Received: by ztxmail05.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id AF6CCB25; Tue, 6 Feb 2001 01:44:28 -0600 (CST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by ztxmail05.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 2802A9A0; Tue, 6 Feb 2001 01:44:27 -0600 (CST) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA21687; Mon, 5 Feb 2001 23:44:20 -0800 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id XAA29727; Mon, 5 Feb 2001 23:27:39 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id XAA02297; Mon, 5 Feb 2001 23:27:39 -0800 (PST) From: Received: from ztxmail01.nz-cce.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA26065; Mon, 5 Feb 2001 23:27:38 -0800 Received: by ztxmail01.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 573312BA2; Tue, 6 Feb 2001 01:27:38 -0600 (CST) Received: from 208.191.167.186 (adsl-208-191-167-186.dsl.hstntx.swbell.net [208.191.167.186]) by ztxmail01.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 8067629C1 for ; Tue, 6 Feb 2001 01:27:36 -0600 (CST) To: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Subject: The Next Yahoo Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <20010206072738.573312BA2@ztxmail01.ztx.compaq.com> Date: Tue, 6 Feb 2001 01:27:38 -0600 (CST) Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk ************************************************* Hi, sa1100-linux What if Yahoo Paid You ? Now a reality !!! World's first completely commissionable Portal just released. Get paid as thousands search, email, or use any of our services. 14 months and 1.5 million dollars invested in the technology and infrastructure. We are going after Yahoo ! Imagine getting paid as others use eBay, Expedia, long distance, cell phones, insurance, electricity, and much more. We have solid long-term contracts with multi-million dollar companies. They are knocking down our door to be a part of our amazing viral customer acquisition model. Get your FREE portal today and start making solid income on thousands as they do what they normally do on the internet! Email: launchmarch16@excite.com OR just reply to this email. Include your phone number. We will call you back to let you in on how to get a founders position and create massive wealth ! We have taken applications for only 1 month now and have already paid out over $100,000 in commissions. Get your share ! We are set to have 1 million customers this year and launch globally this summer. This is the time millionaires will be made with us ! We look forward to speaking with you. ( Trip Wakefield, Houston, TX, USA, 1.877.627.6669 ) P.S. Many of us have already replaced our JOB incomes in 1 month! We have a simple, easy to follow, 3 step system for success ! Be sure to reply with your phone number. If you are outside of the USA, reply with International and your phone number. If you do not wish to correspond, reply with "remove" in the subject. Thank You! ************************************************** From kramer@pa.dec.com Wed Feb 7 03:27:28 2001 Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (root@mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id DAA28215 for ; Wed, 7 Feb 2001 03:27:27 +0100 Received: from ztxmail04.ztx.compaq.com (ztxmail04.ztx.compaq.com [161.114.1.208]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id DAA12598 for ; Wed, 7 Feb 2001 03:27:26 +0100 (MET) Received: by ztxmail04.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 9ED32CD3; Tue, 6 Feb 2001 20:25:38 -0600 (CST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by ztxmail04.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id DF78C875; Tue, 6 Feb 2001 20:25:36 -0600 (CST) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA26659; Tue, 6 Feb 2001 18:25:29 -0800 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id SAA11943; Tue, 6 Feb 2001 18:14:40 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id SAA11874; Tue, 6 Feb 2001 18:14:40 -0800 (PST) Received: from zmamail01.nz-tay.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA17839; Tue, 6 Feb 2001 18:14:39 -0800 Received: by zmamail01.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 7B882C837; Tue, 6 Feb 2001 21:14:38 -0500 (EST) Received: from broadcom.broadcom.co.kr (unknown [211.45.195.4]) by zmamail01.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 48002CB6F for ; Tue, 6 Feb 2001 21:14:37 -0500 (EST) Received: from just (unverified [211.45.195.118]) by broadcom.broadcom.co.kr (EMWAC SMTPRS 0.83) with SMTP id ; Wed, 07 Feb 2001 11:18:43 +0900 Message-Id: <003d01c090ab$6035cd80$76c32dd3@just> From: "Just" To: Date: Wed, 7 Feb 2001 11:12:07 +0900 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_003A_01C090F6.CEFCC340" X-Priority: 3 X-Msmail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2919.6700 X-Mimeole: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2919.6700 Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_003A_01C090F6.CEFCC340 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ks_c_5601-1987" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 c3Vic2NyaWJlIHNhMTEwMC1saW51eA0K ------=_NextPart_000_003A_01C090F6.CEFCC340 Content-Type: text/html; charset="ks_c_5601-1987" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 PCFET0NUWVBFIEhUTUwgUFVCTElDICItLy9XM0MvL0RURCBIVE1MIDQuMCBUcmFuc2l0aW9uYWwv L0VOIj4NCjxIVE1MPjxIRUFEPg0KPE1FVEEgY29udGVudD0idGV4dC9odG1sOyBjaGFyc2V0PWtz X2NfNTYwMS0xOTg3IiBodHRwLWVxdWl2PUNvbnRlbnQtVHlwZT4NCjxNRVRBIGNvbnRlbnQ9Ik1T SFRNTCA1LjAwLjI5MjAuMCIgbmFtZT1HRU5FUkFUT1I+DQo8U1RZTEU+PC9TVFlMRT4NCjwvSEVB RD4NCjxCT0RZIGJnQ29sb3I9I2ZmZmZmZj4NCjxESVY+PEZPTlQgc2l6ZT0yPnN1YnNjcmliZSBz YTExMDAtbGludXg8L0ZPTlQ+PC9ESVY+PC9CT0RZPjwvSFRNTD4NCg== ------=_NextPart_000_003A_01C090F6.CEFCC340-- From kramer@pa.dec.com Wed Feb 7 16:38:48 2001 Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (root@mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id QAA30233 for ; Wed, 7 Feb 2001 16:38:48 +0100 Received: from zmamail05.zma.compaq.com (zmamail05.zma.compaq.com [161.114.64.105]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id QAA26532 for ; Wed, 7 Feb 2001 16:38:47 +0100 (MET) Received: by zmamail05.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 79C2B66CC; Wed, 7 Feb 2001 10:36:59 -0500 (EST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by zmamail05.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 1AA4566B8; Wed, 7 Feb 2001 10:36:51 -0500 (EST) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA31132; Wed, 7 Feb 2001 07:36:47 -0800 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id HAA21941; Wed, 7 Feb 2001 07:26:33 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id HAA27429; Wed, 7 Feb 2001 07:26:33 -0800 (PST) Received: from zmamail02.nz-tay.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA27137; Wed, 7 Feb 2001 07:26:32 -0800 Received: by zmamail02.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 799F55383; Wed, 7 Feb 2001 10:26:31 -0500 (EST) Received: from netgate.keith-koep.com (mailgate.keith-koep.com [62.153.240.195]) by zmamail02.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0DFD34FEF for ; Wed, 7 Feb 2001 10:26:29 -0500 (EST) Received: from otto (otto [195.8.230.40]) by netgate.keith-koep.com (Postfix on Keith&Koep eMail Server 2.0) with SMTP id F183287A11 for ; Wed, 7 Feb 2001 16:23:59 +0100 (CET) Date: Wed, 7 Feb 2001 16:26:05 +0100 (MET) From: keith Reply-To: keith Subject: register To: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Md5: B2V5TgizeZMZiAQpxQAJtw== X-Mailer: dtmail 1.2.0 CDE Version 1.2 SunOS 5.6 sun4u sparc Message-Id: <20010207152400.F183287A11@netgate.keith-koep.com> Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk register From kramer@pa.dec.com Wed Feb 7 17:34:57 2001 Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (root@mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id RAA30315 for ; Wed, 7 Feb 2001 17:34:56 +0100 Received: from zmamail03.zma.compaq.com (zmamail03.zma.compaq.com [161.114.64.103]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id RAA01665 for ; Wed, 7 Feb 2001 17:34:55 +0100 (MET) Received: by zmamail03.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id DD174AB0A; Wed, 7 Feb 2001 11:33:07 -0500 (EST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by zmamail03.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 9B881A946; Wed, 7 Feb 2001 11:33:05 -0500 (EST) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA00602; Wed, 7 Feb 2001 08:33:01 -0800 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id IAA27784; Wed, 7 Feb 2001 08:28:13 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id IAA18793; Wed, 7 Feb 2001 08:28:13 -0800 (PST) Received: from zmamail01.nz-tay.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA01723; Wed, 7 Feb 2001 08:28:13 -0800 Received: by zmamail01.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 9571A10E4B; Wed, 7 Feb 2001 11:28:12 -0500 (EST) Received: from dryline-fw.wireless-sys.com (dryline-fw.wireless-sys.com [216.126.67.45]) by zmamail01.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A969E7EE for ; Wed, 7 Feb 2001 11:28:12 -0500 (EST) Received: from somanetworks.com (keller.yyz.somanetworks.com [10.11.100.45]) by dryline-fw.wireless-sys.com (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id LAA27916; Wed, 7 Feb 2001 11:28:11 -0500 Received: (from georgn@localhost) by somanetworks.com (8.11.0/8.11.0) id f17GSBi02401; Wed, 7 Feb 2001 11:28:11 -0500 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <14977.30618.409694.1365@somanetworks.com> Date: Wed, 7 Feb 2001 11:28:10 -0500 (EST) From: "Georg Nikodym" To: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.arm.linux.org.uk Subject: usb-net-host questions X-Mailer: VM 6.75 under 21.2 (beta40) "Persephone" XEmacs Lucid Reply-To: georgn@somanetworks.com Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk I've applied Oleg's USB patches which solve some of the problems I've been seeing with tcp traffic between my sa1100 device (let's call it "Thang") and my laptop (namely ftp transfers getting stuck). Which leads me to my two questions: 1. To start things up, I do a "modprobe sa1100_usbd" on my Thang. I can now do a "ifconfig usbf 1.1.1.1". Then I do a "modprobe usb-net-host" on my laptop upon which I can "ifconfig usb0 1.1.1.2". I try to ping and nothing good happens (Destination Host Unreachable). If I unplug the USB cable from the Thang and plug it back in then ping starts to work (except the first two packets are reversed [round trip time on packet 0 is about 1s and packet 1 is 4ms, so ping of packet 1 is reported before packet 0]). Is this experience consistent with yours or am I doing something boneheaded. My goal, in case it's not obvious, is to have something much more idiot-proof. 2. I've been observing ftp transfer rates from my laptop to my Thang of 500-600KB/s. vmstat reports interrupt rates as high as 10.5Kint./s. Ftp transfers the other direction only happen at 100-200KB/s with much lower interrupt rates (1.2Kint./s). Does anyone have a simple explanation or hypothesis for the apparent disparity between transfer rates? Thanks for any thoughts. From kramer@pa.dec.com Wed Feb 7 17:57:46 2001 Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (root@mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id RAA30424 for ; Wed, 7 Feb 2001 17:57:46 +0100 Received: from ztxmail05.ztx.compaq.com (ztxmail05.ztx.compaq.com [161.114.1.209]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id RAA03699 for ; Wed, 7 Feb 2001 17:57:44 +0100 (MET) Received: by ztxmail05.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 11F3C911; Wed, 7 Feb 2001 10:55:56 -0600 (CST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by ztxmail05.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id EBDCAACB; Wed, 7 Feb 2001 10:55:50 -0600 (CST) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA10112; Wed, 7 Feb 2001 08:55:49 -0800 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id IAA13491; Wed, 7 Feb 2001 08:50:44 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id IAA19958; Wed, 7 Feb 2001 08:50:44 -0800 (PST) Received: from ztxmail01.nz-cce.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA10483; Wed, 7 Feb 2001 08:50:44 -0800 Received: by ztxmail01.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 94CBE2809; Wed, 7 Feb 2001 10:50:43 -0600 (CST) Received: from fire.he.net (fire.he.net [216.218.144.2]) by ztxmail01.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C121028A9 for ; Wed, 7 Feb 2001 10:50:42 -0600 (CST) Received: from cementship.extenex.net (64-51-136-194.client.dsl.net [64.51.136.194]) by fire.he.net (8.8.6/8.8.2) with ESMTP id IAA18060; Wed, 7 Feb 2001 08:50:38 -0800 Received: from blowhole.extenex.net (blowhole.extenex.net [192.168.100.100]) by cementship.extenex.net (8.9.3/8.8.7) with ESMTP id IAA11075; Wed, 7 Feb 2001 08:50:04 -0800 Received: from wardw by blowhole.extenex.net with local (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 14QXnA-0003HB-00; Wed, 07 Feb 2001 08:50:04 -0800 Date: Wed, 7 Feb 2001 08:50:04 -0800 To: Georg Nikodym Cc: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.arm.linux.org.uk Subject: Re: usb-net-host questions Message-Id: <20010207085004.B12568@extenex.com> References: <14977.30618.409694.1365@somanetworks.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <14977.30618.409694.1365@somanetworks.com>; from georgn@somanetworks.com on Wed, Feb 07, 2001 at 11:28:10AM -0500 From: Ward Willats Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk On Wed, Feb 07, 2001 at 11:28:10AM -0500, Georg Nikodym wrote: > 100-200KB/s with much lower interrupt rates (1.2Kint./s). Does > anyone have a simple explanation or hypothesis for the apparent > disparity between transfer rates? The OUT bound transfer is driven by the host at full speed. Bulk transfer. The IN bound transfer (I'm guessing here) is polled back at the 1ms rate requested by the config descriptor in usb_ctl. "Interrupt" transfer. In other news, after a week fighting other fires I am back working on my endpoint zero rewrite and other mods. I hope to release something shortly but the UDC is one miserable subsytem to program in "the real world" and the Intel docs are wrong, incomplete and naive at every turn.. -- Ward From kramer@pa.dec.com Wed Feb 7 22:03:07 2001 Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (root@mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id WAA31332 for ; Wed, 7 Feb 2001 22:03:07 +0100 Received: from ztxmail05.ztx.compaq.com (ztxmail05.ztx.compaq.com [161.114.1.209]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id WAA18583 for ; Wed, 7 Feb 2001 22:03:05 +0100 (MET) Received: by ztxmail05.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 96AFCBA7; Wed, 7 Feb 2001 15:01:18 -0600 (CST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by ztxmail05.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 57368BEE; Wed, 7 Feb 2001 15:01:12 -0600 (CST) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA11616; Wed, 7 Feb 2001 13:01:10 -0800 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id MAA07503; Wed, 7 Feb 2001 12:47:50 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id MAA30403; Wed, 7 Feb 2001 12:47:50 -0800 (PST) Received: from zmamail01.nz-tay.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA05680; Wed, 7 Feb 2001 12:47:45 -0800 Received: by zmamail01.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 60DEB10D7A; Wed, 7 Feb 2001 15:47:41 -0500 (EST) Received: from stuart.FreedomScientific.com (unknown [209.101.206.131]) by zmamail01.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E6BC5FADA for ; Wed, 7 Feb 2001 15:47:40 -0500 (EST) Received: by STUART with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) id <1NL82K3Q>; Wed, 7 Feb 2001 15:49:39 -0500 Message-Id: <3706DBB87DAED411BE350002B302A5990AAB9C@STUART> From: Michael Reynolds To: "'sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com'" Subject: floppy disk drive support Date: Wed, 7 Feb 2001 15:49:39 -0500 Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----_=_NextPart_001_01C09147.7CDDF380" Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk This message is in MIME format. Since your mail reader does not understand this format, some or all of this message may not be legible. ------_=_NextPart_001_01C09147.7CDDF380 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Hi all, Does anyone know if the FDC37C78 floppy disk chip is supported in Linux? Thanks, Mike Reynolds Blazie Engineering, a division of Freedom Scientific 2850 SE Market Place Stuart, FL 34997 561-223-6443 FAX 561-223-6413 ------_=_NextPart_001_01C09147.7CDDF380 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" floppy disk drive support

Hi all,

Does anyone know if the FDC37C78 floppy disk chip is supported in Linux?


Thanks,

Mike Reynolds
Blazie Engineering, a division of Freedom Scientific
2850 SE Market Place
Stuart, FL 34997
561-223-6443   FAX 561-223-6413


------_=_NextPart_001_01C09147.7CDDF380-- From kramer@pa.dec.com Wed Feb 7 22:35:56 2001 Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (root@mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id WAA31464 for ; Wed, 7 Feb 2001 22:35:56 +0100 Received: from ztxmail03.ztx.compaq.com (ztxmail03.ztx.compaq.com [161.114.1.207]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id WAA20696 for ; Wed, 7 Feb 2001 22:35:54 +0100 (MET) Received: by ztxmail03.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 3E05B1854; Wed, 7 Feb 2001 15:34:07 -0600 (CST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by ztxmail03.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 2DCC91AE2; Wed, 7 Feb 2001 15:34:05 -0600 (CST) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA20482; Wed, 7 Feb 2001 13:34:04 -0800 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id NAA21135; Wed, 7 Feb 2001 13:22:43 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id NAA03528; Wed, 7 Feb 2001 13:22:42 -0800 (PST) Received: from zmamail01.nz-tay.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA11637; Wed, 7 Feb 2001 13:22:40 -0800 Received: by zmamail01.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 83F88F95A; Wed, 7 Feb 2001 16:22:39 -0500 (EST) Received: from dredd.crimea.edu (unknown [213.128.193.148]) by zmamail01.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 74385C855 for ; Wed, 7 Feb 2001 16:22:38 -0500 (EST) Received: (from uucp@localhost) by dredd.crimea.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with UUCP id AAA17648; Thu, 8 Feb 2001 00:22:27 +0300 Received: (from green@localhost) by dredd.crimea.edu (8.10.1/8.10.1) id f17Kk7303364; Wed, 7 Feb 2001 23:46:07 +0300 Date: Wed, 7 Feb 2001 23:46:07 +0300 From: Oleg Drokin To: georgn@somanetworks.com Cc: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Subject: Re: usb-net-host questions Message-Id: <20010207234607.A3342@dredd.crimea.edu> References: <200102072031.f17KVHR16407@morgoth.ixcelerator.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0.1i In-Reply-To: <200102072031.f17KVHR16407@morgoth.ixcelerator.com>; from green@ixcelerator.com on Wed, Feb 07, 2001 at 11:31:17PM +0300 Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk Hello! > I've applied Oleg's USB patches which solve some of the problems I've Which of them? What kernel version do you use? > been seeing with tcp traffic between my sa1100 device (let's call it > "Thang") and my laptop (namely ftp transfers getting stuck). > Which leads me to my two questions: > 1. To start things up, I do a "modprobe sa1100_usbd" on my Thang. I > can now do a "ifconfig usbf 1.1.1.1". Then I do a "modprobe > usb-net-host" on my laptop upon which I can "ifconfig usb0 > 1.1.1.2". I try to ping and nothing good happens (Destination Host (if all is well, you should see "usb_net_host: found device" in kernel log) > Unreachable). If I unplug the USB cable from the Thang and plug it Do you have USB host driver loaded on your laptop at this point? If you plug your device into laptop with usb host driver, and then load usbf module, it won't work till you plug and unplug it. (easily determined by kernel messages "device does not accept new address") This is because usb stack tries to assign usb address to device on its insertion. If there is no usbf driver, nobody listens to set_address requests (actually configure requests). > back in then ping starts to work (except the first two packets are > reversed [round trip time on packet 0 is about 1s and packet 1 is > 4ms, so ping of packet 1 is reported before packet 0]). I see this same behaviour on unplug/replug events. > Is this experience consistent with yours or am I doing something > boneheaded. My goal, in case it's not obvious, is to have > something much more idiot-proof. Just make sure, that once USB on host activates (and sees your device), you have usbdf already loaded. Also, since SA1100 lacks "reset" capability, it needs to be replugged on reboot, too. (though may be there is some way to keep info about assigned USB address, I bet this will not be too trivial to implement.) > 2. I've been observing ftp transfer rates from my laptop to my Thang > of 500-600KB/s. vmstat reports interrupt rates as high as That's pretty descent speed, I see something more like 450-500KB/s > 10.5Kint./s. Ftp transfers the other direction only happen at Yes. 256 bytes/packet max... (64kbps on PC -> SA1100, actually) > 100-200KB/s with much lower interrupt rates (1.2Kint./s). Does Hmm... Have not tried that direction. Will try tomorrow. > anyone have a simple explanation or hypothesis for the apparent > disparity between transfer rates? Host can initiate transfers by itself. Clients should wait till host scan the bus for ready-to send devices and allows them to send (not that good explanation, and may be not very correct, too) Bye, Oleg From kramer@pa.dec.com Wed Feb 7 23:02:25 2001 Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (root@mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id XAA31600 for ; Wed, 7 Feb 2001 23:02:25 +0100 Received: from zmamail03.zma.compaq.com (zmamail03.zma.compaq.com [161.114.64.103]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id XAA22189 for ; Wed, 7 Feb 2001 23:02:23 +0100 (MET) Received: by zmamail03.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id DD0659C07; Wed, 7 Feb 2001 17:00:36 -0500 (EST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by zmamail03.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 0D4609C63; Wed, 7 Feb 2001 17:00:34 -0500 (EST) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA11870; Wed, 7 Feb 2001 14:00:33 -0800 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id NAA20402; Wed, 7 Feb 2001 13:47:18 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id NAA22265; Wed, 7 Feb 2001 13:47:17 -0800 (PST) Received: from zmamail02.nz-tay.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA07140; Wed, 7 Feb 2001 13:47:17 -0800 Received: by zmamail02.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id AC77249FC; Wed, 7 Feb 2001 16:47:16 -0500 (EST) Received: from dryline-fw.wireless-sys.com (dryline-fw.wireless-sys.com [216.126.67.45]) by zmamail02.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 10A204F56 for ; Wed, 7 Feb 2001 16:47:16 -0500 (EST) Received: from somanetworks.com (cr308749-c.wlfdle1.on.wave.home.com [24.156.50.192]) by dryline-fw.wireless-sys.com (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id QAA30741; Wed, 7 Feb 2001 16:47:14 -0500 Received: (from georgn@localhost) by somanetworks.com (8.11.0/8.11.0) id f17LlB701825; Wed, 7 Feb 2001 16:47:11 -0500 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <14977.49759.280769.658924@somanetworks.com> Date: Wed, 7 Feb 2001 16:47:11 -0500 (EST) From: "Georg Nikodym" To: Ward Willats Cc: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.arm.linux.org.uk Subject: Re: usb-net-host questions In-Reply-To: <20010207085004.B12568@extenex.com> References: <14977.30618.409694.1365@somanetworks.com> <20010207085004.B12568@extenex.com> X-Mailer: VM 6.75 under 21.2 (beta40) "Persephone" XEmacs Lucid Reply-To: georgn@somanetworks.com Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk >>>>> "WW" == Ward Willats writes: WW> On Wed, Feb 07, 2001 at 11:28:10AM -0500, Georg Nikodym wrote: >> 100-200KB/s with much lower interrupt rates (1.2Kint./s). Does >> anyone have a simple explanation or hypothesis for the apparent >> disparity between transfer rates? WW> The OUT bound transfer is driven by the host at full speed. Bulk WW> transfer. WW> The IN bound transfer (I'm guessing here) is polled back at the WW> 1ms rate requested by the config descriptor in WW> usb_ctl. "Interrupt" transfer. From looking at the code, I had this suspicion. Thanks for the validation. WW> In other news, after a week fighting other fires I am back WW> working on my endpoint zero rewrite and other mods. I hope to WW> release something shortly I look forward to trying it out. WW> but the UDC is one miserable subsytem to program in "the WW> real world" and the Intel docs are wrong, incomplete and naive at WW> every turn.. Do I really want to know what a UDC is? Thanks again. From kramer@pa.dec.com Wed Feb 7 23:05:06 2001 Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (root@mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id XAA31608 for ; Wed, 7 Feb 2001 23:05:06 +0100 Received: from ztxmail05.ztx.compaq.com (ztxmail05.ztx.compaq.com [161.114.1.209]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id XAA22481 for ; Wed, 7 Feb 2001 23:05:04 +0100 (MET) Received: by ztxmail05.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 06741B49; Wed, 7 Feb 2001 16:03:18 -0600 (CST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by ztxmail05.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id EF1B3BC7; Wed, 7 Feb 2001 16:03:14 -0600 (CST) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA20461; Wed, 7 Feb 2001 14:03:13 -0800 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id NAA20487; Wed, 7 Feb 2001 13:50:25 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id NAA22337; Wed, 7 Feb 2001 13:50:25 -0800 (PST) Received: from ztxmail02.nz-cce.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA01432; Wed, 7 Feb 2001 13:50:24 -0800 Received: by ztxmail02.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 8260E1C89; Wed, 7 Feb 2001 15:50:23 -0600 (CST) Received: from dryline-fw.wireless-sys.com (dryline-fw.wireless-sys.com [216.126.67.45]) by ztxmail02.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B9B0D1C82 for ; Wed, 7 Feb 2001 15:50:21 -0600 (CST) Received: from somanetworks.com (cr308749-c.wlfdle1.on.wave.home.com [24.156.50.192]) by dryline-fw.wireless-sys.com (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id QAA30774; Wed, 7 Feb 2001 16:50:19 -0500 Received: (from georgn@localhost) by somanetworks.com (8.11.0/8.11.0) id f17LoIC01836; Wed, 7 Feb 2001 16:50:18 -0500 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <14977.49946.758440.534551@somanetworks.com> Date: Wed, 7 Feb 2001 16:50:18 -0500 (EST) From: "Georg Nikodym" To: Oleg Drokin Cc: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Subject: Re: usb-net-host questions In-Reply-To: <20010207234607.A3342@dredd.crimea.edu> References: <200102072031.f17KVHR16407@morgoth.ixcelerator.com> <20010207234607.A3342@dredd.crimea.edu> X-Mailer: VM 6.75 under 21.2 (beta40) "Persephone" XEmacs Lucid Reply-To: georgn@somanetworks.com Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk >>>>> "OD" == Oleg Drokin writes: >> I've applied Oleg's USB patches which solve some of the problems OD> Which of them? What kernel version do you use? There was a set that applies against 2.4.0-rmk2-np2 and one that applies against usb-net-host.c which I have in my own 2.4.1 x86 tree. OD> (if all is well, you should see "usb_net_host: found device" in OD> kernel log) This doesn't occur until I play with the cable. OD> Do you have USB host driver loaded on your laptop at this point? OD> If you plug your device into laptop with usb host driver, and OD> then load usbf module, it won't work till you plug and unplug it. OD> (easily determined by kernel messages "device does not accept new OD> address") This is because usb stack tries to assign usb address OD> to device on its insertion. If there is no usbf driver, nobody OD> listens to set_address requests (actually configure requests). Yes. The Thang is actually plugged into a hub (as is a Logitech trackball). The hub (Belkin) is plugged into my laptop. The usb-uhci driver is present as are things like mousedev, usbmouse, etc thanks to /sbin/hotplug. I, as I said earlier, load the usb-net-host module by hand. >> Is this experience consistent with yours or am I doing something >> boneheaded. My goal, in case it's not obvious, is to have >> something much more idiot-proof. OD> Just make sure, that once USB on host activates (and sees your OD> device), you have usbdf already loaded. Also, since SA1100 lacks OD> "reset" capability, it needs to be replugged on reboot, OD> too. (though may be there is some way to keep info about assigned OD> USB address, I bet this will not be too trivial to implement.) OK, I think I'm getting a picture of what's going on but can you tell me more about this lack of reset ability? How do other smart devices handle this kind of situation (like a scanner or anything that couldn't possibly draw all its power from the PC and has its own power switch)? OD> Bye, Oleg Thanks. From kramer@pa.dec.com Wed Feb 7 23:07:16 2001 Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (root@mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id XAA31614 for ; Wed, 7 Feb 2001 23:07:15 +0100 Received: from ztxmail05.ztx.compaq.com (ztxmail05.ztx.compaq.com [161.114.1.209]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id XAA22539 for ; Wed, 7 Feb 2001 23:07:14 +0100 (MET) Received: by ztxmail05.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 0CCEBA8A; Wed, 7 Feb 2001 16:05:27 -0600 (CST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by ztxmail05.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 899E78DB; Wed, 7 Feb 2001 16:05:23 -0600 (CST) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA16740; Wed, 7 Feb 2001 14:05:21 -0800 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id NAA22542; Wed, 7 Feb 2001 13:52:45 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id NAA16146; Wed, 7 Feb 2001 13:52:44 -0800 (PST) Received: from zmamail02.nz-tay.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA14525; Wed, 7 Feb 2001 13:52:44 -0800 Received: by zmamail02.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id C94934ED3; Wed, 7 Feb 2001 16:52:43 -0500 (EST) Received: from fire.he.net (fire.he.net [216.218.144.2]) by zmamail02.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 332AA3645 for ; Wed, 7 Feb 2001 16:52:43 -0500 (EST) Received: from cementship.extenex.net (64-51-136-194.client.dsl.net [64.51.136.194]) by fire.he.net (8.8.6/8.8.2) with ESMTP id NAA17774; Wed, 7 Feb 2001 13:52:34 -0800 Received: from blowhole.extenex.net (blowhole.extenex.net [192.168.100.100]) by cementship.extenex.net (8.9.3/8.8.7) with ESMTP id NAA00818; Wed, 7 Feb 2001 13:51:57 -0800 Received: from wardw by blowhole.extenex.net with local (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 14QcVJ-0000EO-00; Wed, 07 Feb 2001 13:51:57 -0800 Date: Wed, 7 Feb 2001 13:51:57 -0800 To: Oleg Drokin , georgn@somanetworks.com Cc: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Subject: Re: usb-net-host questions Message-Id: <20010207135157.C635@extenex.com> References: <200102072031.f17KVHR16407@morgoth.ixcelerator.com> <20010207234607.A3342@dredd.crimea.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <20010207234607.A3342@dredd.crimea.edu>; from green@dredd.crimea.edu on Wed, Feb 07, 2001 at 11:46:07PM +0300 From: Ward Willats Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk On Wed, Feb 07, 2001 at 11:46:07PM +0300, Oleg Drokin wrote: > > back in then ping starts to work (except the first two packets are > > reversed [round trip time on packet 0 is about 1s and packet 1 is > > 4ms, so ping of packet 1 is reported before packet 0]). > I see this same behaviour on unplug/replug events. The current driver, as written, I believe will drop the first packet that is queued for transmission. (The xmit FIFO is not "primed" per Intel's December eratta.) Could higher-level network protocol retries then cause this effect? -- Ward From kramer@pa.dec.com Thu Feb 8 09:04:10 2001 Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (root@mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id JAA00249 for ; Thu, 8 Feb 2001 09:04:09 +0100 Received: from zmamail03.zma.compaq.com (zmamail03.zma.compaq.com [161.114.64.103]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id JAA15290 for ; Thu, 8 Feb 2001 09:04:07 +0100 (MET) Received: by zmamail03.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 1FB25ABA5; Thu, 8 Feb 2001 03:02:21 -0500 (EST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by zmamail03.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 9A23EA8EA; Thu, 8 Feb 2001 03:02:18 -0500 (EST) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA01098; Thu, 8 Feb 2001 00:02:16 -0800 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id XAA15789; Wed, 7 Feb 2001 23:57:16 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id XAA15077; Wed, 7 Feb 2001 23:57:15 -0800 (PST) Received: from zmamail02.nz-tay.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA01815; Wed, 7 Feb 2001 23:57:14 -0800 Received: by zmamail02.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id CBBFC5564; Thu, 8 Feb 2001 02:57:13 -0500 (EST) Received: from mail.ixcelerator.com (wsa-245.sibintek.net [213.128.193.245]) by zmamail02.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7642154FB for ; Thu, 8 Feb 2001 02:57:09 -0500 (EST) Received: from morgoth.ixcelerator.com (IDENT:root@morgoth.ixcel.ru [172.16.10.70]) by mail.ixcelerator.com (8.10.1/8.10.1) with ESMTP id f187sD417353; Thu, 8 Feb 2001 10:54:13 +0300 Received: (from green@localhost) by morgoth.ixcelerator.com (8.10.1/8.10.1) id f187vGE09079; Thu, 8 Feb 2001 10:57:16 +0300 Date: Thu, 8 Feb 2001 10:57:16 +0300 From: Oleg Drokin To: Ward Willats Cc: Oleg Drokin , georgn@somanetworks.com, sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Subject: Re: usb-net-host questions Message-Id: <20010208105716.B1313@iXcelerator.com> References: <200102072031.f17KVHR16407@morgoth.ixcelerator.com> <20010207234607.A3342@dredd.crimea.edu> <20010207135157.C635@extenex.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2i In-Reply-To: <20010207135157.C635@extenex.com>; from ward.willats@extenex.com on Wed, Feb 07, 2001 at 01:51:57PM -0800 Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk Hello! On Wed, Feb 07, 2001 at 01:51:57PM -0800, Ward Willats wrote: > > > back in then ping starts to work (except the first two packets are > > > reversed [round trip time on packet 0 is about 1s and packet 1 is > > > 4ms, so ping of packet 1 is reported before packet 0]). > > I see this same behaviour on unplug/replug events. > The current driver, as written, I believe will drop the first packet that > is queued for transmission. (The xmit FIFO is not "primed" per Intel's > December eratta.) Could higher-level network protocol retries then cause > this effect? In fact, it is. That's why you see 1st reply to come after second one. Bye, Oleg From kramer@pa.dec.com Thu Feb 8 09:04:10 2001 Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (root@mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id JAA00250 for ; Thu, 8 Feb 2001 09:04:09 +0100 Received: from ztxmail03.ztx.compaq.com (ztxmail03.ztx.compaq.com [161.114.1.207]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id JAA15289 for ; Thu, 8 Feb 2001 09:04:07 +0100 (MET) Received: by ztxmail03.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 365D11A72; Thu, 8 Feb 2001 02:02:20 -0600 (CST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by ztxmail03.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 5E7691BB2; Thu, 8 Feb 2001 02:02:18 -0600 (CST) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA04480; Thu, 8 Feb 2001 00:02:13 -0800 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id XAA15822; Wed, 7 Feb 2001 23:55:42 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id XAA00706; Wed, 7 Feb 2001 23:55:41 -0800 (PST) Received: from ztxmail02.nz-cce.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA24163; Wed, 7 Feb 2001 23:55:40 -0800 Received: by ztxmail02.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 475FF1CB1; Thu, 8 Feb 2001 01:55:40 -0600 (CST) Received: from mail.ixcelerator.com (wsa-245.sibintek.net [213.128.193.245]) by ztxmail02.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F0D121E09 for ; Thu, 8 Feb 2001 01:55:38 -0600 (CST) Received: from morgoth.ixcelerator.com (IDENT:root@morgoth.ixcel.ru [172.16.10.70]) by mail.ixcelerator.com (8.10.1/8.10.1) with ESMTP id f187r0417307; Thu, 8 Feb 2001 10:53:00 +0300 Received: (from green@localhost) by morgoth.ixcelerator.com (8.10.1/8.10.1) id f187u3207440; Thu, 8 Feb 2001 10:56:03 +0300 Date: Thu, 8 Feb 2001 10:56:03 +0300 From: Oleg Drokin To: Georg Nikodym Cc: Oleg Drokin , sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Subject: Re: usb-net-host questions Message-Id: <20010208105603.A1313@iXcelerator.com> References: <200102072031.f17KVHR16407@morgoth.ixcelerator.com> <20010207234607.A3342@dredd.crimea.edu> <14977.49946.758440.534551@somanetworks.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2i In-Reply-To: <14977.49946.758440.534551@somanetworks.com>; from georgn@somanetworks.com on Wed, Feb 07, 2001 at 04:50:18PM -0500 Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk Hello! On Wed, Feb 07, 2001 at 04:50:18PM -0500, Georg Nikodym wrote: > >> I've applied Oleg's USB patches which solve some of the problems > OD> Which of them? What kernel version do you use? > There was a set that applies against 2.4.0-rmk2-np2 and one that > applies against usb-net-host.c which I have in my own 2.4.1 x86 tree. Yes. These semms to be the latest ones. > OD> (if all is well, you should see "usb_net_host: found device" in > OD> kernel log) > This doesn't occur until I play with the cable. Based on your explanations below, It is clear, why. > OD> Do you have USB host driver loaded on your laptop at this point? > OD> If you plug your device into laptop with usb host driver, and > OD> then load usbf module, it won't work till you plug and unplug it. > OD> (easily determined by kernel messages "device does not accept new > OD> address") This is because usb stack tries to assign usb address > OD> to device on its insertion. If there is no usbf driver, nobody > OD> listens to set_address requests (actually configure requests). > Yes. The Thang is actually plugged into a hub (as is a Logitech > trackball). The hub (Belkin) is plugged into my laptop. The usb-uhci > driver is present as are things like mousedev, usbmouse, etc thanks to > /sbin/hotplug. I, as I said earlier, load the usb-net-host module by > hand. So, it means that when USB Hub driver starts up, it tries to assign address to your Thang, but since there is no USB driver on thang, it will not hear these requests. (Check your log for "device oes not accept new address" messages) But if you load driver in Tsang, then reboot your laptop, laptop will see Tsang after reboot. > >> Is this experience consistent with yours or am I doing something > >> boneheaded. My goal, in case it's not obvious, is to have > >> something much more idiot-proof. > OD> Just make sure, that once USB on host activates (and sees your > OD> device), you have usbdf already loaded. Also, since SA1100 lacks > OD> "reset" capability, it needs to be replugged on reboot, > OD> too. (though may be there is some way to keep info about assigned > OD> USB address, I bet this will not be too trivial to implement.) > OK, I think I'm getting a picture of what's going on but can you tell > me more about this lack of reset ability? How do other smart devices Yep. You see, after each reboot SA11x0 need some initialisation from host. Usually special kind of USB packet are used for these, meaning "Hey, host! I have lost all of my internal state, can you reassign me address and other stuff?". That's what I refer to as "reset packet". Refer to Intel's documentation on USB client controller in SA1110 (in e.g. Intel SA1110 advanced developer's manual) for more info. > handle this kind of situation (like a scanner or anything that > couldn't possibly draw all its power from the PC and has its own power > switch)? If you power Tsang down, on power up SA11x0 will attach to USB bus, and host will see it. But if you do not have USB driver in the very early start of booting procedure, this won't help you. Also other devices may be capable to send this "reset" packets. (SA11x0 is not capable of this) Bye, Oleg From kramer@pa.dec.com Thu Feb 8 12:06:31 2001 Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (root@mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id MAA00665 for ; Thu, 8 Feb 2001 12:06:31 +0100 Received: from ztxmail03.ztx.compaq.com (ztxmail03.ztx.compaq.com [161.114.1.207]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id MAA28188 for ; Thu, 8 Feb 2001 12:06:29 +0100 (MET) Received: by ztxmail03.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 4060499D; Thu, 8 Feb 2001 05:04:43 -0600 (CST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by ztxmail03.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 8667492A; Thu, 8 Feb 2001 05:04:41 -0600 (CST) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA04288; Thu, 8 Feb 2001 03:04:39 -0800 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id CAA18588; Thu, 8 Feb 2001 02:58:39 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id CAA17308; Thu, 8 Feb 2001 02:58:39 -0800 (PST) Received: from zmamail02.nz-tay.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA22812; Thu, 8 Feb 2001 02:58:38 -0800 Received: by zmamail02.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id A603A4DDF; Thu, 8 Feb 2001 05:58:37 -0500 (EST) Received: from empeg.com (morrison.empeg.co.uk [193.119.19.130]) by zmamail02.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB08136A4 for ; Thu, 8 Feb 2001 05:58:36 -0500 (EST) Received: from morcheeba (morcheeba.internal.empeg.com [10.35.1.34]) by empeg.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id KAA14022; Thu, 8 Feb 2001 10:58:33 GMT Message-Id: <003801c091be$07119360$2201230a@internal.empeg.com> From: "Hugo Fiennes" To: Cc: , References: <14977.30618.409694.1365@somanetworks.com><20010207085004.B12568@extenex.com> <14977.49759.280769.658924@somanetworks.com> Subject: Re: usb-net-host questions Date: Thu, 8 Feb 2001 10:58:10 -0000 Organization: SONICblue Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-Msmail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.3018.1300 X-Mimeole: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400 Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk > WW> The OUT bound transfer is driven by the host at full speed. Bulk > WW> transfer. > > WW> The IN bound transfer (I'm guessing here) is polled back at the > WW> 1ms rate requested by the config descriptor in > WW> usb_ctl. "Interrupt" transfer. > > >From looking at the code, I had this suspicion. Thanks for the > validation. If a suitably large maximum transfer size is set for an IN interrupt transfer, then in theory the host should issue enough IN tokens to the slave to exhaust the slave's available data within a frame (as long as there's no priority traffic - ie control or isochronous - taking the bandwidth). I realise many here know this anyway, but for those who don't: USB is host driven. A slave cannot send data to the host without the host first asking for it. A slave has a number of endpoints, each of which is either IN (to the host) or OUT (from the host) - or SETUP (configuration - I'll ignore this for now). When you queue a transfer to a USB client, the host will put this in a TD (transfer descriptor) attached to an ED (endpoint descriptor) in the OHCI tree. The OHCI finds the maximum packet size from the ED and sends as much as it can by sending OUT tokens (which then get either ACKed by the slave, in which case a data packet is sent (then ACKed by the slave), or NAKed, in which case the host moves onto the next ED I believe). As the OHCI can easily saturate the bus, the transfer rate is defined by how often the slave cannot accept data (and will automatically issue a NAK) - if you look at a USB bus with an analyser, you'll see this happening a lot! In theory, the SA1110 shouldn't be too bad, as it has DMA & that sort of fun stuff. As the SA1100 (at least the revisions we used in the empeg) didn't have bug-free USB, we used an external controller which whilst being the best available at the time, isn't particularly quick :( For inbound transfers, the TD causes the OHCI to send an IN token to the slave. If the slave has no data to send, it will NAK, otherwise it will respond with data (which then gets ACKed by the host). I'm not sure on exactly how the OHCI handles a NAK on an IN endpoint (ie whether it tries a certain number of times in this 1ms frame, or whether it gives up and postpones this TD to the next frame). If you don't issue a big enough read request, the TD will be small and may well be exhausted in under a frame though, which will cause bad transfer rates. I believe the way most USB<>ethernet converters work is that they have both an interrupt pipe, to tell the host when data is ready, when a TX packet has been sent, etc, *and* a bulk IN pipe on which there is *always* a large read pending - which should give the best throughput. I'm not saying this is the problem there, I've not looked at the code. But it might be. Hugo From kramer@pa.dec.com Thu Feb 8 13:24:45 2001 Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (root@mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id NAA01014 for ; Thu, 8 Feb 2001 13:24:45 +0100 Received: from zmamail05.zma.compaq.com (zmamail05.zma.compaq.com [161.114.64.105]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id NAA04087 for ; Thu, 8 Feb 2001 13:24:43 +0100 (MET) Received: by zmamail05.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 267621D75; Thu, 8 Feb 2001 07:22:57 -0500 (EST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by zmamail05.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id DA3651FB1; Thu, 8 Feb 2001 07:22:54 -0500 (EST) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA29470; Thu, 8 Feb 2001 04:22:53 -0800 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id EAA19224; Thu, 8 Feb 2001 04:17:51 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id EAA19413; Thu, 8 Feb 2001 04:17:50 -0800 (PST) Received: from ztxmail01.nz-cce.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA23683; Thu, 8 Feb 2001 04:17:50 -0800 Received: by ztxmail01.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id ECBFE28C6; Thu, 8 Feb 2001 06:17:49 -0600 (CST) Received: from dryline-fw.wireless-sys.com (dryline-fw.wireless-sys.com [216.126.67.45]) by ztxmail01.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2343F2AB7 for ; Thu, 8 Feb 2001 06:17:49 -0600 (CST) Received: from somanetworks.com (cr308749-c.wlfdle1.on.wave.home.com [24.156.50.192]) by dryline-fw.wireless-sys.com (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id HAA03214; Thu, 8 Feb 2001 07:17:47 -0500 Received: (from georgn@localhost) by somanetworks.com (8.11.0/8.11.0) id f18CHkj06234; Thu, 8 Feb 2001 07:17:46 -0500 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <14978.36457.935629.616027@somanetworks.com> Date: Thu, 8 Feb 2001 07:17:45 -0500 (EST) From: "Georg Nikodym" To: Oleg Drokin Cc: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Subject: Re: usb-net-host questions In-Reply-To: <20010208105603.A1313@iXcelerator.com> References: <200102072031.f17KVHR16407@morgoth.ixcelerator.com> <20010207234607.A3342@dredd.crimea.edu> <14977.49946.758440.534551@somanetworks.com> <20010208105603.A1313@iXcelerator.com> X-Mailer: VM 6.75 under 21.2 (beta40) "Persephone" XEmacs Lucid Reply-To: georgn@somanetworks.com Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk >>>>> "OD" == Oleg Drokin writes: OD> If you power Tsang down, on power up SA11x0 will attach to USB OD> bus, and host will see it. But if you do not have USB driver in OD> the very early start of booting procedure, this won't help you. Hmm. How early? Certainly don't relish the idea of adding code to Thang's boot loader. From kramer@pa.dec.com Thu Feb 8 13:28:43 2001 Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (root@mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id NAA01026 for ; Thu, 8 Feb 2001 13:28:43 +0100 Received: from zmamail04.zma.compaq.com (zmamail04.zma.compaq.com [161.114.64.104]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id NAA04313 for ; Thu, 8 Feb 2001 13:28:41 +0100 (MET) Received: by zmamail04.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id CDC052983; Thu, 8 Feb 2001 07:26:54 -0500 (EST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by zmamail04.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 73F6224C7; Thu, 8 Feb 2001 07:26:52 -0500 (EST) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA20064; Thu, 8 Feb 2001 04:26:51 -0800 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id EAA21100; Thu, 8 Feb 2001 04:22:24 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id EAA23593; Thu, 8 Feb 2001 04:22:24 -0800 (PST) Received: from zmamail02.nz-tay.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA25495; Thu, 8 Feb 2001 04:22:23 -0800 Received: by zmamail02.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 526684EB0; Thu, 8 Feb 2001 07:22:23 -0500 (EST) Received: from mail.ixcelerator.com (wsa-245.sibintek.net [213.128.193.245]) by zmamail02.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 11FF3543D for ; Thu, 8 Feb 2001 07:22:10 -0500 (EST) Received: from morgoth.ixcelerator.com (IDENT:root@morgoth.ixcel.ru [172.16.10.70]) by mail.ixcelerator.com (8.10.1/8.10.1) with ESMTP id f18CJPk31472; Thu, 8 Feb 2001 15:19:25 +0300 Received: (from green@localhost) by morgoth.ixcelerator.com (8.10.1/8.10.1) id f18CMUl18559; Thu, 8 Feb 2001 15:22:30 +0300 Date: Thu, 8 Feb 2001 15:22:30 +0300 From: Oleg Drokin To: Georg Nikodym Cc: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Subject: Re: usb-net-host questions Message-Id: <20010208152230.A18551@iXcelerator.com> References: <200102072031.f17KVHR16407@morgoth.ixcelerator.com> <20010207234607.A3342@dredd.crimea.edu> <14977.49946.758440.534551@somanetworks.com> <20010208105603.A1313@iXcelerator.com> <14978.36457.935629.616027@somanetworks.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2i In-Reply-To: <14978.36457.935629.616027@somanetworks.com>; from georgn@somanetworks.com on Thu, Feb 08, 2001 at 07:17:45AM -0500 Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk Hello! On Thu, Feb 08, 2001 at 07:17:45AM -0500, Georg Nikodym wrote: > OD> If you power Tsang down, on power up SA11x0 will attach to USB > OD> bus, and host will see it. But if you do not have USB driver in > OD> the very early start of booting procedure, this won't help you. > Hmm. How early? Certainly don't relish the idea of adding code to Very early. Something like in first one or two seconds after powering on. > Thang's boot loader. Bye, Oleg From kramer@pa.dec.com Thu Feb 8 17:14:27 2001 Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (root@mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id RAA01831 for ; Thu, 8 Feb 2001 17:14:27 +0100 Received: from zmamail03.zma.compaq.com (zmamail03.zma.compaq.com [161.114.64.103]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id RAA20683 for ; Thu, 8 Feb 2001 17:14:25 +0100 (MET) Received: by zmamail03.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 2E95BABE8; Thu, 8 Feb 2001 11:12:39 -0500 (EST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by zmamail03.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id CDB53ACDD; Thu, 8 Feb 2001 11:12:36 -0500 (EST) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA27532; Thu, 8 Feb 2001 08:12:25 -0800 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id IAA28142; Thu, 8 Feb 2001 08:02:41 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id IAA27151; Thu, 8 Feb 2001 08:02:40 -0800 (PST) Received: from zmamail02.nz-tay.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA15957; Thu, 8 Feb 2001 08:02:40 -0800 Received: by zmamail02.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id CEFCE5765; Thu, 8 Feb 2001 11:02:39 -0500 (EST) Received: from fire.he.net (fire.he.net [216.218.144.2]) by zmamail02.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 308413EC9 for ; Thu, 8 Feb 2001 11:02:39 -0500 (EST) Received: from cementship.extenex.net (64-51-136-194.client.dsl.net [64.51.136.194]) by fire.he.net (8.8.6/8.8.2) with ESMTP id IAA15495; Thu, 8 Feb 2001 08:02:34 -0800 Received: from blowhole.extenex.com (blowhole.extenex.net [192.168.100.100]) by cementship.extenex.net (8.9.3/8.8.7) with ESMTP id IAA02025; Thu, 8 Feb 2001 08:01:57 -0800 Message-Id: <5.0.0.25.2.20010208074730.023f6d20@extenex.com> X-Sender: extenex.com/wardw@extenex.com X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.0 Date: Thu, 08 Feb 2001 08:01:08 -0800 To: "Hugo Fiennes" , From: Ward Willats Subject: Re: usb-net-host questions Cc: , In-Reply-To: <003801c091be$07119360$2201230a@internal.empeg.com> References: <14977.30618.409694.1365@somanetworks.com> <20010207085004.B12568@extenex.com> <14977.49759.280769.658924@somanetworks.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk At 10:58 AM 2/8/2001 +0000, Hugo Fiennes wrote: >If a suitably large maximum transfer size is set for an IN interrupt >transfer, then in theory the host should issue enough IN tokens to the slave >to exhaust the slave's available data within a frame True. But the USB spec (1.0 anyway) says that maximum packet size a host is required to support is 64 bytes (and usb.org validation suite will complain if this is not the case). Every host I've tried can handle the SA 256 maximum without problem, and other parts of the USB docs mention a maximum packet size of 1024 bytes. I'm still trying to reconcile all of this. >In theory, the SA1110 shouldn't be too bad, as it has DMA & that sort of fun >stuff. As the SA1100 (at least the revisions we used in the empeg) didn't >have bug-free USB, we used an external controller which whilst being the >best available at the time, isn't particularly quick :( In theory indeed! Intel has fixed a bunch of bugs, but it still can't decode some address/CRC combinations correctly, will spuriously reset itself during enumeration and configuration, has self-clocked FIFOs and independently clocked registers hat can't be read deterministically, and so on. What a pain! -- Ward From kramer@pa.dec.com Thu Feb 8 18:15:30 2001 Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (root@mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id SAA02028 for ; Thu, 8 Feb 2001 18:15:29 +0100 Received: from ztxmail05.ztx.compaq.com (ztxmail05.ztx.compaq.com [161.114.1.209]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id SAA25007 for ; Thu, 8 Feb 2001 18:15:28 +0100 (MET) Received: by ztxmail05.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 469CABBD; Thu, 8 Feb 2001 11:13:34 -0600 (CST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by ztxmail05.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id CB4E19B2; Thu, 8 Feb 2001 11:13:30 -0600 (CST) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA07853; Thu, 8 Feb 2001 09:13:24 -0800 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id JAA22267; Thu, 8 Feb 2001 09:06:42 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id JAA30356; Thu, 8 Feb 2001 09:06:42 -0800 (PST) Received: from zmamail02.nz-tay.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA15871; Thu, 8 Feb 2001 09:06:41 -0800 Received: by zmamail02.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 4B2C04E1C; Thu, 8 Feb 2001 12:06:41 -0500 (EST) Received: from empeg.com (morrison.empeg.co.uk [193.119.19.130]) by zmamail02.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F6564CDC for ; Thu, 8 Feb 2001 12:06:40 -0500 (EST) Received: from morcheeba (morcheeba.internal.empeg.com [10.35.1.34]) by empeg.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id RAA22831; Thu, 8 Feb 2001 17:06:39 GMT Message-Id: <019401c091f1$724e16c0$2201230a@internal.empeg.com> From: "Hugo Fiennes" To: , References: <14977.30618.409694.1365@somanetworks.com> <20010207085004.B12568@extenex.com> <14977.49759.280769.658924@somanetworks.com> <5.0.0.25.2.20010208074730.023f6d20@extenex.com> Subject: Re: usb-net-host questions Date: Thu, 8 Feb 2001 17:06:15 -0000 Organization: Rio Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-Msmail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.3018.1300 X-Mimeole: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400 Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk > >If a suitably large maximum transfer size is set for an IN interrupt > >transfer, then in theory the host should issue enough IN tokens to the slave > >to exhaust the slave's available data within a frame > > True. But the USB spec (1.0 anyway) says that maximum packet size a host > is required to support is 64 bytes (and usb.org validation suite will complain > if this is not the case). Every host I've tried can handle the SA 256 maximum > without problem, and other parts of the USB docs mention a maximum packet > size of 1024 bytes. I'm still trying to reconcile all of this. Yes, 64 bytes *is* the maximum any packet should be. Larger does work most of the time, but it's most definitely not a good idea. Bigger packets (256? 1024?) are legal for Isochronous transfers only. I meant that if the OHCI's TD says (eg) 640 bytes, the controller will issue back-to-back IN/OUT tokens to try and fulfil this request, giving almost the same transfer rate. Hugo From kramer@pa.dec.com Thu Feb 8 22:01:00 2001 Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (root@mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id WAA02625 for ; Thu, 8 Feb 2001 22:01:00 +0100 Received: from ztxmail05.ztx.compaq.com (ztxmail05.ztx.compaq.com [161.114.1.209]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id WAA07877 for ; Thu, 8 Feb 2001 22:00:58 +0100 (MET) Received: by ztxmail05.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id CF40CAAD; Thu, 8 Feb 2001 14:59:10 -0600 (CST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by ztxmail05.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 396EDA48; Thu, 8 Feb 2001 14:59:09 -0600 (CST) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA05535; Thu, 8 Feb 2001 12:59:04 -0800 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id MAA13340; Thu, 8 Feb 2001 12:52:37 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id MAA13337; Thu, 8 Feb 2001 12:52:37 -0800 (PST) Received: from ztxmail01.nz-cce.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA09376; Thu, 8 Feb 2001 12:52:36 -0800 Received: by ztxmail01.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 2D4772B62; Thu, 8 Feb 2001 14:52:36 -0600 (CST) Received: from xanadu.home (modemcable248.137-200-24.mtl.mc.videotron.ca [24.200.137.248]) by ztxmail01.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 971022AC1 for ; Thu, 8 Feb 2001 14:52:35 -0600 (CST) Received: from localhost (nico@localhost) by xanadu.home (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id PAA22726; Thu, 8 Feb 2001 15:52:34 -0500 X-Authentication-Warning: xanadu.home: nico owned process doing -bs Date: Thu, 8 Feb 2001 15:52:34 -0500 (EST) From: Nicolas Pitre X-Sender: To: SA-1100/Linux Cc: Subject: diff-2.4.1-rmk1-np1 Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk ... is available at the usual sites, which are: ftp://ftp.netwinder.org/users/n/nico/ ftp://ftp.arm.linux.org.uk/pub/linux/arm/people/nico/ ftp://ftp.handhelds.org/pub/linux/arm/sa-1100-patches/ This is lightly tested. It boots on my GraphicsClient, that's all I can say. This is mainly to get everybody's latest patch together. Outline: - updated to 2.4.1-rmk1 (me) - YOPY updates (Tred Lim) - LCD backlight/contrast control (Chester) - more large SA11x0 USB client revamp (Ward Willats) - more usb-net-host fixes (Oleg Drokin) - SA11x0 register monitor using /proc (Sukjae Cho) - IrDA FIR support (Oleg Drokin) - USB function driver using a char dev interface (Ward Willats) - generic DMA interface position fix (me) Note the current USB net link doesn't work for me at the moment. The code is indeed getting saner but glitches occur. I can't fix everything myself so feel free to help as usual. ;-) Enjoy! Nicolas From kramer@pa.dec.com Thu Feb 8 23:44:44 2001 Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (root@mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id XAA02916 for ; Thu, 8 Feb 2001 23:44:44 +0100 Received: from zmamail05.zma.compaq.com (zmamail05.zma.compaq.com [161.114.64.105]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id XAA13093 for ; Thu, 8 Feb 2001 23:44:41 +0100 (MET) Received: by zmamail05.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 4BC421ED5; Thu, 8 Feb 2001 17:42:55 -0500 (EST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by zmamail05.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id E31646188; Thu, 8 Feb 2001 17:42:52 -0500 (EST) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA06810; Thu, 8 Feb 2001 14:42:51 -0800 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id OAA19386; Thu, 8 Feb 2001 14:36:03 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id OAA19381; Thu, 8 Feb 2001 14:36:02 -0800 (PST) Received: from zmamail02.nz-tay.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA21090; Thu, 8 Feb 2001 14:36:02 -0800 Received: by zmamail02.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id AD8A442A3; Thu, 8 Feb 2001 17:36:01 -0500 (EST) Received: from fire.he.net (fire.he.net [216.218.144.2]) by zmamail02.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E1D14A2F for ; Thu, 8 Feb 2001 17:36:01 -0500 (EST) Received: from cementship.extenex.net (64-51-136-194.client.dsl.net [64.51.136.194]) by fire.he.net (8.8.6/8.8.2) with ESMTP id OAA14756; Thu, 8 Feb 2001 14:35:57 -0800 Received: from blowhole.extenex.net (blowhole.extenex.net [192.168.100.100]) by cementship.extenex.net (8.9.3/8.8.7) with ESMTP id OAA00843; Wed, 7 Feb 2001 14:21:13 -0800 Received: from wardw by blowhole.extenex.net with local (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 14Qcxc-0000FG-00; Wed, 07 Feb 2001 14:21:12 -0800 Date: Wed, 7 Feb 2001 14:21:12 -0800 To: Georg Nikodym Cc: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Subject: Re: usb-net-host questions Message-Id: <20010207142112.A933@extenex.com> References: <200102072031.f17KVHR16407@morgoth.ixcelerator.com> <20010207234607.A3342@dredd.crimea.edu> <14977.49946.758440.534551@somanetworks.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <14977.49946.758440.534551@somanetworks.com>; from georgn@somanetworks.com on Wed, Feb 07, 2001 at 04:50:18PM -0500 From: Ward Willats Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk On Wed, Feb 07, 2001 at 04:50:18PM -0500, Georg Nikodym wrote: > OD> Just make sure, that once USB on host activates (and sees your > OD> device), you have usbdf already loaded. Also, since SA1100 lacks > OD> "reset" capability, it needs to be replugged on reboot, > OD> too. (though may be there is some way to keep info about assigned > OD> USB address, I bet this will not be too trivial to implement.) > > OK, I think I'm getting a picture of what's going on but can you tell > me more about this lack of reset ability? How do other smart devices > handle this kind of situation (like a scanner or anything that > couldn't possibly draw all its power from the PC and has its own power > switch)? With my Linux host I need to unplug/plug my device to trigger the voltage change on the wire that causes Linux to enumerate me. Windows 2000 seems to know when my device comes and goes, and tries to enumerate my device while Linux is booting (but the driver is not yet there to answer). I don't know if this a variation in host controllers, software or what. -- Ward From kramer@pa.dec.com Fri Feb 9 08:58:54 2001 Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (root@mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id IAA03968 for ; Fri, 9 Feb 2001 08:58:54 +0100 Received: from ztxmail05.ztx.compaq.com (ztxmail05.ztx.compaq.com [161.114.1.209]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id IAA03125 for ; Fri, 9 Feb 2001 08:58:52 +0100 (MET) Received: by ztxmail05.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 1657988F; Fri, 9 Feb 2001 01:57:05 -0600 (CST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by ztxmail05.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 50940B17; Fri, 9 Feb 2001 01:57:03 -0600 (CST) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA00398; Thu, 8 Feb 2001 23:57:01 -0800 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id XAA08649; Thu, 8 Feb 2001 23:44:30 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id XAA08570; Thu, 8 Feb 2001 23:44:30 -0800 (PST) From: Received: from zmamail01.nz-tay.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA01486; Thu, 8 Feb 2001 23:44:29 -0800 Received: by zmamail01.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 309A7C0AF; Fri, 9 Feb 2001 02:44:29 -0500 (EST) Received: from mail.ixcelerator.com (wsa-245.sibintek.net [213.128.193.245]) by zmamail01.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE3921086B for ; Fri, 9 Feb 2001 02:44:12 -0500 (EST) Received: from morgoth.ixcelerator.com (IDENT:root@morgoth.ixcel.ru [172.16.10.70]) by mail.ixcelerator.com (8.10.1/8.10.1) with ESMTP id f197erk02160; Fri, 9 Feb 2001 10:40:53 +0300 Received: (from green@localhost) by morgoth.ixcelerator.com (8.10.1/8.10.1) id f197i7n04215; Fri, 9 Feb 2001 10:44:07 +0300 Date: Fri, 9 Feb 2001 10:44:07 +0300 Message-Id: <200102090744.f197i7n04215@morgoth.ixcelerator.com> To: ward.willats@extenex.com, sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Subject: Re: usb-net-host questions X-Newsgroups: sa1100.linux In-Reply-To: <20010207142112.A933@extenex.com> User-Agent: tin/1.4.2-20000205 ("Possession") (UNIX) (Linux/2.4.1 (i686)) Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk In article <20010207142112.A933@extenex.com> you wrote: >> OK, I think I'm getting a picture of what's going on but can you tell >> me more about this lack of reset ability? How do other smart devices >> handle this kind of situation (like a scanner or anything that >> couldn't possibly draw all its power from the PC and has its own power >> switch)? > With my Linux host I need to unplug/plug my device to trigger the voltage > change on the wire that causes Linux to enumerate me. Linux tries to enumerate device 2 times and then gives up, if device does not answer. > Windows 2000 seems to know when my device comes and goes, and tries to > enumerate my device while Linux is booting (but the driver is not yet > there to answer). May be it tries all the time, till device answers? > I don't know if this a variation in host controllers, software or what. Probably that's just strategy of never giving up ;) Bye, Oleg From kramer@pa.dec.com Fri Feb 9 12:21:23 2001 Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (root@mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id MAA04727 for ; Fri, 9 Feb 2001 12:21:23 +0100 Received: from zmamail03.zma.compaq.com (zmamail03.zma.compaq.com [161.114.64.103]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id MAA15532 for ; Fri, 9 Feb 2001 12:21:21 +0100 (MET) Received: by zmamail03.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 96C9FA8C2; Fri, 9 Feb 2001 06:19:34 -0500 (EST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by zmamail03.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 52527A9F0; Fri, 9 Feb 2001 06:19:32 -0500 (EST) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA19387; Fri, 9 Feb 2001 03:19:25 -0800 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id DAA12735; Fri, 9 Feb 2001 03:05:32 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id DAA12739; Fri, 9 Feb 2001 03:05:31 -0800 (PST) Received: from zmamail01.nz-tay.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA26984; Fri, 9 Feb 2001 03:05:30 -0800 Received: by zmamail01.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 424DDCA40; Fri, 9 Feb 2001 06:05:06 -0500 (EST) Received: from empeg.com (morrison.empeg.co.uk [193.119.19.130]) by zmamail01.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9CD27C83F for ; Fri, 9 Feb 2001 06:05:05 -0500 (EST) Received: from morcheeba (morcheeba.internal.empeg.com [10.35.1.34]) by empeg.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id LAA05070; Fri, 9 Feb 2001 11:04:55 GMT Message-Id: <004101c09288$10cb4b60$2201230a@internal.empeg.com> From: "Hugo Fiennes" To: "Georg Nikodym" , "Ward Willats" Cc: References: <200102072031.f17KVHR16407@morgoth.ixcelerator.com> <20010207234607.A3342@dredd.crimea.edu> <14977.49946.758440.534551@somanetworks.com> <20010207142112.A933@extenex.com> Subject: Re: usb-net-host questions Date: Fri, 9 Feb 2001 11:04:25 -0000 Organization: Rio Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-Msmail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.3018.1300 X-Mimeole: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400 Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk > > OK, I think I'm getting a picture of what's going on but can you tell > > me more about this lack of reset ability? How do other smart devices > > handle this kind of situation (like a scanner or anything that > > couldn't possibly draw all its power from the PC and has its own power > > switch)? > > With my Linux host I need to unplug/plug my device to trigger the voltage > change on the wire that causes Linux to enumerate me. > > Windows 2000 seems to know when my device comes and goes, and tries to > enumerate my device while Linux is booting (but the driver is not yet > there to answer). > > I don't know if this a variation in host controllers, software or what. USB hosts detect a slave (12Mbit) presence by the fact that slaves have a 1.5k pull-up to 3.3v on the USB+ data line (these are pulled low by hubs, etc, through 15k). Problem is, if a host detects a slave which then doesn't respond to the setup packets on EP0 it tries a few times then gives up (and marks the hub port as down). Many USB slaves, eg ones using the Philips USBD12, have a "softconnect(tm)" circuit, which means you can switch this resistor in by flipping a bit - ie, it will appear no device is connected to the host, even if it's plugged in, until the bit is set. The SA lacks this ability internally, but it's nothing that couldn't be fixed with a GPIO line and a mosfet. Hugo From kramer@pa.dec.com Sat Feb 10 11:07:00 2001 Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (root@mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id LAA07510 for ; Sat, 10 Feb 2001 11:07:00 +0100 Received: from zmamail03.zma.compaq.com (zmamail03.zma.compaq.com [161.114.64.103]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id LAA12600 for ; Sat, 10 Feb 2001 11:06:58 +0100 (MET) Received: by zmamail03.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 6DBA0AA2F; Sat, 10 Feb 2001 05:05:11 -0500 (EST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by zmamail03.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 38DA5AB03; Sat, 10 Feb 2001 05:05:09 -0500 (EST) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA02672; Sat, 10 Feb 2001 02:04:53 -0800 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id BAA23399; Sat, 10 Feb 2001 01:54:57 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id BAA23390; Sat, 10 Feb 2001 01:54:57 -0800 (PST) Received: from ztxmail01.nz-cce.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA23107; Sat, 10 Feb 2001 01:54:55 -0800 Received: by ztxmail01.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 834CF4347; Sat, 10 Feb 2001 03:54:54 -0600 (CST) Received: from dredd.crimea.edu (unknown [213.128.193.148]) by ztxmail01.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1DF282B5F for ; Sat, 10 Feb 2001 03:54:53 -0600 (CST) Received: (from uucp@localhost) by dredd.crimea.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with UUCP id MAA24019; Sat, 10 Feb 2001 12:54:29 +0300 Received: (from green@localhost) by dredd.crimea.edu (8.10.1/8.10.1) id f1A9r0H02546; Sat, 10 Feb 2001 12:53:00 +0300 Date: Sat, 10 Feb 2001 12:53:00 +0300 From: Oleg Drokin To: nico@CAM.ORG, sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com, ipaq@handhelds.org, ward.willats@extenex.com Subject: USB netlink fixes for 2.4.1-rmk1-np1 Message-Id: <20010210125300.A2541@dredd.crimea.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0.1i Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk Hello! With patch below, my USB netlink works again. Bye, Oleg --- arch/arm/mach-sa1100/usb-eth.c.orig Fri Feb 9 11:11:46 2001 +++ arch/arm/mach-sa1100/usb-eth.c Sat Feb 10 12:35:17 2001 @@ -154,6 +154,7 @@ { struct net_device *dev = usbd_info.dev; struct net_device_stats *stats; + struct sk_buff *skb=cur_tx_skb; int ret; if (terminating) @@ -173,9 +174,9 @@ break; } - dev_kfree_skb_irq(cur_tx_skb); cur_tx_skb = next_tx_skb; next_tx_skb = NULL; + dev_kfree_skb_irq(skb); if (!cur_tx_skb) return; --- arch/arm/mach-sa1100/usb_ctl.c.orig Fri Feb 9 11:11:46 2001 +++ arch/arm/mach-sa1100/usb_ctl.c Sat Feb 10 12:47:11 2001 @@ -200,7 +200,7 @@ // mask reset ints, they flood during sequence, mask resume mask_register |= (UDCCR_REM|UDCCR_RESIM); mask_register &= ~UDCCR_SUSIM; // enable suspend interrupts - Ser0UDCCR = mask_register; + UDC_write(Ser0UDCCR, mask_register); UDC_flip( Ser0UDCSR, status ); // clear all pending sources return; // <-- no reason to continue if resetting } @@ -223,8 +223,8 @@ mask_register &= ~UDCCR_RESIM; // and turn on resume interrupts } - Ser0UDCCR = mask_register; - Ser0UDCSR = status; // clear all pending sources + UDC_write(Ser0UDCCR, mask_register); + UDC_flip(Ser0UDCSR, status); // clear all pending sources if (status & UDCSR_EIR) ep0_int_hndlr(status); @@ -372,7 +372,7 @@ buf[USB_ENDPDESC_BADDRESS] = USB_EP_ADDRESS(2, USB_IN); buf[USB_ENDPDESC_WMAXPKTSZE_LO] = (usbd_info.tx_pktsize & 0x00ff); buf[USB_ENDPDESC_WMAXPKTSZE_HI] = (usbd_info.tx_pktsize & 0xff00) >> 8;; -#ifdef CONFIG_SA1100_USB_NETLINK +#if defined(CONFIG_SA1100_USB_NETLINK) || defined(CONFIG_SA1100_USB_NETLINK_MODULE) buf[USB_ENDPDESC_BMATTR] = USB_EP_INT; buf[USB_ENDPDESC_BINTERVAL] = 0x1; /* every 1ms */ #else @@ -526,7 +526,7 @@ UDC_clear(Ser0UDCCS2, UDCCS2_FST); /* enable interrupts */ - Ser0UDCCR = 0; + UDC_write(Ser0UDCCR,0); /* setup dma on endpoints */ ep1_init( usbd_info.dmach_rx ); --- arch/arm/mach-sa1100/usb_ep0.c.orig Fri Feb 9 11:11:46 2001 +++ arch/arm/mach-sa1100/usb_ep0.c Fri Feb 9 12:53:08 2001 @@ -223,7 +223,7 @@ /* could check data length, direction */ if ( request.wValue == 0 ) // clearing ENDPOINT_HALT (aka ENDPOINT_STALL) { - int ep = windex_to_ep_num( request.wValue ); + int ep = windex_to_ep_num( request.wIndex ); if ( ep == 1 ) { printk( "%sclear feature \"endpoint halt\" on receiver\n", pszMe ); --- arch/arm/mach-sa1100/usb_recv.c.orig Fri Feb 9 11:11:46 2001 +++ arch/arm/mach-sa1100/usb_recv.c Fri Feb 9 13:15:24 2001 @@ -95,7 +95,7 @@ ep1_reset(void) { sa1100_dma_flush_all(dmachn_rx); - UDC_clear(Ser0UDCCS1, UDCCS1_FST); + UDC_clear(Ser0UDCCS1, UDCCS1_FST); ep1_done(-EINTR); } --- arch/arm/mach-sa1100/usb_send.c.orig Fri Feb 9 11:11:46 2001 +++ arch/arm/mach-sa1100/usb_send.c Sat Feb 10 12:47:56 2001 @@ -97,7 +97,7 @@ { int status = Ser0UDCCS2; - Ser0UDCCS2 = UDCCS2_SST; + UDC_flip(Ser0UDCCS2, UDCCS2_SST); if (status & UDCCS2_TPC) { sa1100_dma_flush_all(dmachn_tx); From kramer@pa.dec.com Sat Feb 10 19:56:28 2001 Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (root@mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id TAA08279 for ; Sat, 10 Feb 2001 19:56:28 +0100 Received: from zmamail03.zma.compaq.com (zmamail03.zma.compaq.com [161.114.64.103]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id TAA28916 for ; Sat, 10 Feb 2001 19:56:26 +0100 (MET) Received: by zmamail03.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 49C5EA953; Sat, 10 Feb 2001 13:54:40 -0500 (EST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by zmamail03.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 0B01FA8C4; Sat, 10 Feb 2001 13:54:38 -0500 (EST) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA05233; Sat, 10 Feb 2001 10:54:35 -0800 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id KAA02698; Sat, 10 Feb 2001 10:46:27 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id KAA02694; Sat, 10 Feb 2001 10:46:27 -0800 (PST) Received: from zmamail01.nz-tay.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA26237; Sat, 10 Feb 2001 10:46:26 -0800 Received: by zmamail01.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 3532AEF69; Sat, 10 Feb 2001 13:46:26 -0500 (EST) Received: from mail2.rdc1.il.home.com (mail2.rdc1.il.home.com [24.2.1.77]) by zmamail01.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 01687EDB0 for ; Sat, 10 Feb 2001 13:46:25 -0500 (EST) Received: from ci79694-a ([24.17.202.179]) by mail2.rdc1.il.home.com (InterMail vM.4.01.03.00 201-229-121) with SMTP id <20010210184625.UHVZ23363.mail2.rdc1.il.home.com@ci79694-a> for ; Sat, 10 Feb 2001 10:46:25 -0800 Date: Sat, 10 Feb 2001 12:44:31 -0600 From: Ken Causey To: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Subject: Does sa1100-uda1341 implement OSS? Message-Id: <20010210124431.551c782a.ken@premiernet.net> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.4.52 (GTK+ 1.2.8; Linux 2.4.0; i686) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk Looking over drivers/sound/sa1100-uda1341.c I get the impression that it is meant to provide an OSS (Open Sound System)-like interface. But it seems that the MIXER_READ (a.k.a. SOUND_MIXER_READ) and MIXER_WRITE (SOUND_MIXER_WRITE) ioctls are not implemented. Is this intentional or are they on the todo list? Ken Causey (nikos) From kramer@pa.dec.com Sat Feb 10 19:59:07 2001 Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (root@mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id TAA08286 for ; Sat, 10 Feb 2001 19:59:07 +0100 Received: from ztxmail04.ztx.compaq.com (ztxmail04.ztx.compaq.com [161.114.1.208]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id TAA29026 for ; Sat, 10 Feb 2001 19:59:05 +0100 (MET) Received: by ztxmail04.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 8B287C25; Sat, 10 Feb 2001 12:57:18 -0600 (CST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by ztxmail04.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id F34D2F06; Sat, 10 Feb 2001 12:57:16 -0600 (CST) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA26741; Sat, 10 Feb 2001 10:57:15 -0800 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id KAA02730; Sat, 10 Feb 2001 10:51:32 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id KAA02784; Sat, 10 Feb 2001 10:51:32 -0800 (PST) Received: from zmamail01.nz-tay.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA25273; Sat, 10 Feb 2001 10:51:31 -0800 Received: by zmamail01.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id EDD16E792; Sat, 10 Feb 2001 13:51:28 -0500 (EST) Received: from fire.he.net (fire.he.net [216.218.144.2]) by zmamail01.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2DD6BEA86 for ; Sat, 10 Feb 2001 13:51:28 -0500 (EST) Received: from cementship.extenex.net (64-51-136-194.client.dsl.net [64.51.136.194]) by fire.he.net (8.8.6/8.8.2) with ESMTP id KAA19100; Sat, 10 Feb 2001 10:51:19 -0800 Received: from blowhole.extenex.net (blowhole.extenex.net [192.168.100.100]) by cementship.extenex.net (8.9.3/8.8.7) with ESMTP id KAA04479; Sat, 10 Feb 2001 10:50:46 -0800 Received: from wardw by blowhole.extenex.net with local (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 14Rf6c-00009D-00; Sat, 10 Feb 2001 10:50:46 -0800 Date: Sat, 10 Feb 2001 10:50:46 -0800 To: Oleg Drokin Cc: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Subject: Re: USB netlink fixes for 2.4.1-rmk1-np1 Message-Id: <20010210105046.A410@extenex.com> References: <20010210125300.A2541@dredd.crimea.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <20010210125300.A2541@dredd.crimea.edu>; from green@dredd.crimea.edu on Sat, Feb 10, 2001 at 12:53:00PM +0300 From: Ward Willats Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk On Sat, Feb 10, 2001 at 12:53:00PM +0300, Oleg Drokin wrote: > > With patch below, my USB netlink works again. This looks good. Thanks for catching my stupid errors! Are you returning to the macros to set/clear bits based on actual problems, or just superstition. (Mind you, with this part, superstition isn't a bad thing!) -- Ward From kramer@pa.dec.com Sat Feb 10 21:57:42 2001 Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (root@mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id VAA08424 for ; Sat, 10 Feb 2001 21:57:42 +0100 Received: from zmamail03.zma.compaq.com (zmamail03.zma.compaq.com [161.114.64.103]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id VAA03503 for ; Sat, 10 Feb 2001 21:57:40 +0100 (MET) Received: by zmamail03.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 26102AA46; Sat, 10 Feb 2001 15:55:50 -0500 (EST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by zmamail03.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id F1651AA92; Sat, 10 Feb 2001 15:55:47 -0500 (EST) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA26492; Sat, 10 Feb 2001 12:55:43 -0800 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id MAA06748; Sat, 10 Feb 2001 12:48:51 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id MAA06744; Sat, 10 Feb 2001 12:48:50 -0800 (PST) From: Received: from ztxmail01.nz-cce.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA02674; Sat, 10 Feb 2001 12:48:50 -0800 Received: by ztxmail01.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id CFAC829AD; Sat, 10 Feb 2001 14:48:49 -0600 (CST) Received: from mail.ixcelerator.com (wsa-245.sibintek.net [213.128.193.245]) by ztxmail01.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C890C2927 for ; Sat, 10 Feb 2001 14:48:48 -0600 (CST) Received: from morgoth.ixcelerator.com (IDENT:root@morgoth.ixcel.ru [172.16.10.70]) by mail.ixcelerator.com (8.10.1/8.10.1) with ESMTP id f1AKjTk25289; Sat, 10 Feb 2001 23:45:38 +0300 Received: (from green@localhost) by morgoth.ixcelerator.com (8.10.1/8.10.1) id f1AKn3F31139; Sat, 10 Feb 2001 23:49:03 +0300 Date: Sat, 10 Feb 2001 23:49:03 +0300 Message-Id: <200102102049.f1AKn3F31139@morgoth.ixcelerator.com> To: ward.willats@extenex.com, sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com, ipaq@handhelds.org Subject: Re: USB netlink fixes for 2.4.1-rmk1-np1 X-Newsgroups: sa1100.linux In-Reply-To: <20010210105046.A410@extenex.com> User-Agent: tin/1.4.2-20000205 ("Possession") (UNIX) (Linux/2.4.1 (i686)) Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk In article <20010210105046.A410@extenex.com> you wrote: >> With patch below, my USB netlink works again. > This looks good. Thanks for catching my stupid errors! > Are you returning to the macros to set/clear bits based on actual > problems, or just superstition. (Mind you, with this part, > superstition isn't a bad thing!) Some of them (esp. those ones in usb_ctl.c in interrupt routinue) was real show stoppers, some just superstition. Bye, Oleg From kramer@pa.dec.com Sun Feb 11 00:43:05 2001 Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (root@mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id AAA08650 for ; Sun, 11 Feb 2001 00:43:05 +0100 Received: from zmamail03.zma.compaq.com (zmamail03.zma.compaq.com [161.114.64.103]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id AAA09250 for ; Sun, 11 Feb 2001 00:43:03 +0100 (MET) Received: by zmamail03.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 3F902AA2D; Sat, 10 Feb 2001 18:41:16 -0500 (EST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by zmamail03.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 0B206AB77; Sat, 10 Feb 2001 18:41:14 -0500 (EST) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA03370; Sat, 10 Feb 2001 15:41:12 -0800 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id PAA11596; Sat, 10 Feb 2001 15:34:14 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id PAA11615; Sat, 10 Feb 2001 15:34:13 -0800 (PST) Received: from zmamail01.nz-tay.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA01356; Sat, 10 Feb 2001 15:34:13 -0800 Received: by zmamail01.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id E5394AED0; Sat, 10 Feb 2001 18:34:12 -0500 (EST) Received: from fire.he.net (fire.he.net [216.218.144.2]) by zmamail01.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 69228C8A7 for ; Sat, 10 Feb 2001 18:34:12 -0500 (EST) Received: from cementship.extenex.net (64-51-136-194.client.dsl.net [64.51.136.194]) by fire.he.net (8.8.6/8.8.2) with ESMTP id PAA27332; Sat, 10 Feb 2001 15:34:05 -0800 Received: from blowhole.extenex.net (blowhole.extenex.net [192.168.100.100]) by cementship.extenex.net (8.9.3/8.8.7) with ESMTP id PAA04612; Sat, 10 Feb 2001 15:33:35 -0800 Received: from wardw by blowhole.extenex.net with local (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 14RjWI-0000tD-00; Sat, 10 Feb 2001 15:33:34 -0800 Date: Sat, 10 Feb 2001 15:33:34 -0800 To: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com, ipaq@handhelds.org Subject: SA-1100 USB new endpoint zero Message-Id: <20010210153334.A3418@extenex.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i From: Ward Willats Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk Oleg, Georg, everyone: I have posted a USB patch against 2.4.1-rmk1-np1 that contains Oleg changes from this morning along with my new usb_ep0.c endpoint zero rewrite. I'd be interested to hear how enumeration does for you with this version. The directory is: ftp://extenex.com/pub/extenex/patches/ The patch is at: ftp://extenex.com/pub/extenex/patches/diff-usb-2.4.1-rmk1-np1-ww1.gz A tarball of the source files is at: ftp://extenex.com/pub/extenex/patches/usb-2.4.1-rmk1-np1-ww1.tar.gz ..if that's easier for you to give it a try and not mess up your current tree. I am once again directly setting the mask register in usb_ctl.c because I think changes to it don't propagate for read-back until the interrupt condition is over. (Anyway, the macro was complaining.) I am currently seeing a bug where, on first plug in, we get a "zombie suspended -> [resume] -> device is in the powered state" but no reset ever follows and everything hangs -- I must power off, wait, and power on to get a "clean start." If I do get a clean start, everything works fine. A look at the UDC wires with a scope reveals the UDC is putting out a consistent garbage signal on the bus when I am in this hung state. I'd be interested if anyone else sees this, because if they do, it is a problem with the way the UDC is being initialized and if they don't, it is a problem with my hardware. Also, I am curious how suspend/resume works on a SA-1100, since I am using new bits on the SA-1110 to mask and unmask suspend and resume events separately, and this might cause the 1100 some hurt. Next week I will be testing, fixing bugs and tackling some architectural issues. (i.e. moving stuff around some more, cleaning up the usb_ctl interface, etc.). Thanks, -- Ward From kramer@pa.dec.com Sun Feb 11 10:23:10 2001 Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (root@mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id KAA09458 for ; Sun, 11 Feb 2001 10:23:10 +0100 Received: from ztxmail04.ztx.compaq.com (ztxmail04.ztx.compaq.com [161.114.1.208]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id KAA23775 for ; Sun, 11 Feb 2001 10:23:08 +0100 (MET) Received: by ztxmail04.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 9840AF70; Sun, 11 Feb 2001 03:21:21 -0600 (CST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by ztxmail04.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id C106AF77; Sun, 11 Feb 2001 03:21:19 -0600 (CST) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA29925; Sun, 11 Feb 2001 01:21:17 -0800 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id BAA00604; Sun, 11 Feb 2001 01:10:05 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id BAA00601; Sun, 11 Feb 2001 01:10:05 -0800 (PST) From: Received: from zmamail01.nz-tay.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA05374; Sun, 11 Feb 2001 01:10:04 -0800 Received: by zmamail01.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 6E0AE11B6A; Sun, 11 Feb 2001 04:09:56 -0500 (EST) Received: from mail.ixcelerator.com (wsa-245.sibintek.net [213.128.193.245]) by zmamail01.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B1F351187A for ; Sun, 11 Feb 2001 04:09:55 -0500 (EST) Received: from morgoth.ixcelerator.com (IDENT:root@morgoth.ixcel.ru [172.16.10.70]) by mail.ixcelerator.com (8.10.1/8.10.1) with ESMTP id f1B977k11710; Sun, 11 Feb 2001 12:07:07 +0300 Received: (from green@localhost) by morgoth.ixcelerator.com (8.10.1/8.10.1) id f1B9Alc09710; Sun, 11 Feb 2001 12:10:47 +0300 Date: Sun, 11 Feb 2001 12:10:47 +0300 Message-Id: <200102110910.f1B9Alc09710@morgoth.ixcelerator.com> To: ward.willats@extenex.com, sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Subject: Re: SA-1100 USB new endpoint zero X-Newsgroups: sa1100.linux In-Reply-To: <20010210153334.A3418@extenex.com> User-Agent: tin/1.4.2-20000205 ("Possession") (UNIX) (Linux/2.4.1 (i686)) Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk Hello! In article <20010210153334.A3418@extenex.com> you wrote: > I have posted a USB patch against 2.4.1-rmk1-np1 that contains Oleg > changes from this morning along with my new usb_ep0.c endpoint zero > rewrite. I'd be interested to hear how enumeration does for you > with this version. This version is certainly better that original in respect that it works from the start. Though it works not ideally. Each packet received causes stall of receivingendpoint for some strange reason. > I am once again directly setting the mask register in usb_ctl.c > because I think changes to it don't propagate for read-back until > the interrupt condition is over. (Anyway, the macro was complaining.) It does not complain for me. (though I use SA1110 for my tests) > I am currently seeing a bug where, on first plug in, we get a "zombie > suspended -> [resume] -> device is in the powered state" but no reset > ever follows and everything hangs -- I must power off, wait, and power > on to get a "clean start." If I do get a clean start, everything works > fine. Never seen such behaviour. What I've eventually seen was USB host complaining about "channel 1 is bad, possible cable problem", but that condition fixed by rmmoding and then inserting/configuring a sa1100_usbd driver. Problem was apparently due to some interrupt missed. > A look at the UDC wires with a scope reveals the UDC is putting out a > consistent garbage signal on the bus when I am in this hung state. I'd > be interested if anyone else sees this, because if they do, it is a > problem with the way the UDC is being initialized and if they don't, > it is a problem with my hardware. Unfortunatelly, I have no USB bus analyzer to check with. Bye, Oleg From kramer@pa.dec.com Sun Feb 11 12:56:51 2001 Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (root@mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id MAA09751 for ; Sun, 11 Feb 2001 12:56:51 +0100 Received: from zmamail05.zma.compaq.com (zmamail05.zma.compaq.com [161.114.64.105]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id MAA28032 for ; Sun, 11 Feb 2001 12:56:49 +0100 (MET) Received: by zmamail05.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id D1A571E80; Sun, 11 Feb 2001 06:55:02 -0500 (EST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by zmamail05.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id B17D61ECE; Sun, 11 Feb 2001 06:55:00 -0500 (EST) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA29975; Sun, 11 Feb 2001 03:54:58 -0800 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id DAA03656; Sun, 11 Feb 2001 03:42:46 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id DAA03661; Sun, 11 Feb 2001 03:42:45 -0800 (PST) From: Received: from ztxmail01.nz-cce.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA31849; Sun, 11 Feb 2001 03:42:45 -0800 Received: by ztxmail01.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 37D462AF4; Sun, 11 Feb 2001 05:42:45 -0600 (CST) Received: from mdmazzarello.cgfma.org (unknown [194.243.18.67]) by ztxmail01.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D593280B for ; Sun, 11 Feb 2001 05:42:43 -0600 (CST) Received: from 216.126.153.45 (01-045.055.popsite.net [216.126.153.45]) by mdmazzarello.cgfma.org with SMTP (Microsoft Exchange Internet Mail Service Version 5.5.2650.21) id 1XF0L494; Sun, 11 Feb 2001 12:48:17 +0100 Message-Id: <00004cd82e51$0000660c$00004b75@> To: Subject: Brand New 2-Way Motorola Pager - F R E E. 19317 Date: Sun, 11 Feb 2001 19:40:11 -0500 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-Msmail-Priority: Normal Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk F R E E 2-Way Motorola PAGER New 2-Way Motorola Pager for F R E E! No long term contract No activation fee No big prepayment of airtime No credit check PAGING AMERICA is going to give you absolutely F R E E the Brand new 2-Way Motorola pager. This top of the line pager will even receive your E-MAIL! Included with your new pager is the technology that allows you to respond to the E-mails you receive. You can also send messages back and forth between pagers! Don't pass this offer up! Call 877-699-7409 TODAY while supplies last Why pay $189.00 at a retail store when we're giving you this pager absolutely FREE. Your new pager will come with its own e-mail address so you can receive your e-mails as well as alpha-numeric and numeric messages instantly where ever you are. Your new two-way pager has features like 50,000 character memory, message time stamping, automatic garbled message correction, beeps or vibrates, incandescent backlight, saved message folder, a unique never out of range feature that allows your pager to retrieve messages sent earlier when your pager was out of range or turned completely off. You can also receive weather, news and sports. This Motorola pager is small and light weight. All we ask before we'll ship you your new Free pager is for you to allow us to provide some airtime for you. There is no long term contract or credit check. Airtime is month to month and can be cancelled at any time. This pager will come pre-programmed with its own e-mail address as well as a local telephone number to receive numeric pages. This pager comes with a complete 30 day money back guarantee, if after receiving this pager you're not completely happy, send it back and receive a full refund. For immediate delivery call Paging America at 877-699-7409 To be taken off send email to olaf0213@yahoo.com From kramer@pa.dec.com Sun Feb 11 17:39:26 2001 Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (root@mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id RAA10189 for ; Sun, 11 Feb 2001 17:39:25 +0100 Received: from ztxmail05.ztx.compaq.com (ztxmail05.ztx.compaq.com [161.114.1.209]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id RAA07501 for ; Sun, 11 Feb 2001 17:39:24 +0100 (MET) Received: by ztxmail05.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 732E5999; Sun, 11 Feb 2001 10:37:37 -0600 (CST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by ztxmail05.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id DBF51B19; Sun, 11 Feb 2001 10:37:35 -0600 (CST) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA21769; Sun, 11 Feb 2001 08:37:33 -0800 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id IAA09537; Sun, 11 Feb 2001 08:29:18 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id IAA09536; Sun, 11 Feb 2001 08:29:17 -0800 (PST) Received: from zmamail01.nz-tay.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA01248; Sun, 11 Feb 2001 08:29:16 -0800 Received: by zmamail01.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 73EF911B2F; Sun, 11 Feb 2001 11:29:16 -0500 (EST) Received: from dns.nrjp.co.jp (dns.nrjp.co.jp [210.162.235.50]) by zmamail01.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4CDEE118C6 for ; Sun, 11 Feb 2001 11:29:15 -0500 (EST) Received: from hui67df (04-161.044.popsite.net [64.24.247.161]) by dns.nrjp.co.jp (8.8.5/3.6Wbeta7-98021315) with ESMTP id KAA01801; Mon, 12 Feb 2001 10:30:13 +0900 (JST) Message-Id: <200102120130.KAA01801@dns.nrjp.co.jp> From: "Barry Tims" Subject: No Limits #4868 To: owen20d@nrjp.co.jp X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.70 [en] (Win95; I) Mime-Version: 1.0 Date: Sun, 11 Feb 2001 10:20:56 -0500 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl id RAA10189 Complete credit card processing systems at wholesale prices for your business! Internet---Mail Order---Home Based Apply today and take advantage of: § No Application Fee! § No Programming Fee! § Low Rates! § Quick & Simple Approval! Call today and apply: (888) 725-9246 ************************************************************ If you receive this message and have never joined one of our email lists you can be removed by replying to: mailto:bttm2@lycos.com?subject=remove ************************************************************ From kramer@pa.dec.com Sun Feb 11 20:33:56 2001 Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (root@mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id UAA10612 for ; Sun, 11 Feb 2001 20:33:56 +0100 Received: from ztxmail03.ztx.compaq.com (ztxmail03.ztx.compaq.com [161.114.1.207]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id UAA13759 for ; Sun, 11 Feb 2001 20:33:54 +0100 (MET) Received: by ztxmail03.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 05070BD5; Sun, 11 Feb 2001 13:32:06 -0600 (CST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by ztxmail03.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 2852EB9A; Sun, 11 Feb 2001 13:32:05 -0600 (CST) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA16093; Sun, 11 Feb 2001 11:32:03 -0800 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id LAA14370; Sun, 11 Feb 2001 11:23:53 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id LAA14381; Sun, 11 Feb 2001 11:23:52 -0800 (PST) Received: from ztxmail02.nz-cce.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA08129; Sun, 11 Feb 2001 11:23:52 -0800 Received: by ztxmail02.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 4831F1D41; Sun, 11 Feb 2001 13:23:52 -0600 (CST) Received: from fire.he.net (fire.he.net [216.218.144.2]) by ztxmail02.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A0A601C43 for ; Sun, 11 Feb 2001 13:23:51 -0600 (CST) Received: from [192.168.23.2] (wardco.com [165.227.105.2]) by fire.he.net (8.8.6/8.8.2) with ESMTP id LAA19677; Sun, 11 Feb 2001 11:23:44 -0800 Mime-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: In-Reply-To: <200102110910.f1B9Alc09710@morgoth.ixcelerator.com> References: <200102110910.f1B9Alc09710@morgoth.ixcelerator.com> Date: Sun, 11 Feb 2001 11:23:32 -0800 To: green@ixcelerator.com, sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com From: Ward Willats Subject: Re: SA-1100 USB new endpoint zero Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" ; format="flowed" Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk Thanks for looking at this. >the start. Though it works not ideally. Each packet received causes stall >of receivingendpoint for some strange reason. Do you mean the receiver (EP1) is stalling? Or endpoint zero? I have not touched EP1 or EP2 for a while.... >Never seen such behaviour. What I've eventually seen was USB host complaining >about "channel 1 is bad, possible cable problem", but that condition fixed >by rmmoding and then inserting/configuring a sa1100_usbd driver. Problem was >apparently due to some interrupt missed. This sounds like EP1. I moved around the interrupt handling in usb_ctl, and Nicolas moved around my moving around, and you fixed some errors yesterday in all of that -- but I haven't shaken the changes down or really exercised the xmit/recev for a while, so I'll have to do that and see what turns up. Running the character interface at full speed exposes data loss and corruption quickly. Hopefully this stress test will show up something and any fix will take care of the netlink problems. -- Ward From kramer@pa.dec.com Sun Feb 11 23:20:19 2001 Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (root@mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id XAA11095 for ; Sun, 11 Feb 2001 23:20:19 +0100 Received: from zmamail04.zma.compaq.com (zmamail04.zma.compaq.com [161.114.64.104]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id XAA20769 for ; Sun, 11 Feb 2001 23:20:17 +0100 (MET) Received: by zmamail04.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 5C59B5BDD; Sun, 11 Feb 2001 17:18:30 -0500 (EST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by zmamail04.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 46A275BE3; Sun, 11 Feb 2001 17:18:28 -0500 (EST) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA20366; Sun, 11 Feb 2001 14:18:18 -0800 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id OAA19788; Sun, 11 Feb 2001 14:10:33 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id OAA19830; Sun, 11 Feb 2001 14:10:33 -0800 (PST) Received: from zmamail01.nz-tay.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA20851; Sun, 11 Feb 2001 14:10:32 -0800 Received: by zmamail01.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 4BF8C1187D; Sun, 11 Feb 2001 17:10:32 -0500 (EST) Received: from mail.ixcelerator.com (wsa-245.sibintek.net [213.128.193.245]) by zmamail01.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CFB0811782 for ; Sun, 11 Feb 2001 17:10:30 -0500 (EST) Received: from morgoth.ixcelerator.com (IDENT:root@morgoth.ixcel.ru [172.16.10.70]) by mail.ixcelerator.com (8.10.1/8.10.1) with ESMTP id f1BM7mk26479; Mon, 12 Feb 2001 01:07:53 +0300 Received: (from green@localhost) by morgoth.ixcelerator.com (8.10.1/8.10.1) id f1BMBY216164; Mon, 12 Feb 2001 01:11:34 +0300 Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2001 01:11:34 +0300 From: Oleg Drokin To: Ward Willats Cc: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Subject: Re: SA-1100 USB new endpoint zero Message-Id: <20010212011134.A16134@iXcelerator.com> References: <200102110910.f1B9Alc09710@morgoth.ixcelerator.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2i In-Reply-To: ; from ward.willats@extenex.com on Sun, Feb 11, 2001 at 11:23:32AM -0800 Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk Hello! On Sun, Feb 11, 2001 at 11:23:32AM -0800, Ward Willats wrote: > >the start. Though it works not ideally. Each packet received causes stall > >of receivingendpoint for some strange reason. > Do you mean the receiver (EP1) is stalling? Or endpoint zero? Receiver (ep1) is stalling. > I have not touched EP1 or EP2 for a while.... Anyway, that's what I see. Bye, Oleg From kramer@pa.dec.com Mon Feb 12 01:33:37 2001 Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (root@mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id BAA11499 for ; Mon, 12 Feb 2001 01:33:37 +0100 Received: from ztxmail04.ztx.compaq.com (ztxmail04.ztx.compaq.com [161.114.1.208]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id BAA25770 for ; Mon, 12 Feb 2001 01:33:35 +0100 (MET) Received: by ztxmail04.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 6439FD6A; Sun, 11 Feb 2001 18:31:48 -0600 (CST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by ztxmail04.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id B1BC2D8A; Sun, 11 Feb 2001 18:31:46 -0600 (CST) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA04965; Sun, 11 Feb 2001 16:31:42 -0800 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id QAA23699; Sun, 11 Feb 2001 16:23:50 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id QAA23703; Sun, 11 Feb 2001 16:23:50 -0800 (PST) Received: from zmamail02.nz-tay.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA28769; Sun, 11 Feb 2001 16:23:49 -0800 Received: by zmamail02.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 3AC0E60CD; Sun, 11 Feb 2001 19:23:49 -0500 (EST) Received: from xanadu.home (modemcable248.137-200-24.mtl.mc.videotron.ca [24.200.137.248]) by zmamail02.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 902F560DC for ; Sun, 11 Feb 2001 19:23:48 -0500 (EST) Received: from localhost (nico@localhost) by xanadu.home (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id TAA06536; Sun, 11 Feb 2001 19:23:44 -0500 X-Authentication-Warning: xanadu.home: nico owned process doing -bs Date: Sun, 11 Feb 2001 19:23:44 -0500 (EST) From: Nicolas Pitre X-Sender: To: Ken Causey Cc: Subject: Re: Does sa1100-uda1341 implement OSS? In-Reply-To: <20010210124431.551c782a.ken@premiernet.net> Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk On Sat, 10 Feb 2001, Ken Causey wrote: > Looking over drivers/sound/sa1100-uda1341.c I get the impression that it > is meant to provide an OSS (Open Sound System)-like interface. But it > seems that the MIXER_READ (a.k.a. SOUND_MIXER_READ) and MIXER_WRITE > (SOUND_MIXER_WRITE) ioctls are not implemented. Is this intentional or > are they on the todo list? Let's say the todo list, same thing for mmap support. Nicolas From kramer@pa.dec.com Mon Feb 12 03:49:50 2001 Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (root@mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id DAA11765 for ; Mon, 12 Feb 2001 03:49:49 +0100 Received: from zmamail04.zma.compaq.com (zmamail04.zma.compaq.com [161.114.64.104]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id DAA29702 for ; Mon, 12 Feb 2001 03:49:48 +0100 (MET) Received: by zmamail04.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id B15715697; Sun, 11 Feb 2001 21:48:25 -0500 (EST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by zmamail04.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 9B30A55D2; Sun, 11 Feb 2001 21:48:23 -0500 (EST) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA12669; Sun, 11 Feb 2001 18:48:21 -0800 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id SAA28475; Sun, 11 Feb 2001 18:42:43 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id SAA27712; Sun, 11 Feb 2001 18:42:42 -0800 (PST) Received: from zmamail02.nz-tay.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA26996; Sun, 11 Feb 2001 18:42:42 -0800 Received: by zmamail02.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id B3401603B; Sun, 11 Feb 2001 21:42:41 -0500 (EST) Received: from xanadu.home (modemcable248.137-200-24.mtl.mc.videotron.ca [24.200.137.248]) by zmamail02.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A5A36153 for ; Sun, 11 Feb 2001 21:42:41 -0500 (EST) Received: from localhost (nico@localhost) by xanadu.home (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id VAA07126; Sun, 11 Feb 2001 21:42:11 -0500 X-Authentication-Warning: xanadu.home: nico owned process doing -bs Date: Sun, 11 Feb 2001 21:42:11 -0500 (EST) From: Nicolas Pitre X-Sender: To: Ward Willats Cc: , SA-1100/Linux Subject: Re: SA-1100 USB new endpoint zero In-Reply-To: Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk On Sun, 11 Feb 2001, Ward Willats wrote: > I moved around the interrupt handling in usb_ctl, and Nicolas moved > around my moving around, and you fixed some errors yesterday in all > of that -- but I haven't shaken the changes down or really exercised > the xmit/recev for a while, so I'll have to do that and see what > turns up. Running the character interface at full speed exposes data > loss and corruption quickly. Hopefully this stress test will show up > something and any fix will take care of the netlink problems. Well... It doesn't survive a 'ping -f' yet, but it seems to take much longer than before to kill it. Apparently the following patch is required to avoid some transmit errors on the client side: --- bak/linux/arch/arm/mach-sa1100/usb_send.c Sun Feb 11 21:21:34 2001 +++ linux/arch/arm/mach-sa1100/usb_send.c Sun Feb 11 20:50:55 2001 @@ -57,9 +57,9 @@ if (ep2_curdmalen > ep2_remain) ep2_curdmalen = ep2_remain; - UDC_write(Ser0UDCIMP, ep2_curdmalen-1); /* must do this _before_ queue buffer.. */ UDC_flip( Ser0UDCCS2,UDCCS2_TPC ); /* stop NAKing IN tokens */ + UDC_write( Ser0UDCIMP, ep2_curdmalen-1 ); sa1100_dma_queue_buffer(dmachn_tx, NULL, ep2_curdmapos, ep2_curdmalen); } This is applied over Ward's latest patch on top of 2.4.1-rmk1-np1. At this point though, I still get some errors coming from the usb-net-host driver. I'm starting to wonder if we shouldn't throw this crapy usb-net-host.c down the drain and investigate the usbnet.c driver included in the AC patches instead. It may only be cleaner IMHO. Ward --> What driver do you use on the host side to talk to the char function driver? It might be a good thing for us to test as well, just to remove usb-net-host.c from the chain. Nicolas From kramer@pa.dec.com Mon Feb 12 07:18:30 2001 Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (root@mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id HAA12110 for ; Mon, 12 Feb 2001 07:18:30 +0100 Received: from ztxmail03.ztx.compaq.com (ztxmail03.ztx.compaq.com [161.114.1.207]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id HAA05666 for ; Mon, 12 Feb 2001 07:18:28 +0100 (MET) Received: by ztxmail03.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id F22DA9B8; Mon, 12 Feb 2001 00:16:40 -0600 (CST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by ztxmail03.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id F1589A47; Mon, 12 Feb 2001 00:16:38 -0600 (CST) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA18375; Sun, 11 Feb 2001 22:16:37 -0800 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id WAA02386; Sun, 11 Feb 2001 22:08:17 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id WAA01913; Sun, 11 Feb 2001 22:08:16 -0800 (PST) Received: from ztxmail02.nz-cce.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA17755; Sun, 11 Feb 2001 22:08:16 -0800 Received: by ztxmail02.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 1AB2C1DF2; Mon, 12 Feb 2001 00:08:16 -0600 (CST) Received: from fire.he.net (fire.he.net [216.218.144.2]) by ztxmail02.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D2A41F19 for ; Mon, 12 Feb 2001 00:08:15 -0600 (CST) Received: from [192.168.23.2] (wardco.com [165.227.105.2]) by fire.he.net (8.8.6/8.8.2) with ESMTP id WAA25143; Sun, 11 Feb 2001 22:07:54 -0800 Mime-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: In-Reply-To: References: Date: Sun, 11 Feb 2001 22:06:07 -0800 To: Nicolas Pitre From: Ward Willats Subject: Re: SA-1100 USB new endpoint zero Cc: , SA-1100/Linux Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" ; format="flowed" Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk At 9:42 PM -0500 2/11/01, Nicolas Pitre wrote: >longer than before to kill it. Apparently the following patch is required >to avoid some transmit errors on the client side: Man, the UDC is nuts! But I guess this makes sense, the UDC silicon state machine can't take a new max packet size until the pending packet is clear. What inspired intuition and lucky guessing to figure _that_ out! >At this point though, I still get some errors coming from the usb-net-host >driver. I'm starting to wonder if we shouldn't throw this crapy >usb-net-host.c down the drain and investigate the usbnet.c driver included >in the AC patches instead. It may only be cleaner IMHO. I have no opinion. I'm too much of a network dummy to evaluate this or take it on. >Ward --> What driver do you use on the host side to talk to the char >function driver? It might be a good thing for us to test as well, just to >remove usb-net-host.c from the chain. Um..usb generic serial? (I can give you the particulars when I get into the office tomorrow.) I remember doing a mknod for it, I can't remember if I hacked the sources to know the vendor/product ID from the SA descriptors. I then have a test program that puts that tty into raw mode and bangs ordered data down it, or you can fire up minicom on that device and tippy-type or do ascii transfers. From Windows (FWIW) I've used an example MS bulk pipe minidriver from the DDK, and our own stuff. -- Ward From kramer@pa.dec.com Mon Feb 12 08:26:43 2001 Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (root@mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id IAA12241 for ; Mon, 12 Feb 2001 08:26:42 +0100 Received: from zmamail05.zma.compaq.com (zmamail05.zma.compaq.com [161.114.64.105]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id IAA07824 for ; Mon, 12 Feb 2001 08:26:41 +0100 (MET) Received: by zmamail05.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id CEF8B4E6A; Mon, 12 Feb 2001 02:24:54 -0500 (EST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by zmamail05.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 8767264F4; Mon, 12 Feb 2001 02:24:52 -0500 (EST) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA25886; Sun, 11 Feb 2001 23:24:51 -0800 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id XAA04784; Sun, 11 Feb 2001 23:16:48 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id XAA04754; Sun, 11 Feb 2001 23:16:47 -0800 (PST) Received: from ztxmail02.nz-cce.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA13357; Sun, 11 Feb 2001 23:16:47 -0800 Received: by ztxmail02.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 0F6401EC1; Mon, 12 Feb 2001 01:16:46 -0600 (CST) Received: from mail.ixcelerator.com (wsa-245.sibintek.net [213.128.193.245]) by ztxmail02.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DBF3E1F49 for ; Mon, 12 Feb 2001 01:16:44 -0600 (CST) Received: from morgoth.ixcelerator.com (IDENT:root@morgoth.ixcel.ru [172.16.10.70]) by mail.ixcelerator.com (8.10.1/8.10.1) with ESMTP id f1C7EFk04306; Mon, 12 Feb 2001 10:14:15 +0300 Received: (from green@localhost) by morgoth.ixcelerator.com (8.10.1/8.10.1) id f1C7I6D20769; Mon, 12 Feb 2001 10:18:06 +0300 Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2001 10:18:06 +0300 From: Oleg Drokin To: Nicolas Pitre Cc: Ward Willats , SA-1100/Linux Subject: Re: SA-1100 USB new endpoint zero Message-Id: <20010212101806.A20745@iXcelerator.com> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2i In-Reply-To: ; from nico@cam.org on Sun, Feb 11, 2001 at 09:42:11PM -0500 Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk Hello! On Sun, Feb 11, 2001 at 09:42:11PM -0500, Nicolas Pitre wrote: > At this point though, I still get some errors coming from the usb-net-host > driver. I'm starting to wonder if we shouldn't throw this crapy About "Clearing Halt on ep ..."? If that's the case, usb-net-host have nothing to do with hese rroe. It just reports usb-client stalls on SA1100 side (and yes, I see these errors, too) > usb-net-host.c down the drain and investigate the usbnet.c driver included > in the AC patches instead. It may only be cleaner IMHO. hmm. Interesting, I first hear about such a driver. I will try it, too. Bye, Oleg From kramer@pa.dec.com Mon Feb 12 12:22:37 2001 Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (root@mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id MAA12984 for ; Mon, 12 Feb 2001 12:22:37 +0100 Received: from zmamail04.zma.compaq.com (zmamail04.zma.compaq.com [161.114.64.104]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id MAA23631 for ; Mon, 12 Feb 2001 12:22:34 +0100 (MET) Received: by zmamail04.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 8B16B5C21; Mon, 12 Feb 2001 06:20:47 -0500 (EST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by zmamail04.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 67C495C51; Mon, 12 Feb 2001 06:20:45 -0500 (EST) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA05912; Mon, 12 Feb 2001 03:20:43 -0800 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id DAA11400; Mon, 12 Feb 2001 03:10:30 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id DAA11393; Mon, 12 Feb 2001 03:10:30 -0800 (PST) Received: from ztxmail01.nz-cce.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA31335; Mon, 12 Feb 2001 03:10:29 -0800 Received: by ztxmail01.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id CA08729DE; Mon, 12 Feb 2001 05:10:28 -0600 (CST) Received: from gmate.gmate.co.kr (unknown [211.113.71.2]) by ztxmail01.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 53E8129CD for ; Mon, 12 Feb 2001 05:10:27 -0600 (CST) Received: from trlim.swdev.gmate.co.kr (sysdev [211.113.71.6]) by gmate.gmate.co.kr (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id UAA01317; Mon, 12 Feb 2001 20:21:55 +0900 Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2001 20:14:01 +0900 (KST) From: Tred Lim X-Sender: trlim@trlim.swdev.gmate.co.kr To: nico@CAM.ORG Cc: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Subject: Fix to ucb1200 module Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk Hi, ucb1200 generic doesn't work anymore when it's built as a module. Following patch will fix this. It also fixes interrupt status register initialization error. Thanks, Tred Lim trlim@gmate.co.kr Index: 2.4.0-rmk2-np2/arch/arm/config.in diff -u 2.4.0-rmk2-np2/arch/arm/config.in:1.1.1.1 2.4.0-rmk2-np2/arch/arm/config.in:1.2 --- 2.4.0-rmk2-np2/arch/arm/config.in:1.1.1.1 Fri Jan 19 13:37:53 2001 +++ 2.4.0-rmk2-np2/arch/arm/config.in Fri Jan 19 14:54:11 2001 @@ -378,7 +378,12 @@ fi if [ "$CONFIG_EXPERIMENTAL" = "y" ]; then if [ "$CONFIG_ARCH_SA1100" = "y" ]; then - tristate 'UCB1200 support' CONFIG_UCB1200 + tristate 'UCB1200 support' CONFIG_UCB1200_GENERIC + if [ "$CONFIG_UCB1200_GENERIC" != "n" ]; then + define_bool CONFIG_UCB1200 y + else + define_bool CONFIG_UCB1200 n + fi fi fi endmenu Index: 2.4.0-rmk2-np2/drivers/char/Config.in diff -u 2.4.0-rmk2-np2/drivers/char/Config.in:1.1.1.1 2.4.0-rmk2-np2/drivers/char/Config.in:1.2 --- 2.4.0-rmk2-np2/drivers/char/Config.in:1.1.1.1 Fri Jan 19 13:35:43 2001 +++ 2.4.0-rmk2-np2/drivers/char/Config.in Fri Jan 19 14:54:11 2001 @@ -75,7 +75,7 @@ bool ' Console on SA1100 serial port' CONFIG_SERIAL_SA1100_CONSOLE int ' Default SA1100 serial baudrate' CONFIG_SA1100_DEFAULT_BAUDRATE 9600 fi - dep_tristate 'UCB1200 touchscreen support(SA1100 only)' CONFIG_TOUCHSCREEN_UCB1200 $CONFIG_UCB1200 + dep_tristate 'UCB1200 touchscreen support' CONFIG_TOUCHSCREEN_UCB1200 $CONFIG_UCB1200_GENERIC tristate 'Bitsy touchscreen support' CONFIG_TOUCHSCREEN_BITSY if [ "$CONFIG_SA1100_ASSABET" = "y" ]; then tristate 'SA-1100 switches support' CONFIG_SA1100_SWITCHES Index: 2.4.0-rmk2-np2/drivers/char/Makefile diff -u 2.4.0-rmk2-np2/drivers/char/Makefile:1.1.1.1 2.4.0-rmk2-np2/drivers/char/Makefile:1.4 --- 2.4.0-rmk2-np2/drivers/char/Makefile:1.1.1.1 Fri Jan 19 13:35:41 2001 +++ 2.4.0-rmk2-np2/drivers/char/Makefile Mon Jan 22 18:20:42 2001 @@ -103,10 +103,12 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_SERIAL_AMBA) += serial_amba.o obj-$(CONFIG_SERIAL_CLPS711X) += serial_clps711x.o +export-objs += ucb1200_generic.o ifeq ($(CONFIG_ARCH_SA1100),y) -obj-$(CONFIG_UCB1200) += sa1100_mcp.o +ucb1200-objs-$(CONFIG_UCB1200) += sa1100_mcp.o endif -obj-$(CONFIG_UCB1200) += ucb1200_generic.o +ucb1200-objs-$(CONFIG_UCB1200) += ucb1200_generic.o +obj-$(CONFIG_UCB1200_GENERIC) += ucb1200.o obj-$(CONFIG_TOUCHSCREEN_UCB1200) += ucb1200_ts.o obj-$(CONFIG_TOUCHSCREEN_BITSY) += h3600_ts.o @@ -230,3 +232,6 @@ defkeymap.c: defkeymap.map loadkeys --mktable defkeymap.map > defkeymap.c + +ucb1200.o: $(ucb1200-objs-y) + $(LD) $(LD_RFLAG) -r -o $@ $(ucb1200-objs-y) Index: 2.4.0-rmk2-np2/drivers/char/ucb1200_generic.c diff -u 2.4.0-rmk2-np2/drivers/char/ucb1200_generic.c:1.1.1.1 2.4.0-rmk2-np2/drivers/char/ucb1200_generic.c:1.3 --- 2.4.0-rmk2-np2/drivers/char/ucb1200_generic.c:1.1.1.1 Fri Jan 19 13:35:46 2001 +++ 2.4.0-rmk2-np2/drivers/char/ucb1200_generic.c Mon Jan 22 15:13:16 2001 @@ -41,7 +41,7 @@ static struct ucb1200_arch_info ucb1200_arch = { NO_IRQ, }; static struct ucb1200_low_level *ucb1200_low_level = NULL; -static spinlock_t ucb1200_lock; +static spinlock_t ucb1200_lock = SPIN_LOCK_UNLOCKED; #define ucb1200_irq_lock ucb1200_lock static unsigned int ucb1200_irqs[NR_CPUS][UCB1200_NR_IRQS]; @@ -621,6 +621,7 @@ for (i = 2; i <= 10; i++) sib_write_codec(i, 0); + sib_write_codec(UCB1200_REG_INT_STATUS, 0xffff); sib_write_codec(UCB1200_REG_TELECOM_CTL_A, 127); sib_write_codec(UCB1200_REG_AUDIO_CTL_A, 127); sib_write_codec(UCB1200_REG_MODE, 0); From kramer@pa.dec.com Mon Feb 12 16:17:45 2001 Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (root@mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id QAA13599 for ; Mon, 12 Feb 2001 16:17:45 +0100 Received: from zmamail04.zma.compaq.com (zmamail04.zma.compaq.com [161.114.64.104]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id QAA11916 for ; Mon, 12 Feb 2001 16:17:42 +0100 (MET) Received: by zmamail04.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 014F0558E; Mon, 12 Feb 2001 10:15:55 -0500 (EST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by zmamail04.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 85E354F52; Mon, 12 Feb 2001 10:15:49 -0500 (EST) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA27030; Mon, 12 Feb 2001 07:15:46 -0800 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id HAA18176; Mon, 12 Feb 2001 07:02:20 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id HAA18198; Mon, 12 Feb 2001 07:02:20 -0800 (PST) Received: from zmamail02.nz-tay.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA05499; Mon, 12 Feb 2001 07:02:19 -0800 Received: by zmamail02.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 701FC5BAA; Mon, 12 Feb 2001 10:02:19 -0500 (EST) Received: from mail.premiernet.net (mail.premiernet.net [205.229.224.233]) by zmamail02.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 230AE4546 for ; Mon, 12 Feb 2001 10:02:15 -0500 (EST) Received: from win (win.ineffable.com [205.229.224.253]) by mail.premiernet.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id JAA12977; Mon, 12 Feb 2001 09:02:13 -0600 Message-Id: <3.0.1.32.20010212090218.0186ab44@pop3.premiernet.net> X-Sender: 247ent@pop3.premiernet.net (Unverified) X-Mailer: Windows Eudora Pro Version 3.0.1 (32) Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2001 09:02:18 -0600 To: Nicolas Pitre From: Ken Causey Subject: Re: Does sa1100-uda1341 implement OSS? Cc: In-Reply-To: References: <20010210124431.551c782a.ken@premiernet.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk Thanks for the reply. Since I would like to have this functionality, I'm going to take a look at adding support for it. No promises. ;) If I decide that I think I can make some headway on it, I will let you know for sure. Ken Causey (nikos) At 07:23 PM 2/11/01 -0500, Nicolas Pitre wrote: > > >On Sat, 10 Feb 2001, Ken Causey wrote: > >> Looking over drivers/sound/sa1100-uda1341.c I get the impression that it >> is meant to provide an OSS (Open Sound System)-like interface. But it >> seems that the MIXER_READ (a.k.a. SOUND_MIXER_READ) and MIXER_WRITE >> (SOUND_MIXER_WRITE) ioctls are not implemented. Is this intentional or >> are they on the todo list? > >Let's say the todo list, same thing for mmap support. > > >Nicolas > > From kramer@pa.dec.com Mon Feb 12 16:22:09 2001 Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (root@mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id QAA13615 for ; Mon, 12 Feb 2001 16:22:09 +0100 Received: from zmamail03.zma.compaq.com (zmamail03.zma.compaq.com [161.114.64.103]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id QAA12319 for ; Mon, 12 Feb 2001 16:22:07 +0100 (MET) Received: by zmamail03.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id A17189E38; Mon, 12 Feb 2001 10:20:21 -0500 (EST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by zmamail03.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 381A49CA2; Mon, 12 Feb 2001 10:20:13 -0500 (EST) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA22918; Mon, 12 Feb 2001 07:20:08 -0800 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id HAA00732; Mon, 12 Feb 2001 07:10:22 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id HAA00725; Mon, 12 Feb 2001 07:10:22 -0800 (PST) Received: from zmamail01.nz-tay.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA20574; Mon, 12 Feb 2001 07:10:21 -0800 Received: by zmamail01.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 4D645F599; Mon, 12 Feb 2001 10:10:21 -0500 (EST) Received: from xanadu.home (modemcable248.137-200-24.mtl.mc.videotron.ca [24.200.137.248]) by zmamail01.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C5AAAF711 for ; Mon, 12 Feb 2001 10:10:20 -0500 (EST) Received: from localhost (nico@localhost) by xanadu.home (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id KAA08542; Mon, 12 Feb 2001 10:09:54 -0500 X-Authentication-Warning: xanadu.home: nico owned process doing -bs Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2001 10:09:54 -0500 (EST) From: Nicolas Pitre X-Sender: To: Oleg Drokin Cc: Ward Willats , SA-1100/Linux Subject: Re: SA-1100 USB new endpoint zero In-Reply-To: <20010212101806.A20745@iXcelerator.com> Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk On Mon, 12 Feb 2001, Oleg Drokin wrote: > Hello! > > On Sun, Feb 11, 2001 at 09:42:11PM -0500, Nicolas Pitre wrote: > > > At this point though, I still get some errors coming from the usb-net-host > > driver. I'm starting to wonder if we shouldn't throw this crapy > About "Clearing Halt on ep ..."? No. It looks more like a framing mismatch: rx_irq: (PANIC) no room skb cf39c9e0 length 1280 copy 256 tailroom 228 I didn't investigate it yet. > > usb-net-host.c down the drain and investigate the usbnet.c driver included > > in the AC patches instead. It may only be cleaner IMHO. > hmm. Interesting, I first hear about such a driver. I will try it, too. Tell me what you think of it. Nicolas From kramer@pa.dec.com Mon Feb 12 16:27:25 2001 Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (root@mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id QAA13646 for ; Mon, 12 Feb 2001 16:27:25 +0100 Received: from ztxmail05.ztx.compaq.com (ztxmail05.ztx.compaq.com [161.114.1.209]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id QAA12790 for ; Mon, 12 Feb 2001 16:27:22 +0100 (MET) Received: by ztxmail05.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 725CAAB8; Mon, 12 Feb 2001 09:25:34 -0600 (CST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by ztxmail05.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id E8A16B99; Mon, 12 Feb 2001 09:25:32 -0600 (CST) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA27874; Mon, 12 Feb 2001 07:25:31 -0800 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id HAA18527; Mon, 12 Feb 2001 07:15:45 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id HAA18483; Mon, 12 Feb 2001 07:15:44 -0800 (PST) Received: from ztxmail01.nz-cce.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA31981; Mon, 12 Feb 2001 07:15:44 -0800 Received: by ztxmail01.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id F2E5A2881; Mon, 12 Feb 2001 09:15:43 -0600 (CST) Received: from mail.ixcelerator.com (wsa-245.sibintek.net [213.128.193.245]) by ztxmail01.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6978A435F for ; Mon, 12 Feb 2001 09:15:39 -0600 (CST) Received: from morgoth.ixcelerator.com (IDENT:root@morgoth.ixcel.ru [172.16.10.70]) by mail.ixcelerator.com (8.10.1/8.10.1) with ESMTP id f1CFDAk25158; Mon, 12 Feb 2001 18:13:10 +0300 Received: (from green@localhost) by morgoth.ixcelerator.com (8.10.1/8.10.1) id f1CFH5t25718; Mon, 12 Feb 2001 18:17:05 +0300 Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2001 18:17:05 +0300 From: Oleg Drokin To: Nicolas Pitre Cc: Ward Willats , SA-1100/Linux Subject: Re: SA-1100 USB new endpoint zero Message-Id: <20010212181705.A25690@iXcelerator.com> References: <20010212101806.A20745@iXcelerator.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2i In-Reply-To: ; from nico@cam.org on Mon, Feb 12, 2001 at 10:09:54AM -0500 Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk Hello! On Mon, Feb 12, 2001 at 10:09:54AM -0500, Nicolas Pitre wrote: > > > At this point though, I still get some errors coming from the usb-net-host > > > driver. I'm starting to wonder if we shouldn't throw this crapy > > About "Clearing Halt on ep ..."? > No. It looks more like a framing mismatch: > rx_irq: (PANIC) no room skb cf39c9e0 length 1280 copy 256 tailroom 228 I believe this one cannot happen anymore! How to reproduce? > > > usb-net-host.c down the drain and investigate the usbnet.c driver included > > > in the AC patches instead. It may only be cleaner IMHO. > > hmm. Interesting, I first hear about such a driver. I will try it, too. > Tell me what you think of it. Later today, when I get to iPAQ with serial console. Bye, Oleg From kramer@pa.dec.com Mon Feb 12 16:56:11 2001 Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (root@mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id QAA13740 for ; Mon, 12 Feb 2001 16:56:11 +0100 Received: from zmamail04.zma.compaq.com (zmamail04.zma.compaq.com [161.114.64.104]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id QAA15139 for ; Mon, 12 Feb 2001 16:56:09 +0100 (MET) Received: by zmamail04.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 227054FFE; Mon, 12 Feb 2001 10:54:23 -0500 (EST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by zmamail04.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 2DA89558E; Mon, 12 Feb 2001 10:54:19 -0500 (EST) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA18654; Mon, 12 Feb 2001 07:54:18 -0800 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id HAA20651; Mon, 12 Feb 2001 07:46:27 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id HAA20655; Mon, 12 Feb 2001 07:46:27 -0800 (PST) Received: from zmamail01.nz-tay.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA16039; Mon, 12 Feb 2001 07:46:26 -0800 Received: by zmamail01.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 20FDDF711; Mon, 12 Feb 2001 10:46:26 -0500 (EST) Received: from xanadu.home (modemcable248.137-200-24.mtl.mc.videotron.ca [24.200.137.248]) by zmamail01.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A6DB8DC87 for ; Mon, 12 Feb 2001 10:46:25 -0500 (EST) Received: from localhost (nico@localhost) by xanadu.home (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id KAA08689; Mon, 12 Feb 2001 10:46:11 -0500 X-Authentication-Warning: xanadu.home: nico owned process doing -bs Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2001 10:46:11 -0500 (EST) From: Nicolas Pitre X-Sender: To: Oleg Drokin Cc: Ward Willats , SA-1100/Linux Subject: Re: SA-1100 USB new endpoint zero In-Reply-To: <20010212181705.A25690@iXcelerator.com> Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk On Mon, 12 Feb 2001, Oleg Drokin wrote: > Hello! > > On Mon, Feb 12, 2001 at 10:09:54AM -0500, Nicolas Pitre wrote: > > > > > At this point though, I still get some errors coming from the usb-net-host > > > > driver. I'm starting to wonder if we shouldn't throw this crapy > > > About "Clearing Halt on ep ..."? > > No. It looks more like a framing mismatch: > > rx_irq: (PANIC) no room skb cf39c9e0 length 1280 copy 256 tailroom 228 > I believe this one cannot happen anymore! > How to reproduce? I think it was something like 'ping -f -s 1400 ...' Nicolas From kramer@pa.dec.com Tue Feb 13 23:58:00 2001 Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (root@mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id XAA18961 for ; Tue, 13 Feb 2001 23:58:00 +0100 Received: from ztxmail04.ztx.compaq.com (ztxmail04.ztx.compaq.com [161.114.1.208]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id XAA09546 for ; Tue, 13 Feb 2001 23:57:58 +0100 (MET) Received: by ztxmail04.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 8158EF0C; Tue, 13 Feb 2001 16:56:11 -0600 (CST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by ztxmail04.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id E116FF5A; Tue, 13 Feb 2001 16:56:08 -0600 (CST) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA07553; Tue, 13 Feb 2001 14:54:40 -0800 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id OAA21397; Tue, 13 Feb 2001 14:41:14 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id OAA21613; Tue, 13 Feb 2001 14:41:13 -0800 (PST) Received: from zmamail01.nz-tay.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA30847; Tue, 13 Feb 2001 14:41:13 -0800 Received: by zmamail01.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id DFD7011B55; Tue, 13 Feb 2001 17:41:05 -0500 (EST) Received: from xanadu.home (modemcable248.137-200-24.mtl.mc.videotron.ca [24.200.137.248]) by zmamail01.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6CD19C73D for ; Tue, 13 Feb 2001 17:41:05 -0500 (EST) Received: from localhost (nico@localhost) by xanadu.home (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id RAA22519; Tue, 13 Feb 2001 17:41:04 -0500 X-Authentication-Warning: xanadu.home: nico owned process doing -bs Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2001 17:41:04 -0500 (EST) From: Nicolas Pitre X-Sender: To: SA-1100/Linux Cc: Subject: diff-2.4.1-rmk1-np2 Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk ... is available at the usual sites, which are: ftp://ftp.netwinder.org/users/n/nico/ ftp://ftp.arm.linux.org.uk/pub/linux/arm/people/nico/ ftp://ftp.handhelds.org/pub/linux/arm/sa-1100-patches/ Highlights: - UCB1200 drivers should work as module now (me) - some fixes in register monitor (Sukjae Cho) - Freebird updates (Chester) - rtc driver enhancements (Chester) - backlight/contrast docs (Chester) - SA1100 USB netlink fixes (Oleg Drokin) - new SA1100 USB EP0 code (Ward Willats) - some parts of SA-1100.h weren't correctly expanded by the assembler preprocessor (Tred Lim) - small patch for CERF video 'make *config' problem (George G. Davis) - unused SA1100 DMA code removed (me) - initial SA1110 suspend/resume support (Cliff Brake) - some mods to the above (me) Enjoy! Nicolas From kramer@pa.dec.com Thu Feb 15 03:43:54 2001 Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (root@mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id DAA23885 for ; Thu, 15 Feb 2001 03:43:54 +0100 Received: from ztxmail04.ztx.compaq.com (ztxmail04.ztx.compaq.com [161.114.1.208]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id DAA29074 for ; Thu, 15 Feb 2001 03:43:52 +0100 (MET) Received: by ztxmail04.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 4FB45DE4; Wed, 14 Feb 2001 20:42:06 -0600 (CST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by ztxmail04.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id CCD68D74; Wed, 14 Feb 2001 20:42:04 -0600 (CST) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA28056; Wed, 14 Feb 2001 18:41:58 -0800 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id SAA14287; Wed, 14 Feb 2001 18:27:47 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id SAA02514; Wed, 14 Feb 2001 18:27:46 -0800 (PST) Received: from zmamail02.nz-tay.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA07456; Wed, 14 Feb 2001 18:27:46 -0800 Received: by zmamail02.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 4CB935CCF; Wed, 14 Feb 2001 21:27:45 -0500 (EST) Received: from funai-tky.co.jp (unknown [210.154.37.2]) by zmamail02.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B20C5EEC for ; Wed, 14 Feb 2001 21:27:44 -0500 (EST) Received: from hiropu ([192.168.1.19]) by funai-tky.co.jp (8.9.1/3.7Wpr7-98092916) with ESMTP id LAA28073 for ; Thu, 15 Feb 2001 11:27:41 +0900 Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2001 11:27:42 +0900 From: Hiroshi Ishii To: sa1100 mailng list Subject: Re: diff-2.4.1-rmk1-np2 In-Reply-To: References: Message-Id: <20010215111942.0FFB.HIROSHI@funai-tky.co.jp> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Becky! ver. 2.00.03 Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk On Tue, 13 Feb 2001 17:41:04 -0500 (EST) Nicolas Pitre wrote: > Highlights: > [skip] > - SA1100 USB netlink fixes (Oleg Drokin) > - new SA1100 USB EP0 code (Ward Willats) USB netlink working fine? Not working for me. But 2.4.0-rmk2-np2 is working fine. How about, all? Regards; ---- Funai Electric R & D System Software Engineer Hiroshi Ishii From kramer@pa.dec.com Thu Feb 15 09:04:14 2001 Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (root@mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id JAA24452 for ; Thu, 15 Feb 2001 09:04:14 +0100 Received: from zmamail04.zma.compaq.com (zmamail04.zma.compaq.com [161.114.64.104]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id JAA08992 for ; Thu, 15 Feb 2001 09:04:12 +0100 (MET) Received: by zmamail04.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 02A005B8E; Thu, 15 Feb 2001 03:02:26 -0500 (EST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by zmamail04.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id C5D745962; Thu, 15 Feb 2001 03:02:23 -0500 (EST) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA04278; Thu, 15 Feb 2001 00:02:18 -0800 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id XAA09261; Wed, 14 Feb 2001 23:52:21 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id XAA32485; Wed, 14 Feb 2001 23:52:20 -0800 (PST) From: Received: from ztxmail01.nz-cce.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA06004; Wed, 14 Feb 2001 23:52:19 -0800 Received: by ztxmail01.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 387E12AA1; Thu, 15 Feb 2001 01:52:18 -0600 (CST) Received: from mail.ixcelerator.com (wsa-245.sibintek.net [213.128.193.245]) by ztxmail01.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E2CC92985 for ; Thu, 15 Feb 2001 01:52:16 -0600 (CST) Received: from morgoth.ixcelerator.com (IDENT:root@morgoth.ixcel.ru [172.16.10.70]) by mail.ixcelerator.com (8.10.1/8.10.1) with ESMTP id f1F7nEk01797; Thu, 15 Feb 2001 10:49:20 +0300 Received: (from green@localhost) by morgoth.ixcelerator.com (8.10.1/8.10.1) id f1F7pQ430706; Thu, 15 Feb 2001 10:51:26 +0300 Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2001 10:51:26 +0300 Message-Id: <200102150751.f1F7pQ430706@morgoth.ixcelerator.com> To: hiroshi@funai-tky.co.jp, sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Subject: Re: diff-2.4.1-rmk1-np2 X-Newsgroups: sa1100.linux In-Reply-To: <20010215111942.0FFB.HIROSHI@funai-tky.co.jp> User-Agent: tin/1.4.2-20000205 ("Possession") (UNIX) (Linux/2.4.1 (i686)) Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk In article <20010215111942.0FFB.HIROSHI@funai-tky.co.jp> you wrote: >> - SA1100 USB netlink fixes (Oleg Drokin) >> - new SA1100 USB EP0 code (Ward Willats) > USB netlink working fine? Not working for me. No, it cannot be described as "fine", but it works somewhat. > How about, all? USB netlink is work in progress. And right now it slightly broken. I hope to fix that once I find enough time, may be on weekend. Or may be someone fix that before me. Bye, Oleg From kramer@pa.dec.com Fri Feb 16 05:41:23 2001 Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (root@mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id FAA31218 for ; Fri, 16 Feb 2001 05:41:23 +0100 Received: from ztxmail03.ztx.compaq.com (ztxmail03.ztx.compaq.com [161.114.1.207]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id FAA20166 for ; Fri, 16 Feb 2001 05:41:21 +0100 (MET) Received: by ztxmail03.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id CB749B89; Thu, 15 Feb 2001 22:39:34 -0600 (CST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by ztxmail03.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 37FA67FD; Thu, 15 Feb 2001 22:39:33 -0600 (CST) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA20780; Thu, 15 Feb 2001 20:39:30 -0800 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id UAA01413; Thu, 15 Feb 2001 20:22:17 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id UAA31648; Thu, 15 Feb 2001 20:22:16 -0800 (PST) Received: from ztxmail02.nz-cce.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA22866; Thu, 15 Feb 2001 20:22:16 -0800 Received: by ztxmail02.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 139011EA7; Thu, 15 Feb 2001 22:22:16 -0600 (CST) Received: from xanadu.home (modemcable248.137-200-24.mtl.mc.videotron.ca [24.200.137.248]) by ztxmail02.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7236D1F39 for ; Thu, 15 Feb 2001 22:22:15 -0600 (CST) Received: from localhost (nico@localhost) by xanadu.home (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id XAA08935 for ; Thu, 15 Feb 2001 23:22:14 -0500 X-Authentication-Warning: xanadu.home: nico owned process doing -bs Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2001 23:22:14 -0500 (EST) From: Nicolas Pitre X-Sender: To: SA-1100/Linux Subject: network unreachable ... Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk I'll be on vacation for a week effective right now. If you send me patches, I will start looking at them only in a week. In the mean time it would surely be a good idea to post them on this list as well if they are of general interest. Nicolas From kramer@pa.dec.com Fri Feb 16 06:31:12 2001 Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (root@mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id GAA31282 for ; Fri, 16 Feb 2001 06:31:12 +0100 Received: from zmamail04.zma.compaq.com (zmamail04.zma.compaq.com [161.114.64.104]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id GAA21757 for ; Fri, 16 Feb 2001 06:31:10 +0100 (MET) Received: by zmamail04.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id DD5285ACD; Fri, 16 Feb 2001 00:29:23 -0500 (EST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by zmamail04.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 4F25658CA; Fri, 16 Feb 2001 00:29:21 -0500 (EST) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA21254; Thu, 15 Feb 2001 21:29:19 -0800 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id VAA00026; Thu, 15 Feb 2001 21:21:33 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id VAA06963; Thu, 15 Feb 2001 21:21:32 -0800 (PST) Received: from zmamail02.nz-tay.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA15813; Thu, 15 Feb 2001 21:21:32 -0800 Received: by zmamail02.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 711104D13; Fri, 16 Feb 2001 00:21:31 -0500 (EST) Received: from funai-tky.co.jp (ns.funai-tky.co.jp [210.154.37.2]) by zmamail02.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 31987597E for ; Fri, 16 Feb 2001 00:21:27 -0500 (EST) Received: from hiropu ([192.168.1.19]) by funai-tky.co.jp (8.9.1/3.7Wpr7-98092916) with ESMTP id OAA06150 for ; Fri, 16 Feb 2001 14:21:24 +0900 Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2001 14:21:24 +0900 From: Hiroshi Ishii To: sa1100 mailng list Subject: Re: diff-2.4.1-rmk1-np2 In-Reply-To: <200102150751.f1F7pQ430706@morgoth.ixcelerator.com> References: <20010215111942.0FFB.HIROSHI@funai-tky.co.jp> <200102150751.f1F7pQ430706@morgoth.ixcelerator.com> Message-Id: <20010216141754.6A7E.HIROSHI@funai-tky.co.jp> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Becky! ver. 2.00.03 Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk On Thu, 15 Feb 2001 10:51:26 +0300 wrote: > In article <20010215111942.0FFB.HIROSHI@funai-tky.co.jp> you wrote: > > >> - SA1100 USB netlink fixes (Oleg Drokin) > >> - new SA1100 USB EP0 code (Ward Willats) > > USB netlink working fine? Not working for me. > No, it cannot be described as "fine", but it works somewhat. Hi, I saw dmesg when kernel booting. It seems that UDC_write fail. I compared linux-2.4.0-rmk2-np2 and linux-2.4.1-rmk2-np1. There are small different UDC_write/set/clear/flip macro in usb_ctl.h Back to linux-2.4.0-rmk2-np2's macro, netlink works. If have same problem, please try it. thanks; ---- Funai Electric R & D System Software Engineer Hiroshi Ishii From kramer@pa.dec.com Fri Feb 16 18:00:33 2001 Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (root@mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id SAA04974 for ; Fri, 16 Feb 2001 18:00:33 +0100 Received: from ztxmail03.ztx.compaq.com (ztxmail03.ztx.compaq.com [161.114.1.207]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id SAA05327 for ; Fri, 16 Feb 2001 18:00:31 +0100 (MET) Received: by ztxmail03.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 01F491A78; Fri, 16 Feb 2001 10:58:44 -0600 (CST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by ztxmail03.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id DA3BF19F4; Fri, 16 Feb 2001 10:58:42 -0600 (CST) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA10206; Fri, 16 Feb 2001 08:58:41 -0800 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id IAA15691; Fri, 16 Feb 2001 08:49:30 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id IAA00654; Fri, 16 Feb 2001 08:49:29 -0800 (PST) Received: from ztxmail02.nz-cce.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA06339; Fri, 16 Feb 2001 08:49:29 -0800 Received: by ztxmail02.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id AC18A1DFE; Fri, 16 Feb 2001 10:49:28 -0600 (CST) Received: from fire.he.net (fire.he.net [216.218.144.2]) by ztxmail02.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F5921E27 for ; Fri, 16 Feb 2001 10:49:23 -0600 (CST) Received: from cementship.extenex.net (64-51-136-194.client.dsl.net [64.51.136.194]) by fire.he.net (8.8.6/8.8.2) with ESMTP id IAA06272; Fri, 16 Feb 2001 08:49:17 -0800 Received: from blowhole.extenex.net (blowhole.extenex.net [192.168.100.100]) by cementship.extenex.net (8.9.3/8.8.7) with ESMTP id IAA00880; Fri, 16 Feb 2001 08:48:44 -0800 Received: from wardw by blowhole.extenex.net with local (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 14To3o-00009q-00; Fri, 16 Feb 2001 08:48:44 -0800 Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2001 08:48:44 -0800 To: Hiroshi Ishii Cc: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Subject: Re: diff-2.4.1-rmk1-np2 Message-Id: <20010216084844.A594@extenex.com> References: <20010215111942.0FFB.HIROSHI@funai-tky.co.jp> <200102150751.f1F7pQ430706@morgoth.ixcelerator.com> <20010216141754.6A7E.HIROSHI@funai-tky.co.jp> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <20010216141754.6A7E.HIROSHI@funai-tky.co.jp>; from hiroshi@funai-tky.co.jp on Fri, Feb 16, 2001 at 02:21:24PM +0900 From: Ward Willats Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk On Fri, Feb 16, 2001 at 02:21:24PM +0900, Hiroshi Ishii wrote: > I saw dmesg when kernel booting. It seems that UDC_write > fail. I compared linux-2.4.0-rmk2-np2 and linux-2.4.1-rmk2-np1. > There are small different UDC_write/set/clear/flip macro in > usb_ctl.h > Back to linux-2.4.0-rmk2-np2's macro, netlink works. > It would be helpful to have the text of the message the macro displayed, and the chip type/revision. I flipped the do {} while to while {} do, theory being that if it worked right away you would save a loop iteration. (I also played with single write/multiple reads, delays, and other hand-waving, to no avail...) I am seeing some write errors during enumeration in sh_write() and sh_write_with_empty_packet(). Many write errors are not fatal, if you check the chip status later (after the ISR has completed) you will find the change has taken effect. But sometimes not! It is all very timing/traffic sensitive, and the silicon state-machine in the UDC makes undocumented decisions about when to propagate changes to the rest of the UDC core, so it is hard to know when at item will be validly available for read-back. Anyway, I am trying to get a handle on what people are seeing so we can do less voodo with this miserable subsystem. In the meantime, do whatever works! Also still curious if people are seeing errors on startup (at plug-in time). (You get into the "powered" state, but nothing happens after that.) Thanks, -- Ward From kramer@pa.dec.com Sun Feb 18 12:30:02 2001 Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (root@mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id MAA09154 for ; Sun, 18 Feb 2001 12:30:02 +0100 Received: from zmamail05.zma.compaq.com (zmamail05.zma.compaq.com [161.114.64.105]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id MAA20722 for ; Sun, 18 Feb 2001 12:30:00 +0100 (MET) Received: by zmamail05.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id BE43F1FAD; Sun, 18 Feb 2001 06:28:13 -0500 (EST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by zmamail05.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id ECE981FB4; Sun, 18 Feb 2001 06:28:10 -0500 (EST) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA11691; Sun, 18 Feb 2001 03:28:02 -0800 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id DAA15626; Sun, 18 Feb 2001 03:05:22 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id DAA20758; Sun, 18 Feb 2001 03:05:18 -0800 (PST) From: Received: from ztxmail02.nz-cce.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA05022; Sun, 18 Feb 2001 03:05:14 -0800 Received: by ztxmail02.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 0E9BD1C85; Sun, 18 Feb 2001 05:05:05 -0600 (CST) Received: from mail.ixcelerator.com (wsa-247.sibintek.net [213.128.193.247]) by ztxmail02.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB91E1F39 for ; Sun, 18 Feb 2001 05:05:03 -0600 (CST) Received: from morgoth.ixcelerator.com (IDENT:root@morgoth.ixcel.ru [172.16.10.70]) by mail.ixcelerator.com (8.10.1/8.10.1) with ESMTP id f1IB0rk26075; Sun, 18 Feb 2001 14:00:59 +0300 Received: (from green@localhost) by morgoth.ixcelerator.com (8.10.1/8.10.1) id f1IB2rV07955; Sun, 18 Feb 2001 14:02:53 +0300 Date: Sun, 18 Feb 2001 14:02:53 +0300 Message-Id: <200102181102.f1IB2rV07955@morgoth.ixcelerator.com> To: nico@CAM.ORG, ward.willats@extenex.com, sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Subject: Re: SA-1100 USB new endpoint zero X-Newsgroups: sa1100.linux In-Reply-To: User-Agent: tin/1.4.2-20000205 ("Possession") (UNIX) (Linux/2.4.1 (i686)) Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk >> > > > At this point though, I still get some errors coming from the usb-net-host >> > > > driver. I'm starting to wonder if we shouldn't throw this crapy >> > > About "Clearing Halt on ep ..."? >> > No. It looks more like a framing mismatch: >> > rx_irq: (PANIC) no room skb cf39c9e0 length 1280 copy 256 tailroom 228 >> I believe this one cannot happen anymore! >> How to reproduce? > I think it was something like 'ping -f -s 1400 ...' Yes, I see what's going on. We sending bunch of pacjkets and receive errors on some of them, while trying to push 'em to UDC, but PC side do not know that we have not sent part of it, so it receives part of next packet as tail of previous, which leads it to think, it receives too big packet. 2 Ward: BTW, I still cannot use driver with your ep0 rewrite. I still getting SA1100 to STALL its receiving endpoint after each succesfully received packet. Bye, Oleg From kramer@pa.dec.com Sun Feb 18 20:33:57 2001 Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (root@mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id UAA10460 for ; Sun, 18 Feb 2001 20:33:57 +0100 Received: from ztxmail03.ztx.compaq.com (ztxmail03.ztx.compaq.com [161.114.1.207]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id UAA05858 for ; Sun, 18 Feb 2001 20:33:55 +0100 (MET) Received: by ztxmail03.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 792471977; Sun, 18 Feb 2001 13:32:08 -0600 (CST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by ztxmail03.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id ED9921A1E; Sun, 18 Feb 2001 13:32:06 -0600 (CST) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA25922; Sun, 18 Feb 2001 11:31:59 -0800 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id LAA22872; Sun, 18 Feb 2001 11:18:36 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id LAA01062; Sun, 18 Feb 2001 11:18:36 -0800 (PST) Received: from zmamail01.nz-tay.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA24937; Sun, 18 Feb 2001 11:18:35 -0800 Received: by zmamail01.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 6FCC7CA80; Sun, 18 Feb 2001 14:18:35 -0500 (EST) Received: from fire.he.net (fire.he.net [216.218.144.2]) by zmamail01.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF4C2CAC7 for ; Sun, 18 Feb 2001 14:18:31 -0500 (EST) Received: from [192.168.23.2] (wardco.com [165.227.105.2]) by fire.he.net (8.8.6/8.8.2) with ESMTP id LAA08407; Sun, 18 Feb 2001 11:18:19 -0800 Mime-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: In-Reply-To: <200102181102.f1IB2rV07955@morgoth.ixcelerator.com> References: <200102181102.f1IB2rV07955@morgoth.ixcelerator.com> Date: Sun, 18 Feb 2001 11:18:09 -0800 To: green@ixcelerator.com, sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com From: Ward Willats Subject: Re: SA-1100 USB new endpoint zero Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" ; format="flowed" Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk At 2:02 PM +0300 2/18/01, green@ixcelerator.com wrote: >2 Ward: BTW, I still cannot use driver with your ep0 rewrite. I still >getting SA1100 to STALL its receiving endpoint after each succesfully >received packet. > I don't understand. Are you saying usb_ep0 is issuing a STALL in response to an error condition? ep0 has nothing to do with the ep1 receiver. Once ep0 reaches the "configured" state, the ep1 receiver should work fine. Except for hanging when coming out of that first suspend half the time (the "bad start") bug, I've had good luck with the ep0 code (but then, this sort of stuff always works for the author!) But this problem (in usb_ctl) makes the ep0 code look real bad, and I haven't had a chance to seriously investigate it yet. As an aside, I've been fixing many stupid bugs in my half-baked usb-char.c and in the process have run a lot of full speed data through usb_recv.c with 64 byte packets. It seems to be working well. (I still have a one byte corruption bug sometimes when running 1MB files through, but all my tests seem to indicate the problem is in usb-char and not in Nico's usb_recev.c) Thanks, -- Ward From kramer@pa.dec.com Sun Feb 18 23:32:59 2001 Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (root@mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id XAA12690 for ; Sun, 18 Feb 2001 23:32:59 +0100 Received: from zmamail03.zma.compaq.com (zmamail03.zma.compaq.com [161.114.64.103]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id XAA12633 for ; Sun, 18 Feb 2001 23:32:57 +0100 (MET) Received: by zmamail03.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id EA130B4C6; Sun, 18 Feb 2001 17:31:10 -0500 (EST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by zmamail03.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 151E7A799; Sun, 18 Feb 2001 17:31:08 -0500 (EST) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA32564; Sun, 18 Feb 2001 14:31:06 -0800 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id OAA01641; Sun, 18 Feb 2001 14:18:44 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id OAA30861; Sun, 18 Feb 2001 14:18:39 -0800 (PST) Received: from ztxmail01.nz-cce.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA28869; Sun, 18 Feb 2001 14:18:37 -0800 Received: by ztxmail01.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 4B677283C; Sun, 18 Feb 2001 16:18:36 -0600 (CST) Received: from dredd.crimea.edu (unknown [213.128.193.148]) by ztxmail01.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F3442BE9 for ; Sun, 18 Feb 2001 16:18:34 -0600 (CST) Received: (from uucp@localhost) by dredd.crimea.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with UUCP id BAA14062; Mon, 19 Feb 2001 01:16:47 +0300 Received: (from green@localhost) by dredd.crimea.edu (8.10.1/8.10.1) id f1IM7Kf03425; Mon, 19 Feb 2001 01:07:20 +0300 Date: Mon, 19 Feb 2001 01:07:20 +0300 From: Oleg Drokin To: Ward Willats Cc: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com, nico@CAM.ORG, ipaq@handhelds.org, brad@parker.boston.ma.us Subject: USB for 2.4.1-rmk1-np2 Message-Id: <20010219010720.A3127@dredd.crimea.edu> References: <20010128014539.A23617@dredd.crimea.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="XsQoSWH+UP9D9v3l" X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0.1i In-Reply-To: ; from ward.willats@extenex.com on Sun, Jan 28, 2001 at 10:57:25AM -0800 Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk --XsQoSWH+UP9D9v3l Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Hello! This is my latest patch for USB. One of the highlights is that I switched from usb-net-host driver to usbnet one (from AC tree). Patch for usbnet is also included. Problems. With default rx/txsizes we often get UDC stalls by itself (how can that be? But that's clearly what I see, UDC receives 6 256 byte packets in a row and then sends Stall) The biggest remaining problem is UDC not wanting to adjust size of IN packets (like ep2_start [62]: write 0x2a to f800000c (0x3f) failed) which, in turn leads to FIFO underruns. Also we still lack good way to tell other side, when we got error and want to start from scratch. ( I thought that we can just resend bad USB packet (or re-receive), but this does not work). Enjoy. Bye, Oleg --XsQoSWH+UP9D9v3l Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="usb_nn.diff" --- usb-eth.c.orig Sun Feb 18 19:47:51 2001 +++ usb-eth.c Mon Feb 19 00:53:13 2001 @@ -11,6 +11,8 @@ * * This is still work in progress... * + * 19/02/2001 - Now we are compatible with generic usbnet driver. green@iXcelerator.com + * */ #include @@ -23,14 +25,42 @@ #include #include #include +#include #include "usb_ctl.h" #define ETHERNET_PRODUCT_ID 0x505A -struct usb_info_t usbd_info; +/* FIXME - this should go into common include, once usbnet.c goes into + standart kernel */ +// packets are always ethernet inside +// ... except they can be bigger (up to 64K with this framing) +#define MIN_PACKET sizeof(struct ethhdr) +#define MAX_PACKET 32768 + +struct nc_header { // packed: + u16 hdr_len; // sizeof nc_header (LE, all) + u16 packet_len; // payload size (including ethhdr) + u16 packet_id; // detects dropped packets +#define MIN_HEADER 6 +} __attribute__((__packed__)); + +#define PAD_BYTE ((unsigned char)0xAC) +struct nc_trailer { + u16 packet_id; +} __attribute__((__packed__)); + +#define FRAMED_SIZE(mtu) (sizeof (struct nc_header) \ + + sizeof (struct ethhdr) \ + + (mtu) \ + + 1 \ + + sizeof (struct nc_trailer)) + +#define MIN_FRAMED FRAMED_SIZE(0) + +struct usb_info_t usbd_info; static char usb_eth_name[16] = "usbf"; static struct net_device usb_eth_device; @@ -38,19 +68,22 @@ static struct sk_buff *cur_rx_skb, *next_rx_skb; static volatile int terminating; +static int usb_change_mtu (struct net_device *net, int new_mtu) +{ + if (new_mtu <= sizeof (struct ethhdr) || new_mtu > MAX_PACKET) + return -EINVAL; + if (FRAMED_SIZE (new_mtu) > MAX_PACKET) + return -EINVAL; + // no second zero-length packet read wanted after mtu-sized packets + net->mtu = new_mtu; + return 0; +} static struct sk_buff * usb_new_recv_skb(void) { - struct sk_buff *skb = dev_alloc_skb(1518); + struct sk_buff *skb = dev_alloc_skb((12 + FRAMED_SIZE (usb_eth_device.mtu))); if (skb) { - /* - * In order to align IP addresses to a word, we should - * reserve 2 bytes in addition to the 14-byte ethernet - * header. Since our packets come in with a 2-byte header - * instead of the 12-byte MAC addresses, then we need: - * reserved = 14 + 2 - (14 - 12 + 2) = 12 - */ skb_reserve(skb, 12); } return skb; @@ -60,8 +93,9 @@ usb_recv_callback(int flag, int size) { struct sk_buff *skb; - int pktlen, i; - char *mac_header; + int pktlen, templen; + struct nc_header *header = NULL; + struct nc_trailer *trailer = NULL; if (terminating) return; @@ -72,9 +106,14 @@ /* flag validation */ if (flag == 0) { skb_put(skb, size); - if (skb->len > 2) { - pktlen = le16_to_cpu(*(u16*)skb->data); - if (pktlen < 2 || pktlen > 1504) { + if (skb->len > MIN_FRAMED) { + header = (struct nc_header *) skb->data; + le16_to_cpus (&header->hdr_len); + le16_to_cpus (&header->packet_len); + if (header->hdr_len == MIN_HEADER ) { + pktlen = header->packet_len; + } + if (pktlen < MIN_FRAMED || pktlen > FRAMED_SIZE(usb_eth_device.mtu)) { pktlen = 0; usbd_info.eth_stats.rx_frame_errors++; } @@ -83,23 +122,16 @@ usbd_info.eth_stats.rx_errors++; } + templen = pktlen + header->hdr_len + sizeof (struct nc_trailer); + templen += (templen & 0x01) ? 0:1; /* validate packet length */ - if (skb->len < pktlen) { + if (skb->len < templen ) { /* packet not complete yet */ skb = NULL; - } else if (pktlen != 0 && skb->len > pktlen) { - pktlen = 0; - usbd_info.eth_stats.rx_over_errors++; } if (pktlen == 0) { - /* - * Error due to bad frame, bad pktlen, etc. - * Recycle the current skb and reset USB reception. - */ - skb_trim(skb, 0); - skb = NULL; - sa1100_usb_recv_reset(); + goto error; } /* @@ -128,24 +160,55 @@ next_rx_skb = skb; return; } - - usbd_info.eth_stats.rx_packets++; - usbd_info.eth_stats.rx_bytes += skb->len; - /* - * Put the mac addresses back in, over the top of the - * size that was sent over. - */ - mac_header = skb_push(skb, (2*ETH_ALEN)-2); - for (i = 0; i < ETH_ALEN; i++) { - mac_header[i] = usbd_info.dev->dev_addr[i]; - mac_header[i+ETH_ALEN] = usbd_info.host_addr[i]; + if (FRAMED_SIZE (header->packet_len) > MAX_PACKET) { + usbd_info.eth_stats.rx_frame_errors++; + goto error; + } + skb_pull (skb, header->hdr_len); + trailer = (struct nc_trailer *) + (skb->data + skb->len - sizeof *trailer); + skb_trim (skb, skb->len - sizeof *trailer); + + if ((header->packet_len & 0x01) == 0) { + if (skb->data [header->packet_len] != PAD_BYTE) { + usbd_info.eth_stats.rx_frame_errors++; + goto error; + } + skb_trim (skb, skb->len - 1); + } + if (skb->len != header->packet_len) { + usbd_info.eth_stats.rx_frame_errors++; + goto error; + } + + if (header->packet_id != get_unaligned (&trailer->packet_id)) { + usbd_info.eth_stats.rx_fifo_errors++; + goto error; } - skb->dev = usbd_info.dev; - skb->protocol = eth_type_trans(skb, skb->dev); - skb->ip_summed = CHECKSUM_UNNECESSARY; - netif_rx(skb); + if (skb->len) { + int status; +// FIXME: eth_copy_and_csum "small" packets to new SKB (small < ~200 bytes) ? + + skb->dev = &usb_eth_device; + skb->protocol = eth_type_trans (skb, &usb_eth_device); + usbd_info.eth_stats.rx_packets++; + usbd_info.eth_stats.rx_bytes += skb->len; + status = netif_rx (skb); + } else { +error: + usbd_info.eth_stats.rx_errors++; + /* + * Error due to bad frame, bad pktlen, etc. + * Recycle the current skb and reset USB reception. + */ + skb_trim(cur_rx_skb, 0); + if (flag != -EINTR) + sa1100_usb_recv_reset(); + sa1100_usb_recv(cur_rx_skb->tail, skb_tailroom(cur_rx_skb), + usb_recv_callback); + } } @@ -191,24 +254,80 @@ netif_wake_queue(dev); } + +static inline struct sk_buff *fixup_skb (struct sk_buff *skb, int flags) +{ + int padlen; + struct sk_buff *skb2; + + padlen = ((skb->len + sizeof (struct nc_header) + + sizeof (struct nc_trailer)) & 0x01) ? 0 : 1; + if (!skb_cloned (skb)) { + int headroom = skb_headroom (skb); + int tailroom = skb_tailroom (skb); + + if ((padlen + sizeof (struct nc_trailer)) <= tailroom + && sizeof (struct nc_header) <= headroom) + return skb; + + if ((sizeof (struct nc_header) + padlen + + sizeof (struct nc_trailer)) < + (headroom + tailroom)) { + skb->data = memmove (skb->head + + sizeof (struct nc_header), + skb->data, skb->len); + skb->tail = skb->data + skb->len; + return skb; + } + } + skb2 = skb_copy_expand (skb, + sizeof (struct nc_header), + sizeof (struct nc_trailer) + padlen, + flags); + dev_kfree_skb_any (skb); + return skb2; +} + static int usb_eth_xmit(struct sk_buff *skb, struct net_device *dev) { int ret; + struct sk_buff *skb2; long flags; + int length = skb->len; + struct nc_header *header = 0; + struct nc_trailer *trailer = 0; if (next_tx_skb) { printk("%s: called with next_tx_skb != NULL\n", __FUNCTION__); return 1; } - skb = skb_unshare(skb, GFP_ATOMIC); - if (!skb) + if (skb_shared (skb)) { + skb2 = skb_unshare(skb, GFP_ATOMIC); + if (!skb2) { + usbd_info.eth_stats.tx_dropped++; + dev_kfree_skb(skb); + return 1; + } + skb = skb2; + } + + skb2 = fixup_skb (skb, GFP_ATOMIC); + if (!skb2) { + usbd_info.eth_stats.tx_dropped++; + dev_kfree_skb(skb); return 1; + } - skb_pull(skb, 10); - skb->data[0] = skb->len; - skb->data[1] = skb->len >> 8; + header = (struct nc_header *) skb_push (skb, sizeof *header); + header->hdr_len = cpu_to_le16 (sizeof (*header)); + header->packet_len = cpu_to_le16 (length); + if (!((skb->len + sizeof *trailer) & 0x01)) + *skb_put (skb, 1) = PAD_BYTE; + trailer = (struct nc_trailer *) skb_put (skb, sizeof *trailer); + header->packet_id = cpu_to_le16 (usbd_info.packet_id++); + put_unaligned (header->packet_id, &trailer->packet_id); save_flags_cli(flags); if (cur_tx_skb) { @@ -316,6 +435,7 @@ usbd_info.host_addr[5] = 1;/*usbd_info.address;*/ dev->open = usb_eth_open; + dev->change_mtu = usb_change_mtu; dev->stop = usb_eth_release; dev->hard_start_xmit = usb_eth_xmit; dev->get_stats = usb_eth_stats; --- usb_ctl.c.orig Sun Feb 18 19:47:51 2001 +++ usb_ctl.c Mon Feb 19 00:43:15 2001 @@ -372,7 +372,8 @@ buf[USB_ENDPDESC_BADDRESS] = USB_EP_ADDRESS(2, USB_IN); buf[USB_ENDPDESC_WMAXPKTSZE_LO] = (usbd_info.tx_pktsize & 0x00ff); buf[USB_ENDPDESC_WMAXPKTSZE_HI] = (usbd_info.tx_pktsize & 0xff00) >> 8;; -#if defined(CONFIG_SA1100_USB_NETLINK) || defined(CONFIG_SA1100_USB_NETLINK_MODULE) +#if 0 +//defined(CONFIG_SA1100_USB_NETLINK) || defined(CONFIG_SA1100_USB_NETLINK_MODULE) buf[USB_ENDPDESC_BMATTR] = USB_EP_INT; buf[USB_ENDPDESC_BINTERVAL] = 0x1; /* every 1ms */ #else @@ -522,14 +523,13 @@ udc_enable(); /* clear stall - receiver seems to start stalled? 19Jan01ww */ - UDC_clear(Ser0UDCCS1, UDCCS1_FST); - UDC_clear(Ser0UDCCS2, UDCCS2_FST); +// UDC_clear(Ser0UDCCS1, UDCCS1_FST); +// UDC_clear(Ser0UDCCS2, UDCCS2_FST); /* EXPERIMENT 10Feb01ww */ /* clear all top-level sources */ Ser0UDCSR = UDCSR_RSTIR | UDCSR_RESIR | UDCSR_EIR | UDCSR_RIR | UDCSR_TIR | UDCSR_SUSIR ; - Ser0UDCCR |= UDCCR_RESIM; // up and... /* END EXPERIMENT 10Feb01ww */ /* enable interrupts */ --- usb_ctl.h.orig Sun Feb 18 19:47:51 2001 +++ usb_ctl.h Sun Feb 18 19:48:26 2001 @@ -80,6 +80,7 @@ int rx_pktsize; struct usb_stats_t usb_stats; struct net_device_stats eth_stats; /* does not belong here 18Jan01ww */ + u16 packet_id; }; extern struct usb_info_t usbd_info; --- usb_recv.c.orig Sun Feb 18 19:47:51 2001 +++ usb_recv.c Mon Feb 19 00:34:35 2001 @@ -117,16 +117,17 @@ } if (!ep1_curdmalen) { - UDC_flip(Ser0UDCCS1, UDCCS1_RPC); printk("usb_recv: RPC for non-existent buffer\n"); + naking=1; return; } sa1100_dma_stop(dmachn_rx); if (status & UDCCS1_RPE) { - // printk("usb_recv: RPError %x\n", status); + printk("usb_recv: RPError %x\n", status); UDC_flip(Ser0UDCCS1, UDCCS1_RPC); + pci_unmap_single(NULL, ep1_curdmapos, ep1_curdmalen, PCI_DMA_FROMDEVICE); ep1_done(-EIO); return; } --- usb_send.c.orig Wed Feb 14 13:29:18 2001 +++ usb_send.c Mon Feb 19 00:22:19 2001 @@ -106,8 +106,8 @@ printk("usb_send: transmit error %x\n", status); ep2_done(-EIO); } else { - ep2_curdmapos += ep2_curdmalen; - ep2_remain -= ep2_curdmalen; + ep2_curdmapos += Ser0UDCIMP + 1; // this is workaround + ep2_remain -= Ser0UDCIMP + 1; // for case when setting of Ser0UDCIMP was failed if (ep2_remain != 0) { ep2_start(); } else { --XsQoSWH+UP9D9v3l Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="usbnet.diff" --- usbnet.c.orig Sun Feb 18 16:10:47 2001 +++ usbnet.c Mon Feb 19 01:05:42 2001 @@ -61,6 +61,8 @@ * 08-feb-2001 stubbed in "linuxdev", maybe the SA-1100 folk can use it; * AnchorChips 2720 support (from spec) for testing; * fix bit-ordering problem with ethernet multicast addr + * 19-feb-2001 Support for clearing halt conditions. SA1100 UDC support + * updates. Oleg Drokin (green@iXcelerator.com) * *-------------------------------------------------------------------------*/ @@ -85,7 +87,7 @@ #define CONFIG_USB_AN2720 -// #define CONFIG_USB_LINUXDEV +#define CONFIG_USB_LINUXDEV #define CONFIG_USB_NET1080 #define CONFIG_USB_PL2301 @@ -145,6 +147,7 @@ struct sk_buff_head txq; struct sk_buff_head done; struct tasklet_struct bh; + struct tq_struct ctrl_task; }; // device-specific info used by the driver @@ -226,13 +229,13 @@ // all else is optional, and must start with: // u16 vendorId; // from usb-if // u16 productId; -}; +} __attribute__((__packed__)); #define PAD_BYTE ((unsigned char)0xAC) struct nc_trailer { u16 packet_id; -}; +} __attribute__((__packed__)); // packets may use FLAG_FRAMING and optional pad #define FRAMED_SIZE(mtu) (sizeof (struct nc_header) \ @@ -294,7 +297,7 @@ description: "Linux Device", // no reset defined (yet?) // no check_connect needed! - + flags: FLAG_FRAMING, in: 2, out: 1, epsize: 64, }; @@ -1049,6 +1052,17 @@ } /*-------------------------------------------------------------------------*/ +/* usb_clear_halt cannot be called in interrupt context */ + +static void +tx_clear_halt(void *data) +{ + struct usbnet *dev = data; + + usb_clear_halt( dev->udev, usb_sndbulkpipe (dev->udev, dev->driver_info->out)); +} + +/*-------------------------------------------------------------------------*/ static void tx_complete (struct urb *urb) { @@ -1056,6 +1070,15 @@ struct skb_data *entry = (struct skb_data *) skb->cb; struct usbnet *dev = entry->dev; + if (urb->status == USB_ST_STALL) { + if (dev->ctrl_task.sync == 0) { + dev->ctrl_task.routine = tx_clear_halt; + dev->ctrl_task.data = dev; + schedule_task(&dev->ctrl_task); + } else { + printk("Cannot clear TX stall\n"); + } + } urb->dev = 0; entry->state = tx_done; defer_bh (dev, skb); --XsQoSWH+UP9D9v3l-- From kramer@pa.dec.com Mon Feb 19 04:15:44 2001 Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (root@mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id EAA13686 for ; Mon, 19 Feb 2001 04:15:44 +0100 Received: from zmamail04.zma.compaq.com (zmamail04.zma.compaq.com [161.114.64.104]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id EAA21417 for ; Mon, 19 Feb 2001 04:15:42 +0100 (MET) Received: by zmamail04.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 99CD65ADB; Sun, 18 Feb 2001 22:14:05 -0500 (EST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by zmamail04.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 2C90859A1; Sun, 18 Feb 2001 22:14:03 -0500 (EST) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA25923; Sun, 18 Feb 2001 19:14:01 -0800 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id TAA13365; Sun, 18 Feb 2001 19:05:27 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id TAA20500; Sun, 18 Feb 2001 19:05:26 -0800 (PST) Received: from ztxmail02.nz-cce.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA16695; Sun, 18 Feb 2001 19:05:26 -0800 Received: by ztxmail02.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 254341CFF; Sun, 18 Feb 2001 21:05:26 -0600 (CST) Received: from fire.he.net (fire.he.net [216.218.144.2]) by ztxmail02.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 84A151EC8 for ; Sun, 18 Feb 2001 21:05:25 -0600 (CST) Received: from [192.168.23.2] (wardco.com [165.227.105.2]) by fire.he.net (8.8.6/8.8.2) with ESMTP id TAA10059; Sun, 18 Feb 2001 19:05:13 -0800 Mime-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: In-Reply-To: <20010219010720.A3127@dredd.crimea.edu> References: <20010128014539.A23617@dredd.crimea.edu> <20010219010720.A3127@dredd.crimea.edu> Date: Sun, 18 Feb 2001 19:05:06 -0800 To: Oleg Drokin From: Ward Willats Subject: Re: USB for 2.4.1-rmk1-np2 Cc: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com, ipaq@handhelds.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" ; format="flowed" Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk At 1:07 AM +0300 2/19/01, Oleg Drokin wrote: > This is my latest patch for USB. > One of the highlights is that I switched from usb-net-host driver to > usbnet one (from AC tree). Patch for usbnet is also included. Manly! > The biggest remaining problem is UDC not wanting to adjust size of IN > packets (like ep2_start [62]: write 0x2a to f800000c (0x3f) failed) > which, in turn leads to FIFO underruns. Yeah, I saw this even after Nicolas patch to move it after TPC. I've "solved" it by directly slamming the IN max packet register before clearing TPC and _also_ doing the macro slam _after_ TPC. I haven't seen the problem since, but I also haven't exercised the xmitter a great deal since either. So it is just more voodo at this point. -- Ward From kramer@pa.dec.com Wed Feb 21 20:19:53 2001 Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (root@mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id UAA24402 for ; Wed, 21 Feb 2001 20:19:53 +0100 Received: from zmamail03.zma.compaq.com (zmamail03.zma.compaq.com [161.114.64.103]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id UAA22116 for ; Wed, 21 Feb 2001 20:19:52 +0100 (MET) Received: by zmamail03.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 179ACB608; Wed, 21 Feb 2001 14:17:59 -0500 (EST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by zmamail03.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 53E68BDC7; Wed, 21 Feb 2001 14:17:56 -0500 (EST) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA21848; Wed, 21 Feb 2001 11:17:51 -0800 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id LAA02829; Wed, 21 Feb 2001 11:03:43 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id LAA19435; Wed, 21 Feb 2001 11:03:43 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail1.digital.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA19166; Wed, 21 Feb 2001 11:03:42 -0800 Received: from ztxmail02.ztx.compaq.com (ztxmail02.ztx.compaq.com [161.114.1.206]) by mail1.digital.com (8.9.2/8.9.3/WV2.0h) with ESMTP id BAA08645 for ; Wed, 21 Feb 2001 01:27:55 -0800 (PST) Received: by ztxmail02.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 5E8CE1F04; Tue, 20 Feb 2001 21:34:24 -0600 (CST) Received: from email.nist.gov (email.nist.gov [129.6.2.7]) by ztxmail02.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A20351EF3 for ; Tue, 20 Feb 2001 21:34:23 -0600 (CST) Received: from sandbar (sandbar.dmz.cme.nist.gov [129.6.78.200]) by email.nist.gov (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id WAA21541; Tue, 20 Feb 2001 22:34:22 -0500 (EST) Reply-To: From: "Rick Schneeman" To: "sa-1100 List" Subject: Brightness for frontlight inverter on Assabet Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2001 22:35:31 -0500 Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-Msmail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0) Importance: Normal X-Mimeole: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4522.1200 Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk Does any one know if the brightness of the Assabet frontlight inverter is controllable yet through the nmistry kernel module. I see that the intensity is unimplemented and the BCR code for the FREEBIRD has a placeholder. I have the inverter circuit installed but it does not add much light on the screen. I am looking for a way to increase the intensity or brightness; whichever is responsible. Any pointers would be appreciated. Thanks, -Rick Rick Schneeman National Institute of Standards and Technology Gaithersburg, Maryland 20899-8220 USA rschneeman@nist.gov From kramer@pa.dec.com Fri Feb 23 01:31:10 2001 Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (root@mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id BAA31497 for ; Fri, 23 Feb 2001 01:31:10 +0100 Received: from zmamail03.zma.compaq.com (zmamail03.zma.compaq.com [161.114.64.103]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id BAA23578 for ; Fri, 23 Feb 2001 01:31:08 +0100 (MET) Received: by zmamail03.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id F403CBC2D; Thu, 22 Feb 2001 19:29:19 -0500 (EST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by zmamail03.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 7867CBC3D; Thu, 22 Feb 2001 19:29:17 -0500 (EST) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA10614; Thu, 22 Feb 2001 16:29:14 -0800 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id QAA14788; Thu, 22 Feb 2001 16:18:10 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id QAA03621; Thu, 22 Feb 2001 16:18:09 -0800 (PST) Received: from ztxmail01.nz-cce.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA05154; Thu, 22 Feb 2001 16:18:09 -0800 Received: by ztxmail01.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id CD9DB42A4; Thu, 22 Feb 2001 18:18:08 -0600 (CST) Received: from mail.netx4.com (216-064-003-018.inaddr.vitts.com [216.64.3.18]) by ztxmail01.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D9A102B15 for ; Thu, 22 Feb 2001 18:18:07 -0600 (CST) Received: from mvista.com (greeny.netx4.com [192.168.253.30]) by mail.netx4.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id TAA31628; Thu, 22 Feb 2001 19:54:32 -0500 Message-Id: <3A95ABC9.E548BB9C@mvista.com> Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2001 19:16:09 -0500 From: "George G. Davis" Organization: MontaVista Software, Inc. X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.7 [en] (X11; I; Linux 2.4.0-test11 ppc) X-Accept-Language: en Mime-Version: 1.0 To: StrongArm Linux , Arm Linux Cc: "George G. Davis" Subject: Small patch to fix oops when using SA-1111 PS/2 mouse Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="------------A51C503F96293BD73F3F256B" Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------A51C503F96293BD73F3F256B Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Greetings, Attached is a small patch to fix a bug which causes kernel oops when using SA-1111 PS/2 mouse support in 2.4.1-rmk1-np2 (and earlier). -- Regards, George --------------A51C503F96293BD73F3F256B Content-Type: application/octet-stream; name="linux-2.4.1-rmk1-np2-ps2mouse.patch" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="linux-2.4.1-rmk1-np2-ps2mouse.patch" LS0tIGxpbnV4L2RyaXZlcnMvY2hhci9zYTExMTFfa2V5Yi5jLm9yaWcJVGh1IEZlYiAxNSAx MToyMjozMSAyMDAxCisrKyBsaW51eC9kcml2ZXJzL2NoYXIvc2ExMTExX2tleWIuYwlUaHUg RmViIDIyIDE4OjIwOjE3IDIwMDEKQEAgLTQ0Nyw3ICs0NDcsNyBAQAogICAgICAgICAgICAg ICAgaWYgKGhlYWQgIT0gcXVldWUtPnRhaWwpIHsKICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAg cXVldWUtPmhlYWQgPSBoZWFkOwogICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICBpZiAocXVldWUt PmZhc3luYykKLSAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICBraWxsX2Zhc3luYyhx dWV1ZS0+ZmFzeW5jLCBTSUdJTywgUE9MTF9JTik7CisgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAg ICAgICAgICAga2lsbF9mYXN5bmMoJnF1ZXVlLT5mYXN5bmMsIFNJR0lPLCBQT0xMX0lOKTsK ICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgd2FrZV91cF9pbnRlcnJ1cHRpYmxlKCZxdWV1ZS0+ cHJvY19saXN0KTsKICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgIH0KICAgICAgICB9Cg== --------------A51C503F96293BD73F3F256B Content-Type: text/x-vcard; charset=iso-8859-1; name="davis_g.vcf" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-Description: Card for George G. Davis Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="davis_g.vcf" YmVnaW46dmNhcmQgCm46RGF2aXM7R2VvcmdlCnRlbDt3b3JrOjYwMy84ODAtMTQxNAp4LW1v emlsbGEtaHRtbDpGQUxTRQp1cmw6aHR0cDovL3d3dy5tdmlzdGEuY29tCm9yZzpNb250YVZp c3RhIFNvZnR3YXJlLCBJbmMuCmFkcjo7OzQ2IFBpbmUgU3RyZWV0IEV4dGVuc2lvbjtOYXNo dWE7Tkg7MDMwNjA7VVNBCnZlcnNpb246Mi4xCmVtYWlsO2ludGVybmV0OmRhdmlzX2dAbXZp c3RhLmNvbQp0aXRsZTpTb2Z0d2FyZSBFbmdpbmVlcgp4LW1vemlsbGEtY3B0OjstNTM3Ngpm bjpHZW9yZ2UgRy4gRGF2aXMKZW5kOnZjYXJkCg== --------------A51C503F96293BD73F3F256B-- From kramer@pa.dec.com Fri Feb 23 17:51:54 2001 Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (root@mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id RAA00855 for ; Fri, 23 Feb 2001 17:51:54 +0100 Received: from zmamail04.zma.compaq.com (zmamail04.zma.compaq.com [161.114.64.104]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id RAA11802 for ; Fri, 23 Feb 2001 17:51:52 +0100 (MET) Received: by zmamail04.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 463A55EB4; Fri, 23 Feb 2001 11:50:05 -0500 (EST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by zmamail04.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 620965FAF; Fri, 23 Feb 2001 11:49:58 -0500 (EST) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA31348; Fri, 23 Feb 2001 08:49:56 -0800 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id IAA00563; Fri, 23 Feb 2001 08:39:11 -0800 (PST) Received: from ztxmail02.ztx.compaq.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id IAA30362; Fri, 23 Feb 2001 08:39:11 -0800 (PST) Received: by ztxmail02.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id CBE371C36; Fri, 23 Feb 2001 10:39:10 -0600 (CST) Received: from executor.cambridge.redhat.com (dell-paw-3.cambridge.redhat.com [195.224.55.237]) by ztxmail02.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 742681FB4 for ; Fri, 23 Feb 2001 10:39:10 -0600 (CST) Received: from ares.chez-thomas.org (dell-paw-2.cambridge.redhat.com [172.16.18.8]) by executor.cambridge.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 02921ABAA3; Fri, 23 Feb 2001 16:39:09 +0000 (GMT) Message-Id: X-Mailer: XFMail 1.4.6 on Linux X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Mime-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <200102231542.HAA32547@wera.pa.dec.com> X-Printer-X: mailto:g.thomas@opengroup.org Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2001 09:39:08 -0700 (MST) Organization: Red Hat, Inc. From: Gary Thomas To: SA11x0 Linux Subject: Patches? Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk I have some patches I've made to the latest 2.4.0 kernel. Where can I send them? What is the process? Thanks. From kramer@pa.dec.com Fri Feb 23 18:57:51 2001 Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (root@mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id SAA00975 for ; Fri, 23 Feb 2001 18:57:51 +0100 Received: from zmamail05.zma.compaq.com (zmamail05.zma.compaq.com [161.114.64.105]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id SAA15329 for ; Fri, 23 Feb 2001 18:57:49 +0100 (MET) Received: by zmamail05.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id E7D1A6755; Fri, 23 Feb 2001 12:56:01 -0500 (EST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by zmamail05.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 875F165E7; Fri, 23 Feb 2001 12:55:56 -0500 (EST) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA00097; Fri, 23 Feb 2001 09:55:53 -0800 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id JAA14345; Fri, 23 Feb 2001 09:46:26 -0800 (PST) Received: from zmamail01.zma.compaq.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id JAA17577; Fri, 23 Feb 2001 09:46:26 -0800 (PST) Received: by zmamail01.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id B2AA611DAE; Fri, 23 Feb 2001 12:46:24 -0500 (EST) Received: from mail.netx4.com (216-064-003-018.inaddr.vitts.com [216.64.3.18]) by zmamail01.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6CBCC10DDA for ; Fri, 23 Feb 2001 12:46:24 -0500 (EST) Received: from mvista.com (greeny.netx4.com [192.168.253.30]) by mail.netx4.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id NAA32351; Fri, 23 Feb 2001 13:22:52 -0500 Message-Id: <3A96A168.2D9C6C86@mvista.com> Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2001 12:44:08 -0500 From: "George G. Davis" Organization: MontaVista Software, Inc. X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.7 [en] (X11; I; Linux 2.4.0-test11 ppc) X-Accept-Language: en Mime-Version: 1.0 To: Gary Thomas Cc: SA11x0 Linux Subject: Re: Patches? References: Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="------------6E843105EAC039C98229B344" Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------6E843105EAC039C98229B344 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Gary Thomas wrote: > > I have some patches I've made to the latest 2.4.0 kernel. > Where can I send them? What is the process? Nicolas Pitre maintains the SA-1100 kernel. So he's normally the one to send SA-11xx patches too. However, he's on vacation 'til next week sometime. It is also the "norm" to post SA-11xx patches to this list and was Nico's standing request 'til he gets back from vac. Not to encourage cross posting, but it is also often typical to post SA-11xx patches to Russel King and/or the linux-arm-kernel@arm.linux.org.uk list. Depending on how large your patch is you may want to consider discussing the means of delivery with Nico/Russel. Small patches are not a problem for the "lists" and may be of benefit to the rest of us sooner! : ) > > Thanks. -- Regards, George --------------6E843105EAC039C98229B344 Content-Type: text/x-vcard; charset=iso-8859-1; name="davis_g.vcf" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-Description: Card for George G. Davis Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="davis_g.vcf" YmVnaW46dmNhcmQgCm46RGF2aXM7R2VvcmdlCnRlbDt3b3JrOjYwMy84ODAtMTQxNAp4LW1v emlsbGEtaHRtbDpGQUxTRQp1cmw6aHR0cDovL3d3dy5tdmlzdGEuY29tCm9yZzpNb250YVZp c3RhIFNvZnR3YXJlLCBJbmMuCmFkcjo7OzQ2IFBpbmUgU3RyZWV0IEV4dGVuc2lvbjtOYXNo dWE7Tkg7MDMwNjA7VVNBCnZlcnNpb246Mi4xCmVtYWlsO2ludGVybmV0OmRhdmlzX2dAbXZp c3RhLmNvbQp0aXRsZTpTb2Z0d2FyZSBFbmdpbmVlcgp4LW1vemlsbGEtY3B0OjstNTM3Ngpm bjpHZW9yZ2UgRy4gRGF2aXMKZW5kOnZjYXJkCg== --------------6E843105EAC039C98229B344-- From kramer@pa.dec.com Fri Feb 23 19:01:59 2001 Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (root@mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id TAA01001 for ; Fri, 23 Feb 2001 19:01:59 +0100 Received: from ztxmail03.ztx.compaq.com (ztxmail03.ztx.compaq.com [161.114.1.207]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id TAA15553 for ; Fri, 23 Feb 2001 19:01:57 +0100 (MET) Received: by ztxmail03.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 883171BCA; Fri, 23 Feb 2001 12:00:10 -0600 (CST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by ztxmail03.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 8FD231B3C; Fri, 23 Feb 2001 12:00:08 -0600 (CST) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA00531; Fri, 23 Feb 2001 10:00:07 -0800 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id JAA04714; Fri, 23 Feb 2001 09:51:44 -0800 (PST) Received: from ztxmail02.ztx.compaq.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id JAA24067; Fri, 23 Feb 2001 09:51:43 -0800 (PST) Received: by ztxmail02.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 133EC1BFB; Fri, 23 Feb 2001 11:51:43 -0600 (CST) Received: from mail.netx4.com (216-064-003-018.inaddr.vitts.com [216.64.3.18]) by ztxmail02.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46F0D1CFD for ; Fri, 23 Feb 2001 11:51:42 -0600 (CST) Received: from mvista.com (greeny.netx4.com [192.168.253.30]) by mail.netx4.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id NAA32367; Fri, 23 Feb 2001 13:28:25 -0500 Message-Id: <3A96A2B5.53FAA922@mvista.com> Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2001 12:49:41 -0500 From: "George G. Davis" Organization: MontaVista Software, Inc. X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.7 [en] (X11; I; Linux 2.4.0-test11 ppc) X-Accept-Language: en Mime-Version: 1.0 To: Gary Thomas , SA11x0 Linux Subject: Re: Patches? References: <3A96A168.2D9C6C86@mvista.com> Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="------------7CAFFF2791724F0CA3EBC058" Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------7CAFFF2791724F0CA3EBC058 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit "George G. Davis" wrote: > > Gary Thomas wrote: > > > > I have some patches I've made to the latest 2.4.0 kernel. > > Where can I send them? What is the process? BTW, it's usually considered good etiquette to update your kernel source tree to the latest patch level before submitting your patches. This will reduce the workload on the kernel maintainers and will help you to get your changes into the kernel sooner. > > Nicolas Pitre maintains the SA-1100 kernel. > So he's normally the one to send SA-11xx patches too. However, > he's on vacation 'til next week sometime. > > It is also the "norm" to post SA-11xx patches to this list > and was Nico's standing request 'til he gets back from vac. > > Not to encourage cross posting, but it is also often typical > to post SA-11xx patches to Russel King > and/or the linux-arm-kernel@arm.linux.org.uk list. > > Depending on how large your patch is you may want to consider > discussing the means of delivery with Nico/Russel. Small patches > are not a problem for the "lists" and may be of benefit to the > rest of us sooner! : ) > > > > > Thanks. > > -- > Regards, > George -- Regards, George --------------7CAFFF2791724F0CA3EBC058 Content-Type: text/x-vcard; charset=iso-8859-1; name="davis_g.vcf" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-Description: Card for George G. Davis Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="davis_g.vcf" YmVnaW46dmNhcmQgCm46RGF2aXM7R2VvcmdlCnRlbDt3b3JrOjYwMy84ODAtMTQxNAp4LW1v emlsbGEtaHRtbDpGQUxTRQp1cmw6aHR0cDovL3d3dy5tdmlzdGEuY29tCm9yZzpNb250YVZp c3RhIFNvZnR3YXJlLCBJbmMuCmFkcjo7OzQ2IFBpbmUgU3RyZWV0IEV4dGVuc2lvbjtOYXNo dWE7Tkg7MDMwNjA7VVNBCnZlcnNpb246Mi4xCmVtYWlsO2ludGVybmV0OmRhdmlzX2dAbXZp c3RhLmNvbQp0aXRsZTpTb2Z0d2FyZSBFbmdpbmVlcgp4LW1vemlsbGEtY3B0OjstNTM3Ngpm bjpHZW9yZ2UgRy4gRGF2aXMKZW5kOnZjYXJkCg== --------------7CAFFF2791724F0CA3EBC058-- From kramer@pa.dec.com Fri Feb 23 21:24:06 2001 Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (root@mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id VAA01409 for ; Fri, 23 Feb 2001 21:24:06 +0100 Received: from ztxmail05.ztx.compaq.com (ztxmail05.ztx.compaq.com [161.114.1.209]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id VAA22121 for ; Fri, 23 Feb 2001 21:24:04 +0100 (MET) Received: by ztxmail05.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 2C4198DC; Fri, 23 Feb 2001 14:22:17 -0600 (CST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by ztxmail05.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 66417A1F; Fri, 23 Feb 2001 14:22:15 -0600 (CST) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA02837; Fri, 23 Feb 2001 12:22:07 -0800 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id MAA13619; Fri, 23 Feb 2001 12:08:56 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id MAA19092; Fri, 23 Feb 2001 12:08:56 -0800 (PST) Received: from zmamail01.nz-tay.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA02376; Fri, 23 Feb 2001 12:08:55 -0800 Received: by zmamail01.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id AB4F411CFB; Fri, 23 Feb 2001 15:08:54 -0500 (EST) Received: from mail.netx4.com (216-064-003-018.inaddr.vitts.com [216.64.3.18]) by zmamail01.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B5B9C16E for ; Fri, 23 Feb 2001 15:08:54 -0500 (EST) Received: from mvista.com (greeny.netx4.com [192.168.253.30]) by mail.netx4.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id PAA32570; Fri, 23 Feb 2001 15:45:41 -0500 Message-Id: <3A96C2DE.3D5C4C17@mvista.com> Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2001 15:06:54 -0500 From: "George G. Davis" Organization: MontaVista Software, Inc. X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.7 [en] (X11; I; Linux 2.4.0-test11 ppc) X-Accept-Language: en Mime-Version: 1.0 To: StrongArm Linux , Arm Linux Cc: "George G. Davis" Subject: SA-1111 USB patch to fix/cleanup driver init Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="------------7C117D4C8B06A4299599183A" Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------7C117D4C8B06A4299599183A Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Greetings, I've found a couple of problems in the SA-1111 USB driver during the init phase. Some, I've attempted to fix. Others are still open and require further consideration. Here's a summary of what I've found thus far: 1. Dangerous use of virt addr as DMA buf ptr in sa1111_hc_dma_setup To fix this, I've used consistent_alloc to obtain a valid phys addr for the DMA operation. Not that we really care about coherency in this case. We just need a valid phys addr for the DMA op which doesn't expose the infamous SA-1111 A20 DMA bug. BTW, prior to this change, I observed (on a logic analyzer) that use of the virt addr was indeed exposing the A20 DMA bug. My patch has a problem in consistent_free? Don't know what I'm doing wrong there. But I get this error during boot: Trying to vfree() nonexistent vm area (c00ff000) 2. Bad assumptions and use of various SA-1111 device functions to workaround SA-1111 DMA errata during USB init _will_ cause various malfunctions in other drivers depending on what/when other drivers are loaded relative to USB driver. This is just a mess... I believe we need to move this DMA errata workaround into arch/arm/mach-sa1100/hw.c and be done with it. It's _really_ bad idea to be changing the state of other devices/functions which may very well be in use elsewhere. Thanks for all feedback! : ) -- Regards, George --------------7C117D4C8B06A4299599183A Content-Type: application/octet-stream; name="linux-2.4.1-rmk1-np2-usb.patch" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="linux-2.4.1-rmk1-np2-usb.patch" LS0tIGxpbnV4L2RyaXZlcnMvdXNiL3VzYi1vaGNpLXNhMTExMS5oLm9yaWcJVGh1IEZlYiAx NSAxMjoyNDo1NyAyMDAxCisrKyBsaW51eC9kcml2ZXJzL3VzYi91c2Itb2hjaS1zYTExMTEu aAlGcmkgRmViIDIzIDE0OjI1OjA1IDIwMDEKQEAgLTcxLDMyICs3MSw0NCBAQAogc3RhdGlj IHZvaWQKIHNhMTExMV9oY19kbWFfc2V0dXAodm9pZCkKIHsKLQlzdGF0aWMgdW5zaWduZWQg ZG1hVHhCdWZmWzRdOworCWRtYV9hZGRyX3QgdmJ1ZjsKKwl2b2lkICogcGJ1ZjsKIAogCS8q IERNQSBpbml0ICYgc2V0dXAgKi8KIAotI2RlZmluZSBTQUNSMAkJKCooKHZvbGF0aWxlIFdv cmQgKikgU0ExMTExX3AydiAoX1NBQ1IwKSkpCi0jZGVmaW5lIFNBQ1IxCQkoKigodm9sYXRp bGUgV29yZCAqKSBTQTExMTFfcDJ2IChfU0FDUjEpKSkKLSNkZWZpbmUgU0FEVENTCQkoKigo dm9sYXRpbGUgV29yZCAqKSBTQTExMTFfcDJ2IChfU0FEVENTKSkpCi0jZGVmaW5lIFNBRFRT QQkJKCooKHZvbGF0aWxlIFdvcmQgKikgU0ExMTExX3AydiAoX1NBRFRTQSkpKQotI2RlZmlu ZSBTQURUQ0EJCSgqKCh2b2xhdGlsZSBXb3JkICopIFNBMTExMV9wMnYgKF9TQURUQ0EpKSkK LQotI2RlZmluZSBTS1BDUl9VQ0xLRW4JKDE8PDApCi0jZGVmaW5lIFNLUENSX0kyU0NMS0Vu CSgxPDwyKQotI2RlZmluZSBTS1BDUl9EQ0xLRW4JKDE8PDcpCisJLyogICBXQVJOSU5HOiBU aGUgU0EtMTExMSBMMyBmdW5jdGlvbiBpcyB1c2VkIGFzIHBhcnQgb2YgdGhpcyBTQS0xMTEx IERNQQorCSAqICAgZXJyYXRhIHdvcmthcm91bmQuCisJICoKKwkgKiAgIE4uQi4sIFdoZW4g dGhlIEwzIGZ1bmN0aW9uIGlzIGVuYWJsZWQsIGl0IHVzZXMgR1BJT19CPDQ6NT4gYW5kIHRh a2VzCisJICogICBwcmVjZWRlbmNlIG92ZXIgdGhlIFBTLzIgbW91c2UgYW5kIEdQSU9fQiBm dW5jdGlvbnMuIFJlZmVyIHRvICJJbnRlbAorCSAqICAgU3Ryb25nQVJNIFNBLTExMTEgTWlj cm9wcm9jZXNzb3IgQ29tcGFuaW9uIENoaXAsIFNlY3QgMTAuMiIgZm9yIGRldGFpbHMuCisJ ICogICBTbyB0aGlzICJmaXgiIG1heSAiYnJlYWsiIHN1cHBvcnQgb2YgZWl0aGVyIFBTLzIg bW91c2Ugb3IgR1BJT19CIGlmCisJICogICBwcmVjYXV0aW9ucyBhcmUgbm90IHRha2VuIHRv IGF2b2lkIGNvbGxpc2lvbnMgaW4gY29uZmlndXJhdGlvbiBhbmQKKwkgKiAgIHVzZSBvZiB0 aGVzZSBwaW5zLiBBRkFJSywgbm8gcHJlY2F1dGlvbnMgYXJlIHRha2VuIGF0IHRoaXMgdGlt ZS4gU28gaXQKKwkgKiAgIGlzIGxpa2VseSB0aGF0IHRoZSBhY3Rpb24gdGFrZW4gaGVyZSBt YXkgY2F1c2UgcHJvYmxlbXMgaW4gUFMvMiBtb3VzZQorCSAqICAgYW5kL29yIEdQSU9fQiBw aW4gdXNlIGVsc2V3aGVyZS4KKwkgKgorCSAqICAgQnV0IHdhaXQsIHRoZXJlJ3MgbW9yZS4u LiBXaGF0IHdlJ3JlIGRvaW5nIGhlcmUgaXMgb2J2aW91c2x5IGFsdG9nZXRoZXIKKwkgKiAg IGEgYmFkIGlkZWEuIFdlJ3JlIGluZGlzY3JpbWFuYXRlbHkgYml0IGZsaXBwaW5nIGNvbmZp ZyBmb3IgYSBmZXcgZGlmZmVyZW50CisJICogICBmdW5jdGlvbnMgaGVyZSB3aGljaCBhcmUg Im93bmVkIiBieSBvdGhlciBkcml2ZXJzLiBUaGlzIG5lZWRzIHRvIGJlCisJICogICBoYW5k bGVkIGJldHRlciB0aGFuIGl0IGlzIGJlaW5nIGRvbmUgaGVyZSBhdCB0aGlzIHRpbWUuCisJ ICovCiAKIAkvKiBwcmltZSB0aGUgZG1hIGVuZ2luZSB3aXRoIGEgdGlueSBkbWEgKi8KLQlT S1BDUiB8PSBTS1BDUl9JMlNDTEtFbjsKLQlTS0FVRCB8PSAweDAwMDAwMDE4OworCVNLUENS IHw9IFNLUENSX0kyU0NMS0VOOworCVNLQVVEIHw9IFNLUENSX0wzQ0xLRU4gfCBTS1BDUl9T Q0xLRU47CiAJCiAJU0FDUjAgfD0gMHgwMDAwMzMwNTsKIAlTQUNSMSA9IDB4MDAwMDAwMDA7 IAogCQotCVNBRFRTQSA9ICh1bnNpZ25lZCBsb25nKWRtYVR4QnVmZjsKLQlTQURUQ0EgPSBz aXplb2YoZG1hVHhCdWZmKTsKKworCXBidWYgPSBjb25zaXN0ZW50X2FsbG9jKEdGUF9LRVJO RUwgfCBHRlBfRE1BLCA0LCAmdmJ1Zik7CisKKwlTQURUU0EgPSAodW5zaWduZWQgbG9uZylw YnVmOworCVNBRFRDQSA9IDQ7CiAKIAlTQURUQ1MgfD0gMHgwMDAwMDAxMTsKLQlTS1BDUiB8 PSBTS1BDUl9EQ0xLRW47CisJU0tQQ1IgfD0gU0tQQ1JfRENMS0VOOwogCiAJLyogd2FpdCAq LwogCXVkZWxheSgxMDApOwpAQCAtMTA4LDcgKzEyMCwxMSBAQAogCVNBQ1IwIHw9IDB4MDAw MDAwMDQ7CiAJU0FDUjAgJj0gfigweDAwMDAwMDA0KTsKIAotCVNLUENSICY9IH5TS1BDUl9J MlNDTEtFbjsKKwlTS0FVRCAmPSB+KFNLUENSX0wzQ0xLRU4gfCBTS1BDUl9TQ0xLRU4pOwor CisJU0tQQ1IgJj0gflNLUENSX0kyU0NMS0VOOworCisJY29uc2lzdGVudF9mcmVlKHZidWYp OwogfQkKIAogc3RhdGljIGludApAQCAtMTM5LDcgKzE1NSw3IEBACiBzYTExMTFfY2xlYW51 cCh2b2lkKQogewogCS8qIHR1cm4gdGhlIFVTQiBjbG9jayBvZmYgKi8KLQlTS1BDUiAmPSB+ MHgxOworCVNLUENSICY9IH5TS1BDUl9VQ0xLRU47CiB9CiAKIApAQCAtMTYwLDcgKzE3Niw3 IEBACiAJCXJldHVybiAwOwogCiAJLyogdHVybiBvbiBjbG9ja3MgKi8KLQlTS1BDUiA9IFNL UENSX1VDTEtFbjsKKwlTS1BDUiB8PSBTS1BDUl9VQ0xLRU47CiAJdWRlbGF5KDEwMCk7CiAK IAkvKiBmb3JjZSBhIHJlc2V0ICovCg== --------------7C117D4C8B06A4299599183A Content-Type: text/x-vcard; charset=iso-8859-1; name="davis_g.vcf" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-Description: Card for George G. Davis Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="davis_g.vcf" YmVnaW46dmNhcmQgCm46RGF2aXM7R2VvcmdlCnRlbDt3b3JrOjYwMy84ODAtMTQxNAp4LW1v emlsbGEtaHRtbDpGQUxTRQp1cmw6aHR0cDovL3d3dy5tdmlzdGEuY29tCm9yZzpNb250YVZp c3RhIFNvZnR3YXJlLCBJbmMuCmFkcjo7OzQ2IFBpbmUgU3RyZWV0IEV4dGVuc2lvbjtOYXNo dWE7Tkg7MDMwNjA7VVNBCnZlcnNpb246Mi4xCmVtYWlsO2ludGVybmV0OmRhdmlzX2dAbXZp c3RhLmNvbQp0aXRsZTpTb2Z0d2FyZSBFbmdpbmVlcgp4LW1vemlsbGEtY3B0OjstNTM3Ngpm bjpHZW9yZ2UgRy4gRGF2aXMKZW5kOnZjYXJkCg== --------------7C117D4C8B06A4299599183A-- From kramer@pa.dec.com Fri Feb 23 23:28:26 2001 Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (root@mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id XAA01754 for ; Fri, 23 Feb 2001 23:28:26 +0100 Received: from ztxmail05.ztx.compaq.com (ztxmail05.ztx.compaq.com [161.114.1.209]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id XAA27848 for ; Fri, 23 Feb 2001 23:28:23 +0100 (MET) Received: by ztxmail05.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 4D4009ED; Fri, 23 Feb 2001 16:26:36 -0600 (CST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by ztxmail05.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 8586A8D9; Fri, 23 Feb 2001 16:26:34 -0600 (CST) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA04008; Fri, 23 Feb 2001 14:26:33 -0800 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id OAA08151; Fri, 23 Feb 2001 14:15:27 -0800 (PST) Received: from ztxmail01.ztx.compaq.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id OAA12600; Fri, 23 Feb 2001 14:15:26 -0800 (PST) Received: by ztxmail01.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id BB6C77C70; Fri, 23 Feb 2001 12:01:27 -0600 (CST) Received: from executor.cambridge.redhat.com (dell-paw-3.cambridge.redhat.com [195.224.55.237]) by ztxmail01.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 39D71A896 for ; Fri, 23 Feb 2001 11:58:21 -0600 (CST) Received: from ares.chez-thomas.org (dell-paw-2.cambridge.redhat.com [172.16.18.8]) by executor.cambridge.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CFB39ABAA6; Fri, 23 Feb 2001 17:54:33 +0000 (GMT) Message-Id: X-Mailer: XFMail 1.4.6 on Linux X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="_=XFMail.1.4.6.Linux:20010223105433:27272=_" In-Reply-To: <3A96A168.2D9C6C86@mvista.com> X-Printer-X: mailto:g.thomas@opengroup.org Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2001 10:54:33 -0700 (MST) Organization: Red Hat, Inc. From: Gary Thomas To: "George G. Davis" Subject: Re: Patches? Cc: SA11x0 Linux Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk This message is in MIME format --_=XFMail.1.4.6.Linux:20010223105433:27272=_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii On 23-Feb-2001 George G. Davis wrote: > Gary Thomas wrote: >> >> I have some patches I've made to the latest 2.4.0 kernel. >> Where can I send them? What is the process? > > Nicolas Pitre maintains the SA-1100 kernel. > So he's normally the one to send SA-11xx patches too. However, > he's on vacation 'til next week sometime. > > It is also the "norm" to post SA-11xx patches to this list > and was Nico's standing request 'til he gets back from vac. > > Not to encourage cross posting, but it is also often typical > to post SA-11xx patches to Russel King > and/or the linux-arm-kernel@arm.linux.org.uk list. > > Depending on how large your patch is you may want to consider > discussing the means of delivery with Nico/Russel. Small patches > are not a problem for the "lists" and may be of benefit to the > rest of us sooner! : ) Thanks for the info. Since my changes are quite small, I'll just attach them to this response. Basically, I am working with RedBoot, the bootstrap environment from Red Hat (I'm the principle author). RedBoot runs on a wide variety of platforms and we are endeavoring to make it usable to boot Linux wherever possible. That said, I needed a few minor tweaks to the current version to get Linux and RedBoot happy on the Assabet. Note: some of the patches are generic and have nothing to do with RedBoot, but more to do with actually getting the kernel to build. Thanks. --_=XFMail.1.4.6.Linux:20010223105433:27272=_ Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="diffs" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-Type: application/octet-stream; name=diffs; SizeOnDisk=2957 IwojIEkgaGFkIHRyb3VibGUgd2l0aCBpbnZhbGlkIHBhcmFtZXRlciB0YWdzIGNhdXNpbmcgdGhl IGtlcm5lbAojIHRvIGhhbmcgW3ZlcnkgcXVpZXRseV0gZHVyaW5nIGJvb3QuICBUaGlzIHNob3Vs ZCBmaXggdGhhdAojCgpkaWZmIC11ciAtLWV4Y2x1ZGU9Ki5bb2FdIC0tZXhjbHVkZT0uKi5mbGFn KiAtLWV4Y2x1ZGU9LmRlcGVuZCBsaW51eC5PUklHL2tlcm5lbC9hcmNoL2FybS9rZXJuZWwvc2V0 dXAuYyBsaW51eC9rZXJuZWwvYXJjaC9hcm0va2VybmVsL3NldHVwLmMKLS0tIGxpbnV4Lk9SSUcv a2VybmVsL2FyY2gvYXJtL2tlcm5lbC9zZXR1cC5jCVRodSBKYW4gMTEgMTM6MjQ6MjcgMjAwMQor KysgbGludXgva2VybmVsL2FyY2gvYXJtL2tlcm5lbC9zZXR1cC5jCUZyaSBGZWIgMjMgMDg6MTU6 MzUgMjAwMQpAQCAtNDQwLDcgKzQ0MCw4IEBACiAJCQljb250aW51ZTsKIAogCQlwcmludGsoS0VS Tl9XQVJOSU5HCi0JCSAgICAgICAiSWdub3JpbmcgdW5yZWNvZ25pc2VkIHRhZyAweCUwOHhcbiIs IHQtPmhkci50YWcpOworCQkgICAgICAgIklnbm9yaW5nIHVucmVjb2duaXNlZCB0YWcgWzB4JTA4 eF0weCUwOHhcbiIsIHQsIHQtPmhkci50YWcpOworICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgIGJyZWFrOyAgLy8g R2l2ZSB1cCBvbiBiYWQgdGFnCiAJfQogfQogCgojCiMgTXkgY29tcGlsZXIgc2VlbXMgdG8gaGF2 ZSBhIGJyb2tlbiBDIHByZXByb2Nlc3Nvci4gIE5vdCBhbGwKIyB2ZXJzaW9ucyBzdWZmZXIgZnJv bSB0aGlzLCBidXQgaXQgd2FzIG5lY2Vzc2FyeSBmb3IgbWUuCiMKCmRpZmYgLXVyIC0tZXhjbHVk ZT0qLltvYV0gLS1leGNsdWRlPS4qLmZsYWcqIC0tZXhjbHVkZT0uZGVwZW5kIGxpbnV4Lk9SSUcv a2VybmVsL2FyY2gvYXJtL2xpYi9tZW1jcHkuUyBsaW51eC9rZXJuZWwvYXJjaC9hcm0vbGliL21l bWNweS5TCi0tLSBsaW51eC5PUklHL2tlcm5lbC9hcmNoL2FybS9saWIvbWVtY3B5LlMJVGh1IEph biAxMSAxMzoyNDoyNyAyMDAxCisrKyBsaW51eC9rZXJuZWwvYXJjaC9hcm0vbGliL21lbWNweS5T CVR1ZSBGZWIgMjAgMTI6Mjc6MTQgMjAwMQpAQCAtMTQsMTAgKzE0LDEwIEBACiAKIAkJLnRleHQK IAotI2RlZmluZSBFTlRFUglcCi0JCW1vdglpcCxzcAk7XAotCQlzdG1mZAlzcCEse3I0LXI5LGZw LGlwLGxyLHBjfQk7XAotCQlzdWIJZnAsaXAsIzQKKy8vI2RlZmluZSBFTlRFUglcCisvLwkJbW92 CWlwLHNwCTtcCisvLwkJc3RtZmQJc3AhLHtyNC1yOSxmcCxpcCxscixwY30JO1wKKy8vCQlzdWIJ ZnAsaXAsIzQKIAogI2RlZmluZSBFWElUCVwKIAkJTE9BRFJFR1MoZWEsIGZwLCB7cjQgLSByOSwg ZnAsIHNwLCBwY30pCkBAIC0zMSw3ICszMSwxMCBAQAogICovCiBFTlRSWShtZW1jcHkpCiBFTlRS WShtZW1tb3ZlKQotCQlFTlRFUgorLy8JCUVOVEVSCisJCW1vdglpcCxzcAorCQlzdG1mZAlzcCEs e3I0LXI5LGZwLGlwLGxyLHBjfQorCQlzdWIJZnAsaXAsIzQKIAkJY21wCXIxLCByMAogCQliY2MJ MTlmCiAJCXN1YnMJcjIsIHIyLCAjNAoKIwojIFRoaXMgY2hhbmdlIGFsbG93cyB0aGUga2VybmVs IHRvIGdldCBwYXJhbXRlcnMgcGFzc2VkIGluIGZyb20gUmVkQm9vdAojCgpkaWZmIC11ciAtLWV4 Y2x1ZGU9Ki5bb2FdIC0tZXhjbHVkZT0uKi5mbGFnKiAtLWV4Y2x1ZGU9LmRlcGVuZCBsaW51eC5P UklHL2tlcm5lbC9hcmNoL2FybS9tYWNoLXNhMTEwMC9hcmNoLmMgbGludXgva2VybmVsL2FyY2gv YXJtL21hY2gtc2ExMTAwL2FyY2guYwotLS0gbGludXguT1JJRy9rZXJuZWwvYXJjaC9hcm0vbWFj aC1zYTExMDAvYXJjaC5jCVRodSBKYW4gMTggMTk6MjI6NTkgMjAwMQorKysgbGludXgva2VybmVs L2FyY2gvYXJtL21hY2gtc2ExMTAwL2FyY2guYwlUaHUgRmViIDIyIDE1OjUwOjA2IDIwMDEKQEAg LTI3Nyw2ICsyNzcsNyBAQAogI2lmZGVmIENPTkZJR19TQTExMDBfQVNTQUJFVAogTUFDSElORV9T VEFSVChBU1NBQkVULCAiSW50ZWwtQXNzYWJldCIpCiAJQk9PVF9NRU0oMHhjMDAwMDAwMCwgMHg4 MDAwMDAwMCwgMHhmODAwMDAwMCkKKwlCT09UX1BBUkFNUygweGMwMDAzMDAwKQogCUZJWFVQKGZp eHVwX3NhMTEwMCkKIAlNQVBJTyhzYTExMDBfbWFwX2lvKQogCUlOSVRJUlEoZ2VuYXJjaF9pbml0 X2lycSkKCiMKIyBUaGlzIG1ha2VmaWxlIHdhcyBicm9rZW4gb3V0IG9mIHRoZSBib3ggYW5kIHRo dXMgbm8gUENNQ0lBIG5ldHdvcmsKIyBkcml2ZXJzIGV2ZXIgZ290IGJ1aWx0LgojCgpkaWZmIC11 ciAtLWV4Y2x1ZGU9Ki5bb2FdIC0tZXhjbHVkZT0uKi5mbGFnKiAtLWV4Y2x1ZGU9LmRlcGVuZCBs aW51eC5PUklHL2tlcm5lbC9kcml2ZXJzL25ldC9wY21jaWEvTWFrZWZpbGUgbGludXgva2VybmVs L2RyaXZlcnMvbmV0L3BjbWNpYS9NYWtlZmlsZQotLS0gbGludXguT1JJRy9rZXJuZWwvZHJpdmVy cy9uZXQvcGNtY2lhL01ha2VmaWxlCVRodSBKYW4gMTEgMTM6MjQ6NDggMjAwMQorKysgbGludXgv a2VybmVsL2RyaXZlcnMvbmV0L3BjbWNpYS9NYWtlZmlsZQlGcmkgRmViIDIzIDA4OjEyOjE3IDIw MDEKQEAgLTQxLDEyICs0MSwxMiBAQAogTV9PQkpTCQk6PSAkKGZpbHRlci1vdXQgJChleHBvcnQt b2JqcyksICQob2JqLW0pKQogTVhfT0JKUwkJOj0gJChmaWx0ZXIgICAgICQoZXhwb3J0LW9ianMp LCAkKG9iai1tKSkKIAoraW5jbHVkZSAkKFRPUERJUikvUnVsZXMubWFrZQorCiB3dmxhbl9jcy5v OiB3dmxhbl9jcy5jIHd2bGFuX2hjZi5vIHd2bGFuX2hjZmlvLm8KIAkkKENDKSAkKENGTEFHUykg LURNT0RVTEUgLWMgLW8gLiRAICQ8CiAJJChMRCkgLXIgLW8gJEAgLiRAIHd2bGFuX2hjZi5vIHd2 bGFuX2hjZmlvLm8KIAlybSAtZiAuJEAKLQotaW5jbHVkZSAkKFRPUERJUikvUnVsZXMubWFrZQog CiAuaWJtdHIubzogLi4vdG9rZW5yaW5nL2libXRyLmMKIAkkKENDKSAkKENGTEFHUykgLURfX05P X1ZFUlNJT05fXyAtRFBDTUNJQSAtYyAtbyAkQCAuLi90b2tlbnJpbmcvaWJtdHIuYwo= --_=XFMail.1.4.6.Linux:20010223105433:27272=_ --_=XFMail.1.4.6.Linux:20010223105433:27272=_-- End of MIME message From kramer@pa.dec.com Sat Feb 24 02:11:14 2001 Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (root@mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id CAA02224 for ; Sat, 24 Feb 2001 02:11:14 +0100 Received: from zmamail04.zma.compaq.com (zmamail04.zma.compaq.com [161.114.64.104]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id CAA04004 for ; Sat, 24 Feb 2001 02:11:12 +0100 (MET) Received: by zmamail04.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 85DBC5C22; Fri, 23 Feb 2001 20:09:25 -0500 (EST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by zmamail04.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 771395CB5; Fri, 23 Feb 2001 20:09:23 -0500 (EST) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA09710; Fri, 23 Feb 2001 17:09:20 -0800 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id QAA21330; Fri, 23 Feb 2001 16:44:16 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id QAA05863; Fri, 23 Feb 2001 16:44:16 -0800 (PST) Received: from ztxmail01.nz-cce.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA08958; Fri, 23 Feb 2001 16:44:15 -0800 Received: by ztxmail01.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 3E82F260A; Fri, 23 Feb 2001 18:44:15 -0600 (CST) Received: from mail.netx4.com (216-064-003-018.inaddr.vitts.com [216.64.3.18]) by ztxmail01.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A47A626A2 for ; Fri, 23 Feb 2001 18:44:14 -0600 (CST) Received: from mvista.com (greeny.netx4.com [192.168.253.30]) by mail.netx4.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id UAA00509; Fri, 23 Feb 2001 20:21:10 -0500 Message-Id: <3A970369.ED1B50C@mvista.com> Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2001 19:42:17 -0500 From: "George G. Davis" Organization: MontaVista Software, Inc. X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.7 [en] (X11; I; Linux 2.4.0-test11 ppc) X-Accept-Language: en Mime-Version: 1.0 To: StrongArm Linux , Arm Linux Cc: George@mvista.com, G.@mvista.com, Davis@mvista.com Subject: Variable latency accesses and LCD display distortion on Assabet & Neponset Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="------------205168E025248EFA9F8F845B" Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------205168E025248EFA9F8F845B Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Greetings, Many of you Assabet+Neponset users may already know this, but this only came to my attention a short while ago. I seem to recall discussion of LCD display distortion occurring during SMC91C96 network activity. Although I can no longer find this in the archives. Oh, wait, there it is (well for iPaq with PCMCIA accesses anyway - same subject, different mailing list, but same problem I suspect): Subject: [iPAQ] "Sync loss" on LCD with 0.19 during PCMCIA access ? I've found that the LCD screen disruption which occurs on Assabet with SMC91C96 network activity and sometimes PCMCIA/CF accesses depending on the type of card used is due to the use of 100K Ohm pull-ups on open-collector/drain ready/wait signal lines. In the case of the SMC91C96, I've observed that rd/wr cycles take approx 1.5uS to complete while using a 100KOhm pull-up on the SA-1110 RDY line. Yet the SMC chip access should be more in the range of 150nS+. In fact, the SMC pulls the SA-1110 RDY line low for about 150nS then releases it at which point it is sssslllloooowwwwllllyyyy pulled high by the 100KOhm pull-up. Use of 100KOhm pull-ups on OC/OD signal lines may be well intentioned to minimize power. But you may want to consider using approx 10KOhm on these signal lines for better performance and no more screen disruption. Do whatever power/performance tradeoff analysis you like. But if you don't like the screen distortion, change your pull-ups. I suspect this problem also exists at the PCMCIA/CF sockets on the nPWAIT and nIOIS16 signal lines. In this case, any PCMCIA/CF cards which require variable latency access, i.e. pulls nPWAIT low, may have the same problem due to weak 100KOhm pull-ups on these lines too. Again, change to 10KOhm or something more to your liking based on your own power/performance analysis. -- Regards, George --------------205168E025248EFA9F8F845B Content-Type: text/x-vcard; charset=iso-8859-1; name="davis_g.vcf" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-Description: Card for George G. Davis Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="davis_g.vcf" YmVnaW46dmNhcmQgCm46RGF2aXM7R2VvcmdlCnRlbDt3b3JrOjYwMy84ODAtMTQxNAp4LW1v emlsbGEtaHRtbDpGQUxTRQp1cmw6aHR0cDovL3d3dy5tdmlzdGEuY29tCm9yZzpNb250YVZp c3RhIFNvZnR3YXJlLCBJbmMuCmFkcjo7OzQ2IFBpbmUgU3RyZWV0IEV4dGVuc2lvbjtOYXNo dWE7Tkg7MDMwNjA7VVNBCnZlcnNpb246Mi4xCmVtYWlsO2ludGVybmV0OmRhdmlzX2dAbXZp c3RhLmNvbQp0aXRsZTpTb2Z0d2FyZSBFbmdpbmVlcgp4LW1vemlsbGEtY3B0OjstNTM3Ngpm bjpHZW9yZ2UgRy4gRGF2aXMKZW5kOnZjYXJkCg== --------------205168E025248EFA9F8F845B-- From kramer@pa.dec.com Tue Feb 27 01:08:50 2001 Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (root@mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id BAA10260 for ; Tue, 27 Feb 2001 01:08:50 +0100 Received: from zmamail03.zma.compaq.com (zmamail03.zma.compaq.com [161.114.64.103]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id BAA10895 for ; Tue, 27 Feb 2001 01:08:48 +0100 (MET) Received: by zmamail03.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 7FFF5A9D5; Mon, 26 Feb 2001 19:07:01 -0500 (EST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by zmamail03.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 58617AA80; Mon, 26 Feb 2001 19:06:59 -0500 (EST) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA26814; Mon, 26 Feb 2001 16:06:51 -0800 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id PAA00950; Mon, 26 Feb 2001 15:54:13 -0800 (PST) Received: from ztxmail01.ztx.compaq.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id PAA12806; Mon, 26 Feb 2001 15:54:13 -0800 (PST) Received: by ztxmail01.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 8DF042D4F; Mon, 26 Feb 2001 17:54:12 -0600 (CST) Received: from sm5.texas.rr.com (sm5.texas.rr.com [24.93.35.219]) by ztxmail01.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E50D26E7 for ; Mon, 26 Feb 2001 17:54:12 -0600 (CST) Received: from frank (cs272-254.austin.rr.com [24.27.2.254]) by sm5.texas.rr.com (8.11.0/8.11.1) with SMTP id f1QNm7e31120; Mon, 26 Feb 2001 17:48:07 -0600 From: "John Milton" To: "!John Milton" Cc: "SA1100 Mailing list 2" Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2001 17:54:06 -0600 Message-Id: <006701c0a04f$67a68240$1414a8c0@miltie.columbus.oh.us> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-Msmail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 8.5, Build 4.71.2377.0 X-Mimeole: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4522.1200 Importance: Normal Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk Rolls for sandwhiches - not a hoggie bun. Maybe an onion roll?? Veges - zucchini, mushrooms, broccoli, etc. Hazelnut Cream (fatfree if possible) 2 please Milk (carton this time) 6 eggs Butter sticks Cheese - shredded fine. Colby/jack Provolone cheese for sandwhiches (cut please) Chicken breasts...small packages if possible Pork Chops - small packages Fish KRAB :) Ground turkey Ice cream yogurt thing...prefer vanilla! Frozen Corn Diced tomatoes in a can (4) Tomatoe Paste (4) -- John Bly Milton IV (512) w:493-2764, h:873-8567, m:791-8567 Home john.milton@usa.net ICQ! Don't FLAME, inform! O- From kramer@pa.dec.com Tue Feb 27 01:51:56 2001 Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (root@mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id BAA10360 for ; Tue, 27 Feb 2001 01:51:55 +0100 Received: from zmamail03.zma.compaq.com (zmamail03.zma.compaq.com [161.114.64.103]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id BAA12823 for ; Tue, 27 Feb 2001 01:51:54 +0100 (MET) Received: by zmamail03.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 4ED47A7F0; Mon, 26 Feb 2001 19:50:07 -0500 (EST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by zmamail03.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 1ACD8AB18; Mon, 26 Feb 2001 19:50:05 -0500 (EST) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA28377; Mon, 26 Feb 2001 16:50:03 -0800 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id QAA30049; Mon, 26 Feb 2001 16:44:32 -0800 (PST) Received: from ztxmail01.ztx.compaq.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id QAA28928; Mon, 26 Feb 2001 16:44:31 -0800 (PST) Received: by ztxmail01.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 3970B2715; Mon, 26 Feb 2001 18:44:31 -0600 (CST) Received: from smtp.enflex.net (smtp.enflex.net [216.142.71.70]) by ztxmail01.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 823892796 for ; Mon, 26 Feb 2001 18:44:30 -0600 (CST) Received: from merapi.enflex.net (IDENT:root@merapi.enflex.net [216.142.71.132]) by smtp.enflex.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id SAA18099 for ; Mon, 26 Feb 2001 18:03:42 -0700 Received: (from root@localhost) by merapi.enflex.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) id RAA31773 for sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com; Mon, 26 Feb 2001 17:26:26 -0700 Received: from solo (solo.enflex.net [216.142.71.144]) by merapi.enflex.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id RAA31661; Mon, 26 Feb 2001 17:26:23 -0700 From: "John Markham" To: "John Milton" , "!John Milton" Cc: "SA1100 Mailing list 2" Subject: RE: Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2001 17:45:08 -0700 Mime-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-Msmail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=SHA1; protocol="application/x-pkcs7-signature"; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0039_01C0A01B.DA840460" In-Reply-To: <006701c0a04f$67a68240$1414a8c0@miltie.columbus.oh.us> Importance: Normal X-Mimeole: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2919.6700 X-Scanner: scanned by Inflex 0.1.5c - (http://www.inflex.co.za/) Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0039_01C0A01B.DA840460 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit I could not get this to compile. Could you send me a patch? John Markham EnFlex Corp. -----Original Message----- From: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com [mailto:owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com]On Behalf Of John Milton Sent: Monday, February 26, 2001 4:54 PM To: !John Milton Cc: SA1100 Mailing list 2 Subject: Rolls for sandwhiches - not a hoggie bun. Maybe an onion roll?? Veges - zucchini, mushrooms, broccoli, etc. Hazelnut Cream (fatfree if possible) 2 please Milk (carton this time) 6 eggs Butter sticks Cheese - shredded fine. Colby/jack Provolone cheese for sandwhiches (cut please) Chicken breasts...small packages if possible Pork Chops - small packages Fish KRAB:) Ground turkey Ice cream yogurt thing...prefer vanilla! Frozen Corn Diced tomatoes in a can (4) Tomatoe Paste (4) -- John Bly Milton IV (512) w:493-2764, h:873-8567, m:791-8567 Home john.milton@usa.net ICQ! Don't FLAME, inform! O- ------=_NextPart_000_0039_01C0A01B.DA840460 Content-Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature; name="smime.p7s" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="smime.p7s" MIAGCSqGSIb3DQEHAqCAMIACAQExCzAJBgUrDgMCGgUAMIAGCSqGSIb3DQEHAQAAoIIFsTCCAoAw ggHpoAMCAQICAwQNKDANBgkqhkiG9w0BAQQFADCBkjELMAkGA1UEBhMCWkExFTATBgNVBAgTDFdl c3Rlcm4gQ2FwZTESMBAGA1UEBxMJQ2FwZSBUb3duMQ8wDQYDVQQKEwZUaGF3dGUxHTAbBgNVBAsT FENlcnRpZmljYXRlIFNlcnZpY2VzMSgwJgYDVQQDEx9QZXJzb25hbCBGcmVlbWFpbCBSU0EgMjAw MC44LjMwMB4XDTAxMDEyNjE5MTAxNVoXDTAyMDEyNjE5MTAxNVowRTEfMB0GA1UEAxMWVGhhd3Rl IEZyZWVtYWlsIE1lbWJlcjEiMCAGCSqGSIb3DQEJARYTam1hcmtoYW1AZW5mbGV4Lm5ldDCBnzAN BgkqhkiG9w0BAQEFAAOBjQAwgYkCgYEAr21wsSZAI5YQvTOYl2FL3nwcDwfbQKk5fy/ZsYjxd+2e AYSen+KoIPr6cuA4x8f7/xli0rnDP+70F16Bg4S1HKhwDV7824VrmkBZYebkblKqzsBepTHv/BXG I2pN5gn1ybAIP+dwtMo21ZAHRZ6Fi4dPbqxwt/r22xGkd6jHP7ECAwEAAaMwMC4wHgYDVR0RBBcw FYETam1hcmtoYW1AZW5mbGV4Lm5ldDAMBgNVHRMBAf8EAjAAMA0GCSqGSIb3DQEBBAUAA4GBAM29 yxKh1bUH4pRYwpBbpGy7i6E9HyWszQfZLtRAEfC4H+PwwmyikCigbX+Q4pGuApXwh6fM+h0D5NCG JZmiof9bAYoYUKZMWDZlHoOiDOtZ/a5yjXYzGiFMLOnM7Daorm8vWanh6WjqnTZKCVliTVDmjTCL yk9FUVG5ZafWuhxSMIIDKTCCApKgAwIBAgIBDDANBgkqhkiG9w0BAQQFADCB0TELMAkGA1UEBhMC WkExFTATBgNVBAgTDFdlc3Rlcm4gQ2FwZTESMBAGA1UEBxMJQ2FwZSBUb3duMRowGAYDVQQKExFU aGF3dGUgQ29uc3VsdGluZzEoMCYGA1UECxMfQ2VydGlmaWNhdGlvbiBTZXJ2aWNlcyBEaXZpc2lv bjEkMCIGA1UEAxMbVGhhd3RlIFBlcnNvbmFsIEZyZWVtYWlsIENBMSswKQYJKoZIhvcNAQkBFhxw ZXJzb25hbC1mcmVlbWFpbEB0aGF3dGUuY29tMB4XDTAwMDgzMDAwMDAwMFoXDTAyMDgyOTIzNTk1 OVowgZIxCzAJBgNVBAYTAlpBMRUwEwYDVQQIEwxXZXN0ZXJuIENhcGUxEjAQBgNVBAcTCUNhcGUg VG93bjEPMA0GA1UEChMGVGhhd3RlMR0wGwYDVQQLExRDZXJ0aWZpY2F0ZSBTZXJ2aWNlczEoMCYG A1UEAxMfUGVyc29uYWwgRnJlZW1haWwgUlNBIDIwMDAuOC4zMDCBnzANBgkqhkiG9w0BAQEFAAOB jQAwgYkCgYEA3jMypmPHCSVFPtJueCdngcXaiBmClw7jRCmKYzUqbXA8+tyu9+50bzC8M5B/+TRx oKNtmPHDT6Jl2w36S/HW3WGl+YXNVZo1Gp2Sdagnrthy+boC9tewkd4c6avgGAOofENCUFGHgzzw ObSbVIoTh/+zm51JZgAtCYnslGvpoWkCAwEAAaNOMEwwKQYDVR0RBCIwIKQeMBwxGjAYBgNVBAMT EVByaXZhdGVMYWJlbDEtMjk3MBIGA1UdEwEB/wQIMAYBAf8CAQAwCwYDVR0PBAQDAgEGMA0GCSqG SIb3DQEBBAUAA4GBAHMbbyZli/8VNEtZYortRL5Jx+gNu4+5DWomKmKEH7iHY3QcbbfPGlORS+HN 5jjZ7VD0Omw0kqzmkpxuwSMBwgmn70uuct0GZ/VQby5YuLYLwVBXtewc1+8XttWIm7eiiBrtOVs5 fTT8tpYYJU1q9J3Fw5EvqZa4BTxS/N3pYgNIMYICqjCCAqYCAQEwgZowgZIxCzAJBgNVBAYTAlpB MRUwEwYDVQQIEwxXZXN0ZXJuIENhcGUxEjAQBgNVBAcTCUNhcGUgVG93bjEPMA0GA1UEChMGVGhh d3RlMR0wGwYDVQQLExRDZXJ0aWZpY2F0ZSBTZXJ2aWNlczEoMCYGA1UEAxMfUGVyc29uYWwgRnJl ZW1haWwgUlNBIDIwMDAuOC4zMAIDBA0oMAkGBSsOAwIaBQCgggFlMBgGCSqGSIb3DQEJAzELBgkq hkiG9w0BBwEwHAYJKoZIhvcNAQkFMQ8XDTAxMDIyNzAwNDUwNVowIwYJKoZIhvcNAQkEMRYEFN/u sHSpwIyrFilv09DBOZxYXA4TMFgGCSqGSIb3DQEJDzFLMEkwCgYIKoZIhvcNAwcwDgYIKoZIhvcN AwICAgCAMAcGBSsOAwIHMA0GCCqGSIb3DQMCAgEoMAoGCCqGSIb3DQIFMAcGBSsOAwIaMIGrBgkr BgEEAYI3EAQxgZ0wgZowgZIxCzAJBgNVBAYTAlpBMRUwEwYDVQQIEwxXZXN0ZXJuIENhcGUxEjAQ BgNVBAcTCUNhcGUgVG93bjEPMA0GA1UEChMGVGhhd3RlMR0wGwYDVQQLExRDZXJ0aWZpY2F0ZSBT ZXJ2aWNlczEoMCYGA1UEAxMfUGVyc29uYWwgRnJlZW1haWwgUlNBIDIwMDAuOC4zMAIDBA0oMA0G CSqGSIb3DQEBAQUABIGAOlpE7craWOg4Y/FO4z+Jo7TPlJWhAfjfc0+Pmk8Jx2rSwSLD0c3erml8 MdKf8BycoizV4bPDbPSaiJeWhW3ixo7mbAlFXmJE8IIWIcbAw23z3Bq9QB1FDAjFKv432X7g9ngu VV4jI8RruV/qdQF3Fuv+nshGKjCL3NJ1GtZvU8IAAAAAAAA= ------=_NextPart_000_0039_01C0A01B.DA840460-- From kramer@pa.dec.com Tue Feb 27 10:51:07 2001 Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (root@mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id KAA11329 for ; Tue, 27 Feb 2001 10:51:07 +0100 Received: from ztxmail03.ztx.compaq.com (ztxmail03.ztx.compaq.com [161.114.1.207]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id KAA05206 for ; Tue, 27 Feb 2001 10:51:05 +0100 (MET) Received: by ztxmail03.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 42BDFBA4; Tue, 27 Feb 2001 03:48:36 -0600 (CST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by ztxmail03.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 8BC72B75; Tue, 27 Feb 2001 03:48:34 -0600 (CST) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA07833; Tue, 27 Feb 2001 01:48:32 -0800 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id BAA31430; Tue, 27 Feb 2001 01:39:51 -0800 (PST) Received: from zmamail01.zma.compaq.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id BAA11177; Tue, 27 Feb 2001 01:39:50 -0800 (PST) Received: by zmamail01.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 98CE111D97; Tue, 27 Feb 2001 04:39:49 -0500 (EST) Received: from bastion.power-x.co.uk (bastion.power-x.co.uk [62.232.19.201]) by zmamail01.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D579D11E06 for ; Tue, 27 Feb 2001 04:39:48 -0500 (EST) Received: from springhead.px.uk.com (IDENT:dg@springhead.px.uk.com [172.16.18.41]) by bastion.power-x.co.uk (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id JAA02282; Tue, 27 Feb 2001 09:39:36 GMT Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2001 09:42:07 +0000 (GMT) From: "Dr. David Gilbert" To: John Markham Cc: John Milton , !John Milton , SA1100 Mailing list 2 Subject: RE: In-Reply-To: Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk On Mon, 26 Feb 2001, John Markham wrote: > I could not get this to compile. Could you send me a patch? > > John Markham > EnFlex Corp. > Ice cream yogurt thing...prefer vanilla! Ah well there is the problem; there is no chance of getting that to work with ARM Linux. You need chocolate flavour ice cream. Dave -- /------------------------------------------------------------------\ | Dr. David Alan Gilbert | Work:dg@px.uk.com +44-161-286-2000 Ex258| | -------- G7FHJ --------|---------------------------------------- | | Home: dave@treblig.org http://www.treblig.org | \------------------------------------------------------------------/ From kramer@pa.dec.com Tue Feb 27 15:16:59 2001 Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (root@mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id PAA12120 for ; Tue, 27 Feb 2001 15:16:59 +0100 Received: from ztxmail04.ztx.compaq.com (ztxmail04.ztx.compaq.com [161.114.1.208]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id PAA25348 for ; Tue, 27 Feb 2001 15:16:58 +0100 (MET) Received: by ztxmail04.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id A7B579D3; Tue, 27 Feb 2001 08:15:10 -0600 (CST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by ztxmail04.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 04A9EB51; Tue, 27 Feb 2001 08:15:08 -0600 (CST) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA13539; Tue, 27 Feb 2001 06:15:06 -0800 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id GAA27122; Tue, 27 Feb 2001 06:07:25 -0800 (PST) Received: from zmamail01.zma.compaq.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id GAA26311; Tue, 27 Feb 2001 06:07:23 -0800 (PST) Received: by zmamail01.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id C2E2B11F2F; Tue, 27 Feb 2001 09:07:17 -0500 (EST) Received: from web5304.mail.yahoo.com (web5304.mail.yahoo.com [216.115.106.113]) by zmamail01.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 3F27F11F30 for ; Tue, 27 Feb 2001 09:07:17 -0500 (EST) Message-Id: <20010227140716.16138.qmail@web5304.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [192.6.10.2] by web5304.mail.yahoo.com; Tue, 27 Feb 2001 14:07:16 GMT Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2001 14:07:16 +0000 (GMT) From: =?iso-8859-1?q?Fraser=20Dickin?= Subject: Advice on ppp-2.4.0b4 for Assabet To: sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk Has anyone out there sucessfully built and installed pppd from ppp-2.4.0b4 into linux-2.4.1-rmk1-np2? I've configured it to be part of the kernel and have manually created /etc/ppp. However, when I run pppd on my SA1110-based board (an Assabet clone) over /dev/ttyS1, the other end (x86 host pc) can see the initialization sequence but my SA1110 board cannot 'see' the host PC's PPP responses. I've checked, using getty, that /dev/ttyS1 can receive stuff and have also lowered the baud rate down to 9600. Any good suggestions? Fraser ____________________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.co.uk address at http://mail.yahoo.co.uk or your free @yahoo.ie address at http://mail.yahoo.ie From kramer@pa.dec.com Tue Feb 27 16:03:35 2001 Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (root@mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id QAA12216 for ; Tue, 27 Feb 2001 16:03:35 +0100 Received: from ztxmail04.ztx.compaq.com (ztxmail04.ztx.compaq.com [161.114.1.208]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id QAA29008 for ; Tue, 27 Feb 2001 16:03:33 +0100 (MET) Received: by ztxmail04.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id EBA88AC2; Tue, 27 Feb 2001 09:01:46 -0600 (CST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by ztxmail04.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 89EC1BC1; Tue, 27 Feb 2001 09:01:43 -0600 (CST) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA30988; Tue, 27 Feb 2001 07:01:41 -0800 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id GAA16656; Tue, 27 Feb 2001 06:55:22 -0800 (PST) Received: from zmamail02.zma.compaq.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id GAA12000; Tue, 27 Feb 2001 06:55:18 -0800 (PST) Received: by zmamail02.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 599F258C9; Tue, 27 Feb 2001 09:55:16 -0500 (EST) Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by zmamail02.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A267058EE for ; Tue, 27 Feb 2001 09:55:15 -0500 (EST) Received: from arthur.ubicom.tudelft.nl (arthur.ubicom.tudelft.nl [130.161.43.222]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id PAA28266; Tue, 27 Feb 2001 15:55:13 +0100 (MET) Received: (from erik@localhost) by arthur.ubicom.tudelft.nl (8.11.0/8.11.0/SuSE Linux 8.11.0-0.4) id f1REqAO01791; Tue, 27 Feb 2001 15:52:10 +0100 Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2001 15:52:10 +0100 From: Erik Mouw To: Fraser Dickin Cc: sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Subject: Re: Advice on ppp-2.4.0b4 for Assabet Message-Id: <20010227155210.K25658@arthur.ubicom.tudelft.nl> References: <20010227140716.16138.qmail@web5304.mail.yahoo.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <20010227140716.16138.qmail@web5304.mail.yahoo.com>; from fdickin@yahoo.co.uk on Tue, Feb 27, 2001 at 02:07:16PM +0000 Organization: Eric Conspiracy Secret Labs X-Eric-Conspiracy: There is no conspiracy! Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk On Tue, Feb 27, 2001 at 02:07:16PM +0000, Fraser Dickin wrote: > Has anyone out there sucessfully built and installed > pppd from ppp-2.4.0b4 into linux-2.4.1-rmk1-np2? Try ppp-2.4.0, that's two days newer than 2.4.0b4 (b == beta). See Documentation/Changes for the URL. > I've configured it to be part of the kernel and have > manually created /etc/ppp. However, when I run pppd on > my SA1110-based board (an Assabet clone) over > /dev/ttyS1, the other end (x86 host pc) can see the > initialization sequence but my SA1110 board cannot > 'see' the host PC's PPP responses. I've checked, using > getty, that /dev/ttyS1 can receive stuff and have also > lowered the baud rate down to 9600. Only difference is that I use PPP as modules, but that shouldn't really matter. Erik -- J.A.K. (Erik) Mouw, Information and Communication Theory Group, Department of Electrical Engineering, Faculty of Information Technology and Systems, Delft University of Technology, PO BOX 5031, 2600 GA Delft, The Netherlands Phone: +31-15-2783635 Fax: +31-15-2781843 Email: J.A.K.Mouw@its.tudelft.nl WWW: http://www-ict.its.tudelft.nl/~erik/ From kramer@pa.dec.com Tue Feb 27 19:15:54 2001 Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (root@mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id TAA12791 for ; Tue, 27 Feb 2001 19:15:54 +0100 Received: from ztxmail04.ztx.compaq.com (ztxmail04.ztx.compaq.com [161.114.1.208]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id TAA12716 for ; Tue, 27 Feb 2001 19:15:51 +0100 (MET) Received: by ztxmail04.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id C8352921; Tue, 27 Feb 2001 12:14:32 -0600 (CST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by ztxmail04.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 207BA87E; Tue, 27 Feb 2001 12:14:31 -0600 (CST) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA21898; Tue, 27 Feb 2001 10:14:29 -0800 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id KAA27288; Tue, 27 Feb 2001 10:06:57 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id KAA30058; Tue, 27 Feb 2001 10:06:57 -0800 (PST) Received: from zmamail02.nz-tay.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA17532; Tue, 27 Feb 2001 10:06:56 -0800 Received: by zmamail02.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 7AF6B5C8A; Tue, 27 Feb 2001 13:06:56 -0500 (EST) Received: from fire.he.net (fire.he.net [216.218.144.2]) by zmamail02.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 59223612B for ; Tue, 27 Feb 2001 13:06:55 -0500 (EST) Received: from cementship.extenex.net (64-51-136-194.client.dsl.net [64.51.136.194]) by fire.he.net (8.8.6/8.8.2) with ESMTP id KAA12849 for ; Tue, 27 Feb 2001 10:06:53 -0800 Received: from blowhole.extenex.com (blowhole.extenex.net [192.168.100.100]) by cementship.extenex.net (8.9.3/8.8.7) with ESMTP id KAA02424 for ; Tue, 27 Feb 2001 10:06:22 -0800 Message-Id: <5.0.2.1.2.20010227094642.01eaec00@extenex.com> X-Sender: extenex.com/wardw@extenex.com (Unverified) X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.0.2 Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2001 10:05:56 -0800 To: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com From: Ward Willats Subject: Gotta love that crazy SA-1110 UDC! Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk SA1110 Specification Update December, 2000 Errata USB Controller Endpoint 2 (IN) Transmits Incorrect Data Problem: The USB controller may transmit incorrect data to the host and not indicate an error. During normal operation, the USB controller will request that data be put into the Endpoint 2 fifo to be transmitted to the host when the host sends an IN command. There is a small window of time where it is possible that the core or DMA can put a byte into the fifo at the same time the serial shifter begins transmitting that same byte. However, an incorrect byte is actually transmitted, but no error is indicated within the USB controller and no error is indicated via the CRC, so that the host believes that it has received correct data. This situation causes the host to use corrupt data as if it were valid data, without the USB controller or the host knowing that there was an error. Therefore there is no software recovery, unless a checksum is used on the entire data transfer. Affected Step: A0, B0, B1, B2, and B4 Workaround: Allow enough bandwidth in the system so that the Endpoint 2 fifo is not starved for data. To accomplish this, do not hold off the core or the DMA servicing the USB endpoint 2 fifo with long delays due to system activity such as PCMCIA, LCD, other DMA's, or VLIO activity. Alternatively, a software checksum can be used for the entire data transfer to indicate any incorrect data that may have been transferred. Status: Eval From kramer@pa.dec.com Tue Feb 27 20:30:01 2001 Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (root@mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id UAA13011 for ; Tue, 27 Feb 2001 20:30:01 +0100 Received: from ztxmail04.ztx.compaq.com (ztxmail04.ztx.compaq.com [161.114.1.208]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id UAA16928 for ; Tue, 27 Feb 2001 20:30:00 +0100 (MET) Received: by ztxmail04.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 12652B0C; Tue, 27 Feb 2001 13:28:13 -0600 (CST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by ztxmail04.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 09D59BD2; Tue, 27 Feb 2001 13:28:11 -0600 (CST) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA25318; Tue, 27 Feb 2001 11:28:09 -0800 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id LAA20885; Tue, 27 Feb 2001 11:21:36 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id LAA11886; Tue, 27 Feb 2001 11:21:35 -0800 (PST) Received: from ztxmail01.nz-cce.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA24866; Tue, 27 Feb 2001 11:21:32 -0800 Received: by ztxmail01.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id D6997252F; Tue, 27 Feb 2001 13:21:31 -0600 (CST) Received: from xanadu.home (modemcable248.137-200-24.mtl.mc.videotron.ca [24.200.137.248]) by ztxmail01.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 01E41271F for ; Tue, 27 Feb 2001 13:21:30 -0600 (CST) Received: from localhost (nico@localhost) by xanadu.home (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id OAA18455; Tue, 27 Feb 2001 14:21:28 -0500 X-Authentication-Warning: xanadu.home: nico owned process doing -bs Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2001 14:21:28 -0500 (EST) From: Nicolas Pitre X-Sender: To: Ward Willats Cc: Subject: Re: Gotta love that crazy SA-1110 UDC! In-Reply-To: <5.0.2.1.2.20010227094642.01eaec00@extenex.com> Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk Well... Better use a reliable protocol like TCP/IP over the USB link. We skipped the IP checksum assuming the USB link was reliable... but it doesn't seem to be the case now. On Tue, 27 Feb 2001, Ward Willats wrote: > > SA1110 Specification Update > December, 2000 > > Errata > > USB Controller Endpoint 2 (IN) Transmits Incorrect Data > > Problem: > The USB controller may transmit incorrect data to the host and not > indicate an error. During normal operation, the USB controller will > request that data be put into the Endpoint 2 fifo to be transmitted > to the host when the host sends an IN command. There is a small > window of time where it is possible that the core or DMA can put a > byte into the fifo at the same time the serial shifter begins > transmitting that same byte. However, an incorrect byte is actually > transmitted, but no error is indicated within the USB controller and > no error is indicated via the CRC, so that the host believes that it > has received correct data. This situation causes the host to use > corrupt data as if it were valid data, without the USB controller or > the host knowing that there was an error. Therefore there is no > software recovery, unless a checksum is used on the entire data > transfer. > > Affected Step: A0, B0, B1, B2, and B4 > > Workaround: > Allow enough bandwidth in the system so that the Endpoint > 2 fifo is not starved for data. To accomplish this, do not hold off > the core or the DMA servicing the USB endpoint 2 fifo with long > delays due to system activity such as PCMCIA, LCD, other DMA's, or > VLIO activity. > > Alternatively, a software checksum can be used for the entire data > transfer to indicate any incorrect data that may have been > transferred. > > Status: Eval > > From kramer@pa.dec.com Wed Feb 28 17:34:18 2001 Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (root@mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id RAA15877 for ; Wed, 28 Feb 2001 17:34:17 +0100 Received: from ztxmail04.ztx.compaq.com (ztxmail04.ztx.compaq.com [161.114.1.208]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id RAA29147 for ; Wed, 28 Feb 2001 17:34:15 +0100 (MET) Received: by ztxmail04.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 9D994858; Wed, 28 Feb 2001 10:32:28 -0600 (CST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by ztxmail04.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 3368E86B; Wed, 28 Feb 2001 10:32:26 -0600 (CST) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA24642; Wed, 28 Feb 2001 08:32:18 -0800 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id IAA02772; Wed, 28 Feb 2001 08:20:06 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id IAA15305; Wed, 28 Feb 2001 08:20:06 -0800 (PST) Received: from ztxmail01.nz-cce.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA02784; Wed, 28 Feb 2001 08:20:05 -0800 Received: by ztxmail01.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 2EE5B261C; Wed, 28 Feb 2001 10:20:04 -0600 (CST) Received: from violet.csa.iisc.ernet.in (violet.csa.iisc.ernet.in [144.16.67.198]) by ztxmail01.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B2A382715 for ; Wed, 28 Feb 2001 10:20:00 -0600 (CST) Received: (from ksvivek@localhost) by violet.csa.iisc.ernet.in (8.9.3/8.9.3) id XAA03245 for sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com; Wed, 28 Feb 2001 23:14:06 +0530 Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2001 23:14:06 +0530 From: ksvivek@csa.iisc.ernet.in To: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Subject: Memory usage in Assabet Message-Id: <20010228231406.A3212@csa.iisc.ernet.in> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2i Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk Hi, I have an Assabet with 32 MB RAM, and kernel 2.4.0-test8. My compressed ramdisk is ~2.0M, which expands into 8MB ramdisk on boot. Memory usage on the assabet is shown as: >>>>>> <4>Processor: Intel StrongARM-1110 revision 6 <4>Architecture: Intel-Assabet <4>On node 0 totalpages: 4096 <4>zone(0): 4096 pages. <4>zone(1): 0 pages. <4>zone(2): 0 pages. <4>On node 1 totalpages: 4096 <4>zone(0): 4096 pages. <4>zone(1): 0 pages. <4>zone(2): 0 pages. <4>Kernel command line: keepinitrd <4>Console: colour dummy device 80x30 <4>Calibrating delay loop... 124.52 BogoMIPS <6>Memory: 16MB 16MB = 32MB total <5>Memory: 27536KB available (1281K code, 252K data, 64K init) <4>Dentry-cache hash table entries: 4096 (order: 3, 32768 bytes) <4>Buffer-cache hash table entries: 1024 (order: 0, 4096 bytes) <4>Page-cache hash table entries: 8192 (order: 3, 32768 bytes) <4>Inode-cache hash table entries: 2048 (order: 2, 16384 bytes) >>>>>> and /proc/meminfo shows: >>>>>> total: used: free: shared: buffers: cached: Mem: 28262400 16609280 11653120 0 8192000 5570560 Swap: 0 0 0 MemTotal: 27600 kB MemFree: 11380 kB MemShared: 0 kB Buffers: 8000 kB Cached: 5440 kB HighTotal: 0 kB HighFree: 0 kB LowTotal: 27600 kB LowFree: 11380 kB SwapTotal: 0 kB SwapFree: 0 kB >>>>>> This shows that out of a total of 32 MB: 8MB is used for ramdisk, 1281K for kernel code , 252K kernel data. The problem is that the total memory available is shown as 27536KB. Where has the remaining memory ~2.1MB gone ? Boot option includes keepinitrd. Does this mean that the initial compressed ramdisk space is used as well ? Coincidentally, my compressed ramdisk image is ~2.1M. Thanx in advance, Vivek From kramer@pa.dec.com Wed Feb 28 17:42:24 2001 Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (root@mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id RAA15913 for ; Wed, 28 Feb 2001 17:42:24 +0100 Received: from ztxmail05.ztx.compaq.com (ztxmail05.ztx.compaq.com [161.114.1.209]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id RAA29576 for ; Wed, 28 Feb 2001 17:42:22 +0100 (MET) Received: by ztxmail05.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 940EB966; Wed, 28 Feb 2001 10:40:35 -0600 (CST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by ztxmail05.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 3E62299A; Wed, 28 Feb 2001 10:40:33 -0600 (CST) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AB24763; Wed, 28 Feb 2001 08:40:32 -0800 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id IAA31753; Wed, 28 Feb 2001 08:35:42 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id IAA32621; Wed, 28 Feb 2001 08:35:42 -0800 (PST) Received: from ztxmail01.nz-cce.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA24860; Wed, 28 Feb 2001 08:35:40 -0800 Received: by ztxmail01.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 921032688; Wed, 28 Feb 2001 10:35:40 -0600 (CST) Received: from xanadu.home (modemcable248.137-200-24.mtl.mc.videotron.ca [24.200.137.248]) by ztxmail01.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B3E552521 for ; Wed, 28 Feb 2001 10:35:39 -0600 (CST) Received: from localhost (nico@localhost) by xanadu.home (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id LAA03975; Wed, 28 Feb 2001 11:35:18 -0500 X-Authentication-Warning: xanadu.home: nico owned process doing -bs Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2001 11:35:18 -0500 (EST) From: Nicolas Pitre X-Sender: To: Cc: Subject: Re: Memory usage in Assabet In-Reply-To: <20010228231406.A3212@csa.iisc.ernet.in> Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk On Wed, 28 Feb 2001 ksvivek@csa.iisc.ernet.in wrote: > This shows that out of a total of 32 MB: > 8MB is used for ramdisk, 1281K for kernel code , 252K kernel data. > The problem is that the total memory available is shown as 27536KB. Where has > the remaining memory ~2.1MB gone ? Boot option includes keepinitrd. Does this > mean that the initial compressed ramdisk space is used as well ? > Coincidentally, my compressed ramdisk image is ~2.1M. You got it! keepinitrd preserves the initrd image in memory so you don't have to re-upload it when you reboot (pretty useful for kernel development where you spend most of your time rebooting new kernels). Just remove that from your kernel command line params. Nicolas From kramer@pa.dec.com Wed Feb 28 18:07:24 2001 Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (root@mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id SAA15979 for ; Wed, 28 Feb 2001 18:07:23 +0100 Received: from zmamail05.zma.compaq.com (zmamail05.zma.compaq.com [161.114.64.105]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id SAA01534 for ; Wed, 28 Feb 2001 18:07:22 +0100 (MET) Received: by zmamail05.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 016E83DBF; Wed, 28 Feb 2001 12:05:34 -0500 (EST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by zmamail05.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 9EA0D3E3A; Wed, 28 Feb 2001 12:05:32 -0500 (EST) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA25874; Wed, 28 Feb 2001 09:05:31 -0800 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id JAA03102; Wed, 28 Feb 2001 09:00:16 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id JAA25597; Wed, 28 Feb 2001 09:00:16 -0800 (PST) Received: from ztxmail01.nz-cce.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA25515; Wed, 28 Feb 2001 09:00:15 -0800 Received: by ztxmail01.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 1B6332420; Wed, 28 Feb 2001 11:00:14 -0600 (CST) Received: from xanadu.home (modemcable248.137-200-24.mtl.mc.videotron.ca [24.200.137.248]) by ztxmail01.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 487F02490 for ; Wed, 28 Feb 2001 11:00:13 -0600 (CST) Received: from localhost (nico@localhost) by xanadu.home (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id MAA04056; Wed, 28 Feb 2001 12:00:12 -0500 X-Authentication-Warning: xanadu.home: nico owned process doing -bs Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2001 12:00:12 -0500 (EST) From: Nicolas Pitre X-Sender: To: SA-1100/Linux Cc: Subject: diff-2.4.2-rmk1-np1 Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk ... is available at the usual sites, which are: ftp://ftp.netwinder.org/users/n/nico/ ftp://ftp.arm.linux.org.uk/pub/linux/arm/people/nico/ ftp://ftp.handhelds.org/pub/linux/arm/sa-1100-patches/ Highlights: - updated to 2.4.2-rmk1 (me) - SA1111 PS/2 fixes (George G. Davis) - fix/cleanup SA1111 USB driver init (George G. Davis) - further SA1100 USB cleanup (Ward Willats) - usbnet driver [replaces usb-net-host] (David Brownell) - usbnet support for SA1100 (Oleg Drokin) - Freebird updates (Chester) - rtc driver enhancements (Chester) - backlight/contrast docs (Chester) - ramfs with ressource limits (me, from AC patch) - block loopback fixes (Jens Axboe) - MTD updates (me) - JFFS2 support (David Woodhouse) First a big thanks to Ward Willats who pushed the SA1100 USB modularisation and cleanup to a level I start to really like. The messy usb-net-host is gone too. the usbnet driver looks to be way better maintained and generic. The whole thing still doesn't work quite right for me but at least everything is now architecturally at its proper place. Now pay attention to the availability of JFFS2. Yes, this is JFFS with compression support! This has gotten really little testing up to now, but still seems to work quite well for me. Enjoy! Nicolas From kramer@pa.dec.com Fri Mar 2 17:30:52 2001 Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (root@mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id RAA24028 for ; Fri, 2 Mar 2001 17:30:52 +0100 Received: from zmamail03.zma.compaq.com (zmamail03.zma.compaq.com [161.114.64.103]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id RAA10005 for ; Fri, 2 Mar 2001 17:30:50 +0100 (MET) Received: by zmamail03.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id DED229EF7; Fri, 2 Mar 2001 11:29:02 -0500 (EST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by zmamail03.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 6643BA31B; Fri, 2 Mar 2001 11:29:00 -0500 (EST) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA00321; Fri, 2 Mar 2001 08:28:51 -0800 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id IAA09823; Fri, 2 Mar 2001 08:18:13 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id IAA30016; Fri, 2 Mar 2001 08:18:12 -0800 (PST) Received: from zmamail01.nz-tay.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA30292; Fri, 2 Mar 2001 08:18:12 -0800 Received: by zmamail01.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 6FD49CD5A; Fri, 2 Mar 2001 11:18:11 -0500 (EST) Received: from mail.netx4.com (216-064-003-018.inaddr.vitts.com [216.64.3.18]) by zmamail01.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 05617F588 for ; Fri, 2 Mar 2001 11:18:07 -0500 (EST) Received: from mvista.com (greeny.netx4.com [192.168.253.30]) by mail.netx4.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id LAA09841; Fri, 2 Mar 2001 11:58:11 -0500 Message-Id: <3A9FC73E.C1F92D24@mvista.com> Date: Fri, 02 Mar 2001 11:15:58 -0500 From: "George G. Davis" Organization: MontaVista Software, Inc. X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.7 [en] (X11; I; Linux 2.4.0-test11 ppc) X-Accept-Language: en Mime-Version: 1.0 To: Bradford J Snow Cc: Brad Parker , StrongArm Linux Subject: Re: Assabet ADV7171 References: Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="------------8E4F34C29CB90E472A9265BF" Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------8E4F34C29CB90E472A9265BF Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Bradford J Snow wrote: > > Hi, > I tried out the bars and i2c programs and I get display on my assabet but > its basically a series of jagged white and black lines scrolling up and > down the screen. Do you have any idea what the problem is? I will most > likely take a look at how it is configuring the chip to see if there is > anything that looks obvious for changing. I used the precompiled > executable which came in utv.tar, which I assume reflects the included > source. But I am getting display of something so its a good start, I will > put more time into it this weekend, I would like to get this working. FYI: I've been using I2C on another SA-111x platform and found a problem in the i2c-assabet driver. The driver is actively driving the SDA pin high which causes problems during ACK phases among other potential driver (output buffer) collisions between the I2C master and device. I've attached a patch below. > > Thanks, > Brad > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > Bradford J. Snow bradford@wpi.edu > 508 - 831-6538 WPI CS/EE '01 > Executive Council and Events Chair of WPI ACM > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > > On Mon, 26 Feb 2001, Brad Parker wrote: > > > Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2001 09:45:49 -0500 > > From: Brad Parker > > To: Bradford J Snow > > Cc: George G. Davis > > Subject: Re: Assabet ADV7171 > > > > > > Bradford J Snow wrote: > > >Hello, > > >I was wondering if you have been able to successfully have the Assabet > > >board display video through the ADV7171 using your i2c patch. If so or even i > > >f > > >not, if you could point me in the right direction on how to make it work > > >it would be very much appreciated. I am setting up my Assabet to be > > >used as a prototype wearable computer, and I need have NTSC output > > >working. > > > > I put the work I did up on my web page, http://www.heeltoe.com > > > > There are some really simple user space apps as well as some new kernel > > files. If you have problem or questions, feel free to send me email. > > > > -brad > > -- Regards, George --------------8E4F34C29CB90E472A9265BF Content-Type: application/octet-stream; name="patch.2.4.2-rmk1-np1-assabetI2C" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="patch.2.4.2-rmk1-np1-assabetI2C" LS0tIGxpbnV4L2RyaXZlcnMvaTJjL2kyYy1hc3NhYmV0LmMub3JpZwlUaHUgTWFyICAxIDA5 OjQzOjA0IDIwMDEKKysrIGxpbnV4L2RyaXZlcnMvaTJjL2kyYy1hc3NhYmV0LmMJRnJpIE1h ciAgMiAxMTowNzoyMyAyMDAxCkBAIC0zNCwxMSArMzQsMTIgQEAKICAqLwogc3RhdGljIGlu bGluZSB2b2lkIGlpY19hY3F1aXJlcGlucyh2b2lkKQogewotCUdQU1IgPSAoTDNfQ2xvY2tQ aW4gfCBMM19EYXRhUGluKTsKLQlHUERSIHw9IChMM19DbG9ja1BpbiB8IEwzX0RhdGFQaW4p OworCUdQU1IgPSBMM19DbG9ja1BpbjsKKwlHUENSID0gTDNfRGF0YVBpbjsKKwlHUERSIHw9 IEwzX0Nsb2NrUGluOworCUdQRFIgJj0gfkwzX0RhdGFQaW4pOwogCWlpY19hY3F1aXJlZCA9 IDE7CiAJaWljX2Nsb2NrX291dCA9IDE7Ci0JaWljX2RhdGFfb3V0ID0gMTsKIH0KIAogLyoK QEAgLTg4LDE1ICs4OSwxOCBAQAogCWlmICghaWljX2FjcXVpcmVkKQogCQlpaWNfYWNxdWly ZXBpbnMoKTsKIAorI2lmCTAKIAlpZiAoIWlpY19kYXRhX291dCkgewogCQlHUERSIHw9IEwz X0RhdGFQaW47CiAJCWlpY19kYXRhX291dCA9IDE7CiAJfQorI2VuZGlmCiAKIAlpZiAoc3Rh dGUpIHsKLQkJR1BTUiA9IEwzX0RhdGFQaW47CisJCUdQRFIgJj0gfihMM19EYXRhUGluKTsg LyogWFhYIEhhY2svdGVzdC9kZWJ1ZyAqLwogCX0gZWxzZSB7CiAJCUdQQ1IgPSBMM19EYXRh UGluOworCQlHUERSIHw9IEwzX0RhdGFQaW47IC8qIFhYWCBIYWNrL3Rlc3QvZGVidWcgKi8K IAl9CiAJCiB9IApAQCAtMTYxLDcgKzE2NSw3IEBACiAJYml0X2Fzc2FiZXRfc2V0c2NsLAog CWJpdF9hc3NhYmV0X2dldHNkYSwKIAlOVUxMLAotCTIsIDIsIDEwMCwJCS8qCXdhaXRzLCB0 aW1lb3V0ICovCisJNSwgNSwgMTAwLAkJLyoJd2FpdHMsIHRpbWVvdXQgKi8KIH07CiAKIAo= --------------8E4F34C29CB90E472A9265BF Content-Type: text/x-vcard; charset=iso-8859-1; name="davis_g.vcf" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-Description: Card for George G. Davis Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="davis_g.vcf" YmVnaW46dmNhcmQgCm46RGF2aXM7R2VvcmdlCnRlbDt3b3JrOjYwMy84ODAtMTQxNAp4LW1v emlsbGEtaHRtbDpGQUxTRQp1cmw6aHR0cDovL3d3dy5tdmlzdGEuY29tCm9yZzpNb250YVZp c3RhIFNvZnR3YXJlLCBJbmMuCmFkcjo7OzQ2IFBpbmUgU3RyZWV0IEV4dGVuc2lvbjtOYXNo dWE7Tkg7MDMwNjA7VVNBCnZlcnNpb246Mi4xCmVtYWlsO2ludGVybmV0OmRhdmlzX2dAbXZp c3RhLmNvbQp0aXRsZTpTb2Z0d2FyZSBFbmdpbmVlcgp4LW1vemlsbGEtY3B0OjstNTM3Ngpm bjpHZW9yZ2UgRy4gRGF2aXMKZW5kOnZjYXJkCg== --------------8E4F34C29CB90E472A9265BF-- From kramer@pa.dec.com Sat Mar 3 04:13:15 2001 Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (root@mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id EAA25944 for ; Sat, 3 Mar 2001 04:13:15 +0100 Received: from zmamail05.zma.compaq.com (zmamail05.zma.compaq.com [161.114.64.105]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id EAA11147 for ; Sat, 3 Mar 2001 04:13:13 +0100 (MET) Received: by zmamail05.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 3AC943D03; Fri, 2 Mar 2001 22:11:26 -0500 (EST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by zmamail05.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 077AF3F9F; Fri, 2 Mar 2001 22:11:24 -0500 (EST) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA20159; Fri, 2 Mar 2001 19:11:15 -0800 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id TAA11854; Fri, 2 Mar 2001 19:02:12 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id TAA07134; Fri, 2 Mar 2001 19:02:12 -0800 (PST) Received: from zmamail01.nz-tay.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA30624; Fri, 2 Mar 2001 19:02:11 -0800 Received: by zmamail01.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 17DF311DF0; Fri, 2 Mar 2001 22:02:11 -0500 (EST) Received: from fire.he.net (fire.he.net [216.218.144.2]) by zmamail01.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6BA1911DC5 for ; Fri, 2 Mar 2001 22:02:10 -0500 (EST) Received: from cementship.extenex.net (64-51-136-194.client.dsl.net [64.51.136.194]) by fire.he.net (8.8.6/8.8.2) with ESMTP id TAA18119; Fri, 2 Mar 2001 19:02:01 -0800 Received: from blowhole.extenex.net (blowhole.extenex.net [192.168.100.100]) by cementship.extenex.net (8.9.3/8.8.7) with ESMTP id TAA03805; Fri, 2 Mar 2001 19:01:27 -0800 Received: from wardw by blowhole.extenex.net with local (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 14Z2IR-0000Ge-00; Fri, 02 Mar 2001 19:01:27 -0800 Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2001 19:01:27 -0800 To: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Subject: SA USB Function patch for the weekend Message-Id: <20010302190127.A1013@extenex.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i From: Ward Willats Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk This is a patch against the just released linux-2.4.2-rmk1-np1. It contains: - Some new routines in usb_ep0.c to set DE and IPR since the standard macros were not working and you also have to check for SST and SE while doing this. - A "massive attack" hideous _temporary_ hack in usb_send.c to see if I can beat IN packet count register into submission. If this seems to work we can back it down. - The usb-char.c now returns errors during read, if, say, you unplug the wire while sending data. - The 2nd loading of the usb-char module not working has been fixed. I'm in the smoke and mirrors phase now, hope this makes things more reliable! -- Ward --- /home/wardw/newzoo/usb_ctl.c Thu Mar 1 14:16:25 2001 +++ linux/arch/arm/mach-sa1100/usb_ctl.c Thu Mar 1 11:01:00 2001 @@ -201,15 +201,16 @@ /* start UDC internal machinery running */ udc_enable(); - - /* mask everything */ - UDC_write(Ser0UDCCR,0xF8); + udelay( 100 ); /* clear stall - receiver seems to start stalled? 19Jan01ww */ /* also clear other stuff just to be thurough 22Feb01ww */ UDC_clear(Ser0UDCCS1, UDCCS1_FST | UDCCS1_RPE | UDCCS1_RPC ); UDC_clear(Ser0UDCCS2, UDCCS2_FST | UDCCS2_TPE | UDCCS2_TPC ); + /* mask everything */ + Ser0UDCCR = 0xFC; + /* flush DMA and fire through some -EAGAINs */ ep1_init( usbd_info.dmach_rx ); ep2_init( usbd_info.dmach_tx ); @@ -256,7 +257,7 @@ return -EPERM; } /* mask everything */ - UDC_write(Ser0UDCCR,0xF8); + UDC_write(Ser0UDCCR,0xFC); ep1_reset(); ep2_reset(); udc_disable(); --- /home/wardw/newzoo/usb_ep0.c Thu Mar 1 14:16:25 2001 +++ linux/arch/arm/mach-sa1100/usb_ep0.c Thu Mar 1 13:07:30 2001 @@ -110,6 +110,12 @@ static int read_fifo( usb_dev_request_t * p ); static void get_descriptor( usb_dev_request_t * pReq ); +/* some voodo helpers 01Mar01ww */ + +static void set_de( void ); +static void set_ipr( void ); +static void set_ipr_and_de( void ); + /*************************************************************************** Inline Helpers ***************************************************************************/ @@ -511,13 +517,14 @@ ..so just set DE and we are done */ if ( 0 == wr.bytes_left ) { - UDC_set( Ser0UDCCS0, UDCCS0_DE );/* that's it, so data end */ + /* that's it, so data end */ + set_de(); wr.p = NULL; /* be anal */ current_handler = sh_setup_begin; } else { /* Otherwise, more data to go */ write_fifo(); - UDC_set( Ser0UDCCS0, UDCCS0_IPR );/* some data is ready */ + set_ipr(); } } /* @@ -544,17 +551,13 @@ */ if ( 0 == wr.bytes_left ) { - /* doing the following as two writes is a little voodo - ..from intel's original assembler driver. Value - ..of this approach unkown... */ - UDC_set( Ser0UDCCS0, UDCCS0_IPR ); - UDC_set( Ser0UDCCS0, UDCCS0_DE ); + set_ipr_and_de(); wr.p = NULL; current_handler = sh_setup_begin; PRINTKD( "%ssh_write empty() Sent empty packet \n", pszMe ); } else { write_fifo(); /* send data */ - UDC_set( Ser0UDCCS0, UDCCS0_IPR ); /* flag a packet is ready */ + set_ipr(); /* flag a packet is ready */ } Ser0UDCCS0 = cs_reg_out; } @@ -624,10 +627,10 @@ i = 0; do { Ser0UDCD0 = *wr.p; - udelay( 10 ); + udelay( 20 ); /* voodo 28Feb01ww */ i++; } while( Ser0UDCWC == bytes_written && i < 10 ); - if ( i == 10 ) { + if ( i == 50 ) { printk( "%swrite_fifo: write failure\n", pszMe ); usbd_info.stats.ep0_fifo_write_failures++; } @@ -637,6 +640,10 @@ } wr.bytes_left -= bytes_written; + /* following propagation voodo so maybe caller writing IPR in + ..a moment might actually get it to stick 28Feb01ww */ + udelay( 300 ); + usbd_info.stats.ep0_bytes_written += bytes_written; PRINTKD( "L=%d WCR=%8.8X\n", wr.bytes_left, Ser0UDCWC ); } @@ -764,6 +771,78 @@ } } + +/* some voodo I am adding, since the vanilla macros just aren't doing it 1Mar01ww */ + +#define ABORT_BITS ( UDCCS0_SST | UDCCS0_SE ) +#define OK_TO_WRITE (!( Ser0UDCCS0 & ABORT_BITS )) + +static void set_de( void ) +{ + int i = 1; + while( 1 ) { + if ( OK_TO_WRITE ) { + Ser0UDCCS0 |= UDCCS0_DE; + } else { + printk( "%sQuitting set DE because SST or SE set\n", pszMe ); + break; + } + if ( Ser0UDCCS0 & UDCCS0_DE ) + break; + udelay( i ); + if ( ++i == 50 ) { + printk( "%sDangnabbbit! Cannot set DE! (DE=%8.8X CCS0=%8.8X)\n", + pszMe, UDCCS0_DE, Ser0UDCCS0 ); + break; + } + } +} + +static void set_ipr( void ) +{ + int i = 1; + while( 1 ) { + if ( OK_TO_WRITE ) { + Ser0UDCCS0 |= UDCCS0_IPR; + } else { + printk( "%sQuitting set IPR because SST or SE set\n", pszMe ); + break; + } + if ( Ser0UDCCS0 & UDCCS0_IPR ) + break; + udelay( i ); + if ( ++i == 50 ) { + printk( "%sDangnabbbit! Cannot set IPR! (IPR=%8.8X CCS0=%8.8X)\n", + pszMe, UDCCS0_IPR, Ser0UDCCS0 ); + break; + } + } +} + +#define BOTH_BITS (UDCCS0_IPR | UDCCS0_DE) + +static void set_ipr_and_de( void ) +{ + int i = 1; + while( 1 ) { + if ( OK_TO_WRITE ) { + Ser0UDCCS0 |= BOTH_BITS; + } else { + printk( "%sQuitting set IPR/DE because SST or SE set\n", pszMe ); + break; + } + if ( (Ser0UDCCS0 & BOTH_BITS) == BOTH_BITS) + break; + udelay( i ); + if ( ++i == 50 ) { + printk( "%sDangnabbbit! Cannot set DE/IPR! (DE=%8.8X IPR=%8.8X CCS0=%8.8X)\n", + pszMe, UDCCS0_DE, UDCCS0_IPR, Ser0UDCCS0 ); + break; + } + } +} + + /* end usb_ep0.c */ --- /home/wardw/newzoo/usb_send.c Thu Mar 1 14:16:25 2001 +++ linux/arch/arm/mach-sa1100/usb_send.c Wed Feb 28 22:53:45 2001 @@ -17,6 +17,7 @@ #include #include #include +#include // for the massive_attack hack 28Feb01ww #include #include #include @@ -52,6 +53,8 @@ static void ep2_start(void) { + int massive_attack; + if (!ep2_len) return; @@ -60,9 +63,30 @@ ep2_curdmalen = ep2_remain; Ser0UDCIMP = ep2_curdmalen-1; /* experiement ..22Feb01ww */ + udelay( 8 ); + Ser0UDCIMP = ep2_curdmalen-1; /* experiement ..22Feb01ww */ + udelay( 16 ); + Ser0UDCIMP = ep2_curdmalen-1; /* experiement ..22Feb01ww */ + udelay( 32 ); + Ser0UDCIMP = ep2_curdmalen-1; /* experiement ..22Feb01ww */ + /* must do this _before_ queue buffer.. */ UDC_flip( Ser0UDCCS2,UDCCS2_TPC ); /* stop NAKing IN tokens */ UDC_write( Ser0UDCIMP, ep2_curdmalen-1 ); + + massive_attack = 20; + while ( Ser0UDCIMP != ep2_curdmalen-1 && massive_attack-- ) { + printk( "usbsnd: Oh no you don't! Let me spin..." ); + udelay( 500 ); + printk( "and try again...\n" ); + UDC_write( Ser0UDCIMP, ep2_curdmalen-1 ); + } + if ( massive_attack != 20 ) { + if ( Ser0UDCIMP != ep2_curdmalen-1 ) + printk( "usbsnd: Massive attack FAILED :-( %d\n", 20 - massive_attack ); + else + printk( "usbsnd: Massive attack WORKED :-) %d\n", 20 - massive_attack ); + } sa1100_dma_queue_buffer(dmachn_tx, NULL, ep2_curdmapos, ep2_curdmalen); } @@ -113,7 +137,7 @@ printk("usb_send: transmit error %x\n", status); ep2_done(-EIO); } else { -#if 0 // 22Feb01ww/Oleg +#if 1 // 22Feb01ww/Oleg ep2_curdmapos += ep2_curdmalen; ep2_remain -= ep2_curdmalen; #else --- /home/wardw/newzoo/usb-char.c Thu Mar 1 14:16:25 2001 +++ linux/arch/arm/mach-sa1100/usb-char.c Thu Mar 1 12:31:08 2001 @@ -126,6 +126,7 @@ static int sending = 0; static int usb_ref_count = 0; static int last_tx_result = 0; +static int last_rx_result = 0; static int last_tx_size = 0; static struct timer_list tx_timer; @@ -304,10 +305,20 @@ wake_up_interruptible( &wq_read ); wake_up_interruptible( &wq_poll ); - } - else + + last_rx_result = 0; + + kick_start_rx(); + + } else if ( flag != -EAGAIN ) { charstats.cnt_rx_errors++; - kick_start_rx(); + last_rx_result = flag; + rx_ring.in = rx_ring.out = 0; /* right in all cases? 28Feb01ww */ + wake_up_interruptible( &wq_read ); + wake_up_interruptible( &wq_poll ); + } + else /* init, start a read */ + kick_start_rx(); } @@ -407,13 +418,22 @@ size_t stCount, loff_t *pPos ) { ssize_t retval; + int flags; DECLARE_WAITQUEUE( wait, current ); PRINTK( KERN_DEBUG "%sread()\n", pszMe ); + local_irq_save( flags ); + if ( last_rx_result == 0 ) { + local_irq_restore( flags ); + } else { /* an error happended and receiver is paused */ + local_irq_restore( flags ); + last_rx_result = 0; + kick_start_rx(); + } + add_wait_queue( &wq_read, &wait ); while( 1 ) { - int flags; ssize_t bytes_avail; ssize_t bytes_to_end; @@ -453,6 +473,10 @@ } break; } + else if ( last_rx_result ) { + retval = last_rx_result; + break; + } else if ( pFile->f_flags & O_NONBLOCK ) { // no data, can't sleep retval = -EAGAIN; break; @@ -466,7 +490,8 @@ set_current_state( TASK_RUNNING ); remove_wait_queue( &wq_read, &wait ); - /* printk( "%s read returning %d\n", pszMe, retval ); */ + if ( retval < 0 ) + printk( "%sread error %d - %s\n", pszMe, retval, what_the_f( retval ) ); return retval; } @@ -505,7 +530,7 @@ int nThisTime = MIN( TX_PACKET_SIZE, stCount ); copy_from_user( tx_buf, pUserBuffer, nThisTime ); sending = nThisTime; - retval = sa1100_usb_send( tx_buf, nThisTime, tx_done_callback ); + retval = sa1100_usb_send( tx_buf, nThisTime, tx_done_callback ); if ( retval < 0 ) { char * p = what_the_f( retval ); printk( "%sCould not queue xmission. rc=%d - %s\n", @@ -576,6 +601,7 @@ free_string_descriptors(); del_timer( &tx_timer ); sa1100_usb_close(); + up( &xmit_sem ); } MOD_DEC_USE_COUNT; return 0; From kramer@pa.dec.com Sat Mar 3 17:26:36 2001 Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (root@mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id RAA27107 for ; Sat, 3 Mar 2001 17:26:36 +0100 Received: from ztxmail05.ztx.compaq.com (ztxmail05.ztx.compaq.com [161.114.1.209]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id RAA06692 for ; Sat, 3 Mar 2001 17:26:34 +0100 (MET) Received: by ztxmail05.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 3A08C803; Sat, 3 Mar 2001 10:24:47 -0600 (CST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by ztxmail05.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id BDA2DA84; Sat, 3 Mar 2001 10:24:45 -0600 (CST) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA28258; Sat, 3 Mar 2001 08:24:43 -0800 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id IAA10585; Sat, 3 Mar 2001 08:18:00 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id IAA05926; Sat, 3 Mar 2001 08:17:59 -0800 (PST) From: Received: from ztxmail01.nz-cce.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA31806; Sat, 3 Mar 2001 08:17:59 -0800 Received: by ztxmail01.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id E715E2CDF; Sat, 3 Mar 2001 10:17:58 -0600 (CST) Received: from mail.ixcelerator.com (unknown [62.231.2.151]) by ztxmail01.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD0632CF3 for ; Sat, 3 Mar 2001 10:17:57 -0600 (CST) Received: from morgoth.ixcelerator.com (IDENT:root@morgoth.ixcel.ru [172.17.10.70]) by mail.ixcelerator.com (8.10.1/8.10.1) with ESMTP id f23GExR21690; Sat, 3 Mar 2001 19:14:59 +0300 Received: (from green@localhost) by morgoth.ixcelerator.com (8.10.1/8.10.1) id f23GGne28946; Sat, 3 Mar 2001 19:16:49 +0300 Date: Sat, 3 Mar 2001 19:16:49 +0300 Message-Id: <200103031616.f23GGne28946@morgoth.ixcelerator.com> To: ward.willats@extenex.com, ipaq@handhelds.org, nico@CAM.ORG, sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Subject: Re: SA USB Function patch for the weekend User-Agent: tin/1.4.2-20000205 ("Possession") (UNIX) (Linux/2.4.2 (i686)) Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk In article <20010302190127.A1013@extenex.com> you wrote: > This is a patch against the just released linux-2.4.2-rmk1-np1. See this patch, please. This UDC thing is truely strange. Anyway, I never see any write failures, when writing to IN size register, after aplying this patch. Insted, now I see than my notebook cannot keep-up with large packets stram an dros some of them. So I made 2 command line parameters: usb_[rw]size and anyone can now easily customize packetsize. (anyone willing to document this?) # ping -n -f 1.1.1.1 -s 1400 PING 1.1.1.1 (1.1.1.1) from 1.1.1.2 : 1400(1428) bytes of data. From kramer@pa.dec.com Sat Mar 3 20:03:59 2001 Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (root@mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id UAA27374 for ; Sat, 3 Mar 2001 20:03:59 +0100 Received: from ztxmail04.ztx.compaq.com (ztxmail04.ztx.compaq.com [161.114.1.208]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id UAA13082 for ; Sat, 3 Mar 2001 20:03:57 +0100 (MET) Received: by ztxmail04.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 4409681B; Sat, 3 Mar 2001 13:02:10 -0600 (CST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by ztxmail04.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id A9BD3987; Sat, 3 Mar 2001 13:02:08 -0600 (CST) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA31186; Sat, 3 Mar 2001 11:02:07 -0800 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id KAA28959; Sat, 3 Mar 2001 10:55:37 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id KAA02464; Sat, 3 Mar 2001 10:55:37 -0800 (PST) Received: from zmamail02.nz-tay.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA32369; Sat, 3 Mar 2001 10:55:36 -0800 Received: by zmamail02.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 88741619A; Sat, 3 Mar 2001 13:55:36 -0500 (EST) Received: from fire.he.net (fire.he.net [216.218.144.2]) by zmamail02.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A7F216361 for ; Sat, 3 Mar 2001 13:55:35 -0500 (EST) Received: from [192.168.23.2] (wardco.com [165.227.105.2]) by fire.he.net (8.8.6/8.8.2) with ESMTP id KAA31593; Sat, 3 Mar 2001 10:55:33 -0800 Mime-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: Date: Sat, 3 Mar 2001 10:55:16 -0800 To: ipaq@handhelds.org, sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com From: Ward Willats Subject: Re: SA USB Function patch for the weekend Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" ; format="flowed" Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk >See this patch, please. This UDC thing is truely strange. >Anyway, I never see any write failures, when writing to IN size register, >after aplying this patch. Good, me too, but we only saw them once in a long while. (We do 1 way file transfer and only use the transmitter to send little ACK packets now and then.) Now, how much of the stuff before setting TPC can be removed? My boss wanted to put together a test release so I just tried the most overpowering things I could think of to get by Q/A :-). There is no logic/reason to the stuff before setting TPC at all, and I'm a little embarassed at being such a shameless hacker. >stram an dros some of them. So I made 2 command line parameters: >usb_[rw]size and anyone can now easily customize packetsize. >(anyone willing to document this?) I can put this in the SA1100_USB "Documentation" file for the next go-round if you like.... Thanks, -- Ward From kramer@pa.dec.com Wed Mar 7 23:13:51 2001 Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (root@mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id XAA11326 for ; Wed, 7 Mar 2001 23:13:50 +0100 Received: from zcamail03.zca.compaq.com (zcamail03.zca.compaq.com [161.114.32.103]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id XAA16079 for ; Wed, 7 Mar 2001 23:13:47 +0100 (MET) Received: by zcamail03.zca.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 787FCE10; Wed, 7 Mar 2001 14:11:57 -0800 (PST) Received: from mailrelay01.cac.cpqcorp.net (mailrelay01.cac.cpqcorp.net [16.47.132.152]) by zcamail03.zca.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 57D5FD0B; Wed, 7 Mar 2001 14:11:57 -0800 (PST) Received: by mailrelay01.cac.cpqcorp.net (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 228A1147; Wed, 7 Mar 2001 14:11:50 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mailrelay01.cac.cpqcorp.net (Postfix) with SMTP id CFAE313E; Wed, 7 Mar 2001 14:11:49 -0800 (PST) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA13426; Wed, 7 Mar 2001 14:11:43 -0800 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id OAA05085; Wed, 7 Mar 2001 14:00:41 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id OAA01919; Wed, 7 Mar 2001 14:00:40 -0800 (PST) Received: from zmamail01.nz-tay.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA07821; Wed, 7 Mar 2001 14:00:39 -0800 Received: by zmamail01.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 56AABF4BF; Wed, 7 Mar 2001 17:00:39 -0500 (EST) Received: from ns.mizi.com (ns.mizi.com [203.239.30.1]) by zmamail01.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 054A6C01B for ; Wed, 7 Mar 2001 17:00:36 -0500 (EST) Received: from mizi.com (IDENT:root@unixian.mizi.com [203.239.30.118]) (authenticated (0 bits)) by ns.mizi.com (8.11.0/8.11.0) with ESMTP id f27M0W428570 for ; Thu, 8 Mar 2001 07:00:33 +0900 Message-Id: <3AA6AF66.944189DA@mizi.com> Date: Thu, 08 Mar 2001 07:00:06 +0900 From: "Jung Hwa , Jung" Organization: MIZI Research X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.73 [ko] (X11; I; Linux 2.2.17-7mz i686) X-Accept-Language: ko Mime-Version: 1.0 To: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Subject: audio-sa1100-mcp.c problem. Content-Type: text/plain; charset=EUC-KR Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk hi everyone, I'm working on SA1100 with UCB1200 to port linux 2.4-rmk. Everything goes okay except sound driver.. I'm using sound driver located in /arch/arm/special/audio-sa1100-mcp.c. Surely it compiled clear with very little modification. But when I put some kinda audio clip(wav) to /dev/mcp it always stuck and stuck. Follow lines describe ma situation: (I've added some comments(printk) its source , so we can find problem fast) ---------------------------------------------------------------- Kernel booting message: Loading kernel from flash ... done Starting kernel ... Linux version 2.4.0-rmk2-np2 (root@unixian.mizi.com) (gcc version 2.95.2 20000212 ( release) [Rebel.com]) #88 8q 3?y 8 05:22:06 KST 2001 Processor: Intel StrongARM-1110 revision 6 Architecture: Intel-Assabet On node 0 totalpages: 8192 zone(0): 8192 pages. zone(1): 0 pages. zone(2): 0 pages. Kernel command line: root=/dev/mtdblock0 rw mem=32M Console: colour dummy device 80x30 Calibrating delay loop... 180.22 BogoMIPS Memory: 32MB = 32MB total Memory: 30748KB available (1129K code, 235K data, 64K init) Dentry-cache hash table entries: 4096 (order: 3, 32768 bytes) Buffer-cache hash table entries: 1024 (order: 0, 4096 bytes) Page-cache hash table entries: 8192 (order: 3, 32768 bytes) Inode-cache hash table entries: 2048 (order: 2, 16384 bytes) POSIX conformance testing by UNIFIX Linux NET4.0 for Linux 2.4 Based upon Swansea University Computer Society NET3.039 Initializing RT netlink socket sigma detected Starting kswapd v1.8 Console: switching to colour frame buffer device 80x30 RAMDISK driver initialized: 16 RAM disks of 8192K size 1024 blocksize loop: loaded (max 8 devices) JFFS version 1.0, (C) 1999, 2000 Axis Communications AB loop: loaded (max 8 devices) Serial driver version 5.02 (2000-08-09) with no serial options enabled SA1100 serial driver version 1.3 ttyS0 on SA1100 UART1 (irq 15) ttyS1 on SA1100 UART3 (irq 17) ttyS2 on SA1100 UART2 (irq 16), using IRDA Error UCB1200 setting! Success UCB1200 Initial output setting. UCB1200 generic module installed ucb1200-ts is registered audio-mcp: audio_sa1100_init unixian: audio_shared_init: shared->mcp = f8060000 SA1100 MCP audio driver version 1.1 initialized mcp-common: initializing MCP SA1100/UCB1200 module initalized SA1100 flash: probing for 2 partitions (buswidth = 4) SA1100: Found 2 x16 CFI devices at location 0 in 16 bit mode JEDEC ID: 89 18 mtd: Giving out device 0 to root mtd: Giving out device 1 to ramdisk SA1100 flash access initialized Linux PCMCIA Card Services 3.1.22 options: none NET4: Linux TCP/IP 1.0 for NET4.0 IP Protocols: ICMP, UDP, TCP IP: routing cache hash table of 512 buckets, 4Kbytes TCP: Hash tables configured (established 2048 bind 2048) NET4: Unix domain sockets 1.0/SMP for Linux NET4.0. NetWinder Floating Point Emulator V0.95 (c) 1998-1999 Rebel.com ds: no socket drivers loaded! VFS: Mounted root (jffs filesystem). Freeing init memory: 64K serial console detected. Disabling virtual terminals. console=/dev/console init started: BusyBox v0.49 (2001.02.26-05:23+0000) multi-call binary -- GPL2 mount: Mounting /dev/mtdblock0 on / failed: Device or resource busy Please press Enter to activate this console. ^[[B^[[B # # ----------------------------------------------------------------- cat some files on /proc # cat /proc/mcp mcp-vaddr: f8060000 mcp-mccr: 00007f7f mcp-mcsr: 00001505 enable-rqs: 0 enables: 0 disable-rqs: 0 disables: 0 mcp-ids: none mcp-enabled: none # cat /proc/audio_mcp audio shared: device-major: 42 sample-rate: 11025 rate-locked: no attenuation: 0 gain: 10 nclients: 0 audio input: enabled: no interrupts: 0 wakeups: 0 samples: 0 overruns: 0 audio output: enabled: no interrupts: 0 wakeups: 0 samples: 0 underruns: 0 # ------------------------------------------------------------------- here is problem... # cat test1.wav >/dev/mcp audio-mcp: audio_open audio-mcp: audio_dev_client_create: id=0 unixian Request IRQ request status: 18 536870912 audio-mcp succeedaudio-mcp: audio_hardware_init audio-mcpunixian say :before calling fuction mcp_common_enable audio-mcpunixian Say :after calling function mcp_common_enable audio-mcpunixian say :before calling function codec_write(REG 7) with audio_ctl_a v alue 522 audio-mcpunixian say :after calling function codec_write(REG 7) audio-mcpunixian say :before calling function codec_write(REG 8)with audio_ctl_b va lue 0 unixian: in codec_write function unixian: in critical section of codec_write function unixian: waiting mcp_mcsr_wait_write unxian: waiting mcp_mcsr_wait_write progress inner loopunixian: out critical section of codec_write unixian: in codec_write function unixian: in critical section of codec_write function unixian: waiting mcp_mcsr_wait_write unxian: waiting mcp_mcsr_wait_write progress inner loopmcsr register stat:1285 505 .mcsr register stat:1285 505 .mcsr register stat:1285 505 .mcsr register stat:1285 505 .mcsr register stat:1285 505 .mcsr register stat:1285 505 .mcsr register stat:1285 505 .mcsr register stat:1285 505 .. .. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- When I write some audio clip directly to /dev/mcp for test, it's going infinite loop. follow lines from audio-sa1100-mcp.c: static void codec_write(mcp_reg *mcp, int addr, int data) { ulong flags; /* critical section */ printk("unixian: in codec_write function\n"); save_flags_cli(flags); { printk("unixian: in critical section of codec_write function\n"); printk("unixian: waiting mcp_mcsr_wait_write\n"); mcp_mcsr_wait_write(mcp); mcp->mcdr2 = ((addr & 0xf) << MCDR2_V_RN) | MCDR2_M_nRW | (data & 0xffff); } restore_flags(flags); printk("unixian: out critical section of codec_write\n"); } static inline void mcp_mcsr_wait_write(mcp_reg *mcp) { /* wait for outstanding write to complete */ printk("unxian: waiting mcp_mcsr_wait_write progress\n"); printk("inner loop"); while ((mcp->mcsr & MCSR_M_CWC) == 0) { *********************************************** printk("mcsr register stat:%d %x\n.", mcp->mcsr, mcp->mcsr); } /* spin */ static void audio_hardware_init(audio_shared *shared) { mcp_reg *mcp = shared->mcp; int asd; #ifdef AUDIO_DEBUG_VERBOSE printk(AUDIO_NAME ": audio_hardware_init\n"); #endif /* turn on the MCP */ //unixian printk(AUDIO_NAME "unixian say :before calling fuction mcp_common_enable\n"); (void) mcp_common_enable(shared->mcp_id); printk(AUDIO_NAME "unixian Say :after calling function mcp_common_enable\n"); /* disable audio I/O, clear options */ shared->audio_ctl_b = 0; printk(AUDIO_NAME "unixian say :before calling function codec_write(REG 8)with audio_ctl_b value %x\n", shared->audio_ctl_b); codec_write(mcp, CODEC_REG_AUDIO_CTL_B, shared->audio_ctl_b); printk(AUDIO_NAME "unixian say :after calling function codec_write(REG 8)\n"); //unixian: This driver is feeling stuck in follow area // set default gain, audio sample rate divisor asd = CODEC_ASD_NUMERATOR / AUDIO_RATE_DEFAULT; //shared->audio_ctl_a = (AUDIO_GAIN_DEFAULT << 7) | asd; shared->audio_ctl_a = 0; printk(AUDIO_NAME "unixian say :before calling function codec_write(REG 7) with audio_ctl_a value %x\n", shared->audio_ctl_a); codec_write(mcp, CODEC_REG_AUDIO_CTL_A, shared->audio_ctl_a); printk(AUDIO_NAME "unixian say :after calling function codec_write(REG 7)\n"); */ #ifdef CONFIG_SA1100_TIFON /* direction of audio switch control pins */ GPDR |= 0x1c; codec_write( mcp, 1, codec_read( mcp, 1) | (3<<8)); #endif } ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Please read carefully codec_write and mcp_mcsr_wait_write function.. Device is stuck when comparing MCSR to CWC. As you know, MCSR means MCP status register. CWC is hex 0x1000(1000000000000). Definitely MCSR gotta change, but still remains with same bit value. I don't know why.... Please help me to solve this out. Thanks in advance. From kramer@pa.dec.com Fri Mar 9 00:49:12 2001 Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (root@mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id AAA17263 for ; Fri, 9 Mar 2001 00:49:12 +0100 Received: from zcamail04.zca.compaq.com (zcamail04.zca.compaq.com [161.114.32.104]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id AAA21222 for ; Fri, 9 Mar 2001 00:49:10 +0100 (MET) Received: by zcamail04.zca.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 6AABB3A7; Thu, 8 Mar 2001 15:48:35 -0800 (PST) Received: from mailrelay01.cac.cpqcorp.net (mailrelay01.cac.cpqcorp.net [16.47.132.152]) by zcamail04.zca.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C3B23AC; Thu, 8 Mar 2001 15:48:35 -0800 (PST) Received: by mailrelay01.cac.cpqcorp.net (Postfix, from userid 12345) id AB78E131; Thu, 8 Mar 2001 15:47:13 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mailrelay01.cac.cpqcorp.net (Postfix) with SMTP id 7F68F15E; Thu, 8 Mar 2001 15:47:13 -0800 (PST) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA31100; Thu, 8 Mar 2001 15:47:05 -0800 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id PAA13250; Thu, 8 Mar 2001 15:38:17 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id PAA03592; Thu, 8 Mar 2001 15:38:16 -0800 (PST) Received: from zmamail02.nz-tay.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA16465; Thu, 8 Mar 2001 15:38:16 -0800 Received: by zmamail02.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id D89656250; Thu, 8 Mar 2001 18:38:15 -0500 (EST) Received: from thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (thorgal.et.tudelft.nl [130.161.40.91]) by zmamail02.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 31A033577 for ; Thu, 8 Mar 2001 18:38:15 -0500 (EST) Received: (from bakker@localhost) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.7/8.8.7) id AAA17238; Fri, 9 Mar 2001 00:38:13 +0100 Mime-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: Date: Fri, 9 Mar 2001 00:37:10 +0100 To: linux-arm@lists.arm.linux.org.uk From: "J.D. Bakker" Subject: Linking to COFF / IPP Cc: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" ; format="flowed" Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk Hi all, I've written an optimized Fast Fourier Transform (FFT) for StrongARM. Before I slap a GPL header on and release it, I would like to compare its performance to the FFT in the Intel Performance Primitives (IPP) (see http://developer.intel.com/software/products/ipp/). Trouble is that Linux is not a supported platform (yet). Has anyone managed to use the IPP libraries in Linux yet ? The files in the Intel library seem to be archives of COFF files. Is there any way to convince binutils to link to COFF files ? Thanks, JDB. -- LART. 250 MIPS under one Watt. Free hardware design files. http://www.lart.tudelft.nl/ From kramer@pa.dec.com Fri Mar 9 01:33:43 2001 Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (root@mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id BAA17511 for ; Fri, 9 Mar 2001 01:33:43 +0100 Received: from zcamail03.zca.compaq.com (zcamail03.zca.compaq.com [161.114.32.103]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id BAA23304 for ; Fri, 9 Mar 2001 01:33:42 +0100 (MET) Received: by zcamail03.zca.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id D2620DF1; Thu, 8 Mar 2001 16:31:52 -0800 (PST) Received: from mailrelay01.cac.cpqcorp.net (mailrelay01.cac.cpqcorp.net [16.47.132.152]) by zcamail03.zca.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB483E59; Thu, 8 Mar 2001 16:31:52 -0800 (PST) Received: by mailrelay01.cac.cpqcorp.net (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 357C515A; Thu, 8 Mar 2001 16:31:54 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mailrelay01.cac.cpqcorp.net (Postfix) with SMTP id E063913A; Thu, 8 Mar 2001 16:31:53 -0800 (PST) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA19753; Thu, 8 Mar 2001 16:31:48 -0800 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id QAA31345; Thu, 8 Mar 2001 16:26:26 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id QAA10102; Thu, 8 Mar 2001 16:26:26 -0800 (PST) From: Received: from ztxmail01.nz-cce.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA13892; Thu, 8 Mar 2001 16:26:25 -0800 Received: by ztxmail01.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 9A7282405; Thu, 8 Mar 2001 18:26:24 -0600 (CST) Received: from rascallinux.hkcable.com.hk (unknown [61.18.145.95]) by ztxmail01.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3675B24B3 for ; Thu, 8 Mar 2001 18:26:23 -0600 (CST) Received: (from sylam@localhost) by rascallinux.hkcable.com.hk (8.9.3/8.9.3) id IAA02158; Fri, 9 Mar 2001 08:18:34 +0800 Message-Id: <200103090018.IAA02158@rascallinux.hkcable.com.hk> Subject: Re: Linking to COFF / IPP To: bakker@thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (J.D. Bakker) Date: Fri, 9 Mar 2001 08:18:34 +0800 (CST) Cc: linux-arm@lists.arm.linux.org.uk, sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com In-Reply-To: from "J.D. Bakker" at Mar 09, 2001 12:37:10 AM X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL1] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk > > Hi all, > > I've written an optimized Fast Fourier Transform (FFT) for StrongARM. > Before I slap a GPL header on and release it, I would like to compare > its performance to the FFT in the Intel Performance Primitives (IPP) > (see http://developer.intel.com/software/products/ipp/). Trouble is > that Linux is not a supported platform (yet). > > Has anyone managed to use the IPP libraries in Linux yet ? The files > in the Intel library seem to be archives of COFF files. Is there any > way to convince binutils to link to COFF files ? IPP libraries have Linux version. You can search it easily on Intel website. But there is no source for the libraries and no sample program at all. If you know how to make use of it, could you post a sample program here? Best wishes, Jacky Lam From kramer@pa.dec.com Fri Mar 9 05:13:15 2001 Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (root@mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id FAA18063 for ; Fri, 9 Mar 2001 05:13:15 +0100 Received: from zcamail05.zca.compaq.com (zcamail05.zca.compaq.com [161.114.32.105]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id FAA01754 for ; Fri, 9 Mar 2001 05:13:13 +0100 (MET) Received: by zcamail05.zca.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 30BC29C8; Thu, 8 Mar 2001 20:13:37 -0800 (PST) Received: from mailrelay01.cac.cpqcorp.net (mailrelay01.cac.cpqcorp.net [16.47.132.152]) by zcamail05.zca.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE8429E1; Thu, 8 Mar 2001 20:13:36 -0800 (PST) Received: by mailrelay01.cac.cpqcorp.net (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 881C915B; Thu, 8 Mar 2001 20:11:25 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mailrelay01.cac.cpqcorp.net (Postfix) with SMTP id 5191D13D; Thu, 8 Mar 2001 20:11:25 -0800 (PST) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA28567; Thu, 8 Mar 2001 20:11:23 -0800 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id UAA02129; Thu, 8 Mar 2001 20:05:23 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id UAA27943; Thu, 8 Mar 2001 20:05:23 -0800 (PST) Received: from ztxmail02.nz-cce.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA22316; Thu, 8 Mar 2001 20:05:22 -0800 Received: by ztxmail02.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 5807D1F76; Thu, 8 Mar 2001 22:05:22 -0600 (CST) Received: from nwcst289.netaddress.usa.net (nwcst289.netaddress.usa.net [204.68.23.34]) by ztxmail02.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 8A4801C8A for ; Thu, 8 Mar 2001 22:05:21 -0600 (CST) Received: (qmail 21002 invoked by uid 60001); 9 Mar 2001 04:05:20 -0000 Message-Id: <20010309040520.21001.qmail@nwcst289.netaddress.usa.net> Received: from 204.68.23.34 by nwcst289 for [206.234.168.215] via web-mailer() on Fri Mar 9 04:05:20 GMT 2001 Date: 8 Mar 2001 21:05:20 MST From: Jason Lin To: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Subject: Kernel Booting X-Mailer: USANET web-mailer () Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl id FAA18063 Hi! I am working on a project which hardware platform is based on SA1110. The bootldr is from handhelds.org with minor changes. The kernel version is 2.4.2 with patches. I tried to boot the kernel and failed. The console shown as followed: kernel_image_dest: C0000000 kernel_image_offset: 00008000 C0008000: E1A00000 C0008004: E1A00000 C0008008: E1A00000 C000800C: E1A00000 C0008010: E1A00000 C0008014: E1A00000 C0008018: E1A00000 C000801C:ystem_name=ramdisk argc=00000002 args=noinitrd root=/dev/mtdblock4 init=/linuxrc console=ttySA0 setting boot parameters get_param: could not find parameter system_rev first_word_of_ramdisk=00600000 Setting up Linux parameters at address=C0000100 using_ramdisk=00000001 initrd_start=D0100004 dram_size=02000000 nr_pages=00002000 command line is: noinitrd root=/dev/mtdblock4 init=/linuxrc console=ttySA0 linuxEntryPoint=C0008000 Booting Linux image Then, just stay there forever. Can someone point me to the area I can look at? Thanks! Jason Lin ____________________________________________________________________ Get free email and a permanent address at http://www.netaddress.com/?N=1 From kramer@pa.dec.com Fri Mar 9 10:28:01 2001 Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (root@mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id KAA18627 for ; Fri, 9 Mar 2001 10:28:01 +0100 Received: from zmamail05.zma.compaq.com (zmamail05.zma.compaq.com [161.114.64.105]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id KAA16101 for ; Fri, 9 Mar 2001 10:27:58 +0100 (MET) Received: by zmamail05.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id F0E9C3BEB; Fri, 9 Mar 2001 04:26:07 -0500 (EST) Received: from taynzmail03.nz-tay.cpqcorp.net (taynzmail03.nz-tay.cpqcorp.net [16.47.4.103]) by zmamail05.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AFE5E6737; Fri, 9 Mar 2001 04:26:05 -0500 (EST) Received: by taynzmail03.nz-tay.cpqcorp.net (Postfix, from userid 12345) id E6D67184; Fri, 9 Mar 2001 04:26:03 -0500 (EST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by taynzmail03.nz-tay.cpqcorp.net (Postfix) with SMTP id C135313C; Fri, 9 Mar 2001 04:26:01 -0500 (EST) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA27666; Fri, 9 Mar 2001 01:24:36 -0800 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id BAA17650; Fri, 9 Mar 2001 01:18:28 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id BAA15805; Fri, 9 Mar 2001 01:18:27 -0800 (PST) Received: from ztxmail01.nz-cce.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA29038; Fri, 9 Mar 2001 01:18:26 -0800 Received: by ztxmail01.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id AA03127DA; Fri, 9 Mar 2001 03:18:26 -0600 (CST) Received: from mail.futuretv.com (salisbury.labs.futuretv.com [194.216.164.17]) by ztxmail01.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D29902453 for ; Fri, 9 Mar 2001 03:18:25 -0600 (CST) Received: from pig.labs.futuretv.com ([192.168.33.33]) by mail.futuretv.com with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1) id 14bJ20-0002HJ-00; Fri, 09 Mar 2001 09:17:52 +0000 Received: from localhost ([::ffff:127.0.0.1] helo=pig.labs.futuretv.com ident=pb) by pig.labs.futuretv.com with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1) id 14bJ1z-0004sJ-00; Fri, 09 Mar 2001 09:17:51 +0000 X-Mailer: exmh version 2.1.1 10/15/1999 (debian) To: "J.D. Bakker" Cc: linux-arm@lists.arm.linux.org.uk, sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Subject: Re: Linking to COFF / IPP In-Reply-To: Your message of "Fri, 09 Mar 2001 00:37:10 +0100." From: Philip Blundell Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Fri, 09 Mar 2001 09:17:51 +0000 Message-Id: Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk In message , "J.D. Bakker" writes: >Has anyone managed to use the IPP libraries in Linux yet ? The files >in the Intel library seem to be archives of COFF files. Is there any >way to convince binutils to link to COFF files ? Have you tried building with "--enable-targets=arm-coff"? That might be enough to do the trick. p. From kramer@pa.dec.com Fri Mar 9 11:07:14 2001 Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (root@mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id LAA18808 for ; Fri, 9 Mar 2001 11:07:14 +0100 Received: from zcamail05.zca.compaq.com (zcamail05.zca.compaq.com [161.114.32.105]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id LAA19267 for ; Fri, 9 Mar 2001 11:07:12 +0100 (MET) Received: by zcamail05.zca.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 1DA95A61; Fri, 9 Mar 2001 02:07:32 -0800 (PST) Received: from mailrelay01.cce.cpqcorp.net (mailrelay01.cce.cpqcorp.net [16.47.68.171]) by zcamail05.zca.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AEDBC8F8; Fri, 9 Mar 2001 02:07:31 -0800 (PST) Received: by mailrelay01.cce.cpqcorp.net (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 505B82FF; Fri, 9 Mar 2001 04:05:19 -0600 (CST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mailrelay01.cce.cpqcorp.net (Postfix) with SMTP id A4EA730A; Fri, 9 Mar 2001 04:05:17 -0600 (CST) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA01940; Fri, 9 Mar 2001 02:03:56 -0800 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id BAA12573; Fri, 9 Mar 2001 01:57:56 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id BAA20568; Fri, 9 Mar 2001 01:57:56 -0800 (PST) Received: from ztxmail01.nz-cce.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AB15324; Fri, 9 Mar 2001 01:57:55 -0800 Received: by ztxmail01.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 67A4C2654; Fri, 9 Mar 2001 03:57:55 -0600 (CST) Received: from thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (thorgal.et.tudelft.nl [130.161.40.91]) by ztxmail01.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A4A0C244A for ; Fri, 9 Mar 2001 03:57:54 -0600 (CST) Received: (from bakker@localhost) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.7/8.8.7) id KAA18731; Fri, 9 Mar 2001 10:57:42 +0100 Mime-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: In-Reply-To: References: Date: Fri, 9 Mar 2001 10:57:08 +0100 To: Philip Blundell From: "J.D. Bakker" Subject: Re: Linking to COFF / IPP Cc: linux-arm@lists.arm.linux.org.uk, sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" ; format="flowed" Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk At 09:17 +0000 09-03-2001, Philip Blundell wrote: >In message , "J.D. Bakker" writes: >>Has anyone managed to use the IPP libraries in Linux yet ? The files >>in the Intel library seem to be archives of COFF files. Is there any >>way to convince binutils to link to COFF files ? > >Have you tried building with "--enable-targets=arm-coff"? That might be >enough to do the trick. Thanks, but it seems that won't be necessary. My information was outdated: while the IPP beta was COFF-only, the full release (http://developer.intel.com/design/strong/swsup/IPP.htm) has an ELF version. Confusingly, the main IPP page lists Windows as a system requirement -- but that seems to apply only to the Pentium version. Oh well, at least it looks like I have a way to link the thing. JDB. -- Jan-Derk Bakker, bakker@mmc.et.tudelft.nl The lazy man's proverb: 'There's no business like slow business !' From kramer@pa.dec.com Fri Mar 9 14:20:41 2001 Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (root@mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id OAA19369 for ; Fri, 9 Mar 2001 14:20:41 +0100 Received: from zmamail04.zma.compaq.com (zmamail04.zma.compaq.com [161.114.64.104]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id OAA04823 for ; Fri, 9 Mar 2001 14:20:39 +0100 (MET) Received: by zmamail04.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id F1604574D; Fri, 9 Mar 2001 08:18:51 -0500 (EST) Received: from mailrelay01.cce.cpqcorp.net (mailrelay01.cce.cpqcorp.net [16.47.68.171]) by zmamail04.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 776E45C31; Fri, 9 Mar 2001 08:18:51 -0500 (EST) Received: by mailrelay01.cce.cpqcorp.net (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 79448313; Fri, 9 Mar 2001 07:18:46 -0600 (CST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mailrelay01.cce.cpqcorp.net (Postfix) with SMTP id A5F051CC; Fri, 9 Mar 2001 07:18:43 -0600 (CST) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA03261; Fri, 9 Mar 2001 05:18:41 -0800 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id EAA17350; Fri, 9 Mar 2001 04:53:02 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id EAA22396; Fri, 9 Mar 2001 04:53:01 -0800 (PST) Received: from ztxmail02.nz-cce.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA14761; Fri, 9 Mar 2001 04:52:55 -0800 Received: by ztxmail02.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 1D5B41D95; Fri, 9 Mar 2001 06:52:53 -0600 (CST) Received: from dredd.crimea.edu (unknown [213.128.193.148]) by ztxmail02.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BEDC41E27 for ; Fri, 9 Mar 2001 06:52:51 -0600 (CST) Received: (from uucp@localhost) by dredd.crimea.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with UUCP id PAA07669 for sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com; Fri, 9 Mar 2001 15:46:40 +0300 Received: (from green@localhost) by dredd.crimea.edu (8.10.1/8.10.1) id f29CTae01826 for sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com; Fri, 9 Mar 2001 15:29:36 +0300 Date: Fri, 9 Mar 2001 15:29:36 +0300 From: Oleg Drokin To: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Subject: NULL Pointer traps is not there on SA1100 arch?! Message-Id: <20010309152936.C1661@dredd.crimea.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0.1i Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk Hello! I am experienced some strange thing, I want to share. ;) I got used on x86 traps when something dereferences NULL pointer, even in kernel mode. that easies debugging and so on. But see line below and output, I got from it: printk("%p Byte # 39: %d\n",skb,skb->data[48+14]); 00000000 Byte # 39: 0 So, no oops for NULL pointer dereference on arm? Kernel used: 2.4.2-rmk1-np1 Bye, Oleg From kramer@pa.dec.com Sat Mar 10 18:55:55 2001 Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (root@mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id SAA22988 for ; Sat, 10 Mar 2001 18:55:55 +0100 Received: from zcamail03.zca.compaq.com (zcamail03.zca.compaq.com [161.114.32.103]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id SAA14495 for ; Sat, 10 Mar 2001 18:55:52 +0100 (MET) Received: by zcamail03.zca.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 84A88FD2; Sat, 10 Mar 2001 09:54:03 -0800 (PST) Received: from mailrelay01.cac.cpqcorp.net (mailrelay01.cac.cpqcorp.net [16.47.132.152]) by zcamail03.zca.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5EBFFED1; Sat, 10 Mar 2001 09:54:03 -0800 (PST) Received: by mailrelay01.cac.cpqcorp.net (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 81B8E15E; Sat, 10 Mar 2001 09:53:59 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mailrelay01.cac.cpqcorp.net (Postfix) with SMTP id DF9FD14C; Sat, 10 Mar 2001 09:53:58 -0800 (PST) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA11531; Sat, 10 Mar 2001 09:53:55 -0800 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id JAA00091; Sat, 10 Mar 2001 09:43:50 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id JAA03580; Sat, 10 Mar 2001 09:43:49 -0800 (PST) From: Received: from ztxmail01.nz-cce.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA24559; Sat, 10 Mar 2001 09:43:48 -0800 Received: by ztxmail01.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 7ECF527B3; Sat, 10 Mar 2001 11:43:48 -0600 (CST) Received: from gomeznt01.gomezshipping.an (unknown [208.136.54.146]) by ztxmail01.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6677B248B; Sat, 10 Mar 2001 11:43:44 -0600 (CST) Received: from gauifnbece.cc.net.ei (38.37.111.77) by gomeznt01.gomezshipping.an (NPlex 5.1.054) id 3A8D190B0000128B; Sat, 10 Mar 2001 13:36:14 -0400 Message-Id: <000066521ee4$00005d79$00005cf9@pob23uifesi.cic.org.ar ([61.48.316.4]) by ris5s2.daidacent14sere1.chua.cesaimtv.net.ie (8.9.1a/8.9.1/1.0) with SMTP id NAE11975 ([217.45.256.4])> To: Subject: Mortgage Rates DROPPED! Act Now & Save! 23801 Date: Sat, 10 Mar 2001 13:07:08 -0500 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Priority: 3 X-Msmail-Priority: Normal Reply-To: debtstarze4@usa.net Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk The Lender

The Lender's Network Mortgage Specialists =

<= font color=3D"#FFFFFF">For U.S.A. Homeowners Only
Interest Rates have Dropped....Start Saving Now!

We Shop The Best Loan For You!

The Lenders Network is = a 100% free service which lets you shop for a mortgage conveniently and securely from the comf= ort of your home. Using our vast network of lenders across the U.S., we will search our database of loan programs for the best loans that fit your need= s.  Even if you're currently working with another lender or have been turned down before, we can still help. 

Our loan programs can get you the cash you need for:

  • Debt Consolidation
  • 2nd Mortgage
  • Refinance
  • Credit Repair
  • Home Improvement
  • New Car
  • Dream Vacation
  • College Tuition
  • To start a new business ..and much, much more!

Funding borr= owers with less than perfect credit is our specialty!

W= e can get you the loan you need. 
Regardless of whether you have good or bad credit, we can help you.

Ready to get started? 
Simply fill out the our 60 second form, and we= 'll begin shopping for your loan.
  
It's that easy!  We Make the Lenders Compete for Y= OUR Business!

Click Here For A Free Mortgage Quote

 

Removal Instructions
Click on the below link to be exclude from further communication.
Click= Here

From kramer@pa.dec.com Mon Mar 12 23:32:37 2001 Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (root@mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id XAA28975 for ; Mon, 12 Mar 2001 23:32:36 +0100 Received: from zcamail04.zca.compaq.com (zcamail04.zca.compaq.com [161.114.32.104]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id XAA07444 for ; Mon, 12 Mar 2001 23:32:33 +0100 (MET) Received: by zcamail04.zca.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 9B8BE320; Mon, 12 Mar 2001 14:32:03 -0800 (PST) Received: from taynzmail03.nz-tay.cpqcorp.net (taynzmail03.nz-tay.cpqcorp.net [16.47.4.103]) by zcamail04.zca.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 44861374; Mon, 12 Mar 2001 14:32:03 -0800 (PST) Received: by taynzmail03.nz-tay.cpqcorp.net (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 92501154; Mon, 12 Mar 2001 17:30:39 -0500 (EST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by taynzmail03.nz-tay.cpqcorp.net (Postfix) with SMTP id 80367137; Mon, 12 Mar 2001 17:30:37 -0500 (EST) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA29910; Mon, 12 Mar 2001 14:30:29 -0800 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id OAA06179; Mon, 12 Mar 2001 14:23:07 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id OAA25921; Mon, 12 Mar 2001 14:23:07 -0800 (PST) Received: from ztxmail02.nz-cce.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA28205; Mon, 12 Mar 2001 14:23:06 -0800 Received: by ztxmail02.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id D64661D8F; Mon, 12 Mar 2001 16:23:05 -0600 (CST) Received: from xanadu.home (modemcable084.137-200-24.mtl.mc.videotron.ca [24.200.137.84]) by ztxmail02.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E69A91C23 for ; Mon, 12 Mar 2001 16:23:04 -0600 (CST) Received: from localhost (nico@localhost) by xanadu.home (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id RAA05775; Mon, 12 Mar 2001 17:23:03 -0500 X-Authentication-Warning: xanadu.home: nico owned process doing -bs Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2001 17:23:03 -0500 (EST) From: Nicolas Pitre X-Sender: To: SA-1100/Linux Cc: Subject: diff-2.4.2-rmk1-np2 In-Reply-To: Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk ... is available at the usual sites, which are: ftp://ftp.netwinder.org/users/n/nico/ ftp://ftp.arm.linux.org.uk/pub/linux/arm/people/nico/ ftp://ftp.handhelds.org/pub/linux/arm/sa-1100-patches/ New stuff: - more sleep/wake-up support (Sukjae Cho, Chester Kuo) - IDE cmdline for quick booting systems (Jeff Sutherland) - SA1111 mouse IRQ fixes (David Plentovich) - yet another big SA11x0 USB bunch of fixes (Ward Willats, Oleg Drokin) - more SA11x0 FIR changes (Oleg Drokin) [more eyeballs on this one might be required to get it fully working] - ide-cs works again (George G. Davis) - the PCP macro used in the LCD driver was defined wrong (David Neuer) - latest loop block driver fixes (Jens Axboe) - updated MTD stuff (me) - kernel oops for unaligned mem access when alignment fixup configured out (me) - misaligned memory access can be trapped for user space aps (me) - usbnet.c driver removed (me) [since it's intended to run on your PC, get it from the AC patches instead] Too many problems poped up because of unnoticed misaligned memory access in kernel code lately. Therefore I enforced a kernel oops if ever this happens again with the kernel alignment trap configured out. Anyway, according to Alan Cox, this is a bad idea to configure it out, but Russell King has some good reasons for it to do so on some f***ed up ARM architectures. However this is not the case on any SA11x0 design I'm aware of. Of course this is a bad idea to rely on the alignment trap to perform unaligned memory access in general. If those access are predictable, you are better to use the macros provided by include/asm/unaligned.h. The alignment trap can fixup misaligned access for the exception cases, but at a high performance cost. It may hapen, but it has to be rare. Now for user space applications, it is possible to configure the alignment trap to SIGBUS any code performing unaligned access (good for debugging bad code), or even fixup the access by software like for kernel code. The later mode isn't recommended for performance reasons (just think about the floating point emulation that works about the same way). Fix your code instead! To change the alignment trap behavior, simply echo one of the following mode numbers into /proc/sys/debug/alignment: mode behavior ---- -------- 0 unaligned access ignored, needed for compatibility with older ARM binaries that used to do unaligned memory access on purpose for their documented results. This is the default. 1 any process performing an unaligned memory access will be killed with a SIGBUS. 2 any process performing an unaligned memory access will have its access fixed up by the kernel in software. This is of course slow (think about the floating point emulator) and not recommended for production use. For example, you can do this on system boot: echo 1 > /proc/sys/debug/alignment You can also read the content of the same file to get statistical information on unaligned access occurences plus the current mode of operation for user space code. Enjoy! Nicolas From kramer@pa.dec.com Wed Mar 14 19:41:36 2001 Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (root@mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id TAA04994 for ; Wed, 14 Mar 2001 19:41:36 +0100 Received: from zcamail04.zca.compaq.com (zcamail04.zca.compaq.com [161.114.32.104]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id TAA01963 for ; Wed, 14 Mar 2001 19:41:33 +0100 (MET) Received: by zcamail04.zca.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id A0CAB39A; Wed, 14 Mar 2001 10:41:04 -0800 (PST) Received: from taynzmail03.nz-tay.cpqcorp.net (taynzmail03.nz-tay.cpqcorp.net [16.47.4.103]) by zcamail04.zca.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F69C1EF; Wed, 14 Mar 2001 10:41:00 -0800 (PST) Received: by taynzmail03.nz-tay.cpqcorp.net (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 6FB8D171; Wed, 14 Mar 2001 13:39:36 -0500 (EST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by taynzmail03.nz-tay.cpqcorp.net (Postfix) with SMTP id 4E6141A7; Wed, 14 Mar 2001 13:39:34 -0500 (EST) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA02374; Wed, 14 Mar 2001 10:39:19 -0800 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id KAA02693; Wed, 14 Mar 2001 10:30:08 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id KAA29943; Wed, 14 Mar 2001 10:30:08 -0800 (PST) Received: from ztxmail01.nz-cce.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA03333; Wed, 14 Mar 2001 10:30:05 -0800 Received: by ztxmail01.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 40F862FA9; Wed, 14 Mar 2001 12:30:05 -0600 (CST) Received: from pigeon.maya.com (po.maya.com [192.70.254.2]) by ztxmail01.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7BAF12483 for ; Wed, 14 Mar 2001 12:29:59 -0600 (CST) Received: from maya.com (cook-pc.maya.com [192.70.254.33]) by pigeon.maya.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B60583081A for ; Wed, 14 Mar 2001 13:01:51 -0500 (EST) Message-Id: <3AAFB8E7.C8DEDE36@maya.com> Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2001 13:31:03 -0500 From: Nicole Cook X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.72 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.2.14-5.0 i686) X-Accept-Language: en Mime-Version: 1.0 To: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Subject: difficulties with diff-2.4.2-rmk1-np2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk I'm trying to build this on a cerf board in order to use FIR, but my build fails because it can't find cerf89x0.o. It looks like this is because the patch fails on the net Makefile: more net/Makefile.rej *************** *** 108,113 **** obj-$(CONFIG_HP100) += hp100.o obj-$(CONFIG_SMC9194) += smc9194.o obj-$(CONFIG_ARM_AM79C961A) += am79c961a.o obj-$(CONFIG_ARM_ETHERH) += 8390.o obj-$(CONFIG_WD80x3) += wd.o 8390.o obj-$(CONFIG_EL2) += 3c503.o 8390.o --- 108,114 ---- obj-$(CONFIG_HP100) += hp100.o obj-$(CONFIG_SMC9194) += smc9194.o obj-$(CONFIG_ARM_AM79C961A) += am79c961a.o + obj-$(CONFIG_CERF_CS8900A) += cerf89x0.o obj-$(CONFIG_ARM_ETHERH) += 8390.o obj-$(CONFIG_WD80x3) += wd.o 8390.o obj-$(CONFIG_EL2) += 3c503.o 8390.o I looked at the Makefile to add the line by hand, but none of the other lines are there, & it's only about 50-some lines total. I have linux-2.4.2, and applied the rmk1 and rmk1-np2 patches, and I'm not sure why this would fail. Any suggestions? Nicole From kramer@pa.dec.com Thu Mar 15 02:52:56 2001 Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (root@mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id CAA06598 for ; Thu, 15 Mar 2001 02:52:56 +0100 Received: from zmamail04.zma.compaq.com (zmamail04.zma.compaq.com [161.114.64.104]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id CAA25009 for ; Thu, 15 Mar 2001 02:52:54 +0100 (MET) Received: by zmamail04.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 713F363B1; Wed, 14 Mar 2001 20:51:06 -0500 (EST) Received: from taynzmail03.nz-tay.cpqcorp.net (taynzmail03.nz-tay.cpqcorp.net [16.47.4.103]) by zmamail04.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 267466377; Wed, 14 Mar 2001 20:51:06 -0500 (EST) Received: by taynzmail03.nz-tay.cpqcorp.net (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 73AC517D; Wed, 14 Mar 2001 20:51:02 -0500 (EST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by taynzmail03.nz-tay.cpqcorp.net (Postfix) with SMTP id 4576515E; Wed, 14 Mar 2001 20:51:00 -0500 (EST) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA15414; Wed, 14 Mar 2001 17:50:58 -0800 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id RAA32593; Wed, 14 Mar 2001 17:46:10 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id RAA23606; Wed, 14 Mar 2001 17:46:09 -0800 (PST) Received: from zmamail02.nz-tay.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA14012; Wed, 14 Mar 2001 17:46:05 -0800 Received: by zmamail02.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 82D006214; Wed, 14 Mar 2001 20:46:01 -0500 (EST) Received: from dredd.crimea.edu (unknown [213.128.193.148]) by zmamail02.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A848F4C75 for ; Wed, 14 Mar 2001 20:45:59 -0500 (EST) Received: (from uucp@localhost) by dredd.crimea.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with UUCP id EAA21437; Thu, 15 Mar 2001 04:45:15 +0300 Received: (from green@localhost) by dredd.crimea.edu (8.10.1/8.10.1) id f2F1j0W04451; Thu, 15 Mar 2001 04:45:00 +0300 Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2001 04:44:59 +0300 From: Oleg Drokin To: Ward Willats Cc: nico@CAM.ORG, ipaq@handhelds.org, sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Subject: USB fixes. Message-Id: <20010315044459.G3733@dredd.crimea.edu> References: <20010312165916.A1545@extenex.com> <20010315025248.A3657@dredd.crimea.edu> <20010314160622.A13421@extenex.com> <20010315031549.B3733@dredd.crimea.edu> <20010314163241.A14086@extenex.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="fOHHtNG4YXGJ0yqR" X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0.1i In-Reply-To: <20010314163241.A14086@extenex.com>; from ward.willats@extenex.com on Wed, Mar 14, 2001 at 04:32:41PM -0800 Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk --fOHHtNG4YXGJ0yqR Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Hello! This is one more patch for USB subsystem. It is against 2.4.2-rmk1-np2. Now usb networking should be rock stable, I believe. Also attached patch for usbnet.c from 2.4.2-ac20. Includes fixes from original author and Billy Taylor. 2Nico: It was a bad idea to DMA directly into skb, as dma controller expects 8byte aligned buffers, and if we do that, IP code breaks. Enjoy. Bye, Oleg --fOHHtNG4YXGJ0yqR Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="usb-rmk1-np2.diff" diff -uNr old/usb-eth.c new/usb-eth.c --- old/usb-eth.c Tue Mar 13 01:59:55 2001 +++ new/usb-eth.c Thu Mar 15 03:46:46 2001 @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@ -/* + /* * Ethernet driver for the SA1100 USB client function * Copyright (c) 2001 by Nicolas Pitre * @@ -12,7 +12,16 @@ * This is still work in progress... * * 19/02/2001 - Now we are compatible with generic usbnet driver. green@iXcelerator.com - * + * 09/03/2001 - Dropped 'framing' scheme, as it seems to cause a lot of problems with little benefit. + * Now, since we do not know what size of packet we are receiving + * last usb packet in sequence will always be less than max packet + * receive endpoint can accept. + * Now the only way to check correct start of frame is to compare + * MAC address. Also now we are stalling on each receive error. + * + * 15/03/2001 - Using buffer to get data from UDC. DMA needs to have 8 byte + * aligned buffer, but this breaks IP code (unaligned access). + * */ #include @@ -25,49 +34,21 @@ #include #include #include -#include +#include #include "sa1100_usb.h" -#include "usb_ctl.h" #define ETHERNET_VENDOR_ID 0x49f #define ETHERNET_PRODUCT_ID 0x505A +#define MAX_PACKET 32768 // Should be global, so that insmod can change these int usb_rsize=64; int usb_wsize=64; -/* FIXME - this should go into common include, once usbnet.c goes into - standart kernel */ -// packets are always ethernet inside -// ... except they can be bigger (up to 64K with this framing) -#define MIN_PACKET sizeof(struct ethhdr) -#define MAX_PACKET 32768 - -struct nc_header { // packed: - u16 hdr_len; // sizeof nc_header (LE, all) - u16 packet_len; // payload size (including ethhdr) - u16 packet_id; // detects dropped packets -#define MIN_HEADER 6 -} __attribute__((__packed__)); - -#define PAD_BYTE ((unsigned char)0xAC) -struct nc_trailer { - u16 packet_id; -} __attribute__((__packed__)); - -#define FRAMED_SIZE(mtu) (sizeof (struct nc_header) \ - + sizeof (struct ethhdr) \ - + (mtu) \ - + 1 \ - + sizeof (struct nc_trailer)) - -#define MIN_FRAMED FRAMED_SIZE(0) - static struct usbe_info_t { struct net_device *dev; - char host_addr[ETH_ALEN]; u16 packet_id; struct net_device_stats stats; } usbe_info; @@ -77,14 +58,16 @@ static struct sk_buff *cur_tx_skb, *next_tx_skb; static struct sk_buff *cur_rx_skb, *next_rx_skb; static volatile int terminating; +static char *dmabuf; // we need that, as dma expect it's buffers to be aligned on 8 bytes boundary static int usb_change_mtu (struct net_device *net, int new_mtu) { if (new_mtu <= sizeof (struct ethhdr) || new_mtu > MAX_PACKET) return -EINVAL; - if (FRAMED_SIZE (new_mtu) > MAX_PACKET) - return -EINVAL; // no second zero-length packet read wanted after mtu-sized packets + if (((new_mtu + sizeof (struct ethhdr)) % usb_rsize) == 0) + return -EDOM; + net->mtu = new_mtu; return 0; } @@ -92,58 +75,55 @@ static struct sk_buff * usb_new_recv_skb(void) { - struct sk_buff *skb = dev_alloc_skb((12 + FRAMED_SIZE (usb_eth_device.mtu))); + struct sk_buff *skb = alloc_skb( 2 + sizeof (struct ethhdr) + usb_eth_device.mtu,GFP_ATOMIC); + if (skb) { - skb_reserve(skb, 12); + skb_reserve(skb, 2); } return skb; } +static u8 bcast_hwaddr[ETH_ALEN]={0xff,0xff,0xff,0xff,0xff,0xff}; static void usb_recv_callback(int flag, int size) { struct sk_buff *skb; - int pktlen, templen; - struct nc_header *header = NULL; - struct nc_trailer *trailer = NULL; if (terminating) return; skb = cur_rx_skb; - pktlen = 0; /* flag validation */ if (flag == 0) { + if ( skb_tailroom (skb) < size ) { // hey! we are overloaded!!! + usbe_info.stats.rx_over_errors++; + sa1100_usb_recv_stall(); + goto error; + } + memcpy(skb->tail,dmabuf,size); skb_put(skb, size); - if (skb->len > MIN_FRAMED) { - header = (struct nc_header *) skb->data; - le16_to_cpus (&header->hdr_len); - le16_to_cpus (&header->packet_len); - if (header->hdr_len == MIN_HEADER ) { - pktlen = header->packet_len; - } - if (pktlen < MIN_FRAMED || pktlen > FRAMED_SIZE(usb_eth_device.mtu)) { - pktlen = 0; + if ( skb->len >= sizeof(struct ethhdr)) { + if (memcmp(skb->data,usb_eth_device.dev_addr,ETH_ALEN) && memcmp(skb->data,bcast_hwaddr,ETH_ALEN) ) { usbe_info.stats.rx_frame_errors++; + sa1100_usb_recv_stall(); + goto error; } } - } else if (flag == -EIO) { - usbe_info.stats.rx_errors++; + } else { + if (flag == -EIO) { + usbe_info.stats.rx_errors++; + sa1100_usb_recv_stall(); + } + goto error; } - templen = pktlen + header->hdr_len + sizeof (struct nc_trailer); - templen += (templen & 0x01) ? 0:1; /* validate packet length */ - if (skb->len < templen ) { + if (size == usb_rsize ) { /* packet not complete yet */ skb = NULL; } - if (pktlen == 0) { - goto error; - } - /* * At this point skb is non null if we have a complete packet. * If so take a fresh skb right away and restart USB receive without @@ -153,7 +133,7 @@ if (skb) cur_rx_skb = next_rx_skb; - sa1100_usb_recv(cur_rx_skb->tail, skb_tailroom(cur_rx_skb), + sa1100_usb_recv(dmabuf, skb_tailroom(cur_rx_skb), usb_recv_callback); if (!skb) return; @@ -171,32 +151,6 @@ return; } - if (FRAMED_SIZE (header->packet_len) > MAX_PACKET) { - usbe_info.stats.rx_frame_errors++; - goto error; - } - skb_pull (skb, header->hdr_len); - trailer = (struct nc_trailer *) - (skb->data + skb->len - sizeof (struct nc_trailer)); - skb_trim (skb, skb->len - sizeof (struct nc_trailer)); - - if ((header->packet_len & 0x01) == 0) { - if (skb->data [header->packet_len] != PAD_BYTE) { - usbe_info.stats.rx_frame_errors++; - goto error; - } - skb_trim (skb, skb->len - 1); - } - if (skb->len != header->packet_len) { - usbe_info.stats.rx_frame_errors++; - goto error; - } - - if (header->packet_id != get_unaligned (&trailer->packet_id)) { - usbe_info.stats.rx_fifo_errors++; - goto error; - } - if (skb->len) { int status; // FIXME: eth_copy_and_csum "small" packets to new SKB (small < ~200 bytes) ? @@ -205,20 +159,19 @@ skb->protocol = eth_type_trans (skb, &usb_eth_device); usbe_info.stats.rx_packets++; usbe_info.stats.rx_bytes += skb->len; - skb->ip_summed = CHECKSUM_UNNECESSARY; + skb->ip_summed = CHECKSUM_NONE; status = netif_rx (skb); + if (status != NET_RX_SUCCESS) + printk("netif_rx failed with code %d\n",status); } else { error: - usbe_info.stats.rx_errors++; /* - * Error due to bad frame, bad pktlen, etc. + * Error due to HW addr mismatch, or IO error. * Recycle the current skb and reset USB reception. */ skb_trim(cur_rx_skb, 0); - if (flag != -EINTR) - sa1100_usb_recv_reset(); - sa1100_usb_recv(cur_rx_skb->tail, skb_tailroom(cur_rx_skb), - usb_recv_callback); +// if ( flag == -EINTR || flag == -EAGAIN ) // only if we are coming out of stall + sa1100_usb_recv(dmabuf, skb_tailroom(cur_rx_skb), usb_recv_callback); } } @@ -265,48 +218,12 @@ netif_wake_queue(dev); } - -static inline struct sk_buff *fixup_skb (struct sk_buff *skb, int flags) -{ - int padlen; - struct sk_buff *skb2; - - padlen = ((skb->len + sizeof (struct nc_header) - + sizeof (struct nc_trailer)) & 0x01) ? 0 : 1; - if (!skb_cloned (skb)) { - int headroom = skb_headroom (skb); - int tailroom = skb_tailroom (skb); - - if ((padlen + sizeof (struct nc_trailer)) <= tailroom - && sizeof (struct nc_header) <= headroom) - return skb; -/* if ((sizeof (struct nc_header) + padlen - + sizeof (struct nc_trailer)) < - (headroom + tailroom)) { - skb->data = memmove (skb->head - + sizeof (struct nc_header), - skb->data, skb->len); - skb->tail = skb->data + skb->len; - return skb; - }*/ - } - skb2 = skb_copy_expand (skb, - sizeof (struct nc_header), - sizeof (struct nc_trailer) + padlen, - flags); - dev_kfree_skb_any (skb); - return skb2; -} - static int usb_eth_xmit(struct sk_buff *skb, struct net_device *dev) { int ret; struct sk_buff *skb2; long flags; - int length = skb->len; - struct nc_header *header = 0; - struct nc_trailer *trailer = 0; if (next_tx_skb) { printk("%s: called with next_tx_skb != NULL\n", __FUNCTION__); @@ -323,22 +240,9 @@ skb = skb2; } - skb2 = fixup_skb (skb, GFP_ATOMIC); - if (!skb2) { - usbe_info.stats.tx_dropped++; - dev_kfree_skb(skb); - return 1; + if ((skb->len % usb_wsize) == 0) { + skb->len++; // other side will ignore this one, anyway. } - skb = skb2; - - header = (struct nc_header *) skb_push (skb, sizeof (struct nc_header)); - header->hdr_len = cpu_to_le16 (sizeof (struct nc_header)); - header->packet_len = cpu_to_le16 (length); - if (!((skb->len + sizeof (struct nc_trailer)) & 0x01)) - *skb_put (skb, 1) = PAD_BYTE; - trailer = (struct nc_trailer *) skb_put (skb, sizeof (struct nc_trailer)); - header->packet_id = cpu_to_le16 (usbe_info.packet_id++); - put_unaligned (header->packet_id, &trailer->packet_id); save_flags_cli(flags); if (cur_tx_skb) { @@ -385,7 +289,7 @@ } MOD_INC_USE_COUNT; - sa1100_usb_recv(cur_rx_skb->tail, skb_tailroom(cur_rx_skb), + sa1100_usb_recv(dmabuf, skb_tailroom(cur_rx_skb), usb_recv_callback); return 0; } @@ -422,29 +326,18 @@ static int usb_eth_probe(struct net_device *dev) { + u8 node_id [ETH_ALEN]; + + get_random_bytes (node_id, sizeof node_id); + node_id [0] &= 0xfe; // clear multicast bit + /* - * Assign the hardware address of the board: use - * 40 00 00 00 00 XX, where XX is the USB address of the - * device + * Assign the hardware address of the board: + * generate it randomly, as there can be many such + * devices on the bus. */ - dev->dev_addr[0] = 0x40; - dev->dev_addr[1] = 0; - dev->dev_addr[2] = 0; - dev->dev_addr[3] = 0; - dev->dev_addr[4] = 0; - dev->dev_addr[5] = 1; + memcpy (dev->dev_addr, node_id, sizeof node_id); - /* - * we know the host mac address because it is derived from - * the USB address. - */ - usbe_info.host_addr[0] = 0x40; - usbe_info.host_addr[1] = 0; - usbe_info.host_addr[2] = 0; - usbe_info.host_addr[3] = 0; - usbe_info.host_addr[4] = 0xff; - usbe_info.host_addr[5] = 1; - dev->open = usb_eth_open; dev->change_mtu = usb_change_mtu; dev->stop = usb_eth_release; @@ -479,6 +372,9 @@ { int rc; + dmabuf = kmalloc( usb_rsize, GFP_KERNEL | GFP_DMA ); + if (!dmabuf) + return -ENOMEM; strncpy(usb_eth_device.name, usb_eth_name, IFNAMSIZ); usb_eth_device.init = usb_eth_probe; if (register_netdev(&usb_eth_device) != 0) @@ -513,6 +409,7 @@ sa1100_usb_close(); if ( (pstr = sa1100_usb_get_string_descriptor(1)) != NULL ) kfree( pstr ); + kfree(dmabuf); unregister_netdev(&usb_eth_device); } diff -uNr old/usb_ctl.h new/usb_ctl.h --- old/usb_ctl.h Tue Mar 13 01:59:55 2001 +++ new/usb_ctl.h Thu Mar 15 01:59:35 2001 @@ -119,5 +119,5 @@ } - +#define CHECK_ADDRESS { if ( Ser0UDCAR == 1 ) { printk("%s:%d I lost my address!!!\n",__FUNCTION__, __LINE__);}} #endif /* _USB_CTL_H */ diff -uNr old/usb_ep0.c new/usb_ep0.c --- old/usb_ep0.c Tue Mar 13 01:59:55 2001 +++ new/usb_ep0.c Thu Mar 15 03:40:07 2001 @@ -215,6 +215,7 @@ current_handler = sh_setup_begin; wr.p = NULL; wr.bytes_left = 0; + usbd_info.address=0; } /* handle interrupt for endpoint zero */ @@ -325,6 +326,7 @@ ..it and pray... */ Ser0UDCAR = address; + usbd_info.address = address; usbctl_next_state_on_event( kEvAddress ); set_cs_bits( UDCCS0_SO | UDCCS0_DE ); /* no data phase */ printk( "%sI have been assigned address: %d\n", pszMe, address ); diff -uNr old/usb_recv.c new/usb_recv.c --- old/usb_recv.c Fri Mar 2 14:34:47 2001 +++ new/usb_recv.c Thu Mar 15 03:21:59 2001 @@ -112,7 +112,7 @@ unsigned int len; int status = Ser0UDCCS1; - if ( naking ) printk( "%sEh? in ISR but nakking = %d\n", "usbrx: ", naking ); + if ( naking ) printk( "%sEh? in ISR but naking = %d\n", "usbrx: ", naking ); if (status & UDCCS1_RPC) { @@ -192,4 +192,12 @@ } EXPORT_SYMBOL(sa1100_usb_recv_reset); + +void +sa1100_usb_recv_stall(void) +{ + ep1_stall(); +} + +EXPORT_SYMBOL(sa1100_usb_recv_stall); diff -uNr old/usb_send.c new/usb_send.c --- old/usb_send.c Tue Mar 13 01:59:55 2001 +++ new/usb_send.c Thu Mar 15 03:54:53 2001 @@ -12,6 +12,8 @@ * This is still work in progress... * * Please see linux/Documentation/arm/SA1100/SA1100_USB for details. + * 15/03/2001 - ep2_start now sets UDCAR to overcome something that is hardware + * bug, I think. green@iXcelerator.com */ #include @@ -84,6 +86,7 @@ } /* End remove if never seen... 8Mar01ww */ + Ser0UDCAR = usbd_info.address; // fighting stupid silicon bug sa1100_dma_queue_buffer(dmachn_tx, NULL, ep2_curdmapos, ep2_curdmalen); } @@ -124,6 +127,9 @@ ep2_int_hndlr(int udcsr) { int status = Ser0UDCCS2; + + if (Ser0UDCAR != usbd_info.address) // check for stupid silicon bug. + Ser0UDCAR = usbd_info.address; UDC_flip(Ser0UDCCS2, UDCCS2_SST); --fOHHtNG4YXGJ0yqR Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="usbnet-ac20.diff" --- usbnet.c.orig Wed Mar 14 23:43:36 2001 +++ usbnet.c Thu Mar 15 00:13:35 2001 @@ -119,6 +119,9 @@ #define CONTROL_TIMEOUT_MS (500) /* msec */ #define CONTROL_TIMEOUT_JIFFIES ((CONTROL_TIMEOUT_MS * HZ)/1000) +// between wakeups +#define UNLINK_TIMEOUT_JIFFIES ((3 /*ms*/ * HZ)/1000) + /*-------------------------------------------------------------------------*/ // list of all devices we manage @@ -297,7 +300,6 @@ description: "Linux Device", // no reset defined (yet?) // no check_connect needed! - flags: FLAG_FRAMING, in: 2, out: 1, epsize: 64, }; @@ -842,6 +844,9 @@ devdbg (dev, "frame hdr_len, header->packet_len, header->packet_id); #endif + } else { + // we trust the network statck to remove + // the extra byte we may have appended } if (skb->len) { @@ -996,10 +1001,11 @@ temp = unlink_urbs (&dev->txq) + unlink_urbs (&dev->rxq); // maybe wait for deletions to finish. - // FIXME -- use "while (!done)" for paranoia - if (temp) { + while (skb_queue_len (&dev->rxq) + && skb_queue_len (&dev->done) + && skb_queue_len (&dev->txq)) { current->state = TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE; - schedule (); + schedule_timeout (UNLINK_TIMEOUT_JIFFIES); dbg ("waited for %d urb completions", temp); } dev->wait = 0; @@ -1060,6 +1066,7 @@ struct usbnet *dev = data; usb_clear_halt( dev->udev, usb_sndbulkpipe (dev->udev, dev->driver_info->out)); + netif_wake_queue (&dev->net); } /*-------------------------------------------------------------------------*/ @@ -1078,11 +1085,12 @@ } else { printk("Cannot clear TX stall\n"); } + } else { + netif_wake_queue (&dev->net); } urb->dev = 0; entry->state = tx_done; defer_bh (dev, skb); - netif_wake_queue (&dev->net); } /*-------------------------------------------------------------------------*/ @@ -1148,15 +1156,6 @@ flags = in_interrupt () ? GFP_ATOMIC : GFP_KERNEL; - if (skb_shared (skb)) { - struct sk_buff *skb2; - skb2 = skb_unshare (skb, flags); - if (!skb2) { - dbg ("can't unshare skb"); - goto drop; - } - skb = skb2; - } if (info->flags & FLAG_FRAMING) { struct sk_buff *skb2; skb2 = fixup_skb (skb, flags); @@ -1186,10 +1185,18 @@ *skb_put (skb, 1) = PAD_BYTE; trailer = (struct nc_trailer *) skb_put (skb, sizeof *trailer); } else if ((length % EP_SIZE (dev)) == 0) { - // FIXME: adding a zero length packet would be better. - // Linux seems to drop this byte though ... - skb->len++; - } + if (skb_shared (skb)) { + struct sk_buff *skb2; + skb2 = skb_unshare (skb, flags); + if (!skb2) { + usb_free_urb (urb); + dbg ("can't unshare skb"); + goto drop; + } + skb = skb2; + } + skb->len++; + } FILL_BULK_URB (urb, dev->udev, usb_sndbulkpipe (dev->udev, info->out), --fOHHtNG4YXGJ0yqR-- From kramer@pa.dec.com Thu Mar 15 20:33:24 2001 Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (root@mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id UAA09184 for ; Thu, 15 Mar 2001 20:33:23 +0100 Received: from ztxmail04.ztx.compaq.com (ztxmail04.ztx.compaq.com [161.114.1.208]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id UAA06688 for ; Thu, 15 Mar 2001 20:33:22 +0100 (MET) Received: by ztxmail04.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 67D0E848; Thu, 15 Mar 2001 13:31:33 -0600 (CST) Received: from mailrelay01.cce.cpqcorp.net (mailrelay01.cce.cpqcorp.net [16.47.68.171]) by ztxmail04.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 86C5195C; Thu, 15 Mar 2001 13:31:33 -0600 (CST) Received: by mailrelay01.cce.cpqcorp.net (Postfix, from userid 12345) id ED068336; Thu, 15 Mar 2001 13:31:25 -0600 (CST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mailrelay01.cce.cpqcorp.net (Postfix) with SMTP id 1CDAA353; Thu, 15 Mar 2001 13:31:24 -0600 (CST) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA25944; Thu, 15 Mar 2001 11:31:20 -0800 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id LAA03137; Thu, 15 Mar 2001 11:21:10 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id LAA05822; Thu, 15 Mar 2001 11:21:09 -0800 (PST) Received: from ztxmail02.nz-cce.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA20239; Thu, 15 Mar 2001 11:21:09 -0800 Received: by ztxmail02.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 4F5051F4E; Thu, 15 Mar 2001 13:21:08 -0600 (CST) Received: from pigeon.maya.com (po.maya.com [192.70.254.2]) by ztxmail02.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 667091DC5 for ; Thu, 15 Mar 2001 13:21:07 -0600 (CST) Received: from maya.com (cook-pc.maya.com [192.70.254.33]) by pigeon.maya.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 35DC33080C for ; Thu, 15 Mar 2001 13:53:02 -0500 (EST) Message-Id: <3AB1165F.8EFD09AE@maya.com> Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2001 14:22:07 -0500 From: Nicole Cook X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.72 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.2.14-5.0 i686) X-Accept-Language: en Mime-Version: 1.0 To: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Subject: Re: difficulties with diff-2.4.2-rmk1-np2 References: <3AAFB8E7.C8DEDE36@maya.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk I added the net drivers to the makefile by hand and configured and built the kernel (once again with net drivers enabled). I'm not very experienced with kernel makefiles but I did get the kernel build to try to build cerf89x0.c. Unfortunately, it can't find the required .h file, and I'm not really sure why. This is what my linux/net/Makefile looks like now: O_TARGET := network.o mod-subdirs := ipv4/netfilter ipv6/netfilter ipx irda atm netlink sched export-objs := netsyms.o subdir-y := core ethernet subdir-m := ipv4 # hum? subdir-$(CONFIG_NET) += 802 sched subdir-$(CONFIG_INET) += ipv4 subdir-$(CONFIG_NETFILTER) += ipv4/netfilter subdir-$(CONFIG_UNIX) += unix subdir-$(CONFIG_IPV6) += ipv6 ifneq ($(CONFIG_IPV6),n) ifneq ($(CONFIG_IPV6),) subdir-$(CONFIG_NETFILTER) += ipv6/netfilter endif endif subdir-$(CONFIG_KHTTPD) += khttpd subdir-$(CONFIG_NETLINK) += netlink subdir-$(CONFIG_PACKET) += packet subdir-$(CONFIG_NET_SCHED) += sched subdir-$(CONFIG_BRIDGE) += bridge subdir-$(CONFIG_IPX) += ipx subdir-$(CONFIG_ATALK) += appletalk subdir-$(CONFIG_WAN_ROUTER) += wanrouter subdir-$(CONFIG_X25) += x25 subdir-$(CONFIG_LAPB) += lapb subdir-$(CONFIG_NETROM) += netrom subdir-$(CONFIG_ROSE) += rose subdir-$(CONFIG_AX25) += ax25 subdir-$(CONFIG_IRDA) += irda subdir-$(CONFIG_SUNRPC) += sunrpc subdir-$(CONFIG_ATM) += atm subdir-$(CONFIG_DECNET) += decnet subdir-$(CONFIG_ECONET) += econet obj-y := socket.o $(join $(subdir-y), $(patsubst %,/%.o,$(notdir $(subdir-y)))) ifeq ($(CONFIG_NET),y) obj-$(CONFIG_MODULES) += netsyms.o obj-$(CONFIG_SYSCTL) += sysctl_net.o obj-$(CONFIG_HP100) += hp100.o obj-$(CONFIG_SMC9194) += smc9194.o obj-$(CONFIG_ARM_AM79C961A) += am79c961a.o obj-$(CONFIG_CERF_CS8900A) += cerf89x0.o obj-$(CONFIG_ARM_ETHERH) += 8390.o obj-$(CONFIG_WD80x3) += wd.o 8390.o obj-$(CONFIG_EL2) += 3c503.o 8390.o endif include $(TOPDIR)/Rules.make It seems to me that make dep and Rules.make should direct it to find the .h files. Is this not true? Is this makefile still missing something? Sorry if these seem like silly questions, as I said, I've not tried changing kernel makefiles around before. Thanks for any help. Nicole From kramer@pa.dec.com Mon Mar 19 18:47:02 2001 Received: from ztxmail03.ztx.compaq.com (ztxmail03.ztx.compaq.com [161.114.1.207]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id SAA19068 for ; Mon, 19 Mar 2001 18:47:00 +0100 Received: by ztxmail03.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id A9B0E870; Mon, 19 Mar 2001 11:46:02 -0600 (CST) Received: from mailrelay01.cce.cpqcorp.net (mailrelay01.cce.cpqcorp.net [16.47.68.171]) by ztxmail03.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A038AE6; Mon, 19 Mar 2001 11:46:02 -0600 (CST) Received: by mailrelay01.cce.cpqcorp.net (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 85E3233B; Mon, 19 Mar 2001 11:43:15 -0600 (CST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mailrelay01.cce.cpqcorp.net (Postfix) with SMTP id D6C432E1; Mon, 19 Mar 2001 11:43:13 -0600 (CST) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA23088; Mon, 19 Mar 2001 09:43:06 -0800 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id JAA11162; Mon, 19 Mar 2001 09:31:55 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id JAA20314; Mon, 19 Mar 2001 09:31:54 -0800 (PST) Received: from ztxmail01.nz-cce.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA15928; Mon, 19 Mar 2001 09:31:53 -0800 Received: by ztxmail01.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 109052611; Mon, 19 Mar 2001 11:31:53 -0600 (CST) Received: from xanadu.home (modemcable084.137-200-24.mtl.mc.videotron.ca [24.200.137.84]) by ztxmail01.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 15B0E2601 for ; Mon, 19 Mar 2001 11:31:52 -0600 (CST) Received: from localhost (nico@localhost) by xanadu.home (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id MAA04078; Mon, 19 Mar 2001 12:31:50 -0500 X-Authentication-Warning: xanadu.home: nico owned process doing -bs Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2001 12:31:50 -0500 (EST) From: Nicolas Pitre X-Sender: To: SA-1100/Linux Cc: Subject: diff-2.4.2-rmk1-np3 In-Reply-To: Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk ... is available since Saturday at the usual sites, which are: ftp://ftp.netwinder.org/users/n/nico/ ftp://ftp.arm.linux.org.uk/pub/linux/arm/people/nico/ ftp://ftp.handhelds.org/pub/linux/arm/sa-1100-patches/ Changes: - updates for ADS Graphics Client Plus (Deepak Saxena) - disabling of SA1111 re-commented out because of SA1111 braindamage (me) - small unalignment fault handling correction (Russell King) - yet more SA1110 USB netlink fixes (Oleg Drokin) - usbnet driver is back to be in sync with the above change (me) - updates to MTD code fixing the breakage I introduced in the last rev (me) There is apparently a problem with IRQ 15 on UART1 for some people in the last patch. This one is not supposed to fix that problem AFAIK. Il would be nice to know if it still exist. Enjoy! Nicolas From kramer@pa.dec.com Tue Mar 20 10:58:45 2001 Received: from ztxmail05.ztx.compaq.com (ztxmail05.ztx.compaq.com [161.114.1.209]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id KAA21098 for ; Tue, 20 Mar 2001 10:58:44 +0100 Received: by ztxmail05.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 21A9BAF5; Tue, 20 Mar 2001 03:58:13 -0600 (CST) Received: from mailrelay01.cce.cpqcorp.net (mailrelay01.cce.cpqcorp.net [16.47.68.171]) by ztxmail05.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 049B0896; Tue, 20 Mar 2001 03:58:12 -0600 (CST) Received: by mailrelay01.cce.cpqcorp.net (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 26052303; Tue, 20 Mar 2001 03:58:12 -0600 (CST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mailrelay01.cce.cpqcorp.net (Postfix) with SMTP id 9CE0131F; Tue, 20 Mar 2001 03:58:10 -0600 (CST) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA03272; Tue, 20 Mar 2001 01:58:08 -0800 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id BAA13731; Tue, 20 Mar 2001 01:55:18 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id BAA04960; Tue, 20 Mar 2001 01:55:18 -0800 (PST) Received: from zmamail01.nz-tay.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA05519; Tue, 20 Mar 2001 01:55:17 -0800 Received: by zmamail01.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 5791CD402; Tue, 20 Mar 2001 04:55:07 -0500 (EST) Received: from bjapp1.163.net (unknown [202.108.255.246]) by zmamail01.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 318B8F165 for ; Tue, 20 Mar 2001 04:55:01 -0500 (EST) Received: by bjapp1.163.net (Postfix, from userid 1005) id D2AAF1CB264F3; Tue, 20 Mar 2001 17:54:43 +0800 (CST) Mime-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <3AB728E3.05392@bjapp1> Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2001 17:54:43 +0800 (CST) From: "\"@nO<\"@nO" , "@pa.dec.com"@thorgal.et.tudelft.nl To: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Subject: why i can't input X-Priority: 3 X-Originating-Ip: [210.74.236.50] Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk hi, My target is assabet/neponset,I use angelboot to download my zImage,the procedure is ok,I haven't got any errors,my kernel is linux-2.4.0-test6-rmk2-np2 download from netwinder, when the minicom runs,I can't see any informations such as 'uncompress linux.......' or other information about linux version, I only can see is that "login:",but I can't input any characters, so I feel very sad,I don't know the reason. Can anyone help me ?I'll be very appreciative. becky From kramer@pa.dec.com Thu Mar 22 14:57:14 2001 Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (root@mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id OAA27954 for ; Thu, 22 Mar 2001 14:57:14 +0100 Received: from ztxmail03.ztx.compaq.com (ztxmail03.ztx.compaq.com [161.114.1.207]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id OAA12676 for ; Thu, 22 Mar 2001 14:57:12 +0100 (MET) Received: by ztxmail03.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 4963DA39; Thu, 22 Mar 2001 07:55:26 -0600 (CST) Received: from taynzmail03.nz-tay.cpqcorp.net (taynzmail03.nz-tay.cpqcorp.net [16.47.4.103]) by ztxmail03.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D221EBF0; Thu, 22 Mar 2001 07:55:25 -0600 (CST) Received: by taynzmail03.nz-tay.cpqcorp.net (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 039EF24E; Thu, 22 Mar 2001 08:55:20 -0500 (EST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by taynzmail03.nz-tay.cpqcorp.net (Postfix) with SMTP id E4B5F17A; Thu, 22 Mar 2001 08:55:18 -0500 (EST) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA26582; Thu, 22 Mar 2001 05:55:11 -0800 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id FAA13042; Thu, 22 Mar 2001 05:47:28 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id FAA12757; Thu, 22 Mar 2001 05:47:27 -0800 (PST) From: Received: from ztxmail02.nz-cce.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA15634; Thu, 22 Mar 2001 05:47:26 -0800 Received: by ztxmail02.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 68BBC1FD9; Thu, 22 Mar 2001 07:47:26 -0600 (CST) Received: from fwafg.aforeinbursa.com.mx (unknown [200.34.46.2]) by ztxmail02.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B9CF1C63; Thu, 22 Mar 2001 07:47:25 -0600 (CST) Received: by fwafg.aforeinbursa.com.mx; id IAA16066; Thu, 22 Mar 2001 08:38:53 -0500 (EST) Received: from ip105.miami41.fl.pub-ip.psi.net(38.37.111.105) by fwafg.aforeinbursa.com.mx via smap (V5.5) id xmah16027; Thu, 22 Mar 01 07:38:34 -0600 Message-Id: <000025ff42d0$000034ba$000039c1@> To: Subject: Tired of Having Bad Credit?....Easily Create a NEW Credit Profile! 4154 Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2001 08:39:30 -0500 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Priority: 3 X-Msmail-Priority: Normal Reply-To: cdalb56a@arabia.com Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk Instantly Get a Brand New AAA Credit Profile in 24 Hours!</title= > </head> <body text=3D"#000000" bgcolor=3D"#FFFFFF" link=3D"#0000EE" vlink=3D"#551A= 8B" alink=3D"#FF0000">   <div align=3D"center"> <center> <table border=3D"0" width=3D"600" cellspacing=3D"0" cellpadding=3D"0"> <tr> <td width=3D"100%"> <p align=3D"center"><font face=3D"Arial"><font color=3D"#CC0000"><= font size=3D+2><b>Here's How You Can Have a Brand New</b></font> <br><font size=3D+3><b>Credit Profile in 24 Hours!</b></font> </font> <br><b><font size=3D-1>The Best Part is... It's 100% Legal, 100% Ethical, and Fully GUARANTEED!</font= ></b> </font></p> <hr WIDTH=3D"599" color=3D"#0000FF"><font color=3D"#000000" face=3D"Arial"= >Dear Friend,<br> Do you have bad credit, judgements, bankruptcies or any other cred= it problems? Does it seem like your bad credit is holding you back from qualifying for a major credit card, car loan, or even a department store card? </font> <p><font face=3D"Arial"><font color=3D"#000000">Are you sick of the embarrassment of being rejected at your attempts to get any credit at all? If so... I've got some extremely good news for you.</font> <br> </font> <hr WIDTH=3D"599" color=3D"#0000FF"> <p align=3D"center"><font face=3D"Arial"><font size=3D+1 color=3D"#CC0000"= >I Will Show You Precisely How to Get a New, Separate, Clean</font> <br><font size=3D+1>Credit File... and it will be Clear of Any Past Credit History!</font></font></ce= nter> <p><font size=3D+2 color=3D"#CC0000" face=3D"Arial">And it's 100% LEGAL!</font> <blockquote> <ul> <li> <font size=3D+1 color=3D"#CC0000" face=3D"Arial">It doesn't matter, if you have judgements!</font></li> <li> <font size=3D+1 color=3D"#CC0000" face=3D"Arial">It doesn't matter, if you've filed for bankruptcy!</font></li> <li> <font size=3D+1 color=3D"#CC0000" face=3D"Arial">It doesn't matter, if you've been foreclosed!</font></li> <li> <font size=3D+1 color=3D"#CC0000" face=3D"Arial">It doesn't matter, if you have a tax lien!</font></li> <li> <font color=3D"#CC0000" size=3D"+1" face=3D"Arial">It doesn't matter, if have been a slow payer in the past!</font></li> </ul> </blockquote> <center><font face=3D"Arial"><b><font size=3D+1 color=3D"#000000">It Doesn't Matter, Because Your Credit File Will Be Completely</font></b> <br><b><font size=3D+2>New</font><font size=3D+1> And Completely Independent Of Any Negative Past File!</font></b></font></c= enter> <p align=3D"center"><i><font color=3D"#000000" face=3D"Arial"><b>Wit= h my kit...within the next 60 days, you will quickly and easily</b></font></i></p> <blockquote> <ul> <li> <p align=3D"left"><font color=3D"#CC0000" face=3D"Arial">Get ALL Major Cre= dit Cards</font></li> <li> <p align=3D"left"><font color=3D"#CC0000" face=3D"Arial">Learn Basic and A= dvanced Credit Billing Techniques</font></li> <li> <p align=3D"left"><font color=3D"#CC0000" face=3D"Arial">Get Bank Loans FA= ST and Simple</font></li> <li> <p align=3D"left"><font color=3D"#CC0000" face=3D"Arial">Get Mortgages NOW= </font></li> <li> <p align=3D"left"><font color=3D"#CC0000" face=3D"Arial">Have AAA Credit o= n "Your Brand New File" in 30-60 Days</font></li> <li> <p align=3D"left"><font color=3D"#CC0000" face=3D"Arial">Get INSTANT Credi= t From Real Department Stores</font></li> <li> <p align=3D"left"><font color=3D"#CC0000" face=3D"Arial">Car Loans FAST an= d SIMPLE</font></li><center><font face=3D"Arial"> <br><font color=3D"#CC0000">And much, much more!</font><b><font color=3D"#= CC0000"> </font></b> <br> <br><b><font color=3D"#CC0000"><a href=3D"http://www.freehosting25mb.com/18/newcreditfile/">CLICK HERE TO LEARN MORE!<br> </a></font></b></font><a href=3D"http://www.freehosting25mb.com/remove.htm= l"><font face=3D"Arial" size=3D"1"><br> Click here to be removed from our list</font></a> </ul> </blockquote> </td> </tr> </table> </div> <p> </p> </body> </html> From kramer@pa.dec.com Thu Mar 22 16:00:56 2001 Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (root@mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id QAA28101 for <erikm@thorgal.et.tudelft.nl>; Thu, 22 Mar 2001 16:00:56 +0100 Received: from ztxmail05.ztx.compaq.com (ztxmail05.ztx.compaq.com [161.114.1.209]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id QAA17436 for <erikm@thorgal.et.tudelft.nl>; Thu, 22 Mar 2001 16:00:52 +0100 (MET) Received: by ztxmail05.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 0BC63B1F; Thu, 22 Mar 2001 08:59:06 -0600 (CST) Received: from mailrelay01.cce.cpqcorp.net (mailrelay01.cce.cpqcorp.net [16.47.68.171]) by ztxmail05.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E0E38B01; Thu, 22 Mar 2001 08:59:05 -0600 (CST) Received: by mailrelay01.cce.cpqcorp.net (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 4EDFF2D1; Thu, 22 Mar 2001 08:59:04 -0600 (CST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mailrelay01.cce.cpqcorp.net (Postfix) with SMTP id 9516630E; Thu, 22 Mar 2001 08:58:59 -0600 (CST) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA32685; Thu, 22 Mar 2001 06:58:58 -0800 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id GAA08954; Thu, 22 Mar 2001 06:57:43 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id GAA29689; Thu, 22 Mar 2001 06:57:43 -0800 (PST) Received: from zmamail01.nz-tay.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA20140; Thu, 22 Mar 2001 06:57:42 -0800 Received: by zmamail01.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id E906B10B56; Thu, 22 Mar 2001 09:57:00 -0500 (EST) Received: from gate1.itt.com (gate1.itt.com [151.190.254.100]) by zmamail01.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 86E5F108A9 for <sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com>; Thu, 22 Mar 2001 09:57:00 -0500 (EST) Received: from no.name.available by gate1.itt.com via smtpd (for [161.114.64.101]) with SMTP; 22 Mar 2001 14:57:00 UT Received: from 151.190.173.212 by fwdcwall.de.ittind.com (InterScan E-Mail VirusWall NT); Thu, 22 Mar 2001 09:56:55 -0500 (Eastern Standard Time) Received: by fwemail2.de.ittind.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21) id <HFJKAT92>; Thu, 22 Mar 2001 09:56:55 -0500 Message-Id: <4B8AF49524BFD411A2EE0002B30A15860D9F42@acdnjmail2.acdav.de.ittind.com> From: "Latham, Steve" <Steve.Latham@itt.com> To: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Subject: Burning Neponset MAC address Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2001 09:54:54 -0500 Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21) Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----_=_NextPart_000_01C0B2E0.55C29D90" Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk This message is in MIME format. Since your mail reader does not understand this format, some or all of this message may not be legible. ------_=_NextPart_000_01C0B2E0.55C29D90 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" I plopped the following down inside function smc_probe in smc9194.c for a onetime burn of the MAC address of the neponset ethernet controller's eeprom. Perhaps someone else can make use of it. Steve volatile unsigned *attaddr2; #if (1) SMC_SELECT_BANK(2); SMC_outw( 0x0020, 0x6); //set pointer register to eeprom location 0x20 SMC_SELECT_BANK(1); SMC_outw( 0x0201, 0xA); //write 01:02 value to GA register attaddr2 = 0xc2a17000; //set up ECOR write udelay(750); attaddr2[LAN91C96_ECOR] &= ECOR_WR_ATTRIB; //enable write to eeprom udelay(750); udelay(750); SMC_SELECT_BANK(1); SMC_outw( 0x0005, 0xC); //begin store operation udelay(750); SMC_SELECT_BANK(1); SMC_outw( 0x0006, 0xC); //begin reload operation udelay(750); attaddr2[LAN91C96_ECOR] &= ~ECOR_WR_ATTRIB; //disable the eeprom wite udelay(750); udelay(750); udelay(750); SMC_SELECT_BANK(2); SMC_outw( 0x0021, 0x6); //set pointer register to eeprom location 0x21 SMC_SELECT_BANK(1); SMC_outw( 0x0403, 0xA); //write 02:03 value to GA register udelay(750); attaddr2[LAN91C96_ECOR] = 0x45; //enable write to eeprom udelay(750); udelay(750); SMC_SELECT_BANK(1); SMC_outw( 0x0005, 0xC); //begin store operation udelay(750); SMC_SELECT_BANK(1); SMC_outw( 0x0006, 0xC); //begin reload operation udelay(750); attaddr2[LAN91C96_ECOR] &= ~ECOR_WR_ATTRIB; //disable the eeprom wite udelay(750); udelay(750); udelay(750); SMC_SELECT_BANK(2); SMC_outw( 0x0022, 0x6); //set pointer register to eeprom location 0x22 SMC_SELECT_BANK(1); SMC_outw( 0x0605, 0xA); //write 05:06 to GA register udelay(750); attaddr2[LAN91C96_ECOR] &= ECOR_WR_ATTRIB; udelay(750); SMC_SELECT_BANK(1); SMC_outw( 0x0005, 0xC); //begin the store operation udelay(750); SMC_SELECT_BANK(1); SMC_outw( 0x0006, 0xC); //begin reload operation udelay(750); attaddr2[LAN91C96_ECOR] &= ~ECOR_WR_ATTRIB; //disable the eeprom write #endif ************************************ If this email is not intended for you, or you are not responsible for the delivery of this message to the addressee, please note that this message may contain ITT Privileged/Proprietary Information. In such a case, you may not copy or deliver this message to anyone. You should destroy this message and kindly notify the sender by reply email. Information contained in this message that does not relate to the business of ITT is neither endorsed by nor attributable to ITT. ************************************ ------_=_NextPart_000_01C0B2E0.55C29D90 Content-Type: application/octet-stream; name="Steve Latham (E-mail).vcf" Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="Steve Latham (E-mail).vcf" BEGIN:VCARD VERSION:2.1 N:Latham;Steve;;; FN:Steve Latham (E-mail) ORG:ITT AC/D; TITLE:Software Engineer TEL;WORK;VOICE:(973) 284-2175 ADR;WORK;ENCODING=QUOTED-PRINTABLE:;;Mailstop 8359=0D=0A100 Kingsland;Clifton;NJ;07012;United States of America LABEL;WORK;ENCODING=QUOTED-PRINTABLE:Mailstop 8359=0D=0A100 Kingsland=0D=0AClifton, NJ 07012=0D=0AUnited States o= f America EMAIL;PREF;EX:/o=ITTIND/ou=CLIFTON_NJ/cn=ITTACDNJ/cn=Steve Latham REV:20001109T170200Z END:VCARD ------_=_NextPart_000_01C0B2E0.55C29D90-- From kramer@pa.dec.com Thu Mar 22 21:06:42 2001 Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (root@mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id VAA29016 for <erikm@thorgal.et.tudelft.nl>; Thu, 22 Mar 2001 21:06:42 +0100 Received: from ztxmail05.ztx.compaq.com (ztxmail05.ztx.compaq.com [161.114.1.209]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id VAA07415 for <erikm@thorgal.et.tudelft.nl>; Thu, 22 Mar 2001 21:06:40 +0100 (MET) Received: by ztxmail05.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id BDF18808; Thu, 22 Mar 2001 14:04:52 -0600 (CST) Received: from taynzmail03.nz-tay.cpqcorp.net (taynzmail03.nz-tay.cpqcorp.net [16.47.4.103]) by ztxmail05.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 65B7D8CA; Thu, 22 Mar 2001 14:04:52 -0600 (CST) Received: by taynzmail03.nz-tay.cpqcorp.net (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 8EEB61BD; Thu, 22 Mar 2001 15:04:48 -0500 (EST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by taynzmail03.nz-tay.cpqcorp.net (Postfix) with SMTP id 875D0369; Thu, 22 Mar 2001 15:04:46 -0500 (EST) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA26280; Thu, 22 Mar 2001 12:04:44 -0800 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id MAA17457; Thu, 22 Mar 2001 12:00:23 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id MAA26121; Thu, 22 Mar 2001 12:00:22 -0800 (PST) Received: from ztxmail02.nz-cce.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA25453; Thu, 22 Mar 2001 12:00:22 -0800 Received: by ztxmail02.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id A5E271FE6; Thu, 22 Mar 2001 14:00:21 -0600 (CST) Received: from localhost (dsl027-150-098.nyc1.dsl.speakeasy.net [216.27.150.98]) by ztxmail02.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4073F1CA9 for <sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com>; Thu, 22 Mar 2001 14:00:21 -0600 (CST) Received: from dhd by localhost with local (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 14gBFF-0001Zc-00 for <sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com>; Thu, 22 Mar 2001 14:59:41 -0500 To: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Subject: [PATCH] Fix polling and wakeup in sa1100-uda1341.c audio driver From: David Huggins-Daines <dhd@cepstral.com> Organization: Cepstral LLC Date: 22 Mar 2001 14:59:41 -0500 Message-Id: <87elvp7exe.fsf@monolith.eradicator.org> Lines: 69 User-Agent: Gnus/5.0803 (Gnus v5.8.3) Emacs/20.7 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk Hi, The SA1100 audio driver had a problem where it would oops in audio_poll() if the device had not been opened O_RDWR. Also, the DMA completion callbacks were not actually waking up processes polling on the device, only process sitting in blocking reads. This patch should fix both those problems. It also clarifies the call to audio_recording() in audio_poll() (what is actually being checked for is an error return, not a non-zero value). Cheers --- linux/drivers/sound/sa1100-uda1341.c Thu Mar 22 14:53:39 2001 +++ sa1100-uda1341.c Thu Mar 22 14:30:28 2001 @@ -693,6 +693,8 @@ * Current buffer is sent: wake up any process waiting for it. */ up(&b->sem); + /* And any process polling on write. */ + wake_up(&b->sem.wait); #define CHROME 1 /* What else are you going to do with 32 LEDs? */ #ifdef CHROME @@ -715,6 +717,8 @@ */ b->size = size; up(&b->sem); + /* And any process polling on read. */ + wake_up(&b->sem.wait); } @@ -966,7 +970,7 @@ } ret = audio_recording(s); - if (ret) + if (ret < 0) return ret; /* be sure to have a full sample byte count */ @@ -1048,16 +1052,15 @@ ret = audio_recording(&input_stream); if (ret < 0) return ret; + poll_wait(file, &input_stream.buf->sem.wait, wait); } if (file->f_mode & FMODE_WRITE) { if (!output_stream.buffers && audio_setup_buf(&output_stream)) return -ENOMEM; + poll_wait(file, &output_stream.buf->sem.wait, wait); } - - poll_wait(file, &input_stream.buf->sem.wait, wait); - poll_wait(file, &output_stream.buf->sem.wait, wait); if (file->f_mode & FMODE_READ) { for (i = 0; i < input_stream.nbfrags; i++) { -- David Huggins-Daines | dhd@cepstral.com Toolsmith | +1 412 512 0129 (PCS) Cepstral LLC | Pittsburgh, PA, USA From wrl-techops@pa.dec.com Sat Mar 24 14:44:57 2001 Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (root@mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id OAA02437 for <erikm@thorgal.et.tudelft.nl>; Sat, 24 Mar 2001 14:44:57 +0100 Received: from zmamail04.zma.compaq.com (zmamail04.zma.compaq.com [161.114.64.104]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id OAA25146 for <erikm@thorgal.et.tudelft.nl>; Sat, 24 Mar 2001 14:44:55 +0100 (MET) Received: by zmamail04.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 846765A97; Sat, 24 Mar 2001 08:43:08 -0500 (EST) Received: from taynzmail03.nz-tay.cpqcorp.net (taynzmail03.nz-tay.cpqcorp.net [16.47.4.103]) by zmamail04.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 65EAE5B14; Sat, 24 Mar 2001 08:43:08 -0500 (EST) Received: by taynzmail03.nz-tay.cpqcorp.net (Postfix, from userid 12345) id C2C6F148; Sat, 24 Mar 2001 08:43:06 -0500 (EST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by taynzmail03.nz-tay.cpqcorp.net (Postfix) with SMTP id 83A9813A; Sat, 24 Mar 2001 08:43:04 -0500 (EST) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA21311; Sat, 24 Mar 2001 05:43:00 -0800 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id FAA22142; Sat, 24 Mar 2001 05:35:39 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id FAA06675; Sat, 24 Mar 2001 05:35:38 -0800 (PST) From: <ging75@hotmail.com> Received: from zmamail02.nz-tay.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA07928; Sat, 24 Mar 2001 05:35:37 -0800 Received: by zmamail02.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 5B25B6509; Sat, 24 Mar 2001 08:35:37 -0500 (EST) Received: from krivet4.krivet.re.kr (unknown [210.204.173.29]) by zmamail02.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id CB523656E for <sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com>; Sat, 24 Mar 2001 08:35:35 -0500 (EST) Message-Id: <000078993acf$00001027$000056d3@32.102.75.17> To: <glazeraze@hotmail.com> Subject: F R E E Teen Hardcore Site - WET GIRLS.. ... .. ... .... .. 22227 Date: Sat, 24 Mar 2001 08:40:44 -0500 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Priority: 3 X-Msmail-Priority: Normal Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk <html> <head> </head> <br> <center> <table cellpadding=3D0 cellspacing=3D0 border=3D0 width=3D600> <tr> <td width=3D465 bgcolor=3D#cc0000> <font face=3D"arial,helvetica" color=3D"white" size=3D"3"> <center><b>Adult Freebie Express March 25, 2001</b></center> </font> </td> </tr> </TABLE> <br> <table cellpadding=3D0 cellspacing=3D0 border=3D0 width=3D600> <tr> <td width=3D"465"> <table> <tr> <td width=3D140 valign=3D"top"> <hr width=3D140 color=3D"#325c7d" size=3D1 align=3D"left"> </td> <td width=3D185 valign=3D"top" align=3D"center"> <font face=3D"verdana,helvetica" color=3D"#0000ff" size=3D1> <center><b>IN THIS AFE EDITION</b></center> </td> <td width=3D140 valign=3D"top"> <hr width=3D140 color=3D"#325c7d" size=3D1 align=3D"left"> </td></tr> </table> <P align=3Dcenter width=3D500> <FONT color=3D#cc3399> <STRONG><font face=3D"Arial" size=3D"4">Are you over 18???????<BR>We Want = to Get YOU Off!! </STRONG> </P> <DIV align=3Dcenter> <a href=3D"http://www.mo3aa.abafbdb.mx%3D14%3D02%3D14%3D05%3D14%2Ecom%7Cne= t.ped%3D02%3D05%3D14%3D%3D02%3D14%3D05%3D14%3D14.jjjjjjjj.com:80/mo3/abafb= db/"> Click Here For 100% Free 3 day Trial!</a> <BR><BR></DIV></FONT> <P><FONT face=3DArial><FONT color=3D#cc0000><STRONG>  Hi My Name Is Stephanie, I just turned 18 TODAY..!!<BR><FONT color=3D#0000ff>I have been wanting to do live nude webcams but I was not able to because I was too young..</FONT><F= ONT color=3D#000000></STRONG><BR></FONT><STRONG>BUT NOW its all legal..Come ch= eck out my live feeds and all my picture pages..!!</STRONG></FONT><FONT color=3D#000000><BR></FONT><STRONG><FONT color=3D#0000ff>I do this because= I like it and it doesn't cost a dime to watch..!!</FONT></STRONG></FONT><BR><FONT color=3D#ff0033><FONT size=3D6><STRONG> <a href=3D"http://www.mo3aa.abafbdb.mx%3D14%3D02%3D14%3D05%3D14%2Ecom%7Cne= t.ped%3D02%3D05%3D14%3D%3D02%3D14%3D05%3D14%3D14.jjjjjjjj.com:80/mo3/abafb= db/"> Click HERE to See my first Try ;)</a> </STRONG></FONT></FONT></P> <!--Begin Right Side Bar Main--> <td width=3D"10">=FFFFFFA0</td> <td width=3D"125" align=3D"center" bgcolor=3D"#cc3399" valign=3D"top"> <font face=3D"verdana,sans-serif" color=3D"black" size=3D"2"> <b>Find out how to get FREE Trials!!</b><br> <hr color=3D"#384881" noshade width=3D"125" size=3D"1"> Monthly Content beats the competition! </td> </tr> </table> <!--End Main--> <center> <hr noshade width=3D"600"> <hr noshade width=3D"600" color=3D"darkgreen"><font face=3DArial size=3D2> </b><br>To receive no more of these go to <a href=3D"mailto:wave799us@yahoo.com"> This Page</a></font> <hr color=3D"lime" noshade width=3D"600" size=3D"1"> </center> </body> </html> From wrl-techops@pa.dec.com Sat Mar 24 14:44:58 2001 Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (root@mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id OAA02443 for <erikm@thorgal.et.tudelft.nl>; Sat, 24 Mar 2001 14:44:58 +0100 Received: from zcamail04.zca.compaq.com (zcamail04.zca.compaq.com [161.114.32.104]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id OAA25147 for <erikm@thorgal.et.tudelft.nl>; Sat, 24 Mar 2001 14:44:56 +0100 (MET) Received: by zcamail04.zca.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 5DCBD138; Sat, 24 Mar 2001 05:44:32 -0800 (PST) Received: from taynzmail03.nz-tay.cpqcorp.net (taynzmail03.nz-tay.cpqcorp.net [16.47.4.103]) by zcamail04.zca.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E167313D; Sat, 24 Mar 2001 05:44:31 -0800 (PST) Received: by taynzmail03.nz-tay.cpqcorp.net (Postfix, from userid 12345) id B0AD01A0; Sat, 24 Mar 2001 08:43:06 -0500 (EST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by taynzmail03.nz-tay.cpqcorp.net (Postfix) with SMTP id 7F9D0148; Sat, 24 Mar 2001 08:43:04 -0500 (EST) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA08699; Sat, 24 Mar 2001 05:43:00 -0800 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id FAA02513; Sat, 24 Mar 2001 05:39:19 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id FAA26994; Sat, 24 Mar 2001 05:39:19 -0800 (PST) From: <ging75@hotmail.com> Received: from zmamail02.nz-tay.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA24883; Sat, 24 Mar 2001 05:39:16 -0800 Received: by zmamail02.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id A564B668F; Sat, 24 Mar 2001 08:39:15 -0500 (EST) Received: from nts-exg.wingluen.com.hk (unknown [210.184.29.250]) by zmamail02.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B7FC466F6; Sat, 24 Mar 2001 08:39:04 -0500 (EST) Message-Id: <000078993acf$00001027$000056d3@32.102.75.17> To: <glazeraze@hotmail.com> Subject: F R E E Teen Hardcore Site - WET GIRLS.. ... .. ... .... .. 22227 Date: Sat, 24 Mar 2001 08:43:38 -0500 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk <html> <head> </head> <br> <center> <table cellpadding=3D0 cellspacing=3D0 border=3D0 width=3D600> <tr> <td width=3D465 bgcolor=3D#cc0000> <font face=3D"arial,helvetica" color=3D"white" size=3D"3"> <center><b>Adult Freebie Express March 25, 2001</b></center> </font> </td> </tr> </TABLE> <br> <table cellpadding=3D0 cellspacing=3D0 border=3D0 width=3D600> <tr> <td width=3D"465"> <table> <tr> <td width=3D140 valign=3D"top"> <hr width=3D140 color=3D"#325c7d" size=3D1 align=3D"left"> </td> <td width=3D185 valign=3D"top" align=3D"center"> <font face=3D"verdana,helvetica" color=3D"#0000ff" size=3D1> <center><b>IN THIS AFE EDITION</b></center> </td> <td width=3D140 valign=3D"top"> <hr width=3D140 color=3D"#325c7d" size=3D1 align=3D"left"> </td></tr> </table> <P align=3Dcenter width=3D500> <FONT color=3D#cc3399> <STRONG><font face=3D"Arial" size=3D"4">Are you over 18???????<BR>We Want = to Get YOU Off!! </STRONG> </P> <DIV align=3Dcenter> <a href=3D"http://www.mo3aa.abafbdb.mx%3D14%3D02%3D14%3D05%3D14%2Ecom%7Cne= t.ped%3D02%3D05%3D14%3D%3D02%3D14%3D05%3D14%3D14.jjjjjjjj.com:80/mo3/abafb= db/"> Click Here For 100% Free 3 day Trial!</a> <BR><BR></DIV></FONT> <P><FONT face=3DArial><FONT color=3D#cc0000><STRONG>  Hi My Name Is Stephanie, I just turned 18 TODAY..!!<BR><FONT color=3D#0000ff>I have been wanting to do live nude webcams but I was not able to because I was too young..</FONT><F= ONT color=3D#000000></STRONG><BR></FONT><STRONG>BUT NOW its all legal..Come ch= eck out my live feeds and all my picture pages..!!</STRONG></FONT><FONT color=3D#000000><BR></FONT><STRONG><FONT color=3D#0000ff>I do this because= I like it and it doesn't cost a dime to watch..!!</FONT></STRONG></FONT><BR><FONT color=3D#ff0033><FONT size=3D6><STRONG> <a href=3D"http://www.mo3aa.abafbdb.mx%3D14%3D02%3D14%3D05%3D14%2Ecom%7Cne= t.ped%3D02%3D05%3D14%3D%3D02%3D14%3D05%3D14%3D14.jjjjjjjj.com:80/mo3/abafb= db/"> Click HERE to See my first Try ;)</a> </STRONG></FONT></FONT></P> <!--Begin Right Side Bar Main--> <td width=3D"10">=FFFFFFA0</td> <td width=3D"125" align=3D"center" bgcolor=3D"#cc3399" valign=3D"top"> <font face=3D"verdana,sans-serif" color=3D"black" size=3D"2"> <b>Find out how to get FREE Trials!!</b><br> <hr color=3D"#384881" noshade width=3D"125" size=3D"1"> Monthly Content beats the competition! </td> </tr> </table> <!--End Main--> <center> <hr noshade width=3D"600"> <hr noshade width=3D"600" color=3D"darkgreen"><font face=3DArial size=3D2> </b><br>To receive no more of these go to <a href=3D"mailto:wave799us@yahoo.com"> This Page</a></font> <hr color=3D"lime" noshade width=3D"600" size=3D"1"> </center> </body> </html> From wrl-techops@pa.dec.com Tue Mar 27 23:21:23 2001 Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (root@mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id XAA12162 for <erikm@thorgal.et.tudelft.nl>; Tue, 27 Mar 2001 23:21:22 +0200 Received: from zmamail05.zma.compaq.com (zmamail05.zma.compaq.com [161.114.64.105]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id XAA03406 for <erikm@thorgal.et.tudelft.nl>; Tue, 27 Mar 2001 23:21:19 +0200 (METDST) Received: by zmamail05.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 7BF994335; Tue, 27 Mar 2001 16:19:31 -0500 (EST) Received: from taynzmail03.nz-tay.cpqcorp.net (taynzmail03.nz-tay.cpqcorp.net [16.47.4.103]) by zmamail05.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A6464522; Tue, 27 Mar 2001 16:19:31 -0500 (EST) Received: by taynzmail03.nz-tay.cpqcorp.net (Postfix, from userid 12345) id BCA871F1; Tue, 27 Mar 2001 16:19:25 -0500 (EST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by taynzmail03.nz-tay.cpqcorp.net (Postfix) with SMTP id AA0B428A; Tue, 27 Mar 2001 16:19:23 -0500 (EST) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA15153; Tue, 27 Mar 2001 13:19:17 -0800 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id NAA30040; Tue, 27 Mar 2001 13:11:04 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id NAA12424; Tue, 27 Mar 2001 13:11:03 -0800 (PST) Received: from zmamail01.nz-tay.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA01246; Tue, 27 Mar 2001 13:11:02 -0800 Received: by zmamail01.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 818A6F22B; Tue, 27 Mar 2001 16:11:02 -0500 (EST) Received: from pigeon.maya.com (po.maya.com [192.70.254.2]) by zmamail01.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 22BF4C20B for <sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com>; Tue, 27 Mar 2001 16:11:02 -0500 (EST) Received: from maya.com (cook-pc.maya.com [192.70.254.33]) by pigeon.maya.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D4C0D30807 for <sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com>; Tue, 27 Mar 2001 15:36:25 -0500 (EST) Message-Id: <3AC1023C.D5911AD3@maya.com> Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2001 16:12:28 -0500 From: Nicole Cook <cook@maya.com> X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.72 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.2.14-5.0 i686) X-Accept-Language: en Mime-Version: 1.0 To: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Subject: irq_desc[irq].action = 0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk I appear to have an irq problem trying to get 2.4.2-rmk1-np2 to work. This seems strange, since I'm not sure what I could be doing, but it seems like irqs might be colliding. I know where the kernel is trying to free irqs (arch/arm/kernel/irq.c), but I'm not sure why it is. Do I need to change irq settings? SA1100 serial driver version 1.3 ttyS0 on SA1100 UART3 (irq 17) ttyS1 on SA1100 UART1 (irq 15) Linux PCMCIA Card Services 3.1.22 options: none ds: no socket drivers loaded! VFS: Mounted root (ext2 filesystem). Freeing init memory: 44K irq_desc[irq].action = 0 disabled irq 17 irq_desc[irq].action = 0 disabled irq 17 INIT: irq_desc[irq].action = 0 disabled irq 17 version 2.74 bootingirq_desc[irq].action = 0 disabled irq 17 irq_desc[irq].action = 0 disabled irq 17 rc (8): undefined instruction: pc=4004afc4 Code: 00000000 eca0420c (e8806ff0) e2400030 eaffffff irq_desc[irq].action = 0 disabled irq 17 irq_desc[irq].action = 0 disabled irq 17 irq_desc[irq].action = 0 disabled irq 17 INIT: irq_desc[irq].action = 0 disabled irq 17 Entering runlevel: 3irq_desc[irq].action = 0 disabled irq 17 irq_desc[irq].action = 0 disabled irq 17 INIT: irq_desc[irq].action = 0 disabled irq 17 no more processes left in this runlevelirq_desc[irq].action = 0 disabled irq 17 irq_desc[irq].action = 0 disabled irq 17 (hang) -------------------------- Nicole Cook Software Engineer MAYA Design From wrl-techops@pa.dec.com Wed Mar 28 00:06:04 2001 Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (root@mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id AAA12294 for <erikm@thorgal.et.tudelft.nl>; Wed, 28 Mar 2001 00:06:04 +0200 Received: from ztxmail04.ztx.compaq.com (ztxmail04.ztx.compaq.com [161.114.1.208]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id AAA05955 for <erikm@thorgal.et.tudelft.nl>; Wed, 28 Mar 2001 00:06:02 +0200 (METDST) Received: by ztxmail04.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 584A6A98; Tue, 27 Mar 2001 16:04:11 -0600 (CST) Received: from taynzmail03.nz-tay.cpqcorp.net (taynzmail03.nz-tay.cpqcorp.net [16.47.4.103]) by ztxmail04.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F8C7A0D; Tue, 27 Mar 2001 16:04:11 -0600 (CST) Received: by taynzmail03.nz-tay.cpqcorp.net (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 827CB14D; Tue, 27 Mar 2001 17:04:10 -0500 (EST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by taynzmail03.nz-tay.cpqcorp.net (Postfix) with SMTP id 79702246; Tue, 27 Mar 2001 17:04:08 -0500 (EST) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA06794; Tue, 27 Mar 2001 14:04:07 -0800 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id OAA27303; Tue, 27 Mar 2001 14:03:27 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id OAA07210; Tue, 27 Mar 2001 14:03:26 -0800 (PST) Received: from zmamail01.nz-tay.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA32129; Tue, 27 Mar 2001 14:03:25 -0800 Received: by zmamail01.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 66B23121A2; Tue, 27 Mar 2001 17:03:25 -0500 (EST) Received: from mail.netx4.com (216-064-003-018.inaddr.vitts.com [216.64.3.18]) by zmamail01.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 104CE12502 for <sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com>; Tue, 27 Mar 2001 17:03:25 -0500 (EST) Received: from mvista.com (IDENT:davis_g@greeny.netx4.com [192.168.253.30]) by mail.netx4.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id NAA01250; Tue, 27 Mar 2001 13:09:52 -0500 Message-Id: <3AC10DF6.A973BD08@mvista.com> Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2001 17:02:30 -0500 From: "George G. Davis" <davis_g@mvista.com> Organization: MontaVista Software, Inc. X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.7 [en] (X11; I; Linux 2.4.0 ppc) X-Accept-Language: en Mime-Version: 1.0 To: Nicole Cook <cook@maya.com> Cc: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Subject: Re: irq_desc[irq].action = 0 References: <3AC1023C.D5911AD3@maya.com> Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="------------9B580FDCDC7B02A4A4BE1736" Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------9B580FDCDC7B02A4A4BE1736 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Nicole Cook wrote: > > I appear to have an irq problem trying to get 2.4.2-rmk1-np2 to work. Probably not. There were some debug printk's left in after someone submitted patches to resolve IRQ problems for the SA-1111 PS/2 mouse and a general problem was also discovered in that SA-1111 IRQs were never disabled after a driver called free_irq. The printk's are a remnant of fixes for this later problem. But they should be harmless (though annoying : ). > This seems strange, since I'm not sure what I could be doing, but it > seems like irqs might be colliding. I know where the kernel is trying > to free irqs (arch/arm/kernel/irq.c), but I'm not sure why it is. Do I > need to change irq settings? > > SA1100 serial driver version > 1.3 > ttyS0 on SA1100 UART3 (irq > 17) > ttyS1 on SA1100 UART1 (irq > 15) > Linux PCMCIA Card Services > 3.1.22 > options: > none > ds: no socket drivers > loaded! > VFS: Mounted root (ext2 > filesystem). > Freeing init memory: > 44K > irq_desc[irq].action = > 0 > disabled irq > 17 > irq_desc[irq].action = > 0 > disabled irq > 17 > INIT: irq_desc[irq].action = > 0 > disabled irq > 17 > version 2.74 bootingirq_desc[irq].action = > 0 > disabled irq > 17 > > irq_desc[irq].action = 0 > disabled irq > 17 > rc (8): undefined instruction: > pc=4004afc4 > Code: 00000000 eca0420c (e8806ff0) e2400030 > eaffffff > irq_desc[irq].action = > 0 > disabled irq > 17 > irq_desc[irq].action = > 0 > disabled irq > 17 > irq_desc[irq].action = > 0 > disabled irq > 17 > INIT: irq_desc[irq].action = > 0 > disabled irq > 17 > Entering runlevel: 3irq_desc[irq].action = > 0 > disabled irq > 17 > > irq_desc[irq].action = > 0 > disabled irq 17 > > INIT: irq_desc[irq].action = > 0 > disabled irq > 17 > no more processes left in this runlevelirq_desc[irq].action = > 0 > disabled irq > 17 > > irq_desc[irq].action = > 0 > disabled irq > 17 > > (hang) > > -------------------------- > Nicole Cook > Software Engineer > MAYA Design -- Regards, George --------------9B580FDCDC7B02A4A4BE1736 Content-Type: text/x-vcard; charset=iso-8859-1; name="davis_g.vcf" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-Description: Card for George G. Davis Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="davis_g.vcf" YmVnaW46dmNhcmQgCm46RGF2aXM7R2VvcmdlCnRlbDt3b3JrOjYwMy84ODAtMTQxNAp4LW1v emlsbGEtaHRtbDpGQUxTRQp1cmw6aHR0cDovL3d3dy5tdmlzdGEuY29tCm9yZzpNb250YVZp c3RhIFNvZnR3YXJlLCBJbmMuCmFkcjo7OzQ2IFBpbmUgU3RyZWV0IEV4dGVuc2lvbjtOYXNo dWE7Tkg7MDMwNjA7VVNBCnZlcnNpb246Mi4xCmVtYWlsO2ludGVybmV0OmRhdmlzX2dAbXZp c3RhLmNvbQp0aXRsZTpTb2Z0d2FyZSBFbmdpbmVlcgp4LW1vemlsbGEtY3B0OjstNTM3Ngpm bjpHZW9yZ2UgRy4gRGF2aXMKZW5kOnZjYXJkCg== --------------9B580FDCDC7B02A4A4BE1736-- From wrl-techops@pa.dec.com Wed Mar 28 00:14:13 2001 Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (root@mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id AAA12318 for <erikm@thorgal.et.tudelft.nl>; Wed, 28 Mar 2001 00:14:13 +0200 Received: from zcamail03.zca.compaq.com (zcamail03.zca.compaq.com [161.114.32.103]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id AAA06274 for <erikm@thorgal.et.tudelft.nl>; Wed, 28 Mar 2001 00:14:11 +0200 (METDST) Received: by zcamail03.zca.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id DDD3BCFC; Tue, 27 Mar 2001 14:12:22 -0800 (PST) Received: from mailrelay01.cac.cpqcorp.net (mailrelay01.cac.cpqcorp.net [16.47.132.152]) by zcamail03.zca.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B6F6FC98; Tue, 27 Mar 2001 14:12:22 -0800 (PST) Received: by mailrelay01.cac.cpqcorp.net (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 9A78D148; Tue, 27 Mar 2001 14:12:19 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mailrelay01.cac.cpqcorp.net (Postfix) with SMTP id 3FE0D192; Tue, 27 Mar 2001 14:12:19 -0800 (PST) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA20211; Tue, 27 Mar 2001 14:12:18 -0800 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id OAA06256; Tue, 27 Mar 2001 14:11:56 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id OAA16161; Tue, 27 Mar 2001 14:11:56 -0800 (PST) Received: from ztxmail01.nz-cce.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA07884; Tue, 27 Mar 2001 14:11:55 -0800 Received: by ztxmail01.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 02BB22F0D; Tue, 27 Mar 2001 16:11:54 -0600 (CST) Received: from pigeon.maya.com (po.maya.com [192.70.254.2]) by ztxmail01.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5ACF52D9E for <sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com>; Tue, 27 Mar 2001 16:11:54 -0600 (CST) Received: from maya.com (cook-pc.maya.com [192.70.254.33]) by pigeon.maya.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 66B9830807 for <sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com>; Tue, 27 Mar 2001 16:37:19 -0500 (EST) Message-Id: <3AC11081.60C0E42B@maya.com> Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2001 17:13:21 -0500 From: Nicole Cook <cook@maya.com> X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.72 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.2.14-5.0 i686) X-Accept-Language: en Mime-Version: 1.0 To: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Subject: Re: irq_desc[irq].action = 0 References: <3AC1023C.D5911AD3@maya.com> <3AC10DF6.A973BD08@mvista.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk "George G. Davis" wrote: > > Nicole Cook wrote: > > > > I appear to have an irq problem trying to get 2.4.2-rmk1-np2 to work. > > Probably not. There were some debug printk's left in after someone submitted > patches to resolve IRQ problems for the SA-1111 PS/2 mouse and a general > problem was also discovered in that SA-1111 IRQs were never disabled after > a driver called free_irq. The printk's are a remnant of fixes for this later > problem. But they should be harmless (though annoying : ). > Thanks - I probably would have just ignored them if my kernel hadn't hung immediately afterward. But it looks like the problem must be something else. ------------------------------ Nicole Cook Software Engineer MAYA Design From wrl-techops@pa.dec.com Wed Mar 28 01:08:05 2001 Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (root@mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id BAA12636 for <erikm@thorgal.et.tudelft.nl>; Wed, 28 Mar 2001 01:08:05 +0200 Received: from zmamail04.zma.compaq.com (zmamail04.zma.compaq.com [161.114.64.104]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id BAA08975 for <erikm@thorgal.et.tudelft.nl>; Wed, 28 Mar 2001 01:08:03 +0200 (METDST) Received: by zmamail04.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id EF2CA6262; Tue, 27 Mar 2001 18:06:16 -0500 (EST) Received: from mailrelay01.cce.cpqcorp.net (mailrelay01.cce.cpqcorp.net [16.47.68.171]) by zmamail04.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ADD8E61CE; Tue, 27 Mar 2001 18:06:16 -0500 (EST) Received: by mailrelay01.cce.cpqcorp.net (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 6FDA82EB; Tue, 27 Mar 2001 17:06:15 -0600 (CST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mailrelay01.cce.cpqcorp.net (Postfix) with SMTP id 3BEBF221; Tue, 27 Mar 2001 17:06:11 -0600 (CST) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA13066; Tue, 27 Mar 2001 15:06:09 -0800 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id PAA31214; Tue, 27 Mar 2001 15:03:27 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id PAA10040; Tue, 27 Mar 2001 15:03:27 -0800 (PST) Received: from ztxmail02.nz-cce.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA06597; Tue, 27 Mar 2001 15:03:26 -0800 Received: by ztxmail02.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 666F21E04; Tue, 27 Mar 2001 17:03:25 -0600 (CST) Received: from mail.netx4.com (216-064-003-018.inaddr.vitts.com [216.64.3.18]) by ztxmail02.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A49361E44 for <sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com>; Tue, 27 Mar 2001 17:03:24 -0600 (CST) Received: from mvista.com (IDENT:davis_g@greeny.netx4.com [192.168.253.30]) by mail.netx4.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id OAA01370; Tue, 27 Mar 2001 14:10:07 -0500 Message-Id: <3AC11C13.BD1C0054@mvista.com> Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2001 18:02:43 -0500 From: "George G. Davis" <davis_g@mvista.com> Organization: MontaVista Software, Inc. X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.7 [en] (X11; I; Linux 2.4.0 ppc) X-Accept-Language: en Mime-Version: 1.0 To: Nicole Cook <cook@maya.com>, sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Subject: Re: irq_desc[irq].action = 0 References: <3AC1023C.D5911AD3@maya.com> <3AC10DF6.A973BD08@mvista.com> Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="------------9031FD639A467688B223649C" Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------9031FD639A467688B223649C Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit "George G. Davis" wrote: > > Nicole Cook wrote: <snip> > > This seems strange, since I'm not sure what I could be doing, but it > > seems like irqs might be colliding. I know where the kernel is trying > > to free irqs (arch/arm/kernel/irq.c), but I'm not sure why it is. Do I > > need to change irq settings? > > > > SA1100 serial driver version > > 1.3 > > ttyS0 on SA1100 UART3 (irq > > 17) > > ttyS1 on SA1100 UART1 (irq > > 15) > > Linux PCMCIA Card Services > > 3.1.22 > > options: > > none > > ds: no socket drivers > > loaded! > > VFS: Mounted root (ext2 > > filesystem). > > Freeing init memory: > > 44K > > irq_desc[irq].action = > > 0 > > disabled irq > > 17 > > irq_desc[irq].action = > > 0 > > disabled irq > > 17 > > INIT: irq_desc[irq].action = > > 0 > > disabled irq > > 17 > > version 2.74 bootingirq_desc[irq].action = > > 0 > > disabled irq > > 17 > > > > irq_desc[irq].action = 0 > > disabled irq > > 17 > > rc (8): undefined instruction: > > pc=4004afc4 > > Code: 00000000 eca0420c (e8806ff0) e2400030 > > eaffffff > > irq_desc[irq].action = > > 0 > > disabled irq > > 17 > > irq_desc[irq].action = > > 0 > > disabled irq > > 17 > > irq_desc[irq].action = > > 0 > > disabled irq > > 17 > > INIT: irq_desc[irq].action = > > 0 > > disabled irq > > 17 > > Entering runlevel: 3irq_desc[irq].action = > > 0 > > disabled irq > > 17 > > > > irq_desc[irq].action = > > 0 > > disabled irq 17 > > > > INIT: irq_desc[irq].action = > > 0 > > disabled irq > > 17 > > no more processes left in this runlevelirq_desc[irq].action = > > 0 > > disabled irq > > 17 > > > > irq_desc[irq].action = > > 0 > > disabled irq > > 17 > > > > (hang) Off hand, my guess is that you have a problem with your ramdisk (I'm assuming, of course that you are in fact using a ramdisk). All of the "disabled irq 17" messages are from open/close sequences for /dev/ttyS0, SA-1100 UART 3 in this case. I'm not savvy enough to determine what problem you may have in this case. But, have you used this ramdisk before? It looks like you may be missing entries in /etc/inittab to start a getty (or shell) on the console and/or other ttys. It looks like whatever you had setup to run via /etc/inittab (if anything), ran to completion and there's nothing left to do. Of course, that "undefined instruction" message is rather ominous! Again, that could be due to a bad ramdisk. Although I seem to recall seeing this problem mentioned before. Have you checked the archives of the mailing list? > > > > -------------------------- > > Nicole Cook > > Software Engineer > > MAYA Design > > -- > Regards, > George -- Regards, George --------------9031FD639A467688B223649C Content-Type: text/x-vcard; charset=iso-8859-1; name="davis_g.vcf" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-Description: Card for George G. Davis Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="davis_g.vcf" YmVnaW46dmNhcmQgCm46RGF2aXM7R2VvcmdlCnRlbDt3b3JrOjYwMy84ODAtMTQxNAp4LW1v emlsbGEtaHRtbDpGQUxTRQp1cmw6aHR0cDovL3d3dy5tdmlzdGEuY29tCm9yZzpNb250YVZp c3RhIFNvZnR3YXJlLCBJbmMuCmFkcjo7OzQ2IFBpbmUgU3RyZWV0IEV4dGVuc2lvbjtOYXNo dWE7Tkg7MDMwNjA7VVNBCnZlcnNpb246Mi4xCmVtYWlsO2ludGVybmV0OmRhdmlzX2dAbXZp c3RhLmNvbQp0aXRsZTpTb2Z0d2FyZSBFbmdpbmVlcgp4LW1vemlsbGEtY3B0OjstNTM3Ngpm bjpHZW9yZ2UgRy4gRGF2aXMKZW5kOnZjYXJkCg== --------------9031FD639A467688B223649C-- From wrl-techops@pa.dec.com Wed Mar 28 01:53:39 2001 Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (root@mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id BAA12716 for <erikm@thorgal.et.tudelft.nl>; Wed, 28 Mar 2001 01:53:39 +0200 Received: from ztxmail03.ztx.compaq.com (ztxmail03.ztx.compaq.com [161.114.1.207]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id BAA11264 for <erikm@thorgal.et.tudelft.nl>; Wed, 28 Mar 2001 01:53:36 +0200 (METDST) Received: by ztxmail03.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id CB26C1BB3; Tue, 27 Mar 2001 17:51:49 -0600 (CST) Received: from mailrelay01.cce.cpqcorp.net (mailrelay01.cce.cpqcorp.net [16.47.68.171]) by ztxmail03.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7AF981A9F; Tue, 27 Mar 2001 17:51:49 -0600 (CST) Received: by mailrelay01.cce.cpqcorp.net (Postfix, from userid 12345) id E71CF323; Tue, 27 Mar 2001 17:51:48 -0600 (CST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mailrelay01.cce.cpqcorp.net (Postfix) with SMTP id 3DEB9361; Tue, 27 Mar 2001 17:51:45 -0600 (CST) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA03625; Tue, 27 Mar 2001 15:51:43 -0800 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id PAA26934; Tue, 27 Mar 2001 15:50:11 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id PAA27211; Tue, 27 Mar 2001 15:50:10 -0800 (PST) Received: from zmamail01.nz-tay.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA00113; Tue, 27 Mar 2001 15:50:10 -0800 Received: by zmamail01.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 82F6AED0A; Tue, 27 Mar 2001 18:50:09 -0500 (EST) Received: from pigeon.maya.com (po.maya.com [192.70.254.2]) by zmamail01.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1BA65C47B for <sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com>; Tue, 27 Mar 2001 18:50:09 -0500 (EST) Received: from maya.com (cook-pc.maya.com [192.70.254.33]) by pigeon.maya.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5FE6B30807 for <sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com>; Tue, 27 Mar 2001 18:15:38 -0500 (EST) Message-Id: <3AC1278B.A9551804@maya.com> Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2001 18:51:40 -0500 From: Nicole Cook <cook@maya.com> X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.72 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.2.14-5.0 i686) X-Accept-Language: en Mime-Version: 1.0 To: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Subject: Re: irq_desc[irq].action = 0 References: <3AC1023C.D5911AD3@maya.com> <3AC10DF6.A973BD08@mvista.com> <3AC11C13.BD1C0054@mvista.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk "George G. Davis" wrote: > > Off hand, my guess is that you have a problem with your ramdisk (I'm > assuming, of course that you are in fact using a ramdisk). All of the > "disabled irq 17" messages are from open/close sequences for /dev/ttyS0, > SA-1100 UART 3 in this case. I'm not savvy enough to determine what > problem you may have in this case. But, have you used this ramdisk > before? It looks like you may be missing entries in /etc/inittab to > start a getty (or shell) on the console and/or other ttys. It looks > like whatever you had setup to run via /etc/inittab (if anything), > ran to completion and there's nothing left to do. > > Of course, that "undefined instruction" message is rather ominous! > Again, that could be due to a bad ramdisk. Although I seem to recall > seeing this problem mentioned before. Have you checked the archives > of the mailing list? > Regards, > George I think you're right about it being due to a bad ramdisk. The one I was trying to use was stripped down as much as possible, and I think it was missing some of what was needed. I've tried a couple other versions, and while neither of them quite work, they work a little better, and I think I can get a working ramdisk if I start from one of the default versions. Thanks. ------------------------------ Nicole Cook Software Engineer MAYA Design From wrl-techops@pa.dec.com Wed Mar 28 14:14:16 2001 Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (root@mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id OAA14366 for <erikm@thorgal.et.tudelft.nl>; Wed, 28 Mar 2001 14:14:15 +0200 Received: from zcamail04.zca.compaq.com (zcamail04.zca.compaq.com [161.114.32.104]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id OAA17679 for <erikm@thorgal.et.tudelft.nl>; Wed, 28 Mar 2001 14:14:10 +0200 (METDST) Received: by zcamail04.zca.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 31734304; Wed, 28 Mar 2001 04:13:45 -0800 (PST) Received: from mailrelay01.cce.cpqcorp.net (mailrelay01.cce.cpqcorp.net [16.47.68.171]) by zcamail04.zca.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7805A21C; Wed, 28 Mar 2001 04:13:44 -0800 (PST) Received: by mailrelay01.cce.cpqcorp.net (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 9E07237C; Wed, 28 Mar 2001 06:12:14 -0600 (CST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mailrelay01.cce.cpqcorp.net (Postfix) with SMTP id 70C462FA; Wed, 28 Mar 2001 06:12:12 -0600 (CST) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA26824; Wed, 28 Mar 2001 04:12:10 -0800 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id EAA27040; Wed, 28 Mar 2001 04:08:54 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id EAA23369; Wed, 28 Mar 2001 04:08:54 -0800 (PST) Received: from ztxmail01.nz-cce.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA26995; Wed, 28 Mar 2001 04:08:53 -0800 Received: by ztxmail01.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 1E36D25B9; Wed, 28 Mar 2001 06:08:51 -0600 (CST) Received: from gda-server (unknown [202.88.153.15]) by ztxmail01.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 190C12DF1 for <sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com>; Wed, 28 Mar 2001 06:08:49 -0600 (CST) Received: from [192.168.0.66] by gda-server (ArGoSoft Mail Server, Version 1.5 (1.5.0.8)); Wed, 28 Mar 2001 17:33:47 Message-Id: <00d401c0b780$acc71900$4200a8c0@gdatr4> From: "Harishankkar" <S.harishankkar@gdatech.co.in> To: <Sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com> Subject: blob boot loader Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2001 17:44:44 +0530 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_00D1_01C0B7AE.C609D6E0" X-Priority: 3 X-Msmail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2615.200 X-Mimeole: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2615.200 Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_00D1_01C0B7AE.C609D6E0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable hi all i am porting linux on assabet. i am using blob bootloader. i have configure the kernel for console_serial_config . i can send my image & ramdisk to RAM. but after it when i type command boot. then it gives me messages starting kernel........... uncompressing the kernel............................................. after that no response hang please tell me what could be the reason. thanks in advance __ _ / / (_)__ __ ____ __ / /__/ / _ \/ // /\ \/ / . . . t h e c h o i c e o f a /____/_/_//_/\_,_/ /_/\_\ G N U g e n e r a t i o n . . . ------------------------------ ------=_NextPart_000_00D1_01C0B7AE.C609D6E0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable <!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN"> <HTML><HEAD> <META content=3D"text/html; charset=3Diso-8859-1" = http-equiv=3DContent-Type> <META content=3D"MSHTML 5.00.2614.3500" name=3DGENERATOR> <STYLE></STYLE> </HEAD> <BODY bgColor=3D#ffffff> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>hi all</FONT></DIV> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>i am porting linux on = assabet.</FONT></DIV> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>i am using blob = bootloader.</FONT></DIV> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>i have configure the kernel for=20 console_serial_config .</FONT></DIV> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>i can send my image & ramdisk to=20 RAM.</FONT></DIV> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>but after it when i type command = boot.</FONT></DIV> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>then it gives me messages</FONT></DIV> <DIV> </DIV> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>starting kernel...........</FONT></DIV> <DIV> </DIV> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>uncompressing the=20 kernel.............................................</FONT></DIV> <DIV> </DIV> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>after that no response</FONT></DIV> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>hang</FONT></DIV> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>please tell me what could be the=20 reason.</FONT></DIV> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>thanks in advance</FONT></DIV> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2><BR>   __   = _<BR>  /=20 /  (_)__  __ ____  __<BR> / /__/ / _ \/ // /\ \/ = /  . .=20 .  t h e   c h o i c e   o f  =20 a<BR>/____/_/_//_/\_,_/=20 /_/\_\           &= nbsp; =20 G N U   g e n e r a t i o n . . .</FONT></DIV> <DIV> </DIV> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial=20 size=3D2><BR>------------------------------<BR></FONT></DIV></BODY></HTML= > ------=_NextPart_000_00D1_01C0B7AE.C609D6E0-- From wrl-techops@pa.dec.com Wed Mar 28 16:19:59 2001 Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (root@mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id QAA14737 for <erikm@thorgal.et.tudelft.nl>; Wed, 28 Mar 2001 16:19:58 +0200 Received: from zcamail04.zca.compaq.com (zcamail04.zca.compaq.com [161.114.32.104]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id QAA26571 for <erikm@thorgal.et.tudelft.nl>; Wed, 28 Mar 2001 16:19:54 +0200 (METDST) Received: by zcamail04.zca.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 2DDFC3C3; Wed, 28 Mar 2001 06:19:32 -0800 (PST) Received: from mailrelay01.cac.cpqcorp.net (mailrelay01.cac.cpqcorp.net [16.47.132.152]) by zcamail04.zca.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 75E053D0; Wed, 28 Mar 2001 06:19:31 -0800 (PST) Received: by mailrelay01.cac.cpqcorp.net (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 1B5C3134; Wed, 28 Mar 2001 06:18:06 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mailrelay01.cac.cpqcorp.net (Postfix) with SMTP id E057913C; Wed, 28 Mar 2001 06:18:05 -0800 (PST) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA15110; Wed, 28 Mar 2001 06:18:04 -0800 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id GAA23544; Wed, 28 Mar 2001 06:15:24 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id GAA29730; Wed, 28 Mar 2001 06:15:23 -0800 (PST) Received: from ztxmail01.nz-cce.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA26008; Wed, 28 Mar 2001 06:15:22 -0800 Received: by ztxmail01.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 5F04E2D00; Wed, 28 Mar 2001 08:15:20 -0600 (CST) Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by ztxmail01.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A2D212F3D for <Sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com>; Wed, 28 Mar 2001 08:15:18 -0600 (CST) Received: from arthur.ubicom.tudelft.nl (root@arthur.ubicom.tudelft.nl [130.161.43.222]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id QAA25996; Wed, 28 Mar 2001 16:15:15 +0200 (METDST) Received: (from erik@localhost) by arthur.ubicom.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3/Debian 8.9.3-21) id QAA08727; Wed, 28 Mar 2001 16:14:22 +0200 Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2001 16:14:22 +0200 From: Erik Mouw <J.A.K.Mouw@ITS.TUDelft.NL> To: Harishankkar <S.harishankkar@gdatech.co.in> Cc: Sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Subject: Re: blob boot loader Message-Id: <20010328161422.B902@arthur.ubicom.tudelft.nl> References: <00d401c0b780$acc71900$4200a8c0@gdatr4> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <00d401c0b780$acc71900$4200a8c0@gdatr4>; from S.harishankkar@gdatech.co.in on Wed, Mar 28, 2001 at 05:44:44PM +0530 Organization: Eric Conspiracy Secret Labs X-Eric-Conspiracy: There is no conspiracy! Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk On Wed, Mar 28, 2001 at 05:44:44PM +0530, Harishankkar wrote: > i am porting linux on assabet. > > i am using blob bootloader. > > i have configure the kernel for console_serial_config . > > i can send my image & ramdisk to RAM. > > but after it when i type command boot. > > then it gives me messages > > > > starting kernel........... > > > > uncompressing the kernel............................................. > > > > after that no response > > hang > > please tell me what could be the reason. Standard issue. Disable CONFIG_ANGELBOOT (make menuconfig --> General Setup --> Load kernel using Angel Debug Monitor). Recompile kernel and retry. Erik -- J.A.K. (Erik) Mouw, Information and Communication Theory Group, Department of Electrical Engineering, Faculty of Information Technology and Systems, Delft University of Technology, PO BOX 5031, 2600 GA Delft, The Netherlands Phone: +31-15-2783635 Fax: +31-15-2781843 Email: J.A.K.Mouw@its.tudelft.nl WWW: http://www-ict.its.tudelft.nl/~erik/ From wrl-techops@pa.dec.com Wed Mar 28 23:28:56 2001 Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (root@mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id XAA16020 for <erikm@thorgal.et.tudelft.nl>; Wed, 28 Mar 2001 23:28:55 +0200 Received: from zmamail04.zma.compaq.com (zmamail04.zma.compaq.com [161.114.64.104]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id XAA22566 for <erikm@thorgal.et.tudelft.nl>; Wed, 28 Mar 2001 23:28:54 +0200 (METDST) Received: by zmamail04.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id A13D765DE; Wed, 28 Mar 2001 16:27:07 -0500 (EST) Received: from taynzmail03.nz-tay.cpqcorp.net (taynzmail03.nz-tay.cpqcorp.net [16.47.4.103]) by zmamail04.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6CBCF65E4; Wed, 28 Mar 2001 16:27:05 -0500 (EST) Received: by taynzmail03.nz-tay.cpqcorp.net (Postfix, from userid 12345) id EF3E314D; Wed, 28 Mar 2001 16:27:02 -0500 (EST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by taynzmail03.nz-tay.cpqcorp.net (Postfix) with SMTP id B7E01295; Wed, 28 Mar 2001 16:27:00 -0500 (EST) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA11968; Wed, 28 Mar 2001 13:26:58 -0800 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id NAA06583; Wed, 28 Mar 2001 13:21:17 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id NAA12110; Wed, 28 Mar 2001 13:21:16 -0800 (PST) Received: from zmamail02.nz-tay.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA24594; Wed, 28 Mar 2001 13:21:15 -0800 Received: by zmamail02.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 52F1535BB; Wed, 28 Mar 2001 16:21:14 -0500 (EST) Received: from dredd.crimea.edu (unknown [213.128.193.148]) by zmamail02.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9565844EC for <sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com>; Wed, 28 Mar 2001 16:21:12 -0500 (EST) Received: (from uucp@localhost) by dredd.crimea.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with UUCP id BAA03390; Thu, 29 Mar 2001 01:20:59 +0400 Received: (from green@localhost) by dredd.crimea.edu (8.10.1/8.10.1) id f2SLKuQ05783; Thu, 29 Mar 2001 01:20:56 +0400 Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2001 01:20:56 +0400 From: Oleg Drokin <green@dredd.crimea.edu> To: nico@CAM.ORG, sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Subject: alignment exception Message-Id: <20010329012056.A5756@dredd.crimea.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0.1i Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk Hello! You seemed to be interested in alignment exceptions, so here is one for you. It have occured while I stress-tested usb netlink (by compiling glibc over nfs) I tried to run ksymoops on the oops, but it seems that my ksymoops does not have much support for arm right now. If you need any other data, I can provide it. Kernel in question is 2.4.2-rmk1-np3 ksymoops 2.3.5 on armv4l 2.4.2-rmk1-np3. Options used -V (default) -k /proc/ksyms (default) -l /proc/modules (default) -o /lib/modules/2.4.2-rmk1-np3/ (default) -m /usr/src/linux/System.map (default) Warning: You did not tell me where to find symbol information. I will assume that the log matches the kernel and modules that are running right now and I'll use the default options above for symbol resolution. If the current kernel and/or modules do not match the log, you can get more accurate output by telling me the kernel version and where to find map, modules, ksyms etc. ksymoops -h explains the options. Warning (expand_objects): object /lib/modules/2.4.2-rmk1-np3/kernel/fs/nfs/nfs.o for module nfs has changed since load Warning (expand_objects): object /lib/modules/2.4.2-rmk1-np3/kernel/fs/lockd/lockd.o for module lockd has changed since load Warning (expand_objects): object /lib/modules/2.4.2-rmk1-np3/kernel/net/sunrpc/sunrpc.o for module sunrpc has changed since load Error (expand_objects): cannot stat(./usb-eth.o) for usb-eth Warning (expand_objects): object /lib/modules/2.4.2-rmk1-np3/kernel/arch/arm/mach-sa1100/sa1100_usb.o for module sa1100_usb has changed since load Warning (expand_objects): object /lib/modules/2.4.2-rmk1-np3/kernel/drivers/net/ppp_async.o for module ppp_async has changed since load Warning (expand_objects): object /lib/modules/2.4.2-rmk1-np3/kernel/drivers/net/ppp_generic.o for module ppp_generic has changed since load Warning (expand_objects): object /lib/modules/2.4.2-rmk1-np3/kernel/drivers/net/slhc.o for module slhc has changed since load Warning (expand_objects): object /lib/modules/2.4.2-rmk1-np3/kernel/drivers/char/h3600_ts.o for module h3600_ts has changed since load Error (pclose_local): find_objects pclose failed 0x100 Warning (compare_maps): ksyms_base symbol fp_printk not found in System.map. Ignoring ksyms_base entry Warning (compare_maps): ksyms_base symbol fp_send_sig not found in System.map. Ignoring ksyms_base entry Warning (compare_maps): ksyms_base symbol kern_fp_enter not found in System.map. Ignoring ksyms_base entry Warning (compare_maps): mismatch on symbol nlmsvc_grace_period , lockd says c291fb80, /lib/modules/2.4.2-rmk1-np3/kernel/fs/lockd/lockd.o says c291f4d8. Ignoring /lib/modules/2.4.2-rmk1-np3/kernel/fs/lockd/lockd.o entry Warning (compare_maps): mismatch on symbol nlmsvc_ops , lockd says c291fb7c, /lib/modules/2.4.2-rmk1-np3/kernel/fs/lockd/lockd.o says c291f4d4. Ignoring /lib/modules/2.4.2-rmk1-np3/kernel/fs/lockd/lockd.o entry Warning (compare_maps): mismatch on symbol nlmsvc_timeout , lockd says c291fb84, /lib/modules/2.4.2-rmk1-np3/kernel/fs/lockd/lockd.o says c291f4dc. Ignoring /lib/modules/2.4.2-rmk1-np3/kernel/fs/lockd/lockd.o entry Warning (compare_maps): mismatch on symbol nfs_debug , sunrpc says c2914b80, /lib/modules/2.4.2-rmk1-np3/kernel/net/sunrpc/sunrpc.o says c29148b0. Ignoring /lib/modules/2.4.2-rmk1-np3/kernel/net/sunrpc/sunrpc.o entry Warning (compare_maps): mismatch on symbol nfsd_debug , sunrpc says c2914b84, /lib/modules/2.4.2-rmk1-np3/kernel/net/sunrpc/sunrpc.o says c29148b4. Ignoring /lib/modules/2.4.2-rmk1-np3/kernel/net/sunrpc/sunrpc.o entry Warning (compare_maps): mismatch on symbol nlm_debug , sunrpc says c2914b88, /lib/modules/2.4.2-rmk1-np3/kernel/net/sunrpc/sunrpc.o says c29148b8. Ignoring /lib/modules/2.4.2-rmk1-np3/kernel/net/sunrpc/sunrpc.o entry Warning (compare_maps): mismatch on symbol rpc_debug , sunrpc says c2914b7c, /lib/modules/2.4.2-rmk1-np3/kernel/net/sunrpc/sunrpc.o says c29148ac. Ignoring /lib/modules/2.4.2-rmk1-np3/kernel/net/sunrpc/sunrpc.o entry Warning (compare_maps): mismatch on symbol rpc_garbage_args , sunrpc says c2914b5c, /lib/modules/2.4.2-rmk1-np3/kernel/net/sunrpc/sunrpc.o says c291488c. Ignoring /lib/modules/2.4.2-rmk1-np3/kernel/net/sunrpc/sunrpc.o entry Warning (compare_maps): mismatch on symbol rpc_success , sunrpc says c2914b4c, /lib/modules/2.4.2-rmk1-np3/kernel/net/sunrpc/sunrpc.o says c291487c. Ignoring /lib/modules/2.4.2-rmk1-np3/kernel/net/sunrpc/sunrpc.o entry Warning (compare_maps): mismatch on symbol rpc_system_err , sunrpc says c2914b60, /lib/modules/2.4.2-rmk1-np3/kernel/net/sunrpc/sunrpc.o says c2914890. Ignoring /lib/modules/2.4.2-rmk1-np3/kernel/net/sunrpc/sunrpc.o entry Warning (compare_maps): mismatch on symbol xdr_one , sunrpc says c2914b44, /lib/modules/2.4.2-rmk1-np3/kernel/net/sunrpc/sunrpc.o says c2914874. Ignoring /lib/modules/2.4.2-rmk1-np3/kernel/net/sunrpc/sunrpc.o entry Warning (compare_maps): mismatch on symbol xdr_two , sunrpc says c2914b48, /lib/modules/2.4.2-rmk1-np3/kernel/net/sunrpc/sunrpc.o says c2914878. Ignoring /lib/modules/2.4.2-rmk1-np3/kernel/net/sunrpc/sunrpc.o entry Warning (compare_maps): mismatch on symbol xdr_zero , sunrpc says c2914b40, /lib/modules/2.4.2-rmk1-np3/kernel/net/sunrpc/sunrpc.o says c2914870. Ignoring /lib/modules/2.4.2-rmk1-np3/kernel/net/sunrpc/sunrpc.o entry Warning (compare_maps): mismatch on symbol __module_parm_desc_usb_rsize , usb-eth says c2902eb4, /lib/modules/2.4.2-rmk1-np3/kernel/arch/arm/mach-sa1100/usb-eth.o says c29031f8. Ignoring /lib/modules/2.4.2-rmk1-np3/kernel/arch/arm/mach-sa1100/usb-eth.o entry Warning (compare_maps): mismatch on symbol __module_parm_desc_usb_wsize , usb-eth says c2902f0c, /lib/modules/2.4.2-rmk1-np3/kernel/arch/arm/mach-sa1100/usb-eth.o says c2903250. Ignoring /lib/modules/2.4.2-rmk1-np3/kernel/arch/arm/mach-sa1100/usb-eth.o entry Warning (compare_maps): mismatch on symbol __module_parm_usb_rsize , usb-eth says c2902ea0, /lib/modules/2.4.2-rmk1-np3/kernel/arch/arm/mach-sa1100/usb-eth.o says c29031e4. Ignoring /lib/modules/2.4.2-rmk1-np3/kernel/arch/arm/mach-sa1100/usb-eth.o entry Warning (compare_maps): mismatch on symbol __module_parm_usb_wsize , usb-eth says c2902ef8, /lib/modules/2.4.2-rmk1-np3/kernel/arch/arm/mach-sa1100/usb-eth.o says c290323c. Ignoring /lib/modules/2.4.2-rmk1-np3/kernel/arch/arm/mach-sa1100/usb-eth.o entry Warning (compare_maps): mismatch on symbol keyRet , h3600_ts says c28ace9c, /lib/modules/2.4.2-rmk1-np3/kernel/drivers/char/h3600_ts.o says c28aca40. Ignoring /lib/modules/2.4.2-rmk1-np3/kernel/drivers/char/h3600_ts.o entry Internal error: alignment exception: 0 CPU: 0 pc : [<c005c5c8>] lr : [<c005caf4>] Using defaults from ksymoops -t elf32-littlearm -a arm sp : c148dd40 ip : c148dd6c fp : c148dd68 r10: c1415400 r9 : c148dd9c r8 : c1ffe0e0 Warning (Oops_set_i370_regs): garbage 'r9 : c148dd9c r8 : c1ffe0e0' at end of i370 register line ignored r7 : 000457b0 r6 : c292304c r5 : 733d2933 r4 : 733d2933 r3 : 36283a76 r2 : c1ffe0e0 r1 : 000457b0 r0 : c1415400 Flags: NzcV IRQs on FIQs on Mode SVC_32 Segment user Control: C06D517F Table: C06D517F DAC: 00000015 Process make (pid: 4105, stackpage=c148d000) Code: 0a00000f e1a05004 (e5953020) e1530007 1afffff7 >>PC; c005c5c8 <find_inode+38/7c> <===== >>r10; c1415400 <_end+12b5f90/274bbdc> Code; c005c5c0 <find_inode+30/7c> 00000000 <_PC>: Code; c005c5c0 <find_inode+30/7c> 0: 0a00000f beq 44 <_PC+0x44> c005c604 <find_inode+74/7c> Code; c005c5c4 <find_inode+34/7c> 4: e1a05004 mov r5, r4 Code; c005c5c8 <find_inode+38/7c> <===== 8: e5953020 ldr r3, [r5, #32] <===== Code; c005c5cc <find_inode+3c/7c> c: e1530007 cmp r3, r7 Code; c005c5d0 <find_inode+40/7c> 10: 1afffff7 bne fffffff4 <_PC+0xfffffff4> c005c5b4 <find_inode+24/7c> c148dd20: c005caf4 c005c5c8 90000013 ffffffff c148dd40: 000007ff c1ffe0e0 c1415400 000457b0 c292304c c148de60 c148dd9c c148dd94 c148dd60: c148dd6c c005caf4 c005c59c c148dd9c 00000000 c148ddf4 000457b0 00000000 c148dd80: c148ddf4 00000000 c148ddcc c148dd98 c2923250 c005caa8 c29054b0 c148de60 c148dda0: c148ddf4 c04560e0 c148ddf4 c1415400 c148de60 c148def0 00000001 00000000 c148ddc0: c148ddf0 c148ddd0 c29231d8 c29231f4 ffffffdc c04560e0 fffffff3 c148ddf4 c148dde0: c148de60 c148dec0 c148ddf4 c2928170 c2923184 c1480002 c00418a0 c003f1bc c148de00: c148de30 c148de10 c0041924 c0041888 00000001 000081a4 00000001 00000000 c148de20: 00000000 00000b53 00000000 00001000 00000008 ffffffff 00000302 00000000 c148de40: 000457b0 00000000 00000000 3ac23c87 00000000 3ac23c6f 00000000 3ac23c6f c148de60: 00000020 02000001 02000300 00039305 000457b0 00067a55 00044aa7 00000000 c148de80: 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 c148dea0: 00000000 fffffff4 c04560e0 c17a19e0 c17a1a3c c148dee8 c148dec4 c0050f48 c148dec0: c29280d0 c148def0 00000000 c17a19e0 c148df60 c0395011 c148c000 c148df24 c148dee0: c148deec c0051914 c0050ed0 00000000 c0395000 00000011 228e8f2a 00000000 c148df00: c0395000 c148df60 00000001 c00177c4 00000005 00000000 c148df5c c148df28 c148df20: c0052370 c0051238 00000004 00000000 c148c000 00000000 00000000 00000000 c148df40: c0395000 c00177c4 00000005 40104f28 c148df8c c148df60 c0044400 c00522fc c148df60: c190aba0 c10248a0 c003b9b4 020c4648 c0395000 00000001 00000001 0000000a c148df80: c148dfac c148df90 c004473c c00443d8 020c4648 00000008 60000010 00000001 c148dfa0: 00000000 c148dfb0 c0017640 c0044704 020c4648 c001dc98 020c4aa8 00000000 c148dfc0: 00000000 00000000 020c4648 00000008 020c4aa8 00000001 020c4aa8 02022464 c148dfe0: 40104f28 bfffda6c 401050ac bfffda60 400af810 400af7e4 60000010 020c4aa8 Backtrace: Function entered at [<c005c590>] from [<c005caf4>] Function entered at [<c005ca9c>] from [<c2923250>] Function entered at [<c29231e8>] from [<c29231d8>] Function entered at [<c2923178>] from [<c2928170>] r7 = C148DE60 r6 = C148DDF4 r5 = FFFFFFF3 r4 = C04560E0 Function entered at [<c29280c4>] from [<c0050f48>] r7 = C17A1A3C r6 = C17A19E0 r5 = C04560E0 r4 = FFFFFFF4 Function entered at [<c0050ec4>] from [<c0051914>] Function entered at [<c005122c>] from [<c0052370>] Function entered at [<c00522f0>] from [<c0044400>] Function entered at [<c00443cc>] from [<c004473c>] r4 = 0000000A Function entered at [<c00446f8>] from [<c0017640>] r7 = 00000001 r6 = 60000010 r5 = 00000008 r4 = 020C4648 Warning (Oops_read): Code line not seen, dumping what data is available Trace; c005c590 <find_inode+0/7c> Trace; c005caf4 <iget4+58/13c> Trace; c005ca9c <iget4+0/13c> Trace; c2923250 <[nfs]__nfs_fhget+68/d8> Trace; c29231e8 <[nfs]__nfs_fhget+0/d8> Trace; c29231d8 <[nfs]nfs_fhget+60/70> Trace; c2923178 <[nfs]nfs_fhget+0/70> Trace; c2928170 <[nfs]nfs_lookup+ac/f0> Trace; c29280c4 <[nfs]nfs_lookup+0/f0> Trace; c0050f48 <real_lookup+84/144> Trace; c0050ec4 <real_lookup+0/144> Trace; c0051914 <path_walk+6e8/9c8> Trace; c005122c <path_walk+0/9c8> Trace; c0052370 <open_namei+80/680> Trace; c00522f0 <open_namei+0/680> Trace; c0044400 <filp_open+34/50> Trace; c00443cc <filp_open+0/50> Trace; c004473c <sys_open+44/f0> Trace; c00446f8 <sys_open+0/f0> Trace; c0017640 <fast_syscall_return+0/4> 32 warnings and 2 errors issued. Results may not be reliable. From wrl-techops@pa.dec.com Thu Mar 29 00:18:43 2001 Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (root@mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id AAA16196 for <erikm@thorgal.et.tudelft.nl>; Thu, 29 Mar 2001 00:18:43 +0200 Received: from zcamail05.zca.compaq.com (zcamail05.zca.compaq.com [161.114.32.105]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id AAA25447 for <erikm@thorgal.et.tudelft.nl>; Thu, 29 Mar 2001 00:18:39 +0200 (METDST) Received: by zcamail05.zca.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id A238E295; Wed, 28 Mar 2001 14:19:18 -0800 (PST) Received: from mailrelay01.cac.cpqcorp.net (mailrelay01.cac.cpqcorp.net [16.47.132.152]) by zcamail05.zca.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 78BCC38F; Wed, 28 Mar 2001 14:19:18 -0800 (PST) Received: by mailrelay01.cac.cpqcorp.net (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 83A6118E; Wed, 28 Mar 2001 14:16:48 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mailrelay01.cac.cpqcorp.net (Postfix) with SMTP id 3E7E3177; Wed, 28 Mar 2001 14:16:48 -0800 (PST) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA26293; Wed, 28 Mar 2001 14:16:47 -0800 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id NAA28035; Wed, 28 Mar 2001 13:37:13 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id NAA10191; Wed, 28 Mar 2001 13:36:58 -0800 (PST) Received: from ztxmail01.nz-cce.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA09277; Wed, 28 Mar 2001 13:36:48 -0800 Received: by ztxmail01.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 81E892EF2; Wed, 28 Mar 2001 15:36:47 -0600 (CST) Received: from dredd.crimea.edu (unknown [213.128.193.148]) by ztxmail01.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 916552DD5 for <sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com>; Wed, 28 Mar 2001 15:36:45 -0600 (CST) Received: (from uucp@localhost) by dredd.crimea.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with UUCP id BAA03415; Thu, 29 Mar 2001 01:36:33 +0400 Received: (from green@localhost) by dredd.crimea.edu (8.10.1/8.10.1) id f2SLaWl05822; Thu, 29 Mar 2001 01:36:32 +0400 Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2001 01:36:32 +0400 From: Oleg Drokin <green@dredd.crimea.edu> To: nico@CAM.ORG, sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Subject: usb-eth change Message-Id: <20010329013632.A5807@dredd.crimea.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0.1i Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk Hello! With this past usb-eth support is resistant to errors (yes, I get ocasional errors when SA11x0 is loaded with other stuff while working with usb). With this one I was almost able to compile glibc 2.1.3 (see my previous message with oops for cause of almost :) ) here is statistic after compilation: usbf Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 9E:FE:46:FF:DB:F4 inet addr:1.1.1.1 Mask:255.255.255.0 UP RUNNING MTU:1500 Metric:1 RX packets:2765922 errors:62 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:50 TX packets:2902741 errors:1 dropped:2 overruns:0 carrier:0 collisions:0 txqueuelen:100 notice 'error' fields. Also here is some stats from actual compilation. (at this point libc and libm was actually made already) real 181m53.267s user 63m29.660s sys 22m26.000s And here is the patch. As an added bonus, cpu usage of usb-eth receive part was little lowered . 2 Nico: it leaves some cruft commented, but I just post it to share my success ;) I still work on it and I may need it. --- usb-eth.c.orig Wed Mar 28 20:45:49 2001 +++ usb-eth.c Wed Mar 28 21:29:10 2001 @@ -103,19 +103,12 @@ } memcpy(skb->tail,dmabuf,size); skb_put(skb, size); - if ( skb->len >= sizeof(struct ethhdr)) { - if (memcmp(skb->data,usb_eth_device.dev_addr,ETH_ALEN) && memcmp(skb->data,bcast_hwaddr,ETH_ALEN) ) { - usbe_info.stats.rx_frame_errors++; - sa1100_usb_recv_stall(); - goto error; - } - } } else { if (flag == -EIO) { usbe_info.stats.rx_errors++; - sa1100_usb_recv_stall(); + // sa1100_usb_recv_stall(); } - goto error; + //goto error; } /* validate packet length */ @@ -149,6 +142,14 @@ skb_trim(skb, 0); next_rx_skb = skb; return; + } + if ( skb->len >= sizeof(struct ethhdr)) { + if (memcmp(skb->data,usb_eth_device.dev_addr,ETH_ALEN) && memcmp(skb->data,bcast_hwaddr,ETH_ALEN) ) { + // This frame is not for us. nor it is broadcast + usbe_info.stats.rx_frame_errors++; + kfree_skb(skb); + goto error; + } } if (skb->len) { Bye, Oleg From wrl-techops@pa.dec.com Thu Mar 29 00:25:58 2001 Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (root@mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id AAA16210 for <erikm@thorgal.et.tudelft.nl>; Thu, 29 Mar 2001 00:25:58 +0200 Received: from zcamail05.zca.compaq.com (zcamail05.zca.compaq.com [161.114.32.105]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id AAA25738 for <erikm@thorgal.et.tudelft.nl>; Thu, 29 Mar 2001 00:25:56 +0200 (METDST) Received: by zcamail05.zca.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 8A9E6A17; Wed, 28 Mar 2001 14:26:34 -0800 (PST) Received: from mailrelay01.cce.cpqcorp.net (mailrelay01.cce.cpqcorp.net [16.47.68.171]) by zcamail05.zca.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 21B6FBDE; Wed, 28 Mar 2001 14:26:34 -0800 (PST) Received: by mailrelay01.cce.cpqcorp.net (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 02DDD308; Wed, 28 Mar 2001 16:24:06 -0600 (CST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mailrelay01.cce.cpqcorp.net (Postfix) with SMTP id 315172F9; Wed, 28 Mar 2001 16:24:05 -0600 (CST) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA01021; Wed, 28 Mar 2001 14:24:03 -0800 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id NAA15595; Wed, 28 Mar 2001 13:56:10 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id NAA07889; Wed, 28 Mar 2001 13:55:54 -0800 (PST) Received: from ztxmail01.nz-cce.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA12992; Wed, 28 Mar 2001 13:55:44 -0800 Received: by ztxmail01.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 6D4E62FA5; Wed, 28 Mar 2001 15:55:41 -0600 (CST) Received: from pigeon.maya.com (po.maya.com [192.70.254.2]) by ztxmail01.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 298C12E97 for <sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com>; Wed, 28 Mar 2001 15:55:41 -0600 (CST) Received: from maya.com (cook-pc.maya.com [192.70.254.33]) by pigeon.maya.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 03AF230807 for <sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com>; Wed, 28 Mar 2001 16:21:05 -0500 (EST) Message-Id: <3AC25E2D.2ACB8AB2@maya.com> Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2001 16:57:01 -0500 From: Nicole Cook <cook@maya.com> X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.72 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.2.14-5.0 i686) X-Accept-Language: en Mime-Version: 1.0 To: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Subject: Re: irq_desc[irq].action = 0 References: <3AC1023C.D5911AD3@maya.com> <3AC10DF6.A973BD08@mvista.com> <3AC11C13.BD1C0054@mvista.com> <3AC1278B.A9551804@maya.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk Nicole Cook wrote: > > "George G. Davis" wrote: > > > > > Off hand, my guess is that you have a problem with your ramdisk (I'm > > assuming, of course that you are in fact using a ramdisk). All of the > > "disabled irq 17" messages are from open/close sequences for /dev/ttyS0, > > SA-1100 UART 3 in this case. I'm not savvy enough to determine what > > problem you may have in this case. But, have you used this ramdisk > > before? It looks like you may be missing entries in /etc/inittab to > > start a getty (or shell) on the console and/or other ttys. It looks > > like whatever you had setup to run via /etc/inittab (if anything), > > ran to completion and there's nothing left to do. > > > > Of course, that "undefined instruction" message is rather ominous! > > Again, that could be due to a bad ramdisk. Although I seem to recall > > seeing this problem mentioned before. Have you checked the archives > > of the mailing list? > > > Regards, > > George I've tried to find a ramdisk that will work with 2.4.2 - but I don't seem to have one. Is there a place to download a working ramdisk, or build instructions more detailed than ramdisk.txt? Nicole From wrl-techops@pa.dec.com Thu Mar 29 01:16:04 2001 Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (root@mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id BAA16470 for <erikm@thorgal.et.tudelft.nl>; Thu, 29 Mar 2001 01:16:03 +0200 Received: from ztxmail03.ztx.compaq.com (ztxmail03.ztx.compaq.com [161.114.1.207]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id BAA27596 for <erikm@thorgal.et.tudelft.nl>; Thu, 29 Mar 2001 01:16:00 +0200 (METDST) Received: by ztxmail03.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id C9876885; Wed, 28 Mar 2001 17:14:12 -0600 (CST) Received: from mailrelay01.cac.cpqcorp.net (mailrelay01.cac.cpqcorp.net [16.47.132.152]) by ztxmail03.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF1551B2A; Wed, 28 Mar 2001 17:14:11 -0600 (CST) Received: by mailrelay01.cac.cpqcorp.net (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 464A013A; Wed, 28 Mar 2001 15:14:11 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mailrelay01.cac.cpqcorp.net (Postfix) with SMTP id E6E5E164; Wed, 28 Mar 2001 15:14:10 -0800 (PST) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA20010; Wed, 28 Mar 2001 15:14:10 -0800 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id PAA05245; Wed, 28 Mar 2001 15:10:13 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id PAA29519; Wed, 28 Mar 2001 15:10:12 -0800 (PST) Received: from ztxmail02.nz-cce.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA16069; Wed, 28 Mar 2001 15:10:11 -0800 Received: by ztxmail02.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 6FC661CA8; Wed, 28 Mar 2001 17:10:11 -0600 (CST) Received: from mail-green.research.att.com (H-135-207-30-103.research.att.com [135.207.30.103]) by ztxmail02.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 053361F89 for <sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com>; Wed, 28 Mar 2001 17:10:10 -0600 (CST) Received: from hermes.research.att.com (hermes.research.att.com [135.207.16.38]) by mail-green.research.att.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C4E41E00D for <sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com>; Wed, 28 Mar 2001 18:10:10 -0500 (EST) Received: from research.att.com (wave-136.research.att.com [135.207.10.136]) by hermes.research.att.com (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id SAA16646 for <sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com>; Wed, 28 Mar 2001 18:02:52 -0500 (EST) Message-Id: <3AC26F1B.A9DCA1AD@research.att.com> Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2001 18:09:15 -0500 From: Jack Chang <tcc@research.att.com> Organization: AT&T Labs-Research X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.76 [en] (Win98; U) X-Accept-Language: en,zh-TW Mime-Version: 1.0 To: SA-1100/Linux <sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com> Subject: Unable to handle kernel paging request ? Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk Please see attatched below. What does it mean? Thanks for the help Jack T. Chang ---------------------------8< ---------------------------------------8<---------- Starting kernel ... Uncompressing Linux................................. done, booting the kernel._ Linux version 2.4.0-rmk2-np2 (root@localhost) (gcc version 2.95.2 19991 Processor: Intel StrongARM-1110 revision 6 Architecture: Intel-Assabet On node 0 totalpages: 8192 zone(0): 8192 pages. zone(1): 0 pages. zone(2): 0 pages. Kernel command line: keepinitrd Console: colour dummy device 80x30 Calibrating delay loop... 194.15 BogoMIPS Memory: 32MB = 32MB total Memory: 28016KB available (797K code, 231K data, 60K init) Dentry-cache hash table entries: 4096 (order: 3, 32768 bytes) Buffer-cache hash table entries: 1024 (order: 0, 4096 bytes) Page-cache hash table entries: 8192 (order: 3, 32768 bytes) Inode-cache hash table entries: 2048 (order: 2, 16384 bytes) POSIX conformance testing by UNIFIX Linux NET4.0 for Linux 2.4 Based upon Swansea University Computer Society NET3.039 scale: SA-1110 clock scaling initialized, clock speed is 206 MHz Starting kswapd v1.8 Console: switching to colour frame buffer device 80x60 pty: 256 Unix98 ptys configured RAMDISK driver initialized: 16 RAM disks of 8192K size 1024 blocksize loop: loaded (max 8 devices) Uniform Multi-Platform E-IDE driver Revision: 6.31 ide: Assuming 50MHz system bus speed for PIO modes; override with idebus=xx RAMDISK: Compressed image found at block 0 Unable to handle kernel paging request at virtual address ceb26593 <----------- pgd = c0004000 *pgd = 00000000, *pmd = 00000000 Internal error: Oops: 0 CPU: 0 pc : [<c001e054>] lr : [<c001e398>] sp : c01ff408 ip : a0000013 fp : c01ff440 r10: 01000000 r9 : 00000004 r8 : c01ff468 r7 : 00000003 r6 : 00000004 r5 : e5943004 r4 : ceb26593 r3 : 00000001 r2 : 01000000 r1 : c00f2894 r0 : ceb26593 Flags: nzcv IRQs on FIQs on Mode SVC_32 Segment kernel Control: C000517F Table: C000517F DAC: 0000001D Process swapper (pid: 1, stackpage=c01ff000) Code: e3150601 0a00000c (e5d43000) e357000f e5d41001 Stack: c01ff3e0: c001e398 c001e054 ......... ......... -- ---------------------------8< ---------------------------------------8<---------- From wrl-techops@pa.dec.com Thu Mar 29 03:13:00 2001 Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (root@mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id DAA16682 for <erikm@thorgal.et.tudelft.nl>; Thu, 29 Mar 2001 03:12:56 +0200 Received: from ztxmail04.ztx.compaq.com (ztxmail04.ztx.compaq.com [161.114.1.208]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id DAA02139 for <erikm@thorgal.et.tudelft.nl>; Thu, 29 Mar 2001 03:12:54 +0200 (METDST) Received: by ztxmail04.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 672B5B64; Wed, 28 Mar 2001 19:11:07 -0600 (CST) Received: from taynzmail03.nz-tay.cpqcorp.net (taynzmail03.nz-tay.cpqcorp.net [16.47.4.103]) by ztxmail04.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB059B68; Wed, 28 Mar 2001 19:11:06 -0600 (CST) Received: by taynzmail03.nz-tay.cpqcorp.net (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 10E5D336; Wed, 28 Mar 2001 20:08:26 -0500 (EST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by taynzmail03.nz-tay.cpqcorp.net (Postfix) with SMTP id D7F0514D; Wed, 28 Mar 2001 20:08:23 -0500 (EST) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA00892; Wed, 28 Mar 2001 17:08:22 -0800 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id RAA24411; Wed, 28 Mar 2001 17:07:01 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id RAA08179; Wed, 28 Mar 2001 17:07:00 -0800 (PST) Received: from zmamail02.nz-tay.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA08541; Wed, 28 Mar 2001 17:07:00 -0800 Received: by zmamail02.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id CC41F65EF; Wed, 28 Mar 2001 20:06:59 -0500 (EST) Received: from xanadu.home (modemcable084.137-200-24.mtl.mc.videotron.ca [24.200.137.84]) by zmamail02.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 53BBA459D for <sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com>; Wed, 28 Mar 2001 20:06:59 -0500 (EST) Received: from localhost (nico@localhost) by xanadu.home (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id UAA08247; Wed, 28 Mar 2001 20:06:47 -0500 X-Authentication-Warning: xanadu.home: nico owned process doing -bs Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2001 20:06:47 -0500 (EST) From: Nicolas Pitre <nico@CAM.ORG> X-X-Sender: <nico@xanadu.home> To: Oleg Drokin <green@dredd.crimea.edu> Cc: SA-1100/Linux <sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com> Subject: Re: alignment exception In-Reply-To: <20010329012056.A5756@dredd.crimea.edu> Message-Id: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0103282004450.2169-100000@xanadu.home> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk On Thu, 29 Mar 2001, Oleg Drokin wrote: > Hello! > > You seemed to be interested in alignment exceptions, so here is one for you. > It have occured while I stress-tested usb netlink (by compiling glibc > over nfs) Hmmm... Suggestion: Always configure CONFIG_ALIGNMENT_TRAP=y. Nicolas From wrl-techops@pa.dec.com Thu Mar 29 03:42:56 2001 Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (root@mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id DAA16732 for <erikm@thorgal.et.tudelft.nl>; Thu, 29 Mar 2001 03:42:56 +0200 Received: from zmamail04.zma.compaq.com (zmamail04.zma.compaq.com [161.114.64.104]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id DAA03133 for <erikm@thorgal.et.tudelft.nl>; Thu, 29 Mar 2001 03:42:55 +0200 (METDST) Received: by zmamail04.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id AB4506395; Wed, 28 Mar 2001 20:41:07 -0500 (EST) Received: from mailrelay01.cce.cpqcorp.net (mailrelay01.cce.cpqcorp.net [16.47.68.171]) by zmamail04.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 427F26280; Wed, 28 Mar 2001 20:41:07 -0500 (EST) Received: by mailrelay01.cce.cpqcorp.net (Postfix, from userid 12345) id F4041368; Wed, 28 Mar 2001 19:38:32 -0600 (CST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mailrelay01.cce.cpqcorp.net (Postfix) with SMTP id 4D6CE361; Wed, 28 Mar 2001 19:38:31 -0600 (CST) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA18407; Wed, 28 Mar 2001 17:38:30 -0800 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id RAA16959; Wed, 28 Mar 2001 17:37:43 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id RAA01103; Wed, 28 Mar 2001 17:37:42 -0800 (PST) Received: from zmamail02.nz-tay.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA05446; Wed, 28 Mar 2001 17:37:42 -0800 Received: by zmamail02.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id BD56B6059; Wed, 28 Mar 2001 20:37:41 -0500 (EST) Received: from xanadu.home (modemcable084.137-200-24.mtl.mc.videotron.ca [24.200.137.84]) by zmamail02.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 38A46618D for <sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com>; Wed, 28 Mar 2001 20:37:41 -0500 (EST) Received: from localhost (nico@localhost) by xanadu.home (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id UAA08262; Wed, 28 Mar 2001 20:37:40 -0500 X-Authentication-Warning: xanadu.home: nico owned process doing -bs Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2001 20:37:40 -0500 (EST) From: Nicolas Pitre <nico@CAM.ORG> X-X-Sender: <nico@xanadu.home> To: Jack Chang <tcc@research.att.com> Cc: SA-1100/Linux <sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com> Subject: Re: Unable to handle kernel paging request ? In-Reply-To: <3AC26F1B.A9DCA1AD@research.att.com> Message-Id: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0103282030370.2169-100000@xanadu.home> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk On Wed, 28 Mar 2001, Jack Chang wrote: > Please see attatched below. What does it mean? Thanks for the help [...] > RAMDISK: Compressed image found at block 0 > Unable to handle kernel paging request at virtual address ceb26593 What is the size of your ramdisk (compressed vs uncompressed) ? > <----------- > pgd = c0004000 > *pgd = 00000000, *pmd = 00000000 > Internal error: Oops: 0 > CPU: 0 > pc : [<c001e054>] lr : [<c001e398>] > sp : c01ff408 ip : a0000013 fp : c01ff440 > r10: 01000000 r9 : 00000004 r8 : c01ff468 > r7 : 00000003 r6 : 00000004 r5 : e5943004 r4 : ceb26593 > r3 : 00000001 r2 : 01000000 r1 : c00f2894 r0 : ceb26593 > Flags: nzcv IRQs on FIQs on Mode SVC_32 Segment kernel > Control: C000517F Table: C000517F DAC: 0000001D > Process swapper (pid: 1, stackpage=c01ff000) > Code: e3150601 0a00000c (e5d43000) e357000f e5d41001 > Stack: > c01ff3e0: > c001e398 c001e054 > ......... > ......... Unfortunately, you cut the most important part i.e. the backtrace. Also you should consider looking up the addresses enclosed between [<>] into your System.map file and give that result as well, otherwise nobody will have a clue on where the crash occurred. Nicolas From wrl-techops@pa.dec.com Thu Mar 29 08:32:58 2001 Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (root@mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id IAA17384 for <erikm@thorgal.et.tudelft.nl>; Thu, 29 Mar 2001 08:32:58 +0200 Received: from zmamail03.zma.compaq.com (zmamail03.zma.compaq.com [161.114.64.103]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id IAA12273 for <erikm@thorgal.et.tudelft.nl>; Thu, 29 Mar 2001 08:32:56 +0200 (METDST) Received: by zmamail03.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 1CA33A3EA; Thu, 29 Mar 2001 01:31:10 -0500 (EST) Received: from mailrelay01.cac.cpqcorp.net (mailrelay01.cac.cpqcorp.net [16.47.132.152]) by zmamail03.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B8E45A715; Thu, 29 Mar 2001 01:31:09 -0500 (EST) Received: by mailrelay01.cac.cpqcorp.net (Postfix, from userid 12345) id A29B817B; Wed, 28 Mar 2001 22:31:08 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mailrelay01.cac.cpqcorp.net (Postfix) with SMTP id 6F66617F; Wed, 28 Mar 2001 22:31:08 -0800 (PST) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA16925; Wed, 28 Mar 2001 22:31:06 -0800 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id WAA14549; Wed, 28 Mar 2001 22:28:22 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id WAA20220; Wed, 28 Mar 2001 22:28:18 -0800 (PST) Received: from ztxmail02.nz-cce.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA14611; Wed, 28 Mar 2001 22:28:17 -0800 Received: by ztxmail02.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id EB9981C8E; Thu, 29 Mar 2001 00:28:16 -0600 (CST) Received: from mail.ixcelerator.com (unknown [62.231.2.151]) by ztxmail02.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B762A1DA8 for <sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com>; Thu, 29 Mar 2001 00:28:15 -0600 (CST) Received: from morgoth.ixcelerator.com (IDENT:root@morgoth.ixcel.ru [172.17.10.70]) by mail.ixcelerator.com (8.11.3/8.11.3/IXCELERATOR) with ESMTP id f2T6SDu27238; Thu, 29 Mar 2001 10:28:13 +0400 Received: (from green@localhost) by morgoth.ixcelerator.com (8.10.1/8.10.1) id f2T6TUd00400; Thu, 29 Mar 2001 10:29:30 +0400 Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2001 10:29:30 +0400 From: Oleg Drokin <green@ixcelerator.com> To: Nicolas Pitre <nico@CAM.ORG> Cc: Oleg Drokin <green@dredd.crimea.edu>, SA-1100/Linux <sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com> Subject: Re: alignment exception Message-Id: <20010329102930.A392@iXcelerator.com> References: <20010329012056.A5756@dredd.crimea.edu> <Pine.LNX.4.33.0103282004450.2169-100000@xanadu.home> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2i In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0103282004450.2169-100000@xanadu.home>; from nico@cam.org on Wed, Mar 28, 2001 at 08:06:47PM -0500 Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk Hello! On Wed, Mar 28, 2001 at 08:06:47PM -0500, Nicolas Pitre wrote: > > You seemed to be interested in alignment exceptions, so here is one for you. > > It have occured while I stress-tested usb netlink (by compiling glibc > > over nfs) > Hmmm... > Suggestion: Always configure CONFIG_ALIGNMENT_TRAP=y. I thought I did. Cannot verify rigth now. But if it is not enabled, I will try to enable and reproduce. Bye, Oleg From wrl-techops@pa.dec.com Thu Mar 29 11:22:37 2001 Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (root@mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id LAA17720 for <erikm@thorgal.et.tudelft.nl>; Thu, 29 Mar 2001 11:22:37 +0200 Received: from ztxmail05.ztx.compaq.com (ztxmail05.ztx.compaq.com [161.114.1.209]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id LAA23082 for <erikm@thorgal.et.tudelft.nl>; Thu, 29 Mar 2001 11:22:35 +0200 (METDST) Received: by ztxmail05.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id CBD77982; Thu, 29 Mar 2001 03:20:47 -0600 (CST) Received: from taynzmail03.nz-tay.cpqcorp.net (taynzmail03.nz-tay.cpqcorp.net [16.47.4.103]) by ztxmail05.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 85D17957; Thu, 29 Mar 2001 03:20:47 -0600 (CST) Received: by taynzmail03.nz-tay.cpqcorp.net (Postfix, from userid 12345) id BFD771BD; Thu, 29 Mar 2001 04:20:46 -0500 (EST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by taynzmail03.nz-tay.cpqcorp.net (Postfix) with SMTP id 9A9D124E; Thu, 29 Mar 2001 04:20:44 -0500 (EST) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA15269; Thu, 29 Mar 2001 01:20:43 -0800 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id BAA23299; Thu, 29 Mar 2001 01:16:48 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id BAA21156; Thu, 29 Mar 2001 01:16:47 -0800 (PST) Received: from ztxmail02.nz-cce.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA29062; Thu, 29 Mar 2001 01:16:43 -0800 Received: by ztxmail02.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 1C1681CF6; Thu, 29 Mar 2001 03:16:43 -0600 (CST) Received: from gda-server (unknown [202.88.153.15]) by ztxmail02.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 36C9E1DE6 for <sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com>; Thu, 29 Mar 2001 03:16:33 -0600 (CST) Received: from [192.168.0.66] by gda-server (ArGoSoft Mail Server, Version 1.5 (1.5.0.8)); Thu, 29 Mar 2001 14:20:10 Message-Id: <003001c0b82e$c127eec0$4200a8c0@gdatr4> From: "Harishankkar" <S.harishankkar@gdatech.co.in> To: <Sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com> Subject: Re: blob boot loader Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2001 14:30:50 +0530 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-Msmail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2615.200 X-Mimeole: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2615.200 Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk Hi , I have disabled use Angel as a boot loader in the kernel Configuration. I am using BLOB.But I am getting this problem. Starting kernel........ Uncompressing Linux...........................done.Booting the kernel. Here it hangs. What could be the problem? Does this means that I got Uncompressing the kernel message means that I have Angel disabled in the kernel know,bcos the control has passed to the kernel. But it hangs there. Please help Thanx in advance, hari From wrl-techops@pa.dec.com Thu Mar 29 13:42:31 2001 Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (root@mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id NAA18230 for <erikm@thorgal.et.tudelft.nl>; Thu, 29 Mar 2001 13:42:31 +0200 Received: from zcamail03.zca.compaq.com (zcamail03.zca.compaq.com [161.114.32.103]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id NAA03115 for <erikm@thorgal.et.tudelft.nl>; Thu, 29 Mar 2001 13:42:28 +0200 (METDST) Received: by zcamail03.zca.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id A1FBDCBB; Thu, 29 Mar 2001 03:40:38 -0800 (PST) Received: from taynzmail03.nz-tay.cpqcorp.net (taynzmail03.nz-tay.cpqcorp.net [16.47.4.103]) by zcamail03.zca.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 064BED25; Thu, 29 Mar 2001 03:40:38 -0800 (PST) Received: by taynzmail03.nz-tay.cpqcorp.net (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 0900714D; Thu, 29 Mar 2001 06:40:39 -0500 (EST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by taynzmail03.nz-tay.cpqcorp.net (Postfix) with SMTP id D782E2FB; Thu, 29 Mar 2001 06:40:36 -0500 (EST) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA22336; Thu, 29 Mar 2001 03:40:34 -0800 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id DAA27764; Thu, 29 Mar 2001 03:38:40 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id DAA04475; Thu, 29 Mar 2001 03:38:39 -0800 (PST) From: <euro9@dubaimail.com> Received: from ztxmail02.nz-cce.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA22247; Thu, 29 Mar 2001 03:38:39 -0800 Received: by ztxmail02.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id C3A411CC9; Thu, 29 Mar 2001 05:38:38 -0600 (CST) Received: from svrluhr.luhrfilter.com.au (luhrfi.lnk.telstra.net [139.130.213.152]) by ztxmail02.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 5B39D1FCC for <sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com>; Thu, 29 Mar 2001 05:38:17 -0600 (CST) Received: (qmail 20578 invoked from network); 29 Mar 2001 17:02:20 -0000 Received: from ip116.chicago37.il.pub-ip.psi.net (HELO iufmmaster.corse.iufm.fr) (38.33.45.116) by 203.43.209.193 with SMTP; 29 Mar 2001 17:02:20 -0000 Message-Id: <000047c16009$0000425c$000057a6@ivinhema.com.br> To: <Entrepreneurs@pa.dec.com> Subject: Rates DROPPED! Low Interest Loans From Flexible Funding Institutions! Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2001 05:32:49 -0800 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Priority: 3 X-Msmail-Priority: Normal Reply-To: euro9@dubaimail.com Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk <HTML> <BODY> <!doctype html public "-//w3c//dtd html 4.0 transitional//en"> <html> <head> <meta http-equiv=3D"Content-Type" content=3D"text/html; charset=3Diso-8= 859-1"> <meta name=3D"GENERATOR" content=3D"Microsoft FrontPage 4.0"> <title>Loan Specialists

 We are Loan Specialists.....Ta= p into our huge network of Lenders!

For U.S.A. Homeowners Only
Interest Rates have Dropped....Start Saving Now!

We = Will Shop The Best Loan For You!

We provide a 100% free = service which lets you shop for a loan conveniently and securely from the comfort of your home. Tap into our huge network of lenders across the U.S. with different appetites for different types of credit/equity profiles.  Even if you're currently working with another lender or have been turned down before, we can still help and structure a program that may just make = some sense to you. 

Our loan programs can get you the cash you need for:

  • Debt Consolidation
  • 2nd Mortgage
  • Refinance
  • Credit Repair
  • Home Improvement
  • New Car
  • Dream Vacation
  • College Tuition
  • To start a new business ..and much, much more!

Funding borr= owers with less than perfect credit is our specialty!

W= e can get you the loan you need. 
Regardless of whether you have good or bad credit, we can help you.

Ready to get started? 
Simply fill out the our 60 second form, and we= 'll begin shopping for your loan.
  
It's that easy!  We Make the Lenders Compete for Y= OUR Business!

Please complete this form.
Our loan specialist will be contacting you at your convenience.
Thank You.

 
Contact Information: * Required Info
Name: *
Address: *
City: *
State (USA Only): *
Zip/Postal Code: *<= /td>
Home Phone:  *
Work Phone: *
Email Address: *
Best Time to Call:
Do You Own Your Home?: Mobile Homes DO NOT Qualify
Property Value: *
Property Type:
Purchase Price: *
Year Acquired: *
1st Mortgage Balance Owed: *
1st Mortgage Interest Rate: *
Is 1st Adjustable or Fixed?: *
2nd Mortgage Balance Owed:
Amount You Wish To Borrow: *
Employer:
Monthly Gross Household Income: *
Mon= thly Debt:: 
Credit Rating: *
Loan Interested In: *

 

Removeyou.c= om Inc.
If you would like to be removed from this mailing list and = the databases of thousands of other bulk email providers

CLICK
HERE
From wrl-techops@pa.dec.com Thu Mar 29 19:55:11 2001 Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (root@mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id TAA19394 for ; Thu, 29 Mar 2001 19:55:11 +0200 Received: from zcamail04.zca.compaq.com (zcamail04.zca.compaq.com [161.114.32.104]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id TAA28267 for ; Thu, 29 Mar 2001 19:55:06 +0200 (METDST) Received: by zcamail04.zca.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 8B929392; Thu, 29 Mar 2001 09:54:45 -0800 (PST) Received: from taynzmail03.nz-tay.cpqcorp.net (taynzmail03.nz-tay.cpqcorp.net [16.47.4.103]) by zcamail04.zca.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1368D2B9; Thu, 29 Mar 2001 09:54:45 -0800 (PST) Received: by taynzmail03.nz-tay.cpqcorp.net (Postfix, from userid 12345) id C5C3B179; Thu, 29 Mar 2001 12:53:17 -0500 (EST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by taynzmail03.nz-tay.cpqcorp.net (Postfix) with SMTP id 81BF213A; Thu, 29 Mar 2001 12:53:15 -0500 (EST) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA05268; Thu, 29 Mar 2001 09:53:13 -0800 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id JAA08610; Thu, 29 Mar 2001 09:48:10 -0800 (PST) Received: from zmamail01.zma.compaq.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id JAA08606; Thu, 29 Mar 2001 09:48:09 -0800 (PST) Received: by zmamail01.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 5C48A120AE; Thu, 29 Mar 2001 12:48:09 -0500 (EST) Received: from mail.tiscalinet.it (mail-7.tiscalinet.it [195.130.225.153]) by zmamail01.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D8DC612011 for ; Thu, 29 Mar 2001 12:48:08 -0500 (EST) Received: from ottavio (62.10.158.112) by mail.tiscalinet.it (5.5.025) id 3AB893E5001DDE9A for sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com; Thu, 29 Mar 2001 19:48:07 +0200 Message-Id: <00bd01c0b878$49263180$709e0a3e@ottavio> From: "Giuseppe Ottaviano" To: Subject: SA1110 and 1111, CF and IDE Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2001 19:47:03 +0200 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-Msmail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 X-Mimeole: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400 Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk Hello everyone, I'm designing (ehm, trying to design...) a SA-1110-1111 board. It should be small, cheap and low-power. I have to add an IDE port. I used the 1111 because AFAIK is the cheapest and simplest and smallest way to add two PCMCIA ports to the 1110, and because I hate CPLDs (BTW, using a CPLD+three or four transceivers to buffer the addresses and the data would have been more expensive and more space consuming). What I want to do is leaving the PCMCIA port 0, and use the port 1, the CF port, to connect an HD. I'm looking for the simplest way (less glue-logic possible) to do it. I've thought to hard-connect the d0-15 pins directly to the IDE port, and connect some of the address pins to DA0-2 and the other pins of the IDE, and then control the port via software (I'm using the linux kernel + RMK and NP patches). Should it work? Do you know better solutions? Thanks in advance (and excuse me for my english :-))) Giuseppe "Ottavio84" Ottaviano, giuott@tin.it From wrl-techops@pa.dec.com Thu Mar 29 20:07:56 2001 Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (root@mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id UAA19447 for ; Thu, 29 Mar 2001 20:07:56 +0200 Received: from zmamail04.zma.compaq.com (zmamail04.zma.compaq.com [161.114.64.104]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id UAA28942 for ; Thu, 29 Mar 2001 20:07:53 +0200 (METDST) Received: by zmamail04.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id EE83C6283; Thu, 29 Mar 2001 13:06:01 -0500 (EST) Received: from mailrelay01.cac.cpqcorp.net (mailrelay01.cac.cpqcorp.net [16.47.132.152]) by zmamail04.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 67E8B6259; Thu, 29 Mar 2001 13:06:01 -0500 (EST) Received: by mailrelay01.cac.cpqcorp.net (Postfix, from userid 12345) id B462812E; Thu, 29 Mar 2001 10:06:00 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mailrelay01.cac.cpqcorp.net (Postfix) with SMTP id 818CB186; Thu, 29 Mar 2001 10:06:00 -0800 (PST) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA25792; Thu, 29 Mar 2001 10:06:00 -0800 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id KAA10533; Thu, 29 Mar 2001 10:05:27 -0800 (PST) Received: from zmamail01.zma.compaq.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id KAA10517; Thu, 29 Mar 2001 10:05:26 -0800 (PST) Received: by zmamail01.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 2901A122D5; Thu, 29 Mar 2001 13:05:26 -0500 (EST) Received: from ispname.net (qmail1.ispname.net [64.19.9.36]) by zmamail01.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id CD31F12161 for ; Thu, 29 Mar 2001 13:05:25 -0500 (EST) Received: (qmail 8655 invoked from network); 29 Mar 2001 18:06:03 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO server01.asi) (64.19.30.252) by qmail.ispname.net with SMTP; 29 Mar 2001 18:06:03 -0000 Received: by SERVER01 with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) id ; Thu, 29 Mar 2001 13:10:53 -0500 Message-Id: From: Cliff Brake To: Giuseppe Ottaviano , sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Cc: David Plentovich Subject: RE: SA1110 and 1111, CF and IDE Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2001 13:10:47 -0500 Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk We did exactly that on our SA1110 IDP (www.accelent.com). I have a few suggestions: * somehow connect IORDY to the SA1110 PCMCIA wait signal * connect the IDE IRQ directly to a SA1110 GPIO 0-10 (with 5V-3V buffering). Getting an IDE interrupt to work properly through the SA1111 is possible, but no fun. Cliff >-----Original Message----- >From: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com >[mailto:owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com]On Behalf Of Giuseppe >Ottaviano >Sent: Thursday, March 29, 2001 12:47 PM >To: sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com >Subject: SA1110 and 1111, CF and IDE > > >Hello everyone, >I'm designing (ehm, trying to design...) a SA-1110-1111 board. >It should be >small, cheap and low-power. I have to add an IDE port. I used the 1111 >because AFAIK is the cheapest and simplest and smallest way to add two >PCMCIA ports to the 1110, and because I hate CPLDs (BTW, using >a CPLD+three >or four transceivers to buffer the addresses and the data >would have been >more expensive and more space consuming). What I want to do is >leaving the >PCMCIA port 0, and use the port 1, the CF port, to connect an HD. I'm >looking for the simplest way (less glue-logic possible) to do it. I've >thought to hard-connect the d0-15 pins directly to the IDE >port, and connect >some of the address pins to DA0-2 and the other pins of the >IDE, and then >control the port via software (I'm using the linux kernel + RMK and NP >patches). Should it work? Do you know better solutions? > >Thanks in advance (and excuse me for my english :-))) >Giuseppe "Ottavio84" Ottaviano, >giuott@tin.it > > > From wrl-techops@pa.dec.com Thu Mar 29 21:00:43 2001 Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (root@mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id VAA19559 for ; Thu, 29 Mar 2001 21:00:43 +0200 Received: from zcamail05.zca.compaq.com (zcamail05.zca.compaq.com [161.114.32.105]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id VAA01533 for ; Thu, 29 Mar 2001 21:00:41 +0200 (METDST) Received: by zcamail05.zca.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 525A2B1D; Thu, 29 Mar 2001 11:01:20 -0800 (PST) Received: from taynzmail03.nz-tay.cpqcorp.net (taynzmail03.nz-tay.cpqcorp.net [16.47.4.103]) by zcamail05.zca.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DEC7DBC4; Thu, 29 Mar 2001 11:01:19 -0800 (PST) Received: by taynzmail03.nz-tay.cpqcorp.net (Postfix, from userid 12345) id DD00713A; Thu, 29 Mar 2001 13:58:14 -0500 (EST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by taynzmail03.nz-tay.cpqcorp.net (Postfix) with SMTP id 9A5052B7; Thu, 29 Mar 2001 13:58:12 -0500 (EST) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA29690; Thu, 29 Mar 2001 10:58:11 -0800 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id KAA13519; Thu, 29 Mar 2001 10:57:33 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id KAA13514; Thu, 29 Mar 2001 10:57:33 -0800 (PST) Received: from ztxmail01.nz-cce.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA30228; Thu, 29 Mar 2001 10:57:32 -0800 Received: by ztxmail01.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 7635124CF; Thu, 29 Mar 2001 12:57:32 -0600 (CST) Received: from pigeon.maya.com (po.maya.com [192.70.254.2]) by ztxmail01.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 78E3B2DF1 for ; Thu, 29 Mar 2001 12:57:31 -0600 (CST) Received: from maya.com (cook-pc.maya.com [192.70.254.33]) by pigeon.maya.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 55EA330813 for ; Thu, 29 Mar 2001 13:23:00 -0500 (EST) Message-Id: <3AC385EA.B15D1C2D@maya.com> Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2001 13:58:50 -0500 From: Nicole Cook X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.72 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.2.14-5.0 i686) X-Accept-Language: en Mime-Version: 1.0 To: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Subject: undefined instructions Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk I'm still having problems with undefined instructions when my kernel boots: INIT: version 2.74 booting rc.sysinit (8): undefined instruction: pc=4004be04 Code: 00000000 eca0420c (e8806ff0) e2400030 eaffffff INIT: Entering runlevel: 3 rc (10): undefined instruction: pc=4004be04 Code: 00000000 eca0420c (e8806ff0) e2400030 eaffffff x..x.x.x`.....x`XX...x`...x..X..x`...X..x...Xx.Xx..x.x.x`Xx`X.. 192.70.254.235 login: 192.70.254.235 login: root login (13): undefined instruction: pc=400105b4 Code: 00000000 eca0420c (e8806ff0) e2400030 eaffffdb 192.70.254.235 login: I found a couple of questions about this in the archives but no answers (except some hint of a library problem). Is there a way to figure out what is causing these undefined instructions? I thought it was the stripped down ramdisk I was using, but that doesn't seem to be the case. Nicole ------------------------------ Nicole Cook Software Engineer MAYA Design From wrl-techops@pa.dec.com Thu Mar 29 21:40:21 2001 Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (root@mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id VAA19697 for ; Thu, 29 Mar 2001 21:40:21 +0200 Received: from zcamail05.zca.compaq.com (zcamail05.zca.compaq.com [161.114.32.105]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id VAA03530 for ; Thu, 29 Mar 2001 21:40:17 +0200 (METDST) Received: by zcamail05.zca.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id C7E47886; Thu, 29 Mar 2001 11:40:54 -0800 (PST) Received: from mailrelay01.cac.cpqcorp.net (mailrelay01.cac.cpqcorp.net [16.47.132.152]) by zcamail05.zca.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A49B4876; Thu, 29 Mar 2001 11:40:54 -0800 (PST) Received: by mailrelay01.cac.cpqcorp.net (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 1AF14150; Thu, 29 Mar 2001 11:38:28 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mailrelay01.cac.cpqcorp.net (Postfix) with SMTP id B427116B; Thu, 29 Mar 2001 11:38:27 -0800 (PST) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA10561; Thu, 29 Mar 2001 11:38:26 -0800 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id LAA14499; Thu, 29 Mar 2001 11:37:48 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id LAA14496; Thu, 29 Mar 2001 11:37:47 -0800 (PST) Received: from zmamail02.nz-tay.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA09307; Thu, 29 Mar 2001 11:37:47 -0800 Received: by zmamail02.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id A7A8F66AE; Thu, 29 Mar 2001 14:37:46 -0500 (EST) Received: from cougar.intrinsyc.com (cougar.intrinsyc.com [209.139.192.225]) by zmamail02.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE02466A6 for ; Thu, 29 Mar 2001 14:37:45 -0500 (EST) Received: from intrinsyc.com (192.168.1.7 [192.168.1.7]) by cougar.intrinsyc.com with SMTP (Microsoft Exchange Internet Mail Service Version 5.5.2650.21) id G43507F5; Thu, 29 Mar 2001 11:37:44 -0800 Message-Id: <3AC39006.2C57C502@intrinsyc.com> Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2001 11:41:58 -0800 From: Daniel Chemko Reply-To: dchemko@intrinsyc.com X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.72 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.4.0 i686) X-Accept-Language: en Mime-Version: 1.0 To: Nicole Cook Cc: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Subject: Re: undefined instructions References: <3AC385EA.B15D1C2D@maya.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk Nicole, Make sure that floating point emulation (NWFPE) is enabled in the kernel. It is enabled under general setup. I had this problem porting to 2.4.2 because our board's config file did not have this option selected by default in that kernel. Nicole Cook wrote: > I'm still having problems with undefined instructions when my kernel > boots: > > INIT: version 2.74 > booting > rc.sysinit (8): undefined instruction: > pc=4004be04 > Code: 00000000 eca0420c (e8806ff0) e2400030 > eaffffff > INIT: Entering runlevel: > 3 > rc (10): undefined instruction: > pc=4004be04 > Code: 00000000 eca0420c (e8806ff0) e2400030 > eaffffff > x..x.x.x`.....x`XX...x`...x..X..x`...X..x...Xx.Xx..x.x.x`Xx`X.. > 192.70.254.235 > login: > 192.70.254.235 login: > root > login (13): undefined instruction: > pc=400105b4 > Code: 00000000 eca0420c (e8806ff0) e2400030 > eaffffdb > > 192.70.254.235 login: > > I found a couple of questions about this in the archives but no answers > (except some hint of a library problem). Is there a way to figure out > what is causing these undefined instructions? I thought it was the > stripped down ramdisk I was using, but that doesn't seem to be the case. > > Nicole > > ------------------------------ > Nicole Cook > Software Engineer > MAYA Design From wrl-techops@pa.dec.com Thu Mar 29 22:07:53 2001 Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (root@mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id WAA19728 for ; Thu, 29 Mar 2001 22:07:53 +0200 Received: from ztxmail05.ztx.compaq.com (ztxmail05.ztx.compaq.com [161.114.1.209]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id WAA05039 for ; Thu, 29 Mar 2001 22:07:51 +0200 (METDST) Received: by ztxmail05.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 43171B93; Thu, 29 Mar 2001 14:06:04 -0600 (CST) Received: from mailrelay01.cac.cpqcorp.net (mailrelay01.cac.cpqcorp.net [16.47.132.152]) by ztxmail05.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE3D0A16; Thu, 29 Mar 2001 14:06:03 -0600 (CST) Received: by mailrelay01.cac.cpqcorp.net (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 0209215C; Thu, 29 Mar 2001 12:05:57 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mailrelay01.cac.cpqcorp.net (Postfix) with SMTP id AED0F187; Thu, 29 Mar 2001 12:05:57 -0800 (PST) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA22827; Thu, 29 Mar 2001 12:05:56 -0800 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id MAA15322; Thu, 29 Mar 2001 12:04:54 -0800 (PST) Received: from ztxmail02.ztx.compaq.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id MAA15318; Thu, 29 Mar 2001 12:04:53 -0800 (PST) Received: by ztxmail02.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 97FEE1E9A; Thu, 29 Mar 2001 14:04:27 -0600 (CST) Received: from eising.k-net.dk (eising.k-net.dtu.dk [130.225.71.229]) by ztxmail02.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0547B1E98 for ; Thu, 29 Mar 2001 14:04:26 -0600 (CST) Received: from obelix.vkr.k-net.dk (obelix.vkr.k-net.dk [192.38.209.3]) by eising.k-net.dk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 29C19C4EA for ; Thu, 29 Mar 2001 22:04:18 +0200 (CEST) Received: by obelix.vkr.k-net.dk with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21) id ; Thu, 29 Mar 2001 22:05:26 +0200 Message-Id: From: Anders Frederiksen To: "'sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com '" Subject: RE: SA1110 and 1111, CF and IDE Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2001 22:05:23 +0200 Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk >Hello everyone, >I'm designing (ehm, trying to design...) a SA-1110-1111 board. >It should be >small, cheap and low-power. I have to add an IDE port. I used the 1111 >because AFAIK is the cheapest and simplest and smallest way to add two >PCMCIA ports to the 1110, and because I hate CPLDs (BTW, using >a CPLD+three >or four transceivers to buffer the addresses and the data >would have been >more expensive and more space consuming). Perhaps someone could tell me about their suppliers and especially pricing on the SA1110 and SA1111? I was sure the SA1111 would be far more expensive than the say <5$ logic needed to directly implement two PCMCIA slots... Thanx! /Anders From wrl-techops@pa.dec.com Thu Mar 29 23:46:39 2001 Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (root@mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id XAA19955 for ; Thu, 29 Mar 2001 23:46:39 +0200 Received: from ztxmail03.ztx.compaq.com (ztxmail03.ztx.compaq.com [161.114.1.207]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id XAA09852 for ; Thu, 29 Mar 2001 23:46:37 +0200 (METDST) Received: by ztxmail03.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id A3D091A73; Thu, 29 Mar 2001 15:44:49 -0600 (CST) Received: from mailrelay01.cac.cpqcorp.net (mailrelay01.cac.cpqcorp.net [16.47.132.152]) by ztxmail03.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 33658B49; Thu, 29 Mar 2001 15:44:49 -0600 (CST) Received: by mailrelay01.cac.cpqcorp.net (Postfix, from userid 12345) id D980416F; Thu, 29 Mar 2001 13:44:43 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mailrelay01.cac.cpqcorp.net (Postfix) with SMTP id 8D0C11A0; Thu, 29 Mar 2001 13:44:43 -0800 (PST) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA04649; Thu, 29 Mar 2001 13:44:42 -0800 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id NAA19457; Thu, 29 Mar 2001 13:23:12 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id NAA19474; Thu, 29 Mar 2001 13:22:56 -0800 (PST) Received: from zmamail02.nz-tay.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA02431; Thu, 29 Mar 2001 13:22:46 -0800 Received: by zmamail02.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id D72CD6499; Thu, 29 Mar 2001 16:22:45 -0500 (EST) Received: from mail-blue.research.att.com (mail-blue.research.att.com [135.207.30.102]) by zmamail02.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B27B6798 for ; Thu, 29 Mar 2001 16:22:45 -0500 (EST) Received: from hermes.research.att.com (hermes.research.att.com [135.207.16.38]) by mail-blue.research.att.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 63CF94CEFD for ; Thu, 29 Mar 2001 16:22:40 -0500 (EST) Received: from research.att.com (fp-dialup-104.research.att.com [135.207.4.104]) by hermes.research.att.com (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id QAA20991 for ; Thu, 29 Mar 2001 16:15:17 -0500 (EST) Message-Id: <3AC3A765.BFAF2D51@research.att.com> Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2001 16:21:41 -0500 From: Jack Chang Organization: AT&T Labs- Research X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.73 [en] (X11; I; Linux 2.2.15-4mdksecure i686) X-Accept-Language: en Mime-Version: 1.0 To: SA-1100/Linux Subject: Re: Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer References: <3AC365C2.B006D66E@research.att.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from base64 to 8bit by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl id XAA19955 Hi, Does anyone know what caused this problem? Thx in advance Jack > > ------------------------8<--------------------------- > Starting kernel ... > > Uncompressing Linux................................. done, booting the > kernel. > Linux version 2.4.0-rmk2-np2 (root@localhost.localdomain) (gcc version > 2.95.2 19 > 991024 (release)) #9 Thu Mar 29 11:17:13 EST 2001 > Processor: Intel StrongARM-1110 revision 8 > Architecture: Intel-Assabet > On node 0 totalpages: 8192 > zone(0): 8192 pages. > zone(1): 0 pages. > zone(2): 0 pages. > Kernel command line: keepinitrd > Console: colour dummy device 80x30 > Calibrating delay loop... 194.15 BogoMIPS > Memory: 32MB = 32MB total > Memory: 28008KB available (805K code, 231K data, 60K init) > Dentry-cache hash table entries: 4096 (order: 3, 32768 bytes) > Buffer-cache hash table entries: 1024 (order: 0, 4096 bytes) > Page-cache hash table entries: 8192 (order: 3, 32768 bytes) > Inode-cache hash table entries: 2048 (order: 2, 16384 bytes) > POSIX conformance testing by UNIFIX > Linux NET4.0 for Linux 2.4 > Based upon Swansea University Computer Society NET3.039 > scale: SA-1110 clock scaling initialized, clock speed is 206 MHz > Starting kswapd v1.8 > Console: switching to colour frame buffer device 80x60 > pty: 256 Unix98 ptys configured > RAMDISK driver initialized: 16 RAM disks of 8192K size 1024 blocksize > Uniform Multi-Platform E-IDE driver Revision: 6.31 > ide: Assuming 50MHz system bus speed for PIO modes; override with > idebus=xx > RAMDISK: Compressed image found at block 0 > SA1100 serial driver version 1.3 > ttyS0 on SA1100 UART3 (irq 17) > ttyS1 on SA1100 UART1 (irq 15) > ttyS2 on SA1100 UART2 (irq 16), using IRDA > UDA1341 audio driver initialized > NetWinder Floating Point Emulator V0.95 (c) 1998-1999 Rebel.com > VFS: Mounted root (ext2 filesystem). > Freeing init memory: 60K > INIT: version 2.74 booting > kernel BUG at slab.c:1542! > Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual address > 00000000 > pgd = c000c000 > *pgd = c0b80801, *pmd = c0b80801, *pte = c000308b, *ppte = c000300a > Internal error: Oops: ffffffff > CPU: 0 > pc : [] lr : [] > sp : c01fdeb0 ip : c01fde6c fp : c01fdec0 > r10: 0200dd80 r9 : 00000005 r8 : c18e32c0 > r7 : fffffff4 r6 : 00000007 r5 : c0014640 r4 : 00000000 > r3 : 00000000 r2 : c00ea820 r1 : 00000000 r0 : 00000001 > Flags: nZCv IRQs on FIQs on Mode SVC_32 Segment user > Control: C000D17F Table: C000D17F DAC: 00000015 > Process init (pid: 1, stackpage=c01fd000) > Code: eb001bc0 e3a03000 (e5833000) e91ba810 c00c6ef0 > Stack: > c01fdea0: c0023ed8 c001cdd0 60000013 ffffffff 00000000 c01fdedc > c01fdec4 c003bf > 30 > c01fdec0: c001cd98 00000000 c0014640 c18db000 c01fdef8 c01fdee0 > c005085c c003be > 78 > c01fdee0: 00000000 c0014640 c00150c0 c01fdf18 c01fdefc c00575f4 > c0050834 c00150 > c0 > c01fdf00: c0014640 c01dda40 00000000 c01fdf3c c01fdf1c c0044918 > c0057598 000008 > 02 > c01fdf20: 00000802 0200de60 c0016000 c0017da4 c01fdf6c c01fdf40 > c0044830 c00448 > 40 > c01fdf40: c18e32c0 c01dda40 c003bdf4 00000000 c0016000 00000001 > 00000001 000000 > c01fdfc0: 0200dd80 bffffbe4 0200e0b4 bffff9bc 0200412c 400b97e4 > a0000010 02005b48 > c01fdfe0: 00002000 c010b9dc c00f4080 c00f4070 00000000 c01fe000 > c00193a0 c00170a4 > Backtrace: > Function entered at [] from [] > r4 = 00000000 > Function entered at [] from [] > r6 = C18DB000 r5 = C0014640 r4 = 00000000 > Function entered at [] from [] > r6 = C00150C0 r5 = C0014640 r4 = 00000000 > Function entered at [] from [] > r7 = 00000000 r6 = C01DDA40 r5 = C0014640 r4 = C00150C0 > Function entered at [] from [] > r8 = C0017DA4 r7 = C0016000 r6 = 0200DE60 r5 = 00000802 > r4 = 00000802 > Function entered at [] from [] > r4 = 00000000 > Function entered at [] from [] > r7 = 00000000 r6 = A0000010 r5 = BFFFFBF0 r4 = 00000000 > Kernel panic: Attempted to kill init! > > ------------------------8<--------------------------- From wrl-techops@pa.dec.com Thu Mar 29 23:47:00 2001 Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (root@mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id XAA19961 for ; Thu, 29 Mar 2001 23:47:00 +0200 Received: from zmamail03.zma.compaq.com (zmamail03.zma.compaq.com [161.114.64.103]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id XAA09871 for ; Thu, 29 Mar 2001 23:46:58 +0200 (METDST) Received: by zmamail03.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 823C9BFEB; Thu, 29 Mar 2001 16:45:07 -0500 (EST) Received: from mailrelay01.cce.cpqcorp.net (mailrelay01.cce.cpqcorp.net [16.47.68.171]) by zmamail03.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 37EC7C0EB; Thu, 29 Mar 2001 16:45:07 -0500 (EST) Received: by mailrelay01.cce.cpqcorp.net (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 25A47221; Thu, 29 Mar 2001 15:44:47 -0600 (CST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mailrelay01.cce.cpqcorp.net (Postfix) with SMTP id BAE972E7; Thu, 29 Mar 2001 15:44:43 -0600 (CST) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA06241; Thu, 29 Mar 2001 13:44:42 -0800 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id NAA21462; Thu, 29 Mar 2001 13:39:45 -0800 (PST) Received: from zmamail02.zma.compaq.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id NAA21449; Thu, 29 Mar 2001 13:39:29 -0800 (PST) Received: by zmamail02.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id BA09365BE; Thu, 29 Mar 2001 16:38:59 -0500 (EST) Received: from mail.tiscalinet.it (mail-6.tiscalinet.it [195.130.225.152]) by zmamail02.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E80176793 for ; Thu, 29 Mar 2001 16:38:57 -0500 (EST) Received: from ottavio (62.10.160.164) by mail.tiscalinet.it (5.5.025) id 3AB89338001EF499 for sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com; Thu, 29 Mar 2001 23:38:53 +0200 Message-Id: <002001c0b898$86454400$a4a00a3e@ottavio> From: "Giuseppe Ottaviano" To: References: Subject: Re: SA1110 and 1111, CF and IDE Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2001 23:37:55 +0200 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-Msmail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 X-Mimeole: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400 Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk ----- Original Message ----- From: "Anders Frederiksen" To: Sent: Thursday, March 29, 2001 10:05 PM Subject: RE: SA1110 and 1111, CF and IDE > >Hello everyone, > >I'm designing (ehm, trying to design...) a SA-1110-1111 board. > >It should be > >small, cheap and low-power. I have to add an IDE port. I used the 1111 > >because AFAIK is the cheapest and simplest and smallest way to add two > >PCMCIA ports to the 1110, and because I hate CPLDs (BTW, using > >a CPLD+three > >or four transceivers to buffer the addresses and the data > >would have been > >more expensive and more space consuming). > > Perhaps someone could tell me about their suppliers and especially pricing > on the SA1110 and SA1111? > I was sure the SA1111 would be far more expensive than the say <5$ logic > needed to directly implement two PCMCIA slots... W-what??????? Here in Italy (for small quantities) a Lattice 2064 CPLD as the one used in LART costs more than 30$ (!!!!!) and the transceivers are unfindable!! <5$?? Where can I find these components at this price on-line? Ok, throw away the SA1111!! Do you know any SA1100 or SA1110 board that has a PCMCIA slot and an IDE interface?? Thanks, Giuseppe "Ottavio84" Ottaviano giuott@tin.it From wrl-techops@pa.dec.com Fri Mar 30 10:04:14 2001 Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (root@mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id KAA21330 for ; Fri, 30 Mar 2001 10:04:14 +0200 Received: from zmamail05.zma.compaq.com (zmamail05.zma.compaq.com [161.114.64.105]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id KAA02186 for ; Fri, 30 Mar 2001 10:04:12 +0200 (METDST) Received: by zmamail05.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 2390E1A71; Fri, 30 Mar 2001 03:02:26 -0500 (EST) Received: from taynzmail03.nz-tay.cpqcorp.net (taynzmail03.nz-tay.cpqcorp.net [16.47.4.103]) by zmamail05.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F38104FF5; Fri, 30 Mar 2001 03:02:25 -0500 (EST) Received: by taynzmail03.nz-tay.cpqcorp.net (Postfix, from userid 12345) id C70E12D0; Fri, 30 Mar 2001 03:02:21 -0500 (EST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by taynzmail03.nz-tay.cpqcorp.net (Postfix) with SMTP id 683BC179; Fri, 30 Mar 2001 03:02:19 -0500 (EST) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA16809; Fri, 30 Mar 2001 00:02:06 -0800 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id XAA12872; Thu, 29 Mar 2001 23:54:56 -0800 (PST) Received: from ztxmail02.ztx.compaq.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id XAA12869; Thu, 29 Mar 2001 23:54:55 -0800 (PST) Received: by ztxmail02.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id B39511DD2; Fri, 30 Mar 2001 01:54:37 -0600 (CST) Received: from dns0.uk.neceur.com (dns0.uk.neceur.com [193.116.254.1]) by ztxmail02.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C01C1CC6 for ; Fri, 30 Mar 2001 01:54:33 -0600 (CST) Received: from internal-mail.uk.neceur.com by dns0.uk.neceur.com id HCF30SxE4h31C; Fri, 30 Mar 2001 08:54:31 +0100 (BST) Received: from jordan.mdc.nec.fr by internal-mail.uk.neceur.com id o+K208xE4h3tj; Fri, 30 Mar 2001 08:54:27 +0100 (BST) from jordan.mdc.nec.fr (localhost [127.0.0.1]) id o+K208xE4h3tj (3.3.2/3.1.31); Fri, 30 Mar 2001 08:54:27 +0100 (BST) Received: by jordan.mdc.nec.fr with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21) id ; Fri, 30 Mar 2001 09:59:35 +0200 Message-Id: From: "Deprun, Jean-Francois" To: "'Giuseppe Ottaviano'" , sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Subject: RE: SA1110 and 1111, CF and IDE Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2001 09:59:35 +0200 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21) Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk hi, Do you know where I can find the SA1110 footprint for Orcad? Best regards. JF Deprun -----Message d'origine----- De : Giuseppe Ottaviano [mailto:g.ottavio@tiscalinet.it] Envoye : jeudi 29 mars 2001 23:38 A : sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Objet : Re: SA1110 and 1111, CF and IDE ----- Original Message ----- From: "Anders Frederiksen" To: Sent: Thursday, March 29, 2001 10:05 PM Subject: RE: SA1110 and 1111, CF and IDE > >Hello everyone, > >I'm designing (ehm, trying to design...) a SA-1110-1111 board. > >It should be > >small, cheap and low-power. I have to add an IDE port. I used the 1111 > >because AFAIK is the cheapest and simplest and smallest way to add two > >PCMCIA ports to the 1110, and because I hate CPLDs (BTW, using > >a CPLD+three > >or four transceivers to buffer the addresses and the data > >would have been > >more expensive and more space consuming). > > Perhaps someone could tell me about their suppliers and especially pricing > on the SA1110 and SA1111? > I was sure the SA1111 would be far more expensive than the say <5$ logic > needed to directly implement two PCMCIA slots... W-what??????? Here in Italy (for small quantities) a Lattice 2064 CPLD as the one used in LART costs more than 30$ (!!!!!) and the transceivers are unfindable!! <5$?? Where can I find these components at this price on-line? Ok, throw away the SA1111!! Do you know any SA1100 or SA1110 board that has a PCMCIA slot and an IDE interface?? Thanks, Giuseppe "Ottavio84" Ottaviano giuott@tin.it From wrl-techops@pa.dec.com Fri Mar 30 15:31:50 2001 Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (root@mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id PAA22083 for ; Fri, 30 Mar 2001 15:31:50 +0200 Received: from zcamail04.zca.compaq.com (zcamail04.zca.compaq.com [161.114.32.104]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id PAA24821 for ; Fri, 30 Mar 2001 15:31:47 +0200 (METDST) Received: by zcamail04.zca.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id BF8C32C2; Fri, 30 Mar 2001 05:31:25 -0800 (PST) Received: from taynzmail03.nz-tay.cpqcorp.net (taynzmail03.nz-tay.cpqcorp.net [16.47.4.103]) by zcamail04.zca.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 313632AF; Fri, 30 Mar 2001 05:31:25 -0800 (PST) Received: by taynzmail03.nz-tay.cpqcorp.net (Postfix, from userid 12345) id D99D7295; Fri, 30 Mar 2001 08:29:50 -0500 (EST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by taynzmail03.nz-tay.cpqcorp.net (Postfix) with SMTP id C15241A2; Fri, 30 Mar 2001 08:29:48 -0500 (EST) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA11678; Fri, 30 Mar 2001 05:29:46 -0800 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id FAA21403; Fri, 30 Mar 2001 05:28:02 -0800 (PST) Received: from zmamail01.zma.compaq.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id FAA21402; Fri, 30 Mar 2001 05:28:02 -0800 (PST) Received: by zmamail01.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 2488F10C71; Fri, 30 Mar 2001 08:27:25 -0500 (EST) Received: from eising.k-net.dk (eising.k-net.dtu.dk [130.225.71.229]) by zmamail01.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A2109C450 for ; Fri, 30 Mar 2001 08:27:24 -0500 (EST) Received: from obelix.vkr.k-net.dk (obelix.vkr.k-net.dk [192.38.209.3]) by eising.k-net.dk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 64EAFC8AD for ; Fri, 30 Mar 2001 15:27:23 +0200 (CEST) Received: by obelix.vkr.k-net.dk with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21) id ; Fri, 30 Mar 2001 15:28:27 +0200 Message-Id: From: Anders Frederiksen To: "'sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com '" Subject: RE: SA1110 and 1111, CF and IDE Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2001 15:28:18 +0200 Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk -----Original Message----- From: Giuseppe Ottaviano Here in Italy (for small quantities) a Lattice 2064 CPLD as the one used in LART costs more than 30$ (!!!!!) and the transceivers are unfindable!! <5$?? Where can I find these components at this price on-line? --- www.avnet.com or www.arrow.com are usually OK price references. Still you would probably want to find a local distributor. Or - being willing to pay the price use farnell or like. --- Ok, throw away the SA1111!! Do you know any SA1100 or SA1110 board that has a PCMCIA slot and an IDE interface?? --- Well, the SA1110 dev. man. shows you how to implement two PCMCIA-slots using the everneeded drivers a package of OR-gates and a single AND-gate (p.10-60). The IDE interface is (as mentioned) still on my to-do list *) - but should be pretty straight forward especially if you use the one PCMCIA-slot. Regards, Anders *) I'm struggeling a bit interfacing to the SMSC LAN91C111 at the moment. The device is F* slow and not very well documented regarding timing. But it is possible to add a 10/100Mbit ethernet I/F using a minimum of boardspace and hopefully only a few CPLD gates ;-) From wrl-techops@pa.dec.com Fri Mar 30 16:56:35 2001 Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (root@mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id QAA22228 for ; Fri, 30 Mar 2001 16:56:35 +0200 Received: from zcamail05.zca.compaq.com (zcamail05.zca.compaq.com [161.114.32.105]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id QAA00965 for ; Fri, 30 Mar 2001 16:56:31 +0200 (METDST) Received: by zcamail05.zca.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 5B6973A1; Fri, 30 Mar 2001 06:57:09 -0800 (PST) Received: from mailrelay01.cac.cpqcorp.net (mailrelay01.cac.cpqcorp.net [16.47.132.152]) by zcamail05.zca.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 33D5A349; Fri, 30 Mar 2001 06:57:09 -0800 (PST) Received: by mailrelay01.cac.cpqcorp.net (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 5B75C162; Fri, 30 Mar 2001 06:54:42 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mailrelay01.cac.cpqcorp.net (Postfix) with SMTP id 214FB16C; Fri, 30 Mar 2001 06:54:42 -0800 (PST) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA12301; Fri, 30 Mar 2001 06:54:41 -0800 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id GAA23292; Fri, 30 Mar 2001 06:53:57 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id GAA23364; Fri, 30 Mar 2001 06:53:56 -0800 (PST) Received: from ztxmail02.nz-cce.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA10655; Fri, 30 Mar 2001 06:53:55 -0800 Received: by ztxmail02.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id E9CEF1C4B; Fri, 30 Mar 2001 08:53:53 -0600 (CST) Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by ztxmail02.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2048E1DC2 for ; Fri, 30 Mar 2001 08:53:52 -0600 (CST) Received: from arthur.ubicom.tudelft.nl (root@arthur.ubicom.tudelft.nl [130.161.43.222]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id QAA00810; Fri, 30 Mar 2001 16:53:50 +0200 (METDST) Received: (from erik@localhost) by arthur.ubicom.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3/Debian 8.9.3-21) id QAA21836; Fri, 30 Mar 2001 16:50:47 +0200 Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2001 16:50:47 +0200 From: Erik Mouw To: Jack Chang Cc: SA-1100/Linux Subject: Re: Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer Message-Id: <20010330165047.S902@arthur.ubicom.tudelft.nl> References: <3AC365C2.B006D66E@research.att.com> <3AC3A765.BFAF2D51@research.att.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <3AC3A765.BFAF2D51@research.att.com>; from tcc@research.att.com on Thu, Mar 29, 2001 at 04:21:41PM -0500 Organization: Eric Conspiracy Secret Labs X-Eric-Conspiracy: There is no conspiracy! Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk On Thu, Mar 29, 2001 at 04:21:41PM -0500, Jack Chang wrote: > Hi, Does anyone know what caused this problem? Thx in advance Yes, from mm/slab.c, line 1542: 1542: BUG(); // too big size So kmalloc() failed because it was called with a too large memory request. > > kernel BUG at slab.c:1542! > > Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual address > > 00000000 > > pgd = c000c000 > > *pgd = c0b80801, *pmd = c0b80801, *pte = c000308b, *ppte = c000300a > > Internal error: Oops: ffffffff > > CPU: 0 > > pc : [] lr : [] > > sp : c01fdeb0 ip : c01fde6c fp : c01fdec0 > > r10: 0200dd80 r9 : 00000005 r8 : c18e32c0 > > r7 : fffffff4 r6 : 00000007 r5 : c0014640 r4 : 00000000 > > r3 : 00000000 r2 : c00ea820 r1 : 00000000 r0 : 00000001 > > Flags: nZCv IRQs on FIQs on Mode SVC_32 Segment user > > Control: C000D17F Table: C000D17F DAC: 00000015 > > Process init (pid: 1, stackpage=c01fd000) > > Code: eb001bc0 e3a03000 (e5833000) e91ba810 c00c6ef0 > > Stack: > > c01fdea0: c0023ed8 c001cdd0 60000013 ffffffff 00000000 c01fdedc > > c01fdec4 c003bf > > 30 The addresses only make sense when looked up in System.map. They are kernel dependent. Erik -- J.A.K. (Erik) Mouw, Information and Communication Theory Group, Department of Electrical Engineering, Faculty of Information Technology and Systems, Delft University of Technology, PO BOX 5031, 2600 GA Delft, The Netherlands Phone: +31-15-2783635 Fax: +31-15-2781843 Email: J.A.K.Mouw@its.tudelft.nl WWW: http://www-ict.its.tudelft.nl/~erik/ From wrl-techops@pa.dec.com Sat Mar 31 02:43:21 2001 Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (root@mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id CAA23946 for ; Sat, 31 Mar 2001 02:43:21 +0200 Received: from zmamail05.zma.compaq.com (zmamail05.zma.compaq.com [161.114.64.105]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id CAA28121 for ; Sat, 31 Mar 2001 02:43:19 +0200 (METDST) Received: by zmamail05.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 8BA6A1322; Fri, 30 Mar 2001 19:41:40 -0500 (EST) Received: from mailrelay01.cce.cpqcorp.net (mailrelay01.cce.cpqcorp.net [16.47.68.171]) by zmamail05.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C8E41230; Fri, 30 Mar 2001 19:41:40 -0500 (EST) Received: by mailrelay01.cce.cpqcorp.net (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 66A37304; Fri, 30 Mar 2001 18:41:37 -0600 (CST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mailrelay01.cce.cpqcorp.net (Postfix) with SMTP id D194E303; Fri, 30 Mar 2001 18:41:35 -0600 (CST) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA11035; Fri, 30 Mar 2001 16:41:33 -0800 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id QAA10641; Fri, 30 Mar 2001 16:38:11 -0800 (PST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id QAA11000; Fri, 30 Mar 2001 16:38:10 -0800 (PST) Received: from zmamail02.nz-tay.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA16655; Fri, 30 Mar 2001 16:38:10 -0800 Received: by zmamail02.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id A46DE64DF; Fri, 30 Mar 2001 19:38:09 -0500 (EST) Received: from mail-green.research.att.com (H-135-207-30-103.research.att.com [135.207.30.103]) by zmamail02.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 01077655E for ; Fri, 30 Mar 2001 19:38:07 -0500 (EST) Received: from hermes.research.att.com (hermes.research.att.com [135.207.16.38]) by mail-green.research.att.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4487F1E06E for ; Fri, 30 Mar 2001 19:38:07 -0500 (EST) Received: from research.att.com ([135.207.8.147]) by hermes.research.att.com (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id TAA04179 for ; Fri, 30 Mar 2001 19:30:44 -0500 (EST) Message-Id: <3AC526AC.F4C1501C@research.att.com> Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2001 19:37:00 -0500 From: Jack Chang Organization: AT&T Labs-Research X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.76 [en] (Win98; U) X-Accept-Language: en,zh-TW Mime-Version: 1.0 To: SA-1100/Linux Subject: Blob issue or ?? Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk Hi, I have an SA-1110 based development board, after I compiled the kernel and used Blob (1.8-pre2) to download the kernel and ramdisk to the SDRAM through serial port, I typed "boot" at the prompt, it gave me CRC error while "Uncompressing Kernel..." and the system halted. However, if I use JFlash to burn blob+kernel+ramdisk, i.e. dd if=blob of=blob-linux bs=1024 dd if=zImage of=blob-linux bs=1024 seek=64 dd if=ramdisk.gz of=blob-linux bs=1024 seek=832, into the Flash, then it boots fine. Is there anyway to find out what the problem is? Thx -- Jack T. Chang tcc@research.att.com From wrl-techops@pa.dec.com Sun Apr 1 08:04:12 2001 Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (root@mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id IAA26421 for ; Sun, 1 Apr 2001 08:04:12 +0200 Received: from zmamail04.zma.compaq.com (zmamail04.zma.compaq.com [161.114.64.104]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id IAA14097 for ; Sun, 1 Apr 2001 08:04:10 +0200 (METDST) Received: by zmamail04.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id B023964E8; Sun, 1 Apr 2001 01:02:23 -0500 (EST) Received: from mailrelay01.cce.cpqcorp.net (mailrelay01.cce.cpqcorp.net [16.47.68.171]) by zmamail04.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 41664627B; Sun, 1 Apr 2001 01:02:23 -0500 (EST) Received: by mailrelay01.cce.cpqcorp.net (Postfix, from userid 12345) id C5022341; Sun, 1 Apr 2001 00:02:12 -0600 (CST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mailrelay01.cce.cpqcorp.net (Postfix) with SMTP id 1216334E; Sun, 1 Apr 2001 00:02:11 -0600 (CST) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA13890; Sat, 31 Mar 2001 22:02:08 -0800 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id VAA27113; Sat, 31 Mar 2001 21:53:56 -0800 (PST) Received: from ztxmail02.ztx.compaq.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id VAA27197; Sat, 31 Mar 2001 21:53:55 -0800 (PST) Received: by ztxmail02.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 502A11EAF; Sat, 31 Mar 2001 23:53:46 -0600 (CST) Received: from note.orchestra.cse.unsw.EDU.AU (note.orchestra.cse.unsw.EDU.AU [129.94.242.29]) by ztxmail02.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 391FE1E5E for ; Sat, 31 Mar 2001 23:53:45 -0600 (CST) Received: From paulaner With LocalMail ; Sun, 1 Apr 2001 15:53:23 +1000 From: "Adam 'WeirdArms' Wiggins" To: "Deprun, Jean-Francois" Date: Sun, 1 Apr 2001 15:53:23 +1000 (EST) X-Sender: awiggins@paulaner.disy.cse.unsw.EDU.AU Cc: "'Giuseppe Ottaviano'" , sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Subject: RE: SA1110 and 1111, CF and IDE In-Reply-To: Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk On Fri, 30 Mar 2001, Deprun, Jean-Francois wrote: > hi, > Do you know where I can find the SA1110 footprint for Orcad? I think I have one. Still need it? Cheers Adam > > Best regards. > > JF Deprun > > -----Message d'origine----- > De : Giuseppe Ottaviano [mailto:g.ottavio@tiscalinet.it] > Envoye : jeudi 29 mars 2001 23:38 > A : sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com > Objet : Re: SA1110 and 1111, CF and IDE > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Anders Frederiksen" > To: > Sent: Thursday, March 29, 2001 10:05 PM > Subject: RE: SA1110 and 1111, CF and IDE > > > > >Hello everyone, > > >I'm designing (ehm, trying to design...) a SA-1110-1111 board. > > >It should be > > >small, cheap and low-power. I have to add an IDE port. I used the 1111 > > >because AFAIK is the cheapest and simplest and smallest way to add two > > >PCMCIA ports to the 1110, and because I hate CPLDs (BTW, using > > >a CPLD+three > > >or four transceivers to buffer the addresses and the data > > >would have been > > >more expensive and more space consuming). > > > > Perhaps someone could tell me about their suppliers and especially pricing > > on the SA1110 and SA1111? > > I was sure the SA1111 would be far more expensive than the say <5$ logic > > needed to directly implement two PCMCIA slots... > W-what??????? > Here in Italy (for small quantities) a Lattice 2064 CPLD as the one used in > LART costs more than 30$ (!!!!!) and the transceivers are unfindable!! <5$?? > Where can I find these components at this price on-line? > > Ok, throw away the SA1111!! > Do you know any SA1100 or SA1110 board that has a PCMCIA slot and an IDE > interface?? > > Thanks, > Giuseppe "Ottavio84" Ottaviano > giuott@tin.it > From wrl-techops@pa.dec.com Sun Apr 1 08:50:46 2001 Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (root@mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id IAA26475 for ; Sun, 1 Apr 2001 08:50:46 +0200 Received: from ztxmail04.ztx.compaq.com (ztxmail04.ztx.compaq.com [161.114.1.208]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id IAA15003 for ; Sun, 1 Apr 2001 08:50:44 +0200 (METDST) Received: by ztxmail04.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 239FDBF4; Sun, 1 Apr 2001 00:48:57 -0600 (CST) Received: from taynzmail03.nz-tay.cpqcorp.net (taynzmail03.nz-tay.cpqcorp.net [16.47.4.103]) by ztxmail04.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E9F8B943; Sun, 1 Apr 2001 00:48:56 -0600 (CST) Received: by taynzmail03.nz-tay.cpqcorp.net (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 82E2B2D0; Sun, 1 Apr 2001 01:48:56 -0500 (EST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by taynzmail03.nz-tay.cpqcorp.net (Postfix) with SMTP id 5A28C19B; Sun, 1 Apr 2001 01:48:54 -0500 (EST) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA08487; Sat, 31 Mar 2001 22:48:53 -0800 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id WAA18274; Sat, 31 Mar 2001 22:45:26 -0800 (PST) Received: from zmamail01.zma.compaq.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id WAA28739; Sat, 31 Mar 2001 22:45:25 -0800 (PST) Received: by zmamail01.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id C74261219E; Sun, 1 Apr 2001 01:45:24 -0500 (EST) Received: from mail.tiscalinet.it (mail-3.tiscalinet.it [195.130.225.149]) by zmamail01.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3153C12356 for ; Sun, 1 Apr 2001 01:45:24 -0500 (EST) Received: from ottavio (62.10.154.182) by mail.tiscalinet.it (5.5.025) id 3AB890F2002575F0 for sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com; Sun, 1 Apr 2001 08:45:21 +0200 Message-Id: <000b01c0ba77$320903a0$b69a0a3e@ottavio> From: "Giuseppe Ottaviano" To: References: Subject: Re: SA1110 and 1111, CF and IDE Date: Sun, 1 Apr 2001 08:43:49 +0200 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-Msmail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 X-Mimeole: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400 Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk > On Fri, 30 Mar 2001, Deprun, Jean-Francois wrote: > > > hi, > > Do you know where I can find the SA1110 footprint for Orcad? > > I think I have one. Still need it? > I need it too, could you send me it ? Thanks, Giuseppe Ottaviano giuott@tin.it From wrl-techops@pa.dec.com Sun Apr 1 09:08:14 2001 Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (root@mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id JAA26499 for ; Sun, 1 Apr 2001 09:08:14 +0200 Received: from zcamail03.zca.compaq.com (zcamail03.zca.compaq.com [161.114.32.103]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id JAA15383 for ; Sun, 1 Apr 2001 09:08:12 +0200 (METDST) Received: by zcamail03.zca.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id CBF20CAA; Sat, 31 Mar 2001 23:06:22 -0800 (PST) Received: from mailrelay01.cce.cpqcorp.net (mailrelay01.cce.cpqcorp.net [16.47.68.171]) by zcamail03.zca.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7AE21F31; Sat, 31 Mar 2001 23:06:22 -0800 (PST) Received: by mailrelay01.cce.cpqcorp.net (Postfix, from userid 12345) id CCE392D1; Sun, 1 Apr 2001 01:06:23 -0600 (CST) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mailrelay01.cce.cpqcorp.net (Postfix) with SMTP id 60D931EB; Sun, 1 Apr 2001 01:06:22 -0600 (CST) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA09945; Sat, 31 Mar 2001 23:06:21 -0800 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id XAA28087; Sat, 31 Mar 2001 23:03:01 -0800 (PST) Received: from ztxmail01.ztx.compaq.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id XAA27693; Sat, 31 Mar 2001 23:03:01 -0800 (PST) Received: by ztxmail01.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 9E6112568; Sun, 1 Apr 2001 01:03:00 -0600 (CST) Received: from smtp1.Stanford.EDU (smtp1.Stanford.EDU [171.64.14.23]) by ztxmail01.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 29E962D72 for ; Sun, 1 Apr 2001 01:03:00 -0600 (CST) Received: from ssdlcalvin (72.sm8.dialup.garlic.net [216.139.3.72]) by smtp1.Stanford.EDU (8.11.1/8.11.1) with ESMTP id f3172vP29704 for ; Sat, 31 Mar 2001 23:02:58 -0800 (PST) Reply-To: From: "Zsolt Kiraly" To: Subject: SA-11xx Orcad footprints Date: Sat, 31 Mar 2001 23:02:58 -0800 Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-Msmail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) X-Mimeole: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400 Importance: Normal In-Reply-To: <000b01c0ba77$320903a0$b69a0a3e@ottavio> Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk If you guys send any Orcad footprints to me, I'll put them up on my website ssdl.stanford.edu/salinux. Please don't send files with licenses that don't allow such a thing. Thanks, Zsolt > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com > [mailto:owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com]On Behalf Of Giuseppe > Ottaviano > Sent: Saturday, March 31, 2001 10:44 PM > To: sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com > Subject: Re: SA1110 and 1111, CF and IDE > > > > > > On Fri, 30 Mar 2001, Deprun, Jean-Francois wrote: > > > > > hi, > > > Do you know where I can find the SA1110 footprint for Orcad? > > > > I think I have one. Still need it? > > > I need it too, could you send me it ? > > Thanks, > Giuseppe Ottaviano > giuott@tin.it > > From wrl-techops@pa.dec.com Sun Apr 1 15:50:11 2001 Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (root@mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id PAA27026 for ; Sun, 1 Apr 2001 15:50:11 +0200 Received: from zcamail05.zca.compaq.com (zcamail05.zca.compaq.com [161.114.32.105]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id PAA26133 for ; Sun, 1 Apr 2001 15:50:09 +0200 (METDST) Received: by zcamail05.zca.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 4F40A2E6; Sun, 1 Apr 2001 06:50:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mailrelay01.cac.cpqcorp.net (mailrelay01.cac.cpqcorp.net [16.47.132.152]) by zcamail05.zca.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 28DE0251; Sun, 1 Apr 2001 06:50:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mailrelay01.cac.cpqcorp.net (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 04D47167; Sun, 1 Apr 2001 06:48:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mailrelay01.cac.cpqcorp.net (Postfix) with SMTP id 6103E180; Sun, 1 Apr 2001 06:48:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA01029; Sun, 1 Apr 2001 06:47:56 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id GAA02344; Sun, 1 Apr 2001 06:45:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ztxmail02.ztx.compaq.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id GAA05130; Sun, 1 Apr 2001 06:45:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: by ztxmail02.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 72E311D9B; Sun, 1 Apr 2001 08:45:39 -0500 (CDT) Received: from mail.tiscalinet.it (mail-5.tiscalinet.it [195.130.225.151]) by ztxmail02.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 162181FC9 for ; Sun, 1 Apr 2001 08:45:39 -0500 (CDT) Received: from ottavio (62.10.155.203) by mail.tiscalinet.it (5.5.025) id 3AB892650025E8E9 for sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com; Sun, 1 Apr 2001 15:45:37 +0200 Message-Id: <008001c0bab1$e66aa3a0$cb9b0a3e@ottavio> From: "Giuseppe Ottaviano" To: Subject: Where to buy LCDs? Date: Sun, 1 Apr 2001 15:44:05 +0200 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-Msmail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 X-Mimeole: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400 Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk Hello, do you know a site where to find LCD modules (if possible in Europe)? I'm looking for a 240x320 greyscale LCD 4 to 6 inches, if possible with touchscreen embedded. Thanks, Giuseppe Ottaviano giuott@tin.it From wrl-techops@pa.dec.com Sun Apr 1 16:15:32 2001 Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (root@mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id QAA27060 for ; Sun, 1 Apr 2001 16:15:32 +0200 Received: from ztxmail04.ztx.compaq.com (ztxmail04.ztx.compaq.com [161.114.1.208]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id QAA26792 for ; Sun, 1 Apr 2001 16:15:30 +0200 (METDST) Received: by ztxmail04.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 84303A31; Sun, 1 Apr 2001 09:13:43 -0500 (CDT) Received: from mailrelay01.cce.cpqcorp.net (mailrelay01.cce.cpqcorp.net [16.47.68.171]) by ztxmail04.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 64F10A94; Sun, 1 Apr 2001 09:13:43 -0500 (CDT) Received: by mailrelay01.cce.cpqcorp.net (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 6EBB42C3; Sun, 1 Apr 2001 09:13:42 -0500 (CDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mailrelay01.cce.cpqcorp.net (Postfix) with SMTP id EAD6532D; Sun, 1 Apr 2001 09:13:40 -0500 (CDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA13292; Sun, 1 Apr 2001 07:13:39 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id HAA04118; Sun, 1 Apr 2001 07:09:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ztxmail02.ztx.compaq.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id HAA05652; Sun, 1 Apr 2001 07:09:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: by ztxmail02.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id DA20B1FA0; Sun, 1 Apr 2001 09:09:54 -0500 (CDT) Received: from thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (thorgal.et.tudelft.nl [130.161.40.91]) by ztxmail02.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 03E931FD0 for ; Sun, 1 Apr 2001 09:09:53 -0500 (CDT) Received: (from bakker@localhost) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.7/8.8.7) id QAA27051; Sun, 1 Apr 2001 16:09:51 +0200 Mime-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: In-Reply-To: <008001c0bab1$e66aa3a0$cb9b0a3e@ottavio> References: <008001c0bab1$e66aa3a0$cb9b0a3e@ottavio> Date: Sun, 1 Apr 2001 16:08:50 +0200 To: "Giuseppe Ottaviano" From: "J.D. Bakker" Subject: Re: Where to buy LCDs? Cc: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" ; format="flowed" Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk At 15:44 +0200 01-04-2001, Giuseppe Ottaviano wrote: >Hello, >do you know a site where to find LCD modules (if possible in Europe)? >I'm looking for a 240x320 greyscale LCD 4 to 6 inches, if possible with >touchscreen embedded. http://www.farnell.com/ . Not cheap, but fast and with an extensive inventory. HTH, JDB. -- LART. 250 MIPS under one Watt. Free hardware design files. http://www.lart.tudelft.nl/ From wrl-techops@pa.dec.com Sun Apr 1 21:28:22 2001 Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (root@mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id VAA27802 for ; Sun, 1 Apr 2001 21:28:22 +0200 Received: from zcamail04.zca.compaq.com (zcamail04.zca.compaq.com [161.114.32.104]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id VAA08117 for ; Sun, 1 Apr 2001 21:28:21 +0200 (METDST) Received: by zcamail04.zca.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id C1B183D1; Sun, 1 Apr 2001 12:27:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: from taynzmail03.nz-tay.cpqcorp.net (taynzmail03.nz-tay.cpqcorp.net [16.47.4.103]) by zcamail04.zca.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 598122F1; Sun, 1 Apr 2001 12:27:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: by taynzmail03.nz-tay.cpqcorp.net (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 20666191; Sun, 1 Apr 2001 15:26:28 -0400 (EDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by taynzmail03.nz-tay.cpqcorp.net (Postfix) with SMTP id D4B0117A; Sun, 1 Apr 2001 15:26:25 -0400 (EDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA26369; Sun, 1 Apr 2001 12:26:19 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id MAA11124; Sun, 1 Apr 2001 12:24:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id MAA12526; Sun, 1 Apr 2001 12:24:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ztxmail01.nz-cce.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA28462; Sun, 1 Apr 2001 12:24:54 -0700 Received: by ztxmail01.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 843572CE1; Sun, 1 Apr 2001 14:24:54 -0500 (CDT) Received: from fire.he.net (fire.he.net [216.218.144.2]) by ztxmail01.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E8DB32D4B for ; Sun, 1 Apr 2001 14:24:53 -0500 (CDT) Received: from [192.168.23.2] (wardco.com [165.227.105.2]) by fire.he.net (8.8.6/8.8.2) with ESMTP id MAA19986 for ; Sun, 1 Apr 2001 12:24:52 -0700 Mime-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: Date: Sun, 1 Apr 2001 12:24:44 -0700 To: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com From: Ward Willats Subject: Compact Flash wiring Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" ; format="flowed" Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk My hardware guy is noodling out some CF design for us, and he asked the question below. I thought someone on this list might have some insight, since this is an area I know little about.... Thanks, -- Ward Ward, Thanks for the info. I couldn't find what I needed. I think if someone can answer the following question I'll know the rest. IS THE SIGNAL 'RESET' ASSERTING AS 'RESET' OR '-RESET'? The documentation I have claims if the card operates in 'memory mode' or 'io mode' it asserts '-reset' if it operates in 'true ide' mode it asserts 'reset'. All 'compact flash' cards, according to the documentation I have, must operate in 'all' 3 modes. Therefore I'm implementing 'ide mode' if there is any question for a particular signal. Does anyone have documentation that came with their 'compact flash' card? From wrl-techops@pa.dec.com Sun Apr 1 22:24:50 2001 Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (root@mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id WAA27889 for ; Sun, 1 Apr 2001 22:24:50 +0200 Received: from zmamail04.zma.compaq.com (zmamail04.zma.compaq.com [161.114.64.104]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id WAA10323 for ; Sun, 1 Apr 2001 22:24:46 +0200 (METDST) Received: by zmamail04.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id D5D5B5CE4; Sun, 1 Apr 2001 16:22:57 -0400 (EDT) Received: from taynzmail03.nz-tay.cpqcorp.net (taynzmail03.nz-tay.cpqcorp.net [16.47.4.103]) by zmamail04.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C4805E6C; Sun, 1 Apr 2001 16:22:57 -0400 (EDT) Received: by taynzmail03.nz-tay.cpqcorp.net (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 39D5017A; Sun, 1 Apr 2001 16:22:57 -0400 (EDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by taynzmail03.nz-tay.cpqcorp.net (Postfix) with SMTP id 06856191; Sun, 1 Apr 2001 16:22:55 -0400 (EDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA17089; Sun, 1 Apr 2001 13:22:53 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id NAA09485; Sun, 1 Apr 2001 13:22:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id NAA10003; Sun, 1 Apr 2001 13:22:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: from zmamail01.nz-tay.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA29562; Sun, 1 Apr 2001 13:22:12 -0700 Received: by zmamail01.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 4C73C10BEB; Sun, 1 Apr 2001 16:22:12 -0400 (EDT) Received: from smtp3.andrew.cmu.edu (SMTP3.ANDREW.CMU.EDU [128.2.10.83]) by zmamail01.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A505BD25 for ; Sun, 1 Apr 2001 16:22:08 -0400 (EDT) Received: from UNIX10.ANDREW.CMU.EDU (UNIX10.ANDREW.CMU.EDU [128.2.11.210]) by smtp3.andrew.cmu.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id QAA10929; Sun, 1 Apr 2001 16:17:03 -0400 (EDT) Date: Sun, 1 Apr 2001 16:17:02 -0400 (EDT) From: John G Dorsey To: Ward Willats Cc: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Subject: Re: Compact Flash wiring In-Reply-To: Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk On Sun, 1 Apr 2001, Ward Willats wrote: > IS THE SIGNAL 'RESET' ASSERTING AS 'RESET' OR '-RESET'? The documentation I > have claims if the card operates in 'memory mode' or 'io mode' it asserts > '-reset' if it operates in 'true ide' mode it asserts 'reset'. All 'compact > flash' cards, according to the documentation I have, must operate in 'all' 3 > modes. Therefore I'm implementing 'ide mode' if there is any question for a > particular signal. Does anyone have documentation that came with their > 'compact flash' card? I think the CompactFlash specification is the source you should trust here. From table 5 in version 1.4 of the spec: When the pin is high, this signal Resets the CompactFlash Storage Card or CF+ Card. The CompactFlash Storage Card or CF+ Card is Reset only at power up if this pin is left high or open from power-up. The CompactFlash Storage Card or CF+ Card is also Reset when the Soft Reset bit in the Card Configuration Option Register is set. In true IDE mode, the signal is nRESET (negative logic), but I'm not sure that I've ever seen a true IDE CF device. (IDE devices like the Microdrive are CF+ I/O cards.) -jd From wrl-techops@pa.dec.com Tue Apr 3 20:22:14 2001 Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (root@mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id UAA01570 for ; Tue, 3 Apr 2001 20:22:14 +0200 Received: from zmamail05.zma.compaq.com (zmamail05.zma.compaq.com [161.114.64.105]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id UAA01420 for ; Tue, 3 Apr 2001 20:22:11 +0200 (METDST) Received: by zmamail05.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id D606E18A3; Tue, 3 Apr 2001 14:20:23 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailrelay01.cac.cpqcorp.net (mailrelay01.cac.cpqcorp.net [16.47.132.152]) by zmamail05.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 768FD187F; Tue, 3 Apr 2001 14:20:23 -0400 (EDT) Received: by mailrelay01.cac.cpqcorp.net (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 0721014A; Tue, 3 Apr 2001 11:20:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mailrelay01.cac.cpqcorp.net (Postfix) with SMTP id D159D181; Tue, 3 Apr 2001 11:20:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA19279; Tue, 3 Apr 2001 11:19:55 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id LAA14659; Tue, 3 Apr 2001 11:10:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id LAA14305; Tue, 3 Apr 2001 11:10:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: from zmamail01.nz-tay.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA29491; Tue, 3 Apr 2001 11:10:29 -0700 Received: by zmamail01.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id B386D11511; Tue, 3 Apr 2001 14:10:28 -0400 (EDT) Received: from xanadu.home (modemcable084.137-200-24.mtl.mc.videotron.ca [24.200.137.84]) by zmamail01.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F3948116A0 for ; Tue, 3 Apr 2001 14:10:27 -0400 (EDT) Received: from localhost (nico@localhost) by xanadu.home (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id OAA18199; Tue, 3 Apr 2001 14:10:27 -0400 X-Authentication-Warning: xanadu.home: nico owned process doing -bs Date: Tue, 3 Apr 2001 14:10:27 -0400 (EDT) From: Nicolas Pitre X-X-Sender: To: SA-1100/Linux Cc: Subject: diff-2.4.2-rmk2-np1 Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk ... is available at the usual sites, which are: ftp://ftp.netwinder.org/users/n/nico/ ftp://ftp.arm.linux.org.uk/pub/linux/arm/people/nico/ ftp://ftp.handhelds.org/pub/linux/arm/sa-1100-patches/ This is not against the latest RMK patch, but still it should contains most of the patches I had pending. I wanted this to be a synchronization point before I start on the source cleanup I'm contemplating for a while. Highlights for this patch: - updated to 2.4.2-rmk2 (me) - most of Tulsa PFS-168 support (George G. Davis) - more FIR work (Russell King, Oleg Drokin) - superfluous debugging IRQ code and printk's removed (me) - fix polling and wakeup in sa1100-uda1341.c (David Huggins-Daines) - yet more SA1110 USB network fixes (Oleg Drokin) - updated JFFS2 code with the current CVS (me) Note on JFFS2: This version of the JFFS2 filesystem format is incompatible with the previous one. A reliability problem was found with the previous format which fix involved breaking filesystem compatibility. Because JFFS2 deployment was still extremely limited, it was decided to go ahead with the fix at this time. A new mkfs.jffs2 is also required accordingly. Enjoy! Nicolas From wrl-techops@pa.dec.com Tue Apr 3 22:12:11 2001 Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (root@mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id WAA01825 for ; Tue, 3 Apr 2001 22:12:10 +0200 Received: from zmamail05.zma.compaq.com (zmamail05.zma.compaq.com [161.114.64.105]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id WAA07076 for ; Tue, 3 Apr 2001 22:12:07 +0200 (METDST) Received: by zmamail05.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id B8312187D; Tue, 3 Apr 2001 16:10:18 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailrelay01.cac.cpqcorp.net (mailrelay01.cac.cpqcorp.net [16.47.132.152]) by zmamail05.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1547A1B91; Tue, 3 Apr 2001 16:10:18 -0400 (EDT) Received: by mailrelay01.cac.cpqcorp.net (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 7723A14F; Tue, 3 Apr 2001 13:10:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mailrelay01.cac.cpqcorp.net (Postfix) with SMTP id 34CA8169; Tue, 3 Apr 2001 13:10:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA28137; Tue, 3 Apr 2001 13:10:12 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id NAA22347; Tue, 3 Apr 2001 13:08:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id NAA22495; Tue, 3 Apr 2001 13:08:16 -0700 (PDT) From: Received: from zmamail01.nz-tay.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA02950; Tue, 3 Apr 2001 13:08:14 -0700 Received: by zmamail01.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 815E3DF04; Tue, 3 Apr 2001 16:08:14 -0400 (EDT) Received: from internet.atc.com.kw (unknown [168.187.142.66]) by zmamail01.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 394A7113E2; Tue, 3 Apr 2001 16:08:09 -0400 (EDT) Received: from [209.206.0.40] by internet.atc.com.kw (Netscape Messaging Server 3.01) with SMTP id 391; Tue, 3 Apr 2001 11:52:48 +0300 Message-Id: <000025561499$00005eba$00000e97@Received: from crcst154.netaddress.usa.net (HELO crcst346.netaddress.usa.net) (204.68.24.154) > To: Subject: Rates DROPPED! Low Interest Loans From Flexible Lenders! Date: Tue, 03 Apr 2001 02:05:06 -0800 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Priority: 3 X-Msmail-Priority: Normal Reply-To: abel98s@arabia.com Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk Loan Specialists

 We are Loan Specialists.....Ta= p into our huge network of Lenders!

For U.S.A. Homeowners Only
Interest Rates have Dropped....Start Saving Now!

We = Will Shop The Best Loan For You!

We provide a 100% free = service which lets you shop for a loan conveniently and securely from the comfort of your home. Tap into our huge network of lenders across the U.S. with different appetites for different types of credit/equity profiles.  Even if you're currently working with another lender or have been turned down before, we can still help and structure a program that may just make = some sense to you. 

Our loan programs can get you the cash you need for:

  • Debt Consolidation
  • 2nd Mortgage
  • Refinance
  • Credit Repair
  • Home Improvement
  • New Car
  • Dream Vacation
  • College Tuition
  • To start a new business ..and much, much more!

Funding borr= owers with less than perfect credit is our specialty!

W= e can get you the loan you need. 
Regardless of whether you have good or bad credit, we can help you.

Ready to get started? 
Simply fill out the our 60 second form, and we= 'll begin shopping for your loan.
  
It's that easy!  We Make the Lenders Compete for Y= OUR Business!

Please complete this form.
Our loan specialist will be contacting you at your convenience.
Thank You.

 
Contact Information: * Required Info
Name: *
Address: *
City: *
State (USA Only): *
Zip/Postal Code: *<= /td>
Home Phone:  *
Work Phone: *
Email Address: *
Best Time to Call:
Do You Own Your Home?: Mobile Homes DO NOT Qualify
Property Value: *
Property Type:
Purchase Price: *
Year Acquired: *
1st Mortgage Balance Owed: *
1st Mortgage Interest Rate: *
Is 1st Adjustable or Fixed?: *
2nd Mortgage Balance Owed:
Amount You Wish To Borrow: *
Employer:
Monthly Gross Household Income: *
Mon= thly Debt:: 
Credit Rating: *
Loan Interested In: *

 

Removal Instructions
Click on the below link to be exclude from further communication.
Click Here=

From wrl-techops@pa.dec.com Wed Apr 4 21:36:24 2001 Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (root@mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id VAA04783 for ; Wed, 4 Apr 2001 21:36:24 +0200 Received: from zcamail05.zca.compaq.com (zcamail05.zca.compaq.com [161.114.32.105]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id VAA24669 for ; Wed, 4 Apr 2001 21:36:22 +0200 (METDST) Received: by zcamail05.zca.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id E5B1D8FF; Wed, 4 Apr 2001 12:37:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mailrelay01.cac.cpqcorp.net (mailrelay01.cac.cpqcorp.net [16.47.132.152]) by zcamail05.zca.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C85E8ADA; Wed, 4 Apr 2001 12:37:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mailrelay01.cac.cpqcorp.net (Postfix, from userid 12345) id B627A163; Wed, 4 Apr 2001 12:34:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mailrelay01.cac.cpqcorp.net (Postfix) with SMTP id 87608179; Wed, 4 Apr 2001 12:34:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA28469; Wed, 4 Apr 2001 12:34:25 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id MAA19648; Wed, 4 Apr 2001 12:28:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id MAA24036; Wed, 4 Apr 2001 12:28:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: from zmamail01.nz-tay.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA13965; Wed, 4 Apr 2001 12:28:34 -0700 Received: by zmamail01.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 67B8DDC83; Wed, 4 Apr 2001 15:28:34 -0400 (EDT) Received: from xanadu.home (modemcable084.137-200-24.mtl.mc.videotron.ca [24.200.137.84]) by zmamail01.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F0B40DF5F for ; Wed, 4 Apr 2001 15:28:33 -0400 (EDT) Received: from localhost (nico@localhost) by xanadu.home (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id PAA21270; Wed, 4 Apr 2001 15:28:28 -0400 X-Authentication-Warning: xanadu.home: nico owned process doing -bs Date: Wed, 4 Apr 2001 15:28:28 -0400 (EDT) From: Nicolas Pitre X-X-Sender: To: Oleg Drokin Cc: SA-1100/Linux , Subject: Re: final usb patch In-Reply-To: <20010404223935.A4222@linuxhacker.ru> Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk On Wed, 4 Apr 2001, Oleg Drokin wrote: > Hello! > > Here is the latest patch. I just figured that most of my link errors was due > to noisy USB cable, I replaced craddle and now I can use it without problems, > but with this patch I am able to compile glibc even over noisy cable, > so I think it worth including. > Patch is against 2.4.2-rmk2-np1 > I most probably stop to hack on this usb code for a while and start to > collect reports on its behavior (esp. reproducible bad one), > so if you have something to share, feel free to mail me. One thing I would like you to test is removing the receive dma buffer. The claim that dma requires 8-byte alignment isn't specified in any documentation, and things seem to work pretty well on the transmit side anyway. This might certainly help for slightly better performance and less CPU usage. Nicolas From wrl-techops@pa.dec.com Thu Apr 5 08:03:49 2001 Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (root@mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id IAA06033 for ; Thu, 5 Apr 2001 08:03:49 +0200 Received: from zmamail04.zma.compaq.com (zmamail04.zma.compaq.com [161.114.64.104]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id IAA18849 for ; Thu, 5 Apr 2001 08:03:47 +0200 (METDST) Received: by zmamail04.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id D38EC618E; Thu, 5 Apr 2001 02:02:00 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailrelay01.cac.cpqcorp.net (mailrelay01.cac.cpqcorp.net [16.47.132.152]) by zmamail04.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7FB8661A2; Thu, 5 Apr 2001 02:02:00 -0400 (EDT) Received: by mailrelay01.cac.cpqcorp.net (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 1251B188; Wed, 4 Apr 2001 23:01:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mailrelay01.cac.cpqcorp.net (Postfix) with SMTP id 53FF5199; Wed, 4 Apr 2001 23:01:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA27359; Wed, 4 Apr 2001 23:01:57 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id XAA32326; Wed, 4 Apr 2001 23:00:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id XAA15148; Wed, 4 Apr 2001 23:00:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: from zmamail02.nz-tay.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA24543; Wed, 4 Apr 2001 23:00:03 -0700 Received: by zmamail02.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 606115321; Thu, 5 Apr 2001 02:00:02 -0400 (EDT) Received: from linuxhacker.ru (unknown [213.128.193.148]) by zmamail02.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D2F4850C5 for ; Thu, 5 Apr 2001 01:59:59 -0400 (EDT) Received: (from uucp@localhost) by linuxhacker.ru (8.9.3/8.9.3) with UUCP id WAA11573; Wed, 4 Apr 2001 22:54:29 +0400 Received: (from green@localhost) by linuxhacker.ru (8.10.1/8.10.1) id f34IdZG04225; Wed, 4 Apr 2001 22:39:35 +0400 Date: Wed, 4 Apr 2001 22:39:35 +0400 From: Oleg Drokin To: nico@CAM.ORG, sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com, ward.willats@extenex.com Subject: final usb patch Message-Id: <20010404223935.A4222@linuxhacker.ru> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0.1i Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk Hello! Here is the latest patch. I just figured that most of my link errors was due to noisy USB cable, I replaced craddle and now I can use it without problems, but with this patch I am able to compile glibc even over noisy cable, so I think it worth including. Patch is against 2.4.2-rmk2-np1 I most probably stop to hack on this usb code for a while and start to collect reports on its behavior (esp. reproducible bad one), so if you have something to share, feel free to mail me. Bye, Oleg --- usb_recv.c.orig Wed Apr 4 22:28:17 2001 +++ usb_recv.c Wed Apr 4 22:29:20 2001 @@ -116,11 +116,6 @@ if (status & UDCCS1_RPC) { - if (status & UDCCS1_SST) { - printk("usb_recv: stall sent\n"); - UDC_flip(Ser0UDCCS1, UDCCS1_SST); - } - if (!ep1_curdmalen) { printk("usb_recv: RPC for non-existent buffer\n"); naking=1; @@ -128,6 +123,13 @@ } sa1100_dma_stop(dmachn_rx); + + if (status & UDCCS1_SST) { + printk("usb_recv: stall sent OMP=%d\n",Ser0UDCOMP); + UDC_flip(Ser0UDCCS1, UDCCS1_SST); + ep1_done(-EIO); // UDC aborted current transfer, so we do + return; + } if (status & UDCCS1_RPE) { printk("usb_recv: RPError %x\n", status); --- usb-eth.c.orig Wed Apr 4 22:28:17 2001 +++ usb-eth.c Wed Apr 4 22:30:05 2001 @@ -22,6 +22,9 @@ * 15/03/2001 - Using buffer to get data from UDC. DMA needs to have 8 byte * aligned buffer, but this breaks IP code (unaligned access). * + * 01/04/2001 - stall endpoint operations appeared to be very unstable, so + * they are disabled now. + * */ #include @@ -98,7 +101,6 @@ if (flag == 0) { if ( skb_tailroom (skb) < size ) { // hey! we are overloaded!!! usbe_info.stats.rx_over_errors++; - sa1100_usb_recv_stall(); goto error; } memcpy(skb->tail,dmabuf,size); @@ -106,9 +108,8 @@ } else { if (flag == -EIO) { usbe_info.stats.rx_errors++; - // sa1100_usb_recv_stall(); } - //goto error; + goto error; } /* validate packet length */ @@ -126,7 +127,7 @@ if (skb) cur_rx_skb = next_rx_skb; - sa1100_usb_recv(dmabuf, skb_tailroom(cur_rx_skb), + sa1100_usb_recv(dmabuf, usb_rsize, usb_recv_callback); if (!skb) return; From wrl-techops@pa.dec.com Thu Apr 5 19:09:34 2001 Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (root@mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id TAA07639 for ; Thu, 5 Apr 2001 19:09:34 +0200 Received: from zmamail04.zma.compaq.com (zmamail04.zma.compaq.com [161.114.64.104]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id TAA11145 for ; Thu, 5 Apr 2001 19:09:32 +0200 (METDST) Received: by zmamail04.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 22A7E61B2; Thu, 5 Apr 2001 13:07:46 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailrelay01.cac.cpqcorp.net (mailrelay01.cac.cpqcorp.net [16.47.132.152]) by zmamail04.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A2CE36033; Thu, 5 Apr 2001 13:07:45 -0400 (EDT) Received: by mailrelay01.cac.cpqcorp.net (Postfix, from userid 12345) id CA641144; Thu, 5 Apr 2001 10:07:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mailrelay01.cac.cpqcorp.net (Postfix) with SMTP id 462BF148; Thu, 5 Apr 2001 10:07:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA17298; Thu, 5 Apr 2001 10:07:41 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id KAA03648; Thu, 5 Apr 2001 10:05:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id KAA03673; Thu, 5 Apr 2001 10:05:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: from zmamail01.nz-tay.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA14238; Thu, 5 Apr 2001 10:05:10 -0700 Received: by zmamail01.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 5AAB211542; Thu, 5 Apr 2001 13:05:10 -0400 (EDT) Received: from hooper2.licor.com (unknown [204.214.131.136]) by zmamail01.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 8F51211741 for ; Thu, 5 Apr 2001 13:05:09 -0400 (EDT) Received: by hooper2.licor.com(Lotus SMTP MTA v4.6.2 (693.3 8-11-1998)) id 86256A26.001BD469 ; Fri, 6 Apr 2001 00:03:58 -0500 X-Lotus-Fromdomain: LI-COR From: "Chris Lesiak" To: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Message-Id: <86256A26.001BC2FA.00@hooper2.licor.com> Date: Thu, 5 Apr 2001 11:53:33 -0500 Subject: Re: final usb patch Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk I've got a problem that I have had for the last few versions and this one still doesn't do the trick. My current setup is as follows: Assabet with linux-2.4.2-rmk2-np1 and Oleg's final usb patch applied. The other end of the connection is a Pentium with OHCI usb card running linux-2.4.3-ac2. When I ping the assabet from the Pentium, all appears to work fine for a few hundred packets other than the Assabet printking "usb_recv: RPError 26" a couple of times. But the pings continue to work. Finally, the Pentium logs "kernel: NETDEV WATCHDOG: usb0: transmit timed out" The pings fail from that point on. Any suggestions? Thanks Chris Lesiak From wrl-techops@pa.dec.com Thu Apr 5 20:30:08 2001 Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (root@mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id UAA07779 for ; Thu, 5 Apr 2001 20:30:08 +0200 Received: from zcamail03.zca.compaq.com (zcamail03.zca.compaq.com [161.114.32.103]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id UAA15596 for ; Thu, 5 Apr 2001 20:30:06 +0200 (METDST) Received: by zcamail03.zca.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 2179ED41; Thu, 5 Apr 2001 11:28:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mailrelay01.cac.cpqcorp.net (mailrelay01.cac.cpqcorp.net [16.47.132.152]) by zcamail03.zca.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E574DC75; Thu, 5 Apr 2001 11:28:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mailrelay01.cac.cpqcorp.net (Postfix, from userid 12345) id BB94E137; Thu, 5 Apr 2001 11:28:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mailrelay01.cac.cpqcorp.net (Postfix) with SMTP id 826B7182; Thu, 5 Apr 2001 11:28:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA29992; Thu, 5 Apr 2001 11:28:05 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id LAA25437; Thu, 5 Apr 2001 11:25:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id LAA28747; Thu, 5 Apr 2001 11:25:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ztxmail02.nz-cce.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA09107; Thu, 5 Apr 2001 11:25:29 -0700 Received: by ztxmail02.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 746D25009; Thu, 5 Apr 2001 13:24:25 -0500 (CDT) Received: from linuxhacker.ru (unknown [213.128.193.148]) by ztxmail02.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A735E51DA for ; Thu, 5 Apr 2001 13:24:23 -0500 (CDT) Received: (from uucp@localhost) by linuxhacker.ru (8.9.3/8.9.3) with UUCP id WAA13546; Thu, 5 Apr 2001 22:24:00 +0400 Received: (from green@localhost) by linuxhacker.ru (8.10.1/8.10.1) id f35IOiQ12866; Thu, 5 Apr 2001 22:24:44 +0400 Date: Thu, 5 Apr 2001 22:24:44 +0400 From: Oleg Drokin To: clesiak@licor.com Cc: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Subject: Re: final usb patch Message-Id: <20010405222444.A12850@linuxhacker.ru> References: <200104051804.f35I4ft01868@morgoth.ixcelerator.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0.1i In-Reply-To: <200104051804.f35I4ft01868@morgoth.ixcelerator.com>; from green@linuxhacker.ru on Thu, Apr 05, 2001 at 10:04:41PM +0400 Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk Hello! > I've got a problem that I have had for the last few versions > and this one still doesn't do the trick. Hmm... > My current setup is as follows: > Assabet with linux-2.4.2-rmk2-np1 and Oleg's final usb patch applied. > The other end of the connection is a Pentium with OHCI usb card > running linux-2.4.3-ac2. > When I ping the assabet from the Pentium, all appears to work fine > for a few hundred packets other than the Assabet printking > "usb_recv: RPError 26" a couple of times. But the pings continue > to work. just plaing ping, or some kind of ping -f? What packet size? What usbnet driver? > Finally, the Pentium logs > "kernel: NETDEV WATCHDOG: usb0: transmit timed out" > The pings fail from that point on. What's in logs at assabet side at this point? Also do ifconfig usbf several times to see, may be some values (like error count) increases? Do USB interrupts number is increasing? (in /proc/interrupts) What's in /proc/sausb? Also is host side USB appear to be alive? Does it try to actually send anything? Do numbers given out by 'ifconfif usb0' change over time? I must admit, that I had no time to test this stuff on our assabet board, but I plan to do it. Bye, Oleg From wrl-techops@pa.dec.com Thu Apr 5 20:57:50 2001 Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (root@mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id UAA07844 for ; Thu, 5 Apr 2001 20:57:50 +0200 Received: from zcamail05.zca.compaq.com (zcamail05.zca.compaq.com [161.114.32.105]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id UAA17148 for ; Thu, 5 Apr 2001 20:57:47 +0200 (METDST) Received: by zcamail05.zca.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 04DDBA05; Thu, 5 Apr 2001 11:58:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mailrelay01.cac.cpqcorp.net (mailrelay01.cac.cpqcorp.net [16.47.132.152]) by zcamail05.zca.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D5F58B9F; Thu, 5 Apr 2001 11:58:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mailrelay01.cac.cpqcorp.net (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 6323E182; Thu, 5 Apr 2001 11:55:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mailrelay01.cac.cpqcorp.net (Postfix) with SMTP id A251C172; Thu, 5 Apr 2001 11:55:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA22179; Thu, 5 Apr 2001 11:55:51 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id LAA27511; Thu, 5 Apr 2001 11:54:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id LAA26359; Thu, 5 Apr 2001 11:54:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: from zmamail02.nz-tay.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA09688; Thu, 5 Apr 2001 11:54:53 -0700 Received: by zmamail02.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 39C3E221C; Thu, 5 Apr 2001 14:54:49 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mail.netx4.com (216-064-003-018.inaddr.vitts.com [216.64.3.18]) by zmamail02.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B87EE210D for ; Thu, 5 Apr 2001 14:54:48 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mvista.com (IDENT:davis_g@greeny.netx4.com [192.168.253.30]) by mail.netx4.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id LAA12947; Thu, 5 Apr 2001 11:05:47 -0400 Message-Id: <3ACCBF21.F5663073@mvista.com> Date: Thu, 05 Apr 2001 14:53:21 -0400 From: "George G. Davis" Organization: MontaVista Software, Inc. X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.7 [en] (X11; I; Linux 2.4.0 ppc) X-Accept-Language: en Mime-Version: 1.0 To: Chris Lesiak Cc: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Subject: Re: final usb patch References: <86256A26.001BC2FA.00@hooper2.licor.com> Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="------------A859FD09AECC85D29644EFEA" Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------A859FD09AECC85D29644EFEA Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Chris Lesiak wrote: > > I've got a problem that I have had for the last few versions > and this one still doesn't do the trick. > > My current setup is as follows: > > Assabet with linux-2.4.2-rmk2-np1 and Oleg's final usb patch applied. > The other end of the connection is a Pentium with OHCI usb card > running linux-2.4.3-ac2. > > When I ping the assabet from the Pentium, all appears to work fine > for a few hundred packets other than the Assabet printking > "usb_recv: RPError 26" a couple of times. But the pings continue > to work. > > Finally, the Pentium logs > "kernel: NETDEV WATCHDOG: usb0: transmit timed out" > The pings fail from that point on. > > Any suggestions? IMHO, we all need to pay attention to the SA-1110 silicon rev we're using when reporting these problems. So, with that said, can you please provide the first few lines of your kernel init messages, e.g. here's what I'm using: Linux version 2.4.2-hhl1 (davis_g@dp500.netx4.com) (gcc version 2.95.2 199910301 Processor: Intel StrongARM-1110 revision 8 I think this works out to be rev B4 silcon. Later silicon revs should work better. If you're really lucky, you'll have the latest rev B5 silicon. : ) > > Thanks > Chris Lesiak -- Regards, George --------------A859FD09AECC85D29644EFEA Content-Type: text/x-vcard; charset=iso-8859-1; name="davis_g.vcf" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-Description: Card for George G. Davis Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="davis_g.vcf" YmVnaW46dmNhcmQgCm46RGF2aXM7R2VvcmdlCnRlbDt3b3JrOjYwMy84ODAtMTQxNAp4LW1v emlsbGEtaHRtbDpGQUxTRQp1cmw6aHR0cDovL3d3dy5tdmlzdGEuY29tCm9yZzpNb250YVZp c3RhIFNvZnR3YXJlLCBJbmMuCmFkcjo7OzQ2IFBpbmUgU3RyZWV0IEV4dGVuc2lvbjtOYXNo dWE7Tkg7MDMwNjA7VVNBCnZlcnNpb246Mi4xCmVtYWlsO2ludGVybmV0OmRhdmlzX2dAbXZp c3RhLmNvbQp0aXRsZTpTb2Z0d2FyZSBFbmdpbmVlcgp4LW1vemlsbGEtY3B0OjstNTM3Ngpm bjpHZW9yZ2UgRy4gRGF2aXMKZW5kOnZjYXJkCg== --------------A859FD09AECC85D29644EFEA-- From wrl-techops@pa.dec.com Thu Apr 5 21:51:51 2001 Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (root@mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id VAA07956 for ; Thu, 5 Apr 2001 21:51:51 +0200 Received: from zcamail05.zca.compaq.com (zcamail05.zca.compaq.com [161.114.32.105]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id VAA20337 for ; Thu, 5 Apr 2001 21:51:49 +0200 (METDST) Received: by zcamail05.zca.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 5FB419E7; Thu, 5 Apr 2001 12:52:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mailrelay01.cce.cpqcorp.net (mailrelay01.cce.cpqcorp.net [16.47.68.171]) by zcamail05.zca.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 08343B2E; Thu, 5 Apr 2001 12:52:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mailrelay01.cce.cpqcorp.net (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 238152E5; Thu, 5 Apr 2001 14:49:51 -0500 (CDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mailrelay01.cce.cpqcorp.net (Postfix) with SMTP id 66E9733E; Thu, 5 Apr 2001 14:49:49 -0500 (CDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA07342; Thu, 5 Apr 2001 12:49:47 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id MAA12843; Thu, 5 Apr 2001 12:45:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id MAA13101; Thu, 5 Apr 2001 12:45:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: from zmamail01.nz-tay.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA04878; Thu, 5 Apr 2001 12:45:13 -0700 Received: by zmamail01.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 690D81137D; Thu, 5 Apr 2001 15:45:13 -0400 (EDT) Received: from hooper2.licor.com (unknown [204.214.131.136]) by zmamail01.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id BCD021159E for ; Thu, 5 Apr 2001 15:45:12 -0400 (EDT) Received: by hooper2.licor.com(Lotus SMTP MTA v4.6.2 (693.3 8-11-1998)) id 86256A26.002A828D ; Fri, 6 Apr 2001 02:44:19 -0500 X-Lotus-Fromdomain: LI-COR From: "Chris Lesiak" To: "George G. Davis" Cc: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Message-Id: <86256A26.002A803B.00@hooper2.licor.com> Date: Thu, 5 Apr 2001 14:42:33 -0500 Subject: Re: final usb patch Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; Boundary="0__=1Pe8yHfyCFvDYUvzOoMpI4NcERk1sVqOUmvOoPa8Xnp7402FOdVb00gK" Content-Disposition: inline Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk --0__=1Pe8yHfyCFvDYUvzOoMpI4NcERk1sVqOUmvOoPa8Xnp7402FOdVb00gK Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline I'm using: Linux version 2.4.2-rmk2-np1 (root@argus3) (gcc version 2.95.2.1 19991024 (release)) #71 Processor: Intel StrongARM-1110 revision 8 Is the usb-eth working on your revision 8 board? Thanks, Chris Lesiak Chris Lesiak wrote: > > I've got a problem that I have had for the last few versions > and this one still doesn't do the trick. > > My current setup is as follows: > > Assabet with linux-2.4.2-rmk2-np1 and Oleg's final usb patch applied. > The other end of the connection is a Pentium with OHCI usb card > running linux-2.4.3-ac2. > > When I ping the assabet from the Pentium, all appears to work fine > for a few hundred packets other than the Assabet printking > "usb_recv: RPError 26" a couple of times. But the pings continue > to work. > > Finally, the Pentium logs > "kernel: NETDEV WATCHDOG: usb0: transmit timed out" > The pings fail from that point on. > > Any suggestions? IMHO, we all need to pay attention to the SA-1110 silicon rev we're using when reporting these problems. So, with that said, can you please provide the first few lines of your kernel init messages, e.g. here's what I'm using: Linux version 2.4.2-hhl1 (davis_g@dp500.netx4.com) (gcc version 2.95.2 199910301 Processor: Intel StrongARM-1110 revision 8 I think this works out to be rev B4 silcon. Later silicon revs should work better. If you're really lucky, you'll have the latest rev B5 silicon. : ) > > Thanks > Chris Lesiak -- Regards, George --0__=1Pe8yHfyCFvDYUvzOoMpI4NcERk1sVqOUmvOoPa8Xnp7402FOdVb00gK Content-type: application/octet-stream; name="davis_g.vcf" Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="davis_g.vcf" Content-transfer-encoding: base64 YmVnaW46dmNhcmQgCm46RGF2aXM7R2VvcmdlCnRlbDt3b3JrOjYwMy84ODAtMTQxNAp4LW1vemls bGEtaHRtbDpGQUxTRQp1cmw6aHR0cDovL3d3dy5tdmlzdGEuY29tCm9yZzpNb250YVZpc3RhIFNv ZnR3YXJlLCBJbmMuCmFkcjo7OzQ2IFBpbmUgU3RyZWV0IEV4dGVuc2lvbjtOYXNodWE7Tkg7MDMw NjA7VVNBCnZlcnNpb246Mi4xCmVtYWlsO2ludGVybmV0OmRhdmlzX2dAbXZpc3RhLmNvbQp0aXRs ZTpTb2Z0d2FyZSBFbmdpbmVlcgp4LW1vemlsbGEtY3B0OjstNTM3NgpmbjpHZW9yZ2UgRy4gRGF2 aXMKZW5kOnZjYXJkCg== --0__=1Pe8yHfyCFvDYUvzOoMpI4NcERk1sVqOUmvOoPa8Xnp7402FOdVb00gK-- From wrl-techops@pa.dec.com Thu Apr 5 22:23:53 2001 Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (root@mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id WAA08011 for ; Thu, 5 Apr 2001 22:23:53 +0200 Received: from ztxmail03.ztx.compaq.com (ztxmail03.ztx.compaq.com [161.114.1.207]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id WAA21952 for ; Thu, 5 Apr 2001 22:23:50 +0200 (METDST) Received: by ztxmail03.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 9244FAEE; Thu, 5 Apr 2001 15:22:03 -0500 (CDT) Received: from mailrelay01.cac.cpqcorp.net (mailrelay01.cac.cpqcorp.net [16.47.132.152]) by ztxmail03.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 09941195B; Thu, 5 Apr 2001 15:22:03 -0500 (CDT) Received: by mailrelay01.cac.cpqcorp.net (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 1A4F1185; Thu, 5 Apr 2001 13:21:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mailrelay01.cac.cpqcorp.net (Postfix) with SMTP id 3850F191; Thu, 5 Apr 2001 13:21:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA21574; Thu, 5 Apr 2001 13:21:56 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id NAA12182; Thu, 5 Apr 2001 13:21:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id NAA12685; Thu, 5 Apr 2001 13:21:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: from zmamail01.nz-tay.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA18220; Thu, 5 Apr 2001 13:21:00 -0700 Received: by zmamail01.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 14284DDD6; Thu, 5 Apr 2001 16:21:00 -0400 (EDT) Received: from hooper2.licor.com (unknown [204.214.131.136]) by zmamail01.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 53401114B8 for ; Thu, 5 Apr 2001 16:20:59 -0400 (EDT) Received: by hooper2.licor.com(Lotus SMTP MTA v4.6.2 (693.3 8-11-1998)) id 86256A26.002DCD0D ; Fri, 6 Apr 2001 03:20:16 -0500 X-Lotus-Fromdomain: LI-COR From: "Chris Lesiak" To: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Message-Id: <86256A26.002DCCF3.00@hooper2.licor.com> Date: Thu, 5 Apr 2001 15:15:37 -0500 Subject: Re: final usb patch Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk I used plain ping with a 64 byte size. I am using the usbnet driver from linux-2.4.3-ac2 which appears to be have usbnet-ac20.diff already applied. Before ping starts failing, ifconfig on Assabet shows usbf Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr F2:B1:10:52:F1:5A inet addr:172.24.41.106 Mask:255.255.255.255 UP RUNNING MTU:1500 Metric:1 RX packets:94 errors:4 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:1 TX packets:94 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0 collisions:0 txqueuelen:100 RX bytes:7728 (7.5 kb) TX bytes:9044 (8.8 kb) and ifconfig on Pentium shows no errors at all. Once the pings start failing, no more errors appear with ifconfig on either end. Also, usb interrupts stop occuring on both ends. cat /proc/sausb on the Assabet gives: SA1100 USB Controller Core USB state: configured (configured) 6 ep0 bytes read: 9 ep0 bytes written: 100 ep0 FIFO read failures: 0 ep0 FIFO write failures: 0 Address Register: 0x0000001A - 26 IN max packet size: 34 (00000021) OUT max packet size: 64 (0000003F) UDC Mask Register Value: 00000000 UDC Active: NO Suspend interrupts masked: NO Resume interrupts masked: NO Reset interrupts masked: NO UDC Interrupt Request Register Value: 00000000 Reset pending: NO Suspend pending: NO Resume pending: NO ep0 pending: NO receiver pending: NO tramsitter pending: NO Hello! > I've got a problem that I have had for the last few versions > and this one still doesn't do the trick. Hmm... > My current setup is as follows: > Assabet with linux-2.4.2-rmk2-np1 and Oleg's final usb patch applied. > The other end of the connection is a Pentium with OHCI usb card > running linux-2.4.3-ac2. > When I ping the assabet from the Pentium, all appears to work fine > for a few hundred packets other than the Assabet printking > "usb_recv: RPError 26" a couple of times. But the pings continue > to work. just plaing ping, or some kind of ping -f? What packet size? What usbnet driver? > Finally, the Pentium logs > "kernel: NETDEV WATCHDOG: usb0: transmit timed out" > The pings fail from that point on. What's in logs at assabet side at this point? Also do ifconfig usbf several times to see, may be some values (like error count) increases? Do USB interrupts number is increasing? (in /proc/interrupts) What's in /proc/sausb? Also is host side USB appear to be alive? Does it try to actually send anything? Do numbers given out by 'ifconfif usb0' change over time? I must admit, that I had no time to test this stuff on our assabet board, but I plan to do it. Bye, Oleg From wrl-techops@pa.dec.com Fri Apr 6 19:16:48 2001 Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (root@mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id TAA10938 for ; Fri, 6 Apr 2001 19:16:48 +0200 Received: from ztxmail05.ztx.compaq.com (ztxmail05.ztx.compaq.com [161.114.1.209]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id TAA24848 for ; Fri, 6 Apr 2001 19:16:46 +0200 (METDST) Received: by ztxmail05.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 4ABA7A6E; Fri, 6 Apr 2001 12:14:55 -0500 (CDT) Received: from mailrelay01.cac.cpqcorp.net (mailrelay01.cac.cpqcorp.net [16.47.132.152]) by ztxmail05.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E4F382D; Fri, 6 Apr 2001 12:14:51 -0500 (CDT) Received: by mailrelay01.cac.cpqcorp.net (Postfix, from userid 12345) id EBEF817B; Fri, 6 Apr 2001 10:14:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mailrelay01.cac.cpqcorp.net (Postfix) with SMTP id BFC87185; Fri, 6 Apr 2001 10:14:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA09784; Fri, 6 Apr 2001 10:14:38 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id KAA17617; Fri, 6 Apr 2001 10:11:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id KAA17529; Fri, 6 Apr 2001 10:11:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ztxmail02.nz-cce.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA20042; Fri, 6 Apr 2001 10:11:41 -0700 Received: by ztxmail02.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 7AC9F9896; Fri, 6 Apr 2001 12:11:41 -0500 (CDT) Received: from www.abcsinc.com (unknown [12.148.134.2]) by ztxmail02.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id CD728999F for ; Fri, 6 Apr 2001 12:11:40 -0500 (CDT) Received: from hardwar8 ([192.168.1.122]) by www.abcsinc.com (8.9.3/8.8.7) with SMTP id MAA00331 for ; Fri, 6 Apr 2001 12:58:22 -0500 Message-Id: <005e01c0bebc$8d9bc920$7a01a8c0@abcsinc.com> From: "David Anders" To: Subject: elf board Date: Fri, 6 Apr 2001 12:11:00 -0500 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_005B_01C0BE92.A4936680" X-Priority: 3 X-Msmail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2615.200 X-Mimeole: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2615.200 Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_005B_01C0BE92.A4936680 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable is anyone other there doing development on the elf board from inhand = electronics? ------=_NextPart_000_005B_01C0BE92.A4936680 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
is anyone other there doing development = on the elf=20 board from inhand electronics?
------=_NextPart_000_005B_01C0BE92.A4936680-- From wrl-techops@pa.dec.com Sat Apr 7 11:41:17 2001 Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (root@mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id LAA12479 for ; Sat, 7 Apr 2001 11:41:17 +0200 Received: from zcamail04.zca.compaq.com (zcamail04.zca.compaq.com [161.114.32.104]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id LAA25746 for ; Sat, 7 Apr 2001 11:41:15 +0200 (METDST) Received: by zcamail04.zca.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 697A82E4; Sat, 7 Apr 2001 02:40:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: from taynzmail03.nz-tay.cpqcorp.net (taynzmail03.nz-tay.cpqcorp.net [16.47.4.103]) by zcamail04.zca.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F0E682A8; Sat, 7 Apr 2001 02:40:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: by taynzmail03.nz-tay.cpqcorp.net (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 43126131; Sat, 7 Apr 2001 05:39:18 -0400 (EDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by taynzmail03.nz-tay.cpqcorp.net (Postfix) with SMTP id 46A701D1; Sat, 7 Apr 2001 05:39:16 -0400 (EDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA25853; Sat, 7 Apr 2001 02:39:12 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id CAA27529; Sat, 7 Apr 2001 02:32:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id CAA13306; Sat, 7 Apr 2001 02:32:54 -0700 (PDT) From: Received: from ztxmail01.nz-cce.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA31313; Sat, 7 Apr 2001 02:32:53 -0700 Received: by ztxmail01.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 5C7DD7D37; Sat, 7 Apr 2001 04:32:53 -0500 (CDT) Received: from manripo-h.ed.chungnam.kr (unknown [210.204.97.1]) by ztxmail01.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 755067DD2 for ; Sat, 7 Apr 2001 04:32:51 -0500 (CDT) Received: (qmail 18882 invoked from network); 25 Mar 2000 14:28:09 -0000 Received: from slip-32-102-75-11.wi.us.prserv.net (HELO 32.102.75.11) (32.102.75.11) by softdnserror with SMTP; 25 Mar 2000 14:28:09 -0000 Message-Id: <00006bce2e74$000039ec$00001eaf@> To: Subject: We want to give you a Brand New F R E E Pager ... 7855 Date: Sun, 25 Mar 2001 22:28:33 -0500 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-Msmail-Priority: Normal Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk Brand New Pager for F R E E! Put F R E E pagers on your kids - Give one to your loved ones - For F R E E Here at Paging America we are excited to be offering you this exclusive, top of the line, full featured pager in your choice of color for F R E E . This side viewable display pager is one of the smallest and lightest pagers on the market today. Call 877-699-7409 to be Guaranteed Your F R E E Pager Today Your pager will hold up to 20 numeric messages. It has 9 music alerts and silent vibration. New FLEX technology provides three times the battery life. Also, message time and date stamping and smart alarm so you can set a daily or weekly reminder. Just call the toll F R E E number and we'll ship your F R E E pager to you immediately in your choice of color already programmed with a local telephone number for your town. Make this easy phone call and we will deliver your pager immediately. Call 877-699-7409 to get in on this exciting offer today To get off this send email to wave799us@yahoo.com From wrl-techops@pa.dec.com Sat Apr 7 12:19:02 2001 Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (root@mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id MAA12589 for ; Sat, 7 Apr 2001 12:19:02 +0200 Received: from ztxmail04.ztx.compaq.com (ztxmail04.ztx.compaq.com [161.114.1.208]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id MAA26890 for ; Sat, 7 Apr 2001 12:18:59 +0200 (METDST) Received: by ztxmail04.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id C01F1AFB; Sat, 7 Apr 2001 05:17:12 -0500 (CDT) Received: from taynzmail03.nz-tay.cpqcorp.net (taynzmail03.nz-tay.cpqcorp.net [16.47.4.103]) by ztxmail04.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1AF9B888; Sat, 7 Apr 2001 05:17:12 -0500 (CDT) Received: by taynzmail03.nz-tay.cpqcorp.net (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 759E3290; Sat, 7 Apr 2001 06:17:11 -0400 (EDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by taynzmail03.nz-tay.cpqcorp.net (Postfix) with SMTP id 43F72131; Sat, 7 Apr 2001 06:17:09 -0400 (EDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA08399; Sat, 7 Apr 2001 03:17:08 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id DAA06641; Sat, 7 Apr 2001 03:15:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id DAA14671; Sat, 7 Apr 2001 03:15:06 -0700 (PDT) From: Received: from zmamail01.nz-tay.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA20083; Sat, 7 Apr 2001 03:15:05 -0700 Received: by zmamail01.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id C0314E325; Sat, 7 Apr 2001 06:15:04 -0400 (EDT) Received: from dominios2.arnet.com.ar (corderoatado.arnet.com.ar [200.45.0.3]) by zmamail01.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A102E14D; Sat, 7 Apr 2001 06:15:03 -0400 (EDT) Received: from 210.101.86.173 ([216.214.207.198]) by dominios2.arnet.com.ar with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.5.1877.357.35); Sat, 7 Apr 2001 07:09:45 -0300 Message-Id: <000050201683$000037fa$00006745@210.101.86.173> To: Subject: Mortgage Rates DROPPED! Act Now & Save! Date: Sat, 07 Apr 2001 04:43:25 -0600 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Priority: 3 X-Msmail-Priority: Normal Reply-To: flo3564@yahoo.com Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk Loan Specialists

 We are Loan Specialists.....Ta= p into our huge network of Lenders!

For U.S.A. Homeowners Only
Interest Rates have Dropped....Start Saving Now!

We = Will Shop The Best Loan For You!

We provide a 100% free = service which lets you shop for a loan conveniently and securely from the comfort of your home. Tap into our huge network of lenders across the U.S. with different appetites for different types of credit/equity profiles.  Even if you're currently working with another lender or have been turned down before, we can still help and structure a program that may just make = some sense to you. 

Our loan programs can get you the cash you need for:

  • Debt Consolidation
  • 2nd Mortgage
  • Refinance
  • Credit Repair
  • Home Improvement
  • New Car
  • Dream Vacation
  • College Tuition
  • To start a new business ..and much, much more!

Funding borr= owers with less than perfect credit is our specialty!

W= e can get you the loan you need. 
Regardless of whether you have good or bad credit, we can help you.

Ready to get started? 
Simply fill out the our 60 second form, and we= 'll begin shopping for your loan.
  
It's that easy!  We Make the Lenders Compete for Y= OUR Business!

Please complete this form.
Our loan specialist will be contacting you at your convenience.
Thank You.

 
Contact Information: * Required Info
Name: *
Address: *
City: *
State (USA Only): *
Zip/Postal Code: *<= /td>
Home Phone:  *
Work Phone: *
Email Address: *
Best Time to Call:
Do You Own Your Home?: Mobile Homes DO NOT Qualify
Property Value: *
Property Type:
Purchase Price: *
Year Acquired: *
1st Mortgage Balance Owed: *
1st Mortgage Interest Rate: *
Is 1st Adjustable or Fixed?: *
2nd Mortgage Balance Owed:
Amount You Wish To Borrow: *
Employer:
Monthly Gross Household Income: *
Mon= thly Debt:: 
Credit Rating: *
Loan Interested In: *

 

Removal Instructions
Click on the below link to be exclude from further communication.
Click Here=

From wrl-techops@pa.dec.com Sat Apr 7 19:39:57 2001 Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (root@mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id TAA13208 for ; Sat, 7 Apr 2001 19:39:57 +0200 Received: from zcamail04.zca.compaq.com (zcamail04.zca.compaq.com [161.114.32.104]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id TAA10192 for ; Sat, 7 Apr 2001 19:39:55 +0200 (METDST) Received: by zcamail04.zca.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id BB7EA288; Sat, 7 Apr 2001 10:39:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: from taynzmail03.nz-tay.cpqcorp.net (taynzmail03.nz-tay.cpqcorp.net [16.47.4.103]) by zcamail04.zca.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 74EC3148; Sat, 7 Apr 2001 10:39:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: by taynzmail03.nz-tay.cpqcorp.net (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 053DF143; Sat, 7 Apr 2001 13:38:07 -0400 (EDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by taynzmail03.nz-tay.cpqcorp.net (Postfix) with SMTP id 01AA3193; Sat, 7 Apr 2001 13:38:04 -0400 (EDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA02788; Sat, 7 Apr 2001 10:37:59 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id KAA06577; Sat, 7 Apr 2001 10:36:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id KAA26984; Sat, 7 Apr 2001 10:36:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ztxmail02.nz-cce.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA13644; Sat, 7 Apr 2001 10:36:11 -0700 Received: by ztxmail02.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 9BAB59A1F; Sat, 7 Apr 2001 12:36:10 -0500 (CDT) Received: from hooper2.licor.com (unknown [204.214.131.136]) by ztxmail02.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 069279822 for ; Sat, 7 Apr 2001 12:36:10 -0500 (CDT) Received: by hooper2.licor.com(Lotus SMTP MTA v4.6.3 (778.2 1-4-1999)) id 86256A27.00609BA7 ; Sat, 7 Apr 2001 12:35:13 -0500 X-Lotus-Fromdomain: LI-COR From: "Chris Lesiak" To: green@linuxhacker.ru, sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Message-Id: <86256A27.00609B89.00@hooper2.licor.com> Date: Sat, 7 Apr 2001 12:33:36 -0500 Subject: Re: final usb patch Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk My problems appear not to be with the Assabet. I tried a host machine with built in UHCI usb and the usb-eth link is rock stable. Now, to determine if the problem is with OHCI or my card in particular. Thanks all for the nice work. Chris Lesiak From wrl-techops@pa.dec.com Sun Apr 8 02:31:20 2001 Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (root@mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id CAA14444 for ; Sun, 8 Apr 2001 02:31:20 +0200 Received: from ztxmail05.ztx.compaq.com (ztxmail05.ztx.compaq.com [161.114.1.209]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id CAA22390 for ; Sun, 8 Apr 2001 02:31:18 +0200 (METDST) Received: by ztxmail05.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 6E6FC9C2; Sat, 7 Apr 2001 19:29:30 -0500 (CDT) Received: from mailrelay01.cac.cpqcorp.net (mailrelay01.cac.cpqcorp.net [16.47.132.152]) by ztxmail05.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 180DC94F; Sat, 7 Apr 2001 19:29:30 -0500 (CDT) Received: by mailrelay01.cac.cpqcorp.net (Postfix, from userid 12345) id E1E70165; Sat, 7 Apr 2001 17:29:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mailrelay01.cac.cpqcorp.net (Postfix) with SMTP id B584E16C; Sat, 7 Apr 2001 17:29:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA32170; Sat, 7 Apr 2001 17:29:11 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id RAA15917; Sat, 7 Apr 2001 17:26:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id RAA09404; Sat, 7 Apr 2001 17:26:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: from zmamail01.nz-tay.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA04667; Sat, 7 Apr 2001 17:26:10 -0700 Received: by zmamail01.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 699551176B; Sat, 7 Apr 2001 20:26:10 -0400 (EDT) Received: from xanadu.home (modemcable084.137-200-24.mtl.mc.videotron.ca [24.200.137.84]) by zmamail01.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B413111687 for ; Sat, 7 Apr 2001 20:26:09 -0400 (EDT) Received: from localhost (nico@localhost) by xanadu.home (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id UAA05944; Sat, 7 Apr 2001 20:26:07 -0400 X-Authentication-Warning: xanadu.home: nico owned process doing -bs Date: Sat, 7 Apr 2001 20:26:07 -0400 (EDT) From: Nicolas Pitre X-X-Sender: To: SA-1100/Linux Cc: Subject: diff-2.4.2-rmk2-np2 Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk ... is available at the usual sites, which are: ftp://ftp.netwinder.org/users/n/nico/ ftp://ftp.arm.linux.org.uk/pub/linux/arm/people/nico/ ftp://ftp.handhelds.org/pub/linux/arm/sa-1100-patches/ This should be the last 2.4.2 patch. This one hopefully fixes the remaining breakages from the previous one. - fix to arch/arm/mach-sa1100/Makefile (me) - export discontig_node_data symbol to modules (me) - merged latest JFFS2 fixes (me) - "final USB patch" (Oleg Drokin) Enjoy! Nicolas From wrl-techops@pa.dec.com Tue Apr 10 09:03:48 2001 Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (root@mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id JAA03329 for ; Tue, 10 Apr 2001 09:03:48 +0200 Received: from zcamail05.zca.compaq.com (zcamail05.zca.compaq.com [161.114.32.105]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id JAA20759 for ; Tue, 10 Apr 2001 09:03:45 +0200 (METDST) Received: by zcamail05.zca.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id BC72C3BE; Tue, 10 Apr 2001 00:04:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mailrelay01.cac.cpqcorp.net (mailrelay01.cac.cpqcorp.net [16.47.132.152]) by zcamail05.zca.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 98AF82CB; Tue, 10 Apr 2001 00:04:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mailrelay01.cac.cpqcorp.net (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 582A2199; Tue, 10 Apr 2001 00:01:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mailrelay01.cac.cpqcorp.net (Postfix) with SMTP id 01781185; Tue, 10 Apr 2001 00:01:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA04181; Tue, 10 Apr 2001 00:01:34 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id XAA13952; Mon, 9 Apr 2001 23:54:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id XAA15601; Mon, 9 Apr 2001 23:54:43 -0700 (PDT) From: Received: from ztxmail02.nz-cce.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA22824; Mon, 9 Apr 2001 23:54:42 -0700 Received: by ztxmail02.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id DE6299808; Tue, 10 Apr 2001 01:54:41 -0500 (CDT) Received: from ns.online.hn (unknown [207.42.177.131]) by ztxmail02.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C61E9979; Tue, 10 Apr 2001 01:54:25 -0500 (CDT) Received: from [203.75.114.199] ([216.214.206.73]) by ns.online.hn (Netscape Messaging Server 3.5) with SMTP id 327; Tue, 10 Apr 2001 00:58:05 -0600 Message-Id: <000005234c40$000040b9$00003092@210.102.25.114> To: HomeOwner@online.hn Subject: Mortgage Rates DROPPED! Act Now And Save! Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2001 01:12:56 -0600 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Priority: 3 X-Msmail-Priority: Normal Reply-To: apl876c@oceanfree.net Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk Loan Specialists

 We are Loan Specialists.....Ta= p into our huge network of Lenders!

For U.S.A. Homeowners Only
Interest Rates have Dropped....Start Saving Now!

We = Will Shop The Best Loan For You!

We provide a 100% free = service which lets you shop for a loan conveniently and securely from the comfort of your home. Tap into our huge network of lenders across the U.S. with different appetites for different types of credit/equity profiles.  Even if you're currently working with another lender or have been turned down before, we can still help and structure a program that may just make = some sense to you. 

Our loan programs can get you the cash you need for:

  • Debt Consolidation
  • 2nd Mortgage
  • Refinance
  • Credit Repair
  • Home Improvement
  • New Car
  • Dream Vacation
  • College Tuition
  • To start a new business ..and much, much more!

Funding borr= owers with less than perfect credit is our specialty!

W= e can get you the loan you need. 
Regardless of whether you have good or bad credit, we can help you.

Ready to get started? 
Simply fill out the our 60 second form, and we= 'll begin shopping for your loan.
  
It's that easy!  We Make the Lenders Compete for Y= OUR Business!

Please complete this form.
Our loan specialist will be contacting you at your convenience.
Thank You.

 
Contact Information: * Required Info
Name: *
Address: *
City: *
State (USA Only): *
Zip/Postal Code: *<= /td>
Home Phone:  *
Work Phone: *
Email Address: *
Best Time to Call:
Do You Own Your Home?: Mobile Homes DO NOT Qualify
Property Value: *
Property Type:
Purchase Price: *
Year Acquired: *
1st Mortgage Balance Owed: *
1st Mortgage Interest Rate: *
Is 1st Adjustable or Fixed?: *
2nd Mortgage Balance Owed:
Amount You Wish To Borrow: *
Employer:
Monthly Gross Household Income: *
Mon= thly Debt:: 
Credit Rating: *
Loan Interested In: *

 

Removal Instructions
Click on the below link to be exclude from further communication.
Click Here=

From wrl-techops@pa.dec.com Wed Apr 11 15:59:28 2001 Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (root@mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id PAA08930 for ; Wed, 11 Apr 2001 15:59:28 +0200 Received: from zmamail05.zma.compaq.com (zmamail05.zma.compaq.com [161.114.64.105]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id PAA06888 for ; Wed, 11 Apr 2001 15:59:26 +0200 (METDST) Received: by zmamail05.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id ED6424D42; Wed, 11 Apr 2001 09:57:39 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailrelay01.cac.cpqcorp.net (mailrelay01.cac.cpqcorp.net [16.47.132.152]) by zmamail05.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5FB614DF2; Wed, 11 Apr 2001 09:57:29 -0400 (EDT) Received: by mailrelay01.cac.cpqcorp.net (Postfix, from userid 12345) id B8CB6179; Wed, 11 Apr 2001 06:57:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mailrelay01.cac.cpqcorp.net (Postfix) with SMTP id 8DEC5152; Wed, 11 Apr 2001 06:57:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA00344; Wed, 11 Apr 2001 06:57:12 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id GAA13854; Wed, 11 Apr 2001 06:50:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id GAA13811; Wed, 11 Apr 2001 06:50:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ztxmail02.nz-cce.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA07505; Wed, 11 Apr 2001 06:50:47 -0700 Received: by ztxmail02.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 987AB98E1; Wed, 11 Apr 2001 08:50:47 -0500 (CDT) Received: from hypnos.cps.intel.com (hypnos.cps.intel.com [192.198.165.17]) by ztxmail02.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D0DBC98F9 for ; Wed, 11 Apr 2001 08:50:45 -0500 (CDT) Received: from SMTP (fmsmsxvs04-1.fm.intel.com [132.233.42.204]) by hypnos.cps.intel.com (8.9.1a+p1/8.9.1/d: relay.m4,v 1.35 2001/02/12 09:03:45 smothers Exp $) with SMTP id NAA22159 for ; Wed, 11 Apr 2001 13:50:35 GMT Received: from fmsmsx26.fm.intel.com ([132.233.48.26]) by 132.233.48.204 (Norton AntiVirus for Internet Email Gateways 1.0) ; Wed, 11 Apr 2001 13:50:35 0000 (GMT) Received: by fmsmsx26.fm.intel.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) id <2TR481PK>; Wed, 11 Apr 2001 06:50:34 -0700 Message-Id: From: "Joergensen, Anders D" To: "Sa1100-Linux (E-mail)" Subject: troubles mounting! Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2001 06:50:23 -0700 Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl id PAA08930 Hi all, I've compiled the 2.2.13 kernel with the same patches as Nicolas Pitre has done in his brutus-test library (patch-2.2.13-rmk2 and diff-2.2.13-rmk2-np14). However when replacing the precompiled kernel with my own zImage, the ramdisk fails to mount on my Brutus board. My zImage has been compiled according to the brutus_config configuration. Can anyone interpret the error message for me - and perhaps give me a hint on how to fix it? Thanks in advance, Anders Jørgensen > Uncompressing Linux......................... done, booting the kernel. Linux version 2.2.13-rmk2-np14 (root@localhost.localdomain) (gcc version 2.95.3 20010315 (release)) #1 ons apr 11 12:05:22 CEST 2001 NetWinder Floating Point Emulator V0.94.1 (c) 1998 Corel Computer Corp. Console: colour dummy device 80x30 Calibrating delay loop... 194.15 BogoMIPS Memory: 12280k/16M available (632k code, 20k reserved, 364k data, 16k init) POSIX conformance testing by UNIFIX Linux NET4.0 for Linux 2.2 Based upon Swansea University Computer Society NET3.039 Starting kswapd v 1.5 Console: switching to colour frame buffer device 40x30 Keyboard driver v1.01 SA1100 serial driver version 4.27 with no serial options enabled ttyS00 at 0xf8010000 (irq = 15) is a SA1100 UART ttyS01 at 0xf8050000 (irq = 17) is a SA1100 UART pty: 256 Unix98 ptys configured MCP SA1100/UCB1200 module initalized SA1100 MCP audio driver version 2.2 initialized RAM disk driver initialized: 16 RAM disks of 8192K size RAMDISK: Compressed image found at block 0 EXT2-fs error (device ramdisk(1,0)): ext2_check_descriptors: Block bitmap for group 0 not in group (block 0)! EXT2-fs: group descriptors corrupted ! Unable to handle kernel paging request at virtual address 9f0000ef memmap = C0004000, pgd = c0004000 *pgd = 00000000, *pmd = 00000000 Internal error: Oops: 2 CPU: 0 pc : [] lr : [] sp : c0003eac ip : c0003ec8 fp : c0003ec4 r10: 00000003 r9 : 00000100 r8 : 00000004 r7 : 00000001 r6 : 00000003 r5 : ffffffff r4 : 9f0000ef r3 : 00000000 r2 : c00adee4 r1 : 00000003 r0 : 00000003 Flags: Nzcv IRQs on FIQs off Mode SVC_32 Segment kernel Control: C000517D Table: C000517D DAC: 0000001D Process swapper (pid: 1, stackpage=c0003000) Stack: c0003e80: c0053764 c0003ea0: c00176a8 80000053 ffffffff 00000000 00000001 c011b000 c0003f04 c0003ec8 c0003ec0: c0053764 c0017684 c011b0fc 00000001 c01076e0 00000001 00000000 c011b000 c0003ee0: 00000100 00000000 c00afaa0 00000000 c00a0734 00000000 c0003f2c c0003f08 c0003f00: c0036a68 c00535f4 00000000 c00afaa0 c00ac764 c00a0858 c00cb5c4 c00a0880 c0003f20: c0003fb4 c0003f30 c00377b8 c00369d4 00000001 00000000 00000000 00000000 c0003f40: c00b1564 00000003 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 c0003f60: 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 c0003f80: 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000001 c00ac764 c00c6c68 c00b1520 c00cb5c4 c0003fa0: 4401a11b c00081a4 c0003fdc c0003fb8 c000c9d0 c00376b8 00000000 c000ca88 c0003fc0: c00d220c c00ac75c c00ac760 c00ac984 c0003ffc c0003fe0 c000ca98 c000c8e4 c0003fe0: c000ca88 c00d220c c00ac75c c00ac760 c00abfd8 c0004000 c000e4a8 c000ca94 Backtrace: Function entered at [] from [] r6 = c011b000 r5 = 00000001 r4 = 00000000 Function entered at [] from [] Function entered at [] from [] Function entered at [] from [] Function entered at [] from [] r8 = c00ac984 r7 = c00ac760 r6 = c00ac75c r5 = c00d220c r4 = c000ca88 Function entered at [] from [] r7 = c00ac760 r6 = c00ac75c r5 = c00d220c r4 = c000ca88 Function entered at [] from [] Function entered at [] from [] r7 = c00d7028 r6 = c00c6d80 r5 = c00d7028 r4 = c00c6e04 Code: e1540005 0a00000a (e5940000) e5903000 e5944004 < From wrl-techops@pa.dec.com Wed Apr 11 22:56:16 2001 Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (root@mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id WAA10326 for ; Wed, 11 Apr 2001 22:56:16 +0200 Received: from ztxmail04.ztx.compaq.com (ztxmail04.ztx.compaq.com [161.114.1.208]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id WAA02185 for ; Wed, 11 Apr 2001 22:56:14 +0200 (METDST) Received: by ztxmail04.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 9C6B71E06; Wed, 11 Apr 2001 15:54:26 -0500 (CDT) Received: from taynzmail03.nz-tay.cpqcorp.net (taynzmail03.nz-tay.cpqcorp.net [16.47.4.103]) by ztxmail04.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FB661CAA; Wed, 11 Apr 2001 15:54:26 -0500 (CDT) Received: by taynzmail03.nz-tay.cpqcorp.net (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 79465361; Wed, 11 Apr 2001 16:54:25 -0400 (EDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by taynzmail03.nz-tay.cpqcorp.net (Postfix) with SMTP id E9C42275; Wed, 11 Apr 2001 16:54:22 -0400 (EDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA02149; Wed, 11 Apr 2001 13:54:19 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id NAA27594; Wed, 11 Apr 2001 13:53:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id NAA11848; Wed, 11 Apr 2001 13:53:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: from zmamail01.nz-tay.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA12312; Wed, 11 Apr 2001 13:53:04 -0700 Received: by zmamail01.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 9B7B9D624; Wed, 11 Apr 2001 16:53:03 -0400 (EDT) Received: from linuxhacker.ru (unknown [213.128.193.148]) by zmamail01.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 96C36D6D9 for ; Wed, 11 Apr 2001 16:53:02 -0400 (EDT) Received: (from uucp@localhost) by linuxhacker.ru (8.9.3/8.9.3) with UUCP id AAA04429; Thu, 12 Apr 2001 00:52:58 +0400 Received: (from green@localhost) by linuxhacker.ru (8.10.1/8.10.1) id f3BKjAj08170; Thu, 12 Apr 2001 00:45:10 +0400 Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2001 00:45:10 +0400 From: Oleg Drokin To: nico@CAM.ORG, sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Subject: cvs.handhelds.org: stuff Message-Id: <20010412004510.A8166@linuxhacker.ru> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0.1i Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk Hello! This patch contains stuff I was not sure where to put. Bye, Oleg diff -uNr --exclude=CVS --exclude=.cvsignore /skiff/src/linux/arch/arm/config.in kernel/arch/arm/config.in --- /skiff/src/linux/arch/arm/config.in Wed Apr 11 23:10:55 2001 +++ kernel/arch/arm/config.in Thu Apr 5 22:04:20 2001 @@ -355,6 +362,7 @@ bool ' Timer LED' CONFIG_LEDS_TIMER bool ' CPU usage LED' CONFIG_LEDS_CPU fi + tristate 'SA11x0 Register Proc Entries (Experimental)' CONFIG_SA1100_REGMON fi if [ "$CONFIG_ARCH_EBSA110" = "y" ]; then define_bool CONFIG_LEDS_TIMER y diff -uNr --exclude=CVS --exclude=.cvsignore /skiff/src/linux/arch/arm/mach-sa1100/Makefile kernel/arch/arm/mach-sa1100/Makefile --- /skiff/src/linux/arch/arm/mach-sa1100/Makefile Wed Apr 11 23:10:56 2001 +++ kernel/arch/arm/mach-sa1100/Makefile Fri Mar 2 14:34:46 2001 @@ -11,8 +11,8 @@ # Object file lists. -obj-y := arch.o hw.o dma-sa1100.o # mm.o -obj-m := gpio.o regmon.o +obj-y := arch.o hw.o dma-sa1100.o time.o # mm.o +obj-m := gpio.o obj-n := obj- := diff -uNr --exclude=CVS --exclude=.cvsignore /skiff/src/linux/arch/arm/mach-sa1100/time.c kernel/arch/arm/mach-sa1100/time.c --- /skiff/src/linux/arch/arm/mach-sa1100/time.c Thu Jan 1 03:00:00 1970 +++ kernel/arch/arm/mach-sa1100/time.c Sat Feb 24 18:55:13 2001 @@ -0,0 +1,38 @@ +#include +#include +#include + +#include + +extern spinlock_t rtc_lock; + +extern int (*set_rtc)(void); + +static int sa1100_set_rtc(void) +{ + spin_lock_irq(&rtc_lock); + RCNR = xtime.tv_sec; + spin_unlock_irq(&rtc_lock); + return 1; +} +static int sa1100_rtc_init(void) +{ + RTAR = 0xFFFFFFFF; + + /* Initilize RTC Status register */ + RTSR = (RTSR_AL| RTSR_HZ) & (~RTSR_HZE) & (~RTSR_ALE); + + /* Configure clock divider counter so that + * RCNR can increase at every 1 Hz + * See section 9.3.5 in SA1100 Developer's manual */ + RTTR = 0x8000; + spin_lock_irq(&rtc_lock); + xtime.tv_sec = RCNR; /* RCNR remains valid after software reset */ + xtime.tv_usec = 0; + spin_unlock_irq(&rtc_lock); + + set_rtc = sa1100_set_rtc; + return 0; +} + +__initcall(sa1100_rtc_init); diff -uNr --exclude=CVS --exclude=.cvsignore /skiff/src/linux/drivers/usb/usb-ohci-sa1111.h kernel/drivers/usb/usb-ohci-sa1111.h --- /skiff/src/linux/drivers/usb/usb-ohci-sa1111.h Wed Apr 11 23:10:56 2001 +++ kernel/drivers/usb/usb-ohci-sa1111.h Wed Apr 4 21:25:00 2001 @@ -12,11 +12,14 @@ * */ +#if defined(CONFIG_SA1111) #include "asm/arch-sa1100/SA-1111.h" #include "asm/proc/cache.h" +#endif static int ohci_mem_init (void); + #define SA1111_OHCI_BASE SA1111_p2v(_SA1111(0x0400)) #define SA1111_OHCI_EXTENT 512 #define SA1111_OHCI_IRQ NIRQHCIM @@ -62,7 +65,7 @@ #endif - +#if defined(CONFIG_SA1111) /* * The SA-1111 errata says that the DMA hardware needs to be exercised * before the clocks are turned on to work properly. This code does @@ -206,6 +209,7 @@ return sa1111_hc_start_ohci(); } +#endif /* -------------- */ diff -uNr --exclude=CVS --exclude=.cvsignore /skiff/src/linux/drivers/usb/usb-ohci.c kernel/drivers/usb/usb-ohci.c --- /skiff/src/linux/drivers/usb/usb-ohci.c Wed Apr 11 23:10:56 2001 +++ kernel/drivers/usb/usb-ohci.c Thu Apr 5 22:05:06 2001 @@ -85,6 +85,11 @@ #define OHCI_DEBUG_DUMP #endif +#if defined(CONFIG_ARCH_PERSONAL_SERVER) +#define OHCI_MEM_CONSISTENT /* use consistent allocator */ +#define OHCI_NO_PM +#endif + /* x86 & PCI compile flags */ #ifdef __i386__ #define OHCI_MEM_SLAB @@ -112,7 +117,7 @@ #include "usb-ohci.h" -#ifdef CONFIG_SA1111 +#if defined(CONFIG_SA1111) || defined(CONFIG_ARCH_PERSONAL_SERVER) #include "usb-ohci-sa1111.h" #endif From wrl-techops@pa.dec.com Wed Apr 11 22:56:19 2001 Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (root@mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id WAA10333 for ; Wed, 11 Apr 2001 22:56:19 +0200 Received: from zcamail05.zca.compaq.com (zcamail05.zca.compaq.com [161.114.32.105]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id WAA02186 for ; Wed, 11 Apr 2001 22:56:15 +0200 (METDST) Received: by zcamail05.zca.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 0C04CB5D; Wed, 11 Apr 2001 13:57:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mailrelay01.cac.cpqcorp.net (mailrelay01.cac.cpqcorp.net [16.47.132.152]) by zcamail05.zca.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E0ED2B77; Wed, 11 Apr 2001 13:57:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mailrelay01.cac.cpqcorp.net (Postfix, from userid 12345) id E244B188; Wed, 11 Apr 2001 13:54:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mailrelay01.cac.cpqcorp.net (Postfix) with SMTP id A4D1C198; Wed, 11 Apr 2001 13:54:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA18168; Wed, 11 Apr 2001 13:54:19 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id NAA12073; Wed, 11 Apr 2001 13:53:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id NAA12786; Wed, 11 Apr 2001 13:53:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: from zmamail01.nz-tay.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA29159; Wed, 11 Apr 2001 13:53:06 -0700 Received: by zmamail01.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 886C0D410; Wed, 11 Apr 2001 16:53:05 -0400 (EDT) Received: from linuxhacker.ru (unknown [213.128.193.148]) by zmamail01.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ADAB0D624 for ; Wed, 11 Apr 2001 16:53:04 -0400 (EDT) Received: (from uucp@localhost) by linuxhacker.ru (8.9.3/8.9.3) with UUCP id AAA04437; Thu, 12 Apr 2001 00:53:00 +0400 Received: (from green@localhost) by linuxhacker.ru (8.10.1/8.10.1) id f3BKjiv08179; Thu, 12 Apr 2001 00:45:44 +0400 Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2001 00:45:44 +0400 From: Oleg Drokin To: nico@CAM.ORG, sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Subject: cvs.handhelds.org: unk Message-Id: <20010412004544.A8174@linuxhacker.ru> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0.1i Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk Hello! These are things I was not sure about Bye, Oleg diff -uNr --exclude=CVS --exclude=.cvsignore /skiff/src/linux/include/linux/mm.h kernel/include/linux/mm.h --- /skiff/src/linux/include/linux/mm.h Wed Apr 11 23:10:45 2001 +++ kernel/include/linux/mm.h Fri Mar 2 14:35:30 2001 @@ -525,6 +525,12 @@ #define pgcache_under_min() (atomic_read(&page_cache_size) * 100 < \ page_cache.min_percent * num_physpages) +#ifndef __arm__ +#define memc_update_addr(x,y,z) +#define memc_update_mm(x) +#define memc_clear(x,y) +#endif + #endif /* __KERNEL__ */ #endif diff -uNr --exclude=CVS --exclude=.cvsignore /skiff/src/linux/include/pcmcia/ss.h kernel/include/pcmcia/ss.h --- /skiff/src/linux/include/pcmcia/ss.h Wed Apr 11 23:10:45 2001 +++ kernel/include/pcmcia/ss.h Fri Mar 2 14:35:31 2001 @@ -30,6 +30,10 @@ #ifndef _LINUX_SS_H #define _LINUX_SS_H +#ifndef _LINUX_CS_TYPES_H +#include +#endif + /* Definitions for card status flags for GetStatus */ #define SS_WRPROT 0x0001 #define SS_CARDLOCK 0x0002 From wrl-techops@pa.dec.com Wed Apr 11 22:56:19 2001 Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (root@mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id WAA10334 for ; Wed, 11 Apr 2001 22:56:19 +0200 Received: from zcamail03.zca.compaq.com (zcamail03.zca.compaq.com [161.114.32.103]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id WAA02184 for ; Wed, 11 Apr 2001 22:56:14 +0200 (METDST) Received: by zcamail03.zca.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 1F91AC6B; Wed, 11 Apr 2001 13:54:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mailrelay01.cac.cpqcorp.net (mailrelay01.cac.cpqcorp.net [16.47.132.152]) by zcamail03.zca.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E6E30E27; Wed, 11 Apr 2001 13:54:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mailrelay01.cac.cpqcorp.net (Postfix, from userid 12345) id D91CB156; Wed, 11 Apr 2001 13:54:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mailrelay01.cac.cpqcorp.net (Postfix) with SMTP id 333DD19E; Wed, 11 Apr 2001 13:54:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA11828; Wed, 11 Apr 2001 13:54:20 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id NAA11092; Wed, 11 Apr 2001 13:53:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id NAA26137; Wed, 11 Apr 2001 13:53:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ztxmail02.nz-cce.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA32077; Wed, 11 Apr 2001 13:53:03 -0700 Received: by ztxmail02.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id EBE329AA4; Wed, 11 Apr 2001 15:53:02 -0500 (CDT) Received: from linuxhacker.ru (unknown [213.128.193.148]) by ztxmail02.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 66DFD981D for ; Wed, 11 Apr 2001 15:53:00 -0500 (CDT) Received: (from uucp@localhost) by linuxhacker.ru (8.9.3/8.9.3) with UUCP id AAA04408; Thu, 12 Apr 2001 00:52:51 +0400 Received: (from green@localhost) by linuxhacker.ru (8.10.1/8.10.1) id f3BKhYM08152; Thu, 12 Apr 2001 00:43:34 +0400 Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2001 00:43:34 +0400 From: Oleg Drokin To: nico@CAM.ORG, sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Subject: cvs.handhelds.org: power Message-Id: <20010412004334.A8147@linuxhacker.ru> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0.1i Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk Hello! This patch contains most of power-saving stuff from cvs.handhelds.org Bye, Oleg diff -uNr --exclude=CVS --exclude=.cvsignore /skiff/src/linux/arch/arm/config.in kernel/arch/arm/config.in --- /skiff/src/linux/arch/arm/config.in Wed Apr 11 23:10:55 2001 +++ kernel/arch/arm/config.in Thu Apr 5 22:04:20 2001 @@ -322,6 +325,10 @@ tristate 'Kernel support for ELF binaries' CONFIG_BINFMT_ELF tristate 'Kernel support for MISC binaries' CONFIG_BINFMT_MISC dep_bool 'Power Management support (experimental)' CONFIG_PM $CONFIG_EXPERIMENTAL +if [ "$CONFIG_ARCH_SA1100" = "y" ]; then + dep_tristate 'Advanced power management support' CONFIG_APM $CONFIG_PM +fi + dep_tristate 'RISC OS personality' CONFIG_ARTHUR $CONFIG_CPU_32 if [ "$CONFIG_ARCH_EBSA110" = "y" -o \ diff -uNr --exclude=CVS --exclude=.cvsignore /skiff/src/linux/arch/arm/kernel/armksyms.c kernel/arch/arm/kernel/armksyms.c --- /skiff/src/linux/arch/arm/kernel/armksyms.c Wed Apr 11 23:10:43 2001 +++ kernel/arch/arm/kernel/armksyms.c Wed Apr 4 23:06:56 2001 @@ -105,6 +105,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(dump_thread); EXPORT_SYMBOL(dump_fpu); EXPORT_SYMBOL(udelay); +EXPORT_SYMBOL(__delay); #ifdef CONFIG_CPU_32 EXPORT_SYMBOL(__ioremap); EXPORT_SYMBOL(__iounmap); @@ -184,6 +185,13 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(__arch_copy_to_user); EXPORT_SYMBOL(__arch_clear_user); EXPORT_SYMBOL(__arch_strnlen_user); + +#ifdef CONFIG_ARCH_SA1100 +extern int pm_do_suspend(void); +extern int sa1110_suspend(void); +EXPORT_SYMBOL(pm_do_suspend); +EXPORT_SYMBOL(sa1110_suspend); +#endif /* consistent area handling */ EXPORT_SYMBOL(pci_alloc_consistent); diff -uNr --exclude=CVS --exclude=.cvsignore /skiff/src/linux/arch/arm/kernel/process.c kernel/arch/arm/kernel/process.c --- /skiff/src/linux/arch/arm/kernel/process.c Thu Feb 22 21:59:02 2001 +++ kernel/arch/arm/kernel/process.c Fri Mar 2 14:34:46 2001 @@ -74,6 +74,9 @@ * The following aren't currently used. */ void (*pm_idle)(void); +/* + * pm_power_off is used by machine_power_off(). + */ void (*pm_power_off)(void); /* diff -uNr --exclude=CVS --exclude=.cvsignore /skiff/src/linux/arch/arm/mach-sa1100/apm.c kernel/arch/arm/mach-sa1100/apm.c --- /skiff/src/linux/arch/arm/mach-sa1100/apm.c Wed Apr 11 23:10:56 2001 +++ kernel/arch/arm/mach-sa1100/apm.c Thu Mar 22 23:24:40 2001 @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@ -/* -*- linux-c -*- +/* * bios-less APM driver for ARM Linux * Jamey Hicks * adapted from the APM BIOS driver for Linux by Stephen Rothwell (sfr@linuxcare.com) @@ -33,7 +33,6 @@ #include #include #include -#include #ifdef CONFIG_MAGIC_SYSRQ extern void (*sysrq_power_off)(void); @@ -105,14 +104,9 @@ /* * Local variables */ -#ifdef CONFIG_APM_CPU_IDLE -static int clock_slowed; -#endif static int suspends_pending; static int standbys_pending; -static int waiting_for_resume; static int ignore_normal_resume; -static int bounce_interval = DEFAULT_BOUNCE_INTERVAL; #ifdef CONFIG_APM_RTC_IS_GMT # define clock_cmos_diff 0 @@ -187,115 +181,6 @@ return APM_SUCCESS; } -static int apm_get_event(apm_event_t *event, apm_eventinfo_t *info) -{ - /* assigns *event and *info */ - *event = 0; - *info = 0; -#ifdef CONFIG_SA1100_BITSY - if (machine_is_bitsy()) { - if ((GPLR & GPIO_BITSY_NPOWER_BUTTON) == 0) { - /* power on/off button is depressed */ - printk(__FUNCTION__ ": power button\n"); - *event = APM_USER_SUSPEND; - } - } -#endif - -#ifdef CONFIG_SA1100_ACCELENT - // FIXME do we need to debounce?? - if (machine_is_accelent_sa()) { - if ((GPLR & 0x1) == 0) { - printk(__FUNCTION__ ": power button\n"); - *event = APM_USER_SUSPEND; - } - } -#endif - return APM_SUCCESS; -} - - -static int set_power_state(u_short what, u_short state) -{ - if (state == APM_STATE_SUSPEND) - { - printk("*** whee here we go into suspend\n"); - sa1110_suspend(); - send_event(APM_CRITICAL_RESUME); - } - return APM_SUCCESS; -} - -static int apm_set_power_state(u_short state) -{ - return set_power_state(APM_DEVICE_ALL, state); -} - -#ifdef CONFIG_APM_CPU_IDLE -static int apm_do_idle(void) -{ - u32 dummy; - -#if CONFIG_APM_BIOS - if (apm_bios_call_simple(APM_FUNC_IDLE, 0, 0, &dummy)) - return 0; -#endif - -#ifdef ALWAYS_CALL_BUSY - clock_slowed = 1; -#else - clock_slowed = (apm_bios_info.flags & APM_IDLE_SLOWS_CLOCK) != 0; -#endif - return 1; -} - -static void apm_do_busy(void) -{ - u32 dummy; - - if (clock_slowed) { -#if CONFIG_APM_BIOS - (void) apm_bios_call_simple(APM_FUNC_BUSY, 0, 0, &dummy); -#endif - clock_slowed = 0; - } -} - -#endif /* CONFIG_APM_CPU_IDLE */ - -static void apm_power_off(void) -{ -#ifdef CONFIG_SA1100_BITSY - if (machine_is_bitsy()) { - set_bitsy_egpio(EGPIO_BITSY_CARD_RESET | EGPIO_BITSY_OPT_RESET | EGPIO_BITSY_CODEC_NRESET | EGPIO_BITSY_QMUTE); - clr_bitsy_egpio(EGPIO_BITSY_OPT_NVRAM_ON | EGPIO_BITSY_OPT_ON - | EGPIO_BITSY_LCD_ON | EGPIO_BITSY_RS232_ON | EGPIO_BITSY_LCD_PCI - | EGPIO_BITSY_IR_ON - | EGPIO_BITSY_AUD_AMP_ON | EGPIO_BITSY_AUD_PWR_ON - | EGPIO_BITSY_LCD_5V_ON | EGPIO_BITSY_LVDD_ON); - - } -#endif -} - -#ifdef CONFIG_APM_DO_ENABLE -static int apm_enable_power_management(int enable) -{ - u32 eax; - - if ((enable == 0) && (apm_bios_info.flags & APM_BIOS_DISENGAGED)) - return APM_NOT_ENGAGED; - if (apm_bios_call_simple(APM_FUNC_ENABLE_PM, APM_DEVICE_BALL, - enable, &eax)) - return (eax >> 8) & 0xff; - if (enable) - apm_bios_info.flags &= ~APM_BIOS_DISABLED; - else - apm_bios_info.flags |= APM_BIOS_DISABLED; - return APM_SUCCESS; -} -#endif - static int apm_get_power_status(u_char *ac_line_status, u_char *battery_status, u_char *battery_flag, @@ -335,29 +220,6 @@ str, err); } -#if defined(CONFIG_APM_DISPLAY_BLANK) && defined(CONFIG_VT) -static int apm_console_blank(int blank) -{ - int error; - u_short state; - - state = blank ? APM_STATE_STANDBY : APM_STATE_READY; - /* Blank the first display device */ - error = set_power_state(0x100, state); - if ((error != APM_SUCCESS) && (error != APM_NO_ERROR)) { - /* try to blank them all instead */ - error = set_power_state(0x1ff, state); - if ((error != APM_SUCCESS) && (error != APM_NO_ERROR)) - /* try to blank device one instead */ - error = set_power_state(0x101, state); - } - if ((error == APM_SUCCESS) || (error == APM_NO_ERROR)) - return 1; - apm_error("set display", error); - return 0; -} -#endif - static int queue_empty(struct apm_user *as) { return as->event_head == as->event_tail; @@ -444,35 +306,7 @@ } -static int send_event(apm_event_t event) -{ - switch (event) { - case APM_SYS_SUSPEND: - case APM_CRITICAL_SUSPEND: - case APM_USER_SUSPEND: - /* map all suspends to ACPI D3 */ - if (pm_send_all(PM_SUSPEND, (void *)3)) { - if (event == APM_CRITICAL_SUSPEND) { - printk(KERN_CRIT "apm: Critical suspend was vetoed, expect armageddon\n" ); - return 0; - } - if (apm_bios_info.version > 0x100) - apm_set_power_state(APM_STATE_REJECT); - return 0; - } - break; - case APM_STATE_STANDBY: - (void) pm_send_all(PM_STANDBY, NULL); - break; - case APM_NORMAL_RESUME: - case APM_CRITICAL_RESUME: - /* map all resumes to ACPI D0 */ - (void) pm_send_all(PM_RESUME, (void *)0); - break; - } - - return 1; -} +extern void pm_do_suspend(void); static int suspend(void) { @@ -481,17 +315,26 @@ printk("*** suspend()\n"); +#if 0 get_time_diff(); cli(); - err = apm_set_power_state(APM_STATE_SUSPEND); + err = pm_send_all(PM_SUSPEND, NULL); + if (err) + return err; + + err = sa1110_suspend(); + reinit_timer(); set_time(); if (err == APM_NO_ERROR) err = APM_SUCCESS; if (err != APM_SUCCESS) apm_error("suspend", err); - send_event(APM_NORMAL_RESUME); + pm_send_all(PM_RESUME, NULL); sti(); +#else + pm_do_suspend(); +#endif queue_event(APM_NORMAL_RESUME, NULL); for (as = user_list; as != NULL; as = as->next) { as->suspend_wait = 0; @@ -507,201 +350,11 @@ int err; get_time_diff(); - err = send_event(APM_STATE_STANDBY); - if ((err != APM_SUCCESS) && (err != APM_NO_ERROR)) - apm_error("standby", err); - err = apm_set_power_state(APM_STATE_STANDBY); + err = pm_send_all(PM_STANDBY, NULL); if ((err != APM_SUCCESS) && (err != APM_NO_ERROR)) apm_error("standby", err); } -static apm_event_t get_event(void) -{ - int error; - apm_event_t event; - apm_eventinfo_t info; - - static int notified; - - /* we don't use the eventinfo */ - error = apm_get_event(&event, &info); - if (error == APM_SUCCESS) - return event; - - if ((error != APM_NO_EVENTS) && (notified++ == 0)) - apm_error("get_event", error); - - return 0; -} - -static void check_events(void) -{ - apm_event_t event; - static unsigned long last_resume; - static int ignore_bounce; - - while ((event = get_event()) != 0) { - if (debug) { - if (event <= NR_APM_EVENT_NAME) - printk(KERN_DEBUG "apm: received %s notify\n", - apm_event_name[event - 1]); - else - printk(KERN_DEBUG "apm: received unknown " - "event 0x%02x\n", event); - } - if (ignore_bounce - && ((jiffies - last_resume) > bounce_interval)) - ignore_bounce = 0; - if (ignore_normal_resume && (event != APM_NORMAL_RESUME)) - ignore_normal_resume = 0; - - switch (event) { - case APM_SYS_STANDBY: - case APM_USER_STANDBY: - if (send_event(event)) { - queue_event(event, NULL); - if (standbys_pending <= 0) - standby(); - } - break; - - case APM_USER_SUSPEND: -#ifdef CONFIG_APM_IGNORE_USER_SUSPEND - if (apm_bios_info.version > 0x100) - apm_set_power_state(APM_STATE_REJECT); - break; -#endif - case APM_SYS_SUSPEND: - if (ignore_bounce) { - if (apm_bios_info.version > 0x100) - apm_set_power_state(APM_STATE_REJECT); - break; - } - /* - * If we are already processing a SUSPEND, - * then further SUSPEND events from the BIOS - * will be ignored. We also return here to - * cope with the fact that the Thinkpads keep - * sending a SUSPEND event until something else - * happens! - */ - if (waiting_for_resume) - return; - if (send_event(event)) { - queue_event(event, NULL); - waiting_for_resume = 1; - if (suspends_pending <= 0) - (void) suspend(); - } - break; - - case APM_NORMAL_RESUME: - case APM_CRITICAL_RESUME: - case APM_STANDBY_RESUME: - waiting_for_resume = 0; - last_resume = jiffies; - ignore_bounce = 1; - if ((event != APM_NORMAL_RESUME) - || (ignore_normal_resume == 0)) { - set_time(); - send_event(event); - queue_event(event, NULL); - } - break; - - case APM_CAPABILITY_CHANGE: - case APM_LOW_BATTERY: - case APM_POWER_STATUS_CHANGE: - send_event(event); - queue_event(event, NULL); - break; - - case APM_UPDATE_TIME: - set_time(); - break; - - case APM_CRITICAL_SUSPEND: - send_event(event); - /* - * We can only hope it worked - we are not allowed - * to reject a critical suspend. - */ - (void) suspend(); - break; - } - } -} - -static void apm_event_handler(void) -{ - static int pending_count = 4; - int err; - - if ((standbys_pending > 0) || (suspends_pending > 0)) { - if ((apm_bios_info.version > 0x100) && (pending_count-- <= 0)) { - pending_count = 4; - if (debug) - printk(KERN_DEBUG "apm: setting state busy\n"); - err = apm_set_power_state(APM_STATE_BUSY); - if (err) - apm_error("busy", err); - } - } else - pending_count = 4; - check_events(); -} - -/* - * This is the APM thread main loop. - * - * Check whether we're the only running process to - * decide if we should just power down. - * - */ -#define system_idle() (nr_running == 1) - -static void apm_mainloop(void) -{ - int timeout = HZ; - DECLARE_WAITQUEUE(wait, current); - - add_wait_queue(&apm_waitqueue, &wait); - set_current_state(TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE); - for (;;) { - /* Nothing to do, just sleep for the timeout */ - timeout = 2*timeout; - if (timeout > APM_CHECK_TIMEOUT) - timeout = APM_CHECK_TIMEOUT; - schedule_timeout(timeout); - if (exit_kapmd) - break; - - /* - * Ok, check all events, check for idle (and mark us sleeping - * so as not to count towards the load average).. - */ - set_current_state(TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE); - apm_event_handler(); -#ifdef CONFIG_APM_CPU_IDLE - if (!system_idle()) - continue; - if (apm_do_idle()) { - unsigned long start = jiffies; - while ((!exit_kapmd) && system_idle()) { - apm_do_idle(); - if ((jiffies - start) > APM_CHECK_TIMEOUT) { - apm_event_handler(); - start = jiffies; - } - } - apm_do_busy(); - apm_event_handler(); - timeout = 1; - } -#endif - } -} - static int check_apm_user(struct apm_user *as, const char *func) { if ((as == NULL) || (as->magic != APM_BIOS_MAGIC)) { @@ -783,6 +436,7 @@ static int do_ioctl(struct inode * inode, struct file *filp, u_int cmd, u_long arg) { + int err; struct apm_user * as; DECLARE_WAITQUEUE(wait, current); @@ -792,45 +446,20 @@ if (!as->suser) return -EPERM; switch (cmd) { - case APM_IOC_STANDBY: - if (as->standbys_read > 0) { - as->standbys_read--; - as->standbys_pending--; - standbys_pending--; - } else if (!send_event(APM_USER_STANDBY)) - return -EAGAIN; - else - queue_event(APM_USER_STANDBY, as); - if (standbys_pending <= 0) - standby(); - break; - case APM_IOC_SUSPEND: - if (as->suspends_read > 0) { - as->suspends_read--; - as->suspends_pending--; - suspends_pending--; - } else if (!send_event(APM_USER_SUSPEND)) - return -EAGAIN; - else - queue_event(APM_USER_SUSPEND, as); - if (suspends_pending <= 0) { - if (suspend() != APM_SUCCESS) - return -EIO; - } else { - as->suspend_wait = 1; - add_wait_queue(&apm_suspend_waitqueue, &wait); - while (1) { - set_current_state(TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE); - if ((as->suspend_wait == 0) - || signal_pending(current)) - break; - schedule(); - } - set_current_state(TASK_RUNNING); - remove_wait_queue(&apm_suspend_waitqueue, &wait); - return as->suspend_result; - } - break; + case APM_IOC_STANDBY: { + pm_send_all(PM_STANDBY, NULL); + } break; + case APM_IOC_SUSPEND: { + err = pm_send_all(PM_SUSPEND, (void *)2); + if (err) + return err; + + err = sa1110_suspend(); + + err = pm_send_all(PM_RESUME, (void *)0); + if (err) + return err; + } break; default: return -EINVAL; } @@ -846,30 +475,6 @@ return 0; filp->private_data = NULL; lock_kernel(); - if (as->standbys_pending > 0) { - standbys_pending -= as->standbys_pending; - if (standbys_pending <= 0) - standby(); - } - if (as->suspends_pending > 0) { - suspends_pending -= as->suspends_pending; - if (suspends_pending <= 0) - (void) suspend(); - } - if (user_list == as) - user_list = as->next; - else { - struct apm_user * as1; - - for (as1 = user_list; - (as1 != NULL) && (as1->next != as); - as1 = as1->next) - ; - if (as1 == NULL) - printk(KERN_ERR "apm: filp not in user list\n"); - else - as1->next = as->next; - } unlock_kernel(); kfree(as); return 0; @@ -980,125 +585,6 @@ return p - buf; } -static int apm(void *unused) -{ - unsigned short error; - char * power_stat; - char * bat_stat; - - kapmd_running = 1; - - exit_files(current); /* daemonize doesn't do exit_files */ - current->files = init_task.files; - atomic_inc(¤t->files->count); - daemonize(); - - strcpy(current->comm, "kapmd"); - sigfillset(¤t->blocked); - current->tty = NULL; /* get rid of controlling tty */ - - if (apm_bios_info.version > 0x100) { - /* - * We only support BIOSs up to version 1.2 - */ - if (apm_bios_info.version > 0x0102) - apm_bios_info.version = 0x0102; - if (apm_driver_version(&apm_bios_info.version) != APM_SUCCESS) { - /* Fall back to an APM 1.0 connection. */ - apm_bios_info.version = 0x100; - } - } - if (debug && (smp_num_cpus == 1)) { - unsigned char ac_line_status; - unsigned char battery_status; - unsigned char battery_flag; - unsigned char battery_percentage; - unsigned short battery_life; - printk(KERN_INFO "apm: Connection version %d.%d\n", - (apm_bios_info.version >> 8) & 0xff, - apm_bios_info.version & 0xff); - - error = apm_get_power_status(&ac_line_status, &battery_status, &battery_flag, &battery_percentage, &battery_life); - if (error) - printk(KERN_INFO "apm: power status not available\n"); - else { - switch (ac_line_status) { - case APM_AC_OFFLINE: power_stat = "off line"; break; - case APM_AC_ONLINE: power_stat = "on line"; break; - case APM_AC_BACKUP: power_stat = "on backup power"; break; - default: power_stat = "unknown"; break; - } - switch (battery_status) { - case APM_BATTERY_STATUS_HIGH: bat_stat = "high"; break; - case APM_BATTERY_STATUS_LOW: bat_stat = "low"; break; - case APM_BATTERY_STATUS_CRITICAL: bat_stat = "critical"; break; - case APM_BATTERY_STATUS_CHARGING: bat_stat = "charging"; break; - default: bat_stat = "unknown"; break; - } - printk(KERN_INFO - "apm: AC %s, battery status %s, battery life ", - power_stat, bat_stat); - if (battery_percentage == 0xff) - printk("unknown\n"); - else - printk("%d%%\n", battery_percentage); - if (apm_bios_info.version > 0x100) { - printk(KERN_INFO - "apm: battery flag 0x%02x, battery life ", - battery_flag); - if (battery_life == APM_BATTERY_LIFE_UNKNOWN) - printk("unknown\n"); - else - printk("%d %s\n", battery_life & APM_BATTERY_LIFE_VALUE_MASK, - (battery_life & APM_BATTERY_LIFE_MINUTES) ? - "minutes" : "seconds"); - } - } - } - -#ifdef CONFIG_APM_DO_ENABLE - if (apm_bios_info.flags & APM_BIOS_DISABLED) { - /* - * This call causes my NEC UltraLite Versa 33/C to hang if it - * is booted with PM disabled but not in the docking station. - * Unfortunate ... - */ - error = apm_enable_power_management(1); - if (error) { - apm_error("enable power management", error); - return -1; - } - } -#endif - if ((apm_bios_info.flags & APM_BIOS_DISENGAGED) - && (apm_bios_info.version > 0x0100)) { - error = apm_engage_power_management(APM_DEVICE_ALL, 1); - if (error) { - apm_error("engage power management", error); - return -1; - } - } - - /* Install our power off handler.. */ - if (power_off) - pm_power_off = apm_power_off; -#ifdef CONFIG_MAGIC_SYSRQ - sysrq_power_off = apm_power_off; -#endif - if (smp_num_cpus == 1) { -#if defined(CONFIG_APM_DISPLAY_BLANK) && defined(CONFIG_VT) - console_blank_hook = apm_console_blank; -#endif - apm_mainloop(); -#if defined(CONFIG_APM_DISPLAY_BLANK) && defined(CONFIG_VT) - console_blank_hook = NULL; -#endif - } - kapmd_running = 0; - - return 0; -} - #ifndef MODULE static int __init apm_setup(char *str) { @@ -1182,8 +668,6 @@ pm_active = 1; create_proc_info_entry("apm", 0, NULL, apm_get_info); - - kernel_thread(apm, NULL, CLONE_FS | CLONE_FILES | CLONE_SIGHAND | SIGCHLD); misc_register(&apm_device); diff -uNr --exclude=CVS --exclude=.cvsignore /skiff/src/linux/arch/arm/mach-sa1100/dma-sa1100.c kernel/arch/arm/mach-sa1100/dma-sa1100.c --- /skiff/src/linux/arch/arm/mach-sa1100/dma-sa1100.c Wed Apr 11 23:10:43 2001 +++ kernel/arch/arm/mach-sa1100/dma-sa1100.c Wed Apr 4 21:24:17 2001 @@ -74,6 +74,19 @@ sa1100_dma_t dma_chan[MAX_SA1100_DMA_CHANNELS]; +#ifdef CONFIG_PM +typedef struct { + u_long DDAR; + u_long SetDCSR; + u_long ClrDCSR; + dma_addr_t DBSA; + u_long DBTA; + dma_addr_t DBSB; + u_long DBTB; +} dma_shadow_regs_t; + +dma_shadow_regs_t shadow_regs[MAX_SA1100_DMA_CHANNELS]; +#endif /* * DMA processing... @@ -511,6 +524,52 @@ DPRINTK("freed\n"); } +#ifdef CONFIG_PM +/* Should be called by device that uses DMA when sleep & wake-up */ +int sa1100_dma_sleep(dmach_t channel) +{ + sa1100_dma_t *dma = &dma_chan[channel]; + dma_regs_t *regs = dma->regs; + dma_shadow_regs_t* shadow = &shadow_regs[channel]; + + shadow->SetDCSR = regs->RdDCSR & + (DCSR_RUN | DCSR_IE | DCSR_STRTA | DCSR_STRTB); + shadow->ClrDCSR = ~(regs->RdDCSR) & + (DCSR_RUN | DCSR_IE | DCSR_STRTA | DCSR_STRTB); + + sa1100_dma_stop(channel); + + shadow->DDAR = regs->DDAR; + shadow->DBSA = regs->DBSA; + shadow->DBTA = regs->DBTA; + shadow->DBSB = regs->DBSB; + shadow->DBTB = regs->DBTB; + + return 0; +} +int sa1100_dma_wakeup(dmach_t channel) +{ + sa1100_dma_t *dma = &dma_chan[channel]; + dma_regs_t *regs = dma->regs; + dma_shadow_regs_t* shadow = &shadow_regs[channel]; + + regs->DDAR = shadow->DDAR; + regs->DBSA = shadow->DBSA; + regs->DBTA = shadow->DBTA; + regs->DBSB = shadow->DBSB; + regs->DBTB = shadow->DBTB; + + if (shadow->SetDCSR | DCSR_RUN) { + regs->ClrDCSR = (shadow->ClrDCSR | DCSR_RUN | DCSR_IE); + regs->SetDCSR = (shadow->SetDCSR & ~(DCSR_RUN | DCSR_IE)); + sa1100_dma_resume(channel); + } else { + regs->ClrDCSR = shadow->ClrDCSR; + regs->SetDCSR = shadow->SetDCSR; + } + return 0; +} +#endif EXPORT_SYMBOL(sa1100_request_dma); EXPORT_SYMBOL(sa1100_dma_set_callback); @@ -523,6 +582,10 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(sa1100_dma_flush_all); EXPORT_SYMBOL(sa1100_free_dma); +#ifdef CONFIG_PM +EXPORT_SYMBOL(sa1100_dma_sleep); +EXPORT_SYMBOL(sa1100_dma_wakeup); +#endif static int __init sa1100_init_dma(void) { diff -uNr --exclude=CVS --exclude=.cvsignore /skiff/src/linux/arch/arm/mach-sa1100/power.c kernel/arch/arm/mach-sa1100/power.c --- /skiff/src/linux/arch/arm/mach-sa1100/power.c Wed Apr 11 23:10:56 2001 +++ kernel/arch/arm/mach-sa1100/power.c Sun Apr 1 17:04:49 2001 @@ -41,13 +41,6 @@ #include #include - -extern unsigned long *sleep_param; /* virtual address */ -extern unsigned long sleep_param_p; /* physical address */ -extern void cpu_sa1100_resume(void); /* function the bootloader will call back */ - -extern int cpu_sa1100_do_suspend(void); - static struct { u32 osmr0, osmr1, osmr2, osmr3, oscr; u32 ower, oier; @@ -60,9 +53,15 @@ } sys_ctx; +extern unsigned long *sleep_param; /* virtual address */ +extern unsigned long sleep_param_p; /* physical address */ +extern void cpu_sa1100_resume(void); /* function the bootloader will call back */ + +extern int cpu_sa1100_do_suspend(void); + int sa1110_suspend(void) { - + /* set up pointer to sleep parameters */ sleep_param = kmalloc (SLEEP_PARAM_SIZE*sizeof(long), GFP_ATOMIC); if (!sleep_param) @@ -75,6 +74,7 @@ /* disable interrupts */ cli(); + RCNR = xtime.tv_sec; /* save vital registers */ sys_ctx.osmr0 = OSMR0; @@ -99,13 +99,14 @@ sys_ctx.ppar = PPAR; sys_ctx.psdr = PSDR; - /* XXX Should be in serial driver */ + /* XXX Should be in serial driver */ + /* Save serial port context for quick restore */ #if defined(CONFIG_SA1100_ASSABET) || defined(CONFIG_SA1100_FREEBIRD) sys_ctx.serutcr0 = Ser1UTCR0; sys_ctx.serutcr1 = Ser1UTCR1; sys_ctx.serutcr2 = Ser1UTCR2; sys_ctx.serutcr3 = Ser1UTCR3; - DPRINTK("save serial port 1 value\n"); + DPRINTK("save serial port 1 value\n"); #else sys_ctx.serutcr0 = Ser3UTCR0; sys_ctx.serutcr1 = Ser3UTCR1; @@ -120,47 +121,51 @@ GFER = 0x1; GEDR = 0x1; } else if (machine_is_bitsy()) { - /* will add more sources later */ - - /* Wake up by releasing the power button */ - PWER = 0x1; + /* will add more sources later */ + + /* Wake up by releasing the power button or by RTC */ + PWER = 0x1 | (1 << 31); GRER = 0x1; + /* Wakened by pushing button will cause cpu + * by following button release, + * so disable falling edge detection */ GFER = 0x0; GEDR = 0x1; + /* Clear previous reset status */ + RCSR = RCSR_HWR | RCSR_SWR | RCSR_WDR | RCSR_SMR; + + PCFR = PCFR_OPDE | PCFR_FP | PCFR_FS; + PGSR = 0x00000000; + } else if (machine_is_assabet()) { + PWER = 0x1; + GRER = 0x1; + GFER = 0x0; + GEDR = 0x1; + RCSR = RCSR_HWR | RCSR_SWR | RCSR_WDR | RCSR_SMR; - /* Clear reset status */ - PCFR = PCFR_OPDE | PCFR_FP | PCFR_FS; - PGSR = 0x00000000; - } else if (machine_is_assabet()) { - PWER = 0x1; - GRER = 0x1; - GFER = 0x0; - GEDR = 0x1; - - RCSR = RCSR_HWR | RCSR_SWR | RCSR_WDR | RCSR_SMR; - /* Clear reset status */ - PCFR = PCFR_OPDE | PCFR_FP | PCFR_FS; - PGSR = 0x00000000; + /* Clear reset status */ + PCFR = PCFR_OPDE | PCFR_FP | PCFR_FS; + PGSR = 0x00000000; } else if (machine_is_freebird()) { - PWER = 0x1; - GRER = 0x1; - GFER = 0x0; - GEDR = 0x1; - - RCSR = RCSR_HWR | RCSR_SWR | RCSR_WDR | RCSR_SMR; - PCFR = PCFR_OPDE | PCFR_FP | PCFR_FS; - PGSR = 0x0; - DPRINTK("just print at freebird board\n"); + PWER = 0x1; + GRER = 0x1; + GFER = 0x0; + GEDR = 0x1; + + RCSR = RCSR_HWR | RCSR_SWR | RCSR_WDR | RCSR_SMR; + PCFR = PCFR_OPDE | PCFR_FP | PCFR_FS; + PGSR = 0x0; + DPRINTK("just print at freebird board\n"); } /* set resume return address */ PSPR = virt_to_phys(cpu_sa1100_resume); cpu_sa1100_do_suspend(); - DPRINTK("*** made it back from resume\n"); + /* restore registers */ GPDR = sys_ctx.gpdr; GRER = sys_ctx.grer; @@ -173,7 +178,7 @@ Ser1UTCR1 = sys_ctx.serutcr1; Ser1UTCR2 = sys_ctx.serutcr2; Ser1UTCR3 = sys_ctx.serutcr3; - DPRINTK("restore serial port 1 value\n"); + DPRINTK("restore serial port 1 value\n"); #else Ser3UTCR0 = sys_ctx.serutcr0; Ser3UTCR1 = sys_ctx.serutcr1; @@ -198,42 +203,41 @@ ICCR = sys_ctx.iccr; ICMR = sys_ctx.icmr; - #if defined(CONFIG_SA1100_BITSY) if (machine_is_bitsy()) { if (ICIP & IC_GPIO0) { - /* if wakeup source is power button, clear int flag to - prevent sleeping again */ + /* if wakeup source is power button, clear interrupt + flag to prevent sleeping again */ GEDR = GPIO_GPIO0; ICIP = GPIO_GPIO0; } } #endif #if defined(CONFIG_SA1100_ASSABET) - if (machine_is_assabet()) { - if (ICIP & IC_GPIO0) { - GEDR = GPIO_GPIO0; - ICIP = GPIO_GPIO0; - } - } + if (machine_is_assabet()) { + if (ICIP & IC_GPIO0) { + GEDR = GPIO_GPIO0; + ICIP = GPIO_GPIO0; + } + } #endif #if defined(CONFIG_SA1100_FREEBIRD) - if (machine_is_freebird()) { - if (ICIP & IC_GPIO0) { - GEDR = GPIO_GPIO0; - ICIP = GPIO_GPIO0; - } - } + if (machine_is_freebird()) { + if (ICIP & IC_GPIO0) { + GEDR = GPIO_GPIO0; + ICIP = GPIO_GPIO0; + } + } #endif - sti(); - DPRINTK("*** after disable interrupt\n"); + xtime.tv_sec = RCNR; + sti(); kfree (sleep_param); return 0; } -static int pm_do_suspend(ctl_table *ctl, int write, struct file *file, void *buffer, size_t *len) +int pm_do_suspend(void) { int retval; @@ -255,7 +259,7 @@ static struct ctl_table pm_table[] = { - {ACPI_S1_SLP_TYP, "suspend", NULL, 0, 0600, NULL, &pm_do_suspend}, + {ACPI_S1_SLP_TYP, "suspend", NULL, 0, 0600, NULL, (proc_handler *)&pm_do_suspend}, {0} }; diff -uNr --exclude=CVS --exclude=.cvsignore /skiff/src/linux/arch/arm/mach-sa1100/suspend.S kernel/arch/arm/mach-sa1100/suspend.S --- /skiff/src/linux/arch/arm/mach-sa1100/suspend.S Wed Apr 11 23:10:56 2001 +++ kernel/arch/arm/mach-sa1100/suspend.S Tue Mar 13 01:59:55 2001 @@ -134,11 +134,13 @@ @ save address of sleep_param in r4 mov r0, r4 - @ Adjust memory timing before lowering CPU clock - ldr r0, =MDREFR - ldr r1, [r0] - orr r1, r1, #MDREFR_K1DB2 - str r1, [r0] + @ Adjust memory timing before lowering CPU clock + @ Clock speed ajdustment without changing memory timing makes + @ CPU hang in some cases + ldr r0, =MDREFR + ldr r1, [r0] + orr r1, r1, #MDREFR_K1DB2 + str r1, [r0] @ delay 90us and set CPU PLL to lowest speed @ fixes resume problem on high speed SA1110 diff -uNr --exclude=CVS --exclude=.cvsignore /skiff/src/linux/drivers/char/console.c kernel/drivers/char/console.c --- /skiff/src/linux/drivers/char/console.c Wed Apr 11 23:10:43 2001 +++ kernel/drivers/char/console.c Thu Apr 5 22:04:20 2001 @@ -3002,6 +3002,10 @@ { case PM_RESUME: unblank_screen(); + /* Just temporary fix. Remove cursor after wakeup */ +#if defined(CONFIG_SA1100_BITSY) + hide_cursor(fg_console); +#endif break; case PM_SUSPEND: do_blank_screen(0); --- /skiff/src/linux/drivers/video/sa1100fb.c Wed Apr 11 23:10:57 2001 +++ kernel/drivers/video/sa1100fb.c Thu Apr 12 00:13:02 2001 @@ -1283,7 +1305,7 @@ */ static void sa1100fb_disable_lcd_controller(void) { - DPRINTK("Disabling LCD controller\n"); + DPRINTK("Disabling LCD controller: controller_state=%d\n", current_par.controller_state); /* Exit if already LCD disabled, or LDD IRQ unmasked */ if ((current_par.controller_state == LCD_MODE_DISABLED) || @@ -1329,7 +1352,7 @@ { u_long flags; - DPRINTK("__FUNCTION__\n"); + DPRINTK("sa1100fb_enable_lcd_controller: controller_state=%d\n", current_par.controller_state); local_irq_save(flags); /* Disable controller before changing parameters */ @@ -1411,11 +1442,43 @@ current_par.controller_state = LCD_MODE_ENABLED; } +#ifdef CONFIG_SA1100_OMNIMETER + LEDBacklightOn(); +#endif /* Restore interrupt status */ local_irq_restore(flags); } /* + * Formal definition of the VESA spec: + * On + * This refers to the state of the display when it is in full operation + * Stand-By + * This defines an optional operating state of minimal power reduction with + * the shortest recovery time + * Suspend + * This refers to a level of power management in which substantial power + * reduction is achieved by the display. The display can have a longer + * recovery time from this state than from the Stand-by state + * Off + * This indicates that the display is consuming the lowest level of power + * and is non-operational. Recovery from this state may optionally require + * the user to manually power on the monitor + * + * Now, the fbdev driver adds an additional state, (blank), where they + * turn off the video (maybe by colormap tricks), but don't mess with the + * video itself: think of it semantically between on and Stand-By. + * + * So here's what we should do in our fbdev blank routine: + * + * VESA_NO_BLANKING (mode 0) Video on, front/back light on + * VESA_VSYNC_SUSPEND (mode 1) Video on, front/back light off + * VESA_HSYNC_SUSPEND (mode 2) Video on, front/back light off + * VESA_POWERDOWN (mode 3) Video off, front/back light off + * + * This will match the matrox implementation. + */ +/* * sa1100fb_blank(): * Blank the display by setting all palette values to zero. Note, the * 12 and 16 bpp modes don't really use the palette, so this will not @@ -1425,23 +1488,59 @@ sa1100fb_blank(int blank, struct fb_info *info) { int i; - - DPRINTK("blank=%d info->modename=%s\n", blank, info->modename); - if (blank) { +#ifdef CONFIG_PM + struct pm_dev *pm_dev = NULL; +#endif + + DPRINTK("sa1100fb_blank: blank=%d info->modename=%s\n", blank, info->modename); + switch (blank) { + case VESA_POWERDOWN: + case VESA_VSYNC_SUSPEND: + case VESA_HSYNC_SUSPEND: if (current_par.visual != FB_VISUAL_TRUECOLOR) - for (i = 0; i < current_par.palette_size; i++) - sa1100fb_palette_write(i, sa1100fb_palette_encode(i, 0, 0, 0, 0)); + for (i = 0; i < current_par.palette_size; i++) + sa1100fb_palette_write(i, sa1100fb_palette_encode(i, 0, 0, 0, 0)); sa1100fb_disable_lcd_controller(); - } - else { +#ifdef CONFIG_PM + while ((pm_dev = pm_find(PM_ILLUMINATION_DEV, pm_dev)) != NULL) + pm_send(pm_dev, PM_BLANK, NULL); +#endif + break; + case VESA_NO_BLANKING: +#ifdef CONFIG_PM + while ((pm_dev = pm_find(PM_ILLUMINATION_DEV, pm_dev)) != NULL) + pm_send(pm_dev, PM_UNBLANK, NULL); +#endif if (current_par.visual != FB_VISUAL_TRUECOLOR) - sa1100fb_set_cmap(&fb_display[current_par.currcon].cmap, 1, - current_par.currcon, info); + sa1100fb_set_cmap(&fb_display[current_par.currcon].cmap, 1, + current_par.currcon, info); sa1100fb_enable_lcd_controller(); } - /* TODO: Bitsy support for blanking display */ } +#ifdef CONFIG_PM +static int sa1100fb_pm_callback(struct pm_dev *pm_dev, pm_request_t req, void *data) +{ + int wait_count=0; + switch (req) { + case PM_SUSPEND: /* enter D1-D3 */ + sa1100fb_blank(VESA_POWERDOWN, &fb_info); + while(current_par.controller_state!=LCD_MODE_DISABLED + && wait_count<10) { + mdelay(10); + wait_count++; + } /* Wait for lcd disable, wait 30ms max */ + if (current_par.controller_state!=LCD_MODE_DISABLED) + printk(__FUNCTION__ ": not disabled yet: controller_state=%d\n", current_par.controller_state); + break; + case PM_RESUME: /* enter D0 */ + sa1100fb_blank(VESA_NO_BLANKING, &fb_info); + break; + } + DPRINTK("returning\n"); + return 0; +} +#endif /* * sa1100fb_switch(): @@ -1474,25 +1573,6 @@ return 0; } -#ifdef CONFIG_PM -static int sa1100fb_pm_callback(struct pm_dev *pm_dev, pm_request_t req, void *data) -{ - DPRINTK("req = %d\n", req); - switch (req) { - case PM_SUSPEND: - sa1100fb_disable_lcd_controller(); - while(current_par.controller_state != LCD_MODE_DISABLED); - break; - case PM_RESUME: - sa1100fb_enable_lcd_controller(); - break; - } - DPRINTK("returning\n"); - return 0; -} -#endif - - int __init sa1100fb_init(void) { int ret; @@ -1559,8 +1639,9 @@ #endif register_framebuffer(&fb_info); + #ifdef CONFIG_PM - fb_pm_dev = pm_register(PM_SYS_DEV, 0, sa1100fb_pm_callback); + fb_pm_dev = pm_register(PM_SYS_DEV, PM_SYS_VGA, sa1100fb_pm_callback); #endif /* This driver cannot be unloaded at the moment */ diff -uNr --exclude=CVS --exclude=.cvsignore /skiff/src/linux/include/asm-arm/cpu-multi32.h kernel/include/asm-arm/cpu-multi32.h --- /skiff/src/linux/include/asm-arm/cpu-multi32.h Thu Oct 19 07:14:09 2000 +++ kernel/include/asm-arm/cpu-multi32.h Fri Feb 9 23:57:07 2001 @@ -44,6 +44,10 @@ */ int (*_do_idle)(int mode); /* + * Suspend the processor + */ + void (*_do_suspend)(unsigned long sleep_param_virt); + /* * Processor architecture specific */ struct { /* CACHE */ @@ -133,6 +137,7 @@ #define cpu_proc_fin() processor._proc_fin() #define cpu_reset(addr) processor.reset(addr) #define cpu_do_idle(mode) processor._do_idle(mode) +#define cpu_do_suspend(virt) processor._do_suspend(virt) #define cpu_cache_clean_invalidate_all() processor.cache.clean_invalidate_all() #define cpu_cache_clean_invalidate_range(s,e,f) processor.cache.clean_invalidate_range(s,e,f) diff -uNr --exclude=CVS --exclude=.cvsignore /skiff/src/linux/include/asm-arm/cpu-single.h kernel/include/asm-arm/cpu-single.h --- /skiff/src/linux/include/asm-arm/cpu-single.h Thu Oct 19 07:14:09 2000 +++ kernel/include/asm-arm/cpu-single.h Fri Feb 9 23:57:13 2001 @@ -28,6 +28,7 @@ #define cpu_proc_fin cpu_fn(CPU_NAME,_proc_fin) #define cpu_reset cpu_fn(CPU_NAME,_reset) #define cpu_do_idle cpu_fn(CPU_NAME,_do_idle) +#define cpu_do_suspend cpu_fn(CPU_NAME,_do_suspend) #define cpu_cache_clean_invalidate_all cpu_fn(CPU_NAME,_cache_clean_invalidate_all) #define cpu_cache_clean_invalidate_range cpu_fn(CPU_NAME,_cache_clean_invalidate_range) diff -uNr --exclude=CVS --exclude=.cvsignore /skiff/src/linux/include/linux/pm.h kernel/include/linux/pm.h --- /skiff/src/linux/include/linux/pm.h Wed Apr 11 23:10:57 2001 +++ kernel/include/linux/pm.h Fri Jan 19 05:23:01 2001 @@ -31,10 +31,18 @@ */ enum { + PM_SUSPEND_CHECK, PM_SUSPEND, /* enter D1-D3 */ PM_STANDBY, /* enter ?? state */ PM_RESUME, /* enter D0 */ + PM_SLOW_CLOCK, + PM_UNSLOW_CLOCK, + + /* blank and unblank screen */ + PM_BLANK, + PM_UNBLANK, + /* enable wake-on */ PM_SET_WAKEUP, @@ -61,6 +69,7 @@ PM_SCSI_DEV, /* SCSI device */ PM_ISA_DEV, /* ISA device */ PM_MTD_DEV, /* Memory Technology Device */ + PM_ILLUMINATION_DEV, /* Display Back or Front Light */ }; typedef int pm_dev_t; @@ -77,6 +86,7 @@ PM_SYS_FDC = 0x41d00700, /* floppy controller */ PM_SYS_VGA = 0x41d00900, /* VGA controller */ PM_SYS_PCMCIA = 0x41d00e00, /* PCMCIA controller */ + PM_SYS_LIGHT = 0x41d00a00, /* LCD light -Jamey Hicks Jan 17 2001 */ }; /* diff -uNr --exclude=CVS --exclude=.cvsignore /skiff/src/linux/kernel/pm.c kernel/kernel/pm.c --- /skiff/src/linux/kernel/pm.c Wed Apr 11 23:10:18 2001 +++ kernel/kernel/pm.c Fri Sep 29 16:07:30 2000 @@ -131,8 +131,11 @@ prev_state = dev->state; next_state = (int) data; if (prev_state != next_state) { - if (dev->callback) + if (dev->callback) { + printk("pm_send: callback=%p rqst=%d", dev->callback, rqst); status = (*dev->callback)(dev, rqst, data); + printk(" status=%d\n", status); + } if (!status) { dev->state = next_state; dev->prev_state = prev_state; From wrl-techops@pa.dec.com Wed Apr 11 22:56:22 2001 Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (root@mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id WAA10344 for ; Wed, 11 Apr 2001 22:56:21 +0200 Received: from ztxmail04.ztx.compaq.com (ztxmail04.ztx.compaq.com [161.114.1.208]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id WAA02195 for ; Wed, 11 Apr 2001 22:56:18 +0200 (METDST) Received: by ztxmail04.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id C8C651DCC; Wed, 11 Apr 2001 15:54:30 -0500 (CDT) Received: from mailrelay01.cac.cpqcorp.net (mailrelay01.cac.cpqcorp.net [16.47.132.152]) by ztxmail04.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0ED761CAA; Wed, 11 Apr 2001 15:54:27 -0500 (CDT) Received: by mailrelay01.cac.cpqcorp.net (Postfix, from userid 12345) id ECBF7198; Wed, 11 Apr 2001 13:54:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mailrelay01.cac.cpqcorp.net (Postfix) with SMTP id A995319E; Wed, 11 Apr 2001 13:54:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA06049; Wed, 11 Apr 2001 13:54:19 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id NAA13031; Wed, 11 Apr 2001 13:53:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id NAA25781; Wed, 11 Apr 2001 13:53:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: from zmamail01.nz-tay.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA24138; Wed, 11 Apr 2001 13:53:01 -0700 Received: by zmamail01.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 6809FD6D9; Wed, 11 Apr 2001 16:53:00 -0400 (EDT) Received: from linuxhacker.ru (unknown [213.128.193.148]) by zmamail01.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C4AED3F4 for ; Wed, 11 Apr 2001 16:52:59 -0400 (EDT) Received: (from uucp@localhost) by linuxhacker.ru (8.9.3/8.9.3) with UUCP id AAA04402; Thu, 12 Apr 2001 00:52:44 +0400 Received: (from green@localhost) by linuxhacker.ru (8.10.1/8.10.1) id f3BKevo08131; Thu, 12 Apr 2001 00:40:57 +0400 Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2001 00:40:57 +0400 From: Oleg Drokin To: nico@CAM.ORG, sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Subject: sync-up with cvs.handhelds.org Message-Id: <20010412004057.A8096@linuxhacker.ru> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0.1i Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk Hello! As a person, who tries to keep cvs.handhelds.org in sync with your latest and greatest patches, I decided to sent some stuff that is in cvs, but not in your patches, to you. I hope this will be beneficial not only for me (easier to sync up), but also for all others. Patches are splitted in several bundles: arch: This one adds several new sa11x0 architectures, such as Omnimeter, Jornada720, Itsy, ... (all together, because if I do several different diffs, they will not apply clean together) power: This one is for power management char: Whis one contains different char device changes. stuff: This is stuff I do not know what to include to, so I separated it ;) unk: these are 2 patches, that I think are needed, but not sure, see for yourself. Also you will find that sometimes patches contain little pieces that are should be belonging to other diff. This is because I basically hope you will apply these patches all together ;) (and to save you time merging not applying diffs). These places are: sa1100_fb driver in power bundle (little bit for omnimeter), arch/arm/mach-sa1100/Makefile in arch - contains part for regmon (from stuff), may be somewhere else, but I forgot about it, then. All patches are against 2.4.2-rmk2-np2. They will follow each one in separate letter. Note that I merely just extracted this stuff from cvs.handhelds.org, and all authorship and credits belongs to original authors. Bye, Oleg From wrl-techops@pa.dec.com Wed Apr 11 23:11:30 2001 Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (root@mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id XAA10390 for ; Wed, 11 Apr 2001 23:11:30 +0200 Received: from ztxmail03.ztx.compaq.com (ztxmail03.ztx.compaq.com [161.114.1.207]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id XAA03059 for ; Wed, 11 Apr 2001 23:11:28 +0200 (METDST) Received: by ztxmail03.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id C9F6D96E; Wed, 11 Apr 2001 16:09:41 -0500 (CDT) Received: from taynzmail03.nz-tay.cpqcorp.net (taynzmail03.nz-tay.cpqcorp.net [16.47.4.103]) by ztxmail03.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F062B16; Wed, 11 Apr 2001 16:09:41 -0500 (CDT) Received: by taynzmail03.nz-tay.cpqcorp.net (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 0DF1D15A; Wed, 11 Apr 2001 17:09:41 -0400 (EDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by taynzmail03.nz-tay.cpqcorp.net (Postfix) with SMTP id 136C93CB; Wed, 11 Apr 2001 17:09:39 -0400 (EDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA11114; Wed, 11 Apr 2001 14:09:37 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id OAA06012; Wed, 11 Apr 2001 14:09:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id OAA03440; Wed, 11 Apr 2001 14:08:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ztxmail02.nz-cce.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA15252; Wed, 11 Apr 2001 14:08:57 -0700 Received: by ztxmail02.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id BF79197F9; Wed, 11 Apr 2001 16:08:52 -0500 (CDT) Received: from kings-cross.london.uk.eu.org (pc57-cam4.cable.ntl.com [62.253.135.57]) by ztxmail02.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4DFC2987E for ; Wed, 11 Apr 2001 16:08:51 -0500 (CDT) Received: from localhost ([::ffff:127.0.0.1] helo=kings-cross.london.uk.eu.org ident=pb) by kings-cross.london.uk.eu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 14nRqt-0004EM-00; Wed, 11 Apr 2001 22:08:35 +0100 X-Mailer: exmh version 2.3.1 01/18/2001 (debian 2.3.1-1) with nmh-1.0.4+dev To: Oleg Drokin Cc: nico@CAM.ORG, sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Subject: Re: cvs.handhelds.org: unk In-Reply-To: Message from Oleg Drokin of "Thu, 12 Apr 2001 00:45:44 +0400." <20010412004544.A8174@linuxhacker.ru> References: <20010412004544.A8174@linuxhacker.ru> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2001 22:08:35 +0100 From: Philip Blundell Message-Id: Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk > These are things I was not sure about > >diff -uNr --exclude=CVS --exclude=.cvsignore /skiff/src/linux/include/linux/mm >.h kernel/include/linux/mm.h >--- /skiff/src/linux/include/linux/mm.h Wed Apr 11 23:10:45 2001 >+++ kernel/include/linux/mm.h Fri Mar 2 14:35:30 2001 >@@ -525,6 +525,12 @@ > #define pgcache_under_min() (atomic_read(&page_cache_size) * 100 < \ > page_cache.min_percent * num_physpages) > >+#ifndef __arm__ >+#define memc_update_addr(x,y,z) >+#define memc_update_mm(x) >+#define memc_clear(x,y) >+#endif >+ > #endif /* __KERNEL__ */ This isn't SA-1100 specific at all, but it seems pretty important. p. From wrl-techops@pa.dec.com Thu Apr 12 12:50:09 2001 Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (root@mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id MAA12394 for ; Thu, 12 Apr 2001 12:50:08 +0200 Received: from zcamail03.zca.compaq.com (zcamail03.zca.compaq.com [161.114.32.103]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id MAA08136 for ; Thu, 12 Apr 2001 12:50:07 +0200 (METDST) Received: by zcamail03.zca.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 62908FA1; Thu, 12 Apr 2001 03:48:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: from taynzmail03.nz-tay.cpqcorp.net (taynzmail03.nz-tay.cpqcorp.net [16.47.4.103]) by zcamail03.zca.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 22AB1DA4; Thu, 12 Apr 2001 03:48:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: by taynzmail03.nz-tay.cpqcorp.net (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 3B9EF348; Thu, 12 Apr 2001 06:48:17 -0400 (EDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by taynzmail03.nz-tay.cpqcorp.net (Postfix) with SMTP id 45A56249; Thu, 12 Apr 2001 06:48:15 -0400 (EDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA09254; Thu, 12 Apr 2001 03:48:07 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id DAA03200; Thu, 12 Apr 2001 03:44:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id DAA17682; Thu, 12 Apr 2001 03:44:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ztxmail01.nz-cce.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA00010; Thu, 12 Apr 2001 03:44:44 -0700 Received: by ztxmail01.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 8D0432BF7; Thu, 12 Apr 2001 05:44:43 -0500 (CDT) Received: from julia.funai-tky.co.jp (funai-tky.as.wakwak.ne.jp [61.115.76.21]) by ztxmail01.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF55C7D8F for ; Thu, 12 Apr 2001 05:44:42 -0500 (CDT) Received: from hiropu (hiropu) by julia.funai-tky.co.jp (8.11.3+3.4W/8.11.3/smtpfeed 1.12) with ESMTP id f3CAhpv30736 for ; Thu, 12 Apr 2001 19:43:51 +0900 Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2001 19:43:51 +0900 From: Hiroshi Ishii To: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Subject: How to work ucb1200 on brutus board? Message-Id: <20010412194151.855E.HIROSHI@funai-tky.co.jp> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Becky! ver. 2.00.03 Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk Hi, Please tell me How to work ucb1200 on brutus board at latest kernel (2.4.x)? Regards; ---- Funai Electric R & D System Software Engineer Hiroshi Ishii From wrl-techops@pa.dec.com Thu Apr 12 15:36:12 2001 Received: from ns1.et.tudelft.nl (root@ns1.et.tudelft.nl [130.161.33.17]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id PAA12794 for ; Thu, 12 Apr 2001 15:36:12 +0200 Received: from ztxmail03.ztx.compaq.com (ztxmail03.ztx.compaq.com [161.114.1.207]) by ns1.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3 (PHNE_22672)/8.9.3) with ESMTP id PAA11534 for ; Thu, 12 Apr 2001 15:36:10 +0200 (METDST) Received: by ztxmail03.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 45219832; Thu, 12 Apr 2001 08:33:05 -0500 (CDT) Received: from mailrelay01.cac.cpqcorp.net (mailrelay01.cac.cpqcorp.net [16.47.132.152]) by ztxmail03.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA85498B; Thu, 12 Apr 2001 08:33:04 -0500 (CDT) Received: by mailrelay01.cac.cpqcorp.net (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 8074F191; Thu, 12 Apr 2001 06:33:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mailrelay01.cac.cpqcorp.net (Postfix) with SMTP id 5601215E; Thu, 12 Apr 2001 06:33:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA05619; Thu, 12 Apr 2001 06:33:03 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id GAA11317; Thu, 12 Apr 2001 06:31:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id GAA22861; Thu, 12 Apr 2001 06:31:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: from exchou-gh04.cca.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA06225; Thu, 12 Apr 2001 06:31:52 -0700 Received: by exchou-gh04.cca.cpqcorp.net with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2652.78) id <2X58VQM8>; Thu, 12 Apr 2001 08:31:51 -0500 Message-Id: From: "Hicks, Jamey" To: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Subject: re: cvs.handhelds.org: unk Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2001 08:31:20 -0500 Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2652.78) Content-Class: urn:content-classes:message Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk -----Original Message----- From: Hicks, Jamey Sent: Wednesday, April 11, 2001 10:06 PM To: Philip Blundell Cc: Oleg Drokin; nico@CAM.ORG; sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Subject: Re: cvs.handhelds.org: unk Philip Blundell wrote: >> These are things I was not sure about >> >> diff -uNr --exclude=CVS --exclude=.cvsignore > > /skiff/src/linux/include/linux/mm > >> .h kernel/include/linux/mm.h >> --- /skiff/src/linux/include/linux/mm.h Wed Apr 11 23:10:45 2001 >> +++ kernel/include/linux/mm.h Fri Mar 2 14:35:30 2001 >> @@ -525,6 +525,12 @@ >> #define pgcache_under_min() (atomic_read(&page_cache_size) * 100 < \ >> page_cache.min_percent * num_physpages) >> >> +#ifndef __arm__ >> +#define memc_update_addr(x,y,z) >> +#define memc_update_mm(x) >> +#define memc_clear(x,y) >> +#endif >> + >> #endif /* __KERNEL__ */ > > > This isn't SA-1100 specific at all, but it seems pretty important. > > p. > This patch enables you to build the kernel for i386 etc. even after RMK and NP patches are applied. I'd like to be able to use one source tree for all platforms. Jamey From wrl-techops@pa.dec.com Thu Apr 12 17:32:11 2001 Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (root@mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id RAA13181 for ; Thu, 12 Apr 2001 17:32:11 +0200 Received: from zmamail03.zma.compaq.com (zmamail03.zma.compaq.com [161.114.64.103]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id RAA29304 for ; Thu, 12 Apr 2001 17:32:10 +0200 (METDST) Received: by zmamail03.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 79163A214; Thu, 12 Apr 2001 11:30:23 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailrelay01.cac.cpqcorp.net (mailrelay01.cac.cpqcorp.net [16.47.132.152]) by zmamail03.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D4D96C00E; Thu, 12 Apr 2001 11:30:22 -0400 (EDT) Received: by mailrelay01.cac.cpqcorp.net (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 4B212153; Thu, 12 Apr 2001 08:30:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mailrelay01.cac.cpqcorp.net (Postfix) with SMTP id 22146174; Thu, 12 Apr 2001 08:30:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA30813; Thu, 12 Apr 2001 08:30:14 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id IAA30016; Thu, 12 Apr 2001 08:26:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id IAA28228; Thu, 12 Apr 2001 08:26:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: from zmamail01.nz-tay.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA31560; Thu, 12 Apr 2001 08:26:45 -0700 Received: by zmamail01.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 0EFCAD5F9; Thu, 12 Apr 2001 11:26:45 -0400 (EDT) Received: from xanadu.home (modemcable084.137-200-24.mtl.mc.videotron.ca [24.200.137.84]) by zmamail01.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6DD8BE629 for ; Thu, 12 Apr 2001 11:26:44 -0400 (EDT) Received: from localhost (nico@localhost) by xanadu.home (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id LAA22903; Thu, 12 Apr 2001 11:26:39 -0400 X-Authentication-Warning: xanadu.home: nico owned process doing -bs Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2001 11:26:39 -0400 (EDT) From: Nicolas Pitre X-X-Sender: To: Hiroshi Ishii Cc: Subject: Re: How to work ucb1200 on brutus board? In-Reply-To: <20010412194151.855E.HIROSHI@funai-tky.co.jp> Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk On Thu, 12 Apr 2001, Hiroshi Ishii wrote: > Hi, > > Please tell me How to work ucb1200 on brutus board at > latest kernel (2.4.x)? It probably need to be fixed with the newer driver. Nicolas From wrl-techops@pa.dec.com Fri Apr 13 03:26:16 2001 Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (root@mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id DAA15009 for ; Fri, 13 Apr 2001 03:26:16 +0200 Received: from zmamail05.zma.compaq.com (zmamail05.zma.compaq.com [161.114.64.105]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id DAA26804 for ; Fri, 13 Apr 2001 03:26:14 +0200 (METDST) Received: by zmamail05.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 5AAC418E8; Thu, 12 Apr 2001 21:24:28 -0400 (EDT) Received: from taynzmail03.nz-tay.cpqcorp.net (taynzmail03.nz-tay.cpqcorp.net [16.47.4.103]) by zmamail05.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F31DC1A82; Thu, 12 Apr 2001 21:24:27 -0400 (EDT) Received: by taynzmail03.nz-tay.cpqcorp.net (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 4D526363; Thu, 12 Apr 2001 21:24:27 -0400 (EDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by taynzmail03.nz-tay.cpqcorp.net (Postfix) with SMTP id 4FF16361; Thu, 12 Apr 2001 21:24:25 -0400 (EDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA28191; Thu, 12 Apr 2001 18:24:23 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id SAA03743; Thu, 12 Apr 2001 18:22:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id SAA06740; Thu, 12 Apr 2001 18:22:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ztxmail02.nz-cce.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA09011; Thu, 12 Apr 2001 18:22:32 -0700 Received: by ztxmail02.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 727EB9834; Thu, 12 Apr 2001 20:22:31 -0500 (CDT) Received: from julia.funai-tky.co.jp (funai-tky.as.wakwak.ne.jp [61.115.76.21]) by ztxmail02.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C27B29A63 for ; Thu, 12 Apr 2001 20:22:30 -0500 (CDT) Received: from hiropu (hiropu) by julia.funai-tky.co.jp (8.11.3+3.4W/8.11.3/smtpfeed 1.12) with ESMTP id f3D1MTR02194 for ; Fri, 13 Apr 2001 10:22:29 +0900 Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2001 10:22:29 +0900 From: Hiroshi Ishii To: sa1100 mailng list Subject: Re: How to work ucb1200 on brutus board? In-Reply-To: <443DA3AC.C64149B8@sri.receiptcity.com> References: <20010412194151.855E.HIROSHI@funai-tky.co.jp> <443DA3AC.C64149B8@sri.receiptcity.com> Message-Id: <20010413102104.5BBF.HIROSHI@funai-tky.co.jp> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-2022-JP" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Becky! ver. 2.00.03 Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk On Wed, 12 Apr 2006 19:04:44 -0600 dhammika wrote: > i tried to bring up 2.4 in brutus but never had any luck. as i can > remember the latest kernel version that i was able bring up in brutus > was 2.4.0-test5. i think i had the ucb 1200 working with that, but only > the touch screen. brutus' 4mb memory banks seems to be doing weired > things, sometimes the kernel would take hours to just comeup. $B!!(BThanks. I'll check it, and try to merge current tree. Regards; ---- Funai Electric R & D System Software Engineer Hiroshi Ishii From wrl-techops@pa.dec.com Fri Apr 13 18:18:49 2001 Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (root@mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id SAA17459 for ; Fri, 13 Apr 2001 18:18:49 +0200 Received: from zcamail05.zca.compaq.com (zcamail05.zca.compaq.com [161.114.32.105]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id SAA16618 for ; Fri, 13 Apr 2001 18:18:47 +0200 (METDST) Received: by zcamail05.zca.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 662401D5; Fri, 13 Apr 2001 09:19:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mailrelay01.cac.cpqcorp.net (mailrelay01.cac.cpqcorp.net [16.47.132.152]) by zcamail05.zca.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 44C3239C; Fri, 13 Apr 2001 09:19:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mailrelay01.cac.cpqcorp.net (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 6BA91132; Fri, 13 Apr 2001 09:16:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mailrelay01.cac.cpqcorp.net (Postfix) with SMTP id 40F09153; Fri, 13 Apr 2001 09:16:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA04659; Fri, 13 Apr 2001 09:16:48 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id JAA13273; Fri, 13 Apr 2001 09:06:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ztxmail01.ztx.compaq.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id JAA12125; Fri, 13 Apr 2001 09:06:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: by ztxmail01.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id BE4BD7F1A; Fri, 13 Apr 2001 11:06:07 -0500 (CDT) Received: from mail.tiscalinet.it (mail-4.tiscalinet.it [195.130.225.150]) by ztxmail01.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E93D4776A for ; Fri, 13 Apr 2001 11:06:06 -0500 (CDT) Received: from ottavio (62.10.154.92) by mail.tiscalinet.it (5.5.025) id 3AB891BB005324DF for sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com; Fri, 13 Apr 2001 18:06:03 +0200 Message-Id: <007c01c0c433$811cd320$5c9a0a3e@ottavio> From: "Giuseppe Ottaviano" To: Subject: PCMCIA specs Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2001 18:04:55 +0200 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-Msmail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 X-Mimeole: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400 Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk Hi to all, where can I find the PCMCIA specifications? I only found the CompactFlash ones, but in the PCMCIA.org site it seems to be impossible to download any information about PC-Cards. Must I pay to get them? Do exist any free informations about PCMCIA (I'm particularly interested to the power management). Thanks, Giuseppe Ottaviano giuott@tin.it From wrl-techops@pa.dec.com Fri Apr 13 18:27:54 2001 Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (root@mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id SAA17489 for ; Fri, 13 Apr 2001 18:27:54 +0200 Received: from zcamail05.zca.compaq.com (zcamail05.zca.compaq.com [161.114.32.105]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id SAA17443 for ; Fri, 13 Apr 2001 18:27:52 +0200 (METDST) Received: by zcamail05.zca.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id AE24A28C; Fri, 13 Apr 2001 09:28:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mailrelay01.cce.cpqcorp.net (mailrelay01.cce.cpqcorp.net [16.47.68.171]) by zcamail05.zca.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7289E3E8; Fri, 13 Apr 2001 09:28:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mailrelay01.cce.cpqcorp.net (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 3D3C034A; Fri, 13 Apr 2001 11:25:58 -0500 (CDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mailrelay01.cce.cpqcorp.net (Postfix) with SMTP id C40BC1AA; Fri, 13 Apr 2001 11:25:56 -0500 (CDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA11097; Fri, 13 Apr 2001 09:25:55 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id JAA13798; Fri, 13 Apr 2001 09:19:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: from exchou-gh04.cca.cpqcorp.net by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id JAA01801; Fri, 13 Apr 2001 09:19:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: by exchou-gh04.cca.cpqcorp.net with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2652.78) id <2X58YYNX>; Fri, 13 Apr 2001 11:19:34 -0500 Message-Id: From: "Hicks, Jamey" To: Giuseppe Ottaviano , sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Subject: RE: PCMCIA specs Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2001 11:19:29 -0500 Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2652.78) Content-Class: urn:content-classes:message Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk The PCMCIA spec must be purchased. I recommend PCMCIA System Architecture and Cardbus System Architecture both by MindShare, Inc and published by Addision Wesley. Jamey From wrl-techops@pa.dec.com Sat Apr 14 08:12:41 2001 Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (root@mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id IAA18867 for ; Sat, 14 Apr 2001 08:12:41 +0200 Received: from zmamail04.zma.compaq.com (zmamail04.zma.compaq.com [161.114.64.104]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id IAA07003 for ; Sat, 14 Apr 2001 08:12:40 +0200 (METDST) Received: by zmamail04.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 8A430614E; Sat, 14 Apr 2001 02:10:53 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailrelay01.cce.cpqcorp.net (mailrelay01.cce.cpqcorp.net [16.47.68.171]) by zmamail04.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3578C6150; Sat, 14 Apr 2001 02:10:53 -0400 (EDT) Received: by mailrelay01.cce.cpqcorp.net (Postfix, from userid 12345) id B87E3324; Sat, 14 Apr 2001 01:10:51 -0500 (CDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mailrelay01.cce.cpqcorp.net (Postfix) with SMTP id 683892AF; Sat, 14 Apr 2001 01:10:50 -0500 (CDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA13656; Fri, 13 Apr 2001 23:10:48 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id XAA31140; Fri, 13 Apr 2001 23:07:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id XAA07530; Fri, 13 Apr 2001 23:07:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ztxmail02.nz-cce.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA15662; Fri, 13 Apr 2001 23:07:57 -0700 Received: by ztxmail02.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 959CA98B6; Sat, 14 Apr 2001 01:07:56 -0500 (CDT) Received: from xanadu.home (modemcable084.137-200-24.mtl.mc.videotron.ca [24.200.137.84]) by ztxmail02.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F209099FE for ; Sat, 14 Apr 2001 01:07:55 -0500 (CDT) Received: from localhost (nico@localhost) by xanadu.home (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id CAA21132; Sat, 14 Apr 2001 02:07:55 -0400 X-Authentication-Warning: xanadu.home: nico owned process doing -bs Date: Sat, 14 Apr 2001 02:07:54 -0400 (EDT) From: Nicolas Pitre X-X-Sender: To: SA-1100/Linux Cc: Subject: diff-2.4.3-rmk1-np1 Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk ... is available at the usual sites, which are: ftp://ftp.netwinder.org/users/n/nico/ ftp://ftp.arm.linux.org.uk/pub/linux/arm/people/nico/ ftp://ftp.handhelds.org/pub/linux/arm/sa-1100-patches/ The changes are: - updated to 2.4.3-rmk1 (me) - *big* cleanup of the files in arch/arm/mach-sa1100 (me) - ATA flash card can be inserted more than once again (me) - ide-cs is now known as "ide-cs" rather than "ide_cs" (me) - updated to the latest JFFS2 revision (me) The ide-cs change is to be inline with the official kernel. Therefore you might have to modify your /etc/pcmcia/config file accordingly for ATA cards to work again. The big mach-sa1100 cleanup is what makes this patch worth it. Please have a look at it, verify that it still compiles as expected for you, and send me corrections/comments before I continue. I'm probably 3/4 done with it now. The next target is mm-sa1100.c. I'd like to have patches for the current files containing your code which copyright/credits/description in the header is missing. Also note that I didn't merge any of the patches I've received recently. They will go in after the cleanup is completed. Enjoy! Nicolas From wrl-techops@pa.dec.com Wed Apr 18 21:23:25 2001 Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (root@mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id VAA31032 for ; Wed, 18 Apr 2001 21:23:25 +0200 Received: from zmamail05.zma.compaq.com (zmamail05.zma.compaq.com [161.114.64.105]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id VAA27973 for ; Wed, 18 Apr 2001 21:23:23 +0200 (METDST) Received: by zmamail05.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 790BF1B36; Wed, 18 Apr 2001 15:21:36 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailrelay01.cce.cpqcorp.net (mailrelay01.cce.cpqcorp.net [16.47.68.171]) by zmamail05.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 276C91A55; Wed, 18 Apr 2001 15:21:36 -0400 (EDT) Received: by mailrelay01.cce.cpqcorp.net (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 1A496313; Wed, 18 Apr 2001 14:21:32 -0500 (CDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mailrelay01.cce.cpqcorp.net (Postfix) with SMTP id 78FD220E; Wed, 18 Apr 2001 14:21:28 -0500 (CDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA17296; Wed, 18 Apr 2001 12:21:25 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id MAA09996; Wed, 18 Apr 2001 12:15:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id MAA12106; Wed, 18 Apr 2001 12:15:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ztxmail01.nz-cce.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA05320; Wed, 18 Apr 2001 12:15:18 -0700 Received: by ztxmail01.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id B2FE026B5; Wed, 18 Apr 2001 14:15:17 -0500 (CDT) Received: from usc.edu (usc.edu [128.125.253.136]) by ztxmail01.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F0AE57BE4 for ; Wed, 18 Apr 2001 14:15:16 -0500 (CDT) Received: from scf-fs.usc.edu (root@scf-fs.usc.edu [128.125.253.183]) by usc.edu (8.9.3.1/8.9.3/usc) with ESMTP id MAA24938; Wed, 18 Apr 2001 12:15:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pallas (pallas.usc.edu [128.125.72.23]) by scf-fs.usc.edu (8.9.3.1/8.9.3/usc) with SMTP id MAA04663; Wed, 18 Apr 2001 12:15:14 -0700 (PDT) From: "Karthik DK" To: Cc: Subject: PS/2 mouse and ts X driver on assabet Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2001 12:16:30 -0700 Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-Msmail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0) Importance: Normal X-Mimeole: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2919.6700 Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk Hi all I was trying to get the PS/2 mouse running on the assabet/neponset board. I wanted to use it in X-windows. But I was unsuccessful. Could somebody tell me how to get the PS/2 mouse running. I tried two options: 1) Set the CONFIG_PSMOUSE=y in config file 2) Tried a suggestion on the arm-linux mailing list for using PS/2 mouse on CLPS7500FE by Phil. It suggested a modification in pckbd_init_hw in pc_keyb.c. The change was to add psaux_init(). Both these did not work. My problem is that in the X that I am running the touch screen pointer has a 180 degree phase shift ( if I try to click on top-right corner it goes to bottom left). I use X 4.0.2. Is there any fix for the touch screen? I tried to use xcalibrate (from handhelds.org) to correct this. xcalibrate starts off and says "To calibrate screen, poke at Crosshairs. If the screen is badly miscalibrated, Press a button while poking crosshairs". When I poke at the crosshairs, nothing happens. Is there any other fix to the touch screen or the PS/2 mouse problem. Thanks in advance KAR. From wrl-techops@pa.dec.com Thu Apr 19 03:01:23 2001 Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (root@mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id DAA32032 for ; Thu, 19 Apr 2001 03:01:23 +0200 Received: from zmamail03.zma.compaq.com (zmamail03.zma.compaq.com [161.114.64.103]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id DAA14244 for ; Thu, 19 Apr 2001 03:01:22 +0200 (METDST) Received: by zmamail03.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 157D7ADB4; Wed, 18 Apr 2001 20:59:36 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailrelay01.cce.cpqcorp.net (mailrelay01.cce.cpqcorp.net [16.47.68.171]) by zmamail03.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 99366AEC7; Wed, 18 Apr 2001 20:59:35 -0400 (EDT) Received: by mailrelay01.cce.cpqcorp.net (Postfix, from userid 12345) id E48CE2BC; Wed, 18 Apr 2001 19:59:34 -0500 (CDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mailrelay01.cce.cpqcorp.net (Postfix) with SMTP id 71072368; Wed, 18 Apr 2001 19:59:33 -0500 (CDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA26380; Wed, 18 Apr 2001 17:59:31 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id RAA06385; Wed, 18 Apr 2001 17:57:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id RAA07696; Wed, 18 Apr 2001 17:57:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ztxmail01.nz-cce.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA29644; Wed, 18 Apr 2001 17:57:06 -0700 Received: by ztxmail01.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 063DD2DE5; Wed, 18 Apr 2001 19:57:05 -0500 (CDT) Received: from xanadu.home (modemcable084.137-200-24.mtl.mc.videotron.ca [24.200.137.84]) by ztxmail01.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D85F02DF5 for ; Wed, 18 Apr 2001 19:57:04 -0500 (CDT) Received: from localhost (nico@localhost) by xanadu.home (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id UAA10278; Wed, 18 Apr 2001 20:57:03 -0400 X-Authentication-Warning: xanadu.home: nico owned process doing -bs Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2001 20:57:03 -0400 (EDT) From: Nicolas Pitre X-X-Sender: To: SA-1100/Linux Cc: Subject: diff-2.4.3-rmk1-np2 Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk ... is available at the usual sites, which are: ftp://ftp.netwinder.org/users/n/nico/ ftp://ftp.arm.linux.org.uk/pub/linux/arm/people/nico/ ftp://ftp.handhelds.org/pub/linux/arm/sa-1100-patches/ Highlights: - big cleanup continued (me) - assorted patches from handhelds.org (Oleg Drokin) - ext2fs corruption fix (Ingo Molnar) - Freebird update (Chester) - SA1100 RTC driver update (Chester) - scale PCMCIA timings with CPU speed changes (John Dorsey) The architecture cleanup should be over now. Please check your code for errors I might have made during the conversion. I couldn't test compilation for every 21 different machines actually supported. ;) Things I know are broken: - bitsy ts driver doesn't currently compile; - SA1111 OHCI patch generated too much rejects for me to bother at this point. If your changes aren't included with this patch, please resubmit them now against this version. Thanks. Enjoy! Nicolas From wrl-techops@pa.dec.com Thu Apr 19 12:55:51 2001 Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (root@mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id MAA00471 for ; Thu, 19 Apr 2001 12:55:51 +0200 Received: from zcamail05.zca.compaq.com (zcamail05.zca.compaq.com [161.114.32.105]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id MAA11466 for ; Thu, 19 Apr 2001 12:55:49 +0200 (METDST) Received: by zcamail05.zca.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 7842B3AE; Thu, 19 Apr 2001 03:56:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mailrelay01.cac.cpqcorp.net (mailrelay01.cac.cpqcorp.net [16.47.132.152]) by zcamail05.zca.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4856A15E; Thu, 19 Apr 2001 03:56:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mailrelay01.cac.cpqcorp.net (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 09F2D2BA; Thu, 19 Apr 2001 03:53:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mailrelay01.cac.cpqcorp.net (Postfix) with SMTP id C360C1F6; Thu, 19 Apr 2001 03:53:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA09003; Thu, 19 Apr 2001 03:53:31 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id DAA14002; Thu, 19 Apr 2001 03:48:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id DAA12190; Thu, 19 Apr 2001 03:48:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: from zmamail01.nz-tay.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA29973; Thu, 19 Apr 2001 03:48:13 -0700 Received: by zmamail01.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id CAD7AFFDB; Thu, 19 Apr 2001 06:48:12 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mail.ixcelerator.com (unknown [62.231.2.151]) by zmamail01.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E3A6E101CB for ; Thu, 19 Apr 2001 06:48:11 -0400 (EDT) Received: from morgoth.ixcelerator.com (IDENT:root@morgoth.ixcel.ru [172.17.10.70]) by mail.ixcelerator.com (8.12.0.Beta7/8.12.0.Beta7/IXCELERATOR) with ESMTP id f3JAm7vi019077; Thu, 19 Apr 2001 14:48:08 +0400 Received: (from green@localhost) by morgoth.ixcelerator.com (8.10.1/8.10.1) id f3JAmdH08378; Thu, 19 Apr 2001 14:48:39 +0400 Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2001 14:48:39 +0400 Message-Id: <200104191048.f3JAmdH08378@morgoth.ixcelerator.com> From: green@linuxhacker.ru To: nico@CAM.ORG, sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Subject: Re: diff-2.4.3-rmk1-np2 X-Newsgroups: sa1100.linux In-Reply-To: User-Agent: tin/1.4.2-20000205 ("Possession") (UNIX) (Linux/2.4.3 (i686)) Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk > Things I know are broken: > - bitsy ts driver doesn't currently compile; Here is diff against cvs version that compiles and yours (though with some additional cruft ;) ) diff -urN --exclude=.cvsignore --exclude=CVS /skiff/srcs/linux/include/linux/h3600_ts.h kernel/include/linux/h3600_ts.h --- /skiff/srcs/linux/include/linux/h3600_ts.h Thu Apr 19 13:24:48 2001 +++ kernel/include/linux/h3600_ts.h Thu Apr 19 14:21:44 2001 @@ -78,6 +78,7 @@ #define SPI_READ_ID 0x0b /* ( request/response) */ #define SPI_WRITE_ID 0x0c /* ( request/response) */ #define FLITE_ID 0x0d /* backlight ( request/response) */ +#define STX_ID 0xa1 /* ( extension pack status request/response) */ #define MAX_ID 14 @@ -270,7 +271,7 @@ #define EEPROM_READ_CMD_OFFSET 0 #define EEPROM_READ_CMD_LEN 2 -typedef struct { +typedef struct h3600_eeprom_read_request { unsigned char addr; /* 8bit Address Offset 0-255 */ unsigned char len; /* Number of 16bit words to read 0-128 */ unsigned short buff[EEPROM_RD_BUFSIZ]; @@ -279,7 +280,7 @@ /* EEPROM WRITE */ #define EEPROM_WRITE_CMD_OFFSET 1 -typedef struct { +typedef struct h3600_eeprom_write_request { unsigned char len; /* used only to compute the number of bytes to send */ unsigned char addr; /* 0-128 */ unsigned short buff[EEPROM_WR_BUFSIZ]; @@ -289,7 +290,7 @@ #define SPI_READ_CMD_OFFSET 0 #define SPI_READ_CMD_LEN 3 -typedef struct { +typedef struct h3600_spi_read_request { unsigned short addr; /* 16bit Address Offset 0-128 */ unsigned char len; /* Number of bytes to read */ unsigned char buff[SPI_RD_BUFSIZ]; @@ -297,11 +298,30 @@ /* SPI WRITE */ #define SPI_WRITE_CMD_OFFSET 2 -typedef struct { +typedef struct h3600_spi_write_request { unsigned short len; /* used only to compute the number of bytes to send */ unsigned short addr; /* this 16bit address accesses a single byte */ unsigned char buff[SPI_WR_BUFSIZ]; } SPI_WRITE; + +/* + * For querying microcontroller on PCMCIA extension pack via SPI via onboard microcontroller + * + * Packet consists of: + * command byte = STX = 0xA1 + * subcmd and len (subcmd << 4), 4bits of len + * len bytes of data + * checksum + * + * Subcmd is one of: + * - versionid (subcmd=1) -- 3 data bytes in response correspond to X.XX (ascii?) + * - battery (subcmd=2) -- 4 data bytes in response correspond to chemistry (first byte) and voltage + */ + +typedef struct h3600_option_pack_request { + unsigned char cmdlen; /* cmd << 4 | len */ + unsigned char data[SPI_RD_BUFSIZ]; +} OPTION_PACK_REQUEST; /* -------- end of EEPROM and SPI Interfaces ---------------*/ Bye, Oleg From wrl-techops@pa.dec.com Fri Apr 20 00:14:47 2001 Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (root@mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id AAA02720 for ; Fri, 20 Apr 2001 00:14:47 +0200 Received: from zcamail04.zca.compaq.com (zcamail04.zca.compaq.com [161.114.32.104]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id AAA27419 for ; Fri, 20 Apr 2001 00:14:45 +0200 (METDST) Received: by zcamail04.zca.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 17B37201; Thu, 19 Apr 2001 15:14:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mailrelay01.cce.cpqcorp.net (mailrelay01.cce.cpqcorp.net [16.47.68.171]) by zcamail04.zca.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7FE3D38C; Thu, 19 Apr 2001 15:14:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mailrelay01.cce.cpqcorp.net (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 2FA1A381; Thu, 19 Apr 2001 17:12:56 -0500 (CDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mailrelay01.cce.cpqcorp.net (Postfix) with SMTP id 7D2312DE; Thu, 19 Apr 2001 17:12:49 -0500 (CDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA10012; Thu, 19 Apr 2001 15:12:47 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id PAA01407; Thu, 19 Apr 2001 15:10:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id PAA23181; Thu, 19 Apr 2001 15:10:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: from zmamail02.nz-tay.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA29400; Thu, 19 Apr 2001 15:10:00 -0700 Received: by zmamail02.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 51DE35083; Thu, 19 Apr 2001 18:10:00 -0400 (EDT) Received: from pigeon.maya.com (po.maya.com [192.70.254.2]) by zmamail02.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F23051C4 for ; Thu, 19 Apr 2001 18:10:00 -0400 (EDT) Received: from maya.com (cook-pc.maya.com [192.70.254.33]) by pigeon.maya.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D0623080C for ; Thu, 19 Apr 2001 18:10:33 -0400 (EDT) Message-Id: <3ADF62B4.F9F5BFBB@maya.com> Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2001 18:12:04 -0400 From: Nicole Cook X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.72 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.2.14-5.0 i686) X-Accept-Language: en Mime-Version: 1.0 To: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Subject: fir setup/utils Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk Are there any instructions for setting up fir drivers and utils on a strongarm board? The infrared-howto is out of date, and I seem to be missing something in my setup. Nicole From wrl-techops@pa.dec.com Fri Apr 20 08:41:50 2001 Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (root@mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id IAA03739 for ; Fri, 20 Apr 2001 08:41:50 +0200 Received: from zcamail03.zca.compaq.com (zcamail03.zca.compaq.com [161.114.32.103]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id IAA17733 for ; Fri, 20 Apr 2001 08:41:49 +0200 (METDST) Received: by zcamail03.zca.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id F0E68DEE; Thu, 19 Apr 2001 23:39:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mailrelay01.cac.cpqcorp.net (mailrelay01.cac.cpqcorp.net [16.47.132.152]) by zcamail03.zca.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D16DDFC6; Thu, 19 Apr 2001 23:39:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mailrelay01.cac.cpqcorp.net (Postfix, from userid 12345) id F25ED252; Thu, 19 Apr 2001 23:39:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mailrelay01.cac.cpqcorp.net (Postfix) with SMTP id C1118320; Thu, 19 Apr 2001 23:39:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA08955; Thu, 19 Apr 2001 23:39:56 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id XAA23035; Thu, 19 Apr 2001 23:37:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id XAA24292; Thu, 19 Apr 2001 23:37:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: from zmamail01.nz-tay.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA07150; Thu, 19 Apr 2001 23:37:22 -0700 Received: by zmamail01.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 2FBE2D9B0; Fri, 20 Apr 2001 02:37:22 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mail.ixcelerator.com (unknown [62.231.2.151]) by zmamail01.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8ED3CD871 for ; Fri, 20 Apr 2001 02:37:21 -0400 (EDT) Received: from morgoth.ixcelerator.com (IDENT:root@morgoth.ixcel.ru [172.17.10.70]) by mail.ixcelerator.com (8.12.0.Beta7/8.12.0.Beta7/IXCELERATOR) with ESMTP id f3K6bHvi007629; Fri, 20 Apr 2001 10:37:17 +0400 Received: (from green@localhost) by morgoth.ixcelerator.com (8.10.1/8.10.1) id f3K6bxF23985; Fri, 20 Apr 2001 10:37:59 +0400 Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2001 10:37:59 +0400 Message-Id: <200104200637.f3K6bxF23985@morgoth.ixcelerator.com> From: green@linuxhacker.ru To: cook@maya.com, sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Subject: Re: fir setup/utils X-Newsgroups: sa1100.linux In-Reply-To: <3ADF62B4.F9F5BFBB@maya.com> User-Agent: tin/1.4.2-20000205 ("Possession") (UNIX) (Linux/2.4.3 (i686)) Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk > Are there any instructions for setting up fir drivers and utils on a > strongarm board? The infrared-howto is out of date, and I seem to be > missing something in my setup. insmod irda insmod sa1100_ir and you now have irda0 interface that is described in varous HOWTOs. Please note that FIR itself does not work properly, still. (hmm, I looked at WinCE that was shipped with Compaq iPAQ, and it seems FIR is unsupported there as well.) Bye, Oleg From wrl-techops@pa.dec.com Sun Apr 22 12:51:09 2001 Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (root@mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id MAA09773 for ; Sun, 22 Apr 2001 12:51:08 +0200 Received: from ztxmail05.ztx.compaq.com (ztxmail05.ztx.compaq.com [161.114.1.209]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id MAA19698 for ; Sun, 22 Apr 2001 12:51:07 +0200 (METDST) Received: by ztxmail05.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 67AC817DE; Sun, 22 Apr 2001 05:49:27 -0500 (CDT) Received: from mailrelay01.cac.cpqcorp.net (mailrelay01.cac.cpqcorp.net [16.47.132.152]) by ztxmail05.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0703F17BD; Sun, 22 Apr 2001 05:49:27 -0500 (CDT) Received: by mailrelay01.cac.cpqcorp.net (Postfix, from userid 12345) id CC247198; Sun, 22 Apr 2001 03:49:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mailrelay01.cac.cpqcorp.net (Postfix) with SMTP id 7F4B0334; Sun, 22 Apr 2001 03:49:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA30397; Sun, 22 Apr 2001 03:49:09 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id DAA10259; Sun, 22 Apr 2001 03:48:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id DAA19369; Sun, 22 Apr 2001 03:48:44 -0700 (PDT) From: Received: from ztxmail01.nz-cce.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA14759; Sun, 22 Apr 2001 03:48:43 -0700 Received: by ztxmail01.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 4EB57264E; Sun, 22 Apr 2001 05:48:43 -0500 (CDT) Received: from www.linux.org.uk (parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk [195.92.249.252]) by ztxmail01.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8CC017EFA for ; Sun, 22 Apr 2001 05:48:42 -0500 (CDT) Received: from dyn-33.linux.theplanet.co.uk ([195.92.244.33] helo=caramon.arm.linux.org.uk) by www.linux.org.uk with esmtp (Exim 3.13 #1) id 14rHPi-0005HX-00; Sun, 22 Apr 2001 11:48:22 +0100 Received: from raistlin.arm.linux.org.uk (IDENT:root@raistlin.arm.linux.org.uk [192.168.0.3]) by caramon.arm.linux.org.uk (8.11.0/8.11.0) with ESMTP id f3MAmOb03882; Sun, 22 Apr 2001 11:48:24 +0100 Received: (from rmk@localhost) by raistlin.arm.linux.org.uk (8.7.4/8.7.3) id LAA01631; Sun, 22 Apr 2001 11:48:23 +0100 Message-Id: <200104221048.LAA01631@raistlin.arm.linux.org.uk> Subject: Re: irda stuff To: green@linuxhacker.ru (Oleg Drokin) Date: Sun, 22 Apr 2001 11:48:22 +0100 (BST) Cc: nico@CAM.ORG, sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com In-Reply-To: <20010422144355.A18889@linuxhacker.ru> from "Oleg Drokin" at Apr 22, 2001 02:43:55 PM X-Location: london.england.earth.mulky-way.universe X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL3] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk Oleg Drokin writes: > Attached is my latest attempt on getting FIR code to work > on sa1100. > It does indeed receives frames, but sending still causes some problems > (frames sometimes get aborted for no apparent reason and so on). > May be if someone will look into it, he will find the problem. > Also, it seems there is no working FIR implementation at all > (at least I have not found one. Even WinCE seems to not support FIR > on sa1100). Have you tried removing/turning off all the debugging printks in the IRDA code? Using printk in SIR mode on the assabet is enough corrupt the timing such that it will not work. -- Russell King (rmk@arm.linux.org.uk) The developer of ARM Linux http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/personal/aboutme.html From wrl-techops@pa.dec.com Sun Apr 22 12:51:09 2001 Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (root@mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id MAA09775 for ; Sun, 22 Apr 2001 12:51:09 +0200 Received: from zmamail05.zma.compaq.com (zmamail05.zma.compaq.com [161.114.64.105]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id MAA19699 for ; Sun, 22 Apr 2001 12:51:07 +0200 (METDST) Received: by zmamail05.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 8D0081A42; Sun, 22 Apr 2001 06:49:26 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailrelay01.cce.cpqcorp.net (mailrelay01.cce.cpqcorp.net [16.47.68.171]) by zmamail05.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 34B26182D; Sun, 22 Apr 2001 06:49:26 -0400 (EDT) Received: by mailrelay01.cce.cpqcorp.net (Postfix, from userid 12345) id A8C8A335; Sun, 22 Apr 2001 05:49:14 -0500 (CDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mailrelay01.cce.cpqcorp.net (Postfix) with SMTP id 9CE0D2D0; Sun, 22 Apr 2001 05:49:12 -0500 (CDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA23577; Sun, 22 Apr 2001 03:49:05 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id DAA03702; Sun, 22 Apr 2001 03:45:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id DAA21551; Sun, 22 Apr 2001 03:45:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ztxmail01.nz-cce.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA13647; Sun, 22 Apr 2001 03:45:38 -0700 Received: by ztxmail01.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id B583B7E01; Sun, 22 Apr 2001 05:45:37 -0500 (CDT) Received: from linuxhacker.ru (unknown [213.128.193.148]) by ztxmail01.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2BF1D7C53 for ; Sun, 22 Apr 2001 05:45:36 -0500 (CDT) Received: (from uucp@localhost) by linuxhacker.ru (8.9.3/8.9.3) with UUCP id OAA03245; Sun, 22 Apr 2001 14:45:16 +0400 Received: (from green@localhost) by linuxhacker.ru (8.10.1/8.10.1) id f3MAhts18899; Sun, 22 Apr 2001 14:43:55 +0400 Date: Sun, 22 Apr 2001 14:43:55 +0400 From: Oleg Drokin To: nico@CAM.ORG, sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Cc: rmk@arm.linux.org.uk Subject: irda stuff Message-Id: <20010422144355.A18889@linuxhacker.ru> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="T4sUOijqQbZv57TR" X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0.1i Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk --T4sUOijqQbZv57TR Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Hello! Attached is my latest attempt on getting FIR code to work on sa1100. It does indeed receives frames, but sending still causes some problems (frames sometimes get aborted for no apparent reason and so on). May be if someone will look into it, he will find the problem. Also, it seems there is no working FIR implementation at all (at least I have not found one. Even WinCE seems to not support FIR on sa1100). Bye, Oleg --T4sUOijqQbZv57TR Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="ir.diff" --- /skiff/src/linux-2.4.3-rmk1-np2/drivers/net/irda/sa1100_ir.c Sat Apr 21 14:22:41 2001 +++ sa1100_ir.c Tue Apr 17 23:58:48 2001 @@ -97,7 +97,12 @@ static void sa1100_irda_dma_receive(struct sa1100_irda *si) { + if ( si->hscr0 & HSCR0_TXE ) { + printk("Got called, while HSCR0_TXE, aborting\n"); + return; + } // First empty receive FIFO + si->hscr0 &= ~HSCR0_TXE; Ser2HSCR0 = si->hscr0 & ~HSCR0_RXE; // Here one would enable DMA and stuff @@ -122,6 +127,7 @@ { unsigned long flags; int brd, ret = -EINVAL; + int t = si->using_hssr; switch (speed) { case 9600: case 19200: case 38400: @@ -188,6 +194,8 @@ PPSR |= GPIO_IRDA_FIR; restore_flags(flags); + if ( t == 0 ) + sa1100_irda_dma_receive(si); ret = 0; break; @@ -506,6 +514,7 @@ struct sa1100_irda *si = dev->priv; int status = Ser2HSSR0; + printk("hssp interrupt arrived st: %x cr0: %x st1: %x\n",status,Ser2HSCR0,Ser2HSSR1); /* * Deal with any receive errors first. The any of the lowest 8 bytes * in the FIFO may contain an error. @@ -563,6 +572,7 @@ skb = alloc_skb(len + 1, GFP_ATOMIC); if (skb == NULL) { si->stats.rx_dropped++; + status = Ser2HSSR0; continue; } skb_reserve(skb, 1); @@ -582,6 +592,7 @@ } status = Ser2HSSR0; + printk("in loop st: %x cr0: %x st1: %x\n",status,Ser2HSCR0,Ser2HSSR1); } while (status & HSSR0_EIF); } @@ -595,7 +606,7 @@ /* Transmitter underrun */ if (status & HSSR0_TUR) - printk("sa1100_ir: error: transmitter underrun?\n"); + printk("sa1100_ir: error: transmitter underrun? %p\n",si->txskb); /* Receiver Abort - we lost synchronisation, start from scratch */ // nothing that we can do about it. @@ -645,8 +656,16 @@ si->newspeed = 0; } + // here we need to wait till transmission is actually completed, before we disable transmitter. + while ( Ser2HSSR1 & HSSR1_TBY ) ; + while ( !(Ser2HSSR0 & HSSR0_TUR) ) ; + Ser2HSSR0 |= HSSR0_TUR; + //printk("txirq interrupt finished st: %x cr0: %x st1: %x\n",Ser2HSSR0,Ser2HSCR0, Ser2HSSR1); + si->hscr0 &= ~HSCR0_TXE; + sa1100_irda_dma_receive(si); netif_wake_queue(dev); - } + } else + sa1100_irda_dma_receive(si); } /* @@ -701,6 +720,8 @@ if (si->txskb) BUG(); + if (si->hscr0 & HSCR0_TXE) + printk("hardtx, sending with HSCR0_TXE!\n"); si->txskb = skb; si->txbuf_dma = pci_map_single(NULL, skb->data, skb->len, PCI_DMA_TODEVICE); @@ -710,6 +731,7 @@ si->hscr0 = (si->hscr0 & ~HSCR0_RXE) | HSCR0_TXE; Ser2HSCR0 = si->hscr0; + //printk("tx started st: %x cr0: %x st1: %x\n",Ser2HSSR0,Ser2HSCR0, Ser2HSSR1); } if (ret == 0) --T4sUOijqQbZv57TR-- From wrl-techops@pa.dec.com Sun Apr 22 12:57:52 2001 Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (root@mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id MAA09799 for ; Sun, 22 Apr 2001 12:57:52 +0200 Received: from zcamail04.zca.compaq.com (zcamail04.zca.compaq.com [161.114.32.104]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id MAA19845 for ; Sun, 22 Apr 2001 12:57:50 +0200 (METDST) Received: by zcamail04.zca.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 476281B7; Sun, 22 Apr 2001 03:57:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mailrelay01.cce.cpqcorp.net (mailrelay01.cce.cpqcorp.net [16.47.68.171]) by zcamail04.zca.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B049F201; Sun, 22 Apr 2001 03:57:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mailrelay01.cce.cpqcorp.net (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 65D4F14B; Sun, 22 Apr 2001 05:56:02 -0500 (CDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mailrelay01.cce.cpqcorp.net (Postfix) with SMTP id A5AA82D0; Sun, 22 Apr 2001 05:56:00 -0500 (CDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA22104; Sun, 22 Apr 2001 03:55:58 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id DAA07146; Sun, 22 Apr 2001 03:55:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id DAA00497; Sun, 22 Apr 2001 03:55:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ztxmail01.nz-cce.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA01857; Sun, 22 Apr 2001 03:55:29 -0700 Received: by ztxmail01.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 063E3279E; Sun, 22 Apr 2001 05:55:29 -0500 (CDT) Received: from linuxhacker.ru (unknown [213.128.193.148]) by ztxmail01.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD07C7D9D for ; Sun, 22 Apr 2001 05:55:27 -0500 (CDT) Received: (from uucp@localhost) by linuxhacker.ru (8.9.3/8.9.3) with UUCP id OAA03281; Sun, 22 Apr 2001 14:55:18 +0400 Received: (from green@localhost) by linuxhacker.ru (8.10.1/8.10.1) id f3MArCU18938; Sun, 22 Apr 2001 14:53:12 +0400 Date: Sun, 22 Apr 2001 14:53:12 +0400 From: Oleg Drokin To: rmk@arm.linux.org.uk Cc: nico@CAM.ORG, sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Subject: Re: irda stuff Message-Id: <20010422145312.A18925@linuxhacker.ru> References: <20010422144355.A18889@linuxhacker.ru> <200104221048.LAA01631@raistlin.arm.linux.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0.1i In-Reply-To: <200104221048.LAA01631@raistlin.arm.linux.org.uk>; from rmk@arm.linux.org.uk on Sun, Apr 22, 2001 at 11:48:22AM +0100 Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk Hello! On Sun, Apr 22, 2001 at 11:48:22AM +0100, rmk@arm.linux.org.uk wrote: > > Attached is my latest attempt on getting FIR code to work > > on sa1100. > > It does indeed receives frames, but sending still causes some problems > > (frames sometimes get aborted for no apparent reason and so on). > > May be if someone will look into it, he will find the problem. > > Also, it seems there is no working FIR implementation at all > > (at least I have not found one. Even WinCE seems to not support FIR > > on sa1100). > Have you tried removing/turning off all the debugging printks in the > IRDA code? Sure I did. With no success, of course. > Using printk in SIR mode on the assabet is enough corrupt the timing such > that it will not work. Well, SIR mode works perfectly for me with sa1100_ir driver. Also, FIR driver works with blocks that are transferred by DMA, so debugging printks are not so much of a problem, I believe. Sudden aborts of transfer means that I disable transmitter before it sends whole frame (though I check all necessary bits before it happens, so I really cannot find out why). Bye, Oleg From wrl-techops@pa.dec.com Sun Apr 22 17:23:33 2001 Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (root@mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id RAA10421 for ; Sun, 22 Apr 2001 17:23:33 +0200 Received: from zcamail04.zca.compaq.com (zcamail04.zca.compaq.com [161.114.32.104]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id RAA28087 for ; Sun, 22 Apr 2001 17:23:31 +0200 (METDST) Received: by zcamail04.zca.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 4762836D; Sun, 22 Apr 2001 08:23:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mailrelay01.cac.cpqcorp.net (mailrelay01.cac.cpqcorp.net [16.47.132.152]) by zcamail04.zca.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2826E1FF; Sun, 22 Apr 2001 08:23:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mailrelay01.cac.cpqcorp.net (Postfix, from userid 12345) id CD4A1152; Sun, 22 Apr 2001 08:21:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mailrelay01.cac.cpqcorp.net (Postfix) with SMTP id 8C8183AB; Sun, 22 Apr 2001 08:21:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA17410; Sun, 22 Apr 2001 08:21:32 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id IAA18878; Sun, 22 Apr 2001 08:20:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id IAA19157; Sun, 22 Apr 2001 08:20:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: from zmamail02.nz-tay.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA24193; Sun, 22 Apr 2001 08:20:08 -0700 Received: by zmamail02.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 6B8CB51C7; Sun, 22 Apr 2001 11:20:08 -0400 (EDT) Received: from xanadu.home (modemcable084.137-200-24.mtl.mc.videotron.ca [24.200.137.84]) by zmamail02.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C6F1523C for ; Sun, 22 Apr 2001 11:20:08 -0400 (EDT) Received: from localhost (nico@localhost) by xanadu.home (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id LAA08336; Sun, 22 Apr 2001 11:19:53 -0400 X-Authentication-Warning: xanadu.home: nico owned process doing -bs Date: Sun, 22 Apr 2001 11:19:53 -0400 (EDT) From: Nicolas Pitre X-X-Sender: To: Oleg Drokin Cc: Russell King , SA-1100/Linux Subject: Re: irda stuff In-Reply-To: <20010422145312.A18925@linuxhacker.ru> Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk On Sun, 22 Apr 2001, Oleg Drokin wrote: > Well, SIR mode works perfectly for me with sa1100_ir driver. > Also, FIR driver works with blocks that are transferred by DMA, > so debugging printks are not so much of a problem, I believe. > Sudden aborts of transfer means that I disable transmitter before > it sends whole frame (though I check all necessary bits before > it happens, so I really cannot find out why). Did you try making SIR working with DMA as well? This might give a clue. Nicolas From wrl-techops@pa.dec.com Sun Apr 22 17:27:58 2001 Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (root@mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id RAA10435 for ; Sun, 22 Apr 2001 17:27:58 +0200 Received: from ztxmail04.ztx.compaq.com (ztxmail04.ztx.compaq.com [161.114.1.208]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id RAA28195 for ; Sun, 22 Apr 2001 17:27:56 +0200 (METDST) Received: by ztxmail04.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 84284CD3; Sun, 22 Apr 2001 10:26:10 -0500 (CDT) Received: from mailrelay01.cce.cpqcorp.net (mailrelay01.cce.cpqcorp.net [16.47.68.171]) by ztxmail04.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 20091C8E; Sun, 22 Apr 2001 10:26:10 -0500 (CDT) Received: by mailrelay01.cce.cpqcorp.net (Postfix, from userid 12345) id B5D541C2; Sun, 22 Apr 2001 10:26:09 -0500 (CDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mailrelay01.cce.cpqcorp.net (Postfix) with SMTP id DF0B3204; Sun, 22 Apr 2001 10:26:07 -0500 (CDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA01011; Sun, 22 Apr 2001 08:26:06 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id IAA19254; Sun, 22 Apr 2001 08:25:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id IAA19097; Sun, 22 Apr 2001 08:25:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ztxmail02.nz-cce.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA20792; Sun, 22 Apr 2001 08:25:48 -0700 Received: by ztxmail02.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id B0C889A78; Sun, 22 Apr 2001 10:25:47 -0500 (CDT) Received: from linuxhacker.ru (unknown [213.128.193.148]) by ztxmail02.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 784709ADA for ; Sun, 22 Apr 2001 10:25:46 -0500 (CDT) Received: (from uucp@localhost) by linuxhacker.ru (8.9.3/8.9.3) with UUCP id TAA03689; Sun, 22 Apr 2001 19:25:36 +0400 Received: (from green@localhost) by linuxhacker.ru (8.10.1/8.10.1) id f3MFPJ819688; Sun, 22 Apr 2001 19:25:19 +0400 Date: Sun, 22 Apr 2001 19:25:19 +0400 From: Oleg Drokin To: Nicolas Pitre Cc: Russell King , SA-1100/Linux Subject: Re: irda stuff Message-Id: <20010422192519.A19677@linuxhacker.ru> References: <20010422145312.A18925@linuxhacker.ru> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0.1i In-Reply-To: ; from nico@cam.org on Sun, Apr 22, 2001 at 11:19:53AM -0400 Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk Hello! On Sun, Apr 22, 2001 at 11:19:53AM -0400, Nicolas Pitre wrote: > > Well, SIR mode works perfectly for me with sa1100_ir driver. > > Also, FIR driver works with blocks that are transferred by DMA, > > so debugging printks are not so much of a problem, I believe. > > Sudden aborts of transfer means that I disable transmitter before > > it sends whole frame (though I check all necessary bits before > > it happens, so I really cannot find out why). > Did you try making SIR working with DMA as well? This might give a clue. Hmm. DMA is available in FIR mode only, I believe. In SIR mode plain UART is used. Bye, Oleg From wrl-techops@pa.dec.com Sun Apr 22 17:33:20 2001 Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (root@mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id RAA10446 for ; Sun, 22 Apr 2001 17:33:20 +0200 Received: from zcamail05.zca.compaq.com (zcamail05.zca.compaq.com [161.114.32.105]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id RAA28452 for ; Sun, 22 Apr 2001 17:33:18 +0200 (METDST) Received: by zcamail05.zca.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 453D3354; Sun, 22 Apr 2001 08:34:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mailrelay01.cce.cpqcorp.net (mailrelay01.cce.cpqcorp.net [16.47.68.171]) by zcamail05.zca.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 09A26175; Sun, 22 Apr 2001 08:34:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mailrelay01.cce.cpqcorp.net (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 6D75B3DC; Sun, 22 Apr 2001 10:31:30 -0500 (CDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mailrelay01.cce.cpqcorp.net (Postfix) with SMTP id CC5C51EC; Sun, 22 Apr 2001 10:31:28 -0500 (CDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA31446; Sun, 22 Apr 2001 08:31:27 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id IAA11498; Sun, 22 Apr 2001 08:31:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id IAA00874; Sun, 22 Apr 2001 08:31:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ztxmail02.nz-cce.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA01844; Sun, 22 Apr 2001 08:31:03 -0700 Received: by ztxmail02.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 47E8F9B05; Sun, 22 Apr 2001 10:31:03 -0500 (CDT) Received: from xanadu.home (modemcable084.137-200-24.mtl.mc.videotron.ca [24.200.137.84]) by ztxmail02.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AEC39997A for ; Sun, 22 Apr 2001 10:31:02 -0500 (CDT) Received: from localhost (nico@localhost) by xanadu.home (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id LAA08367; Sun, 22 Apr 2001 11:30:57 -0400 X-Authentication-Warning: xanadu.home: nico owned process doing -bs Date: Sun, 22 Apr 2001 11:30:57 -0400 (EDT) From: Nicolas Pitre X-X-Sender: To: Oleg Drokin Cc: Russell King , SA-1100/Linux Subject: Re: irda stuff In-Reply-To: <20010422192519.A19677@linuxhacker.ru> Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk On Sun, 22 Apr 2001, Oleg Drokin wrote: > Hmm. DMA is available in FIR mode only, I believe. > In SIR mode plain UART is used. Well... you can run DMA on those as well. Nicolas From wrl-techops@pa.dec.com Sun Apr 22 17:41:26 2001 Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (root@mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id RAA10483 for ; Sun, 22 Apr 2001 17:41:26 +0200 Received: from ztxmail05.ztx.compaq.com (ztxmail05.ztx.compaq.com [161.114.1.209]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id RAA28669 for ; Sun, 22 Apr 2001 17:41:25 +0200 (METDST) Received: by ztxmail05.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 695B9169A; Sun, 22 Apr 2001 10:39:38 -0500 (CDT) Received: from taynzmail03.nz-tay.cpqcorp.net (taynzmail03.nz-tay.cpqcorp.net [16.47.4.103]) by ztxmail05.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D75F016AD; Sun, 22 Apr 2001 10:39:37 -0500 (CDT) Received: by taynzmail03.nz-tay.cpqcorp.net (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 896B81EB; Sun, 22 Apr 2001 11:39:36 -0400 (EDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by taynzmail03.nz-tay.cpqcorp.net (Postfix) with SMTP id C971E27B; Sun, 22 Apr 2001 11:39:34 -0400 (EDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA04579; Sun, 22 Apr 2001 08:39:33 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id IAA16668; Sun, 22 Apr 2001 08:38:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id IAA10124; Sun, 22 Apr 2001 08:38:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: from zmamail02.nz-tay.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA00261; Sun, 22 Apr 2001 08:38:55 -0700 Received: by zmamail02.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id A58BB5352; Sun, 22 Apr 2001 11:38:49 -0400 (EDT) Received: from linuxhacker.ru (unknown [213.128.193.148]) by zmamail02.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB38B53B2 for ; Sun, 22 Apr 2001 11:38:48 -0400 (EDT) Received: (from uucp@localhost) by linuxhacker.ru (8.9.3/8.9.3) with UUCP id TAA03769; Sun, 22 Apr 2001 19:38:37 +0400 Received: (from green@localhost) by linuxhacker.ru (8.10.1/8.10.1) id f3MFcL619741; Sun, 22 Apr 2001 19:38:21 +0400 Date: Sun, 22 Apr 2001 19:38:21 +0400 From: Oleg Drokin To: Nicolas Pitre Cc: Russell King , SA-1100/Linux Subject: Re: irda stuff Message-Id: <20010422193821.A19735@linuxhacker.ru> References: <20010422192519.A19677@linuxhacker.ru> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0.1i In-Reply-To: ; from nico@cam.org on Sun, Apr 22, 2001 at 11:30:57AM -0400 Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk Hello! On Sun, Apr 22, 2001 at 11:30:57AM -0400, Nicolas Pitre wrote: > > Hmm. DMA is available in FIR mode only, I believe. > > In SIR mode plain UART is used. > Well... you can run DMA on those as well. Sure. But I will need to pass each character through some IrDA functions, still, so benefit is almost zero. Also DMA modes are different for FIR and SIR, so I do not see any benefit in using DMA for SIR. Bye, Oleg From wrl-techops@pa.dec.com Sun Apr 22 18:33:49 2001 Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (root@mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id SAA10554 for ; Sun, 22 Apr 2001 18:33:49 +0200 Received: from zcamail05.zca.compaq.com (zcamail05.zca.compaq.com [161.114.32.105]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id SAA00630 for ; Sun, 22 Apr 2001 18:33:47 +0200 (METDST) Received: by zcamail05.zca.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 1A52D22E; Sun, 22 Apr 2001 09:34:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mailrelay01.cce.cpqcorp.net (mailrelay01.cce.cpqcorp.net [16.47.68.171]) by zcamail05.zca.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9966930A; Sun, 22 Apr 2001 09:34:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mailrelay01.cce.cpqcorp.net (Postfix, from userid 12345) id A219F374; Sun, 22 Apr 2001 11:31:58 -0500 (CDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mailrelay01.cce.cpqcorp.net (Postfix) with SMTP id 9669F1C0; Sun, 22 Apr 2001 11:31:56 -0500 (CDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA03986; Sun, 22 Apr 2001 09:31:55 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id JAA30750; Sun, 22 Apr 2001 09:31:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id JAA20584; Sun, 22 Apr 2001 09:31:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: from zmamail01.nz-tay.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA23181; Sun, 22 Apr 2001 09:31:03 -0700 Received: by zmamail01.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 6F576E25D; Sun, 22 Apr 2001 12:31:02 -0400 (EDT) Received: from xanadu.home (modemcable084.137-200-24.mtl.mc.videotron.ca [24.200.137.84]) by zmamail01.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 17093E314 for ; Sun, 22 Apr 2001 12:31:02 -0400 (EDT) Received: from localhost (nico@localhost) by xanadu.home (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id MAA08480; Sun, 22 Apr 2001 12:30:49 -0400 X-Authentication-Warning: xanadu.home: nico owned process doing -bs Date: Sun, 22 Apr 2001 12:30:49 -0400 (EDT) From: Nicolas Pitre X-X-Sender: To: Oleg Drokin Cc: Russell King , SA-1100/Linux Subject: Re: irda stuff In-Reply-To: <20010422193821.A19735@linuxhacker.ru> Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk On Sun, 22 Apr 2001, Oleg Drokin wrote: > Hello! > > On Sun, Apr 22, 2001 at 11:30:57AM -0400, Nicolas Pitre wrote: > > > Hmm. DMA is available in FIR mode only, I believe. > > > In SIR mode plain UART is used. > > Well... you can run DMA on those as well. > Sure. But I will need to pass each character through some IrDA > functions, still, so benefit is almost zero. > Also DMA modes are different for FIR and SIR, so I do not see > any benefit in using DMA for SIR. Fair enough. Nicolas From wrl-techops@pa.dec.com Tue Apr 24 17:08:24 2001 Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (root@mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id RAA17224 for ; Tue, 24 Apr 2001 17:08:24 +0200 Received: from zcamail03.zca.compaq.com (zcamail03.zca.compaq.com [161.114.32.103]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id RAA26901 for ; Tue, 24 Apr 2001 17:08:23 +0200 (METDST) Received: by zcamail03.zca.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 9F998836; Tue, 24 Apr 2001 08:06:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mailrelay01.cce.cpqcorp.net (mailrelay01.cce.cpqcorp.net [16.47.68.171]) by zcamail03.zca.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EBE4C8FE; Tue, 24 Apr 2001 08:06:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mailrelay01.cce.cpqcorp.net (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 51ED3296; Tue, 24 Apr 2001 10:06:06 -0500 (CDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mailrelay01.cce.cpqcorp.net (Postfix) with SMTP id 060C414B; Tue, 24 Apr 2001 10:06:01 -0500 (CDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA24054; Tue, 24 Apr 2001 08:05:54 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id IAA12320; Tue, 24 Apr 2001 08:02:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id IAA01087; Tue, 24 Apr 2001 08:02:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: from zmamail02.nz-tay.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA27920; Tue, 24 Apr 2001 08:02:01 -0700 Received: by zmamail02.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 260F550FF; Tue, 24 Apr 2001 11:02:01 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mail-blue.research.att.com (mail-blue.research.att.com [135.207.30.102]) by zmamail02.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ECDAD525F for ; Tue, 24 Apr 2001 11:02:00 -0400 (EDT) Received: from hermes.research.att.com (hermes.research.att.com [135.207.16.38]) by mail-blue.research.att.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F8704D248 for ; Tue, 24 Apr 2001 11:02:00 -0400 (EDT) Received: from research.att.com (gliss.research.att.com [135.207.17.204]) by hermes.research.att.com (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id KAA28334 for ; Tue, 24 Apr 2001 10:54:03 -0400 (EDT) Message-Id: <3AE59843.45EF998F@research.att.com> Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2001 11:14:12 -0400 From: "Jack T.C. Chang" X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.61 [en] (X11; U; IRIX 6.3 IP32) X-Accept-Language: en Mime-Version: 1.0 To: SA-1100/Linux Subject: Blob and SDRAM setting for SA1110 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk Hi, In src/start.S (blob-1.0.8-pre2), the MDCNFG is set to 0x72547254, but when I use the "clock" command at the boot loader prompt, it reads back MDCNFG=0x62576257. Did I miss anything there? thx Jack From wrl-techops@pa.dec.com Tue Apr 24 17:50:33 2001 Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (root@mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id RAA17336 for ; Tue, 24 Apr 2001 17:50:33 +0200 Received: from ztxmail04.ztx.compaq.com (ztxmail04.ztx.compaq.com [161.114.1.208]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id RAA00301 for ; Tue, 24 Apr 2001 17:50:31 +0200 (METDST) Received: by ztxmail04.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 069C4C45; Tue, 24 Apr 2001 10:48:45 -0500 (CDT) Received: from taynzmail03.nz-tay.cpqcorp.net (taynzmail03.nz-tay.cpqcorp.net [16.47.4.103]) by ztxmail04.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C06BD39; Tue, 24 Apr 2001 10:48:44 -0500 (CDT) Received: by taynzmail03.nz-tay.cpqcorp.net (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 17D753BB; Tue, 24 Apr 2001 11:48:44 -0400 (EDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by taynzmail03.nz-tay.cpqcorp.net (Postfix) with SMTP id E9DAD1FB; Tue, 24 Apr 2001 11:48:41 -0400 (EDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA14435; Tue, 24 Apr 2001 08:48:40 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id IAA09720; Tue, 24 Apr 2001 08:47:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id IAA30537; Tue, 24 Apr 2001 08:47:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ztxmail02.nz-cce.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA04449; Tue, 24 Apr 2001 08:47:37 -0700 Received: by ztxmail02.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id B4A169929; Tue, 24 Apr 2001 10:47:36 -0500 (CDT) Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by ztxmail02.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 973C19B0B for ; Tue, 24 Apr 2001 10:47:35 -0500 (CDT) Received: from arthur.ubicom.tudelft.nl (erik.et.tudelft.nl [130.161.48.56]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id RAA29922; Tue, 24 Apr 2001 17:47:31 +0200 (METDST) Received: (from erik@localhost) by arthur.ubicom.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3/Debian 8.9.3-21) id RAA27807; Tue, 24 Apr 2001 17:43:44 +0200 Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2001 17:43:44 +0200 From: Erik Mouw To: "Jack T.C. Chang" Cc: SA-1100/Linux Subject: Re: Blob and SDRAM setting for SA1110 Message-Id: <20010424174344.B2615@arthur.ubicom.tudelft.nl> References: <3AE59843.45EF998F@research.att.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <3AE59843.45EF998F@research.att.com>; from tcc@research.att.com on Tue, Apr 24, 2001 at 11:14:12AM -0400 Organization: Eric Conspiracy Secret Labs X-Eric-Conspiracy: There is no conspiracy! Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk On Tue, Apr 24, 2001 at 11:14:12AM -0400, Jack T.C. Chang wrote: > In src/start.S (blob-1.0.8-pre2), the MDCNFG is set to 0x72547254, but > when I use > the "clock" command at the boot loader prompt, it reads back > MDCNFG=0x62576257. > Did I miss anything there? thx Yes, the clock command is only tested on a single platform: LART. That means it only supports a SA1100, so you'll have to change it for SA1110. Erik -- J.A.K. (Erik) Mouw, Information and Communication Theory Group, Department of Electrical Engineering, Faculty of Information Technology and Systems, Delft University of Technology, PO BOX 5031, 2600 GA Delft, The Netherlands Phone: +31-15-2783635 Fax: +31-15-2781843 Email: J.A.K.Mouw@its.tudelft.nl WWW: http://www-ict.its.tudelft.nl/~erik/ From wrl-techops@pa.dec.com Thu Apr 26 02:33:46 2001 Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (root@mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id CAA22286 for ; Thu, 26 Apr 2001 02:33:46 +0200 Received: from ztxmail03.ztx.compaq.com (ztxmail03.ztx.compaq.com [161.114.1.207]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id CAA13800 for ; Thu, 26 Apr 2001 02:33:45 +0200 (METDST) Received: by ztxmail03.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 7DE171B2E; Wed, 25 Apr 2001 19:31:57 -0500 (CDT) Received: from taynzmail03.nz-tay.cpqcorp.net (taynzmail03.nz-tay.cpqcorp.net [16.47.4.103]) by ztxmail03.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 314521BB3; Wed, 25 Apr 2001 19:31:57 -0500 (CDT) Received: by taynzmail03.nz-tay.cpqcorp.net (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 550A0166; Wed, 25 Apr 2001 20:31:55 -0400 (EDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by taynzmail03.nz-tay.cpqcorp.net (Postfix) with SMTP id 42B3037E; Wed, 25 Apr 2001 20:31:53 -0400 (EDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA26899; Wed, 25 Apr 2001 17:31:51 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id RAA21784; Wed, 25 Apr 2001 17:25:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id RAA07356; Wed, 25 Apr 2001 17:25:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: from zmamail01.nz-tay.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA25725; Wed, 25 Apr 2001 17:25:53 -0700 Received: by zmamail01.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id B4C55D75F; Wed, 25 Apr 2001 20:25:52 -0400 (EDT) Received: from xanadu.home (modemcable084.137-200-24.mtl.mc.videotron.ca [24.200.137.84]) by zmamail01.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 600BAD00C for ; Wed, 25 Apr 2001 20:25:52 -0400 (EDT) Received: from localhost (nico@localhost) by xanadu.home (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id UAA23033; Wed, 25 Apr 2001 20:25:51 -0400 X-Authentication-Warning: xanadu.home: nico owned process doing -bs Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2001 20:25:51 -0400 (EDT) From: Nicolas Pitre X-X-Sender: To: SA-1100/Linux Cc: Subject: diff-2.4.3-rmk2-np1 Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk ... is available at the usual sites, which are: ftp://ftp.netwinder.org/users/n/nico/ ftp://ftp.arm.linux.org.uk/pub/linux/arm/people/nico/ ftp://ftp.handhelds.org/pub/linux/arm/sa-1100-patches/ Highlights: - updated to 2.4.3-rmk2 (me) - iPAQ touchscreen driver compiles now (Oleg Drokin) - Freebird update (Chester) - removed Jornada720 pieces that didn't compile (me) - some LART updates (Erik Mouw) - more SA1100 FIR changes (Oleg Drokin) - merged latest MTD layout plus some tweaks to make it compile (me) The SA1111 OHCI driver support from 2.4.2 is still not merged. It would need someone who is more into USB with a working SA1111 board to look at it. Enjoy! Nicolas From wrl-techops@pa.dec.com Fri May 4 23:55:36 2001 Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (root@mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id XAA16361 for ; Fri, 4 May 2001 23:55:36 +0200 Received: from zmamail04.zma.compaq.com (zmamail04.zma.compaq.com [161.114.64.104]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id XAA29425 for ; Fri, 4 May 2001 23:55:34 +0200 (METDST) Received: by zmamail04.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id ABF3C5E98; Fri, 4 May 2001 17:53:48 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailrelay01.cce.cpqcorp.net (mailrelay01.cce.cpqcorp.net [16.47.68.171]) by zmamail04.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 674DD5F90; Fri, 4 May 2001 17:53:48 -0400 (EDT) Received: by mailrelay01.cce.cpqcorp.net (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 6241652F; Fri, 4 May 2001 16:53:42 -0500 (CDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mailrelay01.cce.cpqcorp.net (Postfix) with SMTP id A2313692; Fri, 4 May 2001 16:53:40 -0500 (CDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA25468; Fri, 4 May 2001 14:53:37 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id OAA22228; Fri, 4 May 2001 14:49:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id OAA17373; Fri, 4 May 2001 14:49:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ztxmail01.nz-cce.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA25568; Fri, 4 May 2001 14:49:01 -0700 Received: by ztxmail01.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 80B547DC2; Fri, 4 May 2001 16:49:00 -0500 (CDT) Received: from mail-blue.research.att.com (mail-blue.research.att.com [135.207.30.102]) by ztxmail01.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 418EB7EB6 for ; Fri, 4 May 2001 16:49:00 -0500 (CDT) Received: from hermes.research.att.com (hermes.research.att.com [135.207.16.38]) by mail-blue.research.att.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE9CB4CFA6 for ; Fri, 4 May 2001 17:48:55 -0400 (EDT) Received: from research.att.com (wave-100.research.att.com [135.207.10.100]) by hermes.research.att.com (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id RAA09011 for ; Fri, 4 May 2001 17:40:45 -0400 (EDT) Message-Id: <3AF323A2.4751345E@research.att.com> Date: Fri, 04 May 2001 17:48:19 -0400 From: Jack Chang Organization: AT&T Labs- Research X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.73 [en] (X11; I; Linux 2.2.15-4mdksecure i686) X-Accept-Language: en Mime-Version: 1.0 To: SA-1100/Linux Subject: EXT2-fs warning: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=big5 Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from base64 to 8bit by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl id XAA16361 I got the following message during boot: "EXT2-fs warning: maximal mount count reached, running e2fsck is recommended" What does it mean and what caused it? Since I have only one ramdisk mounted. Thx -- Jack T. Chang From wrl-techops@pa.dec.com Sat May 5 00:03:40 2001 Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (root@mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id AAA16420 for ; Sat, 5 May 2001 00:03:40 +0200 Received: from zcamail03.zca.compaq.com (zcamail03.zca.compaq.com [161.114.32.103]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id AAA29857 for ; Sat, 5 May 2001 00:03:38 +0200 (METDST) Received: by zcamail03.zca.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 11FAA497; Fri, 4 May 2001 15:01:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mailrelay01.cac.cpqcorp.net (mailrelay01.cac.cpqcorp.net [16.47.132.152]) by zcamail03.zca.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E480A7B7; Fri, 4 May 2001 15:01:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mailrelay01.cac.cpqcorp.net (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 2F91447D; Fri, 4 May 2001 15:01:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mailrelay01.cac.cpqcorp.net (Postfix) with SMTP id 8363D4DC; Fri, 4 May 2001 15:01:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA10873; Fri, 4 May 2001 15:01:39 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id PAA01635; Fri, 4 May 2001 15:01:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id PAA01644; Fri, 4 May 2001 15:01:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: from zmamail01.nz-tay.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA10561; Fri, 4 May 2001 15:01:21 -0700 Received: by zmamail01.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 938C3D2DF; Fri, 4 May 2001 18:01:20 -0400 (EDT) Received: from xanadu.home (modemcable084.137-200-24.mtl.mc.videotron.ca [24.200.137.84]) by zmamail01.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 29D7F10326 for ; Fri, 4 May 2001 18:01:20 -0400 (EDT) Received: from localhost (nico@localhost) by xanadu.home (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id SAA17704; Fri, 4 May 2001 18:01:19 -0400 X-Authentication-Warning: xanadu.home: nico owned process doing -bs Date: Fri, 4 May 2001 18:01:19 -0400 (EDT) From: Nicolas Pitre X-X-Sender: To: Jack Chang Cc: SA-1100/Linux Subject: Re: EXT2-fs warning: In-Reply-To: <3AF323A2.4751345E@research.att.com> Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk On Fri, 4 May 2001, Jack Chang wrote: > I got the following message during boot: > "EXT2-fs warning: maximal mount count reached, running e2fsck is > recommended" > What does it mean and what caused it? Since I have only one ramdisk > mounted. > Thx Do a e2fsck on your ramdisk image. Nicolas From wrl-techops@pa.dec.com Sun May 6 04:01:08 2001 Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (root@mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id EAA18879 for ; Sun, 6 May 2001 04:01:08 +0200 Received: from ztxmail04.ztx.compaq.com (ztxmail04.ztx.compaq.com [161.114.1.208]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id EAA16445 for ; Sun, 6 May 2001 04:01:07 +0200 (METDST) Received: by ztxmail04.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 22482F1B; Sat, 5 May 2001 20:59:19 -0500 (CDT) Received: from mailrelay01.cce.cpqcorp.net (mailrelay01.cce.cpqcorp.net [16.47.68.171]) by ztxmail04.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CEA05D37; Sat, 5 May 2001 20:59:18 -0500 (CDT) Received: by mailrelay01.cce.cpqcorp.net (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 8334A6CF; Sat, 5 May 2001 20:59:15 -0500 (CDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mailrelay01.cce.cpqcorp.net (Postfix) with SMTP id C9B5943B; Sat, 5 May 2001 20:59:13 -0500 (CDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA09664; Sat, 5 May 2001 18:59:11 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id SAA26657; Sat, 5 May 2001 18:56:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id SAA26574; Sat, 5 May 2001 18:56:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ztxmail01.nz-cce.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA27660; Sat, 5 May 2001 18:56:13 -0700 Received: by ztxmail01.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 973E43C26; Sat, 5 May 2001 20:56:12 -0500 (CDT) Received: from xanadu.home (modemcable084.137-200-24.mtl.mc.videotron.ca [24.200.137.84]) by ztxmail01.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0CA033EA3 for ; Sat, 5 May 2001 20:56:12 -0500 (CDT) Received: from localhost (nico@localhost) by xanadu.home (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id VAA07955; Sat, 5 May 2001 21:56:11 -0400 X-Authentication-Warning: xanadu.home: nico owned process doing -bs Date: Sat, 5 May 2001 21:56:11 -0400 (EDT) From: Nicolas Pitre X-X-Sender: To: SA-1100/Linux Cc: Subject: diff-2.4.4-rmk2-np1 Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk ... is available at the usual sites, which are: ftp://ftp.netwinder.org/users/n/nico/ ftp://ftp.arm.linux.org.uk/pub/linux/arm/people/nico/ ftp://ftp.handhelds.org/pub/linux/arm/sa-1100-patches/ Changelog: - updated to 2.4.4-rmk2 (me) - UCB1200 ADC & audio codec (Brad Parker, George G. Davis) - fix to usb-ohci-sa1111.h[*] (Dan McDonald) - actually fix symbol export in discontig.c (John Dorsey) - removed extra ramfs features from -ac patches (me) I removed the -ac ramfs patch since tmpfs in the generic 2.4.4 kernel is already offering the same functionalities, and I want to try to reduce the size of the -np patch. [*] The SA1111 USB is still broken nevertheless. Enjoy! Nicolas From wrl-techops@pa.dec.com Tue May 8 00:41:17 2001 Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (root@mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id AAA24290 for ; Tue, 8 May 2001 00:41:17 +0200 Received: from ztxmail05.ztx.compaq.com (ztxmail05.ztx.compaq.com [161.114.1.209]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id AAA05648 for ; Tue, 8 May 2001 00:41:15 +0200 (METDST) Received: by ztxmail05.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id C6FE848E; Mon, 7 May 2001 17:39:24 -0500 (CDT) Received: from taynzmail03.nz-tay.cpqcorp.net (taynzmail03.nz-tay.cpqcorp.net [16.47.4.103]) by ztxmail05.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5AE14492; Mon, 7 May 2001 17:39:24 -0500 (CDT) Received: by taynzmail03.nz-tay.cpqcorp.net (Postfix, from userid 12345) id C891817E; Mon, 7 May 2001 18:39:17 -0400 (EDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by taynzmail03.nz-tay.cpqcorp.net (Postfix) with SMTP id 63608217; Mon, 7 May 2001 18:39:15 -0400 (EDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA29806; Mon, 7 May 2001 15:39:08 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id PAA21394; Mon, 7 May 2001 15:33:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id PAA07195; Mon, 7 May 2001 15:33:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ztxmail02.nz-cce.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA12435; Mon, 7 May 2001 15:33:47 -0700 Received: by ztxmail02.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id E196051AB; Mon, 7 May 2001 17:33:46 -0500 (CDT) Received: from mail-green.research.att.com (H-135-207-30-103.research.att.com [135.207.30.103]) by ztxmail02.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9CEBE19C9 for ; Mon, 7 May 2001 17:33:46 -0500 (CDT) Received: from hermes.research.att.com (hermes.research.att.com [135.207.16.38]) by mail-green.research.att.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 167561EBD2 for ; Mon, 7 May 2001 18:33:46 -0400 (EDT) Received: from research.att.com (brookline.research.att.com [135.207.8.146]) by hermes.research.att.com (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id SAA19256 for ; Mon, 7 May 2001 18:25:31 -0400 (EDT) Message-Id: <3AF72295.F39AD4FD@research.att.com> Date: Mon, 07 May 2001 18:32:54 -0400 From: Jack Chang Organization: AT&T Labs- Research X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.73 [en] (X11; I; Linux 2.2.15-4mdksecure i686) X-Accept-Language: en Mime-Version: 1.0 To: SA-1100/Linux Subject: wireless network card Content-Type: text/plain; charset=big5 Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from base64 to 8bit by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl id AAA24290 Does arm-linux support any wireless network pc card (802.11b) besides the Wavelan ? I am looking for the pc card using 3.3 Volt. Thx -- Jack Chang From wrl-techops@pa.dec.com Tue May 8 13:15:46 2001 Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (root@mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id NAA26069 for ; Tue, 8 May 2001 13:15:46 +0200 Received: from ztxmail05.ztx.compaq.com (ztxmail05.ztx.compaq.com [161.114.1.209]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id NAA06832 for ; Tue, 8 May 2001 13:15:45 +0200 (METDST) Received: by ztxmail05.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id B727C48B; Tue, 8 May 2001 06:13:57 -0500 (CDT) Received: from mailrelay01.cac.cpqcorp.net (mailrelay01.cac.cpqcorp.net [16.47.132.152]) by ztxmail05.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 44C577EF; Tue, 8 May 2001 06:13:57 -0500 (CDT) Received: by mailrelay01.cac.cpqcorp.net (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 2AC0148A; Tue, 8 May 2001 04:13:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mailrelay01.cac.cpqcorp.net (Postfix) with SMTP id CDBEE41F; Tue, 8 May 2001 04:13:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA26028; Tue, 8 May 2001 04:13:48 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id EAA15482; Tue, 8 May 2001 04:07:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id EAA14936; Tue, 8 May 2001 04:06:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ztxmail02.nz-cce.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA20332; Tue, 8 May 2001 04:06:58 -0700 Received: by ztxmail02.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 3E6C4526B; Tue, 8 May 2001 06:06:57 -0500 (CDT) Received: from mail-ffm1.kkf.net (mail-ffm1.kkf.net [212.63.53.14]) by ztxmail02.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E9D841806 for ; Tue, 8 May 2001 06:06:55 -0500 (CDT) Received: from mail-ffm1.kkf.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail-ffm1.kkf.net (8.11.2/8.11.2) with ESMTP id f48B6sv13580 for ; Tue, 8 May 2001 13:06:54 +0200 (MEST) Received: from www.hw-agent.de (www.hw-agent.de [212.63.43.180]) by mail-ffm1.kkf.net (8.11.2/8.11.2) with ESMTP id f48B6p413566; Tue, 8 May 2001 13:06:52 +0200 (MEST) Received: from hw-mail.hoeft-wessel.de (unknown [172.26.252.3]) by www.hw-agent.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A4E47763E; Tue, 8 May 2001 12:07:21 +0200 (CEST) Received: by HW_MAIL with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21) id ; Tue, 8 May 2001 13:06:48 +0200 Message-Id: <81413F587EB9D1118F56000092941A3E01F45847@HW_MAIL> From: "JOR. - Jordan, Roman" To: "'Nicolas Pitre'" Cc: "'sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com'" Subject: AW: diff-2.4.4-rmk2-np1 Date: Tue, 8 May 2001 13:06:47 +0200 Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl id NAA26069 hallo, i haved paused this list for a while. Now i have a question. At ftp.handhelds.org i found your diff file. But no actual patch file (which has to bee applied before). I found only patches for kernel version 2.4.0 at handhelds.org. Where can i get the actual patch files? Thanks, in advance Roman Jordan -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- Von: Nicolas Pitre [mailto:nico@CAM.ORG] Gesendet: Sonntag, 6. Mai 2001 03:56 An: SA-1100/Linux Cc: linux-arm-announce@lists.arm.linux.org.uk Betreff: diff-2.4.4-rmk2-np1 ... is available at the usual sites, which are: ftp://ftp.netwinder.org/users/n/nico/ ftp://ftp.arm.linux.org.uk/pub/linux/arm/people/nico/ ftp://ftp.handhelds.org/pub/linux/arm/sa-1100-patches/ Changelog: - updated to 2.4.4-rmk2 (me) - UCB1200 ADC & audio codec (Brad Parker, George G. Davis) - fix to usb-ohci-sa1111.h[*] (Dan McDonald) - actually fix symbol export in discontig.c (John Dorsey) - removed extra ramfs features from -ac patches (me) I removed the -ac ramfs patch since tmpfs in the generic 2.4.4 kernel is already offering the same functionalities, and I want to try to reduce the size of the -np patch. [*] The SA1111 USB is still broken nevertheless. Enjoy! Nicolas From wrl-techops@pa.dec.com Wed May 9 17:24:57 2001 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (root@mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id RAA31124 for ; Wed, 9 May 2001 17:24:57 +0200 Received: from zmamail03.zma.compaq.com (zmamail03.zma.compaq.com [161.114.64.103]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id RAA15222 for ; Wed, 9 May 2001 17:24:55 +0200 (METDST) Received: by zmamail03.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 7088E9265; Wed, 9 May 2001 11:23:08 -0400 (EDT) Received: from taynzmail03.nz-tay.cpqcorp.net (taynzmail03.nz-tay.cpqcorp.net [16.47.4.103]) by zmamail03.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3446D8FED; Wed, 9 May 2001 11:23:08 -0400 (EDT) Received: by taynzmail03.nz-tay.cpqcorp.net (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 99AEB1E7; Wed, 9 May 2001 11:23:06 -0400 (EDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by taynzmail03.nz-tay.cpqcorp.net (Postfix) with SMTP id 2AF262C9; Wed, 9 May 2001 11:23:04 -0400 (EDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA22154; Wed, 9 May 2001 08:23:00 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id IAA26246; Wed, 9 May 2001 08:17:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id IAA14210; Wed, 9 May 2001 08:17:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ztxmail02.nz-cce.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA07473; Wed, 9 May 2001 08:17:00 -0700 Received: by ztxmail02.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id CE7B251D0; Wed, 9 May 2001 10:16:59 -0500 (CDT) Received: from xanadu.home (modemcable084.137-200-24.mtl.mc.videotron.ca [24.200.137.84]) by ztxmail02.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 54C615034 for ; Wed, 9 May 2001 10:16:59 -0500 (CDT) Received: from localhost (nico@localhost) by xanadu.home (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id LAA26549; Wed, 9 May 2001 11:15:55 -0400 X-Authentication-Warning: xanadu.home: nico owned process doing -bs Date: Wed, 9 May 2001 11:15:55 -0400 (EDT) From: Nicolas Pitre X-X-Sender: To: "JOR. - Jordan, Roman" Cc: "'sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com'" Subject: Re: AW: diff-2.4.4-rmk2-np1 In-Reply-To: <81413F587EB9D1118F56000092941A3E01F45847@HW_MAIL> Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk On Tue, 8 May 2001, JOR. - Jordan, Roman wrote: > hallo, > i haved paused this list for a while. > Now i have a question. At ftp.handhelds.org i found your diff file. But no > actual patch file (which has to bee applied before). I found only patches > for kernel version 2.4.0 at handhelds.org. Where can i get the actual patch > files? For -rmk patches which have to be applied before any -np patch see: ftp://ftp.arm.linux.org.uk/pub/linux/arm/source/kernel-patches/v2.4/ The -np patches are available at: ftp://ftp.arm.linux.org.uk/pub/linux/arm/people/nico/ Nicolas From wrl-techops@pa.dec.com Fri May 11 21:41:38 2001 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id VAA11724 for ; Fri, 11 May 2001 21:41:38 +0200 Received: from ztxmail05.ztx.compaq.com (ztxmail05.ztx.compaq.com [161.114.1.209]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id VAA07814 for ; Fri, 11 May 2001 21:41:07 +0200 (METDST) Received: by ztxmail05.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id BACFB49F; Fri, 11 May 2001 14:39:19 -0500 (CDT) Received: from taynzmail03.nz-tay.cpqcorp.net (taynzmail03.nz-tay.cpqcorp.net [16.47.4.103]) by ztxmail05.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 43F51704; Fri, 11 May 2001 14:39:19 -0500 (CDT) Received: by taynzmail03.nz-tay.cpqcorp.net (Postfix, from userid 12345) id DEA3A5CB; Fri, 11 May 2001 15:39:12 -0400 (EDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by taynzmail03.nz-tay.cpqcorp.net (Postfix) with SMTP id 984E339C; Fri, 11 May 2001 15:39:10 -0400 (EDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA02307; Fri, 11 May 2001 12:39:01 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id MAA22713; Fri, 11 May 2001 12:29:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id MAA07449; Fri, 11 May 2001 12:29:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ztxmail01.nz-cce.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA25725; Fri, 11 May 2001 12:29:31 -0700 Received: by ztxmail01.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 7C8637C46; Fri, 11 May 2001 14:29:30 -0500 (CDT) Received: from dryline-fw.wireless-sys.com (unknown [216.126.67.45]) by ztxmail01.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CBC3C3F0B for ; Fri, 11 May 2001 14:29:29 -0500 (CDT) Received: from somanetworks.com (keller.yyz.somanetworks.com [10.11.100.45]) by dryline-fw.wireless-sys.com (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id PAA08111 for ; Fri, 11 May 2001 15:29:29 -0400 Received: (from georgn@localhost) by somanetworks.com (8.11.0/8.11.0) id f4BJTRR19693 for sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com; Fri, 11 May 2001 15:29:27 -0400 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <15100.5035.119453.780659@somanetworks.com> X-Mailer: VM 6.90 under 21.2 (beta44) "Thalia" XEmacs Lucid Reply-To: georgn@somanetworks.com From: "Georg Nikodym" To: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Cc: georgn@somanetworks.com Subject: Stupid question Date: Fri, 11 May 2001 12:30:35 -0400 Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk I have a script that somewhat automates for me the application of the various rmkX and npY patches to a linus tree. Implicit in this script is the assumption that there is a one to many mapping of rmkX to npY patches. With 2.4.4, I see that there's rmk1, rmk2, rmk2-np1. Did I miss a rmk1-np1? I'm assuming not but I just want to be certain. Thanks. From wrl-techops@pa.dec.com Fri May 11 23:02:12 2001 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (root@mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id XAA11888 for ; Fri, 11 May 2001 23:02:12 +0200 Received: from zmamail05.zma.compaq.com (zmamail05.zma.compaq.com [161.114.64.105]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id XAA10864 for ; Fri, 11 May 2001 23:02:11 +0200 (METDST) Received: by zmamail05.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 95BCF6839; Fri, 11 May 2001 17:00:24 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailrelay01.cce.cpqcorp.net (mailrelay01.cce.cpqcorp.net [16.47.68.171]) by zmamail05.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B6BA6846; Fri, 11 May 2001 17:00:24 -0400 (EDT) Received: by mailrelay01.cce.cpqcorp.net (Postfix, from userid 12345) id F0DCD448; Fri, 11 May 2001 16:00:18 -0500 (CDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mailrelay01.cce.cpqcorp.net (Postfix) with SMTP id 7A2FD698; Fri, 11 May 2001 16:00:14 -0500 (CDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA30395; Fri, 11 May 2001 14:00:12 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id NAA25510; Fri, 11 May 2001 13:55:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id NAA09265; Fri, 11 May 2001 13:55:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ztxmail02.nz-cce.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA21283; Fri, 11 May 2001 13:55:00 -0700 Received: by ztxmail02.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id CC524510E; Fri, 11 May 2001 15:54:59 -0500 (CDT) Received: from xanadu.home (modemcable084.137-200-24.mtl.mc.videotron.ca [24.200.137.84]) by ztxmail02.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 293E39A41 for ; Fri, 11 May 2001 15:54:59 -0500 (CDT) Received: from localhost (nico@localhost) by xanadu.home (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id QAA03173; Fri, 11 May 2001 16:54:57 -0400 X-Authentication-Warning: xanadu.home: nico owned process doing -bs Date: Fri, 11 May 2001 16:54:57 -0400 (EDT) From: Nicolas Pitre X-X-Sender: To: Georg Nikodym Cc: Subject: Re: Stupid question In-Reply-To: <15100.5035.119453.780659@somanetworks.com> Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk On Fri, 11 May 2001, Georg Nikodym wrote: > > I have a script that somewhat automates for me the application of > the various rmkX and npY patches to a linus tree. > > Implicit in this script is the assumption that there is a one to many > mapping of rmkX to npY patches. > > With 2.4.4, I see that there's rmk1, rmk2, rmk2-np1. Did I miss a > rmk1-np1? I'm assuming not but I just want to be certain. There is none. I sometimes may release many patches over the same -rmk patched tree, but sometimes Russell is faster than me. Nicolas From wrl-techops@pa.dec.com Mon May 14 22:39:06 2001 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (root@mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id WAA27924 for ; Mon, 14 May 2001 22:39:06 +0200 Received: from zcamail05.zca.compaq.com (zcamail05.zca.compaq.com [161.114.32.105]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id WAA23109 for ; Mon, 14 May 2001 22:39:04 +0200 (METDST) Received: by zcamail05.zca.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id B7710DC3; Mon, 14 May 2001 13:40:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mailrelay01.cce.cpqcorp.net (mailrelay01.cce.cpqcorp.net [16.47.68.171]) by zcamail05.zca.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B7AE1F7B; Mon, 14 May 2001 13:40:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mailrelay01.cce.cpqcorp.net (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 43B2A2A8; Mon, 14 May 2001 15:37:06 -0500 (CDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mailrelay01.cce.cpqcorp.net (Postfix) with SMTP id 8ED00534; Mon, 14 May 2001 15:37:02 -0500 (CDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA01079; Mon, 14 May 2001 13:36:55 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id NAA27611; Mon, 14 May 2001 13:31:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id NAA27594; Mon, 14 May 2001 13:31:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ztxmail01.nz-cce.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA23618; Mon, 14 May 2001 13:31:17 -0700 Received: by ztxmail01.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 6AACE7D5B; Mon, 14 May 2001 15:31:16 -0500 (CDT) Received: from dryline-fw.wireless-sys.com (unknown [216.126.67.45]) by ztxmail01.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9936F7F6B for ; Mon, 14 May 2001 15:31:12 -0500 (CDT) Received: from somanetworks.com (keller.yyz.somanetworks.com [10.11.100.45]) by dryline-fw.wireless-sys.com (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id QAA05971 for ; Mon, 14 May 2001 16:31:11 -0400 Received: (from georgn@localhost) by somanetworks.com (8.11.0/8.11.0) id f4EKV8112494; Mon, 14 May 2001 16:31:08 -0400 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <15104.16523.41966.63601@somanetworks.com> Date: Mon, 14 May 2001 16:31:07 -0400 From: "Georg Nikodym" To: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Cc: georgn@somanetworks.com Subject: hwtimer.o X-Mailer: VM 6.90 under 21.2 (beta44) "Thalia" XEmacs Lucid Reply-To: georgn@somanetworks.com Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk In arch/arm/mach-sa1100/Makefile, lines like: # Miscelaneous functions obj-$(CONFIG_SA1100_FREQUENCY_SCALE) += cpu-scale.o obj-$(CONFIG_PROFILER) += hwtimer.o obj-$(CONFIG_APM) += apm.o obj-$(CONFIG_PM) += power.o suspend.o obj-m += gpio.o registers.o got removed in 2.4.4-rmk2-np1 (there were others). Presuming this was intentional, what is the "blessed" way for someone to build, say, hwtimer.o into their kernel... From wrl-techops@pa.dec.com Mon May 14 22:58:23 2001 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (root@mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id WAA28000 for ; Mon, 14 May 2001 22:58:22 +0200 Received: from zmamail04.zma.compaq.com (zmamail04.zma.compaq.com [161.114.64.104]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id WAA23928 for ; Mon, 14 May 2001 22:58:21 +0200 (METDST) Received: by zmamail04.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id B06C54C1A; Mon, 14 May 2001 16:56:33 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailrelay01.cce.cpqcorp.net (mailrelay01.cce.cpqcorp.net [16.47.68.171]) by zmamail04.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3805D4C3C; Mon, 14 May 2001 16:56:33 -0400 (EDT) Received: by mailrelay01.cce.cpqcorp.net (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 5D60F405; Mon, 14 May 2001 15:56:32 -0500 (CDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mailrelay01.cce.cpqcorp.net (Postfix) with SMTP id 2D828534; Mon, 14 May 2001 15:56:30 -0500 (CDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA08254; Mon, 14 May 2001 13:56:29 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id NAA28295; Mon, 14 May 2001 13:55:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id NAA28296; Mon, 14 May 2001 13:55:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: from zmamail02.nz-tay.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA19908; Mon, 14 May 2001 13:55:52 -0700 Received: by zmamail02.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 3A6442147; Mon, 14 May 2001 16:55:51 -0400 (EDT) Received: from xanadu.home (modemcable084.137-200-24.mtl.mc.videotron.ca [24.200.137.84]) by zmamail02.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 777A5209F for ; Mon, 14 May 2001 16:55:51 -0400 (EDT) Received: from localhost (nico@localhost) by xanadu.home (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id QAA29693; Mon, 14 May 2001 16:55:50 -0400 X-Authentication-Warning: xanadu.home: nico owned process doing -bs Date: Mon, 14 May 2001 16:55:49 -0400 (EDT) From: Nicolas Pitre X-X-Sender: To: Georg Nikodym Cc: Subject: Re: hwtimer.o In-Reply-To: <15104.16523.41966.63601@somanetworks.com> Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk On Mon, 14 May 2001, Georg Nikodym wrote: > > In arch/arm/mach-sa1100/Makefile, lines like: > > # Miscelaneous functions > obj-$(CONFIG_SA1100_FREQUENCY_SCALE) += cpu-scale.o > obj-$(CONFIG_PROFILER) += hwtimer.o > obj-$(CONFIG_APM) += apm.o > obj-$(CONFIG_PM) += power.o suspend.o > obj-m += gpio.o registers.o > > got removed in 2.4.4-rmk2-np1 (there were others). > > Presuming this was intentional, what is the "blessed" way for someone > to build, say, hwtimer.o into their kernel... This wasn't intentional. Nicolas From wrl-techops@pa.dec.com Mon May 14 23:23:39 2001 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (root@mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id XAA28094 for ; Mon, 14 May 2001 23:23:39 +0200 Received: from zmamail04.zma.compaq.com (zmamail04.zma.compaq.com [161.114.64.104]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id XAA25332 for ; Mon, 14 May 2001 23:23:37 +0200 (METDST) Received: by zmamail04.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 8E7974D5D; Mon, 14 May 2001 17:21:46 -0400 (EDT) Received: from taynzmail03.nz-tay.cpqcorp.net (taynzmail03.nz-tay.cpqcorp.net [16.47.4.103]) by zmamail04.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D8AA6316; Mon, 14 May 2001 17:21:46 -0400 (EDT) Received: by taynzmail03.nz-tay.cpqcorp.net (Postfix, from userid 12345) id E727152F; Mon, 14 May 2001 17:21:45 -0400 (EDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by taynzmail03.nz-tay.cpqcorp.net (Postfix) with SMTP id 77A587EB; Mon, 14 May 2001 17:21:43 -0400 (EDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA31503; Mon, 14 May 2001 14:21:42 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id OAA28949; Mon, 14 May 2001 14:21:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id OAA28954; Mon, 14 May 2001 14:21:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: from zmamail02.nz-tay.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA30869; Mon, 14 May 2001 14:21:05 -0700 Received: by zmamail02.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 8FB792186; Mon, 14 May 2001 17:21:04 -0400 (EDT) Received: from xanadu.home (modemcable084.137-200-24.mtl.mc.videotron.ca [24.200.137.84]) by zmamail02.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 043B3209A for ; Mon, 14 May 2001 17:21:03 -0400 (EDT) Received: from localhost (nico@localhost) by xanadu.home (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id RAA29813; Mon, 14 May 2001 17:21:03 -0400 X-Authentication-Warning: xanadu.home: nico owned process doing -bs Date: Mon, 14 May 2001 17:21:03 -0400 (EDT) From: Nicolas Pitre X-X-Sender: To: SA-1100/Linux Cc: Subject: diff-2.4.4-rmk3-np1 Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk ... is available at the usual sites, which are: ftp://ftp.netwinder.org/users/n/nico/ ftp://ftp.arm.linux.org.uk/pub/linux/arm/people/nico/ ftp://ftp.handhelds.org/pub/linux/arm/sa-1100-patches/ Highlights: - updated to 2.4.4-rmk3 (me) - restored configure.in/Makefile bits that fell into cracks in last patch (me) - switched to a new, cleaner, prettier serial driver for SA1100 (me) - added hooks for machine dependent features in the new serial_sa1100.c (me) The version of the new serial driver I merged was provided by Jeff Sutherland, but I don't know exactly who wrote it originally (ARM Limited, Deep Blue Solutions Ltd., Russell?). The old driver is still available with CONFIG_SERIAL_SA1100_OLD and it has been renamed to serial_sa1100_old.c. The new driver uses the officially assigned device names and major/minor numbers as follow: /dev/ttySA0 major 204 minor 5 /dev/ttySA1 major 204 minor 6 /dev/ttySA2 major 204 minor 7 /dev/cuasa0 major 205 minor 5 /dev/cuasa1 major 205 minor 6 /dev/cuasa2 major 205 minor 7 Don't forget to adjust your /etc/inittab. The goal is to fase out serial_sa1100_old.c when the new serial_sa1100.c is proven stable and satisfactory for everybody. Please test it. Any comments/patches are welcome. Enjoy! Nicolas From wrl-techops@pa.dec.com Thu May 17 04:46:24 2001 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (root@mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id EAA05443 for ; Thu, 17 May 2001 04:46:24 +0200 Received: from ztxmail05.ztx.compaq.com (ztxmail05.ztx.compaq.com [161.114.1.209]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id EAA23682 for ; Thu, 17 May 2001 04:46:23 +0200 (METDST) Received: by ztxmail05.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 083115DD; Wed, 16 May 2001 21:44:34 -0500 (CDT) Received: from mailrelay01.cce.cpqcorp.net (mailrelay01.cce.cpqcorp.net [16.47.68.171]) by ztxmail05.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D4B6E4EA; Wed, 16 May 2001 21:44:34 -0500 (CDT) Received: by mailrelay01.cce.cpqcorp.net (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 47B8062B; Wed, 16 May 2001 21:44:32 -0500 (CDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mailrelay01.cce.cpqcorp.net (Postfix) with SMTP id 52B3E411; Wed, 16 May 2001 21:44:30 -0500 (CDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA09308; Wed, 16 May 2001 19:44:25 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id TAA00811; Wed, 16 May 2001 19:37:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id TAA32642; Wed, 16 May 2001 19:37:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: from zmamail02.nz-tay.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA32010; Wed, 16 May 2001 19:37:28 -0700 Received: by zmamail02.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 2309420D6; Wed, 16 May 2001 22:37:28 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mail-green.research.att.com (H-135-207-30-103.research.att.com [135.207.30.103]) by zmamail02.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E920822D0 for ; Wed, 16 May 2001 22:37:27 -0400 (EDT) Received: from hermes.research.att.com (hermes.research.att.com [135.207.16.38]) by mail-green.research.att.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C6291EE0D for ; Wed, 16 May 2001 22:37:27 -0400 (EDT) Received: from research.att.com ([135.207.8.148]) by hermes.research.att.com (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id WAA14731 for ; Wed, 16 May 2001 22:28:58 -0400 (EDT) Message-Id: <3B033924.411DF466@research.att.com> Date: Wed, 16 May 2001 22:36:20 -0400 From: Jack Chang Organization: AT&T Labs-Research X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.76 [en] (Win98; U) X-Accept-Language: en,zh-TW Mime-Version: 1.0 To: SA-1100/Linux Subject: drivers/net/cs89x0.c in kernel 2.4.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk Has any one run the cs89x0 driver successfully on SA-1110 based systems? I think I have problems with irq_map[] and netcard_portlist[]. I couldn't even probe the device. Any suggestions? Thx -- Jack T. Chang From wrl-techops@pa.dec.com Thu May 17 04:58:00 2001 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (root@mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id EAA05458 for ; Thu, 17 May 2001 04:58:00 +0200 Received: from ztxmail03.ztx.compaq.com (ztxmail03.ztx.compaq.com [161.114.1.207]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id EAA24015 for ; Thu, 17 May 2001 04:57:58 +0200 (METDST) Received: by ztxmail03.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 2DE56217A; Wed, 16 May 2001 21:56:11 -0500 (CDT) Received: from taynzmail03.nz-tay.cpqcorp.net (taynzmail03.nz-tay.cpqcorp.net [16.47.4.103]) by ztxmail03.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EFEAE234F; Wed, 16 May 2001 21:56:10 -0500 (CDT) Received: by taynzmail03.nz-tay.cpqcorp.net (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 4C4847C1; Wed, 16 May 2001 22:56:10 -0400 (EDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by taynzmail03.nz-tay.cpqcorp.net (Postfix) with SMTP id CBF5D6A6; Wed, 16 May 2001 22:56:07 -0400 (EDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA11343; Wed, 16 May 2001 19:56:06 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id TAA01202; Wed, 16 May 2001 19:52:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id TAA32710; Wed, 16 May 2001 19:52:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ztxmail02.nz-cce.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA08934; Wed, 16 May 2001 19:52:45 -0700 Received: by ztxmail02.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 7EF171817; Wed, 16 May 2001 21:52:44 -0500 (CDT) Received: from julia.funai-tky.co.jp (funai-tky.as.wakwak.ne.jp [61.115.76.21]) by ztxmail02.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A3A41A55 for ; Wed, 16 May 2001 21:52:44 -0500 (CDT) Received: from hiropu (hiropu) by julia.funai-tky.co.jp (8.11.3+3.4W/8.11.3/smtpfeed 1.12) with ESMTP id f4H2qgH15005 for ; Thu, 17 May 2001 11:52:42 +0900 Date: Thu, 17 May 2001 11:52:42 +0900 From: Hiroshi Ishii To: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Subject: How to wake up assabet? Message-Id: <20010517114228.7421.HIROSHI@funai-tky.co.jp> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Becky! ver. 2.00.03 Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk Hi Please tell me how to wake up assabet? When do "echo > /proc/sys/pm/suspend" , it seems assabet sleeping. But never wake up, because of I don't know how to wake up. I'm using kernel-2.4.4-rmk3-np1. Thanks. ---- Funai Electric R & D System Software Engineer Hiroshi Ishii From wrl-techops@pa.dec.com Thu May 17 10:07:15 2001 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (root@mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id KAA06051 for ; Thu, 17 May 2001 10:07:14 +0200 Received: from zmamail05.zma.compaq.com (zmamail05.zma.compaq.com [161.114.64.105]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id KAA06014 for ; Thu, 17 May 2001 10:07:13 +0200 (METDST) Received: by zmamail05.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 0044D69CA; Thu, 17 May 2001 04:05:24 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailrelay01.cce.cpqcorp.net (mailrelay01.cce.cpqcorp.net [16.47.68.171]) by zmamail05.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A65DE6B50; Thu, 17 May 2001 04:05:24 -0400 (EDT) Received: by mailrelay01.cce.cpqcorp.net (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 431B04C8; Thu, 17 May 2001 03:05:23 -0500 (CDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mailrelay01.cce.cpqcorp.net (Postfix) with SMTP id 67CE6584; Thu, 17 May 2001 03:05:21 -0500 (CDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA08405; Thu, 17 May 2001 01:05:18 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id BAA03069; Thu, 17 May 2001 01:03:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id BAA11260; Thu, 17 May 2001 01:03:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ztxmail01.nz-cce.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA32129; Thu, 17 May 2001 01:03:59 -0700 Received: by ztxmail01.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 99B0227E; Thu, 17 May 2001 03:03:58 -0500 (CDT) Received: from femail18.sdc1.sfba.home.com (femail18.sdc1.sfba.home.com [24.0.95.145]) by ztxmail01.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 459CC33F for ; Thu, 17 May 2001 03:03:58 -0500 (CDT) Received: from russ.local ([65.5.244.178]) by femail18.sdc1.sfba.home.com (InterMail vM.4.01.03.20 201-229-121-120-20010223) with ESMTP id <20010517080357.KYLO20888.femail18.sdc1.sfba.home.com@russ.local> for ; Thu, 17 May 2001 01:03:57 -0700 Subject: Re: drivers/net/cs89x0.c in kernel 2.4.0 From: Russ Dill To: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com In-Reply-To: <3B033924.411DF466@research.att.com> References: <3B033924.411DF466@research.att.com> Content-Type: text/plain X-Mailer: Evolution/0.10 (Preview Release) Date: 17 May 2001 01:04:02 -0700 Message-Id: <990086642.3656.0.camel@russ> Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk On 16 May 2001 22:36:20 -0400, Jack Chang wrote: > Has any one run the cs89x0 driver successfully on SA-1110 based systems? > > I think I have problems with irq_map[] and netcard_portlist[]. I > couldn't even probe > the device. Any suggestions? Thx It needs some modifications to work with arm, many versions are currently floating around. things that need to be done (I may forget a few): * pcmcia timings should be set (may be done in a different, driver, like ide) * the address that should be used is the virtual address mapped to pcmcia address space, I think the first slot is at 0xf600000, its #define'd somewhere. Watch out for addresses not being unsigned longs. * An even, then odd, then even address should be read from the device's address space. * The corresponding GPIO for the enterupt should be setup I think that is it, if you want one of the drivers that is floating around, let me know more about your hardware and I'll see if the one I have is appropriate From wrl-techops@pa.dec.com Thu May 17 16:56:20 2001 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (root@mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id QAA07484 for ; Thu, 17 May 2001 16:56:20 +0200 Received: from zcamail05.zca.compaq.com (zcamail05.zca.compaq.com [161.114.32.105]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id QAA05122 for ; Thu, 17 May 2001 16:56:18 +0200 (METDST) Received: by zcamail05.zca.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 4FF7CA86; Thu, 17 May 2001 07:57:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mailrelay01.cac.cpqcorp.net (mailrelay01.cac.cpqcorp.net [16.47.132.152]) by zcamail05.zca.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3042180D; Thu, 17 May 2001 07:57:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mailrelay01.cac.cpqcorp.net (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 2401341D; Thu, 17 May 2001 07:54:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mailrelay01.cac.cpqcorp.net (Postfix) with SMTP id E78EC4F2; Thu, 17 May 2001 07:54:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA13388; Thu, 17 May 2001 07:54:16 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id HAA22526; Thu, 17 May 2001 07:51:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id HAA20922; Thu, 17 May 2001 07:51:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: from zmamail01.nz-tay.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA13049; Thu, 17 May 2001 07:51:07 -0700 Received: by zmamail01.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id C6157CAF4; Thu, 17 May 2001 10:50:59 -0400 (EDT) Received: from xanadu.home (modemcable084.137-200-24.mtl.mc.videotron.ca [24.200.137.84]) by zmamail01.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D4CE1CB18 for ; Thu, 17 May 2001 10:50:58 -0400 (EDT) Received: from localhost (nico@localhost) by xanadu.home (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id KAA07788; Thu, 17 May 2001 10:50:47 -0400 X-Authentication-Warning: xanadu.home: nico owned process doing -bs Date: Thu, 17 May 2001 10:50:47 -0400 (EDT) From: Nicolas Pitre X-X-Sender: To: Hiroshi Ishii Cc: Subject: Re: How to wake up assabet? In-Reply-To: <20010517114228.7421.HIROSHI@funai-tky.co.jp> Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk On Thu, 17 May 2001, Hiroshi Ishii wrote: > Hi > > Please tell me how to wake up assabet? > > When do "echo > /proc/sys/pm/suspend" , it seems assabet > sleeping. But never wake up, because of I don't know how to > wake up. I'm using kernel-2.4.4-rmk3-np1. You also need wake-up support in the bootloader. Nicolas From wrl-techops@pa.dec.com Thu May 17 17:05:03 2001 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (root@mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id RAA07508 for ; Thu, 17 May 2001 17:05:03 +0200 Received: from zcamail05.zca.compaq.com (zcamail05.zca.compaq.com [161.114.32.105]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id RAA05873 for ; Thu, 17 May 2001 17:05:01 +0200 (METDST) Received: by zcamail05.zca.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 7AE21116E; Thu, 17 May 2001 08:06:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mailrelay01.cac.cpqcorp.net (mailrelay01.cac.cpqcorp.net [16.47.132.152]) by zcamail05.zca.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5AB251267; Thu, 17 May 2001 08:06:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mailrelay01.cac.cpqcorp.net (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 7746652C; Thu, 17 May 2001 08:03:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mailrelay01.cac.cpqcorp.net (Postfix) with SMTP id 4162940A; Thu, 17 May 2001 08:03:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA12591; Thu, 17 May 2001 08:03:13 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id IAA22819; Thu, 17 May 2001 08:02:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id IAA16301; Thu, 17 May 2001 08:02:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ztxmail02.nz-cce.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA02811; Thu, 17 May 2001 08:02:54 -0700 Received: by ztxmail02.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 540E1531A; Thu, 17 May 2001 10:02:53 -0500 (CDT) Received: from julia.funai-tky.co.jp (funai-tky.as.wakwak.ne.jp [61.115.76.21]) by ztxmail02.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 86308516E for ; Thu, 17 May 2001 10:02:52 -0500 (CDT) Received: from HIROPAD (HIROPAD) by julia.funai-tky.co.jp (8.11.3+3.4W/8.11.3/smtpfeed 1.12) with SMTP id f4HF2oH19432; Fri, 18 May 2001 00:02:50 +0900 Message-Id: <002501c0dee2$18dbd850$1601a8c0@HIROPAD> From: "hiroshi" To: "Nicolas Pitre" Cc: References: Subject: Re: How to wake up assabet? Date: Fri, 18 May 2001 00:00:22 +0900 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-Msmail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2919.6700 X-Mimeole: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2919.6700 Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk ----- Original Message ----- From: "Nicolas Pitre" To: "Hiroshi Ishii" Cc: Sent: Thursday, May 17, 2001 11:50 PM Subject: Re: How to wake up assabet? > > When do "echo > /proc/sys/pm/suspend" , it seems assabet > > sleeping. But never wake up, because of I don't know how to > > wake up. I'm using kernel-2.4.4-rmk3-np1. > > You also need wake-up support in the bootloader. > I'm using Angel and angelboot when boot. It doesn't support wake-up? What bootloader support wake-up? thnaks From wrl-techops@pa.dec.com Wed May 23 20:04:56 2001 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id UAA30404 for ; Wed, 23 May 2001 20:04:55 +0200 Received: from ztxmail03.ztx.compaq.com (ztxmail03.ztx.compaq.com [161.114.1.207]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id UAA27746 for ; Wed, 23 May 2001 20:04:53 +0200 (METDST) Received: by ztxmail03.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 8900A223C; Wed, 23 May 2001 13:03:05 -0500 (CDT) Received: from mailrelay01.cac.cpqcorp.net (mailrelay01.cac.cpqcorp.net [16.47.132.152]) by ztxmail03.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE84F21D6; Wed, 23 May 2001 13:03:04 -0500 (CDT) Received: by mailrelay01.cac.cpqcorp.net (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 8FFC2523; Wed, 23 May 2001 11:03:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mailrelay01.cac.cpqcorp.net (Postfix) with SMTP id 3CB11515; Wed, 23 May 2001 11:03:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA02434; Wed, 23 May 2001 11:02:59 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id KAA10739; Wed, 23 May 2001 10:57:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id KAA10771; Wed, 23 May 2001 10:57:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: from zmamail02.nz-tay.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA03801; Wed, 23 May 2001 10:57:19 -0700 Received: by zmamail02.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 89CE5564E; Wed, 23 May 2001 13:57:18 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mirapoint.inter.net.il (unknown [192.114.186.20]) by zmamail02.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 35B885558 for ; Wed, 23 May 2001 13:57:17 -0400 (EDT) Received: from gad (ip36-5.urbis.net.il [192.118.5.36]) by mirapoint.inter.net.il (Mirapoint) with SMTP id APV85853; Wed, 23 May 2001 19:56:32 +0200 (IST) Reply-To: From: "Gad Hayisraeli" To: "Sa1100-Linux list" Cc: "Linux-Arm-kernel List" , "Linux-Arm List" Subject: some questions - using ramdisk-ks, ethernet CF LP-E, Date: Wed, 23 May 2001 20:56:32 +0300 Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0012_01C0E3CA.D8888B20" X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-Msmail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) X-Mimeole: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2314.1300 Importance: Normal X-Ms-Tnef-Correlator: Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0012_01C0E3CA.D8888B20 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1255" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit 1. i've downloaded ramdisk-ks.gz from wareable group. which version of blob and kernel, and what conf. of the both do i need in order to run it smoothly and support the standard Assabet CF LP-E ethernet card ? ( i tried some version which failed loading the ramdisk, and i think because the blob+kernel did not support large ramdisk like the KS) 2. does the card's driver loads automatically ? if not, what do iahve to do in order to config it (i want to use ping, ftp, etc.) 3. how can i upload the whole image (blob+kernel+ramdisk or just kernel+ramdisk) back to the linux/win host , from the Assabet ? (i simply got from someone an already-built version, on the Assabet) 4. in the already-built version, he used usb and usbf devices, in an ethernet mode. which device is the right one, for using it like a simple etherent card ? (ping, ftp...) and how can i configure it to be that ? thanks Gad ------=_NextPart_000_0012_01C0E3CA.D8888B20 Content-Type: application/ms-tnef; name="winmail.dat" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="winmail.dat" eJ8+IiARAQaQCAAEAAAAAAABAAEAAQeQBgAIAAAA5wQAAAAAAADrAAEIgAcAGAAAAElQTS5NaWNy b3NvZnQgTWFpbC5Ob3RlADEIAQ2ABAACAAAAAgACAAEGgAMADgAAANEHBQAXABQAOAAAAAMAQwEB A5AGAHAHAAAlAAAACwACAAEAAAALACMAAAAAAAMAJgAAAAAACwApAAAAAAADADYAAAAAAB4AcAAB AAAANgAAAHNvbWUgcXVlc3Rpb25zIC0gdXNpbmcgcmFtZGlzay1rcywgZXRoZXJuZXQgQ0YgTFAt RSwgAAAAAgFxAAEAAAAWAAAAAcDjsbH8cEyZpdI7TFWmZ+I2W/dIwQAAAgEdDAEAAAAVAAAAU01U UDpHQURAU1lFVEUuQ08uSUwAAAAACwABDgAAAABAAAYOAHgIoLHjwAECAQoOAQAAABgAAAAAAAAA HTUldGO21BGaAADQt0zQ+8KAAAALAB8OAQAAAAIBCRABAAAAAwMAAP8CAABUBAAATFpGdSktw8Dh AAVmYmlkBAAAZABygGNwZzEyNTUA+MULYG4OgDAzNwH3AqcJAgBjaArAc2V0MLAgRGF2DYACgH0K gUsR4AfQawuAZDQMYGNjAFALA2x0cgqxC6YgADEuIGkndmUgUGRvd24JAGEBAGQQIHJhbQ2Ray1r IHMuZ3ogA1Igd3UKwGUBoGwU8AnACGBwJi4KogqAd2gOUGggCxTgEWBpAiAgb2YgsQJgb2IgAHAV oGsEkdhlbCwZkxhAYQVABaDMbmYUoBkhdGgU8Abg9xuAFQEUsCAaEBWRC4AZEE8LIASQG3AcIHJ1 A6BpTQVAcwRgG9FseRmTc+0XsHAJERtzcwGQEtALERwgQQQQAaARgCBDRuAgTFAtRRfkEYAbkNca ARrRH8I/F+QoHDETsL8IkB6RA3AU8BimGERmC3DvF1AVoBVSC4BnG3MVxRpEMyLBGFBuaxlABZBh dfcRcBt0GWErGeQVAA2AHFBnG9AepwtgcmclhyTQaaMZ4BtzS1MpF+QyFKCvFRAHkRuCIeInBCBk BRC/GKEk0wQgJyAdQADAdA5Q+wdAHkE/FLAZMCixGkAao/kcEmFoFOEdQRwSHMka8vZpJUAdsSgc QBbwAjAdMt0nMnAlIRpAAYBwGkARgKxjLisFF+QzFKBoFSD/IdEdkTIwC1AVYRtzGEAG8KsU8Adw YSmhKCe5KynW3QWxaicwBUA27CkZQADQDybQHUEbgipQbnV4L/8D8AOgNHA4ITLBFrIbgiAGtyI2 HEAAkG0LUB5QZyjBfxajI0ICIBTwA5EHQBcRZPB5LWJ1AxAFQBilGkD3GPE7eTN7NBShQAQ+jz+U /xuRJzEVoCcwGYREMRkwAQD9EeBjB5AaQByxA5EhVwRinxfbRQQUsCvUBRBnaAVAfz4RMsEFsScw JSIdsSpTYX88xBTwIVMJ8CHGMYAyhy7/THArBRmiNHgw9AhwNgEx8/8gQBtxGsEiNRfkTyEmwA2w XTOZRxVwF+QSMQBSMAALAACACCAGAAAAAADAAAAAAAAARgAAAAADhQAAAAAAAAMAAoAIIAYAAAAA AMAAAAAAAABGAAAAABCFAAAAAAAAAwAHgAggBgAAAAAAwAAAAAAAAEYAAAAAUoUAAI5qAQAeAAmA CCAGAAAAAADAAAAAAAAARgAAAABUhQAAAQAAAAQAAAA5LjAAHgAKgAggBgAAAAAAwAAAAAAAAEYA AAAANoUAAAEAAAABAAAAAAAAAB4AC4AIIAYAAAAAAMAAAAAAAABGAAAAADeFAAABAAAAAQAAAAAA AAAeAAyACCAGAAAAAADAAAAAAAAARgAAAAA4hQAAAQAAAAEAAAAAAAAACwANgAggBgAAAAAAwAAA AAAAAEYAAAAAgoUAAAEAAAALABGACCAGAAAAAADAAAAAAAAARgAAAAAGhQAAAAAAAAMAEoAIIAYA AAAAAMAAAAAAAABGAAAAAAGFAAAAAAAACwAbgAggBgAAAAAAwAAAAAAAAEYAAAAADoUAAAAAAAAD AByACCAGAAAAAADAAAAAAAAARgAAAAARhQAAAAAAAAMAHoAIIAYAAAAAAMAAAAAAAABGAAAAABiF AAAAAAAAAgH4DwEAAAAQAAAAHTUldGO21BGaAADQt0zQ+wIB+g8BAAAAEAAAAB01JXRjttQRmgAA 0LdM0PsCAfsPAQAAAIIAAAAAAAAAOKG7EAXlEBqhuwgAKypWwgAAUFNUUFJYLkRMTAAAAAAAAAAA TklUQfm/uAEAqgA32W4AAABDOlxXSU5ET1dTXExvY2FsIFNldHRpbmdzXEFwcGxpY2F0aW9uIERh dGFcTWljcm9zb2Z0XE91dGxvb2tcbWFpbGJveC5wc3QAAAADAP4PBQAAAAMADTT9NwAAAgF/AAEA AAAvAAAAPE5FQkJKS0FBQk5PRkpDRElMREVOT0VFQUNEQUEuZ2FkQHN5ZXRlLmNvLmlsPgAAAwAG EJj+ZKkDAAcQzgIAAAMAEBAAAAAAAwAREAAAAAAeAAgQAQAAAGUAAAAxSVZFRE9XTkxPQURFRFJB TURJU0stS1NHWkZST01XQVJFQUJMRUdST1VQV0hJQ0hWRVJTSU9OT0ZCTE9CQU5ES0VSTkVMLEFO RFdIQVRDT05GT0ZUSEVCT1RIRE9JTkVFRElOAAAAAKu3 ------=_NextPart_000_0012_01C0E3CA.D8888B20-- From wrl-techops@pa.dec.com Thu May 24 15:24:36 2001 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id PAA00556 for ; Thu, 24 May 2001 15:24:35 +0200 Received: from zmamail04.zma.compaq.com (zmamail04.zma.compaq.com [161.114.64.104]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id PAA03819 for ; Thu, 24 May 2001 15:24:34 +0200 (METDST) Received: by zmamail04.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 9ED485140; Thu, 24 May 2001 09:22:47 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailrelay01.cce.cpqcorp.net (mailrelay01.cce.cpqcorp.net [16.47.68.171]) by zmamail04.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2CBE95D18; Thu, 24 May 2001 09:22:47 -0400 (EDT) Received: by mailrelay01.cce.cpqcorp.net (Postfix, from userid 12345) id B5DFF689; Thu, 24 May 2001 08:22:36 -0500 (CDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mailrelay01.cce.cpqcorp.net (Postfix) with SMTP id 11E2F683; Thu, 24 May 2001 08:22:35 -0500 (CDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA16649; Thu, 24 May 2001 06:22:31 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id GAA17862; Thu, 24 May 2001 06:18:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id GAA15776; Thu, 24 May 2001 06:18:09 -0700 (PDT) From: Received: from ztxmail02.nz-cce.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA28362; Thu, 24 May 2001 06:18:08 -0700 Received: by ztxmail02.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 21F7A50A5; Thu, 24 May 2001 08:18:08 -0500 (CDT) Received: from grinet.corp.graphic-reseau.com (unknown [212.234.230.226]) by ztxmail02.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1513F538E; Thu, 24 May 2001 08:18:06 -0500 (CDT) Received: from 63.129.6.140 ([63.129.6.140]) by grinet.corp.graphic-reseau.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.1600); Thu, 24 May 2001 15:16:40 +0200 Message-Id: <0000604d1d34$0000663e$000014fc@> To: Subject: Mortgage Loans Made Easy! Date: Thu, 24 May 2001 06:35:05 -0500 X-Priority: 3 X-Msmail-Priority: Normal Reply-To: 42410@mcd.alcatel.be X-Originalarrivaltime: 24 May 2001 13:16:41.0525 (UTC) FILETIME=[C59DDE50:01C0E453] Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk Shopping For Your Loan Just Got Easier! Tap into Our Huge Network Of Lenders. We Provide a 100% FREE Service! Click Here for "ALL" Details: http://usuarios.tripod.es/shotcredit/mort30.html ============================================ REMOVAL INSTRUCTIONS: Click Here mailto:zipout67@uole.com?subject=Delete-Mort From wrl-techops@pa.dec.com Sun May 27 16:53:56 2001 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id QAA11015 for ; Sun, 27 May 2001 16:53:55 +0200 Received: from ztxmail05.ztx.compaq.com (ztxmail05.ztx.compaq.com [161.114.1.209]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id QAA10387 for ; Sun, 27 May 2001 16:53:54 +0200 (METDST) Received: by ztxmail05.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 52B751CD0; Sun, 27 May 2001 09:52:02 -0500 (CDT) Received: from taynzmail03.nz-tay.cpqcorp.net (taynzmail03.nz-tay.cpqcorp.net [16.47.4.103]) by ztxmail05.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D64FD1DE6; Sun, 27 May 2001 09:52:01 -0500 (CDT) Received: by taynzmail03.nz-tay.cpqcorp.net (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 7C1A768D; Sun, 27 May 2001 10:51:56 -0400 (EDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by taynzmail03.nz-tay.cpqcorp.net (Postfix) with SMTP id 902144EC; Sun, 27 May 2001 10:51:54 -0400 (EDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA18568; Sun, 27 May 2001 07:51:51 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id HAA13568; Sun, 27 May 2001 07:46:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id HAA17933; Sun, 27 May 2001 07:46:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ztxmail01.nz-cce.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA09733; Sun, 27 May 2001 07:46:14 -0700 Received: by ztxmail01.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 9B6731FE; Sun, 27 May 2001 09:46:13 -0500 (CDT) Received: from xanadu.home (modemcable084.137-200-24.mtl.mc.videotron.ca [24.200.137.84]) by ztxmail01.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 13AD7197 for ; Sun, 27 May 2001 09:46:13 -0500 (CDT) Received: from localhost (nico@localhost) by xanadu.home (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id KAA14890 for ; Sun, 27 May 2001 10:46:12 -0400 X-Authentication-Warning: xanadu.home: nico owned process doing -bs Date: Sun, 27 May 2001 10:46:12 -0400 (EDT) From: Nicolas Pitre X-X-Sender: To: SA-1100/Linux Subject: SA1100FB driver (fwd) Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk ---------- Forwarded message ---------- Date: Sun, 27 May 2001 10:26:33 +0100 From: Russell King - ARM Linux To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.arm.linux.org.uk Subject: SA1100FB driver Hi, Once 2.4.5-rmk1 is out, I'm going to do a cleanup of the SA1100FB driver. Currently it has some quite subtle but real bugs in it, as well as lots of stuff that doesn't belong in there (from the days when it was Acornfb). If anyone has any patches to go into this driver RSN, please send them to me ASAP. Thanks. _____ |_____| ------------------------------------------------- ---+---+- | | Russell King linux@arm.linux.org.uk --- --- | | | | http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/ / / | | +-+-+ --- -+- / | THE developer of ARM Linux |+| /|\ / | | | --- | +-+-+ ------------------------------------------------- /\\\ | _______________________________________________ http://lists.arm.linux.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel Please visit the above address for information on this list. From wrl-techops@pa.dec.com Mon May 28 11:16:23 2001 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id LAA13028 for ; Mon, 28 May 2001 11:16:23 +0200 Received: from zmamail03.zma.compaq.com (zmamail03.zma.compaq.com [161.114.64.103]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id LAA12197 for ; Mon, 28 May 2001 11:16:21 +0200 (METDST) Received: by zmamail03.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id A6C59AE86; Mon, 28 May 2001 05:14:30 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailrelay01.cce.cpqcorp.net (mailrelay01.cce.cpqcorp.net [16.47.68.171]) by zmamail03.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 59D77AD0B; Mon, 28 May 2001 05:14:30 -0400 (EDT) Received: by mailrelay01.cce.cpqcorp.net (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 7EF2F420; Mon, 28 May 2001 04:14:28 -0500 (CDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mailrelay01.cce.cpqcorp.net (Postfix) with SMTP id CC7FD545; Mon, 28 May 2001 04:14:26 -0500 (CDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA08377; Mon, 28 May 2001 02:14:20 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id CAA06737; Mon, 28 May 2001 02:06:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id CAA32008; Mon, 28 May 2001 02:06:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: from zmamail02.nz-tay.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA02047; Mon, 28 May 2001 02:06:39 -0700 Received: by zmamail02.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 5689E3F57; Mon, 28 May 2001 05:06:38 -0400 (EDT) Received: from julia.funai-tky.co.jp (funai-tky.as.wakwak.ne.jp [61.115.76.21]) by zmamail02.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 80A92578C for ; Mon, 28 May 2001 05:06:37 -0400 (EDT) Received: from hiropu (hiropu) by julia.funai-tky.co.jp (8.11.3+3.4W/8.11.3/smtpfeed 1.12) with ESMTP id f4S96UH26009 for ; Mon, 28 May 2001 18:06:30 +0900 Date: Mon, 28 May 2001 18:06:30 +0900 From: Hiroshi Ishii To: sa1100 mailng list Subject: Re: How to wake up assabet? In-Reply-To: References: <20010517114228.7421.HIROSHI@funai-tky.co.jp> Message-Id: <20010528172900.B0A0.HIROSHI@funai-tky.co.jp> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Becky! ver. 2.00.03 Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk On Thu, 17 May 2001 10:50:47 -0400 (EDT) Nicolas Pitre wrote: > > > On Thu, 17 May 2001, Hiroshi Ishii wrote: > > > Hi > > > > Please tell me how to wake up assabet? > > > > When do "echo > /proc/sys/pm/suspend" , it seems assabet > > sleeping. But never wake up, because of I don't know how to > > wake up. I'm using kernel-2.4.4-rmk3-np1. > > You also need wake-up support in the bootloader. > Thanks , advice. I understood your advice. So, I've modified "blob" for supporting "wake-up", and it seems to work. Because, when system resume, serial port working. But usb(network) not working. Kernel showing this message lasting ("NETDEV WATCHDOG: usbf: transmit timed out"). USB driver hasn't implemented "standby/resume" yet? Or, I mistake to modify blob? Sorry for my broken english. ---- Funai Electric R & D System Software Engineer Hiroshi Ishii From wrl-techops@pa.dec.com Mon May 28 11:29:14 2001 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id LAA13057 for ; Mon, 28 May 2001 11:29:14 +0200 Received: from zmamail03.zma.compaq.com (zmamail03.zma.compaq.com [161.114.64.103]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id LAA12984 for ; Mon, 28 May 2001 11:29:13 +0200 (METDST) Received: by zmamail03.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id A5F6BC12E; Mon, 28 May 2001 05:27:25 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailrelay01.cac.cpqcorp.net (mailrelay01.cac.cpqcorp.net [16.47.132.152]) by zmamail03.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3377DC2C0; Mon, 28 May 2001 05:27:11 -0400 (EDT) Received: by mailrelay01.cac.cpqcorp.net (Postfix, from userid 12345) id D694D57F; Mon, 28 May 2001 02:26:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mailrelay01.cac.cpqcorp.net (Postfix) with SMTP id A0840593; Mon, 28 May 2001 02:26:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA32567; Mon, 28 May 2001 02:26:58 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id CAA13510; Mon, 28 May 2001 02:26:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id CAA12210; Mon, 28 May 2001 02:26:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: from zmamail01.nz-tay.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA22085; Mon, 28 May 2001 02:26:08 -0700 Received: by zmamail01.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id C1BBED2BB; Mon, 28 May 2001 05:26:07 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mail.ixcelerator.com (unknown [62.231.2.151]) by zmamail01.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 121B5D24B for ; Mon, 28 May 2001 05:26:07 -0400 (EDT) Received: from morgoth.ixcelerator.com (IDENT:root@morgoth.ixcel.ru [172.17.10.70]) by mail.ixcelerator.com (8.12.0.Beta7/8.12.0.Beta7/IXCELERATOR) with ESMTP id f4S9Q0In024365; Mon, 28 May 2001 13:26:01 +0400 Received: (from green@localhost) by morgoth.ixcelerator.com (8.11.2/8.11.2) id f4S9Qq505086; Mon, 28 May 2001 13:26:52 +0400 Date: Mon, 28 May 2001 13:26:52 +0400 Message-Id: <200105280926.f4S9Qq505086@morgoth.ixcelerator.com> From: green@linuxhacker.ru To: hiroshi@funai-tky.co.jp, sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Subject: Re: How to wake up assabet? In-Reply-To: <20010528172900.B0A0.HIROSHI@funai-tky.co.jp> X-Newsgroups: sa1100.linux User-Agent: tin/1.5.8-20010221 ("Blue Water") (UNIX) (Linux/2.4.4 (i686)) Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk In article <20010528172900.B0A0.HIROSHI@funai-tky.co.jp> you wrote: > USB driver hasn't implemented "standby/resume" yet? USB driver does not support suspend/resume yet, but I'll lok into addition of PM callbacks soon. Bye, Oleg From wrl-techops@pa.dec.com Mon May 28 16:25:56 2001 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id QAA14095 for ; Mon, 28 May 2001 16:25:56 +0200 Received: from ztxmail03.ztx.compaq.com (ztxmail03.ztx.compaq.com [161.114.1.207]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id QAA00237 for ; Mon, 28 May 2001 16:25:54 +0200 (METDST) Received: by ztxmail03.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id B013D2693; Mon, 28 May 2001 09:24:06 -0500 (CDT) Received: from mailrelay01.cce.cpqcorp.net (mailrelay01.cce.cpqcorp.net [16.47.68.171]) by ztxmail03.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C96E2474; Mon, 28 May 2001 09:24:06 -0500 (CDT) Received: by mailrelay01.cce.cpqcorp.net (Postfix, from userid 12345) id B6A2667A; Mon, 28 May 2001 09:24:05 -0500 (CDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mailrelay01.cce.cpqcorp.net (Postfix) with SMTP id 11BB6683; Mon, 28 May 2001 09:24:04 -0500 (CDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA02730; Mon, 28 May 2001 07:24:01 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id HAA14666; Mon, 28 May 2001 07:22:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id HAA02495; Mon, 28 May 2001 07:22:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ztxmail02.nz-cce.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA15409; Mon, 28 May 2001 07:22:06 -0700 Received: by ztxmail02.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id CF8E71AC7; Mon, 28 May 2001 09:22:05 -0500 (CDT) Received: from xanadu.home (modemcable084.137-200-24.mtl.mc.videotron.ca [24.200.137.84]) by ztxmail02.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4728C1A59 for ; Mon, 28 May 2001 09:22:05 -0500 (CDT) Received: from localhost (nico@localhost) by xanadu.home (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id KAA24142; Mon, 28 May 2001 10:21:55 -0400 X-Authentication-Warning: xanadu.home: nico owned process doing -bs Date: Mon, 28 May 2001 10:21:55 -0400 (EDT) From: Nicolas Pitre X-X-Sender: To: Hiroshi Ishii Cc: sa1100 mailng list Subject: Re: How to wake up assabet? In-Reply-To: <20010528172900.B0A0.HIROSHI@funai-tky.co.jp> Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk On Mon, 28 May 2001, Hiroshi Ishii wrote: > > On Thu, 17 May 2001 10:50:47 -0400 (EDT) > Nicolas Pitre wrote: > > > > > > > On Thu, 17 May 2001, Hiroshi Ishii wrote: > > > > > Hi > > > > > > Please tell me how to wake up assabet? > > > > > > When do "echo > /proc/sys/pm/suspend" , it seems assabet > > > sleeping. But never wake up, because of I don't know how to > > > wake up. I'm using kernel-2.4.4-rmk3-np1. > > > > You also need wake-up support in the bootloader. > > > > Thanks , advice. I understood your advice. So, I've > modified "blob" for supporting "wake-up", and it seems to > work. Because, when system resume, serial port working. But > usb(network) not working. Kernel showing this message > lasting ("NETDEV WATCHDOG: usbf: transmit timed out"). > > USB driver hasn't implemented "standby/resume" yet? > Or, I mistake to modify blob? The USB module hasn't implemented the power management callback yet. For instance you may try to disable it before entering sleep mode and reconfiguring it after wake up. Nicolas From wrl-techops@pa.dec.com Wed May 30 00:05:31 2001 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id AAA19096 for ; Wed, 30 May 2001 00:05:31 +0200 Received: from ztxmail04.ztx.compaq.com (ztxmail04.ztx.compaq.com [161.114.1.208]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id AAA23410 for ; Wed, 30 May 2001 00:05:29 +0200 (METDST) Received: by ztxmail04.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 4994613E9; Tue, 29 May 2001 17:03:41 -0500 (CDT) Received: from mailrelay01.cce.cpqcorp.net (mailrelay01.cce.cpqcorp.net [16.47.68.171]) by ztxmail04.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 556F91214; Tue, 29 May 2001 17:03:41 -0500 (CDT) Received: by mailrelay01.cce.cpqcorp.net (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 2878757B; Tue, 29 May 2001 17:03:38 -0500 (CDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mailrelay01.cce.cpqcorp.net (Postfix) with SMTP id 8FA335CF; Tue, 29 May 2001 17:03:34 -0500 (CDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA19485; Tue, 29 May 2001 15:03:30 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id OAA18640; Tue, 29 May 2001 14:53:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id OAA16666; Tue, 29 May 2001 14:53:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: from zmamail01.nz-tay.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA07640; Tue, 29 May 2001 14:52:58 -0700 Received: by zmamail01.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 8F6BBDA57; Tue, 29 May 2001 17:52:57 -0400 (EDT) Received: from xanadu.home (modemcable084.137-200-24.mtl.mc.videotron.ca [24.200.137.84]) by zmamail01.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 17618100A8 for ; Tue, 29 May 2001 17:52:57 -0400 (EDT) Received: from localhost (nico@localhost) by xanadu.home (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id RAA11420; Tue, 29 May 2001 17:52:58 -0400 X-Authentication-Warning: xanadu.home: nico owned process doing -bs Date: Tue, 29 May 2001 17:52:58 -0400 (EDT) From: Nicolas Pitre X-X-Sender: To: SA-1100/Linux Cc: Subject: diff-2.4.5-rmk2-np1 Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk ... is available at the usual sites, which are: ftp://ftp.netwinder.org/users/n/nico/ ftp://ftp.arm.linux.org.uk/pub/linux/arm/people/nico/ ftp://ftp.handhelds.org/pub/linux/arm/sa-1100-patches/ ChangeLog: - updated to 2.4.5-rmk2 (me) - most Flexanet support [patch #529/1] (Jordi Colomer) - updated to MTD's latest CVS (me) [includes JFFS2 & al] - added generic big endian support (me) - assorted cleanups (me) The big endian support is still missing for most IP checksum functions, and probably some specific drivers like the frame buffer driver. Still I can run a big endian kernel on my Assabet at the moment. Of course a filesystem with big endian executables is also required. A big endian ARM ramdisk image is available at ftp://ftp.netwinder.org/users/u/urnaik/ along with many other big endian stuff (cross glibc, etc) if you want to experiment with it. Please note that from now Russell King is maintaining the sa1100fb driver. You might note that he introduced a largely cleaned up version in 2.4.5-rmk2 with many bugfixes. Further mods to sa1100fb.c will be sent to him directly. Enjoy! Nicolas From wrl-techops@pa.dec.com Wed May 30 02:11:38 2001 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id CAA19873 for ; Wed, 30 May 2001 02:11:37 +0200 Received: from zmamail03.zma.compaq.com (zmamail03.zma.compaq.com [161.114.64.103]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id CAA28049 for ; Wed, 30 May 2001 02:11:36 +0200 (METDST) Received: by zmamail03.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 8EE28AE7D; Tue, 29 May 2001 20:09:49 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailrelay01.cce.cpqcorp.net (mailrelay01.cce.cpqcorp.net [16.47.68.171]) by zmamail03.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 337A2ACBA; Tue, 29 May 2001 20:09:49 -0400 (EDT) Received: by mailrelay01.cce.cpqcorp.net (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 4E8406AF; Tue, 29 May 2001 19:09:48 -0500 (CDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mailrelay01.cce.cpqcorp.net (Postfix) with SMTP id 95F994BC; Tue, 29 May 2001 19:09:46 -0500 (CDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA22246; Tue, 29 May 2001 17:09:45 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id RAA02723; Tue, 29 May 2001 17:05:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id RAA01620; Tue, 29 May 2001 17:05:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: from zmamail02.nz-tay.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA08945; Tue, 29 May 2001 17:05:57 -0700 Received: by zmamail02.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id D90CC5431; Tue, 29 May 2001 20:05:56 -0400 (EDT) Received: from julia.funai-tky.co.jp (funai-tky.as.wakwak.ne.jp [61.115.76.21]) by zmamail02.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C14654D6 for ; Tue, 29 May 2001 20:05:56 -0400 (EDT) Received: from hiropu (hiropu) by julia.funai-tky.co.jp (8.11.3+3.4W/8.11.3/smtpfeed 1.12) with ESMTP id f4U05sH05249 for ; Wed, 30 May 2001 09:05:54 +0900 Date: Wed, 30 May 2001 09:05:54 +0900 From: Hiroshi Ishii To: sa1100 mailng list Subject: Re: How to wake up assabet? In-Reply-To: <200105280926.f4S9Qq505086@morgoth.ixcelerator.com> References: <20010528172900.B0A0.HIROSHI@funai-tky.co.jp> <200105280926.f4S9Qq505086@morgoth.ixcelerator.com> Message-Id: <20010530090450.A2E7.HIROSHI@funai-tky.co.jp> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Becky! ver. 2.00.03 Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk On Mon, 28 May 2001 13:26:52 +0400 green@linuxhacker.ru wrote: > In article <20010528172900.B0A0.HIROSHI@funai-tky.co.jp> you wrote: > > > USB driver hasn't implemented "standby/resume" yet? > USB driver does not support suspend/resume yet, but I'll lok into addition of > PM callbacks soon. Thank you. Please please do it. ---- Funai Electric R & D System Software Engineer Hiroshi Ishii From wrl-techops@pa.dec.com Wed May 30 20:25:15 2001 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id UAA22924 for ; Wed, 30 May 2001 20:25:15 +0200 Received: from ztxmail05.ztx.compaq.com (ztxmail05.ztx.compaq.com [161.114.1.209]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id UAA19186 for ; Wed, 30 May 2001 20:25:13 +0200 (METDST) Received: by ztxmail05.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 113D41FC3; Wed, 30 May 2001 13:23:26 -0500 (CDT) Received: from mailrelay01.cce.cpqcorp.net (mailrelay01.cce.cpqcorp.net [16.47.68.171]) by ztxmail05.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE1F91D1A; Wed, 30 May 2001 13:23:25 -0500 (CDT) Received: by mailrelay01.cce.cpqcorp.net (Postfix, from userid 12345) id A20AB645; Wed, 30 May 2001 13:23:24 -0500 (CDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mailrelay01.cce.cpqcorp.net (Postfix) with SMTP id 4DD365CF; Wed, 30 May 2001 13:23:22 -0500 (CDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA08073; Wed, 30 May 2001 11:23:19 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id LAA28994; Wed, 30 May 2001 11:18:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id LAA01122; Wed, 30 May 2001 11:18:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ztxmail01.nz-cce.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA17472; Wed, 30 May 2001 11:18:35 -0700 Received: by ztxmail01.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 51AFE7F59; Wed, 30 May 2001 13:18:34 -0500 (CDT) Received: from dawn.barak.net.il (dawn.barak.net.il [212.150.150.43]) by ztxmail01.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E38107D25 for ; Wed, 30 May 2001 13:18:25 -0500 (CDT) Received: from mail.barak.net.il (mail6.barak.net.il [212.150.150.141]) by dawn.barak.net.il (8.11.1/8.11.1) with ESMTP id f4UIJr807854; Wed, 30 May 2001 21:19:57 +0300 (IDT) Received: from doron ([62.90.48.8]) by mail.barak.net.il (8.11.2/8.9.1) with SMTP id f4UIIHM16279; Wed, 30 May 2001 21:18:17 +0300 (IDT) From: "Doron Sandroy" To: "Linux-Arm List" Cc: "Lart List" , "SA1100-Linux list" Subject: need urgently bootldr and flash utils Date: Wed, 30 May 2001 20:32:43 +0200 Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1255" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 1 (Highest) X-Msmail-Priority: High X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) Importance: High X-Mimeole: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4522.1200 Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk I'm using assabet rev 8 board. I tried to compile the latest mtd cvs, patched with them the 2.4.3-rmk2-np1 kernel, but compile failed. (something with capital letters in cfi.h - NEEDED, NOT. But the words are not in src at all...) Also tried to build the bootldr snapshot 17-4-2001 + jd patch for this date, but failed in applying the patch (too many lines do not match !!!) so now I'm asking, urgently please, for: 1. bootldr binary supporting big kernel (up to 768K - 0xc0000) 2. flash utils (binaries), for the mkfs.jffs utility (which is not in the kernel tree) thanks a lot Doron From wrl-techops@pa.dec.com Wed May 30 22:52:14 2001 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id WAA23399 for ; Wed, 30 May 2001 22:52:14 +0200 Received: from zcamail03.zca.compaq.com (zcamail03.zca.compaq.com [161.114.32.103]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id WAA26421 for ; Wed, 30 May 2001 22:52:09 +0200 (METDST) Received: by zcamail03.zca.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 250D768B; Wed, 30 May 2001 13:50:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mailrelay01.cac.cpqcorp.net (mailrelay01.cac.cpqcorp.net [16.47.132.152]) by zcamail03.zca.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 036F7530; Wed, 30 May 2001 13:50:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mailrelay01.cac.cpqcorp.net (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 9D8AD57C; Wed, 30 May 2001 13:50:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mailrelay01.cac.cpqcorp.net (Postfix) with SMTP id 525D1564; Wed, 30 May 2001 13:50:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA27707; Wed, 30 May 2001 13:50:09 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id NAA10711; Wed, 30 May 2001 13:48:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id NAA10693; Wed, 30 May 2001 13:48:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ztxmail01.nz-cce.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA01709; Wed, 30 May 2001 13:48:44 -0700 Received: by ztxmail01.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 4851428F; Wed, 30 May 2001 15:48:44 -0500 (CDT) Received: from alpha.xerox.com (alpha.Xerox.COM [13.1.64.93]) by ztxmail01.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id D2B56137 for ; Wed, 30 May 2001 15:48:43 -0500 (CDT) Received: from toaster.parc.xerox.com ([13.1.102.43]) by alpha.xerox.com with SMTP id <61850(6)>; Wed, 30 May 2001 13:48:37 PDT Received: from toaster.parc.xerox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by toaster.parc.xerox.com (950413.SGI.8.6.12/950213.SGI.AUTOCF) via ESMTP id NAA15561 for ; Wed, 30 May 2001 13:48:35 -0700 Message-Id: <200105302048.NAA15561@toaster.parc.xerox.com> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.0zeta 7/24/97 Reply-To: stewart@parc.xerox.com To: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Subject: [PATCH] Serial console enable flag Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Wed, 30 May 2001 13:48:29 PDT From: Paul Stewart Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk Here's a patch to the latest CVS 2.4.4-rmk3-np1 kernel. The issue is as follows: In order to use the iPAQ (or whatever other SA1100-based device) ttySA0 for some other purpose than console, while still offering run-time ability to use it as a console by default (i.e., the kernel arg "console=ttySA0" is still set) the following solutions have been proposed, to my knowledge: 1. "telinit 4": Runs at an init level where getty won't run on ttySA0 stealing (and echoing) input characters. 2. Perform directly or have something perform a TIOCCONS on some other tty: this prevents output of the sort "echo foo > /dev/console" from actually ending up at the ttySA0 uart. One example of this solution is to run "rxvt -C". These two solutions certainly avert a large number of the situations where ttySA0 would be used inadvertently, but there's still one left: printk. I propose setting a kernel flag to optionally disable the sa1100_console_write routine. Separately, I created a module that provides a sysctl interface to enabling and disabling printk to the serial console at runtime. Perhaps this will be of use to others in the situation where inadvertent output to a device attached to the serial port (in my case a BlueTooth dongle) is undesirable. -- Paul Here's the patch: --- serial_sa1100.c.orig Wed May 30 12:01:38 2001 +++ serial_sa1100.c Wed May 30 12:01:08 2001 @@ -525,11 +525,16 @@ #ifdef CONFIG_SERIAL_SA1100_CONSOLE +int serial_sa1100_console_enabled = 1; +EXPORT_SYMBOL(serial_sa1100_console_enabled); + static void sa1100_console_write(struct console *co, const char *s, u_int count) { struct uart_port *port = sa1100_ports + co->index; unsigned long flags; u_int old_utcr3, status, i; + + if (!serial_sa1100_console_enabled) return; /* * First, save UTCR3 and then disable interrupts And here's serial_sa1100_enable.c: #include #include #include #include #include #include #ifdef CONFIG_SYSCTL #include #include extern int serial_sa1100_console_enabled; #define DEV_SERCONS_ENABLED 1 static int sysctl_sercons_enabled; static int sercons_sysctl_handler(ctl_table *ctl, int write, struct file * filp, void *buffer, size_t *lenp) { int *valp = ctl->data; int val = *valp; int ret; ret = proc_dointvec(ctl, write, filp, buffer, lenp); if (write && *valp != val) { /* we only care for 1 or 0. */ if (*valp) *valp = 1; else *valp = 0; switch (ctl->ctl_name) { case DEV_SERCONS_ENABLED: if (valp == &sysctl_sercons_enabled) serial_sa1100_console_enabled = sysctl_sercons_enabled; break; } } return ret; } #define DEV_SERCONS 6 #define DEV_SERCONS_ENABLED 1 ctl_table sercons_table[] = { { DEV_SERCONS_ENABLED, "enabled", &sysctl_sercons_enabled, sizeof(int), 0644, NULL, &sercons_sysctl_handler }, { 0 } }; ctl_table sercons_sercons_table[] = { {DEV_SERCONS, "sercons", NULL, 0, 0555, sercons_table}, {0} }; /* Make sure that /proc/sys/dev is there */ ctl_table sercons_root_table[] = { #ifdef CONFIG_PROC_FS {CTL_DEV, "dev", NULL, 0, 0555, sercons_sercons_table}, #endif /* CONFIG_PROC_FS */ {0} }; static struct ctl_table_header *sercons_sysctl_header; static void sercons_sysctl_register(void) { static int initialized = 0; if (initialized == 1) return; sercons_sysctl_header = register_sysctl_table(sercons_root_table, 1); sercons_root_table->child->de->owner = THIS_MODULE; /* set the defaults */ sysctl_sercons_enabled = serial_sa1100_console_enabled; initialized = 1; } static void sercons_sysctl_unregister(void) { if (sercons_sysctl_header != NULL) unregister_sysctl_table(sercons_sysctl_header); } #endif /* CONFIG_SYSCTL */ static int __init sercons_sa1100_enable_init(void) { #ifdef CONFIG_SYSCTL sercons_sysctl_register(); #endif return 0; } static void __exit sercons_sa1100_enable_exit(void) { #ifdef CONFIG_SYSCTL sercons_sysctl_unregister(); #endif } module_init(sercons_sa1100_enable_init); module_exit(sercons_sa1100_enable_exit); From wrl-techops@pa.dec.com Sun Jun 3 07:44:50 2001 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id HAA20601 for ; Sun, 3 Jun 2001 07:44:50 +0200 Received: from zmamail04.zma.compaq.com (zmamail04.zma.compaq.com [161.114.64.104]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id HAA00909 for ; Sun, 3 Jun 2001 07:44:48 +0200 (METDST) Received: by zmamail04.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id B3ABD5D3A; Sun, 3 Jun 2001 01:42:57 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailrelay01.cac.cpqcorp.net (mailrelay01.cac.cpqcorp.net [16.47.132.152]) by zmamail04.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4097E5D06; Sun, 3 Jun 2001 01:42:57 -0400 (EDT) Received: by mailrelay01.cac.cpqcorp.net (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 9FA79587; Sat, 2 Jun 2001 22:42:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mailrelay01.cac.cpqcorp.net (Postfix) with SMTP id 73436564; Sat, 2 Jun 2001 22:42:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA08611; Sat, 2 Jun 2001 22:42:42 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id WAA00574; Sat, 2 Jun 2001 22:39:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id WAA24424; Sat, 2 Jun 2001 22:39:04 -0700 (PDT) From: Received: from ztxmail01.nz-cce.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA29863; Sat, 2 Jun 2001 22:39:01 -0700 Received: by ztxmail01.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 2E73A1328; Sun, 3 Jun 2001 00:39:01 -0500 (CDT) Received: from ns.tigris.ru (ns.tigris.ru [212.164.45.10]) by ztxmail01.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7AEC613DE; Sun, 3 Jun 2001 00:38:50 -0500 (CDT) Received: from 63.52.249.22 (pool-63.52.249.22.ipls.grid.net [63.52.249.22]) by ns.tigris.ru (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id MAA09576; Sun, 3 Jun 2001 12:35:41 +0700 (OSS) (envelope-from jjellies@hotmail.com) Message-Id: <000038975e2d$00000bab$0000673a@> To: Subject: Short on cash? We'll give you a FREE Motorola Pager! 26426 Date: Tue, 05 Jun 2001 14:02:50 -0400 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Priority: 3 X-Msmail-Priority: Normal Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk URGENT MESSAGE!

 PRIORITY EXPRESS MAIL

Absolutely FREE Motorola Talkabout Pager

 

You have been selected to recei= ve a FREE MOTOROLA Pager! This side viewable display pager is incredibly small and lightweight. Thi= s incredible MOTOROLA PAGER has a unique, never out of range feature so yo= u will never miss a page.

Call 1(800)761-0511 and Orde= r Your FREE Motorola Pager Today!

This strictly limited-time offe= r will enable you to stay in touch with family and friends.

There is no mistake. Your FREE= MOTOROLA Pager is waiting for you-but you must respond soon. If I do not= hear from you within 7 days this offer will go to someone else. Please do= not allow that to happen!

When you call you will receive = a BRAND NEW PAGER in your choice of color and already programmed with a lo= cal telephone number in just a few days!

P.S. This may be your final no= tice regarding the FREE MOTOROLA Pager.

*

Put your email address in body= of email to get removed.

From wrl-techops@pa.dec.com Mon Jun 4 08:26:21 2001 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id IAA32684 for ; Mon, 4 Jun 2001 08:26:20 +0200 Received: from zmamail05.zma.compaq.com (zmamail05.zma.compaq.com [161.114.64.105]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id IAA04418 for ; Mon, 4 Jun 2001 08:26:18 +0200 (METDST) Received: by zmamail05.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id A5EAD32DA; Mon, 4 Jun 2001 02:24:31 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailrelay01.cce.cpqcorp.net (mailrelay01.cce.cpqcorp.net [16.47.68.171]) by zmamail05.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E911331E; Mon, 4 Jun 2001 02:24:31 -0400 (EDT) Received: by mailrelay01.cce.cpqcorp.net (Postfix, from userid 12345) id A442887B; Mon, 4 Jun 2001 01:24:24 -0500 (CDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mailrelay01.cce.cpqcorp.net (Postfix) with SMTP id F3366885; Mon, 4 Jun 2001 01:24:22 -0500 (CDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA19329; Sun, 3 Jun 2001 23:24:20 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id XAA30005; Sun, 3 Jun 2001 23:20:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id XAA03145; Sun, 3 Jun 2001 23:20:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: from zmamail01.nz-tay.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA22623; Sun, 3 Jun 2001 23:20:56 -0700 Received: by zmamail01.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 83B6AA33C; Mon, 4 Jun 2001 02:20:55 -0400 (EDT) Received: from linuxhacker.ru (unknown [213.128.193.148]) by zmamail01.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 479C09FD2 for ; Mon, 4 Jun 2001 02:20:54 -0400 (EDT) Received: (from uucp@localhost) by linuxhacker.ru (8.9.3/8.9.3) with UUCP id XAA22146; Sun, 3 Jun 2001 23:20:10 +0400 Received: (from green@localhost) by linuxhacker.ru (8.11.2/8.11.2) id f53JH1t01453; Sun, 3 Jun 2001 23:17:01 +0400 Date: Sun, 3 Jun 2001 23:17:01 +0400 From: Oleg Drokin To: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com, nico@CAM.ORG Subject: "zerocopy" for USB client networking driver Message-Id: <20010603231701.A1444@linuxhacker.ru> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk Hello! Nico, per your suggestion I plugged back that code to receive data into skb, but it still does not work for me, I have constant bad bytes at constant offsetsm so I decided I will let you to take a look. For this code to work you need to define DMA_NO_COPY inside of source. (if you will ping your board from PC you most probably not receive anything, try to ping from board to PC) --- usb-eth.c.orig Sun Jun 3 21:37:54 2001 +++ usb-eth.c Sun Jun 3 23:13:00 2001 @@ -25,8 +25,16 @@ * 01/04/2001 - stall endpoint operations appeared to be very unstable, so * they are disabled now. * + * 03/06/2001 - Readded "zerocopy" receive path (tunable). + * */ +// Define DMA_NO_COPY if you want data to arrive directly into the +// receive network buffers, instead of arriving into bounce buffer +// and then get copied to network buffer. +// This does not work correctly right now. +#undef DMA_NO_COPY + #include #include #include @@ -45,6 +53,7 @@ #define ETHERNET_VENDOR_ID 0x49f #define ETHERNET_PRODUCT_ID 0x505A #define MAX_PACKET 32768 +#define MIN(a, b) (((a) < (b)) ? (a) : (b)) // Should be global, so that insmod can change these int usb_rsize=64; @@ -61,7 +70,9 @@ static struct sk_buff *cur_tx_skb, *next_tx_skb; static struct sk_buff *cur_rx_skb, *next_rx_skb; static volatile int terminating; +#ifndef DMA_NO_COPY static char *dmabuf; // we need that, as dma expect it's buffers to be aligned on 8 bytes boundary +#endif static int usb_change_mtu (struct net_device *net, int new_mtu) { @@ -103,7 +114,9 @@ usbe_info.stats.rx_over_errors++; goto error; } +#ifndef DMA_NO_COPY memcpy(skb->tail,dmabuf,size); +#endif skb_put(skb, size); } else { if (flag == -EIO) { @@ -127,8 +140,13 @@ if (skb) cur_rx_skb = next_rx_skb; +#ifndef DMA_NO_COPY sa1100_usb_recv(dmabuf, usb_rsize, usb_recv_callback); +#else + sa1100_usb_recv(cur_rx_skb->tail, MIN(usb_rsize, skb_tailroom (cur_rx_skb)), + usb_recv_callback); +#endif if (!skb) return; @@ -173,7 +191,11 @@ */ skb_trim(cur_rx_skb, 0); // if ( flag == -EINTR || flag == -EAGAIN ) // only if we are coming out of stall - sa1100_usb_recv(dmabuf, skb_tailroom(cur_rx_skb), usb_recv_callback); +#ifndef DMA_NO_COPY + sa1100_usb_recv(dmabuf, usb_rsize, usb_recv_callback); +#else + sa1100_usb_recv(cur_rx_skb->tail, MIN(usb_rsize, skb_tailroom (cur_rx_skb)), usb_recv_callback); +#endif } } @@ -290,8 +312,12 @@ } MOD_INC_USE_COUNT; - sa1100_usb_recv(dmabuf, skb_tailroom(cur_rx_skb), +#ifndef DMA_NO_COPY + sa1100_usb_recv(dmabuf, usb_rsize, usb_recv_callback); +#else + sa1100_usb_recv(cur_rx_skb->tail, MIN(usb_rsize, skb_tailroom (cur_rx_skb)), usb_recv_callback); +#endif return 0; } @@ -373,9 +399,11 @@ { int rc; +#ifndef DMA_NO_COPY dmabuf = kmalloc( usb_rsize, GFP_KERNEL | GFP_DMA ); if (!dmabuf) return -ENOMEM; +#endif strncpy(usb_eth_device.name, usb_eth_name, IFNAMSIZ); usb_eth_device.init = usb_eth_probe; if (register_netdev(&usb_eth_device) != 0) @@ -405,12 +433,14 @@ static void __exit usb_eth_cleanup(void) { - string_desc_t * pstr; - sa1100_usb_stop(); - sa1100_usb_close(); - if ( (pstr = sa1100_usb_get_string_descriptor(1)) != NULL ) - kfree( pstr ); + string_desc_t * pstr; + sa1100_usb_stop(); + sa1100_usb_close(); + if ( (pstr = sa1100_usb_get_string_descriptor(1)) != NULL ) + kfree( pstr ); +#ifndef DMA_NO_COPY kfree(dmabuf); +#endif unregister_netdev(&usb_eth_device); } Bye, Oleg From wrl-techops@pa.dec.com Mon Jun 4 21:09:01 2001 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id VAA02782 for ; Mon, 4 Jun 2001 21:09:01 +0200 Received: from zcamail05.zca.compaq.com (zcamail05.zca.compaq.com [161.114.32.105]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id VAA29416 for ; Mon, 4 Jun 2001 21:08:58 +0200 (METDST) Received: by zcamail05.zca.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id CB3AF8F0; Mon, 4 Jun 2001 12:10:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: from taynzmail03.nz-tay.cpqcorp.net (taynzmail03.nz-tay.cpqcorp.net [16.47.4.103]) by zcamail05.zca.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 74351A94; Mon, 4 Jun 2001 12:10:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: by taynzmail03.nz-tay.cpqcorp.net (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 6174B742; Mon, 4 Jun 2001 15:07:09 -0400 (EDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by taynzmail03.nz-tay.cpqcorp.net (Postfix) with SMTP id 7D909422; Mon, 4 Jun 2001 15:07:07 -0400 (EDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA19045; Mon, 4 Jun 2001 12:06:45 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id LAA03993; Mon, 4 Jun 2001 11:31:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id LAA26156; Mon, 4 Jun 2001 11:31:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ztxmail01.nz-cce.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA27157; Mon, 4 Jun 2001 11:31:11 -0700 Received: by ztxmail01.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id CA9072218; Mon, 4 Jun 2001 13:31:08 -0500 (CDT) Received: from xanadu.home (modemcable084.137-200-24.mtl.mc.videotron.ca [24.200.137.84]) by ztxmail01.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 420CA917B for ; Mon, 4 Jun 2001 13:31:08 -0500 (CDT) Received: from localhost (nico@localhost) by xanadu.home (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id OAA23642; Mon, 4 Jun 2001 14:31:04 -0400 X-Authentication-Warning: xanadu.home: nico owned process doing -bs Date: Mon, 4 Jun 2001 14:31:04 -0400 (EDT) From: Nicolas Pitre X-X-Sender: To: SA-1100/Linux Cc: Subject: diff-2.4.5-rmk4-np1 Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk ... is available at the usual sites, which are: ftp://ftp.netwinder.org/users/n/nico/ ftp://ftp.arm.linux.org.uk/pub/linux/arm/people/nico/ ftp://ftp.handhelds.org/pub/linux/arm/sa-1100-patches/ ChangeLog: - updated to 2.4.5-rmk4 (me) - some MTD fixes and cleanup (me) - correctly handling of the old serial driver selection (me) - direct receive DMA for SA1100 USB (Oleg Drokin) [the code is there, but #ifdef'ed out because of remaining problems] - included informations on RedBoot usage on Assabet (me) The RedBoot information is located in linux/Documentation/arm/SA1100/Assabet. For all those who are looking for a nice bootloader for their Assabets (or even any other hardware with a little porting) I strongly suggess having a look at RedBoot. It has the really nice property of supporting file transfers over a network, GDB stub, etc. Have a look at the file above for some example usages. Enjoy! Nicolas From wrl-techops@pa.dec.com Mon Jun 4 21:09:05 2001 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id VAA02788 for ; Mon, 4 Jun 2001 21:09:04 +0200 Received: from zmamail03.zma.compaq.com (zmamail03.zma.compaq.com [161.114.64.103]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id VAA29424 for ; Mon, 4 Jun 2001 21:09:03 +0200 (METDST) Received: by zmamail03.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id D9B6491FE; Mon, 4 Jun 2001 15:07:15 -0400 (EDT) Received: from taynzmail03.nz-tay.cpqcorp.net (taynzmail03.nz-tay.cpqcorp.net [16.47.4.103]) by zmamail03.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E94B92FA; Mon, 4 Jun 2001 15:07:11 -0400 (EDT) Received: by taynzmail03.nz-tay.cpqcorp.net (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 6485E742; Mon, 4 Jun 2001 15:07:11 -0400 (EDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by taynzmail03.nz-tay.cpqcorp.net (Postfix) with SMTP id 532A5722; Mon, 4 Jun 2001 15:07:09 -0400 (EDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA05002; Mon, 4 Jun 2001 12:06:46 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id MAA18454; Mon, 4 Jun 2001 12:01:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id MAA19218; Mon, 4 Jun 2001 12:01:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ztxmail01.nz-cce.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA14930; Mon, 4 Jun 2001 12:01:51 -0700 Received: by ztxmail01.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id D119C23C4; Mon, 4 Jun 2001 14:01:50 -0500 (CDT) Received: from odin.inter.net.il (odin.inter.net.il [192.114.186.10]) by ztxmail01.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 235B12D6 for ; Mon, 4 Jun 2001 14:01:46 -0500 (CDT) Received: from gad (ip14-5.urbis.net.il [192.118.5.14]) by odin.inter.net.il (Mirapoint) with SMTP id ASI74726; Mon, 4 Jun 2001 22:00:03 +0300 (IDT) Reply-To: From: "Gad Hayisraeli" To: "Linux-Arm List" Cc: "Sa1100-Linux list" Subject: cross compiler kit Date: Mon, 4 Jun 2001 22:00:03 +0300 Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1255" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-Msmail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) Importance: Normal X-Mimeole: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2314.1300 Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk does anyone know about an already-built cross-compiler kit, based on gcc 2.9.5 and newer ? From wrl-techops@pa.dec.com Mon Jun 4 22:20:03 2001 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id WAA02985 for ; Mon, 4 Jun 2001 22:20:03 +0200 Received: from zcamail03.zca.compaq.com (zcamail03.zca.compaq.com [161.114.32.103]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id WAA02261 for ; Mon, 4 Jun 2001 22:20:00 +0200 (METDST) Received: by zcamail03.zca.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 86CDDAFF; Mon, 4 Jun 2001 13:18:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mailrelay01.cac.cpqcorp.net (mailrelay01.cac.cpqcorp.net [16.47.132.152]) by zcamail03.zca.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 44861AED; Mon, 4 Jun 2001 13:18:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mailrelay01.cac.cpqcorp.net (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 985F66F2; Mon, 4 Jun 2001 13:18:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mailrelay01.cac.cpqcorp.net (Postfix) with SMTP id 57B5C4F6; Mon, 4 Jun 2001 13:18:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA19245; Mon, 4 Jun 2001 13:17:49 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id NAA00741; Mon, 4 Jun 2001 13:05:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id NAA00828; Mon, 4 Jun 2001 13:05:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: from zmamail01.nz-tay.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA28320; Mon, 4 Jun 2001 13:05:14 -0700 Received: by zmamail01.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 5C6E07A29; Mon, 4 Jun 2001 16:05:13 -0400 (EDT) Received: from hirogen.kabelfoon.nl (hirogen.kabelfoon.nl [62.45.45.69]) by zmamail01.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF4D37A64 for ; Mon, 4 Jun 2001 16:05:12 -0400 (EDT) Received: from gateway.home (kf-nawij-fp02-036.dial.kabelfoon.nl [62.45.1.164]) by hirogen.kabelfoon.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id E771E7DF6; Mon, 4 Jun 2001 22:05:04 +0200 (CEST) Received: from arthur.home ([192.168.1.6] helo=arthur.ubicom.tudelft.nl ident=root) by gateway.home with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 1570b1-0000H0-01; Mon, 04 Jun 2001 22:05:03 +0200 Received: (from erik@localhost) by arthur.ubicom.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3/Debian 8.9.3-21) id WAA25893; Mon, 4 Jun 2001 22:04:41 +0200 Date: Mon, 4 Jun 2001 22:04:41 +0200 From: Erik Mouw To: Gad Hayisraeli Cc: Linux-Arm List , Sa1100-Linux list Subject: Re: cross compiler kit Message-Id: <20010604220441.U27260@arthur.ubicom.tudelft.nl> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: ; from gad@syete.co.il on Mon, Jun 04, 2001 at 10:00:03PM +0300 Organization: Eric Conspiracy Secret Labs X-Eric-Conspiracy: There is no conspiracy! Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk On Mon, Jun 04, 2001 at 10:00:03PM +0300, Gad Hayisraeli wrote: > does anyone know about an already-built cross-compiler kit, based on gcc > 2.9.5 and newer ? There is no such thing as gcc-2.9.5. You probably mean gcc-2.95.*, for which there are several binaries available. Check the mailing list archives, they are mentioned at least once a month. Erik -- J.A.K. (Erik) Mouw, Information and Communication Theory Group, Department of Electrical Engineering, Faculty of Information Technology and Systems, Delft University of Technology, PO BOX 5031, 2600 GA Delft, The Netherlands Phone: +31-15-2783635 Fax: +31-15-2781843 Email: J.A.K.Mouw@its.tudelft.nl WWW: http://www-ict.its.tudelft.nl/~erik/ From wrl-techops@pa.dec.com Wed Jun 6 03:30:42 2001 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id DAA07938 for ; Wed, 6 Jun 2001 03:30:41 +0200 Received: from ztxmail03.ztx.compaq.com (ztxmail03.ztx.compaq.com [161.114.1.207]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id DAA27115 for ; Wed, 6 Jun 2001 03:30:40 +0200 (METDST) Received: by ztxmail03.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 67CFF13C1; Tue, 5 Jun 2001 20:28:52 -0500 (CDT) Received: from mailrelay01.cce.cpqcorp.net (mailrelay01.cce.cpqcorp.net [16.47.68.171]) by ztxmail03.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E0E5133A; Tue, 5 Jun 2001 20:28:52 -0500 (CDT) Received: by mailrelay01.cce.cpqcorp.net (Postfix, from userid 12345) id B621F456; Tue, 5 Jun 2001 20:28:41 -0500 (CDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mailrelay01.cce.cpqcorp.net (Postfix) with SMTP id A1E47662; Tue, 5 Jun 2001 20:28:39 -0500 (CDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA01664; Tue, 5 Jun 2001 18:28:30 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id SAA05165; Tue, 5 Jun 2001 18:24:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id SAA05161; Tue, 5 Jun 2001 18:24:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: from zmamail01.nz-tay.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA28808; Tue, 5 Jun 2001 18:24:24 -0700 Received: by zmamail01.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 5C6CBA99E; Tue, 5 Jun 2001 21:24:24 -0400 (EDT) Received: from hgxweb03.broxon.com (unknown [65.113.17.70]) by zmamail01.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D0E1778C3 for ; Tue, 5 Jun 2001 21:24:23 -0400 (EDT) Received: by HGXWEB03 with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) id ; Tue, 5 Jun 2001 18:27:25 -0700 Message-Id: <65DDEB69B04AD51182BC00B0D03EDA9029F9@HGXWEB03> From: Gary Sun To: sa1100-linux@pa.dec.com Subject: subscibe Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2001 18:27:24 -0700 Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk subscibe From wrl-techops@pa.dec.com Wed Jun 6 20:00:46 2001 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id UAA10718 for ; Wed, 6 Jun 2001 20:00:46 +0200 Received: from zmamail04.zma.compaq.com (zmamail04.zma.compaq.com [161.114.64.104]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id UAA16655 for ; Wed, 6 Jun 2001 20:00:43 +0200 (METDST) Received: by zmamail04.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id B6DB23ED9; Wed, 6 Jun 2001 13:58:56 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailrelay01.cce.cpqcorp.net (mailrelay01.cce.cpqcorp.net [16.47.68.171]) by zmamail04.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D4D73DEE; Wed, 6 Jun 2001 13:58:56 -0400 (EDT) Received: by mailrelay01.cce.cpqcorp.net (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 07FB6430; Wed, 6 Jun 2001 12:58:55 -0500 (CDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mailrelay01.cce.cpqcorp.net (Postfix) with SMTP id 3AEF074C; Wed, 6 Jun 2001 12:58:52 -0500 (CDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA17233; Wed, 6 Jun 2001 10:58:46 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id KAA10643; Wed, 6 Jun 2001 10:53:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id KAA10634; Wed, 6 Jun 2001 10:53:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: from zmamail01.nz-tay.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA32716; Wed, 6 Jun 2001 10:53:57 -0700 Received: by zmamail01.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 8592BA9E6; Wed, 6 Jun 2001 13:53:57 -0400 (EDT) Received: from freya.inter.net.il (freya.inter.net.il [192.114.186.14]) by zmamail01.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C704BA30C for ; Wed, 6 Jun 2001 13:53:56 -0400 (EDT) Received: from gad ([192.117.156.49]) by freya.inter.net.il (Mirapoint) with SMTP id AQV91406; Wed, 6 Jun 2001 20:51:02 +0300 (IDT) Reply-To: From: "Gad Hayisraeli" To: "Linux-Arm List" Cc: "Linux -Lart List" , "Sa1100-Linux list" Subject: problems using GIVIO on win 2000 Date: Wed, 6 Jun 2001 20:51:01 +0300 Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1255" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-Msmail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) X-Mimeole: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2314.1300 Importance: Normal Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk i'm having problems using givio comm driver in win 2000. it cannot register the service. can someone help with this or give another working driver ? Gad From wrl-techops@pa.dec.com Thu Jun 7 01:25:46 2001 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id BAA11719 for ; Thu, 7 Jun 2001 01:25:46 +0200 Received: from ztxmail04.ztx.compaq.com (ztxmail04.ztx.compaq.com [161.114.1.208]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id BAA00760 for ; Thu, 7 Jun 2001 01:25:44 +0200 (METDST) Received: by ztxmail04.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id E719EBD1; Wed, 6 Jun 2001 18:23:57 -0500 (CDT) Received: from taynzmail03.nz-tay.cpqcorp.net (taynzmail03.nz-tay.cpqcorp.net [16.47.4.103]) by ztxmail04.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9DE2180D; Wed, 6 Jun 2001 18:23:57 -0500 (CDT) Received: by taynzmail03.nz-tay.cpqcorp.net (Postfix, from userid 12345) id EDFDA553; Wed, 6 Jun 2001 19:23:56 -0400 (EDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by taynzmail03.nz-tay.cpqcorp.net (Postfix) with SMTP id DCCEE722; Wed, 6 Jun 2001 19:23:54 -0400 (EDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA16114; Wed, 6 Jun 2001 16:23:53 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id QAA27261; Wed, 6 Jun 2001 16:19:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id QAA27269; Wed, 6 Jun 2001 16:19:49 -0700 (PDT) From: Received: from zmamail02.nz-tay.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA04562; Wed, 6 Jun 2001 16:19:45 -0700 Received: by zmamail02.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 0396C3E70; Wed, 6 Jun 2001 19:19:44 -0400 (EDT) Received: from comatosehitmen.com (h116n3fls20o997.telia.com [212.181.152.116]) by zmamail02.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E8D2C3E98; Wed, 6 Jun 2001 19:19:43 -0400 (EDT) Received: from 63.52.249.90 (pool-63.52.249.90.ipls.grid.net [63.52.249.90]) by comatosehitmen.com (Postfix) with SMTP id E1ED35A3; Thu, 7 Jun 2001 02:56:36 +0200 (CEST) Message-Id: <000011a9630f$000052cf$00006245@> To: Subject: PERFECT Father's Day Gift - FREE Satellite T.V.! 25157 Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2001 05:25:51 -0400 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Priority: 3 X-Msmail-Priority: Normal Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk

~

FREE DIRECTV SATELLIT= E T.V. SYSTEM
with FREE installation

~


Watch 100's of channels of Digital Broadcast quality television on your own Hughes Direct T.V satellite television system. This
new Digital satellite systems use's an 18 inch satellite dish antenna.=

For a limited time you can have this top of the line Digital
Satellite System for FREE! All you do is pay the shipping.
We'll even include FREE Installation


    &= nbsp;    Call 1(800)761-8321 Immediately!
 &nb= sp;    For your FREE Satellite T.V. System


This NEW Hughes Silver Direc= TV Plus digital satellite system has on
screen program & Logo guide, stereo CD sound and infrared remote.

Call us now to arrange immediate delivery. Satellite television
offers 100's of channels of all digital broadcast video quality,
movies, sports, specials, network, cable channels and more
all with CD audio stereo sound. You may even get local
channels now.

 &nbs= p;  &nbs= p;            =         Don't miss= this offer
        It's only available while suppl= ies last!


Please take advantage of this very special opportunity and
get your FREE DIRECTV Satellite Entertainment System with
FREE standard professional installation!

For your Free Sate= llite System call 800-761-8321



To be taken off put your email address i= n the body of this email
_+_+_+_+ From wrl-techops@pa.dec.com Thu Jun 7 13:15:58 2001 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id NAA13227 for ; Thu, 7 Jun 2001 13:15:58 +0200 Received: from ztxmail03.ztx.compaq.com (ztxmail03.ztx.compaq.com [161.114.1.207]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id NAA27104 for ; Thu, 7 Jun 2001 13:15:55 +0200 (METDST) Received: by ztxmail03.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 9CBA21E2B; Thu, 7 Jun 2001 06:14:07 -0500 (CDT) Received: from taynzmail03.nz-tay.cpqcorp.net (taynzmail03.nz-tay.cpqcorp.net [16.47.4.103]) by ztxmail03.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 495DB1D92; Thu, 7 Jun 2001 06:14:07 -0500 (CDT) Received: by taynzmail03.nz-tay.cpqcorp.net (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 1D4D97D4; Thu, 7 Jun 2001 07:14:05 -0400 (EDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by taynzmail03.nz-tay.cpqcorp.net (Postfix) with SMTP id 494D97CD; Thu, 7 Jun 2001 07:14:03 -0400 (EDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA17580; Thu, 7 Jun 2001 04:14:01 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id EAA19813; Thu, 7 Jun 2001 04:10:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id EAA19805; Thu, 7 Jun 2001 04:10:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: from zmamail02.nz-tay.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA21555; Thu, 7 Jun 2001 04:10:20 -0700 Received: by zmamail02.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 2E39C573E; Thu, 7 Jun 2001 07:10:19 -0400 (EDT) Received: from dawn.barak.net.il (dawn.barak.net.il [212.150.150.43]) by zmamail02.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7596A5583 for ; Thu, 7 Jun 2001 07:10:17 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mail.barak.net.il (mail6.barak.net.il [212.150.150.141]) by dawn.barak.net.il (8.11.1/8.11.1) with ESMTP id f57BBpp09369; Thu, 7 Jun 2001 14:11:52 +0300 (IDT) Received: from doron ([62.90.48.1]) by mail.barak.net.il (8.11.2/8.9.1) with SMTP id f57BAAf21607; Thu, 7 Jun 2001 14:10:10 +0300 (IDT) From: "Doron Sandroy" To: "Linux-Arm List" Cc: "Linux -Lart List" , "Sa1100-Linux list" Subject: RE: problems using GIVIO on win 2000 Date: Thu, 7 Jun 2001 14:08:13 +0200 Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0000_01C0EF5B.4AC3EB30" X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-Msmail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) In-Reply-To: Importance: Normal X-Mimeole: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400 Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0000_01C0EF5B.4AC3EB30 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1255" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit i succeeded in this by altering the win2k registry. try installing by the givio readme, to this directory :c:\winnt\system32 and apply the attached file patch to the registry. reboot - and it works. -----Original Message----- From: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com [mailto:owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com]On Behalf Of Gad Hayisraeli Sent: Wed, June 06, 2001 7:51 PM To: Linux-Arm List Cc: Linux -Lart List; Sa1100-Linux list Subject: problems using GIVIO on win 2000 i'm having problems using givio comm driver in win 2000. it cannot register the service. can someone help with this or give another working driver ? Gad ------=_NextPart_000_0000_01C0EF5B.4AC3EB30 Content-Type: application/octet-stream; name="givio_win2k_patch.reg" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="givio_win2k_patch.reg" //5XAGkAbgBkAG8AdwBzACAAUgBlAGcAaQBzAHQAcgB5ACAARQBkAGkAdABvAHIAIABWAGUAcgBz AGkAbwBuACAANQAuADAAMAANAAoADQAKAFsASABLAEUAWQBfAEwATwBDAEEATABfAE0AQQBDAEgA SQBOAEUAXABTAFkAUwBUAEUATQBcAEMAbwBuAHQAcgBvAGwAUwBlAHQAMAAwADEAXABTAGUAcgB2 AGkAYwBlAHMAXABnAGkAdgBlAGkAbwAuAHMAeQBzAF0ADQAKACIAVAB5AHAAZQAiAD0AZAB3AG8A cgBkADoAMAAwADAAMAAwADAAMAAxAA0ACgAiAFMAdABhAHIAdAAiAD0AZAB3AG8AcgBkADoAMAAw ADAAMAAwADAAMAAwAA0ACgAiAEUAcgByAG8AcgBDAG8AbgB0AHIAbwBsACIAPQBkAHcAbwByAGQA OgAwADAAMAAwADAAMAAwADEADQAKACIASQBtAGEAZwBlAFAAYQB0AGgAIgA9AGgAZQB4ACgAMgAp ADoANQAzACwAMAAwACwANwA5ACwAMAAwACwANwAzACwAMAAwACwANwA0ACwAMAAwACwANgA1ACwA MAAwACwANgBkACwAMAAwACwAMwAzACwAMAAwACwAMwAyACwAMAAwACwANQBjACwAMAAwACwANgA3 ACwAMAAwACwAXAANAAoAIAAgADYAOQAsADAAMAAsADcANgAsADAAMAAsADYANQAsADAAMAAsADYA OQAsADAAMAAsADYAZgAsADAAMAAsADIAZQAsADAAMAAsADcAMwAsADAAMAAsADcAOQAsADAAMAAs ADcAMwAsADAAMAAsADAAMAAsADAAMAANAAoAIgBEAGkAcwBwAGwAYQB5AE4AYQBtAGUAIgA9ACIA ZwBpAHYAZQBpAG8ALgBzAHkAcwAiAA0ACgANAAoA ------=_NextPart_000_0000_01C0EF5B.4AC3EB30-- From wrl-techops@pa.dec.com Thu Jun 7 13:26:47 2001 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id NAA13242 for ; Thu, 7 Jun 2001 13:26:46 +0200 Received: from ztxmail03.ztx.compaq.com (ztxmail03.ztx.compaq.com [161.114.1.207]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id NAA27832 for ; Thu, 7 Jun 2001 13:26:43 +0200 (METDST) Received: by ztxmail03.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 8F7F0C7B; Thu, 7 Jun 2001 06:24:53 -0500 (CDT) Received: from mailrelay01.cce.cpqcorp.net (mailrelay01.cce.cpqcorp.net [16.47.68.171]) by ztxmail03.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C3F0FA0; Thu, 7 Jun 2001 06:24:53 -0500 (CDT) Received: by mailrelay01.cce.cpqcorp.net (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 6ED34735; Thu, 7 Jun 2001 06:24:52 -0500 (CDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mailrelay01.cce.cpqcorp.net (Postfix) with SMTP id AB16E476; Thu, 7 Jun 2001 06:24:50 -0500 (CDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA18591; Thu, 7 Jun 2001 04:24:49 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id EAA20152; Thu, 7 Jun 2001 04:22:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id EAA20146; Thu, 7 Jun 2001 04:22:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ztxmail02.nz-cce.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA05489; Thu, 7 Jun 2001 04:22:54 -0700 Received: by ztxmail02.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 4E716183E; Thu, 7 Jun 2001 06:22:54 -0500 (CDT) Received: from exchange.efdnorth.navfac.navy.mil (exchange.efdnorth.navfac.navy.mil [155.252.72.13]) by ztxmail02.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 44A9F18FC; Thu, 7 Jun 2001 06:22:50 -0500 (CDT) Received: from plastic1 (IS~PLASTIC1 [65.88.230.80]) by exchange.efdnorth.navfac.navy.mil with SMTP (Microsoft Exchange Internet Mail Service Version 5.5.2653.13) id MG7W2JC7; Thu, 7 Jun 2001 06:29:47 -0400 From: "Aaron Chase" Subject: Get Fash Cash! To: <#field0#@pa.dec.com> Date: Thu, 07 Jun 2001 00:39:54 -0700 X-Mailer: diffondi V4,0,1,0 (W95/NT) (Build: Feb 20 2001) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Message-Id: <20010607112254.4E716183E@ztxmail02.ztx.compaq.com> Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl id NAA13242 We will help you get the mortgage loan you want! Whether a new home loan is what you seek or to refinance your current home loan at a lower interest rate, we can help! Mortgage rates haven't been this low in the last 12 months, take action now! Refinance your home with us and include all of those pesky credit card bills or use the extra cash for that pool you've always wanted... Where others say NO, we say YES!!! Even if you have been turned down elsewhere, we can help! Easy terms! Our mortgage referral service combines the highest quality loans with the most economical rates and the easiest qualifications! Take just 2 minutes to complete the following form. There is no obligation, all information is kept strictly confidential, and you must be at least 18 years of age. Service is available within the United States only. This service is fast and free. Free information request form: PLEASE VISIT http://www.housedebt.net **************************************************************** Since you have received this message you have either responded to one of our offers in the past or your address has been registered with us. If you wish to be removed, please reply to: mailto:achase247@execs.com?subject=remove **************************************************************** From wrl-techops@pa.dec.com Tue Jun 12 19:03:19 2001 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id TAA29229 for ; Tue, 12 Jun 2001 19:03:18 +0200 Received: from zmamail03.zma.compaq.com (zmamail03.zma.compaq.com [161.114.64.103]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id TAA11503 for ; Tue, 12 Jun 2001 19:03:16 +0200 (METDST) Received: by zmamail03.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id C9F76C20E; Tue, 12 Jun 2001 13:01:28 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailrelay01.cce.cpqcorp.net (mailrelay01.cce.cpqcorp.net [16.47.68.171]) by zmamail03.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 404D3C352; Tue, 12 Jun 2001 13:01:28 -0400 (EDT) Received: by mailrelay01.cce.cpqcorp.net (Postfix, from userid 12345) id E2F3453D; Tue, 12 Jun 2001 12:01:21 -0500 (CDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mailrelay01.cce.cpqcorp.net (Postfix) with SMTP id 035A6430; Tue, 12 Jun 2001 12:01:11 -0500 (CDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA27183; Tue, 12 Jun 2001 10:00:38 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id JAA07601; Tue, 12 Jun 2001 09:48:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id JAA06803; Tue, 12 Jun 2001 09:48:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: from zmamail02.nz-tay.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA18922; Tue, 12 Jun 2001 09:48:41 -0700 Received: by zmamail02.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 971513D75; Tue, 12 Jun 2001 12:48:39 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mail-blue.research.att.com (mail-blue.research.att.com [135.207.30.102]) by zmamail02.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1BD143EC6 for ; Tue, 12 Jun 2001 12:48:39 -0400 (EDT) Received: from hermes.research.att.com (hermes.research.att.com [135.207.16.38]) by mail-blue.research.att.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B5CB4D824 for ; Tue, 12 Jun 2001 12:48:31 -0400 (EDT) Received: from research.att.com (gliss.research.att.com [135.207.17.204]) by hermes.research.att.com (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id MAA09322 for ; Tue, 12 Jun 2001 12:48:20 -0400 (EDT) Message-Id: <3B2647F6.25B698B7@research.att.com> Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2001 12:48:55 -0400 From: "Jack T.C. Chang" X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.61 [en] (X11; U; IRIX 6.3 IP32) X-Accept-Language: en Mime-Version: 1.0 To: SA-1100/Linux Subject: LCD flicker Content-Type: text/plain; charset=big5 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk On Assabet (alone), I switched the LCD panel to 640x480 TFT . The dispaly looks fine after setting up the sa1100fb.c, but when I inserted the CF Ethernet card, the display flickers after connecting to the network. The flicker stops if I unplug the Ethernet cable. I looked into the scope, seems that the flickering rate is the same as the one for ethernet irq. Also, if I reduce the pixel clock then the ethernet has no effects on the display(no more flicker), and of course the display is no good. Is this a hardware problem or the irq handling in the frame buffer? Thx for any help. -Jack From wrl-techops@pa.dec.com Tue Jun 12 19:23:20 2001 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id TAA29282 for ; Tue, 12 Jun 2001 19:23:19 +0200 Received: from zcamail04.zca.compaq.com (zcamail04.zca.compaq.com [161.114.32.104]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id TAA12348 for ; Tue, 12 Jun 2001 19:23:18 +0200 (METDST) Received: by zcamail04.zca.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 6AABB83C; Tue, 12 Jun 2001 10:23:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mailrelay01.cce.cpqcorp.net (mailrelay01.cce.cpqcorp.net [16.47.68.171]) by zcamail04.zca.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E389803; Tue, 12 Jun 2001 10:23:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mailrelay01.cce.cpqcorp.net (Postfix, from userid 12345) id C99477F7; Tue, 12 Jun 2001 12:21:24 -0500 (CDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mailrelay01.cce.cpqcorp.net (Postfix) with SMTP id 7508F599; Tue, 12 Jun 2001 12:21:17 -0500 (CDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA12816; Tue, 12 Jun 2001 10:21:13 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id KAA28078; Tue, 12 Jun 2001 10:18:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id KAA29753; Tue, 12 Jun 2001 10:18:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ztxmail01.nz-cce.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA19841; Tue, 12 Jun 2001 10:18:30 -0700 Received: by ztxmail01.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 5A9F37F7A; Tue, 12 Jun 2001 12:18:23 -0500 (CDT) Received: from mail.tiscalinet.it (mail-5.tiscalinet.it [195.130.225.151]) by ztxmail01.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D5D967CC0 for ; Tue, 12 Jun 2001 12:18:22 -0500 (CDT) Received: from ottavio (62.10.161.78) by mail.tiscalinet.it (5.5.031) id 3B17607900263F91; Tue, 12 Jun 2001 19:18:19 +0200 Message-Id: <01e601c0f363$9209c6c0$709b0a3e@ottavio> From: "Giuseppe Ottaviano" To: "Jack T.C. Chang" , "SA-1100/Linux" References: <3B2647F6.25B698B7@research.att.com> Subject: Re: LCD flicker Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2001 19:16:57 +0200 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="big5" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-Msmail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 X-Mimeole: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400 Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk > On Assabet (alone), I switched the LCD panel to 640x480 TFT . The > dispaly looks fine after setting up > the sa1100fb.c, but when I inserted the CF Ethernet card, the display > flickers after connecting to the network. > The flicker stops if I unplug the Ethernet cable. I looked into the > scope, seems that the flickering rate is the same as > the one for ethernet irq. Also, if I reduce the pixel clock then the > ethernet has no effects on the display(no more flicker), > and of course the display is no good. Is this a hardware problem or the > irq handling in the frame buffer? Thx for any help. Maybe the bus is overloaded. Have you read the intel's application note about bus occupation of the LCD controller? In that appnote is said that a 640x480x12bit requires a bandwidth of 36,864Mbytes. Maybe connecting the ethernet card the bus is saturated, and the lcd controller can't provide the data to the lcd. The strange thing is that the LCD controller has the greatest DMA priority, so it should be the ethernet cart to work uncorrectly, rather that the lcd. HTH, Giuseppe Ottaviano giuott@tin.it From wrl-techops@pa.dec.com Tue Jun 12 19:38:24 2001 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id TAA29347 for ; Tue, 12 Jun 2001 19:38:23 +0200 Received: from zmamail03.zma.compaq.com (zmamail03.zma.compaq.com [161.114.64.103]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id TAA13117 for ; Tue, 12 Jun 2001 19:38:21 +0200 (METDST) Received: by zmamail03.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 2D71BC125; Tue, 12 Jun 2001 13:36:34 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailrelay01.cac.cpqcorp.net (mailrelay01.cac.cpqcorp.net [16.47.132.152]) by zmamail03.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C66A6C0E4; Tue, 12 Jun 2001 13:36:33 -0400 (EDT) Received: by mailrelay01.cac.cpqcorp.net (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 94D4955E; Tue, 12 Jun 2001 10:36:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mailrelay01.cac.cpqcorp.net (Postfix) with SMTP id 647B267F; Tue, 12 Jun 2001 10:36:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA20469; Tue, 12 Jun 2001 10:36:21 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id KAA22533; Tue, 12 Jun 2001 10:32:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id KAA22505; Tue, 12 Jun 2001 10:32:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ztxmail01.nz-cce.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA13352; Tue, 12 Jun 2001 10:32:17 -0700 Received: by ztxmail01.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id D363AB148; Tue, 12 Jun 2001 12:32:14 -0500 (CDT) Received: from cougar.intrinsyc.com (cougar.intrinsyc.com [209.139.192.225]) by ztxmail01.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4DC5FB176 for ; Tue, 12 Jun 2001 12:32:14 -0500 (CDT) Received: from intrinsyc.com (COOKIEMONSTER [192.168.1.7]) by cougar.intrinsyc.com with SMTP (Microsoft Exchange Internet Mail Service Version 5.5.2650.21) id L5K79K8W; Tue, 12 Jun 2001 10:32:13 -0700 Message-Id: <3B265341.7030901@intrinsyc.com> Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2001 10:37:05 -0700 From: Daniel Chemko User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux 2.4.0 i686; en-US; rv:0.9.1) Gecko/20010607 X-Accept-Language: en-us Mime-Version: 1.0 To: Giuseppe Ottaviano Cc: "Jack T.C. Chang" , SA-1100/Linux Subject: Re: LCD flicker References: <3B2647F6.25B698B7@research.att.com> <01e601c0f363$9209c6c0$709b0a3e@ottavio> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=Big5 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk We have in the past experienced the same effect here with tft and VGA screens. My coworker ended up modifying the flash driver to stop writing if it found an LCD data active bit set, because writing to flash was also causing the screen to flicker. It may have been a gross hack ,but it did fix the LCD starvation with the flash. Basically from what we saw, the LCD was being starved by any auxilery I/O. For the network, we had the same issue, but the project died so we were not able to correctly estimate the problem with ethernet. Giuseppe Ottaviano wrote: >>On Assabet (alone), I switched the LCD panel to 640x480 TFT . The >>dispaly looks fine after setting up >>the sa1100fb.c, but when I inserted the CF Ethernet card, the display >>flickers after connecting to the network. >>The flicker stops if I unplug the Ethernet cable. I looked into the >>scope, seems that the flickering rate is the same as >>the one for ethernet irq. Also, if I reduce the pixel clock then the >>ethernet has no effects on the display(no more flicker), >>and of course the display is no good. Is this a hardware problem or the >>irq handling in the frame buffer? Thx for any help. >> > > Maybe the bus is overloaded. Have you read the intel's application note > about bus occupation of the LCD controller? In that appnote is said that a > 640x480x12bit requires a bandwidth of 36,864Mbytes. Maybe connecting the > ethernet card the bus is saturated, and the lcd controller can't provide the > data to the lcd. The strange thing is that the LCD controller has the > greatest DMA priority, so it should be the ethernet cart to work > uncorrectly, rather that the lcd. > > HTH, > Giuseppe Ottaviano > giuott@tin.it > > From wrl-techops@pa.dec.com Tue Jun 12 20:05:15 2001 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id UAA29412 for ; Tue, 12 Jun 2001 20:05:15 +0200 Received: from ztxmail03.ztx.compaq.com (ztxmail03.ztx.compaq.com [161.114.1.207]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id UAA14404 for ; Tue, 12 Jun 2001 20:05:13 +0200 (METDST) Received: by ztxmail03.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 4FB1A53A; Tue, 12 Jun 2001 13:03:26 -0500 (CDT) Received: from mailrelay01.cce.cpqcorp.net (mailrelay01.cce.cpqcorp.net [16.47.68.171]) by ztxmail03.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C5F24B1; Tue, 12 Jun 2001 13:03:26 -0500 (CDT) Received: by mailrelay01.cce.cpqcorp.net (Postfix, from userid 12345) id D27A47CE; Tue, 12 Jun 2001 13:03:25 -0500 (CDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mailrelay01.cce.cpqcorp.net (Postfix) with SMTP id C440346C; Tue, 12 Jun 2001 13:03:14 -0500 (CDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA23549; Tue, 12 Jun 2001 11:03:13 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id KAA04888; Tue, 12 Jun 2001 10:59:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id KAA03164; Tue, 12 Jun 2001 10:59:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ztxmail02.nz-cce.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA21647; Tue, 12 Jun 2001 10:59:08 -0700 Received: by ztxmail02.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 1BC851A23; Tue, 12 Jun 2001 12:59:07 -0500 (CDT) Received: from mail.netx4.com (unknown [209.113.146.155]) by ztxmail02.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B53F5399 for ; Tue, 12 Jun 2001 12:59:06 -0500 (CDT) Received: from mvista.com (IDENT:davis_g@greeny.netx4.com [192.168.253.30]) by mail.netx4.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id KAA08603; Tue, 12 Jun 2001 10:22:15 -0400 Message-Id: <3B2657DE.9E7C1D65@mvista.com> Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2001 13:56:46 -0400 From: "George G. Davis" Organization: MontaVista Software, Inc. X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.7 [en] (X11; I; Linux 2.4.0 ppc) X-Accept-Language: en Mime-Version: 1.0 To: Giuseppe Ottaviano Cc: "Jack T.C. Chang" , SA-1100/Linux Subject: Re: LCD flicker References: <3B2647F6.25B698B7@research.att.com> <01e601c0f363$9209c6c0$709b0a3e@ottavio> Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="------------75E43656A701A3C841F67696" Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------75E43656A701A3C841F67696 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Giuseppe Ottaviano wrote: > > > On Assabet (alone), I switched the LCD panel to 640x480 TFT . The > > dispaly looks fine after setting up > > the sa1100fb.c, but when I inserted the CF Ethernet card, the display > > flickers after connecting to the network. > > The flicker stops if I unplug the Ethernet cable. I looked into the > > scope, seems that the flickering rate is the same as > > the one for ethernet irq. Also, if I reduce the pixel clock then the > > ethernet has no effects on the display(no more flicker), > > and of course the display is no good. Is this a hardware problem or the > > irq handling in the frame buffer? Thx for any help. > > Maybe the bus is overloaded. Have you read the intel's application note > about bus occupation of the LCD controller? In that appnote is said that a > 640x480x12bit requires a bandwidth of 36,864Mbytes. Maybe connecting the > ethernet card the bus is saturated, and the lcd controller can't provide the > data to the lcd. The strange thing is that the LCD controller has the > greatest DMA priority, so it should be the ethernet cart to work > uncorrectly, rather that the lcd. FWI, I've looked at access timing to the LP-E CF card via oscilloscope and observed variable latency access timing where some accesses take almost a full microsecond to complete. This can (and apparently does) cause LCD FIFO underrun conditions. Of course, as per the Intel SA-1110 Spec Update, back-to-back PCMCIA accesses can lock out bus requests from the LCD DMA controller again leading to FIFO underrun conidition. Refer to the Spec Update for details and suggested work arounds. P.S. My previous (wild) speculation concerning weak pull-ups on PCMCIA/CF ready lines was flat out wrong (I should obtain relevant specs and read them before speaking next time : ). These lines appear to be actively driven by PCMCIA/CF cards which require variable latency access. But I neither have a PCMCIA/CF spec nor know what I'm talking about anyway! : ) > > HTH, > Giuseppe Ottaviano > giuott@tin.it -- Regards, George --------------75E43656A701A3C841F67696 Content-Type: text/x-vcard; charset=iso-8859-1; name="davis_g.vcf" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-Description: Card for George G. Davis Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="davis_g.vcf" YmVnaW46dmNhcmQgCm46RGF2aXM7R2VvcmdlCnRlbDt3b3JrOjYwMy84ODAtMTQxNAp4LW1v emlsbGEtaHRtbDpGQUxTRQp1cmw6aHR0cDovL3d3dy5tdmlzdGEuY29tCm9yZzpNb250YVZp c3RhIFNvZnR3YXJlLCBJbmMuCmFkcjo7OzQ2IFBpbmUgU3RyZWV0IEV4dGVuc2lvbjtOYXNo dWE7Tkg7MDMwNjA7VVNBCnZlcnNpb246Mi4xCmVtYWlsO2ludGVybmV0OmRhdmlzX2dAbXZp c3RhLmNvbQp0aXRsZTpTb2Z0d2FyZSBFbmdpbmVlcgp4LW1vemlsbGEtY3B0OjstNTM3Ngpm bjpHZW9yZ2UgRy4gRGF2aXMKZW5kOnZjYXJkCg== --------------75E43656A701A3C841F67696-- From wrl-techops@pa.dec.com Tue Jun 12 20:45:07 2001 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id UAA29510 for ; Tue, 12 Jun 2001 20:45:07 +0200 Received: from zmamail05.zma.compaq.com (zmamail05.zma.compaq.com [161.114.64.105]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id UAA16046 for ; Tue, 12 Jun 2001 20:45:05 +0200 (METDST) Received: by zmamail05.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 20F231837; Tue, 12 Jun 2001 14:43:19 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailrelay01.cce.cpqcorp.net (mailrelay01.cce.cpqcorp.net [16.47.68.171]) by zmamail05.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B9191AC0; Tue, 12 Jun 2001 14:43:18 -0400 (EDT) Received: by mailrelay01.cce.cpqcorp.net (Postfix, from userid 12345) id DECA0751; Tue, 12 Jun 2001 13:43:17 -0500 (CDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mailrelay01.cce.cpqcorp.net (Postfix) with SMTP id 9C9A23FF; Tue, 12 Jun 2001 13:43:08 -0500 (CDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA07692; Tue, 12 Jun 2001 11:43:02 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id LAA13185; Tue, 12 Jun 2001 11:41:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id LAA13538; Tue, 12 Jun 2001 11:41:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ztxmail01.nz-cce.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA22057; Tue, 12 Jun 2001 11:41:20 -0700 Received: by ztxmail01.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 5682FB340; Tue, 12 Jun 2001 13:41:19 -0500 (CDT) Received: from xanadu.home (modemcable084.137-200-24.mtl.mc.videotron.ca [24.200.137.84]) by ztxmail01.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B8061B360 for ; Tue, 12 Jun 2001 13:41:18 -0500 (CDT) Received: from localhost (nico@localhost) by xanadu.home (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id OAA17768; Tue, 12 Jun 2001 14:41:19 -0400 X-Authentication-Warning: xanadu.home: nico owned process doing -bs Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2001 14:41:19 -0400 (EDT) From: Nicolas Pitre X-X-Sender: To: SA-1100/Linux Cc: Subject: diff-2.4.5-rmk5-np1 Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk ... is available at the usual sites, which are: ftp://ftp.netwinder.org/users/n/nico/ ftp://ftp.arm.linux.org.uk/pub/linux/arm/people/nico/ ftp://ftp.handhelds.org/pub/linux/arm/sa-1100-patches/ ChangeLog: - updated to 2.4.5-rmk5 (me) - revamped the RTC driver with the same interface and functionalities as the PC RTC driver (me) - boot time and "set_rtc()" support for the SA1100 RTC (me) - reordered the SA1100 flash probe to solve problems introduced in the last patch (me) - fix /dev/mtdblock decoding on the kernel command line (me) - SA1111 USB support is back (Brad Parker) - some Freebird updates (Chester) - assorted minor fixes (Oleg Drokin) Enjoy! Nicolas From wrl-techops@pa.dec.com Tue Jun 12 20:49:55 2001 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id UAA29541 for ; Tue, 12 Jun 2001 20:49:55 +0200 Received: from ztxmail03.ztx.compaq.com (ztxmail03.ztx.compaq.com [161.114.1.207]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id UAA16392 for ; Tue, 12 Jun 2001 20:49:53 +0200 (METDST) Received: by ztxmail03.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 5255E591; Tue, 12 Jun 2001 13:48:06 -0500 (CDT) Received: from mailrelay01.cce.cpqcorp.net (mailrelay01.cce.cpqcorp.net [16.47.68.171]) by ztxmail03.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2DD1F6D2; Tue, 12 Jun 2001 13:48:06 -0500 (CDT) Received: by mailrelay01.cce.cpqcorp.net (Postfix, from userid 12345) id F3775481; Tue, 12 Jun 2001 13:48:05 -0500 (CDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mailrelay01.cce.cpqcorp.net (Postfix) with SMTP id 9E457794; Tue, 12 Jun 2001 13:48:01 -0500 (CDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA32672; Tue, 12 Jun 2001 11:47:58 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id LAA13933; Tue, 12 Jun 2001 11:47:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id LAA13903; Tue, 12 Jun 2001 11:47:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ztxmail01.nz-cce.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA09753; Tue, 12 Jun 2001 11:47:35 -0700 Received: by ztxmail01.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 529BAB15A; Tue, 12 Jun 2001 13:47:34 -0500 (CDT) Received: from mail.netx4.com (unknown [209.113.146.155]) by ztxmail01.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA934B2A5 for ; Tue, 12 Jun 2001 13:47:33 -0500 (CDT) Received: from mvista.com (IDENT:davis_g@greeny.netx4.com [192.168.253.30]) by mail.netx4.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id LAA08742; Tue, 12 Jun 2001 11:10:43 -0400 Message-Id: <3B266338.54192E4D@mvista.com> Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2001 14:45:12 -0400 From: "George G. Davis" Organization: MontaVista Software, Inc. X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.7 [en] (X11; I; Linux 2.4.0 ppc) X-Accept-Language: en Mime-Version: 1.0 To: Hugo Fiennes Cc: Giuseppe Ottaviano , "Jack T.C. Chang" , SA-1100/Linux Subject: Re: LCD flicker References: <3B2647F6.25B698B7@research.att.com> <01e601c0f363$9209c6c0$709b0a3e@ottavio> <3B2657DE.9E7C1D65@mvista.com> <022801c0f36e$4d25aa00$2201230a@morcheeba> Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="------------E38C1DE1CB4FDBF5E1F36010" Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------E38C1DE1CB4FDBF5E1F36010 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hugo Fiennes wrote: > > > FWI, I've looked at access timing to the LP-E CF card via oscilloscope > > and observed variable latency access timing where some accesses take > > almost a full microsecond to complete. This can (and apparently does) > > cause LCD FIFO underrun conditions. Of course, as per the Intel SA-1110 > > Spec Update, back-to-back PCMCIA accesses can lock out bus requests > > from the LCD DMA controller again leading to FIFO underrun conidition. > > Refer to the Spec Update for details and suggested work arounds. > > Which chip does the LP-E card use? The 91c94/96 (which we use in the > empeg-car mk2) runs fine with MECR=0x0163 on a 221MHz SA1100 - ISTR the > minimum cycle time is 185ns for this chip. AFAIK, it's an 8390 compatible device. My current 206MHz SA-1110+SA-1111 setup (using 2.4.2 based kernel) shows MECR=0x2948. > The other likely ethernet chip (the CS8900A) is even quicker... > > Hugo -- Regards, George --------------E38C1DE1CB4FDBF5E1F36010 Content-Type: text/x-vcard; charset=iso-8859-1; name="davis_g.vcf" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-Description: Card for George G. Davis Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="davis_g.vcf" YmVnaW46dmNhcmQgCm46RGF2aXM7R2VvcmdlCnRlbDt3b3JrOjYwMy84ODAtMTQxNAp4LW1v emlsbGEtaHRtbDpGQUxTRQp1cmw6aHR0cDovL3d3dy5tdmlzdGEuY29tCm9yZzpNb250YVZp c3RhIFNvZnR3YXJlLCBJbmMuCmFkcjo7OzQ2IFBpbmUgU3RyZWV0IEV4dGVuc2lvbjtOYXNo dWE7Tkg7MDMwNjA7VVNBCnZlcnNpb246Mi4xCmVtYWlsO2ludGVybmV0OmRhdmlzX2dAbXZp c3RhLmNvbQp0aXRsZTpTb2Z0d2FyZSBFbmdpbmVlcgp4LW1vemlsbGEtY3B0OjstNTM3Ngpm bjpHZW9yZ2UgRy4gRGF2aXMKZW5kOnZjYXJkCg== --------------E38C1DE1CB4FDBF5E1F36010-- From wrl-techops@pa.dec.com Tue Jun 12 22:38:30 2001 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id WAA29705 for ; Tue, 12 Jun 2001 22:38:30 +0200 Received: from zmamail03.zma.compaq.com (zmamail03.zma.compaq.com [161.114.64.103]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id WAA21711 for ; Tue, 12 Jun 2001 22:38:28 +0200 (METDST) Received: by zmamail03.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id DFA1BA7A7; Tue, 12 Jun 2001 16:36:40 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailrelay01.cce.cpqcorp.net (mailrelay01.cce.cpqcorp.net [16.47.68.171]) by zmamail03.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 682F1AE51; Tue, 12 Jun 2001 16:36:40 -0400 (EDT) Received: by mailrelay01.cce.cpqcorp.net (Postfix, from userid 12345) id D221048B; Tue, 12 Jun 2001 15:36:39 -0500 (CDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mailrelay01.cce.cpqcorp.net (Postfix) with SMTP id C98BA5B8; Tue, 12 Jun 2001 15:36:35 -0500 (CDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA03701; Tue, 12 Jun 2001 13:36:26 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id NAA21884; Tue, 12 Jun 2001 13:29:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id NAA21551; Tue, 12 Jun 2001 13:29:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ztxmail01.nz-cce.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA26230; Tue, 12 Jun 2001 13:29:11 -0700 Received: by ztxmail01.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id CF6F7B323; Tue, 12 Jun 2001 15:29:09 -0500 (CDT) Received: from mail-blue.research.att.com (mail-blue.research.att.com [135.207.30.102]) by ztxmail01.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 762CEB08E for ; Tue, 12 Jun 2001 15:29:09 -0500 (CDT) Received: from hermes.research.att.com (hermes.research.att.com [135.207.16.38]) by mail-blue.research.att.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B07C04DB50; Tue, 12 Jun 2001 16:29:08 -0400 (EDT) Received: from research.att.com (gliss.research.att.com [135.207.17.204]) by hermes.research.att.com (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id QAA15086; Tue, 12 Jun 2001 16:28:58 -0400 (EDT) Message-Id: <3B267BAD.7EB2C4B7@research.att.com> Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2001 16:29:34 -0400 From: "Jack T.C. Chang" X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.61 [en] (X11; U; IRIX 6.3 IP32) X-Accept-Language: en Mime-Version: 1.0 To: Hugo Fiennes Cc: "George G. Davis" , Giuseppe Ottaviano , SA-1100/Linux Subject: Re: LCD flicker References: <3B2647F6.25B698B7@research.att.com> <01e601c0f363$9209c6c0$709b0a3e@ottavio> <3B2657DE.9E7C1D65@mvista.com> <022801c0f36e$4d25aa00$2201230a@morcheeba> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk I think the MECR is set in drivers/pcmcia/sa1100_generic.c based on the values specified in drivers/pcmcia/sa1100.h: /* MECR: Expansion Memory Configuration Register * (SA-1100 Developers Manual, p.10-13; SA-1110 Developers Manual, p.10-24) * * BS_xx = ( PCMCIA_CYCLE / ( 2 * 3 * CPU_CYCLE ) ) - 1 * * Official PCMCIA cycle times: * * - I/O: 255ns * - attribute: 300ns * - common memory (3.3V): 600, 250, 200, 150, 100ns * - common memory (5V): 250, 200, 150, 100ns */ Are those numbers supposed to be modified then? Thx again! -Jack Hugo Fiennes wrote: > > FWI, I've looked at access timing to the LP-E CF card via oscilloscope > > and observed variable latency access timing where some accesses take > > almost a full microsecond to complete. This can (and apparently does) > > cause LCD FIFO underrun conditions. Of course, as per the Intel SA-1110 > > Spec Update, back-to-back PCMCIA accesses can lock out bus requests > > from the LCD DMA controller again leading to FIFO underrun conidition. > > Refer to the Spec Update for details and suggested work arounds. > > Which chip does the LP-E card use? The 91c94/96 (which we use in the > empeg-car mk2) runs fine with MECR=0x0163 on a 221MHz SA1100 - ISTR the > minimum cycle time is 185ns for this chip. > > The other likely ethernet chip (the CS8900A) is even quicker... > > Hugo From wrl-techops@pa.dec.com Tue Jun 19 05:08:48 2001 Return-Path: Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.34.250]) by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id FAA17396 for ; Tue, 19 Jun 2001 05:08:48 +0200 Received: from ztxmail03.ztx.compaq.com (ztxmail03.ztx.compaq.com [161.114.1.207]) by mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id FAA07554 for ; Tue, 19 Jun 2001 05:08:46 +0200 (METDST) Received: by ztxmail03.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 0E596187; Mon, 18 Jun 2001 22:06:59 -0500 (CDT) Received: from mailrelay01.cce.cpqcorp.net (mailrelay01.cce.cpqcorp.net [16.47.68.171]) by ztxmail03.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B3BB3314; Mon, 18 Jun 2001 22:06:58 -0500 (CDT) Received: by mailrelay01.cce.cpqcorp.net (Postfix, from userid 12345) id CE8467ED; Mon, 18 Jun 2001 22:06:55 -0500 (CDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com (pobox1.pa.dec.com [16.1.240.19]) by mailrelay01.cce.cpqcorp.net (Postfix) with SMTP id DD4E06BD; Mon, 18 Jun 2001 22:06:53 -0500 (CDT) Received: from wera.pa.dec.com by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA00288; Mon, 18 Jun 2001 20:06:50 -0700 Received: by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id UAA06145; Mon, 18 Jun 2001 20:02:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by wera.pa.dec.com; (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/06Jun96-0357PM) id UAA08201; Mon, 18 Jun 2001 20:02:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ztxmail02.nz-cce.cpqcorp.net by pobox1.pa.dec.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-1157AM) id AA10233; Mon, 18 Jun 2001 20:02:37 -0700 Received: by ztxmail02.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345) id 307A05338; Mon, 18 Jun 2001 22:02:36 -0500 (CDT) Received: from xanadu.home (modemcable084.137-200-24.mtl.mc.videotron.ca [24.200.137.84]) by ztxmail02.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F8511AC6 for ; Mon, 18 Jun 2001 22:02:35 -0500 (CDT) Received: from localhost (nico@localhost) by xanadu.home (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id XAA23454; Mon, 18 Jun 2001 23:02:36 -0400 X-Authentication-Warning: xanadu.home: nico owned process doing -bs Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2001 23:02:36 -0400 (EDT) From: Nicolas Pitre X-X-Sender: To: SA-1100/Linux Cc: Subject: diff-2.4.5-rmk6-np1 Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-sa1100-linux@wrl-mail.pa.dec.com Precedence: bulk ... is available at the usual sites, which are: ftp://ftp.netwinder.org/users/n/nico/ ftp://ftp.arm.linux.org.uk/pub/linux/arm/people/nico/ ftp://ftp.handhelds.org/pub/linux/arm/sa-1100-patches/ ChangeLog: - updated to 2.4.5-rmk6 (me) - some Flexanet corrections (Jordi Colomer) - New (cleaner) SA1111 USB code (Brad Parker) - more SA-1111 PS/2 mouse IRQ fixes (George G. Davis) - fixes due to new consistent_free() (me) - fix to config code for Assabet w/o Neponset support (me) - miscellaneous fixes (Oleg Drokin, Erik Mouw) Enjoy! Nicolas